Rohs2.0测试报告样本
ROHS2.0有害物质测试计划表
配方变更时/ 抽样5PCS委 托第三方测
同一供应商（由 物料供应商提供 有效的有害物质
2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）十项检测
同一供应商（由 物料供应商提供 有效的有害物质
USB HUB IC
料
试
检测报告）
检测报告）
主控IC
DDR
EMMC
1.新供应商供货物料、供应商新供货物料、或供应商物料材质出现变更时，进料检验时，必须实施以上环保检测项目,OK后能正式入库。 备注 2.供应商首次交货时需做RoHS检测，根据检验结果与所提供之第三方检测报告比对确认；
托第三方测 有效的有害物质
试
检测报告）
2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）十项检测
二次/半年/ 同一供应商（由 物料供应商提供 有效的有害物质
检测报告）
二三级管
功放IC
Байду номын сангаас
电源IC
串口IC
VGAIC
低
新供方/公司 一次/1年/
1次/1年/
I C 类
高清切换IC USB切换IC
风 险 进
1次/年
1次/年
3.进料依合格供应商名录对供应商材料或物料进行检测时,以不同材质及表面处理为类别进行抽检同一规格即可;
制表：
审核：
核准：
表单编号：xx-xxxx-xx A0
送检 单位
材料类别/站别
PCB
插 头
线 材 接 线 端 子
IQC
制造 物料
覆铜板 HDMI座 VGA座 串口座 网口座 USB座 耳机座
AV座 电池座 高频头座 SD卡座 SD卡座 2P接线母座 4P接线母座 6P接线母座 8P接线母座 9P接线母座 10P接线母座 屏线座子
欧盟工厂级RoHS2.0测试仪器的测试标准、规范及原理
随着ROHS2.0的实施，又有一大批产品因被检出不符合相关法规，而且这次全是ROHS新增加管理的项目：邻苯和REACH中的部分管理项目，因此，当这些产品投放到市场前，如不加以检测是否符合相关基准要求，其潜在的危害是巨大的，甚至有可能对消费者的生命、财产安全或环境造成损害。
骏辉腾科技的“X+1”计划助力工厂应对RoHS2.0法规2019年7月22日，RoHS2.0指令正式生效，具体指令需要管控的物质及限值如下:工厂级RoHS2.0一站式管控，需要简单，方便，快速，高效的管理手段；2006年7月1日生效以来，众多工厂已购XRF（X荧光光谱仪），术名：能量色散光谱仪，俗称：RoHS测试仪，或者RoHS+无卤测试仪，主要是用于检测有害物质中的元素分析应对RoHS指令；辅助合金分析，镀层分析等等功能；2019年7月22日强制执行的RoHS2.0新增了四项邻苯有害物质测试，已购的XRF已无法满足测试需求，需要配备对应的色谱仪器；骏辉腾科技借助专业的服务为广大客户提出了“X+1”计划，助力不同厂家，不同型号的X（X 荧光光谱仪）加上骏辉腾科技推出的LC-2800 有机物综合测试仪，并针对性设计出专业的工厂级实验室“既测试，又展示”的完善解决工厂级RoHS2.0十项检测。
并且同时可扩充测试PAHs,AZO,DMF,BPA等相关有机物，提出一站式服务解决了行业痛点及客户关心的重点；通过多年努力，现骏辉腾科技产品成功与各种品牌及型号的XRF进行了互补，让客户有更广阔的选择空间并为用户提供了便捷的服务；欧盟RoHS 2.0指令：2015年6月4日，欧盟在其官方公报上发布指令(EU) 2015/863对RoHS2.0(2011/65/EU) 附录II进行修订，正式将四种邻苯二甲酸酯(DEHP、BBP、DBP、DIBP) 列入RoHS2.0附录II中，到2016年12月31日止，欧盟成员国必须将此指令转为各国的法规并执行。
RoHS 2.0 调和标准及均质材料示例
Material Data Form (材質成分表)
IEC 62321
文件相關調和標準
IEC 62474
佐證技術文件10年備存
Overview : Homogeneous Materials example
IC:
Die ,Die attach ,wire ,Mold compound ,Lead frame, Plating…etc.
Surface finish(OSP , Immersion Gold…etc)
Solder mask Ink(Silk screen)
copper foil
Thin core (Pregpreg +copper foil)
Pregpreg (Epoxy resin + Glass Fiber+ Flame retardant)
Overview : Homogeneous Materials example
機構材質
需要依照機構圖面,才能確定最終完整材質
MHale Waihona Puke lar(銘板):PC,背膠,油墨…etc.
包裝材料
紙箱:
紙箱本體,油墨,白膠,鋼釘…etc
Overview : Homogeneous Materials example
Connector:
塑膠粒,pin 腳,鍍層(or PCB 板)
Overview : Homogeneous Materials example
PCB 空板:
Laminate基材,PREGPREG,COPPER FOIL, Solder mask ,Surface finish OSP …etc.
ROHS2.0联络报告
深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司 编号：
联络报告共 1 页 ， 第 1 页
各厂商负责人：
你们好！
2011年7月1日，欧盟议会和理事会在欧盟官方公报上发布指令 2011/65/EU（ROHS 2.0）以取代2002/95/EC ，新指令在2011年7月21日生效，2013年1月3日起指令2002/95/EC 将会被废除。
2011/65/EU RoHS2.0主要增加HBCDD、DEHP、DBP和BBP四项管控物质，即原来RoHS主要管控六项有害物质，现管控十项有害物质。
请各厂商自查交“深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司”物料是否含有最新增加的四项管控物质，因此请各厂商在2012年提交给“深圳市创亿欣精密电子股份有限公司”的物料SGS 报告，需要有此四项物质的测试项目及结果（金属类材料除外），另重申我司只接受SGS、CTI、ITS三家第三方检测公司的报告。
以上，谢谢各厂商的配合！并请在2012年1月13号前签回。
祝：新年快乐！。
欧盟ROHS2.0标准及检测方法
欧盟ROHS2.0标准及检测方法欧盟ROHS2.0标准欧盟公报(OJ)发布RoHS2.0修订指令(EU)2015/863，欧盟RoHS2.0更新终于尘埃落定，由原来的六项管控物质：铅（Pb）、汞（Hg）、镉（Cd）、六价铬（Cr VI）、多溴联苯（PBB）、多溴二苯醚（PBDE），变为十项管控物质，新增邻苯二甲酸二（2-乙基己基）酯（DEHP）、邻苯二甲酸甲苯基丁酯（BBP）、邻苯二甲酸二丁基酯（DBP）、邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯（DIBP）（简称邻苯4P），此前曾在ROHS2.0中被优先列为评估物质的六溴环十二烷（HBCCD）未被正式列入限制物质清单。
该十项管控物质管控的限量均为0.1%和0.01%。
此修订指令发布后，欧盟各成员国需在2016年12月31日前将此指令转为各国的法规并执行。
且2019年7月22日起所有输欧电子电器产品(除医疗和监控设备)均需满足该限制要求,;2021年7月22日起，医疗设备(包括体外医疗设备)和监控设备(包括工业监控设备)也将纳入该管控范围。
此外，已属REACH附件XVII第51条邻苯管控的玩具产品将不受此指令中DEHP、BBP、DBP的管控。
指令编辑欧盟议会及欧盟委员会于2003年2月13日在其《公报》上发布了《废旧电子电气设备指令》（简称《WEEE指令》）和《电子电气设备中限制使用某些有害物质指令》（简称《RoHS 指令》）《RoHS指令》和《WEEE指令》规定纳入有害物质限制管理和报废回收管理的有十大类102种产品，前七类产品都是我国主要的出口电器产品。
包括大型家用电器、小型家用电器、信息和通讯设备、消费类产品、照明设备、电器电子工具、玩具、休闲和运动设备、医用设备（被植入或被感染的产品除外）、监测和控制仪器、自动售卖机。
2008年12月3日，欧盟发布了WEEE指令（2002/96/EC）和RoHS指令（2002/95/EC）的修订提案。
本次提案的目的是创造更好的法规环境，即简单、易懂、有效和可执行的法规。
RoHS 2.0欧洲议会报告-20100615
RR\430424EN.docPE430.424v05-00EN United in diversityENEUROPEAN PARLIAMENT2009 - 2014Session documentA7-0196/201015.6.2010***IREPORTon the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast)(COM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD)) Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Rapporteur: Jill Evans(Recast - Rule 87 of the Rules of Procedure)PR_COD_1RecastingamSymbols for procedures* Consultation proceduremajority of the votes cast**I Cooperation procedure (first reading)majority of the votes cast**II Cooperation procedure (second reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the common positionmajority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amendthe common position*** Assent proceduremajority of Parliament’s component Members except in casescovered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty andArticle 7 of the EU Treaty***I Codecision procedure (first reading)majority of the votes cast***II Codecision procedure (second reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the common positionmajority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amendthe common position***III Codecision procedure (third reading)majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by theCommission.)Amendments to a legislative textIn amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics. Inthe case of amending acts, passages in an existing provision that theCommission has left unchanged, but that Parliament wishes to amend, arehighlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make inpassages of this kind are indicated thus: [...]. Highlighting in normal italics isan indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislativetext for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text(for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of thedepartments concerned.PE430.424v05-00 2/80 RR\430424EN.doc ENCONTENTSPage DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (5)EXPLANATORY STATEMENT (71)ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS (76)ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION (78)PROCEDURE (80)RR\430424EN.doc 3/80 PE430.424v05-00ENPE430.424v05-00 4/80 RR\430424EN.doc ENRR\430424EN.doc 5/80 PE430.424v05-00ENDRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTIONon the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast)(COM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading - recast) The European Parliament ,− having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council(COM(2008)0809),− having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which theCommission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0471/2008), – having regard to the Commission communication to Parliament and the Council entitled: 'Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures' (COM)2009)0665), – having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the functioning of the EU, − having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16December 20091, − having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 29 May 20102, − having regard to Rules 87 and 55 of its Rules of Procedure,− having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health andFood Safety (A7-0196/2010), 1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account therecommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; 2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend theproposal substantially or replace it with another text; 3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission and tothe national parliaments.1OJ C 306, 16.12.2009, p. 36–382OJ C 141, 29.5.2010, p. 55–64PE430.424v05-006/80RR\430424EN.docENAmendment 1Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3a) Directive 2008/98/EC of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 gives first priority to prevention in waste legislation. Prevention is defined inter alia as measures that reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products.JustificationThe recast of RoHS should be put into the context of the waste hierarchy established in the waste framework directive in 2008. Prevention is the top priority in the binding waste hierarchy. Prevention includes measures to reduce the content of harmful substances in materials and products. The recast of RoHS recast is therefore an important opportunity to translate this obligation into concrete action, all the more that electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) continues to create numerous problems during waste treatment. Amendment 2Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3b) The Council Resolution of 25 January 1988 on a Community action programme to combat environmental pollution by cadmium 1 invites theCommission to pursue without delay the development of specific measures for such a programme. Human health also has to be protected and an overall strategy that in particular restricts the use of cadmium and stimulates research into substitutes should therefore be implemented. That Resolution stresses that the use ofcadmium should be limited to cases where such use is suitable and where safer alternatives do not exist.1OJ C 30, 4.2.1988, p. 1.RR\430424EN.doc7/80PE430.424v05-00ENJustificationThe reference to the Council Resolution of 1988 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should bereinstated as it is the political reference for combating environmental pollution by cadmium.Amendment 3Proposal for a directive Recital 3 c (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3c) The European Parliament, in its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the review of the Community Strategy on Waste Management and the draft Council resolution on waste policy 1, asked the Commission to present proposals for directives on a number of priority waste streams, including electrical and electronic waste. The European Parliament, in the same resolution, requested the Council and theCommission to put forward proposals to reduce the presence of hazardous substances in waste such as chlorine, mercury, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), cadmium and other heavy metals.1OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p. 241.JustificationThe reference to the Parliament Resolution of 1996 (Recital 4 of current RoHS) should be inserted as an important reminder that Parliament already asked for concrete restrictions on PVC back in 1996. Amendment 4Proposal for a directive Recital 3 d (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3d) Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending DirectivePE430.424v05-008/80RR\430424EN.docEN79/117/EEC 1 recalls that the objective of protecting the environment and human health from persistent organic pollutants cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, owing to thetransboundary effects of those pollutants, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level. Pursuant to that Regulation, releases of persistent organic pollutants, such as dioxins and furans, which are unintentional by-products of industrial processes, should be identified and reduced as soon as possible with the ultimate aim of elimination, where feasible. Thermal treatment oruncontrolled disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment containinghalogenated flame retardants or PVC can contribute significantly to the formation of dioxins and furans.1OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 7.JustificationThe RoHS recast needs to be put into the context of the EU’s international obligations to reduce total releases of dioxins and furans, with the goal of their continuing minimization and, where feasible, ultimate elimination. The final destiny of large quantities of WEEE remains unclear. High-temperature incineration remains the exception. Sub-standardtreatment of WEEE – in the EU or in third countries - risks remaining a reality for significant amounts. Emissions of dioxins and furans can only be addressed via material choices at design stage. Amendment 5Proposal for a directive Recital 3e (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3e) The study commissioned by theCommission on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment highly recommended a phase-out oforganobromines and organochlorines due to their potential to form polybrominated and polychlorinated dioxins and furans in waste treatment operations, and gave priority to the phase-out of PVC overselective risk management options toguarantee a reduced release of PVC, of itsadditives and of hazardous combustionproducts. It also recommends thelabelling of beryllium metal and berylliumoxide and the voluntary phase-outcombined with market surveillance ofseveral other examined substances.JustificationThe recommendations of the Öko-Institut with its different options should be referred to,reflecting that the suggestions go beyond the recommendation to include substances intoAnnex IV.Amendment 6Proposal for a directiveRecital 3f (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(3f) There is scientific uncertainty aboutthe safety of nanomaterials for humanhealth and the environment, nointernationally agreed definition of ananomaterial and no internationallyagreed test guidelines. The Commission'sScientific Committee on Emerging andNewly Identified Health Risks(SCENIHR) adopted on 28-29 September2005 an opinion on nanotechnologieswhich concluded that there were "majorgaps in the knowledge necessary for riskassessment and concluded that "existingtoxicological and eco-toxicologicalmethods may not be sufficient to addressall of the issues arising in relation tonanoparticles". There is increasingscientific evidence that some carbonnanotubes may behave like asbestos fibresand thus have severe impact on humanhealth. The same applies to nanosilverparticles which may end up in theenvironment and may have severe impactson soil, aquatic and terrestrial organisms.RR\430424EN.doc 9/80 PE430.424v05-00ENPE430.424v05-0010/80RR\430424EN.docENJustificationA 2009 research project on emerging nanotechnologies found that about 807 products are available on the market containing nanomaterials, some of which are EEE. There is acommon agreement amongst nanotoxicologists that risks of severe impacts on health and the environment are real, precautious measures are therefore warranted in regards tonanomaterials. This amendment is linked to the amendment of Art. 4 (1) b new, suggesting a labelling for nanosilver and carbon nanotubes.Amendment 7Proposal for a directive Recital 6Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(6) The substances covered by thisDirective are scientifically well researched and evaluated and have been subject to different measures both at Community and at national level.(6) The substances covered by this Directive should be scientifically well researched and evaluated prior toestablishing restrictions and becoming subject to different measures both at Union and at national level. Substances listed in Annex III should be scientifically well researched and evaluated prior to establishing restrictions.JustificationThe assessment of substances listed in annex III has not yet been completed. The substances listed in annex III are scheduled for assessment, which should be done thoroughly; however, this work has not yet been finished.Amendment 8Proposal for a directive Recital 7Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(7) The measures provided for in this Directive take into account existing international guidelines andrecommendations and are based on an assessment of available scientific and technical information. The measures are necessary to achieve the chosen level of protection of human and animal health and(7) The measures provided for in this Directive take into account existing international guidelines andrecommendations and are based on an assessment of available scientific and technical information. The measures are necessary to achieve the chosen level of protection of human and animal health andthe environment, having regard to the risks which the absence of measures would be likely to create in the Community. The measures should be kept under review and, if necessary, adjusted to take account of available technical and scientific information. the environment, having regard to the risks which the absence of measures would be likely to create in the Union. The measures should be kept under review and, if necessary, adjusted to take account of available technical and scientific information. In particular, the risks to human health and the environment arising from the use of substances listed in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 with special attention to Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) and Dibutylphthalate (DBP) should be considered as a priority.JustificationSubstances about which some concern has been expressed by various bodies.Amendment 9Proposal for a directiveRecital 8Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(8) This Directive supplements the general Community waste management legislation, such as Directive 2008/[…]/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste. (8) This Directive supplements the general EU waste management legislation, such as Directive 2008/[…]/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste as well as Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)1.1 OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.JustificationIt should be stated specifically that RoHS supplements REACH. RoHS and REACH have different objectives, scope, timelines, and outreach. RoHS was created to address the specific problems of a fast-growing waste stream, REACH addresses chemical substances at a general level, with no special focus on waste. REACH is a regional law still in its infancy, RoHS is already setting a global standard. Key problems with WEEE are due to polymers, which are exempted from REACH. RoHS should be further developed to address the specificRR\430424EN.doc 11/80 PE430.424v05-00problems of the recovery and disposal of WEEE at the origin.Amendment 10Proposal for a directiveRecital 11Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(11) The technical development of electrical and electronic equipment without heavy metals, PBDE and PBB should be taken into account. (11) The technical development of electrical and electronic equipment without heavy metals, brominated flame retardants, chlorinated flame retardants, PVC and its hazardous plasticisers should be taken into account.JustificationThe electronics industry is well-advanced in its global initiative to phase out the use of brominated/chlorinated flame retardants and PVC. Major electronics companies have already phased out the use of these substances in some/all of their products (e.g. 50% of all new mobile phones are already low halogen). Almost all major electronics companies have committed to do so for consumer products (e.g. market share of low-halogen personal computers will be at over 40% in the next 1-2 years). Similar action has already been undertaken by some manufacturers of ‘white goods’ in the past.Amendment 11Proposal for a directiveRecital 12Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(12) As soon as scientific evidence is available and taking into account the precautionary principle, the prohibition of other hazardous substances and their substitution by more environmentally friendly alternatives which ensure at least the same level of protection of consumers should be examined, paying attention to coherency with other Community legislation, and in particular to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Specific account should be taken of the (12) Periodically, and as soon as scientific evidence is available, and taking into account the precautionary principle, the prohibition of other hazardous substances and their substitution by more environmentally friendly alternative substances or technologies which ensure at least the same level of protection of consumers should be examined.To this end, the Commission should study the negative impacts of other hazardous substances and the feasibility of substituting them, in particular at the end of life of electrical and electronic equipment, with a view to making legislative proposals to strengthen thePE430.424v05-00 12/80 RR\430424EN.docpotential impact on SMEs.provisions of this Directive on a regularbasis. This examination should include afull impact assessment with consultationof relevant stakeholders. The examinationshould also pay attention to coherencewith other EU legislation and maximisesynergies with the work carried out underRegulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Specificaccount should be taken of the potentialimpact on SMEs.JustificationAmendment 12Proposal for a directiveRecital 12 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(12a) The development of renewableforms of energy is one of the Union’s keyobjectives, and the contribution made byrenewable energy sources toenvironmental and climate objectives iscrucial. Directive 2009/28/EC of 23 April2009 on the promotion of the use ofenergy from renewable sources andamending and subsequently repealingDirectives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC1recalls that there should be coherencebetween those objectives and theremainder of the Union’s environmentallegislation. Consequently, this Directiveshould not prevent the development ofrenewable energy technologies thatpresent no danger to the environment andthat are sustainable and economicallyviable, such as photovoltaic solar panels,which should be excluded from the scopeof this Directive. Independent impactassessment studies requested by theCommission also recommend theexclusion of photovoltaic solar panelsfrom the scope of this Directive.RR\430424EN.doc 13/80 PE430.424v05-001 OJ L 140, 05.06.2009, p. 16.JustificationThe revision of the RoHS Directive should be coherent with the EU’s climate change objectives and should allow the development of sustainable, economically viable forms of energy. It is therefore essential to allow specific exclusions from the scope of this Directive in order to help the EU attain its broader objectives as regards environmental protection, security of energy supply and combating climate change.Amendment 13Proposal for a directiveRecital 13Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(13) Exemptions from the substitution requirement should be permitted if substitution is not possible from the scientific and technical point of view , taking specific account of the situation of SMEs or if the negative environmental, health or socio-economic impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the health, environmental or socio-economic benefits of the substitution or the availability and reliability of substitutes is not ensured.Substitution of the hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment should also be carried out in a way so as to be compatible with the health and safety of users of electrical and electronic equipment. The placing on the market of medical devices requires a conformity assessment procedure, according to Directives 93/42/EC and98/79/EC, which could require the involvement of a notified body designated by Competent Authorities of Member States. If such a notified body certifies that the safety of the potential substitute for the intended use in medical devices or in vitro medical devices is not demonstrated, this will be viewed as a clear negative socio-economic, health and consumer safety impact. It should be possible to apply for (13) Exemptions from the substitution requirement should be permitted if substitution is not possible from a scientific and technical point of view, taking specific account of the situation of SMEs or if the negative environmental and health impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the health and environmental benefits of the substitution. Substitution of the hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment should also be carried out in a way so as to be compatible with the health and safety of users of electrical and electronic equipment. Socio-economic considerations should be taken into account when deciding on the duration of an exemption. It should be possible to grant a grace period after expiry of an exemption in case more time is required to ensure adequate availability of substitutes, including for reasons of intellectual property restrictions. The placing on the market of medical devices requires a conformity assessment procedure, according to Directives 93/42/EC and98/79/EC, which could require the involvement of a notified body designated by Competent Authorities of Member States. If such a notified body certifies thatPE430.424v05-00 14/80 RR\430424EN.docexemptions of equipment coming under the scope of this Directive from the date of its entry into force, even when that is before the actual inclusion in the scope of that equipment. the safety of the potential substitute for the intended use in medical devices or in vitro medical devices is not demonstrated, this will be viewed as a clear negative socio-economic, health and consumer safety impact. It should be possible to apply for exemptions of equipment coming under the scope of this Directive from the date of its entry into force, even when that is before the actual inclusion in the scope of that equipment.Amendment 14Proposal for a directiveRecital 14Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(14) Exemptions from the prohibition for certain specific materials or components should be limited in their scope, in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, given that the use of those substances in such applications should become avoidable.(14) Exemptions from the prohibition for certain specific materials or components should be adopted on a case-by-case basis and should be limited in their scope and duration, in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, given that the use of those substances in such applications should become avoidable.Amendment 15Proposal for a directiveRecital 14 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(14a)The use of nanomaterials inelectrical and electronic equipment mayincrease with the further development oftechnology. There is inadequateinformation about the use ofnanomaterials other than nanosilver andcertain carbon nanotubes in electrical andelectronic equipment and the risksRR\430424EN.doc 15/80 PE430.424v05-00associated with such use. In order toenable the Commission to assess thesafety of nanomaterials in electrical andelectronic equipment, economic operatorsshould notify the use of nanomaterials inelectrical and electronic equipment andprovide all relevant data with regard totheir safety for human health and theenvironment. The Commission shouldassess the information received and comeforward with a legislative proposal foradequate risk management, if necessary.Producers should label electrical andelectronic equipment that containsnanomaterials that can lead to exposureof consumers, in order to enableconsumers to make an informed choice.Amendment 16Proposal for a directiveRecital 19Text proposed by the Commission Amendmentdeleted(19) The measures necessary for theimplementation of this Directive should beadopted in accordance with CouncilDecision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999laying down the procedures for theexercise of implementing powersconferred on the Commission.(This amendment is linked to the replacement of the former "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" by the new procedure of delegated acts under Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.)JustificationRecital 20 as modified covers the necessary provisions.Amendment 17PE430.424v05-00 16/80 RR\430424EN.docProposal for a directiveRecital 20Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(20) In particular the Commission should be empowered to adapt Annexes II, III, IV,V and VI to technical and scientific progress and to adopt other necessary implementing measures. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of Directive 2002/95/EC, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC. (20) In order to allow the provisions of this Directive to be adapted to technical and scientific progress and to adopt other necessary measures, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in respect of the adaptation of Annexes V, VI,VIa and VIb, the adoption of a format for applications for exemptions, detailed rules for compliance with maximum concentration values, on sampling and inspection, the definition of nanomaterials, standards for the detection of nanomaterials, the application of the labelling of nanomaterials and adaptations to REACH.Amendment 18Proposal for a directiveRecital 23 a (new)Text proposed by the Commission Amendment(23a) A thorough analysis of the addedvalue of the RoHS Directive should becarried out in the context of the upcomingreview of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.RR\430424EN.doc 17/80 PE430.424v05-00Amendment 19Proposal for a directiveArticle 1Text proposed by the Commission AmendmentThis Directive lays down rules on the restriction of use of hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment with a view to contribute to the protection of human health and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment. This Directive lays down rules on the restriction of use of hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment with a view to contribute to the protection of human health, the environment, and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment.JustificationThe subject matter should reflect the content of the recitals. Recital 4 says: “even if WEEE were collected separately and submitted to recycling processes, its content of mercury, cadmium, would be likely to pose risk to health and the environment”. Recital 5 then states that “the most effective way of ensuring the significant reduction of risks to health and the environment relating to those substances … is the substitution”. Thus the phase-out of hazardous substances contributes to the protection of the environment as such, not just via environmentally sound recovery and disposal.Amendment 20Proposal for a directiveArticle 2 - paragraph 1Text proposed by the Commission Amendment1. This Directive shall apply to electrical and electronic equipment falling under the categories set out in Annex I as specified in Annex II . 1. This Directive shall apply to electrical and electronic equipment, including cables, consumables and accessories, falling under the categories set out in Annex I.PE430.424v05-00 18/80 RR\430424EN.doc。
供应商ROHS 2.0环保要求调查表及供应商ROHS 2.0环保声明书
Company (公司名称)：
Address (地址)﹕
供应商ROHS 2.0环保要求调查表及供应商ROHS 2.0环保声明书
供应商ROHS 2.0环保要求调查表
供货商名称Supplier Name::
地址Address:
签名Signature:
公章Company Stamp:
日期Date:
NO
ROHS原有6项有害物质substance
1
镉及其化合物Cadmium and its compounds（Cd）
6
十溴联苯醚Polybrominated Diphenyl ether（PBDE）
ROHS 2.0新增四项有害物质substance
1
Hexabromocyclododecane and all major diastereoisomers identified
六溴环十二烷（HBCDD）
2
Bis (2-ethyl(hexyl)phthalate)邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)（DEHP）
<1000ppm
邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)
<1000ppm
邻苯二甲酸丁苄酯（BBP）
<1000ppm
邻苯二甲酸二丁酯（DBP)
<1000ppm
详细内容请参照歐盟RoHS2.0指令
我司已理解并执行环保（RoHS2.0指令等）要求， 并郑重承诺：所提供的产品，元器件，原材料， 辅料等符合环保要求。如有任何原料更改,均须重新提交所更改材料后的RoHS2.0测试报告,待XX公司确认OK后方可更换.
Is there anyROHS 2.0testReport
以下rohs2.0中管控的邻苯测试项目
ROHS指令(2002/95/EC) 资料下称ROHS1.0从 2006 年 7 月 1 日起，欧盟对电子电气产品禁用六种危险物质进行了管控，已被纳入管控的物质包括铅、镉、汞、六价铬、多溴联苯、多溴联苯醚（PBBs）以及多溴联苯醚、其中最为关注的是铅、镉、汞等重金属。
为了进一步降低电子电气产品对环境的污染，以及人体长期接触后可能对人体健康造成的潜在危害，欧盟于 2011 年 7 月 1 日颁布了ROHS2.0指令(2011/65/EU)，并于 2013 年7 月 22 日起正式实施。
和 ROHS1.0相比，ROHS2.0 扩大了管控的物质范围，并对标准进行了更新，特别是在多溴联苯、多溴联苯醚等卤代阻燃剂的使用上做了明确的规定。
ROHS2.0对于管控的物质增加了四种物质，即邻苯二甲酸、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯、邻苯二甲酸二辛酯和邻苯二甲酸二十二烷酯。
以下将对 ROHS2.0中新增管控的邻苯测试项目进行详细介绍。
1. 邻苯二甲酸含量测试为了确定电子电气产品中邻苯二甲酸的含量是否符合 ROHS2.0标准的要求，需要进行相应的化学测试。
通过合适的实验方法和仪器设备，可以准确地测定出产品中邻苯二甲酸的含量，从而判断其是否符合欧盟的相关法规要求。
这一测试项目是 ROHS2.0中对邻苯的管控要求的重要组成部分，也是保障产品质量和安全的重要手段之一。
2. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯含量测试邻苯二甲酸二丁酯是一种常见的可塑剂，在电子电气产品的制造中被广泛使用。
然而，过量的邻苯二甲酸二丁酯对人体健康和环境都可能造成危害。
根据 ROHS2.0 的要求，需要对产品中邻苯二甲酸二丁酯的含量进行测试，确保其符合相关的管控标准。
通过专业的实验室和技术人员进行测试，可以准确判定产品中邻苯二甲酸二丁酯的含量是否符合法规要求。
3. 邻苯二甲酸二辛酯含量测试邻苯二甲酸二辛酯是一种常见的增塑剂，也被广泛用于电子电气产品的制造中。
然而，过量的邻苯二甲酸二辛酯对人体和环境都可能构成危害。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
《电子信息产品污染防治管理办法》规定，自2006年7月1日起，列入电子信息产品污染重点防治目录中的电子信息产品中不得含有铅、汞、镉、六价铬、聚合溴化联本醚和聚合溴化联本及其他有毒有害物质。
对于2006年7月1日以前的一段时间，要求电子信息产品制造商们实行有毒有害物质的减量化生产措施，并积极寻找可替代品。
同时，一个名为“电子信息产品污染防治标准工作组”的机构也已经开始筹备成立，该机构的主要任务是研究和建立符合中国国情的电子信息产品污染防治标准，开展与电子信息产品污染防治有关的标准研究和制定工作，特别是加快制定急需的材料、工艺、测试方法和实验方法的基础标准。
RoHS认证周期：七个工作日RoHS禁止有害物质的测试标准及方法（目前所用的测试方法是业界默认的方法，并非欧盟强制规定的）
今年针对非金属ROHS检测强制执行ROHS 2.0，也就是ROHS 10项检测，其中除了之前ROHS 6项中的铅，镉，汞，六价铬，多溴联本，多溴联本醚之外，还增加了邻苯二甲酸盐中的三项，和六溴环十二烷，一共增加了四项。
所以现在非金属检测ROHS 2.0的都是检测这10项，金属ROHS检测不变。