【案例分析】行政管理学案例库.doc

【案例分析】行政管理学案例库.doc
【案例分析】行政管理学案例库.doc

MID-STATES COMMUNITY SERVICES (A)

On Sunday, March 30 a fight occurred in the Club Room, the employees' cafeteria of Mid-States Community Services' Housing Department, between a housing administrator-intern and a building technician. The two men grappled for several seconds, rolling on the floor and throwing punches, until they were pulled apart by two interns and another technician who were standing by when the fight broke out. Aside from a bloody nose and a puffed left eye, the intern who had been fighting emerged unscathed. The technician had a torn shirt and a badly bruised right hand. Both were very angry and were ready to resume the fight if the peacemaking bystanders would only let them go.

A series of incidents over the past several weeks had given rise to this outburst, and the events which followed it threatened to throw the entire Department into turmoil, perhaps even to shut it down.

Two days after the fight, on Tuesday, April 1, the Associate Director for Administration for Mid-States Community Services, Frank Garrow, reflected on all that had happened the last two days and wondered what might have been done differently. He wondered, as well, what he should do next. The situation was boiling.

Before you go on, jot down answers to the following: As Frank Garrow, what more do you want to know before you take action?

Background

Mid-States Community Services is a large, multi-site, multi-service public agency with central offices in a major U.S. Great Lakes port city. The Housing Department, located on the outskirts of the city, was created under special stock for the homeless. It also served as an internship training site for students in a public Administration program at a University nearby who had a special interest in public management. The Departme nt's employees are largely young and divided between the “professional" administrators and the "non?professional" technicians and support staff.

This case has been adapted (June 1985) by Dr. Scott Cook, Research Associate, Harvard Business School, and Dr. Dvora Yanow, Lecturer, Harvard Graduate School of Education, by permission of Professor David kuechle, Harvard Graduate School of Education, from a case originally prepared for use in Harvard?s Institute for Educational Management (IEM 9-680-517, Revised 10/80). It is a fictionalized account of actual events. Names, titles, and locations have been disguised.

The Club Room was a popular gathering spot for the junior professional staff and interns but was also used on occasion by senior management and the technical and support staff. It consisted of a large, attractive hall in which various hot dishes and snacks were served and a bar area where one could buy soft drinks, beer and wine. The Club Room served hot food from 7 a.m. until 2 p.m. and was generally crowded around the noon hour. It was not as crowded as usual on March 30 when the fight took place.

The pugilists were Douglas Jones, an intern, and George Madison, a mid-grade building technician who had been employed by MCS for six years. Jones, an African-American, had recently been a defense halfback on the University of Michigan Big-10 championship football team. He was 6 feet tall and weighed 195 pounds. Madison, a 6'2", 220 pound Caucasian, age 27, was himself an accomplished amateur boxer. Madison often came to the Club Room for a snack at noontime and, on occasion, for a beer before going home at night. He was well-known among the professional staff and sometimes socialized with them. Known as a generous spender, Madison frequently bought rounds of drinks for everyone sitting around the Club Room's semi-circular bar or at a table when he was invited to join a group of housing administrators. He owned a

white Cadillac El Dorado, which could often be spotted in the agency parking lot into the evening hours. Although married, Madison sometimes dated women he met at the Club room.

George Madison was one of several full-time building technicians assigned to the Department. He was a member of the technicians9union, one of six unions representing the agency's non-professional personnel. His immediate supervisor was Patrick Mulloney, Head of Support and Technical Services in the Department. Mulloney reported to the Associate Director for Administration, Frank Garrow.

The fight between Madison and Jones had probably been brewing for several weeks. Jones and his fiancee, Margaret Vaughn, also an intern, ofter came to the Club Room, sometimes together, sometimes separately. Vaughn, a striking woman, had attracted Madison's attention one day, and he offered to buy her a drink. She accepted, and the two had a friendly conversation. Vaughn became especially interested in Madison when she learned that he was the union steward for technical personnel. The two discussed the union, its history at the agency—how it had been formed and what nature of grievances arose. Vaughn especially wanted to learn about contract provisions dealing with the resolution of disputes. She explained that she hoped to move into labor relations and personnel administration some day and to become an arbitrator. Madison offered to bring copies of the collective bargaining agreements to Vaughn and to let her have copies of various arbitration decisions which had been delivered in the last several years dealing with agency problems.

This initial meeting between Madison and Vaughn led to several others, always in the Club Room in the late afternoon and usually accompanied by a few drinks. Madison and Vaughn were often joined by other members of the administrative staff, and Madison soon became something of a folk hero—an attractive, bright individual who was about the same age as the interns but who, 11 years earlier, had dropped out of high school to become a building assistant, then had worked his way through an apprentice program until he became a mid-grade technician and went to work for MCS. Between his earnings from his job with the agency and freelance after-hours work, he made more than many of the professionals at MCS.

Madison, in his conversations with the administrators and interns, often expressed regret that he hadn't gone on to college as they had. The administrators and interns, conversely, said they admired Madison: here he was, making more than some of them had earned or stood to earn after graduate school, skilled in what he did, apparently happy and easily able to enjoy all that the community had to offer in terms of social life, stimulating conversation and a relaxed atmosphere in pleasant surroundings. Most of the professional staff, on the other hand, knocked themselves out with long hours and high pressure positions and looked forward to spending the next 20 years trying to pay off their debts.

Conversations at the Club Room ran the full gamut and often turned to race relations. Madison had been born and raised in Virginia. His father was president of a local union, and he spent his first two years as an apprentice with that local. According to Madison, all the members were white males, but they often worked on construction jobs with blacks who were unskilled or semi-skilled. Madison recounted many tales about his experiences in Virginia with the plantation owners' philosophy of black-white relationships, a philosophy which he said still existed when he left Virginia in the late 1970s.

According to Madison his best friends were blacks—men he met at work, and men and women who associated with amateur boxing in and around the Washington-Baltimore-Richmond area. In conversations at the Club Room the often derided the

professional staff for having unrealistic attitudes about civil rights, calling them elite snobs who viewed the world from the privileged perspective of the upwardly mobile. "Blacks don't want equal rights," he used to say. “They want to have their own way of life, and they don't want to be measured by white man's standards." He accused black professionals in the Department of being elitists, the same as the whites.

These views, of course, often stirred arguments at the Club Room tables, but they were mostly friendly in tone, tempered considerably by Madison's own smiling way. It was difficult not to like him, especially when he offered to buy a round of drinks for everyone.

Margaret Vaughn first came to sense that there might be trouble about three weeks before the fight. Madison asked her for a date, and she refused, saying she was engaged to be married. Madison, obviously irritated, walked away abruptly after saying:" What's the matter, aren't I good enough for you?” The next day, as Madison was leaving the Club Room, having stopped during his lunch hour to buy an ice cream cone, he spotted Margaret Vaughn outside, standing with a group of interns. He went up to her, stuck the ice cream cone in front of her face, and said, "Wanna lick my cone?”According to Vaughn he made the gesture in an obscene manner, and she一somewhat surprised and angered一said, “Go away. I am not interested in you!” Madison, in turn, said, "Black beauty! You are that all right. I'll bet you can have any guy you want, any time!” and he walked away.

The following week, on March 13, Margaret Vaughn and her fiance, Douglas Jones, went to the Club Room after a meeting, and Madison was there. Vaughn and Jones sat at a table with a few friends, and Madison went over, pulled up a chair, sat down and yelled at the bartender to bring everyone a drink. He then engaged Jones in a conversation. According to Jones, they talked about many things一including football, boxing, race relations and, eventually, Margaret. Three weeks later both men tried to recall the conversation, and their versions were somewhat different. According to Jones,

“Madison' inferred' that black women, in general, and Margaret, in particular, were not loyal to a single person. He said further that Margaret and he had dated frequently and that he intended to spend the night with her. I told him to 'bug off' 一to get out and stay away from Margaret一that she didn't want to see him.” Madison recalled the conversation as follows:

“Jone said to me -'I understand you've been seeing Margared lately. I just want you to know that she doesn't like it and that I don't either. I suggest you bug off!' I told him I would not bother him or Margaret 一but that I considered myself a friend of everyone there, and I didn't intend to *bug off'. But I got up anyhow and walked away.”

That seemed to end things, at least temporarily. However, during the following week Margaret Vaughn asked for an appointment with the head of the Human Resources Office, Dr. Nicholas Herman, a specialist in labor relations. She told Herman that the matter was personal, but she wanted to tell someone, fearing that more serious things might happen. Then she recounted the incidents regarding George Madison, Douglas Jones and herself. Herman agreed with Vaughn that Madison had probably overstepped his bounds. He also agreed that while all employees have a right to frequent the Club Room during lunch breaks and off hours, they have an obligation to treat others with respect.

Dr. Herman asked Vaughn what, if anything, he ought to do. Vaughn, in response, said, " I don't think there's anything you can do, but I wanted to talk to someone—to let you know that there could be trouble.” Herman said:

“I appreciate that, but I feel helpless. As far as I can see, no one has gone out of control. This man, Madison, may have overstepped his bounds in things he's said and done, but I have difficulty distinguishing between this and a few things that happen between two or more employees that go even further beyond the boundaries of propriety."

Vaughn said: “You're right. I think we can handle this ourselves." She thanked Dr. He rman for listening and left, saying, as she departed from his office, “ I'll keep you informed if anything further develops.”

Herman replied, “Thank you. I hope this has been helpful.^

On Friday, March 28, the Club Room was less crowded than usual. Margaret Vaughn, Douglas Jones, and a close friend of Jones, John Seiler, met there after work. Seiler, a wiry 140 pounder, had been Jones' roommate during graduate school and was also in the internship program. Upon their arrival at the cafeteria, Seiler went to the bar to buy a pitcher of beer. The other two sat down at a table to wait for him. George Madison was shanding alone at the far end of the bar, and when he saw Seiler he walked over to him, shoved him aside, and said, “I'll buy this one." According to S eiler, “ The shove was not a friendly tap!”

Madison then paid for the pitcher of beer and took it over to the table where Vaughn and Jones were seated. Seiler followed with a second pitcher of beer plus some bags of nuts and potato chips, and he sat down too. Then, according to Seiler, Madison said: “ This is my party! Why don't you get lost." Siler then said, “We've got business here, and I think you're not part of it.”

There is some difference regarding what happened next. However, all four persons reported that Jones got up, grabbed a chair from another table and slid it between where Madison and Seiler were seated. He, Jones, stood in back of the chair and said something to Madison. According to Jones, he said: " Thanks for the beer, George, but we're busy trying to finish a report, and I wish you would leave. You can take the pitcher with you." Madison said he heard Jones say: " I'd like you to leave and stay away from this place. You're not wanted here."

Whatever was said, Madison got up from the table and moved toward Jones. Seiler then jumped up, moved between the two and yelled, " Cool it!" Madison turned and walked away, leaving both pitchers of beer on the table. He went back to the bar for a few minutes, then left the Club Room.

On Sunday, George Madison was doing overtime, working on a new housing complex not far from the Department office which was scheduled to be opened on Tuesday, April 1. The new complex was to be named after the retiring director of MCS, and dedication ceremonies were to be held the coming weekend, to be attended by the agency's Board of Directors, government officials, directors of other community agencies, other prominent public figures, and neighborhood residents.

At about noon Madison drove over the Club Room with Frank Joyce, another technician who had been assigned to the same job. Since it was Sunday, the cafeteria was quiet, open only because of the extra work people were putting in anticipation of the opening and dedication of the new complex. Joyce and Madison had often worked together and were long-time acquaintances. The two went to the cafeteria counter to pick up sandwiches, and Madison noticed Douglas Jones sitting at a table with two other” professionals.^ Jones looked up, Madison looked back, and the two men star ed at each other at a distance while Madison went through the cafeteria line. As he was paying for his lunch at the cashier's desk, he poured a cup of coffee, then he looked back toward Jones, and Jones was still staring at him. So Madison put down his cup of coffee, left his sandwich on the counter, and went over to Jones' table. Jones got up and

moved toward Madison, saying, “Is something wrong?”

Madison, in response, said, “Nothing that a fist in the mouth wouldn't solve.”

Jones said, “ Do you want to come outside?”

Madison, without saying anything, moved toward the door

It's not clear exactly what was said next. At least three witnesses were there, but no one could state who threw the first punch. Within seconds the two men were on the floor, slugging each other. Jones' two companions leapt up and tried to break up the fight, and they were joined by Frank Joyce, the technician. Eventually, the three succeeded in breaking up the men—two of them holding onto Jones and telling Madison to back off. Joyce stood in front of Madison——then backed him away after saying, "If you're going to hit him, you've got to hit me first." Aftermath At about 3 p.m. on Sunday, Thomas Hotchkiss, Head of Internships and Training Programs for MCS, received a phone call at his home. It was James Robertson, Acting Coordinator of Internships. Robertson, apologizing for calling Hotchkiss at home, told him about the fight一relating the story told him by Doug Jones and his two companions. He traced the events of the last several weeks and said that he, Robertson, and a few of the interns would like to meet with Hotchkiss as soon as possible on Monday—that the situation was hot, and many people were in an uproar about George Madison's conduct. Hotchkiss, after listening to the account, said:

“ In my opinion this man Madison ought to be removed from the Department tomorrow morning." Hotchkiss agreed to meet the managers at 2:30 p.m. on Monday and said that in the meantime, he would contact Patrick Mulloney, Madison's supervisor, and ask him to suspend Madison until further notice.

By the next morning一Monday, March 31一word had passed quickly about the fight the day before, and many said they were not surprised. Some called Madison a “troublemaker”,a "nigger baiter”,“sexist." And some related oth er instances where he had gotten into near-fights——making advances to women, sometimes doing things that were interpreted as obscene. All of this was passed on to Hotchkiss at the 2:30 meeting, which was attended by James Robertson, Douglas Jones, John Seiler, Margaret Vaughn, and six other members of the professional staff. AH except Robertson and Seiler were black.

Hotchkiss told them that he had talked to Patrick Mulloney that morning and that Madison was not working that day—having been promised the day off the week before in return for working Sunday. He said, however, that he was scheduled to meet with Mulloney and Madison the next morning, Tuesday, April 1. He essentially repeated to the group what he had said to Robertson the day before一with three qualifiers (underlined in the following quote):

Hotchkiss urged them not to take matters into their own hands, promising to meet with them again on Wednesday. They set a 4:00 p.m. date for the Wednesday meeting.

The next morning, Tuesday, Patrick Mulloney came to Hotchkiss' office. He said he had talked to Madison about the incident and that Madison wished to apologize to the interns. However, according to Mulloney, Madison claimed that Jones had been the aggressor and that he, Madison, was only defending himself. The rest of the conversation, according to Mulloney, went something like this:

Hotchkiss: "I don't for a minute believe that your man was defending himself. I had a dozen staff members in here yesterday, threatening to take things into their own hands, and they were all in essential agreement on the facts. We can't have that man mixing with the professional staff, particularly the interns. He's a menace. In fact, I think he has psychological problems."

Mulloney: "Wait a minute, Tom. You haven't heard his side of things. I suggest

you hear him out before coming to any conclusions.”

Hotchkiss: "I'm prepared to do that. Bring him over here."

At about 10:30 Mulloney returned to Hotchkiss' office along with George Madison. Hotchkiss sat behind his large desk with the bright morning sun shining through the window over his shoulder, directly into the face of Madison as he sat down. Mulloney didn't notice this, and Madison raised no objection at the time. Hotchkiss then told Madison that although they'd never met, he had come to know him through the interns and administrative staff. Mulloney related the rest of Hotchkiss9 words, as follows:

“If all I have heard is only 25 percent true, we don't have any need for you around here. The interns are calling you a" nigger baiter/ a" troublemaker/ and have said you're treating our women with disrespect. We're not living in the dark ages here. We had our share of grievances and work actions in the last several years and people like you set them off. I suggest you start l ooking for a job elsewhere, now.”

Madison: " Mr. Hotchkiss, there is another side to the story, and I think you ought to hear it."

Hotchkiss: "Tell it to Pat [Mulloney]. I have other matters to attend to. Good day."

Mulloney: " Tom, I think we'd better talk about this further. There are some things you don't know, and I'm afraid you've overstepped your bounds.”

Hotchkiss: " Look. Fve heard enough. The Director doesn't need any more problems than he's got already. These interns are ready to take things into their own hands, and I intend to prevent it. I hope you don't plan to aggravate them any more!"

Mulloney and Madison left the office, both of them incensed that Hotchkiss had apparently taken the interns7 stories as being true and was unwilling to listen further. He had hardly let Madison talk at all.

Dr. Herman's Involvement

Following the meeting between the interns and Hotchkiss on Monday morning, Margaret Vaughn knocked on Dr. Herman's door. He was in his office and listened while Vaughn related the incidents of the previous days. She said the interns and others were upset about Madison's conduct, but they did not want to cause him to be fired. "If he would just stay away from the cafeteria, everything would be all right," said Vaughn.

Following Vaughn's visit, Herman called Hotchkiss. He said that interns had informed him about the Madison situation and offered his assistance to Hotchkiss, if he wanted it, in trying to resolve the situation. Hotchkiss thanked Herman and invited him to attend Wednesday's 4:00 p.m. meeting. Herman said he would cancel another appointment and might be a bit late, but that he would be there.

The Grievance

Following their meeting with Hotchkiss, Mulloney told Madison to take the rest of the day off. Mulloney said that Hotchkiss had no authority to decide who works and who doesn't work in the technical service area, but he didn't want to risk further confrontations between Madison and the interns, at least for the rest of the day.

Madison, obviously angry, said, “I'll take off, b ut I expect to be paid for the day."

Mulloney: " Well talk about pay when you get back. Come and see me first thing in the morning.”

Madison: " I think I'm getting a bum rap. Nobody's heard my side so far. These guys have drummed up a plot against me just because I made pass at one of their women.”

Mulloney: "Cool it, George. I agree you've probably gotten a bum rap. But do me

a favor, and clear out. And don't hang around the Clu

b Room for a few days. It's for

your own good. These people can be mean, so let's not give them any temptation.”

Madison: "O.K. You're the boss. I'll see you tomorrow."

Madison checked out, but he went directly to the union office, looking for

Clarence miller, General Secretary of the Union Council. Miller represented the

technicians and other unionized employees at Mid-States, who had joined together for

negotiations and had a single collective bargaining agreement.

Madison found Miller in his office and said he had a grievance—that he had been

sent home for the day by Mulloney and that Hotchkiss, in a kangaroo court earlier that

day, had virtually fired him. He told Miller about the fight on Sunday and about earlier

instances involving Margaret Vaughn, Douglas Jones, and other interns and

professional sta仟in the Club Room.

As steward for the Department's technical crew, Madison had frequent contact

with Miller, and there was a certain fondness of each man for the other. In fact,

Madison was extremely popular among members of the non-professional staff, just as

he had apparently been with the professionals. He was a hard worker, and regularly did

a little bit extra一helping out the people he worked with, covering for them when they

were sick, under the weather or when they wanted to leave a little early. When he

handled grievances raised by members of the Union Council, he did it with vigor.

He often worked in areas of MCS where other employees, unionized or non-

unionized, also worked, such as the central dining room, the small library, and the

computer center and came to know a great many employees by name. Like the

professionals, the non-professionals knew him to be a generous spender, and they often

joined him for a few drinks after work at the Club Room.

After hearing Madison's story, Clarence Miller called Mulloney. He asked

Mulloney if Madison had been suspended or discharged. Mulloney said he didn't know 一that he had told Madison to come and see him the next morning. Miller, in turn, said, “ I hope you know you're sitting on a powder keg. If you take action against Madison,

you're going to shut down the whole deal with the union一and that might just shut

down the whole agency."

Mulloney: " I know, I know. Keep your shirt on, will you? I want to work

something out, if I can. Madison's in big trouble, I hope you know. There's more than

o ne side to this story, and I don't think any of us knows it all yet.”

Miller told Mulloney He'd be in touch with him. Then he hung up and talked

some more with Madison. He told him to go home for the day and to check with him in

the morning after he saw Mulloney. In the meantime, Miller said he was going to see

Frank Garrow.

Meeting between Clarence Miller and Frank Garrow

At 3:30 that afternoon Clarence Miller went to the office of Frank Garrow,

Associate Director for Administration. Under the collective bargaining agreement

Garrow represented management at all third step grievance meetings involving the

unionized staff. This was the final step before arbitration. Since Miller represented the

union members at that stage, these two men had developed a close working

relationship over the years. Probably no two people were better acquainted with union-

management relations at MCS. While they often argued with each other, they also had

great mutual respect. Most of their problems were solved before formal grievances

ever got to the third step level, because Miller and Garrow tried to alert each other to

problems that were brewing. Garrow, in the spirit of accommodation, gave priority to

Miller whenever he asked for a meeting.

Garrow: "Did you get a cup of coffee, Clarence?"

Miller: "Virginia said she would brew up a fresh pot. I don't understand how a bum like you deserves such a fine woman for a secretary."

Garrow: “My wife says the same thing about herself. How do I deserve such fine women? You tell me!"

Miller: " We've got a problem, and frankly I'm worried. This one could blow us out of the water.”

Garrow: "Are you referring to George Madison?”

Miller: "Yes. I gather Mulloney's talked to you already?”

Garrow: "Mulloney—hell! The director called. He said some of the black administrators—he mentioned no names—had met him at lunch and asked what we intended to do about the fight. Stafford does not like surprises, and this one caught him cold.,^

Miller: "What did he do?"

Garrow: " In short, I guess he told them he didn't know anything about it. So they 'briefed' him—saying that George Madison had been getting drunk in the Club Room, making obscene remarks and that he got into a fight on Sunday with one of the interns.

I guess he bloodied him up a bit. At any rate, Stafford told them he'd check into it一that he was sure it would be handled in an appropriate manner. Then he called me一madder than helL He does not like surprises!

Memories of earlier 'affairs' that went Put of controP still stick in his mind and, as you know, the Board, the high profile government officials and prominent community people are here for the retirement party and dedication ceremonies this week. It's an important time, and the Director doesn't want any embarrassments/^

Miller: "Mulloney told Madison to go home for the day——to check with him tomorrow. As I understand, Hotchkiss got involved and told Madison this morning to start looking for another job.”

Garrow: " What in hell does Hotchkiss know? It looks like we've got a little organizational problem here."

Miller: "I hate to ruin your day, but I thought you had better know.”

Garrow: " Thanks. Til be in touch."

As Miller was getting up to leave, Patrick Mulloney entered the Associate Director's office carrying three cups of coffee. He asked Miller to stay. The three men talked for the next half hour, Miller making it clear that any disciplinary action against Madison would likely result in a sympathy strike by others― specially if the discipline was severe-

Mulloney: "George is a hell of a good worker and a nice guy. But sometimes he turns from Jekyll to Hyde一he's got a fierce temper, thay tell me—specially after a few drinks.

Miller: "He's a well-built man. I wouldn't want to tangle with him.”

Mulloney: "He won a few amateur boxing titles not too long ago, and he keeps himself in excellent shape.”

Garrow: "What's your plan for tomorrow morning?"

Mulloney: "That's why I'm here. I need your advice."

And that he intended to be there. Upon learning this, Garrow felt somewhat relieved knowing that Herman, a professional colleague, might be able to at least keep Hotchkiss from making commitments as the alleged spokesman for the agency. In addition he might help cool the situation.

Meeting of Wednesday, April 2, 4:00 p.m.

The meeting took place as scheduled. Those in attendance were Hotchkiss, who

sat at his desk, Patrick Mulloney, Dr. Herman and four interns: Douglas Jones, Margaret Vaughn, John Seiler, and James Robertson, Intern Coordinator. At approximately 4:10 p.m. the office door opened, and Director Charles Srafford poked his head inside, asking Hotchkiss to come to the outer office.

In the absence of Hotchkiss, the parties in the office evidenced confusion about the purpose of the meeting. So Dr. Herman took charge. He asked the interns to recount, as best they could, all of the events that led to the fight on Sunday, the 30lh. Mulloney was obviously nervous about this, but he had little choice but to sit and listen. At approximately 4:30 Hotchkiss returned, sat at his desk and appeared to be going through some papers——not apparently paying attention to what was being said by the others-

Margaret Vaughn did most of the talking, but all four interns participated in relating the facts, as they saw them, to Mulloney and Herman. Then Herman told the interns that Madison had not been at work that day and would be reporting the next morning. He asked what they thought the Department should do. All four said they thought he should be fired. This, of course, did not jibe with what Vaughn had told Herman in his office on Monday.

Mulloney then interrupted, saying, “There are two sides to the stolry. We're convicting a man without even letting him be heard!"

It was then about 5:15 p.m. Hotchkiss got up, put on his coat, picked up his briefcase and said: " I'll leave the office to you. Please turn off the lights when you leave,” and he walked out.

Margaret Vaughn, responding to Mulloney, said: "George Madison is a nice enough person, most of the time. But he should not be around management interns. Can't he be assigned somewhere else?"

Mulloney: "How can you assign someone to a job in this Department where he's not in contact with the professional staff?”

Robertson: "You can at least tell him to stay out of the Club Room."

Mulloney: "He's on his own time when he's at the Club. The place is open to everyone. How can we discriminate against him?”

Dr. Herman then interrupted. Addressing himself to the interns, he suggested that the easiest thing for them to recommend would be that Madison be discharged. This way Madison would go away, there would be no more fights in the Club Room, no more encounters between him and the interns, and everyone could to be willing at least to discuss this for a few minutes一to explore some other alternatives. Bear in mind, Madison is a married man. He has six years of seniority in MCS and is a highly-respected technician. We're asking Pat Mulloney to do something that could ruin the career of a promising man."

The interns then rose to the challenge, and for the next hour they participated, almost enthusiastically, in an exploration of workable solutions, short of discharge or transfer. Mulloney participated as well, with slightly less enthusiasm.

Finally, at about 6:45, the parties came up with a package. It contained four elements:

1 .Madison would apologize to each of the interns一Jones, Vaughn and Seiler—for his actions on Sunday and give them assurances that there would be no further such incidents.

2.Mulloney would inform Madison that any further “incident” between himself and a trainee would result in his discharge.

3.Mulloney would advise Madison not to frequent the Club Room for the next two months (after which time the present intern group—Jones, Vaughn and Seiler

among them—would have completed the training program and most likely moved into positions elsewhere in the agency or in other agencies).

4.Madison could return to work on Thursday.

After a certain amount of prodding from Dr. Herman, Mulloney agreed to present the proposal to Madison. Mulloney said he was reasonably convinced he could get Madison to agree, because he knew that Madison himself was worried about being discharged. The four-point plan might be a welcome alternative, especially if it didn't involve a loss of pay.

The next morning Mulloney, in the presence of Clarence Miller, presented the plan to Madison, not telling him that it had been formulated by the interns. Both Mulloney and Miller pointed out that while they realized the whole series of incidents had two sides and that Madison hadn't voiced his, the probability of further difficulties was high if he didn't accept. Miller, in turn, said to Madison that if he wanted to file a grievance he could一that the union would carry the case to arbitration, if necessary. "But,” said Miller, “you're not losing any money, and maybe a los s of a little face isn't too bad when the stakes are this high."

Madison agreed, and this information was later conveyed to Hotchkiss, Associate Director Garrow, Dr. Herman, and Director Stafford. Hotchkiss, who had left the Wednesday meeting early, called Mulloney and congratulated him, saying, “Pat, it's been a pleasure to work with you on this. It's good to know we can hammer out our problems together?"

Mulloney thanked him, but his relief was only temporary.

On Friday morning, April 4, Mulloney received the following memorandum.

MID-STATES COMMUNITY SERVICES

Housing Department

MEMORANDUM

April 3, 19

TO: Patrick Mulloney

FROM: Thomas Hotchkiss

I want to confirm this morning's telephone conversation.

As I said this morning, I wanted you to know how grateful we throughout the agency are to you for your thoughtful and careful handling of the recent series of incidents concerning the member of the technical staff and several of our interns. Both Director Stafford and I feel that you could not have been more helpful and cooperative, and we are very grateful and highly appreciative for all the assistance and the considerable number of hours you have invested toward solution of the problem.

I now believe that the solution consisting of the technician's apologies to each of the interns, his assurance to you and to them that there will be no further incidents, and your communicating to him that any further incident would result in his being dismissed from the agency, adds up to a good solution with one possible concern only remaining.

That concern is the one that Director Stafford and I share; namely, that because of the erratic behavior of the technician in question, we would like to have you discuss this with Dr. Andrew Roseberger, Head of MCS Health Services, and arrange for the technician to be interviewed and thereby certified by competent medical staff. I realize that this may create a new and difficult problem for you, but as I mentioned this morning, I do feel that this is important, and so does Director Stafford.

Again with thanks for all your efforts in this problem,

Yours very truly,

Thomas M. Hotchkiss

Head of internships and

Training Programs

Cc: Director Charles Stafford

Waldo R. Baker, Associate Director (MCS) Human Resources and

Administration Patrick McEHeney, Associate Director (HD) Personnel

行政管理学案例分析汇总

《行政管理学》案例分析汇总 案例2-1 阳光下的服务 ——天津加强政务服务,建设服务型政府 政务公开这个词,人们越来越熟悉,老百姓申请公租房、办理注册企业等各种手续,常常要和政府部门打支道。对政务公开带来的好处,就更有发言权。政务公开了,老百姓到政府部门办事就更方便了,查找信息的渠道也就更多了。政府的决策更透明,服务也会更主动。对政务公开的新变化,天津当地的老百姓有着很多新感受、新体会。 这几个月来,天津市民粱虹心情一直不错。三个多月前,她和80多岁的老母亲,一起搬进了新房。梁虹住的房子,是天津市政府专门为困难群众建的公租房。屋内设施齐全,住在这里,每个月只要付少量的租金。梁虹说:“这房子54.68平方米,政府给我补贴每月450元,我自己每月只掏420元左右。”梁虹身体不好,没有固定工作,搬到新居前,曾经和家里十几口人挤在一间只有18平方米的房子里。今年3月,梁虹向房管部门提出了租赁公共住房的申请。原以为办理过程会很复杂,没想到申请当天,工作人员审核完材料,当场就给她发了选房证明。之后的选房,更让她印象深刻。选房采取的是公开摇号的方式,梁虹作为住户代表,当时就在现场。梁虹说:“选房要按顺序,在受益人群里,我们通过摇号来排顺序,选房的时候有人大代表、政协委员、公证处在场,都是通过公正公开摇号,透明度也高,大家心服口服。”公租房住户汪美说:“公平公正就在那搁着,没有什么可作假,也作不了假。”公租房住户肖金玲说:“每道手续办得都特别轻松,也不用费好些曲折去办,一看证明符合,‘啪’就盖戳,特别痛快、特别透明。” 公开透明,是天津市政府为老百姓办事遵循的基本原则。2007年以来,天津市政府每年坚持实施20项民心工程,每一项从确定到实施,都要通过各种方式广泛听取市民意见。 2010年,政府想对珠江公园进行改造,改造前专门在周边小区召开了听证会。河西区汉江里社区居委会主任王保节说:“当时公园里有个门球场,已经用了十多年了,很旧了,每天老人们还得拉沙子碾那个场地。当时我们提出,这个场馆是不是提升一下、改造一下?政府后来就采纳了。”居民姜秀敏说:“政府采纳了,我们很高兴,这样变成塑胶的,像绿地毯一样,多漂亮。” 在天津,有个大家都熟悉的便民服务热线8890,三万多家企业通过它,为市民提供高效便捷的服务。8890的谐音是拨拨就灵,服务平台设置在天津行政许可服务中心。开通六年来,已经办理群众求助事项900多万件,群众满意率始终在99%以上。8890家庭网络服务中心主任朱晓利说:“8890的服务内容有26类,350个子项,涉及市民家庭生活的方方面面,对群众和企业都是不收费的,是一个公益性的平台。”’在天津行政许可服务中心,除了8890这样的社会服务平台,还设置了为企业法人服务的行政审批平台、公共资源公开

2269电大个人与团队管理答案(绝对全面)

2269电大个人与团队管理答案(绝对全面)

“个人与团队管理”课程考核 期末复习材料 第一部分:单项选择题 第一单元:自我规划 一、考核知识点:GSK26 头脑风暴法的步骤 (一)教材索引 参见《个人与团队管理(上册)》(第二版)(以下简称:“个人上”)第10页。 (二)练习题 1.关于头脑风暴法的第二个阶段,做法不正确的是()。 A. 对那些提出荒谬想法的人进行批评教育 B. 挑出需要保留的想法,并剔除那些无用的想法 C. 仔细考虑剩下的想法并根据价值或有效性进行编号 D. 继续工作,合理处理剩下的想法 2.刘总是团队的领导者,近期举行了一次会议,他是会议主持人。针对最近出现的问题,让大家提出各种解决问题的想法,不管想法多么离奇。刘总规定在其他团队成员发表自己的想法时,任何人不准提出异议,也不准做出任何批评

建议,但是刘总可以做一些启发性的发言和引导。可以看出刘总在这次会议中运用了()。 A. 德尔菲法 B. 电子会议 C. 头脑风暴法 D. 名义群体法 3.头脑风暴法是一种发挥人们创造力的方法,在使用头脑风暴法的过程中,人们应遵循的原则是()。 A. 人员都应该是专家 B. 能够进行批评 C. 人员越少越好 D. 提出较多数量的想法 4.头脑风暴法一般分为两个阶段,关于这两个阶段,说法不正确的是()。 A. 第一个阶段是提出想法 B. 第二个阶段是批评、评估并对各种想法进一步筛选 C. 两个阶段是相互关联的 D. 两个阶段可以同时进行 5.为解决突发问题,公司领导建议大家提出各种各样的想法,想法越多越好。这个建议体现了头脑风暴法的()的特点。 A. 鼓励“自由想象” B. 排除评论性批判 C. 要求提出一定数量的观念 D. 改进观念 (三)练习题分析 练习题答案:1. A;2. C;3. D;4. D;5.

行政管理案例分析第1次作业答案

1、立法、行政、司法的“三权分立”思想是由( A 提出的 A. 孟德斯鸠B。洛克C。潘恩D、杰斐逊 2、公共物品的最显著特征是(B A. 大家共同占有 B. 消费的非排他性 C. 消费的排他性 D. 国家拥有 3、为了弥补或完善决策而制定的决策方案,称为(B A. 积极方案 B. 追踪方案 C. 临时方案 D. 应变方案 4、西方行政学发展的新古典时期,也称为(C A. 传统时期 B. 成熟日期 C. 行为科学日期 D. 现代管理时期 5、我国由人民代表投票选举产生政府领导者的制度属于(D

A. 聘任制 B. 委任制 C. 考任制 D. 选任制 6、下列不属于行政领导权力的来源是(A A .决策权力 B. 归属权 C. 合法权力 D. 奖惩权力 7、公共预算过程的阶段不包括(C A. 编制 B. 执行 C. 控制 D. 决算 8、1980年,我国着手财政管理体制重大改革,实行(A 体制 A. 划分收支,分级包干 B. 划分税种、核实收支、分级包干 9、我国许多地方行政法规都附有实施细则,制定实施细则的行政立法属于(A A .补充性立法

B. 执行性立法 C. 试验性立法 D. 自主性立法 10、从国家行政法规的效力看(A A. 它高于行政规章的效力 B. 它等于行政规章的效力 C. 它低于行政规章的效力 D. 它不能与行政规章比较 11、行政文化在行政主体之间、行政主体和行政对象之间建立信任、沟通关系这表现了行政文化的(B 功能 A. 规范 B. 维系 C. 引导 D. 选择 12、处于行政活动起始阶段的行政文化构成形态是(C A. 行政规范 B. 行政意志 C. 行政心态 D. 行政评价

精选行政管理学案例分析题

《行政管理学》案例分析 案例分析 1984年3月12日第六届全国人大常委会第四次会议通过了《中华人民共和国专利法》,于1985年4月1日施行。 为了做好施行专利法的准备工作,需要在全国范围内建立相应的专利管理机构和专利服务机构。经国务院批准,国家科委、国家经委、劳动人事部、中国专利局联合下发了《关于在全国设置专利工作机构的通知》。专利管理机关具有执法和管理的双重职能。 据此,广州市于1984年l0月成立了广州市专利管理处,属事业单位,定编10人。随着市场经济的发展,专利纠纷案、专利侵权案、假冒专利案也逐年上升,专利处的工作压力越来越大。广州市人大两次检查广告专利工作,提出整改意见。市委、市府有关部门也想了许多办法,决定将广州市专利管理处改称广州市专利管理办公室,升格为副局级单位管理,编制增加至25人。 1992年9月第七届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十七次会议通过了《中华人民共和国专利法》的修改。修改后的专利法加强了执法的力度,增加了打假的内容、手段,给专利工作赋予了新的内容。专利法的调整,专利工作量的增加,得到市委、市府的关注。考虑到广州专利工作的具体情况,在广州市1995年机构改革时将广州市专利管理办公室改称广州市专利管理局.编制增至35人,归口市科委管理,并明确:市专利局是市政府授权主管全市专利执法和行政管理的机构,安排有13项工作。行政管理工作增加:参与制定知识产权法规、参与重大经济政策的专利保护评价、管理专利技术许可合同、专利权、专利申请权转让合同、以专利为主的无形资产评估等内容;专利执法方面增加:查处将非专利产品冒充专利产品或者将非专利方法冒充专利方法的行为,并做出处理决定等新的内容,并定性专利局就是行政管理和执法。 问题: 1.广州市专利机构设置的依据是什么?20世纪末,我国进行了多次机构改革,每次都较大幅度地削减了机构和人员,为什么专利管理机构能在这样的背景下建立和发展起来呢? 2.广州市专利机构经历了专利处、专利办、专利局的变化,人员编制由10人,25人.再增至35人。机构规格由低到高,人员由少到多,是否是所有行政机构发展的必然规律?机构设置一般要遵循什么原则?? 答案: 1.答案要点: ???????? (1) 广州市专利机构的设置是根据行政环境提出的要求,为了做好施行专利法的准备工作而设立的。 ???????? (2) 专利管理机构建立和发展的原因:其一,尽管在20世纪末.我国进行了多次机构改革,每次都较大幅度地削减机构和人员,但要看到并不是所有的机构都相应地裁减,必须要根据具体情况具体分析,要看有没有必要。一些机构庞大,冗员过多,当然要削减。相反,有些机构“势单力薄”,当然要加强。其二,专利机构的建立和发展是为了满足行政环境提出的要求,它的发展具有合理性和必然性。 ???????? 2.答案要点: ???????? (1) 并非所有行政机构都象广州市专利机构那样经历规格由低到高、人员由少到多的。有些机构则恰恰相反甚至取消。行政机构的设置与变化应符合行政环境的需要,遵循一定的行政组织编制管理原则。 ???????? (2) 机构设置一般要遵循精简原则、统一原则、效能原则和编制立法原则等。?

个人与团队管理各知识点

《个人与团队管理》各章知识点 第一单元自我规划 第1章:思考你的目标 1、什么是创造性思维方法,你的工作当中的哪些方面适合应用创造性思维方法? 创造性思维是指不依常规、寻求变异、想出新方法、建立新理论、从多方面寻求答案的开放式思维方式。头脑风暴法的规则遵循两个独立的阶段,这两个阶段不能同时进行。在我们的工作中,经常会遇到比如:制定目标、解决问题的情况,我们经常采用头脑风暴法。 例:培养创造型思维是培养创造能力的一个方面。(对) 2、什么是头脑风暴法?个人和集体使用头脑风暴进行创造性思维有什么区别和联系? 头脑风暴法(Brainstorming)是为了克服阻碍产生创造性方案的遵从压力的一种相对简单的方法,它利用一种思想产生过程,鼓励提出任何种类的方案设计思想,同时禁止对各种方案的任何批评。个人头脑风暴不会受到别人的干扰,但是思路狭窄;团队头脑风暴法能够集中很多人的意见,但是人们往往会有所顾虑。3、假如你现在面对职业或工作的选择,你会采用什么手段来面对这些选择? 具体情况具体对待。面对不同的情况,应该有不同的方法。一般来讲包括: 改变境遇 积极进取——使自己更加适应; 面对其他挑战,如参加训练和培训; 改善工作环境; 授权给其他人,让他们承担一些日常事务。 改变自己 检查自己的真实想法——嘴上说的和心中想的是否一致; 改变行为; 发展在其他领域的技能和能力 改变个人与工作之间的关系 适应工作; 将工作看作达到目标的方法; 通过降低问题的重要性来改变看法——更注重工作之余的生活。 离开 4、请思考你是如何制定自己的目标和计划的。 制定目标时首先应该分析自己的现状,考虑自己的选择,这种情况可以用个人头脑风暴法来进行,但是一定要遵循头脑风暴法的规则。 制定计划:可以按照计划的时间长短进行,长期计划一般是提纲挈领的;而短期的计划则是详细具体的,事情的时间、地点、人物等都应该具体详细。当然其他的方法也可以。 第2章:自我认知 1、什么是自我认知?在日常生活中你是怎样了解自己和他人的? 自我认知是情感智能框架中的一个方面,也就是了解自己的情感,主要包括:情感自我认知、正确的自我评估、自信等。一般通过测试,视个人情况而定,只要合理即可。 一般来说:与他人沟通,理解他人,换角度思考,反思自己的行为,接受各种反馈意见等都能帮助你去理解自己和他人。 例:情感智能框架中的认知包括( D )。

公共行政学 课程综述(案例模版)

《公共行政学》课程综述 学校: 姓名: 学号: 班级: 指导教师: 目录 内容摘要 目录 一、公共行政学的主要内容 (3) 二、行政监督原理在实践中的运用 (4) 三、学习体会和收获 (6) 参考文献

《公共行政学》课程综述 内容摘要:(250字左右)………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… 关键词:公共行政学;内容;原理;体会(不超过5个) 公共行政学,在我国也称为行政管理学或是行政学,是一门研究公共行政组织及其对公共事务管理活动的科学。公共行政学这门课程是政治学、管理学、法学、经济学、社会学、心理学和人类文化学等学科的交叉学科。学习公共行政学能够让我们提高国家各级行机构的效率和能量,使国家的行政活动走向科学、规范、民主与法制。 一、公共行政学的主要内容 公共行政学第一章讲述了公共行政的含义。公共行政就是政府行政,具有公共性.政治性.法制性.民主性.公平性.和高效性的特点。第二章主要介绍行政环境是指直接或间接影响公共行政的各种内外部因素的总和。它具有复杂性、约束性、多样性、和不稳定性,的特点。行政环境与公共行政的关系是辨证的关系,公共行政必须适应行政环境,行政环境制约、决定公共行政;公共行政对行政环境有改造作用。虽然一般行政环境即自然地理、政治、经济、文化和国际环境对公共行政的作用是十分重要的,但是,具体环境的作用也不容忽视。组织环境组织文化对公共组织形成团体凝聚力有十分重要的作用。第三章介绍政府职能的含义.特点和类型。政府职能是指政府在社会中所扮演的角色和所起的作用。政府职能有普遍性.强制性.系统性.不可代替性和服务性等特点。论述政府在资源配置方面失效,以及政府干预的限度。划分了政府职能的类型,论述了政府的基本职能内容。第四章主要介绍行政体制就是政府体制。它有政治性.稳定性.系统性.滞后性和继承性等特点。行政体制可分为中央政府

个人与团队管理作业及答案知识交流

个人与团队管理 第1次平时作业 一、名词解释(每题4分,共20分) 1.团队: 一个组织在特定的可操作范围内,为实现特定目标而建立的相互合作,一致努力的由若干成员组成的共同体。 2.共同愿景: 是一种描绘组织目的、使命和核心价值理念的,浓缩的未来发展“蓝图”,是一个组织最希望实现的美好前景。 3.团队精神: 是指团队整体的价值观、信念和奋斗意识,是团队成员为了团队的利益和目标而相互协作、共同奋斗的思想意识。 4.团队凝聚力: 也称内聚办,是指一个团队之中的成员围绕在团队,尽心于团队的全部力量。 5.团队士气: 就是团队的成员对自身所在的团队感到满意,愿意成为该团队的一员,并协助达成团队目标的一种态度。 二、单项选择:(每题2分,共20分) 1、下面说法中不属于团队特点的是( B )。 A 职责明确 B 成员有时不具有决策权 C 信息沟通充分 D “机构”具有不确定性 2、团队成员角色中的(D )具有很高的分析技能。 得分 教师签名 得分 批改人 得分 批改人

A 倡导者 B 组织者 C 建议者 D 开发者 3、团队成员角色中的(B)倾向于了解所有成员的看法。 A 倡导者 B 联络者 C 建议者 D 开发者 4、 ( A )在员工参与决策方面功能不足。 A 自我管理型团队 B 多功能型团队 C 虚拟型团队 D 问题解决型团队 5、在信任的五个维度中,罗宾斯认为最重要的是( A ) A 正直 B 能力 C 忠实 D 一贯 E 开放 6、希望自己在某个组织中有一定的位置,以获得物质上和精神上的满足。这是团队成员的( D )。 A 责任意识 B 自豪意识 C 亲和意识 D 归属意识 7、当团队的主要任务是作出高质量的复杂决策时,团队规模最好为( C )。 A 3-5人 B 5-7人 C 7-12人 D 12-15人 8、建设团队文化最有利的阶段是( C )。 A 成立阶段 B震荡阶段 C 规范化阶段 D 高产阶段 D 调整阶段 9、以下表现中不属于团队在高产阶段的表现的是( A )。 A 个别成员会挑战领导者 B团队成员具有一定的决策权 C 团队成员分享信息 D 团队成员有完成任务的使命感 10、不属于团队规则内容的是( D )。 A 团队的战略 B团队的约束 C 团队成员的角色 D 团队成员的沟通方式

竺乾威《公共行政学》(第三版)课后“案例与思考”讲解

绪论 案例一政府——?掌舵?还是?划桨" 1.如何界定政府的掌舵职能? 答:按照现代社会、现代市场对政府的要求,政府主要应该起到一个?掌舵?的作用。 (1)美国学者戴维〃奥斯本和特德〃盖布勒在《改革政府——企业精神如何改革着公营部门》一书中指出:?‘政府’这个词的词根来自希腊文,意思是‘操舵’。政府的职责是掌舵而不是划桨。直接提供服务就是划桨,可政府并不擅长于划桨。?换言之,在社会经济的发展中,政府要像?舵手?一样,把握全局,协调、整合各方力量,保证正确的发展方向。 (2)具体而言界定政府的掌舵职能,就是要确定好在市场经济条件下政府的角色。政府在生产角色、提供角色、安排角色之间的比重要进行合理改变,即生产角色比重的降低及提供、安排角色比重的提高。 ①政府应放弃不必要的生产职能。政府角色合理定位的关键在于降低政府生产角色的比重,为市场和社会的生产及市场和社会提供空间。帮助政府放弃生产职能有三种途径,即委托授权、政府撤资以及政府淡出。此外,可以在基础设施领域实行民营化。 ②规范市场秩序和社会秩序。政府对公平秩序的维持以法律和规则体系为载体,为各种力量提供基本的行为规范,是市场和社会正常运转的基础,也是政府顺利实现各种制度安排的基础。 ③政府管理能力的提高。?掌舵?作用的最主要体现就是管理能力。政府在放弃部分生产职能后,必须能够承担更多的管理和控制责任。为了承担这些责任,政府要能够管理合同、有效促进竞争、进行合理规制、增强风险共担意识、进行有效金融支持。 2、政企分开涉及哪些重要因素? 答:政企分开的含义包括:一是要把政府的行政职能和所有权职能分开;二是政府所有权职能中,要把资产的管理职能和资产的运营职能分开;三是资产运营职能中,要把资本金的经营和财产的经营分开。其涉及的重要因素具体有以下几点: (1)企业所有权与经营权的分开。明确企业的所有权,建立严格的现代企业制度,做到产权清晰、权责明确、管理科学。 (2)政府与企业社会职能的分开。将政府的公共管理职能和企业的经营管理职能实行最彻底的分离,使企业成为真正的市场主体。国有企业应逐步从竞争性生产和经济领域退出,国有企业甩掉不必要的社会职能包袱,通过产权处臵的方法,通过职能分离,压缩国有企业的规模。 (3)政府国有资产所有者职能与行政职能的分开。通过贸易自由化,放松准入,停止补贴和转移支付等方法促使企业更具竞争性,区分开政府作为资产所有者时的职能与作为一般监管者的职能。以资本为纽带建立起出资关系,实现国有资产由行政管理向产权管理转变的条件,建立与国有资产管理体制相配套的企业制度和外部环境。 (4)硬化国有企业的预算,特别是通过投资改革,使其向更商业化的信贷靠近,限制软贷款的获得等方法,使其有压力和活力。 (5)改善激励机制。这要求改变国有企业管理者与政府之间的关系,一方面赋予企业经营者以更大的自由权,另一方面引入新的监督机制,如稽查制度、业绩评议、管理合同等。 3、你如何理解D市政府职能的转变? 答:由计划经济体制转轨到市场经济体制后,我国的各级政府都需要结合各自的实际情况积极探索政府职能的转变。 (1)政府职能转变或者说政府角色定位一直是政府管理中的一个难点,D市政府结合本市的具体情况,抓住职能转变的关键和核心,通过界定产权、建立现代企业制度、提供与新的国有资产管理体制相配套的企业制度和外部环境、完善社会保障制度等有效的措施实现了政企分开,理顺了体制,建立起了良好的政企关系。 (2)这个案例也告诉我们,政府职能转变一定要抓住关键,尊重科学发展规律。要通过一系列配套的,符合客观规律的措施实现政府职能的良好转变,从而赢得地区的良好发展,也为政府的进一步发展奠定良好的基础。也只有在变化的行政环境中积极主动作为,通过自身的努力来积极推进政府职能转变,才能建立一个积极负责、有作为的政府形象。

行政管理学案例

下面是某报2002年7月26日的一则报道。请运用行政职能原理分析这一案例指出存在的问题以及解决办法。 谁来牵走这条破船? 编辑同志:环岛路是我市一道靓丽的风景线,可太阳湾海滨浴场的潮间带却长期搁置着一条废弃的渔船,实在有碍观瞻。在媒体曝光后,这条破船仍“巍然不动”。希望有关部门尽快清除这一瑕疵,恢复环岛路的美丽风光。 ——读者王某 一条破旧不堪的渔船,却让几个职能部门的负责人都皱起了眉头。因为“目前没有相关规定,我们没办法解决。” 16日,记者以《破船脏了环境》为题对王某反映的问题作了报道。18日早晨,记者再次来到该处,看到这条已经腐朽的渔船依然占据着沙滩一隅。记者绕船走了一圈,发现船体上没有牌照或可以显示主人身份的标志。“太阳湾”海滨浴场的一位工作人员告诉记者,这条渔船从今年4月份就停靠在这里。他还说,环岛路沙滩上还有不少这类破船,它们与周围的景观极不协调,而且船体的碎片也成了沙滩垃圾的“制造者”。 哪个部门对清理这条木船负有责任?受市机关效能投诉中心委托,当日下午,记者以游客身份,在近一个小时内拨打了多个单位的电话,可是仍然无法找到能牵走这条破船的“主管部门”。 某管理办。工作人员态度还算温和,询问了渔船的停放地,然后说他们管的是海上,沙滩上的事情他们会和执法部门联系。记者

追问这个问题究竟属于哪个部门管,他回答说,环岛路由很多部门管辖,“职责有交叉”。“有没有直接主管的部门呢?”对记者这一问题,他没有回答,只是记下了记者的联系电话,表示“处理后会给一个反馈”。 城监某大队。工作人员听到记者的陈述后,回答说:“可以去看一下”。记者问他们是不是主管部门,他回答说:“如果是侵占沙滩、影响市容就可以管。如果是在水上我们就管不了。”“这艘船是停在海边的沙滩上,你们能管吗?”“如果是沙滩公共的地方,我们就可以管。如果是营利性的,应该别的部门管。”并说该片沙滩属于“太阳湾”的卫生管理范围,应该由“太阳湾”管理处找到船主,视情况清理。“如果找不到呢?”“这个具体情况不太清楚,我们也解决不了。” 某监督局。记者问:“渔船上一般都应该有船牌号,渔船的报废归哪里管?”“归我们。渔船报废后,由我们就地拆解”。“如果是停在海滩上的报废的渔船呢?你们会管吗?”“那要请示领导。”“为什么要请示领导?”“我们现在没有接到通知要管这件事情。”他还说,“这件事情比较复杂,我是值班的,不太清楚该事的具体过程”。同时,他还对记者的游客身份表示质疑。后来他还是记录下记者所说的情况,表示要调查一下这艘船的船主。 某管理局。工作人员说,船可能是当地渔民的,要记者与那里的相关部门联系。记者问,这种情况究竟有没有部门管,他回答说:“目前没有明确的主管部门。”“最好能找到船主,事情会比较好办,在没有找到船主之前,各个部门都不好贸然处理。”

国开《公共行政学》形考任务完整版参考试题答案

形考任务1:话题讨论 (请同学们在学完第5章后完成本次任务。本次任务为小组讨论形式,请同学们按照要求完成任务。本次任务以25分的成绩计入形成性考核。) 考核内容:围绕“征收公交卡磨损费是否合法”为题进行讨论。 考核要求: 1、教师会提前对同学们进行分组,每组7位左右学生。每个小组设立1名组长,组长可以由教师指定,也可以由小组在讨论前,由小组成员决定。 2、第五周初布置任务,第六周方能开展讨论,每位学生需要提前准备不少于300字的讨论发言提纲。 3、需要确定一名记录员,记录每一位发言者的发言要点。 4、讨论时,组长首先发言,然后自由讨论,讨论要求紧紧围绕讨论题目,不跑题。 5、讨论结束后,由组长汇总各位同学的发言,总结出不少于300字小组讨论的要点及内容。 6、教师根据每一位学生的讨论提纲以及小组讨论的结果给每一位学生评分。 (一)个人讨论提纲(17.5分),不少于300字 (二)小组讨论结果(7.5分),不少于300字 形考任务2:案例分析 (请同学们在学完第11章后完成本次任务。本次任务为案例分析形式,本次任务以25分的成绩计入形成性考核。) 考核形式:案例分析 考核内容: 案例:我国多数城市开展“公厕革命”试点工作,以“服务百姓、便民利民”为宗旨,如广州市天河区试点“公厕革命”,免费提供手纸、洗手液,但和上海、北

京、苏州等地一些实施免费手纸的公厕一样,出现了手纸浪费和偷盗的现象。“每次如厕使用的卷筒纸长度为1.6米”,造成极大浪费。对此人们议论纷纷,寻因“公厕革命”、“免费手纸”推行之路为何如此步履艰难,从而寻找良策。 考核要求:三个问题均需要结合案例进行分析,如果不能结合案例进行分析,最多只能得到60分。 请结合前11章的相关理论并结合案例分析: 1、公共舆论将此现象的矛头指向“国民素质低下”是否合适?(5分) 2、公共管理部门的管理是否规范、科学、方式是否单一?(10分) 3、政府公共管理能力是否需要加强?公共管理方式方法如何转型?(10分)形考任务3:测试题 题目1 管理层次 反馈 题目2 行政规章 反馈 题目3 行政决策参与

最新行政管理学案例分析题[1]

《行政管理学》案例分析 第2章案例分析 1984年3月12日第六届全国人大常委会第四次会议通过了《中华人民共和国专利法》,于1985年4月1日施行。 为了做好施行专利法的准备工作,需要在全国范围内建立相应的专利管理机构和专利服务机构。经国务院批准,国家科委、国 家经委、劳动人事部、中国专利局联合下发了《关于在全国设置专利工作机构的通知》。专利管理机关具有执法和管理的双重职能。 据此,广州市于1984年l0月成立了广州市专利管理处,属事业单位,定编10人。随着市场经济的发展,专利纠纷案、专利侵 权案、假冒专利案也逐年上升,专利处的工作压力越来越大。广州市人大两次检查广告专利工作,提出整改意见。市委、市府有关 部门也想了许多办法,决定将广州市专利管理处改称广州市专利管理办公室,升格为副局级单位管理,编制增加至25人。 1992年9月第七届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十七次会议通过了《中华人民共和国专利法》的修改。修改后的专利法加强了执法的力度,增加了打假的内容、手段,给专利工作赋予了新的内容。专利法的调整,专利工作量的增加,得到市委、市府的 关注。考虑到广州专利工作的具体情况,在广州市1995年机构改革时将广州市专利管理办公室改称广州市专利管理局.编制增至 35人,归口市科委管理,并明确:市专利局是市政府授权主管全市专利执法和行政管理的机构,安排有13项工作。行政管理工作增加:参与制定知识产权法规、参与重大经济政策的专利保护评价、管理专利技术许可合同、专利权、专利申请权转让合同、以专 利为主的无形资产评估等内容;专利执法方面增加:查处将非专利产品冒充专利产品或者将非专利方法冒充专利方法的行为,并做 出处理决定等新的内容,并定性专利局就是行政管理和执法。 问题: 1.广州市专利机构设置的依据是什么?20世纪末,我国进行了多次机构改革,每次都较大幅度地削减了机构和人员,为什么专 利管理机构能在这样的背景下建立和发展起来呢? 2.广州市专利机构经历了专利处、专利办、专利局的变化,人员编制由10人,25人.再增至35人。机构规格由低到高,人员由少到多,是否是所有行政机构发展的必然规律?机构设置一般要遵循什么原则? 答案: 1.答案要点: (1)广州市专利机构的设置是根据行政环境提出的要求,为了做好施行专利法的准备工作而设立的。 (2)专利管理机构建立和发展的原因:其一,尽管在20世纪末.我国进行了多次机构改革,每次都较大幅度地削减机构和人员,但要看到并不是所有的机构都相应地裁减,必须要根据具体情况具体分析,要看有没有必要。一些机构庞大,冗员过多,当然要削 减。相反,有些机构“势单力薄”,当然要加强。其二,专利机构的建立和发展是为了满足行政环境提出的要求,它的发展具有合 理性和必然性。 2.答案要点: (1)并非所有行政机构都象广州市专利机构那样经历规格由低到高、人员由少到多的。有些机构则恰恰相反甚至取消。行政机 构的设置与变化应符合行政环境的需要,遵循一定的行政组织编制管理原则。 (2) 机构设置一般要遵循精简原则、统一原则、效能原则和编制立法原则等。 第3章案例分析 时下,国家机关向社会公开招考领导干部的做法不再是新鲜事了。下面是摘自某市向全国公开选拔副厅、局级领导干部信息中 的部分内容。 参选人员基本条件: 1.思想政治素质好。具有履行职责所需要的理论水平和政策水平;坚决贯彻执行党的基本理论、基本路线和各项方针政策;努力实现党的宗旨、密切联系群众;事业心强,有强烈的改革意识和开拓进取精神;作风民主,顾全大局,清正廉洁,并有实绩。 2.具有拟参选职位所必备的专业知识和工作经验,有较强的宏观决策能力和组织协调能力。 3.现任正县(处级)职务并任职2年以上(1998年8月31日前任职),现任国有特大型企业中层正职、国有大型企业厂级副职、国有中型企业厂级正职并任职3年以上(1997年8月31日前任职)。 现任副厅、局级以上职务、国有特大型企业厂级副职以上职备和国有大型企业厂级正职职务的,不受任职年限限制。 获得博士学位的海外留学人员,不受本款任职资格条件限制,但应有3年以上工作经历。 4.年龄在45周岁以下(1955年1月1日以后出生),具有大学本科以上学历。

《个人与团队管理》模拟题一(正确答案)

《个人与团队管理》课程模拟题一 1.“在一旁观察别人的工作情况”属于非正式学习中的()。(A)工作观摩 2.关于制订工作计划,说法不正确的是()。(C)计划限制了行动的自由度 3.在工作场所应用QQ、MSN、Skype等软件进行沟通,属于现代信息技术沟通方式中的()。(B)即时信息沟通 4.华阳建筑公司的建筑工地分散在很多地方,各工地领导需要就建筑材料调拨和人员安排进行交流,不适合他们的书面沟通方式是()。 (C)布告栏 5.关于身体语言沟通,说法不正确的是()。(C)相对于口头语言沟通来说,身体语言沟通的有效性要差很多 6.小张向项目经理递交了一份建议书,提出了自己对项目进展的一些看法,这种工作报告的形式属于()。(D)从下到上形式 7.组织部门中,“负责主体业务的研发”是()部门的基本职责。(B)业务 8.关于组织目标和价值观,说法正确的是()。 (D)组织的目标决定了组织的核心价值观 9.关于增强自我认知能力的两种方式,说法不正确的是()。(B)反思仅仅是简单地思考问题 10.关于学习中存在的障碍及其解决方法,对应不正确的是()。(D)工作无稳定感——辞职,寻找新的工作 11.利用活动跟踪表可以清楚地了解自己的工作习惯,填写活动跟踪表的最后一步是()。(C)按照优先级别对一天的活动进行分析 12.人们的行为通常反映出他们的性格,属于消极/自卑类型的人的典型行为表现是()。(D)无条件地自我牺牲 13.“在做出决策以前及时提供信息以供参考”,这是考虑到优质信息特点中的()。 (D)恰当的时间 14.演讲台上,小薛的音调富有变化,抑扬顿挫,给他人以自信、坚定的感觉,传达此信息的沟通方式属于()。(B)副语言沟通 15.关于使用形体语言抓住听众心理,做法不正确的是()。(D)把双臂抱在胸前 16.在工作谈判中,出现的谈判冲突和其处理方法对应不正确的是()。(C)大声斥责——不问原因就道歉 17.根据PEST分析法,劳动和社会保障属于组织的()环境。(A)政治法律 18.从组织内营销类部门有影响力的员工所掌握的信息,来获取客户需求信息的缺点是()。(C)员工为保证自身利益,不轻易将这些信息进行分享 19.查尔斯·汉迪在《认识组织》中提出的组织文化类型不包括()。(C)强势文化 20.关于头脑风暴法的第一个阶段,做法不正确的是()。(D)谨慎思考,避免出现荒谬想法 21.电子头脑风暴法是一种简便的创新思维方法,属于它的优点的是()。(C)更多人员参与 22.从整体上看,SWOT分析可以分为两部分,第二部分OT可以用来分析()。(B)外部条件或因素 23.小李在利用SWOT分析法进行自我评估时,发现自己做事缺乏恒心,这属于他的()。 (B)劣势 24.根据KOLB学习周期,“总结从经验中获得的知识,并对这些知识进行研究,然后将所有的信息汇总,从中得出结论,接下来决定应该怎样应用自己的知识进行实践”是从()阶段开始学习。(B)反思 25.进行反思的方法有很多,不正确的是()。(C)不需要遵循逻辑 26.SMART目标中的S代表()。(A)明确的 27.有些人可能需要压力来激励自己前进,但压力过大不利于健康,防止压力过度的方法不正确的是()。(C)拒绝别人的帮助 28.关于计划在提高工作效率中的应用,说法不正确的是()。(B)每天工作不同,所以不用事先做计划 29.表达需求有很多种方法,说出需求的方法不正确的是()。(A)对你的需求做到心中有数,不但要积极还要好斗 30.沟通的要素包括()和时间安排五个方面。(A)目的意图,沟通对象,信息内容,方式方法 31.商务文件除了需要准确无误、条理清晰外,还应具有()的特点。(B)开门见山 32.与环境的陈设属于同一种沟通方式的是()。(C)环境的颜色搭配 33.办公室的内部设计是一种道具沟通方式。除传统式办公室设计外,常见的办公室设计还有()。(A)开放式设计 34.在会议协调阶段中,关于各个阶段的协调,描述和做法相对应的是()。(B)“协商问题和希望获得的结果”阶段:重新陈述议程中的内容 35.会议中有时会出现争论的情况,面对这种情况,做法不正确的是()。(B)不予理睬 36.小李经常在公司做工作报告,每次她都要花很长时间准备。准备材料的步骤不正确的是()。(A)将搜集到的所有信息写到材料中 37.谈判是一个双向的过程,除了作出合理反应的能力外,个人的()决定了谈判能否成功。(A)洞察局面的能力 38.迈克尔·波特的“五力模型”是用来分析行业的()。 D)竞争状态 39.运用SWOT分析法对组织进行分析的步骤,说法正确的是()。(A)通过判断组织优缺点来分析组织内部情况

《公共行政学》作业1-4参考答案

《公共行政学》作业1答案 一、名词解释: 1、地方政府体制:是地方政府按照一定的法律或标准划分的政府组织形式。。 2、非营利组织:是指组织的设立和经营不是以营利为目的,且净盈余不得分配,由志愿人员组成,实行自我管理的、独立的、公共或民间性质的组织团体。 3、人事行政:是指国家的人事机构为实现行政目标和社会目标,通过各种人事管理手段对公共行政人员所进行的制度化和法治化管理。 4、公文管理:就是对公文的创制、处置和管理,即在公文从形成、运转、办理、传递、存贮到转换为档案或销毁的一个完整周期中,以特定的方法和原则对公文进行创制加工、保管料理,使其完善并获得功效的行为或过程。 二、单项选择: 1.被称为“人事管理之父”和行为科学的先驱者的是( C )。 A.普耳B.斯密C.欧文D.斯图亚特 2.公共行政生态学的代表作《公共行政生态学》于1961年发表,该书的作者是( A)。A.里格斯B.古立克C.德鲁克D.高斯 3.20世纪30年代,古立克把管理职能概括为( A)。 A.计划、组织、人事、指挥、协调、报告、预算 B.领导、决策、组织、指挥、协调、人事、预算 C.计划、领导、人事、指挥、组织、报告、预算 D.计划、领导、人事、沟通、协调、组织、预算 4、职位分类最早产生于19世纪的( B )国,后被许多国家所效仿。 A、法 B、美 C、中 D、英 5、由立法机关或其他任免机关经过考察而直接任命产生行政领导者的制度是(C)。 A、选任制 B、考任制 C、委任制 D、聘任制 6.公共行政学研究的核心问题是( A)。 A.政府职能B.行政监督C.行政决策D.行政体制 7.法国第五共和国宪法所确立的一种中央政府体制是( C)。 A.内阁制B.总统制C.半总统制D.委员会制 8.内阁制,起源于18世纪的( A)国,后来为许多西方国家所采用。 A.英国B.美国C.日本D.加拿大 9.我国最早提出学习行政学的是梁启超,他于1876年在( B)中提出“我国公卿要学习行政学”。 A.《行政学原理》B.《论译书》C.《行政学的理论与实际》D.《行政学》10.对于一般的省、市、县、乡而言,实行民族自治的自治区、自治州、自治县、自治乡就是( A)的行政区。 A.特殊型B.发展型C.传统型D.现代型 三、多选题: 1.下列属于文化环境要素的是( BCDE)。 A.法律制度B.意识形态C.道德伦理D.价值观念E.教育 2.国家公务员的培训主要有( BCDE)等几种形式。 A.综合培训B.更新知识培训C.任职培训D.业务培训E.初任培训3.下列国家实行总统制的有( AD )。 A.墨西哥B.德国C.新加坡D.埃及E.丹麦

行政管理学案例选编

行政管理学案例选编 函授05行政管理(专)夜大05行政管理(专) 1、行政环境 世界卫生组织每年都对世界主要城市的大气质量污染情况进行监测评比,沈阳作为一个老污染城市历来“榜上有名”,1988年还曾进入到世界十大污染城市第二位。沈阳市属以煤烟型大气污染为主的城市,全市每年燃煤量达1000万吨,这些煤炭的60%都是在冬季取暖中烧掉的。为了使沈阳冬季大气污染严重的情况得到明显改善,沈阳环保部门从去年初开始对各种锅炉、窑炉进行治理,取缔了一批严重冒黑烟的炉窑。结合上述案例,谈谈你对行政环境与行政管理之间关系的认识。 2、行政职能 给企业定指标、下任务这种计划经济管理方式,在一些政府经济管理部门仍然很吃香,1993年初,S 省定出全年的经济工作指标。据此指标又定出了一系列指标,诸如企业亏损额要减少25%;提质降损要达1亿元;生产销售率要达到96%等,这些指标又层层分解到各地市厅局、厂矿企业。有位厂长问:这些指标是根据企业实际制订出来的,还是根据“计划”定出来的?一位负责经济工作的领导同志回答:说实话,我也说不清,只有天知道!对此,有的厂长说:“现在都什么年月了,政府经济管理还是那种上级压下级,一级压一级,一压到底!”还有厂长说:“指标没得准,定得越高,水分越大,必然是下级哄上级,一级哄一级,一哄到顶!”这种落伍于时代的计划经济管理方式何时才能退出历史舞台呢?结合上述案例,谈谈你对我国政府行政管理职能转变的认识。 3、行政监督 (1)某县印刷厂附近的下水道堵塞,造成污水四溢,臭气熏天。附近1000多户居民深受其害,多次向有关部门反映,但问题一直得不到解决。某报记者对此作了专门的采访,并在该报的监督专栏里对有关部门提出了批评和建议,终于促使有关部门马上采取措施。在不到一周的时间内解决了下水道堵塞问题。请问:1.请从行政监督的角度看,上述报纸的报导和批评属于何种监督?2.这种监督具有什么特点?有何作用? (2)某县人事局自1988年以来在招工等群众关心的热点问题上实行公开办事人员、公开办事制度的办法,以此接受群众监督。这样做的结果,一方面解除了以往在招工时困扰人事局机关及工作人员的人情网,为人事部门减轻了压力;另一方面,广大群众也非常满意,在一定程度上密切了干群关系。试用行政学原理说明某县人事局这种做法的科学性和合理性。 4、行政立法 (1)为了加强县文化局的领导班子建设,某县人民政府办公会议决定任命××为该县文化局局长,并以县人民政府的名义发出了正式任命通知。该县人大常委会认为县政府的任命通知违背了宪法和地方组织法的有关规定,遂建议县人民政府予以纠正,但县人民政府不予理睬。为此,县人大常委会专门召开了常委会议,委员们一致通过了撤销县人民政府关于任命文化局长的决定。请从行政法制、行政监督的角度分析该县人民政府、县人大常委会对上述问题的处理是否得当?为什么? (2)1997年2月初,中共某县县委向该县人大常委会党组和县人民政府党组织提交了19名乡、镇长任职和免职的建议名单。县人民政府随即据此将这19名乡、镇长予以任免,并以县人民政府正式文件的形式发至县直属各单位、各乡镇人民政府和有关国家机关。该县人大常委会收到此任免文件后,认为该文件违背了宪法、地方各级人大和地方各级人民政府组织法的有关规定,遂建议县政府予以纠正。县政府认为,对这19名乡、镇长的任免是党组织的意见,政府和人大都应坚持党的领导,无权对党组织的建议提出异议,

个人与团队管理考试必读图文稿

个人与团队管理考试必 读 文件管理序列号:[K8UY-K9IO69-O6M243-OL889-F88688]

《个人与团队管理》考试必读 襄樊电大傅雨青 考核大纲说明 本课程是开放教育经济专科工商管理专业的限选课(课程性质为统设)和其他专业的选修课(课程性质为省开),也适于作为其它专业专、本科的选修课程(课程性质为省开)。 本课程由劳动和社会保障部职业技能鉴定中心委托北京天向互动教育中心提供技术支持。学习者学习有关课程,参加相应的考试并合格,可获得相应学历教育的学分,同时可获得由劳动和社会保障部颁发的“通用管理能力水平等级证书(基础级)”。本课程课内计划学时54,共3个学分。 本课程体系融合西方最先进的管理理念,经众多着名跨国公司的管理实践得以改进与补充,为国外大量一流公司和企业大学所采用,是打造应用型职业经理人和增强职场竞争力的最有效工具。在保留原课程体系的基础上,国内数十位管理学专家、学者与一线管理人员进行了精心的本土化改造,它充分考虑中国的管理实情与需求,是中国管理界迄今为止最为系统、最具指导意义的系统型管理培训教材。同时,它采用了国际上先进的互动式、情景式、案例式和训练式的教学方法,真正实现了理念先进性和操作实用性的完美结合。在此基础上,劳动和社会保障部职业技能鉴定中心出台了国内第一个以管理能力水平为导向的从业者管理技能标准,正式将通用管理能力纳入国家培训认证体系。这套认证体系的推出,为广大从业者和准就业人群提供了一个全面学习基础管理知识和技能、提高职业素质和就业能力的机会,使他们能够成为国家行业发展中所急需的具有通用管理能力的人才,有助于提升中国企事业单位管理层的管理能力与管理素质,培养并发展中国的高素质职业管理团队。 一、考核大纲制定依据 通用管理能力认证体系是由劳动和社会保障部职业技能鉴定中心引进国外先进理论和资源组织制定的包含一系列通用型管理课程的教学考核系统,它是建立在对就业者应具备能力的长期研究和开发的基础之上。整套体系将就业者在工作过程中所涉及到的具有共性和普适性的管理技能、方法和工具以模块化的方式组织起来,为就业者提供全面的管理技能和素质训练,它适用于每一位就业者、管理人或潜在的管理人。 个人与团队管理是通用管理能力(基础级)中的一个证书。《个人与团队管理》的教材包括上、下二册,上册包括《自我规划》《时间管理》、《工作沟通》、《团队简报》《工作谈判》、《走出困境》6个单元,下册包括《个人与团队》《个人与企业》《团队腾飞》《团队学习》、《实现目标》和《团队激励》6个单元。

行政管理学案例分析答案

《行政管理学》案例分析及答案 案例分析一: 会议对于行政管理来说,是必不可少的重要手段。但是,会议过多,滥开会议,形成“会海”,则是行政管理的一大弊端。据《人民日报》报道,1985年5月25日至6月5日,某县接到上级会议通知38个,平均一天3个会议,该县领导不知参加哪个会好,无奈只好派一副县长专驻地区开会,人称为“开会县长”。另据不完全统计,1983年全国的会议开支达3.3亿元;1984年全国企业管理费共280亿元,其中直接用于会议的费用达70亿元,占整个管理费的1/4,相当于全国人民近一个月创造的财政收入。而且会议质量低下,严重影响行政效率。正如一副对联所说,“今天开会,明天开会,天天开会;你也讲话,我也讲话,人人讲话。”可实际问题却“无法落实”。所以对此“会山会海”人们深恶痛绝。早在1922年苏联诗人马雅可夫斯基(1893—1930),针对苏联“会海”情况,发表一首讽刺诗《开会谜》,向社会发出呼喊:“假使能再召开一次会,来讨论杜绝一切会议,那该多好!”此诗受到列宁的高度肯定:“我保证这是完全正确。” 提问: (1)对于行政管理来说,会议为什么是必不可少的重要手段? 而会议过多,滥开会议,形成“会海”,则是行政管理的一大弊端。这又是为什么? (2)针对“会海”甚至“会害”,你对会议进行科学管理有何建议? 答案: 1.答案要点: (1) 会议对于行政管理来说,是必不可少的重要手段,是因为会议具有相当重要的作用,而这些作用用于行政管理是必不可少的。会议的作用主要表现在:集思广益,丰富领导经验,提高领导水平;贯彻群众路线,实现人民群众参与国家和社会事务的管理,增强人民群众的主人翁意识和责任感;沟通信息,协调关系等。 (2) 适当的会议是必要的,但是会议过多,滥开会议,形成“会海”,则是行政管理的一大弊端甚至“祸害”。这是因为过多的会议不仅不利于行政效率的提高,反而使大量的时间、精力和财富浪费。行政人员忙于“开会”而无暇顾及工作。虽然开会有时也是工作的一部分,但工作绝不是开会。甚至有借开会之名,行吃、喝、玩之实的现象,变相贪污公款。这是绝不允许的。“会海”必须填平,“会害”必须清除。 2.答案要点:针对“会海”、“会害”,对会议的科学管理提出两点意见: (1) 会议管理必须以提高会议效率、重视会议质量为核心。 (2) 遵循精简节约原则。 案例分析二: 某市一化工厂附近的下水道堵塞,造成污水四溢,臭气熏天。附近1000多户居民深受其害,多次向有关部门反映,但问题一直得不到解决。某报记者对此作了专门的采访,并在该报的监督专栏里对有关部门提出了批评和建议,终于促使有关部门马上采取措施。在不到一周的时间内解决了下水道堵塞问题。 提问: (1)请从行政监督的角度看,上述报纸的报导和批评属于何种监督? (2)这种监督具有什么特点?有何作用? 参考答案: (1)上述报纸的报导和批评属于舆论监督。舆论监督是指通过报刊、广播、电视等传媒工具,对国家行政机关及其工作人员提出批评、建议而实施的监督。 (2)舆论监督的特点: ①广泛性。舆论监督是社会各方面都能普遍运用的监督方式,它是以社会所有阶级、阶层、组织、利益集

相关文档
最新文档