Gravitating Magnetic Monopole in the Global Monopole Spacetime

合集下载

Magnetically Charged Black Holes with Hair

Magnetically Charged Black Holes with Hair

Abstes the properties of magnetically charged black holes are described. In addition to the standard Reissner-N¨ ordstrom solution, there are new types of static black holes that arise in theories containing electrically charged massive vector mesons. These latter solutions have nontrivial matter fields outside the horizon; i.e., they are black holes with hair. While the solutions carrying unit magnetic charge are spherically symmetric, those with more than two units of magnetic charge are not even axially symmetric. These thus provide the first example of time-independent black hole solutions that have no rotational symmetry.
1. Introduction
Almost two centuries ago Laplace published his Exposition du system du monde [1]. Its final chapter contained a number of speculations on the future of astronomy. Among these was the observation that “A luminous star of the same density as the Earth, and whose diameter was two hundred and fifty times larger than that of the Sun, would not, because of its attraction, allow any of its rays to reach us; it is thus possible that the largest luminous bodies in the universe may, by this means, be invisible.” Two centuries later, black holes have indeed become objects of great astrophysical interest. There is strong evidence for their production by the collapse of dying stars and for the existence of black holes of great size in the cores of some galaxies. It has also been speculated that microscopic black holes produced shortly after the big bang may account for a portion of the dark matter in the universe. Lectures presented at the XIII International Symposium “Field Theory and Mathematical Physics”, Mt. Sorak, Korea (June-July 1994). This work was supported in part by the US Department of Energy.

英语作文磁铁的作用

英语作文磁铁的作用

英语作文磁铁的作用Title: The Role of Magnets: Exploring Their Impact and Applications。

Magnets have long been marvels of nature, captivating scientists and ordinary individuals alike with their mysterious forces. From the humble fridge magnet to the intricate mechanisms of MRI machines, the applications of magnets are vast and varied. In this essay, we will delve into the multifaceted roles of magnets and explore their significance in various fields.First and foremost, magnets play a crucial role in everyday life. Refrigerator magnets, for instance, serve as practical tools for displaying reminders, photos, and children's artwork. Beyond their decorative function, these magnets rely on the magnetic force to adhere to metal surfaces, providing a simple yet effective means of organization and expression.Moving beyond domestic settings, magnets find extensive use in industries ranging from electronics to transportation. In the realm of electronics, magnets are integral components in speakers, headphones, and microphones, where they facilitate the conversion of electrical signals into sound waves and vice versa. Moreover, magnets play a pivotal role in generating electricity in power plants, particularly in generators and turbines where they induce motion through electromagnetic induction.In the realm of transportation, magnets are employed in various applications to enhance efficiency and performance. Maglev (magnetic levitation) trains, for instance, utilize powerful magnets to achieve levitation and propulsion, enabling them to travel at high speeds with minimal friction. This revolutionary technology not only offers faster transportation but also reduces energy consumption and environmental impact compared to traditional rail systems.Furthermore, magnets have revolutionized modernmedicine through their indispensable role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). By harnessing the principles of magnetism and radio waves, MRI machines generate detailed images of internal body structures, aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous medical conditions. Without magnets, this non-invasive imaging technique, which has become indispensable in healthcare, would not be possible.In addition to their practical applications, magnets also contribute to scientific research and exploration. Magnetic compasses have guided explorers and navigators for centuries, facilitating the mapping of unchartedterritories and the navigation of vast oceans. Moreover, magnets are essential tools in particle accelerators and research laboratories, where they are utilized to manipulate and control the movement of charged particles, enabling scientists to study fundamental aspects of matter and energy.Furthermore, magnets have found niche applications in various fields, including agriculture, construction, and environmental remediation. In agriculture, magnets are usedin machinery such as grain separators and cow magnets, which help prevent hardware disease in livestock by attracting ingested metal objects. In construction, magnets are employed in magnetic sweepers to remove metal debris from worksites, enhancing safety and efficiency. Additionally, magnets play a role in environmental remediation by facilitating the separation and purification of contaminated materials, contributing to efforts to mitigate pollution and restore ecosystems.In conclusion, magnets are indispensable tools that permeate nearly every aspect of modern life. From household appliances to advanced medical imaging systems, their influence is pervasive and profound. As our understanding of magnetism continues to evolve, so too will the range and sophistication of applications, ushering in newpossibilities and advancements across various domains. Truly, the role of magnets in shaping the world cannot be overstated.。

小学上册第十三次英语第5单元综合卷

小学上册第十三次英语第5单元综合卷

小学上册英语第5单元综合卷英语试题一、综合题(本题有100小题,每小题1分,共100分.每小题不选、错误,均不给分)1.__________ are used in the production of rubber.2.My mom works as a _______ (职业). She is very _______ (形容词) and helps many people.3.Kittens like to play with _________ (线团).4.在中国历史上,________ (silk) 是一种珍贵的商品。

5.The __________ was an important document in the fight for independence. (独立宣言)6. A process in which energy is released as heat is called a ______ process.7.What is 30 ÷ 3?A. 5B. 7C. 9D. 108.What is the name of the region of space where light cannot escape?A. Black HoleB. SingularityC. Event HorizonD. Gravity Well9.What is the main purpose of a calendar?A. To tell timeB. To show datesC. To measure distanceD. To calculate10.The __________ (历史的教育工具) enhance learning.11.What is the name of the place where we keep our clothes?A. LibraryB. ClosetC. KitchenD. Bathroom12. A __________ is a place where people go for relaxation.13.What is the process of making bread rise?A. FermentationB. BakingC. MixingD. KneadingA14.The crab has a hard ______ (外壳) to protect itself.15.What do we call a baby goose?A. GoslingB. DucklingC. ChickD. Puppy16.My favorite ________ (游戏) is hide and seek. I always find a good ________ (藏身之处).17.What do you call the person who teaches you at school?A. DoctorB. TeacherC. EngineerD. ChefB18.The bear forages for berries in the sunny ____.19.The stars are _____ (twinkling/shining) in the night sky.20.How many hours are in a day?A. 20B. 22C. 24D. 2621.The chemical formula for silver chloride is _____.22.Magnetic fields are produced by moving ______.23.What do we call the animal that is known for changing colors?A. ChameleonB. GeckoC. IguanaD. Monitor lizardA24.Which animal is known for its black and white stripes?A. ZebraB. LionC. GiraffeD. TigerA25.The weather is _______ (凉爽的).26.The ______ (小黄蜂) buzzes around the colorful ______ (花朵).27.What is the term for a baby cow?A. CalfB. KidC. LambD. FoalA28.The wolf is known for its strong ________________ (嗅觉).29.y of Utrecht ended the War of the ________ (西班牙王位继承). The Trea30.The car is _____ (fast/slow).31.I have a toy ________ (飞机) that can fly high in the ________ (天空).32.The stars twinkle ________ (在夜空中).33.The __________ is known for its significant wildlife population. (非洲)34.What is the name of the fairy tale character who lost her shoe?A. Snow WhiteB. CinderellaC. Sleeping BeautyD. Little Red Riding HoodB35.My teacher is a ______. She is very kind.36.What is the name of the fairy tale about a girl who lost her shoe?A. Sleeping BeautyB. CinderellaC. Snow WhiteD. Little Red Riding HoodB37.My friend is a ______. He loves to travel.38.The musician plays in a _____ (乐队).39.Which animal is known for its long neck?A. TigerB. GiraffeC. ElephantD. KangarooB Giraffe40.The man is very ________.41.What do we call the first letter of the alphabet?A. BB. AC. CD. DB42.The ______ (青蛙) croaks loudly in the evening.43. A ______ is a type of insect that can fly.44.What is the name of the famous ship that sank in 1912?A. TitanicB. BritannicC. OlympicD. LusitaniaA45.What is the capital of India?A. MumbaiB. New DelhiC. KolkataD. ChennaiB46.The ________ is very gentle and loves to be petted.47.I wear my favorite ______ (帽子) on sunny days.48. A lever can help lift heavy ______.49.The bear catches fish in the ____.anic solvents can dissolve ______ substances.51.What is the tallest mountain in the world?A. KilimanjaroB. K2C. Mount EverestD. Rocky Mountain52.What is the capital of South Korea?A. BeijingB. SeoulC. TokyoD. HanoiB53. A ____ is a playful animal that loves to chase after its friends.54.It is ___ outside. (sunny)55.The _____ (花卉展) showcases different types of flowers.56.The ancient Romans celebrated many ________ (节日).57.The dolphin is a ______ (社交的) animal.58.In _____ (智利), you can find the Atacama Desert.59.The chemical symbol for neon is ____.60.Which planet is known as the Red Planet?A. EarthB. VenusC. MarsD. Jupiter61.What do we use to write on a blackboard?A. PenB. CrayonC. ChalkD. MarkerC62.I enjoy ______ in the sunshine. (playing)63.The butterfly flaps its ______.64.We are going to ______ a movie tonight. (watch)65.My favorite animal is a _______ (海豚).66.What is the name of the structure that protects your foot?A. ShoeB. SockC. SandalD. BootA67.Who is known for saying "I have a dream"?A. Abraham LincolnB. Martin Luther King Jr.C. Nelson MandelaD. John F. KennedyB68.The first successful blood transfusion was performed in _______.69. A ______ is often used to represent the composition of a compound.70.I like to ______ (创建) art projects.71.What is the name of the fairy in Peter Pan?A. CinderellaB. Tinker BellC. Snow WhiteD. ArielB Tinker Bell72.How do you say "dog" in Spanish?A. PerroB. ChienC. HundD. Cane73.What do you call a person who travels to space?A. AstronautB. PilotC. CosmonautD. EngineerA74.The ______ helps with the regulation of blood pressure.75.I love my ________ (音乐玩具) that plays different tunes.76.The lion is known as the _______ (森林之王).77.I enjoy making up stories about my _________ (玩具).78.I like to help my ___ (parents).79.The first television broadcast occurred in ________.80. A black hole has a ______ force.81.I enjoy talking to my __________. (朋友)82.He is a _____ (评论员) who analyzes sports games.83.What is the primary color of a banana?A. GreenB. YellowC. BrownD. RedB84. A _______ (海马) has a unique swimming style.85. A __________ (晶体) has a regular geometric structure.86.What do we call the force that pulls objects toward the Earth?A. FrictionB. GravityC. MagnetismD. Acceleration87.My sister has a _____ (玩偶) that she takes everywhere. 我妹妹有一个她到处带的玩偶。

Origin of Intense Magnetic Fields Near Neutron Stars and Black Holes Due to Non-Minimal Gra

Origin of Intense Magnetic Fields Near Neutron Stars and Black Holes Due to Non-Minimal Gra

a rXiv:084.4895v1[astro-ph]3Apr28Origin of Intense Magnetic Fields Near Neutron Stars and Black Holes Due to Non-Minimal Gravitational-Electromagnetic Coupling.Rafael S.de Souza ∗and Reuven Opher †IAG,Universidade de S˜a o Paulo,Rua do Mat˜a o 1226,Cidade Universit´a ria,CEP 05508-900,S˜a o Paulo,SP,Brazil.Abstract The origin of magnetic fields in astrophysical objects is a challenging problem in astro-physics.Throughout the years,many scientists have suggested that non-minimal gravitational-electromagnetic coupling (NMGEC)could be the origin of the ubiquitous astrophysical magnetic fields.We investigate the possible origin of intense magnetic fields ∼1015−1016by NMGEC near rotating neutron stars and black holes,connected with magnetars,quasars,and gamma-ray bursts.Whereas these intense magnetic fields are difficult to explain astrophysically,we find that they are easily explained by NMGEC.I.INTRODUCTIONCosmic magneticfields pervade the Universe.However,their origin is one of the most challenging problems in modern astrophysics(e.g.,[1],[2]).Various authors have suggested a gravitational origin of the magneticfields in rotating celestial bodies.In particular,a number of studies have been made on nonminimal gravitational electromagnetic coupling (NMGEC).It has been motivated,in part,by the Schuster-Blackett(S-B)conjecture,which suggests that the magneticfields in planets and stars arise due to their rotation[3].In this scenario,neutral mass currents generate magneticfields,implying the existence of a non-minimal coupling between gravitational and electromagneticfields.An early attempt to encompass the S-B conjecture in a gravitational theory was made by Pauli in the1930s [4].During the1940s and50s,after Blackett resuscitated the conjecture[5],many authors, such as Bennett et al.[6],Papapetrou[7],and Luchak[8],also attempted to encompass it in a gravitational ter,in the eighties,Barut&Gornitz also studied the NMGEC conjecture[9].The majority of these studies were based on thefive-dimensional Kaluza-Klein formalism.This formalism was used in order to describe a unified theory of gravitation and electromagnetism with NMGEC in such a way that the S-B conjecture is obtained.Opher &Wichoski[10]proposed that the B∼10−6−10−5G magneticfield in spiral galaxies isdirectly obtained from NMGEC.In this paper,we investigate the possibility that NMGEC is the origin of the intense magneticfields near rotating neutron stars and black holes, connected with magnetars,quasars,and gamma ray bursts.II.BASIC FEATURES OF THE MODELNMGEC suggests the following relation between the angular momentum L and the mag-netic dipole moment m:m= β√2c L,(1) whereβis a constant,G the Newtonian constant of gravitation,and c is the speed of light. The angular momentum L isL=IΩ,(2)whereΩ=2πP−1is the angular velocity,P the rotational period,and I is the moment of inertia.The dipole moment m is related to the magneticfield B bym=1/2r3B,(3)where r is the distance from m to the point at which B is measured.Moving electric charges can create an additional magneticfield.Thisfield may partly compensate for the magneticfield of NMGEC origin.If a NMGECfield B nm is present,the total magnetic inductionfield B tot is B tot=B nm+B em,where B em is the magneticfield induced by the moving charges.Since electric charges may move in different ways in rotating bodies,it is to be expected thatβin(1)is not a universal constant.Indeed,different results forβwere found for fourteen different rotating bodies:metallic cylinders in the laboratory,moons,planets,stars and galaxies[11].A mean value forβwas found to beβ=0.076[11].III.MAGNETARSAnomalous X-ray pulsars(AXPs)and soft gamma-ray repeaters(SGRs)have been dis-covered in recent years.A pulsed component with a period of a few seconds was present in the radiation,which suggests that the central object is probably a single neutron star, since no sign of a companion was found.An important feature of SGRs is the presence of sporadic bursts of gamma radiation withflare energies up to1044ergs.The magneticfields of these objects,assuming that their deceleration is due to magnetic dipole radiation,are∼1015G,which is three orders of magnitude greater than thefields in radio pulsars.Assuming that the magneticfields play the determining role in these objects,they form a special group known as magnetars.Magnetars initially rotate with short periods∼1ms,but quickly lose most of their rotational energy through magnetic braking,giving a large energy boost to the associated supernova explosion.The magnetar model was introduced by Duncan and Thompson([12],[13]).The recent observation of quasi-periodic oscillations(QPOs)in giantflares in SGRs1806-20and1900+14may be thefirst direct detection of neutron star oscillations([14],[15],[16]). The Alfv´e n wave crossing time in the neutron star is t A=2R/V A∼70B−115ρ1/214R6ms,whereB≡1015B15G,the densityρ≡1014ρ14g/cm3,and V2A=B2/4πρ.Glampedakis et al.([17],[18])showed that the oscillating modes most likely to be excited by a fractured crust are those for which the crust and core oscillate together due to the coupling of the strong magneticfield,B∼1015G.These global modes are on the order of the pure toroidal crustal modes with frequencies∼30−100Hz([19],[20]).From eqs.(1)-(3),we obtain the NMGEC prediction for B nm,B nm=βc−1G1/2Ir−32πP−1G,(4) where I is in g cm2,r in km,and P is in seconds.Typical values for I and r for neutron stars are I=1045g cm2and r=106cm.When inserted in(4),we obtainB nm=5.414×1013βP−1G.(5)The very intense magneticfields,∼1015G,in magnetars are not easy to produce astro-physically.We examine the possibility that they could be produced by ing P ≃1ms in(5)for a newly born neutron star,we get B≃5×1016βG.We thusfind thatNMGEC can easily produce the requiredfields.IV.QUASARSSupermassive black holes are generally believed to be the power sources of quasars and other active galactic nuclei.Apart from its mass,the other fundamental properties of an astrophysical black hole are its charge and,in particular,its spin.A spinning Kerr black hole has a greater radiative efficiency than that of a non-rotating Schwarzschild black hole. Both are expected to have negligible charge due to the high conductivity of the surrounding plasma.Wang et al.[21]estimated the average radiative efficiency of a large sample of quasars,selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,by combining their luminosity and their black hole mass functions.They found that quasars have an average radiative efficiency of ∼30%−35%over the redshift interval0.4<z<2.1.This strongly suggests that the Kerr black holes are rotating very rapidly with approximately maximum angular momentum, which remains roughly constant with redshift.The inferred large spins and their lack of significant evolution with redshift are in agreement with the predictions of semianalytical models of hierarchical galaxy formation([22],[23],[21]).In these models,black holes gain most of their mass through accretion.Using the rotation measures(RMs)of high redshift galaxies,Pentericci et al.[24] obtained an estimate of the accretion disk magneticfield in the region where polarized optical radiation is generated.Assuming that the magneticflux is conserved and that the optical radiation is emitted from the accretion disk in the region∼103r g,(where r g is the gravitational radius of a supermassive black hole),we obtain the following estimate of the accretion disk magneticfield in the generation region of the optical radiation:B∼2×103(RM/103)(108M⊙/M BH)2G(6) [24].Thefield strength given by(6)for quasar accretion disks was found to be∼150−300 G[24].We can compare this value with the NMGEC prediction for magneticfields in quasars. Using(1)and taking M BH∼108M⊙andβ∼1,we obtain B∼109G near r g.Assumingthat the magneticflux produced by NMGEC is conserved as it expands from r g to103r g (decreasing as1/r2),we obtain B∼103G at r∼103r g,which is in good agreement with the quasar accretion disk magneticfield obtained from(6).V.GAMMA-RAY BURSTSMagneticfields are very important in Gamma-Ray Bursts(GRBs)[25].It is generally accepted that the observed afterglow is produced by synchrotron emission which involves magneticfields.Synchrotron radiation is also the best model for promptγ-ray emission. The relativistic outflow is a Poyntingflux(with negligible baryon content)[25].A natural way to produce the Poyntingflux is by magnetic reconnection.The magneticfield required for the Poyntingflux can easily be evaluated.Since the compact source is of size∼106cm,magneticfields∼1015G are needed to produce the required energy output of the GRB.We apply equation(1)to a rapidly rotating black hole,assumed to be the inner engine of a popular model of the GRB[25].The magneticfield in the vicinity of the black hole is obtained,using r∼106cm,from(3).The dimensionless spin parameterαof the GRB is defined as Jc/GM2.We then obtain the magneticfield for a GRB in terms of the spinparameterαfrom(1):B=G3/2M2αβ(r/R⊙)3αβG(7)The NMGEC prediction from(7),usingα∼1,β∼0.1,r∼106cm,and M∼2.5M⊙is B ∼1015Gauss,in good agreement with the requiredfield.VI.CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONObservations indicate the presence of intense magneticfields in magnetars,quasars and gamma-ray bursts(GRBs).Standard astrophysical theories have difficulty in ex-plaining them.We evaluated the magneticfields predicted by non-minimal gravitational-electromagnetic coupling(NMGEC)for these objects.In the magnetar models for AXPs, SGRs,and QPOs,magneticfields∼1015G are required.We showed that for typical values of moments of inertia,radii,and periods for rapidly rotating newly-born neutron stars,the NMGEC theory predicts the required magneticfields.The accretion disk magneticfield in quasars in the region∼103r g,where polarized optical radiation is generated,is estimated to be on the order of a thousand G.For a maximally rotating black hole in this region,NMGEC predicts thisfield.In GRBs a magneticfield∼1015G is required to produce the Poyntingflux needed to supply the energy observed.Thisfield is predicted by NMGEC to exist outside a rapidly rotating black hole of several solar mass.It is not easy to produce astrophysically intense magneticfields.We showed here that suchfields are predicted naturally by rapidly rotating neutron stars and black holes by NMGEC.If such intensefields are definitely proven to exist,it would give support for the NMGEC theory.AcknowledgmentsR.S.S.thanks the Brazilian agency FAPESP forfinancial support(04/05961-0).R.O. thanks FAPESP(06/56213-9)and the Brazilian agency CNPq(300414/82-0)for partial support.[1]Rees,M.J.1987,QJRAS,28,197.[2]Kronberg,P.P.1994,Rep.Prog.Phys.,57,325[3]Schuster,A.1980,Proc.R.Inst.,13,273[4]Pauli,W.1933,Ann.Phys.(Leipzig)18,305[5]Blackett,P.M.S.1947,Nature,159,658[6]Bennet et al.1949,Proc.R.Soc.London A,198,39[7]Papapetrou,A.,Philos.Mag.1950,41,399[8]Luchak,G.1952,Can.J.Phys.,29,470[9]Barut,A.O.and Gornitz,T.,Found.Phys.1985,15,433[10]Opher,R.and Wichoski,U.F.1997,Phys.Rev.Lett.,78,787[11]Jacob,B.2004,astro-ph/0401468[12]Duncan,R.C.,Thompson,C.1992,Astrophys.J.,L9,392[13]Thompson,C.,Duncan,R.C.1995,MNRAS,275,255[14]Israel,G.L.et al.2005,Astrophys.J.,628,L53[15]Strohmayer,T.F.and Watts,A.L.2005,Astrophys.J.,632,L111[16]Watts,A.L.and Strohmayer,T.F.2006,Astrophys.J.,637,L117[17]Glampedakis,K.,Samuelson,L.and Anderson,N.2006,MNRAS,371,L74[18]Glampedakis,K.,Samuelson,L.and Anderson,N.2007,Astrophys.Sp.Sci.,308,607[19]van Horn,H.M.1980,Astrophys.J.,236,899[20]Duncan,R.C.1998,Astrophys.J.,498,L45[21]Wang,J.M.,Chen,Y.M.,Ho,L.C.,&McLure,R.J.2006,ApJ,642,10[22]Volonteri,M.et al.2005,Astrophys.J.,620,69[23]Soltan,A.1982,MNRAS,200,115[24]Pentericci,L.,van Reeven,W.and&Carilli,C.L.,et al.2000,A&A Suppl.,145,121[25]Piran,T.2005,Rev.Mod.Phys.,76,1143。

凝聚态物理实验第六章第一节

凝聚态物理实验第六章第一节

Curie-Weiss Paramagnetism
• CW paramagnetism originates from local spins with interactions.
• The Weiss temperature characterizes the type and strength of the interaspins. • When > 0, there is ferromagnetic interactions between neighboring spins, i.e., spins tend to align parallel.
• Many things can fly (levitated) in a strong magnetic field, WHY?
• It is due to the materials‟ diamagnetism.
• What causes the diamagnetism?
Atomic magnetism
Curie Paramagnetism
• If the material contains partially filled inner electronic shell (unpaired spin), then it could have local magnetic moment.
• Then the second term in the Hamiltonian leads to Curie paramagnetism.
ri is the z-projection of the electron orbital
• This is a diamagnetic term caused by all electrons in an atom, even for filled cores. Thus it is called core diamagnetism.

磁单极子

磁单极子

“There’s a mathematical analogy here, a neat and beautiful one. But they’re not magnetic monopoles”Steven Bramwell, a physicist at University College London who pioneered work on monopoles in spin ices, says摘录自原文,和以往一样,不是真正的磁单极子,所以nature才会没有放在最头条这是一个很古老的问题了, 三个月前就被提了出来. 但我最近才对这篇文章所做的工作有所了解. (因为前几天组会提到这篇文章了...) 虽然现在这个问题可能已经不受关注了, 但由于与我所研究的领域紧密相关, 我还是决定把答案写下来.(本答案前几段只需要普通物理和微积分的基本知识. 涉及文章内容的部分需要有关spinor BEC 以及超流的知识, 但我还是尽量用通俗的语言将实验内容描述了一遍. )首先应当简要介绍一下Dirac磁单极子. 我们知道在Maxwell方程组中, 电场是有源的而磁场是无源的:<-磁场无源, 不存在"磁荷".并且磁场也不会产生电场对应的"磁流":<-不存在"磁流".因而Maxwell方程组对于电和磁是不对称的. 在电磁学的初期人们曾经类比电荷提出过磁荷的概念, 但那只是naive的想法, 最终被实验否决了. 磁单极子真正现代的讨论起源于1931年Dirac在提出相对论量子力学时, 发现磁单极子具有一些奇特的性质: 考虑一个强度为的磁单极子和强度为的电单极子(即电荷)同时存在在空间里, 则磁荷和电荷必须量子化. 在自然单位制下, 这个结果可以写成, 其中是整数. 因此磁单极子的存在将会导致电荷量子化, 而电单极子的存在将会导致磁荷量子化. [1] 我们还需要了解所谓"Dirac弦"的概念. 这个概念的核心是说, 描述磁单极子的磁矢势必然是奇异的: 考虑在原点的一个磁单极子, 以及一个围绕原点而半径为的球体. 假如存在一个无奇点的, 则根据Stokes定理,, 结果取0是因为闭曲面的边界是0. 但对于磁单极子, 磁通量, 矛盾. 因此在球面上至少有一个奇异点. 将所有的所对应的这些奇异点连起来, 就得到了一条从原点到无穷远的Dirac弦. [2]下面便可以介绍题目中所提到的Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field这篇文章. 简单说来, 这里所指的"Dirac monopoles"和上文所提到的Dirac磁单极子(Dirac magnetic monopoles, 注意文章标题中并没有magnetic)除了数学结构上一样之外, 没有物理上的关联.文章中将一团spinor BEC放入一系列人工设置的磁场中. 在绝热近似下, 自旋所感受到的磁场, locally正是如同磁单极子的磁场. 这会导致superfluid velocity的形式与磁单极子的磁矢势的形式完全相同, 即, 而的奇异点, 即所谓Dirac弦, 就是下图中红色的与z轴平行的部分. 由于vorticity是, 因此vorticity的形式与磁单极子的磁场相同, 即.如果用经典的模型解释这个实验, 粗略地说来是在极低温下将一团没有粘滞阻力的液体即超流液体放置在用激光调制的精心设计的人工磁场中. 这样液体流动的速度场和磁单极子的磁矢势相似, 液体流动的涡量场(就是速度场的旋度, 描述液体旋涡运动程度)和磁单极子的磁场相似. 这样磁单极子的磁矢势和磁场就完全以相同的数学结构类比到spinor BEC的superfluid velocity和vorticity上去了, 这就是文章所声称的"Dirac monopoles". 但是这个类比和之前所说的磁单极子导致电荷量子化等等没有任何关系, 这里的Dirac monopoles的结构不导致任何量子化. 不过这篇文章从冷原子的角度说, 还是有一些有意思的结果. 比如上图中的Dirac弦最终将会reduce到两根vortex lines, 这阐明了上述结果实际上是两根vortex lines 并到一起的极限情况. (不同vortex lines的vortex方向是相反的, 因此并到一起会抵消. 只有在原点留下奇异点. )其实人家也没说这是Dirac magnetic monopole, 只说是Dirac monopole...只是因为有些人会错意了而已... 因此实际上这个问题的标题应该改成: "如何看待2014 年1 月30 日《自然》关于狄拉克单极子的文章?" 其实Nature为了求新求异经常没节操地发表一些不大靠谱的文章, 例子太多实在不甚枚举. 对于Nature上的文章还应该谨慎对待.[1] 现在我们用局域规范不变性导出电荷量子化, 而不依赖于磁单极子, 但那时还没有这样的理论.[2] Dirac弦具体形式依赖于所选取的磁矢势的规范. 值得一提的是, 上述证明最早来自于杨振宁. 他基于此利用数学上纤维丛的概念, 发展了规范场的理论. 他指出所谓规范场就是主丛上的联络, DIrac的磁单极量子化就是丛按照第一陈类进行分类的结果. 有关于此, 他自己有一篇很精彩的科普性文章: MAGNETIC MONOPOLES, FIBER BUNDLES, AND GAUGE FIELDS.此文有中文翻译.【知乎用户的回答(19票)】:赞同@欧阳月空的答案。

The Magnetic Monopole Seventy-Five Years Later

The Magnetic Monopole Seventy-Five Years Later

To appear in a special volume of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, in honor of the 65th birthday of Gabriele Veneziano. 2 e-mail: konishi(at)df.unipi.it
2
however describes the dynamics of quarks and gluons, and it is not obvious from (1) how magnetic (dual) degrees of freedom appear and how they interact. One way to detect such degrees of freedom is ’t Hooft’s Abelian gauge fixing. One chooses the gauge so that a given field (perhaps some composite a of Fµν ) in the adjoint representation to take an Abelian form λ1 0 0 X = 0 λ2 0 , λ 1 > λ2 > λ3 . (2) 0 0 λ3 For a generic gauge-field configuration Aµ (x), however, it is not possible to keep the above diagonal form everywhere in R4 . Near a singularity λ1 = λ2 , diagonalization of the matrix X = X |λ1 =λ2 + C (x) 0 0 0 (3)

On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars

On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars

a r X i v :a s t r o -p h /0002525v 1 29 F eb 2000Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.000,1–??(1999)Printed 1February 2008(MN L A T E X style file v1.4)On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radiopulsarsV.S.Beskin 1,2and R.R.Rafikov 31National Astronomical Observatory,Osawa 2–21–1,Mitaka,Tokyo 181–8588,Japan 2P.N.Lebedev Physical Institute,Leninsky prosp.,53,Moscow,117924,Russia 3Princeton University Observatory,Princeton,NJ,08544,USAAccepted 1999.Received 1999;in original form 1999ABSTRACTThe two–fluid effects on the radial outflow of relativistic electron–positron plasma are considered.It is shown that for large enough Michel (1969)magnetization param-eter σ≫1and multiplication parameter λ=n/n GJ ≫1one–fluid MHD approxima-tion remains correct in the whole region |E |<|B |.In the case when the longitudinal electric current is smaller than the Goldreich–Julian one,the acceleration of particles near the light surface |E |=|B |is determined.It is shown that,as in the previously considered (Beskin Gurevich &Istomin 1983)cylindrical geometry,almost all electro-magnetic energy is transformed into the energy of particles in the narrow boundary layer ∆̟/̟∼λ−1.Key words:two–fluid relativistic MHD:radio pulsars—particle acceleration1INTRODUCTIONDespite the fact that the structure of the magnetosphere of radio pulsars remains one of the fundamental astrophysical problems,the common view on the key theoretical question –what is the physical nature of the neutron star braking –is absent (Michel 1991,Beskin Gurevich &Istomin 1993,Mestel 1999).Nevertheless,very extensive theoretical studies in the seventies and the eighties allowed to obtain some model-independent results.One of them is the absence of magnetodipole energy loss.This result was first obtained theoretically (Henriksen &Norton 1975,Beskin et al 1983).It was shown that the electric charges filling the magnetosphere screen fully the magnetodipole radiation of a neutron star for an arbitrary inclination angle χbetween the rotational and magnetic axes if there are no longitudinal currents flowing in the ter this result was also confirmed by observations.The direct detections of the interaction of the pulsar wind with a companion star in close binaries (see e.g.Djorgovsky &Evans 1988,Kulkarni &Hester 1988)have shown that it is impossible to explain the heating of the companion by a low–frequency magnetodipole wave.On the other hand,the detailed mechanism of particle acceleration remains unclear.Indeed,a very high magnetization parameter σ(Michel 1969)in the pulsar magnetosphere demonstrates that within the light cylinder r <R L =c/Ωthe main part of the energy is transported by the Poynting flux.It means that the additional mechanism of particle acceleration must work in the vicinity of the light cylinder.It is necessary to stress that an effective particle acceleration can only take place for small enough longitudinal electric currents I <I GJ when the plasma has no possibility to pass smoothly through the fast magnetosonic surface and when the light surface |E |=|B |is located at a finite distance.As to the case of the large longitudinal currents I >I GJ ,both analytical (Tomimatsu 1994,Begelman &Li 1994,Beskin et al 1998)and numerical (Bogovalov 1997)considerations demonstrate that the acceleration becomes ineffective outside the fast magnetosonic surface,and the particle-to-Poynting flux ratio remains small:∼σ−2/3(Michel 1969,Okamoto 1978).The acceleration of an electron–positron plasma near the light surface was considered by Beskin Gurevich and Istomin (1983)in the simple 1D cylindrical geometry for I ≪I GJ .It was shown that in a narrow boundary layer ∆̟/̟∼1/λalmost all electromagnetic energy is actually converted to the particles energy.Nevertheless,cylindrical geometry does not provide the complete picture of particle acceleration.In particular,it was impossible to include self–consistently the disturbance of a poloidal magnetic field and an electric potential,the later playing the main role in the problem of the plasma acceleration (for more details see e.g.Mestel &Shibata 1994).Hence,a more careful 2D consideration is necessary.c1999RAS2V.S.Beskin and R.R.RafikovIn Sect.2we formulate a complete system of2D two–fluid MHD equations describing the electron–positron outflow from a magnetized body with a monopole magneticfield.The presence of an exact analytical force–free solution(Michel 1973)allows us to linearize this system which results in the existence of invariants(energy and angular momentum)along unperturbed monopolefield lines similar to the ideal one–fluid MHDflow.In Sect.3it is shown that forσ≫1andλ≫1 (λ=n/n GJ is the multiplication factor)the one–fluid MHD approximation remains true in the entire region within the light surface.Finally,in Sect.4the acceleration of particles near the light surface|E|=|B|is considered.It is shown that,as in the case of cylindrical geometry,in a narrow boundary layer∆̟/̟∼λ−1almost all the electromagnetic energy is converted into the energy of particles.2BASIC EQUATIONSLet us consider a stationary axisymmetric outflow of a two–component plasma in the vicinity of an active object with a monopole magneticfield.It is necessary to stress that,of course,the monopole magneticfield is a rather crude approximation for a pulsar magnetosphere.Nevertheless,even for a dipole magneticfield near the origin,at large distances r≫R L in the wind zone the magneticfield can have a monopole–like structure.For this reason the disturbance of a monopole magnetic field can give us an important information concerning particle acceleration far from the neutron star.The structure of theflow is described by the set of Maxwell‘s equations and the equations of motion∇E=4πρe,∇×E=0,∇B=0,∇×B=4πc×B.(2)Here E and B are the electric and magneticfields,ρe and j are the charge and current densities,and v±and p±are the speed and momentum of particles.In the limit of infinite particle energyγ=∞,v0r=c,v0ϕ=0,v0θ=0,(3) and for charge and current densityρ0e=ρs R2sr2cosθ,(4)the monopole poloidal magneticfieldB0r=B sR2scR sccosθ,(7) and theflux functionΨ(r,θ),so thatB0p=∇Ψ×eϕ2πce R2s2cosθ+η+(r,θ) ,(9)n−=ΩB sr2 λ+1c[−cosθ+δ(r,θ)],(11)Ψ(r,θ)=2πB s R2s[1−cosθ+εf(r,θ)],(12)c 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars3v ±r=c1−ξ±r (r,θ),v ±θ=cξ±θ(r,θ),v ±ϕ=cξ±ϕ(r,θ),(13)B r =B sR 2ssin θ∂fr sin θ∂f cR s c ∂δcr−sin θ−∂δsin θ∂2cos θξ+r−λ+1∂rr2∂δsin θ∂∂θ=0,(20)∂ζrλ−12cos θξ−θ,(21)−ε∂r 2−ε∂θ 1∂θ=2Ω2cos θξ+ϕ−λ+1∂rξ+θγ++ξ+θγ+r ∂δr −sin θΩr2ξ+ϕ,(23)∂r=−4λσ −1∂θ+ζrξ−r +c∂rγ+=4λσ−∂δr ξ+θ,(25)∂∂r−sin θ∂rξ+ϕγ++ξ+ϕγ+Ωr sin θ∂fΩr 2ξ+θ,(27)∂r=−4λσ −εc∂r−c4λmc 3(29)is the Michel‘s (1969)magnetization parameter,m is the electron mass,and all deflecting functions are supposed to be ≪1.It is necessary to stress that for applications the magnetic field B s is to be taken near the light cylinder R s ≈R L because in the internal region of the pulsar magnetosphere B ∝r −3.As it has already been mentioned,only outside the light cylinder the poloidal magnetic field may have quasi monopole structure.As a result,σ=Ω2eB 0R 34V.S.Beskin and R.R.Rafikov1975,Arons Scharlemann 1979),γin ≤102for secondary plasma.For this reason in what follows we consider in more details the caseγ3in ≪σ,(34)when the additional acceleration of particles inside the fast magnetosonic surface takes place (see e.g.Beskin Kuznetsova Rafikov 1998).It is this case that can be realized for fast pulsars.Moreover,it has more general interest because the relation(34)may be true also for AGNs.As to the case γ3in ≫σcorresponding to ordinary pulsars,the particle energy remains constant (γ=γin )at any way up to the fast magnetosonic surface (see Bogovalov 1997for details).Further,one can putδ(R s ,θ)=0,(35)εf (R s ,θ)=0,(36)η+(R s ,θ)−η−(R s ,θ)=0.(37)These conditions result from the relation c E s +ΩR s e ϕ×B s =0corresponding rigid rotation and perfect conductivity of the surface of a star.Finally,as will be shown in Sect.3.2,the derivative ∂δ/∂r actually determines the phase of plasma oscillations only and plays no role in the global structure.Finally,the determination of the electric current and,say,the derivative ∂f/∂r depend on the problem under consideration.Indeed,as is well–known,the cold one–fluid MHD outflow contains two singular surfaces,Alfv´e nic and fast magnetosonic ones.It means that for the transonic flow two latter functions are to be determined from critical conditions (Heyvaerts 1996).In particular,the longitudinal electric current within this approach is not a free parameter.On the other hand,if the electric current is restricted by some physical reason,the flow cannot pass smoothly through the fast magnetosonic surface.In this case,which can be realized in the magnetosphere of radio pulsars (Beskin et al 1983,Beskin &Malyshkin 1998),near the light surface |E |=|B |an effective particle acceleration may take place.Such an acceleration will be considered in Sect.4.3THE ELECTRON–POSITRON OUTFLOW 3.1The MHD LimitIn the general case Eqns.(19)–(28)have several integrals.Firstly,Eqns.(21),(25),and (26)result in ζ−22σλsin θ=1sin θ,(38)where l (θ)describe the disturbance of the electric current at the star surface by the equation I (R,θ)=I A sin 2θ+l (θ).Expression (38)corresponds to conservation of the total energy flux along a magnetic field line.Furthermore,Eqns.(25)–(28)together with the boundary conditions (35),(36)result in δ=εf −1c ξ+ϕ+14λσγ−1−Ωr sin θ4λσγin .(40)They correspond to conservation of the z –component of the angular momentum for both types of particles.It is necessary to stress that the complete nonlinearized system of equations contains no such simple invariants.As σλ≫1,we can neglect in Eqns.(23)–(28)their left-hand sides.In this approximation we have ξ+=ξ−i.e.γ−=γ+=γ,so that −1∂θ+ζr ξr +c Ωr sin θ∂fΩr 2ξθ=0,(42)and γ1−Ωr sin θtan θεf +l (θ)σsin θ(γ−γin ).(45)c1999RAS,MNRAS 000,1–??On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars5 Substituting these expressions into(41)and using Eqns.(19)–(22),we obtain the following equation describing the disturbance of the magnetic surfacesε(1−x2sin2θ)∂2fx2∂sinθ∂f∂x−2εsinθcosθ∂fsinθdσ(γ−γin)−sinθ∂θ−2λsin2θ(ξ+r−ξ−r)+2λxsinθ(ξ+ϕ−ξ−ϕ)≈0,(47)so actually there is perfect agreement with the MHD approximationε(1−x2sin2θ)∂2fx2∂sinθ∂f∂x−2εsinθcosθ∂fsinθdσ(γ−γin)−sinθ∂θ=0.As was shown earlier(Beskin et al1998),to pass through the fast magnetosonic surface it’s necessary to have|l|<σ−4/3.(49) Hence,within the fast magnetosonic surface r≪r F one can neglect terms containingδ=εf andζ.Then,relations(41)and (42)result inγ(1−x sinθξϕ)=γin,(50)ξr=ξϕ2ξr−ξ2ϕ,(53) we obtain forσ≫γ3in for r≪r Fγ2=γ2in+x2sin2θ,(54)ξϕ= x sinθ x sinθ,(55)ξr= x2sin2θ x2sin2θ,(56)in full agreement with the MHD results.Next,to determine the position of the fast magnetosonic surface r F,one can analyze the algebraic equations(38)and (41)which give−∂δtanθδ−1xξϕ=0.(57) Using now expressions(43)and(53),one canfind2γ3−2σ K+1∂θ.(59) Equation(58)allows us to determine the position of the fast magnetosonic surface and the energy of particles.Indeed, determining the derivative r∂γ/∂r,one can obtainr ∂γ3γ−σ(2K+x−2).(60)c 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??6V.S.Beskin and R.R.RafikovAs the fast magnetosonic surface is the X–point,both the nominator and denominator are to be equal to zero here.As a result,evaluating r∂K/∂r as K,we obtainδ∼σ−2/3;(61) r F∼σ1/3R L;(62)γ(r F)=σ1/3sin2/3θ,(63) where the last expression is exact.These equations coincide with those obtained within the MHD consideration.It is the self–consistent analysis whenδ=εf,and hence K depends on the radius r that results in thefinite value for the fast magnetosonic radius r F.On the other hand,in a given monopole magneticfield,whenεf does not depend on the radius,the critical conditions result in r F→∞for a cold outflow(Michel,1969,Li et al1992).Near the fast magnetosonic surface r∼σ1/3R L the MHD solution givesγ∼σ1/3,(64)εf∼σ−2/3.(65) Hence,Eqns.(53),(55),and(56)result inξr∼σ−2/3,(66)ξθ∼σ−2/3,(67)ξϕ∼σ−1/3.(68) As we see,theθ–component of the velocity plays no role in the determination of theγ.However,analyzing the left-hand sides of the Eqns.(23)–(28)one can evaluate the additional(nonhydrodynamic)varia-tions of the velocity components∆ξ±r∼λ−1σ−4/3,(69)∆ξ±θ∼λ−1σ−2/3,(70)∆ξ±ϕ∼λ−1σ−1.(71) Hence,for nonhydrodynamic velocities∆ξ±r≪ξr and∆ξ±ϕ≪ξϕto be small,it is necessary to have a large magnetizationparameterσ≫1only.On the other hand,∆ξ±θ/ξθ∼λ−1.In other words,for a highly magnetized plasmaσ≫1even outside the fast magnetosonic surface the velocity components(and,hence,the particle energy)can be considered hydrodynamically. The difference∼λ−1appears in theθcomponent only,but it does not affect the particle energy.Finally,one can obtain from (39),(40)thatδ−εftanθδ−σ−11∂θ+sinθξr.(75) Together with(21)one can obtain for r≫r Fγ=σ 2cosθεf−εsinθ∂f∂r r2∂f∂θξr+1∂θ(ξϕsinθ)=0.(77) Together with(76)this equation in the limit r≫r F coincides with the asymptotic version of the trans–field equation (Tomimatsu1994,Beskin et al1998)ε∂2f∂r−sinθD+1∂θ=0,(78)where g(θ)=K(θ)/sin2θ,andc 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars7D +1=1∂rr 2∂δ∂θ+1∂θ(ξϕsin θ)+2λ(ξ+r −ξ−r )=0.(80)Indeed,one can see from equations (19)and (20)that near the origin x =R s in the case γ+in =γ−in (and for the small variationof the current ζ∼σ−4/3which is necessary,as was already stressed,to pass through a fast magnetosonic surface)the densityvariation on the surface is large enough:(η+−η−)∼γ−2in ≫ζ.Hence,the derivative ∂2δ/∂r 2here is of the order of γ−2in .Onthe other hand,according to (22),the derivative ε∂2f/∂r 2is x 2times smaller.This means that in the two–component system the longitudinal electric field is to appear resulting in a redistribution of the particle energy.Clearly,such a redistribution is impossible for the charge–separated outflow.In other words,for a finite particle energy a one–component plasma cannot maintain simultaneously both the Goldreich charge and Goldreich current density (4).In a two–component system with λ≫1it can be realized by a small redistribution of particle energy (Ruderman &Sutherland 1975,Arons &Scharlemann 1989).For simplicity,let us consider only small distances x ≪1.In this case one can neglect the changes of the magnetic ing now (25)and (26),we haveγ+=γin −4λσδ;(81)γ−=γin +4λσδ.(82)Finally,taking into account that ξθand ξϕare small here,one can obtain from (20)r2∂2δ∂r +1∂θsin θ∂δγ2in,(83)where A =16λ2σ16λ2σ,(86)and µ≈√∂rr2∂δ∂θξr +1∂θ(ξϕsin θ)=0.(89)c1999RAS,MNRAS 000,1–??8V.S.Beskin and R.R.RafikovAsδ∼εf≪σ−2/3for r≪r F,andξr∼γ−20≫δ,thefirst term in(89)can be omitted.As a result,the solution of Eqn.(89)coincides exactly with the MHD expression,i.e.γ2=γ2in+x2sin2θ(54).Finally,using(87),(88),and(55)–(56), one can easily check that the nonhydrodynamical terms(47)in the trans–field equation(48)do actually vanish.4THE BOUNDARY LAYERLet us now consider the case when the longitudinal electric current I(R,θ)in the magnetosphere of radio pulsars is too small (i.e.the disturbance l(θ)is too large)for theflow to pass smoothly through the fast magnetosonic surface.First of all,it can be realized when the electric current is much smaller than the Goldreich one.This possibility was already discussed within the Ruderman–Sutherland model of the internal gap(Beskin et al1983,Beskin&Malyshkin1998).But it may take place in the Arons model(Arons&Scharlemann1979)as well.Indeed,within this model the electric current is determined by the gap structure.Hence,in general case this current does not correspond to the critical condition at the fast magnetosonic surface.In particular,it may be smaller than the critical current(of course,the separate consideration is necessary to check this statement).For simplicity let us consider the case l(θ)=h sin2θ.Neglecting now the last terms∝σ−1in the trans–field equation (48),we obtainε(1−x2sin2θ)∂2fx2∂sinθ∂f∂x−2εsinθcosθ∂f(2|h|)1/4.(92) As we see,for l(θ)=h sin2θthis surface has the form of a cylinder.It is important that the disturbance of magnetic surfaces εf∼(|h|)1/2remains small here.Comparing now the position of the light surface(92)with that of the fast magnetosonic surface(62),one canfind that the light surface is located inside the fast magnetosonic one ifσ−4/3≪|h|≪1,(93) which is opposite to(49).One can check that the condition(93)just allows to neglect the non force–free term in Eqn.(48).Using now the solution(91)and the MHD conditionδ=εf,one canfind from(58)2γ3−2σ hx2sin4θ+1√x0−x sinθ,(95) wherex0=14(2|h|)1/21On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars 9 Figure1.The behavior of the Lorentz factor in the caseσ−4/3≪|h|≪1.One can see that the one–fluid MHD solution(95)existsforγ<σ1/3only.But in the two–fluid approximation in the narrow layer∆̟=̟c/λthe particle energy increases up to the value∼σcorresponding to the full conversion of the electromagnetic energy to the energy of particles.invariants(39)and(40)can be used to defineξ±ϕ:ξ+ϕ=1γ+ ;(99)ξ−ϕ=1γ− .(100)Furthermore,one can define2ξ+r=1(γ−)2+(ξ−ϕ)2+(ξ−θ)2.(102) As to the energy integral(38),it determines the variation of the currentζ.Now it can be rewritten asζ=22σsinθ.(103)Finally,Eqns.(19)–(28)look like̟2c d2δ2cosθ ξ+θ− λ+12cosθ ξ+r− λ+1d̟2=−2sin2θ λ−12cosθ ξ−ϕ ,(105)̟c d2σsinθ−̟ccosθd̟−sinθξ+r+sinθd̟ ξ−θγ− =−4λσ −γ++γ−sinθdδx0ξ−ϕ ,(107)̟cdd̟−sinθξ+θ,(108)c 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??10V.S.Beskin and R.R.Rafikov̟c dd̟−sinθξ−θ,(109)where we neglected the terms∝δ/r in(106)and(107).Comparing the leading terms,we have inside the layer∆̟/R L∼λ−1γ±∼h1/2cσ,(110)ξ±θ∼h1/4c,(111)ξ±r∼h1/2c,(112)∆δ∼h3/4c/λ,(113) where h c=|h|.Then the leading terms in(99)–(103)for∆̟>λ−1R L areξ+ϕ=1x0,(114)ξ−ϕ=1x0,(115)2ξ+r=(ξ+ϕ)2+(ξ+θ)2,(116) 2ξ−r=(ξ−ϕ)2+(ξ−θ)2,(117)ζ=−(γ++γ−)d̟2=2λsinθcosθ(ξ+θ−ξ−θ),(119)̟c d2σsinθ−̟ccosθd̟−sinθξ+r,(120)̟c d2σsinθ−̟ccosθd̟−sinθξ−r,(121)̟cdd̟ γ− =4λσsinθξ−θ,(123)with all the terms in the right–hand sides of(120)and(121)being of the same order of magnitude.As a result,the nonlinear equations(119)–(123)and(105)give the following simple asymptotic solutionγ±=4sin2θσ(λl)2,(124)ξ±θ=∓2sinθλl,(125)∆δ=−4On the particle acceleration near the light surface of radio pulsars11F(rad) x =−2m2c4γ2 (E y−B z)2+(E z−B y)2 ,(129)which can be important for large enough particle paring(129)with appropriate terms in(120)–(123)one can conclude that the radiation force can be neglected forσ<σcr,whereσcr= cc <3×10−3B−3/712λ2/74(131)which givesP>0.06B3/712λ−2/74s.(132)Hence,for most radio pulsars the radiation force indeed can be neglected.As to the pulsars withσ>σcr,it is clear that for γ>σcr the radiation force becomes larger than the electromagnetic one and strongly inhibits any further acceleration.As a result,we can evaluate the maximum gamma–factor which can be reached during the acceleration asγmax≈σcr≈106.(133)5DISCUSSIONThus,on a simple example it was demonstrated that for real physical parameters of the magnetosphere of radio pulsars (σ≫1andλ≫1)the one–fluid MHD approximation remains true in the whole region within the light surface|E|=|B|. On the other hand,it was shown that in a more realistic2D case the main properties of the boundary layer near the light surface existing for small enough longitudinal currents I<I GJ(effective energy transformation from electromagneticfield to particles,current closure in this region,smallness of the disturbance of electric potential and poloidal magneticfield)remain the same as in the1D case considered previously(Beskin et al1983).It is necessary to stress the main astrophysical consequences of our results.First of all,the presence of such a boundary layer explains the effective energy transformation of electromagnetic energy into the energy of particles.As was already stressed,now the existence of such an acceleration is confirmed by observations of close binaries containing radio pulsars(as to the particle acceleration far from a neutron star,see e.g.Kennel&Coroniti1984,Hoshino et al1992,Gallant&Arons 1994).Simultaneously,it allows us to understand the current closure in the pulsar magnetosphere.Finally,particle acceleration results in the additional mechanism of high–energy radiation from the boundary of the magnetosphere(for more details see Beskin et al1993).Nevertheless,it is clear that the results obtained do not solve the whole pulsar wind problem.Indeed,as in the cylindrical case,it is impossible to describe the particle motion outside the light surface.The point is that,as one can see directly from Eqn.(126),for a complete conversion of electromagnetic energy into the energy of particles it is enough for them to pass onlyλ−1of the total potential drop between pulsar magnetosphere and infinity.It means that the electron–positron wind propagating to infinity has to pass the potential drop which is much larger than their energy.It is possible only in the presence of electromagnetic waves even in an axisymmetric magnetosphere which is stationary near the origin.Clearly,such aflow cannot be considered even within the two–fluid approximation.In our opinion,it is only a numerical consideration that can solve the problem completely and determine,in particular,the energy spectrum of particles and the structure of the pulsar wind.Unfortunately,up to now such numerical calculations are absent.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors are grateful to I.Okamoto and H.Sol for fruitful discussions.VSB thanks National Astronomical Observatory, Japan for hospitality.This work was supported by INTAS Grant96–154and by Russian Foundation for Basic Research(Grant 96–02–18203).REFERENCESArons J.,Scharlemann E.T.,1979,ApJ,231,854Begelman M.C.,Li Z.-Y.,1994,ApJ,426,269Beskin V.S.,Gurevich A.V.,Istomin Ya.N.,1983,Soviet Phys.JETP,58,235Beskin V.S.,Gurevich A.V.,Istomin Ya.N.,1993,Physics of the Pulsar Magnetosphere,Cambridge Univ.Press,CambridgeBeskin V.S.,Kuznetsova I.V.,Rafikov R.R.,1998,MNRAS299,341c 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??12V.S.Beskin and R.R.RafikovBeskin V.S.,Malyshkin L.M.,1998,MNRAS298,847Bogovalov S.V.,1997,A&A,327,662Djorgovsky S.,Evans C.R.,1988,ApJ,335,L61Gallant Y.A.,Arons J.,1994,ApJ,435,230Goldreich P.,Julian,W.H.,1969,ApJ,157,869Henriksen R.N.,Norton J.A.,1975,ApJ,201,719Heyvaerts J.,1996,in Chiuderi C.,Einaudi G.,ed,Plasma Astrophysics,Springer,Berlin,p.31Hoshino M.,Arons J.,Gallant Y.A.,Langdon A.B.,1992,ApJ,390,454Kennel C.F.,Coroniti,F.V.,1984,ApJ,283,694Kulkarni S.R.,Hester J.,1988,Nature,335,801Li Zh.–Yu.,Chiueh T.,Begelman M.C.,1992,ApJ,394,459Mestel L.,1999,Cosmical Magnetism,Clarendon Press,OxfordMestel L.,Shibata S.,1994,MNRAS,271,621Michel F.C.,1969,ApJ,158,727Michel F.C.,1973,ApJ,180,L133Michel F.C.,1991,Theory of Neutron Star Magnetosphere,The Univ.of Chicago Press,ChicagoOkamoto I.,1978,MNRAS,185,69Ruderman M.A.,Sutherland P.G.,1975,ApJ,196,51Shibata S.,1997,MNRAS,287,262Tomimatsu A.,1994,Proc.Astron.Soc.Japan,46,123c 1999RAS,MNRAS000,1–??。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

. Astrophysics bounds on the flux of magnetic monopole and evidence that the galactic magnetic field is mainly azimuthal [9] indicate that the excess number density of such object, if they really exist, is very small. Moreover, upper bounds on the number density of global monopole is at most one in the local group of galaxies as pointed out by Hiscock [10]. Differently from a pure global monopole, this compost topological defect exerts a gravitational interaction on surrounding matter, apart from the electromagnetic one on charged particles. So, such object shares with both, global and magnetic monopole, some of their relevant properties. Numerical simulation related with the upper bound on the number density of them in the Universe, may be developed in a similar manner as it was developed to global monopole only in the paper by Bennett and Rhie [11]. The complete information about this system requires the knowledge of the behaviors of the matter and gravitational fields, i.e., we have to know how these fields change along the distance and how they are connected; besides we also want to know how these fields’ behaviors are affected when the energy scale of breakdown of gauge symmetry and the Higgs self-coupling are varying. Because it is impossible to solve analytically the complete set of coupled differential equation associated with this system, only numerical analysis makes possible to obtain these informations. Numerical analysis of self-gravitating magnetic monopole has been developed by several authors, see for example Refs. [5] and [12]. For the global monopole case Harari and Loust´ o [13] have shown numerically the behavior of the Higgs field and how it is affected by the variation of the parameter η . More recently Maison [14] and Liebling [15] have analyzed the stability condition for the global monopole solution. They found that for η bigger than some critical value, the global monopole fail to be static. This paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we briefly review some of the relevant characteristics of the local and global monopole in a curved spacetime. We also introduce the model used to describe the system which presents the topological defect formed by both monopoles and derive the equations of motion which governs the behavior of this object. Because it is
Abstract In this paper we study the regular self-gravitating ’t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole in a global monopole spacetime. We show that for the large distance, the structure of the manifold corresponds to the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om spacetime with a solid angle deficit factor. Although we analyze static and spherically symmetric solutions, it is not possible to solve analytically the system of coupled differential equations and only numerical evaluations can provide detailed information about the behavior of this system at the neighborhood of the defect’s core. So, for this reason we solve numerically the set of differential equations for the metric tensor and for the matter fields for different values of the Higgs field vacuum expectation value, η , and

E-mail: spinelly@fisica.ufpb.br E-mail: umbelino@ccen.ufpb.br ‡ E-mail: emello@fisica.ufpb.br

1
the self-coupling constant, λ. PACS: 04.20-q, 41.20-q, 04.20Jb, 11.duction
The self-gravitating ’t Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopole [1] in a curved spacetime has been studied a few years ago considering it as a magnetic point charge [2, 3]. The exact solution obtained for the metric tensor has the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om form corresponding to a point (magnetic) charge g = 1/e. A regular solution for this system has been presented by Nieuwenhuizen et al [4]. There, they have constructed a positive-definite functional energy function of the matter fields only. They claimed that this is enough to prove the existence of non-singular monopole solutions. More recently Lee et al [5] and Ortiz [6] have shown that non-singular monopole solutions exist only if the Higgs vacuum expectation value, η , is smaller or equal to a critical value, ηcr , which is of order of the Planck mass. In the limiting case the monopole becomes a black hole, with the region outside the horizon described by the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om solution. Barriola and Vilenkin [7] have analyzed the effect in the geometry of the spacetime produced by a system composed by Higgs field only, which undergoes to a spontaneous breakdown of global O (3) gauge symmetry. They noticed that the solution for the metric tensor is similar to the Schwarzchild spacetime with an additional solid angle deficit and a nonzero scalar curvature. They pointed out that for large value of the geometric mass, the model describes a black hole carrying a global monopole. One of the main differences between the large distance behaviors in the geometries of the spacetime produced by both topological defects, the local and the global monopoles, is due to their energy densities, which for the global monopole case decreases as 1/r 2 . This behavior is responsible for the solid angle deficit presented by this geometry. In this paper we continue the discussion related with this topic and consider both type of topological defects in the same model. We analyze the effects produced by local and global monopole on the geometry of the manifold. We investigate the possibility of this system to present regular solution and we also analyze its behavior near and far away from the defect’s core. So the basic idea of this model is to describe a regular topological defect which presents a magnetic field besides to present a solid angle deficit. Assuming the existence of such object in a typical galaxy, the total energy contained inside it would be strongly provided by the global Higgs field [8] 3
相关文档
最新文档