零基础考生考研英语阅读高分复习经验_毙考题
2021考研英语阅读真题：考研英语(一)第3篇 - 毙考题
2021考研英语阅读真题：考研英语（一）第3篇 - 毙考题毙考题APP2021考研英语阅读真题：考研英语（一）第3篇The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions pu blished in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE).Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrut iny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said:“The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the rese arch we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he “found the foresight b ehind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.考试使用毙考题，不用再报培训班邀请码：8806毙考题APPThis impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in stat istical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2021, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.总主编马西娅・麦克娜特今天宣布：《科学》杂志在同行评阅之外又增加一轮数据审查。
考研英语阅读真题：考研英语(一)第1篇_毙考题
2016考研英语阅读真题：考研英语（一）第1篇France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for woman.Its lawmakers gave preliminary approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra-thin models on runways.The parliament also agreed to ban websites that “incite excessive thinness” by promoting extreme dieting.Such measures have a couple of uplifting motives.They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up with impinging on health.That’s a start.And the ban on ultra-thin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to death – as some have done.It tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends women, especially teenage girls, about the social tape – measure they must use to determine their individual worth.The bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to woman (and many men)that they should not let others be arbiters of their beauty.And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to intangible qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or wasp-waist physiques.The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skin-deep-and bone-showing.Under the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a government-defined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.The fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in focusing on material adornment and idealized body types.In Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set voluntary standard for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement.In contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules and sanctions regarding age, health, and other characteristics of models.The newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical charter clearly states, we are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.The charter’s main tool of enforcement is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week(CFW), which is run by the Danish Fashion Institute.But in general it relies on a name-and–shame method of compliance.Relying on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best step.Even better would be to help elevate notions of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular industry.法国一向以作为全球时尚革新者为傲，如今它已决定其时尚产业已经失去了定义女性体型美的绝对权力。
考研英语一阅读理解的技巧和方法
考研英语一阅读理解的技巧和方法一、技巧1. 仔细阅读题目在开始阅读文章之前，一定要仔细阅读题目，明确题目的要求，确定题目中的关键词，这有助于在阅读文章时有针对性地寻找答案。
2. 理清文章结构阅读理解文章一般包括题干、选项和文章三个部分，而文章的结构大多有开头、中间和结尾三个部分。
理清文章结构可以帮助我们更好地理解文章的内容和逻辑关系。
3. 掌握解题技巧在考研英语一阅读理解中，常见的解题技巧包括精读和泛读相结合、排除法和选项分析等。
掌握这些解题技巧可以帮助我们更快更准确地找到答案。
4. 注重细节把握在阅读文章时，一定要注重细节把握，有时候答案就隐藏在文章的细枝末节中。
要善于捕捉文章中的细节信息，从中寻找答案。
二、方法1. 多读英文文章多读英文文章是提高阅读理解能力的有效方法。
通过阅读英文文章，可以提高我们的阅读速度和理解能力，培养对英文语境的适应能力。
2. 多做模拟题通过做大量的考研英语一阅读理解的模拟题，可以帮助我们熟悉题型和题目，掌握解题技巧，提高解题效率和准确率。
3. 多积累词汇在阅读理解中，词汇是理解文章的基础，因此要多积累词汇，提高词汇量，以便更好地理解文章内容。
4. 注重语法和逻辑英语阅读理解考试涉及到语法和逻辑的使用，因此要抓住语法和逻辑的要点，加强语法和逻辑的训练，以提高阅读理解能力。
5. 注重专业知识考研英语一阅读理解中，经常涉及到一些专业知识，因此要注重积累和掌握专业知识，以便更好地理解和解答相关题目。
三、总结考研英语一阅读理解是考研英语一部分中的重要组成部分，对于考研学子来说，掌握好阅读理解的技巧和方法对提高考研英语一的成绩至关重要。
通过合理的技巧和方法的运用，相信大家一定可以在考研英语一阅读理解中取得理想的成绩。
在考研英语一阅读理解中，除了掌握技巧和方法外，还需要注重平时的积累和训练。
以下是一些延伸的内容，希望对大家在备战考研英语一阅读理解中有所帮助。
四、积累词汇的方法1. 阅读英文报纸、杂志和书籍多读英文报纸、杂志和书籍可以帮助我们了解不同领域的词汇，并学习如何在不同语境中使用这些词汇。
考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2)-毙考题
考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2)阅读是考研英语的重要题型之一，也是保障英语成绩的关键题目。
因此，考研学子们要充分重视英语阅读，除了平时多多阅读英语杂志、报纸外，还需要针对阅读进行专项训练。
小编整理了关于考研英语阅读题源的系列文章考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2)，请参考!Who s the Smart Sibling?Ten weeks ago, Bo Cleveland and his wife embarked on a highly unscientific experiment-they gave birth to their first child. For now, Cleveland is too exhausted to even consider having another baby, but eventually, he will. In fact, hes already planned an egalitarian strategy for raising the rest of his family. Little Arthur won t get any extra attention just because he s the firstborn, and, says his father, he probably won t be much smarter than his future .siblings; either. It s the sort of thing many parents would say, but it s a bit surprising coming from Cleveland,who studies birth order and IQ at Pennsylvania State University. As he knows too well, a study published recently in the journal Science suggests that firstborns do turn out sharper than their brothers and sisters, no matter how parents try to compensate. Is Cleveland wrong? Is Arthur destined to be the smart sibling just because he had the good luck to be born first?For decades, scientists have been squabbling over birth order like siblings fighting over a toy. Some of them say being a first-, middle- or lastborn has significant effects on intelligence. Others say that s nonsense, The spat goes back at least as far as Alfred Adler, a Freud-era psychologist who argued that firstborns had an edge. Other psychologists found his theory easy to believemiddle and youngest kids already had a bad rap, thanks to everything from primogeniture laws to the Prodigal Son. When they set out to confirm the birth-order effects Adler had predicted, they found some evidence. Dozens of studies over the next several decades showed small differences in IQ; scholastic-aptitude tests and other measures of achievement So did anecdata suggesting that firstborns were more likely to win Nobel Prizes or become (ahem) prominent psychologists.But even though the scientists were turning up birth-order patterns easily, they couldn tpin down a cause. Perhaps, one theory went, the mother s body was somehow attacking the lateroffspring in uterus. Maternal antibody levels do increase with each successive pregnancy. Butthere s no evidence that this leads to differences in intelligence, and the new study in Silence,based on records from nearly a quarter of a million young Norwegian men, strikes down theantibody hypothesis. It looks at kids who are the eldest by accident-those whose older siblingsdie in infancy--as well as those who are true firstborns. Both groups rack up the same highscores on IQ tests. Whatever is lowering the latterborns scores, it isn t prenatal biology, sincebeing raised as the firstborn, not actually being the firstborn, is what counts.The obvious culprits on the nurture side are parents. But it s hard to think that favoritism toward firstborns exists in modem society. Most of us no longer view secondborn as second best, and few parents will admit to treating their kids differently. In surveys, they generally say they give their children equal attention. Kids concur, reporting that they feel they re treated fairly.Maybe, then, the problem with latterborns isn t nature or nurture-maybe there simply isn t a problem. Not all the research shows a difference in intelligence. A pivotal 2000 study by Joe Rodgers ,now a professor emeritus at the University of Oklahoma, found no link between birth order and smarts. And an earlier study of American families found that the youngest kids, not theoldest, did best in school. From that work, say psychologist Judith Rich Harris, a prominent critic of birth-order patterns, it s clear that the impression that the firstborn is more often the academic achiever is false.Meanwhile, many of the studies showing a birth-order pattern in IQ have a big, fat,methodological flaw. The Norwegian Science study is an example, says Cleveland: It scomparing Bill, the first child in one family; to Bob, the second child in another family. Thatwould be fine if all families were identical, but of course they aren t. The study controls forvariables such as parental education and family size. But Rodgers, the Oklahoma professor,notes that there are hundreds of other factors in play; and because it s so hard to discountall of them, he s not sure whether the patterns in the Science article are real.No one is more sensitive to that criticism than the Norwegian scientists. In fact, theyalready have an answer ready in the form of a second paper. Soon to be published in thejournal Intelligence, it s, similar to the Science study except for one big thing: instead ofcomparing Bill to Bob, it compares Bill to younger brothers Barry and Barney. The samebirth- order pattern shows up: the firstborns, on average, score about two points higher thantheir secondborn brothers, and hapless thirdborns do even worse. The purpose of thetwo papers was exactly the same, says Petter Kristensen of Norway s National Instituteof Occupational Health, who led both new studies. But this second one is much more comprehensive, and in a sense it s better than the Science paper. The data are there--within families, birth order really does seem linked to brain power. Even the critics have to soften their positions a little. The Intelligence study must be taken very seriously says Rodgers.No one, not even Kristensen, thinks the debate is over For one thing, there s still that argument about what s causing birth-order effects. It s possible, says UC Berkeley researcher Frank Sulloway, that trying .to treat kids in an evenhanded way in fact results in inequity. Well-meaning parents may end up shortchanging middleborns because there s one thing they can t equalize: at no point in the middle child s life does he get to be the only kid inthe house. Alternatively, says Sulloway; there s the theory he has his money on, the family- niche hypothesis Older kids, whether out of desire or necessity axe often called on to be assistant parents, he notes. Getting that early- taste of responsibility may prime them for achievement later on. If they think Oh, I m supposed to be more intelligent so I d betterdo my homework, it doesn t matter if they actually are more-intelligent, says Sulloway, Itbecomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. If the firstborns homework involves reading Science and Intelligence, there ll be no stopping them now.词汇注解重点单词embark / im ba:k/【文中释义】v.着手，从事【大纲全义】v. (使)上船(或飞机，汽车等)：着手，从事extra / ekstr /【文中释义】adj.额外的【大纲全义】adj额外的，附加的n.附加物，额外的东西adv.特别地compensate / kɔmpənseit/【文中释义】v.补偿，弥补【大纲全义】v.(for)补偿，赔偿，抵消nonsense / nɔnsəns/【文中释义】n.荒谬的言行，胡话【大纲全义】n.胡说，废话;冒失(或轻浮)的行为rap / r p/【文中释义】n.不公正的判决，苛评【大纲全义】n.叩击，轻拍，斤责，急敲(声);不公正的判决，苛评，v. 敲，拍，打，斤责，使着迷predict / pri dikt/【文中释义】v.预言【大纲全义】v.预言，预测，预告prominent / prɔminənt/【文中释义】adj杰出的【大纲全义】adj.突起的，凸出的;突出的，杰出的offspring /ɔfspriŋ; (us) ɔ:f-/【文中释义】n..子孙,后代【大纲全义】n. 子孙,后代,结果，产物;(动物的)崽successive /sək sesiv/【文中释义】adj.连续的【大纲全义】adj.接连的，连续的pregnancy / Pregnənsi/【文中释义】n.怀孕【大纲全义】n.妊振;怀孕(期);(事件等的)酝酿;(内容)充实，富有意义nurture / nə: tʃə/【文中释义】n.养育，教育【大纲全义】n.营养品;养育，培养，滋养v. 给予营养物，养育，培养，滋养超纲单词egalitarian n. 平等主义sibling n. 兄弟妞妹squabble v. 为争吵spat n. 争吵primogeniture n. 长子身份aptitude n. 才能，资质anecdata n. 二逸事证据prenatal adj. 产前的，出生前的重点段落译文两周前，伯克利夫兰和他的妻子进行了一项非常不科学的实验他们生下了他们的第一个孩子。
考研er：你的英语备考规划已到请签收毙考题
考研er：你的英语备考规划已到－请签收-毙考题————————————————————————————————作者：————————————————————————————————日期:ﻩ２019考研er:你的英语备考规划已到,请签收摘要:聪明的１9考研eｒ早早都在开始准备了,备考初阶段,一个完备的规划可以让我们尽快的进入备考状态,高效学习。
ﻪﻪﻭﻭﻭﻪ▶概况篇ﻭﻪﻪﻭ英语是全国统考的三门公共课之一。
考试时间安排在第一天的下午，时长为3个小时,满分１0０分。
ﻭﻭﻪﻪﻭﻪﻭ有过考研经验，或对考研有大概了解的同学应该知道,考研英语是没有听力的。
相信这对不擅长听力的小伙伴来说是个极好的消息。
考研英语试卷由以下几部分组成：ﻪﻪﻭﻭﻪ1.完形填空(10分)。
共2０个空,每空0．5分。
这种题每年的平均分不是很高,在多数考生看来有些鸡肋,食之无味又弃之可惜。
大多数辅导老师都会建议学生在考试的最后１０-2０分钟作答。
ﻪﻪﻪ2.阅读理解(6０分)。
采用4＋1+１的形式,阅读Ａ部分有4篇文章(每篇文章400词左右）,每篇文章有5道题目,每题2分,共40分;阅读B部分有1篇文章,又叫新题型（500词左右)，有几种题型供选择，比如句子匹配题和段落匹配题以及小标题题型等。
通俗的说新题型有点像长胖了的完型填空（也就是填词变成了填句子）,或者粉碎性骨折的完形填空(文章段落顺序完全打乱让你还原正确的段落顺序)。
ﻪﻭﻪﻭ阅读理解这50分无疑是你整个英语复习过程中的重中之重。
好了，现在大家应该知道历届研友口中的得阅读者得天下是怎么来的了吧。
ﻪﻭﻭﻭ 3.这里把阅读C部分(1０分)单拿出来说，也是一篇文章，另一个名字是我们熟知的英译汉。
这部分英语一和英语二稍有区别,英语一是句子翻译，把文章中的5处划线句子（150词左右吧)翻译成中文即可;英语二是段落翻译，要求把１50词左右的一段或两段文章全部翻译。
ﻭﻭﻭ这个题看似简单，其实在整个英语试卷中得分率很低,多年平均分都是３分上下。
【英语答题技巧】英语答题顺序及时间安排_毙考题
【英语答题技巧】英语答题顺序及时间安排毙考题说：考场上可谓是争分夺秒，每一分钟都不应该白白浪费。
因此，每一位考研er都要在考前对答题顺序及时间安排提前做好准备，打好心理建设，力求认真对待每一道题，保持最好的状态，发挥最优的水平。
▶时间分配在做题时间的安排上，我们必须要遵守的一大原则是：时间分配与题目分值成正比。
分值越高的题目，得分的机会相应也较大，若能留足时间，认真作答，自然更易摘得高分，与其他考生拉开差距。
与此相对的，在一些分值相对较低的题型中，考生们的得分普遍相近，得分率较低，在此类题型上花费太多时间是极不明智的。
从上述原则出发，考研英语的传统阅读理解（40分）和作文（30分）共70分，是重中之重，要求我们为其留足时间。
一般来说，四篇阅读理解文章，做题时间在60分钟到70分钟之间；建议每篇文章花费15分钟时间，如果有个别较难的文章，可以多花点时间，但是不要超过20分钟。
作文时间则应该严格控制在40分钟之内，小作文15分钟，大作文25分钟足矣，其关键是要紧扣题目、层次清晰、思路明确，并辅以标准的语言表达。
剩下的三类题型，完型填空、翻译、新题型，各占10分。
从近年的真题走势来看，新题型部分的难度并不是很大，20分钟足以又快又好地将其完成；翻译既考察翻译能力，又考察阅读技巧，有一定难度，考生普遍不高，建议将时间控制在20分钟以内；完形填空题量大，难度高，分值低，包括填涂答题卡在内，最多花15分钟。
当然，上述时间分配不是固定不变的，考生可以根据自己答题情况灵活调整，关键是牢牢把握住核心原则，把时间花在最容易产生效益的地方。
▶做题顺序考研英语的答题顺序要因人而异的，考生可以根据自身答题情况来调整顺序，使自己达到最佳应试状态。
但根据上述时间分配原则，并结合各类题型的特点，我们依然可以探寻出一条相对高效的答题之路。
开考后，建议考生优先解答作文、阅读两大题型。
关于作文，大部分考生都会在考前复习时准备不同题材的作文模板，趁着刚刚开考，记忆尚且清晰，审题结束后便可直接套用，相对来说容易写得顺畅，做下面的题也会更有信心。
考研英语阅读真题：考研英语(二)第篇_毙考题
2012考研英语阅读真题：考研英语（二）第1篇Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, L.A. Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.District administrators say that homework will still be a pat of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see vey little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its stude nts’ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does nothing to ensure that the homework students are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for L.A. Unified to do homework right.家庭作业从来就没有受到学生甚至家长的真正欢迎，但最近几年来，家庭作业却受到人们的鄙视。
考研英语阅读答题技巧总结
考研阅读技巧一、考研阅读的整体解题思路与步骤时间分配：每篇16分钟最佳，最多可延长至20分钟左右。
第一步：快速划出段落序号以及各段首句分钟第二步：阅读首段，了解文章主题（Theme）1-2分钟宏观把握，随机应变，根据第一段内容，才能更好的给定位打下基础。
第三步：扫描题干，尽量找出题干能够提供的信息（Key Words）1分钟定位词的优先考虑顺序:1、首先标出明确告诉位置的题目所在（某段某行）2、专有名词优先，包括人名、地名、书名以及带引号的词等3、数字、时间、时段（包括某些介词短语）4、较长、较复杂的词组（名词动词词组优先）5、重要的动词、形容词或副词等实词6、条件词、因果词、比较词等虚词（往往起到辅助作用）第四步：变速浏览原文，抓住中心 7-8分钟注意把握三个阅读原则：原则一：首段原则（文章的第一段逐字读明白，可以反复和回读）原则二：首末句原则（其余各段的首尾句要细读，其他各句正常阅读即可）原则三：“路标”原则。
所谓路标词，就是表示作者思想衔接和转折的功能词汇。
1、中心词2、转折词3、态度词4、例证词5、列举词（具体请见第四部分）第五步：仔细审题，定位原文 3-5分钟原则一：关键词定位原则原则二：自然段定位原则原则三：长难句定位原则注意一：关键词在原文可能是原词本身，也可能是关键词的同义词。
注意二：问原因的问题，一般问主要原因（major reason）注意三：“邪恶的眼睛”（in the eyes of），注意问的是谁的观点和态度。
第六步：重叠选项，斟酌答案。
3-5分钟原则：不能仅凭借印象做题，考研阅读的干扰项干扰性巨大，除了理解原文，分辨正确和错误的选项也是一种重要的基本功。
一般对原文进行同义替换的是答案：同义替换的手段有：a)关键词替换 b)句型替换 c)正话反说 d)语言简化（总之，换汤不换药！）原则一：选最佳答案而不是正确答案（四个选项都要认真看，不能偏心）。
原则二：不放过任何一个选项，仔细读每个选项，鉴于强干扰性，要求必须记住：选一个选项应有选的理由，不选一个选项也应有不选的理由。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
零基础考生考研英语阅读高分复习经验
考研英语分客观题60分(包括10分完型、40分阅读、10分新题型)和主观题40分(包括10分翻译、10分小作文、20分大作文)。
主观题，视水区旱区而定，不同地区没有可比性。
而客观题，答案是唯一的，不管英语想过线的还是英语想拿高分的，客观题都不能有失。
下面为大家分享一位过来人的阅读复习经验，希望能够帮助大家。
▶词汇
词汇是基础，大纲词汇必须掌握。
阅读中如果一句话中有一两个单词不认识，很可能导致这句话的意思搞错，甚至把整篇文章的主导思想搞错;如果问题选项中有单词不认识就更麻烦了。
说一下自己的体会，一开始做阅读练习的时候，错一大片，有时候甚至错一半，当时真是怕英语不过线，然后我痛定思痛，认真总结了阅读错的原因，我发现，是因为词汇关没过，文中一些单词不认识导致对文章关键句甚至作者的主体思想理解错误。
所以我下决心一定要攻克单词关，从论坛上学习了不少前辈的经验，受益匪浅，有一个学长说的很好，不要指望在一个地方将单词记住，关键是要在不同的地方去记忆或者练习同一个单词，我很以为然，于是去寻找快速记忆的捷径，最终搜了一款迈西背单词软件将单词过了一遍，说实话，我不推荐每个人都用软件记单词，因为不方便携带，我在电脑旁足足坚忍了20多天，每天将近2个小时，有时候眼睛都有点酸，终于将单词搞完了一轮，才长出一口气。
一轮下来(其实不止一轮，因为软件有循环记忆，不熟练的单词从不同程度上重复记忆了很多次)，虽然有些单词还是没有完全记住，但大致都留了一个印象，在做阅读的时候明显有了感觉，结合上下文和脑海中残留的模糊的印象，基本能猜出单词的意思，这样阅读难度就降低了许多，而且这样过后，这个单词我也基本上掌握了，可以说是一举两得。
最后做往年真题的时候，近几年的真题阅读都是错1个或全对，考研时阅读就错了1个，错的那个争议也比较大，不可强求吧。
更重要的是英语掌握了得当的方法，节省了很多时间，可以投入更多的精力在数学和专业课上。
因此，要想阅读得高分，必须首先攻克单词。
▶阅读技巧
核心思想就是分块阅读。
一篇阅读有5个问题，每个问题是按顺序分布的。
比如说一篇阅读有5段，第一问在第一段中找答案，第二问在第二段中找，以此类推，这就是所谓的分块阅读法，分块阅读的基础就是——题目是按顺序分块设置的。
至于如何在块中发现答案，要找的就是同义替换，下文中会有详细介绍。
(当然诸如这篇文章的题目应选什么? 的问题除外，需要结合整篇文章作答，不过这类问题很少)
因此阅读的技巧和关键就在于通过问题分解文章，缩小每次的阅读内容，各个击破。
切记不要一口气读完文章后将5个问题一齐作答，一来记不住文章的要点和细节，二来会中出题人的陷阱(干扰项其实就是在细节上做手脚)，如偷梁换柱等。
阅读的方法如下：
(1)扫一遍5个问题，对题干信息有个印象，看一眼就行了，不需要记住。
然后按顺序精读，对含有题干信息的语句仔细阅读。
另外，留意Which of
thefollowing would be the best title of the test? 、The author’s
attitudetowards… 这之类的问题，在分解阅读时可以顺便留意一下作者的观点态度。
(2)第一个问题，答案一般就在第一段。
后面几问同理，这样整篇文章被分解成四五个部分，一部分最多三四个长句，对每个部分认真阅读，目标清晰，很容易得到正解;同时，每个部分，废话居多，真正的答案往往就其中一句话或其中一个关键短语，选对选项的关键在于找
准同义替换(有种题型不能用找同义替换的方法，后面的补充说明里有讲)。
(3)正确的选项往往以同义替换的形式出现。
这一点是成败的关键，考研英语阅读的每一个问题都是非常严谨的，其严谨在于：正确选项实质上就是原文中某句话的同义替换，而不是靠蒙和猜，正确选项一定能在原文中找到相应的依据。
同义替换分2种。
第1种是：正确选项中的某个短语和原文中的某个短语意思相同，如explore和probe都是探索，shared和collective都是共同的，purchase和for
the sale都表示交易、买卖第2种是：正确选项是对原文中某句话的概括，如：discoveryis described as seeingwhat
everybody has seen and thinking what nobody hasthought 概括起来就是scientific work
calls for acritical mind (当然这里critical的一词多义要非常熟悉才行); Politicians have
repeatedly backloaded public-sector pay deals, keeping the pay increases modest
but addingto holidaysand especially pensions that are already generous 概括起来就是
the incomein the statesector is indirectly
augmented (第二个例子的意思是国有部门虽然工资没涨太多但是其福利奖金有所增加，所以概括起来就是间接地增加了国有部门收入)。
(4)注意出题人设置干扰项时的惯用伎俩。
干扰项无非以下几种：
①偷梁换柱：原文中说人物A做了事件B ，干扰项为可能为人物C做了事件B ，而人物C其实在原文中另一处出现的。
如果仅凭印象选择，很容易出错。
②前后混淆：如人物A在文中第3段提出了某观点，干扰项可能为第1段里的某个观点，前后顺序颠倒。
原理上与偷梁换柱差不多。
③以偏概全：原文中说事件A的必要条件是B、C、D ，干扰项可能为如果B发生，则A一定发生。
④过度引申：原文中说A今天做了某件事，干扰项可能为A经常做这件事
⑤无中生有：干扰项是YY出来的，在原文中找不到依据，比过度引申更离谱
⑥曲解原文：原文中说A很好，干扰项可能为A不好，当然不会这么直接
结合原文，以原文为依据，排除干扰选项。
切记凭感觉答题。
总结起来，阅读的技巧就是：
一个问题一个问题地将文章分块→读懂每块的长难句→以原文为依据→找准同义替换、排除干扰项
▶长难句
如果单词没问题，那唯一的难点就只剩长难句，实际上考研阅读的每个段落就三四个长难句。
攻克长难句，笨方法就是找主谓宾这些，弄清楚谁做了什么，怎么做的。
而实际上，英语的句式和中文有少许差异，这就是阅读时的难点。
但是要知道，长难句的句式也就那几种。
只要把考研英语往年阅读真题(四五套就够了)里的每个句式都搞懂，长难句的问题基本上可以迎刃而解。
如果单词和长难句都能搞定，就能保证文章能看懂，再按上面所说的分块阅读法做，阅读自然不在话下。
切记，读长难句时一定要心平气和，不要贪快，特别是基础不太好的同学，一眼扫过一个长句是不可能看懂的。
一开始练习阅读的时候不要贪快，
先慢慢按方法来，有了一定的正确率之后，再逐步加快速度。
总之，阅读的方法很重要，并不是说你把张剑的150篇、张锦芯的200篇等等全做一遍，最后就能拿高分。
盲目地做题，可能的结果就是做的题很多，但每次都错很多，没有提高。
我一开始也是做了一些阅读练习，但是做了没提高，有时候错得少，有时候错很多，完全是靠运气在做阅读，而不是实力。
最后我反思了自己的问题，前面已经说过了，先攻克单词，再用分块阅读法，最后能稳定到错一个或全对的程度，这才是应该到达的目的。
方法最重要，不要盲目做题。
英语基础不好的同学，不要怕英语，四六级没考好很可能就是你没掌握得当的方法，只要你肯摸索、肯总结、肯吃苦(背单词一定要肯吃苦)，就一定能成功!
最后和大家说：我想，每一次都推荐一下对大家都非常有用的信息，只推荐三个有用的，其他的我觉得都没什么意思，每一次推荐都不容易，希望大家珍惜。
大家有选择性的看，都是个人觉得非常好的。
一切都做了，离成功就近了，好运与机遇就会降临。
请大家多关注，我常常会推荐一些很好用的东西给大家。
推荐快速学习一下思维导图法与快速阅读法，对理解与记忆的帮助十分之大，里面有专门针对考研的课件，对于时间不够用，效率低的同学特别适用，本人切身体验，目前我的阅读速度是5000字/分钟，看书、复习的效率相信大家也明白，没用不会推荐希望对大家也有帮助!
另外由衷提醒大家，你要成功考上，光靠你报报班、看看书是完全不够，我们需要的不仅仅是大量复习、大量看书，我真的觉得快速阅读法是非常适合考研的同学使用的。