【飞屋环游记观后感500】飞屋环游记英文观后感
《飞屋环游记》英文电影观后感（7篇）
《飞屋环游记》英文电影观后感（7篇）《飞屋环游记》英文电影观后感篇1星期天，老师让我们看了一部非常有趣搞笑的电影，名字叫《飞屋环游记》，相信你看了也会觉得非常搞笑。
内容是这样的，小男孩卡尔看了一个新闻短片：一个探险家查尔斯发现了新的物种，却不被大家相信，但卡尔却深信不疑。
在以后的生活中，卡尔认识了有冒险精神的小女孩爱丽，并结为了夫妻。
他们有一个梦想，就是去南美洲的“仙境瀑布”那里安家。
可是直到爱丽去世，这个梦想也没能实现。
就在卡尔即将被送进养老院的时候，他启动了用气球带着屋子飞的计划。
不过让他没想到的是，他的飞屋上搭了一个因为要集齐最后一枚徽章而被他戏弄过的小男孩罗素。
一老一少的飞屋在经历了风暴云团后，发现了“仙境瀑布”就在眼前。
为了到达“仙境瀑布”，卡尔和小男孩拉着屋子向目的地出发。
路上他们认识了一只爱吃巧克力的色彩斑斓的大鸟，也就是探险家查尔斯所说的新物种;还遇到了一群会说话的狗和那位探险家查尔斯。
查尔斯为了证明自己，一直想抓住那只大鸟。
后来查尔斯抓住了大鸟，卡尔也把飞屋搬到了瀑布旁边，可卡尔却发现这不是他追求的目标。
于是他决定与罗素一起去救大鸟。
经过了许多惊险万分的搏斗，老少两人终于救出了大鸟，而罗素也获得了他想要的徽章。
看完了这部电影，我明白了很多东西：每个人都有自己的梦想，但如果我们没有勇气和毅力去追求的话，那就会变成一个梦而已。
成功的秘诀就在于把梦想坚持到底，勇敢地去追求，永不放弃。
《飞屋环游记》英文电影观后感篇2今晚偶然看了《飞屋环游记》这样一部很好的动画，突然很羡慕美国的社会和美国的孩子。
至少他们有一帮力挺CREATION与力赞CREATIVE的家长和社会环境。
片头用以青梅竹马的方式短暂地描绘出主人公的爱情与承诺，很容易启发对于孩子们的教育，让孩子们自然地接触到这些他们必将接触到的事物，这种含蓄而又不避讳地手段才是教育真正需要的.。
并且不得不说的是，片头的陈述非常地有感染力，非常地感人。
“飞屋环游记”英语读后感
“飞屋环游记”英语读后感The movie focuses on 78-year old man Carl Fredrickson's (voiced by Edward Asner) life who always had a dream of going on a journey to South American to see the wilds of it. He buys thousands of balloons just to attach it to his house to float up in the sky. So, he starts with his journey up in the sky in his house with balloons attached to it. Suddenly, he's not alone and somebody's at the door while flying, it's a boy scout kid named Russell. He invites the boy with him on his journey to South America.Just brilliant and simple story-telling, beautiful visuals as usual with Pixar, awesome voice work, funny and smart dialogue, beautiful score once again by Michael Giacchino & very, very enjoyable characters. Speaking of characters, the highlight of the film: Dug the Dog. A sort of 'robot' dog that will have you have you in a lot of stitches each scene that dog is in and that was the case with me. Simply, one of the funniest characters Pixar ever made. Pete Doctor, one of the four Pixar directors (John Lassester, Andrew Stanton, Brad Bird) who directed Monster's Inc (20xx) needs and should get nominated for his clever, genius and smart directing of this but if Stanton didn't get the nods for (Finding Nemo and WALL-E) andBird for (The Incredibles & Ratatouille) which they should of been, then the Oscars are making another HUGE mistake for not nominating this guy for this movie.Up is the funniest Pixar movie, funnier than the Toy Story movies, A Bug's Life & Finding Nemo which were the funniest, in my opinion. The movie is not just hilarious, it's emotional and sad at times. Like WALL-E, it focuses on the character feelings but not as magical as WALL-E. Still, Up is full of emotional, fun and hilarious proportions. Your in for a BIG ride in this!。
飞屋环游记电影的观后感英语6篇
飞屋环游记电影的观后感英语6篇《飞屋环游记》是一部迪斯尼皮克斯出品的动画片，永远不会抹杀生活的用心好处，虽然残酷能够让人震撼深思，但温馨的完美同样有动人心魄的力量。
那么你知道《飞屋环游记》观后感怎么写吗?下面是小编为大家收集有关于飞屋环游记电影的观后感英语，希望你喜欢。
飞屋环游记电影的观后感英语精选篇1这部影片以感情为线索，开始一段为完成最初的约定而不懈努力的旅程，讲述了途中遇到的种.种......幸福的开头让人向往，这是一对多么令人羡慕的小夫妻，执子之手，白头偕老。
然而离别是每个人都要经历的，最终有一天，妻子去世了，留下为完成的约定和形影孤独的丈夫。
丈夫于是开始一段惊险的飞屋之旅，在途中，他遇到了罗素、道格、凯文和他少年时崇拜的偶像——探险家查尔斯·蒙兹。
他发现往往事与愿违，但他也体会到了大自然的亲切，体会到了童心之美，体会到了助人之乐。
这部影片让我心潮涌动的不止是卡尔和艾丽的感情，还有罗素——一个爱好探险的小男孩的善良、勇敢和对大自然的热爱，还有影片里动物和人所表现出的互相帮忙的品质。
初始，我是不喜欢罗素的，只觉得他不懂礼貌，老是增添麻烦。
可是之后觉得他是个很优秀的孩子。
文质彬彬、每句话都能贴人心眼的人未必是个不错的人。
罗素他只是一个孩子，所以口无遮拦，不怕说出自我找卡尔的母的，所以不加思考地说出凯文的喜好、透露凯文的行踪，让卡尔的旅途充满艰辛。
最终也是因为罗素要去救凯文使卡尔丢了他心爱的房子。
在日常生活中，这样的人必定遭人唾弃，因为此刻的人们太浮于外在的种.种了，太在意利益了。
真心朋友的言行往往会刺到你“伟大”的自尊心，是最让你受不了的人，于是你以为他（她）对你不够好，不了解你；于是~你又少了一个真心朋友。
也许因为罗素还小，不明白这个世界是危险的，他不会细心翼翼，他不害怕朋友会伤害他，所以他很快和凯文成了好朋友，跟凯文欢乐的玩耍。
而卡尔却是经历害怕凯文到厌恶到理解到救助到热爱的历程。
飞屋环游记英语观后感
飞屋环游记英语观后感飞屋环游记英语观后感飞屋环游记英语观后感篇1Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran T orino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isnt alone ... hes inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.As the movie progresses, Carls house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russells age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On theother hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something weve encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studios films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. Im a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a childrens film with side jokes for adults, a familyfilm, or a film thats made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if youre old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)飞屋环游记英语观后感篇2In its opening stretch the new Pixar movie “Up” flies high, borne aloft by a sense of creative flight and a flawlessly realized love story. Its on-screen and unlikely escape artist is Carl Fredricksen, a widower and former balloon salesman with a square head and a round nose that looks ready for honking. Voiced with appreciable impatience by Ed Asner, Carl isn’t your typical American animated hero. He’s 78, for starters, and the years have taken their toll on his lugubrious body and spirit, both of which seem solidly tethered to the ground. Even the two corners of his mouth point straight down. It’s as if he were sagging into the earth.Eventually a bouquet of balloons sends Carl and his house soaring into the sky, where they go up, up and away and off to an adventure in South America with a portly child, some talking (and snarling and gourmet-cooking) dogs and an unexpected villain. Though the initial images of flight are wonderfully rendered —the house shudders and creaks and splinters and groans as it’s ripped from its foundation by the balloons — the movie remains bound by convention, despite even its modest 3-D depth. This has become the Pixar way. Passages of glorious imagination are invariably matched by stock characters and banal story choices, as each new movie becomes another manifestationof the movie-industry divide between art and the bottom line.In “Up” that divide is evident between the early scenes, which tell Carl’s story with extraordinary tendern ess and brilliant narrative economy, and the later scenes of him as a geriatric action hero. The movie opens with the young Carl enthusing over black-and-white newsreel images of his hero, a world-famous aviator and explorer, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer). Shortly thereafter, Carl meets Ellie, a plucky, would-be adventurer who, a few edits later, becomes his beloved wife, an adult relationship that the director Pete Docter brilliantly compresses into some four wordless minutes during which the couple dream together, face crushing disappointment and grow happily old side by side. Like the opener of “Wall-E” and the critic’s Proustian reminiscence of childhood in “Ratatouille,” this is filmmaking at its purest.The absence of words suggests that Mr. Docter and the co-director Bob Peterson, with whom he wrote the screenplay, are looking back to the silent era, as Andrew Stanton did with the Chaplinesque start to “Wall-E.” Even so, partly because “Up” includes a newsreel interlude, its marriage sequence also brings to mind the breakfast table in “Citizen Kane.” In this justly famous (talking) montage, Orson Welles shows the collapse of a marriage over a number of years through a series of images of Kane and his first wife seated across from each other at breakfast, another portrait of a marriage in miniature. As in their finest work, the Pixar filmmakers have created thrilling cinema simply by rifling through its history.Those thrills begin to peter out after the boy, Russell (Jordan Nagai), inadvertently hitches a ride with Carl, forcing the old man to assume increasingly grandfatherly duties. But before thathappens there are glories to savor, notably the scenes of Carl —having decided to head off on the kind of adventure Ellie and he always postponed —taking to the air. When the multihued balloons burst through the top of his wooden house it’s as if a thousand gloriously unfettered thoughts had bloomed above his similarly squared head. Especially lovely is the image of a little girl jumping in giddy delight as the house rises in front of her large picture window, the sunlight through the balloons daubing her room with bright color.In time Carl and Russell, an irritant whose Botero proportions recall those of the human dirigibles in “Wall-E,” float to Sout h America where they, the house and the movie come down to earth. Though Mr. Docter’s visual imagination shows no signs of strain here — the image of Carl stubbornly pulling his house, now tethered to his torso, could have come out of the illustrated Freud — the story grows progressively more formulaic. And cuter. Carl comes face to face with his childhood hero, Muntz, an eccentric with the dashing looks and frenetic energy of a younger Kirk Douglas. Muntz lives with a legion of talking dogs with which he has been hunting a rare bird whose gaudy plumage echoes the palette of Carl’s balloons.The talking dogs are certainly a hoot, including the slobbering yellow furball Dug and a squeaky-voiced Doberman, Alpha (both Mr. Peterson), not to mention the dog in the kitchen and the one that pops open the Champagne. And there’s something to be said about the revelation that heroes might not be what you imagined, particularly in a children’s movie and particularly one released by Disney. (Muntz seems partly inspired by Charles Lindbergh at his most heroic and otherwise.) But much like Russell, the little boy with father problems, and muchlike Dug, the dog with master issues, the story starts to feel ingratiating enough to warrant a kick. O.K., O.K., not a kick, just some gently expressed regret.飞屋环游记英语观后感篇3Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixars cutting-edge output, the fact that the studios 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldnt seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.Its also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinemas past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "Its a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."Boxoffice-wise, the skys the limit for "Up."Even with its PG rating (the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"), there really is no demographic that wont respond to its many charms.The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the films 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner).Borrowing "WALL-Es" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchinos plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.Deciding its better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included), determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer).But he soon discovers theres a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai), and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc.") and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntzs pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.It’s that good.。
飞屋环游记观后感(英文)After Viewing Impressions about Travel Notes of A f Fying House
After Viewing Impressions about Travel Notes of A f Fying House Last Sunday , I saw a movie named Travel notes of a flying house.This movie is very interesting and I like it very much.The movie mainly talked about that a little boy with a flying dream grew with a little girl with the same dream,and then they got married,grow old together. Until the hostess Eli dead, didn't they finish the flying dream of wonderland waterfall. Finally one day, the 78 years old’s Mr Carr built a flying home, flew away to the fairyland waterfall, and there occurred many amazing and moving stories.The film, tells me three truth. First of all, people should have a dream and pursuit.Only in this way will you have spirit,as for the single-minded pursuit of dreams and perseverance, then do you have a fight. Secondly, the difficulties are not invincible, but you have not the courage to face, to challenge.I believe that as long as face them bravely, you will be able to get victory and successful.Finally, there is nothing more powerful than the power of love.when are we in the most difficult time, only the family, let us all unite with each other, let us be fearless, and so as to win.。
飞屋环游记的英语观后感
飞屋环游记的英语观后感简介《飞屋环游记》（Up）是由皮克斯动画工作室制作，于2009年上映的一部3D动画冒险喜剧片。
电影以老人卡尔·弗雷德里克森的奇妙冒险为主线，讲述了他为了实现过世妻子的遗愿，把房子系在气球上，飞向南美洲的天堂瀑布之旅。
在旅程中，卡尔结识了一个调皮聪明的小男孩拉塞尔，两人携手度过了一系列惊险有趣的经历。
作为一部家庭娱乐电影，《飞屋环游记》以其独特的情节、精心设计的角色以及精美的动画效果，在全球范围内赢得了高度赞誉和广泛好评。
本篇观后感将从语言学习者的角度出发，针对电影中的英语对话和情景进行分析和评价。
语言学习的机会《飞屋环游记》中的英语对话能够为学习者提供多种机会，帮助他们提高听力、口语和阅读理解能力。
首先，电影中的对话速度适中，语言清晰，可以帮助学习者适应真实场景下的英语交流。
对话内容有趣且生动，生活化的语境使学习者更容易理解和记忆。
其次，电影中包含了丰富多样的口语表达和俚语，如“Let it go!”、“Oh, for crying out loud!”等常见口头禅。
这样的表达方式不仅能够提高学习者的听力理解能力，还能丰富他们的口语表达技巧。
此外，电影中出现了一些常见的英语语法结构和词汇，包括时态、介词短语和形容词等。
通过观看电影，学习者可以更加直观地了解和掌握这些语法规则和词汇，提高自己的语言运用能力。
生动有趣的情节《飞屋环游记》以其精彩纷呈的情节和出色的角色塑造而受到广大观众的喜爱。
不仅孩子们喜欢拉塞尔活泼可爱的形象，成年观众也会被卡尔与拉塞尔在冒险中建立的深厚友谊所打动。
电影中的情节交织着温情、喜剧、冒险和温暖的家庭氛围，充满了情感共鸣。
通过讲述卡尔为了实现妻子的愿望而踏上旅程的故事，电影探讨了生命的意义、亲情的重要性以及珍惜当下的价值。
这些主题的表达使得电影中的对话更加充满教育意义和思考深度，给观众带来触动和启发。
合适的学习资源作为一部广受欢迎的动画电影，《飞屋环游记》提供了丰富的学习资源，供语言学习者不断学习和练习。
飞屋环游记英文观后感4篇
飞屋环游记英文观后感4篇《飞屋环游记》英语观后感篇一《飞屋环游记》英语观后感篇四Today, the school organized “children watching animation, childlike innocence“ activities. We went to see the movie -- flying house ring travel notes.I was impressed by the film. It is said that an old man named Fei Dexun and a lovely field Explorer Russell ride in the balloon house, experience a thousand hardships, reach the Paradise Falls, and put his home there, to realize the dream of the old man Fei Dexun. Fei Dexun and his wife AI became partners when they were young. Later, Ellie died, and the old man would be sent to the green oak nursing home. Fei Dexun put the 100000 balloons he used to hang on the house and flew up into the air. The results met the rush to “help the elderly“ badge of the little boy, russell. He accidentally took the flying room of Fei Dexuns old man and started an adventure together. The way they experienced a lot of hardships and dangers, and a bird named Kevin became a friend. Later, in order to save Kevin, they almost failed to realize their dreams. Then it is friendship and justice, so that they finally overcome the evil and win thebattle.The story is very touching. After reading it, we will find that there is a truth in it: persistence will win. I like this movie!。
飞屋环游记的英语观后感
飞屋环游记的英语观后感《飞屋环游记》（Up）是迪士尼和皮克斯联合制作的一部动画电影，由皮克斯的首席创作官约翰·拉塞特执导。
这部电影于2009年上映，讲述了一个老人为了完成他和已故妻子的梦想，将自己的房子装上气球，飞向南美洲遥远的天堂大楼的故事。
无论是故事情节、角色刻画，还是电影的整体制作和音乐，都让我留下了深刻的印象。
以下是我对《飞屋环游记》的英语观后感。
首先，我要提到这部电影的故事情节。
故事始于一位年迈的老人卡尔·弗雷德里克森（Carl Fredricksen），他的愿望是带着他的房子和妻子艾琳的照片，飞向与他们年轻时曾经一同梦想探索的遥远地方。
为了实现这个梦想，老人使用了大量的气球将房子升上天空，成为了一个飘浮的“飞屋”。
然而，他不知道自己的房子上来了一个不速之客——一个名叫罗素的小男孩。
他们由此展开了一场充满冒险和友谊的旅程。
故事的创意让我着实吃了一惊。
老人利用气球把房子升空的设定，不仅给了观众一种奇幻的感觉，也暗示了卡尔对妻子的深爱以及对未来的美好希望。
与此同时，小男孩罗素的加入为整个故事增添了活力和童真。
他身上的积极与梦想与卡尔形成了鲜明的对比，两个不同年龄段的人之间的友谊故事也令人感动。
除了故事情节，电影中的角色刻画也让我深受触动。
老人卡尔是一个有着坚定信念和温柔内心的人。
他的冷漠和孤独源于对逝去妻子的思念，而飞屋则是他与妻子的爱的延续。
罗素是一个充满热情和好奇心的小男孩，他的乐观和忍耐力使他成为卡尔的好朋友。
这两个截然不同的角色通过旅行中的故事发展，互相影响和改变，向观众传递了深刻的情感，令人动容。
此外，《飞屋环游记》在制作上也堪称完美。
电影的动画效果精美细腻，特别是在描绘飘飞在蓝天中的“飞屋”时，画面色彩鲜艳、欢快淋漓。
人物形象的设计也非常生动，每一个角色的神情、动作都栩栩如生。
尤其令我印象深刻的是电影的配乐，充满活力和感染力，与故事情节完美相配合。
它可以将观众带入情感的波澜中，让人们在观看电影时产生共鸣。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
【飞屋环游记观后感500】飞屋环游
记英文观后感
【--个人简历制作】
《飞屋环游记》是由彼特·道格特执导，皮克斯动画工作室制作的第十部动画电影、首部3D电影，下面就是飞屋环游记英文观后感。
飞屋环游记英文观后感【1】Up is a slightly-left-of-center masterpiece. The emotional impact of the beautiful, wordless summation of Carl's life that opens the movie is the bass note that resonates through the whole film and is at least as affecting as the scene in Wall-E when he holds his own hands while watching Hello Dolly. The rest of the movie, of course, is breathtaking on just about every level, especially the tactile quality of all the characters and textures and the completely realized weather effects and action scenes. With no "new" technical milestones (fur in Monsters, Inc., water in Finding Nemo, realistic camera effects in Wall- E), the design is the main focus, from the hilariously stylized characters to the amazing setting of the tepui.
I know----that's a interesting trip!
飞屋环游记英文观后感【2】 A simple discussion about Up
Pixar Animation Studios is a superior about talking story at all times: Toy Story is a story about deeply fraternal affection. Finding Nemo is a story about a father’s introspection about his education road. The Incredibles is a story about middle-aged man and wife’s life crisis. Cars is a story about moralities in physical education’s world by telling a star’s experiences. Ratatouille is a story about a spirit that never gives up and you can realize your dream. Because of those wonderful cartoons, Pixar makes itself become an excellent symbol in cartoon sphere.
Therefore, Up is worth being expected. And the truth is that it’s a fantastic cartoon. To my mind, dream, commitment and responsibility is the key of Up’s successful.
Children’s dreams are the easiest and the most romantic, on account of they always have deeply interest and passion for new things and strange world. But sometimes it’s difficult to realize their dreams by themselves; they usually need adults’help. And those behaviors are not only their promises, but their
commitments and responsibilities.
Russell and Carl’s relationship is a key of Up. They have many differences: age, characters and background. And Up explains the relationship between adults and children by them.
Though Carl and Ellie’s love story just a few minutes, it is impressive
and affecting. And it’s my favorite part in Up. Every man and wife wants to live a happy life, but true life usually makes it difficult to realize. But it doesn’t mean dream is unpractical, promise is untrue. Through Carl becomes unsociable and eccentric, he still remember his promise to Ellie. In my opinion, the thing which flies is not the house, but a heart which is brave and insists on its dream and promise.
And the adventurer, Charles is a special role in Up. I think he stands for the people, who just care about their own benefit, totally forget social benefit and their roles in the society. There are so many kinds of dreams, so there are some persons make fame and wealth to be their goals. In fact, it is reasonable, but it’s wrong to damage the social benefit. This way of doing things is terrible, shameful and lamentable. In the film, Charles forges sample at first, then kills many innocent men, and tries his best to get the animal, a kind of big bird. Everything he does is for
his own fame and wealth. The film has hit the right and wrong on the nose. In the final battle, empty-handed Charles fell down into a so deep cliff. It’s not only a punishment to him, but a satire to this kind of people.
Dream likes a check, promise likes an acceptance. Once you promise, you must try your best to make it come true for it is your responsibility and duty.。