最新封条测试报告2017

合集下载

封条测试报告

TEST REPORT NO.:DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. JOB NO.:13 NOVEMBER 2012TABLE OF CONTENTSSubject Paragraph Page No. Abstract 1.0 2 References 2.0 2 Seal Classification 3.0 2 Administrative Information 4.0 3 Test Program Outline 5.0 3 Test Results 6.0 4Page NumberNo. of Photos Evidence of Tampering (Minimum Diameter) Test and Results 4 1 Tensile Test and Results 6 1 Shear Test and Results 8 1 Bending Test and Results 10 1 Impact Test and Results 12 1 Test Equipment List 15 1 Test Item Photo 16 11.0 ABSTRACTThis test report details the results of freight container mechanical seal classification testing conducted on Bolt Seals, under reference (a) to the requirements of reference (c).Results of the tests are detailed in the following text.Exceptions/deviations during tests are as follows: The room ambient temperature deviated from the specified tolerance during the tensile, bend and shear tests. The temperature went 3.3ºC over tolerance.Test data pertinent to this program will remain on file at Dayton T. Brown, Inc. for 90 days.The testing and results contained in this report are in accordance with the testing requirements called out in ISO 17712:2010 and are only applicable to the specific units identified in the test report and do not address any individual manufacturer's compliance or non-compliance with all the requirements of ISO 17712:2010 which are the sole responsibility of each manufacturer and not part of the testing performed and recorded in this test report.Dayton T. Brown, Inc. is not involved in any production quality inspections. All tests are based on the samples that are selected by the manufacturer and provided to Dayton T. Brown, Inc. without any Dayton T. Brown, Inc. involvement in said selection.Dayton T. Brown, Inc. performs testing to ISO 17712:2010 under laboratory conditions. These tests do not measure and are not intended to measure all possible applications or installations of the seal assembly or components. In that event, the report will describe the particular application tested in detail. Dayton T. Brown, Inc. is not responsible for actual performance of any seal assembly as installed in any application.This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Dayton T. Brown, Inc.2.0 REFERENCES(a) Customer Purchase Order No.: 2012/11/0578(b) Dayton T. Brown, Inc. Job No.: 411863-04-000(c) Test Specifications: ISO 17712:2010 (E) Clauses: 4.4.3 and 53.0 SEAL CLASSIFICATIONISO 17712:2010 (E): (H)-High Security for Clauses: 4.4.3 and 54.0 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION5.0 TEST PROGRAM OUTLINETest Test Item Description ResultsEvidence of Tampering (Minimum Diameter) CS Bolt 3 Bolt Seal,Serial No. DTB 0000126See Page 4.Tensile CS Bolt 3 Bolt Seals,Serial Nos. 0000101 through 0000105See Page 6.Shear CS Bolt 3 Bolt Seals,Serial Nos. 0000106 through 0000110See Page 8.Bending CS Bolt 3 Bolt Seals,Serial Nos. 0000111 through 0000115See Page 10.Impact CS Bolt 3 Bolt Seals,Serial Nos. 0000116 through 0000125See Page 12.Test Equipment List andTest Item PhotoCS Bolt 3 Bolt Seal See Page 15 and 16.6.0 TEST RESULTS4.4.3 - Evidence of Tampering (Minimum Diameter) Test and ResultsTEST REQUIREMENTThe evidence of tampering (minimum diameter) test shall be conducted in accordance with reference (c).TEST RESULTSAll testing was performed in accordance with the referenced specification.TEST DATA Date: 6 November 2012Evidence of Tampering (Minimum Diameter) Test at Room TemperatureMeasurement (mm)Pin LockSpecimen No. Head Body Remarks0000126 20.85 18.02 Meets RequirementsTech: JBTest RequirementsThe minimum diameter (or minimum widest cross-dimension) for the metal components of a bolt seal shall be 18mm.5.2 - Tensile Test and ResultsTEST REQUIREMENTThe tensile test shall be conducted in accordance with reference (c).TEST RESULTSA pretest visual inspection of the test items revealed no anomalies.All testing was performed in accordance with the referenced specification, with the following exception: The temperature went up to 3.3ºC over tolerance.Test room ambient conditions: 24.3ºC and 48.6%RHTEST DATA Date: 8 November 2012Tensile Test at Room TemperatureLoad ClassificationSpecimen No. kN Rating Remarks0000101 24.90 H *0000102 23.75 H *0000103 21.72 H *0000104 23.93 H *0000105 23.74 H *Tech: SD* A post-test visual inspection of the test items revealed that the bolts pulled out of the lock mechanism due to testing.Classification KeyRating Load to FailureHigh Security (H): 10.0 kNSecurity (S): 2.27 kNIndicative (I): <2.27 kNTYPICAL PHOTO OF THE TENSILE TEST SET UP411863-04-04-R12-1132 FILE NO. 12-107205.3 - Shear Test and ResultsTEST REQUIREMENTThe shear test shall be conducted in accordance with reference (c).TEST RESULTSA pretest visual inspection of the test items revealed no anomalies.All testing was performed in accordance with the referenced specification, with the following exception: The temperature went up to 3.3ºC over tolerance.Test room ambient conditions: 24.3ºC and 48.7%RHTEST DATA Date: 8 November 2012Shear Test at Room TemperatureLoad ClassificationSpecimen No. (kN) Rating Remarks0000106 8.896 H *0000107 8.896 H *0000108 8.896 H *0000109 8.896 H *0000110 8.896 H *Tech: SD* A post-test visual inspection of the test items revealed a slight indent on the shaft of the bolts due to testing.Classification KeyRating Load to FailureHigh Security: (H): 3.336kNSecurity (S): 2.224kNIndicative (I): <2.224kNSAFETY PRECAUTIONS – Do not exceed a shear force greater than 8900 N (2001 lbf). If the specimen has not failed at that force, halt the test and unload the test equipment. Record a shear force of 8896 N (2000 lbf). Sudden and violent rupture of the test specimen can endanger personnel, equipment and property.5.4 - Bending Test and ResultsTEST REQUIREMENTThe bending test shall be conducted in accordance with reference (c).TEST RESULTSA pretest visual inspection of the test items revealed no anomalies.All testing was performed in accordance with the referenced specification, with the following exception: The temperature went up to 3.1ºC over tolerance.Test room ambient conditions: 24.1ºC and 53.5%RHTEST DATA Date: 8 November 2012Bending Test at Room TemperatureLoad ClassificationSpecimen No. Force (Nm) Rating Remarks0000111 72.40 H *0000112 73.86 H *0000113 73.86 H *0000114 74.46 H *0000115 74.29 H *Tech: SD* A post-test visual inspection of the test items revealed that the shaft of the seals bent due to testing. Classification KeyRigid SealsRating Moment to FailureHigh Security (H): 50 NmSecurity (S): 22 NmIndicative (I): <22 Nm5.5 - Impact Test and ResultsTEST REQUIREMENTThe impact test shall be conducted in accordance with reference (c).TEST RESULTSA pretest visual inspection of the test items revealed no anomalies.All testing was performed in accordance with the referenced specification.TEST DATA Date: 8 November 2012Impact Test at 18 ±3º CNumber of Successful ImpactsPer Load (J) ClassificationSpecimen No. 13.56 27.12 40.68 Rating Remarks0000116 5 5 5 H *0000117 5 5 5 H *0000118 5 5 5 H *0000119 5 5 5 H *0000120 5 5 5 H *Tech: SD * A post-test visual inspection of the test items revealed that plastic portions of the seals broke or deformed due to testing. The bolt and lock of the seals remained intact.Classification KeyLoad to FailureRating (5 impacts at each load)High Security (H): 40.68 JSecurity (S): 27.12 JIndicative (I): <27.12 J5.5 - Impact Test and ResultsTEST DATA – (Continued) Date: 8 November 2012Impact Test at -27 ±3º CNumber of Successful ImpactsPer Load (J) ClassificationSpecimen No. 13.56 27.12 40.68 Rating Remarks0000121 5 5 5 H *0000122 5 5 5 H *0000123 5 5 5 H *0000124 5 5 5 H *0000125 5 5 5 H *Tech: SD* A post-test visual inspection of the test items revealed that plastic portions of the seals broke or deformed due to testing. The bolt and lock of the seals remained intact.Classification KeyLoad to FailureRating (5 impacts at each load)High Security (H): 40.68 JSecurity (S): 27.12 JIndicative (I): <27.12 JTYPICAL PHOTO OF THE IMPACT TEST SET UP411863-04-04-R12-1132 FILE NO. 12-10723Test equipment utilized for the program reported herein was within its assigned interval of calibration. Details are on file at Dayton T. Brown, Inc. and will be made available upon request.。

陶瓷纤维密封条检测报告

陶瓷纤维密封条检测报告陶瓷纤维密封条是一种新型的密封材料，在高温和化学腐蚀环境下具有良好的耐久性和密封性能。

为了确保陶瓷纤维密封条的质量，需要进行相关的检测和评估。

以下是一份陶瓷纤维密封条的检测报告的参考内容。

1. 产品基本信息：陶瓷纤维密封条的名称、型号、批号、生产日期等基本信息。

2. 检测目的：明确检测的目的，比如验证产品是否符合标准要求、评估产品性能等。

3. 检测方法：描述所采用的检测方法和设备，确保检测的准确性和可靠性。

4. 外观检查：对陶瓷纤维密封条的外观进行检查，包括颜色、表面光洁度、尺寸、平整度等。

5. 密度检测：测量陶瓷纤维密封条的密度，以评估其质量和密封性能。

6. 耐温性能：将陶瓷纤维密封条置于高温环境，记录其耐温时间和温度范围，以评估其耐久性。

7. 化学腐蚀性能：将陶瓷纤维密封条浸泡在不同腐蚀介质中，观察其表面变化和性能损失情况，以评估其耐腐蚀性能。

8. 压缩弹性：对陶瓷纤维密封条进行压缩测试，记录其压缩程度和恢复程度，以评估其密封性能。

9. 抗拉强度：测量陶瓷纤维密封条在拉伸状态下的强度，以评估其牢固性和耐用性。

10. 环保性能：检测陶瓷纤维密封条中是否含有有害物质，以确保其环保性能符合相关标准要求。

11. 结论与建议：根据检测结果，对陶瓷纤维密封条的性能进行评估，并给出相应的结论和建议，比如是否合格、使用注意事项等。

12. 检测人员信息：记录参与检测的人员姓名、单位、联系方式等信息。

13. 参考标准：列出所参考的相关标准和规范，以保证检测结果的可比性和准确性。

以上是一份陶瓷纤维密封条检测报告的参考内容。

在报告中，除了记录检测结果，还应注意描述检测过程中的操作细节和实验条件，以确保检测的可重复性和可靠性。

同时，报告应使用清晰简明的语言，以方便阅读和理解。

断桥铝密封实验报告(3篇)

一、实验目的本次实验旨在探究断桥铝窗户的密封性能，分析影响密封效果的因素，并评估不同密封材料和工艺对密封性能的影响，为提高断桥铝窗户的密封效果提供理论依据。

二、实验材料与设备1. 断桥铝窗户样品：不同型号、不同密封条的断桥铝窗户各3套。

2. 密封材料：硅酮密封胶、三元乙丙橡胶密封条、聚氯乙烯密封条等。

3. 实验设备：密封性能测试仪、温湿度计、压力计、显微镜等。

三、实验方法1. 密封条老化实验：将不同型号的断桥铝窗户密封条分别置于老化箱中，模拟实际使用环境，观察密封条的老化情况。

2. 密封性能测试：使用密封性能测试仪对断桥铝窗户进行密封性能测试，包括气密性、水密性、隔音性能等指标。

3. 密封材料对比实验：将不同密封材料分别安装在断桥铝窗户上，测试其密封性能，对比不同材料的密封效果。

4. 密封工艺分析：对不同密封工艺进行对比分析，找出影响密封性能的关键因素。

四、实验结果与分析1. 密封条老化实验：实验结果显示，硅酮密封胶密封条老化程度最轻，聚氯乙烯密封条老化程度最重，三元乙丙橡胶密封条居中。

这说明硅酮密封胶密封条具有较好的耐老化性能。

2. 密封性能测试：实验结果显示，气密性、水密性、隔音性能等指标均达到国家标准要求。

其中，气密性指标最高，水密性指标次之，隔音性能指标最低。

3. 密封材料对比实验：实验结果显示，硅酮密封胶密封效果最好，聚氯乙烯密封条次之，三元乙丙橡胶密封条效果最差。

这说明硅酮密封胶具有较好的密封性能。

4. 密封工艺分析：实验结果表明，密封条安装位置、密封胶涂抹均匀程度、焊接质量等均对密封性能有较大影响。

其中，密封条安装位置和密封胶涂抹均匀程度对密封性能的影响最为显著。

1. 断桥铝窗户的密封性能与其密封材料、密封条老化程度、密封工艺等因素密切相关。

2. 硅酮密封胶具有较好的耐老化性能和密封性能，是断桥铝窗户密封材料的理想选择。

3. 在实际应用中，应重视密封条的安装位置、密封胶涂抹均匀程度、焊接质量等因素，以提高断桥铝窗户的密封性能。

封条测试报告2023

封条测试报告20231. 引言本文档旨在提供关于封条测试的详细报告，包括测试背景、测试目的、测试范围、测试过程、测试结果以及结论等。

通过该报告，我们将全面评估封条的可靠性和有效性，为生产和运输过程的封条应用提供可靠的参考依据。

2. 测试背景封条作为一种安全措施，广泛应用于各种行业和领域，在运输、存储、保密等方面发挥重要作用。

然而，为确保封条的质量和可信度，我们需要进行封条的测试和评估，以保证其满足相关标准和要求。

3. 测试目的本次封条测试的目的在于验证封条的可靠性和有效性，确保其具备以下特点：•承受一定程度的力量或压力；•阻止非授权人员的访问或入侵；•可在未被破坏的状态下保持完整性。

4. 测试范围本次封条测试的范围包括但不限于以下方面：•封条材料的强度和耐久性测试；•封条的安装、拆除和再使用性能测试；•封条的防篡改能力测试。

5. 测试过程5.1 封条材料的强度和耐久性测试通过对封条材料的拉力测试、压力测试和耐腐蚀性测试等，评估封条材料的强度和耐久性。

5.2 封条的安装、拆除和再使用性能测试测试封条在安装、拆除和再使用过程中的性能表现，主要包括封条的易用性、可靠性和耐久性等。

5.3 封条的防篡改能力测试测试封条在遭受各种篡改行为后能否保持完整性和可靠性，主要包括封条的防篡改能力、防复制能力和防伪能力等。

6. 测试结果根据对封条的测试和评估，我们得出以下结论：•经过封条材料的强度和耐久性测试，封条材料具有良好的承载能力和耐久性，能够在恶劣环境下使用；•在封条的安装、拆除和再使用性能测试中，封条表现出良好的易用性和可靠性，能够满足实际运输和存储的需求；•封条的防篡改能力测试结果显示，封条具备较高的防篡改、防复制和防伪能力，可以有效保护封闭物的完整性。

7. 结论通过本次封条测试，我们确认了封条的可靠性和有效性，并验证了封条的各项性能指标符合相关标准和要求。

封条作为一种安全措施，在运输、存储、保密等方面具有重要的应用前景。

封条测试报告范文

封条测试报告范文封条是指一种密封、保险或安全检查的装置，用于确保一个物品或设备在运输、存储或使用过程中未被篡改、损坏或擅自打开。

封条广泛应用于各行各业，例如运输、物流、食品、医疗等领域。

对于一款封条来说，其品质和可靠性至关重要。

为了测试封条的性能和可靠性，我们进行了一系列的实验证明。

以下是封条测试报告。

1.测试目的本次测试的目的是评估封条在不同环境条件下的性能和可靠性。

我们将对封条进行断强度测试、耐温度测试、耐腐蚀性测试和防伪性测试。

2.测试方法与过程2.1断强度测试：选择一定数量的封条样品，使用专业测试设备逐渐增加施加在封条上的拉力，记录下封条断裂时的拉力数值。

2.2耐温度测试：将一定数量的封条样品置于高温环境中，如100℃，并保持一定时间，然后观察封条是否出现异常现象，如变形、熔化等。

2.3耐腐蚀性测试：将一定数量的封条样品置于具有腐蚀性的溶液中，如酸性和碱性溶液，并保持一定时间，然后观察封条是否出现腐蚀现象。

2.4防伪性测试：3.测试结果与分析3.1断强度测试结果显示，所有样品的断裂拉力均超过了预期的标准值，表明该封条具有较高的拉力强度，能够有效抵抗外力。

3.2耐温度测试结果显示，在100℃高温下，封条样品没有出现变形或熔化的现象，表明封条具有良好的耐温性能。

3.3耐腐蚀性测试结果显示，在酸性和碱性溶液中浸泡一定时间后，封条样品表面无腐蚀迹象，保持了良好的外观和功能。

4.结论基于以上测试结果，我们可以得出以下结论：4.1该封条具有良好的断强度，能够有效抵抗外力，确保物品或设备的安全性。

4.2该封条具有良好的耐温性能，能够在高温环境下正常工作。

4.3该封条具有良好的耐腐蚀性能，能够在腐蚀性溶液中保持稳定。

4.4该封条具有较高的防伪性能，能够有效防止伪造和篡改。

总体而言，该封条经过了一系列严格的测试，表现出了优秀的性能和可靠性。

这份测试报告为该封条的质量和可靠性提供了充分的证明，对消费者和客户来说是一个有力的参考。

封条检测报告

30 March 2011411852-06-04-C11-0646Certificate of Conformance for Freight Container Mechanical Seal TestingSeal Classification: High SecurityCustomer: Mega Fortris Group P.O. Box 934Dayton, NJ 08810 Attention:Mr. Adria NGPurchase Order No.: FTR7809 Sample Type: Bolt SealSeal Name: Mega Container Seal (as provided by customer) Model No.: MCS (as provided by customer) Serial Nos.:MCS000301 through MCS000326Specification No.: ISO 17712:2010(E) Clauses: 4.4.3 and 5 Test Date:29 March 2011Dayton T. Brown, Inc. certifies that 26 samples, 5 for each test and 1 for measurements, of the Seals referenced above, were subjected to the following tests.Test NameParagraph No.Classification RatingTensile Test5.2High Security Shear Test 5.3 High SecurityBending Test5.4 High Security Impact Test at Room Temp5.5 High Security Impact Test at Reduced Temp5.5 High SecurityMinimum Diameter Test (Pass/Fail)4.4.3 PassResults: The above listed tests were completed with no discrepancies noted. Refer to Test Report No. 411852-06-04-R11-0647 for complete details.The test results contained herein pertain only to the specimens listed in this report. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Dayton T. Brown, Inc.Prepared by:J. BenincasaEngineer:T. ZimoulisQuality Department:Pg 1 of 1This document is digitally signed and certified to ensure content integrity and author’s authenticity.James BenincasaDigitally signed by James Benincasa DN: c=US, st=New York, l=Bohemia, o=Dayton T. Brown, Inc., cn=James Benincasa,email=jbenincasa@ Date: 2011.03.31 14:18:52 -04'00'。

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 1 of 11CUSTOMER NAME: SHANGHAI XINFAN INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONADDRESS: NO.1336, JINGE ROAD, JINSHAN DISTRICT, SHANGHAI, 201506CHINAThis Report cancels and supersedes the Report No.: SHIN170206091MR dated: Feb 21 ,2017 issued by SGS-CSTC Standards Technical Services (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd, original report will be invalid from today.Sample Name : Bolt SealsProduct Specification : NEW TSS-BS02Manufacturer : Shanghai Xinfan Industrial CorporationOther Information : IN-SH-5802-17042Above information and sample(s) was/were submitted and confirmed by the client. SGS, however, assumes no responsibility to verify the accuracy, adequacy and completeness of the sample information provided by client.***********SGS Ref. No. : SHIN1702006044PSDate of Receipt : Feb 13, 2017Testing Start Date : Feb 13, 2017Testing End Date : Feb 21, 2017Test result(s) : For further details, please refer to the following page(s)(Unless otherwise stated the results shown in this test report refer only tothe sample(s) tested)Signed forSGS-CSTC Standards TechnicalServices （Shanghai）Co., Ltd.Authorized signatoryTEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 2 of 11Summary of Results:No. Test Item Test Method Result Conclusion1 Impact test ISO 17712:2013 section 5.5 See result /2 Shear test ISO 17712:2013 section 5.3 8896 N /3 Tensile Test ISO 17712:2013 section 5.2 20.7 kN /4 Bending Test(Rigid seals)ISO 17712:2013 section 5.4 59.04 Nm /Pass : Meet the requirements;Fail : Does not meet the requirements;Note:/ : Not Apply to the judgment.TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 3 of 111. Test Item: Impact TestSample Description: Bolt SealTest Method: ISO 17712:2013 Section 5.5Test Condition:Dead blow weight: 4±0.01kgHigh Temperature: 18℃Low Temperature: -27℃Lab Environmental Condition: 23±2℃, 50±5%RHTest Result:Test Item 1 2 3 4 5 High TemperatureImpact Load, J＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 Low TemperatureImpact Load, J＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 ＞ 40.68 Seal Classification HImpact test seal classification requirementsLow Temperature Impact Load, J High TemperatureImpact Load, JDead Blow Mass DropHeightSeal Classification40.68 40.68 1.037 m “H” (high-security seal) 27.12 27.12 0.691 m “S” (security seal) <27.12 <27.12 0.346 m “I” (indicative seal)TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 4 of 11Test Photo:During test- at Low temperatureDuring test- at RT Before testTEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 5 of 11After test- at RT After test- at Low TemperatureEquipment Information:Equipment Model Equipment No. Calibration date Next Calibration date Tensile impact/ P-368 2016-6-28 2017-6-27 testerDamp heatKAHA-480KBS P-129 2016-7-22 2017-7-21 chamberTEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 6 of 112. Test Item: Shear TestSample Description: Bolt SealTest Method: ISO 17712:2013 Section 5.3Test Condition:Testing speed: 12.5 mm/minLab Environmental Condition: 23±2℃, 50±5%RHTest Result:Test Item 1 2 3 4 5 Average valueLoad to Failure, N 8896 8896 8896 8896 8896 8896 SealClassificationHShear test seal classification requirementsLoad to Failure (kN) Seal Classification3.336 “H” (high-security seal)2.224 “S” (security seal)<2.224 “I” (indicative seal)TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 7 of 11Test Photo:During testBefore test After testEquipment Information:Equipment Model Equipment No. Calibration date Next Calibration date Universal testingC43.104E P-328 2016-9-23 2017-9-22 machineTEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 8 of 113. Test Item: Tensile TestSample Description: Bolt SealTest Method: ISO 17712:2013 Section 5.2Test Condition:Testing speed: 50.8 mm/minLab Environmental Condition: 23±2℃, 50±5%RHTest Result:Test Item 1 2 3 4 5 Average valueLoad to Failure，kN23.36 22.89 19.41 15.56 22.25 20.7SealClassificationHTensile test seal classification requirementsLoad to Failure (kN) Seal Classification10.0 “H” (high-security seal)2.27 “S” (security seal)<2.27 “I” (indicative seal)TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 9 of 11Test Photo:During testBefore test After testEquipment Information:Equipment Model Equipment No. Calibration date Next Calibration date Universal testingC43.104E P-328 2016-9-23 2017-9-22 machineTEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 10 of 114. Test Item: Bending Test (Rigid seals)Sample Description: Bolt SealTest Method: ISO 17712:2013 Section 5.4Lab Environmental Condition: 23±2℃, 50±5%RHTest Result:Test Item 1 2 3 4 5 Average valueBending Moment to Failure(Rigid seals), Nm55.00 64.00 53.00 62.00 61.21 59.04Seal Classification HBending test seal classification requirementsCycle to Failure (Flexible seals) Bending Moment to Failure(Rigid seals) (Nm)Seal Classification501 50 “H” (high-security seal) 251 22 “S” (security seal) <251 <22 “I” (indicative seal)TEST REPORTNo. : SHIN1702006091MR-01Date : Mar 14, 2017Page: 11 of 11Test Photo:During test Before testAfter testEquipment Information: EquipmentModel Equipment No. Calibration date Next Calibration date Torque WrenchTW P-277 2016-3-23 2017-3-22 Stopwatch S P-387 2016-3-18 2017-3-18******** End of report********。