Measurement of B - D- tau+ nu and B - h() nu nubar Decays at Belle

合集下载

LTE中级考试易错题集

LTE中级考试易错题集

2. MIMO 的信道容量与空间信道的有关性有关。

信道有关性越低,MIMO 信道容量越大答案: BA.错误B.正确3.S1 切换控制面时延小于 X2 切换。

答案: BA.错误B.正确1. MU-MIMO 能够提高单用户的吞吐率,而 SU-MIMO 能够提高小区均匀吞吐率答案:AA.错误B.正确11.专有承载能够有 non-GBR种类的 QoS。

答案: BA.错误B.正确12. 对于 10ms 帧长构造,一帧包含 2 个特别子帧。

答案: AA.错误B.正确17.探测参照信号可用于 LTE上下行调动。

答案: BA.错误B.正确8. SGs接口倡始的地点更新,信息中的LAC有可能不是用户所在地点的LAC。

答案: BA.错误B.正确17.3GPP R8 及此后的 SGSN与 PGW 之间的接口是 S4 接口。

答案: AA.错误B.正确15.发送 TM RLC实体要对 RLC SDU进行分段功能的办理。

答案: AA.错误B.正确13. 一个 TM RLC实体要么被配置为发送TM RLC实体,要么被配置为接收TM RLC实体。

答案: BA.错误B.正确14.在一个子帧的前几个符号上,发送 PDCCH。

答案: BA.错误B.正确16.UE 和 S-GW 之间的业务承载叫做 RAB。

答案: AA.错误B.正确14. S11 接口控制平面使用S1AP协议。

答案: AA.错误B.正确15 极化天线主要分为垂直极化,平行极化和交错极化这三种FALSE16、 LTE系统中,各个用户的PHICH划分是经过码分来实现的TRUE17、中心网不支持IMS 网络时,也能够进行鉴于VOIP技术的语音业务FALSE 1、判断题:21.LTE中, TDD 模式的峰值速率最多大概是 FDD 模式的多少()答案: CA.0.5B.0.7C.0.8D.0.924. 对于 LTE系统 A3 事件的说法,正确的有():(多项选择题)答案: CDA. A3 事件指服务小区质量低于必定门限B. A3 事件指而同频邻区质量高于必定门限C. A3 事件主要用于触发同频切换D. A3 事件用于 ICIC 用户种类裁决21. Measurement Report 信息中包含哪些信息()(多项选择题)答案: ABA.RSRPB.RSRQC.SINRD.RI5.Ga 接口的承载协议是()答案: AA.GTP'B.DiameterC.GTPD.Radius8.对于 PCRF QoS控制描绘错误的选项是()答案: CA.QoS 参数由 PCRF下发B.可实现业务级的 QoS 控制C.QoS不包含带宽控制D.可实现会话级的 QoS 控制13.中国挪动 2013 年 4G 网络工程无线建设频次规划()答案: CA. F 和 E 用于室外,B. F 和 A 用于室外,C. F 和 D 用于室外,D. F 和 D 用于室外,D用于室内E用于室内E用于室内A用于室内8. UL Grant 是在那个信道进行传递():答案: DA. PUCCHB. PDSCHC. PUSCHD. PDCCH1. PCFICH( Physical Control Format Indication Channel )信道的作用是():答案: AA. 指示在这个子帧(subframe)内 PDCCH信道占用的OFDM 符号数B. 指示在这个无线侦(radio frame )内 PDCCH信道占用的OFDM 符号数C. 指示在这个子帧(subframe)内 PDCCH信道占用的CCE数D. 指示在这个无线侦(radio frame )内 PDCCH信道使用的CCE数11. 物理层供给以下什么信息给MAC 层()答案: AA.终端调动恳求信令B.终端缓存状态C.终端数据分段大小D.终端 DRX状态10.正常 CP时 ,1 帧包含多少个符号()答案: D TDD-LTE。

临床试验英语词汇

临床试验英语词汇

临床试验英语词汇————————————————————————————————作者:————————————————————————————————日期:ﻩ专业术语、缩略语中英对照表缩略语英文全称中文全称ABE Average Bioequivalence平均生物等效性ACActivecontrol 阳性对照ADEAdverseDrug Event药物不良事件ADR AdverseDrug Reaction 药物不良反应AE Adverse Event 不良事件AIAssistant Investigator 助理研究者ALB Albumin白蛋白ALDApproximateLethal Dose近似致死剂量ALP Alkaline phosphatase 碱性磷酸酶ALT Alanineaminotransferase 丙氨酸转氨酶ANDAAbbreviated New Drug Application 简化新药申请ANOV A Analysis of variance方差分析AST Aspartate aminotransferase天冬氨酸转氨酶ATR Attenuatedtotal reflection 衰减全反射法BABioavailability生物利用度BE Bioequivalence生物等效性BMIBodyMass Index 体质指数BUN Blood ureanitrogen血尿素氮CATDComputer-assistedtrial design计算机辅助试验设计CDER Center of DrugEvaluation andResearch药品评价和研究中心CFRCode ofFederal Regulation美国联邦法规CI Co-Investigator合作研究者CI Confidence Interval可信区间COI Coordinating Investigator 协调研究者CRC Clinical ResearchCoordinator临床研究协调者CRF Case Report/Record Form病历报告表/病例记录表CRO Contract ResearchOrganization 合同研究组织CSA Clinical Study Application临床研究申请CTA Clinical Trial Application 临床试验申请CTPClinical Trial Protocol临床试验方案CTR ClinicalTrial Report 临床试验报告CTXClinical Trial Exemption临床试验免责CHMP Committee for Medicinal 人用药委会Products for Human UseDSCDifferentialscanning差示扫描热量计DSMBData Safety andmonitoring Board数据安全及监控委员会EDCElectronic Data Capture电子数据采集系统EDP Electronic Data Processing 电子数据处理系统EWPEurope Working Party欧洲工作组FDA Foodand Drug Administration 美国食品与药品管理局FR FinalReport 总结报告GCP GoodClinicalPractice药物临床试验质量管理规范GCP Good Laboratory Practice 药物非临床试验质量管理规范GLU Glucose葡萄糖GMP GoodManufacturing Practice 药品生产质量管理规范HEV Healtheconomic evaluation健康经济学评价IB Investigator’s Brochure研究者手册IBE IndividualBioequivalence个体生物等效性IC Informed Consent 知情同意ICF InformedConsentForm知情同意书ICH International Conference onHarmonization 国际协调会议IDMIndependentData Monitoring 独立数据监察IDMC IndependentData Monitoring Committee 独立数据监察委员会IEC Independent EthicsCommittee 独立伦理委员会IND Investigational New Drug新药临床研究IRB Institutional Review Board机构审查委员会ITT Intention-to –treat 意向性分析IVD In VitroDiagnostic体外诊断IVRS InteractiveVoice Response System 互动语音应答系统LD50 Mediallethaldose半数致死剂量LLOQLower Limit ofquantitation 定量下限LOCF Last observation carry forward 最接近一次观察的结转LOQ Limitof Quantitation检测限MA Marketing Approval/Authorization 上市许可证MCA Medicines Control Agency 英国药品监督局MHW Ministryof HealthandWelfare 日本卫生福利部MRT Mean residencetime 平均滞留时间MTD MaximumToleratedDose 最大耐受剂量ND Not detectable无法定量NDANew Drug Application 新药申请NEC New DrugEntity 新化学实体NIH NationalInstitutesof Health国家卫生研究所(美国)NMR NuclearMagneticResonance核磁共振PD Pharmacodynamics 药效动力学PI Principal Investigator 主要研究者PK Pharmacokinetics药物动力学PLProduct License 产品许可证PMA Pre-market Approval (Application)上市前许可(申请)PP Perprotocol符合方案集PSI Statisticians inthe PharmaceuticalIndustry制药业统计学家协会QA QualityAssurance 质量保证QAU QualityAssurance Unit 质量保证部门QC Quality Control 质量控制QWP QualityWorking Party 质量工作组RARegulatory Authorities 监督管理部门REV Revision修订SA Site Assessment 现场评估SAESeriousAdverse Event 严重不良事件SAPStatistical Analysis Plan 统计分析计划SAR Serious Adverse Reaction严重不良反应SD Source Data/Document 原始数据/文件SD Subject Diary受试者日记SDV Source Data Verification 原始数据核准SELSubject Enrollment Log 受试者入选表SFDA State FoodandDrug Administration 国家食品药品监督管理局SI Sponsor-Investigator 申办研究者SI Sub-investigator 助理研究者SICSubjectIdentification Code受试者识别代码SOP Standard Operating Procedure标准操作规程SPLStudy PersonnelList 研究人员名单SSLSubjectScreening Log 受试者筛选表T&RTestand Reference Product 受试和参比试剂T-BIL Total Bilirubin 总胆红素T-CHO Total Cholesterol总胆固醇TG Thromboglobulin 血小板球蛋白Tmax Time of maximum concentration 达峰时间TP Total proteinum 总蛋白UAEUnexpected Adverse Event 预料外不良事件WHO World Health Organization世界卫生组织WHO-WHOInternational Conference WHO 国际药品管理当局会议ICDR A of Drug RegulatoryAuthoritiesAberrant result 异常结果Absorption phase 吸收相Absorption 吸收Accuracy 准确度Accurate 精密度Administer 给药Amendment修正案Approval批准Assess 估计AuditReport 稽查报告Audit 稽查Auditor 稽查员Analytical run/batch:分析批Benefit 获益Bias 偏性,偏倚Bioequivalence 生物等效Biosimilar/Follow-on biologics 生物仿制药Blank Control 空白对照Blind codes编制盲底Blind review 盲态检查/盲态审核Blindingmethod 盲法Blinding/masking盲法/设盲Blocksize 每段的长度Block 层/分段BCS生物药剂学分类系统Carryover effect延滞效应Case history病历Clinical equivalence临床等效性Clinical study 临床研究Clinical Trial Report 临床试验报告Comparison对照Compensation补偿,赔偿金Compliance 依从性Concomitant 伴随的Conduct行为Confidence level置信水平Consistency test一致性检验Contract/ agreement 协议/合同Control group对照组CoordinatingCommittee 协调委员会Crossover design 交叉设计Cross-over Study 交叉研究Cure 痊愈Datamanagement数据管理Descriptivestatisticalanalysis描述性统计分析Dichotomies二分类Dispense 分布Diviation偏差Documentation 记录/文件Dosage forms剂型Dose dumping 剂量倾卸(药物迅速释放入血而达到危险浓度) Dose-reaction relation 剂量-反应关系Doubleblinding 双盲Double dummy双模Dropout 脱落Effectiveness疗效Eliminationphase 消除相Emergency envelope 应急信件Enantiomers 对映体End point 终点Endpointcriteria/measurement终点指标Enterohepatic recycling 肠肝循环Essential Documentation必需文件Ethical伦理的Ethicscommittee 伦理委员会Evaluate 评估Exclusion Criteria排除标准Excretion排泄Expedite促进Extrapolated外推的Essentially similarproduct:基本相似药物Factorialdesign析因设计Failure 无效,失败Finacing 财务,资金Final point终点First passmetabolism 首过代谢Fixed-dose procedure 固定剂量法Fullanalysis set 全分析集GC-FTIR气相色谱-傅利叶红外联用GC-MS气相色谱-质谱联用Genericdrug通用名药Genemutation基因突变Genotoxicity tests 生殖毒性试验Global assessmentvariable全局评价变量Group sequential design 成组序贯设计Hypothesis test假设检验Highly permeable:高渗透性Highlysoluble:高溶解度Highly variable drug:高变异性药物Highly:VariableDrug 高变异性药物HVDP:高变异药物制剂Identification 鉴别,身份证Improvement好转Invitro 体外In vivo 体内Inclusion Criteria 入选表准InformationGathering信息收集InitialMeeting启动会议Inspection 检察/视察Institution Inspection 机构检察Instruction 指令,说明Integrity 完整,正直Intercurrent 中间发生的,间发的Inter-individual variability 个体间变异性Interim analysis 期中分析Investigational Product试验药物Investigator 研究者Involve引起,包括IR红外吸收光谱Innovator Product:原创药Ka吸收速率常LC-MS液相色谱-质谱联用logarithmic transformation 对数转换Logiccheck 逻辑检查Lostof followup失访Mask面具,掩饰Matched pair匹配配对Metabolism 代谢Missingvalue 缺失值Mixedeffect model 混合效应模式Modified releaseproducts改良释放剂型Monitor 监查员Monitoring Plan 监察计划Monitoring Report 监察报告MS-MS质谱-质谱联用Multi-center Trial多中心试验Negative 阴性,否定的Non-clinical Study 非临床研究Non-inferiority 非劣效性Non-Linear Pharmacokinetics非线性药代动力学Non-parametricstatistics非参数统计方法NTID:窄治疗指数制剂Obedience 依从性Open-blinding非盲Open-label 非盲Original Medical Record 原始医疗记录Outcome Assessment 结果评价Outcome measurement结果指标Outlier 离群值OIP 经口服吸收药物Parallel group design 平行组设计Parameter estimation参数估计Parametricstatistics参数统计方法Patient file 病人档案Patient History 病历Per protocol,PP符合方案集Permeability渗透性Pharmacodynamiccharacteristics药效学特征Pharmacokinetic characteristics药代学特征Placebo Control 安慰剂对照Placebo安慰剂Polytomies多分类Post-dosing postures给药后坐姿Potential 潜在的Power 检验效能Precision 精密度Preclinical Study临床前研究Precursor母体前体Premature 过早的,早发Primary endpoint 主要终点Primary variable主要变量Prodrug 药物前体Protocolamendment方案补正Protocol Amendments修正案Protocol试验方案Quality Control Sample:质控样品Rapidly dissolving:快速溶出Racemates 外消旋物Randomization 随机/随机化Range check 范围检Rating scale量表Recruit招募,新会员Replication可重复Retrieval取回,补修Revise 修正Risk 风险Run in 准备期Safety evaluation安全性评价Safety set安全性评价的数据集SampleSize样本量、样本大小Samplingschedules采血计划Scaleoforderedcategorical ratings有序分类指标Secondaryvariable 次要变量Sequence 试验次序Seriousness严重性Severity严重程度Significant level 检验水准Simple randomization简单随机Single Blinding 单盲Siteaudit试验机构稽查Solubility溶解度Specificity 特异性Specify叙述,说明Sponsor-investigator申办研究者Standard curve 标准曲线Statistical model 统计模型Statistical tables 统计分析表Steadystate 稳态Storage储存Stratified 分层StudyAudit研究稽查Study Site研究中心Subgroup 亚组Sub-investigator 助理研究者Subject EnrollmentLog受试者入选表SubjectEnrollment 受试者入选Subject IdentificationCode List受试者识别代码表Subject Recruitment 受试者招募Subject Screening Log 受试者筛选表Subject 受试者Submit交付,委托Superiority 检验Supplemental增补的Supra-bioavailability 超生物利用度(试验药的生物利用度大于对照药)Survival analysis生存分析System Audit 系统稽查SmPC:药品说明书Standard Sample:标准样品Target variable目标变量Treatment group试验组Trial error 试验误差TrialInitial Meeting试验启动会议Trial Master File 试验总档案Trial Objective试验目的Trial site 试验场所TripleBlinding 三盲Twoone-side test 双单侧检验Therapeuticequivalence:治疗等效性Un-blinding 破盲/揭盲Verify查证、核实Visual analogy scale 直观类比打分法Vulnerablesubject弱势受试者Wash-out Period 洗脱期Well-being 福利,健康Withdraw撤回,取消药代动力学参数Ae(0-t):给药到t时尿中排泄的累计原形药。

TDO2基因敲除小鼠模型的建立和初步表型研究

TDO2基因敲除小鼠模型的建立和初步表型研究

positivedrug(venlafaxinehydrochloride13 5mg·kg-1+diazepam0 9mg·kg-1),high(10 8g·kg-1),medium(5 4g·kg-1)andlow(2 7g·kg-1)doseofcompoundChaijinJieyutabletsgroup.Exceptcontrol,chronicunpredictablemildstresswithchronicsleepdeprivationwasusedtobuildthemodelofdepressiveinsomniarats.Thebehavioralchangesofratsweredetectedbyopenfieldtest,sucroseprefer encetestandrightingreflextest.ThecontentsofGluandGABAinhippocampusandhypothalamusofratsweredetectedbyELISA.TheproteinexpressionlevelsofGAD67,GABAARandGABABRinhippocampusandhypothalamusofratsweredetectedbyWesternblot.TheGAD67,GABAARandGABABRmRNAex pressioninhippocampusandhypothalamusofratsweredetectedbyqRT PCR.Results Comparedwithmodelgroup,thenumberofactivitiesandsucrosewaterpreferencewereimprovedbycompoundChaijinJieyutab lets;theincubationperiodoffallenasleepwasshort ened,andthesleepdurationwasextended,andtheincreaseofsleepratewascausedbysubthresholddoseofpentobarbitalsodium.Furthermore,GluandGABAcontentincreasedincompoundChaijinJieyutabletsgroupscomparedwithmodelgroup;therelativeex pressionlevelsofGAD67,GABAAR,GABABRproteinandgenedecreased.Conclusions CompoundChaijinJieyutabletscoulddevelopanti depressiveinsomniaeffect,anditsmechanismmayberelatedtothein creaseofGABAreceptorexpressioninhippocampusandhypothalamus.Keywords:compoundChaijinJieyutablets;depres siveinsomnia;hippocampus;hypothalamus;GABAAR;GABABR网络出版时间:2021-4-239:31:00 网络出版地址:https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1086.R.20210422.1413.048.html◇实验方法学◇TDO2基因敲除小鼠模型的建立和初步表型研究李素素,常 艳,魏 伟(安徽医科大学临床药理研究所,抗炎免疫药物教育部重点实验室,抗炎免疫药物安徽省协同创新中心,安徽合肥 230032)doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1978.2021.05.024文献标志码:A文章编号:1001-1978(2021)05-0730-05中国图书分类号:R 332;R322 47;R341 7;R345 47;R394 2;R977 3;R977 4摘要:目的 构建TDO2基因敲除的C57BL/6小鼠,初步研究其表型。

EN 62040-2-2006

EN 62040-2-2006

EUROPEAN STANDARDEN 62040-2 NORME EUROPÉENNEEUROPÄISCHE NORM March 2006CENELECEuropean Committee for Electrotechnical StandardizationComité Européen de Normalisation ElectrotechniqueEuropäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische NormungCentral Secretariat: rue de Stassart 35, B - 1050 Brussels© 2006 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members.Ref. No. EN 62040-2:2006 E ICS 17.220; 29.200Supersedes EN 50091-2:1995English versionUninterruptible power systems (UPS)Part 2: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) requirements(IEC 62040-2:2005)Alimentations sans interruption (ASI) Partie 2: Exigences pour la compatibilité électromagnétique (CEM) (CEI 62040-2:2005) Unterbrechungsfreie Stromversorgungssysteme (USV) Teil 2: Anforderungen an dieelektromagnetische Verträglichkeit (EMV)(IEC 62040-2:2005)This European Standard was approved by CENELEC on 2005-10-01. CENELEC members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the Central Secretariat or to any CENELEC member.This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the Central Secretariat has the same status as the official versions.CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.EN 62040-2:2006–2–ForewordThe text of document 22H/74A/FDIS, future edition 2 of IEC 62040-2, prepared by SC 22H, Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), of IEC TC 22, Power electronic systems and equipment, was submitted to the IEC-CENELEC parallel vote and was approved by CENELEC as EN 62040-2 on 2005-10-01.This European Standard supersedes EN 50091-2:1995 + corrigendum January 1998.The following dates were fixed:– latest date by which the EN has to be implementedat national level by publication of an identicalnational standard or by endorsement (dop) 2006-10-01– latest date by which the national standards conflictingwith the EN have to be withdrawn (dow) 2008-10-01This European Standard was prepared under a mandate given to CENELEC by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association and supports the essential requirements of Directive 89/336/EEC (see Annex ZZ).This European Standard makes reference to International Standards. Where the International Standard referred to has been endorsed as a European Standard or a home-grown European Standard exists, this European Standard shall be applied instead. Pertinent information can be found on the CENELEC web site.__________Endorsement noticeThe text of the International Standard IEC 62040-2:2005 was approved by CENELEC as a European Standard without any modification.__________3 – EN 62040-2:2006 –CONTENTS1Scope (6)2Normative references (7)3Terms and definitions (8)3.1 83.2 84Environment (8)5UPS Categories (8)5.1UPS of category C1 (8)5.2UPS of category C2 (9)5.3UPS of category C3 (9)5.4UPS of category C4 (9)5.5Categories and environment (9)6Emission (10)6.1General (10)6.2General requirements (10)6.3General measurement conditions (10)6.4Conducted emissions (11)6.5Radiated emissions (13)7Immunity (14)7.1General (14)7.2General requirements and performance criteria (14)7.3Basic immunity requirements – High-frequency disturbances (15)7.4Immunity to low-frequency signals (17)7.5Immunity to power-frequency magnetic field (17)7.6Immunity to voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations (17)Annex A (normative) Electromagnetic emission – Test methods (18)A.1General (18)A.2Measuring equipment (18)A.3Test unit configuration (19)A.4Determination of maximum emission configuration(s) (20)A.5Operation of the equipment under test (21)A.6Method of measurement of mains terminal interference voltage (21)A.7Method of measurement at a.c. output ports (where applicable) (23)A.8Method of measurement of radiated emission (23)A.9Measurement site (24)A.10Equipment set-up for radiated emission tests (24)A.11Measurement of radiated magnetic disturbances (25)Annex B (informative) Electromagnetic emission limits and measurement methods of magnetic field – H field (33)Annex C (informative) Electromagnetic emission – Limits of signal ports (35)Annex D (normative) Electromagnetic immunity – Test methods (36)D.1General (36)D.2Electrostatic discharge (ESD) (36)D.3Immunity to radiated electromagnetic (EM) fields (36)D.6Immunity to low-frequency signals (37)Annex E (informative) User installation testing (39)EN 62040-2:2006 –4 –Annex ZZ (informative) Coverage of Essential Requirements of EC Directives (40)Figure 1 – Examples of ports (8)Figure A.1 – Circuit for disturbance voltage measurements on mains supply or UPS output (26)Figure A.2 – Minimum alternative test site (26)Figure A.3 – Set-up for measurement of conducted emission for table-top units (27)Figure A.4 – Test set-up for floor-standing units (27)Figure A.5 – Test configuration for table-top equipment (conducted emission measurement) (28)Figure A.6 – Test configuration for table-top equipment (conducted emission measurement) – Plan view (29)Figure A.7 – Alternative test configuration for table-top equipment (conductedemission measurement) – Plan view (29)–5 – EN 62040-2:2006Figure A.8 – Test configuration for floor-standing equipment (conducted emission measurement) (30)Figure A.9 – Test configuration for table-top equipment (radiated emission requirement) (31)Figure A.10 – Test configuration for floor-standing equipment (radiated emission measurement) (32)Figure B.1 – Test set-up for measuring radiated disturbances (33)Figure D.2 – Phase unbalance (38)Table 1 – Limits of mains terminal interference voltage frequency range 0,15 MHz to30 MHz for category C1 UPS and category C2 UPS equipment (12)Table 2 – Limits of mains terminal interference voltage frequency range 0,15 MHz to30 MHz for Category C3 UPS equipment (12)Table 3 – Limits of radiated emission in the frequency range 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz (13)Table 4 – Performance criteria for immunity tests (14)Table 5 – Minimum immunity requirements for UPS intended for UPS of category C1 (15)Table 6 – Minimum immunity requirements for UPS of category C2 and C3 (16)Table B.1 – UPS which has a rated output current less than, or equal to, 16 A (34)Table B.2 – UPS which has a rated output current greater than 16A (34)Table C.1 – Limits of signal ports (35)EN 62040-2:2006 –6 –UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SYSTEMS (UPS) –Part 2: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) requirements1 ScopeThis part of IEC 62040 applies to UPS units intended to be installed– as a unit or in UPS systems comprising a number of interconnected UPS and associated control/switchgear forming a single power system; and– in any operator accessible area or in separated electrical locations, connected to low-voltage supply networks for either industrial or residential, commercial and light industrial environments.This part of IEC 62040 is intended as a product standard allowing the EMC conformity assessment of products of categories C1, C2 and C3 as defined in this part of IEC 62040, before placing them on the market.Equipment of category 4 is treated as a fixed installation. Checking is generally done after installation in its final place of use. Sometimes partial checking may be done before. See Annex EThe requirements have been selected so as to ensure an adequate level of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) for UPS at public and industrial locations. These levels cannot, however, cover extreme cases, which may occur in any location but with extremely low probability of occurrence.This part of IEC 62040 takes into account the differing test conditions necessary to encompass the range of physical sizes and power ratings of UPS.A UPS unit or system shall meet the relevant requirements of this part of IEC 62040 as a stand-alone product. EMC phenomena produced by any customers' load connected to the output of the UPS equipment shall not be taken into account.Special installation environments are not covered, nor are fault conditions of UPS taken into account.This part of IEC 62040 does not cover d.c. supplied electronic ballast or UPS based on rotating machines.This part of IEC 62040 states:– EMC requirements;– test methods;– minimum performance levels.–7 – EN 62040-2:2006 2 Normative referencesThe following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.IEC 60050-161:1990, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) – Chapter 161: Electromagnetic compatibilityIEC 61000-2-2:2002, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 2-2: Environment – Compatibility levels for low-frequency conducted disturbances and signalling in public low-voltage power supply systemsIEC 61000-3-2:2000, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 3-2: Limits Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current 16 A per phase)IEC 61000-4-1:2000, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-1: Testing and measure-ment techniques Overview of IEC 61000-4 seriesIEC 61000-4-2:1995, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques – Electrostatic discharge immunity testIEC 61000-4-3:2002, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4-3: Testing and measure-ment techniques Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity testIEC 61000-4-4:2004, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-4: Testing and measurement techniques Electrical fast transient/burst immunity testIEC 61000-4-5:1995, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-5:Testing and measure-ment techniques – Surge immunity testIEC 61000-4-6:2003, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-6: Testing and measure-ment techniques – Immunity to conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fieldsIEC 61000-4-8:1993, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 4-8:Testing and measure-ment techniques – Power frequency magnetic field immunity testIEC 62040-3:1999, Uninterruptible power systems (UPS) – Part 3: Method of specifying the performance and test requirementsCISPR 16-1-1:2003, Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 1-1: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus Measuring apparatusCISPR 16-1-2:2003, Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 1-2: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus Ancillary equipment – Conducted disturbancesCISPR 22:2005, Information technology equipment – Radio disturbance characteristics – Limits and methods of measurementEN 62040-2:2006 –8 –3 Terms and definitionsFor the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in IEC 60050-161 related to EMC and to relevant phenomena apply, together with the following.3.1portparticular interface of the UPS with the external electromagnetic environment (see Figure 1)3.2enclosure portphysical boundary of the UPS through which electromagnetic fields may radiate or impingeEnclosure portFigure 1 – Examples of ports4 EnvironmentThe following examples of environment cover the majority of UPS installations.a) First environment: environment that includes residential, commercial and light industrialpremises directly connected without intermediate transformers to a public low-voltage mains supply.b) Second environment: environment that includes all commercial, light industry andindustrial establishments other than those directly connected to a low-voltage mains that supplies buildings used for residential purposes.5 UPS Categories5.1 UPS of category C1This category includes UPS intended for use without any restriction in the first environment. Such UPS are suitable for use in residential establishments.Category C1 UPS shall meet the category C1 UPS emission limits and withstand the immunity requirements of Table 5.–9 – EN 62040-2:2006 5.2 UPS of category C2This category includes UPS with an output current not exceeding 16 A and intended for use without any restriction in the second environment. Such UPS may also be used in the first environment when connected:– through industrial plugs and sockets or– through national plugs and sockets or– permanently.Category C2 UPS shall meet the category C2 UPS emission limits and withstand the immunity requirements of Table 6.The following wording shall be included in the instructions for use.WARNING: This is a category C2 UPS product. In a residential environment, this product may cause radio interference, in which case the user may be required to take additional measures.5.3 UPS of category C3This category includes UPS with an output current exceeding 16 A and intended for use in the second environment. Such UPS are suitable for use in commercial or industrial installations having a minimum boundary of 30 m from other buildings classified as first environment.Category C3 UPS shall meet category C3- UPS emission limits and withstand the immunity requirements of Table 6.The following wording shall be included in the instructions for use.WARNING: This is a product for commercial and industrial application in the second environment installation restrictions or additional measures may be needed to prevent disturbances.5.4 UPS of category C4This category includes UPS intended for use in complex environments and subject to an agreement between supplier and customer regarding applicable emission and immunity levels.The UPS of category C4 is not limited by current ratings.5.5 Categories and environmentIf the environment has been determined as the first environment, UPS of category C1 or C2 should be used.If the environment has been determined as the second environment, UPS of category C2 or C3 should be used.If the environment is not covered exclusively either by the first or second environment, UPS of category C4 should be used.EN 62040-2:2006 –10 –6 Emission6.1 GeneralDisturbances in the frequency range from 0 Hz to 1,0 GHz are covered.The emission requirements have been selected so as to ensure that disturbances generated by UPS operating normally do not reach a level which could prevent other apparatus from operating as intended.NOTE 1 The limits in this part of IEC 62040 may not, however, fully provide protection against interference to radio and television reception when the UPS is used closer than 10 m to the receiving antenna for category C1 or C2 UPS and 30 m for category C3 UPS.NOTE 2 In special cases, for instance, when highly susceptible apparatus is being used in proximity, additional mitigation measures may have to be employed to reduce the electromagnetic emission further below the specified levels.requirements6.2 GeneralUPS shall comply with the emission limits of 5.3 to 5.4.The tests shall be made with the UPS in the following conditions:– rated input voltage;– normal and stored energy mode of operation;– linear load that results in the highest interference level.The objective of 5.4 is to define limits and test methods for UPS defined in the scope of this part of IEC 62040 in relation to electromagnetic emissions which may cause interference in other apparatus, for example, radio receivers.These emission limits represent essential electromagnetic compatibility requirements.Test requirements are specified for each port considered. Refer to Annex A for test methodology.6.3 General measurement conditions6.3.1 GeneralThe measurements shall be made in the operating mode producing the largest emission in the frequency band being investigated consistent with normal applications. UPS operating modes (normal mode and stored energy mode) shall be investigated.An attempt should be made to maximise the emission by varying the test set-up configuration of the test sample.For UPS with additional mains terminals (ports) for the connection of separate supplies for static by-pass and/or maintenance by-pass circuits, these terminals (ports) shall, wherever possible, be temporarily connected to the normal a.c. input port supply. Conducted emission tests in 5.3 shall include measurement of these additional circuits.If the UPS is part of a system or can be connected to auxiliary accessories, then the UPS shall be tested while connected to the minimum configuration of auxiliary accessories necessary to exercise the ports, or be terminated in an equivalent impedance.UPS a.c. outputs shall be loaded with a linear load capable of operating the unit under test for any load condition within its output rating.The configuration and mode of operation during measurement shall be precisely noted in the test report. Refer to Annex A for test set-up and measurement criteria. For in situ testing, see Annex E. The tests shall be carried out within the specific operating environment range for the UPS and at its rated supply voltage, unless otherwise indicated.6.3.2 Documentation for the purchaser/usera) The purchaser/user shall be informed if special measures have to be taken to achievecompliance, for example, the use of shielded or special cables. Any restriction on the length of the a.c. output cables shall also be indicated.b) Notwithstanding that the scope of supply of the UPS shall comply with any localregulation, documentation shall be available to the purchaser/user upon request. A list of auxiliary accessories, together with the UPS complying with the emission requirements, shall be made available.6.3.3 ApplicabilityMeasurements are made on the relevant ports of the UPS.emissions6.4 Conducted6.4.1 Limits of mains terminal interference voltageThe UPS shall not exceed the limits of either Tables 1 or 2 according to the category of UPS and the rated output current under test.The UPS shall meet both the average and quasi-peak limit when using, respectively, an average detector receiver and a quasi-peak detector receiver, and measured in accordance with the methods described in Clause A.6.If the average limit is met when using a quasi-peak detector receiver, the test unit shall be deemed to meet both limits, and measurement with the average detector receiver is unnecessary.If the reading on the measuring receiver shows fluctuations close to the limit, the reading shall be observed for at least 15 s at each measurement frequency; the highest reading shall be recorded, with the exception of any brief isolated high reading, which shall be ignored.a) UPS of category C1 and C2Table 1 – Limits of mains terminal interference voltage frequency range0,15 MHz to 30 MHz for category C1 UPS and category C2 UPS equipmentFrequency range Limits dB(μV)MHz Category C1 UPS Category C2 UPSQuasi-peak Average Quasi-peak Average 0,15 to 0,50 66 to 56a56 to 46a79660,50 to 5b564673605 to 30 60507360a The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency.b The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.b) UPS of category C3Table 2 – Limits of mains terminal interference voltage frequency range0,15 MHz to 30 MHz for Category C3 UPS equipmentUPS rated output current Frequency range LimitsdB (μV)A MHz Quasi-peak Average0,15 to 0,50b10090 >16 – 1000,50 to 5,0b86765,0 to 30,0 90 to 70a80 to 60a0,15 to 0,50b130120 >1000,50 to 5,0b1251155,0 to 30,0 115105a The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency.b The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.6.4.2 Limits of a.c. output interference voltageThe limits in Tables 1 and 2 apply.An allowance of +14 dB is permitted for conducted disturbances at the output of the UPS as specified in Tables 1 and 2, except for C3 greater that 100 A where no increase is allowed.These limits only apply to UPS where the output cable, as declared by the manufacturer, inhis users’ instructions, can exceed 10 m in length.The values shall be measured using a voltage probe in accordance with A.2.3.6.4.3 Limits of signal and telecommunication portsFor ports intended for connection to the public switched telecommunication network (PSTN),the test methods and limits of CISPR 22 apply (see also Annex C).6.4.4 Limits of d.c. portsThe d.c. port is deemed an internal part of the UPS and, as such, is not subject to limits of conducted interference. The effect of conducted interference on the d.c. port may, however, cause radiated interference, but no further tests are required, provided that the UPS, in both normal and in stored energy modes of operation and when set-up as described in this clause, complies with the radiated requirements according to 6.5.Where a UPS is provided with terminals for the connection of an external d.c. source, thisport shall be included in the test set-up and tested as shown below.For table-top UPS, the battery and its enclosure shall be installed in a position permitted by the manufacturer's instructions. For floor-standing UPS, the external d.c. source and its enclosure shall be positioned 0,8 m from the UPS and wired in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.For large UPS, where the d.c. source will be installed at a distance from the UPS, the port shall be wired in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, and a test battery or power supply shall be fitted to the d.c. source end of the cables to enable measurement in stored energy mode.6.4.5 Low-frequency emissions – Input current harmonicsIf the rated input current and voltage are within the scope of IEC 61000-3-2, the limits and test methodology therein shall apply.emissions6.5 Radiatedfield6.5.1 ElectromagneticThe UPS shall meet the limits of Table 3.If the reading on the measuring receiver shows fluctuations close to the limit, the reading shall be observed for at least 15 s at each measurement frequency; the highest reading shall be recorded, with the exception of any brief isolated high reading, which shall be ignored.No limits apply for radiated emission below 30 MHz.Measurements methods and informative limits for study are given in Annex B.Table 3 – Limits of radiated emission in the frequency range 30 MHz to 1 000 MHzFrequency range Quasi-peak limitsdB(μV/m)MHz Category C1 UPS Category C2 UPS Category C3 UPS30 to 230 304050230 to 1 000 374760The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequency.NOTE 1 The test distance is 10 m. If the emission measurement at 10 m cannot be made because of high ambient noise levels or for other reasons, measurement may be made at a closer distance, for example, 3 m (see CISPR 22, 10.3.1, note).NOTE 2 Additional provisions may be required for cases where interference occurs.6.5.2 MagneticfieldNo limits apply for magnetic emissions. Refer to Annex B for measurement methods and informative limits.7 Immunity7.1 GeneralImmunity requirements in the frequency range 0 Hz to 1 GHz only are covered.These test requirements represent essential electromagnetic compatibility immunity require-ments. Test requirements are specified for each port considered.The levels given in this clause do not cover extreme cases, which may occur in any location but with an extremely low probability of occurrence. For such cases, higher levels may be required.NOTE In special cases, situations will arise where the level of disturbances may exceed the levels specified in this part of IEC 62040, for example, where a hand-held transmitter is used in proximity of a UPS. In these instances, special mitigation measures may have to be employed.7.2 General requirements and performance criteriaThe equipment shall, as a minimum, comply with the immunity limits of 7.3 to 7.6. The performance criteria adequate for UPS are given in Table 4.Table 4 – Performance criteria for immunity testsCriterion A Criterion BOutput characteristics Voltage permitted to vary only withinthe steady-state characteristicsapplicable (100 m sec limits inFigures 1, 2 or 3 of IEC 62040-3)Voltage permitted to vary within the inverse time characteristics applicable (<100 m sec limits in Figures 1, 2 or 3 of IEC 62040-3)External and internalindications and meteringChange only during test Change only during testControl signals to external devices No change Change only temporarily in consistencywith the actual UPS mode of operationMode of operation No change Change only temporarilyThe tests shall be made with the UPS in the following conditions:– rated input voltage;– normal mode of operation;– linear load at rated active output power or at light load according to IEC 62040-3.The UPS shall be specified with the proper level in case of different levels of performance criteria.Refer to Annex D for test methodology.7.3 Basic immunity requirements – High-frequency disturbances7.3.1 ConditionsIn Tables 5 and 6, the minimum immunity requirements for high-frequency disturbance tests, and acceptance criteria are stated. The acceptance criteria are detailed in Table 4.7.3.2 Equipment of category C1The levels in Table 5 shall be applied to UPS of category C1. If a UPS is designed to have immunity according to Table 5, it shall include a written warning in the catalogue or on the equipment which indicates that it is not intended to be used in an industrial environment.Table 5 – Minimum immunity requirements for UPS intended for UPS of category C1Port Phenomenon Basic standardfor test methodLevelPerformance(acceptance)criterionESD IEC 61000-4-24 kV CDor 8 kV ADif CD impossibleBEnclosure portRadio-frequency electro-magnetic field, amplitude modulated.IEC 61000-4-380 to 1 000 MHz3 V/m80 % AM (1 kHz)AFast transient-burst IEC 61000-4-4 1 kV/5 kHz a B Surge b1,2/50 us, 8/20 us IEC 61000-4-51 kV c2 kV dBAC input and outputpower portsConducted radio-frequency common mode e IEC 61000-4-60,15 to 80 MHz3 V80 % AM (1 kHz)ADC power port Fast transient-burst e IEC 61000-4-4 1 kV/5 kHzCapacitive clampBFast transient-burst e IEC 61000-4-4 1 kV/5 kHzCapacitive clampBSignal and control portsConducted radio-frequency common mode e IEC 61000-4-60,15 to 80 MHz3 V80 % AM (1 kHz)ACD = contact discharge AD = air discharge AM = amplitude modulationa Power ports with current rating < 100 A: direct coupling using the coupling and decoupling network. Powerports with current rating > 100 A: direct coupling or capacitive clamp without decoupling network. If thecapacitive clamp is used, the test level shall be 2 kV/5 kHz.b Light-load test condition is acceptable for power ports rated for current > 63A.c Coupling line to line.d Coupling line to earth.e Applicable only to ports or interfaces with cables whose total length according to the manufacturer's functionalspecification may exceed 3 m.。

艾默生质量流量计原理

艾默生质量流量计原理
密度工作原理
在高准质量流量计中,质量和谐振频率之间的关系是密度测量 的基础。去理解这个关系,就认为是弹簧和质量系统。
1.当质量增加时,系统的谐振 频率就减少。
2. 当质量减少时,系统的谐振频 率就增加。
As the naturalfrequencyofthe tubes (measuredbytheleftpick-offcoil)increases, the tubeperiod becomes shorter. Thisexample wouldmean thatthemass inthe tubes is decreasing. It is easier to timetubecycles (frequency)thancountthem, so we measure the tubeperiod whichis the inverseofthetubefrequency. [Tubeperiod = 1 / tubefrequency]
科里奥利流量计– 弯 管 工 作 原 理
Undera no-flowcondition(end view)boththe inletand outletpickoffcoilsare in-phase. Thetimedifferencebetweenthe measurements (delta T)is zero.
流量传感器 (ELITE CMF)
流量变送器 (RFT9739)
频率/ 脉冲输出 ( 0 - 10 kHz) 毫安输出 ( 4 - 20 mA)
后位设备
后位设备 (ALTUS Model 3300)
变送器接口 (HC275)
(= Transparency 9)
Other factors besides temperature and pressure come into playwhenusingmost volumetric flowmeasurement technologies. These factors don’t affect Coriolis. Perhaps the best wayto get at thisis to ask the questionfirst:Is volumetric measurement affected byother factors?

JESD22-A113-D

JESD22-A113-D
charge for or resell the resulting material.
PRICE: Please refer to the current Catalog of JEDEC Engineering Standards and Publications online at/Ca来自alog/catalog.cfm
be used either domestically or internationally.
JEDEC standards and publications are adopted without regard to whether or not their adoption may involve patents or articles, materials, or processes. By such action JEDEC does not assume any liability to any patent owner, nor does it assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting
AUGUST 2003
JEDEC SOLID STATE TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
NOTICE
JEDEC standards and publications contain material that has been prepared, reviewed, and approved through the JEDEC Board of Directors level and subsequently reviewed and approved
the JEDEC standards or publications.

LTE中连接态和空闲态的区别

LTE中连接态和空闲态的区别

(1)EMM-DEREGISTERED如果UE是在EMM-DEGEGISTERED状态,则MME中的EMM上下文中没有UE有效的位置或路由信息。

UE在MME中是不可及的,因为系统不知道UE的位置信息。

但是,在EMM-DEREGISTERED状态,UE和MME中是有可能保存一些UE的上下文的,比如鉴权信息,这样能避免每次附着的时候都要运行AKA程序。

(2)EMM-REGISTERED用户通过E-UTRAN或者GERAN/UTRAN进行了成功的附着程序后,UE就进入了EMM- REGISTERED状态。

MME进入EMM-REGISTERED状态,可以是通过UE从GERAN/UTRAN 选择了一个E-UTRAN小区而触发的TAU程序,也可以是通过UE从E-UTRAN中触发的附着程序。

在EMM-REGISTERED状态,UE就可以正常使用业务了。

UE在MME中的位置信息至少能准确到TA列表的程度。

在EMM-REGISTERED状态,UE至少有一个永远都在的激活的PDN连接,并且建立了EPS安全上下文。

在执行完去附着程序后,UE和MME中的状态就会变为EMM-DEREGISTERED。

收到TAU拒绝和附着拒绝消息,UE和MME中的状态行为取决于拒绝消息中的“原因值”,但是在大部分情况下,UE和MME中的状态都会变成EMM-DEREGISTERED。

如果UE所有的承载都释放了,比如完成了从E-UTRAN向Non-3GPP接入的切换以后,那么MME中UE的MM状态应该变为EMM-DEREGISTERED。

如果UE是驻扎在E-UTRAN 中的,则UE检测到它所有的承载都释放了以后,UE应该把自己的状态改为EMM-DEREGISTERED。

如果UE驻扎在GERAN/UTRAN中,则属于UE的所有承载(PDP上下文)都释放了以后,UE要把TIN(Temporary Identity used in Next update,下次更新时用的临时标识)设置为P-TMSI来去激活ISR。

5G NR 语音解决方案概述和部署指南说明书

5G NR 语音解决方案概述和部署指南说明书

5G NR Voice Solutions Overview and Deployment GuidelinesNetwork Performance Considerations Network Performance ConsiderationsNR focused on Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB), a migration from NSA to SA now requires to study the implementation of voice solutions in order to complete the cycle of offerings to the end-user with the full potential of 5G technology.In addition, EPC may remain active as core network connectivity with UE, until 5GS deployment matches L TE EPS in cases to provide service continuity between L TE and 5G accesses or to support Voice over NR handover to VoL TE (in limited NRcoverage). Therefore, the N26 interface has been introduced to be an inter-CN interface between the MME (Mobility Manage-ment Entity) in EPC and AMF (Access and Mobility Management function) in 5GC to enable interworking between them, and it is used to provide seamless session continuity, as illustrated in the end-to-end network architecture in figure 3.The support of N26 interface in the network is optional for interworking, whereas mobility procedures such as Idle andConnected mode mobility (inter-system re-selection and handover, respectively) between EPC and 5GC are supported using N26. Therefore, for a network that supports interworking procedures with N26, the UE operates in single-registration mode only, given also that the support of single registration mode is mandatory for UEs that support both 5GC and EPC NAS. In single-registration mode, the UE has only one active MM (Mobility Management) state, and is either in 5GC NAS mode or in EPC NAS mode (when connected to 5GC or EPC, respectively). UE maintains a single coordinated registration for 5GC and EPC. For mobility in UE single-registration mode, either using or not using the network N26 interface for interworking is possible. This means that another UE registration mode exists which is dual-registration mode. In this mode, the support of N26 network interface between AMF in 5GC and MME in EPC is not required, because UE handles independent registrations for 5GC and EPC using separate RRC connections, where the UE may be registered to 5GC only, EPC only, or to both 5GC and EPC. In the case 5G network does not support VoNR/EPSFB, dual-registration mode allows the UE to register to 5GS (for data) and EPS (for voice) at same time, for which UE needs to support dual-standby radio, which can increase powerconsumption. When network does not support N26 interface, the delay of the inter-system change is potentially longer and ongoing voice call is affected by additional EPC attach procedure. As a summary, UE single-registration mode with N26support by network is considered the highly preferred implementation over both single-registration without N26 or dual-reg-istration mode owing its better performance to lower data interruption during the inter-system handover, better devicepower consumption with single-standby, and better voice call setup delays experience. The focus of the study in this paper is on UE single-registration mode with N26.At the stage of UE registration, the 5GS and UE capabilities are negotiated during the initial registration process to conclude if EPSFB or VoNR can be utilized. As shown in figure 4,HSS + UDMPCRF +PCF SGWMMES6a N10N15S11S5-CS5-U N11N3N2X2Xn S1-US1-MMEN1UuUu 4G-only or 5G UE with EPC-only Capability (NSA, S1-Mode)5G UE with 5GC Capability (SA, N1 mode)& (NSA, S1-Mode)L TE eNB connected to EPC fully NR gNB can be connected to 5GC fully or partially to EPC (En-gNB)L TE NG-eNB connected to 5GC fullyX2XnXnN26N7N4N8E-UTRANAMFNG-RANgNBseNBsNG-eNBsPGW-C +SMF PGW-U +UPFFigure 3. 5GC and EPC Interworking Architecture (Non-roaming Architecture)The capabilities indications check is handled at NAS (Non-Access Stratum) layer, called domain selection. The UE’s usage 1.There are two level of capability negotiations:Figure 4. 5GC Registration Procedure – Voice ServicesIn figure 5(a), if a request for establishing the QoS flow for IMS voice reaches the NG-RAN, NG-RAN is configured tosupport EPS fallback for IMS voice and decides to trigger fallback to EPS, taking into account UE capabilities, indication from AMF that "Redirection for EPS fallback for voice is possible", network configuration (e.g. N26 availability configura-tion) and radio conditions, then the a redirection or handover procedure to L TE starts. After the UE camps successfully on L TE cell and initiates Tracking Area Update procedure (TAU) or a fresh attach process (in case of TAU failure or no support for N26), the call continues normally as VoL TE call. In contrast, the VoNR call flows in figure 5(b) shows that the IMS call continues all the way on 5G system without any inter-RAT system change interruption. Therefore, the network is the one controlling the initiation of EPSFB after knowing the UE capabilities for voice services over 5G system. Finally, figure 5(c) shows an indicative IMS SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) call flow between the UE and IMS server during Mobile-originated call, with SIP messages used in later sections to calculate the call setup latency.In the next sections, we discuss the deployment observations and challenges related to VoNR and EPSFB, and some of the possible solutions to overcome those challenges.Network Performance Considerations Network Performance Considerations UE UE 5GS/EPS/IMS5GS/IMS1. MO or MT IMS session in 5GC, IMS SIP Flow forvoice establishment initiated (on 5QI 5)2. PDU session modification to setupIMS voice Qos Flow7. PDN connection modification to setupdedicated bearer for voice (QCI 1)5. NW initiated Handover or Redirection to EPS 8. IMS voice session establishment(a) EPSFB Call Flow(c) Mobile-originated (MO) IMS Call Flow(b) VoNR Call Flow6. TAU (N26) or Attach (without N26, request type“handover”)1. MO or MT IMS session in 5GC, IMS SIP Flow forvoice establishment initiated (on 5QI 5)2. PDU session modification to setupIMS voice Qos Flow4. PDN connection modification to setupdedicated bearer for voice (5QI 1)5. ims voice session establishment3. 5GC processing voice + Qos flow3. NG-RAN trigger for fallback(optional: measurement report solicitation)4. Reject Session Modification(Indicating IMS voice Fallback in progress)UEIMSINVITE 100-Trying 183-Session ProgressPRACK 200-OK200-OK 180-Ringing 200-OK (for INVITE)ACKIMS voice session establishedQos flow for voice added (5QI=1, or QCI=1)Update Figure 5. End-to-End Call Flow for EPSFB and VoNRIt is observed that VoL TE call setup is generally optimized across major networks due to the legacy implementations whileVoNR and EPSFB may require additional effort to come in line with VoL TE in an end-to-end-optimization. Next, we will analyze the data to break down the areas where VoNR improvement may be needed, and where in particular EPSFB isNow, coming back to the areas of optimization for the VoNR network shown in figure 6 (on the left hand side), if wefurther breakdown the Delay_1, one of the areas that require attention is “Paging Delays”. MO UE will only continue with the call setup as long as MT UE is paged successfully, and hence Delay_1 is a reflection of how quickly MT UE can bepaged. The default paging cycle can definitely affect the Delay_1 values, figure 8 below shows the effect of paging cycle on call setup time.As depicted in figure 6, it can be observed that the major delay comes from Delay_1, and can be further concluded that there is a scope of improvement in radio and core if we compare the data with that of VoNR Optimized Network. Inaddition, if we compare the average values of Delay_2 of all networks to that of one VoNR optimized network, it can be seen that the average delays are more than double. At a high level it is safe to assume that perhaps the VoNR deploy-ment will also observe several phases of optimization as it happened during VoL TE deployment phase. It is not unrealis-tic to say that with more optimizations the VoNR performance will be matched to that of VoL TE, and in future VoNR may even outperform due to the enhancements that come with 5G core and radio. Generally, to illustrate this potential improvements of VoNR radio and core network processing, we further looked into IMS signaling delay analysis. We defined “Abs. IMS SIP Latency” as IMS SIP Round Trip Time, calculated as the average time difference between SIP messages (e.g. between SIP INVITE on UL 100 Trying on downlink, Update OK, etc..). It is a procedural delay between UE and IMS server that covers the IMS SIP path over the radio/core network all the way into IMS server (E2E latencies on 5QI=5). As illustrated in figure 7, due to NR enhancements in terms of radio and core delays (e.g. link quality and advanced antenna techniques), VoNR IMS Signaling delay reduced by ~42% compared to VoL TE, while the increased EPSFB IMS latency (of ~9% compared to VoL TE) is due to the radio/core switching latencies during the process. Thisindicates that potentially VoNR IMS signaling performance is better than VoL TE and EPSFB and it can possibly reduce the IMS failures due to timeout procedures, improve RTP timeouts and the overall Jitter, and hence having better coverage (delay budget) where the call quality could also improve.1.000.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.90A v e r a g e D e l a y s [s e c ]0.520.480.28-42.22%Baseline+8.73%EPSFB (ALL Networks)SIP Signaling Round Trip TimeIMS Delay Reduction using VoL TE As baselineVoL TE(ALL Networks)VoNR(ALL Networks)0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.505.00A v e r a g e D e l a y s [s e c ]2.890.891.654.10VoNR Delay_1 (Paging Aspect)MO Call Setup TimedefaultPaging Cycle in NR SIB1 = 1280msecdefaultPaging Cycle in NR SIB1 = 320msec Figure 7. VoNR vs. VoL TE vs. EPSFB: IMS Signaling Delay AnalysisFigure 8. Impact of paging cycle (Idle mode DRX cycle) on Call Setup Latency1 ms1 ms1 ms 1 ms 5 msFigure 9. Paging Procedure and Idle Mode Measurements in L TEHowever in NR, the mechanism is different than that of L TE as there is no per-slot reference signal structure and insteadFigure 11. Delay_1 latencies from different RRC states (From SIP_INVITE till SIP_Session_Progress)Therefore, the newly introduced RRC state “RRC Inactive” state in 5G NR can potentially bring delay improvement in this situation while transitioning to connected state during the voice call setup. During the transition from RRC Inactive to RRC connected, the UE may not have to follow legacy procedures as it used to happen from RRC idle to RRC connected. Instead,It is observed that EPSFB using the technique of “Redirection without L TE Measurement” has the lowest overall call setup latency, an average reduction of ~7%, comparing with “Handover EPSFB” and “Redirection with L TE Measurement”.Handover or Redirection. Therefore, reducing TTT can shorten the delays bring by Inter-RAT measurement and reporting in NR. Reducing TTT value from 320 msec to 40 msec (a typical value used in VoL TE for Inter-RAT measurements such as eSRVCC), the EPSFB measurement delay can be reduced in one-side (MO or MT) from 540 msec to 260 msec, in average, improving the call setup latency for EPSFB, and leads to (540-260)*2 = 560 msec call setup latency saving in two-side (in the case network configures both MO and MT with 40 msec EPSFB B1 TTT). This effect was observed clearly in the test when comparing networks using 320 msec and 40 msec event B1 TTT, and in average, the EPSFB call setup latency wasBesides that, evaluating the L TE Tracking Area Update (TAU) procedure delays and its effect to EPSFB shows that most of the time for EPSFB with Redirection, the network adds Authentication and Security Mode procedures which adds to the delay during the NR to L TE transition, while this delay most of the time is not found EPS FB with Handover. This is typically an area related to network implementation and can provide good improvements once reviewed how frequent these procedures needed and how different it is in case of redirection and handover. In the case TAU triggered without additional Authentica-tion and Security Mode procedures, the procedural delay affects the call setup by an additional 280 msec, while in the case of TAU with Authentication and Security Mode procedures, the additional delay goes all the way up to 670 msec.Figure 15 also shows that the delay from when UE camps successfully to L TE (after TAU is completed) till SIP_180_Ringing is 3.34 sec for Handover and 3.25 sec for Redirection. This delay is very similar between Handover and Redirection, because it is not really affected by the radio overheads, rather it is related to EPS and IMS signaling. The overall delay after TAU procedure includes the events of EPS Bearer Context setup (QCI-1) and IMS SIP message exchange in L TE between 183_Session_Prog-ress till 180_Ringing. This delay after TAU procedure may essentially be similar to the overall VoLTE call setup time shown in figure 6, where the IMS and core network procedures exchange takes place in L TE at this stage.Up to this point, we have analyzed the EPSFB call setup latency and the major contributor to the delays during a success-ful call setup. However, there are cases where the call setup increases significantly reaching abnormal average observedas 9.51 sec, which is higher than the average observed in figure. 13. When analyzing the abnormal call setup, it was observed it is mostly coming in the occasions during EPSFB handover with measurements, where UE may be unable tofind L TE cell or the handover execution fails at the gNB side. Another occasion observed is where the redirection takesplace to L TE, and the UE cannot find suitable L TE cell on the redirected band. These measurement failure cases are common especially in early deployment where the coverage areas of 5G and L TE are different especially that both 5G andL TE are deployed in different bands. There are several solutions to this abnormal call setup, such as:Network radio planning optimization: Inter-RAT neighbor cell planning especially in cases L TE is deployed on several bands.Network algorithms: in case of handover failures within a certain period (e.g. 3 sec) where UE does not return anyestablishment cause and EPS fallback for IMS voice was triggered in NR via RRCRelease with voiceFallbackIndication The UE shall use mo-VoiceCall as establishment cause, in case of RRC Connection Request after redirection from NR for the purpose of voice fallback to L TE, and SystemInformationBlockType2 includes voiceService-CauseIndication (L TE Rel-12 IE for IMS) and the establishment cause received from upper layers is not set to highPriorityAccess or emergencyNetwork Performance Considerations Network Performance Considerations 3GPP Rel-16 Feature Enhanced cross-slotschedulingWake-up Signal (WUS)Adaptive MIMO layer in BWP frameworkEnhanced UE-assistedinformation (UAI)Second DRXconfiguration SCell Dormancy and Faster ActivationBrief Description In Rel-15, A-CSI-RS slot offset (K0) is 0 for Sub-6, and RF and RS buffering are still needed. For this, Rel-16 allows slot offset (k0) > 0. Rel-15 uses BWP switching by RRC configuration to adapt same/cross slot scheduling, while Rel-16 specifies a new adaptation within an active BWP. It saves power consumption when the data arrival is sparse.A wake-up signal indication (WUS) conveyed by a new PDCCH format to inform UE whetheror not to start the DRX-onDuration timer for the next DRX cycle. Beneficial in the case ofsporadic trafficIn Rel-15, the DL maximum number of MIMO layers is configured per serving cell which is commonto all the DL BWPs of the carrier. In Rel-16, the DL maximum number of MIMO layers can beseparately configured for each DL BWP. The DL maximum number of MIMO layers can be changedthrough BWP switch which can reduce power consumption by adaptation to less number ofreceive antennas at UE.Challenging for network to customize configurations for all the devices based on theirpower saving and overheating protection requirements. Supported UE-assisted informa-tion (UAI) in Rel-16 are as follows:If UE prefers an adjustment in the connected mode DRX cycle length, for the purpose of delaybudget reporting;If it prefers certain DRX parameter values, and/or a reduced maximum number of second-ary component carriers, and/or a reduced maximum aggregated bandwidth and/or areduced maximum number of MIMO layers and/or minimum scheduling offsets K0 and K2for power saving purpose;If it expects not to send or receive more data in near future, it can provide its preferred RRC state.In Rel-15, in FR1+FR2 CA, all the cells share the same single C-DRX configuration and timing. In Rel-16, secondary C-DRX can be applied to second group of cells (e.g. FR2 cells) togo to sleep earlier, and reduce active time.In Rel-15, SCell deactivation to activation by MAC CE takes longer transition time. SCelldormancy in Rel-16 enables shorter switch delay from Scell dormancy to activated state. Thedormant BWP is one of the UE’s dedicated BWPs configured by network via dedicated RRCsignaling, in which, UE stops monitoring PDCCH in the SCell, but activities such as CSImeasurement/reporting and beam management are not impacted.If it is experiencing internal overheating;The paper so far has addressed the details of call setup latency. However, during VoNR call, there can be other aspects of improvements that can be needed to improve user experience such as:Maintain Quality of Experience for voice services. In this area, the network operators may need to ensure the userexperience is at the same level with VoL TE services when it comes to call drop rate, supplementary services, callhold/swap/merge, IMS server error handling (4xx/5xx errors), call continuity in cell-edge, inter-operator and roaming calling. This area is not covered in this paper, but brought up to be an essential area of testing before the launch of VoNR services.Maintain Quality of Service. The end-user experience is subject to factors such as battery consumption during VoNR calls, call quality in different radio coverage (indoor and outdoor). In addition, the network capacity aspects need to consider user dimensioning for VoNR similar to what was done in VoL TE.Table 3. Brief Overview of 3GPP Rel-16 Device Power Saving FrameworkOther VoNR Features ConsiderationsFor battery consumption, 3GPP in Rel-16 has addressed this area with several new features that can be summarized intable 3. Some of them can have direct influence to VoNR performance especially BWP adaptation .22 MediaTek’s Bandwidth Part Adaptation WhitepaperWhat it means is that the network uses connected mode DRX (cDRX) for VoNR calls with a typical value of 40 msec Long DRX Cycle. However, if two UEs are in a call, and one of which is in bad radio condition, the other UE in good condition may not be aware of the need to relax the DRX cycle in order to give time to the bad UE to perform more re-transmissions and hence improving the coverage. Referring to the mechanism in figure 17, UE1, despite its good coverage conditions, requests and if granted by the gNB, can achieve the shortening of its cDRX cycle, in order to be able to provide more delay budget for UE2 so that UE2 can better tackle its poor coverage conditions and increase the reliability of its uplink transmissions. As such, IMS call quality can be improved through reduced end-to-end delay and jitter. In this flow, UE1 (IMS voice receiver) is in good radio condition and configured with 40 ms cDRX. UE2 (IMS sender) is in bad radio condition and configured with no cDRX. The scenario in figure 17 happens in the following sequence:UE2 detects bad-radio condition (e.g., high BLER), it does many HARQ retransmissions, which cause long jitter and E2E delay at the receiver UE1,UE1 detects that VoNR quality is bad (e.g., large jitter or delay), hence it suggests gNB1 to de-configure CDRX or shorten CDRX cycle, by sending a DelayBudgetReport message to decrease the cDRX cycle length (or even disables it). As a result, end-to-end delay and jitter are reduced,UE2 detects that VoNR E2E delay has dropped. UE2 reports larger delay headroom to gNB2, so gNB utilize the additional delay budget to improve the reliability of UE2 uplink transmissions in order to reduce packet loss, e.g., via suitable repetition or retransmission mechanisms.UEs could estimate the E2E delay budget based on packet loss ratio (PLR), e.g., based on monitoring of RTP receive statistics, RTT thresholds (e.g., with RTT determined by using RTCP sender and receiver reports), or User Plane Latencies. Hence, when both UEs support delay budget report, it becomes best to achieve the desired gain of the feature, while gNB coordination is needed. For example, while an UE receiver in good coverage may turn off cDRX to create delay budget for an UE sender, it may be the case that the UE sender does not even support delay budget reporting, or that the UE sender's gNB may not grant the additional delay budget to the UE sender, so the effort of the UE receiver may not deliver any end-to-end perfor-mance gain, and end up wasting the battery power of the IMS receiver UE. The UE advertises its capability of this feature in UE Capability Information message through delayBudgetReporting. The network can utilize this feature as part of the。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Mtag = Eb2eam − p2tag and ∆Etag = Etag − Ebeam,
are used to identify the Btag candidates, where Ebeam is the beam energy. The momentum (ptag) and energy (Etag) of the Btag meson is calculated by a summation over all particles that are not assigned to Bsig. The signal candidates are required to satisfiy
The flavor-changing neutral-current process B → h(∗)νν is sensitive to physics beyond the SM. The SM branching fractions are estimated to be 1.3×10−5 and 4 × 10−6 for B → K∗νν and B → Kνν decays [3], respectively, and are expected to be much lower for other modes. Theoretical calculation of the decay amplitudes for these decays is particularly reliable, because of the absence of long-distance interactions that affect charged-lepton channels B → h(∗)l+l−. New physics such as SUSY particles or a possible fourth generation could potentially contribute to the penguin loop or box diagram and enhance the amplitudes [3]. Reference [4] also discusses the possibility of discovering light dark matter in b → s transitions with large missing momentum. Due to the challenge of cleanly detecting rare modes with two final-state neutrinos, only a few studies of h(∗)νν have been carried out to date [5, 6, 7].
2. B0 → D∗−τ +ντ
We select charged tracks that are associated with the interaction point (IP). The electrons candidates are selected using the information from particle identification systems. The four momenta of electron candidates are corrected for bremsstrahlung radiation by adding photons within a 50 mrad cone along the track direction. The π0 candidates are reconstructed from pairs of photon with the invariant mass in the range 118 MeV/c2 and 150 MeV/c2. Minimum energies of 60–120 MeV are required for the photon canidates from π0 decays, according to different polar angles. Photons that are not included in pi0 reconstruction and exceed a polar-angle dependent energy threshold (100–200 MeV) are included in the tag-side B-meson (Btag) reconstruction.
Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Bled, 2007
1
Measurement of B → D∗−τ +ντ and B → h(∗)νν Decays at Belle
K.-F. Chen Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
1. Introduction
The decay B0 → D∗−τ +ντ is dominated by the b → c transition and can provide the important information associated with the charge Higgs in the Standard Model (SM). The τ lepton in the final state provide additional observables sensitive to the physics beyond SM, as well as the τ polarization, which cannot be accessed in other semileptonic decays. However, the neutrinos in the final states and the low efficiencies from τ reconstruction make the search to be very challenging. The SM predict a B → D∗τ +ντ branching fraction of 1.4% [2], while there are several experimental results provided by the LEP experiments; the averaged b → τ ντ X semi-inclusive branching fraction is 2.48 ± 0.26% [1].
arXiv:0708.4089v2 [hep-ex] 31 ervation of the decay B0 → D∗−τ +ντ and a search for the rare decays B → h(∗)νν, where h(∗) stands for a light meson. A data sample of 535 million BB pairs collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB e+e− collider is used. We find a signal with a significance of 5.2 standard deviations on B0 → D∗−τ +ντ and measure the branching fraction to be 2.02+−00..4307(stat.) ± 0.37(syst.)%. No significant signal is observed for B → h(∗)νν decays and we set upper limits on the branching fractions at 90% confidence level. The limits on B0 → K∗0νν and B+ → K+νν decays are more stringent than the previous constraints, while the first searches for B0 → K0νν, π0νν, ρ0νν, φνν and B+ → K∗+νν, ρ+νν are presented.
Once a D∗+ candidate is reconstructed and a charged track expected from τ + is selected, the remaining particles measured by the detector are used to reconstruct the Btag. Two kinematical variables,
Reconstruction of the Btag strongly suppresses the combinatorial and continuum backgrounds and provides kinematical constraints on the signal meson (Bsig). We take the advantage of the clean signature, supported by the D∗ meson at the signal side. The Btag meson is reconstructed using all the particles that remain after selecting candidates for Bsig decay daughters. The D∗ mesons are reconstructed through the following decay chain: D∗+ → D0π+, D0 → K−π+ and K−π+π0. The τ leptons are reconstructed in τ → e+νeντ and π+ντ decays, while the τ → µ+νeντ mode is excluded due to the inefficient muon identification in the relevant momentum range. For τ + → π+ντ decays, only D0 → K−π+ mode is used in order to avoid the higher combinatorial background.
相关文档
最新文档