2010年考研英语一难度
历年考研英语一难度系数表
历年考研英语一难度系数表
【原创版】
目录
1.考研英语一的难度系数
2.考研英语一的题型及难度分布
3.考研英语一与四六级英语的比较
4.如何应对考研英语一的挑战
正文
历年考研英语一难度系数表显示，考研英语一的难度系数在各个题型中有所不同。
以下是对各个题型的详细分析：
1.完型填空：此题型难度系数相对较低，通常为蓝色，表示最容易的题目。
这一部分主要考察学生的词汇量和语法知识，需要学生在理解语境的基础上，准确地填写合适的单词。
2.阅读理解：阅读理解是考研英语一难度系数较高的题型，通常为红色，表示最难的题目。
这一部分主要考察学生的推理分析能力，需要学生通过阅读理解文章，判断作者的观点和态度，并进行推理分析。
3.英译汉：这一题型难度系数居中，主要考察学生的英汉翻译能力。
需要学生准确理解英文句子的含义，并能够用通顺的中文表达出来。
4.写作：写作是考研英语一的重要组成部分，难度系数与阅读理解相当。
这一部分主要考察学生的写作能力和思维能力，需要学生用恰当的词汇和表达，展示自己的观点和思考。
考研英语一的难度系数与四六级英语相比，有过之而无不及。
四六级英语主要考察学生的基本语言能力，如听力、词汇量和语法知识等。
而考研英语一则更注重考察学生的推理分析能力和思维能力，需要学生具备更高的英语水平和更强的综合素质。
面对考研英语一的挑战，学生需要认真复习历年真题，了解每个模块的考察特点和难度系数，合理预判考试难度和题型。
同时，学生还需要多背词汇，提高阅读理解能力，加强写作练习，以提高自己的写作能力和思维能力。
考研英语一阅读历年难度
考研英语一阅读历年难度本文将探讨考研英语一阅读历年难度的变化和趋势，并为考生提供一些实用的建议。
下面是本店铺为大家精心编写的5篇《考研英语一阅读历年难度》，供大家借鉴与参考，希望对大家有所帮助。
《考研英语一阅读历年难度》篇1考研英语一阅读是考研英语中最重要的一部分，也是考生们花费时间和精力最多的一部分。
阅读历年真题是考生们备考的重要步骤，通过分析历年真题的难度，考生可以更好地了解考试的规律和趋势，从而更好地备考。
一、历年难度变化和趋势考研英语一阅读的难度是逐年变化的，有时候难度会相对较低，有时候则会相对较高。
根据对历年真题的分析，我们可以得出以下结论：1. 难度波动较大考研英语一阅读的难度波动较大，有时候同一题型的难度在不同年份之间可能会有较大的差别。
例如，2010 年的阅读难度相对较高，而 2011 年的阅读难度相对较低。
2. 题型种类较多考研英语一阅读的题型种类较多，包括事实细节题、推理判断题、主旨大意题、词汇题等。
不同题型的难度也有所不同，例如事实细节题相对较易，而推理判断题相对较难。
3. 文章难度不一考研英语一阅读的文章难度也不一，有些文章难度较大，有些文章难度较小。
文章难度的大小与文章类型、文章来源、文章长度等因素有关。
二、备考建议基于以上分析，考生可以采取以下备考建议：1. 多练习历年真题考生可以多练习历年真题，从而更好地了解考试的规律和趋势。
练习历年真题不仅可以提高考生的阅读能力，还可以帮助考生熟悉考试题型和解题思路。
2. 提高词汇量词汇是阅读的基础，考生需要不断提高自己的词汇量。
考生可以通过背单词、读英文原著等方式提高词汇量，从而更好地应对阅读考试。
3. 多阅读英文文章考生可以多阅读英文文章，从而更好地提高自己的阅读能力。
阅读英文文章不仅可以扩充词汇量，还可以提高阅读速度和理解能力。
4. 分析文章结构和类型考生需要学会分析文章的结构和类型，从而更好地理解文章的内容和主旨。
分析文章结构和类型可以帮助考生更好地解答阅读题型，从而提高得分率。
2010年考研英语一大小作文点评及参考范文
正如我们所料，2010年的大作文还是考了我们所预测的图画作文，这是考研历史上第11次考图画作文了。
字数要求在160--200词。
图画作文往往是一张抽象而意味深长的图片或漫画，有时让人很难理解。
今年的图画只有一张图，但主题明显直接。
图画中间是一个火锅，火锅里面写满了很多汉字，比如佛，功夫，解构，礼，后现代，老舍，莎士比亚，爱因斯坦，道，仁，京剧等许多代表中国和外国文化的东西。
把这些东西放在一起，就意味着中西文化融合在一起，特别是下面的文字提示：文化“火锅”，既美味又营养。
能更好地帮助我们理解图画的主题：即文化融合Cultural integration的问题。
可以说这也是一个考研永恒的话题，这个话题在2002考研作文里面出现过，可以说是同一个主题。
考研大作文多年来关注的是对青少年思想品德方面的教育，比如：01年要培养爱心；02年要把民族文化发扬光大；03年要学会自立自强；04年要与时俱进；05年要孝敬父母；06年关于偶像崇拜；07年的自信；08的合作与团结，09年人们普遍关心的网络问题。
从中我们可以看得出命题专家们对教育年轻一代的良苦用心。
所以我们可以概括出大作文的命题规律是有关青年人成长的问题居多，另外就是社会上的一些热点或人们普遍关心的话题。
这一点对2011年考生的作文备考有很大帮助。
在写大作文时，第一段需要简短描述图画的内容。
今年的图画中的火锅hot pot，以及代表中国文化的许多东西，考生没必要一一翻译出来，自己量力而行，选择几个有代表性的东西翻译出来就行。
第二段需要阐释图画寓意，其实就是让我们分析文化的融合和交流问题这一现象。
最后一段应该表明作者本人对文化融合和交流这种现象的态度或看法。
【作文思路】按照我们课堂上的写作方法，可以这样来展开描述和议论。
第一段为传统的图画描述段，根据图画中的具体信息，尤其是下面的文字说明，进行直接描述。
比如可以运用我们冲刺课堂上传授的精彩句型" Whoever in front of this cartoon/drawing/picture will be greatly impressed. How amusing and interesting it is!What is vividly illustrated in the painting above is that currently cultural integration is highly pervasive in China. (对漫画笼统地描述)。
考研10年英语一真题
考研10年英语一真题近十年来，考研英语一部分的出题方式、难度以及考察重点都有所变化。
在备考过程中，了解这些变化对于提高备考的针对性和效果非常重要。
本文将对近十年考研英语一真题进行分析，以期帮助考生更好地备考。
一、阅读理解（考查阅读能力）阅读理解一直是考研英语一部分的重点和难点。
近十年来，阅读理解的难度逐年提高，并增加了新的题型，如选择句子填空、段落大意等。
在备考过程中，要注重提高对词汇、语法、逻辑推理等基础知识的掌握，并多做真题，熟悉各种题型。
二、完形填空（考查语法和词汇能力）在近十年的真题中，完形填空的难度主要在于对词汇和语法的考察。
备考时，需要掌握常用词汇的用法和搭配，同时对于常见的语法知识（如动词时态、语态、副词、介词等）也要有一定的了解。
多做真题，熟悉各种句型和搭配，并进行针对性的练习。
三、翻译（考查综合运用能力）翻译部分在近十年的考研英语一中的比重逐渐减少，但仍然是备考的难点之一。
备考时，要提高词汇量和语言运用能力，熟悉各种表达方式，并多做翻译练习。
同时，积累专业词汇和常用短语，对于科技、经济、文化等领域的知识有一定的了解。
四、写作（考查语言表达能力）近十年来，考研英语一写作部分一直是备考的重点和难点。
备考时，要提高语法、词汇、逻辑推理能力。
熟悉各种写作形式和结构，并多做写作练习。
注意语言表达的准确性和流畅性，避免语法错误和表达不清的问题。
综上所述，近十年考研英语一真题在阅读理解、完形填空、翻译和写作等方面都有一定的变化。
备考时，要注重对基础知识的掌握，多做真题练习，熟悉各种题型和形式。
通过有针对性的准备和复习，相信每位考生都能取得满意的成绩。
祝各位考生在备考和考试中取得好成绩！。
2010年考研英语二与英语一各题型区别
2010年考研英语二与英语一各题型区别2010年考研英语样题已经出炉，全卷与去年相比，题型有了新的变化，作文题材也做了较大调整。
考生该如何应对？2010年的考研英语第一次分为英语一和英语二两套试卷，两套试卷究竟有什么不同？不同的考生该如何备考？什么是“英语二”？从今年开始，考研英语配合中国的整个研究生入学考试的改革，以及配合中国整个研究生硕士培养方式的一个改革，由原来的一种考试，变成了现在的两种考试。
这两种考试它针对的是两种不同的培养方向的硕士生。
一种叫做学术型的硕士，另外一种叫做专业学位的硕士。
硕士招生规模中90%左右的还是这种学术型的，就是研究型的硕士。
剩下的10%到15%左右为专业学位硕士。
这种专业学位硕士就包含了以前的MBA，包含了以前的工程硕士、艺术硕士、政府管理硕士，也就是MPA。
以前这些考试是单独命题，出不同的试卷，今年在整合的一个大背景，所有的考试都被放在了一天，而且从英语考试方面也做出了一个调整，就是规定了一个新的考试科目，叫做英语二。
英语(二)的试卷结构题型一：英语知识应用，完形填空(四选一)，共20题，分值10分；题型二：阅读理解，共5篇，25题，分值50分；题型三：英译汉，共1题，分值15分；题型四：写作，共2篇作文，分值25分。
词汇要求：能熟练应用5500个单词。
英语二与英语一之各种题型的区别(1)语法我们英语二规定了总共有八个语法点，具体的语法点是要考的。
只要把这八点做到了，基本上就没问题了。
首先第一个就是名词、代词它的用法，数和格，就是可数不可数，这种会考。
第二个是形容词。
第三个是动词，动词包括时态、语态，时态就是常见的，比如一般现在、一般将来这样子的过去时，语态就是主动和被动。
第四点常用连词，连词大家知道常用的就是七个，这个大家把它准备好了，估计在考察语法方面不大。
第五个就是非谓语动词，就是不定式和名词。
第六个虚拟语气，具体有什么样的表现形式，以及虚拟语气在语言中起到一个什么样的作用，这个应该是一个考察的重点。
2010考研英语一阅读及答案
Text 1(2010)Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that thecritics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journa lism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.’”Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England’s foremost classical-music critics, a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967, the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.Is there any chance that Cardus’s criticism will enj oy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly upholstered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that __________.[A] arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.[B] English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.[C] high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.[D] young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War II were characterized by __________.[A] free themes.[B] casual style.[C] elaborate layout. [D] radical viewpoints.23. Which of the following would Shaw and Newman most probably agree on?[A] It is writers' duty to fulfill journalistic goals.[B] It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.[C] Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.[D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.24. What can be learned about Cardus according to the last two paragraphs?[A] His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.[B] His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.[C] His style caters largely to modern specialists.[D] His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.25. What would be the best title for the text?[A] Newspapers of the Good Old Days[B] The Lost Horizon in Newspapers[C] Mournful Decline of Journalism[D] Prominent Critics in MemoryOver the past decade, thousands of patents have seen granted for what are called business methods. Amazon com received one for its “one-click” online payment system Merrill Lynch got legal prot ection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lying a box.Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready toscale hack on business-method patents, which have been controversialever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz the U.S court of Appeals for the federal circuit said it would use particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known,is “a very big deal,”says Dennis D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of law. It “has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents.”Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face because it was the federal circuit itself that introduced such patents with is 1998 decision in the so-called state Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging internet companies trying to stake out exclusive pints to specific types of online transactions. Later, move established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might bent them to the punch. In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents despitethe fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly,some Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal circuit issued an unusual o rder stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court’s judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should “reconsider” its state street Bank ruling.The Federal Circuit’s action comes in t he wake of a series of recent decisions by the supreme. Count that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions” that are obvious. The judges on the Federal circuit are “reaction to theanti-patent trend at the supreme court” says Harol d C. Wegner, a patent attorney and professor at Washington University Law School.26. Business-method patents have recently aroused concern becauseof __________.[A] their limited value to business[B] their connection with asset allocation[C] the possible restriction on their granting[D] the controversy over authorization27. Which of the following is true of the Bilski case?[A] Its ruling complies with the court decisions[B] It involves a very big business transaction[C] It has been dismissed by the Federal Circuit[D] It may change the legal practices in the U.S.28. The word “about-face” (Line 1, Para 3) most probably means __________.[A] loss of good will [B] increase of hostility[C] change of attitude[D] enhancement of disunity29. We learn from the last two paragraphs that business-method patents __________.[A] are immune to legal challenges[B] are often unnecessarily issued[C] lower the esteem for patent holders[D] increase the incidence of risks30. Which of the following would be the subject of the text?[A] A looming threat to business-method patents[B] Protection for business-method patent holders[C] A legal case regarding business-method patents[D] A prevailing tread against business-method patentsIn his book The Tipping Point Malcolm Aladuell argues that “social epidemics” are driven in large part by the actions of a tiny minority of special individuals, often called influentials, who are unusually informed, persuasive, or well connected. The idea is intuitively compelling, but it doesn't explain how ideas actually spread.The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible-sounding but largely untested theory called the “two-step flow of communication”:Information flows from the media to the influentials and from them to everyone else. Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials, those selected people will do most of the work for them. The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of certain looks, brands, or neighborhoods. In many such cases, a cursory search for causes finds that some small group of people was wearing, promoting, or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention. Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the ideathat only certain special people can drive trends.In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed. In fact, they don’t seem to be required at all.The researchers’ argument stems from a simple observation about social influence: With the exception of a few celebrities like OprahWinfrey — whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media, not interpersonal, influence — even the most influential members of a population simply don't interact with that many others. Yet it is precisely these non-celebrity influentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are supposed to drive social epidemics, by influencing their friends and colleagues directly. For a social epidemic to occur, however, each person so affected must then influence his or her own acquaintances, who must in turn influence theirs, and so on; and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential. If people in the network just two degrees removed from the initial influential prove resistant, for example, the cascade of change won't propagate very far or affect many people.Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence, the researchers studied the dynamics of social influence by conducting thousands of computer simulations of populations, manipulating a number of variables relating to people’s ability to influence others and their tendency to be influenced. They found that the principal requirement for what is called “global cascades”— the widespread propagation of influence through networks — is the presence not of a few influentials but, rather, of a critical mass of easily influenced people.31. By citing the book The Tipping Point the author intends to__________.[A] analyze the consequences of social epidemics[B] discuss influentials’ function in spreading ideas[C] exemplify people’s intuitive response to social epidemics[D] describe the essential characteristics of influentials32. The author suggests that the “two-step-flow theory”__________.[A] serves as a solution to marketing problems[B] has helped explain certain prevalent trends[C] has won support from influentials[D] requires solid evidence for its validity33. What the researchers have observed recently shows that__________.[A] the power of influence goes with social interactions[B] interpersonal links can be enhanced through the media[C] influentials have more channels to reach the public[D] most celebritiea enjoy wide media attention34. The underlined phrase “these people” in paragraph 4 refers to the ones who __________.[A] stay outside the network of social influence [B] have little contact with the source of influence[C] are influenced and then influence others[D] are influenced by the initial influential35. What is the essential element in the dynamics of social influence?[A] The eagerness to be accepted [B] The impulse to influence others[C] The readiness to be influenced [D] The inclination to rely on othersBankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public. Behind the scenes, they have been taking aim at someone else the accounting standard-setters. Their rules, moan the banks, have forced them to report enormous losses, and it’s just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.Unfortunately, banks’ lobbying now seems to be working. Thedetails may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, essential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult. After a bruising encounter with Congress, America’s Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long0term assets in their income statement. Bob Herz, the FASB’s chairman, cried out against those who “question our motives.” Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobby group poli tely calls “the use of judgment by management.”European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes it reconstruction of rules later this year is strong Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did “notlive in a political vacuum” but“in the real wor l d” and the Europe could yet develop different rules.It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they Largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be kn own for years. But bank’s shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. And dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains.To get the system working again, losses must be recognized anddealt with. America’s new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.36. Bankers complained that they were forced to __________.[A] follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules[B] collect payments from third parties[C] cooperate with the price managers[D] reevaluate some of their assets37. According to the author, the rule changes of the FASB may result in __________.[A] the diminishing role of management[B] the revival of the banking system[C] the bank’s long-term asset losses[D] the weakening of its independence38. According to Paragraph 4, McCreevy objects to the IASB’s att empt to __________.[A] keep away from political influences[B] evade the pressure from their peers[C] act on their own in rule-setting[D] take gradual measures in reform39. The author thinks the banks were “on the wrong planet” in that they __________.[A] misinterpreted market price indicators[B] exaggerated the real value of their assets[C] neglected the likely existence of bad debts[D] denied booking losses in their sale of assets40. The author’s attitude towards standard-setters is one of __________.[A] satisfaction [B] skepticism [C] objectiveness [D] sympathy。
考研英语(一)与(二)难度对比
考研英语（一）与（二）难度对比首先：完型。
虽然英语一完型240-280个单词，英语二完型完型350个单词左右，这说明英语二已知信息要多于英语一完型，即：从理论上来看英语二完型的难度要低于英语一完型的难度，但是从历年得分情况来看，考英语二的同学在完型的平均分上相对于英语一同学并没有明显的提高。
再加上完型向来是大部分考生熟悉又先天不足的弱项，所以15年考研在完型上同学们应该和历年一样分值不会有太大波动，基本上平均分徘徊在3-4分之间。
第二：传统阅读。
英语一和英语二在阅读命题思路上略有不一致，即：英语二有自己的命题特色：(1)比如像这种题型In the following part immediately after this text, the author will most probably focus on______. (2010年Text 2第30题)英语一一般不会出现；(2)在就是细节推理或判断题型，在很大程度上英语一也只是就某一段的并列或局部信息进行考察，所以应对策略就是跟原文逐个比对，认真一点即可。
但是在做英二题的时候你会发现不仅考察局部信息还考察全局信息，有时跨越三、五个段落，所以相对较难。
例如：【2010年Text1 第23题】Which of the followingstatements is NOT true?[A]Sales of contemporaryart fell dramatically from 2007 to 2008.[B]The art market surpassedmany other industries in momentum。
[C]The art marketgenerally went downward in various ways。
[D]Some art dealers wereawaiting better chances to come。
考研英语一历年平均分
考研英语一历年平均分
英语一历年平均分如下：
2021年47.04分
2020年49.15分
2019年48.59分
2018年48.61分
2017年53.94分
全国硕士研究生统一招生考试中考研英语是必不可少的，几乎70%专业的考研科目都规定必须考英语的，有的学校还会对考研英语成绩有所要求。
从2010年开始，全国硕士研究生入学考试的英语试卷分为了英语一和英语二。
英语一即原研究生入学统考“英语”，所有学术型硕士研究生和部分专业型硕士必考英语一。
难度系数以0.5作为衡量标准，如果一道题正确率有50%，那么这道题的难度系数就是0.5。
因此不难得出难度系数与试卷难度的关系：难度系数越小，试卷难度越大。
可见2021年考研英语一的难度为近五年里最大的，考生平均分也是近五年里最低的。
考研英语二的整体难度不如考研英语一，从难度系数和平均分都可以发现此条规律。
难度系数都没有低于0.5，平均分都没有低于50分。
但2021年的考研英语二依然是近五年里最难的，平均分比2020年足足少了5分。
备考的考生可根据2021年的难度在平时的训练中有意加大训练题目的难度和深度，这样在考试过程中才不会因为试卷太难导致心态不稳，从而没有取得理想的成绩。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
2010年考研英语一难度
2010考研英语一难度属于中上等，是05年至11年之间最难的一次考研英语。
2010年考研英语主要包括英语知识运用、阅读理解和写作等，考题陷阱较多，题目刁钻并且作文题目较难。
难点有以下这些：
第一，在词汇上，是对词汇深度和广度的一个考察，要求掌握相关词汇的常用成语的意思。
第二，完形填空、新题型等题型中都有很难的长难句，要求能够对这些长难句进行分析、理解、翻译。
第三，2010考研阅读是近30年来最难的一套题目，不仅要求大家能够理解字面上的含义，还要求能够理解文字的言外之意，并且在阅读完之后可以做出准确的判断推理。
第四，要求考生对英文国家的经济、历史、人文等社会背景知识有广泛的认识。
第五，反预测趋势明显增强，2010考研英语大纲中对小作文的要求有一些小的变动，增加了给出中文文章，提炼英文摘要的要求，因此，今年很多老师以及培训机构都在这个方面下了很大的功夫，但人却反其道而行之，考察了最基础的通知。