Geological and isotopic evidence for magmatic-hydrothermal
Geology, C–H–O–S–Pb isotope systematics and geochronology of the Yindongpo gold

Geology,C –H –O –S –Pb isotope systematics and geochronology of the Yindongpo gold deposit,Tongbai Mountains,central China:Implication for ore genesisJing Zhang a ,Yan-Jing Chen b ,c ,⁎,Franco Pirajno d ,Jun Deng a ,Hua-Yong Chen c ,e ,Chang-Ming Wang aaState Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China bKey Laboratory of Orogen and Crust Evolution,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China cKey Laboratory for Mineralogy and Metallogeny,Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guangzhou 510640,China dCentre for Exploration Targeting,School of Earth and Environment,University of Western Australia,35Stirling Highway,Crawley WA 6008,Australia eCODES ARC Center of Excellence in Ore Deposits,University of Tasmania,7001,Australiaa b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o Article history:Received 19September 2012Received in revised form 10January 2013Accepted 13January 2013Available online 11February 2013Keywords:GeologyIsotope geochemistry Ore genesisYindongpo gold deposit Tongbai MountainsThe Yindongpo gold deposit is located in the Weishancheng Au –Ag-dominated polymetallic ore belt in Tongbai Mountains,central China.The ore bodies are stratabound within carbonaceous quartz –sericite schists of the Neoproterozoic Waitoushan Group.The ore-forming process can be divided into three stages,represented by early barren quartz veins,middle polymetallic sul fide veinlets and late quartz –carbonate stockworks,with most ore minerals,such as pyrite,galena,native gold and electrum being formed in the middle stage.The average δ18O water values changed from 9.7‰in the early stage,through 4.9‰in the middle stage,to −5.9‰in the late stage,with the δD values ranging between −65‰and −84‰.The δ13C CO 2values of ore fluids are between −3.7‰and +6.7‰,with an average of 1.1‰.The H –O –C isotope systematics indi-cate that the ore fluids forming the Yindongpo gold deposit were probably initially sourced from a process of metamorphic devolatilization,and with time gradually mixed with meteoric water.The δ34S values range from −0.3‰to +5.2‰,with peaks ranging from +1‰to +4‰.Fourteen sul fide samples yield 206Pb/204Pb values of 16.990–17.216,207Pb/204Pb of 15.419–15.612and 208Pb/204Pb of 38.251–38.861.Both S and Pb isotope ratios are similar to those of the main lithologies of the Waitoushan Group,but differ from other lithologic units and granitic batholiths in the Tongbai area,which suggest that the ore metals and fluids originated from the Waitoushan Group.The available K –Ar and 40Ar/39Ar ages indicate that the ore-forming process mainly took place in the period of 176–140Ma,during the transition from collisional compression to extension and after the closure of the oceanic seaway in the Qinling Orogen.The Yindongpo gold deposit is interpreted as a stratabound orogenic-style gold system formed during the transition phase from collisional compression to extension.The ore metals in the Waitoushan Group were extracted,transported and then accumulated in the carbona-ceous sericite schist layer.The carbonaceous sericite schist layer,especially at the junction of collapsed anti-cline axis and fault structures,became the most favorable locus for the ore bodies.©2013Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.1.IntroductionThe concept of orogenic-type gold deposit was first introduced by Bohlke (1982)and then thoroughly addressed by Groves et al.(1998),Kerrich et al.(2000)and Goldfarb et al.(2001)to de fine a class of structurally controlled gold deposits formed by fluids,assumed to have originated mainly from syn-to post-orogenic metamorphic devolatilization.Several structurally-controlled lode gold deposits in China and elsewhere have been assigned to the class of orogenic gold de-posits (Chen et al.,2000a,2000b,2001,2012a,2012b;Chen et al.,2005a,2008;Crispini et al.,2011;Fan et al.,2003;Hart et al.,2002;Jiang et al.,2009a,2009b;Kerrich et al.,2000;Mao et al.,2002;Rui et al.,2002;Zhao et al.,2011;Zhou et al.,2002)and interpreted to have mainly formed during continental collision tectonics.Consequently,a tectonic model for collisional orogeny,metallogeny and fluid flow (CMF model)was established to interpret the metallogenic mechanism and space –time patterns of various genetic types including orogenic gold lodes (Chen and Fu,1992;Chen et al.,2004;Pirajno,2009,2012).Many structurally-controlled Ag±Pb –Zn,Pb –Zn±Ag,Cu and Mo lodes have also been interpreted as orogenic type (Chen,2006),including the Tieluping and Yindonggou Ag deposits in Henan province (Chen et al.,2004,2005b;Sui et al.,2000;Zhang et al.,2009);the Gaojiabaozi Ag de-posit in Liaoning province (Wang et al.,2008;Yu et al.,2009);the Tiemurt Pb –Zn –Cu (Zhang et al.,2012),the Wulasigou Cu (Zheng et al.,2012)and Mengku Fe (Wan et al.,2012)deposits in Xinjiang;the Lengshuibeigou,Xigou and Wangpingxigou Pb –Zn±Ag deposits inOre Geology Reviews 53(2013)343–356⁎Corresponding author at:Key Laboratory of Orogen and Crust Evolution,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China.E-mail address:yjchen@ (Y.-J.Chen).0169-1368/$–see front matter ©2013Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved./10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.01.017Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirectOre Geology Reviewsj ou r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w.e l s e v i e r.c o m /l o c a t e /o r e g e or e vHenan province(Qi et al.,2007,2009;Yao et al.,2008);the Bainaimiao Cu±Au deposit in Inner Mongolia(Li et al.,2008);and the Zhifang Mo (Deng et al.,2008),the Dahu Mo–Au(Li et al.,2011a;Ni et al.,2008, 2012)and the Longmendian Mo(Li et al.,2011b)deposits in Henan province.Recent advances have not only improved the understanding of ore genesis and exploration targeting in orogenic belts,but also intro-duced several new uncertainties.One of them is whether the orogenic type deposit can occur as stratabound style;if not,how to clarify the ge-netic type of deposits formed by metamorphic ore-formingfluids that focused in specific lithologies(e.g.,carbonaceous beds,stratigraphic un-conformities);and if so,what are the geochemical signatures and metal sources of these stratabound orogenic-type deposits.Several gold de-posits,such as Muruntau in Uzbekistan,Kumtor in Kyrgyzstan,Sukhoi Log in Russia,Homestake in USA(Bierlein and Maher,2001;Goldfarb et al.,2001)and Sawayardun in Xinjiang(Chen et al.,2012a,b;Liu et al.,2007),Yangshan in Gansu(Yang et al.,2006,2009)and Yindongpo in Henan(Chen,1995;Zhou et al.,2002),show stratabound characteris-tics but alsofit an orogenic-style of mineral system.In this contribution we report the results of studies on the Yindongpo gold deposit,which occurs in the Weishancheng ore belt in Tongbai Mountains,Henan province,central China(Zhang et al., 2011).The Yindongpo deposit contains32,337kg Au at an average grade of7.61g/t,130.5t Ag at an average grade of38.41g/t, and26,792t Pb at an average grade of0.95%(Zhang Guan,pers. comm.).The deposit is characterized by a stratabound to stratiform ge-ometry,and has attracted the interest of geologists for its metallogenic style,ore genesis,spatial distribution and economic potential(Chen and Fu,1992;HBGMR,1985;Hu et al.,1988;Luo,1992;Xu et al.,1995; Zhang et al.,2009).However,an integrated study on the deposit has not been reported as yet.This paper summarizes the geology and H–O–C–S stable and radiogenic isotopic systematics of the Yindongpo gold deposit,and discusses the sources of ore metals andfluids,as well as the ore-forming mechanism(s).2.Geological setting2.1.Regional geologyThe Tongbai Mountains are part of the Central China Orogen (Fig.1A)that was formed during the Mesozoic collision between the Yangtze and North China continents(Wu and Zheng,2012),with the Shang-Dan fault zone being interpreted as main suture(Fig.1B).The Shang-Dan suture zone comprises ophiolite slices and Paleozoic–Triassic sediments,the latter containing radiolarian fossils(Du et al., 1997;Feng et al.,1994).North of the Shang-Dan suture is the northern Qinling accretionary belt(Chen et al.,2009)that includes the Qinling Metamorphic Complex,the Erlangping and Kuanping terranes.These terranes are south of the Luanchuan fault,which is accepted as the boundary between the Qinling Orogen and the reactivated southern margin of the North China Craton(Fig.1B).The Qinling Metamorphic Complex comprises the Qinling Group(pre-Rodinian metamorphic basement)and Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic granitoids which were mostly formed in magmatic-arc settings.The Erlangping terrane, which hosts the Weishancheng ore belt,is bound by the Zhu-Xia fault to south and the Waxuezi fault to north(Fig.1B,C),and mainly com-prises Neoproterozoic–Early Paleozoic volcano-sedimentary succes-sions and associated intrusions that formed in a back-arc basin(Chen et al.,2004;Hu et al.,1988;Sun et al.,2002).In the Kuanping terrane, the Kuanping Group mainly consists of Mesoproterozoic muscovite–biotite(quartz)schists,metagabbros,basaltic rocks and ophiolite slices, and is interpreted as a Mesoproterozoic ophiolite complex accreted to the southern margin of North China Craton(Gao et al.,1991;He etal.,Fig.1.Schematic map showing the geology of the Tongbai Mountains(Zhang et al.,2011).A)Location of the Qinling–Tongbai–Dabie Mountains.B)Tectonic framework of the Qinling–Tongbai–Dabie Mountains.C)Geology of the Tongbai Mountains and the location of the Yindongpo gold deposit.SDF,Shang-Dan suture zone;MLF,Mian-Lue suture zone.SBF,San-Bao fault;F1,Machaoying fault;F2,Luanchuan fault;F3,Waxuezi fault;F4,Zhu-Xia fault;F5,Tong-Shang fault;F6,Tan-Lu fault;F7,Duanzhuang(Duanzhuang–Duimenchong)fault.344J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews53(2013)343–3562009;Hu et al.,1988;Luo,1992;Zhao et al.,2004,2009).The Kuanping Group is locally covered by or interleaved with Neoproterozoic to Early Paleozoic metamorphic sediments,and thereby is interpreted to have developed in Neoproterozoic or Early Paleozoic(Chen et al.,2009;and reference therein).The Weishancheng Au–Ag-dominated polymetallic ore belt in the northern Tongbai Mountains,strikes WNW for about20km with a width of ca.1km,and is located in the Erlangping terrane,north of the Zhu-Xia fault(F4in Fig.1C).Its eastern and western extensions are covered by Wucheng and Nanyang Cenozoic basins,respectively. The ore belt contains the Yindongpo Au deposit,the Poshan Ag deposit and the Yindongling Ag-dominated polymetallic deposit,as well as nu-merous small ore deposits or occurrences(Figs.1and2).2.2.Local geologyAll the deposits and occurrences in the Weishancheng ore belt are hosted in low-grade metamorphic carbonaceous rocks of the Waitoushan Group(Figs.1and2),which has a total thickness of about2500m and consists of mica schist,quartz–mica schist,plagioclase–amphibole schist, marble and minor quartzite.The Waitoushan Group is divided into the Upper Waitoushan,Mid-dle Waitoushan and Lower Waitoushan Formations(abbreviated as UWF,MWF and LWF respectively in the following text andfigures), each containing several members(Fig.3).The UWF is mainly composed of quartz–mica schist.The MWF comprises plagioclase–amphibole schist and carbonaceous quartz–sericite schist.The LWF contains more plagioclase–amphibole schist and marble.In the Tongbai Mountains,the Waitoushan Group is unique for its high abundance of organic carbon,Au,Ag and other metallic elements(Chen and Fu, 1992;HBGMR,1994).The Yindongpo gold deposit is hosted in the sec-ond member of MWF(Fig.3).The axis of the Heqianzhuang anticline strikes90°–120°,and is subparallel with the regional faults(Fig.2).This anticline comprises the Waitoushan Group and Dalishu Formation of the Erlangping Group.The anticlinal axis dies to the east and the hinge plunges towards the west.The Waitoushan Group occurs along the axis of the anticline,whereas the Dalishu Formation forms its southern limb.The orebodies are mainly sited in the hinge and/or along the two limbs of the anticline(Figs.2B,4,5A,C).The NW-trending faults are the dominant regional structures,and are crosscut by the ENE-trending,post-ore faults(Fig.2A).The largest fault is labeled F1and controls the Yindongpo deposit(Fig.2B).The anticline was intruded by granitic plutons,such as the Taoyuan Paleozoic granodiorite pluton and Liangwan monzogranite pluton.The Taoyuan granodiorite yields biotite K–Ar ages of390–357Ma,with the magma being sourced from the basement of northern Qinling accre-tionary belt(Zhang et al.,1999,2000).It intruded the Erlangping Group and Early Paleozoic quartz diorite then was intruded by granites,such as the Liangwan pluton,of Mesozoic age(Yanshanian;see below) (Figs.1and2).The Liangwan monzogranite pluton intruded the Dalishu Formation of the Erlangping Group(Figs.1and2)at128–111Ma(bio-tite K–Ar,whole rock Rb–Sr isochrones)and originated from partial melting of the Tongbai complex in southern Qinling terrane,implying that the lower crust of northern Tongbai Mountains(corresponding to northern Qinling accretionary belt)contains the components fromtheFig.2.Schematic map showing regional and ore geology of the Yindongpo Au deposit.A)Geology of the Weishancheng ore belt after Zhang et al.(2011).B)Geology and distribution of the Yindongpo orebodies,modified after HBGMR(1994).Abbreviations:XLZ,Xialaozhuang;GLZ,Guolaozhuang;ZZ,Zhangzhuang;LJC,Luanjiachong;JZ,Jiangzhuang;WG,Weigou;NXG, Nanxiaogou;ZhZ,Zhuzhuang.345J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews53(2013)343–356southern Qinling terrane,via a northward-directed continental subducting slab (Zhang et al.,1999,2000,2011).3.Deposit geology3.1.Characteristics of the orebodiesThe Yindongpo gold deposit covers an area 2km long and 0.6–0.9km wide (Fig.2B).The distribution of the orebodies is strictly con-trolled by carbonaceous beds (graphite-rich quartz –sericite schists)and the Heqianzhuang anticline and fault systems (Figs.2and 4A).The orebodies are typically stratabound and lenticular in shape,or occur as saddles and veins,and generally dip with the hosting strata (Fig.2B).The orebodies in the northern limb of the anticline are steeper than those in the southern limb (Fig.2B).The contacts between orebodies and wallrocks are gradational and are determined by a cut-off grade.The depth of orebodies increases from southeast to northwest.Most of orebodies are hosted in the second member of MWF (Figs.2B,3and 4),especially in the silici fied quartz –sericite schist and/or carbonaceous quartz –sericite schist.The No.0exploration line divides the Yingdongpo deposit into east-ern and western sectors.The eastern sector contains 19ore bodies,with Nos.1,2,3and 3–1being thick,long and continuously mineralized (Figs.2B and 4).In the western ore sector,Nos.51,52,54and 55are the most important orebodies,but are thinner,smaller and less contin-uously mineralized than those in the eastern sector (Figs.2B and 4).The No.1orebody is the largest,with Au reserves accounting for 78%of the ore in eastern sector (HBGMR,1994).It is 1600m long,600m deep and 8m wide,with average grades of 6.23g/t Au and 50g/t Ag,respectively.The ores were mined by open pitting and underground operation.3.2.Ore types and ore mineral assemblagesAltered tectonite breccia,fine vein-disseminated silici fied schist,and silici fied (carbonaceous)quartz –sericite schist (Fig.5),are all Au,Ag,Fe,Cu,Sb,As,Bi,Pb,Zn,Co and Sn enriched,but only Au attained suf ficient ore grades to be economically extracted.Ore minerals include sul fides,native elements,sulfates and oxides (Fig.5),such as pyrite,chalcopy-rite,sphalerite,galena,native gold,electrum and argentite,and ac-counting for up to 10%of the ore by volume.Gangue minerals are mainly quartz,sericite and carbonate.Fine-grained graphite is com-monly present in the ores (Fig.5D).Cataclastic textures and fissure-fillings are commonly observed.Stockworks,veinlets,disseminations,and banded ores are the main ore styles (Fig.5).3.3.Mineralization stages and wallrock alterationOn the basis of the paragenetic sequences of minerals (Fig.6),ore petrography and crosscutting relationships,the ore-forming process can be divided into three stages,namely,an early-stage barren quartz veins or replacement with or without pyrite (Fig.5F),a middlestageFig.3.Lithostratigraphy and ore metal concentrations of the Waitoushan Group.From HBGMR (1994).346J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews 53(2013)343–356with polymetallic sul fides (Fig.5G,H),and a late stage of quartz –carbonate veinlets (Fig.5I).Abundant pyrite,galena,native gold,electrum and other ore minerals formed in the middle stage.Three stage fluid –rock interactions resulted in wallrock alteration,mainly including silici fication,sericitization,carbonation and chloritization.Silici fication is the most prominent and in the early stage it was pervasive.Locally,the wallrocks were completely re-placed by fine-grained quartz with minor sericite,forming sericite-bearing siliceous replacement and/or quartz veins.In this case,the primary fabrics of wallrocks,such as schistosity and cleavage,cannot be observed because they were obliterated by pervasive silici fication.In general,ore grades increase with increasing intensity of hydrother-mal alteration.4.Samples and analytical methodsMost samples in this study were collected from No.1orebody at Levels of 155,145,115and 75(the digits represent the meters above the sea level).Sampling was carried out taking into account the field recognition of lateral zonation and the three-stage evolution of the mineralization.Rock samples collected from different strata were pulverized in an agate mill under 200meshes.Mineral aggregates were taken from the specimens using tweezers and then were crushed into grains with sizes of 0.1–0.5mm.After panning and filtration,clean mineral grains (quartz,calcite,and sul-fides)were handpicked under the binocular microscope.In order to eliminate other interlocking minerals (e.g.sul fides),quartz separates were soaked in HNO 3-solution at a temperature between 60and 80°C for 12h and rinsed with deionized water.Then the separates were treated 6times using supersonic centrifugal clari fier and rinsed with deionized water for a week.The last rinsed water was monitored by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer to con firm that no ions were left.The samples were dried in an oven before analysis.For sul fides,approximately 10to 50mg were first leached in acetone to remove surface contamination and then washed by distilled water and dried at 60°C in the oven.The carbonate separates were only washed by distilled water and dried at 60°C in the oven.The analytical methods were explained in detail by Ding (1988).The carbon isotopic composition of fluid inclusion was measured on CO 2.Separated from fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite during thermal decrepitation,the CO 2gas was collected and condensed using a liquid nitrogen-alcohol cooling trap (−70°C)for analysis on a MAT-252mass spectrometry.Hydrogen isotope analysis of water contained in fluid in-clusions was collected in a similar manner.After collection the water was puri fied and then reduced using zinc to produce hydrogen which was analyzed on a MAT-253mass spectrograph.To measure oxygen iso-tope ratios,quartz separates were reacted with BrF 5at 500–550°C for at least 5h to generate O 2which was condensed using liquid nitrogen.The collected O 2was converted to CO 2at about 700°C with platinum as cat-alyzer,and then the CO 2was analyzed on MAT-252mass spectrometry.Sulfur isotope ratios in sul fides were analyzed on SO 2using Delta-S mass spectrometer.For lead isotope ratios,approximately 10to 50mg of sul fide samples was first leached in acetone to remove surface contamination and then washed by distilled water and dried at 60°C in the oven.Washed sul fides were dissolved in dilute mix solution of nitric acid and hydro fluoric acid.Following ion exchange chemistry,the lead in the solution was loaded onto rhenium filaments using a phosphoric acid –silica gel emitter.The lead isotopic compositions were measured on MAT-261thermal ioniza-tion mass spectrometer with the standard sample NBS 981.The H –O –C isotopes were measured in the State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Science.Isotopic data were reported in per mil relative to the Vienna SMOW standard for oxygen and hydrogen,and the Peedee Belemnite limestone (PDB)standard for carbon.Both sulfur and lead isotope analyses were finished at the Open Laboratory of Iso-topic Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences.The Sul-fur isotopic compositions were reported relative to the Canyon Diablo Triolite (CDT)standard.Total uncertainties were estimated to be bet-ter than ±0.2‰for δ18O,±2.0‰for δD,±0.2‰for δ13C,and ±0.2‰for δ34S at the σlevel respectively.Estimated precision for the 206Pb/204Pb,207Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb ratios is about 0.1%,0.09%and 0.30%at the 2σlevel respectively.The K –Ar isochron age was analyzed by RGA-10dating system in Key Laboratory of Orogen and Crust Evolution,PekingUniversityFig.4.Simpli fied exploration sections showing orebodies of the Yindongpo Au deposit.Modi fied after HBGMR (1994).347J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews 53(2013)343–356and the systematic error of K –Ar dating is estimated to be b 4%.The 40Ar/39Ar plateau age was analyzed at the Geochronology Research Laboratory of Queen's University,Ontario,Canada.40Ar/39Ar analyses were performed by standard laser step-heating techniques described in detail by Clark et al.(1998).All data have been corrected for blanks,mass discrimination,and neutron-induced interferences.A plateau age is obtained when the apparent ages of at least three consecutive steps,comprising a minimum of 55%of the 39Ar k released,agreeFig.5.Geology,ore type and mineral assemblages of the Yindongpo gold deposit.A)Heqianzhuang anticline axis shown at an open pit;B)ore-hosting fault developed along the boundary between carbonaceous schist and two-mica schist;C)north limb of the No.55orebody (30°∠60°)and its foot-and hanging-walls;D)a small-size anticline in altered carbonaceous quartz schist;E)pyrite-bearing quartz veinlets in carbonaceous quartz schist;F)early-stage barren,milky quartz vein;G)pyrite-rich,high-grade ore;H)middle-stage ore rich in pyrite and galena;I)late-stage quartz-carbonate vein;J)chalcopyrite armored with covellite;K)euhedral pyrite in quartz;L.pyrite with cataclastic texture;M)sphalerite with thin film of tiny galena;N)sphalerite containing chalcopyrite droplets,forming exsolution texture;O)early-stage pyrite replaced by galena.348J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews 53(2013)343–356within 2σerror with the integrated age of the plateau segment.Errors and isotope-correlation diagrams represent the analytical precision at ±2σ.5.Isotope systematics 5.1.Hydrogen –oxygen isotopesThe δD and δ18O values for the Yindongpo ore deposit are listed in Table 1.The δ18O water was calculated according to the δ18O mineral and trapping temperature of fluid inclusion which was estimated according to homogenization temperature and its pressure correlation.The fluids of early-stage quartz (sample 99H09)have an δ18O water value of about +10.6‰,higher than the maximum for magmatic water,suggesting that the fluids were sourced from metamor-phic devolatilization rather than magmatism (Chen et al.,2005b,2008).It is common knowledge that magmatic fluids are generated from the magma above the temperature of 573°C (lowest eutectic point).The δ18O water ratio of the initial magmatic fluids is not higher than the δ18O quartz of the equilibrated magmatic rocks,due to 1000ln αquartz –water >0when T b 724°C.Hence the maximum δ18O water value of magmatic water was estimated to be 9‰(Fig.7).During continuous cooling and water –rock reaction processes,the δ18O water of magmatic water was reduced again along with the formation of hy-drothermal minerals such as quartz.If the fluids forming the Yindongpo deposit were initially magmatic and still kept δ18O water =+10.6‰when the temperature decreased to 414°C,their initial δ18O water must be far higher than 10.6‰.Such δ18O water value is obviously higher than the estimated maximum for magmatic water,also higher than the δ18O values of granitoids in Qinling –Tongbai Mountains,which range 6.1‰–10.4‰(Chen et al.,2000b ).Thus,the early stage fluid must be metamorphic in origin,instead of magmatic or meteoric,which is further supported by sulfur and lead isotope signatures,discussed ahead.The δ18O values of the middle-stage fluids range from +3.1‰to +5.5‰,averaging +4.9‰;whereas the δD values range from −68‰to −84‰,and average −75‰.Compared to the early-stage fluids,sam-ples of the middle-stage fluids clearly shift towards the meteoric water line (Fig.7),suggesting a signi ficant input of meteoric water into the fluid system.The δ18O water values of late-stage quartz and calcite are between −8.1‰and −3.7‰,averaging −5.9‰.Such low δ18O water values strong-ly indicate that the fluids were mainly sourced from meteoric water.Con-sidering the δD ratios in fluids vary in a narrow range (−65to −85‰)in early and middle stages,we estimate that the late stage δD water values are similar to the middle stage.These measured and estimated δD water values are close to that of Mesozoic meteoric water in Qinling Moun-tains (Fig.7).Assuming that the average δD water value of the late stage is same to that of the middle stage,the late stage samples are close to or shift towards the meteoric water line,especially to the domain of Mesozoic meteoric water in Qinling mountain range (Fig.7),which was drawn by Zhang (1989)from a H –O isotope geochemical study of numerous meteoric hydrothermal deposits formed in Mesozoic.This suggests that the late stage fluids are of meteoric origin.In conclusion,the average δ18O Water values changed from 9.7‰in the early stage,through 4.9‰in the middle stage and −5.9‰in the late stage,with the δD values ranging between −60‰and −90‰,strongly support that the ore fluids of the Yindongpo gold deposit were initially sourced from metamorphic devolatilization,and later changed to mainly meteoric water,from the early to the late stages of the mineralization process.5.2.Carbon isotopesThe δ13C CO 2values of the early-and middle-stage fluids forming the Yindongpo Au deposit widely vary between −3.7‰and +6.7‰,with an average of 1.1‰(Table 1).These values are higher than those of organic matter (ca.−27‰),atmospheric CO 2(−7to −11‰;Hoefs,2004),freshwater carbonate (−9to −20‰:Hoefs,2004),igneous rocks (−3to −30‰:Hoefs,2004;Zheng,1999),continental crust (−7‰:Faure,1986)and the mantle (−5to −7‰:Hoefs,2004);and therefore,the CO 2in the fluids forming the Yindongpo mineral system cannot independently have been supplied by any one or a mixture of the above-mentioned reservoirs.The marine carbonate,which is the carbon reservoir with highest δ13C value (ca.0.5‰;Schidlowski,1998),must be considered as the source of CO 2in the ore fluids,at least as a necessary end-member,considering that released CO 2via decarbonation could have higher δ13C than the residue carbonates (Jiang et al.,2004;Tang et al.,2011,in press ).The δ13C values of the carbonates in Waitoushan Group range from +1.9‰to +2.9‰(Table 1),suggesting that they most likely provided CO 2(with the highest δ13C value of 6.7‰)for the Yindongpo ore fluid-system via metamorphic de-carbonation.The δ13C values of calcite in late-stage veins at Yindongpo deposit range from −2.4‰to −0.6‰(Table 1),and correspond to the δ13C CO 2values of −2.8‰to −1.0‰calculated using the carbon isotope fractionation equation of for calcite –CO 2system (Chacko et al.,1991).The calculated δ13C CO 2values are lower than the δ13C CO 2values of ore-forming fluids in early and middle stages,suggesting that the fluid system was mixed with or replaced by meteoric water,which ef ficiently reduced the δ13Cvalue.Fig.6.Paragenetic sequence for major minerals of the Yindongpo Au deposit.349J.Zhang et al./Ore Geology Reviews 53(2013)343–356。
ICP-MS分析

ICP-MS分析1000-0569/2007/023(02)43227—32ActaPetrologicaSinica岩石地质样品的一次阴离子色谱法Hf分离及其MC—ICP-MS分析杨岳衡张宏福刘颖谢烈文祁昌实,Y ANGYueHeng一,ZHANGH0ngFu,LIUYing3XIELieWen,Qt涂湘林ChangShi?andTUXiangLin1.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所岩石圈演化国家重点实验室,北京1000292.中国科学院广州地球化学研究所同位素年代学和地球化学重点实验室,广州5106403.中国科学院研究生院,北京1000391.StateKeyLaboratoryofLithosphericEvolution,lttstitttteofGeologyandGeophysics,Chi neseAcademyofScie~es,Beijing100029,China2.KeyLaboratoryofhompeGeochronologyandGeochemistry,GuangzhouInstituteofGeo chemistry,ChineseAcademyofSciences,Guangzhou510640,China3.GraduateSchooloftheChineseAcademyofSciences,Beijing100039,China2006-09—30收稿.2006—12-25改回.Y angYH,ZhangHF,LiuY,XieLW,QiCSandTuXL.2007. samplesusinganionexchangechromatographyanditsisotopic23(2):227—232OnecolumnprocedureforHfpurificationingeologicalanalysesbyMe-ICP-MS.ActaPetrologicaSinica,AbstractAone—columnprocedureforHfpurificationingeologicalsamplesusinganionexchangechromatog raphyanditsisotopicanalysesbyMC—ICP—MSwasdevelopedinthispaper.ThechemicalseparationbetweenHfandisobaricelementssu chasLu,Yband matrixmaterialslikeTiWascarriedoutsimultaneouslythroughpopularanionexchangechro matography.Thistechniqueavoidsusing popularmultipleionexchangechromatography,specialextractionchromatographicresinsa ndperchloricacidtobreakdownHfand REEfluoridesafterHFdissolvedtherock.Hfyieldsare>90%andtotalproceduralblanksa reca.50pg.Muhipleanalysesof StandardReferenceMaterialsdemonstratethatthismethodwassimple,time—saving,inexpensiveandefficient,especiallysuitablefor theHfisotopiccompositionofyoungsamples.KeywordsHfisotope,MC—ICP—MS,Anionexchangechromatography,Geologicalsamples摘要本文建立了适合MC—ICP—MS测试地质样品中Hf同位素的一次阴离子交换化学分离方法.使用常规的阴离子交换树脂就可以完成Hf与干扰元素和基体元素的分离,避免了当前广泛采用的多次离子交换柱的麻烦,也无需使用特效树脂,HF处理样品后,也不必使用HC10赶尽HF.Hf的回收率大于90%,过程空白约为50pg.岩石标样的重复分析表明,该方法简单,快速,经济,有效,尤其适合年轻地质样品Hf同位素组成分析.关键词Hf同位素;MC—ICP—MS;阴离子交换色谱法;地质样品中图法分类号P588.122近十年来,多接收器电感耦合等离子体质谱(Multi—CollectorInductivelyCoupledPlasmaMassSpectrometry:MC—ICP—MS)的出现,使得高电离能元素Hf的同位素测试变得简便和快捷,不但样品的化学分离大大简化,而且质谱测试速度也大大加快.国际核心刊物有关Hf同位素分析方法及其应用研究成果不断涌现(Blichert—Toft,2001).在这一国际Hf同位素热潮下,国内Hf同位素研究也取得了可喜的进展.李献华等(2003)首次进行了锆石的激光取样(Laser本文受国家自然科学基金委大陆动力学重点项目(40534022),国家杰出青年科学基金项目(40225009)和中国科学院广州地球化学研究所所长测试基金联合资助.第一作者简介:杨岳衡,男,1970年生,在职博士生,同位素地球化学专业,E-mail:***********************228Ablation:LA)MC—ICP—MS测试Hf同位素研究,随后徐平等(2004)也开展了系列标准锆石Hf同位素工作.短短几年时间,国内学者的努力使得锆石LA—MC—ICP—MS的Hf同位素测试技术13趋成熟,并得到了国际同行认可(wueta1.,2006),为我国学者运用该技术研究国内地质问题提供了条件,相应地,也取得了可喜的研究成果(1Jela1.,2005a;Y angeta1.,2005;Zhengeta1.,2005;Jiangeta1.,2006;Lieta1.,2006;Wueta1.,2006;Xiaeta1.,2006;Y angeta1.,2006a;2006b;Zhangeta1.,2006a;2006b).同时,国内多家实验室也先后建立了岩石样品(Yuaneta1.,2004;李献华等,2005b;韩宝福等,2006)的Hf分离方法.总体而言,目前岩石样品的Hf分离方法不是采用多次阴,阳离子交换(Blichert.Torteta1.,1997;Davideta1.,1999;Amelineta1.,1999;LeFevreandPin2001;Kleinhannseta1.,2002;Bizzarroeta1.,2003;LeFevreandPin2005;韩宝福等,2006;Lueta1.,2007)就是使用特效树脂(如Ln,UTEV A,TODGA树脂)(Munkereta1.,2001;Yuaneta1.,2004;李献华等,2005b;Connelly2006;Connellyeta1.,2006;Laeta1.,2007)来实现Hf与干扰元素和基体元素分离.同时,由于Hf极易与F一络合的特性,样品经过HF溶解后,都必须用HC104赶尽HF(PatchettandTatsumoto1980;SaltersandHart1994;Munkereta1.,2001;韩宝福等,2006; Connelly2006;Connellyeta1.,2006;Lueta1.,2007),否则严重影响Hf的回收,或者,避免HF的使用而采用碱熔方法处理样品(LeFevreandPin2001;Bizzarroeta1.,2003;Ubecketa1.,2003;LeFevreandPin2005;李献华等,2005b).本文在前人工作的基础上(Munkereta1.,2001),利用Hf与F一络合在阴离子树脂有较高的分配系数,而干扰元素(Yb,Lu)不在柱上吸附.同时,在不同的酸度体系下又实现基体元素(rri)与Hf的分离,从而一次在阴离子交换柱上实现Hf与其他元素的分离,这样既可以采用HF溶解样品,又无需使用HC10赶尽HF,也避免了特效树脂(如Ln树脂)的有限使用次数的限制(Munkereta1.,2001;Yuaneta1., 2004),降低了成本.岩石标样的重复测试表明,该方法简单,快速,经济,有效.ActaPetrologicaSinica岩石2007,23(2)l样品溶解与化学分离本实验中使用高纯水(电阻率>18MI'I);HC1,HNO,HF是北京化工厂优级纯试剂经过二次亚沸蒸馏纯化得到; HAc,H:O和H,BO,为北京化工厂优级纯试剂;标准溶液AlfaHf100001xg/ml(No.14374),AlfaLulO001xg/ml(No. 35765),AlfaYb10001~g/ml(No.13819),AlfaZrlO001xg/ml (No.13875)和AlfaTi1000g/ml(No.35768)购自Johnson MattheyCompany的AlfaAesar公司,逐级稀释为工作溶液;标准溶液Ta(1O001xg/m1)和W(1O001xg/m1)购自国家标准物质研究中心,逐级稀释为工作溶液;树脂为Bio—RadAG1.X8 (200~400mesh,C1一型),装填树脂材料为Bio.Rad2ml(0.8×4cm).称取lOOmg样品,于7mlSavillex溶样罐中,加入2ml浓HF和0.5ml浓HNO,置于电热板上保温一周,期间不时摇动溶样罐,使得样品充分溶解,蒸干样品,加入适量的HBO和HC1,保温l2小时溶解样品,再次蒸干,然后加入6MHC1溶解样品,蒸干,最后加入3MHC1溶解样品,保温l2小时,然后加入少量的水和微量HF,准备上柱.化学分离的详细步骤见表1.2质谱测试Hf同位素分析是在中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所岩石圈演化国家重点实验室ThermalFinniganNeptuneMC—ICP—MS上完成的.有关仪器详细介绍,详细参见文献(wueta1.,2006).Hf同位素组成的测定,全部采用静态方式,具体的法拉第杯结构:L4:"Yb,L3=Lu,L2:蜥Yb+Lu+Hf,Ll=77Hf,Center=78Hf,Hl:79Hf,H2=柏Ta+柏Hf+柏W,H3:Ta,H4=w.测量"Yb是为了监控"Yb对"6Hf的干扰,测量Lu是为了监控Lu对"Hf的干扰,测量…Ta是为了监控Ta对.Hf的干扰,测量w是为了监控.w表1一次阴离子交换柱的Hf分离流程Table1OnecolumnprocedureforHfpurificationusinganionexchangechromatography杨岳衡等:地质样品的一次阴离子色谱法Hf分离及其MC—ICP—MS分析对Hf的干扰.在测试样品之前,使用实验室的内部标准AlfaHf标准溶液(200ng/m1)对Neptune进行参数优化,包括等离子体部分(炬管位置和载气流速等参数)和离子透镜参数,以达到最大灵敏度.通常,200ng/mlAlfaHf的标准溶液,Hf信号强度为3.5V左右.在以后的实际样品测试过程中,只是对炬管位置和载气流速稍作调节即可进行实际样品的测量.仪器的操作条件参见文献(wueta1.,2006).化学分离后的Hf用2%HNO+0.1%HF溶液引入质谱,使用自由雾化进样方式.样品测量完成后,使用2%HNO+0.1%HF溶液清洗进样系统,然后开始下一个样品的测量.通常,完成一个样品的测量时间为10Min,两个样品之间洗涤时间为5Min.经验表明,2%HNO+0.1%HF混合溶液比单纯2%HNO而言,洗涤Hf具有更好的效果.3结果与讨论3.1结果重复测试岩石标样Hf同位素分析结果列于表2.可以看出,国家岩石标样GSR-3(玄武岩)的表2岩石标样的Hf测试结果Table2ResultsofHfisotopicanalysesforSRM229".Hf/"Hf比值与碱熔后用特效树脂(如Ln树脂)的结果在误差范围内完全一致(李献华等,2005b),其他国际岩石标样BCR一1,BHVO一2,W-2的Hf/"Hf比值与文献报道的值在误差范围内也完全一致(PatchettandTatsumoto1980: Blichert—Toft2001;Davideta1.,2001;LeFevreandPin2001: Munkereta1.,2001;Chueta1.,2002;Bizzarroeta1.,2003; Ubecketa1.,2003;Lapeneta1.,2004:Weieta1.2004:Wittingeta1.2006;李献华等,2005b;韩宝福等,2006).以上测试结果表明,我们所获得的Hf同位素组成是准确可信的,化学分离方法是有效的.3.2讨论Munkereta1.(2001)发展了适合zr同位素MC.ICP—MS分析的单柱阴离子色谱法分离方法.由于zr,Hf极其相似化学行为,同时MC—ICP—MS测试zr,Hf同位素的要求又不尽相同,如Mo,Cr40Ar,W干扰zr,Yb,"6Lu,GdO,DyO干扰Hf,.Ta和啪W干扰.Hf,我们在此基础上发展了适合Hf同位素MC—ICP—MS分析的化学分离方法.(1)硼酸在地质样品分析中,HF作为破坏硅酸盐有效试剂广泛使用,钙和镁作为主量元素在地质样品中则大量存在,尤其对基性和超基性样品而言,大量氟化钙,镁沉淀严重影响Hf的回收(Blichert—Toft,2001;Connellyeta1.,2006),同时,稀土元素也容易形成氟化物沉淀.因此,我们在HF样品溶解后加入适量的硼酸来络合F一,破坏氟化物沉淀,使得钙,镁和稀土元素以阳离子形式存在,大大提高了Hf的回收率,同时,也使得以阳离子形式的稀土元素在阴离子交换树脂上不停留.(2)同质异位素由于同质异位素("Yb,Lu)的存在以及稀土元素氧化物(GdO,DyO)干扰Hf.因此,稀土元素必须彻底与Hf分离.在阴离子交换柱上,稀土元素等阳离子不在阴离子柱上吸附,穿柱而过,而Hf与F结合的络合阴离子则紧紧吸附在树脂上,只有在较高浓度HC1才能够淋洗下来,这就保证了稀土元素与Hf的彻底分离,有效地避免了MC—ICP—MS分析Hf时的同质异位素干扰. 同时,在实际质谱测试过程中,也可以通过"Yb和"Lu的信号强度来监控它们与Hf的分离程度,质谱测试数据显示,"Yb和Lu法拉第杯的信号强度均小于0.00004V,充分说明了它们之间的彻底分离.研究表明,当含Hf溶液中"Yb!Hf和"Lu/Hf的信号强度均小于0.0001时,不必对"Hf/"Hf比值做同质异位素的干扰校正(李献华等,2005b).尽管在阴离子交换柱上Hf与稀土元素能够有效的分离,但为了检验NeptuneMC—ICP—MS对同质异位素的干扰扣除能力,在AlfaHf标准溶液(200ng/ml,下同)中加入不同量的Lu和Yb来进行实验,测试结果表明,在Lu/Hf<0.1,Yb/Hf<0.04时,NeptuneMC—ICP—MS可以完全有效的进行同质异位素的干扰扣除(图1A,B),这也进一步印证了LA—2300.282220.282200.282l8至0.282160.282l40.282l2000002000060001000400080020060l0408 000010000400008000200060010040080206l0Lu/Hf0.2824O0.282350.28230028225028220ActaPetrologicaSinica岩石2007,23(2):l{_000O020*******l000400080020060l040000l00004000080002000600l00400802Yb/Hf图1AlfaHf中加入不同量Lu,Yb对MC—ICP—MS测试Hf的影响Fig.1EffectsofAHfanalyseswithanadditionofvariableLu.Ybcontents 0282230.2822l兰0.28219:.{_lI;i..l}I'}Il{{一.工ll'A00o00200006000l00040008002006010400004000080o0200060,0J00400802lI}}".Ili.一fii00000200006000l00040008002006010400004000080o02000600l0040080206w/Hf图2AlfaHf中加入不同量Ta,w对MC—ICP—MS测试Hf的影响Fig.2EffectsofAlfaHfanalyseswithanadditionofvariableTa,Wcontents MC—ICP—MS进行(斜)锆石Hf同位素分析时"Hf的同质异位素干扰主要来自"Yb.此外,在化学分离中Ta和w与Hf之间的彻底分离则是比较困难的,尽管它们对".Hf没有直接的干扰,但是'册Ta和啪w干扰.Hf,为此,在AlfaHf标准溶液中加入不同量的Ta和w来进行实验,测试结果表明,Ta和w的存在对MC.ICP—MS测试Hf没有影响(图2A,B). (3)基体元素MC.ICP—MS较以前经典的热电离质谱(ThermalIonizationMassSpectrometry:TIMS)或热一二次离子质谱(hotSecondaryIonMassSpectrometry:hot—SIMS)测试Hf最突出的优点是无需zr,Hf分离.由于zr,Hf极其相似的化学性质,几乎相同的离子半径(分别为0.80,0.81h),实现它们之间的分离需要非常繁琐的步骤(Patchettand Tatsumoto1980:SaltersandHart1994),而这恰恰是Hf化学分离的难点,也是以前TIMS和hot—SIMS必须克服的难关(Bliehert.T0fl2001).研究表明,Zr/Hf达到200(祁昌实等,2005)甚至到800(Goolaertseta1.,2004)对Hf同位素的MC—ICP.MS测试没有影响.在NeptuneMC—ICP—MS进行不同zr/H喊验,结果表明,大量zr的存在不影响Hf同位素的测试(图3A),Zr,Hf无需分离,这样化学分离大大简化.同时,MC.ICP—MS对Ti,Hf之间分离也没有TIMS或hot—SIMS要求那么苛刻.尽管Ti的存在对Hf的MC—ICP—MS分析没有质谱干扰,但是大量Ti的存在容易在锥孑L堆积,大大降低了Hf的传输效率,造成电障效应,引起仪器产生质量漂移(Blichert—Toileta1.,1997),因此,绝大部分还是需要与Hf分离.Goolaertseta1.(2004)曾对样品中Ti含量对Hf同位素测定的影响作过研究,在Ti/Hf浓度比值高达30的JMC-475标准溶液中s176Hf/Hf测量结果没有受到明显的影响.研究表明,在醋酸,硝酸和双氧水混合体系中,n与F一的络合离子的分配系数很小(~1),远远小于zr,Hf络合F一的络合离子的分配系数(大于100)(Munkereta1.,2001),因此,在该条件下,可以实现Ti与Hf的有效分离.在实际地质样品中,TiO含量变化较大,一般为0.01—4%,杨岳衡等:地质样品的一次阴离子色谱法Hf分离及其MC—ICP—MS分析0.282220.282200.282l80.282l60282l4Mean:0.282185±0.000013(2SDN=22).TI:…it.I;…IITlT…T:?工工一fl,上t上tt圭王1i士f-t~.AMcan:0.282187±0.000007(2SDN=26)T?TTI-.r.TITTT{IITIITll1T}TII~TTTIIH.Bo1o4o.826lo305070901200l0.40.826103050709012016020000.20.6l4820406080l0000.20.6l4820406080l00l40l80ZHfTi/Hf图3AlfaHf中加入不同量Zr,Ti对MC—ICP—MS测试Hf的影响Fig.3EffectsofAlfaHfanalyseswithanadditionofvariableZr,Ticontents 金红石则达90%以上,我们使用4MHAc+8mMHNO3+1%H,0,混合溶液淋洗,可以看到非常明显的橙黄色溶液,直到变成无色,接下来,用6MHC1+0.1MHF淋洗并接收zr,Hf用于进一步分析.在NeptuneMC—ICP—MS也进行不同Ti/Hf试验(图3B),结果表明,即使Ti/Hf达到200,也没有观察到对Hf的MC—ICP—MS测试有明显的影响.通常化学分离后,Ti/Hf通常小于5,这样不会对Hf分析有影响,从岩石标样的测试结果也间接证明了这一点.4小结建立了一次阴离子交换柱实现Hf与干扰元素和基体元素的化学分离方法.该方法既可以采用HF处理样品,又无需用HCIO赶HF,也避免了使用特效树脂.岩石标样的重复测试表明,该方法简单,快速,经济,有效,尤其适合年轻地质样品Hf同位素组成分析.致谢本文前期实验是在中国科学院广州地球化学研究所同位素年代学与同位素地球化学重点实验室完成的.实验室主任李献华研究员给予悉心的指导和热情帮助.作者与北京大学地球与空间科学学院韩宝福教授和西北大学教育部大陆动力学实验室袁红林博士就相关问题进行了讨论与交流.两位匿名审稿人提出了宝贵的修改意见,进一步完善了论文.在此,一并致以诚挚的谢意.ReferencesBizzarroM,BakerJA,UlfbeckD.2003.ANewDigestionandChemical SeparationTechniqueforRapidandHighlyReproducible DeterminationofLu/HfandHfIsotopeRatiosinGeologicalMaterials byMC—ICP—MS.Geostand.Newslett.,27(2):133—14523lBliched..r0flj.ChauvelC.AlbaredeF.1997.SeparationofHfandLuf0rhigh—precisionisotopeanalysisofrocksamplesbymagnetic sector-multiplecollectorICPMS.Contrib.Minera1.Petro1..127: 248—260Blichert..r0flj.2001.0ntheLu—Hfisotopegeochemistryofsilicate rocks.Geostand.Newslett.,25(1):4l一56ConnellyJN.2006.Improveddissolutionandchemicalseparation methodsforLu—Hfgarnetchronometry.Geochem.Geophys. Geosyst.,7:Q04005,doi:10.1O29/20o5GGoolO82 ConnellyJN,UlfbeckD,ThraneKeta1.2006.PurifyingLuandHff0r analysesbyMC—ICP—MSusingTODGAresin.Chem.Geo1..233: l26一l36DavidK,BirckJL,TeloukPeta1.1999.Applicationofisotopedilution forDrecisemeashrement0fZr/Hfand176H£/77Hfratiosbymass spectrometry(ID.TIMS/ID—MC—ICP—MS).Chem.Geo1..157:l—l2GoolaertsA,MattielliN,Jongjeta1.2004.HfandLuIsotopic ReferenceV altiesfortheZirconStandard9150obvMC—ICPMS. Chem.Geo1..2o6:l一9HanBF.ZhangL.GuLBeta1.2006.SeparationofHffromrocksamplesforisotopeanalysisbyMC—ICP—MSusingion—exchange chromatographymethod.ActaPetrologicaSinica,22(2):513—516 (inChinesewithEnglishabstract)JiangYH,JiangSY,LingHFeta1.2006.Low—degreemeltingofa metasomatizedlithosphericmantlefortheoriginofCenozoicYulong monzogranite—porphyry.eastTibet:GeochemicalandSrNdPbHf isotopicconstraints.EarthP1anet.Sci.Lett..24l:617—633K1einhannsI.KreissigK,binedchemical separationofLu,Hf,Sm,NdandREEsfromasinglerockdigest: DreciseandaccurateisotopedeterminationsofLu—HfandSm—Nd usingmuhicollector—ICP—MS.Ana1.Chem.74:67—73LeFe,vreB.PinC.2005.Astraightforwardseparationschemeforc0nc0mitantLuHfandSmNdisotoperatioandisotopedilution analysis.AnalyticaChimicaActa.543:209—22lkFe,vreB.PinC.2001.Anextractionchromatographymethodf0rHf separationpriortoisotopicanalysisusingmuhiplecollectionICP—massspectrometry.Ana1.Chem..73:2453—2460LiXH,LiangXR,WeiGJeta1.2003.PreciseanalysisofzirconHfisot0pesbvLAM—MC—ICPMS.Geochimica,32:86—9O(inChinese withEnglishabstract)LiXH,QiCS,LiuY eta1.2005a.PetrogenesisoftheNeopro—temzoic232bimodalvolcanicrocksalongthewesternmar~noftheY angtzeBlock:NewconstraintsfromHfisotopesandFe/Mnratios.Chin.Sci.Bul1..50:248l一2486LiXH,Qics.LiuYeta1.2005b.RapidseparationofHffromrock samplesforisotopeanaIvsisbyMC—ICPMS:amodifiedsingle—colunlll exlractionchromatographymethod.Geochimica,34(2):109一ll4 (inChinesewithEnglishabstract)LiXH,LiZX,WingateMTDeta1.2006.Geochemistrv0fthe755Ma MundineWelldykeswalTfl,northwesternAustralia:Partofa NeoproterozoicmantlesuperplumebeneathRodinia?Preeambrian Res..146:l—l5LuYH.AkioMakishimaandEizoNakamura.2o07.PurifieationofHfin silicatematerialsusingextractionchromatographicresin,andits applicati0ntoprecisedetemilnati0nof76Hf/77HfbvMC—ICP—MS with79Hfspike.J.Ana1.At.Speetrom..22:69—76MtinkerC,WeyerS,SchererE,MezgerK.2001.Separationofhigh fieldstrengthelements(Nb,Ta,zr,Hf)andLufromrocksamples forMC—ICPMSmeasurements.Geochem.Geophys.Geosyst.2.10. 1029/2o0lGCO0o183PatchettP.TatsumotoJ.1980.Aroutinehigh—precisionmethodforLu—Hfisotopegeochemistryandchronology.M.,Contrib.Minera1.Petro1..75:263—267QiCS,LixH,LiangxReta1.2005.High—precisionmeasurementofHf isotopicreferencevaluesfortheU—Pbgeochronologystandardzircons bymulti—collectorICP.MS.JournalofChineseMassSpectrometry Society,26(3):149—154.(inChinesewithEnglishabstract) SaltersVJM.1994.76Hf/Hfdeterminationinsmallsamp1esbva high—temperatureSIMStechnique.Ana1.Chem.,66:4186—4189 UlfbeckD,BakerJA,WaightTeta1.2003.Rapidsampledigestionby fusionandchemicalseparationofHfforisotopicanalysisbyMC..ICP. MS.anta.59:365—373WeisD.KiefferB.MaersehalkCeta1.2o05.High—precisionPb—Sr-Nd—HfisotopiccharaterizationofUSGSBHV0.1andBHVO-2reference materials.Geoehem.Geophys.Geosyst.,2,10.1O29/2oo4GCoo0852WittigN,BakerJAandDownesH.2006.Datingthemantlerootsofyoungcontinentalcrust.Geology,34(4):237—240 WiedenbeckM.AlleP.CorfuFeta1.1995.rhreenaturalzircon standardsforUrhPb.LuHf.traceelement.andREEanalyses. Geostand.Newslett..19:l一23Wu,F.Y.,Y ang,Y.H.,Xie,L.W.,eta1.2o06.Hfisotopic compositionsofthestandardzirconsandbaddeleyitesusedinUPb geochronology.Chem.Geo1.,234:105—126Xia,X.P.,Sun,M.,Zhao,G.C.,eta1.2006.UPbandHfisotopic studyofdetritalzirconsfromtheWulashankhondalites:Constraints ontheevolutionoftheOrdosTerrane.WesternBlockoftheNorth ChinaCraton.EarthPIanet.Sci.Lett..24l:581—593XuP,WuFY.XieLWeta1.2oo4.Hfisotopiccompositionsofthe standardzirconsforU—Phdating.Chin.Sci.Bul1..49:1642一l(珥8Y angJH,WuFY,ChungSLeta1. significanceofEarlyCretaceous uhrabigh—pressureorogenicbelt,2005.Petrogenesisandtectonic graniticmagmastismintheSuluEastChina.Chem.Geo1.,222:ActaPetrologicaSinica岩石2007,23(2)2【x】一23lY angJH,WuFY,ChungSLeta1.2006a.Ahybridoriginforthe QianshanA—typegranites,northeastChina:GeochemicalandSr—Nd—Hfisotopicevidence.Lithos.89:89—106Y angJH.WuFY,ShaoJAeta1.2006b.OntheinitialtimingoftheY anshanMountainbuilding.EarthPlanet.Sei.Lett.,246:145一l6oY angXJ.PinC.2000.Determinationoftracezirconiumandhafniumin basalticrocksbyinductivelycoupledplasmaatomicemission spectrometryafterchemicalseparation:allevaluationoftwomethods basedonextractionchromatography,Analyst,125:453—457 YuanHL.GaoS.UweNeta1.2004.,nmckingthecontinental founderingprocess:evidencefromhafniumisotopiccompositionsby multiplecollectorinductivelycoupledplasmasmass spectrome.p344ZhangJH,GeWC,WuFY.2006a.Mesozoicbimodalsuiteandits geologicalsignificanceinZhalantunoftheGreatXing'anRange: zir?。
陨石撞地球英语作文简单

陨石撞地球英语作文简单Title: A Close Encounter: When a Meteorite Strikes Earth。
Introduction:The universe is an awe-inspiring expanse, filled with celestial bodies ranging from distant stars to wandering asteroids. Occasionally, these cosmic travelers venture too close to home, leading to dramatic events like meteorite impacts on Earth. In this essay, we delve into the phenomenon of meteorite impacts and their implications.What is a Meteorite?A meteorite is a solid piece of debris from an object such as a comet, asteroid, or meteoroid that survives its passage through Earth's atmosphere and lands on theplanet's surface. These fragments can vary in size fromtiny grains to massive boulders weighing several tons. Whenthey collide with Earth, they can cause significant damage depending on their size and velocity.The Impact Process:When a meteorite enters Earth's atmosphere, it encounters resistance from air molecules, causing it to heat up and glow brightly, creating a spectacular sight known as a meteor or shooting star. Most meteoroids burn up completely during this fiery descent, never reaching the surface. However, if the meteorite is large enough and robust, it can withstand the intense heat and pressure, making it through to impact the Earth's surface.Consequences of Impact:The consequences of a meteorite impact can be profound, ranging from localized destruction to global cataclysms. Small meteorites may create impact craters and cause minimal damage, while larger ones can unleash devastation on a much grander scale. Historical records and geological evidence indicate that several mass extinction events inEarth's history, including the demise of the dinosaurs, may have been triggered by massive meteorite impacts.Scientific Importance:Despite the potential for destruction, meteorite impacts also present invaluable scientific opportunities. The study of meteorites provides insights into the composition and evolution of our solar system. By analyzing the chemical and isotopic signatures of meteorites, scientists can unravel the mysteries of planetary formation and early solar system dynamics.Mitigation and Preparedness:Given the potential threat posed by meteorite impacts, scientists and policymakers are actively engaged in efforts to mitigate the risks and enhance preparedness. Advanced telescopes and monitoring systems are deployed to track near-Earth objects (NEOs) and identify potential impact threats well in advance. Additionally, international collaborations facilitate the development of strategies fordeflecting or intercepting incoming asteroids or comets, thus reducing the likelihood of catastrophic impacts.Conclusion:In conclusion, meteorite impacts represent afascinating yet potentially hazardous aspect of our dynamic universe. While these cosmic collisions have shaped Earth's history and continue to pose risks to our planet, they also offer valuable opportunities for scientific discovery and exploration. Through continued research, vigilance, and collaboration, we can better understand and mitigate the impact of these celestial visitors, ensuring the safety and resilience of our planet for generations to come.。
Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic

From SAUNDERS , eds) , 1989 , Magmatism in the Ocean Geological Socicty Special Publication No. 42 , pp. 313-345.
3 13
3 14
Major issues in the chemical evolution and geodynamics of the mantle
A first-order aim in the study of oceanic basa Its is to improve our understanding of the chemical
S.-s. Sun & W. F. McDonough
contribute to the geochemica\ and isotopic evolution of mantle reservoirs. The nature of mantle convection processes through time (whole mantle or layered mantle) is critical to our understanding of the chemica\ and thermal evo\ution of the Earth. The term ‘ reservoir' is used here in a general sense to refer to a part of the man tI e which has a partícular regíonal chemical and isotopic composítion , whereas the term ‘ componen t' speci缸" ally refers to a reservoir (or many reservoìrs) in thεmantle with an isotopically distinctive composition (eg HIMU , EM , MORB). This use of theterm ‘compone时, is similar to that in Zindler & Hart (1986). In essεnce each mantle reservoir carries an identifiable chemistry and isotopic fingerprínt of the specific processes and environments whích hav已 acted upon it. These composítional fingerprints reflect the responses to such factors as partìal melting under di在'erent P-T-X(C0 2 , water rich , melts or fluids) conditions , sediment subduction , and recycling of oceanic crust and asthenosphere through the subduction zone environment. Mantle differentiation processes through time Our understandin喜 of mantle differentiation 蹈' sociated with the Earth's accretion , core formation and the e挂rly history of man tI e-crust fractionation relies upon chemical and isotopíc studies of Archaean to modern volcanic rocks and other planetary bodies , petrological and chemical experiments carried out under hightemperature and high-prεssure conditions , and numerical modelling of the thermal evolution of the Earth. Even if some thermal models favour the pr出 ence of upper and lower mantle convection cells at present (eg Richter 1985) , there is no obvious reason to argue against whole-mantle convectÌon during the early history of the Earth. It is generaIl y assumed that the early Earth's man tI e temperature was higher (eg 2000 oC surface potential temperature) (Richter 1985) , which would favour vigorous , and probably chaotic , whole-mantle convection with possible largescale mantle meIting. Consequent1 y , it is very likely that the lower mantle would have been ìnvolved in the formation of the earliest enriched lithosphere , resulting in an incompatibleelement-dεpleted character , ie a non-primitive fractionated Iower mantle. At the same time , dense early-formed severely hydrothermaIl y altered mafic to ultramafic crust and lithospheric mantle may well have been rapidly recycI ed back i 挝o the convective mantle by meteorite
生命探测器的英文作文

生命探测器的英文作文Life Detector: Unveiling the Enigma of Extraterrestrial Life.In the vast cosmic tapestry, the question of extraterrestrial life has captivated the human imagination for centuries. As we embark on an ambitious quest to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos, the development oflife detectors has emerged as a crucial tool in our search for signs of life beyond Earth.Life detectors, also known as biosignatures, are scientific instruments designed to identify the presence of life by detecting specific chemical or physical signatures that are characteristic of living organisms. These signatures can range from the presence of complex organic molecules to the emission of waste products or the detection of specific biosignatures in geological samples.One of the most promising types of life detectors isthe chemical biomarker. Biomarkers are molecules that are produced by living organisms and can persist in the environment long after the organism itself has died. Someof the most common biomarkers include amino acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and nucleic acids. These molecules are essential for the basic functions of life, and their detection in extraterrestrial environments could provide strong evidence of past or present life.Another type of life detector is the isotopic biomarker. Isotopes are different forms of the same element that have the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons. Isotopic ratios in the environment can beaffected by the presence of life, as certain isotopes are preferentially used by living organisms. By analyzing isotopic ratios in geological samples, scientists can infer the presence of life in an ancient environment.Life detectors can also be used to detect the presenceof waste products produced by living organisms. For example, the presence of methane in an extraterrestrial atmosphere could be a sign of microbial life, as methane is abyproduct of the metabolism of certain types of bacteria. Similarly, the detection of oxygen in an atmosphere could indicate the presence of photosynthetic life, as oxygen is a byproduct of photosynthesis.The development of life detectors has opened up new possibilities for exploring the question ofextraterrestrial life. By deploying life detectors on space probes and landers, scientists can analyze samples from other planets and moons in search of signs of life. The Mars rovers, for example, are equipped with a variety of life detectors that have been used to analyze the chemical composition of the Martian surface and search for evidence of past or present life.The detection of life beyond Earth would have profound implications for our understanding of the universe and our place within it. It would provide definitive proof thatlife is not unique to our planet and could potentially lead to new insights into the origins and evolution of life. The search for extraterrestrial life is an ongoing scientific endeavor, and the development of life detectors is a vitalpart of that quest. As we continue to explore the depths of space, the possibility of finding life beyond Earth is more tantalizing than ever before.。
同位素参考文献

参考资料这里列出部分书籍和文献目录,供初次进入实验室工作的研究生参考1、放射性同位素地球化学基本原理1) Dickin AP, 1995. Radiogenic Isotope Geology. Cambridge University Press (reprinted in 1997, 2000, 2002).Faure, G, 1986, Principles of Isotope Geology (Second edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp589.(第一版出版于1977年,有中译本:G.福尔著,潘曙兰、乔广生译,同位素地质学原理。
北京:科学出版社,1983)2) 陈岳龙,杨忠芳,赵志丹编著,2005年。
同位素地质年代学与地球化学。
北京:地质出版社,441页。
2、同位素分析技术通论1) 黄达峰,罗修泉,李喜斌,邓中国等编著,2006年,同位素质谱技术与应用。
质谱技术丛书。
北京:化学工业出版,311页。
2)赵墨田,曹永明,陈刚,姜山编著,2006年,无机质谱概论。
质谱技术丛书。
北京:化学工业出版社,322页。
许荣华,张宗清,宋鹤彬,1985,稀土地球化学和同位素地质新方法。
北京:地质出版社,159页。
3、U-Th-Pb同位素分析1)Hanchar JM and Hoskin PWO, eds. 2003. Zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Vol. 53. pp500.2)Randall RP and Stephen RN, 2003. Zircon U-Th-Pb geochronology by isotope Dilution – thermal ionization mass Spectrometry (ID-TIMS). In: Hanchar JM and Hoskin PWO, eds. Zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Vol. 53. pp183-213.3)Randall R. Parrish, Randall R. Parrish, and Stephen R. Noble. 2003. Historical Development of Zircon Geochronology.Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Vol. 53. pp145-181.4)Chen F, Hegner E, Todt W (2000) Zircon ages and Nd isotopic and chemical compositions of orthogneisses from the Black forest, Germany: evidence for a Cambrian magmatic arc. Int J Earth Sciences 88:791–8025) Mattinson, J.M., 1994. A study of complex discordance in zircons using step-wise dissolution techniques. Contrib.Mineral. Petrol. 116, 117– 129.6) Krogh TE. 1982. Improved accuracy of U–Pb zircon ages by the creation of more concordant systems using an airabrasion technique. Geochim Cosmochim Acta Vol. 46: 637-6497)Krogh TE. 1973. A low-contamination method for hydrothermal decomposition of zircon and extraction of U and Pb for isotopic age determinations. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Vol. 37: 485-4948) Poller U, Liebetrau V, Todt W (1997) U–Pb single-zircon dating under cathodelum- ine scence control (CLC-method):application to polymetamorphic orthogneisses. Chem Geol 139:287–2979) W. M. White. 1997. Geochemistry. Hopkins University Press. pp701.10) 沈渭洲编著,1994,同位素地质学教程。
地化名词

地化名词及解释1.有机化合物(organic compound):除CO2、碳酸盐岩和金属碳化物外的所有含碳原子化合物2.烃类化合物(hydrocarbons compound):指只含碳、氢元素的化合物,包括正构烷烃、支链烷烃、环烷烃和芳香烃。
3.非烃化合物/杂原子化合物(NSO化合物)(non hydrocarbon compounds/heteroatom compounds): 在组成石油、沥青和干酪根的有机化合物中,除C、H原子外的其它原子称为杂原子,含杂原子的化合物称为杂原子化合物或非烃化合物4.烷烃(saturated group):只有碳氢单键的稳定分子称为烷烃或饱和烃5.立体化学(Stereochemistry):在分子中,原子之间的立体的或三维的关系称为立体化学6.同分异构体(isomeride)分子式相同而其结构基团排列不同的化合物称为同分异构体7.碳架异构:(carbon skeleton isomerism):碳架异构是由碳架中原子(atom)结合的顺序不同而产生的异构8.取代位置异构(coordination isomerism):取代位置异构是由于取代基在碳链或环上位置不同而产生的异构9.官能团异构(functional group isomerism) :官能团的异构是由于官能团的不同而形成的异构10.互变异构(tautomerism): 互变异构是由于活泼氢可以改变在分子内的位置产生的异构,该反应是可逆的11.立体异构(stereo isomerism):立体异构是指具有相同的分子式和相同的原子连接顺序,但是由于分子内的原子在空间排布的位置不同而产生的异构12.顺反异构(geometric Isomerism):指由于共价键的旋转受到阻碍而产生原子在空间排布的位置不同的异构13.构象异构(conformational isomerism):指由于分子内单键旋转位置不同而产生的异构。
桐柏秦岭岩群的两类变质作用_任留东

2
区域地质
秦岭造山带是一条具有复杂地壳结构和组成 、 经历了多
期地质过程的复合型造山带, 中国南、 北大陆于印支期完成 了主体拼合而形成统一的中国大陆( 张国伟等,2001 ) 。 以 分为南秦岭、 北秦岭构造单元, 其中北秦岭主 商丹断裂为界, 要出露 3 个变质单元, 由北向南, 依次为宽坪群、 二郎坪群和 秦岭群, 其间为构造接触。 秦岭群主要由黑云斜长片麻岩 、 斜长角闪岩、 石榴( 蓝晶) 夕线片麻岩, 以及石英岩、 变粒岩、 石 墨 大 理 岩、 石 墨 片 岩 及 钙 硅 酸 盐 岩 等 组 成 ( 游 振 东 等, 1991 ) , 为一套中深变质杂岩系, 变质程度普遍达角闪岩相, 局部达麻粒岩相, 伴随强烈深熔混合岩化和多期次变形 、 岩 浆侵入活动( 游振东等,1991 ; 王涛和杨家喜,1993 ) , 近年 还在秦岭群北缘发现有一套高压 超高压岩片, 并报道有柯 石英假象和锆石中含金刚石包裹体( Hu et al. ,1995 ; Yang et al. , 2003 ) 。秦岭群现多称秦岭岩群 。桐柏地区的秦岭岩 群则产出麻粒岩( 翟淳等,1997 ; Xiang et al. ,2010 ,2012 ) ( 图 1) 。 同位素年代学研究表明, 榴辉岩的峰期变质年龄在 500 ~ 485Ma 之间, 480Ma 已经开始折返, 并在 470Ma 左右折返 到了地 壳 浅 部 ( Yang et al. ,2003 ; 刘 良 等,2009 ,2013 ; Wang et al. , 2011 ; Bader et al. , 2013 ) 。而在秦岭岩群南部 松树沟地区也出露有高压麻粒岩及其退变的榴闪岩, 其变质 时代与北 侧 的 榴 辉 岩 相 似, 高 压 麻 粒 岩、 榴辉岩变质时代 505Ma( 张建新等, 2011 ) ; 低压角闪二辉麻粒岩变质时代为 440 ± 2Ma, 2011 ) 。 角闪岩相变质时代 426 ± 1Ma( 张建新等,
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
ARTICLEGeological and isotopic evidence for magmatic-hydrothermal origin of the Ag –Pb –Zn deposits in the Lengshuikeng District,east-central ChinaChangming Wang &Da Zhang &Ganguo Wu &M.Santosh &Jing Zhang &Yigan Xu &Yaoyao ZhangReceived:7August 2012/Accepted:27March 2014/Published online:8April 2014#Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014Abstract The Lengshuikeng ore district in east-central China has an ore reserve of ∼43Mt with an average grade of 204.53g/t Ag and 4.63%Pb+Zn.Based on contrasting geological characteristics,the mineralization in the Lengshuikeng ore district can be divided into porphyry-hosted and stratabound types.The porphyry-hosted minerali-zation is distributed in and around the Lengshuikeng granite porphyry and shows a distinct alteration zoning including minor chloritization and sericitization in the proximal zone;sericitization,silicification,and carbonatization in the periph-eral zone;and sericitization and carbonatization in the distal zone.The stratabound mineralization occurs in volcano-sedimentary rocks at ∼100–400m depth without obvious zoning of alterations and ore minerals.Porphyry-hosted and stratabound mineralization are both characterized by early-stage pyrite –chalcopyrite –sphalerite,middle-stage acanthite –native silver –galena –sphalerite,and late-stage pyrite –quartz –calcite.The δ34S values of pyrite,sphalerite,and galena in the ores range from −3.8to +6.9‰with an average of +2.0‰.The C –O isotope values of siderite,calcite,and dolomite range from −7.2to −1.5‰with an average of −4.4‰(V-PDB)and from +10.9to +19.5‰with an average of +14.8‰(V-SMOW),respectively.Hydrogen,oxygen,and carbon iso-topes indicate that the hydrothermal fluids were derived main-ly from meteoric water,with addition of minor amounts of magmatic water.Geochronology employing LA –ICP –MS analyses of zircons from a quartz syenite porphyry yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 136.3±0.8Ma considered as the emplacement age of the porphyry.Rb –Sr dating of sphalerite from the main ore stage yielded an age of 126.9±7.1Ma,marking the time of mineralization.The Lengshuikeng mineralization classifies as an epithermal Ag –Pb –Zn deposit.Keywords Stable isotope .Geochemistry .Porphyry .Stratabound .Ag –Pb –Zn .LengshuikengIntroductionThe Lengshuikeng ore district,located in the Jiangxi Province of east-central China (Fig.1a ),contains more than 50ore bodies belonging to seven deposits hosted in granite porphyry,pyroclastic,and carbonate rocks.The ore reserves in Lengshuikeng have been estimated at ∼43Mt with average grades of 2.11%Pb,2.61%Zn,204.53g/t Ag,0.08g/t Au,and 0.01%Cd.The ores can be grouped into two types:(1)porphyry-hosted (Yinluling,Baojia,and Yinzhushan)and (2)stratabound (Xiabao,Yinkeng,Yinglin,and Xiaoyuan).The porphyry-hosted mineralization is distributed within and around the Lengshuikeng granite porphyry,whereas the stratabound mineralization occurs in volcano-sedimentary rocks at ∼100–400m depth.The spatial distribution of the porphyry-hosted and stratabound ore bodies,their mineral constituents,and the zoning of alteration assemblages are markedly different from those of typical porphyry deposits.Editorial handling:T.Bissig and G.BeaudoinC.Wang (*):D.Zhang :G.Wu :M.Santosh :J.Zhang :Y .Xu :Y .ZhangState Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and MineralResources,China University of Geosciences,No.29,Xueyuan Road,Beijing 100083,People ’s Republic of China e-mail:wcm233@Y .XuNo.912Geological Surveying Team,Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development,Yingtan 334000,ChinaMiner Deposita (2014)49:733–749DOI 10.1007/s00126-014-0521-8Over the past several decades,research in the Lengshuikeng ore district was focused on geological characteristics,mineral-ization,wall rock alteration,fluid inclusions,and geochemistry of the porphyry-hosted deposits (Deng 1991;Meng et al.2007;Wang et al.2010c ).Recently,stratabound Ag –Pb –Zn deposits have been found beneath the porphyry-hosted deposits,occur-ring in volcano-sedimentary rocks of the E ’huling Formation.This paper reports the geologic and isotopic characteristics of the porphyry-hosted and stratabound ores,in combination with those from Chinese literature.The regional and theLengshuikeng Ag –Pb –Zn ore district geologies,including the occurrence of ore bodies,and associated hydrothermal alter-ation are described,followed by a discussion of the origin of the Ag –Pb –Zn deposits.Regional geological settingThe Lengshuikeng ore district is located in northeastern Jiangxi Province,east-central China,close to the Shaoxing–Fig.1a Location map for the Lengshuikeng District.b Sketch map showing the Late Mesozoic volcanic-intrusive complex belt in SE China.c Sketch map showing the regional geology of the Lengshuikeng ore district and Dexing ore field (modified after Jiang et al.2011).Major faults in the study area:Shi –Hang Shiwandashan –Hangzhou as collision-induced suture zone between the Cathaysia and Yangtze blocks,SJ Shaoxing –Jiangshan,ZD Zhenghe –DapuJiangshan(SJ)fault between the Cathaysia and Yangtze blocks(Fig.1b).This fault represents the eastern part of the Shiwandashan–Hangzhou(Shi–Hang)fault zone and is con-sidered to mark the collisional suture zone in SE China(Yao et al.2011).Geophysical and remote sensing data suggest that the SJ fault extends deep into the lower crust and upper mantle (Fig.1c;Wang et al.2010c).The collisional amalgamation of the Cathaysia and Yangtze blocks into the proto“South China”Block(SCB)began in the early Qingbaikou period (∼950±50Ma)and was completed by the end of the Jinning Orogeny at ca.850Ma(Shu and Charvet1996;Charvet et al. 1996;Li et al.2008,2010;Zhang and Zheng2013).During the Sinian(ca.850–600Ma),the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks were rifted.In the Caledonian(600–405Ma),the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks collided for a second time and reunited within the SCB(Zhou et al.2002;Wang et al.2010a, b).During the Variscan(405–270Ma),extension within the SCB resulted in Paleozoic intracontinental rifts.The Indosinian collision between the South China and North China blocks occurred from the Palaeozoic to Late Triassic(ca.270–208Ma;Wang et al.2013a,2014a). Magmatic activity during208to180Ma is documented by bimodal magmatism in southeastern Hunan Province and the A-type granitic magmatism in southern Jiangxi Province(Zhao et al.1998;Yu et al.2006,2010).From Triassic to Early Jurassic(180–145Ma),most areas of the Wuyi Mountains in the northeastern part of the Cathaysia Block(Fig.1b)were folded and uplifted before undergoing extensional collapse.The region ex-perienced Early Cretaceous granite magmatism(145–100Ma) and the formation of large-scale Late Cretaceous–Paleogene red bed sedimentary basins between100and70Ma(Jahn 1974;Jahn et al.1990;Zhou et al.2006;Shu et al.2009;Wang et al.2014b).The Precambrian units include greenschist facies metamorphic rocks dated at1,000–800Ma(Fig.1c;Li et al.1996;Shu and Charvet1996;Zhou et al.2002; Shu et al.2009).The Cambrian and Ordovician rocks are mainly sandstone,mudstone,and carbonaceous mudstone. Silurian sedimentary rocks are absent.The Devonian, Carboniferous,and Permian strata comprise shallow marine to littoral facies clastic rocks,limestone,and dolomite.The Lower Triassic series consists of muddy limestone and shale. Middle Triassic strata are absent in most areas of the Wuyi Mountains.The Wuyi Mountains are largely composed of Late Mesozoic volcanic rocks and associated clastic strata (Fig.1c).Lower Jurassic strata include conglomerate and coarse arkosic sandstone,quartz sandstone,and siltstone with carbonaceous mudstone and coal-bed intercalations.Middle Jurassic strata are composed of terrestrial clastic rocks and bimodal volcanic rocks.Upper Jurassic strata comprise andes-ite and rhyolitic tuffs and tuffaceous siltstone(Liu1985;Ye 1987).Lower Cretaceous strata include rhyolitic welded tuffs with basalt intercalations(Yu et al.2006).Upper Cretaceous siltstone and mudstone are intercalated with gypsum-bearing layers and basalt,the latter with an age of105–98Ma(Yu et al.2001).Paleogene strata include coarse clastic rocks,siltstone,and mudstone with inter-calated gypsum and oil-bearing shale.Neogene silt-stones locally overlie the Paleogene rocks.Southeast China is characterized by extensive magmatism, which formed a belt of volcanic-intrusive complexes(Fig.1b). Two major tectono-magmatic periods have been recognized in the Wuyi Mountains:the Indosinian and the Yanshanian.The Indosinian magmatic period lasted from240to208Ma(Xie et al.2006).The Yanshanian igneous rocks formed during two main stages of Early Yanshanian(208–145Ma)and Late Yanshanian(145–90Ma)and are characterized by abundant rhyolitic volcanic rocks and highly aluminous granitoids(Jahn et al.1976;Chen1999;Li2000;Deng et al.2010,2011,2014; Zhou et al.2006;Zhao et al.2012).Geology of the Lengshuikeng ore districtDeposit geologyThe stratigraphic sequence in the Lengshuikeng District com-prises the Jurassic Daguding and E’huling Formations.The Daguding Formation is composed of andesite and rhyolitic tuffs and tuffaceous siltstone.The E’huling Formation is composed of tuffs,rhyolite,tuffaceous siltstone,sandstone, and manganese-and iron-rich carbonates,which are the main host of the stratabound ores.The NE-striking F1fault dipping toward NW(Figs.2and 3a)comprises the northern segment of the Hushi fault.The most prominent structural feature in the Lengshuikeng District is F2reverse fault(Figs.2and3a).The stratabound fracture along the manganese-and iron-rich carbonate strata(Fig.3a) was cemented by later ore sulfide minerals and hydrothermal alteration minerals.Middle Jurassic and Early Cretaceous magmatic rocks are exposed in the Lengshuikeng District(Fig.2).The Jurassic igneous rocks are mainly granitic including the Yinluling, Yinzhushan,Biaojia,and Yinglin porphyries.The Yinzhushan granite porphyry has been dated as162–159Ma (Meng et al.2007;Zuo et al.2010).The Early Cretaceous rocks include quartz syenite porphyry,rhyolite porphyry, alkali-feldspar granite porphyry,and mafic dykes(Fig.2). The quartz syenite porphyries crop out in the southeastern and northwestern parts of the Lengshikeng District(Fig.2),with widely dispersed chloritization,sericitization,silicifica-tion,and carbonatization,with associated pyrite.Wang et al.(2010c )and Meng et al.(2007)reported that rhyolite porphyry and alkali-feldspar granite porphyry cut all the granite por-phyry and pyroclastic carbonate ore-hosted rocks (Fig.3)as well as the quartz syenite porphyry.The least hydrothermally altered granite porphyries contain phenocrysts (15–35%)of quartz,plagioclase,K-feldspar,and biotite in a groundmass (65–85%)of subhedral K-feldspar,quartz,plagioclase,and minor biotite.Accessory minerals (∼1%)are mainly magnetite,zircon,and apatite.Most quartz crystals are xenomorphic and exhibit undulose extinction.The quartz syenite porphyries contain phenocrysts (33–55%)of K-feldspar (∼20%),biotite (∼10%),and plagioclase (∼8%)in a groundmass (45–67%)of subhedral K-feldspar,biotite,and quartz.K-feldspar phenocrysts are euhedral to subhedral,have a grain size of 2–5mm,and are locally replaced by sericite.Plagioclase phenocrysts are euhedral to subhedral,3–6mm in size,with evidence of weak silicification and sericitization.Biotite phenocrysts are 0.5–1.0mm in size and show alteration to chlorite and carbonate.Ore bodies and wall rock alterationAmong the various ore deposits,the Baojia porphyry-hosted deposit is the most important,accounting for 52%of the total ore reserve in the Lengshuikeng District (Fig.2).The porphyry-hosted ore bodies (Fig.3a )are associated with NNE-striking F 2reverse faults or comprise of fracture fillings in veins and breccias.Associated with the porphyry-hosted ore bodies is a distinct zoning of alteration and ore minerals,both vertically and laterally (Fig.3b,c ).An inner (or proximal)zone in the granite porphyry is characterized by enrichments in lead,zinc (with grade Pb+Zn >5%)with minor disseminated chalcopyrite and pyrite,and with minor chlorite and sericite alteration.The intermediate zone surrounds the inner zone near the contact between the granite porphyry and country rocks.This intermediate zone exhibits strong sericitization,carbonatization,and silicification,and in some cases,high-grade native silver mineralization (Ag >200g/t),with minor galena –sphalerite vein mineralization (Fig.4a ).The outer peripheral (or distal)zone is hosted by volcano-sedimentary country rocks to the granite porphyry and is de-fined by weakly developed silver,galena,sphalerite veins (Ag <100g/t;Pb+Zn <2%),and vein sericite and carbonate.Stratabound mineralization is hosted by manganese –iron carbonate layers of the E ’huling Formation (∼5.0–33.1-m thickness)between tuffaceous sandstone and rhyolitic crystal tuff (Jiangxi Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development (JBGMED)1982;Meng et al.2007).These rocks are characterized by high-grade native silver minerali-zation (Ag >200g/t),lead,zinc (with grade Pb+Zn >5%)as veins and breccias,with minor vein chlorite,sericite,and carbonate (Fig.4b,c ).Ore mineralogy and paragenesisThe mineralization in stratabound and porphyry-hosted ores can be divided into three stages (Fig.5):stage 1,pyrite –chalcopyrite –sphalerite;stage 2,silver minerals –galena –sphalerite;and stage 3,pyrite –quartz –calcite.The mineral assemblage of stage 1is dominantly pyrite and Fe-rich sphal-erite,with small amounts of chalcopyrite,cubanite,galena,arsenopyrite,pyrrhotite,and minor quartz (Fig.6a –c ).Stage 1mineralization was accompanied by chloritization and sericitization,replacing K-feldspar and plagioclase crystals in rhyolitic crystal tuff and granite porphyry.Siderite is intergrown with sphalerite but occurs mostly as overgrowths on sphalerite or as monomineralic cement in breccias and thin veinlets.Stage 2was the principal stage of silver –lead –zinc mineralization.This stage is characterized by sericitization and carbonatization,and minor chloritization.The silver –lead –zinc minerals of stage 2fill the manganese –ironFig.2Geological map of the Lengshuikeng Ag –Pb –Zn ore district (after JBGMED 1982).Sections a and b are shown in Fig.3a –ccarbonate stratabound fractures.The dominant silver minerals are acanthite (Ag 2S)and native silver,which occur in fissures within manganese –iron carbonate or in the intergranular space between manganese –iron carbonate and early sulfides.In ad-dition,fine-grained canfieldite (Ag 8SnS 6),proustite (Ag 3AsS 3),aerosite (Ag 3SbS 3),Ag-bearing tetrahedrite (Cu 12Sb 4S 13),and kustelite (Ag,Au)occur in the intergranular pores of manganese –iron carbonate or as inclusions in galena,sphalerite,and other sulfides.The galena is euhedral and coarse-grained (Fig.6e ).V eins,veinlets,or disseminated silver minerals –gale-na –sphalerite are disseminated in the intergranular pores of manganese –iron carbonate (Fig.6f –h ).Stage 1pyrite is cut by galena and sphalerite vein (Fig.6b ),sphalerite surrounded by galena (Fig.4d ),and sphalerite cut by ankerite –galena vein.InFig.3Geological features along sections a and b of the Baojiao deposit in the Lengshuikeng ore district (after JBGMED 1982):a relationship of ore bodies,b alteration zoning,and c mineralized zonestage 3,ore minerals are dominated by pyrite,with lesser galena,pyrrhotite,and arsenopyrite.Calcite,quartz,and quartz –pyrite are characterized by open-space filling textures such as comb,veins,and veinlets and cut the stage 2galena or sphalerite veins (Figs.4e,f and 6d ).Sampling and analytical procedure for stable and radiogenic isotopesSamples were collected from ore materials at the −80,−120,−152,and −160m levels of underground workings,outcropsFig.4Macroscopic features of samples selected for ore mineralogy and paragenesis studies.a Porphyry-hosted ore with vein galena and with chloritization and sericitization.b Brecciated stratabound-type ore.c Stratabound-type ore with vein sphalerite and galena and with chloritization,sericitization,and carbonation (Lu et al.2012).d Sphalerite phase (stage 1)surrounded by galena (stage 2)(Lu et al.2012).e Pyrite (stage 1)intersected by quartz vein (stage 3).g Disseminated ore intersected by pyrite vein (stage 3).Sp sphalerite,Gn galena,Py pyrite,Chl chloritization,Ser sericitization,Cbn carbonation,and Qz quartz(Fig.2)at ∼160m.s.l.elevations,and two drill holes in the Lengshuikeng ore district.Pure mineral concentrates from the porphyry-hosted and stratabound ores and wallrocks were prepared using a combination of heavy liquid and magnetic-and hand-picking techniques,and these were then checked by X-ray diffraction to ensure mineral purity.Sulfur isotope analyses of sphalerite,galena,and pyrite were carried out at the Resource and Environment Analysis Centre of the Geochemistry Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences.Pyrite,galena,and sphalerite were combusted with CuO at 1,000°C,and the sulfur isotopic compositions was determined on a MAT-253mass spectrometer.The sulfur isotopic compositions were reported relative to the Canyon Diablo Triolite (VCDT)standard.Routine analytical precision for standards material was ±0.2‰.Rhodochrosite,siderite,calcite,and ankerite were handpicked under a stereomicroscope and washed with dis-tilled water.Carbon and oxygen isotopic measurements were made in the Environmental Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Science.About 150μg was reacted with phosphoric acid at 72°C for 6h using a GasBench II (Thermo-Finnigan).TheCO 2produced was analyzed for carbon and oxygen isotope ratios using a MAT-253isotope ratio mass spectrometer.The carbon and oxygen isotope measurements have a precision better than 0.1‰.Accuracy and precision were routinely checked by running the carbonate standard NBS-19after every six measurements of the samples.Carbon isotope ratios are reported relative to Peedee belemnite (V-PDB),and oxy-gen isotope ratios are reported relative to standard mean ocean water (V-SMOW).Rb –Sr analyses were performed at the Laboratory for Radiogenic Isotope Geochemistry (LRIG),Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academy of Sciences (Li et al.2006).Sphalerite grains in Teflon®vessels,washed ultrasonically in analysis-grade alcohol and millipore water,were dissolved using 0.3ml 3N HNO 3and 0.1ml HF at 120°C.Rb and Sr were separated using ion exchange col-umns.Rb and Sr concentrations were measured by isotope dilution,and a mixed 87Rb/84Sr spike solution was used.Isotopic ratios of Rb and Sr were measured on an IsoProbe-T mass spectrometer at the LRIG.Correction of mass frac-tionation for Sr isotopic ratios was based on an 88Sr/86Sr value of 8.37521.Repeated measurements of NBS987Sr standard solution gave an average value of 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.710250±31(2σ).One quartz syenite porphyry sample in the Lengshuikeng District (Fig.2)was selected for U –Pb zircon dating by laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA –(MC)–ICP –MS)at the Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,Tianjin,China (Li et al.2009).The zircon was ablated with a NUP193-FX ArF Excimer laser using a spot diameter of 35μm,with constant 13–14J/cm 2energy density and a frequency of 8–10Hz.The ablated material was carried in He into the plasma source of a GVI.All measurements were made in static mode,using Faraday cups for 238U,232Th,208Pb,206Pb,207Pb,and an ion-counting channel for 204Pb.A common Pb correction is achieved by using the measured 204Pb and assuming an initial Pb composition from Stacey and Kramers (1975).Analytical results Sulfur isotope dataThe δ34S values determined from 20sulfide samples collected in this study and δ34S data from previous works in the same area (Meng et al.2007;Xu et al.2001;No 912Geological Surveying Team (NGST)1997)are listed in Table 1and plotted in Fig.7.The δ34S values of sulfides in ores range from −3.8to 6.9‰with an average of 2.0‰.However,the majority of sulfide minerals have δ34S values between −1andFig.5Mineral paragenesis of the porphyry-hosted and stratabound ores in the Lengshuikeng ore district showing mineral assemblages4‰.The ranges of δ34S values of sulfides in the porphyry-hosted and stratabound ores from −3.8to 6.9‰(average 2.3‰)and −2.4to 4.9‰(average 1.7‰),respectively.The δ34S values of pyrite in the porphyry-hosted ores in pyrite –chalcopyrite –sphalerite (stage 1)range from 2.2to 4.9‰(average 3.9‰).However,the δ34S values of pyrite,sphaler-ite,and galena in the porphyry-hosted ores in silver minerals –galena –sphalerite (stage 2)range from −0.4to 3.1‰(average 2.0‰),0.9to 4.3‰(average 2.8‰),and −2.4to 2.8‰(average −0.4‰),respectively.The δ34S values of pyrite,sphalerite,and galena in the stratabound ores in pyrite –chal-copyrite –sphalerite (stage 1)range from 2.3to 4.0‰(average 3.3‰),3.5to 6.9‰(average 5.0‰),and 3.2‰,respectively.However,the δ34S values of pyrite,sphalerite,and galenainFig.6Photomicrographsshowing the salient mineralogical and textural aspects.a Pyrite disseminated in porphyry-hosted ore and replacing K-feldspar crystals.b Granite porphyry fragments cemented by sulfide minerals with brecciated vein structure and pyrite breccias intersected by galena and sphalerite vein (Su 2013).c Chalcopyrite,galena,andsphalerite in rhyolitic crystal tuff,with chloritization andsericitization.d Galena with “crumpled ”texture and galena and sphalerite intersected by quartz vein.e Dolomite replaced by sphalerite and sphalerite surrounded by galena.fAggregate of acanthite in the intergranular pores of ferromanganese carbonate (Lu et al.2012).g Subhedral native silver occurring in the intergranular pores of ferromanganese carbonate(Lu et al.2012).h Native silver vein in ferromanganese carbonate (Lu et al.2012).Aca acanthite,Cpy chalcopyrite,Dol dolomite,Fer ferromanganese carbonate,Gn galena,Ksp K-feldspar,Py pyrite,Qz quartz,Slv native silver,and Sp sphaleritethe stratabound ores in silver minerals–galena–sphalerite (stage2)range from2.3to2.8‰(average2.5‰),0.9to 3.8‰(average2.2‰),and−3.8to2.4‰(average0.1‰), respectively.Carbon and oxygen isotope dataThe carbon and oxygen isotope values of carbonate minerals were determined for nine hydrothermal siderite samples col-lected from the stratabound ores and crystal tuffs with weak alteration,two calcite vein samples,five ankerite vein sam-ples,and eight manganese–iron carbonate samples(rhodo-chrosite and siderite)from the volcano-sedimentary strata. Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions are listed in Table2and plotted in Fig.8.Theδ13C PDB values in rhodochrosite and siderite samples from the volcano-sedimentary strata vary from−7.0to−2.4‰(Table2).Theδ13C PDB values of hydrothermal carbonates in siderite,calcite,and ankerite samples vary from−7.2to −2.2‰,from−3.3to−1.5‰,and from−3.9to−2.0‰,Table1Sulfur isotopic compositions of sulfide minerals from the Lengshuikeng Ag–Pb–Zn ore districtSample no.Mineral Stageδ34S(‰)Sample no.Mineral Stageδ34S(‰)Sample no.Mineral Stageδ34S(‰)Stratabound ores Stratabound ores Porphyry-hosted oresZK504Py1 3.7PD152-4Gn2 1.1ZK10412-1b Py2 1.9Zk13Py1 4.0ZK136-1Gn2−1.4L14c Py2 2.0ZK410-2Py1 3.0LSK-74a Gn2 1.8L15c Py2 1.7No12Py1 2.3N4-8-102b Gn20.1L16c Py2 2.4ZK515Py1 3.2S4-0-28b Gn20.2L26c Py2 1.5 LSK-9a Py1 3.5LSK-101a Gn2 2.0126-2-1a Py2−0.4 LSK-9-1a Py1 3.6LSK-102a Gn2 2.4130N-4a Sp2 4.3 LSK-41a Py1 2.7So-8-11b Gn2−1.7130S-1a Sp2 2.9 LSK-42a Py1 3.6N4-8-77b Gn2−0.1L17c Sp2 3.2ZK136-1Sp1 4.3N4-8-13b Gn2 1.1L18c Sp2 2.9PD160-6Sp1 5.8N4-8-96b Gn2−0.9L19c Sp2 2.6PD80-10Sp1 5.1N8-4-20b Gn20.2L20c Sp2 1.9Zk197Sp1 3.5So-12-23b Gn2−3.8LSK-77a Sp2 4.6No7Sp1 5.2N4-8-102b Py2 2.7LSK-78a Sp2 3.6PD152-4Sp1 4.6N8-8-26b Py2 2.3L27c Sp2 1.5ZK515Sp1 6.9So-8-11b Py2 2.3L28c Sp20.9 LSK-101a Sp1 4.6Porphyry-hosted ores130N-4a Gn2 1.2PD80-13Sp1 5.0L1c Py1 4.9130S-1a Gn20.1 LSK-74a Sp1 4.8L2c Py1 4.9LSK-77a Gn2 1.6ZK515Gn1 3.2L3c Py1 4.1L21c Gn2 2.8N4-8-77b Py1 3.0L4c Py1 4.1L22c Gn2−0.3N8-0-150b Py1 4.0L5c Py1 3.6L23c Gn2−0.9ZK136-1Py2 2.8L6c Py1 3.6L24c Gn2−1.7So-8-11b Sp2 2.3L7c Py1 2.2L25c Gn2−2.3N4-8-77b Sp2 2.8L8c Py2 3.1L29c Gn2−0.1N4-8-102b Sp2 1.0L9c Py2 3.0L30c Gn2−0.2 LSK-102a Sp2 3.8L10c Py2 2.6L31c Gn2−0.4So-12-23b Sp20.9L11c Py2 2.5L32c Gn2−0.9N4-8-77b Gn2−0.8L12c Py2 2.3L33c Gn2−1.1Zk29Gn2 1.6L13c Py2 2.3L34c Gn2−1.2Zk311Gn2−0.1ZK10010-718b Py2 2.3L35c Gn2−2.4Zk198-1Gn20.2ZK10010-719b Py2 1.4Sp sphalerite,Gn galena,Py pyritea Meng et al.(2007)b Xu et al.(2001)c NGST(1997)isotopic composition of sulfideminerals in the Lengshuikeng oredistrict.a All sulfide minerals.bSulfide minerals in porphyry-hosted ore.c Sulfide minerals instratabound oreTable2Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of carbonate minerals from the Lengshuikeng Ag–Pb–Zn ore district.Theδ18O SMOW values were calculated fromδ18O PDB values using the formula:δ18O SMOW=1.03091×δ18O+30.91(González and Lohmann1985)Sampling location Sample no.Lithology Mineralδ13C PDBδ18O SMOW ∼152m elev.PD152-3Manganese–iron carbonate Rhodochrosite−3.311.6∼160m elev.160-4Manganese–iron carbonate Rhodochrosite−2.418.0∼120m elev.PD120-9Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−3.914.6∼152m elev.PD152-11Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−5.313.0 13703drill hole Zk315Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−2.716.8 15150drill hole Zk18Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−5.914.9∼152m elev.PD152-10Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−5.513.4 13704drill hole Zk198-1Manganese–iron carbonate Siderite−7.019.5∼160m elev.160-3Crystal tuff Hydrothermal siderite−2.217.9 13213drill hole ZK513-1Crystal tuff Hydrothermal siderite−3.917.5 15150drill hole Zk32Crystal tuff Hydrothermal siderite−4.213.5∼120m elev.PD120-5Crystal tuff Hydrothermal siderite−5.917.5∼160m elev.160-6Stratabound ore Hydrothermal siderite−3.816.8∼120m elev.No5Stratabound ore Hydrothermal siderite−5.413.6∼120m elev.PD120-6Stratabound ore Hydrothermal siderite−5.913.5∼152m elev.PD152-4Stratabound ore Hydrothermal siderite−3.613.7 13213drill hole ZK509Stratabound ore Hydrothermal siderite−7.212.8 15150drill hole Zk33Ankerite vein Ankerite−3.313.1 15150drill hole Zk34Ankerite vein Ankerite−2.013.5 15151drill hole ZK136Ankerite vein Ankerite−3.313.9 15151drill hole Zk138-2Ankerite vein Ankerite−3.911.0 13703drill hole Zk309Ankerite vein Ankerite−3.012.4 15151drill hole ZK138-3Calcite vein Calcite−1.510.9 13703drill hole Zk313Calcite vein Calcite−3.311.9 Surface a83Carboniferous Limestone0.619.6a NGST(1997)respectively (Table 2).The δ18O SMOW values in rhodochrosite and siderite samples from the volcano-sedimentary strata vary from 11.6to 19.5‰and from 10.9to 11.9‰,respectively (Table 2).The δ18O SMOW values of hydrothermal carbonates in siderite,calcite,and ankerite samples vary from 12.9to 17.9‰,from 10.9to 11.9‰,and from 11.0to 13.9‰.One Carboniferous limestone sample is isotopically heavy (19.6‰;NGST 1997).Rubidium and strontium isotope dataThe Rb –Sr analytical data of sphalerite are given in Table 3.The sphalerite was separated from the manganese –iron car-bonate ores in the silver minerals –galena –sphalerite stage.Data regression for isochron ages and weighted mean values were performed using the ISOPLOT software (Ludwig 2001),with 2%error for 87Rb/86Sr ratios and 0.05%error for 87Sr/86Sr at the 95%confidence level.The analytical data for sphalerite yielded an age of 126.9±7.1Ma (Fig.9)with an initial 87Rb/86Sr ratio of 0.71490(mean square weighted deviation (MSWD)=0.94).Zircon U –Pb geochronologyMeasured 206Pb/238U ages from individual zircons are shown in Fig.10,and the analytical results of LA –ICP –MS U –Pb dating are listed in Table 4.For the quartz syenite porphyry (sample T10),analyses from 20spots cluster close to the concordia,yielding a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 136.31±0.81Ma (2σ,MSWD=1.3;Fig.10).DiscussionAges of magmatism and mineralizationThe results presented in this study together with those from previous investigations suggest multistage magmatism in the Lengshuikeng and adjacent regions.The magmatic activity took place principally during three periods,in the Jurassic,earlier Early Cretaceous,and later Early Cretaceous.The Jurassic magmatism in the Lengshuikeng District is represented by the emplacement age of the graniteporphyry,Fig.8Plots of calculated δ18O SMOW versus δ13C PDB from various samples in the Lengshuikeng ore district.Carbonate fields are from previous studies.The data are from four different materials including marine carbonate (Baker and Fallick 1989;Hoefs 1997),continental carbonate (Hoefs 1997),sedimentary organic matter carbon (Hodson 1977;Hoefs 1997),and magma-mantle carbonate (Taylor et al.1967;Valley 1986;Ray et al.1999).This plot offers information about various processes of CO 2and carbonate ions including meteoric water influence,sea water penetration,sediment contamination,and high temperature influence,low temperature alteration (Deines 1989;Demrny and Harangi 1996;Demeny et al.1998;Hoernle et al.2002),decarboxylation and oxidation (Hofmann and Bernasconi 1998),decarbonate and carbon-ate dissolution (Lorrain et al.2003),crystallization differentiation with no significantly influence on the oxygen,and carbon isotopic composition (Santos and Clayton 1995;Bindeman 2008)Table 3Rb –Sr isotopiccompositions of sphalerite in the Lengshuikeng Ag –Pb –Zn ore districtSample no.Mineral Rb (μg/g)Sr (μg/g)87Rb/86Sr87Sr/86Sr(±2σ)I sr PD152-7Sphalerite 1.390 4.0800.98910.716557±340.71435ZK205Sphalerite 0.0960.9720.28660.715641±380.71500ZK513-1Sphalerite 2.060 1.820 3.27260.720846±220.71354No4Sphalerite0.9603.9600.70190.716056±180.71449。