公园应该收费吗-Should The Park Charge-
英语作文关于公园是否要收费
英语作文关于公园是否要收费Should Parks Charge Admission Fees?The debate surrounding whether parks should charge admission fees has been ongoing for quite some time, with arguments on both sides holding firm ground. While some advocate for the introduction of fees to ensure the parks' sustainability and proper maintenance, others believe that parks should remain free for all to enjoy, serving as a public resource and an integral part of urban green spaces.On the one hand, charging admission fees in parks can provide a steady source of revenue for their upkeep and improvement. With the increasing cost of maintaining and enhancing park facilities, funds from admission fees can be channeled towards essential services like landscaping, sanitation, and security. This ensures that parks remain clean, safe, and well-maintained, creating a pleasant environment for visitors. Additionally, the revenue generated can be used to introduce new amenities andattractions, further enhancing the visitor experience.Moreover, charging admission fees can help regulate the flow of visitors, reducing overcrowding and congestion in popular parks. This is especially relevant during peak seasons and holidays when parks often become overcrowded, impacting the quality of visitors' experience. By setting a price barrier, parks can discourage unnecessary visits, ensuring that those who truly value the experience are able to enjoy it.However, there are also compelling arguments against charging admission fees in parks. One of the main reasonsis that parks serve as a vital public resource, providing opportunities for people to engage with nature, relax, and exercise. They are an integral part of urban green spaces, promoting physical and mental health,。
高中英语真题-2014高考英语书面表达基础训练题(5)及答案
高中英语真题:2014高考英语书面表达基础训练题（5）及答案【2014高考英语吉林省实验中学一模试题】书面表达（满分 25分）作文：最近,你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论.讨论的主题是:公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息,给报社写一封信,客观地介绍讨论情况.注意: 1. 信的开头已为你写好.2. 词数: 100 左右.3. 参考词汇: 门票--- entrance fees【参考范文】Dear editor,I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whe ther an entrance fee should be charged for parks.Opinions are divided on the question. 60％ of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. They believe a public park sh ould be free of charge. People need a place where they can res t and enjoy themselves. Charging entrance fees will no doubt k eep some people away. What is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to the appearance of a city.On the other hand, 40％ think that fees should be charged beca use you need money to pay gardeners and other workers, and t o buy plants and young trees. They suggest, however, fees sho uld be charged low.Yours trulyLi Hua【2013界广东省汕头市质量测评试题】基础写作（满分is分）和睦的家庭有利于孩子的个性发展和家人的身心健康。
公园是否应该收费英语作文
公园是否应该收费英语作文The question of whether parks should charge admission fees is a multifaceted issue that sparks passionate debate from various perspectives. While some advocate for free access to these green havens, others contend that fees are necessary for maintenance and improvement. Let's delve into the heart of this debate, exploring the arguments on both sides of the fence. Advocates for free park entry often highlight the fundamental right to access nature's beauty and recreational spaces. Parks, they argue, provide a sanctuary from the hustle and bustle of urban life, offering a place for people to unwind, connect with nature, and engage in physical activity. Imposing fees creates a financial barrier that disproportionately impacts low-income families and individuals, potentially depriving them of these essential benefits. Parks are seen as public goods, much like libraries and schools, that should be accessible to all members of society regardless of their economic status. Furthermore, free parks foster a sense of community and social cohesion. They serve as gathering places for people of diverse backgrounds to interact, fostering a sense of belonging and shared ownership. Families gather for picnics, children frolic on playgrounds, and neighbors connect on park benches, strengthening the social fabric of the community. Charging entrance fees could disrupt these social interactions and create a sense of exclusivity, potentially leading to social fragmentation and isolation. On the other hand, proponents of park fees point to the financial realities of maintaining these green spaces. Parks require significant resources for upkeep, including landscaping, trash removal, security, and facility maintenance. With increasing budget constraints, municipalities often struggle to allocate sufficient funds for parks, leading to deterioration and neglect. Entrance fees, they argue, provide a sustainable source of revenue that can be directly reinvested into park maintenance and improvements, ensuring their long-term viability. Moreover, fees can serve as a tool for managing park usage and mitigating overcrowding. Popular parks often face issues with overuse, leading to environmental damage, noise pollution, and conflicts among visitors. By implementing entrance fees, park authorities can regulate visitor numbers, reduce wear and tear on the environment, and enhance the overall visitor experience. Additionally, fees can incentivize responsible behavior, asvisitors who pay for access may be more likely to value and respect the park's resources. The debate becomes even more nuanced when considering the diversetypes of parks and their unique needs. Large national parks with extensive infrastructure and amenities may justify entrance fees to support their operations, while smaller community parks might prioritize free access to serve the local population. Additionally, tiered fee structures, with discounts for residents or low-income individuals, could strike a balance between revenue generation and inclusivity. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to charge park fees should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific context and needs ofeach park and its surrounding community. In conclusion, the question of park fees is not a simple one. While the principle of free access to nature and public spaces resonates deeply, the financial realities of park maintenance cannot be ignored. Finding a sustainable solution requires a thoughtful approach that balances the needs of the community, the environment, and the long-term viability of these treasured green spaces. Open dialogue, community engagement, and creative solutions are essential to ensure that parks remain accessible and enjoyable for generations to come.。
【英语作文】高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗
【英语作文】高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗
随着城市建设不断发展，公园作为人们休闲放松的场所也越来越受到重视。
关于公园
是否应该收取门票的问题却一直引发了广泛的讨论。
有人认为，公园应该收门票，这样可
以减轻政府负担，提供更好的维护和管理；而另一些人则认为，公园是公众的文化娱乐场所，收门票会限制人们的参观和游玩。
Furthermore, charging admission fees can also help reduce overcrowding in parks. Many popular parks are often overcrowded, especially during weekends and holidays. This not only affects visitors' experience, but also puts pressure on the park facilities and environment. By charging admission fees, the number of visitors can be effectively controlled, preventing overcrowding and ensuring a better experience for those who choose to visit.。
高考英语满分作文加翻译
高考英语满分作文加翻译篇一，公园要不要收门票?最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论。
讨论的主题是：公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论情况。
60％的同学认为40％的同学认为1．不应该收门票2公园是公众休闲的地方3l如收门票，需建大门、围墙，会影响城市形象1．应收门票，但票价不要太高2．支付园林工人工资3．购新花木注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。
2．词数：100左右。
3．参考词汇：门票---entrance feeDear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. 60% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee do not meet people’s expectations, for a park is consideredto be a place where the public can have a good time when they are not busy either at home or at work. If an entrance fee must be paid by the visitors for a park, it will be necessary to build a gate and surrounding walls. In the end a city will take on a bad look. 40% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee can be accepted, but it must not be too expensive. The money from ticket selling can be used for paying the gardeners in the park and buying some other kinds of flowers and trees.With regard to myself, I think an entrance fee is useful, for it can be used to protect a park. Do we share the same opinion, dear editor?Yours truly,Li Hua亲爱的编辑，本人写信是要告诉你，我们是否要收门票公园的探讨。
高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗_英语作文
高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗亲爱的编辑，我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。
我们60％的同学认为入场费不符合人民的期望，为一个公园被认为是一个地方，市民可以有一个良好的时候，他们不在家或在工作繁忙。
如果入会费必须用于支付公园的游客，有必要建立一个大门和围墙。
在最后一个城市将在一个坏的外观。
我们40％的同学认为入场费可以接受，但不能过于昂贵。
从门票销售的钱可以用来支付在公园的园丁，购买鲜花和树木等种。
至于我自己，我认为入场费是有用的，因为它可以用来保护公园。
我们是否有同感，亲爱的编辑器？此致李华Dear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place forthe public to go to when they are free. If a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. Forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. Money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. As for myself, I really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. At the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. After all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. Do you aGREe with me, dear editor?Yours truly,Li Hua亲爱的编辑，我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。
2020年英语六级翻译预测：公园免费开放
2020年英语六级翻译预测：公园免费开放长久以来，人们一直对市区公园是否应该收门票的话题争论不休。
一些人认为市区公园是用纳税人的钱建立起来的，是供人们休闲、娱乐的公共场所，所以应该是免费的。
另一方面，还有一些人称，考虑到中国人口众多，公民责任意识淡薄的情况，一旦免费开放市区公园，这些公园会管理不善，将不可避免地受到损坏。
综合考虑两种观点，我较认同后者。
能够确定的是市区公园免费开放要与经济发展情况相适合，因为这需要财政的支持。
所以，以中国现有的经济水平，免费开放市区公园的目标要逐步实现。
【翻译词汇】市区公园 urban park门票 entrance fee纳税人 taxpayer休闲 leisure娱乐 entertainment公共场所 public establishment考虑到 considering公民责任意识淡薄 lack of a sense of civic duty较认同 be inclined to与…相适合 proceed with财政的 financial逐步 step by step【精彩译文】The question whether urban parks should charge an entrance fee or not has been a source of controversy for a long time. On the one hand, some people claim that urban parks, supposed to be places where people have leisure and entertainment, are public establishments that have been created with taxpayers’ money and thus should be free. On the other hand, some others maintain that, considering China’s large population and lack of a sense of civic duty, once the parks are free of charge, they will not be properly managed and will inevitably be damaged. When considering opinions of both sides, I am inclined to the latter view.It’s certain that free entry to urban parks should proceed with economic development, as it needs financial support. Hence, the current economic level in China reflects that free entry to parks can only be realized step by step.。
公园是否应该免费开放英语作文
公园是否应该免费开放英语作文Public Parks: Should They Be Free to Access?The debate surrounding the accessibility of public parks has been a long-standing one, with arguments on both sides of the issue. On one hand, proponents argue that public parks should be free and open to all, as they are a valuable community resource that should be available to everyone regardless of their financial situation. On the other hand, opponents argue that charging for access to public parks is necessary to maintain and improve these spaces, ensuring that they can continue to be enjoyed by the public.One of the primary arguments in favor of free public parks is the idea that they serve as a vital resource for the community. Public parks provide a space for people to engage in physical activity, enjoy the outdoors, and connect with their neighbors. This is particularly important for individuals and families who may not have the means to access private recreational facilities or travel to more remote natural areas. By making public parks free to access, these spaces become more inclusive and accessible to all members of the community, regardless of their socioeconomic status.Moreover, proponents of free public parks argue that they play a crucial role in promoting public health and well-being. Regular physical activity, which can be easily incorporated into visits to public parks, has been shown to have numerous benefits, including reduced risk of chronic diseases, improved mental health, and increased overall quality of life. By making public parks free to access, more people may be inclined to take advantage of these spaces, leading to improved community health outcomes.Another argument in favor of free public parks is the potential for these spaces to serve as hubs of community engagement and social interaction. Public parks can provide a neutral gathering place where people from diverse backgrounds can come together, fostering a sense of community and promoting social cohesion. This can be particularly valuable in urban areas, where access to green spaces may be limited and opportunities for social interaction can be scarce. By keeping public parks free to access, these spaces can continue to serve as inclusive and welcoming environments for all members of the community.On the other hand, opponents of free public parks argue that charging for access is necessary to maintain and improve these spaces. Maintaining public parks can be a significant financial burden for local governments, and revenue generated from admission fees can be used to fund essential maintenance, upgrades, andconservation efforts. This can help ensure that public parks remain well-kept, safe, and enjoyable for all visitors.Additionally, opponents argue that charging for access to public parks can help to manage overcrowding and ensure that these spaces are not overused or abused. By implementing admission fees, parks can limit the number of visitors at any given time, reducing the strain on infrastructure and natural resources. This can help to preserve the integrity and sustainability of public parks, ensuring that they can continue to be enjoyed by the community for years to come.Furthermore, some opponents suggest that charging for access to public parks can help to fund additional amenities and services that enhance the visitor experience. This could include the development of new recreational facilities, the implementation of educational programs, or the provision of enhanced security and maintenance services. By generating revenue from admission fees, public parks can potentially offer a more comprehensive and enjoyable experience for visitors.In conclusion, the debate over whether public parks should be freeto access is a complex and multifaceted issue. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is ultimately up to local communities and policymakers to determine the best approach based on their specific needs and priorities. Regardless of the decision, it is clear that publicparks play a vital role in promoting community well-being, and ensuring their accessibility and sustainability should be a top priority.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
公园应该收费吗?Should The Park Charge?
最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报社组织的一场讨论。
讨论的主题是：公园要不要收费？请你根据下面所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论的情况。
60%的同学认为:
1．不应收门票
2．公园是公众休闲的地方
3．如收门票，需修大门、围墙，会影响城市形象
40%的同学认为:
1．应收门票，但票价不宜高
2．支付园林工人工资
3．购新花木
注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。
2．词数：100左右。
3．参考词汇：门票 entrance fee
Dear Editor,
亲爱的编辑，
I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks．
我写信是要告诉你关于我们是否要收公园门票的讨论。
Opinions are divided on the question. 60% of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. They believe a public park should be free of charge. People need a place where they can rest and enjoy themselves． Charging entrance fees will no doubt keep some people away. What is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to the appearance of a city．
在这个问题上我们意见有分歧。
60%的同学反对这个收门票的想法。
他们认为公园应该是免费的。
人们需要一个可以休息和玩乐的地方。
收门票，无疑会推开一些人。
更重要的是，建大门和围墙是必须的，这会损害城市的形象。
On the other hand, 40% think that fees should be charged because you need money to pay gardeners and other workers, and to buy plants and young trees. They suggest, however, fees should be charged low．
另一方面，40%的人认为收费是应该的，因为需要钱来支付园林工人工资，并购买新花木。
然而，他们建议收费应低。
Yours truly,
Li Hua
你真诚的，李华。