sat写作题目大全

合集下载

SAT Essay真题汇总

Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on the following issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience or observations.Official Study Guide, Second Edition1. Isit important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions ofauthority?2. Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affecttheir communities or the nation in general?3. Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?4. Do changes that make our lives easier not necessarily make them better?5. Is conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame or power?6. Can success be disastrous?7. Do we need other people in order to understand ourselves?8. Is the world changing for the better?9. Do you think that ease does not challenge us and what we need adversityto help us discover who we are?10. Should heroes be defined as people who say that they think when weourselves lack the courage to say it?MoreDo memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeed in the present?Kaplan Test1. Do you think that people are capable of finding happiness or are theyalways searching for something beyond what they have?2. If you want to become an expert in a certain field, do you need to havemore talent or more motivation?3. Which do you think contributes more to personal happiness: what happensto you or the way you respond to what happens?4. Do you agree with Aaron Burr that it is wisest to put things off if you can?5. Do we ourselves cause change in our lives by making certqain decisions,or are we acted upon by events that happen around us?6. Is it really impossible to fail? Are some failures simply unsuccessfulattempts to accomplish what we set out to do, or do all failures ultimately provide some benefits, even if we can’t see it right away?7. “If you don’t like something, change it. If you can’t change it, change yourattitude. Don’t complain.”D o you agree with Maya Angelou that it is pointless to complain?8. Do you think that teaching something to another person can help you tolearn or master a subject or process?9. Do you believe that fantasy or imagination is more important thanknowledge?10. What is your view of the idea that every obstacle can be turned into anopportunity?11. “In seeking truth you have to get both sides of a story.”D o you agree withWater Cronkite that it is necessary to see both sides of an issue in order to discover the truth?历年真题1. Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?2. Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in theirown way?3. It is necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negativeconsequences for other people?4. Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?5. Are we free to make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices wecan make?6. Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the completetruth?7. Does the success of a community – whether it is a class, ta team, a family,a nation or any other group-depend upon people’s willingness to limit theirpersonal interests?8. Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?9. Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?10. Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in position ofauthority?11. Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?12. Can deception-pretending that something is true when it is not- sometimeshave good results?13. Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that payswell?14. Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?15. Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affecttheir communities of the nation in general?16. Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?17. Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?18. Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or canwe benefit from following the crowd?19. Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?20. Is identity something people are born with or given, or it is somethingpeople create for themselves?21. Can people ever be truly original?22. Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especiallygood at and developing that attribute above all else?23. Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?24. Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?25. Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is notreached?26. Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of thepast?27. Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups withwhich they have something in common?28. Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of moderntechnology, even when using it would make life easier?29. Do people place too much emphasis on winning?30. Are people’s actions motivated primarily by a desire for power over others?31. Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?32. Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?33. Are decision made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly andcarefully?34. Can a group of people function effectively without someone being incharge?35. Do actions, not words, reveal a person or group’s true attitudes andintentions?36. Does planning interfere with creativity?37. Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly becausethey expect more of themselves?38. Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is itbest for them to stick with their original decisions?39. Is striving to achieve a goal always the best course of action, or shouldpeople give up if they are not making progress?40. Should people let their feelings guide them when they make importantdecisions?41. Has today’s abundance of information only made it more difficult for us tounderstand the world around us?42. Are people best defined by what they do?43. Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?44. Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network orfamily?45. Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?46.Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking action or should they act first and get more information later?47. Do the demands of others tend to make people more productive than theywould be without such pressure?48. Should all people’s opinions be valued equally, or should only informedopinions be takenseriously?49.Should books portray the world as it is or as it should be?50. Do people make the greatest discoveries by exploring what is unfamiliar tothem or by paying close attention to what seems familiar?51. Do small decisions often have major consequences?52. Is talking the most effective and satisfying way of communicating withothers?53. Should the government be responsible for making sure that people leadhealthy lives?54. Do people succeed by emphasizing their differences from other people?55. Is it absolutely necessary for people to study the creative arts (music,drama, photography, creative writing…)56. Is it important for people to spend time outdoors and to learn to appreciatetheir natural environment?57. Is an idealistic approach less valuable than a practical approach?58. Is it better for people to learn from others than to learn on their own?59. Do people put too much importance on getting every detail right on aproject or task?60. Does the process of ding something matter more than the outcome?61. If people worked less, would they be more creative and active during theirfree time?62. Does every individual have an obligation to think seriously about importantmatters, even when doing so may be difficult?63. Is real success achieved only by people who accomplish goals and solveproblems on their own?。

sat试题及答案

sat试题及答案SAT试题及答案一、阅读理解（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）1. 根据文章A，作者主要讨论了什么主题？A. 环境保护的重要性B. 科技发展对环境的影响C. 可持续发展的策略D. 气候变化的成因答案：C2. 文章B中提到的“生态足迹”是指什么？A. 人类对自然资源的消耗量B. 人类对环境的污染程度C. 人类对生物多样性的影响D. 人类对气候系统的影响答案：A...20. 文章T中作者对于未来的看法是什么？A. 悲观的B. 乐观的C. 中立的D. 无法确定答案：B二、写作（共1题，总计20分）21. 根据所给材料，写一篇不少于500字的议论文，阐述你对“教育公平”的看法。

答案：略三、数学（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）22. 如果一个圆的半径是5厘米，那么它的面积是多少平方厘米？A. 78.5B. 100C. 157D. 196答案：A23. 一个直角三角形的两条直角边分别是3厘米和4厘米，那么它的斜边是多少厘米？A. 5B. 6C. 7D. 8答案：A...41. 如果一个数列的前三项是2, 4, 6，那么这个数列的第10项是多少？A. 20B. 22C. 24D. 26答案：A四、语法（共20题，每题2分，总计40分）42. 下列句子中，语法正确的是：a) She is one of the student who is going to the concert.b) He has more books than me.c) The children was playing in the park.d) I have been living here for two years.答案：d43. 选择正确的动词形式填空：The teacher _______ (explain/explained) the concept to the students yesterday.答案：explained...61. 选择正确的形容词填空：The _______ (boring/interested) lecture made the audience fell asleep.答案：boring五、词汇（共10题，每题2分，总计20分）62. 选择与“innovative”意思相近的词：A. TraditionalB. ConservativeC. CreativeD. Outdated答案：C63. 选择与“compromise”意思相反的词：A. AgreementB. DisputeC. ConflictD. Resolution答案：C...71. 选择与“meticulous”意思相同的词：A. CarelessB. SloppyC. ThoroughD. Haphazard答案：C请注意：以上内容为示例，实际SAT试题及答案会根据考试的具体内容而有所不同。

SAT最新作文题目大全

official●Is the opinion of the majority-in government or in any other circumstances-a poor guide?●Is creativity need more than ever in the world today?●Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remainneutral and impartial?●Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of otherpeople?●Is success in life earned or do people succeed because they are lucky?●Is society’s admirations for famous people beneficial or harmful?●Should people make more of an effort to keep some things private?●Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?●Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in their own way?●ls it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences forother people?●Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?●Are we free to `make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we can make?●Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the complete truth?●Does the success of a community-whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, or anyother group depend upon people’s willingness to limit the ir personal interests?●Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?●Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?●Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority?●Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?●Can deception-pretending that something is true when it is not-sometimes have goodresults?●Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their communitiesor the nation in general?●Is it more important to do Work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?●Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?●Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?●Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?●Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right or wrong, or can we benefit fromthe crowd?●Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?●Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?●Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family?●Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?●Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking actions,or should they get more information later?。

SAT Essay真题汇总

SAT写作题目大汇总

SAT写作题目大汇总SAT写作是SAT考试的主要组成部分，然而写好SAT写作也是一件令人头痛的事，写作的题目是得失分的关键，它不仅仅是一个题目，更是作者本身的观点所在。

下面三立小编为你带来SAT写作题目大汇总一文，希望对你取得好成绩有所帮助，更多资讯请访问三立在线教育，专业老师为你在线解答相关疑问。

1. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below:Assignment: Is the opinion of the majority—in government or in any other circumstances—a poor guide? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.2. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below:Assignment: Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.3. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below:Assignment: Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remain neutral and impartial? Plan and write anessay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.4. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below:Assignment: Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of other people? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.5. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below:引文: If you think that what you do is your own business, you are wrong. In this world your conduct affects not only you but the conduct of other people as well. If you behave in a way that is considered unacceptable and other people copy your behavior, you are responsible for the consequences.Adapted from Margaret Banning, “Letter to Susan”引文: Even scientists know that absolute objectivity has yet to be attained. It’s the same for absolute truth. But, as many news reporters have observed, the idea of objectivity as a guiding principle is toovaluable to be abandoned. Without it, the pursuit of knowledge is hopelessly lost.Adapted from “Focusing Our Values,”Nieman Reports引文: Given the importance of human creativity, one would think it should have a high priority among our concerns. But if we look at the reality, we see a different picture. Basic scientific research is minimized in favor of immediate practical applications. The arts are increasingly seen as dispensable luxuries. Yet as competition heats up around the globe, exactly the opposite strategy is needed.引文: We must seriously question the idea of majority rule. The majority grinned and jeered when Columbus said the world was round. The majority threw him into a dungeon for his discoveries. Where is the logic in the notion that the opinion held by a majority of people should have the power to influence our decisions?Adapted from James A. Reed, “Majority Rule”Assignment: Do people depend on work—whether it is a job, schoolwork, or volunteer work—to determine what their daily activities and interactions with others should be? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.以上相关信息由三立在线为你提供，希望阅读完以上文章后，你能有所收获，对学习有一定的帮助，更多资讯请访问三立在线，专业老师为你指导讲解相关疑惑，为你的考试之路保驾护航。

SAT作文题目大全

SAT作文题目汇总SAT ESSAY QUESTIONS COLLECTION1.OG Practice Test 1: Is there always another explanation or another point of view?2.OG Practice Test 2: Is deception ever justified?3.OG Practice Test 3: What motivates people to change?4.OG Practice Test 4: Do changes that make our lives easier not necessarily make them better?5.OG Practice Test 5: Is conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame, or power?6.OG Practice Test 6: Can success be disastrous?7.OG Practice Test 7: Do we need other people in order to understand ourselves?8.OG Practice Test 8: Is the world changing for the better?9.OG Practice Test 9: Do you think that ease does not challenge us and that we need adversityto help us discover who we are?10.OG Practice Test 10: Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when weourselves lack the courage to say it?11.OC 1: Is the way something seems to be not always the same as it actually is?12.OC 2: Are bad choices and good choices equally likely to have negative consequences?13.OC 3: Do people learn who they are only when they are forced into action?14.OC 4: Are people’s lives the result of the choices they make?15.OC 5: Do closed doors make us creative?16.OC 6: Do people have to be highly competitive in order to succeed?17.CB-1: Is style more important than substance?18.CB-2: Can what we value be determined only by what we sacrifice?19.CB-3: Is perfection something to be admired or sought after?20.CB-4: What makes a person wise?21.(2005.3) Is the opinion of the majority — in government or in any other circumstances — apoor guide?22.(2005.3) Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today?23.(2005.3) Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remainneutral and impartial?24.(2005.3) Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of otherpeople?25.(2005.5) Do people depend on work—whether it is a job, schoolwork, or volunteer work — todetermine what their daily activities and interactions with others should be?26.(2005.5) Does progress depend on people with new ideas rather than on people whose ideasare based on the current way of doing things?27.(2005.5) Are people afraid to speak out against authority, whether the authority is anindividual, a group, or a government?28.(2005.5) Does worrying to o much about other people’s opinions prevent us from seeing thingsclearly?29.(2005.6) Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeedin the present?30.(2005.6) Do people put too much emphasis on learning practical skills?31.(2005.6) Should schools help students understand moral choices and social issues?32.(2005.6) Do newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, and other mediadetermine what is important to most people?33.(2005.10) Is success in life earned or do people succeed because they are lucky?34.(2005.10) Is society’s admiration for famous people beneficial or harmful?35.(2005.10) Do we live in a time when people do not engage in serious thinking?36.(2005.10) Should people make more of an effort to keep some things private?37.(2005.11) Should our perceptions of beauty be influenced by the perceptions of beauty ofother people?38.(2005.11) Is praising others, even if the praise is excessive or undeserved, a necessary part oflife?39.(2005.11) Is conflict helpful?40.(2005.11) Has the acquisition of money and possessions replaced more meaningful ways ofmeasuring our achievements?41.(2005.12) Are leaders necessarily people who are most capable of leadership?42.(2005.12) Is knowledge of the past no longer useful for us today?43.(2005.12) Is it necessary to limit or put restrictions on freedom of thought and expression?44.(2005.12) Do the benefits of scientific and technological developments come at the cost ofundesirable changes to people’s lives?45.(2006.1) Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in their own way?46.(2006.1) Is it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences forother people?47.(2006.1) Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?48.(2006.1) Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?49.(2006.4) Is it best not to change our ideas, opinions, or behaviors?50.(2006.4) Is our ability to change ourselves unlimited, or are there limits on our ability to makeimportant changes in our lives?51.(2006.4) What do you think motivates people to do their best?52.(2006.4) Should each individual decide what and how to learn?53.(2006.5) Are we free to make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we canmake?54.(2006.5) Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the complete truth?55.(2006.5) Does the success of a community—whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, orany other group—depend upon people's willingness to limit their personal interests?56.(2006.5) Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?57.(2006.6) Does a strong commitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect othervalues, such as education and the protection of the environment?58.(2006.6) Are established rules too limited to guide people in real-life situations?59.(2006.6) Is it sometimes better to take risks than to follow a more reasonable course of action?60.(2006.6) Do we tend to accept the opinions of others instead of developing our ownindependent ideas?61.(2006.10) Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?62.(2006.10) Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions ofauthority?63.(2006.10) Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?64.(2006.10) Can deception—pretending that something is true when it is not—sometimes havegood results?65.(2006.11) Do we put too much value on the ideas or actions of individual people?66.(2006.11) Can books and stories about characters and events that are not real teach usanything useful?67.(2006.11) Can people achieve success only if they aim to be perfect?68.(2006.11) Do success and happiness depend on the choices people make rather than on factorsbeyond their control?69.(2006.12) Are people more likely to be productive and successful when they ignore theopinions of others?70.(2006.12) Is it better for people to be realistic or optimistic?71.(2006.12)Is it important to try to understand people’s motivations before judging theiractions?72.(2006.12) Is happiness something over which people have no control, or can people choose tobe happy?73.(2007.1) Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect theircommunities or the nation in general?74.(2007.1) Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?75.(2007.1) Is education primarily the result of influences other than school?76.(2007.1) Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?77.(2007.3) Is it more valuable for people to fit in than to be unique and different?78.(2007.3) Is it best to have low expectations and to set goals we are sure of achieving?79.(2007.3) Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way?80.(2007.5) Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?81.(2007.5) Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?82.(2007.5) Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or can we benefitfrom following the crowd?83.(2007.5) Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?84.(2007.6) Are people more likely to be happy if they focus on goals other than their ownhappiness?85.(2007.6) Is there a value in celebrating certain individuals as heroes?86.(2007.6) Have modern advancements truly improved the quality of peo ple’s lives?87.(2007.6) Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune?88.(2007.10) Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people createfor themselves?89.(2007.10) Can people ever be truly original?90.(2007.10) Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especially good atand developing that attribute above all else?91.(2007.10) Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?92.(2007.11) Does having a large number of options to choose from make people happy?93.(2007.11) Is it always necessary to find new solutions to problems?94.(2007.11) Is the main value of the arts to teach us about the world around us?95.(2007.11) Is criticism —judging or finding fault with the ideas and actions of others —essential for personal well-being and social progress?96.(2007.12) Do people need to “unlearn”, or reject, many of their assumptions and ideas?97.(2007.12) Should people choose one of the two opposing sides of an issue, or is the truthusually found “in the middle”?98.(2007.12) Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?99.(2007.12) Is the most important purpose of technology today different from what it was in thepast?100.(2008.1) Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?101.(2008.1) Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached? 102.(2008.1) Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of the past? 103.(2008.1) Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they something in common?104.(2008.3) Are organizations or group most successful when their members pursue individual wishes and goals?105.(2008.3) Should people always be loyal?106.(2008.3) Do people learn more from losing than from winning?107.(2008.5) Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even when using it would make life easier?108.(2008.5) Do people place too much emphasis on winning?109.(2008.5) Are people’s actions motivated primarily by a desire for power ov er others?110.(2008.5) Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?111.(2008.6) Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be happy?112.(2008.6) Is it better for a society when people act as individuals rather than copying the ideas and opinions of others?113.(2008.6) Are widely held views often wrong, or are such views more likely to be correct? 114.(2008.6) Are the actions of individuals more valuable than the actions of groups or teams? 115.(2008.10) Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?116.(2008.10) Are the decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly and carefully?117.(2008.10) Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge? 118.(2008.10) Do actions, not words, r eveal a person or group’s rule attitudes and intentions? 119.(2008.11) Do all established traditions deserve to remain in existence?120.(2008.11) Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they have?121.(2008.11) Is it necessary for people to combine their efforts with those of others in order to be the most effective?122.(2008.11) Should society limit people’s exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?123.(2008.12) Is persistence more important than ability in dete rmining a person’s success? 124.(2008.12) Is acting an essential part of everyday life?125.(2008.12) Can people have too much enthusiasm?126.(2008.12) Do we only help others in order to help ourselves in some way?127.(2009.1) Does planning interfere with creativity?128.(2009.1) Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they expect more of themselves?129.(2009.1) Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is it best for them to stick with their original decisions?130.(2009.1) Is striving to achieve a goal always the best course of action, or should people give up if they are not making progress?131.(2009.3) Does being ethical make it hard to be successful?132.(2009.3) Is it sometimes necessary to be impolite?133.(2009.3) Should we lim it our use of the term “courage” to acts in which people risk their own well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value?134.(2009.5) Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than we are?135.(2009.5) Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions? 136.(2009.5) Has today's abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to understand the world around us?137.(2009.5) Are people best defined by what they do?138.(2009.6) Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect? 139.(2009.6) Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have, or should people always strive to better themselves?140.(2009.6) Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?141.(2009.6) When some people win, must others lose, or are there situations in which everyone wins?142.(2009.10) Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?143.(2009.10) Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family? 144.(2009.10) Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?145.(2009.10) Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking action or should they act first and get more information later?146.(2009.11) Are the values of a society most clearly revealed in its popular culture?147.(2009.11) Do society and other people benefit when individuals pursue their own goals? 148.(2009.11) Is it better for people to stop trying when they feel certain they will not succeed? 149.(2009.11) Should new ideas be questioned?150.(2009.12) Is it easier now to form friendships than ever before?151.(2009.12) Should people give up their privacy in exchange for convenience of free services? 152.(2009.12) Is it better for people to work out their own ideas on a problem or issue before learning how others have approached it?153.(2009.12) Is it a mistake to believe something simply an authority that it is true?154.(2010.1) Do the demands of others tend to make people more productive than they would be without such pressure?155.(2010.1) Should all people’s opinions be valued equally, or should only informed opinions be taken seriously?156.(2010.1) Should books portray the world as it is or as it should be?157.(2010.1) Do people make the greatest discoveries by exploring what is unfamiliar to them or by paying close attention to what seems familiar?158.(2010.3) Should leaders of a country or group be judged by different standards?159.(2010.3) Is moderation an obstacle to achievement and success?160.(2010.3) Does society put too much emphasis on working hard?161.(2010.5) Do small decisions often have major consequences?162.(2010.5) Is talking the most effective and satisfying way of communicating with others? 163.(2010.5) Should the government be responsible for making sure that people lead healthylives?164.(2010.5) Do people succeed by emphasizing their differences from others?165.(2010.6)Do people tend to get along better with people who are very different from them or with those who are like them?166.(2010.6)Is solitude—spending time alone—necessary for people to achieve their most important goals?167.(2010.6)Should ordinary people be considered heroes, or should the term "hero" be reserved for extraordinary people?168.(2010.6)Is it wrong to use the word "courage" to describe behaviors that are ordinary or self-interested?169.(2010.10) Is it absolutely necessary for people to study the creative arts?170.(2010.10) Is it important for people to spend time outdoors and to learn to appreciate the natural environment?171.(2010.10) Should originality always be more highly praised than conformity?172.(2010.10) Should people adapt to their new surroundings, or should they refuse to change? 173.(2010.11) Do people put much emphasis on doing things by and for themselves?174.(2010.11) Is imagination less valuable than facts and objectivity?175.(2010.11) Is a group of people more likely than an individual leader to bring about significant change?176.(2010.11) Would it be better if people were more accepting of mistakes?177.(2010.12) Is it possible to be a hero in the modern world?178.(2010.12) Does the way that information is communicated today result in people learning less than ever before?179.(2010.12) Do temporary or otherwise imperfect solutions to problems only create more serious problems?180.(2010.12) Is it better for people to have limited choices?181.(2011.1) Is an idealistic approach less valuable than a practical approach?182.(2011.1) Is it better for people to learn from others than to learn on their own?183.(2011.1) Do people put too much importance on getting every detail right on a project or task?184.(2011.1) Does the process of doing something matter more than the outcome?185.(2011.5) Do rules and limitations contribute to a person's happiness?186.(2011.5) If people worked less, would they be more creative and active during their free time?187.(2011.5) Does every individual have an obligation to think seriously about important matters, even when doing so may be difficult?188.(2011.5) Is real success achieved only by people who accomplish goals and solve problemson their own?189.(2011.6) Does every achievement bring with it new challenges?190.(2011.6) Does accepting the values of a group allow people to avoid taking responsibility for their own thoughts and actions?191.(2011.6) Do groups that encourage nonconformity and disagreement function better than those that discourage it?192.(2011.6) Are people fair when faced with unfairness?193. (2011.10) Do people need discipline to achieve freedom?194. (2011.10) Do people have to pay attention to mistakes in order to make progress?195. (2011.10) Are people overly influenced by unrealistic claims and misleading images?196. (2011.10) Are people better off if they do not listen to criticism?197. (2011.11) Should individuals take responsibility for issues and problems that do not affect them directly?198. (2011.11) Is it often difficult for people to determine what is the right thing to do?199. (2011.11) Are the consequences of people's actions more important than the motives behind the actions?200. (2011.11) Are optimistic, confident people more likely than others to make changes in their lives?挑战权威：1,3,7,10,21,22,26,27,28,29,34,35,38,39,42,43,53,56,59,60,62,69,76,77,82,85,89,91,93,95,96,98,10 0,102,110,112,113,115,122,132,134,135,138,140,141,149,153,155,157,158,164,170,172,174,182, 185,189,190,191,195,196,198,199追求完美：13,16,17,19,23,25,30,33,45,48,49,51,66,67,68,72,78,88,90,97,105,118,123,128,129,130,133,137,1 42,148,159,160,161,167,176,179,181,183,186,187,193个人价值观：5,14,18,20,24,31,37,40,74,84,109,111,120,125,131,147,168,177,192,197失败与成功：9,15,46,47,52,58,50,63,70,75,79,87,101,106,108,116,127,139,145,154,184,194,200科技恶果：4,6,8,12,32,44,57,73,80,81,86,92,99,107,119,136,144,150,151,162,163,171,178,180白色谎言：2,11,36,54,64,71,83,94,,124,146,156,169合作优势：41,55,61,65,103,104,114,117,121,126,143,152,165,166,173,175,188备注：当题目适用于多个题型时自动附给最常见的题型，如当遇到有挑权和合作都可写的例子时，自动归给挑权；同样遇到挑权和完美都可写的例子时也归类到挑权中。

场新sat写作真题及汇总

场新s a t写作真题及汇总Have an independent personality. November 2, 20212016年5场新S A T写作真题及范文汇总2016年还剩下12月份的最后一场SAT考试了,这一年是付出也是收获,在最后一场考试来临之前,小编跟大家分享这一年里的前五场新SAT写作考试真题以及一些优秀的写作范文,希望能够给12月份要考试的同学带来参考价值,也希望以后要考SAT的同学们能收藏好好研究;一、2016年3月北美考场3月5日新SAT考试写作文章是出自WashingtonPost华盛顿邮报的一篇文章;此次新SAT 首考的作文题的阅读文章源自E.J. Dionne Jr.于2013年7月3日发表在The Washington Post华盛顿邮报文章名为 A Call for National Service,原文作者大力提倡NationalService;1.文章理解上,本次考试文章主题明确,词汇句型难度正常;2.例证方面,本次考试文章中没有明显的数据或者研究结果类的例证,但是有对于他人的引用等论据;考题原文：写作范文：It is widely acknowledged that a man inpossession of certain unalienablerights will not automatically undertake thecorresponding responsibilities. With an intense sense of social responsibility,American writer E. J. Dionne Jr. proclaims that civil obligations should beimplemented nationwide in his article “ A call for national service” inWashington post. He asserts unavoidable rights must be execrated. Strategies E.J. Dionne Jr. employs to bolster his argument include a personal anecdote, acitation of compelling polls, a quotation from the prestigious Americandocumentation, compare and contrast, paralleled structure and sincere appeal topathos.E.J. Dionne starts his article byillustrating that “ here is the sentence in the Declaration of Independence wealways remember” and “here is the sentence we often forget”, which are theparalleled structures to convey his urgency and attentive concern for the issuethat American citizens should cherish their obligations. Furthermore, hedirectly enumerates that the previous is on rights and the latter obligations.This distinct contrast is utilized to establish an emphasis on his latter pointby highlighting it as a coexisting factor relative to the former mentionedrights in American life. This literal tool serves as a strong technique to drawthe audience into the issue addressed in the wiring.By citing a quotation from “the Declarationof Independence” the author successfully establishes an authoritative image inthe readers’ heart that he is knowledgeable and thoughtfu l. E.J. Dionne’spresentation of a numerical statistics based on the accurate “237” year and agerange “18 and 28” strengthens his weight to his claim. Moreover, the authordemonstrates a personal anecdote that “last week, the Aspen Institute gathereda politi cally diverse group of Americans…to declare a commitment to give a yearof service to the country”, which provides a baseline for readers to findcredence andcredibility with the author’s argument. This anecdote instantlyconnects the author and readers closely which leads to a spiritual resonance.Dionne Jr. reasons that not only Americanscould enjoy their rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness freely butalso should assume their obligations on the solemn pledge of lives, fortunes andsacred honor. “There are no quick fixes to our sense of disconnection, butthere may be a way to restore our sense.” He first raises a precaution in thereaders’ heart then offers a sound solution to show the stringent andwell-organized thinking pattern. Subsequently, the author exemplifies anoccurrence last week, the precise time flow line, to underline the viewpointthat“ we do, indeed, owe something to our country and we owe an enormousdebt”.Dionne utilizes specific diction to enhancehis argument to convince his reader s. He employs personal pronoun such as “ we”for the aim to intrigue his personnel involvement as part of this calling whichfortifies his persuasion as well as consolidates his credibility in thepreachment. Through the careful word selection, Dionne enhances his propositionby ascribing the liability as a fundamental issue. This augments for thepersuasion of his readers by informing them that this is a significant issuethat all people should be aware of and take heed to.Following the calling, the author lists thesolutions and the challenges in the final parts of the article. He makes anefficient use of rhetorical question to challenge his readers to ponder that “who knows whether the universal exception of service would change the countryas much as Mc Chrystal hopes.” By raising this question, Dionne draws outprofound comprehension on the proposal. “It’s based on the belief that certainunalienable rights entail certain unavoidable responsibilities”-----the authorinspires his readers to feel responsible for the fate of America’s future. Thisstrategyis obviously an appeal to pathos, calling the readers to actresolutely and adding the emotionally-infused spur to the American citizens.Overall, E. J. Dionne Jr. provides a coherentand strong logical argument that all Americans should enjoy the unalienablerights that have been prescribed in “the Declaration of Independence”andshoulder the obligations cross thelines of class, race, background, politics,ideology as well. He takes full advantages of a personal anecdote, compellingpolls, an authoritative quotation, compare and contrast, paralleled structureand heart-felt appeal to emotions to thoroughly illustrate his steadfastcalling for national service.二、5月7日亚太新SAT考试5月份亚太地区的新SAT写作阅读文章选自2009年发表在VanityFair上的由Christopher Hitchens写的一片社论文章——The Lovely Stones,讲的是希腊古雕塑本身艺术价值极高,历史上被破坏和贱卖给英国,作者主张应该还给希腊;1. 难度高于OG的文章和2016年3月北美的文章,主要是因为涉及较多历史、雕塑等专业词汇,许多考生可能阅读要花较多时间阅读且理解难度大；2. 主要的论证手法与OG范文公布的基本范围一致,首段就出现引用名人名言,第三段主要用数据和历史事实,这两个出现概率和比重很大,之后主要用了类比;其中类比在OG范文中没有直接出现,备考中容易被忽略,建议后续备考延伸修辞手法;3. 作文部分时间50分钟,非常紧张,主要是阅读专业单词多,理解难度大,大部分考生都没有写完完整的两面答题纸有四面;考题原文：The Lovely StonesChristopher HitchensP1 The great classicist A. W. Lawrence once remarked of the Parthenon that it is “the one building in the world which may be assessed as absolutelyright.”P2 Not that the beauty and symmetry of the Parthenon have not been abused and perverted and mutilated. Five centuries after the birth of Christianity the Parthenon was closed and desolated. It was then “converted” into aChristian church. Turkish forces also used it for centuries as a garrison and an arsenal, with the tragic result that in 1687, when Christian Veniceattacked the Ottoman Turks, a powder magazine was detonated and huge damage inflicted on the structure. Most horrible of all, perhaps, the Acropolis was made to fly a Nazi flag during the German occupation of Athens.P3 The damage done by the ages to the building, and by past empires and occupations, cannot all be put right. But there is one desecration and dilapidation that can at least be partially undone. Early in the 19th century, Britain’s ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Lord Elgin, sent a wrecking crew to the Turkish-occupied territory of Greece, where it sawed off approximately half of the adornment of the Parthenon and carried it away. As with allthings Greek, there were three elements to this, the most lavish andbeautiful sculptural treasury in human history. Under the direction of the artistic genius Phidias, the temple had two massive pediments decorated with the figures of Pallas Athena, Poseidon, and the gods of the sun and the moon. It then had a series of 92 high-relief panels, or metopes, depicting a succession of mythical and historical battles. The most intricate element was the frieze, carved in bas-relief, which showed the gods, humans, and animals that made up the annual Pan-Athens procession: there were 192 equestrian warriors and auxiliaries featured, which happens to be the exact number ofthe city’s heroes who fell at the Battle of Marathon. Experts differ on precisely what story is being told here, but the frieze was quite clearly carved as a continuous narrative. Except that half the cast of the tale isstill in Bloomsbury, in London, having been sold well below cost by Elgin to the British government in 1816 for $2.2 million in today’s currency to payoff his many debts.P4 now, there has been a bitter argument about the legitimacy of the British Museum’s deal. I’ve written a whole book about this controversy and won’t oppress you with all the details, but would just make this one point. If the Mona Lisa had been sawed in two during the Napoleonic Wars and the separated halves had been acquired by different museums in, say, St. Petersburg and Lisbon, would there not be a general wish to see what they might look like if re-united If you think my analogy is overdrawn, consider this: the body ofthe goddess Iris is at present in London, while her head is in Athens. Thefront part of the torso of Poseidon is in London, and the rear part is in Athens. And so on. This is grotesque.P5 It is unfortunately true that the city allowed itself to become very dirty and polluted in the 20th century, and as a result the remaining sculpturesand statues on the Parthenon were nastily eroded by “acid rain.” But gradually and now impressively, the Greeks have been living up to their responsibilities. Beginning in 1992, the endangered marbles were removed from the temple, given careful cleaning with ultraviolet and infra-red lasers, and placed in a climate-controlled interior.P6 About a thousand feet southeast of the temple, the astonishing newAcropolis Museum will open on June 20. With 10 times the space of the old repository, it will be able to display all the marvels that go with the temples on top of the hill. Most important, it will be able to show, for the first time in centuries, how the Parthenon sculptures looked to the citizensof old.P7 The British may continue in their constipated fashion to cling to what they have so crudely amputated, but the other museums and galleries of Europe have seen the artistic point of re-unification and restored to Athens whatwas looted in the years when Greece was defenseless. The Acropolis Museum has hit on the happy idea of exhibiting, for as long as following that precedentis too much to hope for, its own original sculptures with the London-held pieces represented by beautifully copied casts. And it creates a naturalthirst to see the actual re-assembly completed. So, far from emptying or weakening a museum, this controversy has instead created another one, whichis destined to be among Europe’s finest galleries. And one day, surely,there will be an agreement to do the right thing by the world’s most“right” structure.写作范文：Sculptures, bestowed with native people’swisdom, practice and cultural stamp, should be preserved in appropriate placesso as to maintain their integrity.In the article “The Lovely Stones”editorialforConde Nast Digital,Christopher Hitchens argues that the sculptures of theParthenon should be returned to its origin, Greece. By the end of this piece,readers will find themselves nodding in agreement with what the Hitchens has tosay. Hitchens utilizes contrast, historical event, analogy and appeal toemotion to pleadwith the readers to take his side.In order to expose the people’smaltreatment toward the Parthenon, Hitchens starts his article off by employinga sharp contrast. Hitchens first quotes A. W. Lawrence’s remark of theParthenon, “it is the one building in the world which may be assessed asabsolutely right.” Quoting words of praise from an authoritative figureenhances Hitchens’s intention to depict the beauty and glamor of the Parthenon,lending more credibility to his argument. Later, inthe second paragraph,Hitchens points out that the beauty and glamor did not deter people’s abuse,destruction and mutilation. To demonstrate this,Hitchens illustrates theParthenon has been misused as garrison, arsenal andso on. By juxtaposing thefabulous beauty to the destruction of the Parthenon, Hitchens unfolds the harshfact that the significance of the Parthenon has been ignored. This contrastserves as a vehicle to highlight the irony and gravity of people’s maltreatmenttow ard the Parthenon, drawing the readersinto the issue addressed by thewriting.Hitchens strengthens his argument with theportrayal of historical event. In the third paragraph, Hitchens demonstratesthat some parts of the Parthenon were occupied by the British people in the19th century. To present the exquisite sculpture comprehensively, Hitchensfirst notes that three elements of the Parthenon contribute to its outstandingposition in human history —two massive pediments, a series of 92 high-reliefpanels and frieze. Furthermore, the use of detailed image and statistics leadsreaders to imagine the wonder of the Parthenon. However, such wonder has beendestroyed as parts of the sculpture have been carried away and preserved inBritish government. With the help of historical events, Hitchens successfullyenhances the credibility and legitimacy of his claim, creating a compellingappeal to ethos. In addition, the utilization of analogyfurthers Hitchens’ argument that the sculpture of the Parthenon should not bepreserved by different museums. Hitchens adopts several classic forms of artsto highlights the significanceof the integrity of art. Hitchens notes that “Ifthe Mona Lisa had been sawed in two during the Napoleonic Wars and theseparated halves had been acquiredby different museums in, say, St. Petersburgand Lisbon, would there not be a general wish to see what they might look like ifre-united”. Similarly, Hitchens compares the destroyed Parthenon to thegoddess Iris as well as the torso of Poseidon. As the assumptio ns of divided“Mona Lisa” , “goddess Iris” and “the torso of Poseidon” are grotesque, theseparate parts of the Parthenon are also ridiculous. Therefore, the analogyadds more power to Hitchens’ s claim that the integrity of the Parthenon shouldbe preserved i n Greece.Finally, Hitchens appeals to readers’emotion. Hitchens indicates that although the city did not attach muchimportance upon the protection of the Parthenon in the past, “the Greeks havebeen living up to their responsibilities”. Harboring a positiv e attitude, theAcropolis Museum tries to exhibit the integrity of the Parthenon. This practicesurely motivates readers’ longing to witness the marvel of the integralParthenon. At the end of the passage, the readers will definitely agree withHitchens’s clai m that the sculpture of the Parthenon should be returned to itsoriginal land. Thisis a strategy of appeal to pathos, forcing the readers toface an emotionally- charged inquiry that will spur some kind of response.In conclusion, contrast, historical events,analogy and appeal to emotion, all contribute to an exceptionally well-writtenargument. It is his utilization of these practices and more that make thisarticle worthy of recognition.三、2016年6月4日亚太新SAT考试本次考试作文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban来自美国新闻网opinion版块2014年1月23日发表的一篇文章;作者认为通过对碳排放收税是比禁止一些类型的真空吸尘器的使用更好的策略;这次写作题目的难度大大降低,远远低于5月的the lovely stone,甚至低于3月北美的真题a call for national service；文章的主题, 写作风格以及论证手法都非常像og的第二篇范文plastic bag ban；文章比较简单的主要原因是主题浅显易懂,而且文章用词比较简单;考题原文：A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum BanBy SitaSlavovP1 Starting in September, the European Union will ban vacuum cleaners using more than 1,600 watts of power, with the limit slated to be lowered to 900 watts by 2017. This ban won't just affect a handful of the worst offenders. According to the European Commission, the average vacuum cleaner sold today uses 1,800 watts.P2 Intended largely to reduce carbon emissions, the vacuum cleaner ban joins numerous other regulations throughout the world that severely restrict consumers' choices. Want an incandescent light bulb Too bad – they're banned. How about a gas guzzling car Sorry – they're being squeezed out by tighterfuel economy standards.P3 Rules like these rub many people the wrong way because they represent government intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions. Do we really want the government telling us what kind of vacuum cleaner or lightbulb to buy Don't policy makers have better things to think about Backers of such regulations counter that, when people buy powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent bulbs, they don't take into account the spillover costs they impose on others by contributing to climate change.P4 Fortunately, there's a better solution. A carbon tax – set to reflect the spillover costs of carbon emissions – would eliminate the need to micromanage the kinds of vacuum cleaners and light bulbs that people can buy. Instead, the tax would provide consumers with an incentive to act in asocially responsible manner by ensuring that those who operate such products pick up the tab for the climate harm they cause.P5 The main advantage of the carbon tax is that it leaves consumers free to decide whether to buy energy-efficient vacuum cleaners and light bulbs or whether to reduce their carbon footprint in other ways. That's a big improvement over the regulatory approach because individual consumers are ina better position than government bureaucrats to figure out the least painful way to reduce their contribution to climate change.P6 A carbon tax is also better targeted than vacuum cleaner bans and other regulations. Some critics of the EU's new rule claim that consumers will need to run their less powerful vacuum cleaners for longer periods of time to achieve their desired level of cleanliness, which might actually increase the amount of electricity they use. Similarly, improving fuel economy through tighter standards may increase the amount of driving that people do. These"rebound effects" might not be big enough to actually cause a net increase in emissions, but they still reduce the effectiveness of the regulations.P7 A carbon tax avoids these problems by directly targeting the real culprit– carbon. Under a carbon tax, there's an incentive to cut back on carbon emissions along every dimension. In other words, because tax payments are in line with actual emissions, a Prius owner who drives a lot could very wellpay more than an SUV owner who hardly ever drives.P8 Economists of all political stripes agree on these points. In a 2011 pollof leading academic economists representing a variety of demographic backgrounds and political views, 90 percent agreed with the statement: "A tax on the carbon content of fuels would be a less expensive way to reducecarbon-dioxide emissions than would a collection of policies such as'corporate average fuel economy' requirements for automobiles." There's no doubt that economic advisers offer similar advice when policy makers consider regulations like the vacuum cleaner ban. Unfortunately, these misguidedpolicies often turn out to be more politically feasible than a carbon tax.P9 That may change going forward, however. As policy makers look to trim budgets and find additional sources of revenue, a carbon tax could representa good compromise between conservatives and liberals – a way to address climate change while protecting consumer freedom and raising revenue that can be used to lower other taxes.写作范文：In an effort to fight off negative impactsof carbon emissions on the environment, the EU has decided to impose a strictban on vacuum cleanersusing more than 1,600 watts of power. Is this the rightaction to take Obviously, SitaSlavov, a US News contributor, does not side withthe decisionin her article A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban, in which sheclaims that a carbon tax would work as a better solution than the ban. Sheemploys logical reasoning and mainly rhetorical questioning to sway the readersinto her side. Logical reasoning serves as the mostpowerful strategy utilized to present reasons against the vacuum ban and forthe tax. Stating the carbon tax as a better solution, Slavov starts her claimoff with the reason – the tax is“set to reflect the spillover costs of carbonemissions.” This reasonclearly addresses the vacuum ban backers’ claim thatthose who “buy powerful vacuum cleaners and incandescent bulbs” do not considertheir spillover costs, so the readers would begin to deem the tax as at leastone of the alternatives to the ban. What would persuade the audience to believethat the tax is abetter option is the author’s next argument: it givescustomers free choice.In a democratic country, no one would like to be told orforced by“government bureaucrats” to do their business, even a small decisionlike buying energy-efficient vacuum cleaners and light bulbs. Anotherargument,the tax targeting directly at the real culprit – carbon, would enablethe readers to realize that the ban might have a major defect: the“reboundeffects”could decrease its effectiveness. Having realized the point, theaudience would be more reluctant to support the ban. The final statementmadeby the author to bolster her claim would function as the last straw to breakthe back of the ban. In the statement, Slavov mentions that “economists of allpolitical stripes” agree with her points, citing a 2011 poll to add soundnessof her claim. Those ready to take her side would feel that they are not alone,backed up by all these professionals. By repeatedly pointing out theincredibility of the ban proponents’ reasons and the drawbacks of the ban, theauthor establishes and strengthens solidarity and authenticity of her claimthat the tax is a better choice.Logical reasoning aside, rhetorical questioningis flexibly employed to playto the readers’ emotion. The two rhetoricalquestions, “Want an incandescent light bulb” and “How about a gas guzzlingcar”, demonstrate how the government rudely intrudes people’s daily life andmakes decisions for them. This would arouse the readers’ distaste, as it isridiculous that someoneelse rather than oneself could meddle in one’s ownaffairs. Therefor e, they would definitely say no to the next question, “Do wereally want the government telling us what kind of vacuum cleaner or lightbulbto buy”. When reading the subsequent question, “Don't policy makers havebetter things to think about”, they would begi n to ponder upon whether therewould be a“better thing” than the government’s manipulation of their life viabansand regulations. This rhetorical device, clearly a strategy of appealingto emotions, makes it much easier for the audience to embrace theautho r’ssolution—a carbon tax—proposed immediately afterwards.All in all, logical reasoning and rhetoricalquestions strongly champion the author’s claim that a carbon tax performs muchbetter than a compulsory banon vacuum cleaners. Persuaded by her article, thereaders would choose the former, a less political option, the next time theyneed to address “climate change while protecting consumer freedom and raisingrevenue that can be usedto lower other taxes.”四、2016年10月亚洲考场本次写作考题选自纽约时报的文章Read, kids, read,作者 Frank Bruni,全文共15段,作者论点是 Reading must remain a valued activity.真题原文：1、As an uncle I’m inconsistent about too many things.2、Birthdays, for example. My nephew Mark had one on Sunday, and I didn’t remember — and send a text — until 10 p.m., by which point he was asleep.3、But about books, I’m steady. Relentless. I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.I’m reliably hurling novels at them, and also at friends’ kids. I may wellbe responsible for 10 percent of all sales of “The Fault in Our Stars,” a teenage love story to be released as a movie next month. Never have I spent money with fewer regrets, because I believe in reading — not just in its power to transport but in its power to transform.4、So I was crestfallen on Monday, when a new report by Common Sense Media came out. It showed that 30 years ago, only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds said that they “hardly ever” or never read forpleasure. Today, 22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of 17-year-oldssay that. Fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure“almost every day.” Back in 1984, 31 percent did. What a marked and depressing change.5、I know, I know: This sounds like a fogy’s crotchety lament. Or, worse,like self-interest. Professional writers arguing for vigorous reading are dinosaurs begging for a last breath. We’re panhandlers with a better vocabulary.6、But I’m coming at this differently, as someone persuaded that readingdoes things — to the brain, heart and spirit — that movies, television,video games and the rest of it cannot.7、There’s research on this, and it’s cited in a recent article in The Guardian by Dan Hurley, who wrote that after “three years interviewing psychologists and neur oscientists around the world,” he’d concluded that “reading and intelligence have a relationship so close as to be symbiotic.”8、In terms of smarts and success, is reading causative or merely correlated Which comes first, “The Hardy Boys” or the hardy mind That’s difficult to unravel, but several studies have suggested that people who read fiction, reveling in its analysis of character and motivation, are more adept atreading people, too: at sizing up the social whirl around them. They’re more empathetic. God knows we need that.9、Late last year, neuroscientists at Emory University reported enhancedneural activity in people who’d been given a regular course of daily reading, which seemed to jog the brain: to raise its game, if you will.10、Some experts hav e doubts about that experiment’s methodology, but I’m struck by how its findings track something that my friends and I often discuss. If we spend our last hours or minutes of the night reading ratherthan watching television, we wake the next morning with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled. Reading has bequeathed what meditation promises. It has smoothed and focused us.11、Maybe that’s about the quiet of reading, the pace of it. At Success Academy Charter Schools in New York City, whose students significantly outperform most peers statewide, the youngest kids all learn and play chess,in part because it hones “the ability to focus and concentrate,” said Sean O’Hanlon, who supervises the program. Doesn’t reading do the same12、Daniel Willingham, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia, framed it as a potentially crucial corrective to the rapid metabolism and sensory overload of digital technology. He told me that it can demonstrate to kids that there’s payoff in “doing something taxing, in delayed gratification.” A new book of his, “Raising Kids Who Read,” will be published later this year.13、Before talking with him, I arranged a conference call with David Levithan and Amanda Maciel. Both have written fiction in the young adult genre, whose current robustness is cause to rejoice, and they rightly noted that the intensity of the connection that a person feels to a favorite novel, withwhich he or she spends eight or 10 or 20 hours, is unlike any response to a movie.14、That observation br ought to mind a moment in “The Fault in Our Stars” when one of the protagonists says that sometimes, “You read a book and itfills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.”15、Books are personal, passionate. They stir emotions and spark thoughts ina manner all their own, and I’m convinced that the shattered world has less hope for repair if reading becomes an ever smaller part of it.写作范文：The vicissitude of history never fails to amaze us with all the changes ithas brought to human life. If we trace back to see what has been changedsince human civilization, seldom can we see anything that remains intact,with only one exception- the importance of reading. Despite the fact that reading has never dropped from our top priorities, few people keep the habitof it. As a reaction to such pathetic phenomenon, writer Frank Bruni draws people’s attention back to reading and encourages p eople to value it. Strategies he employs include contrast, credible reference and tacticreasoning that appeal to people’s emotion and agreement.One impressive feature of this article is Bruni’s contrast at the very beginning to introduce his topic, with the next paragraphs addressing its benefits. He compares things that he always ignores such as nephew’sbirthday and niece’s school production with things he never fails tooverlook -reading. For the majority of people, especially teenagers, birthday party and school performance are events that family members should remember. Unfortunately, this is not the case for the author. Reading at this point, readers are left a bit disappointed at the author and tend to pay moreattention to what he wants to convey n ext. At the cusp of people’s attention, author Bruni brings about something that deserves greater emphasis- reading: “I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.” Thus the readers start to realize howjustifiable the author is-as nothing like a birthday party or a performancein school is comparable with the importance of reading. With the utilizationof this contrast, the author successfully draws the attention from thereaders and lays a solid foundation for his later argument.Aside from this, the author’s careful choice of evidence adds credibility to the article. He cites properly a report by Common Sense Media, claiming that three is a sharp decline in the percentage of teenagers read for fun “few er than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure”. At the same time, however, the number of the young who hardly ever read or never read for pleasure elevates from “only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds” 30 years ago to “22 p ercent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of17-year-olds “ today. This worrisome report indicates that the young nolonger read as much as they used to. Linked with the previous paragraphs, the。

SAT写作题目分类总结

Hardship and Success
• •Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune? • •Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way? • •Do people place too much emphasis on winning? • •Do people learn more from losing than from winning? • •D we experience difficulties? • •Does being ethical make it hard to be successful? • •Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit? • •Is persistence more important than ability in determining a person’s success? • •Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached?
Celebrities and Heroes
• •Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect? • •Should we limit our use of the term “courage” to acts in which people risk their own well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value? • •Should we admire heroes but not celebrities? • •Is there a value in celebrating certain individuals as heroes?

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

Sat写作题目大全
sat写作对于很多童鞋来说都是一件头疼的事情，今天小编就为大家汇总整理了sat写作题目大全，希望可以帮助到大家!
1. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below: (2005.3)
Assignment: Is the opinion of the majority—in government or in any other circumstances—a poor guide? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.
2. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below: (2005.3)
Assignment: Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.
3. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below: (2005.3)
Assignment: Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remain neutral and impartial? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.
4. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below: (200
5.3)
Assignment: Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of other people? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.
5. Think carefully about the issue presented in the following excerpt and assignment below: (2005.5)
引文: If you think that what you do is your own business, you are wrong. In this world your conduct affects not only you but the conduct of other people as well. If you behave in a way that is considered unacceptable and other people copy your behavior, you are responsible for the consequences.
Adapted from Margaret Banning, “Letter to Susan”
引文: Even scientists know that absolute objectivity has yet to be attained. It’s the same for absolute truth. But, as many news reporters have observed, the idea of objectivity as a guiding principle is too valuable to be abandoned. Without it, the pursuit of knowledge is hopelessly lost.
Adapted from “Focusing Our Values,”Nieman Reports
引文: Given the importance of human creativity, one would think it should have a high priority among our concerns. But if we look at the reality, we see a different picture. Basic scientific research is minimized in favor of immediate practical applications. The arts are increasingly seen as dispensable luxuries. Yet as competition heats up around the globe, exactly the opposite strategy is needed.
引文: We must seriously question the idea of majority rule. The majority grinned and jeered when Columbus said the world was round. The majority threw him into a dungeon for his discoveries. Where is the logic in the notion that the opinion held by a majority of people should have the power to influence our decisions?
Adapted from James A. Reed, “Majority Rule”
Assignment: Do people depend on work—whether it is a job, schoolwork, or
volunteer work—to determine what their daily activities and interactions with others should be? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.。