《后天》的英文影评
后天&2012英语影评
My Impressions of the Disastrous FilmsI.IntroductionThe Day after Tomorrow and 2012 are the science fiction films, involving the advanced digital video effects and many horrible and disastrous scenes to demonstrate the power of the nature and to make p eople worry about the future of environment and human beings’ existence and habitat. Indeed, the plots of these two movies are similar to each other. The Day after Tomorrow mainly tells us that Jack Hall, who is the climatologist, predicts that global warming will lead to a new ice age and he issues a warning at a New Delhi conference, hoping the American vice-president can take measures to deal with it. However, the vice-president refuses to listen to Jack and he doesn’t believe that prediction will come t rue. Before long, some abnormal phenomena happen in man cities. Actually, the scary disaster comes much faster than Jack has imagined before. Afterwards, tornados, floods, the snow, and the hailstones attack many cities. Then the president starts to pay at tention to Jack’ suggestion and decides to evacuate residents of the north so as to save people as soon as possible. At the center of the story, Jack tries to save the world from the effects of global warming while he promises to save his son, Sam, who is trapped in New York. Finally, Jack succeeds in rescuing his son through many difficulties. In 2012, the main character, Jackson, a writer in Los Angeles, who works as a driver for the Russian billionaire Yuri, accidentally finds the big secret that the heads of government officials choose 400000 people to get on gigantic arks in order to ensure the continuity of human life when the world ends. So Jackson rents a private plane, and escapes from the disaster of destruction with his ex-wife, his son, daughter and his x-wife’ boyfriend, Gordon. The center of plot mainly tells us the process of his adventurous journey to get on gigantic ark. Eventually, a small percentage of humans survive from the disaster. Generally, these two movies show us the unusual trips and feasts for eyes and ears, which make us experience some moving scenes and learn some meaningful things.II.we can experience the warmth of the brilliant humanity of people from these two films.2.1 The brilliance of the deeply love.Love is the film’s p rinciple and eternal theme, so do these two disastrous movies. Although these two films show us the terrifying scenes during the disaster, we still see the earnest and deeply love anywhere, such as the love between parents and kids, the love between the lovers, the love between the doctor and the little cancer patient, the love between dogs and the love between the strangers. These beautiful loves fill in the films and make us deeply touched. In these two films, what impresses me is the love between Jack and his son, Sam, and the love between Jackson and his kids, Noah and Lilly. Jack and Jackson are busy in working and have no time in accompanying with their sons, so Sam and Noah misunderstand that their father don’t care about them. Actually, their fathers really love them all the time. When Sam istrapped in New York, Jack determines to go from Washington D.C. to New York to rescue Sam through the ice sheets. In 2012 when the disaster happens, Jackson tries his best to save his son and daughter; when Jackson frees the drill and its cable from the closing mechanism, Noah works together with his father because he is afraid that he will never see his father again. Love between the fathers and kids are always impressed and valuable, if people touch it in heat of hearts.Sincerely, love is the greatest gift on the earth and it shows in any form and in any occasions.Love makes people great and powerful especially in the terrible situation. Because of love, people can work together to fight against the disaster. Besides, there are many moving sights which are full of love. For example, Frank chooses to die in order to save his teammates from death; the beggar gives his last sausage to his beloved dog; Laura tries his best to help the French woman and her children; Nima, a Buddhist monk helps Jackson’s family to get on ark; the American geologist Adrian convince other G8 leaders to let the remaining people on board. Altogether, these warm sights just show the brilliance of humanity, the beautiful love.2.2 The significance of the valuable bravery.Bravery is one of the most beautiful brilliance of humanity in the film. In these two films, most people keep brave to struggle against the disaster. The reporters are bold in reporting immediate news and message about the weather and environment. Doctor, Lucy is the only one person who has enough encourage to stay with the little cancer patient to wait the ambulance when others leave the hospital. The three scientists, who are trapped in the snow area, have nothing to choose, but to wait for death. Honestly, they are so brave and calm to confront of the disaster. Because of braver, they can face the disaster and deal with the situation calmly and optimistically. Due to the bravery, they devote themselves to their jobs with the heart and soul. Thanks to bravery, we can see many people stand fast at their posts. Therefore, bravery is one of the important key to overcoming the difficulties, conquering natural disaster and surviving. Without it, lives are lost, and dreams are destroyed. I think without bravery, people are easy to damage.2.3 The generousness of the great sacrifice.With the heavy heart, I find the brilliance of humanity, sacrifice, which always makes me shed tears. In the films, we can see many scientists sacrifice their personal interests so as to save the humans from the death; many daring rescuing teams make efforts to rescue others at the risk of their lives. Especially, the president in 2012 declines to get on ark but stays along with his people, making me moved deeply. What surprise me is that Yuri, who is a mean and selfish man, sacrifices his life to get his sons on board at last. Even if the disaster is terrible, and many people are eager to survive, there still are many people sacrificing their lives to save others in that they are great and disinterested in most cases.III.we can draw some important and profound lessons from these two films.3.1To value what we have possessed.After experiencing the disaster and surviving finally, the main characters in these twofilms both learn that value is very significant. At fist, they regard their jobs as the priorities, so that they don’t have enough time to stay with their family and express their love to those who they really care about. As the disaster happens, they just find out what is most important to them. When the death is coming, they just find that family is significant and they just regret not spend time on their family, their friends and their relatives. Unfortunately, the main heroes survive eventually, and they are reconciled with their family through the experiencing the disaster. It is obvious that people should better possess what they have at present, or we may have no opportunities in the future. Most people always fail to value something they have, but they often regret not to value before. They always understand the meaning of value when they lose something. So just spare some time to value some people who are important in your life and value the present as soon as possible.3.2 To revere the nature and protect the environment.The Day after Tomorrow and 2012 delivering the environmental message, which making people take seriously to revere the nature and protect the environment. In reality, we human always believe that we are the most senior creatures who can dominate the nature. We think we are so wise and powerful that we can deliberately and recklessly demand what we want from the nature and destroy the nature and environment as we please. Gradually, human being tries their best take advantage of any resources on the earth, and we human beings are only concentrated on the development of economy at any cost, but ignore to care about our nature and our environment. As a result, our environment is worse and worse, which threatens our habitat. Anywa y, the nature is powerful, and the environment is very fragile, so we’d better revere and protect the environment. Otherwise, we will be punished by the nature the day after tomorrow and suffer a lot in the future.Ⅳ.ConclusionThe Day after Tomorrow and 2012 are the same types of the disastrous films, in general. Personally, I like The Day after Tomorrow better. In The Day after Tomorrow, the disaster results from that people excessively exploit the natural resources on the earth, which destroys the ecological balance of the earth. Just as the vice-president say th at“we are wrong, I am wrong. We are wrong to treat the environment badly.” So the reason of the disaster and the president’s word are good for people to reflect and think deeply about the nature’s power and the environmental protection. While in 2012,the disaster happens because of solar flare bombardment the Earth's core begins heating up at an unprecedented rate, eventually causing crustal displacement. Seemingly, people are just the victims of disaster. So people hardly repent their errors and they cannot aware of the consciousness of environmental protection. What’s more, comparing these two movies, I am totally affected by the The Day after Tomorrow due to its deeply and strong emotions, and I am satisfied with its ending. While, I don’t agree the result of 2012, in which only some rich people and scientists and government officials survive. In fact, many people have no any opportunities to know the fact that the big disaster will comes because everything was kept by government around the world from theordinary people. As far as I am concerned, all people have right to survive, whether they are rich or not. After all, everyone is equal and important. Generally speaking, I can benefit something meaningful and helpful from these two films.。
后天电影英文影评
The day after tomorrow is a disaster film, the damage to natural environment from human activity has led to the Revenge of nature.Climate warming, city was flooded, and the temperature plummeted later.In this disaster,human lose their lives,in the face of nature, life is so fragile.Super scene effects, the visual effects of the lens to make us deeply shocked, especially the ship, through the tall buildings.Filming the scene is mostly confined in the interior, location in Hollywood, the one used in the high-tech dominating the perspective, by now film technology production, dimensional synthesis, gives prominence to the true feeling and essential macro effect, to the human vision is so awesome.Human ignorance of the disaster often leads to terrify outcome. Jack Hall has observed the climate will change greatly, but the government to ignore him. If you take action, the outcome may not be so bad.The father is very great, when his son was trapped, the father decided to share the joys and sorrows with his son. You can let yourself die, but you can not let the child go to die. After hard, father and son reunited. This love triumphs over all, including natural disasters.The winter night breeze blowing in the face, suddenly feels the faceof the heat. I feel that my blood is moving faster than the past, and in the last three hours, my breath is almost always taut. Nevertheless my heart has been moved in excitement. I was touched by the light of human nature of the film. Human nature, the term used to comment on the film is too much, more than a flood, but I still want to say, this film, the most let me moved, is human nature. This kind of human nature is broad, is the courage to pay, is for others at the expense of sacrificing their own life, rather than narrow self, not selfish. I can see the human life and human civilization, the fragile, then the body, so beautiful, so the feeling of warmth, in the face of the power of nature's fury, a few seconds, or a few minutes, in the earthquake, volcano, tsunami, super flood in front, have disappeared without a trace. But I also saw, whether it is in what great before the powers of nature, human, or as a human representative of the film and those to national leaders to civilians, in the face of disaster showed human dignity.The day after tomorrow demonstrates us,we and nature must live in harmony, otherwise it will give us a revenge. At the same time, this film proves us that family, friendship and love will give us confidence and hope. Love nature, is to love ourselves.All along, human thought he was very strong, it can conquer natureand change nature. However, as long as the nature gives human beings punishment, they can destroy the human.It's not too late to mend. Protecting the environment is our duty. Tomorrow, beautiful or destroyed, depending on today.。
后天电影观后感300字英文
后天电影观后感300字英文英文回答：The Day After Tomorrow is a 2004 science fiction disaster film directed by Roland Emmerich and starring Dennis Quaid, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Emmy Rossum. The film follows a group of survivors as they attempt to make their way to Mexico after a series of catastrophic events caused by global warming.The Day After Tomorrow received mixed reviews from critics, but it was a commercial success, grossing over $544 million worldwide. The film's special effects were praised, but its plot and characters were criticized.In my opinion, The Day After Tomorrow is a well-made and entertaining disaster film. The special effects are top-notch, and the story is engaging. However, I do think that the film's plot is a bit too predictable, and the characters are not particularly well-developed.Overall, I would recommend The Day After Tomorrow to fans of disaster films. It's a fun and exciting film thatwill keep you on the edge of your seat.中文回答：《后天》是一部2004年的科幻灾难片，由罗兰·艾默里奇执导，丹尼斯·奎德、杰克·吉伦哈尔和艾美·罗森主演。
后天 英文观后感
后天英文观后感“Acquired” the film depicts the United States as a representative of the Earth within one day suddenly nose-dive into glacial science fiction stories. In the story, climate scientists Jack. Hall observed in the study pointed out that prehistoric climate, the greenhouse effect brought about by global warming could trigger an unprecedented global catastrophe. Mainly refer to the destruction of the beautiful human nature, but by the serious nature of the punishment. Lightning 、、 hail storm 、 tornado 、 hurricane 、、floods caused by global warming, such as the melting of Antarctic ice disaster befall humans, before human consciousness to know repentance may have been too late. In an instant because of the disaster emerged, floods, in the eyes; hail, in the eyes; all in the eyes of force majeure. Entry into the Earth’s greenhouse effect will glaciation. Tornado 、 earthquake tsunami 、…… So you ask that the name will become a natural part of human life. In the film, you can see New York City inundated lens: the confusion of the crowd the air vehicle broken glass, followed by the floor, as high waves… you can1/ 2see in the seaside holiday resort in Hawaii hit by the hurricane scene. This is the destruction of the natural consequences, and this is the punishment of mankind. For thousands of years, continually engulfed in the natural human body, should now enjoy nature of the pernicious consequences of brewing.2/ 2。
后天电影英文影评
Film Review of The Day After TomorrowAfter years of warning about global warming, Jack Hall is horrified to find all his predictions coming true much faster than he could have imagined, which means that People will face great danger. Hail stones which are the same as the size of football decimate cities, typhoons destroy Los Angeles and New York becomes flooded. As the big freeze covering the Earth, a small group of survivors try to fend off the cold as the world prepares for a dramatic change in the world order."The day after tomorrow", the translation of the title has a strong and classical meaning. As a successful operation of the commercial disaster film, in just two hours, "the day after tomorrow" shows us a scene about the end of the world, and by virtue of the movie, we finally know how fragile we are. For this reason the first hour is great - it has dramatic pace, is involving and looks fantastic even if we have seen it before in different variations. After the initial danger has passed, the film uses illogical and silly plot devices to put the survivors at risk - a cold eye of a storm, blood infections and wolves. The film tries to deliver an environmental message, but in a way, this film will not help the environmental movement because it is too exaggerated to be taken seriously.In a comfortable environment, people seldom think about themselves will conflict with nature, which does not seem to have any value. However, after watching this movie, many people will consider such a problem, when an irreversible disaster comes, who can survive? We can look at those people which are under the leadership of Library guards, they walked out of the library with fluke mind. But in a greater sense, human beings are always ruined themselves in their conceit. Everyone will choose the possible way as soon as possible to avoid facing the present predicament. However, in all, including future, the current work and dreams are no longer important, we have to face of strong physiological needs directly. Whether we will have stronger self-help ability than the bum on the street?The script does not really create characters either and it means we don't care that much about what happens to them in the final hour. The dialogue in the first hour is nicely gruff, scientific and genre while the second hour is more human and the lines that are not suited for that, not even in the hands of an impressive number of good actors. Thosecities which have a great civilization level are blindly standing on the edge of the disaster, while the animals in the corners of the city have long been calling for life by virtue of their inherent nature of themselves. Of course, when the people choose to escape, they will not care about what is really going around themselves. Once people try their best to save their personal life, people are like the animals, but at such time, human beings are fragile and vulnerable. Many people froze to death in the way of escaping, president died a violent death and giant glacial covers all of New York. By virtue of snow and ice, northern hemisphere becomes rarely sunny.We may have such a chuckle, as if we can also save ourselves like Sim. With a group of people which are lucky enough to wait for the God's rescue. We will be so delighted, as long as there is a profound belief that we can see the miracle. People should have a good look at the world which has changed greatly, nonetheless, what we learn from this movie is to try our best to protect the Earth. If we don't take care of the environment, the day after tomorrow, human beings will die and the nature will retaliate us.ENDPower by Linko。
《后天》英文观后感
《后天》英文观后感Reflections on "The Day After Tomorrow""The Day After Tomorrow" is a film that left me profoundly moved and thinking deeply about the fragility of our planet and the impact of climate change. Directed by Roland Emmerich, this disaster thriller stars Dennis Quaid, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Emmy Rossum, and tells the tale of a rapidly changing climate that leads to catastrophic events across the globe.The film opens with a group of researchers warningabout the potential dangers of climate change, but their warnings are ignored by the public and government officials. Soon after, the world is thrown into a state of chaos as extreme weather patterns wreak havoc on cities and communities. Freezing temperatures, blizzards, and hurricanes ravage the planet, leading to widespread destruction and panic.What makes this film particularly powerful is itsability to show the personal toll that climate change takes on individuals and families. We see Jake Gyllenhaal's character, Sam Hall, frantically searching for his son, who is trapped in New York City during a devastating blizzard. The film also depicts the struggle of a group of survivors as they attempt to find their way through the frozen tundra, fighting for their lives against the elements.The visuals in "The Day After Tomorrow" are breathtaking. The use of CGI and special effects to create realistic and harrowing scenes of destruction and mayhem is truly impressive. From the frigid landscapes to the roaring tornadoes and towering tsunamis, the film captures thepower and randomness of nature in a way that is both terrifying and awe-inspiring.However, what makes this film more than just a visual spectacle is its underlying message about climate changeand our responsibility to protect the planet. The film does not shy away from the seriousness of the issue, showing the potential consequences of ignoring warnings and failing totake action. It forces us to confront the fact that climate change is not just a distant threat, but a real andimminent danger that could have devastating consequencesfor ourselves and future generations."The Day After Tomorrow" also raises importantquestions about the role of science and government in addressing climate change. The film suggests that ourfailure to act is not just a matter of individual choice, but also a failure of institutions and leadership. It calls for a greater emphasis on scientific research and education, as well as stronger policies and regulations to address the root causes of climate change.In conclusion, "The Day After Tomorrow" is not just a thrilling disaster movie, but also a powerful call to action. It reminds us that climate change is a real and pressing issue that demands our immediate attention. By showing the personal and global impact of climate change, the film urges us to take responsibility for our actionsand work together to protect our planet for future generations. As we face the challenges of climate change,it is crucial that we remember the lessons of "The DayAfter Tomorrow" and act swiftly and decisively to safeguard our shared future.。
Thedayaftertomorrow电影《后天》英文影评
后天The Day After Tomorrow 英文影评It is such a relief to hear the music swell up at the end of a Roland Emmerich movie, itsrestorative power giving us new hope. Billions of people may have died, but at least themajor characters have survived. Los Angeles was wiped out by flying saucers in Emmerich's"Independence Day," New York was assaulted in his "Godzilla," and now, in "The Day AfterTomorrow," Emmerich outdoes himself:Los Angeles is leveled by multiple tornados, New Yorkis buried under ice and snow, the United Kingdom is flash-frozen, and lots of the NorthernHemisphere is wiped out for good measure. Thank god that Jack, Sam, Laura, Jason and Dr.Lucy Hall survive, along with Dr. Hall's little cancer patient.So, yes, the movie is profoundly silly. What surprised me is that it's also very scary.The special effects are on such an awesome scale that the movie works despite its cornballplotting. When tornados rip apart Los Angeles (not sparing the Hollywood sign), when a wallof water roars into New York, when a Russian tanker floats down a Manhattan street, whensnow buries skyscrapers, when the crew of a space station can see nothing but violent stormsystems -- well, you pay attention.No doubt some readers are already angry with me for revealing that Jack, Sam, Laura,Jason, Dr. Lucy Hall and the little cancer patient survive. Have I given away the plot?This plot gives itself away. When cataclysmic events shred uncounted lives but the moviezeroes in on only a few people, of course they survive, although some supporting charactersmay have to be sacrificed. What's amusing in movies like "The Day After Tomorrow" is theway the screenplay veers from the annihilation of subcontinents to whether Sam should tellLaura he loves her."sensational claims."Before long, however, it is snowing in India, and hailstones the side of softballs areripping into Tokyo. Birds, which are always wise in matters of global disaster, fly southdouble-time. Turbulence tears airplanes from the sky. The president (PerryKing) learns theFAA wants to ground all flights and asks the vice president, "What doyou think we shoulddo?"Meanwhile, young Sam Hall (Jake Gyllenhaal) goes to New York with an academic decathlonteam, which includes Laura (Emmy Rossum of "Mystic River") and Brian (Arjay Smith). They'restranded there. Ominous portents abound and Jack finally gets his message through to theadministration ("This time," says a friend within the White House, "it will be different.You've got to brief the president directly.")Jack draws a slash across a map of the United States, and writes off everybody north ofit. He issues a warning that super-cooled air will kill anybody exposed to it, advisesthose in its path to stay inside, and then ... well, then he sets off to walk fromWashington to New York to get to his son. Two of his buddies, also veterans of ArcticWe are wondering:(a) why walk to New York when his expertise is desperately need to save millions?(b) won't his son be either dead or alive whether or not he makes the trek? And——(c) how quickly can you walk from Washington to New York over ice sheets and through ahowling blizzard? As nearly as I can calculate, this movie believes it can be done in twonights and most of three days. Oh, I forgot; they drive part of the way, on highways thatare gridlocked and buried in snow, except for where they're driving. How they get gas isnot discussed in any detail.As for the answer to (a), anyone familiar with the formula will know it is because heFeels Guilty About Neglecting His Son by spending all that time being a paleoclimatologist.It took him a lot of that time just to spell it. So, OK, the human subplots are nonse --all except for the quiet scenes anchored by Ian Holm, as a sad, wise Scottishmeteorologist. Just like Peter O'Toole in "Troy," Holm proves that a gifted British-trainedactor can walk into almost any scene and make it seem like it means something.Quaid and Gyllenhaal and the small band of New York survivors do what can be done withimpossible dialogue in an unlikely situation. And Dr. Lucy Hall (Sela Ward),Jack's wifeand Sam's mother, struggles nobly in her subplot, which involves the little cancer patientnamed Peter. She stays by his side after the hospital is evacuated, calling for anambulance, which we think is a tad optimistic, since Manhattan has been flooded up to aboutthe eighth floor, the water has frozen, and it's snowing. But does the ambulance arrive?Here's another one for you:Rember those wolves that escaped from the zoo? Think we'llsee them again?Of the science in this movie I have no opinion. I am sure global warming is real, and Iregret that the Bush administration rejected the Kyoto Treaty, but I doubt that the。
后天 英文影评(简短)
Imagine that you’re in another ice age, shuddering from stem to stern in the biting wind, struggling to find any possible food deep in the pristine layer of snow.This , however, can exactly be true, just as the movie<The Day After Tomorrow > indicated.While scientists today fiercely argue about global warming, people actually knows little about the terrible chain reaction it could produce during a long period of time. It can be easily noticed that the movie attempt to strike the audience with a series of catastrophes. The dominant hue is dark and cold, always put the viewers under a sombre occasion .Even scientists themselves were not able to make any difference in face of the centurial tremendous change. Everyone could only try to save people close to them, regardless of so-called heroism. There is also a spectacle in this film when comparing with other blockbusters. People have been convinced that we human beings can conquer all since Renaissance period. Optimistic movie directors tend to have a supreme hero just as a super man who can eventually settle the problem once for all. Realizing that, Roland Emmerich, together with other artists, have always been drawing our attentions to the reality. Therefore we saw the great success of <Tornado>and the later<2012>.They warn us in such deafening words:”No solution at the end of the world!”We can’t wait until the last day, since no one can afford to pay for it. Gazing at the lovely world around you, how can you imagine its extinction? To make a change is painful, but also necessary.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
《后天》的英文影评
"The Day After T omorrow" is a disaster movie, but it isn't a disastrous one. But if Roland Emmerich really thought he was making a movie with a message, he didn't quite succeed - to be honest, Emmerich is to serious film-making as Naomi Wolf is to recommending "Voluptuous" magazine. The fact that the movie begins with the Twentieth Century Fox logo under stormy skies doesn't make it any more significant.
Well-intentioned it may be, but the movie's plot takes second place to the imagery - the opening credits over an icy landscape, the massive weather systems over the planet, colossal hailstones pelting down on T okyo, snowstorms over India, tidal waves - and the numerous effects houses make it an eye candy feast, especially for people with a grudge against the Big Apple (kudos to Industrial Light and Magic, Digital Domain and all the less renowned FX companies involved). So on that level, it works; the music by Harald Kloser and Thomas Wanker is also a bonus, being more restrained and serious in its support than is usually the way with Emmerich movies. And then there's the script - it has a whole load of characters but doesn't do much with any of them. Example: Climatologist Dennis Quaid's relationship with son Jake Gyllenhaal doesn't seem to be as estranged as it's intended to be, and
similarly the friendship Quaid has with a longtime colleague gets about as much emphasis as the crush his younger colleague has on fellow scientist Tamlyn Tomita (and the movie pays for it later on in a sequence shamelessly ripped off from "Vertical Limit," which has little of the emotional resonance it should). In fact, all the human elements - Gyllenhaal's repressed feelings for classmate Emmy Rossum, his doctor mother Sela Ward's problems with a young patient, etc - all of them are underdeveloped or just plain undeveloped, and some moments practically scream "Contrived Climax Ahoy!" Those moments are there because "The Day After Tomorrow" doesn't have an enemy as a natural outgrowth of its story; the elements aren't really villainous as they have no concept of right or wrong, and the closest thing to a villain here is the current administration in the White House, so Emmerich and co-writer Jeffrey Nachmanoff have to impose a tangible enemy (why else are those wolves there?) on the proceedings. This does help things from getting totally boring in the second half, though it's still pretty watchable even then - but if some more thought had been put into the screenplay, like exploring the characters or developing the promising ideas therein (like Americans fleeing to Mexico, or further looks at the Government side), it would have carried more weight and made the movie into more than an improvement on "Godzilla."
As it is, it's a competently done if implausible attention-holder that wants to be more; that it actually had the potential to be more makes it a bit of a disappointment, but at least it's a watchable one。