英语辩论-克隆合法化

克隆合法化

正方：

Though clone exists all kinds of questions, it is useful for us. Any technology has its own problems, we can’t abandon it because of some disadvantages of it. Besides, we can try it gradually instead of coming into use in a short time. We can believe that reasonable using upon clone may lead us to a bright future.

即使克隆存在着这样或那样的问题，但它依旧对我们是有利的。任何的技术，都存在着它本身的问题，我们不能因为它的某些问题而去放弃发展。此外，我们可以一点一点地推动克隆的发展与使用，没必要一下子就把克隆推出来。我相信，合理地利用克隆，可以让我们人类有一个美好的未来。

补充观点：

1.Infertility people can get a child through cloning.

不育者可以借此方式获得孩子。

2.We can save endangers enimals in this way.

我们还可以通过这种方式拯救濒危动物。

3.In a way, it can make a good balance on gender(性别).

某种程度上，我们可以通过这种方式是性别比例平衡

反方：

I think clone shouldn’t be legal. Now, human being still have no a wholesome system to co ntrol it.And it can’t be afforded for those who really want to clone, which is too expensive. In other words, clone is just a thing for the rich. Therefore, clone can not be a common science like lamp. So I think we shouldn’t make clone legal.

我认为克隆不应该被合法化。现在，人类始终还没有一个完整的体制去控制这门技术。同时，对于那些真正想”克隆“的人来说，它太昂贵了。换句话说，克隆只是富人的”克隆”。因此，克隆无法成为像灯泡那样的大众科学。所以我认为不能让克隆合法化。

补充观点：

1.It breaks biodiversity(生物多样性)，and oneness（单一性）will appear.

克隆会破坏生物多样性，造成单一性的出现

2.It will be used by heresy (邪教) easily. And it will do harm to the safety of society.

会被邪教组织所利用，危害社会。

3.The man who were cloned will be discriminated(歧视) easily.

克隆人容易在社会中受到歧视。