01 04 case interview-Establishing the Facts
法律案件的结果的英文(3篇)
第1篇Case Overview:The landmark legal case of Smith vs. Johnson, which has been the subject of extensive media coverage and public interest, has finally reached its conclusion after a lengthy and complex trial. The case centered around a dispute over land ownership rights, with both parties presenting compelling arguments and evidence.Facts of the Case:The case began when Mr. James Smith, a local farmer, and Mr. Robert Johnson, a real estate developer, both laid claim to a 50-acre plot of land situated on the outskirts of the city. The land in question had been unused for years and was believed to have significant potential for both agricultural and residential development. Both parties had legal documents and historical records supporting their claims, leading to a protracted legal battle.The Arguments:The trial saw both parties presenting their respective cases. Mr. Smith argued that his great-grandfather had purchased the land in the 19th century, and the deed had been passed down through generations. He further claimed that the land had been used for farming purposes continuously since then, providing a strong case for adverse possession. On the other hand, Mr. Johnson presented evidence that the land had been part of his family's estate for over a century and that the deeds had been registered with the appropriate authorities.The Evidence:The court heard testimonies from a variety of witnesses, including historians, real estate experts, and legal scholars. Mr. Smith's witnesses spoke about the historical use of the land for farming, while Mr. Johnson's witnesses highlighted the family's long-standing ownership and the legal registration of the deeds. Additionally, both partiessubmitted a plethora of documents, including property tax records, surveys, and legal correspondence.The Court's Decision:After a thorough examination of the evidence and testimonies, the court delivered its verdict. The presiding judge, Honorable Eliza Thompson, announced the following decision:Verdict:The court finds that Mr. James Smith is the rightful owner of the 50-acre plot of land in question. The evidence presented by Mr. Smith, particularly the historical use of the land for farming purposes, supports the claim of adverse possession. Furthermore, the court notes that Mr. Johnson's evidence, while compelling, does not conclusively prove continuous and exclusive ownership of the land. Therefore, the court rules in favor of Mr. Smith.Reasoning:The court's decision was based on several key factors. Firstly, the court recognized the principle of adverse possession, which allows for the acquisition of property rights through continuous and uninterrupted use over a certain period. The evidence presented by Mr. Smith demonstrated that the land had been used for farming purposes without interruption for a significant portion of the 19th century and into the 20th century.Secondly, the court took into consideration the lack of evidence regarding Mr. Johnson's family's continuous and exclusive use of the land. While the deeds were registered, the court noted that the land had been unused for a considerable time and that there was no clear evidence of Mr. Johnson's family utilizing the land for any purpose during that period.Impact of the Verdict:The verdict in the Smith vs. Johnson case has significant implications for land ownership laws and practices. It reinforces the principle ofadverse possession and highlights the importance of continuous and uninterrupted use of land for property rights acquisition. The case also serves as a reminder to property owners to maintain clear and accurate records of their land ownership and to actively utilize their land to prevent potential disputes.Public Reaction:The public has reacted to the verdict with mixed emotions. Many local farmers and landowners have expressed relief and support for the decision, viewing it as a victory for the principle of adverse possession. Conversely, some developers and real estate professionals have criticized the verdict, arguing that it could discourage investment and development in the area.Conclusion:In conclusion, the Smith vs. Johnson land dispute case has provided a clear and definitive answer to the question of land ownership rights. The court's decision has set a precedent for future cases and willlikely influence land ownership laws and practices in the region. While the outcome has been met with varying degrees of satisfaction, the case has undoubtedly sparked important discussions about property rights and the use of land.第2篇In the bustling city of New York, a landmark legal battle recently concluded with a verdict that has sparked widespread debate and attention. The case, titled "Smith v. Johnson," involved a contentious land dispute that had been dragging on for years. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the case's outcome, highlighting the key arguments, legal precedents, and the implications of the verdict.I. Background of the CaseThe dispute began when two neighboring families, the Smiths and the Johnsons, both claimed ownership of a piece of land situated at the heart of a bustling urban area. The land had been in the Smith familyfor generations, while the Johnsons claimed that they had legally purchased the property from a third party.The conflict escalated when both families attempted to develop the land, leading to a series of legal battles. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court of New York, where it was heard by a panel of judges.II. Key ArgumentsThe Smiths argued that they had clear and uninterrupted possession ofthe land for many years, which should entitle them to ownership. They cited historical documents and witnesses who supported their claim.On the other hand, the Johnsons presented evidence of their legal purchase of the property. They argued that the Smiths' claim was basedon an outdated and fraudulent document.III. Legal PrecedentsThe court carefully examined relevant legal precedents to guide their decision. One of the key precedents was the "Adverse Possession" doctrine, which states that if a person possesses land openly, exclusively, and continuously for a certain period, they can acquire ownership by prescription.The court also considered the "Statute of Frauds" and "Equitable Estoppel" principles, which require written agreements and prohibit parties from being unfairly prejudiced by their own actions.IV. The VerdictAfter a lengthy and thorough examination of the evidence and legal precedents, the Supreme Court of New York ruled in favor of the Johnsons. The court found that the Johnsons had legally purchased the property and had established adverse possession, thereby acquiring ownership rights.The court held that the Smiths' claim was based on a fraudulent document and that they had not demonstrated continuous and exclusive possessionof the land for the required period.V. Implications of the VerdictThe verdict in the Smith v. Johnson case has significant implicationsfor property law in New York and beyond. Here are some of the key takeaways:1. The decision reinforces the importance of legal documentation in property transactions. Parties must ensure that their agreements are properly documented and comply with the Statute of Frauds.2. The court's emphasis on adverse possession highlights the need for clear and uninterrupted possession of land to establish ownership rights.3. The verdict serves as a warning against fraudulent activities in property transactions. Parties must exercise due diligence and verify the authenticity of documents before entering into agreements.4. The case has sparked a debate on the fairness of property laws and the rights of long-standing residents versus new owners. Critics argue that the decision may disadvantage individuals who have lived on landfor generations.VI. ConclusionThe verdict in the Smith v. Johnson case has sent ripples through the legal community and the public at large. While the Johnsons have been declared the rightful owners of the disputed land, the case has raised important questions about property rights, legal documentation, and the fairness of property laws.As the debate continues, it is crucial for all parties involved to understand the implications of the verdict and the legal precedents that guided the court's decision. Only through a thorough examination of these issues can we hope to ensure a fair and just property system for all.第3篇Introduction:In the realm of law, the outcome of a legal case is often a subject of great interest and debate. This essay aims to provide a detailedanalysis of a particular legal case, focusing on the key issues, arguments, and the final judgment rendered by the court. The case in question involves a complex set of facts and legal principles, making it a compelling example of the judicial process.Background:The legal case revolves around a dispute between two parties, Party Aand Party B. Party A, a corporation, accused Party B, an individual, of breaching a contract. The contract in question pertained to the supplyof goods and services, and the parties had entered into it with the intention of establishing a business relationship.Facts of the Case:The facts of the case revealed that Party B had failed to deliver the goods and services as stipulated in the contract. Furthermore, Party B had failed to provide any explanation or justification for the breach.As a result, Party A suffered significant financial losses and sought damages from Party B.Arguments and Issues:The case presented several key issues and arguments, which were crucial in shaping the final judgment. These included:1. Contractual Interpretation:The court had to determine the meaning and scope of the contract between the parties. This involved examining the language used in the contract and considering the context in which the agreement was made.2. Breach of Contract:The court had to establish whether Party B had indeed breached the contract. This required analyzing the evidence presented by both parties, including emails, letters, and other documentary evidence.3. Damages:The court had to determine the appropriate amount of damages that Party A should be awarded. This involved assessing the extent of the losses suffered by Party A and considering any contributory factors that may have mitigated the damages.Judgment and Outcome:After considering the arguments and evidence presented by both parties, the court rendered its judgment. The following key points were highlighted in the judgment:1. Contractual Interpretation:The court held that the contract between the parties was clear and unambiguous. The language used in the contract was straightforward, and there was no room for interpretation. Therefore, the court concludedthat Party B had indeed breached the contract by failing to deliver the goods and services.2. Breach of Contract:The court found that Party B had breached the contract by failing to deliver the goods and services as agreed. The evidence presented by Party A, including emails and letters, supported the claim that Party B had failed to fulfill its obligations under the contract.3. Damages:The court awarded damages to Party A in the amount of $500,000. This amount was calculated based on the evidence presented by Party A, which demonstrated the extent of the financial losses suffered. The court also took into account any contributory factors that may have mitigated the damages.Reasoning:The court's reasoning in reaching its decision was based on thefollowing key principles:1. Contract Law:The court applied the principles of contract law to determine the obligations and rights of the parties. The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations and the consequences of breaching a contract.2. Precedent:The court referred to relevant legal precedents to support its decision. These precedents provided guidance on how similar cases had been decided in the past, ensuring consistency and fairness in the judicial process.3. Equity:The court considered the principle of equity, which allows the court to take into account any mitigating factors that may affect the outcome of the case. In this case, the court determined that Party A's losses were significant and justified the award of damages.Conclusion:The outcome of this legal case serves as a compelling example of the judicial process and the application of legal principles. The court's thorough analysis of the facts, arguments, and evidence led to a fair and just decision. The case highlights the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations and the consequences of breaching a contract. It also demonstrates the role of the court in ensuring equity and fairness in legal disputes.。
群面 四大 case 1
Supporting new business start-ups （EY）IntroductionB&T operates in 30 countries worldwide. It employs 125,000 people. In the UK, B&T has 624,000 business customers. Many of these are small enterprises or start-up businesses. B&T offers a special service for these. This is called Local Business. To set up a new business can be a challenge. Entrepreneurs have to make key decisions when setting up. B&T offers support with this process.The business ideaThe first step is to come up with an idea. This needs to be new and original. Ideas come from many places. Some people get them from other businesses. Others use skills they have or spota gap in the market. Before setting up, market research is necessary. This is to find out about the target market. Researchneeds to look at questions of who, what, where, when and how.For instance:•Who is in the market already?•What is the target market?•Where are customers based?•When do they want the product?22018年8⽉24⽉星期五•How do I reach them?Desk research can provide the answers to these questions. Types of organisationNew businesses have to decide what legal form to take. There are three main types:1. Sole traders. Asingle owner controls the business. The owner takes all of the profit. She or he also takes all of the risk. If the business fails, the owner is liable for debts. This means the owner’s own money and assets are at risk. The sole trader could become bankrupt.2. Partnerships have between 2-20partners. Partners bring more skills. They may also bring more capital. Like the sole trader, most partners can lose their own assets if the business fails.3.Limited company.This is a separate legal body from its owners, who are shareholders. It is more complicated to set up, but the shareholders’level of risk is limited to the amount they put into the company. This is known as limited liability. Budgets and plansA new business needs a good plan to help prevent failure. The plan forecasts costs and revenues. It also sets out how the business will be financed. A detailed budget helps a business to keep control. A common problem is cash flow. Many new businesses need to offer customers credit in order to attract custom. This often leaves the business short of cash. B&T can help by giving advice on how to:•manage debt•avoid late payments•speed up payments from customers.A new business needs financial advice. It also needs a special banking service. B&T provides free business banking (for twelve months). It also provides support froma local business manager.FinanceB&T can also provide business finance such as: •overdrafts –these allow a person to withdraw more money from a current account than there is in it at the time•a business credit card –this allows for instant borrowing. It also creates flexibility•a bank loan - this is useful if the business wants to borrow larger amounts.Task:D&M is a UK based fashion retailer, it is targeted at young men and women aged 20-30 and is planning to enter into Hong Kong Market in 2010. Your group, as the representative of B&T HK, has been asked to give a presentation to the D&M Vice President, on how B&T Hong Kong can assist D&M in their new business start-up in Hong Kong.。
unit5作业答案
第五册第五单元选词填空 B5U5P1261）When you inquire about interest rates, it's important to___compound interest and simple interest.(distinguish between 区别)你咨询利息率时，重要的是区分清楚复利和单一利息。
2）At the meeting there was a lot of___to the proposed changes.(opposition 反对)会议上对于提出的改变出现了很多反对声。
3）For a long time this substance was thought to be harmless, but recently there has been proof ____ and so you are warnedoff it.(to the contrary 相反的)很久以来这种物质被人们认作是无害的，但是最近有证据证明确实有害，所以你离它远些。
4）You must follow the regular___in applying for a visa.(procedures 程序)申请签证时你必须遵循正常程序。
5）They agreed to the plan___, but there were several details they did not like.(in principle 原则上)他们原则上同意了这个计划，但是有几个细节上他们不赞同。
6）The degree of punishment is meant to be___to the seriousness of the crime. (proportional 成比例)惩治的力度应该与所犯罪行的严重程度相符。
7）The___refused to surrender their arms and insisted on their right to use violent means in pursuit of their goals.(rebels 反叛者)反叛者聚集缴械投降，而是坚持认为追寻他们的目标时有权使用暴力手段。
MBA英文案例personal_interview1
精心整理Kellogg Consulting ClubHow to succeed to the Personal InterviewSo, here you are, reading this document and trying to figure out how to land your dream job. We’d like to help by telling you what we believe to be the key areas of preparation for a successful interview.First and foremost, remember that a standard consulting interview has four parts:1)2)A Case part for 20 minutes3)4)Wrap Up.recruiting process.a)and fill in the details. For instance, why did you make the moves you have? What have been the most significan decisions you have made? Where were the challenges and where were the triumphs? This is also your chance to set yourself apart. Give the interviewer something to remember you by - tell an interesting story, talk about a unique skill or talent, etc. One way to do this is to incorporate words that will provoke curiosity in your resume.The CMC offers many sessions to help you polish your storyline. Take advantage of them.b)Know the firm:What does the firm pride itself on? What makes them unique? If a firm prides itself on being a thought leader, show you have been a thought leader or why being a part of a firms that leads the industry is important to you. You must also know the basics about a company such as where they have offices and how they are structured. If you are unclear about any of these areas, ask!! You do, however, want to show someinitial understanding and then ask for clarification.Use Company presentations to ask the consultants smart questions. If you are interested in a firm, call the recruiting manager or aconsultant you have spoken with and get more information about the work and culture.c)Listen well:1)2)3)4)There are fundamental skills that you need to demonstrate to get a consulting job. Do you think you have these qualities? What examples would you use to show what you do?Here is a list of the “critical skills” that consulting firms are looking for:1)Analytical skills: intelligent, able to find patterns and causalrelationships in what appears to be unrelated data; creates hypothesis to drive research, uses clear and logic thinking, draws on pastexperience to solve problems, applies creativity to come up withsolutions2)Business Sense: Entrepreneurial, stays on current businessdevelopments, intuitively understands basic business dynamics,converses easily about business issues.3)Quick Learning: Solicits and is open to feedback, humble, wants toimprove himself/herself, learns from mistakes.4)Communications skills: Listens carefully to understand others, usestactful phrases and timing when communicating, has a good sense for what people mean, understands how he/she is being perceived.5)Integrity: Does not waver on ethical issues, has basic respect forother individuals, is able to maintain confidentiality, followsthrough on commitments.6)Interpersonal Skills: Mature, avoids turning business issues intothings in perspective.7)Leadership skills: Has influence, can make decisions quickly, provides8)9)group’s interests before own, shares credit for joint work.11)Intellectual curiosity: ability to be satisfied with theintellectual challenge of his work, comfortable with the notion that client might not follow their advice.12)Comfort with ambiguity: can thrive in an environment in whichthings are fluid, non structured and uncertain, can bring structure and thought to what seems a confusing situation with maturity andpoise.Don’t worry if it seems you don’t meet these criteria. Mostsuccessful candidates really don’t possess all of them. But beingaware of these needs, and focusing your answers to demonstrate these skills, can be the difference between receiving and offer or not.Talk about these skills, find where you developed them and applied them.2)What should I do before the interviews?This section will cover how to prepare for the interview. This part isa very important one, since it will determine how confident you are when you walk into the interviewing room.a)Logistics:The company should notify you if you are being invited for an interview. Generally, you are given several interview times to choose from.b)c)so that all you stand out of the pack.Therefore, you need to have a very clear agenda for the interview. Come up with headlines - a few key points about yourself that will influence the interviewer. Prepare these headlines in advance, and back each headline backwith a will-chosen anecdote that is interesting enough to help the interviewer understand and remember the headline. The key isto slip in points about yourself during appropriate moments, not tohow it is different from its competitors, and three reasons why you want to work there as opposed to other companies. Also, make sure you have chosen four or five questions to ask your interviewer.Make sure you get a lot of sleep the night before the interview, and a few nights before if possible. Get your preparation and clothes ready one or two days before so that you can relax. Do something fun with friends before the interview to take your mind off it, and you will be more relaxed and confident the next day.e)Before you walk into the interviewer room:Get early so you can take a deep breath, relax and work on last minute details (comb, restrooms, etc). Relax, and take this opportunity to exercise your skills and meet some interesting people. Remember to visualize yourself as an executive attending an important meeting. Last but not least, if you think that this is a life-or-death interview, chances are you will psych yourself out.What should I be aware of during the interview?a)Attitude:Don't complain or be too negative about something, focus on thepositives of all your past experiences, be optimistic and be yourself. b)Communication Skills:will make or break that rapport.Non-verbal communications:∙Eye contact: Looking at the interviewer strengthens the point that∙∙are distracting to the interviewer. In addition, they may comeoff as a sign of nervousness or dishonesty when you are answering difficult questions. Sit up straight in your chair, slumpingconveys a sloppy, laid-back attitude. Lean forward when you areexcited or interested.Verbal communications:∙Pace: many interviewees speed up when they are nervous, and their words become slurred. Pausing for effect will heighten thelistener's interest in what you are saying.∙Space Fillers: Don’t be afraid of silence. Space fillers like "umm", "you know" etc. are both distracting and unprofessional.∙Logic: At all times, keep in mind the question you are supposed to answer. If you use a lenghty example, remember to tie the example back to the question. Doing so makes it seem that you had anorganized approach to your answer.∙Amount: cut yourself when you have made a point. Don’t let yourself recite information in five different ways.c)Etiquette:∙Don’t tal k too much about money or perks.∙the other person.∙∙done so.∙∙Be nice to everybody.∙preferences.d)interview.∙Personality traits should be demonstrated, not directly stated.4) What questions will I be asked during the interview?a)The introduction:During the first tow or three minutes of the interview, interviewers introduce themselves and attempt to break the "ice" by making comments about the weather or other small talk. They also describe the structure of the interview. Remember that you are there because they chose you, and they will have a positive tendency towards you.Many recruiters say that their impressions are shaped in the first five minutes of the interview. To make a good impression,∙Shake hands firmly with the recruiter.∙Relax, the interviewer is looking forward to meeting you after seeing you resume.∙Smile, show some warmth, but err on the formal side rather than on the informal until you have gotten a sense of the interviewerstyle.∙If the interviewer attempts a small talk, make sure to engage in a conversation with him.b) Personality questions:∙∙∙∙Ethics/Sensitivity questions∙Fun Questions∙Resume Questions:∙Decision-making rationale∙Teamwork∙Leadership∙Resume Case Question (eg. tell me the strategy of your prior company…)∙Communications Questions∙Teach me something in five minutes∙Sell me the lamp of the desk…∙Business Questions:∙Interests∙Business KnowledgeFor a complete set of questions, refer to the CMC Website:c) Your questions:In the last few minutes of the interview, interviewers will ask you if you have any questions. You are still being evaluated. While the quality of your questions probably won't make or break the interview, it does make a difference when interviewers are uncertain about yoursign of little interest.∙∙"PCS to Corporate America: From Military Tactics to Corporate Interviewing Strategy"; Roger Cameron.∙"Power Interviews: Job Winning Tactics from Fortune 500 Recruiters"; Neil Yeager and Lee Hough.∙。
法律案例汇报英文版(3篇)
第1篇Executive Summary:The present legal case report details the facts, legal issues, and resolution of the tort case Johnson vs. Smith. This case involves a claim of negligence and breach of duty of care by the defendant, Smith, resulting in damages to the plaintiff, Johnson. The report analyzes the court's decision and its implications for tort law in the jurisdiction.Introduction:In the civil court of [Jurisdiction Name], the plaintiff, Johnson, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Smith, alleging negligence and breach of duty of care. The case revolves around an incident that occurred on [Date of Incident], where the defendant's actions caused significant harm to the plaintiff. The court's decision in this case has significant implications for tort law and the standard of care owed by individuals in similar circumstances.Facts of the Case:On [Date of Incident], the plaintiff, Johnson, was walking along [Location of Incident] when he was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant, Smith. Johnson suffered severe bodily injuries, including fractures, lacerations, and permanent scarring. He was rushed to the hospital, where he underwent several surgeries and extensive rehabilitation.The incident occurred when Smith was driving his car at an excessive speed, violating local traffic regulations. Johnson, who was in a marked crosswalk, had the right-of-way according to the traffic laws. Smith admitted to being distracted by his phone at the time of the accident and failed to yield to Johnson's right-of-way.Legal Issues:The central legal issue in this case is whether the defendant, Smith, owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, Johnson, and whether he breached that duty, resulting in damages.1. Duty of Care:The court determined that Smith owed a duty of care to Johnson as a driver on the road. This duty of care is rooted in the generalobligation to exercise reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others.2. Breach of Duty:The court found that Smith breached his duty of care by driving at an excessive speed, being distracted by his phone, and failing to yield to Johnson's right-of-way. The court held that these actions were negligent and fell below the standard of care expected of a reasonable driver.3. Causation:The court concluded that there was a direct causal link between Smith's breach of duty and Johnson's injuries. The evidence showed that the accident would not have occurred had Smith not been driving negligently.4. Damages:The court considered the extent of Johnson's damages, including medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and future earning capacity. The court awarded Johnson compensatory damages to cover these losses.Decision of the Court:The court found the defendant, Smith, liable for negligence and breach of duty of care. The court awarded the plaintiff, Johnson, compensatory damages in the amount of [Amount of Damages]. The court also ordered Smith to pay Johnson's attorney's fees and costs.Implications of the Decision:The decision in Johnson vs. Smith has several implications for tort law and the standard of care:1. Standard of Care:The case reinforces the importance of adhering to the standard of care when operating a motor vehicle. Drivers are expected to remain attentive and follow traffic laws to prevent accidents and injuries.2. Distracted Driving:The court's decision highlights the dangers of distracted driving and the potential for severe consequences. It serves as a cautionary talefor drivers to refrain from using phones or engaging in otherdistracting activities while operating a vehicle.3. Causation in Tort Cases:The court's finding of direct causation between Smith's breach of duty and Johnson's injuries underscores the importance of establishing a clear link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's damages in tort cases.Conclusion:The Johnson vs. Smith case serves as a critical reminder of the duty of care owed by individuals to others and the consequences of failing to adhere to that duty. The court's decision not only compensates the plaintiff for his damages but also sets a precedent for tort law in the jurisdiction. It underscores the importance of responsible behavior on the road and the need for continuous efforts to promote road safety.第2篇IntroductionThis legal case report presents the details of the lawsuit filed by Johnson against Smith. The case revolves around a breach of contract and negligence, where Johnson claims that Smith failed to fulfill his contractual obligations and caused damages to Johnson's property. The case was heard in the Superior Court of the State of California and provides valuable insights into the interpretation of contracts and the application of negligence laws.BackgroundJohn Johnson and Mark Smith entered into a contract on May 15, 2020, under which Smith agreed to construct a residential building for Johnson on a piece of land owned by Johnson. The contract specified the scope ofwork, the timeline for completion, and the payment schedule. Smith was to complete the construction within six months from the date of the contract.Facts of the Case1. Contractual Breach: Smith failed to complete the construction within the stipulated six-month period. The construction work was delayed due to Smith's negligence in hiring unqualified workers and purchasing substandard materials.2. Negligence: Johnson discovered that the construction work was substandard and that several structural defects had been introduced into the building. Johnson hired an independent inspector who confirmed the defects and advised that the building was unsafe for occupancy.3. Damages: Johnson suffered financial losses due to the delay in the construction and the cost of rectifying the defects. Additionally, Johnson incurred emotional distress due to the uncertainty and inconvenience caused by the breach of contract.Issues RaisedThe case raises two primary issues:1. Breach of Contract: Did Smith breach the contract by failing to complete the construction within the agreed timeframe?2. Negligence: Did Smith act negligently by using substandard materials and hiring unqualified workers, thereby causing damage to Johnson's property?Legal Analysis1. Breach of Contract: The contract between Johnson and Smith was clear and unambiguous regarding the timeline for completion. Smith's failure to complete the construction within the agreed timeframe constitutes a breach of contract. According to the law of contracts, a breach of contract entitles the non-breaching party to seek damages.2. Negligence: Smith's use of substandard materials and hiring unqualified workers amounts to negligence. Negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care, thereby causing harm to another person. In this case, Smith's negligence caused damage to Johnson's property and resulted in financial losses.JudgmentThe Superior Court of the State of California found Smith liable for breach of contract and negligence. The court awarded Johnson damages for the financial losses incurred due to the delay in construction and the cost of rectifying the defects. The court also awarded Johnson damages for emotional distress.ConclusionThe case of Johnson vs. Smith highlights the importance of adhering to contractual obligations and exercising due diligence in the execution of construction projects. It serves as a reminder to contractors andclients alike of the potential consequences of negligence and breach of contract. The judgment in this case reinforces the principle thatparties to a contract must fulfill their obligations and act with reasonable care to avoid liability for damages.Detailed Judgment1. Breach of ContractThe court held that Smith's failure to complete the construction within the agreed timeframe constitutes a material breach of contract. The contract specified that the construction work should be completed within six months from the date of the contract. Smith's delay in completing the work was due to his negligence in hiring unqualified workers and purchasing substandard materials.The court referred to the California Civil Code, which states that a material breach of contract entitles the non-breaching party to seek damages. The court awarded Johnson damages for the financial losses incurred due to the delay in construction, including the cost of hiringadditional workers to complete the project and the cost of rectifyingthe defects caused by Smith's negligence.2. NegligenceThe court found Smith liable for negligence based on the evidence presented during the trial. The court held that Smith's use of substandard materials and hiring unqualified workers was a breach of the standard of care expected from a competent contractor. The court further held that Smith's negligence caused damage to Johnson's property, resulting in financial losses and emotional distress.The court awarded Johnson damages for the cost of rectifying the defects, which included hiring qualified professionals to inspect and repair the building. The court also awarded Johnson damages for emotional distress, taking into account the inconvenience and uncertainty caused by the breach of contract and the resulting damage to Johnson's property.Post-Judgment ProceedingsFollowing the judgment, Smith appealed the decision to the California Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the Superior Court, finding that the trial court had correctly interpreted the contract and applied the principles of negligence.ConclusionThe case of Johnson vs. Smith provides a valuable lesson on the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations and exercising due diligence in the execution of construction projects. The judgment reinforces the principle that parties to a contract must act with reasonable care to avoid liability for damages. The case serves as a reminder to both contractors and clients to adhere to the terms of their agreements and to take necessary precautions to prevent negligence and breach of contract.第3篇Introduction:The case of Johnson vs. Smith, which was heard in the Superior Court of the State of California, serves as a significant legal precedent in property law. The case revolves around the ownership of a piece of land, which has been the subject of a long-standing dispute between the two parties. This report aims to provide a detailed analysis of the case, including the facts, the legal issues involved, the court's decision, and the implications of the judgment.Facts of the Case:The case began when Mr. and Mrs. Johnson purchased a piece of land in a rural area of California. The property, located on the outskirts of a small town, was intended for residential development. After purchasing the land, the Johnsons began the process of subdividing it into smaller plots for sale.Several years later, Mr. Smith, a neighboring landowner, claimed that a portion of the Johnsons' property encroached upon his land. Mr. Smith alleged that the Johnsons had constructed a fence on his property line without his consent, thus infringing upon his rights. The Johnsons, on the other hand, maintained that the fence was on their property and that the boundary line had always been marked correctly.The dispute escalated, leading to a series of failed negotiations and mediation attempts. Ultimately, the matter was brought before the Superior Court of California.Legal Issues Involved:The primary legal issues in this case were:1. Boundary Line Dispute: The court had to determine the exact location of the property line between the Johnsons' and Smith's lands.2. Easements and Encroachments: The court had to assess whether the fence on the boundary line was an easement for the Johnsons or an encroachment on Smith's property.3. Prescriptive Easements: The court had to consider whether Mr. Smith had established a prescriptive easement over the Johnsons' property.4. Damages: The court had to decide the appropriate damages, if any,that should be awarded to either party.The Court's Decision:After hearing the evidence and arguments from both parties, the court made the following findings:1. Boundary Line: The court, after examining the property records and conducting a site visit, concluded that the fence was indeed on the Johnsons' property, and the boundary line had been incorrectly marked.2. Easements and Encroachments: The court ruled that the fence was an encroachment on Smith's property, as it had been constructed without his consent.3. Prescriptive Easements: The court found that Mr. Smith had not established a prescriptive easement over the Johnsons' property, as he had not used the land openly, notoriously, and continuously for the statutory period.4. Damages: The court awarded Mr. Smith damages for the encroachment, including the cost of removing the fence and restoring his property to its original condition.Analysis of the Judgment:The court's decision in this case was based on a careful examination of the evidence and application of relevant legal principles. The following points highlight the key aspects of the judgment:1. Boundary Line Determination: The court's reliance on property records and a site visit demonstrates the importance of accurate documentation and physical inspection in resolving boundary disputes.2. Encroachment and Easements: The court's finding that the fence was an encroachment underscores the principle that landowners must respect each other's property lines and obtain consent before making changes to the land.3. Prescriptive Easements: The court's rejection of Mr. Smith's claimfor a prescriptive easement emphasizes the strict requirements that must be met to establish such an easement.4. Damages: The court's award of damages reflects the principle that a party should be compensated for any harm caused by another's wrongful actions.Implications of the Judgment:The judgment in Johnson vs. Smith has several implications:1. Property Law Precedent: The case sets a precedent for how boundary line disputes and encroachment claims should be resolved in California courts.2. Easement Law: The decision clarifies the requirements forestablishing a prescriptive easement and provides guidance for future cases involving similar claims.3. Landowner Rights and Responsibilities: The case serves as a reminder to landowners of their rights and responsibilities regarding property boundaries and the importance of obtaining proper permissions before making changes to their land.Conclusion:The Johnson vs. Smith property dispute case is a notable example of the complexities involved in property law. The court's decision provides valuable insights into the resolution of boundary line disputes, the recognition of easements, and the assessment of damages. The case stands as a precedent that will guide future legal proceedings and help ensure the fair and equitable resolution of property-related disputes in California.。
面试英语回答
Q：Can you sell yourself in two minutes？Go for it. （你能在两分钟內自我推荐吗？大胆试试吧！）A：With my qualifications and experience, I feel I am hardworking,responsible and diligent in any project I undertake. Your organization could benefit from my analytical and interpersonal skills.(依我的资格和经验，我觉得我对所从事的每一个项目都很努力、负责、勤勉。
我的分析能力和与人相处的技巧，必有价值。
)Q：Give me a summary of your current job description. (对你目前的工作，能否做个概括的说明。
)A：I have been working as a computer programmer for five years. To be specific, I do system analysis, trouble shooting and provide software support. (我干了五年的电脑程序员。
具体地说，我做系统分析，解决问题以及软件供应方面的支持。
）Q：Why did you leave your last job？(你为什么离职呢？)A：Well, I am hoping to get an offer of a better position. If opportunity knocks, I will take it.（我希望能获得一份更好的工作，如果机会来临，我会抓住。
）A：I feel I have reached the "glass ceiling" in my current job. / I feelthere is no opportunity for advancement. （我觉得目前的工作，已经达到顶峰，即沒有升迁机会。
证据的法律效力_英文(2篇)
第1篇IntroductionEvidence plays a crucial role in legal proceedings, serving as the foundation for establishing the truth and reaching a fair judgment. The legal effectiveness of evidence refers to its admissibility, relevance, and weight in the courtroom. This article aims to explore the various aspects of evidence's legal effectiveness, including its types, challenges, and the rules governing its admissibility.I. Types of Evidence1. Real evidenceReal evidence refers to tangible objects or physical items that can be presented in court. It includes photographs, documents, physical objects, and other tangible materials that can help establish the facts of a case. Real evidence is often crucial in proving the existence or non-existence of certain facts.2. Demonstrative evidenceDemonstrative evidence is used to illustrate or explain the facts of a case. It includes charts, graphs, diagrams, models, and simulations. Demonstrative evidence is particularly useful in complex cases where it is difficult to convey the necessary information through words alone.3. Testimonial evidenceTestimonial evidence consists of oral or written statements made by witnesses or parties involved in the case. It can include direct testimony, cross-examination, and expert testimony. Testimonial evidence is essential for establishing the credibility of witnesses andpresenting their perspectives on the facts of the case.4. Documentary evidenceDocumentary evidence includes written, printed, or recorded materialsthat can be presented in court. It can be in the form of contracts, letters, emails, and other documents that are relevant to the case.Documentary evidence is often crucial for proving the existence ofcertain facts or agreements between parties.II. Challenges to Evidence's Legal Effectiveness1. AuthenticityAuthenticity refers to the accuracy and reliability of the evidence. Issues of authenticity can arise when evidence is altered, tampered with, or when its origin is uncertain. To ensure the legal effectiveness of evidence, it is essential to verify its authenticity through properchain of custody and authentication processes.2. AdmissibilityAdmissibility refers to whether the evidence is legally permitted to be presented in court. Certain types of evidence may be excluded based on rules of evidence, such as hearsay, opinion testimony, or privileged communications. Admissibility challenges often arise during pre-trial motions and during the trial itself.3. RelevanceRelevance refers to the connection between the evidence and the facts of the case. Evidence that is not relevant to the case may be excluded by the court. To determine relevance, the court must consider whether the evidence tends to make a fact of consequence more or less probable.4. WeightWeight refers to the persuasiveness of the evidence. The court must consider the weight of the evidence when making a decision. Factors that can affect the weight of evidence include the credibility of the witness, the reliability of the evidence, and the overall context of the case.III. Rules Governing Evidence's Admissibility1. Federal Rules of EvidenceIn the United States, the Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admissibility of evidence in federal courts. These rules provide acomprehensive framework for determining the admissibility of various types of evidence, including real, demonstrative, testimonial, and documentary evidence.2. State rules of evidenceEach state has its own rules of evidence, which may differ from the federal rules. These rules are designed to ensure the fairness and efficiency of the legal process and to promote the search for the truth.3. hearsay exceptionsHearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Under the rules of evidence, hearsay is generally inadmissible. However, there are numerous exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as statements made by a party-opponent, statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment, and statements made in the course of a legal proceeding.IV. ConclusionThe legal effectiveness of evidence is a critical aspect of the legal process. Admissible, relevant, and reliable evidence is essential for establishing the truth and reaching a fair judgment. Understanding the types of evidence, challenges to its effectiveness, and the rules governing its admissibility is crucial for legal professionals and anyone involved in the legal system. By ensuring the legal effectiveness of evidence, we can promote the integrity and fairness of the judicial process.第2篇IntroductionEvidence plays a crucial role in legal proceedings, as it is the foundation upon which the truth is sought and justice is served. The legal effectiveness of evidence refers to its admissibility, relevance, and weight in a court of law. This essay aims to discuss the legal effectiveness of evidence, its significance, and the criteria that determine its admissibility in court.I. The Significance of Evidence1. Establishing the truth: Evidence helps establish the truth by providing facts, information, and proof relevant to the case. It allows the court to make informed decisions based on the evidence presented.2. Upholding justice: The legal effectiveness of evidence ensures that justice is served by enabling the court to assess the credibility of the parties involved and determine their guilt or innocence.3. Preserving legal rights: Evidence is essential for preserving the legal rights of individuals and entities. It helps prevent wrongful convictions, protects the interests of the accused, and upholds the rule of law.II. Criteria for Admissibility of Evidence1. Relevance: The first criterion for the legal effectiveness of evidence is its relevance to the case. Evidence must be directly related to the issues in dispute and have a logical connection to the facts at hand. Irrelevant evidence may be excluded from the trial.2. Authentication: Authentication ensures that the evidence is genuine and has not been tampered with. It involves establishing the origin, authorship, and integrity of the evidence. Failure to authenticate evidence may render it inadmissible.3. Competency: Competency refers to the ability of a witness to testify truthfully and provide reliable information. A witness must be competent to give evidence, and their testimony must be based on personal knowledge or information that is relevant to the case.4. Hearsay: Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Generally, hearsay evidence is inadmissible unless it falls under an exception, such as a dying declaration, a statement made during a legal proceeding, or a statement made by a party-opponent.5. Privileged communications: Privileged communications, such as those between an attorney and client, are protected by law and cannot bedisclosed without the consent of the parties involved. The legal effectiveness of evidence hinges on whether it constitutes a privileged communication.6. Public policy: Certain evidence may be excluded on the grounds of public policy. For example, evidence that promotes racial discrimination or incites violence may be deemed inadmissible.III. Types of Evidence1. Direct evidence: Direct evidence is evidence that proves a fact without any inference or assumption. For example, a witness testifyingto having seen the defendant commit a crime.2. Circumstantial evidence: Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that implies the existence of a fact through a chain of logical inferences. For example, a witness testifying that they saw the defendant leave the crime scene with a bloody knife.3. Physical evidence: Physical evidence includes tangible objects, such as weapons, DNA samples, and fingerprints, that can be presented in court.4. Documentary evidence: Documentary evidence includes written documents, such as contracts, letters, and photographs, that can be used to prove the truth of a matter.IV. Challenges to the Legal Effectiveness of Evidence1. Misinterpretation: The legal effectiveness of evidence can be challenged if it is misinterpreted or misunderstood by the court or the jury.2. Misleading evidence: Evidence that is misleading or deceptive can undermine its legal effectiveness and lead to unfair outcomes.3. False evidence: False evidence, such as perjured testimony or forged documents, can render the legal effectiveness of evidence questionable.V. ConclusionThe legal effectiveness of evidence is essential for ensuring thefairness and integrity of the judicial process. By adhering to thecriteria for admissibility and considering the various types of evidence, courts can make informed decisions and uphold the rule of law. It is crucial to scrutinize the evidence presented in legal proceedings to ensure that justice is served and the legal rights of all parties are protected.。
法律案例英文(3篇)
第1篇Case Number: 2023-CV-12345Court: Superior Court of XYZ StateFacts:In the summer of 2022, John Smith, a local real estate developer, purchased a piece of land in the heart of the city, with the intention of constructing a new shopping center. The land was located near a residential area, and the local community had been expressing concerns about the potential impact of the shopping center on their quality of life.Smith approached the city council with a detailed plan for the shopping center, which included a variety of stores, restaurants, and a parking lot. The city council, recognizing the potential economic benefits of the project, approved the plan with the condition that Smith address the concerns raised by the local residents.To mitigate the impact on the residents, Smith agreed to set aside a portion of the land for a community park and to limit the number of parking spaces to reduce traffic congestion. The construction began, and Smith hired a general contractor, Jane Johnson, to oversee the project.However, during the construction phase, Johnson failed to comply with the agreed-upon specifications for the community park and the parking lot. The park was not built according to the approved plans, and the parking lot was significantly larger than the approved design, leading to increased traffic and noise in the residential area.The residents, led by the local homeowners' association, filed a lawsuit against Smith and Johnson, claiming that they had breached the terms of the construction agreement and caused a significant decrease in their property values and quality of life.Issues:1. Did Smith and Johnson breach the terms of the construction agreement?2. If so, what damages should the residents be awarded?Decision:The court, after a thorough examination of the evidence, found thatSmith and Johnson had indeed breached the terms of the construction agreement. The court ruled that the park was not built according to the approved plans, and the parking lot was larger than the agreed-upon size, both of which violated the conditions set by the city council.The court further found that Johnson, as the general contractor, was vicariously liable for the actions of her employees. Therefore, Smithand Johnson were jointly and severally liable for the damages sufferedby the residents.Rationale:The court based its decision on the following legal principles:1. Contract Law: The court held that Smith and Johnson were bound by the terms of the construction agreement, which they had entered into withthe city council. The breach of these terms was clear, as the park and parking lot did not meet the agreed-upon specifications.2. Negligence: The court found that Johnson, as the general contractor, had a duty to ensure that the construction project was carried out according to the approved plans. Johnson's failure to do so wasnegligent and directly caused the damages suffered by the residents.3. Vicarious Liability: The court ruled that Johnson was vicariously liable for the actions of her employees because she had hired them to perform work on the project and had control over their actions.Damages:The court awarded the residents damages to compensate them for the decrease in their property values and the decrease in their quality of life. The court calculated the damages based on the following factors:1. Decrease in Property Values: The court reviewed the appraisals of the residents' properties before and after the construction of the shoppingcenter. The court found that the property values had decreased by an average of 10% due to the increased traffic and noise.2. Quality of Life: The court considered the evidence presented by the residents, including noise complaints, traffic congestion, and the general disruption to their daily lives. The court awarded each resident a monetary compensation for the inconvenience they had suffered.Conclusion:In conclusion, the court held Smith and Johnson liable for breaching the terms of the construction agreement and for causing damages to the residents. The court's decision serves as a reminder to developers and contractors that they must adhere to the terms of their agreements and take the concerns of the local community into account when undertaking development projects.Order:The court ordered Smith and Johnson to pay the residents a total of $1,500,000 in damages, to be paid within 30 days of the judgment. The court also ordered Smith and Johnson to comply with the original terms of the construction agreement, including the proper construction of the community park and the reduction of the parking lot size.End of Case.第2篇Background:The case of Johnson vs. Smith revolves around a legal dispute over property rights between two neighboring homeowners, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Smith. The dispute arose when Mr. Johnson attempted to build an extension on his property, which he claimed was legally his, but Mr. Smith contested the ownership of the land in question. The case was brought to court to determine the rightful ownership of the land and to resolve the conflict between the two parties.Facts of the Case:Mr. Johnson, a 45-year-old businessman, owned a residential property on Main Street. The property had been in his family for generations, and he had always believed that the land extended beyond the boundary line of his property. Mr. Johnson had plans to build an extension on his property to accommodate his growing family. However, when he began the construction process, Mr. Smith, the owner of the adjacent property, claimed that the land in question belonged to him and that Mr. Johnson's construction was encroaching on his property.Mr. Smith, a 50-year-old engineer, had purchased his property ten years ago and had always believed that the boundary line between his property and Mr. Johnson's property was clear. He was surprised when he discovered that Mr. Johnson was planning to build on what he believed to be his land. Mr. Smith attempted to negotiate with Mr. Johnson, but the two parties were unable to reach a compromise.Legal Arguments:The case of Johnson vs. Smith presented two main legal arguments: the claim of adverse possession and the claim of a prescriptive easement.Mr. Johnson's attorney argued that his client had possessed the land in question for a continuous period of 20 years without interruption or permission from the true owner. According to the doctrine of adverse possession, if a person possesses land openly, continuously, and exclusively for a period of time specified by law (in this case, 20 years), they may acquire legal title to the land. Mr. Johnson's attorney presented evidence that the land in question had been used by his family for many years, and that the boundary line between the properties had never been formally established.On the other hand, Mr. Smith's attorney argued that Mr. Johnson's claim of adverse possession was invalid because he had never openly and continuously possessed the land in question. The attorney pointed out that Mr. Johnson had built a fence on the boundary line, which could be interpreted as an admission of ownership of the land. Furthermore, the attorney argued that the doctrine of adverse possession could not applybecause the property had been divided by a surveyor's line 15 years ago, which had established the boundary line between the properties.The Court's Decision:After reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the court ruled in favor of Mr. Johnson. The court found that Mr. Johnson had possessed the land in question openly, continuously, and exclusively for the required period of time. The court acknowledged that the surveyor's line had been established 15 years ago, but concludedthat the boundary line had never been formally marked or accepted by either party. As a result, the court determined that Mr. Johnson had legally acquired ownership of the land in question through adverse possession.The court ordered Mr. Smith to remove any structures or improvements he had made on the land in question and to return the land to Mr. Johnson. The court also awarded Mr. Johnson damages for the costs associated with the legal battle and the construction of the extension on his property.Conclusion:The case of Johnson vs. Smith highlights the complexities of property law and the importance of establishing clear boundary lines. It also serves as a reminder of the doctrine of adverse possession, which can be a powerful tool for acquiring legal title to land when traditional methods of ownership transfer are not available. In this case, thecourt's decision was based on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both parties. The case serves as a precedent forfuture disputes over property rights and demonstrates the importance of seeking legal counsel when faced with similar issues.第3篇Case Number: 123456789Court: Superior Court of the State of CaliforniaDate of Decision: March 15, 2023Facts of the Case:The case of Smith v. Johnson arises out of a dispute between two neighboring property owners, John Smith and Jane Johnson. The Smiths and the Johnsons have lived next to each other for over two decades, and during this time, they have developed a contentious relationship. The dispute centers around the use of a common boundary line that runs between their properties.The facts of the case are as follows:In 2000, John Smith purchased a piece of land adjacent to Jane Johnson's property. The property deed clearly outlined the boundaries between the two parcels, but it also included a clause that allowed for a certain degree of flexibility in the case of boundary disputes. This clause provided that any disputes arising from the interpretation of the boundaries should be resolved through negotiation or mediation, and if these attempts failed, the matter should be brought before the court.In 2022, the Smiths began constructing a new fence along the common boundary line. However, Jane Johnson believed that the fence encroached on her property, as it was several feet inside the boundary as per her interpretation of the deed. The Smiths claimed that the fence was perfectly within the legal boundaries of their property.Attempts at resolution between the two parties failed, leading to the filing of a lawsuit by Jane Johnson against John Smith and his wife, Emily Smith, for trespass and encroachment.Issues Raised:The primary issue in this case is whether the Smiths' fence encroaches on the Johnsons' property, thereby constituting a trespass. The court must also determine the appropriate remedy for the trespass, if one exists.Arguments of the Parties:Jane Johnson:Jane Johnson argues that the fence encroaches on her property by several feet. She submits that the boundary line is clearly marked on the deed and that the fence has been constructed in a manner that infringes upon her land. Johnson claims that the fence has caused damage to her landscaping and has limited her use of her property. She seeks a court order requiring the Smiths to remove the fence and restore the boundary line to its original condition.John Smith:John Smith and his wife, Emily Smith, counter-argue that the fence is within the legal boundaries of their property. They contend that the boundary line is not as clearly defined as Johnson suggests and that there is room for interpretation. The Smiths also claim that the fence was constructed with the intention of maintaining privacy and enhancing the aesthetics of their property. They argue that Johnson's claims are without merit and request that the court dismiss the lawsuit.Court's Decision:After reviewing the evidence and hearing arguments from both parties, the court finds that the fence does encroach on the Johnsons' property. The court notes that while the boundary line is not explicitly marked on the ground, the deed provides clear guidance on the location of the boundary. The court also considers the photographs and measurements submitted by both parties and concludes that the fence extends into the Johnsons' property.The court finds that John Smith's actions constitute a trespass, as he has encroached upon Johnson's property without permission. The court orders the Smiths to remove the fence and restore the boundary line to its original condition.Remedies:The court awards damages to Jane Johnson in the amount of $5,000 to cover the costs of landscaping repairs and restoration. The court also orders the Smiths to pay Johnson's legal fees, which total $3,000.Conclusion:The case of Smith v. Johnson serves as a reminder of the importance of clear property boundaries and the legal consequences of encroaching upon another's land. The court's decision underscores the need for parties to engage in good faith negotiations and to seek resolution through legal channels when disputes arise. The case also highlights the role of the court in ensuring that property rights are respected and that disputes are resolved in a fair and equitable manner.End of Case Summary。
(完整版)大学英语综合教程4-unit3JobInterview
Cultural Background
• The New York Marathon: in the fall, the largest running event in the U.S., annually attracting 30,000 or more entrants in a race through the five boroughs.
Stand up and greet your interviewer with a firm hand-shake.
Don't wear too much perfume or cologne.
Don't wear big jewelries, bright clothes, or use to much make-up.
Place
Title of interviewer
Preparations
Time
for Interview
Company information
Job description
Question to ask
Career development
Warm-up Activities
• Some important things to remember during the Interview
3
28~31
Everyone should make his or her own tracks
in whatever he or she does.
Part I (1-6): A recent college graduate failed to answer the questions because of lack of preparation.
老麦招聘(1)
•Put it all together: try to answer the overall
question (big picture) with a reasonable, actionable conclusion
–Review what you know –Clarify what you do not understand –Solidify and tender recommendation
•“What is the size of the skateboard market in
the U.S.?”
•“What do you think annual residential real
estate commissions are in Atlanta?”
Responses should demonstrate
?
STEP 1: STATE THE PROBLEMLEM
You must clearly understand the problem
Clear statement of problem to be solved or issue to be resolved
Characteristics of a good problem statement
What not to do
•Play 20 questions •Assume 1 framework fits all •Cover 1 issue without mentioning
and prioritizing all key issues
•Dig your heels in •Hide from the details (or the
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
OverviewSpringboard Our Culture
RolesProfiles & PlacesInterview Practice @ Your Colle
Overview
Interactive Case
Practice
Establishing the Facts
Before proposing a solution, you may wish to compare Bain's
ranking to yours. The interviewer's selection is displayed with an
orange circle around it.
Importance
VerySomewhatNot
Sensitivity of Sales Volume to Price
Changes
Sensitivity of Profit to Volume Giant's
products
Consumer Cookie Preferences
Market Growth for Cookies (US)
Retail Sales By Distribution Channel
Shelf Life (by product)
Share by Cookie Type (US)
Trends in Retail Grocery Promotions
Pricing Trends
Profitability by Product
Friendly's Cost Structure
Selling and Distribution Cost by
Region
Evaluation of Your ApproachBased on your selections, your approachappears to be similar to Bain抯. However,you may wish to review some of the dataslides before proceeding.Continue
1. Introd
client situ
2. Develo
3. Estima
relevant f
4. Synth
conclusi
5. Make a
recomme
discuss
页码，1/2Bain & Company - Join Bain - Interview Practice - Interactive Case Prac...
2003-6-13http://www.bain.com/bainweb/join/interview/practice_int_ugrad_estab_cas...
页码，2/2Bain & Company - Join Bain - Interview Practice - Interactive Case Prac...
2003-6-13http://www.bain.com/bainweb/join/interview/practice_int_ugrad_estab_cas...