雅思写作Task2考官范文:政府类(4)

合集下载

2023.08.26雅思Task2:政府提供免费住房

2023.08.26雅思Task2:政府提供免费住房

8.26大陆雅思大作文范文及解析:政府提供免费住房观点类大作文,社会类话题As housing is a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Sample Answer:Undeniably, shelter stands as a cornerstone of basic human requirements. Yet, I find myself in contention with the proposition that it is the government's role to proffer gratuitous housing to every individual incapable of independently footing the expense. My standpoint arises from apprehensions regarding feasibility, equity, and the potential for engendering a culture of dependency.A primary concern that must be addressed is the colossal fiscal burden such a policy would exert on a nation's treasury. Governments are tasked with the complex role of judiciously allocating resources across an array of sectors, and the pledge to furnish gratuitous housing couldprecipitate a considerable deflection of capital from other critical domains, such as the realm of education or public healthcare.A further apprehension lies in the unforeseen ramifications of such a policy, specifically its potential to stymie personal endeavour. The provision of gratuitous housing, whilst undoubtedly benevolent in intention, may inadvertently dissuade individuals from pursuing gainful employment or enhancing their fiscal circumstances. This could engender a culture of dependency that might prove detrimental in the broader perspective.Moreover, the question of equity emerges. Delineating housing allocation based on fiscal need could engender situations wherein those marginally falling short of the eligibility criteria bear disproportionate financial duress, thereby birthing a fresh cadre of societal disparities. A more balanced approach may lie in the government formulating policies aimed at enhancing the affordability of housing. This could encompass strategies such as offering financial aid to prospective homeowners, instituting rentcontrol measures, or incentivizing the creation ofcost-effective housing units.In conclusion, while the aim of guaranteeing universal access to housing is commendable, the dispensation of free housing to every individual incapable of affording it may not represent the most efficacious or equitable strategy. Instead, policies designed to bolster housing affordability could offer a more nuanced, sustainable resolution.范文作者:Sophia5相关词汇和语法结构In contention with 与...有争议Apprehensions regarding 对...的忧虑Colossal fiscal burden 巨大的财政负担Judiciously allocating resources 明智地分配资源Critical domains 关键领域Unforeseen ramifications 未预见的后果Stymie personal endeavour 阻碍个人努力Inadvertently dissuade 无意间劝阻Engender a culture of dependency 产生依赖文化Question of equity 公平问题Disproportionate financial duress 不成比例的财务压力Fresh cadre of societal disparities 新的社会差异阶层Instituting rent control measures 设立租金控制措施Incentivizing the creation 激励...的创造Efficacious or equitable strategy 有效或公平的策略Bolster housing affordability 提高住房可负担性Nuanced, sustainable resolution 细致的,可持续的解决方案。

#雅#思写作知识点系列之政府职能类

#雅#思写作知识点系列之政府职能类

备考雅思写作需要考生投入一定的时间与精力,对于每个知识点都要牢记。

今天,前程百利小编为大家带来的是雅思写作知识点系列之政府职能类,希望对考生有所帮助。

今天的任务是学习政府职能类写作。

透析“医疗服务是否应该让盈利性公司提供”,练习“只有政府才能解决住房紧缺”的问题;透析“政府是否应该花钱建设剧院和体育场”,练习政府是否该为田家体育运动员出资“的问题。

例题是一道观点比较类成目,通过这道例题,我们练习使用常见的“背景法”开头,用“总结(+建议)”法结尾,并练习用“因果法”这种最基本的段落扩展方法。

一、例题精讲You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Some people think that good health is very Important to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words.题干:一些人认为健康对每个人都很重要,因此医疗服务不应该由通利性的公司提供。

私营医疗机构的缺点要大于它的优点么?1.审题从话题上来看,这是一道政府职能类题目。

“政府职能”是社会科学领域的重要话题,也是雅思写作考试经常关注的一类题目。

它主要探讨政府机构与私营机构的职能分配(如居民住房、大众交通等问题)和政府措施的合理性(如政府为保护公共安全侵犯个人隐私)。

雅思写作考官范文

雅思写作考官范文

雅思写作考官范文范文:In recent years, the issue of environmental protection has become increasingly important. Some people argue that individuals should be responsible for protecting the environment, while others believe that it is thegovernment's duty. In my opinion, both individuals and the government should take responsibility for protecting the environment.On the one hand, individuals play a crucial role in environmental protection. Each person can contribute to the conservation of the environment by making small changes in their daily lives. For example, people can reduce their carbon footprint by using public transportation instead of driving cars, recycling waste, and conserving energy at home. Furthermore, individuals can raise awareness about environmental issues and encourage others to take action.By making conscious choices and adopting sustainable habits,individuals can make a significant impact on the environment.On the other hand, the government also plays a key role in environmental protection. It is the government's responsibility to create and enforce laws and regulations that promote environmental conservation. For instance, the government can implement policies to reduce air and water pollution, protect natural habitats, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the government should invest in environmental education and research to develop sustainable solutions for environmental problems. By taking decisive action, the government can lead the way in preserving the environment for future generations.In conclusion, both individuals and the government have a vital role to play in protecting the environment. While individuals can make a difference through their everyday choices and actions, the government must also take responsibility for creating and enforcing policies that promote environmental conservation. By working together, we can ensure a sustainable future for our planet.。

雅思作文政府职能类话题

雅思作文政府职能类话题

政府职能类话题大学专业该由学生的兴趣来决定还是由政府来决定(2006.9.16.)Some people say that governments should pay for the health care and education but other people say that it is not the governments' responsibility. Discuss the both viewpoints and give your opinion. (2007.1.20)Some people think that government should pay the course fees for those who want to study at university. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (政府决策类) (2007.11.3)Some people believe that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effcects than the positive effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (2007.11.24)some people believe that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should bu financially supports by government. Some people think they should be funded by non-governemnt(e.g.business,scholarship)(2006.04.28)房屋紧缺带来的社会问题,有人认为只能靠government action 解决是否同意(2006.05.13)An increasing number of people choose to live in big cities. What problems will this bring about? Should the government encourage people to live in small towns? 2008.2.14(语义降格)The number of cars keeps increasing, so road systems should be expanded. Some people think the government should pay for it, while others think the car owners should pay for it. What’s your opinion? 2008.3.8(新题初现)Some people think government should ensure the healthy lifestyle. of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 2008.3.29(新题初现)Government encourages industries and business to move out of big cities to regional areas. To what extent do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?08.08.09Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve the poverty. So rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?2009.02.07It is more important for the government to spend money on promoting the healthy lifestyle to prevent the illness than to spend money treating people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?09.03.21Some people think they should keep all the money they earn, and should not have to pay tax to the state. Agree or disagree? (2006.01.07)。

雅思大作文政府类

雅思大作文政府类
雅思作文Part 2 —Government
Presentor—Susan
政府类

国防( defense ):保护一个国家免受攻击 ( protect a country against attack or other threats) 保证法律和公共秩序( enforcement of law and public order) 政府运作(operation of government) 政府职能(government function) 社会保障(social security) 医疗保健(health care system) 福利(welfare) 退休和残疾人福利(retirement and disabilitybenefits)
the direct result of overcrowding and overpopulation
zoning policies划地政策 housing allowance住房补贴

house allocation system dampen the ehthusiasm of individuals in housing investment降低私人投资热情 a grave shortage in the investment in house construction 房屋建设的投资少 ease the housing pressure减轻住房压力 the fundamental rele占主导地位 construction quality建筑工程质量 monotonous cityscape 单一的城市景观( uniformity of house design) comprehensive requiements on living conditions对生活 的高要求

雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题

雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题

雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题 Revised by BETTY on December 25,2020雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题朗阁雅思培训中心周莉引言根据今年问世的剑11来看,政府类话题占据了非常重要的地位,Test 1、2、4都是与政府职能类相关的题目,并且都是Argumentation类型,自2015年以来,政府职能类话题平均每两个月出现一次。

对于大多数考生来说,此类话题较为陌生,并常伴有话题交叉,角度多样的特性,比如经常与教育、医疗、城市建设、犯罪等话题相结合,因此在背景知识和社会阅历的缺失下,考生往往不知从何下笔。

由于绝大多数的政府类题目都与政府投资、支出相关,因此在本文中,朗阁专家将从经济学的角度论述政府存在的意义和政府的职能特性,以帮助烤鸭们积累相关的话题知识、原版语料,并配以2012-2016年雅思写作政府类话题真题(见Appendix A),扩展解题思路。

Why governments exist政府是一个我们熟悉而又陌生的话题。

我们的生活的各个方面比如学习、工作、生活都与政府息息相关,但是对其的探究却并不充分,这导致了大多数学生在论述此类话题时都会存在话语空洞的问题。

要了解政府的职能,我们首先看一下政府存在的目的和原因。

Parkin (2012, 在《Economics》一书中说到“Governments exist for three major reasons. First, they establish and maintain property rights. Second, they provide nonmarket mechanisms for allocating scarce resources. Third, they implement arrangements that redistribute income and wealth”. 首先,政府存在的第一个理由是建立和维护产权,也就是说设定并执行相应的法律体系(set up and enforce legal system)——管控职能(supervision & regulation); 第二,政府提供了非市场机制(nonmarket mechanism)来分配稀缺的资源(allocate scarce resources)。

英语考试作文-关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解

英语考试作文-关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解

英语考试作文关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解雅思写作高分范文能够让考生有效学习遣词造句的技巧,还能扩展词汇量。

对于基础薄弱的考生而言,背诵高分范文也是一个不错的选择。

除了能够快速提高语法的运用能力之外,还能积累大量的好词好句。

今天小站君为大家带来关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文。

希望能够帮助到大家。

雅思写作题目:Many people think that arts (painting and music) do not directly improve people’s life, so the government should spend money on other important areas. Do you agree or disagree?雅思写作题目讲解:第一段:引入话题,艺术是否该获得政府资金支持。

第二段:社会服务当然可以明显地提高人民的生活水平,如教育,医疗,环境或基础建设。

但是这些并不会增加人民的幸福感受。

第三段:人民需要艺术,因为:艺术相关人们的情感和价值观,这是人们行为的核心部分。

艺术培养人的创造和创新能力;艺术是娱乐休闲方式,艺术是感情和精力释放的安全方式,艺术促进不同文化和民族间的理解。

第四段:政府应该既投资社会基础服务,也投资艺术。

这样才能创造一个健康有生机的社会。

雅思写作范文:While the economy is booming in many countries, the funding for arts has been decreasing. The main reason is that some people overly emphasize social services such as medical care and education, but underestimate the intangible role of the arts as they find it difficult to quantify their benefits.在大多数国家经济繁荣的时候,艺术经费也会随之减少。

TOEFL独立写作(政府相关2篇)

TOEFL独立写作(政府相关2篇)

独立写作(有关政府政策)(小马重一1)It i s m ore i mportant f or g overnment t o s pend m oney t o b uild a rt museums a nd m usic p erformance c enter t han t o b uild r ecreational f acilities(such as s wimming p ool, p laygrounds).Every y ear t here i s a t ime f or g overnment t o s ubmit i ts b udget t o p arliament t o d iscuss. That i s n ot a s mooth p rocess, d uring w hich h eat d ebate a re a lways a roused o n h ow t axes raised s hould b e s pent t o b est i mprove c itizens’ w ell b eing. S ome p eople i nsist o n b uilding more a rt m useums a nd m usic p erformance c enters t han r ecreational f acilities. H owever, i n my o pinion, t hat i s a c omplex i ssue, w hich r equires f urther a nd d eeper a nalysis.First, f or t he a rt m useums a nd m usic p erformance h alls, i t i s u ndeniable t hat t hey a re essential t o t he c itizens’ e ntertainment l ife, a nd t hey i ndisputably s hould b e t aken i nto t he government a nnual b udget. H owever, t hinking a bout t he s mall v illages a nd t iny t owns t hat cannot a fford t he h uge c ost o f t hese a rt h alls, t hey s hould b e o nly c onsidered b y t he megacities. E very c ity h as i ts o wn f inancial p ower d ues t o i ts p opulation s ize a nd e conomic level, a nd e ach i s d ifferent f rom t he o thers. F or t hese s mall c ities a nd t owns, l ocal government s hould m easure i ts p ower a nd f oresee t he p robable r esults o f t he p lan o f building a rt m useums a nd m usic h alls, f or i t i s a s evere, p ractical a nd t ough q uestion t o t he city f or l ong r un. I t hink, t hat i f o ne s mall c ity c ould a fford t he a nnual c osts o f t he m useums and h alls, i t s hould i nvest t o b uild t hese t hings, b ecause t hese a rt m useums a nd m usic h alls can n ot o nly c ultivate c itizens’ m inds b ut a lso s timulate t he d evelopment o f t ourism industry.As f or t he r ecreational f acilities, t hey a re n ot o nly t he c ommon r esponsibility f or t he s mall cities a nd m egacities, b ut a lso a d uty t o e very c itizen. N ow, i n e verywhere o f o ur c ountry, the r ecreational f acilities a re f ree o f c harge f or p eople t o u se, g iving e veryone t he opportunity t o r elax a s w ell a s e xercise. S o, p eople h ave t he d uty t o p ay f or b uilding t he recreational f acilities s uch a s t he s wimming p ools a nd f ootball g rounds. I n a ddition, t he charities, s port s tars, c elebrities, f ootball p arties a nd f amous s port t eams w ould l ike t o afford t he c ost o f c onstructions o f t hese f acilities, u sing i t a s t he d onations o r r eciprocations to i mprove t heir p ersonal r eputations. I n a w ord, b ecause t he c onstructions o f r ecreational facilities w ould b e f inished b y t he w hole p ower f rom a ll c lasses o f t he s ociety, e ven t he small t owns s hould d o s omething t o b uild t he r ecreational f acilities t o o ffer t he c itizensmore c hances t o r est, e xercise a nd e njoy.In c onclusion, t he f inal d ecision o n w hich s hould b e f ocused m ore a ctually d epend o n t he primarily l ocal g overnments’ p owers a nd p eople’s d emands.20120203 T he g overnment a nd c orporation s hould s hare a ll t heir s cientific discoveries w ith o ther c ountries i n t he w orld?不同意:1.国家间无偿分享大量发现会挫败科学家的积极性;企业间分享会破坏良性竞争关系 2.高端技术(高科技武器)被恐怖人士得到会危及世界的和平3.世界的和平其实是处于一种动态平衡与牵制的,因为各个国家不知道对方有什么能力,所以谨慎提防,从而维护了世界的和平。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

雅思写作Task2考官范文:政府类(4)
本文收集整理了雅思写作Task2考官范文:政府类(4)。

认真研读一定的雅思范文及作文模板可以帮助我们检验自己的写作水平,并能很好地吸收和应用优秀范文里的优秀内容。

The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.
Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to have a comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.
Model Answer:
A much debated issue these days is whether citizens should take out private health insurance or not. The cost of providing free medical care for both the wealthy and the poor is far too great for any government, and most people agree that if you can pay for insurance, you should. In this essay, I will argue that all who can afford it should be insured, but free medical care must be made available for those too poor to do so.
The most important reason for encouraging people to take out private health insurance is the cost to the government of health care.
Free health cover for people who are able to pay for it is a waste of public money. Of course, people will only pay health insurance premiums if they know that they are getting good value for their money. If they get sick, they should pay very little or nothing at all. In addition, the privately insured are entitled to special benefits such as having the choice of their own doctors, and being able to avoid long waiting lists for hospital beds.
On the other hand, those who really cannot afford to pay private insurance premiums, which are often very high, are still entitled as citizens to the best medical care available –they cannot be expected to pay their own medical bills. However, if they are working, they should still pay a percentage of their wage (say 1 to 2%) as a tax which pays towards the cost of providing "free" medical services.
In conclusion, most people should privately insure their health, but it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free health care system must exist for the very poor and the unemployed.。

相关文档
最新文档