project_performance_improvement

105
daily work for their target. So, the schedule delay ratio will controlled less than 150%
(54+45*4+105)=56.5 weeks
Delay weeks 8.07
32.28
9.69
6.46
10
40
12
9
They don’t know our project plan.
Not analysis for market, so we could not know the project why kick off and who needs.
Project Team
It will influence other project progress.
Responsible Catherine Catherine
l
Contact by mail, phone and meeting
Project team
k
Attend the review meeting (PT)
PDCA Study for Project Performance Improvement
Team leader: Catherine Team Members: Shelley, Simeone, Sean,
Cyril, Amy, Caiqiqiang, Dongzhiwu, Zhenhengwu Date: 2019-7-29
For the four projects, we don’t have an measures for them. Future, if we find or forecast the project will be delay, we need to
note all the project stakeholder, clear the influence range, and action plan for it.
Ph1 :2009.11.13
PH2: 2019.5.31
Now Project pending according to PDP
4
P1st 1.1 Problem
Problem :The project schedule progress slowly.
Project #
6019 6020 6021 7028
Leader and members contact only by mail; Not be invited to the project meeting;
Prototype under order
Prototype waiting for order, and schedule delay We get order, but for the production plan, postpone; When the prototype not validated by France, we need to shipment still.
Team No experience
less com m unication with supporter
under order
120.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
test not on s chedule
No go-aheadism of No more
team
9
If the sales know our project plan, they will ask for production file for popularization.
Final customer Prototype is according to order schedule, so no influence.
SOP Measurement
Machine
Method
Production
Team PM Project delay
9
P1st 2.2 Plato for main reason
Plato for Resaon
18
Main reason
16
14
பைடு நூலகம்
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 Chinasia no PMP PM No experience
Project team no experience
Project team just only waiting for order; Don’t know the next step for project; Not be invited to review meeting;
Less communication with supporter
4 members with best project management experience, and have best equipment or etc. So, we could control the schedule delay ratio less
than 50%.
10 40 12 8 We have the strong logical schedule and we find out all risk, and follow
Delay weeks
PH1
PH2
Plan Actual Delay
-
10 60
50
-
40 75
35
-
12 52
30
1
8
30
22
Avg. ratio
Delay Ratio
500% 87.5% 250% 275% 278.13%
5
P1st 1.2 Influence of Problem
Sales
If the project requested by Sales, and will influence time to market.
8 32 9.6 6.4 schedule closely.
Set up a PMP for project, and training the project team, make them
work together better.
54
also, we need time to resolve risk.
8
No influence, because the status is making by project team.
1
Company
If we not finished PH2 on time, our new production could not appear on the
9
market, and we could not get the order, and the profit of company will down.
So, the schedule delay ratio will controlled less than 80%.
10 40 12 8 We have the schedule and we find a little risk, and follow the schedule
15 60 18 12 optional. Few people of team care the schedule, they always do their
3
3C → 2C (6019)
Plan
Ph1 :2009.10.30
Ph2 :2019.1.29
P1st 1 Problem
Ph3 :2019.12.10
Real
Ph1 :2009.10.23
2C → 2C (6020)
Plan
Ph1 :2019.3.19
PH2: 2019.1.18
PH3 :not definition It is scheduling by Emmanuel
Collect PMP form other company a
Study the PMP from France CIAT b
Study the actual of CIAT Chinasia c
Set up and training d
Training
Internal e External f
Recruitment g
1
Why?
Project schedule postponed BOM cost not on target Project not competitive in the market This analysis will focus on project schedule postponed
2
What?
11
P1st 3.2 Feasibility for Solution
High
g
j
Effective
adlk
bcho
fin
m
Low
Cost
e
High
12
D1st 4 Action plan
Item Action
a
Collect PMP form other company
d
Set up and training
imformation of
project
0.00%
Pareto, not Plato
10
P1st 3.1 Solution for main reason
Chinasia no PMP