2015考研英语：阅读从错一大片到顶多错一个
2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析
2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语（一）试题及答案详细解析Section I Use of English :Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_”functional Kinship” of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what2. [A] defended [B] concluded [C] withdrawn [D] advised3. [A] for [B] with [C] on [D] by4. [A] compared [B] sought [C] separated [D] connected5. [A] tests [B] objects [C]samples [D] examples6. [A] insignificant [B] unexpected [C]unbelievable [D] incredible7. [A] visit [B] miss [C] seek [D] know8. [A] resemble [B] influence [C] favor [D] surpass9. [A] again [B] also [C] instead [D] thus10. [A] Meanwhile [B] Furthermore [C] Likewise [D] Perhaps11. [A] about [B] to [C]from [D]like12. [A] drive [B] observe [C] confuse [D]limit13. [A] according to [B] rather than [C] regardless of [D] along with14. [A] chances [B]responses [C]missions [D]benefits15. [A] later [B]slower [C] faster [D] earlier16. [A]forecast [B]remember [C]understand [D]express17. [A] unpredictable [B]contributory [C] controllable [D] disruptive18. [A] endeavor [B]decision [C]arrangement [D] tendency19. [A] political [B] religious [C] ethnic [D] economic20. [A] see [B] show [C] prove [D] tellSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they dare in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle?The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity.It is t his apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs’ continuing popularity polarized. And also, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today –embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.While Europe’s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy’s reputation with her ratherordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service – as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy’s worst enemies.21. According to the first two Paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain[A] used turn enjoy high public support[B] was unpopular among European royals[C] cased his relationship with his rivals[D]ended his reign in embarrassment22. Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly[A] owing to their undoubted and respectable status[B] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality[C] to give voter more public figures to look up to[D]due to their everlasting political embodiment23. Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?[A] Aristocrats’ excessive reliance on inherited wealth[B] The role of the nobility in modern democracies[C] The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families[D]The nobi lity’s adherence to their privileges24. The British royals “have most to fear” because Charles[A] takes a rough line on political issues[B] fails to change his lifestyle as advised[C] takes republicans as his potential allies[D] fails to adapt himself to his future role25. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined[B] Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne[C] Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs[D]Charles, Slow to React to the Coming ThreatsText 2Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contentsof a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.[B] search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.[C] check suspects’ phone contents without being a uthorized.[D]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.27. The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one of[A] disapproval.[B] indifference.[C] tolerance.[D]cautiousness.28. The author believes that exploring one’s p hone contents is comparable to[A] getting into one’s residence.[B] handling one’s historical records.[C] scanning one’s correspondences.[D] going through one’s wallet.29. In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed.[B] the court is giving police less room for action.[C] citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.[D] phones are used to store sensitive information.30. Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate that[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.[C]California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.[D]principles of the Constitution should never be alteredText 3The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overa ll drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group. He says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue.” “Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”. Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.31. It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that[A] Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.[B] journals are strengthening their statistical checks.[C] few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.[D] lack of data analysis is common in research projects.32. The phrase “flagged up” (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning to[A] found.[B] marked.[C] revised.[D] stored.33. Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may[A] pose a threat to all its peers.[B] meet with strong opposition.[C] increase Science’s circulation.[D]set an example for other journals.34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now[A] adds to researchers’ workload.[B] diminishes the role of reviewers.[C] has room for further improvement.[D]is to fail in the foreseeable future35. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.[B] Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect[C] Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors’ Desks[D] Statisticians Are Coming Back with ScienceText 4Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch’s daughter ,Elisabeth ,spoke of the “unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our institutions” Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptance that the only “sorting mechanism ”in society should be profit and the market .But “it’s us ,human beings ,we the people who create the society we want ,not profit ”.Driving her point home, sh e continued: “It’s increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business could become one of the most dangerous foals for capitalism and freedom.” This same absence of moral purpose was wounding companies such as News International ,shield thought ,making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking .As the hacking trial concludes –finding guilty ones-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones ,and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge –the winder issue of dearth of integrity still standstill, Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people .This is hacking on an industrial scale ,as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds.In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place .One of the astonishing revelations was how little Rebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, wow little she thought to ask and the fact that she never inquired wow the stories arrived. The core of her successful defence was that she knew nothing.In today’s world, title has become normal that well—paid executives should not beaccountable for what happens in the organizations that they run perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business–friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability.The purpose of editing the News of the World was not to promote reader understanding to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions—nor received traceable, recorded answers.36. According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset by[A] the consequences of the current sorting mechanism[B] companies’ financial loss due to immoral practices.[C] governmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.[D]the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.37. It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that[A] Glem Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime[B] more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.[C] Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.[D] phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.38. The author believes the Rebekah Books’s deference[A] revealed a cunning personality[B] centered on trivial issues[C] was hardly convincing[D] was part of a conspiracy39. The author holds that the current collective doctrine shows[A] generally distorted values[B] unfair wealth distribution[C] a marginalized lifestyle[D] a rigid moral cote40. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?[A] The quality of writing is of primary importance.[B] Common humanity is central news reporting.[C] Moral awareness matters in exciting a newspaper.[D] Journalists need stricter industrial regulations.Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the fist A-G to fit into each of the numbered blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)How does your reading proceed? Clearly you try to comprehend, in the sense of identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawingon your explicit knowledge of English grammar (41) ______you begin to infer a context for the text, for instance, by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where.The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of of comprehension. But they show comprehension to consist not just passive assimilation but of active engagement inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by presenting you with specific evidence and cues (42) _______Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each reader. What is in question is not the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or “true” meaning that can be read off and clocked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) _______ Such background material inevitably reflects who we are, (44) _______This doesn’t, however, make interpretation merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page-including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns-debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values.How we read a given text also depends to some extent on our particular interest in reading it. (45)_______such dimensions of read suggest-as others introduced later in the book will also do-that we bring an implicit (often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of readin g. It doesn’t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference points for and counterbalances to one another. Together, they make up the reading component of your overall literacy or relationship to your surrounding textual environment.[A] Are we studying that text and trying to respond in a way that fulfils the requirement of a given course? Reading it simply for pleasure? Skimming it for information? Ways of reading on a train or in bed are likely to differ considerably from reading in a seminar room.[B] Factors such as the place and period in which we are reading, our gender ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretation but at the same time obscure or even close off others.[C] If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in the contest. On the assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them.[D]In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or reference might have had: These might be the ones the author intended.[E]You make further inferences, for instance, about how the test may be significant to you, or about its validity—inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible.[F]In plays，novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not necessarily as mouthpieces for the author’s own thoughts.[G]Rather, we ascribe meanings to test on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of organization or patterning we perceive in a text’s formal structures (so especially its language structures) and various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text.Section III TranslationDirections:Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Within the span of a hundred years, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration—one of the great folk wanderings of history—swept from Europe to America.46) This movement, driven by powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent.47) The United States is the product of two principal forces-the immigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and national characteristics and the impact of a new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world.48) But, the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes. These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American.49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the territory which is now the United States crossed the Atlantic more than a hundred years after the 15th- and 16th-century explorations of North America. In the meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to North America came in small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they subsisted on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ship were lost in storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay.“To the anxious travelers the sight of the American shore brought almost inexpressible relief.” said one recorder of events, “The air at twelve leagues’ distance smelt as sweet as a new-blown garden.” The colonists’ first glimpse of the new land was a si ght of dense woods. 50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a veritable real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and lumber. Here was the raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores.Section IV WritingPart A51. Directions:You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100 words recommending a book to the club members.You should state reasons for your recommendation.You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use Li Ming instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)Part B52. Directions:Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay you should1) describe the drawing briefly2) explain its intended meaning, and3) give your commentsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)手机时代的聚会参考答案及详细解析I cloze1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
考研英语阅读一题都不对
考研英语阅读一题都不对考研英语阅读是考研英语科目中的重要组成部分，它不仅考察学生对英语语言的掌握程度，还考察学生的逻辑思维和分析能力。
然而，有些考生在考试中可能会遇到阅读题目全部答错的情况，这无疑会对他们的总分产生不利影响。
面对这样的困境，考生需要从多个角度进行反思和调整。
首先，考生需要审视自己的词汇量。
考研英语阅读中的文章往往涉及专业领域，因此需要考生具备一定的专业词汇。
如果考生在阅读过程中频繁遇到生词，这将严重影响对文章的理解。
因此，考生需要通过背单词、做词汇题等方式来扩大自己的词汇量。
其次，考生需要提高自己的阅读速度和理解能力。
考研英语阅读的时间是有限的，考生需要在有限的时间内完成阅读和答题。
这就要求考生在平时的练习中提高阅读速度，同时加强对文章结构和逻辑的理解。
可以通过多做阅读理解题、阅读英文报刊杂志等方式来锻炼自己的阅读能力。
再者，考生需要掌握一定的解题技巧。
考研英语阅读题目的类型多样，包括细节理解题、推理判断题、主旨大意题等。
考生需要根据不同的题型掌握相应的解题方法。
例如，对于细节理解题，考生需要仔细阅读文章，找出与题目相关的信息；对于推理判断题，考生需要根据文章内容进行合理的推断。
此外，考生还需要注意答题策略。
在考试中，考生可以先做自己比较有把握的题目，然后再回头处理那些难度较大的题目。
这样可以保证在有限的时间内尽可能多地得分。
同时，考生在答题时要注意时间分配，避免在某个题目上花费过多时间，导致其他题目没有足够的时间完成。
最后，考生需要保持良好的心态。
考研英语阅读的难度较大，考生在备考过程中可能会遇到挫折。
这时，考生需要保持积极的心态，相信自己通过努力可以提高阅读能力。
同时，考生可以通过参加模拟考试、向老师请教等方式来增强自己的信心。
总之，考研英语阅读一题都不对的情况虽然令人沮丧，但考生通过反思自己的学习方法、提高解题技巧、调整答题策略等方式，仍然有机会在考试中取得好成绩。
考生需要保持积极的心态，坚持不懈地努力，相信自己一定能够克服困难，实现考研英语阅读的突破。
考研英语一阅读理解错8个
考研英语一阅读理解错8个
考研英语一的阅读理解部分对于考生来说是相对较难的，需要掌握一定的技巧和策略。
根据您提供的信息，您在这部分错了8个题目，属于中等偏上的水平。
要进一步提高阅读理解部分的成绩，建议您采取以下措施：
1. 增加词汇量：扩大词汇量，特别注意常用词汇和学科专业词汇的掌握。
2. 掌握阅读技巧：学会快速阅读、寻找主题句、定位关键信息和筛选无关信息等技巧。
3. 练习阅读理解题目：多做真题和模拟题，注意总结错题原因和解题方法。
4. 扩大阅读量：多读英文文章和新闻，提高阅读速度和理解能力。
5. 注重细节：在解题时要注意细节，避免因疏忽或理解错误而导致失分。
通过以上措施，相信您的阅读理解部分成绩会有所提高。
同时，也要注意其他部分的备考，争取取得更好的成绩。
祝您考试顺利！。
考研英语阅读理解错8个
考研英语阅读理解错8个
对于考研英语阅读理解错8个的情况，具体分析如下：
阅读理解在考研英语中是非常重要的一部分，错8个意味着在阅读部分扣了大约16分。
通常，如果其他部分答得比较好，这个分数可能仍然可以获得一个相对较好的总分。
但如果其他部分扣分也较多，最终的分数就可能受到影响。
要改善这种情况，可以考虑以下几点：
1. 加强词汇积累：扩大词汇量，尤其是对一些常见词汇的深入了解。
2. 练习与反思：进行大量的阅读练习，并对错误进行深入分析，理解为什么会做错，避免重复犯错。
3. 提高阅读速度：在保证理解的前提下，提高阅读速度，为完成其他部分如翻译、写作等留出更多时间。
4. 了解阅读题型与技巧：熟悉不同题型的解题技巧，如细节题、推理题、主旨题等，有助于更快地定位答案。
5. 增强跨文化意识：了解英语国家的文化背景和习惯用法，有助于更好地理解文章内容。
6. 模拟考试：定期进行模拟考试，评估自己的真实水平，并根据考试结果调整复习策略。
如果能够根据以上建议进行有针对性的训练，相信阅读能力会有所提高。
希望这些建议能对你有所帮助，祝你考研顺利！。
2015年考研英语阅读真题答案及解析(英一英二) (1)
2015年考研英语阅读真题答案及解析苏州新东方张雷每年英语考试结束后，总会有很多考生“哀声载道”：今年的题好难啊！比去年难多了！但我觉得这可能都是幻觉吧！拿今年的阅读题来说，确实很难，但是不是最难的，难度总体还是和往年持平的。
接下来我们就来分别分析下仔细阅读（四选一题）和新题型一、仔细阅读我们很多同学拿到第一篇文章就懵了，第一段讲什么完全看不懂，里面有很多生词看不懂。
我在课上反复强调过，读文章切记不要心急，在考场那样高度压抑和紧张的气氛下，越是心急越是看不懂，一定要沉下来细心分析。
第一段看不懂，再看一篇，因为第一段一般都是中心主旨段，看懂第一段至关重要。
但如果还看不懂就继续往下读，总有能看懂的段落。
而且，并不是说文章读不懂就一题都做不出来的，或者说读懂一部分文章也能做对一部分题，如果能保证这部分题的准确率，我相信每篇做对3个问题不大。
1.在做题的时候我们严格遵守顺序原则：除了主旨题（一般是最后一题）之外，文章的出题顺序和段落顺序保持一致。
考研出题方式一题对应一段（多段落推断题除外），也就是说一题的四个选项均来自于这段几句话，正确选项也来自于这段的某句话或者某几句话，当然对于单段落推断题而言，正确选项很有可能是这段的中心主旨。
所以，定位准确是做对考研阅读题的一个前提！2.另外，考生也应掌握一些做题技巧，这些做题技巧可以帮助我们提分或者提高准确率。
这些技巧就是：1. 选抽象，也就是要排除含有大写字母的(the Castle, thePalace…) ，人名地名机构名( California, FTC、CIA…)，数字（2008, 20%...），专有名词/专业名词( Worldcup, Sat，REM, prefrontal cortex…)的选项。
2. 选BUT转折后，如果转折后看不懂，就选But 转折后的原词 3. 选主旨（文章反复出现的词语）详情看参考我写的“大数据告诉你考研英语阅读选什么”那篇文章3.考生应具备识别错误选项特点的能力1.含有比较级或最高级选项，极有可能是错误的2.跨段选项极有可能是错误的3.含有具体名词的：大写字母的 (the Castle, the Palace…) ；人名地名机构名( California, FTC、CIA…)；数字（2008, 20%...）；专有名词/专业名词( Worldcup, Sat，REM, prefrontal cortex…) 极有可能是错误的。
考研英语阅读能看懂文章但是做错题
一、问题现象很多考研学子在备考英语阅读时，经常出现能够看懂文章，但是在做题时却总是容易出错的情况。
这种现象在考研英语备考中并不罕见，很多学生感到困惑和挫败，不知道应该如何解决这个问题。
二、原因分析1. 阅读速度过快或过慢：很多学生在进行阅读时，要么过于匆忙，导致遗漏文章中的关键信息；要么过于迟缓，导致耗费过多时间在一些细枝末节上。
这两种情况都会影响学生的答题准确性。
2. 对问题的理解不够深刻：有些学生在阅读文章后，对文章中的重点、关键信息没有深入理解，或者理解偏差，导致在做题时选择错误答案。
3. 缺乏解题技巧：考研英语阅读除了对英文阅读理解的要求外，还需要考生有一定的解题技巧和策略，包括排除法、划关键词、归纳总结等。
4. 语言能力不足：有些学生在阅读英文文章时，会因为词汇量不足、语法结构不熟悉等原因影响理解和答题准确性。
三、解决方法1. 提高阅读速度：学生在备考过程中，可以通过大量的阅读训练来提高自己的阅读速度，同时也要注意保持阅读的准确性和深度理解。
2. 注意文章的结构和逻辑关系：在阅读文章时，要注意文章的结构，了解每个段落的主题和论点，抓住关键信息，做到理解的全面和准确。
3. 多做题、总结经验：通过大量的题目训练可以增加对题型的熟悉度和解题技巧，同时在做错题后要认真总结，找出自己的失误和不足，避免下次再犯同样的错误。
4. 加强语言能力训练：提高词汇量、加强语法和句型的训练，可以帮助学生更准确地理解文章，提高答题准确性。
四、结语在备考考研英语阅读时，学生们不仅要提高自己对英文阅读理解的能力，还要注重解题技巧和语言能力的提升。
只有全面提升自己的综合能力，才能在考试中取得更好的成绩。
希望同学们能够认真对待备考过程，克服困难，取得好成绩。
五、阅读训练的重要性阅读训练在考研英语备考过程中具有极其重要的地位。
只有通过大量的阅读训练，才能真正提高学生的阅读速度和准确性。
在进行阅读训练时，学生要注意培养自己的阅读技巧，包括快速定位关键信息、理解文章的结构和逻辑关系等。
考研15年完型错7个
考研15年完型错7个
对于考研15年完型填空错了7个的情况，我们可以从多个角度
进行分析和讨论。
首先，我们可以考虑个人的准备情况。
可能是在备考过程中，
对于完型填空题型的理解不够透彻，或者在平时的练习中没有充分
掌握相关技巧和策略。
另外，也有可能是在考试紧张的情况下，出
现了一些疏忽或者粗心导致了错题的发生。
其次，我们可以从题目类型和难度角度进行分析。
完型填空作
为考研英语的一部分，题目涉及词汇、语法、逻辑推理等多个方面，可能在某些方面的掌握上存在一定的困难，导致出现错误。
另外，也可以考虑到考试环境和心态对答题的影响。
有些同学
在考试过程中可能会因为紧张、焦虑等情绪影响到了答题的效果，
导致了一些错误的发生。
针对这种情况，我们可以采取一些针对性的措施来提高答题的
准确性。
比如，加强对于完型填空题型的理解和掌握，多做一些相
关的练习题，提高对于词汇和语法的敏感度，调整好考试前的心态，
保持平和的心态应对考试等等。
总的来说，出现完型填空错题的情况是可以通过分析原因并采取相应的措施来加以改进的。
希望对你有所帮助。
考研英语分客观题分
考研英语分客观题分————————————————————————————————作者：————————————————————————————————日期：ﻩ考研英语分客观题60分（包括10分完型、40分阅读、１0分新题型)和主观题４0分（包括10分翻译、10分小作文、20分大作文）。
主观题，视水区旱区而定，不同地区没有可比性。
而客观题,答案是唯一的,不管英语想过线的还是英语想拿高分的，客观题都不能有失。
完型20题每题0.5分，性价比较低,我当时没花太多时间复习，最后错了５个,还能接受；新题型的难度远小于阅读理解。
所以客观题里最拉分的还是阅读,阅读看似很难,实际上是有规律可循的,只要掌握了正确的方法，会有较大的提高。
我能从最初的错一大片到最后顶多错一个,靠得就是得当的方法。
方法如下：１、词汇:词汇是基础，大纲词汇必须掌握。
阅读中如果一句话中有一两个单词不认识,很可能导致这句话的意思搞错,甚至把整篇文章的主导思想搞错；如果问题选项中有单词不认识就更麻烦了。
说一下自己的体会,一开始做阅读练习的时候,错一大片，有时候甚至错一半，当时真是怕英语不过线,然后我痛定思痛,认真总结了阅读错的原因，我发现，是因为词汇关没过，文中一些单词不认识导致对文章关键句甚至作者的主体思想理解错误。
其实之前我也把单词过了一两遍，但是忘得特别快,特别是一词多义，我只记住其最基本的意思,而记不住其他意思。
所以我下决心一定要攻克单词关，我看了新东方王江涛老师的文章之后，受益匪浅,然后开始一步一步地去做。
我花了接近20天(视个人情况而定，我记东西很笨)，几乎其它什么事也不做，就背单词。
之前写错了，这20天背了两遍，后来每天花在单词上的时间明显缩短，因为已经比较熟悉了,最后四五遍背下来把单词书背得滚瓜烂熟，真的是每个单词的每一种意思都知道,而且经过四五遍记忆之后,不像以前那样容易忘了,因此两次重复的间隔周期可以延长,单词关算过了。
不过刚开始这个背单词计划的时候，真是痛苦得抓墙,不过两遍之后,轻松多了，因为记不住的越来越少，本来就记住的印象也越深。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
考研交流学习群【198233974】
中公考研 http://www.kaoyan365.cn
2015考研英语：阅读从错一大片到顶多错一个
考研英语分客观题60分(包括10分完型、40分阅读、10分新题型)和主观题40分(包括
10分翻译、10分小作文、20分大作文)。主观题，视水区旱区而定，不同地区没有可比性。
而客观题，答案是唯一的，不管英语想过线的还是英语想拿高分的，客观题都不能有失。完
型20题每题0.5分，性价比较低，我当时没花太多时间复习，最后错了5个，还能接受;
新题型的难度远小于阅读理解。所以客观题里最拉分的还是阅读，阅读看似很难，实际上是
有规律可循的，只要掌握了正确的方法，会有较大的提高。我能从最初的错一大片到最后顶
多错一个，靠得就是得当的方法。
方法如下：
1、词汇：
词汇是基础，大纲词汇必须掌握。阅读中如果一句话中有一两个单词不认识，很可能导
致这句话的意思搞错，甚至把整篇文章的主导思想搞错;如果问题选项中有单词不认识就更
麻烦了。
说一下自己的体会，一开始做阅读练习的时候，错一大片，有时候甚至错一半，当时真
是怕英语不过线，然后我痛定思痛，认真总结了阅读错的原因，我发现，是因为词汇关没过，
文中一些单词不认识导致对文章关键句甚至作者的主体思想理解错误。
所以我下决心一定要攻克单词关，学习了不少前辈的经验，受益匪浅，有一个学长说的
很好，不要指望在一个地方将单词记住，关键是要在不同的地方去记忆或者练习同一个单词，
我很以为然，于是去寻找快速记忆的捷径，最终搜了一款迈西背单词软件将单词过了一遍，
说实话，我不推荐每个人都用软件记单词，因为不方便携带，我在电脑旁足足坚忍了20多
天，每天将近2个小时，有时候眼睛都有点酸，终于将单词搞完了一轮，才长出一口气。一
轮下来(其实不止一轮，因为软件有循环记忆，不熟练的单词从不同程度上重复记忆了很多
次)，虽然有些单词还是没有完全记住，但大致都留了一个印象，在做阅读的时候明显有了
感觉，结合上下文和脑海中残留的模糊的印象，基本能猜出单词的意思，这样阅读难度就降
低了许多，而且这样过后，这个单词我也基本上掌握了，可以说是一举两得。
最后做往年真题的时候，近几年的真题阅读都是错1个或全对，考研时阅读就错了1
个，错的那个争议也比较大，不可强求吧。更重要的是英语掌握了得当的方法，节省了很多
时间，可以投入更多的精力在数学和专业课上。
因此，要想阅读得高分，必须首先攻克单词。
2、阅读技巧：
考研交流学习群【198233974】
中公考研 http://www.kaoyan365.cn
核心思想就是“分块阅读”。一篇阅读有5个问题，每个问题是按顺序分布的。比如说
一篇阅读有5段，第一问在第一段中找答案，第二问在第二段中找，以此类推，这就是所谓
的“分块阅读法”，分块阅读的基础就是——题目是按顺序分块设置的。至于如何在“块”
中发现答案，要找的就是“同义替换”，下文中会有详细介绍。(当然诸如“这篇文章的题
目应选什么?”的问题除外，需要结合整篇文章作答，不过这类问题很少)
因此阅读的技巧和关键就在于“通过问题分解文章，缩小每次的阅读内容，各个击破”。
切记不要一口气读完文章后将5个问题一齐作答，一来记不住文章的要点和细节，二来会中
出题人的陷阱(干扰项其实就是在细节上做手脚)，如偷梁换柱等。
阅读的方法如下：
(1)扫一遍5个问题，对题干信息有个印象，看一眼就行了，不需要记住。然后按顺序
精读，对含有题干信息的语句仔细阅读。另外，留意“Which of the following would be the
best title of the test?”、“The author’s attitude towards„”这之类的问题，在
分解阅读时可以顺便留意一下作者的观点态度。
(2)第一个问题，答案一般就在第一段。后面几问同理，这样整篇文章被分解成四五个
部分，一部分最多三四个长句，对每个部分认真阅读，目标清晰，很容易得到正解;同时，
每个部分，废话居多，真正的答案往往就其中一句话或其中一个关键短语，选对选项的关键
在于找准同义替换(有种题型不能用找“同义替换”的方法，后面的补充说明里有讲)。
(3)正确的选项往往以同义替换的形式出现。这一点是成败的关键，考研英语阅读的每
一个问题都是非常严谨的，其严谨在于：正确选项实质上就是原文中某句话的同义替换，而
不是靠蒙和猜，正确选项一定能在原文中找到相应的依据。
同义替换分2种。第1种是：正确选项中的某个短语和原文中的某个短语意思相同，如
explore和probe都是“探索”，shared和collective都是“共同的”，purchase和for the
sale都表示“交易、买卖”;第2种是：正确选项是对原文中某句话的概括，如：“discovery
is described as seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought”
概括起来就是“scientific work calls for acritical mind”(当然这里critical的一词
多义要非常熟悉才行);“Politicians have repeatedly“backloaded” public-sector pay
deals，keeping the pay increases modest but adding to holidays and especially
pensions that are already generous”概括起来就是“the income in the state sector
考研交流学习群【198233974】
中公考研 http://www.kaoyan365.cn
is indirectly augmented”(第二个例子的意思是“国有部门虽然工资没涨太多但是其福利
奖金有所增加”，所以概括起来就是“间接地增加了国有部门收入”)。
(4)注意出题人设置干扰项时的惯用伎俩。干扰项无非以下几种：
①偷梁换柱：原文中说“人物A做了事件B”，干扰项为可能为“人物C做了事件B”，
而人物C其实在原文中另一处出现的。如果仅凭印象选择，很容易出错。
②前后混淆：如“人物A在文中第3段提出了某观点”，干扰项可能为第1段里的某个
观点，前后顺序颠倒。原理上与偷梁换柱差不多。
③以偏概全：原文中说“事件A的必要条件是B、C、D”，干扰项可能为“如果B发生，
则A一定发生”。
④过度引申：原文中说“A今天做了某件事”，干扰项可能为“A经常做这件事”
⑤无中生有：干扰项是YY出来的，在原文中找不到依据，比过度引申更离谱
⑥曲解原文：原文中说“A很好”，干扰项可能为“A不好”，当然不会这么直接
结合原文，以原文为依据，排除干扰选项。切记凭感觉答题。
总结起来，阅读的技巧就是：
一个问题一个问题地将文章分块→读懂每块的长难句→以原文为依据→找准“同义替
换”、排除“干扰项”
3、长难句：
如果单词没问题，那唯一的难点就只剩长难句，实际上考研阅读的每个段落就三四个长
难句。攻克长难句，笨方法就是找主谓宾这些，弄清楚“谁做了什么，怎么做的”。而实际
上，英语的句式和中文有少许差异，这就是阅读时的难点。但是要知道，长难句的句式也就
那几种。只要把考研英语往年阅读真题(四五套就够了)里的每个句式都搞懂，长难句的问题
基本上可以迎刃而解。如果单词和长难句都能搞定，就能保证文章能看懂，再按上面所说的
“分块阅读法”做，阅读自然不在话下。切记，读长难句时一定要心平气和，不要贪快，特
别是基础不太好的同学，一眼扫过一个长句是不可能看懂的。一开始练习阅读的时候不要贪
快，先慢慢按方法来，有了一定的正确率之后，再逐步加快速度。
总之，阅读的方法很重要，盲目地做题，可能的结果就是做的题很多，但每次都错很多，
没有提高。我一开始也是做了一些阅读练习，但是做了没提高，有时候错得少，有时候错很
多，完全是靠运气在做阅读，而不是实力。最后我反思了自己的问题，前面已经说过了，先
考研交流学习群【198233974】
中公考研 http://www.kaoyan365.cn
攻克单词，再用“分块阅读法”，最后能稳定到错一个或全对的程度，这才是应该到达的目
的。方法最重要，不要盲目做题。英语基础不好的同学，不要怕英语，四六级没考好很可能
就是你没掌握得当的方法，只要你肯摸索、肯总结、肯吃苦(背单词一定要肯吃苦)，就一定
能成功!