Simon考官范文-雅思写作Task 2:Crime话题范文(一边倒的写法)
关于犯罪的雅思作文及分析

关于犯罪的雅思作文及分析(经典版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如演讲稿、总结报告、合同协议、方案大全、工作计划、学习计划、条据书信、致辞讲话、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as speech drafts, summary reports, contract agreements, project plans, work plans, study plans, letter letters, speeches, teaching materials, essays, other sample essays, etc. Want to know the format and writing of different sample essays, so stay tuned!关于犯罪的雅思作文及分析犯罪是属于社会类的雅思作文考题,为了帮助大家备考,下面本店铺给大家带来关于犯罪的雅思作文及分析。
青少年犯罪率上升雅思作文

青少年犯罪率上升雅思作文Task:Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world. Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem?思路解析:青少年犯罪的根源1:媒体暴力的误导,使他们对于暴力产生崇拜,错误地指出通过犯罪去以获取财富就是最合适的。
青少年犯罪的根源2:在经济萧条的大背景下,就业变得十分困难,很多年轻人被迫选择犯罪来谋生,或是报复社会。
解决办法:对于出版物展开审查和分类,这能够把那些不当的信息过滤器掉。
除了就是免费的劳动力培训,这能够使年轻人以获取实际的技能,协助他们在打听工作中赢得优势。
参考范文:Nowadays, it has been reported that there has been an increasing number of crimes committed by youngsters in major cities all over the world. What causes this phenomenon and what people could do to resolve the problem have been widely discussed. In this essay, I would investigate the reasons and suggest some possible solutions accordingly.There are two main reasons why this kind of crimes is on the increase. Firstly, violence on the internet, TV programs and video games is responsible for this situation. It is because youngsters, unlike adults, are lack of abilities to distinguish right from wrong. Therefore, too much violence in the virtual world could render young people aggressive. As a result, they, more often than not, consider violence as the main or even only way to solve problems, thereby leading to crimes. Secondly, low employment rate in many big cities around the world could be another major reason. Most countries are experiencing economic plateau or even backwards due to global economic crisis occurring a few years ago. Consequently, many businesses and factories have decided to cut off their staff or ten d to employ experienced workers over young graduates. This means some youngsters become jobless spontaneously once they graduate. Some of them even turn to commit crimes to make a living or get revenge on society.In order to solve the problem, some main methods are advised accordingly. The first solution is to apply censorship and classification in issuingprograms. This means governments or non-governmental organizations should censor the violent and prostitute contents of programs and label them such as "adult only" or "viewers excluded below 14" before programs are publicized. This would help to keep youngsters from too much violence on programs away. Another method is to carry out free job training programs designed closely related to the demand of the job market. After training, youngsters, more of ten than not, can expect better chances of being employed. Other ways could include tax-reduction policy for university graduates self-employment, providing paid social service positions for youngsters, etc.To conclude, methods such as censorship on programs and free job training for youngsters are strongly recommended too much violence on programs and low employment.(370 words)In some countries, a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers. Why has this happened? What can be done to deal with this?雅思文学创作题目传授题目的类型属于report。
雅思作文 犯罪题材 Crime

9. 犯罪题材Crime引言青少年犯罪话题是否应限制媒体中的犯罪细节持续犯罪的原因以及解决途径犯罪后应该被关进监狱还是应该进行社区服务延长刑期是不是减低犯罪的最有效方法对待犯罪分子,提高教育和工作的培训是不是比将他们送进监狱的更好办法出现反社会的原因及解决方法女性选择步入职场,没时间照看家庭是导致青少年犯罪的原因之一么链接机经关键词◎青少年犯罪的原因(the reasons for the growing number of juvenile delinquency)青少年犯罪成上升趋势(the increasing number of young offenders/ teenage criminals)青少年走上犯罪的道路(embark on the criminal road)的原因是多种多样的(manifold)其一是:例如在单亲家庭(single parent family),缺乏家庭的关爱及正确的引导(lack of connectedness and lack of parental care),甚至是有些家庭存在着家庭暴力(domestic violence/ family violence),不要给孩子贴上消极意义的标签(label)其二是:社会的原因(be led astray in the complicated society)其三是:科技的原因,互联网和手机为犯罪提供了新的渠道(a new avenue for committing crimes)其四是:学校的原因,学生承受的同伴带来的压力及学业压力、竞争压力(peer pressure andstudy pressure, the heated competition)其五是:媒体上包括电视、电影、广告等上面的暴力和血腥的场面(the violent scenes on the media,pornographic or vulgar forms of media)。
雅思大作文-犯罪类

雅思大作文-犯罪类Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment in essential to control violence in society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:Before talking about the essential role of death penalty, you have to think about the meaning, and the purpose, of any kind of punishment. If you consider that the purpose is to prevent the guilty from being nasty again, you can be seduced by an argumentation in favour of the suppression of capital punishment. But you have to think about another aspect of the problem: a punishment is also useful to impress people, to make them fear the law. In fact, let's take the example of a young misfit, which has grown in a violent atmosphere, influenced by older delinquents, etc ... He lives in the streets, he's got no aim but to survive. This is the kind of person who could possibly kill someone for money, or even for fun ... Why would he fear prison? Life would be easier for him there. In addition, in many cases, when you behave normally, you can benefit from penalty reductions. This young misfit needs to be impressed, he needs to know that the law is a frontier. When you cross it, you can lose your life. That is why capital punishment helps keeping a distance between robbery and murder. If you abolish it, you suppress the difference between these two types of crime, which are completely different.But there is also a limit to define: even if death penalty is unavoidable, it would be a crime to apply it to inadequate cases. If there is no premeditation or past facts which can justify such a punishment, it is far too strict to apply death penalty. That is why the lawmakers have to establish precisely the context in which capital punishment car be pronounced. That is the price to pay to limit violence without using excessive violence.。
雅思英语作文 crime 有些人认为每种犯罪都应该有固定的惩罚,一些人觉得犯罪的动机应该被考虑进去

Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.Sample Answer 1:Some people argue whether criminals should always be subject to fixed punishment for certain crimes or situations for committing the crime should be taken into account before inflicting punishment. This essay will examine both sides of the argument, but I am personally inclined to the latter view that suggests consideringcircumstances of a crime while sentencing someone.On the one hand, criminal activities have reduced significantly over the centuries in the history of humankind. Fixed punishments like the death penalty, life imprisonment for drug trafficking deter an offender from such heinous crimes. The ruthlessness of such harsh punishments ensured safety and security in society. For instance, according to a publication on criminal justice from the C.I.A, many middle countries have been consistently ranking near top regarding achieving a low-crime index due totheir aggressive law for enforcing fixed punishments for designated crimes. Nevertheless, the main objective of the law and order is to protect the innocents and punish the wrongdoers. The fixed punishment often contradicts with the fundamental objective of civil society.On the other hand, persecuting a convict violate human rights; often without considering the aspects leading to such crime. Consider Saudi Arabia, ranked as the country with the lowest crime index in the world. The state’s implementation of a strict fundamentalistapproach to persecute criminals regardless of the circumstances of the crime has drawn flak from many human rights organisations. Amnesty International reported that fair trials are prohibited to criminals even if they are wrongly convicted. Finally, in my opinion, a convicted person should be given punishment only based on the circumstances and severity of the crime. For example, if someone murders in the act of self-defence, the verdict given should not amount to life-sentence.In conclusion, I believe that both groups of the argument, for and against the fixed punishments,have their reasons. However, I think that penalties should be decided according to variant circumstances of criminals and keeping in mind that the aim of punishment to prevent further crimes to happen.Sample Answer 2:Have you ever thought about being a judge? There may be various situations in our daily lives in which our judgments are needed to be expressed. But is it really as simple as the situations we encounter every day when it comes to judging serious crimes? For a long time, it has been a controversial issue whetherthere must be fixed punishments for any kind of crime or the incentive is an influential factor that is crucial to be considered. I personally approve of the latter belief since there are a lot of crimes in which the criminal is not really guilty.On the one hand, a group of people dogmatically believe the punishment for any crime ought to be fixed regardless of the crime’s motive. They state that if felons know there is severe punishment even for small crimes, they are hindered and will never attempt to commit a crime. Therefore, the violence and crime rates decline considerably and thus a better societywe will have. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for robbery is of one the robber’s hands being cut irrespective of what he has stolen, an apple or a car.On the other hand, the other group of society argues that where the felony stems from must be investigated and the motivation should be taken into consideration when sentencing a criminal. As a justification, they cite that there are situations in which the crime has not been done deliberately or the culprit is not the real wrongdoer. In particular, in an involuntary homicide, the killer might be the victim since itmight have self-defence or a robbery for feeding a family differs from robbing for profit. In this case, the judge is who can decide the best penalty considering every aspect and condition of crime perpetration.On the whole, even though fixed punishments can be extremely beneficial in the decrease of crime rate and may culminate in a safer society, the justice system should be flexible enough towards certain felonies and consider the crime’s rationale and conditions for giving the most appropriate verdict.Sample Answer 3:In recent years, there has been a rise in the number of crimes being committed. Many people are of the opinion that these wrong-doings should be classified categorically. However, I believe that each offence should be looked upon in a subjective manner, taking into account the nature and severity of these unlawful activities. Giving a fixed punishment would definitely make court proceedings a lot quicker. This is because the judges would not need to decide what type of punishment criminals would deserve as it would have been already decided for them. However, this is an unfair practice as some of the criminals may notdeserve the punishments given to them. For example, a person robbing a convenient store will not deserve the same punishment as a person robbing a bank because the degree of the crime is not as severe as the latter. On the other hand, deciding a crime according to the situation and motive of it makes perfect sense as it would ensure that the lawbreaker is given a fair trial and the right punishment is handed down to him. For instance, a mentally ill person who commits a murder would be judged accordingly, instead of being grouped into the same category of all the other type of murderers. This, therefore, will make the trial balance andfair. In conclusion, my opinion is that the punishment for a crime should be made up based on all the factors leading up to the unlawful action rather than providing judgement based on the classification of crimes into types.Sample Answer 4:In recent days, there is an ongoing debate on how to give appropriate punishment toward people who accused with criminal activities. Some state that they should be punished by looking at the type of crime they have committed, while some people believe that the circumstance and reason of committing a crime should begiven a high priority while accusing someone of the crime. However, I personally argue that these ideas are definitely true and through this essay, I will support these views with some considerations below. Nowadays, the fact shows that there are some cases given injustice punishment toward a criminal. For instance, a grandmother stole three chocolates last year and she had to spend times in prison for several years. In contrast of the corruptors stealing plenty of money from society but punished only a year and completed by good service from the police. In short, the law of government should review and rearrange the constitution whendeciding on the punishment. They should think of the punishment types as the consideration of the punishment decision. Turning to the other arguments, the government also should pay attention to the reason why people have committed criminalities. For example, there are some cases which show the most reason for committing a crime are economic problems. A lot of people have no job thus they prefer to do misconduct to fulfil their daily need. The most obvious solution is by taking the motivation of criminals as an essential consideration in giving punishment. As a result, I truly believe that theseideas are an essential consideration that can encounter social justice.Sample Answer 5:To date, we have thousands of laws, regulations, general rules enumerated to ensure our society functions as it should be. However, these restrictions could never be enough to cover every circumstance that happened around-the-clock. Therefore, should the law be our gospel for us to follow strictly without deviation? Or should we perceive each case as an individual and take multiple factors into considerations? My opinion is definitely on thelatter. For people who value law as an impregnable principle, the law itself would surpass human judgments. Humanity could be a defection when coming to talk about righteousness. Sentiments and bias might get in the way and eventually lead to miscalculation and unjustness, resulting in man-made errors, a horrendous failure for justice. Despite the fact that human error is almost inevitable, people still believe taking certain factors into consideration is genuinely legitimate. Laws are considered the most basic requirement of human morality, making it the reason why this issue has become controversial. People might have broken the lawyet the motivation behind such a deed could alter our interpretation to it. The main character in the Opera “Les miserable” stole a loaf of bread because he was almost starved to death;a young heroin addict pickpocketed a wallet to cater to his cravings. These two cases above are both thieveries, yet the morality standard was hardly even. Our cognition helps us reconsider and adjust our decisions and prevent us from nonchalantly putting the same amount of punishment on these two men without pondering over some more congruous solution. The law could be the guidance, a foundation of our ethical standards. Nevertheless, we stillhave to make room for flexibilities and consider every crime as an individual.Sample Answer 6:There is a controversial fact that whether there should be fixed punishments for crimes or the factors that might lead the crime should be taken into consideration, while penalties for crimes are detected. In my opinion, to decide justice both of them are required. The circumstances brought about the crime should play a role to slight the penalty or deteriorate the punishment.Some people believe that each crime should be performed as a specific punishment that serves to implement justice in a society. In this practice, each person who did the same crime is punished as a standard punishment. For instance, the penalty of forgery is a standard for every person. Every thief, child or adult does not matter, is convicted in the same way.On the other hand, another group of people think that each occasion related to crime is different from one another. Because psychology and position of guilty, environmental factors and reasons and results of the crime affect thedamage of the crime on people or society. Accordingly, such mentioned factors should be detectable on the level of punishment. For instance, if a person causes a traffic accident by a mistake, his position, his regret and his emotional situation should be evaluated, when the penalty is assigned.I personally think that each crime should be assessed specifically and fixed crimes detected beforehand should be able to extend or lessen. Thanks to that, the intentions lied down behind the crime could be thought while deciding the crime of a guilty. Otherwise, thieving a piece ofbread because of hungry will have the same position with a theft who stole many pieces of bread to sell in another place to earn money.Sample Answer 7:In today's modern world, we are constantly bombarded with the issue of crime which has recently increased at an alarming rate in newspapers. Some people, therefore, are of the opinion that all kinds of crime should have its own punishment which is legislated by the government. However, there are a handful of people who assert that some background reasons, which cause the criminals to commitcrimes, should be included in the procedure of deciding on the punishment. Hence, we will examine both sides of the argument before reaching a reasonable conclusion.A fixed punishment for each type of crime is necessary due to several reasons. To begin, it allows every criminal to be treated fairly for every crime. It is important to ensure no one will be discriminated or get offended by the public. In addition, there will not be any unsatisfactory between the criminals who committed the same kind of crime when they are sentenced to jail. Furthermore, a fixed punishment plays anindispensable role in giving a deterrent in turning the would-be offenders. To illustrate, a serious punishment will be incurred to those who commit crimes like murders will definitely deter and cause would-be offenders to change their minds before committing a crime.On the other hand, it is vital to take into account the reasons why criminals commit crimes. First of all, many of them, especially teenagers who are more vulnerable to those feelings of loneliness are more easily influenced by their peers. They do not have mature thinking and are not being aware of the possible negativeimpacts of committing crimes. According to recent research conducted in Columbia, the statistic has shown that about 58% of the youngsters got affected by their badly behaved friends when got caught to involve in crimes. It is also believed by the public that many criminals have the lackings of parental love which eventually causes them to behave violently and aggressively. They, therefore, involve committing crimes including robberies and murders to show how powerful they are.In conclusion, I am of the opinion that every jury should make their decisions on punishments byconsidering the reasons why they commit crimes. Our nation will surely continue to prosper and flourish in the decades to come once the crime rates are successfully reduced.Sample Answer 8:Many people debate on what should be done about punishment on criminals. Some individuals believe that there should be standard punishment for every kind of crime and that should be followed while sentencing a criminal. Yet, some others argue that reasons for crime and background of executing crime should be considered while determining proper punishmentfor criminals. This essay will take a look at this issue from both points of views.To begin with, people may agree to impose fixed standard punishment on criminals based on the crime they committed. By doing this, criminals will be punished according to the crime they made and it seems fair for everyone since they believe the bigger the crime, the harder the prison. For example, imposing the death penalty to both murderer and terrorist who have committed to the same type of crime seems reasonable to many people. It is a considerably equal crime and therefore, they should bepunished by death sentence. When someone kills a person, no matter what was the reason, s/he should be punished according to the predetermined laws.On the other hand, others argue that in determining the proper punishment for criminals, there should be some considerations of what were the motives of crime and also the background of criminals. There must be different punishment between a serial killer and someone who was forced to kill for self-defending. Applying same punishment to the woman who stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed herhungry baby and a corrupt government employee who stole millions of dollar to amass his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the crime in both cases.All in all, fixed punishment is needed to standardise punishment for different crimes. Nonetheless, there should be some considerations on the motives and environment of criminals in imposing the proper punishment.。
雅思写作Task2考官范文:犯罪类(2)

雅思写作Task2考官范文:犯罪类(2)本文收集整理了雅思写作Task2犯罪类考官范文。
认真研读一定的雅思范文及作文模板可以帮助我们检验自己的写作水平,并能很好地吸收和应用优秀范文里的优秀内容。
By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Model Answer 1: (Agree)"Do as I say, not as I do." This is what society tells us when it punishes murderers with the death penalty. Society tells us that murder is wrong, and in our legal system, murder is against the law. Yet we still see our society kill murderers, and thus we are committing murder ourselves. For this reason, the death penalty should end, and instead murderers should be punished with life in prison.Society needs to show a positive model of how our lives should be and how people should act. We should always strive to improve our situation, to be at peace and in harmony with others. However, when wekill murderers, we are not working to improve our society. Instead, we are stooping to the criminals' level.It makes me think about the revenge that came when playing games with my brothers. When we were kids/children, my brother would take my toys, so I would hit him and take my toys back. Then he would hit me harder and take the toys again. Thinking of the death penalty, I imagine a murderer kills someone. Society takes revenge by killing the murderer. This leaves behind the murderer's family and friends, who have tremendous anger inside of them, which they may release onto society. The cycle of killing goes on and on.Society should not condemn people who are taking the same action that society is taking. Society tells us not to kill, and yet society kills when it exercises the death penalty. Because of this contradiction, we should end the death penalty and instead punish murderers by sentencing them to life in prison.Model Answer 2: (Disagree)I strongly support the death penalty for murderers. In today's society, life is very violent. There are many mentally-ill people committing crimes and almost nothing will stop them. We have interviewed capturedcriminals who say, "I was going to kill him, but I knew that I could get the death penalty if I did. So I just left him there." Obviously, having the death penalty saves lives and that makes a positive difference to society.If a criminal does murder someone, and then gets the death penalty, that isn't society's fault. Everyone knows about the death penalty as a punishment for murder. So, the person who murders is really killing himself at the same time he is killing his victim. The murderer has made the choice to die.It is important to remember that the death penalty is used only for people who have committed very serious crimes. For example, a woman shot a police officer when she was trying to escape from jail. She was already a convicted criminal when she committed murder, and she deserves the death penalty.People need to accept responsibility for their actions. Punishing murderers with the death penalty is one way that society can help people to realize/realise the consequences of their decisions.。
雅思大作文犯罪类范文

面对犯罪,我们能做什么?
在这个世界上,每一天都有犯罪行为在发生。
那些受害者及其家人的伤痛是无法
用言语形容的。
所以我在想啊,到底如何才能有效地预防犯罪呢?今天咱们就来聊聊这个话题吧!
不知道你有没有注意到一个现象:贫穷往往和高的犯罪率联系到一起。
当然,并
不是说穷人就会去犯罪哈,但这之间确实存在一些相关性。
你想象一下那种生活在下水道一样环境里的人们,每天都在为了最基本的生活用品发愁,他们会感到绝望,不是吗?在这种情况下,很容易就有人会产生破罐子破摔的想法——干脆做些违法的勾当来获取想要的物质条件。
然后呢,教育也是很重要的方面啊!人要是受了良好的教育,可能就会更容易形
成正确的是非观和价值观。
学校、家庭都是孩子的第一个课堂,如果这个基础打不好,你想想以后可能变成啥样呢?还有些小孩由于各种原因没法得到正常的学习机会,心里苦闷呀,也许就去混社会了……你说这是不是很可惜!
再加上现在的科技发展太迅速了,有时候网络就像是把双刃剑似的。
人们虽然能
在上面找到自己需要的信息和帮助,但同时它也是一个充满诱惑与陷阱的地方。
有人就可能抵挡不住这种诱惑然后走向违法道路啊,例如参与网络诈骗或者传播色情内容等等之类的活动,后果是很严重的嘛!
其实归根结底还是得加强法律和道德建设对吧!不光是让大家知道犯罪的成本有
多高还要教会他们善良是做人的基本准则啊......。
雅思大作文范文三篇法律与犯罪类

雅思大作文范文三篇法律与犯罪类雅思大作文范文:犯罪是人的天性crimes undermine human society. reasons forcommitting a crime are varied and comple某, so wecould not say that violation of law isjust humannature and that people’s tendency to break the lawcould be stopped when they are young.we are still not sure what causes people tocommit a crime. the reason seems to be clear incases in which a thief steals money to make a livingor buy things normally unaffordable. many thieves,when caught and interviewed, reveal that they come from poor families and have very littleeducation. therefore we could establish a relation between less privileged family background andlow level of education. many people used to believe that parents could teach their children theharms of wrongdoing by showing them the consequences of such action and the obligationof complying with social norms. such method works for most children who are aware of whatthey are doing and what would happen from their action. but we also learn from news or othersources that many high-level officials take bribes or abuse power for their own benefit. suchpeople with high income and good education clearly know what they are doing and the possibleconsequences. such crimes would not have happened if tendency to commit crimes could bestopped when people were young.moreover, we know that people tend to act for their own benefit, but we do not know ifthis is due to human nature or other causes such as ideas learned later in life. if it is humannature, people live in faraway places without much education would commit crimes at a higherrate than people with schooling in cities. by contrast, people in remote places are more honestand kind, and the crime rate issignificantly lower than that in city. from such evidence, wecould not conclude that the above assertion is true.while we continue to e某plore what causes crime and how to prevent it, we need to bear inmind that it is far more comple某 than we normally think. accordingly, measures for crimeprevention should also be multidimensional.to sum up, the conclusion that it is human nature to commit crime and that people’stendency to break the law could be stopped when they are young is not well supported. peoplebecome criminals for many reasons and we should adopt more effective methods for crimeprevention.雅思大作文范文:吸食毒品Nowhere in the world has the issue of tobaccobeen so much debated as in our society. Nowadays,tobacco is more harmful than drug to people’shealth, therefore many people think that smoking islegalthat is a direct andprimary reason to inducethis kind of problem. The above point is certainlytrue; this essay will outline three reasons. The main reason is that tobacco is a silent killerto smokers. Tobacco is known to be the probablecause of some 25 different diseases, and forsome,such as lung cancer, bronchitis and emphysema, it is the main cause. According to a WHOreport four million people die yearly from tobacco-related diseases, that is one death everyeight seconds. Tobacco is significantly becoming a greater cause of death and disability thanany other single cause.Another reason is that more and more young people are under 18 years old who smokecigarette have been blinded by the deceit of tobacconists. Tobacco among adolescents remainsstubbornly persistent. Smoking among adolescents rose in the 1990s in severaldevelopedcountries,such as China,Vietnam and Thailand . While new markets are being opened by thetobacco industry actions, old markets have not been closed. Tobacco is a global threat.Last but not the least reason is the increase in cigarette smuggling. Becauseof tobaccosmuggling, the legal retailing and distribution systems are badly affected, and faced withincreased lawlessness and heavy ta某 losses. This behavior severely affectsthe economy.In conclusion, the tobacco should be considered illegal. Perhaps a pack of cigarettes isless harmful than another drug, but tobacco is actually the biggest killer of all thedrugs.雅思大作文范文:吸食毒品Advertisements of tobacco and those of“smoking is harmful”are often seentogether.But there has been an on-going argument about whether or not tobacco should be forbiddenand made illegal. I have always believed that smoking should be illegal for the followingreasons.First, smoking does great harm to human health and causes many diseases. It is reportedthat more than 70% of lung cancer sufferers are smokers, andthe average life-span of smokersis seven years less than that of non-smokers. Moreover, it hurts not only smokers, but also theones around the smokers. Many researchers claim that breathing“second-hand smoke”maybeeven more harmful than smoking.Second, many social problems and disasters can be attributed to smoking. For instance,many wives cannot bear their husbands’smoking all the time,which causes many quarrels, oreven divorces. Furthermore, the biggest firedisaster in China, the Da某inganling fire disaster,was caused by a burning cigarette end, and the cost ofthe resulting loss st, smoking tobaccos is a main source of air pollution.A magazine said thatforevery cigarette smoked each day,a whole tree is needed to clean the air.In otherwords,smoking one less cigar every day equals planting a tree. It is a brilliant contribution to theearth we are living on.In a word, all the above demonstrate that smoking harms yourselves as wellas yourneighbors, pollutes the air we ourselves are breathing, and even agitates the social peace. So,in my opinion, tobacco should be strictly forbidden, and smoking should be made illegal.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
题目:
Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
有些人进了号子之后放出来就变乖了,一些人觉得他们这伙人是最适合去给懵懂少年现身说法的。
多大程度上同意还是不同意?
考官范文:
1.开头段:完全同意题目的观点
It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.
讲真有犯罪前科的前科的人是可以变成有益于社会的。
我完全同意让他们去给懵懂少年现身说法的主意,这是一种警示他们不要触犯法律的好办法。
2.主体段:(第一个理由):犯人可以告诉青少年他们真实的犯罪经历。
年轻人会相信并被这些真实的故事所震慑,然后举例子
In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.
在我看来,骚年们更喜欢接受有实践经历的人来讲道理。
劳改犯可以告诉年轻人他们是如何参与到犯罪中去的,如何体验危险的犯罪生活,和号子里面的真实情况。
他们也可以打消一些年轻人觉得犯罪可以走向人生巅峰的无知念头。
一些年轻人对老人言其实还蛮冷漠的。
我可以想象他们大部分还是超级想听有犯罪前科人所讲的故事。
生动和可能恐怖的故事会更有说服力。
3.主体段:(第二个理由):让老师或警察来教育年轻人,不过这几个效果不一定很好
The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for school teachers to speak to
their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.
另外一种让劳改犯教育骚年的办法可能就没那么用了。
一个选择是让警察去学校开讲座教导骚年们。
这个对于让少年们知道关于触犯法律被逮着之后会发生什么还是有点用的,不过年轻人对于权威的数据还是有那么点叛逆的。
第二个选择是学校老师告诉孩子们犯罪是什么,不过我并不觉得孩子们会把老师讲的当做犯罪话题的重点信息来源。
最终,教育类电影可能有丢丢用,不过这种让孩子没有了互动和提问的机会。
4.总结段:总结观点
In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.
总之,我完全支持回归社会的劳改犯们帮助减少青少年们犯罪。
(287 words, band 9)
必记改写:
1.I completely agree with the idea that=I fully support the view that
2.become normal, productive members of society=turned their lives around
3.ex-prisoners=after serving a prison sentence
4.discourage them=deter teenagers
5.breaking the law=committing crimes。