毕业论文外文翻译-胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究
外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 胜任力模型研究

Research on Competency Model:A Literature Review andEmpirical StudiesAbstractWestern countries have applied competency models to addressing problems existed in their administrative and managerial systems since 1970s,and the findings is positine and promising. However, competency model hasn’t been introduced to China until 1990s and it is still unknown and mysterious to many Chinese managers. This paper aims to uncover the mysterious veil of competency model in order to broaden the horizon of Chinese managers and boost China's human resource development as well as management.Keywords:Competency,Competency Models,Empirical Studies of Competency ModelsIt has been more than 30 years since competency model was utilized to human resource management.In western countries,competency model first displayed its effectiveness in government administration, meanwhile many multinationals and their branch companies applied the competency model to their daily business management and their business was a great success. As the notion of competency is gradually come to light and accepted by people all around the world,more and more enterprises have been trying to build their own competency model under the help of professional consultant firms. As a result,competency model has gradually been a very fashionable phrase in the field of management and quite a few enterprises are thus benefited from it. In recent years, competency model has become a hot spot in the Chinese academia as well as big-,middle- and small-sized enterprises alike,many relevant writings and books have also been translated and published. However, competency and competency model are still mysterious to many Chinese scholars, business managers as well as government administrators.Purpose and Significance of the StudyThe purpose of the study aims to make a critical literature review of the competency model,clarify some confusion related to it and explore its application. The following questions are employed to guide this study:What is competency? What is competency model? What are the theoretical and empirical findings related to competency model?The study illustrates how we could take advantage of competency model in our harmonious society building. On one hand,the study will delineate competency and competency model in order to clarify confusions related to it since it is still strange and mysterious to many Chinese managers and administrators;on the other hand,thestudy would enrich Chinese HRD&HRM in the field of government administration and business management both theoretically and empirically.Research MethodThe present study has utilized qualitative analysis, induction and deduction. Since this research is a literature review in some sense, qualitative analysis will be an indispensable research method; Induction and deduction are applied to both theoretical and empirical studies.In order to enhance the credibility of present research,only the authoritative publications on competency model are reviewed,including books and papers written by foreign and Chinese scholars and HRDHRM practitioners. By searching for the keywords "competency" "competency model" and "competency model building" as well as "empirical studies on competency models",books and papers written by well-known foreign scholars such as McClelland D. C.,Lyle M. Spencer, Anntoinette D. Lucia, Richard Lepsinger etc.,are available; by the same token,books and papers written by Chinese scholars such as Zhi-gong He,Jianfeng Peng, Shaohua Fang, Nengquan Wu,etc.,could be consulted. All the books and papers are published between 1950s and 2007. In addition, many data cited in this paper comes from empirical studies at home and abroad.FindingsIn this part,a literature review of competency is firstly carried out;then competency model as well as its evolution,development and innovation is delineated;finally empirical studies are reviewed. Empirical studies mainly focus on competency model building and its application to human resource development and management.Understanding CompetencyIn 1973,American scholar David C. McClelland published his paper Testing for Competency Rather Than Intelligence which cited a large amount of research findings to illustratethe inappropriateness of assessing personnel qualities by abusing intelligence tests. Dr. McClelland further explained that some factors (personality, intelligence, value,etc.)which people had always taken for granted in determining work performance hadn't displayed their desired result. As a result,he emphasized that people should ignore those theoretical by pothese and subjective judgements which had been proved groundless in reality. He declared that people should tap directly those factors and behaviors which could really impact their performance (McClelland, 1973). These factors and behaviors were named "competency" by McClelland. The publishing of this paper symbolized the debut of competency research. From then on,many scholars started getting involved into the research on competency and they conceptualizedcompetency from different perspectives as shown in the following table: The above ten concepts of competency have a lot in common:①Competency is motive, trait,value,skill,self-image, social role,knowledge;②Competency is a combination;③Competency should be measurable, observable, instructional,phasic and hierarchical;④Competency is a determinant to outstanding performance.Thus competency is an underlying combination of individual characteristics such as motive, inner drive force, quality, attitude,sole role,self-image, knowledge and skill,it is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or superior performance in a job or situation and it is measurable,observable and instructional.Besides,many scholars and consultancy firms believe that competency could be explained under the help of three different models:Iceberg Model. This model treats competency as an iceberg, the part above the water represents behavior, knowledge and skills which are easy to measure and observe,while the part under the water symbolizes underlying qualities such as value,attitude,social role, self-image,traits which are hard to assess,and the deepest part under the water represents the most latent qualities such as inner drive force,social motive, etc. which are most difficult to observe and measure.Onion Model. This model treats competency as an onion, the outer layer represents skills and knowledge which are liable to acquire,the inner layer refers to qualities such as self-image,social role,attitude and value which are relatively difficult to appraise, while the core of the onion symbolizes traits and motives which are most difficult to cultivate and develop.Brain Model. This model stems from the brain mechanism. It presupposes that the brain could be divided into four parts. Each part functions differently. The upper-left part is in charge of competency such as analysing capacity, calculation, strong logic ability; the upper-right part is in charge of competency such as innovation and intuition;the bottom left part is in charge of competency such as organizing ability, planning ability; and the bottom-right part is in charge of competency such as communication ability,perception, etc. Different parts will exert corresponding influence on competency development.Conceptualizations of Competency ModelFew foreign scholars have directly put forward conceptualizations of competency model. By contrast,many Chinese scholars have expressed their opinions on it. The present paper only cites those concepts that have been published by authoritative publishing houses.Jianfeng Peng, a professor in Ch;na Renmin University,together with his students, has studied how to build competency models for effective HR management since 2003. He thought competency model was the combination of differentqualities which were necessary for people to successfully finish a job or achieve superior performance,these qualities included different motives,traits, self-images and social roles as well as knowledge and skill (Jianfeng Peng, 2003). Prof. Peng believed that a competency model was composed of 4-6 competencies that were closely related to performance. Competency models could help managers judge and distinguish key factors that led to superior performance or underperformance. As a result,competency model could be treated as a foundation to improve performance.Professor Nengquan Wu from Sun Yat-sen University published his book Competency Model:Design and Application in 2005,according to his understanding, competency model refers to "proficiencies that people define core competencies of different levels, delineate corresponding behaviors,determine key competencies as well as f inish certain work.”(Nengquan Wu,2005). Prof. Wu conceptualized competency model from the perspective of methodology. He believed that competency model was a unique HRM thinking mode, method and operation flow. On the basis of organizational strategy, competency model could be utilized to enhance organizational competitiveness and improve performance.Shaohua Fang, a senior HRM consultant and expert,provided us with the following definition:"Competency model is to conceptualize and describe the necessary knowledge,skills,qualities and abilities which an employee should have in order to finish work (Shaohua Fang, 2007)”.By taking advantage of definitions of different levels and related behavioral descriptions, people could determine the combination of core competencies and required proficiency to finish work. Hc} pointed out these behaviors and skills must be able to measure,observe and instruct and they should exert a great influence upon personal performance and business success.International Human Resource Institute(IHRI) has also defined competency model:"The so-called competency model is the standardized description and explanation of competencies that could actualize superior performance.”(·IHRI, 2005)IHRI declared that a competency model should include 6^-1 2 competencies.In summary, the first concept mentioned above attaches an importance to the composition of competency model and its function, while all of the rest three concepts emphasize cognitive abilities as well as criterion-referred performance. Thus competency, model is a combination of different competencies which could be observed,delineated,explained and calculated on one hand,and could facilitate superior performance on the other hand.Development and Evolution of Competency ModelIn early 1970, top officials in U. S. Department of State believed that theirdiplomats' se- lection based on intelligence test was ineffective. It was an upset situation for them to find that many seemly excellent people fail to live up to their expectations regarding their work performance. Under such circumstances, Dr. McClelland was invited to help Department of State design an effective personnel selection system which could appraise the actual performance of employees. In that program,McClelland and his colleague Charles Dailey adopted the method of Behavioral Event Interview (BEI) to collect information in older to study factors that influenced the diplomats' performance. Through a series of summaries and analyses, McClelland and Dailey found out the differences between an excellent diplomat and a mediocre diplomat as far as their behaviors and modes of thinking were concerned. In this way, competencies that a diplomat should possess were found out. This program is the earliest empirical application of competency model. And the research findings were two papers: Improving Officer Selection for the Foreign Service (McClelland&Dailey,1972) as well as Evaluating New Methods of Measuring the Qualities Needed in Superior Foreign Service Information Officers(McClelland& Dailey,1973).Mcber and American Management Association (A'MA) also started their research on competency model in the same year. They focused on providing the answer to the question:what kind of competencies should be displayed by successful managers rather than unsuccessful ones? AMA spent 5 years observing 1 800 managers. By comparing the performance of excellent managers and mediocre ones, AMA defined their competencies based on their traits. The research results showed that all the successful managers shared the following 5 competencies:professional knowledge,maturity of mentality, maturity of .entrepreneurship,people relations and maturity of the profession. Of which,only professional knowledge were shared by excellent and mediocre managers (Mcber&.AMA, 1970).Then Prof. Bray carried out 8 years research at AT&T based on technique of assessment center. From the aspectives of abilities, attitudes and traits, etc.,he built a competency model composed of 25 competencies such as interpersonal relations, expression ability, social sensitivity, creativity,flexibility,organizational ability,planning ability, decision-making ability, etc(Bray and Grant,1978).In China,however, researches on competency model are relatively much late.Chinese scholars Chongming Wang and Minke Chen published their paper about competency model in Psychological Science in 1992. They studied 220 senior and middle-level managers of 51 enterprises in 5 cities. After examining and testing the competency model for senior managers on the basis of factor analysis and structural equation modelling, they compiled "Key Managerial Behavior Assessment Scale" (Chongming Wang&Minke Chen,2002).Scholars such as Kan Shi, Jicheng Wang and Chaoping Li took advantage of Behaviocal Event Interview to assess the competency model for senior managers in the industry of telecommunication (Kan Shi,Jicheng Wang&Chaoping Li,2002). Jicheng Wang designed 5 universal competency models for technical personnel,sales people, community service personnel,managers as well as entrepreneurs respectively.Jianfeng Peng and his postgraduate student Xiaojuan Xing built 4 universal competency models for business managers,business technical personnel,marketing personnel as well as HR managers (Jianfeng Peng,2003 ).The above domestic studies illustrate that competency models for middle-level and senior managers have been built based on in-depth interview and questionnairing. Most publications only focus on conceptualizing competency model,its development,behavioral event interview as well as competency model building,most of the findings are theoretical rather than empirical. By contrast,foreign studies are much maturer both theoretically and empirically.Empirical StudiesEmpirical studies highlight the application of competency model to enterprises, governments and other institutions.Nowadays,empirical studies on competency models mainly focus on the following 4 aspects:Staffing and Selection. Besides job standards and skills prescription, more and more businesses have carried out their personnel staffing and selection in light of the candidates' competencies which are crucial to their future performance. This competency-based personnel staffing and selection has connected business strategies and targets to business employees themselves. As a result,the quality of staffing and selection is greatly improved.Performance Management. Businesses which have built their competency models are more interested in the competency rather than the result itself in their performance management. As a result, their performance management style has been competency-driven rather than result-driven. Managers haven’t attached an importance to short-term performance, but current and long-term performances. In such a managerial system,outstanding performance has been easily actualized. Each employee has made most of their core competencies and expertise to make a contribution to their business.Compensation Management.After the competency-based compensation management system is set up, businesses have concentrated on their employees’future development and potential value, which has stimulated employees and managers of all ranks to improve themselves both menetuacy and teconologcal. Competency oases compense lion management system has helped enterprises attract and retain moretalents. In a word,competency model has endowed employees with a sense of respect and creativity.Training and Development. Enterprises which have built their competency models tend to determine core competencies in light of business strategies,environments, employee development planning and performance appraisal. Enterprises decide their training and development priorities on the basis of competency model.Future TrendsDespite that there is a growing body of literature on competency model,research on competency model is still in a premature stage and many questions still remain unanswered. Therefore, further research is required to address several important issues.First of all,although there are growing studies on the impacts of the competency model on organizational outcomes,antecedents of competency model need to be identified and academically explored. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between the features of competency model and its key antecedent variables such as organizational sttracture.leadership and external environment. For example,it can be reasoned that the features of competency model are likely to be positively correlated with the structures of enterprises, governments as well as other institutions. Secondly,the impact of competency model on performance needs to be thoroughly explored. More studies are needed to examine whether the features of competency model or organizational culture,has direct or indirect impacts on organizational performance. While quite a few HRD and HRM researchers and practitioners have demonstrated that the concept of competency model has a positive impact on organizational performance, however,such impact may be mediated by other important organizational variables. Finally, it is also important to consider the relationships of competency model and other important HR variables such as career development, managerial coaching as well as employee training.Conclusions and DiscussionsIn conclusion,competency model has increasingly exerted profound influence on human resource development and management. While this concept has received an increase in both academic and management fields,there are increasing empirical studies designed to examine the nature of the construct and its relationships with other important organizational variables. More studies are needed to enhance the theoretical and empirical foundations of competency model.胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究摘要20世纪70年代以来,西方国家已经利用胜任力模型来解决存在于行政和管理系统中的问题,其结果是积极且有前途的。
如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析

如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析文献综述与实证分析是科学研究中十分重要的步骤,它们可以帮助研究者了解前人的研究进展,为自己的研究提供理论支持和实证依据。
本文将探讨如何进行有效的文献综述与实证分析。
一、文献综述的概念与重要性在开始正式撰写研究论文之前,进行文献综述是至关重要的。
文献综述是对已有研究或文献的全面评述和总结,旨在了解相关领域的研究进展和研究热点,避免重复研究。
它可以帮助研究者确定自己的研究问题,选择适当的理论框架和研究方法。
文献综述的重要性在于:首先,它可以帮助研究者了解前人的研究动态和研究成果,为自己的研究提供理论基础和切入点;其次,它可以发现研究领域的研究空白和争议,为自己的研究提供创新的思路和研究方向;最后,它可以避免研究者进行无意义的重复研究,提高研究效率和质量。
二、文献综述的步骤与方法进行文献综述需要遵循一定的步骤与方法,以下是一般的文献综述步骤:1.确定研究范围与目的:明确综述的范围和目的是非常重要的,可以避免综述过于笼统或过于狭窄。
2.收集文献:通过检索学术数据库、阅读相关期刊、图书和会议论文,收集与研究主题相关的文献资料。
对于不同学科领域,可以采用不同的检索工具和策略,如使用关键词、作者名、期刊名等进行检索。
3.筛选文献:对收集到的文献进行筛选,根据题目、摘要和关键词等信息进行初步筛选,排除与研究主题不相关或质量不高的文献。
4.阅读和理解文献:对筛选出的文献进行仔细阅读和理解,把握研究问题、研究方法、数据分析等关键点。
5.分类与总结:根据文献的研究主题、研究对象、研究方法、研究结论等特点,对文献进行分类和总结,可以采用表格或图表等形式进行呈现。
6.撰写文献综述:在撰写文献综述时,应注重逻辑性、连贯性和准确性。
可以根据已有文献的研究范围、研究方法、研究结论等方面进行分章节、分小节的论述。
三、实证分析的概念与方法与文献综述相比,实证分析更加注重对已有数据和事实的分析与解释。
论文写作中的文献综述与实证研究

论文写作中的文献综述与实证研究在论文写作中,文献综述和实证研究是两个重要的环节。
文献综述是指对已有研究的梳理和总结,而实证研究则是指通过实证方法对问题进行验证和分析。
本文将分别介绍文献综述和实证研究的基本概念、内容要点及写作技巧。
一、文献综述1.基本概念文献综述是指对特定主题的相关文献进行查阅、分析和总结的过程。
通过文献综述,可以建立对特定主题的了解,从而确定自己的研究问题和研究方向。
文献综述需要注意查阅的文献来源的权威性和有效性,并选择与研究主题密切相关的文献。
2.内容要点在进行文献综述时,可以按照以下要点进行论述:(1)研究背景:介绍研究主题的重要性和研究现状,可以分析不同研究立场和观点的差异。
(2)研究目的:明确自己的研究问题,阐述自己的研究目的和动机。
(3)文献选择:介绍选择的文献来源,解释选择的原因,并指出存在的局限性。
(4)文献分析:对每篇文献进行详细的分析,包括研究对象、研究方法、分析框架和结果等。
(5)文献总结:对文献进行总结,指出研究中存在的问题和不足之处,为后续研究提供指导和建议。
3.写作技巧在进行文献综述的写作时,需要注意以下技巧:(1)逻辑清晰:在写作过程中,要注意将各个要点有机地连接起来,保持论述的逻辑清晰性。
(2)客观评价:对于文献的评价要客观公正,可以采用横向对比和纵向比较的方式,找出文献之间的异同点。
(3)避免重复:在文献综述中,应该避免对同一个观点或结果的重复描述,可以选择性地引用文献中的内容。
二、实证研究1.基本概念实证研究是指通过采集和分析实际数据,验证研究问题或提出假设的研究方法。
实证研究可以运用各种定量或定性的研究方法,包括实验、调查、案例分析等。
2.内容要点进行实证研究时,可以按照以下要点进行论述:(1)研究问题:明确自己的研究问题或提出假设,并具体描述研究的目标和研究的对象。
(2)研究方法:介绍研究所采用的具体方法和研究设计,包括数据采集的方法、样本选择的原则等。
国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述的论文

写一篇国内外关于胜任力模型的研究综述的论文,600字
胁任力模型一直都是商业领域的热门话题,因为它能够帮助企业更好地管理人员,并有效地提高绩效。
这一概念已被广泛应用于各行各业,以提供更有效的雇员招聘、培训和管理。
因此,许多学者都在国内外认真研究胜任力模型。
本文将就近年来的研究国内外情况进行综述,以探讨胜任力模型的现状和发展趋势。
首先,国内学者一直致力于通过系统分析和调查研究来研究胜任力模型,并将其应用于企业实践中。
譬如,2017年,张洁
等研究者提出了结合系统动力学的人口科学方法,探究和理解胜任力模型的内在机制,并分析了该模型对企业绩效的影响。
此外,2019年,王春革等研究者利用文献资料分析,提出了
一种基于KM框架的胜任力模型,以提升企业的社会责任感
和职业承诺水平。
而在国外,学者们一直忙于探究胜任力模型的实际应用。
比如,2019年,Gábor和Nikoletta等研究者对来自匈牙利大公司的
调查数据进行了分析,发现已建立的胜任力模型在提高员工绩效方面表现出色。
同时,在2018年,卢芹等研究者采用比较
研究、案例研究和文献分析等方法,发现企业通过开展胜任力模型的实践,能够更好地增强核心竞争力,促进组织高效率发展。
综上所述,国内外的学者都在努力探究胜任力模型的有效性和实施方法,并不断提高企业管理水平,推动企业绩效水平的提升。
因此,我们可以得出结论:胜任力模型可以作为企业管理
的重要工具,为管理者提供有效的帮助,从而提高组织的核心竞争力、增强组织的绩效水平,实现企业的良性发展。
学术论文中的文献综述与实证研究结合方法

学术论文中的文献综述与实证研究结合方法在学术研究中,文献综述和实证研究是两个重要的环节。
文献综述是对已有研究成果的梳理和总结,而实证研究则是通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻研究假设。
本文将探讨学术论文中如何将文献综述与实证研究结合,以提高研究的可信度和说服力。
首先,文献综述是研究的基础。
在进行实证研究之前,研究者需要对相关领域的文献进行全面的查阅和分析,了解已有的研究成果和进展。
文献综述可以帮助研究者确定研究的研究问题和目标,并为后续的实证研究提供理论和方法的指导。
此外,文献综述还可以帮助研究者发现已有研究的不足和局限性,为自己的研究提供切入点和研究空白。
其次,文献综述和实证研究应该相互补充和协调。
文献综述提供了已有研究的理论框架和研究方法,而实证研究则通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些理论和方法。
在实证研究中,研究者可以根据文献综述的结果选择适当的研究方法和数据收集方式,以保证研究的可信度和有效性。
同时,实证研究的结果也可以为文献综述提供新的证据和观点,进一步完善和发展已有的理论和方法。
此外,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以促进学术交流和合作。
通过文献综述,研究者可以了解到不同学者的观点和研究成果,从而与其展开深入的学术交流和合作。
而实证研究则可以为文献综述提供新的实证数据和方法,为其他研究者提供更多的研究资源和参考。
通过学术交流和合作,研究者可以共同推动学科的发展和进步。
最后,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以提高学术论文的质量和影响力。
通过充分的文献综述,研究者可以对已有研究进行全面的评估和分析,从而提出新的研究问题和假设。
而实证研究则可以通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些研究问题和假设,为学术论文提供更加可信和可靠的结论。
同时,文献综述和实证研究的结合还可以提高学术论文的可读性和可理解性,使读者更容易理解和接受研究的观点和结论。
综上所述,学术论文中的文献综述和实证研究是相互依存和相互促进的。
文献综述提供了研究的理论和方法基础,而实证研究则通过实证数据和方法来验证或推翻这些理论和方法。
大学论文中的文献综述与实证研究

大学论文中的文献综述与实证研究在大学论文中,文献综述与实证研究是非常重要的两个部分。
本文将从这两个方面展开讨论,探讨它们在论文写作中的作用和要求。
一、文献综述文献综述是指在写作论文之前,对相关领域的文献资料进行搜集、阅读和总结,以了解已有研究成果、理论观点和研究进展。
它的主要作用有以下几个方面:1. 提供研究背景和理论基础文献综述可以帮助我们对所研究的领域有一个全面的了解,了解前人在这个领域做过的研究,掌握已有的研究成果和理论观点,为我们的研究提供背景和理论基础。
2. 寻找研究的空白和问题通过对文献的综述和分析,我们可以发现已有研究中的不足和问题,找到研究的空白,从而确定我们的研究目标和研究问题,为后续的实证研究提供指导和依据。
3. 避免重复研究和错误文献综述不仅可以了解前人的研究成果,还可以防止我们犯相同的错误或者对已有成果的误解。
通过仔细研读文献,我们可以避免在后续的研究中重复前人的工作,提高研究效率和质量。
在论文中写文献综述时,我们需要注意以下几点:1. 确定综述的范围和内容根据研究的需求和目标,确定文献综述的范围和内容。
可以从多个角度进行分类和归纳,将相关的文献进行梳理和整合,形成对该领域的全面综述。
2. 准确引用和标注文献资料在文献综述中,我们需要准确引用和标注文献资料,遵循学术规范和要求。
可以使用文献管理工具来帮助整理和管理文献,确保引用和标注的准确性。
3. 分析和总结文献资料在综述文献时,我们需要对文献资料进行分析和总结。
可以从研究方法、理论观点、实证结果等方面进行归纳和总结,提取关键信息和结论,为后续的论文写作提供依据。
二、实证研究实证研究是指通过观察、实验、调查等方法,对现实问题进行研究,获取和验证真实的数据和信息。
实证研究可以帮助我们验证和验证理论观点,探索问题的本质和规律。
实证研究在大学论文中的作用主要有以下几个方面:1. 证明或反驳假设和理论观点实证研究可以通过调查、实验等方法获取真实的数据,进一步验证或反驳我们的假设和理论观点。
胜任力 文献综述

文献综述一、前言胜任力的研究和实践起源于美国,在20世纪70年代开始有学者投入到胜任力特征的探究和模型的构建中来。
我国最早在上世纪90年代引入了胜任力模型,后经我国学者研究努力,在对国外已有研究成果的基础上充分结合我国国情,对该理论在人员招聘领域也有了初步的探究,为进一步的发展奠定了研究基础。
二、国外相关研究成果胜任力,在国外常常又被译为competency。
在20世纪70年代以来,国外对于胜任力以及模型建立和应用日臻成熟。
现今大家认可的胜任力定义,最早起源于戴维·麦克利兰(David McClelland)博士(1973)为美国国务院设计的甄选驻外联络官的项目中的应用。
在该项目中他将心理学和管理学相结合,认为绩效优者拥有某些特有的知识与行为使得他获得更高的工作成就,因此将胜任力定义为与工作绩效或生活中其他重要成果直接相似或相联系的知识、技能、特质和动机。
在研究中他发展了确定胜任力的一些关键的方法和和理论,如“行为事件访谈法”(BEI)。
戴维·杜波依斯(David Dubois)(1993)将胜任力定义为是一个人在其工作岗位上获得出色成绩的潜在特征。
提出了绩优者的胜任力特征,主要包括6个方面:目标和行动管理、领导、人力资源管理、指导下级技能、其他、特殊知识。
莱尔·斯宾塞(Lyle Spencer)(1994)和麦克利兰对胜任力做了全面定义。
能够明确卓越绩效者和平庸者可准确测量的个体特征。
他们创建了冰山模型来形象的说明,包括了五个层次:知识、技能、自我概念、特质和动机,。
冰山上的技巧和知识是显性部分,而冰山下的部分为隐性部分。
而对于胜任力模型的建立和应用,最早始于1970年McBer和美国管理协会(AMA)进行了一次胜任力项目研究,该研究旨在比较一般绩效这和绩优者的行为,以此来找出管理者成功的五个重要能力特征:专业知识、心智成熟度、企业家成熟度、人际间成熟度、在职成熟度这五个关键能力特征,只有专业知识是优秀管理者和一般管理者都有的。
毕业论文文献综述实证研究与数据解读

毕业论文文献综述实证研究与数据解读在撰写毕业论文时,文献综述是一个至关重要的部分,它不仅可以展示研究者对该领域已有研究成果的了解程度,还可以为后续研究提供理论支持和研究思路。
本文将结合实证研究与数据解读,探讨如何撰写一篇扎实的毕业论文文献综述。
一、文献综述的重要性文献综述是毕业论文中不可或缺的一部分,它通过对相关领域已有研究文献的梳理和分析,帮助研究者了解当前研究的热点和难点,为研究提供理论依据和研究思路。
一篇好的文献综述应该具备以下几个特点:1. 全面性:对该领域的相关文献进行全面、系统的梳理,包括历史渊源、研究现状、研究方法、研究成果等方面的内容。
2. 深入性:对文献进行深入的分析和评价,揭示其中的研究亮点和不足之处,为后续研究提供借鉴和启示。
3. 逻辑性:文献综述应该具有清晰的逻辑结构,层次分明,条理清晰,使读者能够快速抓住重点,理解作者的观点和论证过程。
二、文献综述的撰写步骤1. 确定研究范围:在进行文献综述之前,首先需要确定研究的范围和主题,明确研究的目的和意义,以便有针对性地查找和筛选相关文献。
2. 检索文献:通过图书馆、学术数据库、期刊论文等渠道,检索和收集与研究主题相关的文献资料,建立文献数据库,方便后续的整理和分析。
3. 文献筛选:对检索到的文献进行筛选和归纳,筛选出与研究主题相关、权威可靠的文献,剔除与研究无关或质量较差的文献。
4. 文献整理:将筛选出的文献按照时间顺序或主题分类进行整理,建立文献框架,明确每篇文献的主要内容和观点。
5. 文献分析:对整理好的文献进行深入分析和评价,揭示其中的研究亮点和不足之处,为后续研究提供理论支持和研究思路。
6. 撰写文献综述:在撰写文献综述时,应该遵循科学的写作规范,包括清晰的结构安排、准确的引用格式、流畅的表达方式等,确保文献综述的质量和可读性。
三、实证研究与数据解读在文献综述中,实证研究和数据解读是至关重要的内容,它们可以为研究提供实证支持和数据支撑,增强研究的可信度和说服力。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Research on Competency Model:A Literature Review andEmpirical StudiesAbstractWestern countries have applied competency models to addressing problems existed in their administrative and managerial systems since 1970s,and the findings is positine and promising. However, competency model hasn’t been introduced to China until 1990s and it is still unknown and mysterious to many Chinese managers. This paper aims to uncover the mysterious veil of competency model in order to broaden the horizon of Chinese managers and boost China's human resource development as well as management.Keywords:Competency,Competency Models,Empirical Studies of Competency ModelsIt has been more than 30 years since competency model was utilized to human resource management.In western countries,competency model first displayed its effectiveness in government administration, meanwhile many multinationals and their branch companies applied the competency model to their daily business management and their business was a great success. As the notion of competency is gradually come to light and accepted by people all around the world,more and more enterprises have been trying to build their own competency model under the help of professional consultant firms. As a result,competency model has gradually been a very fashionable phrase in the field of management and quite a few enterprises are thus benefited from it. In recent years, competency model has become a hot spot in the Chinese academia as well as big-,middle- and small-sized enterprises alike,many relevant writings and books have also been translated and published. However, competency and competency model are still mysterious to many Chinese scholars, business managers as well as government administrators.Purpose and Significance of the StudyThe purpose of the study aims to make a critical literature review of the competency model,clarify some confusion related to it and explore its application. The following questions are employed to guide this study:What is competency? What is competency model? What are the theoretical and empirical findings related to competency model?The study illustrates how we could take advantage of competency model in our harmonious society building. On one hand,the study will delineate competency and competency model in order to clarify confusions related to it since it is still strange and mysterious to many Chinese managers and administrators;on the other hand,the study would enrich Chinese HRD&HRM in the field of government administration and business management both theoretically and empirically.Research MethodThe present study has utilized qualitative analysis, induction and deduction. Since this research is a literature review in some sense, qualitative analysis will be an indispensable research method; Induction and deduction are applied to both theoretical and empirical studies.In order to enhance the credibility of present research,only the authoritative publications on competency model are reviewed,including books and papers written by foreign and Chinese scholars and HRDHRM practitioners. By searching for the keywords "competency" "competency model" and "competency model building" as well as "empirical studies on competency models",books and papers written by well-known foreign scholars such as McClelland D. C.,Lyle M. Spencer, Anntoinette D. Lucia, Richard Lepsinger etc.,are available; by the same token,books and papers written by Chinese scholars such as Zhi-gong He,Jianfeng Peng, Shaohua Fang, Nengquan Wu,etc.,could be consulted. All the books and papers are published between 1950s and 2007. In addition, many data cited in this paper comes from empirical studies at home and abroad.FindingsIn this part,a literature review of competency is firstly carried out;then competency model as well as its evolution,development and innovation is delineated;finally empirical studies are reviewed. Empirical studies mainly focus on competency model building and its application to human resource development and management.Understanding CompetencyIn 1973,American scholar David C. McClelland published his paper Testing for Competency Rather Than Intelligence which cited a large amount of research findings to illustratethe inappropriateness of assessing personnel qualities by abusing intelligence tests. Dr. McClelland further explained that some factors (personality, intelligence, value,etc.)which people had always taken for granted in determining work performance hadn't displayed their desired result. As a result,he emphasized that people should ignore those theoretical by pothese and subjective judgements which had been proved groundless in reality. He declared that people should tap directly those factors andbehaviors which could really impact their performance (McClelland, 1973). These factors and behaviors were named "competency" by McClelland. The publishing of this paper symbolized the debut of competency research. From then on,many scholars started getting involved into the research on competency and they conceptualized competency from different perspectives as shown in the following table: The above ten concepts of competency have a lot in common:①Competency is motive, trait,value,skill,self-image, social role,knowledge;②Competency is a combination;③Competency should be measurable, observable, instructional,phasic and hierarchical;④Competency is a determinant to outstanding performance.Thus competency is an underlying combination of individual characteristics such as motive, inner drive force, quality, attitude,sole role,self-image, knowledge and skill,it is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or superior performance in a job or situation and it is measurable,observable and instructional.Besides,many scholars and consultancy firms believe that competency could be explained under the help of three different models:Iceberg Model. This model treats competency as an iceberg, the part above the water represents behavior, knowledge and skills which are easy to measure and observe,while the part under the water symbolizes underlying qualities such as value,attitude,social role, self-image,traits which are hard to assess,and the deepest part under the water represents the most latent qualities such as inner drive force,social motive, etc. which are most difficult to observe and measure.Onion Model. This model treats competency as an onion, the outer layer represents skills and knowledge which are liable to acquire,the inner layer refers to qualities such as self-image,social role,attitude and value which are relatively difficult to appraise, while the core of the onion symbolizes traits and motives which are most difficult to cultivate and develop.Brain Model. This model stems from the brain mechanism. It presupposes that the brain could be divided into four parts. Each part functions differently. The upper-left part is in charge of competency such as analysing capacity, calculation, strong logic ability; the upper-right part is in charge of competency such as innovation and intuition;the bottom left part is in charge of competency such as organizing ability, planning ability; and the bottom-right part is in charge of competency such as communication ability,perception, etc. Different parts will exert corresponding influence on competency development.Conceptualizations of Competency ModelFew foreign scholars have directly put forward conceptualizations of competency model. By contrast,many Chinese scholars have expressed their opinions on it. The present paper only cites those concepts that have been published byauthoritative publishing houses.Jianfeng Peng, a professor in Ch;na Renmin University,together with his students, has studied how to build competency models for effective HR management since 2003. He thought competency model was the combination of different qualities which were necessary for people to successfully finish a job or achieve superior performance,these qualities included different motives,traits, self-images and social roles as well as knowledge and skill (Jianfeng Peng, 2003). Prof. Peng believed that a competency model was composed of 4-6 competencies that were closely related to performance. Competency models could help managers judge and distinguish key factors that led to superior performance or underperformance. As a result,competency model could be treated as a foundation to improve performance.Professor Nengquan Wu from Sun Yat-sen University published his book Competency Model:Design and Application in 2005,according to his understanding, competency model refers to "proficiencies that people define core competencies of different levels, delineate corresponding behaviors,determine key competencies as well as f inish certain work.‖(Nengquan Wu,2005). Prof. Wu conceptualized competency model from the perspective of methodology. He believed that competency model was a unique HRM thinking mode, method and operation flow. On the basis of organizational strategy, competency model could be utilized to enhance organizational competitiveness and improve performance.Shaohua Fang, a senior HRM consultant and expert,provided us with the following definition:"Competency model is to conceptualize and describe the necessary knowledge,skills,qualities and abilities which an employee should have in order to finish work (Shaohua Fang, 2007)‖.By taking advantage of definitions of different levels and related behavioral descriptions, people could determine the combination of core competencies and required proficiency to finish work. Hc} pointed out these behaviors and skills must be able to measure,observe and instruct and they should exert a great influence upon personal performance and business success.International Human Resource Institute(IHRI) has also defined competency model:"The so-called competency model is the standardized description and explanation of competencies that could actualize superior performance.‖(·IHRI, 2005)IHRI declared that a competency model should include 6^-1 2 competencies.In summary, the first concept mentioned above attaches an importance to the composition of competency model and its function, while all of the rest three concepts emphasize cognitive abilities as well as criterion-referred performance. Thus competency, model is a combination of different competencies which could beobserved,delineated,explained and calculated on one hand,and could facilitate superior performance on the other hand.Development and Evolution of Competency ModelIn early 1970, top officials in U. S. Department of State believed that their diplomats' se- lection based on intelligence test was ineffective. It was an upset situation for them to find that many seemly excellent people fail to live up to their expectations regarding their work performance. Under such circumstances, Dr. McClelland was invited to help Department of State design an effective personnel selection system which could appraise the actual performance of employees. In that program,McClelland and his colleague Charles Dailey adopted the method of Behavioral Event Interview (BEI) to collect information in older to study factors that influenced the diplomats' performance. Through a series of summaries and analyses, McClelland and Dailey found out the differences between an excellent diplomat and a mediocre diplomat as far as their behaviors and modes of thinking were concerned. In this way, competencies that a diplomat should possess were found out. This program is the earliest empirical application of competency model. And the research findings were two papers: Improving Officer Selection for the Foreign Service (McClelland&Dailey,1972) as well as Evaluating New Methods of Measuring the Qualities Needed in Superior Foreign Service Information Officers(McClelland& Dailey,1973).Mcber and American Management Association (A'MA) also started their research on competency model in the same year. They focused on providing the answer to the question:what kind of competencies should be displayed by successful managers rather than unsuccessful ones? AMA spent 5 years observing 1 800 managers. By comparing the performance of excellent managers and mediocre ones, AMA defined their competencies based on their traits. The research results showed that all the successful managers shared the following 5 competencies:professional knowledge,maturity of mentality, maturity of .entrepreneurship,people relations and maturity of the profession. Of which,only professional knowledge were shared by excellent and mediocre managers (Mcber&.AMA, 1970).Then Prof. Bray carried out 8 years research at AT&T based on technique of assessment center. From the aspectives of abilities, attitudes and traits, etc.,he built a competency model composed of 25 competencies such as interpersonal relations, expression ability, social sensitivity, creativity,flexibility,organizational ability,planning ability, decision-making ability, etc(Bray and Grant,1978).In China,however, researches on competency model are relatively much late.Chinese scholars Chongming Wang and Minke Chen published their paper about competency model in Psychological Science in 1992. They studied 220 senior andmiddle-level managers of 51 enterprises in 5 cities. After examining and testing the competency model for senior managers on the basis of factor analysis and structural equation modelling, they compiled "Key Managerial Behavior Assessment Scale" (Chongming Wang&Minke Chen,2002).Scholars such as Kan Shi, Jicheng Wang and Chaoping Li took advantage of Behaviocal Event Interview to assess the competency model for senior managers in the industry of telecommunication (Kan Shi,Jicheng Wang&Chaoping Li,2002). Jicheng Wang designed 5 universal competency models for technical personnel,sales people, community service personnel,managers as well as entrepreneurs respectively.Jianfeng Peng and his postgraduate student Xiaojuan Xing built 4 universal competency models for business managers,business technical personnel,marketing personnel as well as HR managers (Jianfeng Peng,2003 ).The above domestic studies illustrate that competency models for middle-level and senior managers have been built based on in-depth interview and questionnairing. Most publications only focus on conceptualizing competency model,its development,behavioral event interview as well as competency model building,most of the findings are theoretical rather than empirical. By contrast,foreign studies are much maturer both theoretically and empirically.Empirical StudiesEmpirical studies highlight the application of competency model to enterprises, governments and other institutions.Nowadays,empirical studies on competency models mainly focus on the following 4 aspects:Staffing and Selection. Besides job standards and skills prescription, more and more businesses have carried out their personnel staffing and selection in light of the candidates' competencies which are crucial to their future performance. This competency-based personnel staffing and selection has connected business strategies and targets to business employees themselves. As a result,the quality of staffing and selection is greatly improved.Performance Management. Businesses which have built their competency models are more interested in the competency rather than the result itself in their performance management. As a result, their performance management style has been competency-driven rather than result-driven. Managers haven’t attached an importance to short-term performance, but current and long-term performances. In such a managerial system,outstanding performance has been easily actualized. Each employee has made most of their core competencies and expertise to make a contribution to their business.Compensation Management.After the competency-based compensationmanagement system is set up, businesses have concentrated on their employees’future development and potential value, which has stimulated employees and managers of all ranks to improve themselves both menetuacy and teconologcal. Competency oases compense lion management system has helped enterprises attract and retain more talents. In a word,competency model has endowed employees with a sense of respect and creativity.Training and Development. Enterprises which have built their competency models tend to determine core competencies in light of business strategies,environments, employee development planning and performance appraisal. Enterprises decide their training and development priorities on the basis of competency model.Future TrendsDespite that there is a growing body of literature on competency model,research on competency model is still in a premature stage and many questions still remain unanswered. Therefore, further research is required to address several important issues.First of all,although there are growing studies on the impacts of the competency model on organizational outcomes,antecedents of competency model need to be identified and academically explored. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between the features of competency model and its key antecedent variables such as organizational sttracture.leadership and external environment. For example,it can be reasoned that the features of competency model are likely to be positively correlated with the structures of enterprises, governments as well as other institutions. Secondly,the impact of competency model on performance needs to be thoroughly explored. More studies are needed to examine whether the features of competency model or organizational culture,has direct or indirect impacts on organizational performance. While quite a few HRD and HRM researchers and practitioners have demonstrated that the concept of competency model has a positive impact on organizational performance, however,such impact may be mediated by other important organizational variables. Finally, it is also important to consider the relationships of competency model and other important HR variables such as career development, managerial coaching as well as employee training.Conclusions and DiscussionsIn conclusion,competency model has increasingly exerted profound influence on human resource development and management. While this concept has received an increase in both academic and management fields,there are increasing empirical studies designed to examine the nature of the construct and its relationships with other important organizational variables. More studies are needed to enhance the theoreticaland empirical foundations of competency model.胜任力模型研究:文献综述和实证研究摘要20世纪70年代以来,西方国家已经利用胜任力模型来解决存在于行政和管理系统中的问题,其结果是积极且有前途的。