雅思写作范文——富国帮穷国
雅思大作文范文：对贫穷国家是否应提供更多援助类型
Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with other types of help rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Financial aids to developing nations provided by developed countries are quite common in the world. Although financial support, I believe other forms of support could be more helpful.Other kinds of aid, such as education can be a great approach to solve problems in developing countries. In many poor nations, the social problems are very severe due to the fact that most people are under-educated. If rich countries can provide scholarship or build public schools for the children there, crimes would be mitigated, and in the long run, the well- educated workforce can develop the economy of their country by themselves.Also, providing construction material and technology for public facilities is effective. The improvement of public infrastructure, such as libraries, water and electricity supply system and public transport system, in a way contributes to higher productivity as people would less likely be affected by bad public services and save more time and energy for their work.On the other hand, direct financial support may not benefit people in poorer countries as expected. The government in these countries might use the donating money for other purposes. Consequently, the people in need will still suffer. Moreover, some nations try to interfere with other countries’ politics by aiding them financially. So, financial support is not the perfect way to solve social problems in poorer nations.In conclusion, the money donated to developing countries cannot completely solve poor countries’ problems, so international aids should be provided in other forms, such as education or the construction of public facilities.。
2019-2020-雅思话题作文范文：国际援助-推荐word版 (2页)
2019-2020-雅思话题作文范文：国际援助-推荐word版本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==雅思话题作文范文：国际援助雅思话题作文范文：国际援助Poverty reduction is again a hot topic worldwide when the economic crisis hits the poorest counties hardest . While more attention drawn to this issue , some problems emerge with peoples opinions divided . Many people believe countries have a moral obligation to help each other , whilst others argue that aid moneyis , more often than not , misspent by the recipients , so foreign aids , as a well - intended mechanism , simply failed and need to be scrapped .As a more widely shared knowledge than ever , poverty in the third world is an inevitable cause of all the chaos afflicting the world , from crimes , regional confrontations to terrorism , even pandemics . On this more and more globalized world , a nation could no longer be exempt from the unstableness and misery suffered by its neighbouring countries . Even the cry from the faraway end of the globe will be brought to your ears through all the links and ties . It is , therefore , a consensus among both the rich and the poor that only when poverty is eliminated once and for all , can peace and prosperity be attained and sustained . To this common end , the only possible way is to engage rich countries in helping poor ones generously and unconditionally .Sure enough , there are some high - profile scandals of fund misuse . Its also true foreign aid did foster corruption and irresponsible policymaking in some countries . Yet , this should not serve as the excuse of withdrawing these most needed aids which are supposed to and also proved to save lives and deliver hopes . A loose governance or corruptive government cannot cancel off the desperate needs of its people . On the other hand , there are some effective measures can be taken to avoid , at least to some extent , such undesirable situations , for instance , strengthening the supervision of fund disbursement , delivering aids through the network of non -。
5. 刘洪波范文
First, it is obvious that the government is the one most capable and responsible for solving any social issue and ensuring social equality.This is because in order to bridge this wealth gap, the most effective and direct method should be taxation leverage, by which the government can use the rich people’s tax money to subsidize the unfortunate.So, the technology should not become the scapegoat of the issue.
富裕国家对贫穷国家的责任是什么？
富裕国家对贫穷国家的责任是什么？作为当今世界上最为现实的问题之一，贫穷国家的困境一直以来都备受人们的关注。
在这个全球化的时代，富有的国家是否有责任去帮助那些不幸的国家呢？富有国家和穷国之间到底有什么关系呢？本文将从多个角度进行分析，带领读者一步一步了解富裕国家对贫穷国家的责任和义务是什么。
一、经济上的责任首先，富有的国家对于贫穷国家有着即使不能承担全部，但至少承担一部分的责任。
富国与穷国之间存在着显著的经济差距，导致穷国的经济发展遭遇了许多困难。
因此，富国应尽力提供贫穷国家需要的援助和支持，帮助贫穷国家摆脱望而却步的困境。
该如何提供援助和支持呢？一方面，富国可以通过向贫穷国家提供捐款、无偿援助、发展援助项目等方式寻求降低穷国负担，帮助其逐步发展壮大。
另一方面，富国可以在国际贸易和金融体系上为穷国谋求更公正的机会，以解决贫穷国家无法获取公正贸易的问题，避免寨卡病毒的暴发等疫情。
这样的公平贸易，公正财务安排将帮助一个国家在未来取得落后方向的良性改变，而与他们相比，那些致富和高度发展的国家则有义务去做出自己的贡献。
二、文化上的责任除了经济上的责任，富国也承担着防止文化上的全球化问题的责任。
文化是人类生活中重要的组成部分，每个国家都拥有自己的独有文化。
但是，随着全球化的趋势，贫穷国家的文化开始受到富国的影响，难以保持自身独立的文化特点。
面对这一问题，富国应当切实承担起文化交流与文化维护的责任。
通过文化交流，富国可以帮助穷国更好地了解世界，丰富其自身文化内涵，而不是意味着穷国的文化应该去“学习”富国，甚至对文化的保护恰好是维护这种独立和多样性的保护。
在促进文化交流的同时，富国也应当将其文化向穷国介绍，以获悉并帮助了解穷国的独特和個性，保护并推动其独特的文化发展。
三、环境上的责任环境问题是当今世界所面临的最大挑战之一。
然而，穷国需要经济发展，而环境保护是需要大量资金的。
因此，富国将需要帮助穷国发展可持续发展计划和对环境的保护。
【最新2019】雅思写作头脑风暴：援助贫困国家-word范文 (2页)
【最新2019】雅思写作头脑风暴：援助贫困国家-word范文
本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！
== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==
雅思写作头脑风暴：援助贫困国家
作文题目
IELTS 90
Some people believe that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than the positive effects . To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
题目翻译
有人认为援助贫困国家消极影响大于积极影响。
你是否同意，或部分同意这种观点?
题目分析
这里讨论的影响不仅可以认为是对被援助的国家的影响，也可以认为是对全球、发达国家的影响。
头脑风暴
1. 在你的国家，有什么援助贫困国家的行动?
用户回答参考：
●201X年，中国政府首次宣布减免非洲债务的措施，免除了31个非洲重
债穷国和最不发达国家部分到期债务共109亿元人民币。
201X年，中国宣布免除与中国有外交关系的所有非洲重债穷国及最不发达国家截至201X年底对华到期的168笔政府无息贷款债务。
截至到201X年，中国在非洲开展了800多个援建和合作项目。
截至201X年底，中国对非洲国家投资累计达62. 7亿美元，已与28个非洲国家签订了投资保护协定，与8个非洲国家签订避免双重征税协定。
2. 你觉得援助对贫困国家的积极影响和消极影响分别是什么?
用户回答参考：。
富有的国家应该帮助贫穷的国家吗英文作文
富有的国家应该帮助贫穷的国家吗英文作文全文共5篇示例，供读者参考篇1Should Rich Countries Help Poor Countries?Hi! My name is Jamie and I'm 10 years old. Today I want to talk to you about something really important - rich countries helping poor countries. It's a big topic with lots to think about, but I'll do my best to explain it simply.First off, what does it mean for a country to be rich or poor? Basically, rich countries have a lot of money, resources, and their people can afford nice homes, cars, vacations and all the food they need. Poor countries don't have as much money or resources, and lots of people there live in poverty without enough food, clean water, schools or hospitals.Some examples of rich countries are the United States, Canada, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Some poor countries are Haiti, Somalia, Afghanistan and Mali. Of course, even in rich countries there are still some poor people, and even in poor countries there are some rich people too. But overall, you can see the big differences.So should the rich countries help out the poor countries then?I think they absolutely should, and here are a few reasons why:It's the right thing to do. Imagine if you lived in a poor village where many kids didn't have enough food or couldn't go to school. Wouldn't you want someone to help you out if they could? Rich countries have way more than they need, so it's only fair that they share some of their wealth to help others in need. It's like if you had two cupcakes and your friend had none - you would give them one of yours because that's the nice thing to do.It helps make the whole world safer and more stable. When there is a lot of poverty and struggling in parts of the world, it can cause unrest, crime, and even warfare as people get desperate. But by helping developing countries get more food, jobs, education and opportunities, it makes their societies stronger and more peaceful for everyone. A stable world is a safer world for all.We're all human beings at the end of the day. It doesn't matter what country you're from or what you look like. We're all part of the human family. And when some members of your family are really struggling, you want to do what you can to helpthem out. That's what rich countries should do for poor countries - help them like they would help family.It helps economic growth for everyone. By supporting poor countries with trade, investment and development assistance, it allows those nations to build stronger economies over time. And as they get richer and can afford more products, that creates better markets and opportunities for the rich countries too. So it's a win-win!Of course, there are some who disagree with this. They might say that rich countries should just look out for themselves instead of giving away money to other nations. Or they could argue that helping poor countries allows their governments to be lazy and reliant on foreign aid forever.Those are fair points, but I still think helping is the right thing to do, for a few reasons:First, even if a country is getting aid, a lot of that help goes straight to the people through food, housing and education programs. It directly improves their lives. And quite frankly, what's the point of being a rich nation if you can't use some of that wealth to help those most in need?Second, the foreign aid given each year is a tiny fraction of what rich countries spend in total. The U.S. gives about 1% of its budget to foreign aid, for example. I think that's a pretty good use of resources to help millions of struggling people.Finally, and most importantly, helping others is simply the ethical thing to do if you're able to. Would you want to live in a world where people only cared about themselves and never helped those in need, even if they could? I certainly wouldn't. A world like that would be awfully selfish and sad.At the end of the day, we're all part of the human family together on this planet. And I think the luckier and richer members of that family should absolutely do what they can to help out their siblings living in muchmore difficult circumstances. It's the right thing to do, and it benefits everyone in the long run too.Those are just my thoughts as a 10-year-old kid, but I hope it shed some light on this important topic! What do you all think - should rich countries help poor countries? I'd love to hear your perspective too. Thanks for reading!篇2Should Rich Countries Help Poor Countries?Hi there! My name is Jamie and I'm a 4th grader. Today, my teacher Mrs. Miller asked us to write about whether we think rich countries should help poor countries or not. It's a pretty big topic, but I'll give it my best shot!First off, what does it even mean for a country to be rich or poor? Well, when a country is rich, that means the people who live there have a lot of money and resources. They can afford nice houses, cars, education, healthcare, and fun things like vacations. A poor country is the opposite – people there don't have much money. They might live in small homes with no electricity or running water. They can't afford school or medicine when they get sick.Why are some countries so much richer than others? There are a bunch of reasons. Sometimes it's because of the land and climate – if a place has fertile soil and mild weather, it's easier to grow food and build cities. Other times, it's due to resources like oil, gold, or diamonds that can be sold for lots of money. Wars, government issues, and lack of technology can keep countries poor too.So now that we understand rich vs poor countries, should the rich ones help out the poor ones? In my opinion, they absolutely should! Here's why:It's the right thing to do. Imagine if you had a ton of snacks and toys, while your friend had nothing. Wouldn't you want to share some of yours so they don't go hungry and have something to play with? Countries that are well off should have the same caring attitude toward countries that are struggling.It helps prevent conflicts. If a country's people are starving with no jobs, home, or future, they could get really angry at richer nations. By helping out, rich countries can develop friendships and peace with poorer ones.It improves the whole world. When people in poor places get education, they can become scientists, inventors, engineers and come up with amazing ideas to help everybody. Plus, well-fed healthy kids can go on to achieve great things! Helping develops their country's economy too which is good for global trade.We're all human. Just because someone is from a different country doesn't mean they deserve to suffer more than us. Having clean water, enough food, and opportunities should be something every person on earth can rely on.Of course, I can understand why some people might not want their country spending money on others. Here are a few counterpoints:It's expensive. Rich countries already have their own expenses like roads, schools and hospitals to fund for their citizens. Is it fair to make taxpayers spend even more abroad?What if the aid gets misused? Sometimes governments of poor nations can be corrupt. There's a risk that any aid could get wasted or stolen instead of helping those in need.It removes motivation. If a struggling country knows help is on the way, some argue they may not work as hard to improve their own situation and just become dependent on foreign aid.Immigration concerns. By developing poorer countries, there could be a greater population wave trying to immigrate to seek even more opportunities abroad.Those are some fair points too. Still, I tend to believe that helping is the right thing to do. But it has to be done the smart way - rich countries should partner with trustworthy organizations on the ground to make sure aid like food, medicine and education is getting directly to citizens in a way that develops long-term skills too. That way we're not just giving a handout, but a hand up.At the end of the day, we're all human beings regardless of where we're born. Some are luckier with their circumstances thanothers. But just like I'd hope someone would share their snacks if I was hungry on the playground, don't we all deserve a chance at health, happiness and success? I think every country should lend a hand to their neighbors in need. A rising tide lifts all boats, as they say!Well, that's my take! What did you think - did I cover it okay for a 4th grade perspective? Let me know if you have any other questions!篇3Should Rich Countries Help Poor Countries?Hi, my name is Jamie and I'm 10 years old. My teacher asked us to write about whether rich countries should help poor countries. It's a very serious topic but I'll try my best!First of all, what does it mean for a country to be rich or poor?A rich country has a lot of money and resources. The people there can afford nice houses, cars, vacations and all the food and things they need. A poor country doesn't have a lot of money or resources. Many people there live in poverty without enough food, clean water, schools or hospitals.Some examples of rich countries are the United States, Canada, Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom. Someexamples of poor countries are Haiti, Somalia, South Sudan, Central African Republic and Niger. There's a huge difference in how people live between the richest and poorest countries.I think rich countries definitely should help poor countries. Here are some of the main reasons why:It's the right thing to doIn my opinion, if you have a lot and others have very little, you should share what you can to help them. It's not fair that some kids my age don't have enough food or can't go to school just because they were born in a poor country. We're all human beings and we should look out for each other. Helping others is the kind and moral thing to do.It can save livesIn poor countries, lots of kids die from diseases, hunger or lack of clean water that would be totally preventable and treatable in rich countries. By giving poor countries aid like food, medicine and water filters, many lives can be saved. No kid should die because their family is too poor to afford basic things we take for granted.It reduces conflictWhen people are extremely poor with no opportunities, they can become desperate and turn to violence, crime, terrorism or try to migrate somewhere else. By helping poor countries develop and have more jobs and stability, it makes the whole world safer and more peaceful for everyone.It helps economic growthPoor countries are held back because their people don't have access to education, financial services, business loans and markets to sell what they produce. But with investment and aid from rich countries, poor countries can start to build economies, participate in trade, attract businesses and jobs, and climb out of poverty over time. This benefits everyone as poor countries become new markets for businesses in rich countries too.It's in our interestAlthough it costs money to help poor countries, Studies show that for every 1 a rich country spends on development aid, they get back about 2 in terms of increased economic growth, trade, safer communities, fewer conflicts, less migration and other benefits. So in the long run, it pays off for both rich AND poor countries.Those are some of the main reasons I think rich countries should help poor countries. Of course, there are some arguments against it too:It's a free handoutSome people say that giving money and resources to poor countries is just a handout that makes them dependent on aid instead of helping themselves. They think aid can create unhealthy cycles of dependency.CorruptionA concern is that a lot of aid gets wasted or stolen due to corruption in poor countries with unstable governments and weak laws. The aid may never actually reach the poor people who need it.Population growthHelping with food, health and development could make population growth in poor countries skyrocket at a rate their economies can't support, making problems worse.CostThe richest countries already spend hundreds of billions per year on aid and some people think that money should go to needs at home instead of sending it abroad.Those are some of the main arguments on both sides. Personally, I think the benefits of helping far outweigh the risks and downsides. Of course corruption is a huge issue, but a lot of good organizations work hard to cut down corruption and make sure aid is delivered efficiently. And while population growth is a concern, most studies show that as countries develop their birth rates stabilize over time.In the end, the way I see it is that we're all part of the human family. If some members of your family were really struggling while others had plenty, it's natural and right to try to help them out - within reason and in smart ways, but absolutely not ignoring their plight. We're all in this world together. I feel really fortunate to have been born in a rich country and I think those of us who are well-off should absolutely do our part to help our human brothers and sisters in poor countries achieve brighter futures and climb out of extreme poverty.Of course these are just my thoughts as a 10-year-old kid. But I hope that seeing the issue through a child's eyes can maybe remind grown-ups not to overthink it too much sometimes. Atthe end of the day, helping others is just the right thing to do if you're in a position to do so. I'll leave the complicated reasoning and pros and cons to the adults, but from where I'm standing it seems like a no-brainer to me. We should absolutely help build a world where no child has to live in extreme poverty if we can do something about it.What do you all think? I'm really curious to hear other viewpoints on this hugely important issue facing our world. Thanks for reading my essay!篇4Should Rich Countries Help Poor Countries?Hi, my name is Jamie and I'm 10 years old. Today, my teacher Mrs. Thompson asked us to write about whether rich countries should help poor countries or not. It's a really big question that even grown-ups have different opinions about!First of all, what does it mean for a country to be rich or poor? Rich countries have a lot of money, good schools and hospitals, and their people can afford nice houses, cars, phones and whatever else they need. Poor countries don't have as much money, and a lot of their people live in poverty without access to nutritious food, clean water, education or healthcare.The United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan and Australia are examples of rich countries. Some poor countries are Haiti, Yemen, South Sudan, Central African Republic and Burundi. There are also middle-income countries that are kind of in-between, like India, Mexico and Brazil.So should the rich countries help out the poor ones? I think they absolutely should, and here's why:It's the right thing to do. Imagine if you were really hungry and your friend had plenty of food but didn't share any with you. That wouldn't be very nice, would it? Countries are like friends on a giant playground called Earth. The rich ones have way more than they need, while kids in poor countries don't have enough food or clean water and get really sick. Helping others is good, whether you're a person or a country.It helps prevent conflict. If there's a neighborhood with some rich families and some poor families, the poor ones might get jealous and angry at the rich ones. They could start fights or even rob the rich houses because they're struggling so much. When poor countries are struggling with starvation, disease, and lack of opportunities, their people can become resentful toward rich nations. This breeds violence, terrorism, and conflict that canspread. By helping poor nations develop, rich countries can create more peace and stability.It grows the economy. This one is a bit more complicated, but listen: Poor countries don't have a lot of money to buy products and materials from rich countries. But if rich nations help make the poor nations richer through aid and investment, then those poor nations can eventually become new markets for the rich nations' businesses. It grows economies on both sides when there is development. A rising tide lifts all boats, as they say.It's a chance to make new friends. When you help someone, they'll be grateful and want to be your friend. If a rich country helps build roads, schools and hospitals in a poor country, the people there will feel thankful. They can become allies who have each other's backs instead of enemies. Friendship makes the world a better place!It's the moral thing to do. Every human life is precious, whether you're born in a rich country or a poor one. We're all equal and deserve the same chances to survive, be educated, and live good lives. Helping those in desperate need is simply the right thing for those who can afford it. It's like if you saw a kid struggling in a lake - you'd try to save them, right?Of course, I can understand why some people might disagree with this. Their reasons could be:It's expensive and costly for taxpayers. Foreign aid costs a lot of money that could be spent at home instead.The aid might get wasted or stolen by corrupt governments in poor countries instead of helping people.It creates dependency - poor countries might rely on the handouts instead of standing on their own two feet.Issues like poverty, disease, and hunger are complicated with no easy solutions from the outside.Rich countries have faced their own challenges to get where they are, so why should they self-sacrifice to help others?Those are some fair points too. Still, I tend to believe we all have an obligation to assist those in crisis however we can. Even if it's challenging, that doesn't mean we shouldn't try our best.In conclusion, I do think rich countries should strive to support poor nations through foreign aid, investment, sharing technology and resources, and many other means. We're all part of one world that does best when we cooperate and look out for one another across borders. The rich and poor alike deserve dignity, opportunity and hope for the future.That's my opinion, but I'd love to hear what you think about this heavyweight issue! Should those who can help absolutely do so, or do you have other perspectives to share? Let me know.篇5Should Rich Countries Help Poor Countries?Hi, my name is Jamie and I'm going to write about a very important topic - should rich countries help poor countries or not? It's a really big deal and different people have different opinions about it. Let me share my thoughts!First of all, what do we mean by rich and poor countries? Rich countries have a lot of money and wealth. The people there can afford nice houses, cars, vacations, and anything they need. Poor countries don't have as much money. Many people there struggle to get food, clean water, education, and medical care. Some countries are very very poor and many kids don't get to go to school or have toys to play with.So should the rich countries help the poor countries or not? In my opinion, yes they absolutely should help! It's the right thing to do. Can you imagine being really hungry and not having anything to eat? Or getting sick and not having medicine ordoctors? That would be terrible! Rich countries have plenty, so they should share some of what they have with those in need.If I had a ton of cookies and my friend had none, I would definitely give them some of mine. It's no fun eating by yourself when someone else has nothing. By giving some of my cookies, I'd make my friend happy, and we could both enjoy the cookies together. That's how it should be with countries too!Rich countries have a lot of money, food, resources, medicine, and more. Poor countries are lacking in those things their people need. The rich countries should absolutely share some of what they have. It's only fair. Plus, we're all human beings on this planet Earth together, like one big family of 7 billion people. We should be looking out for each other!Another reason rich countries should help is because there's poverty, hunger, disease and lack of education in poor countries.A lot of kids don't get to go to school because their families can't afford it. They have to work in fields or factories at a very young age instead of learning. Many people get sick from unclean drinking water and inadequate healthcare. By giving aid and resources, rich countries can improve situations like that in poorer nations.With that aid, more kids could go to school and get an education. More people could have access to medicine when they're ill. Things like clean water systems could be built so communities don't keep getting diseases from dirty water. Farms and agricultural systems can be set up properly so people get enough food. Overall, the qualities of life for millions of people could be greatly improved with aid from wealthy countries.Of course, some people might disagree and think rich countries shouldn't have to help poor ones. They could say "Those aren't our problems - why should we spend our money on other countries when we have issues in our own country?" That's a fair point, but I still think helping others is the ethical thing to do, especially when you're abundantly blessed. You can focus on your own country too, but also commit some resources to helping those living in extreme poverty and need elsewhere.At the end of the day, we're all part of the human family on this planet. Wealthy countries are extremely fortunate, while many nations lack access to basic human needs and rights. By sharing some of their extra wealth and resources through foreign aid, rich countries can vastly improve living standards and opportunities for those suffering in poverty around the world.Plus, there's another benefit - helping poor countries can lead to more stable, productive societies over time. When people have access to education, jobs, healthcare and quality of life improves, it reduces conflict, instability and population migrations away from those regions. More peace and economic growth can benefit everyone globally in the long run. So really, it's a moral thing to do but it also makes strategic sense.In conclusion, I believe rich countries definitely should help poor countries. It's simply the right thing to do - when you have abundance, you should absolutely share with those in need. We're all human, we're all part of one world together. By being generous through foreign aid and development initiatives, wealthy nations can improve living conditions, human rights, health and education access for millions around the globe. At the same time, it promotes more stability and economic potential in impoverished regions long-term, which is good for everyone. I really hope rich countries will continue stepping up to help out!。
刘洪波范文
.-刘洪波范文————————————————————————————————作者：————————————————————————————————日期：1）Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?写作提纲：观点：每个人都能起作用。
原因1：环境问题是长期人类活动导致的。
原因2：个人能影响政府和公司的决定。
E.g：如果人人不用一次性纸杯，就不会有公司生产。
MODEL ANSWEREnvironmental protection is one of the most important challenges almost every country is facing. However, whether only governments and big firms have resources and powers to preserve our environment is a controversial issue. My view is that every single citizen could also make a huge difference.First, it is clear that it is human activities that have the greatest impact on environment throughout the history. Both environment contamination and conservation are the long-term process, and no single government or big company can meet this challenge alone. So, whoever created the problem should solve it; environment protection needs every one of us to continuously participate in.Moreover, the public’s wills and behaviors have a critical influence on government’s policies and company’s strategies. For example, if everyone says “no” to plastic shopping bags and paper cups, the companies that manufacture such products will switch to environmental-friendly substitutes in order to survive in the market.That is not to say that governments and large companies can not positively contribute. Indeed governments can enact laws and introduce programs to raise the public’s low carbon awareness; companies can promote green products to change the public’s consuming habits. But they also indeed every citizen’s appreciation and support to bring good results.In sum, no effort is too small when we are protecting the environment! Meanwhile, local authorities and organizations must shoulder their responsibility to develop low carbon economy at the macro level. Only by doing so can we assure that we could hand this beautiful planet to our next generation, and the next generation after!(259 words)2）Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.写作提纲观点：人类合理利用动物是正当的。
国之栋梁英文作文
国之栋梁英文作文The backbone of a country is its people. Without the hard work and dedication of its citizens, a country cannot thrive and succeed in the global arena. It is the people who contribute to the economy, uphold the laws, and shape the culture and identity of a nation.In times of crisis, it is the strength and resilience of the people that hold the country together. Whether facing natural disasters, economic downturns, or social unrest, it is the unity and determination of the citizens that help the country overcome challenges and emerge stronger than before.The leaders of a country play a crucial role in guiding and shaping the nation's future. Their decisions and policies have a direct impact on the lives of the people, and it is their responsibility to prioritize the well-being and prosperity of the citizens.Education is the cornerstone of a nation's progress. By investing in the education of its people, a country can ensure a skilled and knowledgeable workforce, as well as a well-informed and engaged citizenry. This, in turn, contributes to the overall development and advancement of the country.The diversity of a country's population is one of its greatest strengths. Embracing and celebrating the different cultures, traditions, and perspectives within a nation enriches its social fabric and fosters a sense of unity and understanding among its people.The spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship drives a country's growth and development. When individuals are empowered to pursue their ideas and ambitions, they contribute to the creation of new industries, technologies, and opportunities that benefit the entire nation.The protection of human rights and the promotion of equality are fundamental to a country's integrity and progress. Upholding these principles ensures that everyindividual has the opportunity to contribute to the betterment of society, regardless of their background or circumstances.In conclusion, the strength and prosperity of a country are built upon the foundation of its people. Their hard work, resilience, diversity, and innovation are essential to the success and advancement of the nation as a whole.。
英语作文 poor countries 富国应该帮助穷国解决他们的基本需求(食物和教育)吗？
Some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition.Do you agree with the idea that rich and developed nations should help the poor nations？Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Model Answer 1:A nations’ welfare is the most crucial part of quality life for citizens in that certain country. Icompletely agree that the governments have an initial role to keep their citizens stay healthy and well-educated. This statement is supported by a numerous reason; governments’ basic responsibility and the governments’ authority. Firstly, it is noticeable that the basic responsibility of the government is to look after their society, especially for people living in under standard of life. Although it may be true that all of the nations should help each other, however, the governments should stand in the front line to guaranty their citizens’ life. In additions, every country in the world has their own income which is collected from many sources such asindividual income tax and value added tax. Hence, the government should distribute this income in an appropriate way such as providing free educations and health facilities. Secondly, it seems that the quality of a country rely on the way the government is governing their society. To return to an earlier point that education and health are esse ntial parts of humans’ life. Therefore, the government should give their main concentration to these terms. As they have an authority to govern their society, the have to decide a governmental decision to improve the citizens’ quality life especially in te rms of education and health for poorer societies.Otherwise, the nations will not have an adequate standard of life. On in all, the care of poorer nations is the main responsibility of the government. The most crucial point made so far, although the wealthier nations should help the other voluntarily, the government are playing the significant role to solve this problem by deciding governmental decisions in terms of education and health.Written by - Ni Wayan SulastriModel Answer 2:Today’s world is di vided into industrialised and developing countries, where the main difference between them is the amount of money they spend on the healthcare system, education and infrastructures. Most citizens in developing nations live under the poverty line and, in my opinion, rich countries have the ability and should take up the responsibility of supporting them.It is true that governments of developing nations should take care of their citizens. However, since those countries are buried into debts as a result of unbalances finances, Rich countries aremore equipped to help fewer fortune nations than their own governments. For example, industrialised countries can help poorer nations with some loans or grants that enable them paying off their debts. In addition, many poor countries live in subhuman conditions because of extreme poverty and epidemic diseases like AIDS and Cholera. They lack the knowledge and the sufficient medical resources to tackle such problems. However developed countries can donate them free medicines and send skilled doctors and nurses. On the other hand, people from many developing countries migrate to wealthy nations to study or to work. Richcountries benefit out of those foreigners. For example, many immigrants to France and the UK have proved themselves in those countries by working hard. But on the other side, the economies of immigrants’ countries get worse because their countries lose them while they are needed to lead their nations to a better future. Therefore, it seems to be sensible that rich countries support the immigrants’ home countries. In conclusion, I believe it would be difficult to see any progress in the economy of developing countries without the cooperation of rich nations.Written by - Omni TouskiModel Answer 3:After reckoning enough, I believe that rich or developed nations should share their wealth and resources with those inferior or poorer nations who are starveling and struggling with their system, because there will be a certain hard time which comes to everyone, so for the sake of humanity, such aid should be provided.First of all, there are many countries which are going through some seriously astounding crisis, such as, illiteracy, crashed economy, hunger, nopossessions, corrupt leaders, infectious diseases and extremism. If you contemplate these factors closely then you start to realise that everything is directly proportional to each other. We live in a world, where the ratio of diseases and terrorism is increasing exponentially and we are being victimised of its brutality, the good examples of this are Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa and India. Extremist and terrorist often recruit people, who are illiterate and have no conscience over anything. That is why proper education should be provided to those countries where such extremism is ignited over hunger and illiteracy. On thecontrary, it should be government's number first priority to look after their citizens and provide them basic necessities. That is why we elect them to be our saviour and be ready to face any catastrophe which comes along. To sum up, I would like to maintain that, instead of being ramified, let's be unanimous and provide an aid to education and food to those countries which are not up to the standards as of first world countries, even if their government fails to sustain it.。
富国帮助穷国英语作文
富国帮助穷国英语作文With the development of globalization, the gap between rich and poor countries becomes more and more obvious. As a responsible member of the global community, it is necessary for developed countries to help poor countries. In this essay, I will discuss the importance of rich countries helping poor countries and suggest some effective ways to achieve this goal.Firstly, rich countries should help poor countries because it is the right thing to do. As human beings, we have a moral obligation to help those who are in need. When we see people suffering from poverty, hunger, and diseases, we cannot turn a blind eye and ignore their plight. Rich countries have the resources and the expertise to make a difference in the lives of millions of people who are struggling to survive. By providing aid and assistance,rich countries can help poor countries to improve their living standards and create a better future for their citizens.Secondly, helping poor countries is also in theinterest of rich countries. Poverty, hunger, and diseases are not limited to poor countries. They can spread to other countries and even become global problems. For example, the outbreak of Ebola in West Africa in 2014 had a significant impact on the global community. If rich countries had not provided assistance to the affected countries, the disease could have spread to other regions and caused a global pandemic. By helping poor countries to overcome these challenges, rich countries can protect themselves and prevent the spread of diseases and other problems.So, how can rich countries help poor countries? There are many ways, but I would like to suggest four effective ways.Firstly, rich countries can provide financial aid to poor countries. Financial aid can help poor countries to invest in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other essential areas. This can help to create jobs, improve living standards, and reduce poverty.Secondly, rich countries can provide technical assistance to poor countries. Technical assistance can help poor countries to develop their own expertise and capabilities. This can help to create sustainable solutions to problems and reduce dependence on foreign aid.Thirdly, rich countries can provide trade opportunities to poor countries. Trade can help poor countries to access global markets and increase their exports. This can help to create jobs, increase income, and reduce poverty.Lastly, rich countries can provide humanitarian aid to poor countries. Humanitarian aid can help to provide food, shelter, and medical assistance to people affected by natural disasters, conflicts, and other emergencies.In conclusion, rich countries have a moral obligation to help poor countries. Helping poor countries is not only the right thing to do, but it is also in the interest of rich countries. By providing financial aid, technical assistance, trade opportunities, and humanitarian aid, richcountries can help poor countries to overcome poverty, hunger, and diseases. This can create a better future for all of us.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Some people think rich countries should help the poor countries by giving money directly. Others believe that there are other more effective forms (形式) of international aids (aid援助).
What’s your opinion?
Model answer:
Poverty (贫穷) is one of the most important problems many developing countries face. However, what types of international aids are more effective for them is a controversial issue. In my view, what the poor countries need most is not financial (资金上的) aid or loans, but advanced technologies and talents in some key areas.
It is obvious that advanced technologies and science are driving force(动力) behind the rich nations. Hi-tech products, innovations(创新), and good management can greatly improve the productivity of whole society and hence(于是) the wealth is accumulated at a high speed. Therefore, to help the poor, we would better give them tools of making fortune.
Moreover, the developed countries can not only send expert teams to poor nations to build roads, dams(大坝), factories and other infrastructures, but train talents and experts for them. The rich countries can provide scholarship or financial help to the students from the poor regions(地区), which some famous western universities are actually doing. It is a wiser way to deliver help.
This is not to say that, under no circumstances(情况) should the rich countries provide aid in form of money. Of course, money definitely can help the country out of many urgent problems. But how can we assure(确定) that the money will be spent in proper ways?
In conclusion, there are some other types of aids rich countries may choose to provide. Meanwhile, if financial aid is offered, we have to make sure that the money is being spent on what people really need and not on filling(fill 充满) the pockets of corrupt politicians.。