最新英语BP辩论反方一辩辩论稿
BP英辩whip发言稿
BP英辩whip发言稿尊敬的评委、各位辩友：首先，我想通过一组数据引起我们的思考。
根据最新的统计数据显示，全球每年有超过800万人因饥饿而死亡，而另外7.5亿人却依然忍受着饥饿的折磨。
相比之下，我们每年浪费的食物却超过13亿吨。
这个数据让人深感震撼，因为它揭示了一个现实：全球饥饿问题不是因为没有足够的食物，而是因为资源的不公平分配和浪费。
今天，我们将探讨的议题是关于全球饥饿问题和食物浪费。
在这个问题上，我们需要思考的不仅是如何解决饥饿问题，而且还要思考如何避免食物的浪费。
我所代表的辩方认为，解决全球饥饿问题和减少食物浪费是一体两面，两者应当同等重要。
我们承认，饥饿是一种灾难，但浪费同样也是一种浪费资源和环境的灾难。
因此，我们呼吁全球社会应当联手解决这一严峻的问题。
首先，让我们来看看全球饥饿问题。
根据联合国粮食及农业组织的数据，全球有1/9的人口忍受着饥饿的折磨。
这代表着8.9亿人每天面对饥饿。
这些人无法得到足够的营养，无法获得充足的食物，更不用说营养均衡的饮食了。
他们中的很多人是因为贫穷而无法获得足够的食物，还有一部分是因为战争、自然灾害等原因无法获得稳定的食物来源。
这些人的生活被饥饿困扰着，每天都在为生存而挣扎。
我们也不要忘记，他们中的很多人是儿童，他们是我们未来的希望。
但由于饥饿的困扰，他们无法健康成长，甚至有些人可能会因此而丧命。
这一切都让人感到心痛和愤怒。
其次，让我们来关注食物浪费的问题。
据统计，全球每年浪费的食物数量超过13亿吨，这是惊人的数字。
这其中包括了生产环节的浪费，例如农作物因种植技术不当或者运输问题而损坏，超市和餐饮行业的浪费，以及家庭日常生活的浪费。
食物浪费不仅是对资源的浪费，也是对环境的浪费。
每年浪费的食物会产生大量的温室气体，对环境造成负面影响。
而且，浪费的食物也是对饥饿人口的最大讽刺，因为我们浪费的食物可以满足很多人的需求。
因此，我们需要意识到食物浪费不仅是对环境的不负责任，更是对全球饥饿问题的一种忽视。
英语辩论稿完整版
辩论稿（全部英语）1.正方一辩：Are interpersonal relationship more important than one’s practical ability to a successful career Dear Mr President, Friends of the other debate, my friends: Hello everybody!As is known to all , The 21st century is the century of talents’ outbreak. It is a highly competitive age. but if you want to obtain a successful career, it relys on not only the practical ability of outstanding individuals, but also good relationships. Therefore, our view is that relationship is more important than the practical ability for a successful career. Here we described the following four aspects.First, as the development of the times, everyone should be raised to their real ability, but the single person's capacity is limited. A person's success, 85% attributed to his personal connections. Seemingly fortune to come, in fact, mostly the result of hard work,contacts.Second, we live in a certain social group among the people.A person's survival and development are inseparable from interaction with others. Chinese saying goes: at home by their parents, go out to rely on friends. If a person can properly handle the relationship, he can overcome many difficulties.Third, Fowler said that the closet friend is better than deposits in business. With good relationships, we can be better in many areas and create more wealth.Fourth, as a college student, every day we live in the campus, to deeply realize that here is a small community. Even if a person with a greater capacity, he can not organize an event all by himself.A recent survey showed that fifteen percent of success is contributed by a person’s professional percents rely on personal relationships. In summary, we must insist that relationship is more important than the practical ability fora successful career.2.反方一辩：Respect other friends, chairman of the divides, each friend: hello!Today's opportunity to come to grips with so many friends and this undoubtedly superior personal quality and ability is a promotion of opportunity. We think that an individual career success, personal ability is more important than relationships.We think: an individual career success, by strength, no strength, interpersonal and how Strength by himself, interpersonal relations also rely on yourself. Interpersonalrelationship just for one person to provide a ready a shortcut to success.Admittedly, personal ability and interpersonal is successful two prerequisite, and today we is exploring the among them successful process in which the crucial: first, from philosophical Angle, the development of internal is things root causes, determines the nature of things and the direction of development, external cause is things develop external conditions. Individual struggle is the internal cause and external cause interpersonal relationship is, therefore, own struggle is the key to success; In the second place, from success successful process to see, we first need to determine target, so as to choose direction and type, again through his own personal struggle, with their own quality and ability the enhancement, to expand interpersonal relationship, using interpersonal relationships, achieve their work and the perfect combination of externalWe all know, interpersonal relationship is again good, have no ability to also won't succeed. Only watched his repeated failure. On the premise of a fine winged capacity. Gold shine is the gold itself became! We think: interpersonal influence to be successful, it is like a good journey, thejourney to walk, inevitable energy, wind, but if there is no firm to reach objective decision and overcome difficulties of perseverance and hard sweat, is impossible to reach the shore. Downwind or downwind or as long as we firmly stepping to the goal, we will definitely be able to arrive.Look at the great is how successful it, that is the gold and the individual effort, interpersonal relationship is a result of people, if their don't strive for, no ability to fight for, interpersonal relations will not come himself, and waiting for is only pulp. Only oneself to have true ability really ability to overcome everything.To sum up, we think that an individual career success personal ability is more important than relationships.3.反方二辩提问（一辩）：Would I ask the first debater a question :Just in your account, you said that 85% person make success with interpersonal relationship, where did the data come from And even if I don’t challenged this data, Edison had said: "genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.” Isn't the personal ability so important4.正方一辩回答：As the debate ，ninties perspiration plus one inspiration was a success, a person is required to pay 99sweat, but the team of ten people only should spend 50 sweats and 50 inspirations to gain the success,Everybady can find which relationship is better meet the efficiency of modern society demandsIt is clear that good relationships will be more than infinitely expand your horizons, so you do not have to take so many detours.5.反方二辩提问（三辩）：Would I ask the third debater a question :Your statement said: students should pay more attention to build relationships in the school. So I want to ask you whether the study is not important Obviously, the study is very important, and It is just one’s practical ability.6.正方三辩回答：7.正方四辩补充发言：Also known as interpersonal relationships, is a basic concept of sociology, its meaning is between people, the process of interaction, through the thoughts, feelings, behavior of the mutual exchange and interaction generated. People as social animals, even with a more tenacious survival skills, from social interaction, and can not have more development, because he is a man in combat. We are a group of people in the struggle.8.正方二辩提问（一辩）：Would I ask the first debater aquestion : if you think what a CEO needs most is a practical ability, so why will he hear so much about interpersonal relationship lecture9.反方一辩回答：They attend the lecture interpersonal relationship is in order to increase the ability of individuals with their own personal ability of interpersonal relations to succeed in his career, rather than using interpersonal relationship.10.正方二辩提问（三辩）：Would I ask the third debater a question: practical ability is IQ and interpersonal relationship is EQ, success come from 20% of IQ and 80% of EQ, what do you think of it11.反方三辩回答：myfellowdebater,反方四辩补充发言：13.反方二辩小结： Each person is in his own success way, or shallow point in the way of job and work, we will face more challenges, we may have a good interpersonal relationship, we may be introduced to find a good job by friend, but when we truly work, we have no our workmate admitted, we also have no ability to truly achieve the company's demand, so in the end ,we will face ousted, we also have no the so-called success. If interpersonal relationship is important, I think interpersonal relationship also belongs to a part of one’spractical ability, So one’s practical ability is very important.14.正方二辩小结：Interpersonal relationship is a very good platform to improve one’s practical ability, people can learn more from this platform, in order to improve their ability. In modern society, people live in groups all over the world. If you do not have interpersonal relationship, others will not know your ability . Such as advertising, no matter how good the commodity is, if others do not know that, and don't use it, the commodity will be a waste product. For another example, if a CEO only have ability but can not deal with various kinds of business relationship, this company will close down. No matter how strong one’s practical ability is, he could not separate himself from the whole society and exists, and he must learn to work with others to be successful, as 80% of EQ lead to success. Practical ability would not make you starve to death in the society, but the relationship can make a better life for you.15.正方一辩：Interpersonal communication is the important to college students’ interpersonal growth andsuccess .Also,it is an important way of exchanging the information and acquiring knowledge in modern society. Manystudents high IQ, EQ is very often donot handle well that how to get along with others, Nowadays a good communication is the necessary ability and qualityto the most companies recruitment。
英语辩论赛一辩英文模版
在英语辩论赛中，一辩是整个辩论赛一辩英文模板，供参考：
第一部分：开场陈词
Good morning/afternoon, respected judges, worthy opponents, and fellow debaters. Today, the proposition/opposition has brought forth a motion that states (提出辩题). We, as the first proposition/opposition, firmly believe that (就辩题立场进行阐述).
第二部分：提出观点
Firstly, let us consider (第一观点). It is evident that (列举相关事实或数据), thus supporting our stance.
Secondly, (第二观点). Through (举例或引用权威观点), we can see that (论述观点).
We expect the opposition to argue (预测对方可能提出的反驳观点), however, this can easily be refuted by (对可能反驳观点的反驳).
第六部分：总结发言
In summary, our stance is grounded in solid evidence and logical reasoning. We have effectively presented (总结发言内容).
As the first proposition/opposition, we firmly believe that (再次强调立场).
bp英语辩论正方一辩发言稿模板
bp英语辩论正方一辩发言稿模板English Response:---。
English Response:Certainly! Here's a template for the first affirmative speaker in a British Parliamentary (BP) style debate:Introduction:Start with a captivating hook or a relevant quote to grab the audience's attention.Introduce the motion and provide a clear definition if necessary.State your team's stance and briefly outline your main arguments.Main Arguments:1. Argument 1:Present your first argument clearly and concisely.Provide evidence or examples to support your point.Anticipate and refute potential counterarguments.2. Argument 2:Introduce your second argument, building upon the first one.Use statistics, anecdotes, or expert opinions to strengthen your argument.Address any weaknesses or limitations in your argument.3. Argument 3:Introduce your third argument, ensuring it complements the previous ones.Utilize logic and reasoning to persuade the audience.Summarize the key points of your argument for emphasis.Rebuttals:Briefly address any points made by the opposing team.Refute their arguments using logic, evidence, or counterexamples.Reinforce your team's position while weakening the opposition's arguments.Conclusion:Summarize your main arguments and restate your team's stance.Leave a memorable closing statement or call to action.English Response:---。
bp英语辩论稿范文
bp英语辩论稿范文英文回答：Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this debate. Today, I would like to discuss the topic of whether technology has brought more harm than good to society.In my opinion, technology has brought numerous benefits to society. Firstly, it has greatly improved communication. With the rise of smartphones and social media platforms, people can now easily connect with others from different parts of the world. This has not only facilitated global collaboration but also fostered cultural exchange.Moreover, technology has revolutionized various industries, leading to increased efficiency and productivity. For instance, automation has streamlined manufacturing processes, allowing for the mass production of goods at a faster rate. This has not only reduced costs but also created job opportunities in the field oftechnology.Additionally, technology has greatly enhanced our daily lives. From smart home devices that automate householdtasks to wearable fitness trackers that help us stay healthy, technology has become an integral part of our routines. It has made our lives more convenient and comfortable.Furthermore, technology has played a crucial role in education. Online learning platforms and educational apps have made education more accessible and flexible. Students can now learn at their own pace and access a vast amount of resources from anywhere in the world. This has democratized education and provided opportunities for lifelong learning.Overall, technology has brought more good than harm to society. It has improved communication, revolutionized industries, enhanced daily lives, and transformed education. While it is true that there are potential downsides to technology, such as privacy concerns and job displacement, the benefits far outweigh the negatives.中文回答：感谢提供这个辩论的机会。
BP制英语辩论
Deputy Leader of the Opposition ：
职责与注意点参照 deputy prime minister
Member of Proposition/Opposition：
1、通过案例延展来支持upper house的立场 2、支持的同时提出新的不同意upper house的观点或者原因 3、反驳对方的理由与观点 注意： 一定要提出新的观点，否则视为职责完成不充分 如果己方的upper house对于某个问题的理由解释不充 分或表述不成熟一定要提出并且完善
Lower house
Whip
2nd~6th
(POI、六分钟末响铃提示)
7th
( 响铃两下 )
1st
( 第一次响铃 )
15’ more
Prime minister：
1、定义权（解释议题）
2、有条理地铺展开己方的理由与依据（相关事例） 注意： 不能歪曲题意
定义特殊词关键词
抓准议题中心
Leader of the Opposition:
General Advice
• First, you’d better get prepared physically and psychologically. Otherwise, you will certainly feel afflicted • Secondly, you have nothing to enjoy except the game itself. • Team work, while self-show is equally important • Last but not least, have a strong desire to win, you guys can learn this from Du Yirong. •
英语辩论赛辩论稿范文【优秀9篇】
英语辩论赛辩论稿范文【优秀9篇】一、由辩论会主席承担1、辩论赛开始2、宣布辩题3、介绍参赛代表队及所持立场4、介绍参赛队员5、介绍规则、评委及工作人员6、辩论比赛7、评委点评8、观众自由提问，评委评分（同时进行）9、宣布比赛结果10 辩论赛结束二、辩论过程1、辩方陈词立论阶段：（1）正、反方一辩发言首先，正反双方争论并发布帖子陈述主要观点。
它必须在规定的时间内完成。
（2）正、反方二辩发言正方二辩、反方二辩以简洁文字重点从理论上论证己方观点；（3）正、反方三辩发言由正方三辩、反方三辩分别以简洁文字进行实证分析，为本方观点提供论据支持。
2、自由辩论阶段赞成者先发言，反对者再发言，赞成者和反对者轮流发言。
（在相对集中的时间内进行）3、总结阶段由双方四辩进行最后陈述，总结已方观点，反驳对方主观点，（1）反方四辩总结陈词（2）正方四辩总结陈词5.观众提问:观众向双方选手提问，选手必须耐心回答。
双方在提问阶段的表现不记入比赛成绩。
6、评委评分阶段7、由评委对双方观点及辩论过程进行点评。
8、结果宣布三、辩论规则1、每位队员必须在规定时间内完成，超过时间按照弃权处理，并从该队总成绩中减去5分。
2、自由辩论规则自由辩论发言必须在两队之间交替进行，首先由正方一名队员发言，然后由反方一名队员发言，双方轮流，直到时间用完为止。
（每一场的自由辩论在集中的两个小时内完成，每场的具体时间另定，每贴的文字在60--800字之间，每次只能提一个问题。
）四、评判标准（一）将聘请五位评委对本次比赛进行全程评议。
（二）评分标准1、论点明晰，论据充足，引证恰当，分析透彻。
2、迅速抓住对方的观点和错误，反驳到点子上。
3、反映敏捷，应对能力强。
4.表达清晰，层次分明，逻辑严密。
（三）评分办法（团体和个人分别记分，满分均为100分）（1）审题：对所持立场能否从逻辑、理论、事实等多层次、多角度理解，论据是否充足，推理关系是否明晰，对本方的难点是否具有有效的处理方法。
最新英语BP辩论反方一辩辩论稿
反方一辩：Respected judicators. Ladies and gen tleme n, good eve ning!In the first part of my speech, I would like to make my rebuttal. Patents do not costs lives, they save more.Our government side have proposed a radical solution to their problem: they want to ignore intellectual property, one of our most important constructs to encourage innovation. On the oppositi on, we believe the status quo of allowi ng a medici ne compa ny to pate nt someth ing and profit from it is necessary for them to have an incentive and ability to create life-saving medicines now and in the future, and it is saving lives in the Iong-term that concerns us.Now I' d like to provide my statements. This house would not abolish patents for life-saving medicines. For the first reason, it takes away the Incentive to Produce Life-saving medicine®n Pollack saidThe pharmaceutical in dustry's repetitious cry that research and developme nt would be curtailed if medici ne prices are moderated is extraord in arily misleadi ng.Yes, research and developme nt costs mon ey. Yet on ly 14% of pharmaceuticals' budgets go to research and developme nt. Reports have lin ked "high medic ine prices to advertis ing, profits and eno rmous executive salaries. The report docume nts that medic ine compa nies are spe nding more than twice as much on marketing, advertising, and administration.”Firms are incen tivized to un dertake research in life-sav ing drugs because now they have a guara nteed retur n on their R&D inv estme nt. Regardless of the course of drug producti on and distribution they will be profit from their research.In addition , Scientists are principally motivated by the desire for peer recognition and also by the fact that they want to have achieved somethi ng more with their lives tha n reduce some tee nager pimples by 30%. We are not dissuading research into live-sang illnesses we ' re invigorating it by offering inciting profit that is tied to results and is cost-effective.Creating a brand new medicine requires enormous amounts of money and failed attempts, and therefore invo Ives a large amount of risk. If a pers on can't be guara nteed some ki nd of con trol or return to that risk and expense, they are unlikely to want to invest in it. In particular, if a medicinecompa ny can make more money by pate nti ng medic ines that cure hair loss, they will take that opti on.For the seco nd aspect,consequences of the loss of incentives is aWfu dic ine compa nies are trying to develop cures for cancer, diabetes and more, and will likely want to develop more cures for illnesses that come up in the future, as they did for swine flu, if they can get a return on the investment. If there is not a significant return to investment, a company will not bother to continue to research and develop these medici nes. Eve n if the curre nt medic ines were released for gen eric development, lack of future medicines would cost far more lives in the long run, and save money on alter native treatme nts.Furthermore, most thi ngs that cause ill ness, such as viruses and bacteria, develop so that they can resist medici nes. We have see n this in the case of the in creased in effective ness of an tibiotics. Prop wants to cha nge the focus of medic ine product ion from the developme nt of new medic ines to the cheaper product ion of medic ines that already exist. This will happe n because any start-up compa ny or investor in the medicines industry will see that it is cheaper to simply create the medicines, rather than put money into research and development, which is the most expensive part of the medicines creation process. If there is a greater focus on this, then less new medicines will be created to combat the ill nesses. This structure beg ins to look very flawed as the ill nesses develop resista nces to old medic in es. There n eeds to be a con ti nuing incen tive to create new medic ines for any illness, not to simply focus on old medicines being created in larger, cheaper amounts. It is worth slightly more expensive medicines if new innovation is constantly able to happen.In conclusion, if we abolish those pate nts,no one would continue research ing and develop ing new medici nes,thus,abolish ing pate nts for life-savi ng medici nes seems to save more lives at the beg innin g, it would kill more lives in the long run.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
反方一辩：
Respected judicators, Ladies and gentlemen, good evening!
In the first part of my speech, I would like to make my rebuttal. Patents do not costs lives, they save more.Our government side have proposed a radical solution to their problem: they want to ignore intellectual property, one of our most important constructs to encourage innovation. On the opposition, we believe the status quo of allowing a medicine company to patent something and profit from it is necessary for them to have an incentive and ability to create life-saving medicines now and in the future, and it is saving lives in the long-term that concerns us.
Now I’d like to provide my statements. This house would not abolish patents for life-saving medicines. For the first reason, it takes away the Incentive to Produce Life-saving medicines.Ron Pollack said,The pharmaceutical industry's repetitious cry that research and development would be curtailed if medicine prices are moderated is extraordinarily misleading.
Yes, research and development costs money. Yet only 14% of pharmaceuticals' budgets go to research and development. Reports have linked "high medicine prices to advertising, profits and enormous executive salaries. The report documents that medicine companies are spending more than twice as much on marketing, advertising, and administration.”
Firms are incentivized to undertake research in life-saving drugs because now they have a guaranteed return on their R&D investment. Regardless of the course of drug production and distribution they will be profit from their research.
In addition , Scientists are principally motivated by the desire for peer recognition and also by the fact that they want to have achieved something more with their lives than reduce some teenager’s pimples by 30%. We are not dissuading research into live-sa ving illnesses we’re invigorating it by offering inciting profit that is tied to results and is cost-effective.
Creating a brand new medicine requires enormous amounts of money and failed attempts, and therefore involves a large amount of risk. If a person can't be guaranteed some kind of control or return to that risk and expense, they are unlikely to want to invest in it. In particular, if a medicine
company can make more money by patenting medicines that cure hair loss, they will take that option.
For the second aspect, consequences of the loss of incentives is awful.Medicine companies are trying to develop cures for cancer, diabetes and more, and will likely want to develop more cures for illnesses that come up in the future, as they did for swine flu, if they can get a return on the investment. If there is not a significant return to investment, a company will not bother to continue to research and develop these medicines. Even if the current medicines were released for generic development, lack of future medicines would cost far more lives in the long run, and save money on alternative treatments.
Furthermore, most things that cause illness, such as viruses and bacteria, develop so that they can resist medicines. We have seen this in the case of the increased ineffectiveness of antibiotics. Prop wants to change the focus of medicine production from the development of new medicines to the cheaper production of medicines that already exist. This will happen because any start-up company or investor in the medicines industry will see that it is cheaper to simply create the medicines, rather than put money into research and development, which is the most expensive part of the medicines creation process. If there is a greater focus on this, then less new medicines will be created to combat the illnesses. This structure begins to look very flawed as the illnesses develop resistances to old medicines. There needs to be a continuing incentive to create new medicines for any illness, not to simply focus on old medicines being created in larger, cheaper amounts. It is worth slightly more expensive medicines if new innovation is constantly able to happen.
In conclusion, if we abolish those patents,no one would continue researching and developing new medicines,thus,abolishing patents for life-saving medicines seems to save more lives at the beginning, it would kill more lives in the long run.。