RSC审稿具体流程
SCI审稿流程与修回处理要点及技巧2
SCI审稿流程与修回处理要点及技巧2来源：梅斯医学SCI文章的写作、统计以及结果部分整理和投稿前准备工作十分重要，做完这些工作后会把论文正式投出去，之后评审会根据我们的文章给出意见。
作者应该如何处理这些意见呢？昨天的文章中梅斯医学张发宝博士为我们讲解了SCI审稿流程与修回处理要点及技巧1，今天继续讲解SCI审稿流程与修回处理要点及技巧2。
一、Reviewer审稿的一般步骤Reviewer审稿时不会花很多时间，可能一篇文章只用15分钟甚至5分钟。
那么这么短的时间他到底看什么呢？首先要看题目摘要，要了解这篇文章想要证明的问题以及研究目的是不是有意思。
如果研究有新意，审稿人接下来会看研究设计。
如果研究设计没有太大缺陷，接下来就会审核一下PICOS各个研究要素。
如果有缺陷可以弥补，就提些意见进行大修。
如果还是没有什么缺陷，后续就是小修阶段。
这些关键问题看完之后，评审才会去看前言、讨论和参考文献，提一些minor的意见。
这就是审稿的一般流程。
二、SCI文章审稿周期影响审稿周期的因素非常多。
大部分期刊审稿周期一般都在三个月左右，三个月之内给出审稿意见都是正常的。
有的期刊审稿会超过三个月。
审稿周期由很多因素决定。
首先就是期刊的工作效率。
这涉及到期刊每年的收稿量，出版周期等。
另一个非常重要的限速步骤就是审稿人。
审稿人审稿的时间占整个审稿周期的80%-90%。
所以要看文章的研究方向是不是好找审稿人。
如果研究领域比较偏，很多时间都会浪费在分配审稿人上。
当编辑分配完审稿人后，投稿状态就会变为under review。
接下来就是漫长的under review阶段。
为什么有时候审稿时间会非常长呢？这当中有一种不好的传言，说找的审稿人做的研究和你的文章非常相像。
审稿人故意拖慢你的审稿时间，同时自己在补实验，想要抢在你之前发表或背靠背同时发表。
那么如何查询审稿周期呢？可以通过梅斯网站期刊智能查询系统，这个系统会给出一个审稿的大致周期。
稿件审核操作流程
如果您已审核完毕，请填写您的审稿意见，在“稿件上传”框中上传你的“修改稿”，在“审 稿单上传”中上传你的“审稿单”。一切填写完毕，点“确定”完成审稿。
稿件审核操作流程
专家，您好！ 我刊网上采编系统的专家评审操作方法如下，请您按照此方法进行操作，以便我们及时准确 地收到您的评审意见。
1. 在主题为“《都市快轨交通》请您审稿”的邮件下方，点击审核链接
进入以下界面
会件下载 ”链接下可以看到编辑部送交给您的稿件信息，您可以下载稿件 和审稿单。
chemical communication
这是我第一次写Chemical Communications(以下简称CC)的论文，虽然先前已有13篇1作SCI 的经历，但对于这样的期刊还是不敢怠慢的，毕竟是Royal Society of Chemistry(RSC)的王牌杂志。
首先，去CC下载了与我课题在大方向上相关的所有文章，只找到4篇，之后认真拜读了一下。
读下来后总体感觉是：特点鲜明、行文流畅、简单易读。
之后，思考我的文章的写作思路。
与长文章(full paper)不同的是，最强的创新点要最先展示，让读者耳目一新，有兴趣接着读下去。
接下来是次要的、再次要的等等。
当然你的东西不可能完美无缺，这时最好就不要提出了，等以后写full paper时再写吧，以免引起不必要的麻烦，有时甚至是导致直接拒稿的主要原因。
另外，CC对投稿格式要求十分严格。
去RSC网站下载了投稿指南认真分析，总结了以下需要注意的几点：1、文章长度<3页(模版格式)；2、要准备graphical abstract，彩图加一句话的说明；3、摘要也要求是一句话不超过50单词；4、实验过程和次要数据可放在supplementary information里；5、要有urgent statement；6、推荐2个审稿人；7、图的dpi至少600。
8、准备license，没有license是不能审稿的。
按照以上的写作精神，在2天不到的时间内写出初稿并整理出上述所需材料。
1天后文章投出，状态为editorial assessment；12天后，状态为manuscript with referees；经历了22天后，状态变为awaiting revised manuscript from authors；编辑的意见是：Dear Professor ****Communication Ref.: B813327ATitle : A novel efficient oxide electrode for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction at 400-600 oCI have received the reports from the referees and I shall be pleased to publish your paper in ChemComm once referee B's comments have been addressed. I would be grateful if you would forward a suitably revised manuscript as soon as possible.Please ensure that you include the following as separate files:* Final manuscript text, preferably in Word format*Schemes preferably as ChemDraw files. ChemDraw structures facilitate article enhancements such as those in the Prospect View, as they can be machine-processed to yield useful information. However, Chemwindow files (filename.cwg, filename.cw2), ISIS/Draw exported as sketch format (filenameskc) and ChemSketch exported in ChemDraw format (filename.cdx) may also be supplied.* Figures, as TIFF, EPS or PDF format at greater than 600dpi.* Graphical Abstract, this should now include a short (-30 word) statement of novelty for publication in the Contents List, and may be in colour.* Any Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI)* Cover Letter, this should describe any changes made in response to the referees' comments and list all the electronic files you are supplying. Please also include information on the file formatsand operating system used.If for any reason you are unable to use file upload then please send the above files, quoting your manuscript reference number, by e-mail to ****************I shall look forward to hearing from you shortly.Yours sincerelyMike BrownReport AThis is a very good paper related to material development of SOFC technology. It qualifies for publication in ChemComm with respect to novelty, significance, reliable and technical quality. It is also readable and understandable for the readers.I recommend acceptance of this paper without any changes.Report BThis is an interesting contribution to the field of medium temperature SOFC.Major point: The electrode properties (e.g. the ASR) are strongly dependent on the microstructure (grain size, porosity, etc.). There is no detailed information on this which makes comparison with other electrode compounds a bit difficult.The electrode impedance response seems to be analyzed by two '(RQ)' circuits, however, given the materials properties I would rather expect a 'Gerischer' type response ( also called 'the chemical impedance' by Adler et al., ref.15). Information on the impedance dispersion should be included. The interpretation of the P(O2) dependence of the two resistances is, without further information, quite speculative.虽然是小修改，但绝不能马虎。
SCI 论文投稿全过程(Elsevier在线投递)
1.投稿前询问(p r e s u b m i s s i o n i n q u i r i e s)为了节省时间,一些杂志要求作者在投稿前先询问杂志编辑对论文内容是否感兴趣。
询问时提交的材料包括重要性介绍(可用coverletter内容)和论文摘要。
编辑也许会很快邀请您递交完整的论文(这并不意味着发表的任何承诺),或许告诉您这篇论文不适合在该杂志发表。
如果确认论文重要,即使编辑有否定的回复,作者也可以继续向该杂志投稿。
2.投稿信(coverletter)coverletter主要向编辑介绍论文题目、主要内容,突出论文的创新性和价值,希望发表在个该杂志的什么栏目或类型,为什么要发表这篇论文,声明没有一稿两投。
还可以简要指出目前该领域的发展方向,说明该杂志什么领域的读者群对这篇论文感兴趣。
例如:“Wewouldliketosubmitourmanuscript“xxxxxxxx(manuscripttitle)”foryourreviewandconsiderationforpublicationinthexxx(journalname)Journala sa“xxxx(papertype)”.Thismanuscriptdescribesoriginalwork,。
3.准备论文(preparationformanuscript)多数杂志要求双倍行距,每一部分最好另起一页,具体格式依据各杂志“投稿须知(Instructionsforauthors)”中的要求而定。
论文修改定稿之前要仔细阅读所投杂志的“投稿须知”,规定了杂志的范围、论文类型、提交方式、审稿过程、格式要求、版权转让等信息。
标题页(titlepage):包括题目(title)、作者(author)、单位(institution)、通讯作者信息(correspondingauthor)、大标题(runninghead)、统计数据(字数、页码、图表数)、资金来源(grantorsupport)等。
Elsevier出版社杂志的审稿程序
Elsevier出版社杂志的审稿程序(中英互译版)Peer Review Policy for Journals of ElsevierThe practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.同行评审制度可以有效地保证杂志发表文章的高质量，其大致程序如下：Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.杂志编辑部对于不同类别的稿件所需审稿人可能会有其特定的要求。
1、Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review.第一步：初审：编辑负责。
SCI期刊如何处理我们的投稿？审稿流程及可能结果全解！
SCI期刊如何处理我们的投稿？审稿流程及可能结果全解！论文审核审稿是论文发表所必须经历的过程，是由科技论文的特点决定的。
审稿即接受同行评价，主要评价论文在创新性和科学性方面是否具有发表价值。
不同期刊的审稿制度也不一样，大致流程一致，具体流程如下。
01 初审编辑初审是指编辑人员对分管专业或学科的论文稿件进行初步审查和评价,以决定是退稿、退修、或者送专家评审。
一篇论文投到国际SCI期刊，编辑会对稿件由一个初步的意见或结论作者应提醒自己注意的是，多数编辑不会将不经仔细准备的稿件送交审稿人。
稿件初审的要点和过程如下：(1) 审定稿件是否属于本刊报道范围；(2) 审定稿件本身形式是否合乎本刊出版形式，是否完整，如缺页、少图等；(3) 浏览全文，初步断定稿件是否属于科技论文的范畴；(4) 对比分析，初步确定稿件是否有一定的创新性；(5) 阅读摘要、引言和结论，大致了解文稿是否有发表价值；(6) 推敲正文部分的科学性和逻辑性，初步辨别所述成果是否真实可靠；(7) 通读全文，找出表达上较大的毛病或指出论文主要组成部分有否遗漏。
比如一篇有关临床的case report论文投到了JBC，其下场是可以想象的，像这种情况，编辑就不用再浪费时间了，不用外审了，直接退稿，当然退稿信会简单解释原因，但都应该是通用格式，像这这种情况，作者不用太不爽，因为editor并不是拒绝你的数据和/或结论，下一步很简单：就是再找一个合适的期刊，再投。
如果论文是适合在该期刊发表的，接下来就会进入下一个环节。
02 同行评审（耗时最长）论文通过初审，接下来编辑便会把论文送交同行评审，一般都会邀请2到3位审稿人进行审稿。
而审稿人大都是本领域科研前沿的专家、知名学者，一般来说期刊的影响越大，所选审稿人的学术水平越高。
然后根据论文的内容，给出小修/大修/拒稿的意见及建议；然而这一过程耗时最长，一般是3-12个月的终审周期，主要原因如下；一般审稿人是无偿审稿，而大部分审稿人都有自己的主要工作要做，期刊主编一般会给审稿人15天-30天的审稿时间，这段时间就会出现以下问题：①审稿人忘记审稿/在审稿时间内未完成审稿，期刊主编就要再邀请另外一个审稿人，再次等待审稿意见；②两个审稿的意见是不一致的，甚至是完全相反的，或者其对稿件的推荐意见并没有很强的证据说明，这种情况下,编辑有两种选择：或做最后决定，或再找一个或更多的审稿人继续审，看是否能有一致的评审意见。
3RSC审稿具体流程
本人认为RSC的稿件处理流程还是很快的，具体流程为：Manuscript tracking-current status descriptionsE-submission awaiting verification by editorial officeAfter e-submission the manuscript files are received at the editorial office,checked and an acknowledgement email sentAssessment by editorial officeOnce a manuscript is received at the editorial office it is subject to an initial assessment.This status may also appear during the refereeing procedure if a referee has declined to review a manuscript.Manuscript with refereesManuscripts are usually sent to two reviewers for peer-review.Once the editorial office receives reports back from the referees an editorial decision is made on your manuscript.If the two reports differ then the paper will be sent to a third adjudicative referee.Any decision will then be communicated to the authors as soon as possible.Awaiting revised manuscript from authorThe reviewers’comments are forwarded to the authors so that changes can be made to the manuscript.The editorial office is now waiting for you to revise and return your manuscript. Revised manuscript receivedOnce a revised manuscript is received at the editorial office it is re-examined by the editorial staff and may be returned to an original referee before a final decision about publication is made. Manuscript being editedOn acceptance the original documents go through a number of stages to generate the proof.The original word processor documents are converted into XML,a highly structured format used to create print,web and archive forms of the paper.The graphics are extracted(if necessary)resized and renamed into standard resolution TIFF images.The text is then edited in XML and the graphics are checked.Proofs of manuscript being preparedOnce editing is complete,the XML and graphics are used to create the first proof of the paper. Awaiting cover permission from authorCover Permission forms give us formal authorisation to use an image supplied by an author on thefront cover of the journal.These need to be received before the image is used.。
英国皇家化学学会电子期刊数据库(RSC)使用指南
2
访问平台： （RSC国际主站） （CALIS本地服务器）
3
可访问期刊列表：
Annual Reports Section A Annual Reports Section B Annual Reports Scetion C Chemcial Science Chemcial Communications Physical Chemistry Chemistry Physics Dalton Transactions Journal of Materials Chemistry New Journal of Chemistry Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry Chemical Society Reviews Chemisty World Eduction in Chemsitry Faraday Discussions
Green Chemistry Natural Product Reports Natural Product Updates Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry Analytical Webbase The Analyst Environmental Science:Process & Impacts Analytical Methods Catalysis Science & Technology （免费） RSC Advances（免费）
下载PDF文件
图6 案例检索
11
六、个性化服务
RSC 电子期刊全文数据库可以提供如下个性化服务内容：回顾 检索历史（My Saved Searches）；保存检索策略（Save this Search）；保存检索结果（Save Record）；E-Mail通告 服务（E-Mail Alert）。 使用个性化服务前需要先建立个人账 户，登陆后即可进行个性化设置使用个性化服务。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
本人认为RSC的稿件处理流程还是很快的，具体流程为：
Manuscript tracking - current status descriptions
E-submission awaiting verification by editorial office
After e-submission the manuscript files are received at the editorial office, checked and an acknowledgement email sent
Assessment by editorial office
Once a manuscript is received at the editorial office it is subject to an initial assessment. This status may also appear during the refereeing procedure if a referee has declined to review a manuscript.
Manuscript with referees
Manuscripts are usually sent to two reviewers for peer-review. Once the editorial office receives reports back from the referees an editorial decision is made on your manuscript. If the two reports differ then the paper will be sent to a third adjudicative referee. Any decision will then be communicated to the authors as soon as possible.
Awaiting revised manuscript from author
The reviewers’ comments are forwarded to the authors so that changes can be made to the manuscript. The editorial office is now waiting for you to revise and return your manuscript. Revised manuscript received
Once a revised manuscript is received at the editorial office it is re-examined by the editorial staff and may be returned to an original referee before a final decision about publication is made. Manuscript being edited
On acceptance the original documents go through a number of stages to generate the proof. The original word processor documents are converted into XML, a highly structured format used to create print, web and archive forms of the paper. The graphics are extracted (if necessary) resized and renamed into standard resolution TIFF images. The text is then edited in XML and the graphics are checked.
Proofs of manuscript being prepared
Once editing is complete, the XML and graphics are used to create the first proof of the paper. Awaiting cover permission from author
Cover Permission forms give us formal authorisation to use an image supplied by an author on the
front cover of the journal. These need to be received before the image is used.。