Overexpression of Jagged-1 combined with blockade of CD40 pathway prolongs allograft survival
胰腺癌细胞Pancreatic cancer cells

miRNA
• Isolated CD44+ /CD133+ / EpCAM+ cells from human PC cell lines, MiaPaCa-2 and L3.6pl cells, display aggressive characteristics.
• Deregulated expression of over 400 miRNAs, including let-7, miR-30, miR-125b, and miR-335.
Notch signaling pathway
• Notch signaling has previously been shown to be required for Ras-induced transformation of fibroblasts and Hras driven tumorigenesis in a mouse mammary tumor model.
Bmi1
• Bmi1 was overexpressed in several pancreatic cancer cell lines.
• Overexpression of Bmi1 in MiaPaCa2 cells resulted in increased proliferation, in vitro invasion, larger in vivo tumors, more metastases, and gemcitabine resistance while opposite results were seen when Bmi1 was silenced in Panc-1 cells.
• efforts to develop inhibitors directly targeting Kras have failed to result in clinically effective treatment.
Tort Notes

Lecture 1 - IntroductionTort = wrongful conduct recognized by law which caused harmful consequence (damage/injury).Tort law establishes various tort actions and provide a means to redress for wrongful injury.1. Formalist v FunctionalistFormalist approach (Winfield)-Key features: The breach of a duty is primarily fixed by law. Duty is towards person. If duty is breached, it is compensated by unliquidated damages. The damages are not fixed and it is determined by the judge.Functionalist approach (Jones)-Key features: Tort is to provide remedy. Tort is concerned about ethic issues. Tort law is a set of rule which regulate behaviors.-There may be conflict of behaviors and we need to look at the objectives to balance the interest.2. The Difficulty of Defining Tortand Tortious Liability●Continually evolving area of the law●New fact situations challenging the limits of tort law●Patchwork of principles●Policy important in developing tort law3. Classification of TortsA Patchwork of Principles- no single set of tortious liability principles- series of separate causes of action – patchwork of principles- Plaintiff needs to base claim on a specific tortious cause of action (eg negligence, nuisance)- Different principles for different cause of action. See Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Southport Corporation [1954] 2 QB 182 (CA)Types of Conduct●Careless - Negligent●Deliberate - Intentional●No fault - Strict liabilityInterests Protected, Injury to:●Person●Personal property (Car, Watch…)●Real property (Land..)●Economic interests (Economic Interst…)●ReputationVariety of tort cause of actions:Example: careless injury to a person●Negligence●Breach of statutory duty●Breach of employers duty of care to employeesExample: intentional injury to a person●Assault●Battery●False imprisonment4. Who may bring a tort action?Anybody who suffer damages.Babies not yet born. (Car accident involving pregnant woman)Deceased people.No prohibition of family members suing against each other.5. Liability in TortWho can be sued in tort?Generally, any wrongdoer may be sued in a tort action. Defendants in tort actions may be:●Individuals●Children●McHale v Watson [1966] ALR 513,●Leung Kwok Lung v Ling Wai [2010] HKEC 544●Family members●Married Persons Status Ordinance (Cap 182) Section 1)●Corporations●Chau Chui Ping v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (2006) HCPI 261 of 2003●Incorporated Bodies●Aberdeen Winner Investments Company Limited v The IncorporatedOwners of Albert House & Another [2004] 3 HKLRD 910●Partnerships (Partnerships not having a recognized legal personality must besued in the name of the individual partners)●Foshan Hua Da Industrial Co v Johnson Stokes & Master (a firm) [1999]1HKLRD 418. Schools●Chan Kin Bun v Wong Sze Man and Carmel Alison Lam FoundationSecondary School [2006] 3 HKLRD 208●Universities●Yip Mau Leung v University of Hong Kong [2003] 3 HKLRD 198●Clubs●Cheng Yuen v Royal Hong Kong Golf Club [197] 2 HKC 426●Societies●Kristan Bowers Phillips v The Hong Kong Philharmonic Society Limited &Others (1997) HCPI 580 of 1996●The government●Wong Tai Wai v Hong Kong SAR Government (2004) CACV 19 and 247 of2003●Government Officials●Li Ngan Shui Brumen v Official Receiver [1995] 1 HKC 133●Statutory Bodies●Cheng Wai Leung v Pneumoconiosis Compensation Fund Board [1990] 2HKC 3336.Tort Immunity: Who may not be sued at tort?(a).Statutory Immunity1. Law Amendment Reform and (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap 23) section 22B1))– a mother who negligently causes pre-birth injury to her child is immunefrom suit by the child. (Hong Kong)Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976 sections 1(1) and (2) allow aclaim by a child for pre-birth injury inflicted by the child’s mother’s negligentdriving. (UK)2.Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance (Cap 382) Section 3Legislators has freedom of speech and debate in the Council and their speech in the council should not be questioned by the court.3.Occupiers Liability Ordinance (Cap 314) Section 7The HKSAR Government has liability in tort only if the tort commited ismentioned in Crown Proceedings Ordinance (Cap 300), in particular Section 4.4.Crown Proceedings Ordinance (Cap 300) Section 4(5)The HKSAR Government cannot be sued when some judicial officers done oromitted to done anything when they are executing the judicial process.Judicial interpretations of this section of the Ordinance:●Wong Shui Kee v Victor Chu & Others (2001) CACV 3176 of 2001●Fu Lok Man v Chief Bailiff of the High Court [1999] 2 HKLRD 835●Lincoln v Daniels [1962] 1 QB 2375. State Immunity Act 1978 (extended to Hong Kong by the State Immunity(Overseas Territories) Order 1979)This legislation raises issues about the immunity of “foreign” governments(including the Central People’s Governmen t of the PRC) from civil proceedingsbefore the Hong Kong courts.The State Immunity Act 1978A state or its representatives will not be immune in respect of proceedings inrelation to commercial matters, contract and tort claims.Before the late 1970s, an independent foreign state and its representatives could not be sued in English or Hong Kong courts without its consent (AbsoluteImmunity Doctrine).Since the late 1970s the doctrine of absolute immunity has been replaced by aDoctrine of Restrictive Immunity in many jurisdictions, like the UK and the US(Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 1976).FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v Democratic Republic of the Congo [2010] 2HKLRD 66: Restrictive approach applied in Hong Kong.Immune propertyCertain property of the state located in the jurisdiction may not be seized tosatisfy any judgment. This immune property includes the property of a state’scentral bank or monetary authority.(b). Common Law Immunity(i). Public Policy Immunity●Policy factors is taken in to account when interpreting “fair, just and reasonable”requirement in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 when deciding if the plaintiff is owed a duty of care.●Public Policy immunity is created for Government agencies and the rescueservices.Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] Ac 53 (HL)Police were immune from an action against certain operational decisions.(ii). Advocates Immunity●The generic term advocates include barristers and litigation solicitors.●For some 200 years, English advocates have enjoyed immunity from being suedfor negligence in respect of the preparation for and conduct of a case in court.●Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191: The immunity was based on public policy.Saif Ali v Sidney Mitchell & Co [1980] AC 198: The immunity extended tosolicitors who were in the same position as barristers in respect of pre-trial andadvocacy work.●The immunity was restricted to pre-trial work affecting the way the case wouldbe conducted in court and to the conduct of the case in court.●Calls for the immunity to be revoked.Arthur JS Hall & Co (A Firm) v Simons [2000] 3 WLR 543 examined the publicpolicy reasons for the advocates immunity and held that they no longer justified its retention for civil proceedings.●Moy v Pettman Smith and another [2005] 1 All ER 903: the immunity shouldalso be abolished for criminal proceedings.●Chamberlains v Lai [2005] 3 NZLR 291: Th e advocate’s negligence immunity isabolished in New Zealand.●D’Orta – Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid & Another (2005) 223 CLR 1: Theadvocate’s immunity should be retained in Australia.Advocates Immunity in Hong Kong(i). Common Law Immunity Issues●In Hong Kong, whether advocates immunity should be retained is yet to bedecided. Hong Kong advocates currently enjoy immunity from negligence actions following Rondel v Worsley●Lam Chi Kong v Tai Siu Ching & Christopher Grounds, HAC 344/2006Hong Kong barristers still enjoy the advocate’s immunity.●HKSAR v Hung Chan Wa and Another CFA File 7/2006The issu e of advocate’s immunity in Hong Kong was yet to be decided.The change is due to the changes in the law of negligence, the functioning of the legal profession, the administration of justice and public perceptions.No view is expressed on whether the change should be made in HK.(ii). Statutory Immunity Issues●In Hong Kong, there is statutory recognition on advocates immunity.●Section 5 of the Supply of Services (Implied Terms) Ordinance Cap 457There is an implied term in a services contract that a supplier of services willcarry out the services “with reasonable care and skill”.Section 1 states that Section 5 is excluded for advocate service in court, tribunal, inquiry or arbitrator, and in carrying out preliminary work directly affecting the conduct of hearing.(iii). Public Law Issues●The Basic Law, Article 35:“Hong Kong residents shall have the right to …,access to the courts, …to judicial remedies.”●The Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance Cap 383, Article 10:“In the determination …of his rights and obligations in a suit at law everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing…”●Both the Basic Law and Bill of Rights Ordinance guarantee Hong Kong peopleaccess to the courts.●The issue arises as to whether these rights are denied by advocate’s immunityfrom tort actions.●If it is found that the right to access to the courts are denied, it still need tosatisfy the rationality and proportionality tests set out by the Court of FinalAppeal in HKSAR v Lam Kwong Wai and Lam Ka Man, FACC No 4 of 2005.●There is a possibility of a “constitutional” tort action for damages resulting fromthe advocate’s immunity. Section 6 of the Bill of Rights Ordinance provides that remedies for breach of the ordinance include such remedy, relief or order thatthe court considers “appropriate and just in the circumstances”.●The issue of the continuation or abolition of advocate’s immunity in Hong Kongraises many issues. These include:●An examination of the policy behind the immunity●Public law issues under the Basic Law and Hong Kong Bill of RightsOrdinance.●The suitability of the immunity for conditions in Hong Kong today● A review of the law in other common law jurisdictions7. Aims and Objectives of Tort Law(i). CompensationLivingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25The damages in tort law aims to put the injured party in the same position as ifhe had never sustained the wrong conduct.D v East Berkshire NHS Trust [2005] 2 AC 373 (HL)The public interest in law enforcement and the administration of justice doessometimes require potential liabilities to be excluded notwithstanding that those “wronged” are not compensated.E.g. Psychiatric and financial harm to business competitors is not compensated.→ Competition is good for the economy and society.E.g. Psychiatric harm from family problems (Marriage or pre-marriage) is notcompensated. → They should be dealt with by the individuals.Mustapha v Culligan of Canada Ltd [2008] SCC 27Minor and transient upsets (not from personal injury) do not constitute personal injury, and hence do not amount to damage.Reid v Rush & Tompkins Plc [1990] 1 WLR 212 (CA)Criminal injury may not be compensated.If the wrongdoer has no money, the sufferer cannot be compensated.(ii). DeterranceLister v Romford Ice & Cold Storage Co Ltd [1957] AC 555 (HL)Tort Damages is used as a sanction to demand the servant should exercise hisproper skill and care in the performance of his duty.(iii). Appeasement – Retributive JusticeBroome v Cassell & Co [1972] Ac 1027 (HL)Tort law originally is used to discourage private revenge in a primitive society.Nowadays, it is regarded as a punishment for wrong doers.(iv). Justice IssuesFair, Just and ReasonableCaparo Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 (HL)Fair just and reasonable is a consideration in determining whether a duty of care is owed.Doing JusticeVellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [2002] 1 WLR 218 (CA)The breach of duty of an officer to a prisoner should be recognized to do justice.Practical JusticeWhite v Jones [1995] 2 AC 207 (HL)T he court will have to fashion ‘an effective remedy for the solicitor’s breach ofhis professional duty to his client’ in such a way as to repair the injustice to thedisappointed beneficiary.Attorney-General v Blake [2001] 1 AC 268 (HL)Doing practical justice was a major objective of the work of the judge as practical justice is expected by the public.(v). RightsPrivacy RightsWainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 (HL)English law is unwilling to formulate a high-level principle in tort to protectprivacy. There is already a number of common law and statutory remedies toprotect privacy.Constitutional RightsWatkins v Home Office [2006] UKHL 17Constitutional right is not sufficiently precise in defining whether an abuse ofright should give rise to a tort action.(vi). Interest - Recognition of interestsRevenue and Customs Commissioners v Total Network SL [2008] 2 WLR 711 (HL) The function of an action of damages is to provide a remedy for interests thatare recognized by the law as entitled to protection.(vii). Loss Distribution v Loss Shifting IssuesSpartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors Ltd) [1973] 1 QB 27 (CA)People should put up with the hazard of cutting of the supply of electricitywithout seeking compensation. They should make up the loss by doing morework the next day. (Loss Distribution)8. Theories of Tort Law(i). Compensation TheoriesBroome v Cassel & Co Ltd [1972] Ac 1027 (HL)The main purpose of tort law is compensation.(ii). Economic TheoriesWildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow LBC [2001] 2 AC 1 (HL)The construction of railways has disrupted the lives and businesses of a largenumber of people. Judges need to confine the right to compensation rigidly toprevent floodgates of arguments.Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923 (HL)Liability to pay compensation for loss caused by negligent conduct acts as adeterrent against increasing the cost of the activity to the community andreduces externalities (Cost pay by the other people).(iii). Corrective v Distributive JusticeMcFarlane v Tayside Health Board [2000] 2 AC 59 (HL)Surgeon’s negligent advise that a vasectomy had rendered the husband infertile.The woman is pregnant.Corrective justice (Indemnity approach): The couple should gain all thecompensation to raise the child.Distributive justice (Just distribution of burdens and losses): The couple shouldnot get a full compensation to raise the child.Distributive justice, which is a moral theory, should apply here. The standard is aobjective ordinary citizen.9. Overlap of Tort and Other Areas of the Law(i). Tort and Contract●Possible concurrent tortious and contractual liability●No double recovery●Different principles for tort and contract actions and assessment of damagesCocurrent LiabilityHenderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 (HL)Concurrent claim in tort and contract is allowed. The claimant is entitled to takeadvantage of the remedy which is most advantageous to him.(ii). Tort and Crime●Some torts are also crimes●Tort - claim by individual●Crime - prosecution by the state●Great difference in civil and criminal proceedingsCivil process v Criminal ProcessArthur J.S. Hall & Co v Simons [2002] 1 AC 615 (HL)Civil: Infringement of right by one party to another party. Remedy is seek from the default party.Criminal: It is concerned on the public interest of the society. The guilty are punished.10. Tort Liability Law of the PRC (See 62-64)11. Sources of Hong Kong Tort LawA Solicitor v The Law Society of Hong Kong [2008] 2 HKLRD 576“It is of great benefit to the Hong Kong courts to examine comparativejurisprudence in seeking the appropriate solution for the problems which comebefore them….At the end of the day, the courts in Hong Kong must decide f orthemselves what is appropriate for our jurisdiction.”“The great strength of the common law lies in its capacity to develop to meet the changing needs and circumstances of the society in which it functions”The court has the power to depart from its previous decision of the Privy Councilon Appeal from Hong Kong, however, this power will be exercised most sparingly.12. A Brief History of Tort Law●Predominance of procedure – forms of action●Writ of trespass –“fertile mother of actions” 1250(i). Trespass and Case●Trespass – direct injury●Trespass on the case – indirect injury or omission●Negligence and action on the case●Wilkinson v Downton (1897) 2QB57●Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 (CA)Distinction between trespass and case is obsolete.Modern approach: Distinction should be intentional or unintentional.Personal injury cause of action:Intentional → Assault or BatteryUnintentional → Negligence(ii). Transition of Forms of Action to Causes of ActionLetang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 (CA)Traditionally, remedy was obtained according to the particular kind of factual situation which constituted the cause of action. (forms of action)The Judicature Act 1873 abolished forms of action. Causes of action remained to be used by lawyers and legislators.Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 (HL)The Common Law Procedure Act 1852 (15 & 16 Vict c76) abolishes the forms of action. Common lawyers separated the law of obligations into contract and tort.Back to the Future●History of tort law resulted in today’s patchwork of principles and differentactions●Historical development of tort influenced by:●Economic changes●Social changes●Rise of the welfare state●Modern development of tort influenced by:●Insurance●Compensation culture●Human Rights legislation●Tort law over the last 100 years dominated by negligence actionLecture 2 - Duty of Care1. Negligence - Introduction●Most dominant modern tort●Shift from precedent to principle●Focus on fault (defendant’s cond uct)●Harm still needs to be considered (plaintiff’s injury)●Changing judicial approaches2. Elements of NegligenceLochgelly Iron and Coal Co v McMullen [1934] AC 1, 25Negligence includes a complex concept of duty, breach and damage thereby suffered by the person to whom the duty was owing.●Duty of care (owed by defendant to plaintiff)●Breach of duty (by defendant)●Causation (in law and in fact)●Damage (type recognized by law)●Remoteness (kind of or occurrence of damage)**All the above elements overlap**The concept of “foreseeability” arises in respect of several of these elements3. The Duty Concept(i). Function●Defines…people…relationships…interests which qualify for legal protection●Control device for determining acceptable behaviour by imposing negligenceliability●No duty owed – no liability for negligenceLe Lievre v Gould [1893] 9QB 491“A man is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to them.”Differentiates various kinds of damage in determining which legal interests to protect Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2AC 605It is important to determine the scope of the duty by reference to the kind of damage from which A must take care to save B harmless.(ii). Established Duty of Care Situations (Precedent)-The existence of duty of care is not contentious if precedent exists.-Negligence claims for acts directly causing physical damage to persons or property do not generally give rise to a duty of care issue.Mobil Oil Hong Kong Ltd v Hong Kong United Dockyards Ltd [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 309“(T)he question of the existence of the duty of care does not give rise to any problem because it is self evident that such a duty exists and the contrary view is unarguable.”(iii). Establishing a General Duty of Care Principle (Principle)Winfield & Jolowicz, Tort (2010) 157Three periods in the history of law must be distinguished.(iii)(a). 1932●Before 1932No general test or principle for determining existence of dutyHeaven v Pender [1883] 11 QBD 503Attempt to state general principle for establishing existence of duty of care,defeated.●In 1932Neighbour Principle [NP]Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562The Neighbour PrincipleDonoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (Foreseeability and Proximity)•The manufacturer of an article of food, medicine or the like, sold by him to a distributor in circumstances which prevent the distributor or the ultimatepurchaser or consumer from discovering by inspection any defect, is under alegal duty to the ultimate purchaser or consumer to take reasonable care that the article is free from defect likely to cause injury to health.•There should be a general conception of relations giving rise to duty of care.•The offender must pay for the liability for negligence, but the range of complains should be limited.•You must love your neighbour→ You must not injure your neighbour (strict definition of neighbour).•You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.•Neighbour are the persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation (in consideration) asbeing so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions whichare called in question.Obiter dictum:●General conception of relations●Strict, to limit the range of complainants●Apply to acts or omissions●Passive duty to avoid injury●Harm or injury must be caused●Care must be reasonable, no more no less●Foreseeable●Likely cause harm or damage●Close and direct relations (proximity)Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562The categories of negligence are never closed.(iii) (b). From 1932-1970●Test for duty based on reasonable foreseeability of harm gradually acceptedand applied unless there is justifications or valid explanations.●Modifications for the Neighbour Principle to meet new circumstances. Hedley Byrne & Co v Heller & Partners Ltd**Neighbour principle rejected for liability for negligent misstatement resulting in pure economic loss. Since it will lead to a too wide liability, the liability is based on special relationship. Negligent words are different from negligent acts.Dorset Yacht v Home Office [1970] AC 1004, 1070(A). Comparison to precedents:●Based upon cumulative experience of the judiciary of the actual consequencesof the lack of care in particular instances●Proceeds by seeking first to identify the relevant characteristics that arecommon to the kinds of conduct and relationships between the parties in actual case, compared to the kinds of conduct and relationships which have been held in previous decisions to give rise to a duty●Gives effect to the judge’s conception of the public interestRelevant character in this case:Plaintiff owed a duty of care if:●Boys under the defendants control●Special conduct or relationship to defendant●Manifest risk if defendant neglected that duty●Reasonable in all circumstances to impose a duty**Public Policy did not require immunity(B). Elimination: (Distinguish from precedents)Ellis v Home Office [1953] 2AllER 149D’Arcy v Prison Commissioners [Times 15 November 1955]- The difference is that the prisoners in these cases are still in custody, but notescaped.- In Dorset, there is distinctive added risk for the boys will steal or appropriateand damage property nearby to elude pursuit.(iii) (c). From 1970-1978●Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 dealt with a defective product likely tocause injury to health (physical injury)●Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin [1973] 1QB 27 extended Neighbour Principleto property damage but recovery not allowed for pure economic loss●Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728 introduced the “twostage” testAnns v Merton LBC [1978] AC 728Issue 1: Duty of cared owed by the council to the plaintiff for the inspection?There is sufficient proximity. (Duty of care existed)The council acted outside the scope of discretion permitted by statue. (Breach) Issue 2: When should the claim be time barred?Claim accrued when there is danger, not the time of construction.Two Part test:1. Whether the damage is foreseeable? If yes, it is in a sufficient relationship of proximity. (Forseeability is the test of proximity).2. Considerations to limit the scope of the duty (Policy Considerations).Types of policy considerations include:●Floodgates of litigation●Exercise of statutory duties and powers●Alternative compensation – insurance●Ethics●Legislature is better forum for deciding the issue(iii) (d). From 1978-1983●Two stage test led to expansion of negligence into new areas●Recovery allowed for pure economic lossJunior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co [1983] 1AC 520Damages are awarded to pure economic loss. This violates the tort law as pure economic loss should be sued in contract.High water mark in expansion of duty of care and negligence.(iii) (e). From 1983-1988●Criticisms of Anns two stage approach:●First stage appears to allow plaintiff to easily establish a prima facie dutyof care by reference to foreseeability of harm.●Seco nd stage arguably requires defendant to advocate “policy” reasonsfor rejecting or limiting duty of care.The Retreat from the Anns ApproachGovernors of the Peabody Donation Fund v Sir Lindsay Parkinson Ltd [1985] AC 210 No duty found from the deviation from building plans which caused lossDeviation agreed to by plaintiff’s employeeAnns test is rejected and Just and Reasonable Test introducedCurran v Northern Ireland Co-Ownership Housing Association [1987] AC 718●Defendant had statutory duty, before making grant, to ensure extension wasbuilt to a satisfactory standard. The extension was defective. Plaintiffs claim torecover economic loss denied. Held statutory duty was to ensure public moneyproperly spent not to protect grant recipient and successors in title.Yuen Kun Yeu v Attorney General of Hong Kong [1988] AC 175The two stage test is wrong as test for forseeability and proximity should beseparated. Forseeability alone is not enough to establish proximity. All thecircumstances should be taken account.Public Policy test should arise in only a limited category.●Close and direct relationship between the parties had to be established beforeliability in tort for negligence could arise●Unlike Dorset Yacht, Commissioner had no control over the DTC's●Commissioner not negligently misrepresenting creditworthiness of a DTC when itremained registered, since his statutory duty was mainly to supervise. Purposeof Ordinance considered.●Two stage test in Anns is not to be regarded in all circumstances as a suitableguide to the existence of a duty of careSutherland Shire Council v Heyman and Another [1985] 60 ALR 1Just and reasonable test is used.(iii)(f). From 1988-2007 (Current Approach)1. Development in criteria in Tort LawPage v Smith [1996] AC 155Tort law is applied to psychiatric illness.●Statement or advice given to a known recipient●Specific purpose of which the maker was aware●Upon which the recipient had relied and acted to his detriment Auditors owed duty to shareholders in making the report, but not to future shareholders (potential investors).。
硝基苯类废水的全混态零价铁-芬顿组合预处理工艺优化与工程验证

第34卷第1期2021年2月污染防治技术POLLUTIO N C ONTROL TE C H N OL O GYVol.34,No.1Feb2021硝基苯类废水的全混态零价铁-芬顿组合预处理工艺优化与工程验证李杰,王骏(南京华创环境技术研究院有限公司,江苏南京211100)摘要:针对企业硝基氯苯装置产生的高毒性、难降解的硝基苯类废水,开发出全混态零价铁-芬顿组合预处理工艺,并分别优化了零价铁还原和芬顿氧化的工艺条件。
结果表明,pH为2.0、零价铁投加量为220mg/L时,废水中硝基苯类物质的去除率可达98.5%以上。
出水pH约为3.0,继续投加3000m//L的1。
2,Fe2+投加比按C(Fe2+,m//L):C(1。
2, m//L)=1:10,1h内COD去除率可达90%以上,且B/C由0.08提高到0.45。
可见该组合预处理工艺可大幅削减废水毒性、改善可生化性,且直接运行成本仅为26.28元/吨,具有良好的环境和经济效益。
关键词:硝基苯类;全混态;零价铁还原;芬顿;组合预处理中图分类号:X730文献标识码:AOptimization and Engineering Verification of Full-mixed Zero-valentIron-Fenton Combined Pretreatment Process for Nitrobenzene WastewaterLO Jie,WANG Jun(Nanjing Huachuang Institute of Environmental Technology Co.,Ltd.Nanjing Jiangsu211100,China)Abstract:Based on the highly toxie and Xifficult-to-XegraXe nitrobenzene waste water produced by the nitrochlorobenzene plant of an enterprise,a fully mixed zero-valent iron-Fenton pretreatment procese wae developed,and tOe procese conditione of reduct tion of zero-valent iron and Fenton oxidation wero optimized respectively.The resulte showed that when the pH wae2.0and the amount of zero-valent iron added wae220m/L,the remove.rate of nitrobenzene compounds in wastewateo can reach moro than 98.5%.The pH of the effluent of the last process wae about3.0,and3000m/L HO wae added subsequently,Fe2+wae added with the ratio of C(Fe2+,m/L):C(H O?,mg/L)=1:10,and the COD removat rate can reach more than90%in1houo,B/ C ratio wae sivnificantly improved from0.08te0.45.Ot can be seen that the combined premeatment process can greatly reduce the toxicity of wastewater and iniprove biodearadabiUm,and the direct operatin/cost wae only26.28RMB/ton,which had/ood environmental and economic benefits.Key words:nitrobenzenes;fully mixed;zero-ralent iron reduction;Fenton;combined pretreatment1概述硝基苯类物质具有强烈的致癌致突变性,广泛存在于染料、农药、医药等工业废水中。
Reputation and Perfection in Repeated Common Interest Games

Ž.GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR18,141᎐1581997ARTICLE NO.GA970520Reputation and Perfection in Repeated CommonInterest Games*Martin W.Cripps and Jonathan P.ThomasDepartment of Economics,Uni¨ersity of Warwick,Co¨entry CV47AL,EnglandReceived June18,1993We consider a wide class of repeated common interest games perturbed withŽ.one-sided incomplete information:one player the informed player might be acommitment type playing the Pareto dominant action.As discounting,which isassumed to be symmetric,and the prior probability of the commitment type go tozero,it is shown that the informed player can be held close to her minmax payoffeven when perfection is imposed on the equilibrium.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification Numbers:C73,D83.ᮊ1997Academic Press1.INTRODUCTIONTwo-person common interest games are defined as games with a stronglyŽ.Pareto-dominant payoff vector Aumann&Sorin,1989.If the game is repeated infinitely often and if the players are patient,it might be expected that they would be able to coordinate and receive average payoffs close to the dominant payoff vector.It is,however,an implication of the Folk theorem for repeated games that there exist equilibria in which patient players receive payoffs substantially below the dominant payoff vector. Moreover,even imposing subgame perfection does not alter this general Ž.result Fudenberg and Maskin,1986.That such inefficient equilibria can survive in the long run when players are very patient seems counterintu-itive,and in this paper we shall investigate whether perfection,when applied to a simple‘‘reputation’’model,can lead to such undesirable equilibria being eliminated.Specifically,we shall consider perturbing a common interest game with Ž.only the possibility that one of the players,say player1,might be a type committed to playing a cooperative action,that is,the action correspond-*We express our gratitude to Klaus Schmidt,an associate editor,and an anonymous referee for useful comments.Our thanks are also due to seminar participants at Bonn, Edinburgh,Erasmus,Exeter,and Tilburg for comments.All remaining errors are our responsibility.1410899-8256r97$25.00Copyrightᮊ1997by Academic PressAll rights of reproduction in any form reserved.142CRIPPS AND THOMASing to the dominant payoff vector.The other player,player2,is unsure of player1’s type.This will allow the possibility of a reputation effect,whereŽplayer1can mimic the commitment strategy of always playing the .cooperative action in the hope of convincing player2of her cooperative intentions.The question we address is:‘‘Will this form of incomplete information allow us to rule out at least the most undesirable equilibria as the players become very patient?’’If the equilibrium concept is that of Nash equilibrium,the answer is negative.1We shall consider whether reputation arguments might nevertheless have a degree of power when the equilibrium concept is refined to incorporate some notion of perfectness. Our results will show that the answer to the question is still negative,in that a small perturbation of the original common interest game has little effect on the attainable equilibria,and extremely undesirable equilibria still exist.In fact,if attention is restricted to pure strategy equilibria,imposing perfection does lead to payoffs close to the Pareto-dominant pair.If a pure-strategy equilibrium leads to payoffs substantially below the Pareto-Ž.dominant‘‘cooperative’’payoff pair,then there must be periods in which one or both players do not play the cooperative actions.If,in thefirst period this occurs,player1is supposed to play noncooperatively,then by cooperating instead she will establish a reputation for being the commit-ment type,and cooperative payoffs are guaranteed thereafter;hence not cooperating cannot be an equilibrium strategy.It must therefore be player 2who isfirst supposed to play noncooperatively,and in a Nash equilibrium this can be enforced by severe off-the-equilibrium-path punishments by player1.But suppose that we impose perfection on the equilibrium.To punish player2,player1must,at some point,play noncooperatively.By not doing so,however,she will establish a reputation for being the commitment type and hence guarantee herself the cooperative payoff thereafter.Roughly speaking,player1cannot credibly punish because she can always‘‘hide behind’’the possibility of being the commitment type Ž.2and has every incentive to do so.Our reason for studying common interest games is that in this class of games this argument seems to be most powerful,and so reputation has the best opportunity to work effec-tively.1Even the assumption of two-sided uncertainty of the type we assume does not forceŽ.cooperation in Nash equilibrium.Aumann&Sorin1989construct a mixed-strategy coun-Ž.terexample to their main result,which assumes pure strategies in which cooperation is not approximated as the players become patient.2Formally,it is easy to establish that for afixed probability of the commitment type and for a given⑀,there is a threshold discount factor above which all pure-strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium payoffs are within⑀of the dominant payoff pair.It should be noted,however, that this depends on the assumption that the perturbation only involves the above described automaton.REPUTATION AND PERFECTION143 We show,however,that if mixed strategies are permitted,then credible and severe punishments are still possible.Our main result,Proposition3, establishes that in a wide class of repeated common interest games,as discounting goes to zero and as the prior probability attached to the commitment type goes to zero,the normal type of player1can be driven close to her minmax payoff.Hence this is a continuity result with the complete information game as the probability of the perturbation goes to zero.Mixed strategies play an important role in the construction because a randomization by the normal type of player1between the cooperative and some other action,can allow her to credibly punish player2if the latter deviates.Specifically,if she randomizes and player2deviates,there is a probability that player2deviates simultaneously with player1revealing herself to be the normal type;if this happens,the continuation game is a complete information game where severe punishments are credible.More-over,an equilibrium in which player1puts positive probability on an action other than the cooperative one need not imply that she receives a continuation payoff equal to the cooperation payoff should she play the cooperative action.In that case,player2will revise upwards the probabil-ity he attaches to facing the commitment type,but not to one,so the continuation payoff need not equal the cooperation payoff.Consequently punishment can be threatened by player1in a way which does not imply cooperation payoffs thereafter.Although this result is,in the context of the reputation literature,a negative one,we see it additionally as afirst step toward investigating perfect equilibria in general incomplete information games.This is of interest because,to our knowledge,nothing is known about generalŽ. properties of the equilibrium payoff set Nash or perfect of general discounted incomplete information games as discounting becomes small.3 This is in contrast to the undiscounted case where complete characteriza-Ž.tions exist,although only for Nash equilibria see Forges,1992.2.THE MODEL AND RESULTSWe begin by describing a broad class of common interest games.When these games are infinitely repeated,with both players discounting theŽ.future with the same factor␦0-␦-1,there is a large set of possibleŽ. equilibrium outcomes.In particular,given any pair g,g of feasible123Ž.Bergin1989shows that sequential equilibria have a Markov property;unfortunately this result does not directly have bearing upon the set of payoffs which can realized in equilib-Ž.Ž. rium.The same can be said for the results of Kalai and Lehrer1993and Jordan1995,who have studied the long-run properties of equilibrium play in contexts more general than the current one.CRIPPS AND THOMAS144strictly individually rational payoffs,there is a discount factor ␦such that for all ␦)␦there exists a subgame perfect equilibrium with the payoffs Ž.g ,g .The repeated common interest games we consider are then 12perturbed so that player 1is either a ‘‘normal’’type or a commitment type,hereafter ‘‘automaton,’’that always plays the Pareto optimal action.Player 2has prior beliefs that attach a probability to player 1being the automaton and a probability 1y to her being a normal type.In our main result,Proposition 3,we show that given any )0,there exists a Ž.␦0-␦-1and )0such that for any ␦)␦and -there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium in which the normal type receives a payoff within of her minmax payoff.2.1.A Class of Common Interest GamesIn this subsection we shall describe the class of common interest games that are studied in this paper.First we define some notation.A finite 2-player game in strategic form is denoted byg s g ,g :A =A ªR 2,Ž.1212Ž.where A is player i ’s finite action space we assume ࠻A G 2,i s 1,2i i Ž.and g is player i ’s payoff function,i s 1,2.Let a [a ,a denote an i 12action profile for the two players and A [A =A be the set of all action 12ÄŽŽ.Ž..profiles.The convex hull of all payoffs is the set G [co g a ,g a N a 1244g A .Let M be a positive number that bounds the payoffs of the players:<Ž.<Ž.M G g a for all a g A ,i s 1,2.Also let the pair g ,g denote the i 12players’minmax payoffsg [min max E g a ,a ,j /i ,i s 1,2,Ž.i ␣,␣i 12i j ␣␣j i where ␣is a mixed action for player i .Define the set of feasible and i ÄŽ.2strictly individually rational payoffs to be G *[G l g ,g g R N g )1214g ,g )g .122We consider a class of common interest games,that is,a class of games Ž.with a strongly Pareto dominant payoff pair Aumann and Sorin,1989,although we shall restrict our attention to games in which the payoff vector ŽU U .to one pair of actions strictly Pareto dominates all others.Let a ,a g A 12denote the action pair corresponding to the Pareto-dominant pair,that is U ŽU U .Ž.U ŽU U .Ž.g [g a ,a )g a and g [g a ,a )g a for all a g A where 1112122122ŽU U .a /a ,a .We make three assumptions about the structure of the 124Ž.co X denotes the convex hull of the set X .REPUTATION AND PERFECTION 145payoffs.These assumptions place some limits on the generality of our results but simplify the arguments considerably.5ˆŽ.i Let A ;A be the set of actions for player 2that give player 22ˆÄ1no more than g if she plays her Pareto optimal action:A [a g 122U ˆŽ.4Ž.A N g a ,a F g .By the definition of g the set A is nonempty.The 2112112ˆset A could be interpreted as the set of possible punishments for player 12if she is playing a U .The first assumption we make is that action a U is not 11ˆalways the unique best response to an action in A ;that is,for some 2ˆU a g A ,there exists a /a such thatˆˆ2211g a ,a G g a ,a ,for all a g A .1Ž.Ž.ˆˆˆŽ.11211211Ž.A sufficient though by no means necessary condition for this is if action a U does not ensure player 1her minmax payoff in the game,that is,if 1U Ž.Ž.min g a ,a -g .Henceforth a ,a will refer to a fixed action ˆˆa g A 11211222U ˆŽ.pair,with a /a and a g A,which satisfies 1.The payoffs when ˆˆ1122Ž.Ž.Ž.actions a ,a are taken will be denoted g [g a ,a ,g [g a ,a .ˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆ1211122212Ž.ii Our second assumption is that there exist feasible and individu-ally rational payoffs that hold both players down to their minmax levels.That is,i i i i ᭚g ,g g G such that a g s g ,b g G g ,i s 1,2,j /i .2Ž.Ž.Ž.˜˜˜˜Ž.12i i j j Ž.iii Our third assumption is that the set G *has a nonempty interior.Given the second and third assumptions above,the set G has the form Ž11.ŽŽ..ŽU U .shown in Fig.1.The dashed line between g ,g see 2and g ,g ˜˜1212will be used in the construction of an equilibrium.This line will be described by the equation g s ␣q g ,where )0.212.2.The Repeated Game of Complete InformationThe game in strategic form described above is played in the periods Ž.t s 0,1,2,....In each period,players are aware of all pure actions taken in previous periods.Player i ’s payoff in this infinitely repeated game is given by the expected discounted sum of its normalized stage-game pay-Ž.ϱt Žt t .Ž.t Žt t .offs,E 1y ␦Ý␦g a ,a i s 1,2,where a [a ,a g A is the t s 0i 1212players’action profile in period t ,␦is their common discount factor Ž.Ž.0-␦-1,and E denotes expectations.We will let G ␦denote the 5Ž.Assumption ii can be relaxed at the cost of some additional complications and an Ž.appropriate reformulation of Proposition 3.Assumption iii is also not essential;the case where the feasible set is one-dimensional was treated in an earlier version,although some of Ž.the constructions needed differ.We conjecture that assumption i is likewise inessential,although we have not proved this.146CRIPPS AND THOMASF IGURE1infinitely repeated game of complete information.Given our assumptions on the structure of payoffs in the stage game,the Perfect Folk Theorem Ž.applies to G␦provided␦is sufficiently close to one.By Fudenberg&Ž.Maskin1991the following result holds for the repeated game of com-Ž.plete information G␦when only pure strategies are observed and there is no public randomization.Ž.Ž.R ESULT1Fudenberg&Maskin,1991.For any g,g g G*there12exists␦-1such that for all1)␦)␦there is a subgame perfect equilibrium Ž.of G␦in which player i’s a¨erage payoff is g.iIn general,the lower bound␦in Result1will vary with the point Ž.g,g g G*that is being sustained as the equilibrium payoff vector.This 12ŽX X.Ž. is because the threshold␦varies with the threat point g,g-g,g1212Ž.used in the proof.By considering those payoff pairs g,g g G*that can12REPUTATION AND PERFECTION 147ŽX X .be supported as equilibrium payoff using a fixed threat point g ,g ,the 12following corollary to Result 1is immediate.U ÄŽ.2C OROLLARY .Let ⑀)0be gi ¨en ,and define G [G l g ,g g R ⑀12U 4N g G g q ⑀,g G g q ⑀;then pro ¨ided G is nonempty ,there is a 1122⑀Ž.U ␦-1such that for all ␦-␦-1and any g ,g g G there is a ⑀⑀12⑀Ž.subgame perfect equilibrium of G ␦in which player i ’s a ¨erage payoff is g .i ŽRecall that the parameter )0is the slope of the dashed line in Fig..1.2.3.The Perturbed Repeated GameWe now introduce a perturbation of the repeated game of common Ž.interests G ␦described above.Before the play commences there is a move of nature,the outcome of which is not observed by player 2.With probability 1y ,nature selects player 1to be a type with payoffs as described above,and with probability ,nature selects a player 1to be a type that always plays action a U independently of history.We will call the 1first type of player 1‘‘the normal type’’and the second type of player 1‘‘the automaton.’’As player 2does not observe nature’s move,this gives a repeated game of one-sided incomplete information which we will denote Ž.Ž.G ,␦and we will study the perfect Bayesian equilibria PBEs of this game.6We adopt the definition of perfect Bayesian equilibrium given by Fuden-Ž.t berg &Tirole 1991a ,which in this context amounts to the following.If h is any history of actions taken by both players up to and including period t ,Žt .then given player 2’s beliefs about facing the automaton,say h ,at the start of period t q 1,strategies must yield a Bayesian Nash equilibrium for the continuation game.7Moreover Bayes’rule is used to update beliefs Žt q 1.Žt .whenever possible;that is,h is derived from h by Bayes’rule whenever player 1plays an action at period t which player 2had expected to be played with positive probability.6The automaton can also be thought of as a type with a standard payoff matrix in which the payoffs in the row corresponding to a U are all equal and strictly greater than all other 1payoffs.At a PBE this type will play a U after every history,including those off the 1equilibrium path.7Ž.The reader is referred to Fudenberg and Tirole 1991a,1991b for formal definitions of all equilibrium concepts used here.For the purpose of the definitions,the automaton should be interpreted as a payoff-matrix type as described in footnote 6;the strategy of such a type in a PBE must be identical to the automaton strategy.This is in contrast to a Nash equilibrium where the payoff-matrix type need only follow the commitment strategy on the equilibrium path.In the equilibria we construct,beliefs off-the-equilibrium path put probability zero on the automaton if player 1has deviated from a U in the past,which is consistent with the idea 1of an automaton which cannot deviate.CRIPPS AND THOMAS148Proposition 1exploits the natural recursive structure of the repeated Ž.games of incomplete information G ,␦to determine a relationship Ž.Ž.between a PBE of G ,␦and a PBE of G ,␦where -1.The principal idea of the proof is very simple.It takes as given a PBE of Ž.Ž.G ,␦with payoffs ␥,␥to the normal type and player 2,respectively,12Ž.and uses this PBE to construct a PBE of G ,␦.In the first period of Ž.U play in G ,␦the normal type of player 1randomizes,playing a with 1Ž.Ž.Žprobability q s 1y r 1y and a with probability 1y q where ˆ1Ž..a is defined below 1.Player 2plays a in the first period.Conditional ˆˆ12U Župon observing a in the first period,player 2will revise his priors about 1.Žplayer 1being an automaton by Bayes’Theorem to precisely given our .ŽU .choice of q .Thus if a ,ais played in the first period,we specify that ˆ12Ž.Ž.the PBE of G ,␦is then played out subsequently,with payoffs ␥,␥.12Ž.ŽU .In this case the expected payoff to the normal type is 1y ␦g a ,a q ˆ112␦␥.In order for randomization for the normal type to be optimal in the 1first period,she must be indifferent between this payoff and what she would receive from playing a in the first period.After the first period ˆ1Ž.history a ,a ,however,she reveals herself to be the normal type,so the ˆˆ12Ž.players are in the complete information game G ␦.Thus it is necessary Ž.that an equilibrium of G ␦can be chosen which makes player 1indiffer-Žent this equilibrium can also be used as the continuation after all actions of player 1other than a U since ais a best response to a ,so the normal ˆˆ112.type will not wish to deviate .In addition,the continuation equilibrium must be selected so that it is optimal for player 2to choose a in the first ˆ2Ž.period;this requires that another equilibrium of G ␦can be chosen asŽ0.0the continuation after a ,a ,where a /a,which is sufficiently severe ˆˆ1222to prevent player 2from deviating.Provided these two equilibria can be Ž.Žconstructed,a PBE of G ,␦has been found with the payoff 1y .ŽU .ŽU .␦g a ,a q ␦␥to the normal type.Since by construction g a ,a F ˆˆ1121112Ž.g ,it follows that the equilibrium of G ,␦has a lower payoff for the 1Ž.normal type than the equilibrium of G ,␦,a property that will,by repeated application of Proposition 1,permit the construction of a PBE with payoffs for the normal type arbitrarily close to her minmax payoff.Define ⑀)0to be such that G U is nonempty.Then we can state:⑀Ž.P ROPOSITION 1.Let ⑀,0-⑀-⑀,and ␦)␦be gi ¨en .Also let ␥,␥⑀12be the expected payoffs to the normal type of player 1and to player 2at a Ž.Ž.PBE for G ,␦.Then G ,␦has a PBE where the normal type of player Ž.ŽU .Ž1recei ¨es the expected payoff 1y ␦g a ,aq ␦␥pro ¨ided with ˆ1121.0--1and ␥satisfy1U y 1␥G g q 1y ␦␦g y g a ,a q 2M q ⑀,3Ž.Ž.Ž.ˆˆŽ.111112REPUTATION AND PERFECTION 1491y U U ␦␣q ␥y g y ⑀y 1y ␦g y g q g y g a ,aŽ.Ž.Ž.ˆˆˆŽ.Ž.12221112F .U U 1y ␦g y g a ,a Ž.ˆŽ.22124Ž.Proof.See the Appendix.Ž.The above proposition allows us to generate an equilibrium for G ,␦Ž.Ž.Ž.using an equilibrium of G ,␦,provided the bounds 3and 4on ␥1and are satisfied.Proposition 2below repeatedly applies Proposition 1.Ž.The first step is to describe a PBE for G 1,␦,which is the complete information game between player 2and the automaton.Player 2’s best response to the automaton is to play the action a U in every period,so in 1Ž.ŽU U .G 1,␦there is a PBE where the players play a ,a in every period.This 12equilibrium is used as a starting point for repeated applications of Proposi-tion 1.The next step is to apply Proposition 1to this PBE to find a PBE Ž1.Ž1.for G ,␦where -1;at this PBE,player 2plays a for one period ˆ2Ž.0U and then G 1,␦is played if a s a .The whole process can be repeated 11Ž1.by applying Proposition 1to the PBE of G ,␦to find a new PBE for Ž12.Ž2.G ,␦where -1;at this PBE,a is played for two periods ˆ2ŽU U .Ž.before play settles on a ,a in G 1,␦.Proposition 2repeatedly applies 12Ž.Proposition 1in this fashion until some step N ␦q 1where the con-Ž.Ž.straint 3is finally violated.At this last equilibrium a is played N ␦q 1ˆ2Ž.periods against the automaton,and in period N ␦q 2play finally settles ŽU U .on a ,a .The process described above thus generates a finite family of 12Ž.1equilibria for the sequence of games G ,␦with priors s 1ии2n y 1n Ž.ииии,n s 0,1,...,N ␦q 1.The PBE described in Proposition 2is parameterized by three se-Än 4N Ž␦.Än 4N Ž␦.Än 4N Ž␦.quences:␥,and .The terms of all of these se-n s 0n s 0n s 0quences depend on ␦,although this dependence is suppressed in the notation.The sequences will be defined inductively because Proposition 1describes a relationship between their adjacent terms.Suppose we have Žn .found an equilibrium for the game G ,␦,where player 1’s normal type has an expected payoff of ␥n ;then Proposition 1determines an equilib-Žn q 1.Žn q 1n n q 1.rium for the game G ,␦where s where player 1’s n q 1Ž.ŽU .n normal type gets the payoff ␥s 1y ␦g a ,aq ␦␥.Thus,given ˆ112Žn n .Žn q 1the pair ␥,,Proposition 1determines the parameters ␥,n q 1n q 1.0,.The initial values of these sequences are determined so ␥is Ž.player 1’s equilibrium payoff at the equilibrium of G 1,␦described above:0s 1,␥0s g U .The following recursion describes how the succes-1CRIPPS AND THOMAS150Žn q 1n q 1n q 1.sive terms ␥,,are generated:␥n q 1s 1y ␦g a U ,aq ␦␥n ,5Ž.Ž.Ž.ˆ112n q 1s n n q 1,6Ž.n q 1n q 11y U U n ␦␣q ␥y g y ⑀y 1y ␦g y g q g y g a ,aŽ.Ž.ˆˆˆŽ.Ž.Ž.2221112s .U U 1y ␦g y g a ,a Ž.Ž.ˆŽ.22127Ž.Ž.P ROPOSITION 2.Let ⑀,0-⑀-⑀,and ␦)␦be gi ¨en and let N ␦be ⑀Ž.the largest positi ¨e integer if one exists such that1y ␦N Ž␦.g a U ,a q ␦N Ž␦.g U Ž.Ž.ˆ11218Ž.U y 1G g q 1y ␦␦g y g a ,a q ⑀.Ž.Ž.ˆˆŽ.11112Ž.n Ž.Then for n s 1,2,...,N ␦q 1,if F there exists a PBE of G ,␦where the normal type of player 1’s payoff is ␥n .Proof.We have shown that ␥0s g U is a PBE payoff for the normal 1Ž.U type of player 1in G 1,␦.It is also true that g is a PBE payoff for the 1Ž.normal type of player 1in G ,␦for all .Thus the proposition is true when n s 0.Now suppose the proposition is true for n s n Јwhere Ž.Žn Ј.n ЈF N ␦.As the proposition is true for n s n Ј,the game G ,␦has a n ЈŽPBE where the normal type of player 1receives the payoff ␥s 1yn Ј.ŽU .n ЈUn Ј␦g a ,a q ␦g .Apply Proposition 1to this equilibrium;␥satis-ˆ1121Ž.Ž.n ЈŽ.fies 3because n ЈF N ␦.Set ␥s ␥in 4.The largest value for 1Ž.Ž.n Јq 1Ž.that satisfies 4will solve 4with equality.This defines as in 7.n Јq 1n Јq 1n ЈŽ.Hence from Proposition 1,if F s the game G ,␦has n Јq 1Ž.ŽU .n Јa PBE where the normal type’s payoff is ␥s 1y ␦g a ,aq ␦␥.ˆ112Q.E.D.Proposition 2goes a long way toward achieving the result described in the Introduction because it shows that for any ␦we can find a such that Ž.the game G ,␦has a PBE where the normal type gets approximately U y 1Ž.ŽŽ..g q 1y ␦␦g y g a ,aq ⑀.As ␦becomes close to unity,there-ˆˆ11112fore,the normal type’s payoff can be made within ⑀of her minmax level g .We want a stronger result,however,so that given ⑀,there are threshold 1values for ␦and for such that for all ␦bigger than its threshold value Ž.and all less than its strictly positive threshold value,equilibriumF IGURE 2payoffs within ⑀of g exist.It is therefore necessary that we consider how 1the family of equilibria described in Proposition 2varies as ␦approaches unity for a given value ⑀)0.The equilibrium payoffs in Proposition 2Ž.Ž.n define a piecewise continuous function ␥where ␥s ␥for ˆˆ␦␦n q 1n Ž.-F .The function ␥describes how the payoffs at the PBEˆ␦Än n 4N Ž␦.we construct are related to the priors.The sequence ,␥deter-n s 0Ž.mines the properties of the function ␥and these are both shown in ˆ␦Ž.Fig.2.The line labeled ␥is referred to in the proof of Lemma 1.We are ␦Ž.particularly interested in how ␥behaves as ␦ª1,and as this happens ˆ␦Ž.the figure changes in two ways.First,N ␦becomes arbitrarily large and each individual line segment becomes arbitrarily short.Second,the points Žn n .5Žn n .Žn q 1n q 1.5,␥become closer together,with ,␥y ,␥ª0,and so the step sizes shrink.The following technical lemma shows that on the Žx interval 0,1the step function in the picture converges uniformly to a Ž.Ž.continuous function ␥*.Moreover,this limiting function ␥*is continuously differentiable for all but one value of .U 8Ž.Ž.Ž.L EMMA 1.If ⑀/␣r q g a ,ay g r ,then as ␦ª1the ˆ1122Ž.function ␥con ¨erges uniformly to a continuous decreasing function ˆ␦Ž.Žx ␥*on 0,1,whereA U U U ␥*s max g q ⑀,g a ,a qg y g a ,a,Ž.Ž.Ž.ˆˆŽ.11122212½5ž/1y A U U U ␣q g a ,ay g y ⑀g y g a ,aŽ.Ž.ˆˆ11221112s ,and A s .9Ž.U U U ž/ž/g y g a ,a g y g y ⑀Ž.ˆ222222Proof.See the Appendix.Lemma 1describes the properties of the equilibria as ␦ª1.We have Ž.shown that as ␦ª1the function ␥*is a good approximation for the Ž.Ž.payoffs at a PBE of G ,␦.Moreover,the function ␥*can be made Ž.arbitrarily close to g by varying ⑀at some strictly positive value of .1This is now used to prove the main result:there exists an equilibrium where the normal type gets a payoff arbitrarily close to g for all games 1where the players are sufficiently patient and the probability of the automaton is small.P ROPOSITION 3.For any )0there exists a ␦)0and a )0such Ž.that for any ␦,satisfying 1)␦)␦and ))0,the game G ,␦has a PBE where the normal type of player 1recei ¨es an expected payoff ␥1within of her minmax payoff ,that is ,satisfying g -␥-g q .111ŽProof.Let )0be given and choose ⑀s r 2without loss of gener-U Ž..ality assume ⑀/␣q g a ,ay g ;then,since )⑀and using ˆ1122Ž.Lemma 1,␥*s g q is equivalent to1A U U U g q 2⑀s g a ,a q g y g a ,a.Ž.Ž.ˆˆŽ.11122212ž/1y A After some rearrangement this implies the unique solution for to Ž.␥*s g q satisfies1␣q g a *,a y g y ⑀Ž.ˆ122A s 1y .␣q g y g q ⑀12The quotient is less than unity if and only if )0,so for all /0there is 0-*-1that satisfies this equation with equality and -*if and Ž.Ž.only if ␥*-g q .The functions ␥are nondecreasing and ˆ1␦8This condition is merely to rule our s 0,which would change the method of solving the Ž.differential equation studied below but not the conclusion .Note that can be negative.Ž.converge uniformly to ␥*so there exists -*and a ␦such that Ž.provided -and ␦)␦,␥-g q .Q.E.D.ˆ␦1Remark .Although Proposition 3establishes that player 1can be held close to her worst payoff,it is easy to show under the same assumptions Ž.that equilibria can be constructed in which she receives approximately U any payoffs between g and g :in Proposition 1,in addition to construct-11ing an equilibrium with payoffs less than ␥,an equilibrium with payoffs 1equal to ␥can be ing this repeatedly,as ␦goes to one in 1Ž.Proposition 3,all points to the ‘‘left’’see Fig.2of the limiting function,Ž.␥*,can be approximated by equilibria.3.CONCLUDING COMMENTSWe have shown that small perturbations of a large class of common interest games,in which one of the players might be a type committed to playing in a cooperative fashion,do not rule out low payoffs,even when sequential rationality is imposed on the equilibrium concept.In a broader context,these results also have implications for the reputation literature Ž.following Fudenberg and Levine 1989,which considers games between a long-run player and a sequence of short-run players,perturbed with the possibility that the long-run player might be committed to some fixed action.Their results were extended to games with two long-run players by Ž.Schmidt 1993for ‘‘conflicting interest games’’and,for general stage Ž.games,by Cripps et al .1996.The latter paper develops a lower bound on the Nash equilibrium payoffs of the informed player which is applicable to the class of games studied here,but the result applies only if the informed player is arbitrarily patient relati ¨e to the uninformed player .It is certainly the case that in some common interest games satisfying our conditions,this lower bound is above the informed player’s minmax payoff.Hence our results imply that with symmetric discounting no such lower bound exists in this class of common interest games,even when perfection is imposed.9APPENDIXProof of Proposition 1.The players’equilibrium strategies for the game Ž.G ,␦are described below:9Ž.An example is constructed in Celentani et al .1996which is similar to the type of construction we use and which establishes that payoffs below the Stackelberg payoff can be Ž.sustained in a PBE.For their game,however,the Cripps et al .1996bound is just the minmax payoff.。
直线加速器发展综述英文

I NSTITUTE OF P HYSICS P UBLISHING P HYSICS IN M EDICINE AND B IOLOGY Phys.Med.Biol.51(2006)R343–R362doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R20REVIEWBack to the future:the history and development of the clinical linear acceleratorDavid I Thwaites and John B TuohyRadiotherapy Physics,Medical Physics and Engineering,Cookridge Hospital and University ofLeeds,Leeds LS166QB,UKReceived22May2006Published20June2006Online at /PMB/51/R343AbstractThe linear accelerator(linac)is the accepted workhorse in radiotherapy in2006.Thefirst medical linac treated itsfirst patient,in London,in1953,sothe use of these machines in clinical practice has been almost co-existent withthe lifetime of Physics in Medicine and Biology.This review is a personalselection of things the authors feel are interesting in the history,particularly theearly history,and development of clinical linacs.A brief look into the futureis also given.One significant theme throughout is the continuity of ideas,building on previous experience.We hope the review might re-connect youngerradiotherapy physicists in particular with some of the history and emphasizethe continual need,in any human activity,to remain aware of the past,in orderto make best use of past experience when taking decisions in the present.History is a picture gallery in which there are a few originals and many copies:Alexis de Tocqueville,L’Ancien R´e gime(1856).(Somefigures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version)1.Introduction:aims,scope and limitations of this reviewInstallation of thefirst clinical linear accelerator began in June1952in the Medical Research Council(MRC)Radiotherapeutic Research Unit at the Hammersmith Hospital,London.It was handed over for physics and other testing in February1953and began to treat patients on 7September that year.Thus the linac’s progress to becoming the dominant machine in modern radiotherapy has been almost simultaneous with the development of Physics in Medicine and Biology(PMB).In line with the remit given for contributions to this anniversary issue of PMB, this review is intended as the authors’personal perspective on developments in thefield over the journal’s lifetime,leavened with relevant personal statements.Unlike many of the other reviews in this issue,and also unlike their distinguished authors,we were not involved in the early development of our subject,as the timescale is long enough not to have allowed that! However we have had contact with many of the early contributors and we have both worked a 0031-9155/06/130343+20$30.00©2006IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK R343R344Review lot with clinical linacs!One of us(JBT)entered RT physics in the Glasgow department in the 1960s,moved to Leeds in the early1970s and retired just as this review was requested.During this career,he worked with machines from AEI(Metropolitan-Vickers),Mullard Equipment Ltd(MEL),Radiation Dynamics Limited(RDL),Philips,Elekta and Varian as well as with a range of Co units.The other(DIT),having worked with a very temperamental van de Graaff ion accelerator during his PhD,joined the Edinburgh radiotherapy centre in the early1980s and whilst there has worked on linacs from RDL,Brown Boveri Corporation(BBC,later Asea Brown Boveri,ABB),and then Varian and since2005mainly with Elekta linacs in the Yorkshire Cancer Centre in Leeds.Both authors have been involved in British Standards Institute(BSI) committees on radiotherapy equipment and have contributed to International Electrotechnical Commission(IEC)recommendations on linac safety and performance standards.As there are a range of textbooks and review papers already available which include thorough descriptions and discussions of linac design,theory,history,developments and current technology,we feel no need to repeat a lot of that detail here.Therefore we have included a relatively small number of references for a review paper.However,we do refer the reader requiring more detail to some of those other wide-ranging sources.In addition,the review was requested just as one of us retired and the other had not long before moved from one centre to another,so it seemed an appropriate time to look back and reflect,to take the editor’s injunction to heart and to indulge ourselves in a nostalgic account of the subject.Thus the review is a personal selection of things we feel are interesting in the history,particularly the early history,and development of clinical linacs.We hope it might re-connect younger radiotherapy physicists in particular with some of that history.If we omit to mention some publications or give them less emphasis than others might,we ask that this is viewed in this context.2.Review of PMB’s role and some other sourcesGiven the nature of this anniversary issue,we have considered PMB’s role in reporting relevant developments.Therefore we recognize that we might be giving a rather UK-centred view. However the early development of linacs and theirfirst clinical implementation in the UK were also closely paralleled in the US,with many other countries soon following suit as regards clinical implementation and a few others as regards linac manufacture.The widespread clinical use of linacs has ensured that developmental ideas have come from many sources and it may be noted that the papers in PMB concerning linacs clearly reflect that,bearing out the journal’s robustly international nature.It is impossible to divorce developments and publications relating to linacs from other developments going on in radiotherapy at the same time.These include,among others, closely inter-related advances in:imaging;dosimetry;treatment planning methods,systems and algorithms;plan evaluation and optimization;beam and high dose volume shaping; information systems andflows;connectivity;immobilization and positioning;verification; process safety;etc.Nor can they be separated from clinical developments,particularly of treatment techniques,as these are spurred by increased cabability and functionality of linacs, whilst in turn linac improvements are driven by the demands of clinical and associated system developments(as well as commercial imperative and competition,of course!).Therefore the selection of which papers are relevant is subjective and may reflect how widely or not the boundaries are drawn around the topic.Thus there is clear overlap with other reviews in the area of radiotherapy in this issue of PMB,particularly with those on IMRT(Bortfeld2006, Webb2006),electron beam therapy physics(Hogstrom and Almond2006)and tomotherapy (Mackie2006).Review R345 Bearing this in mind whilst looking at PMB’s contents over50years provides some interesting observations.There were very few specifically relevant papers before1964, although there was a wide-ranging state-of-the-art review of supervoltage therapy by Frank Farmer from Newcastle in April1962.(In passing it may be noted that thefirst advert in PMB for the Baldwin-Farmer dosemeter,forerunner of modern‘Farmer-design’based ionization chambers and dosemeters,appeared in November1957.)In contrast,the British Journal of Radiology(BJR)carried a significant number of papers describing linac design and clinical implementation over those years.Seminal works also appeared in Nature(ler(1953)) and in the Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers(ler(1954)).Other than Farmer’s1962review,PMB can only be used to track the development of high energy machines in that period by the adverts it contained.By1962those for linacs were beginning to oust those for van de Graaff and other machines(although of course adverts for Canadian and UK Co units still featured strongly,including the‘Hunslet’machines manufactured in Leeds).An advert for Mullard linacs from November1962states that they are‘now in use in three continents’.Mackie’s(2006)review provides an evocative echo of this by using the same phrase to describe the current status of tomotherapy units.In the1960s PMB carried around20directly relevant papers;topics or themes can be identified as including dosimetry,beam spectra,tissue compensators and other accessories. In the1970s and1980s approximately25relevant papers appeared per decade.Topics in the1970s include electron beams,photo-neutrons,coordinate systems,accelerator dosemeter design,lasers for positioning and back-pointing and dosimetry.Topics and themes in the 80s include dosimetry,photo-neutrons,conformal radiotherapy,geometric and dosimetric accuracy,computer-assisted set-up,independent jaws and thefirst mention of dynamic MLC. In the early1990s an average of around5relevant papers per year appeared,rising to15or so per year on average in the later1990s and20or so per year since2000.A multiplicity of themes can be listed,reflecting rapid progress in many areas.In the1990s,these include asymmetric collimators,MLC,dynamic wedge,dynamic MLC,IMRT,IMAT,stereotactic systems,EPIDs,megavoltage CT,cone-beam kV CT,robotic and tomotherapy approaches, Monte Carlo modelling of linacs,spectra,safety,the ubiquitous dosimetry again,and more. Since2000,most of these themes have continued and others have been added,including,for example,IGRT,respiratory-gated systems and approaches,patient support systems design, etc.As examples of two very recent papers,Vassiliev et al(2006)discuss beams produced with theflatteningfilter removed for IMRT use,following on from Fu et al(2004),and Loi et al (2006)discuss neutron production from a mobile linac used for intraoperative electron therapy.Many papers could be cited as meriting attention.However we list only a few here, selected as noteworthy from the advantage of our current perspective and interests.Benner et al(1962)produced an early paper onfluorescent screen and TV-camera based portal imaging. Thefirst dosimetry protocol for MV x-rays appeared in1964,produced by the Hospital Physicists Association(HPA1964),forerunner of the present-day Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine(IPEM).One of thefirst international dosimetry intercomparisons involving at least some linac-produced MV x-rays(Almond et al1972),was reported by three workers that one of us(DIT)has worked closely with on many occasions and which was a forerunner to many other national and international dosimetric intercomparisons(e.g. Thwaites et al1992,Nisbet and Thwaites1997).Brahme et al(1982)published the paper now recognized as defining the inverse planning problem in IMRT.Kallmann et al(1988)provided probably the earliest paper on delivery of arbitrary dose distributions by dynamic MLC.In 1985,Amsterdam’s development of the matrix liquid ion chamber EPID appeared(Meertens et al1990),whilst1986saw a paper on the possibilities for transit dosimetry and on-line verification using imaging(Leong1986).Convery and Rosenbloom(1992)published theR346Review basis of the sweeping leaf technique for dynamic IMRT delivery and for its optimization.In 1990thefirst dosimetry code of practice based on direct provision of absorbed-dose-to-water calibration factors across a range of MV photon energies was published(HPA1990);followed in2003by a similar protocol for electrons(IPEM2003).These were linked to utilization of the UK National Physical Laboratory’s(NPL)pioneering calorimeter-based calibration services.However the proposal that therapy beam calibrations should be based on dosimeter calibrations in terms of dose to water went back at least to1979(Reich1979).In1995,Cho et al discussed cone beam kV CT for radiotherapy,at that time for stimulators,but giving a technique that was later utilised in the William Beaumont Hospital development of x-ray volumetric imaging for linac-mounted systems(Jaffray et al1999,Letourneau et al2005). Finally,as a tribute to close colleagues of one of us(DIT)and in appreciation of the time and effort saved in linac commissioning and QA by the introduction and widespread use of these systems,probably thefirst paper on a computer-controlled beam data acquisition system was given in Bottrill et al(1975).PMB has previously published reviews covering linac technology and development (Farmer1962,Karzmark and Pering1973).Other reviews have also touched on the subject, e.g.Meredith(1984)in an issue reviewing40years of medical physics,to mark the40th anniversary of the founding of the Hospital Physicists Association.In addition,elsewhere than PMB,noteworthy reviews have been given by Karzmark and collaborators(e.g.1984) and Ginzton and Nunan(1984).Also many books are useful,either for directly covering the topic or for covering related practical areas,such as specification,dosimetry,commissioning and QA;the authors would specifically like to draw attention to Greene and Williams(1997), Karzmark et al(1993),Klevenhagen(1983),Metcalfe et al(1997),Van Dyk(1999,2005), and Williams and Thwaites(2000)for further reference.As afinal cautionary note from the trawl through50years of PMB,the July1962issue contained a stern warning on plagiarism,so the authors have attempted to be very careful in preparing this review!However,reading so many superb historical sources in this process may have lead to the use of similar wording in homage to one or other of the giants on whose shoulders we stand!3.Historical overview of the early clinical implementation of linacsThe advantages of higher energy radiotherapy beams had been recognized from early in the development of the speciality,but appropriate equipment was lacking.However megavoltage external beam radiotherapy began in1937,just as radiotherapy was moving from being mainly a palliative procedure to being a major curative agent in cancer treatment and just as it was moving to a reproducibly systematic and quantitative basis(Meredith1984).In that year, treatments began at St Bartholomew’s Hospital,London,using a1MV x-ray unit having two symmetrically arranged Cockcroft-Walton500kV generators and a30ft(approx.9.25m) long x-ray tube to achieve the magic number(Allibone et al1939).This machine,designed and built by the Metropolitan-Vickers Electrical Co Ltd,incorporated many advances,even though based on conventional acceleration techniques.In1987,at a special BIR meeting at St Bartholomew’s to commemorate the50year anniversary of that historic beginning,George Innes gave an engaging account of the physicist’s testing and experience of this unit(later published in Innes(1988)).In his telling it involved frequent small doses of radiation,large electric shocks,especially if turning one’s back on the machine on damp days,and enormous enthusiasm for the task.As George lived well into his90s,this may be a small fragment of evidence for the hormesis effect,although we concede it isfirmly anecdotal!Also in1937, the roentgen was re-defined and was accepted as the unit of radiation quantity;beam directionReview R347 devices had recently been developed;and wedgefilters and beamflatteningfilters were soon to be available(Meredith1984).Thus the stage was set for higher energy machines and awaited development of appropriate technology.Whilst a range of approaches were tried,the linear accelerator has proved to be the system of choice as viewed from today’s perspective and its first faltering clinical steps were taken by the Hammersmith machine.In1953this linac,developed and built by Metropolitan-Vickers(Met-Vic)and using a 3m long accelerating or‘corrugated’waveguide to produce8MV x-rays,was the only one in the world treating patients.Shortly after that two4MeV machines were installed,one in Newcastle by Mullard Equipment Ltd,a division of Philips,and one in the Christie Hospital, Manchester by Met-Vic.The latter company supplied two more clinical4MeV machines (by then known as Orthotrons)in1955to the Western General Hospital,Edinburgh,and to Mount Vernon Hospital,Northwood,Middlesex(Miller1956).Meanwhile the research group at Stanford University,California,USA had developed a6MeV clinical linac which was installed in the Stanford Department of Radiology in1954,treating itsfirst patient in January 1956,at which time there were seven clinical linacs in the world.A few other units had either been installed or were under installation at that time in centres in the UK,including a 15MeV unit at St Bartholomew’s Hospital,and in the US,in Chicago,but it is not clear that they were yet clinical(Miller1956,Karzmark and Pering1973).Three Met-Vic units became operational in Australia in1956–1957(Brisbane,Melbourne,Adelaide)with one soon after in New Zealand,whilst other units were supplied by Mullard to Australia,Japan and Russia by the time of their1962advert quoted above.Varian installed itsfirst prototype6MV fully isocentric linac in UCLA Medical Center in1962.Thefirst Mevatron(then from Applied Radiation)was installed in1965;thefirst Sagittaire from CSF in Paris in1967and thefirst Toshiba in1969(Karzmark and Pering1973).At the time of Farmer’s1962review,there were 15clinical linacs worldwide(as well as‘many’van der Graaff machines and50betatrons);by 196879linacs,as compared with20van der Graaff,137betatrons and around1700Co units (IAEA1968).By Karzmark’s(1984)review,he could state that over one-half of all US MV treatment units were linacs and over90%of new units.As linacs have established themselves as the machine of choice,their numbers have grown well into the thousands(e.g.Podgorsak et al(1999)quote Varian’s production numbers up to that date as3200and it is likely that total production from the other manufacturers was of a similar size).Co unit numbers worldwide have been larger overall,but Co units have been largely replaced by linacs over the last 25years or so in developed countries and are now increasingly likely to be overtaken by linacs elsewhere,as new centres are established and older units are replaced.4.A note on linacs’family treesA number of commercial companies have been mentioned,which might be confusing to those who believe there might have only been three manufacturers!Apparently the clearest and longest single name thread for linacs is Varian,set up by the Varian brothers.The company began producing clinical linacs in1962with that name and remains with it in2006.However, the current Elekta machines have a longer history in a single manufacturing base in Crawley, UK,albeit under three names!They were originally sold under the Mullard Equipment Ltd banner and then directly under the Philips ter the Philips radiotherapy product division became part of the Elekta Oncology Systems group.Meanwhile Siemens bought out other companies and designs for the initial basis of its linac production,but was of course a long-established name in medical radiation products,including betatron production.The earliest UK manufacturer,Metropolitan-Vickers,was already a successful company making kV units,when it developed and produced thefirst clinical linac in the early1950s.It laterR348ReviewFigure1.The‘drift-tube’linear accelerator.became AEI,then the radiotherapy division became Radiation Dynamics Limited of Swindon, UK.The company,under-capitalized for developments in a very competitive market,sold its ‘Dynaray’designs to the Brown-Boveri Corporation of Switzerland at the beginning of the 1990s,as part of the latter’s strategy to switch from betatron to linac production.They brought with them a strong history in computer control of other products which they added to the solid RDL linac design and,amongst other innovations,worked with the Amsterdam group to commercialize the liquid ionization matrix EPID.The radiotherapy division then merged with a Swedish company to become Asea Brown Boveri.These machines sold well in Europe, but before they entered the N American market,the company was bought by Varian.It is interesting to note that cross-links continue,e.g.IMPAC,the oncology information systems supplier originally begun by Varian software engineers has recently merged with Elekta.There have been many other manufacturers in thefield from a number of countries,including Canada, China,France,Japan,Poland,Russia,USA,etc and also Swedish manufacturers of microtrons and racetrack microtrons.However only a few have survived the bracing competition,whilst at the same time continuing to support and fund the required rapid and escalating technological product development in thefield.It must also be noted here that other companies have developed revolutionary new concepts,either as part systems or complete machines,noteworthy examples including the Nomos Corporation’s add-on serial tomotherapy system,Tomotherapy Inc’s helical tomotherapy machines(Mackie2006),Accuray,Novalis and others’robotic arm machines,anda range of companies making specific stereotactic solutions,microMLCs,and other systems.5.Origins of the linear acceleratorThe history of the linear accelerator goes back further than clinical implementation.Following an earlier proposal by the Swedish physicist Ising,the concept was developed in a1928paper by Wider¨o e,a Norwegian physicist working for the Brown-Boveri Company of Switzerland, under the very modest title‘On a new principle for the production of higher voltages’.This was the forerunner of the‘drift-tube’type of linear accelerator(figure1)consisting of a series of co-linear tubes connected alternately to opposite ends of a high-frequency HT generator.The particles experience an energy gain each time they cross a gap.If the ac frequency is constant, the tubes must progressively increase in length to ensure that the particles always arrive at each gap at the correct point in the cycle as their velocity increases.Therefore,although the drift-tube linac came to be widely used in experimental physics both as an accelerator in its own right and as an injector for higher energy machines,it was suited only to the acceleration of heavier particles where the increase in velocity is relatively modest.For electrons,because of their small mass,the velocity increases so rapidly as to make the system impractical,so it was not useful for medical applications requiring the production of high energy x-rays from electron acceleration.It may be noted also that in the same paper,Wider¨o e(1928)proposed the‘beam transformer’,the basis of the magnetic induction part of the betatron.Review R349 6.The development of the microwave linear acceleratorIt would not have been obvious to the workers developing microwave technology,much of it linked to military radar requirements between1935–1945,that their work would provide the basis for equipment that would revolutionize radiotherapy.In the mid-1930s Hansen in Stanford(Hansen1938)developed the concept of an electron accelerator based on the principle of passing electrons repeatedly through a resonant microwave cavity,gaining an increment of energy on each pass,the system being termed the‘Rhumbatron’.However the power levels available from the microwave generators of the time were woefully inadequate for practical purposes.As with many other branches of technology the needs of World War II were to provide the impetus for the necessary developments.Wartime radar required microwave generators with MW outputs and two tubes were developed with such capabilities in1939;the magnetron devised by Boot and Randall(1976)in the UK and the klystron by the Varian brothers(Varian and Varian1939)in the USA.The fundamental difference is that the magnetron is a self-oscillator,producing oscillations in response to a dc input,while the klystron is essentially an amplifier with a low-power microwave input.The wartime radar systems were operated at a frequency of3GHz corresponding to a free-space wavelength of 10cm and fortunately this was well suited to its subsequent adoption in electron accelerators.The development of the microwave linac after1945took place independently on both sides of the Atlantic.One group under D W Fry at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE),then based at the Telecommunications Research Establishment at Great Malvern, England,and one under W W Hansen at Stanford University in California.By all accounts the two groups had little knowledge of the other’s work until the late1940s when after leapfrogging each other’s achievements Fry’s group had produced a clinically workable 8MeV design(Miller1954,1955)and Hansen’s an energy of6MeV(Ginzton et al1948, 1957).The underlying excitement is almost palpable in some of the early contemporaneous accounts,even though still written in measured scientific style.Both systems employed the travelling-wave principle.Whilst this is briefly described below,a full treatment of the theory of microwave linacs can be found in Greene and Williams(1997),Karzmark and Pering (1973),Karzmark(1984),Karzmark et al(1993)and Podgorsak et al(1999).7.Direct accelerators,other approaches and their comparison to linacsBy1953and over the next few years when thefirst linacs were beginning to treat patients,a range of other machines were available for the production of high energy x-rays.A number of direct accelerators were tried,i.e.those in which the energy of the emergent particles is directly related to(and limited by)the applied potential.Systems based on the Cockroft-Walton voltage multiplier and the van de Graaff electrostatic generator were produced,both proving to be relatively unsatisfactory either in terms of reliability and stability or lack of manoeuvrability.The principle of the resonant transformer was also employed;while acceptable for the production of orthovoltage quality x-rays,the bulky insulation required for megavoltage levels rendered the equipment somewhat unsuitable for clinical use.The illustration of a4MeV resonant transformer machine infigure2demonstrates this point.As summarized and compared by Farmer(1962),the significant alternatives to linacs were •resonant transformers normally of up to2MV,requiring treatment rooms occupying more than two storeys in height;•van de Graaff units also operating at2MV,whose major problems were mechanical,linked to the moving components for the high speed belt movement within a pressurized tank;R350ReviewFigure2.A4MeV resonant transformer unit.Figure3.The travelling-wave accelerating structure.•betatrons from Siemens,Allis-Chalmers and Brown-Boveri,of up to35MV(the latter manufacturer supplying a diagnostic x-ray tube incorporated in the machine for set-up, with the ability to transpose the therapy and diagnostic sources);the main problems being dose rate and stability;•and,of course,the Co unit,thefirst of which had begun treatments in1951.It is interesting to consider some of Farmer’s1962conclusions.He compared performance and costs of the systems.A4MV linac at£45000was roughly comparable to the cost of a betatron,but cheaper than a resonant transformer unit.However it was double the price of a Co unit or a van de Graaff machine.Nevertheless,when he considered throughput,costs per patient were similar for linacs and Co units and cheaper than for other high energy units. He concluded that linacs were the machine of choice for larger departments,with Co units possibly being the economic alternative for small centres.His view of the future for linacs was for simpler manufacture and more robust operation,better vacuum systems,reduced size of the machines and better mountings,all of which came to pass in a relatively short time. In fact the development of all of these features was significant in giving linacs the edge over other rival systems as the machine of choice for modern radiotherapy.8.Basic concept of the travelling-wave linear acceleratorFigure3illustrates the basic travelling-wave system.Electrons are injected into a length of waveguide where they are accelerated by the axial electric component of the microwaveReview R351Figure4.A model of the19538MeV linac installation at Hammersmith Hospital.pattern travelling left to right.The plain cylindrical waveguide is modified by the insertion of irises,which have the effect of initially reducing the phase velocity of the waves to match the electrons’injection velocity,in order to‘capture’them.The phase velocity is then increased rapidly over thefirst section of the waveguide,as the electron velocity increases. This section is referred to as the‘buncher’and here the energy gain of the electrons is mainly kinetic.Then over the main length of the system the phase velocity is almost constant(just below c)while the electrons continue to gain energy but now mainly by a relativistic increase in mass.The‘buncher’is so called because,in traversing this section,the captured electrons progressively form into bunches near the crest of each advancing wave,where the efficiency of this bunching process is afigure of merit in waveguide design.(One of thefirst published uses of the often repeated analogy of electron bunches on microwaves being similar to a surfer was given by Miller(1953),although we feel it ought to be Californian in origin!)For a given design thefinal energy of the electrons is∝(LW)12where W is the microwave power input and L is the length of the system.However the parameter which indicates the efficiency of a particular waveguide design,and which ultimately determines the length needed to produce a given energy with a particular level of power input,is the‘shunt impedance’.This is expressed in M m−1and is a measure of the energy gain per unit length per unit power input.While modern designs of accelerating waveguide can produce values in excess of100M m−1 thefirst designs used for clinical machines struggled to achieve20M m−1and so a long waveguide was a feature of all the early machines.9.Design of thefirst clinical machinesThefirst clinical linac at Hammersmith hospital,developed as a co-operative effort between AERE,MRC and Met-Vic,is illustrated infigure4.The accelerating waveguide was long,at 3m to produce8MeV,and was fed by a2MW magnetron.It was horizontal and the electron beam was deflected through90◦onto the target.Treatmentfields of up to20cm square were possible at1m,with dose rates around150r min−1.Although the linac itself was stationary, the treatment head could be swivelled through a limited angle and this feature,together with movements of the treatment couch,permitted someflexibility of the angle of the treatment beam directed at the patient.However,while it was still being installed,a new design was being developed to meet UK Ministry of Health requirements,to a basic specification by Howard-Flanders and Newbery(1950)at the MRC,and a number of these4MV linacs were。
Jagged 1在生理性和病理性新生血管形成中的表达变化

Jagged 1在生理性和病理性新生血管形成中的表达变化目的观察Jagged 1在生理性和病理性新生血管形成中的表达变化,为肿瘤的治疗寻找新的靶点。
方法体外培养血管内皮细胞免疫细胞化学法检测其Jagged 1的表达。
建立鸡胚尿囊膜动态血管发育模型,免疫荧光化学和Western blot检测不同发育时期尿囊膜血管中Jagged 1的表达。
免疫组织化学和Western blot检测正常结直肠组织和大、中、小三种尺寸的结直肠癌肿块中Jagged 1的表达。
结果(1)免疫细胞化学结果显示,Jagged 1是细胞跨膜蛋白,表达于细胞膜上。
(2)成功建立鸡胚尿囊膜动态血管发育模型,其免疫荧光和Western blot 结果显示,Jagged 1随着血管的发育而表达,随血管密度、血流量增加而表达上调。
(3)免疫组化结果显示Jagged 1在结直肠癌中广泛表达,而在正常皮肤及结直肠组织中表达较少,Jagged 1的表达量同肿瘤的体积有关。
结论Jagged 1在内皮细胞、血管发育初期和肿瘤新生血管中表达上调,表明其可能是新生血管形成的早期事件,参与诱导下游新生血管形成基因的表达。
[Abstract] Objective To research the role of Jagged 1 in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Methods The expression of Jagged 1 were detected in endothelial cells by immunocytochemistry.The expression of Jagged 1 were detected in blood vessel of chick chorioallantoic membrane by immunofluorescence and Western blot.The expression of Jagged 1 were detected in normal colorectal mucosa tissue and three colorectal cancers with large,median and small volume by immunohistochemistry and Western blot. Results (1)Results of immunocytochemistry showed that Jagged 1 is a cell transmembrane protein and express in the cell membrane. (2)Successfully established the dynamic blood vessel developmental model of chick chorioallantoic membrane,The dynamic blood vessel developmental model of chick chorioallantoic membrane showed that the vascular network in chorioallantoic membrane develops gradually with embryo age and reveals the process of neovascularization,vigorous growth and wilt dynamically.Results of immunofluorescence and Western blot revealed that Jagged 1 has different expression profiling at different period of vascular development.The expression of Jagged 1 increased with the increasing of physiologic vessels,vessel density,blood supply. (3)Results of immunohistochemistry performed on hemangioma and colorectal cancer,Jagged 1 was widely expressed in neonatal vessels originated from hemangioma proliferation and few expressed in normal skin tissue.The expression of Jagged 1 was related to the tumor size in colorectal cancer. Conclusion The expression of Jagged 1 up-regulated in endothelial cells,primary period of vascular development and tumor angiogenesis,which may be an early event in neovascularization involved in inducing the expression of downstream gene.[Key words] Jagged 1;Angiogenesis;Chick chorioallantoic membrane肿瘤的生长和转移,均呈明显的新生血管依赖性。
(完整)The flea全诗赏析

The flea注意观察这只跳蚤,就会看到你对我的拒绝显得多么渺小;它首先吮吸我的血液,然后轮到你,于是我们的血液在它的体内融为一体。
你知道,这根本谈不上是一种罪孽,也不是羞耻或是失去少女的贞洁.然而它没有求婚就尽情享受,身体膨胀,对合而为一的血液过于迁就,这一点啊,比我们的行为更胜一筹。
哦,停手,别伤害一只跳蚤中的三条性命,我们在它体内几乎享受着比婚后更多的温情。
这只跳蚤就是你和我的共同形象,这是我们的婚床和婚礼的殿堂;尽管父母反对,你也不愿,我们依然相融,并且隐居在黑玉色的活生生的墙壁之中。
尽管出于习惯你具有将我谋杀的用心,可也不要再增添自杀和亵渎神灵以及谋杀三条性命的三种罪行。
既然用无辜的血液将你的指甲染红,这是一种多么残忍的出人意料的行动?这只跳蚤究竟犯了什么样的罪孽,无非是从你的身上吮吸了一滴血液?而且你也以胜利者的口吻说过你发现你我现在都没有变得更弱。
的确如此,那么,惧怕就显得毫无必要,屈从于我,你的名誉也不会损失丝毫。
否则就虚度年华,如跳蚤之死也将你生命消耗。
The Flea” is a poem abo ut class distinction, marriage and struggle between religion。
•Direct address: Marke but this flea...•Repetition: And marke in this•Conceits: Flea > Church > Flea•First stanza: Contemplative and whimsical•Second stanza: Becomes more absurd, pace gets faster•Third stanza: Slowing and reversal of argument.•Not a good idea to write down, but interesting to note that the pace of the poem follows that of sex —a gradual build-up of intensity leading to the sudden, climactic... death of a flea. •Much religious imagery:Confesse itone blood made of two - implies sex and/or pregnancy (ie,mother and child are the "two”) three lives in one flea - holy trinitycloysterdsacrilege, three sinnes in killing three — more holy trinity imageryblood of innocence•Circular argument。
Overexpression of hepatitis B virus surface antigens including the

Overexpression of hepatitis B virus surface antigens including the preS1region in a serum-free Chinese hamster ovary cell lineGeorg W.Holzer,a Josef Mayrhofer,a Judith Leitner,a Martin Blum,a Gerald Webersinke,bSabine Heuritsch,b and Falko G.Falkner a,*aBaxter Vaccine AG,Biomedical Research Center,Uferstrasse 15,A-2304Orth/Donau,AustriabKrankenhaus d.Barmherzigen Schwestern,Molekularbiologisches Labor (I.Int.Abt.),Seilerstaette 44010Linz,AustriaReceived 26September 2002AbstractCurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV)vaccines consist of preparations of recombinant HBV major surface antigen (sAg)and are protective in about 90–95%of vaccinated subjects.In improved vaccines,the frequency of nonresponders to the classical vaccine could be reduced by including additional epitopes from the preS-domains of the middle and large surface antigens.In this report,the development and characterization of a CHO cell line for HBsAg,expressing major,middle,and large antigens are described.Despite the previously reported retention of secreted proteins by the preS1domain,cell lines could be amplified that secreted large amounts of the complete set of antigens.A producer line was established that expressed 1mg HBsAg per 100ml suspension culture per week during exponential growth.The productivity per cell increased further by at least threefold when the culture reached the stationary phase at high cell densities.In the production cell line,several hundred copies of the HBV vector were integrated at two adjacent sites into chromosome 2.The cell line was adapted to growth in a defined protein-free medium minimizing the risk of adventitious agents introduced by animal derived supplements.The cell line stably produced antigen over several months.In the candidate vaccine,both preS2and preS1domains were present at ratios similar to HBsAg from human sera.In summary,a production cell line for an improved HBV vaccine is presented with properties such as high productivity,long term stability of expression,and growth in protein-free media.Ó2003Elsevier Science (USA).All rights reserved.Hepatitis B virus is one of the major causes of human liver disease.Vaccines against HBV were manufactured initially from HBsAg that was isolated from the plasma of asymptomatic carriers [1,2].Because of the inherent risk of transmission of HBV and of unidentified infec-tious agents,the plasma-derived vaccine was replaced almost completely by recombinant material produced in vitro.Today,vaccination is mainly performed with re-combinant major antigen produced in yeast [3–5].Al-though highly efficacious,about 5–10%of the human population fail to develop a protective immune response to these vaccines (nonresponders)or show only low (less than 100IU/ml)anti-HBs antibody levels upon vacci-nation (hyporesponders)[6,7].Recent efforts have fo-cused on vaccines conferring a more completeprotection.Several studies have indicated that enhanced immunogenicity could be achieved if additional HBV surface antigens were included in the vaccine [6,8,9].Naturally occurring 22nm HBsAg particles and also infectious wild-type HBV particles,so-called Dane particles,display three different surface proteins.In addition to the major sAg,they also contain lower quantities of middle and large surface antigens.The large and middle antigens share their carboxy terminal sequences with the major HBsAg,but have additional N-terminal sequences,the preS regions.Investigational vaccines produced in yeast have been described that contain middle antigen,including therefore preS2[10–12],or a synthetic HBsAg displaying selected epitopes of both preS2and preS1[13].Hepatitis B surface antigens from human plasma are at least partly glycosylated.Consequently,an enhanced immunogenicity of the re-combinant proteins is expected if they are produced inaProtein Expression and Purification 29(2003)58–69/locate/yprep*Corresponding author.Fax:+43-1-20100-4000.E-mail address:falknef@ (F.G.Falkner).1046-5928/03/$-see front matter Ó2003Elsevier Science (USA).All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S1046-5928(03)00011-1mammalian expression system that allows more au-thentic glycosylation of the proteins.In attempts to-wards a third generation HBV vaccine,major HBsAg has been expressed in CHO cells together with smaller amounts of the middle antigen[14]or both middle and large antigens[15,16].Because of additional epitopes on the preS1region,the large antigen would be a highly desirable component of a HBV vaccine.In mice,im-mune responses to the preS1region were also accom-panied by an enhanced response to the major sAg[8]. Unfortunately,the large sAg is poorly secreted both from yeast and mammalian cells.Overexpression of the large antigen also severely interferes with the overall HBsAg secretion[17–19]while major antigen alone is readily secreted.The maximal secretion levels for HBsAg in CHO cells described so far were about1l g HBsAg/24h/106cells,with a construct expressing the preS2and the S regions but not preS1[14].Samanta et al.[20]report the secretion of HBV S antigens at1.0–2.5l g/24h/106cells from a mouse cell line transformed with a bovine papillomavirus vector.For production of recombinant proteins,dihyrofolate(dhfr)negative CHO cells[21]that are conventionally transfected and am-plified by the dhfr selection method[22]are a preferred system.CHO cells are widely accepted for their good compliance with modern safety standards and are,for instance,used as production cell lines for various re-combinant biologicals including human factor VIII[23].We have now inserted an expression cassette for all three HBV surface proteins into the CHO cell line DX-B11[21]and attempted to overcome the previous secretion threshold by systematic screening of new producer cell lines.Recording the complete screening process in a single database allowed for both rapid identification of high producer lines and a close reagent tracking throughout the clone histories,thus meeting international GMP guidelines.For safety and handling purposes,the selected producer line wasfinally adapted to growth in a suspension culture under protein-free conditions.Materials and methodsCells and mediaThe CHO cell lines DX-B11and DG44were a gift from wrence Chasin,Columbia University,NY. The human hepatoma cell line HepG2(ATCC HB-8065)was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection.Under nonselective conditions,cells were grown in DMEM(Invitrogen,CA),containing10%fe-tal calf serum.For the amplification of HBsAg ex-pressing CHO cells,selection was performed in MEM a without ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides(In-vitrogen,CA),supplemented with10%dialyzed FCS.Serum-free growing CHO cell lines were maintained in BAV-Sp medium consisting essentially of DMEM and HAMÕs F12media supplemented with soy peptone[24].Construction of plasmidspGHB-2.The plasmid pTHBV-1[25]that contains a duplicate genome of HBV strain ayw3was provided by Dr.G eorge Acs,Mount Sinai Medical Center,New York.The plasmid was digested with the restriction enzyme Mun I,and a3.2fragment that contains the complete genomic HBV sequence was ligated to Eco RI linearized pUC18.The orientation in which the unique Hin dIII site lies downstream of the HBV open reading frames was selected.The resulting plasmid was termed pGHB-1b.To delete genomic sequences downstream of the HBV poly A site,a1.8-kb Hin dIII/Nco I fragment was excised from pGHB-1b and replaced by a0.7-kb PCR product that had been digested with Hin dIII and Nco I,prior to ligation.The PCR fragment was ampli-fied from pGHB-1b with the primers oHB-3(AAT AAG CTT CGT ACT GAA GGA AAG AAG TCA G) and oHB-4,(ACT CTG TTG TCC TCT CCC G C). Primer oHB-3introduces a Hin dIII restriction site60 basepairs downstream of the polyA site.The resulting plasmid,designated pG HB-2,contains the unaltered genomic HBV sequence from the preS1promoter to the precore domain,but lacks most of the core gene and parts of the pol gene sequences.pGHB-3.The start codon of the preS1open reading frame was changed from ATG to TTG by PCR-medi-ated ing the primer oHB-5(CAC TCT GGG ATC TTG CAG AG)that binds at the start of the preS2sequence and the mutagenesis primer oHB-6 (AAC AAG ATC TAC ATC TTG GGG CAT)that binds at the50-end of the preS1region,a0.4-kb PCR fragment was amplified from pGHB-2as template.The mutated preS1fragment was digested with Bgl II and Hin dIII,and cloned into Bgl II/Hin dIII cut pGHB-2. The resulting plasmid,that lacks the preS1start codon, was termed pGHB-3.pSV-dhfr#73.The plasmid pSV-dhfr#73carries the cDNA for wild-type dhfr under control of the SV40 promoter and a downstream SV40splice intron and polyA site in a pUC18background,permitting selection of dhfr-negative cell lines[26].The dhfr cDNA sequence is identical with NCBI GenBank#BC005796. Transfection of cellsFor transient expression experiments,CHO and Hep-G2cells were transfected by lipofection(FuGene6, Roche Diagnostics,IN).Following the manufacturerÕs instructions,6.5l g DNA was used for cells that had been grown to near confluency in10cm diameter culture dishes.Transfections for the establishment of permanentG.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification29(2003)58–6959clones were performed with Lipofectamine2000Re-agent(Invitrogen,CA).Expression vector(6.5l g)and 0.3l g of the plasmid conferring the selection marker were diluted in300l l Optimem-1Medium(Invitrogen, CA)and processed according to the manufactureÕs protocol.For all experiments,cells were grown in DMEM with10%FCS.Immediately before transfec-tion,the medium was replaced by Optimem-1.Establishment of producer linesTwo days posttransfection,cells were trypsinized and seeded into15cm diameter culture dishes with MEM a at split ratios ranging between1:80and1:320.After two weeks,colonies were transferred into24-well plates containing1ml of the selective medium.When the cul-tures had reached confluency,supernatants were drawn, and assayed for HBsAg by ELISA.Following expansion to6-well scale,the clones were subjected to a next round of selection by splitting into selective media in15cm culture dishes.According to the respective amplification levels,media were supplemented with methotrexate (Sigma,St.Louis,MO)from20to1280nM.Subcloning of serum-free growing cell lines was per-formed by limited dilution.Clones at24-well scale were assayed for HBsAg production and subcloned when the media were clearly acidified by cell metabolism.Quantification of HBsAg and expression kineticsCell culture supernatants were tested for HBsAg in an ELISA(Eti Mak3,Diasorin,MN).The plates of this test kit were coated with a mouse monoclonal antibody of equal reactivity to HBsAg of the subtypes ay and ad. To test the HBsAg at different stages of cell growth, producer lines were seeded into6-well plates with2-ml medium at104cells/well.Every24h,the supernatant of one plate was drawn and assayed for HBsAg in an ELISA.The corresponding cells were trypsinized and the cell density was determined in a CASI cell counter (Sch€a rfe,G ermany).From the HBsAg increase over24h and the cell count,the productivity of the culture(given in ng HBsAg/24h/106cells)was calculated for each timepoint.Immunofluorescence stainingThree cell dilutions ranging from5Â104,105,and 2Â105cells were seeded into Falcon354104chamber slides(Becton–Dickinson,NJ)at a density of105cells/ well the day before.The staining procedure was per-formed essentially according to standard procedures.As afirst antibody,a goat anti-HBsAg antiserum(Fitz-gerald Industries,MA)was used in a1:2000dilution. The second antibody was a1:2000diluted mouse anti-goat IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate(Sigma).Western blottingProteins were separated on a reducing12%PAGE. As afirst antibody either goat anti-HBsAg(see above) or mouse anti preS2monoclonal187/04(in-house)or mouse anti-preS1MA18/7(obtained from K.Heer-mann,University G€o ttingen,G ermany)was used. Southern blottingWhole cell DNAs of the CHO cell lines,equivalent to2Â105cells per lane,were digested with Pvu II and resolved on an agarose gel.Blotting was done accord-ing to standard protocols.A2.8-kb Pvu II fragment of the plasmid pGHB-2served as a probe specific for the HBV sAg genes.To estimate the copy number of the integrated HBV DNA,pG HB-2was digested with Pvu II and spiked to wild-type CHO DNA at concen-trations equivalent to100and1000copies in a diploid genome.Fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)Cells from serum-free growing cultures were collected by centrifugation at380g.The resulting pellet was re-suspended in47mM KCl and incubated at37°C for 20min.After centrifugation,the supernatant was re-moved and the cells werefixed three times with metha-nol–glacial acetic acid(3:1).Fixed cells were dropped onto defatted microscope slides and air-dried.As a HBV gene specific probe,a DNA fragment containing the complete sAg open reading frame was labeled by nick-translation using DIG-dUTP(DIG-nick translation mix,Roche Biochemicals,Mannheim).One microgram of the fragment was mixed with100l g human Cot1and 250l g salmon sperm-DNA and ethanol-precipitated. The dried pellet was dissolved in deionized formamide and diluted with one volume of4ÂSSC/20%dextran sulfate(pH7).For hybridization and detection,10l l per slide of the probe was spotted and covered with a coverslip.Slides were transferred into a‘‘HYBrite’’-in-strument(Vysis,IL),where they were denatured at75°C for5min and hybridized overnight at37°C.After re-moving the coverslip,slides were washed twice at42°C in2ÂSSC and once in0:1ÂSSC/20%formamide.The washed slides were blocked for5min in a humidified chamber with4ÂSSC/0.2%Tween20containing5%(w/ v)BSA.Afterwards,the slides were incubated in a hu-midified chamber at37°C for1h with30l l of diluted anti-Digoxigenin-Fluorescein Fab fragments(1:200in 4ÂSSC/0.2%Tween20).Slides were then washed three times at42°C in4ÂSSC/0.2%Tween20,counterstained with DAPI,and analyzed on a Axioplan II microscope (Zeiss,G ermany).60G.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification29(2003)58–69ResultsConstruction of the expression vectorTo express the recombinant sAg proteins at a ratio similar to the composition found in plasma derived particles,the expression vector pG HB-2was constructed that contains the HBsAg genes driven by their natural promoters in an unaltered genetic context.In the HBV genome (see also Fig.1A),expression of the middle and small sAg is controlled by a strong internal promoter.The transcription of messages for the large sAg,how-ever,is driven by a separate promoter located upstream of the preS1region.The preS1promoter is comparably weak and its activity is tissue-dependent [27].Moreover,evidence for interactions between the two promoters has been found [28,29].Therefore,to construct the expres-sion vector pG HB-2,about two thirds of the 3.2-kbp (kb)HBV ayw3genome were excised from a plasmid that contains a duplicated HBV sequence and placed in the bacterial cloning vector.In pG HB-2,the 50-end of the contained HBV sequence is defined by a single Mun I site on the HBV genome that is located 0.2kb upstream of the preS1start codon.As depicted in 1A,the genomic segment includes regulatory elements like the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1(HNF1)binding sequence [30],the HBV posttranscriptional regulatory element that is required for the cytoplasmic localization of the HBV surface RNAs [31,32],viral enhancer sequences [33,34],and the authentic HBV polyadenylation site.In previous studies,the use of the HBV signal was shown to result in 6-fold higher expression levels compared to an artificially in-troduced SV40polyadenylation signal [20].To restrict the HBV sequences required for efficient sAg expression in pG HB-2to a minimum,a Hin dIII cleavage site was introduced by PCR close to the polyA signal down-stream of the sAg gene.By this measure,the HBV se-quence ends 80bp downstream of the start codon of the viral precore region,thereby keeping the polyadenyla-tion signal,while most of the core gene and parts of the pol gene were removed.In contrast to pTHBV,pG HB-2is not any more infective when transfected into mam-malian cells.Influence of the large antigen on secretion of the major antigenIn pG HB-2,the conservation of the natural HBV transcriptional elements should result in expression of a balanced mixture of the surface antigens including also moderate amounts of large antigen.Naturally secreted HBV particles,both the abundant 22nm form and the infectious 42nm Dane particles,contain low quantities of large antigen.Low level expression of recombinant large sAg and its co-secretion with middle and major sAg has been demonstrated previously [16].Though the quantitative influence of large sAg on the overall HBsAg secretion has already been studied in situations where preS1was overexpressed [35],the retention effect of large antigen under its natural transcriptional control has not been described so far.We therefore set up transient transfection experiments to compare secretion of HBV surface antigens in the presence and in the ab-sence of the preS1domain,using the plasmid pG HB-2that contains native HBV sequences.As a negative control,the plasmid pG HB-3that does not express large sAg was constructed (Fig.1B).This plasmid is identical to pG HB-2,except that the start codon of thepreS1Fig.1.Schematic representation of the circular HBV genome and of the HBsAg expression vectors.(A)The surface antigens (large,middle,and major antigens)are encoded by a common open reading frame (ORF,black).The large antigen ORF is controlled by the preS1-promoter,the ORFs encoding the middle and major antigens are controlled by the internal preS2/S-promoter.In addition to the surface antigens,the HBV genome contains open reading frames for the core protein,for the non-structural pol protein,and the X gene.Promoters and other regulatory elements like enhancers and the HBV post transcriptional regulatory element are marked by gray symbols.The filled segment covers those parts of the HBV genome that were re-moved during vector construction,rendering the construct non-infec-tive.(B)The arrangement of the remaining HBV sequences in the plasmid vectors pGHB-2is identical to the wild-type genome.In pG HB-3,the start codon of the preS1open reading frame is mutated,preventing the expression of the large antigen.G.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification 29(2003)58–6961reading frame was mutated,allowing only expression of the middle and major antigens.Following lipofectamine transfection of HepG2human hepatoma cells and the CHO cell lines DXB11and DG 44,HBsAg accumula-tion in the culture supernatants was assayed 96h post transfection.In both CHO cell lines,co-expression of large sAg decreased the amounts of secreted HBsAg in the supernatant by less than half (Fig.2).While CHO DX-B11produced much more HBsAg than CHO DG 44,the influence of the large antigen was similar.Interestingly,in the human hepatoma HepG 2cells the reduction of HBsAg secretion in the presence of large antigen was much more pronounced.On the average,a 5-fold decrease was noted using HepG2cells.Because large antigen expression had only a relatively mildinfluence on the secretion levels in CHO cells,the con-struct with the complete sAg reading frame including the preS1domain was chosen for the generation of stable clones on the basis of the classical CHO DXB11cell line.In contrast to the DXB11cell,in which the dhfr gene is inactivated by mutation,DG 44lacks the entire dhfr gene and cannot revert [36].The inability of DG44cells to revert to the DHFR-negative phenotype by sponta-neous mutation might be of advantage for the screening process.However,the DXB11cell line was chosen for stable transfection for its much higher productivity in the transient expression assay.Database supported screening for producer clones To generate clones stably secreting HBsAg particles,the dehydrofolate reductase (dhfr)negative cell line CHO DX-B11was transfected with a mixture of the HBsAg expression plasmid pGHB-2and the plasmid pSV-dhfr#73conferring the selection marker at a 20:1ratio.Under-representation of the marker plasmid should raise the probability for clones containing mul-tiple copies of the HBV sequences.Initial clones were obtained by splitting the transfected cells into selective media containing various concentrations of the dhfr inhibitor methotrexate (MTX).Colonies were picked and grown to 24-well scale and supernatants were ana-lyzed by HBsAg ELISA.For amplification,clones that secreted more than 10ng/ml HBsAg were expanded and subjected to further rounds of subcloning and screening at unchanged and at higher concentrations of MTX.Both,data on reagents and screening data were collected in an MS-Access database.Among other screening data,HBsAg concentration,MTX concentration,the round of subcloning,and ancestors were linked.In the data-base,the clone designations for each round of screening were assigned to separate categories (Fig.3),allowingFig.2.Transient expression experiments.HBsAg expression plasmids were transfected into CHO cells (cell lines DX-B11and DG 44),and into the human hepatoma cell line HepG2.Levels of the major antigen in the supernatants of the cells were determined by ELISA 96h post-transfection.Plasmid pGHB-2(gray columns)contains the coding sequences for all three HBV surface antigens.Plasmid pGHB-3(white columns)has a mutated start codon for the preS1reading frame and therefore does not express the largeantigen.Fig.3.Design of the database for the HBsAg expression screening.In the database,the name of a clone is composed of IDs for each round of screening.Additionally,the round of subcloning,in which the data set was generated,is indicated (‘‘Round Nr’’).Among others,the database contains fields for the HBsAg concentration,the culture dish from which the probe had been drawn,and yes/no fields to mark clones which were continued in further subcloning and those for which backups had been made.As an example for a data set,a subclone that was analyzed during the screening of the CHO line 0607-195is ing separate categories for each ID allows for requests that group the results of a specific round of screening or of a family of clones.A–C are typical requests that were used during the screening process:(A)‘‘Show all initial clones grown at 20nM MTX’’.(B)‘‘Show all determinations throughout the development of a clone/amplification profile’’.(C)‘‘Show history of an individual clone.’’62G.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification 29(2003)58–69for a comprehensive tracking of each cell line.About 400initial clones were screened.Transfectants express-ing more than 10ng HBsAg/ml (approximately 10%of the primary clones)were amplified further as indepen-dent producer lines.Altogether,the screening process involved over 4000HBsAg quantifications.Grouping of the data allowed us to visualize trends throughout the amplification process and to evaluate the influence of factors like MTX concentration on the development of expression levels.As expected,during the initial screening of transfected clones,the mean HBsAg ex-pression correlated with the MTX concentration in the selective media.However,this was not true for high MTX concentrations (100nM).The distribution of the HBsAg levels of initial clones in dependence of the se-lective pressure is depicted in Fig.4A.About 90%of theclones had HBsAg levels below detection limit.There-fore,for a concise representation of the screening re-sults,also the total number of clones and the mean expression levels were noted for each MTX concentra-tion.For most of the clones,the expression levels reached a plateau after four rounds of selection.To track the development of a clone throughout the re-peated screenings,amplification profiles were compiled,sorting the clones by the round of subcloning.The amplification profile of clone 0607-195from which the final production line was established is shown in Fig.4B.In the profile,the data points of one round of cloning are subdivided because in each screening,the clones were raised at two different MTX concentrations.As it can be deduced from the distributions at rounds 3–6,raising the MTX concentration had only a moderate influence on the HBsAg levels.Each initially selected clone displayed a highly individual amplification profile,differing in the slope of the mean expression over the screening,in the dispersion of the values for a single round of cloning,and in the responsiveness to changes in the selective pressure.In contrast,cell lines derived from the same transfectant displayed a similar behavior during screening.This finding underlines the importance of broad initial screening for independent primary clones to raise the chance for cell lines with a high de-velopment potential.Productivity is maximal in nondividing culturesHighly amplified clones were characterized with re-spect to favorable properties as producer lines.These included short time stability of expression in the ab-sence of selective pressure,growth rates,and growth status dependence of HBsAg secretion.To test the correlation between the growth status of the culture and the relative HBsAg production,producer cells were seeded at low densities and grown until the monolayer had exceeded confluency by several days.On a daily basis,cells were counted and the increase of HBsAg concentration in the supernatant was determined.No-tably,the highest specific productivity was not found during logarithmic growth,but when the cultures had reached the lag phase at high densities,showing a de-cline in cell count (Fig.5).Similar observations have been reported previously for NIH 3T3cells that had been transfected with overlength genomic HBV DNA [37].An increase in HBsAg secretion was also found after growth arrest of the cultures by sudden serum withdrawal (not shown).During the screening process,HBsAg levels had been measured when a clone had reached confluency without normalizing to the exact cell count.Because of the strong influence of the growth status on the secretion levels,all subsequent determi-nations of relative productivity were equally performed with just confluentcultures.Fig.4.Graphic representation of the screening data.(A)Expression levels of the major antigen of the initially selected clones.The values are sorted according to the concentration of MTX during selection.All clones secreting more than the cut-offof 10ng/ml HBsAg were sub-jected to further amplification.Note that almost 90%of the data points are below cut-off.Below each group,the total number of analyzed clones and the mean expression levels are indicated.(B)Amplification profile of clone 0607-195.Within each round of subcloning,data are sorted by MTX concentration.Rectangles mark the clones that were cultured further for establishing the 0607-195producer line.G.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification 29(2003)58–6963A HBsAg producer cell line that grows in serum-free mediaThe cell line 0607-195-12-8-6-18-59,producing 4l g HBsAg/106cells/24h,was chosen for adaptation to growth in serum-free media.First,the cells were main-tained in selective media without MTX,while stepwise reducing serum levels from 10to 0.5%.Attempts to perform the adaptation procedure in the presence of MTX were unsuccessful.For further serum reduction below 0.5%,a medium formulated for serum-free CHO cultures was used,which is essentially a mixture of DMEM and HAM Õs F12media supplemented with soy peptone [24].This medium is non-selective for dhfr be-cause it contains ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleo-sides.At serum levels of 0.25%,the cells lost adherence but continued to grow in suspension.After complete withdrawal of the serum,three rounds of subcloning by limited dilution were performed.These screenings weredone to reselect for high producers and,more impor-tantly,to isolate cell lines that grew at acceptable rates under serum-free conditions.The final cell line was ex-amined by immunofluorescence staining (Fig.6).For the staining procedure,cells were seeded on coverslides in the presence of 10%FCS.Under these conditions the cells,previously growing in suspension,returned largely to adherent growth within 24h.HBsAg expression was detectable in all cells of the monolayer,demonstrating the clonal status of the HBs producer line.The doubling time of the final producer line,briefly termed 195sf-43,was approximately three days.As a negative control for the immunofluorescence experiments,the parental CHO DXB11cell line was used (Fig.6B).The control cells were seeded at the same count as the producer cells.The higher cell density,as seen on the bright light photo-graph,reflects the faster growth of the wild-type cells.No fluorescence was detectable with the control cells,demonstrating that the fluorescence is specific for HBsAg expression.The secreted HBV surface antigen contains preS1and preS2epitopesTo verify that all HBV surface antigens including the preS1domain were expressed,culture supernatants were harvested and the protein pattern was investigated by Western blotting (Fig.7A).Using a polyclonal anti-HBsAg serum,both glycosylation forms of the major antigen were visible in crude supernatants of the pro-ducer line (lane 5).After concentration of the antigens by immune affinity chromatography and banding the particles in a sucrose gradient,also the middle antigen was clearly detectable with the antiserum as a band at 33kDa.The identity of the middle antigen band was verified by using a preS2-specific monoclonal antibody (lane 7).As the preS2epitopes are also present on the large antigen,this antibody should react with both the middle and the large sAg.However,only signals in the range of the two glycosylation forms of middle an-tigen and minor,faster migrating bands were detectable.The presence of the large antigen could be demonstrated by use of a preS1specific monoclonal that visualized two bands in the 43and 39kDa range matching the expected molecular weight of glycosylated and ungly-cosylated large antigens.The polyclonal anti-HBsAg serum detected a band migrating at a molecular weight similar as the large antigen.This signal was found both in crude supernatants and in concentrated preparations.It is,however,not detected by the preS2specific anti-body and therefore indicates the presence of dimerized major antigen rather than the low abundant large anti-gen.Also,an aberrant low molecular weight band was visualized,both,with anti preS2and with anti preS1antibodies,but not with polyclonal HBsAg serum.Proteolytic degradation of the middle antigenintoFig.5.Specific HBsAg expression in correlation with cell growth.Producer lines were seeded into 6-well plates at 104cells/well.Cell count and increase in antigens levels were measured at 24h intervals to calculate the relative productivity of the culture.Confluency was reached at about 106cells/well.Open symbols show the absolute cell count.Major antigen levels (ng/ml)in the supernatants were deter-mined by ELISA and the relative productivity (ng/106cells and 24h;filled symbols)was calculated from the daily increase of the antigen levels and the cell count.Two independent producer lines are shown.64G.W.Holzer et al./Protein Expression and Purification 29(2003)58–69。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
SHORT COMMUNICATIONOverexpression of Jagged-1combined with blockade of CD40pathway prolongs allograft survivalYingying Lin1,Weili Chen1,Jiali Li1,Guoliang Yan2,Chun Li1,Ning Jin1,Jie Chen2,Chang Gao1,Pengfei Ma1, Shuangyue Xu1and Zhongquan Qi1Dendritic cells(DCs)have the tolerogenic potential to regulate adaptive immunity and induce allografts acceptance.Here we investigated whether blockade of the CD40pathway could enhance the immune tolerance induced by DC2.4cells modified to express Jagged-1(JAG1-DC)in heart transplantation.Results showed that JAG1-DC treatment combined with anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody(mAb)administration significantly prolonged cardiac allograft survival in mice,with long-term survival (4110days)of50%of the allografts in the recipients.The therapy specifically inhibited the immune response,induced alloantigen-specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness,upregulated transforming growth factor-βsynthesis and increased the population of regulatory T cells(Tregs)driven by Jagged-1-Notch activation.These results highlight the potential application of gene therapy to induce alloantigen-specific Tregs effectively by providing the Jagged-1stimulation.Immunology and Cell Biology advance online publication,7October2014;doi:10.1038/icb.2014.84Dendritic cells(DCs)in the periphery are in an immature state and become mature on migration to the draining lymphoid tissues,where DCs present antigens to naive T cells and initiate specific immune responses.This process is also crucial for the induction of peripheral tolerance.1–3Various strategies have been used to induce specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness and prolong allograft survival by enhancing the tolerogenic potential,which include the application of specific DC subsets and genetically modified DCs that express immunosuppressive molecules,such as viral interleukin-10(IL-10)or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen4-immunoglobulin.4–7It is worth noting that the immature murine DC2.4cell line has the advantage over primary DCs of being suitable for long-term passage in cell culture and expressing high levels of major histocompatibility complex(MHC) class II molecules,CD80and CD86.8–10To date,four Notch receptors(Notch1–4)andfive Notch ligands (Delta-like l,3,4and Jagged1,2)have been identified,and these molecules have various functions in mammals.11,12Notch signalling has also been implicated as a key regulator of T-cell activation and T helper(Th)cell differentiation;in addition,Notch ligands are expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells.13,14Moreover, there are emerging data suggesting that the Jagged-1-Notch signalling pathway could induce specific regulatory T cells(Tregs)by over-expression of Jagged-1or interactions with transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β),and these Tregs could not only inhibit primary immune responses,but also transfer tolerance of antigenic specificity into the recipient.15–17It is well known that the CD40/CD40L pathway is one of the most important costimulatory pathways and controls the activation of antigen-specific T cells.18Blockade of this pathway has been reported to effectively disrupt T-cell activation and prolong survival of heart, kidney and islet allografts.19In this study,we are thefirst to demonstrate that combined administration of anti-CD40L mono-clonal antibody(mAb)with overexpression of Jagged-1(using the adenovirus,which is the most widely used vector in gene therapy applications)20,21blocks the activation of effector T cells,upregulates the levels of Tregs and leads to long-term allograft survival. RESULTSOverexpression of Jagged-1in the DC2.4cell lineThe pAd5/F35-GFP and pAd5/F35-GFP-Jagged-1viruses efficiently transduced DC2.4cells(abbreviated to GFP(greenfluorescent protein)-DC and JAG1-DC,respectively)at a multiplicity of infection of150plaque forming units per cell.More than90%of the DC2.4 exhibited strong greenfluorescence at48h(both GFP-DC and JAG1-DC,see Figures1a and c).Then,we observed that the Jagged-1protein(180kD)was only expressed in JAG1-DC (Figure1b).By contrast,no significant difference was found between JAG1-DC and GFP-DC in terms of the expression levels of CD11c, CD80,CD86and MHC-II(Figure1c).This result showed that neither transduction by control Ad vector nor overexpression of Jagged-1had any effect on DC expression of surface molecules.Jagged-1modulates the proliferation and activation of T cells by activating Notch-1To measure the effects of Jagged-1on immune responses,we isolated T cells from naive BALB/c mice and co-cultured them with GFP-DC1Organ Transplantation Institute,Xiamen University,Fujian Province,P.R.China and2Basic Medical Department of Medical College,Xiamen University,Fujian Province, P.R.ChinaCorrespondence:Professor Z Qi,Organ Transplantation Institute,Xiamen University,Fujian Province361005,P.R.China.E-mail:oti@Received14March2014;revised25August2014;accepted3September2014or JAG1-DC.Proliferation of the T cells alone was different from T cells+DC (P o 0.05,Figure 1d).JAG1-DC signi ficantly inhibited the proliferation of T cells compared with GFP-DC (P o 0.01,Figure 1d).However,there was no inhibition when JAG-DC were added to memory (CD44High CD62L Low )T cells (data not shown).In addition,the HES-1and Notch-1mRNA expression levels in T cells were also signi ficantly increased after co-culturing with JAG1-DC for 12h compared with GFP-DC (with a mean 4-fold upregulation of HES-1and 68-fold upregulation of Notch-1,Figure 1e).However,the expression of Deltex-1showed no signi ficant differences.Because HES-1or Deltex-1is the downstream transcrip-tional regulator induced by Notch-1receptor activation,our results con firm that the overexpression of Jagged-1protein was biologically active.22,23JAG1-DC signi ficantly enhances the immunosuppressive effect of CD40/CD40L costimulatory blockadeThe JAG1-DC group showed markedly prolonged graft survival compared with either the heart transplantation (HTx)control group or the GFP-DC group (median survival time =14vs 7.5or 8days,n =6per group,both P o 0.01,Figure 2a).But there was also no statistical difference between the control Ab group and the Ab+GFP-DC group (median survival time =44vs 50.5days,n =6per group,P 40.05).A signi ficant prolongation of graft survival was achieved in the Ab+JAG1-DC group,with long-term survival (4110days)of 50%of the recipients,compared with the Ab group or Ab+GFP-DC group (median survival time =103.5vs 44or 50.5days,n =6per group,both P o 0.05).These results suggest that the addition of CD40L blockade to the JAG1-DC treatment signi ficantly prolongs graft survival time.Combination treatment prevents in flammatory reactions in grafts and spleens of recipientsOn days 7and 100post transplantation,all grafts were collected and the expression of genes associated with graft rejection and tolerance were detected with quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 2b).Compared with the Ab+GFP-DC group,the expression of IFN-γwas signi ficantly reduced both on days 7and 100in the Ab+JAG1-DC group.However,the expression of IL-10and IL-4showed no signi ficant differences in the five groups (data not shown).Overall,the relative expressions of both TGF-βand Foxp3were signi ficantly higher in the Ab+JAG1-DC group on day 7(or on day 100)than that in the Ab+GFP-DC group.We observed that the JAG1-DC group had a reduced proliferative response on day 7(Figure 2d).Furthermore,the Ab+JAG1-DC group had a lower proliferative capacity than the JAG1-DC group.To determine whether this proliferation was donor speci fic,the spleno-cytes from C3H mice were used as third-party stimulators.The result revealed that the response of recipient spleens to third-party cells was still strong in the combined therapy group on day 100(Figure 2d).Combination treatment induces expressions of Foxp3and TGF-βTo determine whether the combination treatment resulted in the expansion of Tregs,the expression of CD4and Foxp3were examined (Figure 2c).The results revealed that CD4+Foxp3+T cells were signi ficantly expanded in the spleens and lymph nodes of the Ab +JAG1-DC group on day 7compared with the HTx control group (mean ±s.d.:2.14±0.07vs 1.51±0.11%in the spleens,5.21±0.24vs 3.86±0.27%in the lymph nodes,both P o 0.01).On day 100,the Ab +JAG1-DC group had a higher population of CD4+Foxp3+T cells in the spleens and lymph nodes compared with the Ab+JAG1-DC group on day 7(2.65±0.09vs 2.14±0.07%and 6.09±0.29vs 5.21±0.24%,P o 0.01and P o 0.05,respectively).But there was no difference among the HTx control group,GFP-DC group (spleens:1.59±0.08%,lymphFigure 1Overexpression of Jagged-1in the DC2.4cells.(a )At 48h after infection,the DC2.4cells were analysed for GFP expression and (b )Jagged-1protein (≈180kDa)was detected by western blot.(c )DC2.4cells transduced with Ad5/F35-GFP-Jagged-1(solid lines)showed the same expression of MHC class II and costimulatory ligands as control GFP-DC (dotted lines)by flow cytometry (the isotype controls were shown as filled histogram).(d )MLR cultures consisted of T-cell responders,and GFP-DC or JAG1-DC2.4stimulator cells were determined after 3days.(e )To con firm the functionality of Jagged-1expressed on transduced DCs,T-cell populations were analysed for HES-1,Deltex-1and Notch-1mRNA expression after 12h in the MLR in vitro .Each reaction was carried out in triplicate.Data are representative of three independent experiments,which showed similar results (*P o 0.05,**P o 0.01,***P o 0.001).A full colour version of this figure is available at the Immunology and Cell Biology journal online.2Immunology and Cell Biologynodes: 4.04±0.28%)and JAG1-DC group (spleens: 1.73±0.11%,lymph nodes:4.52±0.15%)on day 7.There was also no difference among the Ab group (spleens: 2.0±0.06%,lymph nodes:4.57±0.23%),Ab+GFP-DC group (spleens: 2.02±0.11%,lymph nodes:5.02±0.12%)and Ab+JAG1-DC group either in the spleens or lymph nodes on day 7.The levels of the in flammatory or tolerogenic cytokines in animal sera were analysed (Figure 2e).Compared with the HTx control group,the JAG1-DC group exhibited signi ficantly upregulated expres-sion of TGF-βon day 7.In addition,the levels of TGF-βwere stably increased in the Ab+JAG1-DC group when compared with the Ab group or Ab+GFP-DC group on day 7.Although the level of TGF-βwas decreased at 100days,it remained at a high level compared with that of the HTx control group.However,there were no marked or persistent increases in the production of IL-4and IL-10in the Ab +JAG1-DC group (data not shown).DISCUSSIONNotch has an important role in regulating the differentiation of naive CD4T cells into distinct Th lineages while antigen-presenting cells express different Notch ligands.24When Notch is activated,the γ-secretase complex proteolytically releases the Notch intracellular domain,which subsequently traf fics to the nucleus and heterodi-merises with the DNA-binding transcription factor CSL,leading to Notch-dependent target gene transcription.25It has been reported that the NICD/CSL complex can bind to lineage-speci fic transcription factors such as T-bet,Gata3or the ROR γt promoter.These interac-tions have a role in directly modulating the expression of cytokines and the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription family,26thereby regulating the differentiation of naive T cells into Th1,Th2or Th17cells.27–29It has also been reported that Jagged-1-Notch interaction can speci fically direct differentiation into Th2cells.Our results indicated that overexpression of Jagged-1in DC2.4cells inhibits T-cell proliferation in vitro ,as a result of Notch-1activation.However,there was no marked or persistent increase in the production of IL-4in vivo .Instead,JAG1-DC combined with anti-CD40L therapy markedly inhibited splenic T-cell proliferation and Th1immunity.In addition,the Jagged-1-Notch pathway regulates naive CD4T-cell differentiation into induced Tregs,which include Th3and Tr1cells.17,30We observed that the expression of TGF-β,but not IL-10,was increased in the grafts and sera in the Ab+JAG1-DC group.Meanwhile,this combination treatment induced a larger CD4+Foxp3+Treg population in the spleens and lymph nodes after 100days,as well as in the grafts.Th3cells have been shown to induce tolerance and downregulate both Th1and Th2responses.31,32Therefore,we presumed that the induced Tregs in the Ab+JAG1-DC group were mostly TGF-β-secreting Th3cells,causing suppression of Th1immunity and maintaining allograft acceptance,which is associated with the presence of the TGF-βsignalling pathway.16,33,34The tolerance induced by anti-CD40L therapy has been showed to depend mostly on the induction of hyporesponsiveness and Tregs rather than T-cell depletion,35,36matching the results we obtained for the combined therapy group in vivo .Another potential mechanism by which the Jagged-1-Notch signalling pathway functions in Th or induced Treg differentiation may be related to interaction withtheFigure 2The JAG1-DC combined with blockade of CD40pathway synergizes to prolong cardiac allograft survival.(a )Cardiac allograft survival was calculated by the Kaplan –Meier method and compared by a log-rank test (n =6mice per group).(b )The relative expression of the mRNA levels of IL-2,IFN-γ,TGF-βand Foxp3in grafts was detected by quantitative real-time PCR.(c )The proportion of CD4+Foxp3+Tregs in the recipients in indicated groups were analysed by flow cytometry.(d )MLR were used to test the proliferative responses of recipient splenic cells to donor cells of C57BL/6or C3H mice.(e )The concentrations of TGF-βin the sera were detected.Each reaction was carried out in triplicate.All data are representative of three independent experiments,which showed similar results (n =3mice per group,*P o 0.05,**P o 0.01,***P o 0.001).A full colour version of this figure is available at the Immunology and Cell Biology journal online.3Immunology and Cell BiologyNF-κB signalling pathway,which has crucial roles in inflammation, immune responses,cell survival and cytokine production.37–39 In conclusion,we showed that the combination therapy had critical effects on the regulation of immune response(it markedly inhibited Th1immunity and induced induced Tregs,but did not shift the balance towards Th2immunity)and promoted long-term allograft survival.This is thefirst report of the effect of JAG1-DC administration in combination with CD40pathway blockade in vivo.This combination strategy,which promotes the induction of Tregs through Jagged-1 stimulation,is highly attractive for gene therapy and has potential as gene modification for treating immunological diseases or as an adjunct to clinical transplantation.METHODSAnimalsFemale C57BL/6,BALB/c and C3H mice,6–8weeks of age,were purchased from Slac Laboratory Animal Co.Ltd(Shanghai,China)and maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment in accordance with the guidelines provided in the‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’(US Department of Health and Human Services).Cell linesThe DC2.4cell line(H-2K b,ShangHai HuiYing Biotechnology Co.Ltd, ShangHai,China)was cultured in RPMI1640medium supplemented with 10%fetal calf serum(Gibco,Grand Island,NY,USA),50μmβ-mercaptoetha-nol(Sigma-Aldrich,St Louis,MO,USA),2m M L-glutamine and10m M HEPES (Life Technologies,Grand Island,NY,USA)and penicillin(100U ml−1)–streptomycin(100μg ml−1)at37°C in a humid environment with5%CO2. Adenoviral vectorCytomegalovirus promoter DNA,the complementary DNA corresponding to full-length Jagged-1(GeneBank:BC058675.1)and GFP was cloned into the chimaeric adenoviral vector pAd5/F35.A human embryonic kidney293cell line was transduced with these Ad5/F35vectors using Lipofectamine2000(Life Technologies)and expanded the viruses.The viruses were extracted using three consecutive freeze/thaw cycles and then were concentrated and purified by double caesium chloride gradient ultracentrifugation and desalting with a dialysis cassette(Pierce,Rockford,IL,USA).DC2.4cells were transduced with either pAd5/F35-GFP-Jagged-1or Ad5/F35-GFP adenovirus at37°C in serum-free RPMI1640medium.After2h,these cells were washed twice and resuspended in fresh complete medium.Western blotCell extracts were prepared by lysing them with lysis buffer(Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology,Jiangsu,China)supplemented with a protease inhibitor ‘cocktail’(Roche Diagnostics,Basel,Switzerland).Protein concentrations were determined by bicinchoninic acid assay(Pierce,Rockford,IL,USA).Immuno-blot analysis was performed as previously described.40Adoptive transfer and heart transplantationThe JAG1-DC or GFP-DC cells were transferred to BALB/c mice via the tail vein(5×106cells per recipient).On the day following the adoptive transfer, hearts from C57BL/6mice were transplanted into the neck vessels of the BALB/c recipients as described previously.41Graft survival was monitored by palpation daily,and rejection was defined as the loss of palpable cardiac contractions.Mixed lymphocyte reactionT lymphocytes were isolated from the spleens of BALB/c mice using nylon wool columns(Wako,Osaka,Japan)and used as responder cells.The purity of T cells was485%(as determined byflow cytometry)and their viability was 490%(as assessed by trypan blue exclusion).JAG1-DC or GFP-DC cells pre-treated with mitomycin C(50μg ml−1,Amresco,Solon,OH,USA)were used as stimulator cells in the mixed lymphocyte reaction(MLR)in vitro(DC: T cells=2×104cells:1×106cells=1:50).After HTx,the lymphocytes were isolated from the spleens of recipient mice and used as responder cells(purified by nylon wool columns)on day7or100. Splenic cells obtained from C57BL/6or C3H mice(also pre-treated with 40μg ml−1mitomycin C)were used as stimulator cells in the MLR ex vivo (stimulator cells:responder cells=1×105cells:1×106cells=1:10).All MLRs were cultured for3days at37°C in a humid environment with5%CO2,and the cell proliferation was measured using a BrdU kit(Roche,Mannheim, Germany).Monoclonal antibodiesThe anti-CD40L mAb(MR-1)and isotype control antibodies were produced from Bio X Cell(West Lebanon,NH,USA)and were administered(0.25mg per dose)by intraperitoneal injection on days0,2,4and6after HTx. Flow cytometryCells(1×106cells per100μl)were labelled using antibodies against murine CD11c,Jagged-1,MHC class II,CD80,CD86and isotype control antibodies (eBioscience Inc.,San Diego,CA,USA).CD4+Foxp3+Tregs were labelled using the Mouse Regulatory T cell staining kit(eBioscience Inc.).Flow cytometry was carried out as previously described.42Quantitative real-time PCRThe mRNA from cells or grafts was extracted using TRIzol(Invitrogen, Carlsbad,CA,USA).Reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR were performed using a StepOne Real-Time PCR System(ABI,Foster,UK). Measurement of cytokine productionThe concentrations of IL-4,IL-10and TGF-βwere detected using commercially available kits(NeoBioscience Technology Co.Ltd,Shenzhen,China). Statistical analysisThe median survival times were compared by the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test,and other data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance, using GraphPad Prism software(GraphPad Software Inc.,San Diego, CA,USA).ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC,81302546)and the Major State Scientific Research Program of China(No.2012CBA01303).1Banchereau J,Steinman RM.Dendritic cells and the control of immunity.Nature1998;392:245–252.2Morel PA,Feili-Hariri M,Coates PT,Thomson AW.Dendritic cells,T cell tolerance and therapy of adverse immune reactions.Clin Exp Immunol2003;133:1–10.3Chung CY,Ysebaert D,Berneman ZN,Cools N.Dendritic cells:cellular mediators for immunological tolerance.Clin Dev Immunol2013;2013:972865.4Mocellin S,Marincola F,Rossi CR,Nitti D,Lise M.The multifaceted relationship between IL-10and adaptive immunity:putting together the pieces of a puzzle.Cytokine Growth Factor Rev2004;15:61–76.5Lee WC,Qiani S,Wan Y,Li W,Xing Z,Gauldie J et al.Contrasting effects of myeloid dendritic cells transduced with an adenoviral vector encoding interleukin-10on organ allograft and tumour rejection.Immunology2000;101:233–241.6O'Rourke RW,Kang SM,Lower JA,Feng S,Ascher NL,Baekkeskov S et al.A dendritic cell line genetically modified to express CTLA4-IG as a means to prolong islet allograft survival.Transplantation2000;69:1440–1446.7Ierino FL,Mulley W,Dodge N,Li YQ,Mouhtouris E,Christiansen D et al.Dendritic cells expressing soluble CTLA4Ig prolong antigen-specific skin graft survival.Immunol Cell Biol2010;88:846–850.8Shen Z,Reznikoff G,Dranoff G,Rock KL.Cloned dendritic cells can present exogenous antigens on both MHC class I and class II molecules.J Immunol1997;158: 2723–2730.9Mann J,Patrick CN,Cragg MS,Honeychurch J,Mann DA,Harris M.Functional analysis of HIV type1Nef reveals a role for PAK2as a regulator of cell phenotype and function in the murine dendritic cell line,DC2.4.J Immunol2005;175:6560–6569.4Immunology and Cell Biology10He FR,Zhu HF,Huang H,Dai YD,Shen X,Wang M et al.Programmed death-1ligands-transfected dendritic cells loaded with glutamic acid decarboxylase65(GAD65)inhibit both the alloresponse and the GAD65-reactive lymphocyte response.Clin Exp Immunol 2008;151:86–93.11Maillard I,Fang T,Pear WS.Regulation of lymphoid development,differentiation,and function by the Notch pathway.Annu Rev Immunol2005;23:945–974.12Radtke F,Fasnacht N,Macdonald HR.Notch signaling in the immune system.Immunity2010;32:14–27.13Yuan JS,Kousis PC,Suliman S,Visan I,Guidos CJ.Functions of notch signaling in the immune system:consensus and controversies.Annu Rev Immunol2010;28: 343–365.14Osborne BA,Minter LM.Notch signalling during peripheral T-cell activation and differentiation.Nat Rev Immunol2007;7:64–75.15Yvon ES,Vigouroux S,Rousseau RF,Biagi E,Amrolia P,Dotti G et al.Overexpression of the Notch ligand,Jagged-1,induces alloantigen-specific human regulatory T cells.Blood2003;102:3815–3821.16Samon JB,Champhekar A,Minter LM,Telfer JC,Miele L,Fauq A et al.Notch1and TGFbeta1cooperatively regulate Foxp3expression and the maintenance of peripheral regulatory T cells.Blood2008;112:1813–1821.17Hoyne GF,Le RI,Corsin-Jimenez M,Tan K,Dunne J,Forsyth LM et al.Serrate1-induced notch signalling regulates the decision between immunity and tolerance made by peripheral CD4(+)T cells.Int Immunol2000;12: 177–185.18Li XC,Rothstein DM,Sayegh MH.Costimulatory pathways in transplantation:chal-lenges and new developments.Immunol Rev2009;229:271–293.19Quezada SA,Jarvinen LZ,Lind EF,Noelle RJ.CD40/CD154interactions at the interface of tolerance and immunity.Annu Rev Immunol2004;22:307–328.20Edelstein ML,Abedi MR,Wixon J.Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2007–an update.J Gene Med2007;9:833–842.21Atkinson H,Chalmers R.Delivering the goods:viral and non-viral gene therapy systems and the inherent limits on cargo DNA and internal sequences.Genetica2010;138: 485–498.22Jarriault S,Le BO,Hirsinger E,Pourquie O,Logeat F,Strong CF et al.Delta-1activation of notch-1signaling results in HES-1transactivation.Mol Cell Biol1998;18: 7423–7431.23Yamamoto N,Yamamoto S,Inagaki F,Kawaichi M,Fukamizu A,Kishi N et al.Role of Deltex-1as a transcriptional regulator downstream of the Notch receptor.J Biol Chem 2001;276:45031–45040.24Amsen D,Blander JM,Lee GR,Tanigaki K,Honjo T,Flavell RA.Instruction of distinct CD4T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells.Cell 2004;117:515–526.25Kopan R,Ilagan MX.The canonical Notch signaling pathway:unfolding the activation mechanism.Cell2009;137:216–233.26Zhu J,Yamane H,Paul WE.Differentiation of effector CD4T cell populations.Annu Rev Immunol2010;28:445–489.27Minter LM,Turley DM,Das P,Shin HM,Joshi I,Lawlor RG et al.Inhibitors of gamma-secretase block in vivo and in vitro T helper type1polarization by preventing Notchupregulation of Tbx21.Nat Immunol2005;6:680–688.28Amsen D,Antov A,Jankovic D,Sher A,Radtke F,Souabni A et al.Direct regulation of Gata3expression determines the T helper differentiation potential of Notch.Immunity2007;27:89–99.29Mukherjee S,Schaller MA,Neupane R,Kunkel SL,Lukacs NW.Regulation of T cell activation by Notch ligand,DLL4,promotes IL-17production and Rorc activation.J Immunol2009;182:7381–7388.30Vigouroux S,Yvon E,Wagner HJ,Biagi E,Dotti G,Sili U et al.Induction of antigen-specific regulatory T cells following overexpression of a Notch ligand by human Blymphocytes.J Virol2003;77:10872–10880.31Weiner HL.Induction and mechanism of action of transforming growth factor-beta-secreting Th3regulatory cells.Immunol Rev2001;182:207–214.32Kumar S,Naqvi RA,Khanna N,Pathak P,Rao DN.Th3immune responses in the progression of leprosy via molecular cross-talks of TGF-beta,CTLA-4and Cbl-b.ClinImmunol2011;141:133–142.33Blokzijl A,Dahlqvist C,Reissmann E,Falk A,Moliner A,Lendahl U et al.Cross-talk between the Notch and TGF-beta signaling pathways mediated by interaction of theNotch intracellular domain with Smad3.J Cell Biol2003;163:723–728.34Campese AF,Grazioli P,de Cesaris P,Riccioli A,Bellavia D,Pelullo M et al.Mouse Sertoli cells sustain de novo generation of regulatory T cells by triggering the Notchpathway through soluble JAGGED1.Biol Reprod2014;90:53.35Nathan MJ,Yin D,Eichwald EJ,Bishop DK.The immunobiology of inductive anti-CD40L therapy in transplantation:allograft acceptance is not dependent upon thedeletion of graft-reactive T cells.Am J Transplant2002;2:323–332.36Niimi M,Pearson TC,Larsen CP,Alexander DZ,Hollenbaugh D,Aruffo A et al.The role of the CD40pathway in alloantigen-induced hyporesponsiveness in vivo.J Immunol1998;161:5331–5337.37Vilimas T,Mascarenhas J,Palomero T,Mandal M,Buonamici S,Meng F et al.Targeting the NF-kappaB signaling pathway in Notch1-induced T-cell leukemia.Nat Med2007;13:70–77.38Shin HM,Minter LM,Cho OH,Gottipati S,Fauq AH,Golde TE et al.Notch1augments NF-kappaB activity by facilitating its nuclear retention.EMBO J2006;25:129–138.39Wang J,Shelly L,Miele L,Boykins R,Norcross MA,Guan E.Human Notch-1inhibits NF-kappa B activity in the nucleus through a direct interaction involving anovel domain.J Immunol2001;167:289–295.40Li WZ,Yu ZY,Ma PF,Wang Y,Jin QW.A novel role of Dma1in regulating forespore membrane assembly and sporulation infission yeast.Mol Biol Cell2010;21:4349–4360.41Matsuura A,Abe T,Yasuura K.Simplified mouse cervical heart transplantation using a cuff technique.Transplantation1991;51:896–898.42Lin Y,Dai H,Su J,Yan G,Xi Y,Ekberg H et al.Arsenic trioxide is a novel agent for combination therapy to prolong heart allograft survival in allo-primed T cellstransferred mice.Transpl Immunol2011;25:194–201.5Immunology and Cell Biology。