适航资料
适航取证知识简介

适航取证知识简介适航取证是民用飞机步入市场投入运营的关键。
ARJ21-700飞机的研制不仅要取得技术上的成功,更要取得商业上的成功,取得商业成功就要经历三个取证阶段:型号合格证阶段(Type Certificate —TC、生产许可证阶段(Production Certificate —PC 和适航证阶段(Airworthi ness Certificate —AC。
型号合格证是中国民航局(CAAC对民用航空器设计批准的合格凭证。
这一阶段主要分为五个过程:申请、受理、审查、颁证和证后管理。
对于运输类飞机,申请人可参照中国民用航空规章(CCAR 21部《民用航空产品、零部件合格审定规定》的有关规定向CAAC提出申请。
CAAC各对申请人进行初步评审,通过后发出受理通知书,并成立专门的型号合格审定委员会(TCB和审查组(TCT。
审查阶段TCT会组织对申请人进行工程评审、工程试飞评审和最终的技术资料工程评审,工程评审重点验证申请人提交的工程资料对于适航标准的符合性以及申请人为向CAAC表明符合性所作的各项部件试验、地面试验和飞行试验;工程试飞评审则包括申请人的研制试飞、验证试飞及合格审定试飞,就ARJ21飞机而言,研制试飞和合格审定试飞在西安进行;最终技术资料工程评审则重点关注全套型号设计资料、计算分析、试验报告和要求的各种手册,如飞行手册、维修大纲等。
当TCB最终会议得出合格审定结论时,CAAC适航当局会对申请人颁发T C证。
证后管理工作由审查组移至经授权的审查部门负责。
生产许可证是CAAC寸已获得民用航空器产品设计批准、欲重复生产该产品的制造人所进行的资格性审定后的最终批准形式,以保证该产品符合经适航部门批准的型号设计。
在型号合格审定阶段应适时协调CAAC申请PC和取得PC的时间节点,并且在型号研制进入全面试制前,着手建立符合相关适航规章要求的质量控制体系、完成生产组织机构手册以及有关文件草案、运行生产质量控制体系。
适航管理知识点

《适航管理》知识点1、相关定义:适航性:民用航空器的适航性是指该航空器包括其部件及子系统整体性能和操纵特性在预期运行环境和使用限制下的安全性和物理完整性的一种品质。
适航标准:适航标准是一类特殊的技术性标准。
它是为保证实现民用航空器的适航性而制定的最低安全标准。
适航管理:民用航空器的适航管理是以保障民用航空器的安全性为目标的技术管理,是政府适航部门在制定了各种最低安全标准的基础上,对民用航空器的设计、制造、使用和维修等环节进行科学统一的审查、鉴定、监督和管理。
适航管理揭示和反映了民用航空器从设计、制造到使用、维修的客观规律,并施以符合其规律的一整套规范化的管理。
初始适航:初始适航管理,是在航空器交付使用之前,适航部门依据各类适航标准和规范,对民用航空器的设计和制造所进行的型号合格审定和生产许可审定,以确保航空器和航空器部件的设计、制造是按照适航部门的规定进行的。
初始适航管理是对设计、制造的控制。
持续适航:持续适航管理,是在航空器满足初始适航标准和规范、满足型号设计要求、符合型号合格审定基础,获得适航证、投入运行后,为保持它在设计制造时的基本安全标准或适航水平,为保证航空器能始终处于安全运行状态而进行的管理。
持续适航管理是对使用、维修的控制。
民用航空器:指除军事、海关、警察等部门使用的国家航空器之外的,用作民用航空飞行活动的航空器。
2、适航标准的特点及含义:“最低”有两层含义,一是表明该标准是基本的、起码的;二是表明该标准是经济负担最轻的。
其特点包括:法规性,务实性,稳健性和平衡性。
3、适航性责任:航空器的设计和制造单位对初始适航负责;航空器运行和维修单位对航空器持续适航负责。
4、适航管理的宗旨:保障民用航空安全,维护公众利益,促进民用航空事业的发展。
5、适航管理的分类及主要内容:适航管理按照工作性质的不同可分为三种类型:立法定标;颁发证件;证后监督检查6、适航管理在保障民用航空安全中的作用:航空器适航性是保障民用航空安全的物质基础;航空器的适航性在民用航空活动的各个环节和全过程影响着民用航空安全;从最低安全要求做起,向最高安全等级水准迈进;从颁发各种适航证件入手,实施质量监督管理,促进企业自我审核机制的建立。
CAAC基础-航空法规

第一部分基础部分第一章--适航1.适航管理法规(1)什么是适航性? P1是指该航空器包括其部件及子系统整体性能和操纵特性在预期运行环境和使用限制下的安全性和物理完整性的一种品质。
这种品质要求航空器应始终处于保持符合其型号设计和始终处于安全运行状态。
(2)适航性是在什么背景下提出来的?(什么需要) P1它的引出并不是出于理论或学术研究的需要,也不是出于设计、制造航空器的需要,而是出于为维护公众利益的民用航空立法的需要。
(3)什么是适航标准? P1是一类特殊的技术性标准。
它是为保证实现民用航空器的适航性而制定的最低安全标准.是国家法规的一部分,必须严格执行。
(4)适航标准又称为最低安全标准,含义? P1[1]最基本的[2]经济负担最轻的(5)航空器必须满足什么条件方能称为是适航的? P2[1]航空器必须始终满足符合其型号设计要求;[2]航空器必须始终处于安全运行状态.航空器的设计和制造单位要对航空器的初始适航性负主要责任。
航空器的使用单位(航空公司)和维修单位(包括所属的各类航空人员—飞行人员、维修人员、检验人员等),对航空器的持续适航性负主要责任。
2.适航管理:(6)什么是适航管理,宗旨为何? P2适航管理:以保障民用航空器的安全性为目标的技术管理,是政府适航部门在制定了各种最低安全标准的基础上,对民用航空器的设计、制造、使用和维修等环节进行科学统一的审查、鉴定、监督和管理。
由中国民用航空总局负责宗旨是:保障民用航空安全,维护公众利益,促进民用航空事业的发展。
(7)适航管理的分类及其关系? P3分为两大类:初始适航管理和持续适航管理。
初始适航管理是在航空器交付使用之前,对航空器设计、制造的控制。
持续适航管理是对航空器使用、维修的控制。
(8)适航管理的特点? P3权威性或法规性,国际性,完整性和统一性,动态发展性,独立性(9)适航管理的主要内容(按工作性质分)P3立法、定标,它是安全性的要求颁发适航证件是合法资格凭证监督检查是符合性的要求3.适航管理法规和文件体系的构成(10)适航管理法规和文件体系的构成? P4[1]法律、行政法规和规章,人大或者人大常委会:《中华人民共和国航空法》对民用航空器适航管理工作的内容、范围有原则的规定。
船舶适航标准

船舶适航标准
船舶适航是指船舶各个方面能够满足航行、作业中一般的安全要求,能够克服可预见的风险而安全航行。
适航包括三方面内容:
1. 适船:船舶的船体、结构能够抵抗航行、作业中能够预见到的风险。
按照“适船”的要求,承运人应当在开航前和开航时妥善装备船舶,使雷达、罗经等助航仪器、锚、缆绳等系泊设备以及海图、航路指南等航行资料齐全可靠。
2. 适员:船员配备能够满足正常航行及作业需要。
3. 适货:船舶适于载运和保管货物。
以上是船舶适航标准,仅供参考,建议查阅船舶行业标准或咨询专业人士了解更多信息。
第一章 飞行器适航基础

适航的起源及其发展
y 6、我国适航审定的发展历史简介。
y 70年代末,民航局成立了工程司,开始着手适航审定管理。 y 从1985年开始到1992年参照FAR逐步制定CCAR25部、23部、35
部、33部、27部、29部、21部等。到1992年基本建立了和FAR相 当的适航审定规章体系。 y 1985年和FAA合作对MD82在中国的转包生产进行监督检查。 y 1985年给Y12II型飞机颁发了型号合格证。并开始对进口中国的 国外飞机进行认可审定。
y 第八章 我国适航认证、管理中存在的挑战 y 适航管理机构、技术储备、适航审查人才等方面的问题; y 航空制造业适航意识薄弱,技术水平较低。
课程参考资料
y 【1】适航性:航空器合格审定引论,张曙光等,北京航空航天大学出版社,2011, 第一版.
y 【2】中国民用航空器适航管理,中国民用航空总局航空器适航司,1994, 中国民航 出版社.
y 2003年开始对ARJ21飞机进行适航审定。 y 2007年建立上海航空器适航审定中心。 y 到目前,适航审定司已颁发了30个左右的型号合格证,近200
个认可型号合格证。
适航的起源及其发展
y 7、小结
y 适航来源于公众利益的需求,以及航空工业发展的需求。 y 适航随着航空工业的进步而发展,航空工业是适航发展的基
环境 人员
航空器
适航覆盖领域
飞 行 器
设计
结构 动力 飞控 测控 环控 能源
…
加工
在飞行器的整个寿命周期
内对飞行器的各部件、各
系统的设计、使用和维修 进行有效管理。
制造
使用
维护
课程简介
y 建立和了解适航相关的基本理念和原则; y 了解适航要求、适航法规、适航认证、型号合格审定管理、
2012级机务《适航知识》期末复习题

适航管理复习提纲1.民用航空产品是指:民用航空器航空发动机螺旋桨2.民用航空器是指除执行()任务之外的航空器军事海关警察3.适航性事以预期运行环境的航空器使用限制为界定条件的;(预期运行环境包括:大气、机场、航路、空管。
使用限制包括:速度、高度、重心、重量)4.航空器必须始终()才能称其是能适航的符合其型号设计并始终处于安全运行状态5.适航标准是为保证实现民用航空器的适航性而制定的()最低安全标准6.中国民用航空器适航管理的机构是:中国民用航空总局<<中华人民共和国民用航空器适航管理条例>>中明确规定民用航空器的适航管理由____民用航空总局负责7.中国民用航空总局是()。
国务院主管全国民航事务的直属机构8.适航管理的对象和最终目标是()。
航空器9.第一部最完整,最重要的国际航空法典是____巴黎公约10. ICAO的中文名称()。
国际民用航空组织11.国际民用航空组织正式成立于:1947年12.国际民用航空组织的()是该组织的最高权力机构大会13.<<国际民用航空公约>>的附件中大部分是由()负责编写的。
空中航行委员会14.<<国际民用航空公约>>附件一的名称是()。
人员执照的颁发15.中国民航法规体系中属于国家法律,具有最高效力的是哪一部?_____中华人民共和国民用航空法16.国务院通过的由总理以国务院令发布的关于民用航空行政法规为中国民航法律体系的____第二层次民用航空行政法规是____由国务院总理以国务院令发布或授权民航总局发布的,为民航法律体系的第二层次17.民航总局局长以总局令发布的是什么法____中国民用航空规章18.制定民用航空飞机标准及管理规章的职责属于()。
中国民用航空总局19.负责对所辖地域的民用航空事务实施行业管理和监督的职责属于()。
民航地区管理局20.民航地区管理局共设置了多少个民航安全监督管理办公室____3321.中华人民共和国民用航空法规定,从事飞行的民用航空器,应当携带下列文件()。
航空运输东方航空培训试题库适航性资料

适航性资料管理1、质量管理部是东航适航性资料的。
A.主体机构 B. 管理机构 C.主管机构 D.收发机构2、质量管理部负责定期发布一次各类资料的最新有效版本信息。
A. 每季度B. 每半年C. 每个月D. 每一年质量3、管理部对发出的适航性资料的合法性和负责。
A. 合理性B. 适用性C.有效性D. 规范性4、勤务单位应配备航线维修管理手册、除冰和防冰大纲以及。
A. 飞机维护手册B.飞机勤务手册C.维修工程管理手册D.以上都是5、各型飞机有关制造厂向航空公司提供的,由质量管理部按各单位需要编制需求计划,统一办理申购或索取手续。
A. 现行有效资料B. 资料C.持续适航资料D. 持续适航文件6、收到的订购资料由质量管理部发放给公司相关部门和各相关飞机维修实施单位、和。
A.维修实施站B. 主维修基地C. 各维修基地D.定检维修单位7、资料注册内容包括:资料编号、资料类型、资料说明、中/英文标题、、版本日期、接收日期、资料来源等A. 供应厂家B. 颁布日期C.版本号D. 以上都是8、局方规章类的资料,质量管理部应存放一套完整的硬拷贝并。
A. 负责将电子文档上传到东航股份局域网B. 负责将电子文档上传到“东航资料档案管理系统”C. 以上都是9、资料注册中必须配置资料的适用性,其中包括。
A.机型、机队的配置,必要时还要配置到具体的飞机号B. 机型、机队的配置C. 机型、飞机号的配置D. 飞机号的配置10、质量管理部门应对适航性资料的现行有效性及进行监督检查。
A. 监控状态B.管理情况C. 接收单位D. 网络资料11、资料管理员将最新有效的MMEL(DDG)、MRB发放至工程技术部进行编译之后,在不超过的时间内应该能够收到由工程技术部发回的已经编译完成的相应有效的MEL以及CMP。
A. 一个月B.六个月C. 三个月D. 15天12、资料管理部门应建立文件收发、和借阅制度。
A. 注册B.登记C. 回执D. 以上都是13、对于接收到的紧急AD,资料管理员应在工作日内,将这份AD 注册并上传至网上。
适航知识简介

五、零部件的批准方式
• 局方不为生产设施位于中华人民共和国境 外的材料、零部件和机载设备的制造人颁 发PMA。 • PMA批准包括:设计批准,生产批准,装机 批准 • 局方将对PMA持有人及CTSOA持有人生产的 零部件进行适航检查,在确认零部件符合 经批准的型号设计并处于安全可用状态后, 颁发适航批准标签。
生产审定 型号审定
1.型号合格证TC 2.型号设计批准书TDA 3.补充型号合格证STC 4.改装设计批准书MDA 5.型号认可证 VTC 6.补充型号认可证VSTC 7.民用航空器材料、零 部件、机载设备设 计批准认可书 VDA
12.适航证
13.出口适航证 14.外国适航证认可书 15.特许飞行证 16.适航批准标签
八、合格审定程序
提交 申请书及 要求的资料 颁发 证件
受理 通知书
局方组织 审查
证后 管理
八、合格审定程序
谢谢 欢迎指正
2015-3-27
21
六、零部件制造人批准书申请书
七、PMA的适用范围
除以下零部件外,生产已经获得TC、TDA的民 用航空产品上的加改装或者更换用的零部件, 应当取得PMA 根据型号合格证书或生产许可证生产的零部件; 根据民航总局颁发的技术标准规定项目批准 书生产的项目; 符合民航总局认为适用的行业技术标准或国 家技术标准的标准件(如螺栓、螺母等); 航空器的所有人或承租人按照民航总局批准 的其他方式为维修或改装自己的航空器而生产 的零部件 。
适航审定
四、零部件合格审定标准
五、零部件的批准Βιβλιοθήκη 式零部件的批准方式(国内) 颁发PMA 颁发CTSOA 随民用航空产品的型号合格审定、型号设计批 准审定、补充型号审定和改装设计批准合格审 定一起批准(随机审定) 零部件的批准方式(国外) 随民用航空产品的型号认可合格审定或补充型 号认可合格审定一起批准(随国外认可批准) 颁发设计批准认可证(VDA)(TSOA件) 民航局规定的其他零部件批准方式
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)][Rules and Regulations][Pages 58003-58006]From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [][FR Doc No: 2012-22924]––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration14 CFR Part 39[Docket No. FAA-2006-24785; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-20-AD; Amendment 39-17196; AD 2012-19-01]RIN 2120-AA64Airworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines Reciprocating EnginesAGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.ACTION: Final rule.––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Lycoming Engines (L)O-360, (L)IO-360, AEIO-360, O-540, IO-540, AEIO-540, (L)TIO-540, IO-580, and IO-720 series reciprocating engines. That AD currently requires replacing certain crankshafts in the affected engines. This AD continues to require replacing certain crankshafts, corrects the start date of affected engine models in Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 569A to the start date in Supplement No. 1 to Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009, and includes additional (formerly experimental) IO-390, AEIO-390, and AEIO-580 series engine models having affected crankshafts. This AD was prompted by Lycoming Engines discovering that the start date of affected engine models in MSB No. 569A is incorrect and the need to include additional engine models having the affected crankshafts. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the crankshaft, which will result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible loss of the aircraft. DATES: This AD is effective October 24, 2012.The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of October 24, 2012.The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain other publication listed in the AD as of November 3, 2006 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006). ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Lycoming, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701; phone: 570 323-6181; fax: 570-327-7101, or on the internet at. You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.Examining the AD DocketYou may examine the AD docket on the Internet at ; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516-228-7337; fax: 516-794-5531; email: norman.perenson@.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:DiscussionWe issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2006-20-09, amendment 39-14778 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006). That AD applies to the specified products. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on April 6, 2012 (77 FR 20743). The original NPRM (76 FR 50152, August 12, 2011) proposed to retain the requirements of AD 2006-20-09 to replace certain crankshafts and to correct the start date of MSB No. 569A from March 1, 1997 to January 1, 1997, which is the start date in Supplement No. 1 to Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009. The SNPRM proposed to add IO-390, AEIO-390, and AEIO-580 series engine models that have the affected crankshafts to the applicability of the AD. The SNPRM also proposed to change Service Instruction No. 1009AS, dated May 25, 2006, to Service Instruction No. 1009AU, dated November 18, 2009, because Lycoming updated this service instruction. The changes to Service Instruction 1009AS do not affect the engine overhaul time.CommentsWe gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comment received on the proposal and the FAA's response to that comment.Request To Determine if AD Applies to IO-360 EngineA commenter asked if the AD applies to the Lycoming Engine IO-360-A3B6D. We reply that this engine is listed in Lycoming MSB No. 569A, so if the crankshaft serial number of that engine is also listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, then the AD applies.Changes to Previous Credit ParagraphWe reviewed our previous credit paragraph in the SNPRM (77 FR 20743, April 6, 2012) and found that not all the ADs and service bulletins (SBs) listed in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of the SNPRM resolved the unsafe conditions. Accordingly, we changed the Credit for Previous Actions paragraphs, paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, retaining only Lycoming MSB No. 569A and AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006) in the AD to resolve the unsafe condition and deleting all other ADs and SBs referenced in the SNPRM. Paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) now read:''(1) If you previously complied with AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006), no further action is required. (2) If you previously accomplished Lycoming MSB No. 569A, no further action is required.''Costs of Compliance ParagraphWe reviewed the cost estimate made in AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006) when we added the new affected engine models to the SNPRM (77 FR 20743, April 6, 2012). We found that the cost estimate in AD 2006-20-09 included the number of affected engines worldwide rather than those installed only on aircraft of U.S. registry. We also found that the cost estimate in AD 2006-20-09 already included the engine models that we have now added to the applicability of this AD. Accordingly, we changed the number of affected engine models from 3,774 to 2,831 and the overall cost estimate from $60,384,000 to $45,288,000.ConclusionWe reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.Costs of ComplianceWe estimate that this AD affects 2,831 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. Because the AD compliance interval coincides with engine overhaul or other engine maintenance, we estimate no additional labor hours will be needed to comply with this AD. Required parts will cost about $16,000 per engine. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to be $45,288,000. Our estimate is independent of any possible warranty coverage.Authority for This RulemakingTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ''General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.Regulatory FindingsWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,(2) Is not a ''significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.Adoption of the AmendmentAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:PART 39–AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.§ 39.13 [Amended]2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD) 2006-20-09, Amendment 39-14778 (71 FR 57407), and adding the following new AD:FAAAviation Safety AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE /aircraft/safety/alerts//fr/advanced.html2012-19-01 Lycoming Engines: Amendment 39-17196; Docket No. FAA-2006-24785; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-20-AD.(a) Effective DateThis AD is effective October 24, 2012.(b) Affected ADsThis AD supersedes AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006).(c) ApplicabilityThis AD applies to Lycoming Engines (L)O-360, (L)IO-360, AEIO-360, IO-390, AEIO-390, O-540, IO-540, AEIO-540, (L)TIO-540, IO-580, AEIO-580, and IO-720 series reciprocating engines listed by engine model number and serial number in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 569A, dated April 11, 2006, and those engines with crankshafts listed by crankshaft serial number in Table 5 of Lycoming MSB 569A, dated April 11, 2006. These applicable engines are manufactured new, rebuilt, overhauled, or had a crankshaft installed after January 1, 1997, according to Supplement No. 1 to Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009.(d) Unsafe ConditionThis AD results from Lycoming Engines discovering that the March 1, 1997 start date of affected engine models in Lycoming MSB No. 569A, is incorrect. This AD also results from the need to include the IO-390, AEIO-390, and AEIO-580 series engine models having affected crankshafts. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the crankshaft, which will result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible loss of the aircraft.(e) ComplianceYou are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the actions have already been done.(f) Engines For Which Action Is RequiredIf you did not previously comply with AD 2006-20-09 or with MSB No. 569A, do the following:(1) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your engine serial number (S/N), and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your crankshaft S/N, replace the affected crankshaft with a crankshaft that is not listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the earliest of the following:(i) The time of the next engine overhaul as specified in Lycoming Service Instruction No.1009AU, dated November 18, 2009; or(ii) The next separation of the crankcase, or(iii) No later than 12 years from the time the crankshaft first entered service or was last overhauled, whichever is later.(2) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, does not list your engine S/N, and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A does list your crankshaft S/N (an affected crankshaft was installed as a replacement), replace the affected crankshaft with a crankshaft that is not listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the earliest of the following:(i) The time of the next engine overhaul as specified in Lycoming Service Instruction No.1009AU, dated November 18, 2009; or(ii) The next separation of the crankcase, or(iii) No later than 12 years from the time the crankshaft first entered service or was last overhauled, whichever is later.(g) Credit for Previous Actions(1) If you previously complied with AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006), no further action is required.(2) If you previously accomplished Lycoming MSB No. 569A, no further action is required.(3) If Lycoming Engines manufactured new, rebuilt, overhauled, or repaired your engine, or replaced the crankshaft in your engine before January 1, 1997, and you have not had the crankshaft replaced, no further action is required.(4) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your engine S/N, and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, does not list your crankshaft S/N, no further action is required.(5) For engine model TIO-540-U2A, S/N L-4641-61A, no action is required.(h) Prohibition Against Installing Certain CrankshaftsAfter the effective date of this AD, do not install any crankshaft that has a S/N listed in Table 5 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, into any engine.(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request. AMOCs approved for AD 2002-19-03 (67 FR 59139, September 20, 2002) and AD 2006-20-09 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006) are approved as AMOCs for this AD.(j) Related InformationFor more information about this AD, contact Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 516-228-7337; fax: 516-794-5531; email: norman.perenson@.(k) Material Incorporated by Reference(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.(2) You must use the following service information to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on October 24, 2012.(i) Lycoming Service Instruction No. 1009AU, dated November 18, 2009.(ii) Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin, Supplement No. 1 to Service Bulletin No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009.(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on November 3, 2006 (71 FR 57407, September 29, 2006).(i) Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006.(ii)Reserved.(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Lycoming, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701; phone: 570 323-6181; fax: 570-327-7101, or on the Internet at.(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.(7) You may view this service information at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: /federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 27, 2012.Colleen M. D'Alessandro,Assistant Manager, Engine & Directorate,Aircraft Certification Service.。