英文论文审稿常用套话
英文审稿人常用语大全
英文审稿人常用语大全英文审稿人在审阅稿件时常用的一些语言包括：1. "The manuscript is well-written and the arguments are clearly presented."2. "The author has effectively addressed the reviewers' comments and concerns."3. "The paper would benefit from a more thorough discussion of the methodology."4. "The conclusions drawn in the manuscript are well supported by the data."5. "The author should consider revising theintroduction to provide a clearer context for the study."6. "The language and grammar used in the manuscript need to be improved for clarity."7. "The paper would benefit from additional referencesto support the arguments."8. "The results presented in the manuscript are consistent with previous findings in the field."9. "The manuscript would benefit from a more in-depth analysis of the results."10. "The organization of the paper could be improved to enhance the flow of the arguments."这些是审稿人在审阅稿件时常用的一些语言，用于表达对文章内容、结构、语言表达等方面的评价和建议。
英文投稿客套语
英文投稿客套语Greetings and salutations to the esteemed reader. I am delighted to present this comprehensive guide on the art of crafting English submission cover letters. As we delve into this topic, let us embark on a journey to explore the nuances and best practices that will elevate your professional correspondence.The cover letter is often the first point of contact between you and the prospective publisher, editor, or organization. It serves as a concise yet impactful introduction to your work, highlighting your qualifications, expertise, and the unique value you bring to the table. Crafting an effective cover letter requires a delicate balance of professionalism, personalization, and persuasion.One of the fundamental elements of a successful cover letter is to personalize it to the specific recipient. Avoid the temptation of using a generic, one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, research the organization, the publication, or the individual you are addressing, and tailor your letter accordingly. Demonstrate your understanding of their mission, values, and the type of content they typically feature. This personalization will instantly grab the reader's attention and convey your genuine interest in the opportunity.Another crucial aspect of the cover letter is to clearly articulate the purpose of your submission. Whether you are pitching a feature article, a research paper, a creative piece, or a guest post, be direct and concise in stating your intent. Provide a brief overview of the work you are submitting, highlighting its relevance, timeliness, and the unique perspective or insights it offers. This will help the reader quickly grasp the essence of your submission and evaluate its fit for their publication or organization.In addition to the purpose of your submission, it is essential to showcase your qualifications and expertise. Carefully curate the information you include, focusing on the most relevant and impactful aspects of your background. This may include your educational credentials, professional experience, awards, publications, or any other achievements that demonstrate your credibility and suitability for the opportunity. Remember to strike a delicate balance between confidence and humility, allowing your accomplishments to speak for themselves.One often overlooked but highly valuable element of a cover letter is the personalization of the closing. Avoid generic sign-offs like "Sincerely" or "Best regards." Instead, consider crafting a more tailored and genuine conclusion that resonates with the reader. This could be a statement of your enthusiasm for the opportunity, areiteration of your unique value proposition, or even a specific call-to-action that encourages the reader to engage further with your submission.Throughout the cover letter, it is essential to maintain a professional and polished tone. Ensure that your language is clear, concise, and free of grammatical or spelling errors. Proofread your letter meticulously, and consider having a trusted colleague or mentor review it as well. Remember, the cover letter is a reflection of your attention to detail and your ability to communicate effectively in a professional setting.Finally, it is crucial to adhere to any specific guidelines or requirements provided by the organization or publication. This may include word count limitations, formatting preferences, or submission instructions. Carefully follow these guidelines to demonstrate your attention to detail and your respect for the recipient's preferences.In conclusion, crafting an effective English submission cover letter is a nuanced art that requires a combination of personalization, professionalism, and persuasion. By following the principles outlined in this guide, you can elevate your correspondence and increase the likelihood of capturing the reader's attention and securing the desired opportunity. Remember, the cover letter is your chance tomake a lasting impression and showcase your unique value proposition. Embrace this opportunity, and let your words be the catalyst for your next professional success.。
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板(可编辑修改word版)
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个 major revision 后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的 rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对 hypothesis 的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar， spelling，and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader。
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study。
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided。
3、对于研究设计的rationale：Also， there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design。
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated。
For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
（完整版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板（可编辑修改word版）
（完整版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板（可编辑修改word版）一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision 后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的 rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对 hypothesis 的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
审稿意见回稿用语
论文返修（response letter)一些很有用的套话1、According to the associate editor and reviewers’comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing.2、In this revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text.3、Thank you for your nice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we have supplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previous draft. Based on your comments, we also attached a point-by-point letter to you and the other two reviewers. We have made extensive revisions to our previous draft. The detailed point-by-point responses are listed below.4、Thanks for your help. We feel really sorry for our carelessness.5、Thank you for your reminding. You and the other two reviewers’comments are all of great importance to our article. All of these comments have contributed a lot to improve the quality of our article. After this revision, we have written a point-by-point response letter to you as you can see above. Meanwhile, we also wrote a point-by-point response letter to the other two nice reviewers to acknowledge their helps and denote where we made revisions.6、We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft. We have added necessary data to supplement our results and edited our article extensively. The detailed corrections are listed below.7、We feel sorry that we did not provide enough information about XXXX.8、it is really a giant mistake to the whole quality of our article. We feel sorry for our carelessness. We have corrected it and we also feel great thanks for your point out.9、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Due to our friend’s help, the article wasedited extensively. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.10、thanks for your careful checks. We are sorry for our carelessness. Based on your comments, we have made the corrections to make the unit harmonized within the whole manuscript.11、your suggestion really means a lot to us. Yes, it would be more understandable if we XXX.12、According to your suggestion, we have corrected the “XXX”into “XXX”.13、 thanks for your correction. It was indeed a serious grammatical error. And we have corrected it according to your suggestion.14、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for the improper wording. We have used “XXXX” as you suggested.15、According to the reviewer’s comments, we have revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. “xxxx”is a journal of great popularity and prestige. We hope that our manuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you very much for your help.欢迎您的下载，资料仅供参考！致力为企业和个人提供合同协议，策划案计划书，学习资料等等打造全网一站式需求。
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板(From Internet)一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original researc h article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript,again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest.A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studie d their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerni ng Figures 1 and 2 result froma misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
sci审稿人常用话术
sci审稿人常用话术
尊敬的作者，
非常感谢您将您的研究成果提交到我们的期刊。
我们非常重视您的工作，并将会认真审阅您的稿件。
以下是我们审稿人常用的话术，希望对您有所帮助。
我们注意到您的研究方法和数据分析是非常可靠和严谨的，这些都是非常重要的因素。
您的研究结果对于我们的学术界和相关领域都有着重要的意义。
我们希望您能就研究目的、方法和结果进行更详细的描述，以便读者更好地理解您的研究。
同时，我们也鼓励您在文章中使用一些实例或案例来支持您的观点，以使读者更容易理解您的研究。
我们建议您在讨论和结论部分对您的研究结果进行深入的分析和解释。
您可以从不同的角度和维度来解读您的发现，并与已有的研究进行比较和对比。
这样可以增加您的研究的学术价值和原创性。
我们还注意到您在文献综述中对已有研究的引用非常充分。
但是我们建议您对这些引用进行进一步的解释和分析，以使读者更好地理解这些研究对您的研究的贡献。
我们希望您能够在文中使用准确且简洁的语言来描述您的研究。
避免使用过多的专业术语和复杂的句子结构，以确保读者能够轻松理解您的研究。
同时，我们也鼓励您使用一些形象生动的词汇，以使
读者更容易产生共鸣和理解您的研究。
非常感谢您对我们期刊的信任和支持。
我们期待您对我们提出的修改意见的回复，并期待您的修订稿。
祝好！。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
编辑一般会发给审稿人一个提纲，类似于这样的：
文章编号
题目
对文章一个概括性的描述及审稿人自己的决定（接受，拒，大修，小修等）
审稿意见：
1、XX
2、XX
3、XX
...
审稿意见的一些套话
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?。