Clump Distance to the Magellanic Clouds and Anomalous Colors in the Galactic Bulge

合集下载

现代科技拉进了人与人之间的距离的英语作文

现代科技拉进了人与人之间的距离的英语作文Modern technology has undoubtedly brought about numerous advancements that have transformed the way we live our lives. However, one concerning aspect of these technological developments is the growing distance between people. In the age of digital communication and social media, we find ourselves increasingly isolated from face-to-face interactions and genuine human connections.The rise of smartphones and instant messaging applications has revolutionized the way we communicate. Gone are the days when people would physically meet to catch up or have a meaningful conversation. Instead, we now rely on a constant stream of text messages, emojis, and short updates to stay connected with our friends and loved ones. While these tools may provide a sense of immediacy and convenience, they often lack the depth and emotional nuance that comes with in-person interactions.Moreover, the constant need to be connected to our devices has led to a phenomenon known as "phubbing," where individuals ignorethe people around them in favor of their phones. This behavior not only undermines the quality of our interpersonal relationships but also contributes to a growing sense of social isolation. Studies have shown that excessive screen time and digital engagement can lead to feelings of loneliness, depression, and anxiety, as we become increasingly disconnected from the physical world and the people in it.Another significant impact of modern technology on human relationships is the prevalence of social media. While platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were initially designed to bring people together, they have often had the opposite effect. Instead of fostering genuine connections, these platforms have created a curated and often idealized version of our lives, leading to a sense of comparison and envy among users. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy and a disconnect from the authentic experiences of our peers.Furthermore, the anonymity and lack of face-to-face interaction on social media can encourage people to engage in cyberbullying, trolling, and other forms of online harassment. This can have devastating consequences on the mental health and well-being of individuals, particularly vulnerable populations such as teenagers and young adults.In addition to the impact on interpersonal relationships, modern technology has also influenced the way we approach romantic relationships. The rise of dating apps and online dating platforms has transformed the way we meet and interact with potential partners. While these tools can provide a convenient way to connect with a larger pool of potential matches, they can also contribute to a more superficial and transactional approach to relationships. The ease of swiping and the abundance of options can lead to a "fear of missing out" mentality, where individuals are constantly seeking the next best thing, rather than investing in meaningful connections.Moreover, the reliance on digital communication in romantic relationships can also lead to misunderstandings and a lack of emotional intimacy. Without the nonverbal cues and physical presence that come with in-person interactions, it can be challenging to convey the depth of our feelings and emotions effectively.Despite these challenges, it is important to recognize that modern technology is not inherently negative. When used in moderation and with intention, these tools can actually enhance our ability to stay connected with loved ones, access information, and explore new opportunities. The key is to find a balance between digital engagement and face-to-face interactions, and to prioritize the cultivation of meaningful relationships and genuine human connections.One potential solution to the growing distance between people in the digital age is to encourage more intentional and mindful use of technology. This could involve setting boundaries around screen time, actively engaging in offline activities and social events, and prioritizing quality time with loved ones. Additionally, educational initiatives and public awareness campaigns could help to raise awareness about the importance of maintaining a healthy balance between digital and physical interactions.Furthermore, the development of more socially conscious and community-oriented technology could also play a role in bridging the gap. For example, some social media platforms are exploring ways to foster more meaningful connections and facilitate in-person meetups and events. Similarly, advancements in virtual and augmented reality technologies could potentially create new avenues for more immersive and engaging forms of digital interaction.In conclusion, the impact of modern technology on human relationships is a complex and multifaceted issue. While these advancements have undoubtedly brought about many benefits, they have also contributed to a growing sense of distance and isolation between people. By recognizing the importance of maintaining a healthy balance between digital and physical interactions, and by exploring innovative solutions to foster more meaningfulconnections, we can work towards a future where technology enhances, rather than hinders, our ability to connect with one another.。

鲸鱼的歌唱：深海的回声英语作文

The Singing of Whales:Echoes of the Deep SeaWhales,the majestic creatures of the ocean,are known for their enchanting songs that resonate through the deep sea.Their melodic and complex vocalizations have captivated scientists and enthusiasts alike, sparking curiosity about the purpose and significance of their songs. Here are some reasons why the singing of whales is considered a fascinating phenomenon:Communication and Social Bonds:Whales use their songs as a means of communication within their social groups.These songs are often sung by male whales during the mating season to attract females and establish dominance.They serve as a way for whales to communicate their presence,location,and reproductive readiness.The intricate patterns and variations in their songs suggest a sophisticated form of communication.Cultural Transmission:Whales exhibit cultural behaviors,including their songs,which are passed down from generation to generation within their populations.Each population of whales has its unique song patterns,which can evolve and change over time.This cultural transmission of songs highlights the social learning and intelligence of whales.Long-Distance Communication:Whales'songs can travel vast distances through the ocean,thanks to the unique acoustic properties of water. These low-frequency sounds can travel for hundreds of miles,allowing whales to communicate with individuals in distant locations.The ability to communicate over long distances is crucial for maintaining social bonds,locating food sources,and navigating the vast ocean.Complex Song Structures:Whale songs are incredibly complex, consisting of a series of repeated phrases and themes.These songs can last for hours and contain a wide range of vocalizations,including clicks, whistles,and melodic patterns.The complexity of their songs suggests alevel of intelligence and cognitive abilities beyond what was previously understood.Emotional Expression:Whales'songs are believed to convey emotions and express individual identities.The melodic and haunting nature of their songs evokes a sense of beauty and mystery.Researchers have observed changes in the pitch,rhythm,and intensity of whale songs, suggesting that they may reflect the emotional state or intentions of the singing whale.Scientific Research and Conservation:Studying whale songs provides valuable insights into the behavior,population dynamics,and migration patterns of these magnificent creatures.Scientists use acoustic monitoring to track and analyze whale songs,contributing to our understanding of their complex social structures and the health of their populations.Conservation efforts aim to protect whales and their habitats,ensuring the continuation of their mesmerizing songs.In conclusion,the singing of whales is a captivating and mysterious phenomenon that serves as a form of communication,social bonding, and cultural transmission within their populations.Their complex and melodic songs travel through the deep sea,carrying echoes of their presence and emotions.Understanding and appreciating the significance of whale songs is crucial for their conservation and the preservation of the enchanting marine ecosystems they inhabit.。

方圆不独行,携手抵妙境作文

方圆不独行,携手抵妙境作文英文回答：Collaboration is a powerful tool that allows us to achieve incredible feats. When we work together, we can overcome challenges and reach new heights. This is especially true when it comes to exploring the unknown and venturing into uncharted territories. By joining forces, we can navigate the complexities of the world and discover the wonders that lie beyond.For example, imagine a group of scientists from different countries coming together to study the depths of the ocean. Each scientist brings their unique expertise and perspective, contributing to a collective understanding of the underwater world. Through their collaboration, they are able to uncover new species, understand marine ecosystems, and make groundbreaking discoveries.Collaboration not only enhances our knowledge andunderstanding, but it also fosters innovation. When diverse minds come together, they bring with them a wealth of ideas and perspectives. This diversity of thought sparkscreativity and leads to the development of new solutionsand technologies. By working together, we can tackle complex problems and find innovative ways to address them.Furthermore, collaboration promotes mutual support and growth. When we collaborate, we create a supportive environment where individuals can learn from one anotherand grow together. We can share our strengths and weaknesses, and help each other overcome obstacles. This sense of camaraderie and support fosters personal and professional growth, enabling us to become better versionsof ourselves.中文回答：合作是一种强大的工具，使我们能够实现令人难以置信的壮举。

海天奇观的名词解释英文

海天奇观的名词解释英文在这个广袤而神秘的地球上，自然界无处不在展现着令人叹为观止的景象。

其中，海洋和天空的交汇处，即海天奇观，以其壮美和神秘感而备受人们的关注。

下面，我们将对海天奇观的名词解释进行英文介绍。

1. 英文名词：Oceanic Aerial Phenomenon解释：Oceanic指的是海洋的，Aerial指的是与天空有关的，Phenomenon表示现象。

因此，Oceanic Aerial Phenomenon可以被理解为海洋和天空交汇处的奇观现象。

2. 英文名词：Marine Celestial Spectacle解释：Marine表示海洋的，Celestial表示天空的，Spectacle表示壮观的景象。

因此，Marine Celestial Spectacle可以被理解为海洋和天空交汇处的壮观景象。

3. 英文名词：Aqua-Cosmos Wonder解释：Aqua表示水的，Cosmos表示宇宙的，Wonder表示奇迹。

因此，Aqua-Cosmos Wonder可以被理解为水与宇宙交融处的奇迹。

4. 英文名词：Mystical Seasky Enigma解释：Mystical表示神秘的，Seasky表示海洋和天空，Enigma表示谜。

因此，Mystical Seasky Enigma可以被理解为神秘的海洋和天空之谜。

5. 英文名词：Oceanic Firmament Mirage解释：Oceanic表示海洋的，Firmament表示天空，Mirage表示幻象。

因此，Oceanic Firmament Mirage可以被理解为海洋与天空之间的幻象。

海天奇观是大自然中一种令人震撼和惊叹的现象，它们的出现常常超越了人类的想象力。

海洋在图景的边缘与蔚蓝的天空融为一体，创造出了一系列美丽而复杂的景观。

这些景象通常是由自然因素，如大气层和海洋的物理现象互相作用产生的。

例如，当太阳和海洋交织时，光线会发生折射和散射，形成令人惊叹的日落和日出景色。

知识的岛屿越大,无知的海岸线就越长英语作文

全文分为作者个人简介和正文两个部分：作者个人简介：Hello everyone, I am an author dedicated to creating and sharing high-quality document templates. In this era of information overload, accurate and efficient communication has become especially important. I firmly believe that good communication can build bridges between people, playing an indispensable role in academia, career, and daily life. Therefore, I decided to invest my knowledge and skills into creating valuable documents to help people find inspiration and direction when needed.正文：知识的岛屿越大,无知的海岸线就越长英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1The Larger the Island of Knowledge, the Longer the Shoreline of IgnoranceAs students, we are constantly in pursuit of knowledge, striving to expand the boundaries of our understanding andunravel the mysteries that surround us. However, the more we learn, the more we realize how vast the ocean of ignorance truly is. This paradoxical relationship between knowledge and ignorance is aptly captured in the phrase, "The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of ignorance."At the outset of our academic journey, we are like explorers venturing into uncharted territories, armed with a sense of curiosity and a thirst for discovery. The world around us is a tapestry of unanswered questions, and each new piece of information we acquire is akin to a small pebble added to the island of our knowledge. With every lesson learned, every concept mastered, and every theory grasped, we feel a sense of accomplishment, as if we have conquered a new frontier.Yet, as our island of knowledge grows, so too does our awareness of the vast expanse of ignorance that surrounds it. With each new discovery, we uncover a multitude of new questions, each one beckoning us to explore further. It is as if the shoreline of our island extends infinitely, revealing new horizons of inquiry and inviting us to venture into the depths of the unknown.This realization can be both exhilarating and humbling. On one hand, it ignites within us a passionate desire to push theboundaries of our understanding, to dive into the depths of unexplored realms, and to contribute to the ever-expanding body of human knowledge. We are driven by an insatiable curiosity, a hunger for intellectual stimulation, and a desire to make our mark on the world through our discoveries and insights.On the other hand, the vastness of our ignorance can be daunting, reminding us of the limitations of our finite minds and the sheer immensity of the universe we inhabit. We are confronted with the sobering truth that no matter how much we learn, there will always be more to uncover, more mysteries to solve, and more questions to ponder.This dichotomy between knowledge and ignorance is not a cause for despair, but rather a testament to the beauty and complexity of the world we inhabit. It is a reminder that learning is a lifelong journey, one that demands humility, perseverance, and an unwavering commitment to intellectual growth.As students, we must embrace this paradox and allow it to fuel our quest for understanding. We must approach each new lesson with an open mind, recognizing that what we learn today may be challenged or refined by the discoveries of tomorrow. We must cultivate a spirit of intellectual curiosity, always seekingto probe deeper, to question assumptions, and to explore alternative perspectives.Furthermore, we must celebrate the collective nature of human knowledge, recognizing that no individual can possibly possess all the answers. We stand on the shoulders of giants, building upon the foundations laid by countless scholars, scientists, and thinkers who have come before us. It is through collaboration, cross-pollination of ideas, and the sharing of discoveries that we can truly push the boundaries of our understanding.The journey of knowledge is one that is never truly complete, for with each answer we uncover, a multitude of new questions emerge. Yet, it is this very journey that makes the pursuit of learning so exhilarating and fulfilling. As students, we have the privilege and responsibility to embrace this paradox, to revel in the joys of discovery while humbly acknowledging the vast oceans of ignorance that surround us.So let us dive into the depths of our curiosity, let us explore the uncharted territories of knowledge, and let us embrace the ever-expanding shoreline of ignorance. For it is in this endless cycle of learning and questioning that we find the true essenceof intellectual growth and the profound beauty of the human experience.篇2The Bigger the Island of Knowledge, the Longer the Shoreline of IgnoranceEver since I was a little kid, I've been fascinated by the vast unknown. Looking up at the night sky, I was in awe of the twinkling stars and the mysteries they held. As I grew older and began learning more in school, my childlike wonder evolved into an intellectual curiosity about the depths of human knowledge. It was in one of my philosophy classes that I first encountered the profound metaphor: "The bigger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of ignorance." This idea resonated deeply with me and has continued to shape my perspective on learning and the pursuit of understanding.On the surface, the metaphor seems almost paradoxical. How can gaining more knowledge lead to increased ignorance? The answer lies in the nature of discovery itself. As we expand the boundaries of what is known, we invariably encounter new frontiers of the unknown. Much like an island's shoreline grows longer as its land mass increases, our awareness of the vastoceans of ignorance surrounding us expands in tandem with our acquisitions of knowledge.When I was a young student, my world of knowledge felt like a small, isolated island. The subjects I studied in elementary school – basic math, reading, writing, and science – were confined and well-defined. I could see the limits of my understanding, the shorelines were clear and close. However, as I progressed through my education, venturing into more advanced topics and specialized fields, the island grew. I learned about ancient civilizations, complex mathematical theories, intricate biological processes, and profound philosophical concepts. With each new discovery, novel fields of inquiry unveiled themselves, and the shorelines stretched further into the distance.It's a humbling realization that no matter how much we learn, there will always be an endless expanse of ignorance surrounding us. The more we know, the more we become aware of how much we don't know. This is not a cause for despair, however, but rather a testament to the boundless potential for growth and exploration that lies before us.One of the most exhilarating aspects of this metaphor is the implication that our journey of learning is never-ending. As wetraverse the shorelines of our current knowledge, venturing into the uncharted waters of ignorance, we inevitably discover new islands, new realms of understanding to explore and incorporate into our ever-expanding archipelago of knowledge.This process is not limited to the realm of academia or scientific endeavors; it permeates all facets of human experience. Every time we encounter a new culture, engage with a different perspective, or confront a complex challenge, we are presented with opportunities to expand our islands of knowledge and, consequently, reveal new shorelines of ignorance.The metaphor also serves as a potent reminder to approach knowledge with humility and an open mind. It would be folly to assume that our current understanding, no matter how vast, encompasses the entirety of truth or reality. There will always be aspects of the world, the universe, and the human experience that elude our comprehension, at least for the time being.As students, we must embrace this concept wholeheartedly. It is a call to maintain a sense of wonder, curiosity, and a thirst for learning that extends beyond the confines of our current curriculums or fields of study. We must be willing to question assumptions, challenge established paradigms, and venture intouncharted intellectual territories, for it is in those unexplored regions that the greatest discoveries and insights await.Furthermore, this metaphor encourages us to cultivate a sense of intellectual humility and respect for the perspectives and knowledge of others. Just as our individual islands of knowledge are surrounded by vast oceans of ignorance, so too are the collective islands of human understanding dwarfed by the enormity of the unknown. By recognizing the inherent limitations of our individual perspectives and embracing the diversity of knowledge and experiences that others bring to the table, we can collectively navigate the shorelines of ignorance more effectively.In practical terms, this metaphor can serve as a guiding principle for our approach to learning and problem-solving. When confronted with a complex issue or a gap in our understanding, we should not shy away from the discomfort of ignorance. Instead, we should embrace it as an opportunity to expand our knowledge, to venture beyond the familiar shorelines and explore the uncharted waters that lie beyond.This mindset fosters a culture of intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and a willingness to challenge preconceived notions. It encourages us to ask probing questions, seek out diverseperspectives, and engage in respectful discourse and debate. By doing so, we not only expand our individual islands of knowledge but also contribute to the collective growth of human understanding.Ultimately, the metaphor of "the bigger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of ignorance" is a profound and empowering concept that should shape our approach to learning and intellectual growth. It reminds us to embrace the vastness of the unknown with humility, curiosity, and a relentless pursuit of understanding. It challenges us to venture beyond the familiar shores, to explore new frontiers of knowledge, and to contribute to the collective expansion of human understanding.As students, we stand at the precipice of a boundless ocean of ignorance, with the opportunity to chart new intellectual territories and discover uncharted islands of knowledge. Let us embrace this metaphor as a guiding principle, a call to lifelong learning and intellectual exploration, and a testament to the endless potential that lies within the human spirit.篇3The Island of Knowledge and the Shoreline of IgnoranceAs a student, I often feel like I'm on a constant journey of exploration, sailing across vast seas of information in search of knowledge. Each new subject I delve into is like an uncharted island waiting to be discovered and understood. But as I've learned more and more, a peculiar pattern has emerged – the more I know, the more I realize how much I don't know. It's as if the island of my knowledge is surrounded by an ever-expanding shoreline of ignorance.When I was younger, the world seemed so simple. The islands of knowledge felt tiny and isolated, surrounded by seemingly endless oceans of the unknown. I remember learning basic facts about animals, planets, and historical events, feeling like I had a pretty good grasp on how everything worked. But as I grew older and my education progressed, those once-tiny islands began to merge and expand, revealing just how vast the realm of human understanding truly is.Take science, for instance. In primary school, science was a straightforward affair – we learned about the basic states of matter, the planets in our solar system, and perhaps did a few simple experiments with vinegar and baking soda. At that point, the "island" of scientific knowledge felt relatively small andself-contained. But as I advanced through secondary school andinto university-level coursework, that modest islet rapidly transformed into a sprawling archipelago of interconnected disciplines.Suddenly, I found myself grappling with complex concepts like quantum mechanics, evolutionary biology, and biochemistry. The more I studied, the more I realized how little I truly understood about the intricate workings of the universe. Each new discovery seemed to uncover a dozen more unanswered questions, like an ever-expanding fractal pattern of uncertainty.And it's not just the sciences that exemplify this phenomenon. The same principle holds true across all academic domains. In literature, for instance, I might have started with simple children's books and fables, only to eventually encounter the rich tapestries of symbolism and metaphor woven into the great novels and poems of human history. The island of literary knowledge, which once felt so simple and straightforward, revealed layers upon layers of nuance and interpretation the deeper I ventured.The truth is, the more we learn, the more we're forced to confront the boundaries of our understanding. With each new piece of knowledge we acquire, we're effectively redrawing the maps of what we know and don't know. The islands ofcomprehension may grow larger and more interconnected, but their sprawling shorelines only serve to highlight the vast, unexplored waters that still lie beyond.This realization can be both humbling and deeply motivating. On one hand, it's a stark reminder of the limitations of human intellect and the sheer scale of all that remains to be discovered. No matter how much we study and learn, there will always be more questions than answers, more mysteries to unravel.But at the same time, this ever-expanding shoreline of ignorance is what drives the relentless pursuit of knowledge forward. It's what inspires scientists to scour the depths of the oceans and the farthest reaches of the cosmos for new insights. It's what compels philosophers and thinkers to continually reexamine and refine the foundations of human understanding. The unknown isn't a barrier – it's an invitation to explore, to sail forth into uncharted waters and claim new lands of comprehension.As a student, this perspective has been invaluable in shaping my approach to learning. I've come to understand that true wisdom isn't about accumulating facts and figures, but about cultivating a deep sense of humility and curiosity. It's about recognizing that the more we know, the more we realize howlittle we truly understand about the complexities of the world around us.So while the island of my knowledge may continue to grow and evolve, I've learned to embrace the ever-lengthening shoreline of ignorance that surrounds it. For it is in those vast, unexplored waters that the greatest opportunities for discovery and growth lie. Each unanswered question is a siren call, beckoning me to set sail once more in search of new lands to claim, new horizons to conquer.The journey of learning is an endless one, with no final destination in sight. But that's precisely what makes it so exhilarating and rewarding. As long as the shoreline of ignorance continues to stretch out before us, there will always be new frontiers to explore, new mysteries to unravel, and new islands of knowledge to claim as our own.。

原始森林探险队作文英语

Embarking on an adventure into the heart of a pristine forest is an experience that few can truly fathom.The thrill of exploring untouched nature,the sounds of wildlife echoing through the trees,and the sense of being one with the environment is both humbling and exhilarating.Setting the Scene:The journey begins with a team of intrepid explorers,each with their own set of skills and expertise.They gather their gear,ensuring they have the necessary equipment for survival in the wild:tents,sleeping bags,compasses,maps,and first aid kits.The team is composed of a seasoned leader,a botanist to identify flora,a zoologist to study the fauna, and a survival expert to guide them through the challenges they may face.The Trek Begins:As the team ventures deeper into the forest,the air becomes denser,filled with the scent of damp earth and the hum of insects.The sunlight filters through the canopy above, casting a dappled pattern on the forest floor.The path is not clearly marked,and the team must rely on their navigational skills and the guidance of the forest itself to find their way.Encountering the Wildlife:The zoologist in the group is particularly excited as they come across various species of birds and mammals,some of which are rare and endangered.The team observes from a distance,taking notes and photographs to document their findings.They are careful not to disturb the animals or their habitats,respecting the delicate balance of the ecosystem. Overcoming Obstacles:The path is not without its challenges.The team encounters dense thickets,steep inclines, and even a swiftflowing river that they must cross.The survival expert leads the group in constructing a makeshift bridge,demonstrating the importance of teamwork and resourcefulness.Camping in the Wilderness:As night falls,the team sets up camp.The botanist identifies edible plants and berries, contributing to their meal for the evening.The sounds of the forest at night are a symphony of hoots,howls,and rustling leaves,adding an air of mystery to their surroundings.Discovering the Unseen:During their exploration,the team stumbles upon a hidden waterfall,a sight that takes their breath away.The water cascades down the rocks,creating a serene and refreshing environment.This discovery is a testament to the beauty and surprises that the forestholds.Reflecting on the Journey:As the expedition comes to an end,the team reflects on the lessons learned and the memories made.They have not only gained knowledge about the forest and its inhabitants but also about themselves and their ability to adapt and overcome challenges. The Return:Emerging from the forest,the team is greeted by the familiar sights and sounds of civilization.However,the experience of the原始forest has left an indelible mark on their hearts,inspiring a deeper appreciation for the natural world and the importance of conservation.In conclusion,the adventure into the原始forest is not just a physical journey but a spiritual one as well.It is a reminder of the interconnectedness of all life and the need to preserve the habitats that sustain it.The teams experience serves as a narrative of courage, curiosity,and the profound impact that immersing oneself in nature can have on ones perspective of the world.。

The effects of dust in simple environments Large Magellanic Cloud HII regions

ERIC F. BELL, KARL D. GORDON, ROBERT C. KENNICUTT, JR., & DENNIS ZARITSKY Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
TO APPEAR IN APJ: January 20 2002, vol. 565, no. 1
ies of different types, as a function of redshift, gives us direct in-
sight into where, when and how galaxies evolve (see e.g. Madau
et al. 1996; Blain et al. 1999; Steidel et al.ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ1999, for attempts to
ABSTRACT
We investigate the effects of dust on Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) H II region spectral energy distributions using arcminute-resolution far-ultraviolet (FUV), Hα, far-infrared (FIR), and radio images. Widely-used indicators of the amount of light lost to dust (attenuation) at Hα and in the FUV correlate with each other, although often with substantial scatter. There are two interesting systematic discrepancies. First, Hα attenuations estimated from the Balmer decrement are lower than those estimated from the Hα-to-thermal radio luminosity ratio. Our data, at this stage, cannot unambiguously identify the source of this discrepancy. Second, the attenuation at 1500Å and UV spectral slope, β, correlate, although the slope and scatter are substantially different from the correlation ﬁrst derived for starbursting galaxies by Calzetti et al. Combining our result with those of Meurer et al. for ultra-luminous infrared galaxies and Calzetti et al. for starbursting galaxies, we conclude that no single relation between β and 1500Å attenuation is applicable to all star-forming systems.

科技拉远了人与人之间的距离作文英语

科技拉远了人与人之间的距离作文英语Technology has undoubtedly brought about significant changes in the way we live our lives. It has revolutionized the way we communicate, work, and interact with one another. However, with these advancements, there is a growing concern that technology has also contributed to a sense of isolation and distance between people.In the past, human interaction was primarily face-to-face. People would gather in physical spaces, engage in conversations, and form meaningful connections. The advent of technology, particularly the internet and social media, has transformed the way we communicate. We can now connect with people across the globe with just a few taps on our smartphones. While this has undoubtedly made it easier to stay in touch with loved ones and maintain long-distance relationships, it has also led to a shift in the quality and depth of our interactions.One of the most significant ways in which technology has impacted human relationships is the way we communicate. Instead of engaging in face-to-face conversations, we often rely on text messages, emails, and social media posts to convey our thoughts and feelings. While these methods can be convenient and efficient,they lack the personal touch and nonverbal cues that are essential for building and maintaining meaningful relationships. Without the ability to read body language, tone of voice, and facial expressions, it becomes increasingly difficult to truly understand and empathize with one another.Moreover, the constant bombardment of information and notifications from our digital devices can be overwhelming and distracting. We find ourselves constantly checking our phones, scrolling through social media, and engaging in multiple conversations simultaneously. This fragmentation of our attention can make it challenging to be fully present and engaged in the moment, which is crucial for fostering deep connections with others.Another concern is the way technology has influenced our social behavior. Many people, particularly younger generations, have become accustomed to communicating through screens rather than face-to-face interactions. This can lead to a lack of social skills and difficulty in navigating real-world social situations. As a result, some individuals may struggle to form and maintain meaningful relationships, leading to feelings of loneliness and isolation.Furthermore, the anonymity and lack of accountability that often come with online interactions can encourage people to behave in ways they might not in a face-to-face setting. This can lead to thespread of misinformation, cyberbullying, and a general lack of empathy and understanding between individuals.It is important to recognize that technology is not inherently good or bad. It is a tool that can be used to enhance our lives and strengthen our connections with others. However, it is crucial that we learn to strike a balance and use technology in a way that complements and enhances our human interactions, rather than replacing them entirely.One way to achieve this balance is to be mindful of our technology use and make a conscious effort to prioritize face-to-face interactions. This could involve setting aside dedicated time for family and friends, engaging in hobbies and activities that bring us together in physical spaces, and being present and attentive during conversations.Additionally, we can use technology in a way that fosters deeper connections. For example, video calls can allow us to see and hear each other, creating a more personal and engaging experience than a simple text message. Social media can also be used to share meaningful experiences and connect with like-minded individuals, rather than just scrolling and consuming content.Ultimately, the challenge lies in finding a way to integrate technology into our lives in a way that enhances our human connections, ratherthan isolating us from one another. By being mindful of our technology use and prioritizing face-to-face interactions, we can work towards maintaining and strengthening the meaningful relationships that are so essential to our well-being and happiness.。

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

a r X i v :a s t r o -p h /9910174v 2 13 N o v 1999Clump Giant Distance to the Magellanic Clouds and AnomalousColors in the Galactic BulgePiotr PopowskiInstitute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,L-413Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,University of CaliforniaP.O.Box 808,Livermore,CA 94551,USA.E-mail:popowski@.ABSTRACTI demonstrate that the two unexpected results in the local Universe:1)anomalous intrinsic (V −I )0colors of the clump giants and RR Lyrae starsin the Galactic center,and 2)very short distances to the Magellanic Clouds(LMC,SMC)as inferred from clump giants,are connected with each other.The(V −I )0anomaly is partially resolved by using the photometry from the phase-IIof the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE)rather than phase-I.The need for V-or I-magnitude-based change in the bulge (V −I )0is one optionto explain the remaining color discrepancy.Such change may originate in acoeﬃcient of selective extinction A V /E (V −I )smaller than typically assumed.Application of the (V −I )0correction (independent of its source)doubles theslope of the absolute magnitude –metallicity relation for clump giants,so thatM I (RC )=−0.23+0.19[Fe /H].Consequently,the estimates of the clumpdistances to the LMC and SMC are aﬀected.Udalski’s (1998c)distance modulusof µLMC =18.18±0.06increases to µLMC =18.27±0.07.The distance modulusto the SMC increases by 0.12to µSMC =18.77±0.08.I argue that a morecomprehensive assessment of the metallicity eﬀect on M I (RC )is needed.Subject Headings:distance scale —dust,extinction —Galaxy:center —Magellanic Clouds —stars:horizontal-branch 1.IntroductionMost of the extragalactic distance scale is tied to the LMC,and so the distance to theLMC (d LMC )inﬂuences the Hubble constant,H 0.For many years now there has been a division between the so called “short”and “long”distance scales to the LMC.Currently,the measured values of d LMC span a range of over 25%(see e.g.,Feast &Catchpole 1997;Stanek,Zaritsky,&Harris 1998).Paczy´n ski &Stanek (1998)pointed out that red clumpgiants should constitute an accurate distance indicator.Udalski et al.(1998a)and Stanek et al.(1998)applied the clump method and found a very short distance to the LMC (µLMC≈18.1).In response,Cole(1998)and Girardi et al.(1998)suggested that clump giants are not standard candles and that their absolute I magnitudes,M I(RC),depend on the metallicity and age of the population.Udalski(1998b,1998c)countered this criticism by showing that the metallicity dependence is at a low level of about0.1mag/dex,and that the M I(RC)is approximately constant for cluster ages between2and10Gyr.Stanek et al.(1999)and Udalski(1999)found a moderate slope of the M I(RC)–[Fe/H]relation of 0.15mag/dex.The only clump determination,which resulted in a truly long d LMC was a study of theﬁeld around supernova SN1987A by Romaniello et al.(1999).However,they assumed a bright M I(RC)from theoretical models and,additionally,the use of the vicinity of SN1987A may not be the most fortunate choice(Udalski1999).The value of M I(RC)in diﬀerent stellar systems is a major systematic uncertainty in the clump method.It is very hard to prove the standard character of a candle’s luminosity. However,it should be possible to check whether other stellar characteristics of a candle behave in a predictable fashion.Therefore,in§2I discuss the(V−I)0colors of the clump giants and RR Lyrae stars in the Galactic bulge.After making photometric corrections,I argue that the remaining color discrepancy between the Baade’s Window and local stars might have been caused by an overestimated coeﬃcient of selective ing corrected colors,in§3I derive a new M I(RC)–[Fe/H]relation for red clump stars and show its substantial impact on the distances to the Magellanic Clouds.I summarize the results in§4.2.Mystery of anomalous colors in the Galactic bulgePaczy´n ski(1998)tried to explain why the clump giants in the Baade’s Window have(V−I)0colors which are approximately0.2magnitudes redder than in the solar neighborhood(Paczy´n ski&Stanek1998).Paczy´n ski(1998)suggested super-solar metallicities of the Galactic bulge stars as a possible solution.However,there is a spectroscopic evidence(see Minniti et al.1995)that the average metallicity of the bulge is [Fe/H]∈(−0.3,0.0).Stutz,Popowski&Gould(1999)found a corresponding eﬀect for the Baade’s Window RR Lyrae stars,which have(V−I)0redder by about0.17than their local counterparts(Fig.1).A similar size of the color shift in RR Lyrae stars and clump giants suggests a common origin of this eﬀect.Does there exists any physical mechanism that could be responsible for such behavior?The bulge RR Lyrae stars and clump giants both burn Helium in theircores,but the similarities end here.RR Lyrae stars pulsate,clump giants do not.RR Lyrae stars are metal-poor,clump giants are metal-rich.RR Lyrae stars are likely to be a part of an axisymmetric stellar halo(e.g.,Minniti1996;Alcock et al.1998a),whereas clump giants form a bar(e.g.,Stanek et al.1994;Ng et al.1996).For RR Lyrae stars,Stutz et al.(1999)suggested that their very red(V−I)0might have resulted from an unusual abundance ofα-elements.Why should a clump population which emerged in a diﬀerent formation process share the same property?The solutions to the anomalous colors proposed by Paczy´n ski(1998)and Stutz et al.(1999)are not impossible but are rather unlikely.Alternatively,the eﬀect might be unrelated to the physics of those stars.The investigated bulge RR Lyrae stars and clump giants share two things in common.First,photometry of both types of stars comes from the OGLE,phase-I,project.Indeed,Paczy´n ski et al.(1999)showed that the OGLE-IV-magnitudes are0.021mag fainter and I-magnitudes0.035mag brighter than the better calibrated OGLE-II magnitudes.Therefore,the correct(V−I)colors should be0.056bluer. Additionally,the new(V−I)0from the more homogeneous Baade’s Window clump is bluer than Paczy´n ski’s&Stanek’s(1998)color even when reduced to OGLE-I calibration1.When the new OGLE-II photometry reported by Paczy´n ski et al.(1999)is used,the(V−I)0 anomaly shrinks and the remaining unexplained shift amounts to∼0.11both for the RR Lyrae stars and clump giants.Second,Paczy´n ski&Stanek(1998)and Stutz et al.(1999)use the same extinction map(Stanek1996)and the same coeﬃcient of conversion from visual extinction A V to color excess E(V−I).The absolute values of A V s are likely approximately correct(see equation1)because the zero point of the extinction map was determined from the(V−K) color and A V/E(V−K)is very close to1(Gould,Popowski,&Terndrup1998;Alcock et al.1998b).However,R V I=A V/E(V−I)is not as secure and has a pronounced eﬀect on the obtained color.Most of the current studies of the Galactic bulge use R V I=2.5.If a true R V I towards Baade’s Window equalsαinstead,then the adjusted Stanek’s(1996)V-band extinction, will be2:αA V,adjusted=1Udalski’s(1998b)data for the LMC,SMC,and Carina galaxy come from OGLE-II and therefore do not require any additional adjustment.2Equation(1)implicitly assumes that diﬀerential(V−I)colors from Stanek(1996)are correct.Whether it is the case is an open question.has been determined based on K-magnitudes3.The adjustment to the color,which follows from equation(1)is:∆(V−I)0=1αA V,adjusted=α−2.5A V,0-point−2.5∆(V−I)0.(3)Using∆(V−I)0≈−0.11as required to resolve the color conﬂict in Baade’s Window and A V,0-point=1.37(Gould et al.1998;Alcock et al.1998b),Iﬁndα≈2.1(Fig.2).This R V I=2.1is certainly low,but not unreasonably so.Szomoru&Guhathakurta(1999)ﬁnd that cirrus clouds in the Galaxy have extinctions consistent with A V/E(B−V)<∼2,which is more extreme than the change suggested here.If the extinction towards Baade’s Window is in part provided by the cirrus clouds,then the low R V I would be expected rather than surprising.The value and variation of R V I was thoroughly investigated by Wo´z niak&Stanek (1996).The essence of the Wo´z niak&Stanek(1996)method to determine diﬀerential extinction is an assumption that regions of the sky with a lower surface density of stars have higher extinction.Wo´z niak&Stanek(1996)used clump giants to convert a certain density of stars to an amount of visual extinction.To make a calibration procedure completely unbiased would require,among other things,that clump giants were selected without any assumption about R V I;that absolute V-magnitudes of clump giants,M V(RC),do not depend on their color[here(V−I)0];and that reddened and unreddened clump giants be drawn from the same parent population.None of these is true.A color-magnitude diagram(CMD)for dense Galacticﬁelds does not allow one to unambiguously distinguish clump giants from other stars.Diﬀerent parts of an intrinsically clean CMD overlap due to diﬀerential reddening and a range of stellar distances.Therefore,the selection of clump giants must involve some assumptions about R V I.Wo´z niak&Stanek(1996)adopt R V I=2.6.This procedure tends to bias the derived relation toward this predeﬁned slope. Wo´z niak&Stanek(1996)were fully aware of this eﬀect,and they performed a number ofsimulations,which are summarized in their Figure4.In brief,in the range2.1<R V I<3.1, the bias scales asδR V I∼0.4(2.6−R V I)and so may become very substantial for a low or high R V I.In particular,if the true R V I=2.1,Wo´z niak and Stanek(1996)wouldﬁnd R V I=2.3.Therefore,this eﬀect alone could account for half of the diﬀerence between the required and measured R V I.The intrinsic characteristics of the bulge clump stars are unknown,but I will assume they resemble the clump measured by Hipparcos(European Space Agency1997).Theﬁt to the local clump giants selected by Paczy´n ski&Stanek(1998)gives M V(RC)∝0.4(V−I)0. Therefore,the structure of the local clump itself acts similarly to extinction with R V I=0.4. In an ideal case,when the CMD locations of the entire clump populations in diﬀerentﬁelds are compared,the M V(RC)−(V−I)0dependence should not matter.However, when combined with the actual extinction and additionally inﬂuenced by the completeness function of a survey,this eﬀect may additionally bias the value of R V I.Because the smaller selective extinction coeﬃcient is not excluded by the current studies,one can assume R V I=2.1to match the(V−I)0colors of the bulge with the ones in the solar neighborhood.The color is a weak function of[Fe/H],so this procedure is justiﬁed because the[Fe/H]of the bulge and solar neighborhood are similar.This change in R V I will decrease the I-mag extinction,A I,by0.11mag.Therefore,the clump distance to the Galactic center would increase by the same amount.3.Recalibration of the clumpWhat is the bearing of the bulge results on the distance to the LMC?Let∆indicate the diﬀerence between the mean dereddened I-magnitude of clump giants and the derredened V-magnitude of RR Lyrae stars at the metallicity of RR Lyrae stars in the Galactic bulge. When monitored in several stellar systems with diﬀerent clump metallicities,the variable ∆,introduced by Udalski(1998b),allows one to calibrate the M I(RC)-[Fe/H]relation with respect to the baseline provided by RR Lyrae stars.The better photometry from Paczy´n ski et al.(1999)and a possible modiﬁcation of R V I inﬂuence the value of∆at the Galactic center(∆BW).It is important to note that one will face the same type of adjustment to∆BW whenever the anomalous colors in the Baade’s Window are resolved at the expense of the modiﬁcation of V-or I-magnitudes.That is,the modiﬁcation of R V I is not a necessary condition!It is simply one of the options.As a result of the change in∆BW, the M I(RC)-[Fe/H]relation for clump giants changes.Moreover,µLMC andµSMC will change as well because the M I(RC)–[Fe/H]relation is used to obtain the clump distances to the Magellanic Clouds.Here,I will modify Udalski’s(1998b)∆versus[Fe/H]plot and derive a new M I(RC) -[Fe/H]relation consistent with the new data and considerations from§2.I construct the Udalski(1998b)plot using his original points modiﬁed in the following way:—To match the change in(V−I)0,I modify∆BW by0.17mags(a combined change from photometry and some other,yet unrecognized,source,e.g.,selective extinction coeﬃcient).—I modify the[Fe/H]of the Baade’s Window clump giants,so that[Fe/H]=0.0(see e.g., Minniti et al.1995for a review on the bulge metallicity).The possible improvement to the above procedure would be a construction of Udalski’s (1998b)diagram based on clump giants in the LMC and SMC clusters,which would reduce the uncertainties associated with the reddening to theﬁeld stars.This more complex treatment is beyond the scope of this paper.I make a linearﬁt to the∆–[Fe/H]relation.I assume that a totalerror in dependent variable∆for the i-th point,σtotal,i,can be expressed asσ2total,i=σ2∆,i+ d∆Even though my approach in this paper is only qualitative,there are two important characteristics of this study:1)The calibration of M I(RC)–[Fe/H]relation,has been based on the homogeneous set of the OGLE-II photometry.Therefore,no corrections due to the use of diﬀerent telescopes, instruments and reduction procedures are required.Unfortunately,this makes the above calibration vulnerable to unrecognized systematic problems of the OGLE photometry.2)The M I(RC)value has been derived based on observational data and not simply picked from a family of possible theoretical models of stellar evolution.Romaniello et al.(1999)provide an independent source of clump photometry in the LMC, but due to the importance of photometric homogeneity I am not able to use their data in a way consistent with the rest of my analysis.With reference to point2),it is crucial to note that observationally calibrated M I(RC)is not subject to the modeling uncertainties which aﬀect the Romaniello et al.(1999)distance to the LMC.However,my calibration is only as good as the assumptions and data that enter the analysis.Reddening corrections to the original Udalski’s(1998b)diagram,which is partly based on theﬁeld stars in the LMC and SMC,may be needed.Therefore,a more comprehensive study of the metallicity eﬀect on M I(RC)is necessary.Udalski’s(1999)determination based on the local clump is an important step toward establishing a reliable M I(RC)–[Fe/H]relation.Andy Becker deserves my special thanks for many stimulating discussions about the extinction issues in the Galactic bulge.I am deeply grateful to Andy Gould for his very careful reading of the original version of this paper and a number of insightful remarks.I also would like to thank Kem Cook for his valuable comments and discussions.Work performed at the LLNL is supported by the DOE under contract W7405-ENG-48.REFERENCESAlcock,C.et al.1998a,ApJ,492,190Alcock,C.et al.1998b,ApJ,494,396Cole,A.A.1998,ApJ,500,L137European Space Agency.1997,The Hipparcos Catalogue(ESA SP-1200)(Paris:ESA) Feast,M.W.,&Catchpole,R.M.1997,MNRAS,286,L1Girardi,L.,Groenewegen,M.A.T.,Weiss,A.,&Salaris,M.1998,MNRAS,301,149 Gould,A.,Popowski,P.,&Terndrup,D.M.1998,ApJ,492,778Minniti,D.1996,ApJ,459,175Minniti,D.,Olszewski,E.W.,Liebert,J.,White,S.D.M.,Hill,J.M.,&Irwin,M.J.1995, MNRAS,277,1293Ng,Y.K.,Bertelli,G.,Chiosi,C.,&Bressan,A.1996,A&A,310,771Paczy´n ski,B.1998,Acta Astron.,48,405Paczy´n ski,B.,&Stanek,K.Z.1998,ApJ,494,L219Paczy´n ski,B.,Udalski,A.,Szyma´n ski,M.,Kubiak,M.,Pietrzy´n ski,G.,Soszy´n ski,I., Wo´z niak,P.,&˙Zebru´n,K.,1999,Acta Astron.,49,319Romaniello,M.,Salaris,M.,Cassisi,S.,&Panagia,N.1999,accepted to ApJ(astro-ph/9910082)Stanek,K.Z.1996,ApJ,460,L37.Stanek,K.Z.,&Garnavich,P.M.1998,ApJ,500,L141Stanek,K.Z.,Ka l u˙z ny,J.,Wysocka,A.,&Thompson,I.1999,submitted to AJ (astro-ph/9908041)Stanek,K.Z.,Mateo,M.,Udalski,A.,Szyma´n ski,M.,Ka l u˙z ny,J.,&Kubiak,M.1994, ApJ,429,L7Stanek,K.Z.,Zaritsky,D.,&Harris,J.1998,ApJ,500,L141Stutz,A.,Popowski,P.,&Gould,A.1999,ApJ,521,206Szomoru,A.,&Guhathakurta,P.1999,AJ,117,2226Udalski,A.1998b,Acta Astron.,48,113Udalski,A.1998c,Acta Astron.,48,383Udalski,A.1999,submitted to ApJ Letters(astro-ph/9910167)Udalski,A.,Szyma´n ski,M.,Kubiak,M.,Pietrzy´n ski,G.,Wo´z niak,P.,&˙Zebru´n,K.1998a, Acta Astron.,48,1Walker,A.R.1992,ApJ,390,L81Wo´z niak,P.,&Stanek,K.Z.1996,464,233Fig.1.—Left part presents(V−I)0colors of the Baade’s Window(open circles)and local (full squares)RR Lyrae stars as a function of(V−K)0.The(V−I)0shift between the two groups is of order of0.17mag.The standard extinction line(dashed)is parallel to the stellar lines and so will not cure the anomaly.The right panel shows a similar situation for clump giants.The vertical(V−I)0color axis should be treated as an abscissa.The two Gaussians are Paczy´n ski’s&Stanek’s(1998)ﬁts to the number densities of clump giants as a function of color:in the solar neighborhood(thick solid line)and in the Baade’s Window (thin dotted line).The(V−I)0diﬀerence between the maxima of the two clump groups is 0.21.Fig.2.—The expected adjustment to the(V−I)0as a function of the selective extinction coeﬃcient R V I.The full dot marks the standard extinction.The dotted lines indicate the new point which would explain the entire color anomaly seen in the Baade’s Window. Fig.3.—Udalski’s(1998b)diagram showing∆versus[Fe/H].In order of increasing[Fe/H], the data points correspond to the Carina,SMC,LMC,and Baade’s Window.The V-magnitude adjustment to RR Lyrae stars is limited to the OGLE-II-based correction in Baade’s Window.The possible changes to∆that move all the points on the diagram by the same amount can be ignored because they do not inﬂuence the calibration.0.51 1.52 2.50.20.40.60.81432100.811.21.41.61.82 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8-0.2-0.1-2-1.5-1-0.50-1.4-1.2-1-0.8[Fe/H]。