《塔兰塔》投稿指南《Talanta》AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK(Elsevier)

合集下载

Elsevier期刊投稿模板和投稿经验

Elsevier期刊投稿模板和投稿经验

General-Template[Title Page]Article TitleAuthorsAuthor affiliationsCorrespondence information: Corresponding author name, affiliation, detailed permanent address, email address, telephone number(Check the Guide for authors to see the required information on the title page)Put the title of your abstract here using both upper and lower case letters, Times New Roman, 12 pts, bold, centered, double spacedA。

Author a, B. Author b, C. Author a,*a Department, University, Street, Postal—Code City, Countryb Laboratory, Institute, Street, Postal—Code City, CountryAbstractThis general template helps you on preparing manuscript for part of Elsevier Journals。

Use this document as a template if you are using Microsoft Word 6.0 or later。

Here comes self—contained abstract。

Please read the Guide for Authors of your target journal for the requirements of Abstract。

化学类英文期刊投稿指南

化学类英文期刊投稿指南

英文文献|英文期刊数据库|英文硕士论文|英文博士论文论文写作资源SCI论文润色北大核心期刊SCI影响因子化学类英文期刊投稿指南[学术须知] 专业SCI论文修改服务:★先修改后付款;☆语言问题免费重修;★24-72小时交稿;☆正规财务发票;★一分钟下单;☆365日不间断服务化学类英文期刊投稿指南:化学类(Chemistry)1【期刊名称】SENSORS AND ACTUA TORS B: CHEMICAL【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI、EI【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months2【期刊名称】Applied Catalysis A: General【所属学科】化学,催化【级别】SCI、EI【投稿主页】/Jour ... 856&Precis=DESC【投稿方式】online submision【影响因子】2.337【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3 months【出版周期】half-month journal3【期刊名称】Tetrahedron Letter【所属学科】有机化学Organic Chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/sci ... c26274c4b9df99e5c0f【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier4【期刊名称】Tetrahedron【所属学科】有机化学Organic Chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier5【期刊名称】The Journal of Organic Chemistry【所属学科】有机化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】6.903【期刊主页】/journals/joceah/index.html【投稿方式】email【出版商】ACS6【期刊名称】Journal of the American Chemical Society【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.462【期刊主页】/journals/jacsat/index.html【投稿方式】email【出版商】ACS7【期刊名称】Angewandte Chemie International Edition【所属学科】化学【影响因子】9.161【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/26737 【投稿方式】email【出版商】Wiley8【期刊名称】Chemistry - A European Journal【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】4.517【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/26293 【投稿方式】email【出版商】Wiley 9【期刊名称】European Journal of Organic Chemistry【所属学科】有机化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】2.426【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/27380 【投稿方式】email【出版商】Wiley10【期刊名称】Journal of Molecular Structure【所属学科】化学,特别是有晶体结构的分子Chemistry【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.0【期刊主页】 ... mp;journal=00222860【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】1-2 week 我师妹的文章是8 天接受的11【期刊名称】The Journal of organic chemistry【所属学科】organic chemistry【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.462【期刊主页】/journals/joceah/index.html【投稿方式】on-line submittion【出版商】American chemistry Society【审稿周期】4-8weeks12【期刊名称】the journal of american chemical society【所属学科】chemistry【级别】SCI【影响因子】6.903【期刊主页】/journals/jacsat/【投稿方式】on-line submittion【出版商】American chemistry Society【审稿周期】4-8weeks13【期刊名称】advanced synthesis & catalysis【所属学科】chemistry【级别】SCI【影响因子】4.482【期刊主页】http///cgi-bin【投稿方式】on-line submittion【出版商】Wiley14【期刊名称】chemical communications【所属学科】chemistry【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.997【期刊主页】/is/journals/current/chemcomm/cccpub.htm 【投稿方式】on-line submittion【出版商】Royal Society of Chemistry【审稿周期】4-8weeks15【期刊名称】Organic &Biomolecular Chmistry【所属学科】有机化学及化学生物学【级别】SCI IF=2.194【期刊主页】/Publishing/Journals/OB/index.asp【投稿方式】email【出版商】RSC【审稿周期】1-2 months16 【期刊名称】Synlett【所属学科】有机化学Organic Chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/ ... synlett/index.shtml 【出版商】Thieme Stuttgart17【期刊名称】SYNTHESIS【所属学科】有机化学Organic Chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/ ... nthesis/index.shtml 【投稿方式】email【出版商】Thieme Stuttgart18【期刊名称】Phytochemistry【所属学科】有机化学Organic Chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/sci ... 7576855b50ec607f058 【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier19【期刊名称】Chemical Communications【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【期刊主页/Publishing/Journals/cc/【投稿方式】email【出版商】RSC20【期刊名称】Green Chemistry【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/Publishing/Journals/gc/index.asp【投稿方式】email【出版商】RSC21【期刊名称】Angewandte Chemie International Edition【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】7.996【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/26737 【投稿方式】email【出版商】Wiley22【期刊名称】Journal of chromatograohy A【所属学科】色谱分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.359【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months23【期刊名称】Journal of chromatograohy B【所属学科】色谱分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】2.176【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months24【期刊名称】Analytical chemistry【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】5.450【期刊主页】/journals/ancham/index.html【投稿方式】在线投稿/email【出版商】ACS【审稿周期】unknown25【期刊名称】electrophoresis【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.743【期刊主页】http://www.wiley-vch.de/publish/en/journals/alphabeticIndex/2027/ 【投稿方式】在线投稿/email【出版商】wiley interscience【审稿周期】2 months26【期刊名称】Journal of chromatography A【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.359【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】在线投稿/email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3 months27【期刊名称】JOURNAL OF SEPARA TION SCIENCE【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.927【期刊主页】http://www.wiley-vch.de/publish/en/journals/alphabeticIndex/2259/ 【投稿方式】在线投稿/email【出版商】wiley interscience【审稿周期】2-3 months28【期刊名称】Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.509【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】在线投稿/email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】1-2 month29【期刊名称】Phytochemical Analysis【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.385【期刊主页】/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-PCA.html 【投稿方式】主页上无在线投稿【出版商】wiley interscience【审稿周期】2=3 months30【期刊名称】Electrochemistry Communications【所属学科】Electrochemistry【级别】SCI、EI【影响因子】2.926【期刊主页】/sci ... daa82c9a2b982514b77【投稿方式】在线投稿【出版商】ELSEVIER【审稿周期】1 month31【期刊名称】Electrochimica Acta【所属学科】Electrochemistry【级别】SCI、EI【影响因子】2.341【期刊主页】/sci ... abf8e59c12785940620【投稿方式】在线投稿【出版商】ELSEVIER【审稿周期】1 month32【期刊名称】Journal of The Electrochemical Society【所属学科】Electrochemical science and technology【级别】SCI、EI【影响因子】2.356【期刊主页】/JES【投稿方式】在线投稿【出版商】ECS【审稿周期】1-3 months33【期刊名称】Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters【所属学科】Electrochemical science and technology【级别】SCI、EI【影响因子】2.271【期刊主页】/ESL【投稿方式】在线投稿【出版商】ECS【审稿周期】1-3 months34【期刊名称】Organic Letters【所属学科】有机化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】4.19【期刊主页】/journals/orlef7/index.html【投稿方式】在线投稿【出版商】ACS【审稿周期】1 month35 【期刊名称】Organic Letters(影响因子: 4.195), Journal of the American Chemical Society(影响因子: 6.903)【所属学科】chemistry【级别】SCI【期刊主页】/about.html【投稿方式】on-line submittion,/paragonplus/splash/index.html or https:///paragon/index.jsp 【出版商】American chemistry Society36【期刊名称】Analytic Chimic Acta【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI、EI【期刊主页】/ACA【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months37【期刊名称】Molecules【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】0.676【期刊主页】/molecules/【投稿方式】在线投稿/email/邮寄【出版商】MDPI【审稿周期】3-6 months38【期刊名称】Catalysis Communications【所属学科】化学&催化【级别】SCI【IF】=1.89【期刊主页】/catcom/【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months39【期刊名称】Applied Catalysis B: Environmental【所属学科】化学&催化&环境科学【级别】SCI【IF】=4.042【期刊主页】/apcatb/【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months40【期刊名称】Journal of Catalysis【所属学科】化学&催化【级别】SCI【IF】=4.063【期刊主页】/jcat/【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months41【期刊名称】Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 【所属学科】化学&催化【级别】SCI【IF】=2.316【期刊主页】/molcaa/【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months42【期刊名称】analytical biochemistry【所属学科】分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】2.370【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description 【投稿方式】email【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】未知43【期刊名称】analyst【所属学科】分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】2.783【期刊主页】/Publishing/Journals/an/index.asp 【投稿方式】email【出版商】皇家化学会【审稿周期】未知44【期刊名称】analytical sciences【所属学科】分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.051【期刊主页】http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/cgi-bin/jsac/analsci/toc/【投稿方式】email【出版商】日本分析化学会【审稿周期】未知45【期刊名称】analytical letters【所属学科】分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】0.915【期刊主页】/newjour/a/msg03705.html【投稿方式】email【Publisher】Marcel Dekker, Inc.【审稿周期】未知46【期刊名称】Analytical Communications【所属学科】分析【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.628【期刊主页】/Publishing/Journals/an/index.asp【投稿方式】email【出版商】皇家化学会【审稿周期】未知47【期刊名称】Macromolecules【所属学科】高分子【级别】SCI, 3.898【期刊主页】/macromolecules/【投稿方式】online submision【出版商】ACS【审稿周期】3-6 months48【期刊名称】Talanta【所属学科】分析化学【级别】SCI、EI,2.532(2004 年)【期刊主页】/tal/【投稿方式】submission on line【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months49【期刊名称】ADV ANCES IN CA TALYSIS【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI,EI【影响因子】9.750【期刊主页】/science/bookseries/03600564 【国际刊号】ISSN: 0360-0564【投稿方式】online【出版商】ELSEVIER ACADEMIC PRESS INC【审稿周期】3~6 months50【期刊名称】CA TALYSIS LETTERS【所属学科】化学&材料【级别】SCI,EI【影响因子】1.904【期刊主页】/east/hom ... 40109-70-35504020-0 【国际刊号】ISSN: 1011-372X【出版商】SPRINGER【审稿周期】3~6 months51【期刊名称】European Polymer Journal【所属学科】化学【影响因子】1.419【期刊主页】 ... mp;journal=00143057【投稿方式】online submision【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months52【期刊名称】Polymer degradation and stability【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI【影响因子】1.685【期刊主页】 ... mp;journal=01413910【投稿方式】online submision【出版商】elsevier【审稿周期】3-6 months53【期刊名称】Green Chemistry【所属学科】化学【级别】SCI Impact Factor:3.5【期刊主页】【投稿方式】email【出版商】RSC【审稿周期】3months54【期刊名称】Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics【所属学科】化学主要高分子类【级别】SCI, 1.39【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/36698【投稿方式】online submision【出版商】Wiley【审稿周期】2 months55【期刊名称】Journal of Applied Polymer Science【所属学科】化学主要高分子类【级别】SCI, 1.3【期刊主页】/cgi-bin/jhome/30035【投稿方式】online submision【出版商】Wiley【审稿周期】2 months56【期刊名称】EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL【简介】This journal publishes results bearing on the physics and chemistry of natural and synthetic macronuclear substances and also reviews articles covering advances in polymer technology.【所属学科】Chemistry ; Physics ; Materials Science【级别】SCI,EI【影响因子】0.720【期刊主页】/wps/find ... ription#description【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】Elsevier【审稿周期】in a month57【期刊名称】Carbohydrate Research【简介】The journal includes normal length research papers, perspectives, notes, rapid communications and book reviews together with notices of meetings concerned w ith carbohydrates.【所属学科】Chemistry【级别】SCI,EI【影响因子】1.43【期刊主页】/Jour ... 829&Precis=DESC【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】Elsevier【审稿周期】2 month58【期刊名称】Carbohydrate Polymers【简介】Carbohydrate Polymers covers the study and exploitation of the industrial applications of carbohydrate polymers in areas such as food, textiles, paper, wood, adhesives, pharmaceuticals, oil field applications and industrial chemistry.【所属学科】Chemistry【级别】SCI,EI【影响因子】1.71【期刊主页】/Jour ... 871&Precis=DESC【投稿方式】online submission【出版商】Elsevier【审稿周期】2 month59【期刊名称】Journal of Physical Chemistry B【所属学科】化学,物理,材料类【级别】SCI【影响因子】3.834 (2004); 3.679 (2003); 3.611 (2002)【期刊主页】/journals/jpcbfk/index.html【投稿方式】on-line submittion【审稿周期】审稿期限是21 天,超过 1 个月编辑会给通讯联系人发信说明情况。

JMCA投稿指引

JMCA投稿指引

How to publish your researchThis guide will help you create a highquality article that will be a valuableaddition to the scientific record.For more details and a selection oftemplates to help get your article readyfor submission, visit our author resource centre: rsc.li/journal-resourcesREAD THE AUTHOR GUIDELINESDoes the journal provide quality peer review , and does the policy suit your approach?Does the journal have a strong reputation ? Is it where your peers publish? Are the metrics good?Does it give you open access options that comply with your funding agency?Is the journal’s scope broad, or specialist,designed to be read by a certain community?Are times to publication important to you?Will it cost anything to publish in this journal? Are there any extra charges?Which language does the journal use? Most international journals use EnglishIs the journal likely to be cited by other researchers in your field?Is it indexed in major online databases(Science Citation Index, PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE)?Does the journal publish articles in the best format for your work (eg Communication, Full Paper)?All Royal Society of Chemistry journals go through rigorous and fair peer reviewCHOOSE THE RIGHT JOURNAL12Tell a storyKeep your writing clear, using consistent language and short paragraphs. Your reader will want an article that is concise, easy to read that makes a definite pointAlways emphasise the novelty of your findingsBuild up a strong structureSplit your article up into recognisable sections. For each, think about who you are writing for and how your work comparesto existing researchIf you would like a second opinion, our language editing service canprovide professional guidance and a comprehensive proofread of yourarticle. Visit rsc.li/langDouble-check those guidelinesIs your authorship correct?Could anything have been plagiarised?Is any of the work fragmented?Have you supported all of your claims?Does the article meet ethical standards?Don’t forget to keep your co-authors up to date and make sure they are happy before you submit the finalarticleAddress your cover letter to the Editor or Associate Editor, and make sure you mention the correct journal. It’s surprisingly common to name the wrong oneYOUR SUBMISSION CHECKLIST5Re-read thoroughly 1 A cover letter which includes:• A summary of your work• S tatement of importance (a chance to ‘sell’ your work to the editor – why is this article a good fit for the journal?)• T he impact of this research on the community • Its future potential Check grammar 2 Your graphical abstract3 Any supplementary information files4 Suggestions for suitable reviewers5 Your articleCheck spellingREVISING YOUR ARTICLE7ARTICLE ASSESSMENT6Following peer review, hopefully your article will be accepted for publication (usually subject to somerevisions)An article might be rejectedfor a lot of different reasons, including if the subject makes it better suited to another journal. If this is the case, a transfer might be recommendedShare a link to your article onlineBangalore, IndiaTokyo, JapanPhiladelphia, USAWashington, USA。

药物分析化学SCI投稿指南--dxy

药物分析化学SCI投稿指南--dxy

药物分析化学SCI投稿指南,教你选最适合的杂志!-from 目录药物分析化学SCI投稿指南,教你选最适合的杂志! (1)-from (1)1. 分析化学类 (1)2. 色谱分析类 (3)3. 药物医学类 (3)4. 质谱类 (4)5. 电化学分析类 (4)Chemistry, Analytical SCI杂志大全-分析类 (6)对于从事药物分析化学的同志们来说,很多时候做课题比投文章更为重要。

当然对于在读研究生来说,为了毕业,文章才是最重要的。

有关药物分析化学可以投的杂志非常多,很多刚开始从事这个方向的同志都不太明白这些杂志的侧重点在哪里,往往会出现虽然自己的文章质量很不错,但是由于没有投到一个最合适的杂志而导致文章没有被录用的情况,这样就非常可惜了。

我从事这个方向的研究也偶一段时日了,文章也发了几篇,也算是积累了一点小经验,现在在这里和大家分享,希望能给从事医药分析和生化分析的同志们在投文章的时候提供一点可以借鉴的东西。

有关怎么写论文,怎么组织自己的文章,怎么做实验整理数据之类的东西论坛里面已经有很多相关的帖子了,我在这里就不再罗嗦。

现在重点讲讲怎么挑选一个最合适自己的杂志,顺便介绍一下药分相关的杂志有哪些。

1. 分析化学类Anal. Chem. IF 5.646 ACS米果化学会的分析化学杂志,分析化学的No.1,对于做药分的同志,如果你的文章的创新非常大,比如说提出了一种新的分析方法或分析手段,比之以前的分析方法有了明显的进步,具有很重大的意义;或者说你的应用体系非常的具有新意,可以考虑投AC。

The Analyst IF 3.198 RSC英国皇家化学会的分析家杂志,文章质量非常不错,对文章的新意要求也是比较高的,要求在方法学或者体系有明显的创新,然后才有被接受的可能。

不过比之AC还是有不小的差距。

Anal. Chim. Acta IF 2.894 分析化学快报, ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA,Journal Country/Territory: NETHERLANDSTalanta IF 2.81 塔兰塔(应用与纯粹化学会杂志)Elsevier的两个分析化学杂志,对新意要求不是那么严格,一般来说,只要有一定的新意,能说出比以前的方法的进步之处,实验数据充实,文章条理清晰,都能被接受。

化工文献检索作业

化工文献检索作业

1.请分别列出五个以下各类期刊的刊名英文全名称及缩写形式(要求SCI收录)(1)物理化学、化学物理催化学报Chinese Journal of Catalysis(Chinese.J. Catal )分子催化Journal of Moleclar Catalysis (J. Mol. Catel )化学物理学报Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics (Chinese .J. Chim Phys )物理化学学报Acta Physico-Chemical Sinica(Acta Phys-Chem Sin )物理化学杂志(A,B,C快报)The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, B, C, Letters(J. Phys. Chem.A.B.C.Lett)催化杂志Journal of Catalysis(J. Catal.)化学热力学杂志The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics(J. Chem. Thermodyn)化学物理快报Chemical Physics Letters(Chem. Phys. Lett.)热化学学报Thermochimica Acta (Thermochim. Acta)(2)无机化学分析化学学报Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry (Chinese. J. Inorg Chem)无机化学Inorganic Chemistry (Inorg. Chem.)配位化学杂志Journal of Coordination Chemistry (J. Coord. Chem.)配位化学评论Coordination Chemistry Reviews (Coord. Chem. Rev.)无机化学进展Progress in Inorganic Chemistry (Prog. Inorg. Chem.)(3)分析化学分析化学Analytical Chemistry (Anal. Chem.)分析科学学报Journal of Analytical Science (J. Anal Sci)分析化学家Analyst (Analyst)分析化学评论Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry (Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.)塔兰塔Talanta (Talanta)分析通讯Analytical Communications (Anal. Commun.)(4)有机化学有机化学Chinese Journl of Organic Chemistry (Chinese.J. Org Chem )有机化学杂志Journal of Organic Chemistry (J. Org. Chem. )杂环化学杂志Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry (J. Heterocycl. Chem.)四面体Tetrahedron (Tetrahedron)四面体快报Tetrahedron Letters (Tetrahedron Lett.)碳水化合物研究Carbohydrate Research (Carbohydr. Res.)有机化学通讯Organic Letter (Org. Lett.)(5)高分子化学与物理高分子学报Acta Polymerica Sinica (Acta Polym Sin )聚合物科学Journal of Polymer Science (J. Polym. Sci.)聚合物Polymer (Polymer)应用聚合物科学杂志Journal of Applied Polymer Science(J. Appl. Polym. Sci.)聚合物科学进展Progress in Polymer Science (Prog. Polym. Sci.)欧洲聚合物杂志European Polymer Journal (Eur. Polym. J.)(6)化学工业与化学工程化工学报Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology(J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.)化学工程Chemical Engineering (Chem. Eng.)现代化工Modern Chemical Industry (Mod Chem Ind)化学工程与技术Chemical Engineering and Technology (Chem. Eng. Technol.)化学工程科学Chemical Engineering Science (Chem. Eng. Sci.)(7)化学综合类美国化学会志Journal of the American Chemical Society (J. Am. Chem. Soc.)化学研究报告Accounts of Chemical Research (Acc. Chem. Res.)德国应用化学Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.)自然化学Nature Chemistry (Nat Chem)化学通讯Chemical Communications (Chem. Commun.)中国化学Chinese Journal of Chemistry (Chin. J. Chem .)(8)材料化学类材料花学Chemistry of Materials (Chem. Mater. )先进材料Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.)先进功能材料Advanced Functional Materials (Adv. Funct. Mater.)材料化学杂志A,B,C: Journal of Materials Chemistry A,B,C(J. Mater. Chem.A,B,C)先进能源材料Advanced Energy Materials (Adv Energy Mater)2.科技文献按文献性质不同可划分为哪几类文献?定义分别是什么?并举例说明。

第三章 化学化工类期刊的查阅

第三章 化学化工类期刊的查阅

第三章化学化工类期刊的查阅第一节概述期刊又称杂志,据统计,目前世界上已有约5万种科技期刊,每年发表的研究论文约500万篇,占科技情报的60%以上。

科技期刊与图书相比较,具有报道及时,内容广泛新颖,能及时反映世界科技水平动向等特点。

在科技界已形成通过科技期刊发表科研成果的传统,许多新的成果、新的观点、新的方法往往首先在期刊上刊登。

科技期刊在科技活动中一直起着非常重要的作用,是科学交流的主要工具,也只文献检索的最终目标之一。

科技期刊的类型比较多,按其内容性质划分,主要有以下几类:⑴原始文献期刊刊载原始性研究报告,学术论文,反映有关领域中最新的研究成果,属于一次文献。

如我国的化学学报、化工学报、高等学校化学学报等。

⑵通讯性期刊由于原始研究论文在期刊上发表常常要拖延一定时间。

为了使有关新科研成果、新领域的研究论文迅速与读者见面,出现了“快报”“简报”之类专门发表简小精悍文章的通讯性期刊。

这类刊物一般在稿件收到两个月内即可发表,因而报到内容的速度最快、最新。

如:国外《化学快报》(Chemisty Letters),《分析快报》(Analytytical Letters)等。

⑶文摘和检索性期刊用来报到、累积和查询文献线索的工具,包括文摘、题录、索引和目录等,是在原始文献的基础上编辑出版的二次文献。

利用文摘和检索性的期刊,既可检索新的信息,也可以进行回溯检索。

如美国的《化学文摘CA》、《全国报刊索引》等。

⑷综论性期刊专门刊载综论性文章的期刊。

综论又称述评,它是针对某一学科、专业或课题,收集某一特定时期内有关的原始文献,再加以分析、综合和浓缩,评述其成就和进展,并提出评价和建议,属于二次文献。

阅读综论,可以花较少的时间和精力了解有关学科领域的近期进展情况,并从引用的参考文献可查到所需要的原始文献。

如:《化学进展》、《化工进展》等。

此外,有些期刊业刊载学术水平很高的综论性文章。

⑸新闻性期刊刊载学术机构或工厂企业有关的新闻消息,包括技术动态、生产管理、新产品、新技术以及商品价格、市场销售等。

化学研究常用数据库文库

化学研究常用数据库文库

下面3个是化学专业数据库1. 美国化学会(ACS) 2. 英国皇家化学会 RSC 3. 日本化学会(CSJ) http://www.chemistry.or.jp/index-e.html同时还有以下两个数据库也有大量的化学类期刊4.SD 5.Wiley ;维普资讯-中文科技期刊数据库万方数据标准镜像系统中国知网/中国科学院科学数据库/Ei中国(查阅最新的EI收录的中国科技期刊)/twice/coverage.jspApabi数字资源平台/dlib/List.asp?lang=gb方正阿帕比-阅读分享/idoican/index.htmlScienceDirect - Home(常用的外文论文数据库,推荐使用)/IEEE Xplore- Guest Home Page(IEEE数据库)/Xplore/guesthome.jspElsevier ——全球(主要是欧洲)学术书刊出版集团,提供论文在线投稿服务/wps/find/homepage.cws_homeEngineering Village (著名的EI数据库)http://166.111.120.42/controller/servlet/Controller?CID=quickSearch&database=7Maney Publishing Ingenta Connect (论文搜索)/content/maneyNetLibrary 在线图书馆(论文、书刊搜索)/Google Book Search (各种各样的中、外文书籍,在线阅读)/(英文)/(中文)Google 学术搜索/schhp?hl=zh-CNWorldSciNet 论文搜索/ProQuest 欧美大学学位论文检索/umi/index.jsp麦根——一个不错的电子期刊搜索网站,有不少时尚、科技、体育等类型的杂志/Journal of the American Chemical Society《美国化学会志》美国Chemical Reviews《化学评论》美国Journal of Chemical Education《化学教育杂志》美国Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index, Quarterly Supplement《化学文摘社资料来源索引季度补充篇》美国Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry《组合化学杂志》美国Chemical Society Reviews《化学会评论》英国Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry.《英国化学会志:道尔顿汇刊(无机化学)》英国Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions, Part 1: An International Journal of Organic and Bio-Organic Chemistry《英国化学会志:柏尔金汇刊第一辑(有机化学与生物有机化学)》英国Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions, Part 2: An International Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry《英国化学会志:柏尔金汇刊第二辑(物理有机化学)》英国Chemical Communications《化学通讯》英国Pure and Applied Chemistry《理论化学与应用化学》英国Natural Product Reports《天然产物报告》英国Natural Product Updates《天然产物快报》英国Green Chemistry《绿色化学》英国Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan《日本化学会通报》日本Chemistry Letters《化学快报》日本European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry(Text in English)《欧洲无机化学杂志》德国Journal of Physical Chemistry A: Molecules, Spectroscopy, Kinetics, Environment and General Theory《物理化学杂志,A辑:分子、光谱学、动力学、环境与普通理论》美国542B0006-1B Journal of Physical chemistry B: Materials, Surfaces, Interfaces & Biophysical《物理化学杂志,B辑:材料、表面、界面与生物物理》美国International Journal of Chemical Kinetics《国际化学动力学杂志》美国Electrochimica Acta《电化学学报》英国Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics《物理化学化学物理》英国Journal of Catalysis《催化杂志》美国Catalysis Reviews; Science and Engineering《催化评论;科学与工程》美国Journal of the Electrochemical Society《电化学学会志》美国Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry《固体电化学杂志》德国Applied Catalysis A: General 《应用催化,A辑:总论》荷兰Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 《应用催化,B辑:环境》荷兰Catalysis Today 《今日催化》荷兰IEEE Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters《IEEE电化学与固体快报》美国Inorganic Chemistry《无机化学》美国Journal of Organic Chemistry《有机化学杂志》美国Journal of Applied Polymer Science《应用聚合物科学杂志》美国Organometallics《有机金属化合物》美国Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry《杂环化学杂志》美国Applied Organometallic Chemistry《应用有机金属化学》英国Synthetic Communications《合成通讯》美国Synthesis(Text in English) 《合成》德国Research on Chemical Intermediates《化学媒介物研究》荷兰Analytical Chemistry, with Annual Reviews and LabGuide《分析化学》美国Journal of Chromatographic Science《色谱科学杂志》美国Analyst. Analytical Abstracts. Analytical Communications. 《化验师》《分析化学文摘》及《分析化学通讯》英国Chromatographia(Text in English)《色层法》德国Talanta《塔兰塔》荷兰。

英文论文审稿意见英文版

英文论文审稿意见英文版

英文论文审稿意见汇总之老阳三干创作1、目标和结果不清晰.It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充沛.◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experimentsshould be provided.3、对研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈说结论/夸年夜功效/不严谨:The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:A hypothesis needs to be presented.6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/界说概念:What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?7、对研究问题的界说:Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one section to define the problem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充沛地写literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对claim,如A>B的证明,verification:There is no experimental comparison of the algorithmwith previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.10、严谨度问题:MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式(重视水平):◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.12、语言问题(呈现最多的问题):有关语言的审稿人意见:◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results ofthe study are clear to the reader.◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.◆ As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.◆ Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆ the quality of English needs improving.来自编纂的鼓励:Encouragement from reviewers:◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greaterdepth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting.◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomaterials.◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见Ms. Ref. No.: ******Title: ******Materials Science and EngineeringDear Dr. ******,Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.For your guidance, reviewers&#39; comments are appended below.Reviewer #1: This work proposes an extensive review onmicromulsion-based methods for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles. As such, the matter is of interest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:1) the overall quality of the English language is rather poor;2) some Figures must be selected from previous literature to discuss also the synthesis of anisotropically shaped Ag nanoparticles (there are several examples published), which has been largely overlooked throughout the paper. ;Once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manuscript could be accepted for publication in this journal这是一篇全过程我均比力了解的投稿,稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的,中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊,并很快获得发表.其时我作为审稿人之一,除提出一些修改建议外,还特建议了5篇应增加的参考文献,该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇.作者或许看到审稿意见还不错,因此决意检验考试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿.几经修改和弥补后,请一位英文“功底"较好的中国人翻译,投稿后约3周,便返回了三份审稿意见.从英文刊的反馈意见看,这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够,其次是语言表达方面的欠缺,另外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的缺乏.感想:一篇好的论文,从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢.附1:中译审稿意见审稿意见—1(1) 英文表达太差,尽管意思年夜致能表达清楚,但文法毛病太多.(2) 文献综述较差,观点或论断应有文献支持.(3) 论文读起来像是XXX的广告,不知道作者与XXX是否没有关联.(4) 该模式的立异性其实不是如作者所述,目前有许多XX采用此模式(如美国地球物理学会),作者应详加调查并分析XXX运作模式的立异点.(5) 该模式也不是作者所说的那样胜利……(审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析)审稿意见—2(1) 缺少直接相关的文献引用(如…).(2) 写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准.审稿意见—3(1) 作者应着重指出指出自己的贡献.(2) 缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析.(3) 需要采纳表格和图件形式展示(数据)资料.Our JPCA paper were peer reviewed by two reviewers, and their comments are as follows:The Comments by the First ReviewerEditor: Michael A. DuncanReviewer: 68Manuscript Number: jp067440iManuscript Title: Restricted Geometry Optimization, a Different Way to Estimate Stabilization Energies for Aromatic Molecules of Various TypesCorresponding Author: YuRecommendation: The paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted.Additional Comments: In the present work the authors introduce a new energy-based aromaticity measure. Referred as restricted geometry optimization, the extra stabilization energy (ESE) is calculated by means of an energy scheme in which the different double bonds are localized. This methodology is applied to different sets of aromatic systems, and the results are compared to previous already existing schemes. This procedure seems to work better than previous ones, however it must be underlined that with a much greater complexity. It avoids having to choose a reference structure, and it is worthnoticing that benzene appears to be the most aromatic system. Thus the method presented might mean a new contribution to the different aromacity criteria, however before acceptance for publication I would recommend important changes to be taken into account in the manuscript.The new method used is not presented in a comprehensible way. In the second paragraph of the Introduction the authors should already describe it, and not first presenting the results for benzene and notgoing into the method till the second section. The formulas used must be described precisely as well. So I would recommend that before acceptance the manuscript should be rewritten in order to make it more comprehensible not only to physical chemists but also to the experimental chemical community, and at the same time to improve the English used.Other minor points are:- First line of Introduction: aromaticity is one of the most important concepts in organic chemistry, but most of organic compounds are not aromatic.- Introduction, line 4:notice that only energetic ways of evaluating aromaticity are mentioned, however geometry-based (HOMA), magnetic-based (NICS) and electronic-based (SCI, PDI) methods are also important, and this point should be pointed out.- Section 3.1, last line of first paragraph: is B3LYP chosen just because it gives similar results to HF and MP2? This should be pointed out in the manuscript.- Enlarge description in point 3.4.1 by going deeper into the data in Figure 8.Review Sent Date: 18-Dec-2006******** *********************************The Comments by the Second ReviewerEditor: Michael A. DuncanReviewer: 67Manuscript Number: jp067440iManuscript Title: Restricted Geometry Optimization, a Different Way to Estimate StabilizationEnergies for Aromatic Molecules of Various Types Corresponding Author: YuRecommendation: The paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted.Additional Comments:Comments on the manuscript "Restricted Geometry Optimization, a Different Way to Estimate Stabilization Energies for Aromatic Molecules of Various Types" by Zhong-Heng Yu, Peng BaoAuthors propose a restricted geometry optimization technique subject to pi orbital interaction constraints as a new measure of aromaticity. The approach is interesting and has certain merits. My main objection is that the manuscript is difficult to read and understand, mainly because of poor English. A substantial revision in this respect would be beneficiary.各位:新的恶战开始了.投往JASA的文章没有被拒,但被批得很凶.尽管如此,审稿人和编纂还是给了我们一个修改和再被审的机会.我们应当珍惜这个机会,不急不火.我们首先要有个修改的指导思想.年夜家先看看审稿意见吧.-----邮件原件----- Manuscript #07-04147: Editor's Comments:This is my personal addition to the automatically generated email displayed above. Your manuscript has now been read by three knowledgeable reviewers, each of whom has provided thoughtful and detailed comments on the paper. The main points of the reviews are self-explanatory and mostly consistent across the reviews. Your presentation needs to be reworked substantially, and thereviews give you many suggestions for doing so. Clearly, the introduction needs to be much more concise and focused on the main questions you propose to answer, and why these questions are important. The rationale forselecting this unusual condition must be clear. Your discussion should focuson how the questions have been answered and what they mean. The resultssection is heavily dependent on statistical analyses that did not satisfythe reviewers. The figures and tables could be improved and perhapsconsolidated. The methods could be shortened. For example, I think readers would take your word thatthesewere nonsense sentences, or perhaps you could simply cite some other workwhere they were used. In general, it is unusual to present the first resultsas late as page 17 of a manuscript.Beyond the issues of presentation, some serious questions are raised by the reviewers about the design. The most notable (but not the only problem) is that there are no conditions where young and olderlisteners can be compared at nearly the same performance level in the baseline condition, and that at least floor effects and potentially ceiling effects are likely to significantly influence the older/younger comparison. The older listeners are tested at only one signal-to-noise ratio, at which performance was extremely poor. This asymmetric design where data for three signal-to-masker ratios are available for the younger listeners but only one for the older listeners is not ideal, but perhaps the comparison could have been salvaged if you had guessed a little better in selecting the signal-to-masker ratio for the older listeners. That didn't work out and you didn't adjust to it. I'm sorry to say that in my opinion this problem is so serious that it precludes publication of t!heolder versus younger data in JASA, as I see no way of making a valid comparison with things as they are. Further, after reading the manuscript and the reviews, it seems to me that even the subjective impressioncomparison is difficult to interpret because of the different sensation levels at which the older and younger groups listened (if the target was fixed at 56 dBA).The Brungart et al. and Rakerd et al. data that you cite where the masker delay was manipulated over the 0 to 64 ms range would seem to have been a nice springboard for your study in older listeners. Would it not have been cleaner to have replicated those conditions with younger subjects in your lab, and then tested older listeners to see whether thepatterns of data were different? There, at least, the target stimulus condition itself is not varying and there are archival data out there for comparison. As the reviews point out, your conditions present brand new complications because the ITI changes the spatial impression of the target, may change the energetic masking of the target, and distorts the target temporally all at the same time. Although the temporal distortions did not impair performancesubstantially in quiet, they may well in noise. Further, the spatial impressions created by the target in quiet are likely to be very different than those when the target is at v! erylow sensation levels in masking. Please investigate the literature on the influence of sensation level and noise on the strength ofthe precedence effect, particularly the perception of "echoes" at the longer delays. Yuan Chuan Chiang did her dissertation on this and published the results in JASA in 1998, but the first observation that noise can influence the breaking apart of a lead-lag stimulus into two images dates back at least to Thurlow and Parks (1961). To be sure, the sounds that we want to listen to are often accompanied by reflections, and I am not questioning the general validity of your conditions. However, it is important that your experimental design allows you separate out the various contributions to your results.I think there are several options for you to consider: (1) If you think it is very important to publish all the data you have right now, you couldwithdraw the manuscript and attempt to publish the data in another journal.(2) You could argue that the reviewers and I are wrong about the seriousness of the floor effect with the older listeners and submit a revision that includes the same data while making a convincing case for the validity of the older/younger comparison. Although this option is open to you, I don't think this is a promising alternative. (3) You could collect more data on older listeners under more favorable conditions where performance is better. With the added data this could either be a new manuscript, or, if such data were collected and the paper rewritten in a reasonable amount of time, it could be considered a revision of the current manuscript. The revision would be sent back to the reviewers. Of course, I cannot promise in advance that amanuscript evenwith these newdata would be judged favorably by the reviewers. (4) You could drop the older/younger comparison from the manuscript and submit a much shorter version that includes only the younger data and focuses on the noise masker/speech masker distinction, perhaps analyzing your data to draw inferences about release from energetic versus informational masking from the data. Here too, it will be important to provide a clear rationale for what your specific question is about release from masking, why your conditions were chosen, and what new insights your data offer. I still worry about how spatial effects and the effects of temporal distortions are to be distinguished. (5) You could simply withdraw the manuscript and consider a more straightforward design for asking the questions you want to ask with older listeners.Thank your for submitting your manuscript to JASA. I hope the alternatives described will help guide you on how you should proceed from here. Whatever you decide to do, please consider the reviewers' comments very carefully as they have gone out of their way to provide you with suggestions on improving the presentation.Sincerely yours, Richard L. FreymanReviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations:Reviewer #1 (Good Scientific Quality):No. See attached Reviewer #1 (Appropriate Journal): YesReviewer #1 (Satisfactory English/References): No.Reviewer #1 (Tables/Figures Adequate): No.Reviewer #1 (Concise): No.Reviewer #1 (Appropriate Title and Abstract): No, because the term "interval-target interval" in thetitle required further explanation.MS#: 07-04147 Huang et al. "Effect of changing the inter-target interval on informational masking and energetic masking of speech in young adults and older adults." This paper investigates the benefits of release from masking in younger and older listeners, as a function of inter-target interval (ITI) in two masker conditions (speech masking and noise masker). The same target speech was presented from two different locations simultaneously in two different maskers, one from each location (L or R). Results show that release from informational masking is evident in both younger and older listeners when the ITI was reduced from 64 ms to 0 ms.General comments:1. Introduction needs to be rewritten:&#x2022; The general impression is that the introduction section is unnecessarily lengthy. There is too much unnecessary information, while some important terms and information are left unexplained. &#x2022; The organization is poor and concepts are disjointed, jumping from place to place. For example, the authors spent 1.5 pages on reverberation and the difference between older and younger adults, than spent a full-page to talk about masking, and then came back to reverberation.&#x2022; In addition, the authors did not clearly present the purpose of the study and the core of the issues under investigation. The authors mentioned that "the present study investigated whether changing theITI over the whole precedence-operation range...can induce a release of target speech from speech masking or noise masking." However, they did not explain how and why manipulating ITI can address their questions, questions that were not clearly stated anywhere inthe paper. No hypothesis was provided in the paper and no explanation was given regarding how the experimental conditions or contrast of results in different conditions can answer the questions under investigation.2. Report of results and statistical analyses needs to be accurate and precise:&#x2022; Authors failed to provide results of statistical analyses in many occasions.&#x2022; At the beginning of the result section for both the younger andolder groups, the authors should clearly present the number of factors included in the analysis and which one was a between-subject factor and which ones were within-subject factors. Main effects and interaction (3-way and 2-way) should also be reported clearly. &#x2022; Bonferroni correction was mentioned in the post-hoc analyses; however, no pvalue was reported. &#x2022; The authors should not use the term "marginally significant". It is either"significant" or "nonsignificant". I don't see p=0.084 is "marginallysignificant."&#x2022; When you say percent release, do you mean percentage point difference between the 64 ms ITI and other ITI values? For example, in the statement "...the releaseamount was 31.9% under the speech-masking condition,...", do you mean "31.9 percentage points"?3. Baseline condition is questionable:&#x2022; The authors failed to provide clear explanation of the results. For example, the authors finally provided the definition of release from masking (on p.19) as "...the release of speech from masking at each ITI is defined as the percent difference between the speech-identification at the ITI and the speech identification at the ITI of 64 ms (the longest ITI in this study)." &#x2022; It took me a while to understand what this means, and finally came up with the interpretation (if my interpretation is correct) of the data for the authors. It seems that when ITI was at 0 ms, theperceived spatial location is between the two maskers (spatial separation). But when the ITI was 32 and/or 64 ms, listeners heard two images (one from each side) and there was no spatial separation between the target speech and the masker on either side. Therefore, according to the authors, the release from masking is the performance difference between the ITI conditions when listeners heard only one image in a location different from the maskers', and the ITI conditions where two images from the masker locations were heard. However, I have a problem with the baseline condition (64 ms ITI in which two images were perceived). If the listeners could not fuse the image, did they hear a delay (echo) between the two targets? If so, the poor performance in the 64 ms condition can be partially due to theconfusion/disruption induced by the echo in noise conditions inaddition to the lack of spatial separation between the target and themasker.4. Subject recruitment criteria were unclear:&#x2022; The authors recruited both young and older adults in the study and claimed that both groups had "clinically normal hearing." However, reading the fine details of their hearing thresholds (< 45 dB HL between 125 and 4k Hz), it is hard to accept that the hearing thresholds are within normal limits in the older group. There is at least a mild hearing loss below 4k Hz and mild-to-moderate hearing loss above 4k Hz (see Fig. 1) in these subjects. The authors should explain the differences in the results in relation to the threshold differences between the two groups.&#x2022; The threshold data provided in Fig. 1 is average data. It is necessary to provide individual threshold data (at least for the older group) in a table format.5. Language problem:&#x2022; I understand that English is not the authors' native language. It is recommended that the authors seek assistance in proof-reading the manuscript before submission.6. Tables and Figures:&#x2022; Table 1 and 2 are not necessary since the information is presented in Fig. 7 &#x2022; The authors should provide legends in the figures.&#x2022; The authors should provide error bars in thegraphs in Fig 1. &#x2022; It is hard to see the short ITI data in Fig. 2 &#x2022; The authors should consider changing the scale on the y-axis in Fig. 4 to provide better visualization of the data. &#x2022; Fig. 6 should be deleted. Results could be clearly described in the text.Specific comments (this is by no means a complete list):p.3 first par: The quote from Knudsen (1929) is not necessary.p.4 first & second par. The authors provided an exhaustive list of references in various place. I recommend they only cite the ones that are most relevant and representative. p.4 last sentence. "A listener subject to informational masking a target speech feels it difficult to segregate audible components of the targetspeech from those of masking speech." This sentence is incomprehensible,please rewrite. p.5 first line, first par. "Masking (particularly information masking) of target speech can be reduced if the listener can use certain cues (perceived spatial location, acoustical features, lexical information, etc) to facilitate his/her selective attention to the target speech." References are needed for each cue listed in this sentence. p.5 line 5. "Age-related deficits...inhibition of goal-irrelevantinformation..., therefore may cause more speech-recognition difficulties" This sentence is coming out of the blue without further explanation.p. 8-10. Please explain the terms "inter-loudspeaker interval","inter-masker interval", "inter-target interval" before using them.p.11 line 11 "Moreover, if the recognition of target speech under either the speech masking condition or noise masking condition is significantlyinfluenced by the ITI in younger adults, the present study further investigated whether there is an age-related deficit in the releasing effect of changing the ITI." This sentence is incomprehensible. p.11 line 2 "The 36 young university students all had normal and balanced...." Change "balance" to "symmetrical." p. 12 line 8 "Direct English translations of the sentences are similar but not identical to the English nonsense sentences that were developed by Helfer (1997) and also used in studies by Freyman et al. (1999, 2001, 2004) and Li et al. (2004)." I thought the sentences were created by the authors. So, are they a direct translation from the English version or created by theauthors?p.13 last par "For the two-source target presentation,...." This came out of the blue. The experimental conditions should be described clearly in a separate section. Schematic representation of the conditions could be included.p.15 line 8 "During a session, the target-speech sounds were presented at a level such that each loudspeaker, playing alone, would produce a sound pressure of 56 dBA." Is this the rms level of speech? The level at 56 dBA seems a little low to me. It may sound very soft for the older listeners given that they have mild to moderate hearing loss. Can you explain why you chose such a low presentation level? p.15 last line "There were 36 ((17+1)x2) testing condition for younger participants, and there were 32 ((15+1)x2) testingconditions for older participants." The number of conditions for each group is not apparent to me. Could you explain further in the manuscript? p.16 line 9 "...participated in additional speech-recognition experiments under the condition without masker presentation." Where did the target speech come from? Front? Right? Or left? p.17-27. See comments on reporting results and statistical analysis under "General comments" point #2. p.23 line 12-13 "A 2 (masker type) by 15 (ITI) within-subject ANOVA confirms that the interaction between masker type and ITI was significant..." Since the interaction is significant, the authors should not simply interpret the main effects. p.29 line 9 Explain "self-masking" effect. Would the author expect a "self-masking" effect in noise?p.30 last par first line "Specifically, when the SNR was -4 dB, changing the ITI (absolute value) from 64 to 0 ms led to only a small improvement in target-speech intelligibility, and the improvement was similar between the speech masking condition and the noise masking condition." The amount of release from masking in the speech masker condition at -4 dB SNR may be limited by the ceiling effect. p.31 line 5 "In older participants, the reduction of the ITI also improved speech recognition under both the speech masking condition and the noise masking condition..." It is hard to tell if there is a significant difference among the ITI conditions with the noise masker due to the floor effect. p.31 line 7 from bottom. "The results suggest a faster decay of temporal storage of the fine details of speech sound in olderadults than in younger adults. Thus at long it is (16 ms or 32 ms), cues induced by the integration of leading and lagging target signals were weaker and/or not be well used in older participants." First, the author should take into account the hearing loss in the older group. Second, this conclusion seems somewhatcontradictory to what the authors reported regarding the perceived image(s) of the target signal under various ITI conditions. All except for one younger subject perceived two separate images at 32 ms ITI, but most of the older subjects still perceived the target as one image. p.32 2nd par. The discussion on the effect of inter-sound delay on ear channel acoustics came out of nowhere.Reviewer #2 Evaluations:Reviewer #2 (Good Scientific Quality): Generally yes - see general remarks below. Reviewer #2 (Appropriate Journal): YesReviewer #2 (Satisfactory English/References):Clarity and conciseness could be improved - see general remarks.The referencing is occasionally excessive, e.g. the 17 references provided to back up the existence of informational masking on page 4, lines 13-17, or p28 lines 15-16. Some choice examples would generally suffice instead of。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

TALANTAThe International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical ChemistryAUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS• Description• Audience• Impact Factor• Abstracting and Indexing • Editorial Board• Guide for Authors p.1p.2p.2p.2p.2p.4ISSN: 0039-9140DESCRIPTIONTalanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, preliminary communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and novel sensor and instrumentation development, are especially encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, and materials science and engineering are welcome.Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.Since classical spectrophotometric measurements and applications (including derivative spectrophometry), fluorimetry, solvent extraction, titrimetry, chemometrics, etc. are well established and are considered routine analytical methods, studies in such areas should demonstrate a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems. New reagents or systems should demonstrate clear advantage, and their presentation should be comprehensive rather than generating a series of similar papers for several analytes or similar reagents. Modifications of reagents should demonstrate significant improvements. Obvious application of known chemistries or methods to established instrumental techniques are discouraged.Application of established analytical approaches to relatively simple matrices having no major interferences, such as pharmaceutical preparations, are discouraged unless considerable improvements over other methods in the literature are demonstrated. Papers dealing with analytical data such as stability constants, pKa values, etc. should be submitted to more specific journals, unless novel analytical methodology is demonstrated, or important analytical data are provided which could be useful in the development of analytical procedures.AUDIENCEAnalytical Chemists.IMPACT FACTOR2009: 3.290 © Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2010ABSTRACTING AND INDEXINGAnalytical AbstractsAqualine AbstractsBIOSISChemical AbstractsCurr Cont ASCA/Phy Chem & Earth SciEIC/IntelligenceElsevier BIOBASEResearch AlertSCISEARCHScience Citation IndexScopusEDITORIAL BOARDEditors in ChiefG.D. Christian, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Washington, Bagley Hall, Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700, USA, Fax: +1 206 685 3478, Email: christian@J-.M. Kauffmann, Inst. de Pharmacie, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Campus Plaine CP 205/6, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium, Fax: +32 2 650 5187, Email: talanta@ulb.ac.beAssociate Editor, South America, Africa and the Middle-EastJ.L. Burguera, Universidad de Los Andes, Merida, VenezuelaAssociate Editor ChinaJ-H. Wang, Research Ctr. for Analytical Sciences Northeastern University, Wenhua Road 3 -1 1, Box 332, 110006 Shenyang, ChinaAssistant EditorsR.E. Synovec, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAJ.C. Viré, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, BelgiumAdvisory BoardR. Apak, Istanbul, TurkeyE. Bakker, Geneva, SwitzerlandB.J. Birch, Luton, UKZ. Cai, Hong Kong, ChinaJ-L. Capelo-Martinez, Ourense, SpainO. Chailapakul, Bangkok, ThailandS. Cosnier, Grenoble Cedex 9, FranceW. Frenzel, Berlin, GermanyA.G. González, Sevilla, SpainA. Ho, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROCP. Hubert, Sart-Tilman Liège 1, BelgiumJ. Kalivas, Moscow, ID, USAB. Karlberg, Stockholm, SwedenA.A. Karyakin, Moscow, Russian FederationS.D. Kolev, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaJ-M. Lin, Beijing, ChinaA.C. Olivieri, Rosario, ArgentinaY. Lin, Richland, WA, USAS. Motomizu, Okayama, JapanS.A. Ozkan, Ankara, TurkeyJ.M. Pingarrón, Madrid, SpainE. Pretsch, Zürich, SwitzerlandV. Remcho, Corvallis, OR, USAM. Shamsipur, Kermanshah, IranM.M. Silva, Porto Alegre, BrazilP. Solich, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic D.G. Themelis, Thessaloniki, GreeceK. Thurbide, Calgary, CanadaD.L. Tsalev, Sofia, BulgariaB. Walczak, Katowice, PolandJ. Wang, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USAJ.D. Winefordner, Gainsville, FL, USAX-P. Yan, Tianjin, ChinaE.A.G. Zagatto, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil X.R. Zhang, Beijing, ChinaD. Barceló, Barcelona, SpainJ.S. Becker, Jülich, GermanyS. Daniele, Venezia, ItalyM. del Valle, Barcelona, SpainGUIDE FOR AUTHORSINTRODUCTIONTalanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, preliminary communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and novel sensor and instrumentation development, are especially encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, and materials science and engineering are welcome.Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.Since classical spectrophotometric measurements and applications (including derivative spectrophometry), fluorimety, solvent extraction, titrimetry, chemometrics, etc. are well established and are considered routine analytical methods, studies in such areas should demonstrate a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems. New reagents or systems should demonstrate clear advantage, and their presentation should be comprehensive rather than generating a series of similar papers for several analytes or similar reagents. Modifications of reagents should demonstrate significant improvements. Obvious application of known chemistries or methods to established instrumental techniques are discouraged.Application of established analytical approaches to relatively simple matrices having no major interferences, such as pharmaceutical preparations, are discouraged unless considerable improvements over other methods in the literature are demonstrated. Papers dealing with analytical data such as stability constants, pKa values, etc. should be submitted to more specific journals, unless novel analytical methodology is demonstrated, or important analytical data are provided which could be useful in the development of analytical procedures.Types of paperTalanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, preliminary communications and reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Letters to the Editors will be considered for publication. Data should be submitted only if they are clearly related to analytical measurements.BEFORE YOU BEGINEthics in PublishingFor information on Ethics in Publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication see /publishingethics and /ethicalguidelines.Conflict of interestAll authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within three years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work. See also /conflictsofinterest.Submission declaration and verificationSubmission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any otherlanguage, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. To verify originality, your article may be checked by the originality detection software iThenticate. See also /editors/plagdetect.Changes to authorshipThis policy concerns the addition, deletion, or rearrangement of author names in the authorship of accepted manuscripts:Before the accepted manuscript is published in an online issue: Requests to add or remove an author, or to rearrange the author names, must be sent to the Journal Manager from the corresponding author of the accepted manuscript and must include: (a) the reason the name should be added or removed, or the author names rearranged and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, fax, letter) from all authors that they agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed. Requests that are not sent by the corresponding author will be forwarded by the Journal Manager to the corresponding author, who must follow the procedure as described above. Note that: (1) Journal Managers will inform the Journal Editors of any such requests and (2) publication of the accepted manuscript in an online issue is suspended until authorship has been agreed.After the accepted manuscript is published in an online issue: Any requests to add, delete, or rearrange author names in an article published in an online issue will follow the same policies as noted above and result in a corrigendum.CopyrightUpon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' (for more information on this and copyright see /copyright). Acceptance of the agreement will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement.Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations (please consult /permissions). If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for use by authors in these cases: please consult /permissions.Retained author rightsAs an author you (or your employer or institution) retain certain rights; for details you are referred to: /authorsrights.Role of the funding sourceYou are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement then this should be stated. Please see /funding.Funding body agreements and policiesElsevier has established agreements and developed policies to allow authors whose articles appear in journals published by Elsevier, to comply with potential manuscript archiving requirements as specified as conditions of their grant awards. To learn more about existing agreements and policies please visit /fundingbodies.Language and language servicesPlease write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these). Authors who require information about language editing and copyediting services pre- and post-submission please visit /languageediting or our customer support site at for more information.SubmissionSubmission to this journal proceeds totally online and you will be guided stepwise through the creation and uploading of your files. The system automatically converts source files to a single PDF file of the article, which is used in the peer-review process. Please note that even though manuscript sourcefiles are converted to PDF files at submission for the review process, these source files are needed for further processing after acceptance. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for revision, takes place by e-mail removing the need for a paper trail.Please note that a Novelty Statement is required for submission. This statement should provide information in one or two sentences as to what is new and novel in the manuscript in relation to prior related work, including the authors' own.Please submit your article via /locate/talantaRefereesRefereeing of PapersAll papers submitted are refereed by experts who advise the Editors-in-Chief on the matter of acceptance in accordance with the high standards required and on the understanding that the subject matter has not been previously published and that the authors accept full responsibility for the factual accuracy of the data presented and have obtained any necessary authority to publish. Referees will be encouraged to present critical and unbiased reports which are designed to assist the author in presenting material in the clearest and most unequivocal way possible. At the discretion of the Editors-in-Chief, and if referees agree, the names of referees may be disclosed if thereby agreement between author and referee is likely to result. Authors should appreciate that the comments of referees are presented in a constructive spirit, and that agreement between the views of author and referee must result in a higher standard of publication.When submitting their paper authors are requested to provide names and addresses (including e-mail addresses) of three competent but independent referees, although the choice of referees used will be made by the Editor.Preliminary communications will be refereed urgently and will be accorded priority in publication. Letters to the editors will not be refereed, but will be published at the discretion of the Editors-in-Chief. If accepted, they will also be given priority. All papers accepted are subject to editorial amendment if necessary.PREPARATIONUse of wordprocessing softwareIt is important that the file be saved in the native format of the wordprocessor used. The text should be in single-column format. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the wordprocessor's options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italics, subscripts, superscripts etc. When preparing tables, if you are using a table grid, use only one grid for each individual table and not a grid for each row. If no grid is used, use tabs, not spaces, to align columns. The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier: /guidepublication). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics will be required whether or not you embed your figures in the text. See also the section on Electronic illustrations.To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the "spell-check" and "grammar-check" functions of your wordprocessor.Article structureSubdivision - unnumbered sectionsDivide your article into clearly defined sections. Each subsection is given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line. Subsections should be used as much as possible when cross-referencing text: refer to the subsection by heading as opposed to simply "the text".IntroductionState the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results.Material and methodsProvide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described.ResultsResults should be clear and concise.DiscussionThis should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.AppendicesIf there is more than one appendix, they should be identified as A, B, etc. Formulae and equations in appendices should be given separate numbering: Eq. (A.1), Eq. (A.2), etc.; in a subsequent appendix, Eq. (B.1) and so on. Similarly for tables and figures: Table A.1; Fig. A.1, etc.Essential title page information• Title.Concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible.• Author names and affiliations.Where the family name may be ambiguous (e.g., a double name), please indicate this clearly. Present the authors' affiliation addresses (where the actual work was done) below the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter immediately after the author's name and in front of the appropriate address. Provide the full postal address of each affiliation, including the country name, and, if available, the e-mail address of each author.• Corresponding author. Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that telephone and fax numbers (with country and area code) are provided in addition to the e-mail address and the complete postal address. Contact details must be kept up to date by the corresponding author.• Present/permanent address. If an author has moved since the work described in the article was done, or was visiting at the time, a "Present address" (or "Permanent address") may be indicated as a footnote to that author's name. The address at which the author actually did the work must be retained as the main, affiliation address. Superscript Arabic numerals are used for such footnotes. AbstractA concise and factual abstract is required. The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. An abstract is often presented separately from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. For this reason, References should be avoided, but if essential, then cite the author(s) and year(s). Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself. KeywordsImmediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 6 keywords, using American spelling and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, "and", "of"). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.AbbreviationsDefine abbreviations that are not standard in this field in a footnote to be placed on the first page of the article. Such abbreviations that are unavoidable in the abstract must be defined at their first mention there, as well as in the footnote. Ensure consistency of abbreviations throughout the article. AcknowledgementsCollate acknowledgements in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title page, as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List here those individuals who provided help during the research (e.g., providing language help, writing assistance or proof reading the article, etc.).NomenclatureAll nomenclature, abbreviation, and units should conform as closely as possible to the rules established by IUPAC (available online at /.)Math formulaePresent simple formulae in the line of normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small fractional terms, e.g., X/Y. In principle, variables are to be presented in italics. Powers of e are often more conveniently denoted by exp. Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text).FootnotesFootnotes should be used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article, using superscript Arabic numbers. Many wordprocessors build footnotes into the text, and this feature may be used. Should this not be the case, indicate the position of footnotes in the text and present the footnotes themselves separately at the end of the article. Do not include footnotes in the Reference list.Table footnotesIndicate each footnote in a table with a superscript lowercase letter.ArtworkElectronic artworkGeneral points• Make sure you use uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.• Save text in illustrations as "graphics" or enclose the font.• Only use the following fonts in your illustrations: Arial, Courier, Times, Symbol.• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.• Provide captions to illustrations separately.• Produce images near to the desired size of the printed version.• Submit each figure as a separate file.A detailed guide on electronic artwork is available on our website:/artworkinstructionsYou are urged to visit this site; some excerpts from the detailed information are given here. FormatsRegardless of the application used, when your electronic artwork is finalised, please "save as" or convert the images to one of the following formats (note the resolution requirements for line drawings, halftones, and line/halftone combinations given below):EPS: Vector drawings. Embed the font or save the text as "graphics".TIFF: color or grayscale photographs (halftones): always use a minimum of 300 dpi.TIFF: Bitmapped line drawings: use a minimum of 1000 dpi.TIFF: Combinations bitmapped line/half-tone (color or grayscale): a minimum of 500 dpi is required. DOC, XLS or PPT: If your electronic artwork is created in any of these Microsoft Office applications please supply "as is".Please do not:• Supply files that are optimised for screen use (like GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); the resolution is too low;• Supply files that are too low in resolution;• Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.Color artworkPlease make sure that artwork files are in an acceptable format (TIFF, EPS or MS Office files) and with the correct resolution. If, together with your accepted article, you submit usable color figures then Elsevier will ensure, at no additional charge, that these figures will appear in color on the Web (e.g., ScienceDirect and other sites) regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in color in the printed version. For color reproduction in print, you will receive information regarding the costs from Elsevier after receipt of your accepted article. Please indicate your preference for color in print or on the Web only. For further information on the preparation of electronic artwork, please see /artworkinstructions.Please note: Because of technical complications which can arise by converting color figures to "gray scale" (for the printed version should you not opt for color in print) please submit in addition usable black and white versions of all the color illustrations.Figure captionsEnsure that each illustration has a caption. Supply captions separately, not attached to the figure. A caption should comprise a brief title (not on the figure itself) and a description of the illustration. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used. TablesNumber tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. Place footnotes to tables below the table body and indicate them with superscript lowercase letters. Avoid vertical rules. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in tables do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.ReferencesCitation in textPlease ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Any references cited in the abstract must be given in full. Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text. If these references are included in the reference list they should follow the standard reference style of the journal and should include a substitution of the publication date with either "Unpublished results" or "Personal communication" Citation of a reference as "in press" implies that the item has been accepted for publication.Web referencesAs a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.), should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.References in a special issuePlease ensure that the words 'this issue' are added to any references in the list (and any citations in the text) to other articles in the same Special Issue.Reference management softwareThis journal has standard templates available in key reference management packages EndNote (/support/enstyles.asp) and Reference Manager (/support/rmstyles.asp). Using plug-ins to wordprocessing packages, authors only need to select the appropriate journal template when preparing their article and the list of references and citations to these will be formatted according to the journal style which is described below. Reference styleText: Indicate references by number(s) in square brackets in line with the text. The actual authors can be referred to, but the reference number(s) must always be given.Example: "..... as demonstrated [3,6]. Barnaby and Jones [8] obtained a different result ...."List: Number the references (numbers in square brackets) in the list in the order in which they appear in the text.Examples:Reference to a journal publication:[1] J. van der Geer, J.A.J. Hanraads, R.A. Lupton, J. Sci. Commun. 163 (2000) 51–59.Reference to a book:[2] W. Strunk Jr., E.B. White, The Elements of Style, third ed., Macmillan, New York, 1979. Reference to a chapter in an edited book:[3] G.R. Mettam, L.B. Adams, in: B.S. Jones, R.Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the Electronic Age, E-Publishing, Inc. New York, 1994, pp. 281–304.Journal abbreviations sourceJournal names should be abbreviated according toIndex Medicus journal abbreviations: /tsd/serials/lji.html;List of serial title word abbreviations: /2-22661-LTWA-online.php;CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service): /sent.html.Video dataElsevier accepts video material and animation sequences to support and enhance your scientific research. Authors who have video or animation files that they wish to submit with their article are strongly encouraged to include these within the body of the article. This can be done in the same way as a figure or table by referring to the video or animation content and noting in the body text where it should be placed. All submitted files should be properly labeled so that they directly relate to the video file's content. In order to ensure that your video or animation material is directly usable, please provide the files in one of our recommended file formats with a preferred maximum size of 50 MB. Video and animation files supplied will be published online in the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Web products, including ScienceDirect: . Please supply 'stills' with your files: you can choose any frame from the video or animation or make a separate image. These will be used instead of standard icons and will personalize the link to your video data. For more detailed instructions please visit our video instruction pages at /artworkinstructions.。

相关文档
最新文档