6 From Empire to Independence, 1750-1776

合集下载

Independence:英语文化中的“独立”是怎么来的?

Independence:英语文化中的“独立”是怎么来的?

Independence:英语文化中的“独立”是怎么来的?很多国家的国庆节都称为“Independence Day独立日”,包括印度、巴西、以色列,最著名的当然是美国的“独立日”,日期在每年七月初,也称为 The Fourth of July.英语中的Independence 是一个抽象词语,对应中文的“独立”;但从构词方式的内涵原理来说,Independence 和“独立”却是遵循两种不同的思路。

“独立”似乎是来自“独自站立、树立”这个形象,而Independence 却是源于 Dependence这种状态的否定形式,字面含义是:不依靠、没有依靠。

三十年战争Independence 虽然是英语中一个非常重要的概念,但实际上并不是英语自古以来就有的原生词语,而是从法语引进而来的,时间大概在 17 世纪中期。

在 17 世纪的上半叶,从 1618 年到 1648 年,相当于中国明朝末年,欧洲发生了Thirty Years’ War,中文称为三十年战争,几乎所有欧洲国家和地区都卷入了这场冲突。

三十年战争结束时,交战各国经过多方谈判,签订了一系列条约协议,合在一起统称为Peace of Westphalia 威斯特伐利亚和平条约。

这些条约所规定的国际体系,标志着欧洲现代国际关系的开端。

在谈判过程中,位于法国、德国、意大利之间的 Switzerland,提出要从“Holy Roman Empire 神圣罗马帝国”这个国际联盟中脱离出来自立门户,要求获得“Independen ce 独立”这种资格。

对于瑞士所要求的Independence,当年的很多国家都感到无法理解、无法想象:Independence 有什么好处,Independence 不就是“无依无靠”吗?如果遇到事、谁来给你们撑腰呢?观念创新17世纪时,欧洲已经开始进入现代,但源于中世纪的观念和思维仍有很大影响。

在长达一千年的中世纪时期,欧洲文化一直信奉 The Great Chain of Beings 的理念,认为世界万物、从岩石草木到国家地区,都是相互依靠、构成一个整体,是无法分割的。

ALli2Revolutionperiod

ALli2Revolutionperiod
Philadelphia to draft the Declaration of Independence.
Thomas Jefferson
1779—1781 弗吉尼亚州长 Chosen as the governor of Virginia. 1785—1789赴法国执行外交任美国驻法国大使 Acted as American minister to France.
Common Sense American Crisis Rights of Man The Age of Reason
Thomas Jefferson p34-36
1743-1826
The third president of America
Active in public affairs for 40 years
A farmer, a writer, an educator
leading American architects
Monticello 蒙地切罗,美国弗吉尼亚州中部夏洛茨维尔东南一个住
宅区,由托马斯·杰斐逊设计,从1770年开始作为 他的宅邸达56年之久。直到1923年杰斐逊去逝不久 才为其他家族所有,现为国家圣地。
T. Paine
T. Jefferson
G. Washington
The Declaration of Independence
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal... that they are endowed by their Creator
The growth of industry
English government required them to export raw materials and import finished goods at a high price

美国_独立宣言_中英文对照

美国_独立宣言_中英文对照

美国《独立宣言》中英文对照The Declaration of IndependenceIN CONGRESS, JUL Y 4,1776 THE UNANIMOUSDECLARATION OF THETHIRTEEN UNITEDSTA TES OF AMERAICAWhen in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws Nature and Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that they are among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among them, deriving their just power from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, thant right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity, which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is usurpations, all having in direct object tyranny over these States. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend them.He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.]He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasion on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolution, to cause others to be elected ; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from withoutand convulsion within.He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws of naturalizing of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the condition of new appropriations of lands.He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent of laws for establishing judiciary powers.He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their office, and the amount and payment of their salary.He has erected a multitude of new officers, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out our substances.He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislatures.He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation.For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us;For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murder which they should commit on the inhabitants of these States.For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;For imposing taxes on us without our consent;For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury;For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses;For abolishing the free systems of English laws in a neighboring Province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule these Colonies;For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments;For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely parallel in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.He has excited domestic insurrection amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petition have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince whose character is thusmarked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpation, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them., as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled , appealing to the supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by authority of the good people of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States Colonies and Independent States; that they are absolved by from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.在人类事务发展的过程中,当一个民族必须解除同另一个民族的联系,并按照自然法则和上帝的旨意,以独立平等的身份立于世界列国之林时,出于对人类舆论的尊重,必须把驱使他们独立的原因予以宣布。

拉丁美洲的文化

拉丁美洲的文化

Bolivardislikedfederalism.
Río de la Plata
Argentina, Bolivia southofBrazil , North of Chili, Paraguay, partofthecen terofPeruand Uruguay.
1816 independencewasdeclared
Chile
1810 theGovernment Junta




proclaimedtheindependeceandrecognice Chile as a free country withinthespanishmonarchy. Bernardo O’Higginsleaderofindependence. Miguel Carrera called in 1811 forrepresentativegovermentwith no class basis. Conservatives. Radical minority. O’Higgins out ofpoliticsfortryingtopush radical measures.
In colonial periodtheywerearound 100,000 to
200,000 AfterindependecefromSpain (With Argentina) Independencefrom Argentina (1842) threepresidentsalldictators. Dr. José Gaspar Rodrí guez( 1816-1841) , Carlos A. López (1841-1862), Francisco Solano López (1862-1870) Isolation

6-From-Empire-to-Independence--1750-1776

6-From-Empire-to-Independence--1750-1776
time 1759 British capture Quebec 1763 Treaty of Paris; Pontiac's uprising; Proclamation of
1763 creates "Indian Country"; Paxton Boys massacre
6
Chronology
Dunmore's War 1775 Fighting begins at Lexington and Concord; Second
Continental Congress
1776 Americans invade Canada; Thomas Paine's Common Sense; Declaration of Independence
John Adams (1818)
2
“A great empire and little minds go ill together.” Edmund Burke, March 1776
3
Chapter Review Questions
1.
2. 3. 4.
5.
How did overwhelming British success in the Seven Years’ War lead to an imperial crisis in British North America?
Explain the changes in British policy toward the colonies from 1750 to 1776.
Trace the developing sense of an American national community over this same period.

《英语国家概况》- Chapter 5 The Rise and Fall of the British Empire

《英语国家概况》- Chapter 5 The Rise and Fall of the British Empire

第五章英帝国的兴衰Ⅰ.辉格党人和托利党人这两个政党名称皆起源于1688年的光荣革命,皆以绰号命名。

辉格是对牧牛人的贬称,而托利是爱尔兰语歹徒的意思。

泛泛而言,辉格人是指那些反对绝对王权、支持新教徒享有宗教自由权利的人们。

第一位沙夫茨伯雷伯爵(1621-1683)被视为辉格党首任领袖。

托利党人是指那些支持世袭王权、不愿去除国王的人。

辉格党人在19世纪中叶与持不同意见的托利党人结盟组成自由党。

托利党则为保守党的前身,至今还保留托利党这个绰号。

在19世纪初,辉格党没有特定的纲领,也不是现代意义上团结一致的政党。

他们还没有组建政党结构,例如没有政党基金。

辉格党人主张:(1)削弱王权(比如任命政府重要官员的权力);(2)同情非国教教徒(即已脱离国教的卫理公会及其他新教派别);(3)保护商人和银行家的利益。

大多数辉格党人赞同某种形式的议会改革,但就改革的深度不能达成一致。

(例如:允许商人投票吗?或者允许所有的男性有选举权吗?)托利党人是一批持传统观点的人。

他们主张保留君主和英格兰教会的权力。

他们不喜欢非国教教徒,认为他们是对英格兰教会的一大威胁。

他们想严格地维护法律与秩序,害怕下层造反。

他们并不总是赞同改革,尤其坚决反对议会改革,他们只同意某些人道主义改革。

议会中还有另一派观点,支持者较少。

他们是激进派分子,认为只有彻底的改革才能解决根本问题。

议会成员中只有少数激进派分子,但在18世纪末、19世纪初他们非常活跃,广泛散播激进观点。

他们的一个共同目标是彻底改革议会制度。

激进派分子深受杰拉米·本汉姆"功利主义"哲学的影响。

本汉姆认为政府的功能应是"取得最大多数人的最大幸福"。

他认为有两种办法做到这一点:(1)政府和行政应尽可能高效。

任何低效和无用的事情都应改革(例如,教育制度,监狱制度和议会);(2)政府应尽可能少地干涉人民的个人生活。

激进派分子倡导"不干涉主义",这是一种激进的自由贸易观点,因为他们认为进出口关税干涉了贸易的自然流通。

英国崛起

英国崛起

WAR HISTORY
Why Spain crusade against English
Mary is the wife of Felipe II. She is a Catholic(天主教徒).And Felipe II is also a Catholic. But Elizabeth I is a Puritan(清教徒) That ‘s a one reason. 玛丽一世是菲利普二世的妻子。她和丈夫 菲利普都是天主教徒。对清教徒打压,而 伊丽莎白一世是一名清教徒。这是其中一 个原因。
BACKGROUND
1.Geographical discovery is a key to world. It bring wealth to Europe. The wealth change the Europe a lot and it created two big empires(帝国).One named Spain and Portugal.
万国博览会开幕式成为整个伦敦 的节日,万众喧腾中,前来剪彩 的英国女王维多利亚反复使用一 个词语,来表达自己的兴奋情绪: 荣光、荣光、无尽的荣光。
4. ADAM SMITH’S < THE WEALTH OF NATIONS>
4. ADAM SMITH’S < THE WEALTH OF NATIONS>
4. ADAM SMITH’S < THE WEALTH OF NATIONS>
亚当斯密的小故事 《国富论》出版 12 年后的一天,伦敦刚刚下过一 场阵雨,雾都的空气霎时变得新鲜而清爽。这天 晚上,职务仅仅是一个海关官员的亚当 · 斯密,应 邀去一位公爵家里做客。客厅里的王公贵族和商 界巨贾,几乎掌握了英国经济的全部命脉,英国 当时的政府首相皮特先生也在其中。当斯密下了 马车,步入客厅时,原本散坐四处、谈笑风生的 绅士们,立即停止了话题,大家把眼光都投向了 斯密,并纷纷站起向他致意,斯密不好意思地说: “先生们,请坐。”这时候,已经站在斯密身边 的首相皮特认真地说道:“博士,您不坐,我们 是不会坐下的,哪里有学生不为老师让座的 呢?”。

英语国家概况-时间中文说明

英语国家概况-时间中文说明
17世纪,托马斯,妮卡-第一台蒸汽机。
1756-1763英法,七年战争,1763(巴黎条约)加拿大交给英国
1800s /18世纪末,19世纪初,《圈地法》地公布.The open field system
1806年,DomesdayBook英国国王土地志,《末日审判书》
1830,英国成为世界工厂
1832,rotten borough(英国1832年前)有名无实的选区
1922.Rose Perot罗斯·佩罗run for thepresidentindependent candidate and gain 19% of votes
1929.10.24The Great Depression大萧条black Thursday黑色星期四
1932,罗斯福新政FranklinD.Roosevelt, the new deal
1978,the new federal immigration act
澳大利亚
1971,采纳多元文化政策
新西兰
1840,(外坦基条约)毛利人和英国人。The treaty ofwaitangi
1947,杜鲁门向希腊和土耳其提供援助
1947,6月5日。Marshalplan马歇尔计划
1950.麦卡锡主义,McCarthyism
1954,9月US sign a mutualdefencetreatywithTaiwan共同防御条约
1960年以后,美国,open-door policy移民政策有改变
1835-1857. UK parliament英国议会被烧
1836—1848,Thecharistmovement宪章运动
1914到1918年第一次世界大战WWI.
1918.允许妇女参加选举National election inEngland1918 allow female to vote
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

The Removal of the French from North America
In the Treaty of Paris of 1763, the French lost all its North American mainland possessions.
Bibliography
Douglass Adair & John A. Schutz editors, Peter Oliver's Origins & Progress of the American Revolution (1781) Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1967) & The Ordeal of Thomas Hutchinson (1974) John Ferling, A Life of John Adams (1992) Eric Foner, Tom Paine and Revolutionary America (1976) Robert Gross, The Minutemen and Their World (1976) Stephen Kurtz & James Hutson editors, Essays on the American Revolution (1973) Barbara W. Tuchman, The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam (1984) Gary Wills, Inventing America (1978) Gordon Wood, The Radicalism of the American Revolution (1991)
The impending war involved Indian peoples of the interior. The Iroquois Confederacy and Creeks successfully played the European powers off one another.
“A great empire and little minds go ill together.” Edmund Burke, March 1776
Chapter Review Questions
1. How did overwhelming British success in the Seven Years’ War lead to an imperial crisis in British North America? 2. Explain the changes in British policy toward the colonies from 1750 to 1776. 3. Trace the developing sense of an American national community over this same period. 4. What were the principal events leading to the beginning of armed conflict at Lexington and Concord? 5. How were the ideals of American republicanism expressed in the Declaration of Independence?
Frontier Warfare
The defeat of General Braddock in 1755 was followed by the outbreak of war between Britain and France in 1756. 1756. The French achieved early victories in New York. The British harshly treated French-speaking Frenchfarmers of Acadia by expelling them from their homes. Many moved to Louisiana where they became known as "Cajuns."
Chronology
1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1770 1772 1773 1774 Sugar Act Stamp Act and Stamp Act Congress Declaratory Act Townshend Revenue Acts Treaties of Hard Labor and Fort Stanwix Boston Massacre First Committee of Correspondence in Boston Tea Act; Boston Tea Party Intolerable Acts; First Continental Congress; Congress; Dunmore's War 1775 Fighting begins at Lexington and Concord; Second Continental Congress 1776 Americans invade Canada; Thomas Paine's Common Sense; Declaration of Independence
The Conference resulted in:
The Iroquois leaving without an agreement; and adoption of Benjamin Franklin's Plan of Union, though this was rejected by colonial assemblies.
considering a collective colonial response to the conflict with New France and the Indians of the interior; and negotiation of a settlement with the Iroquois Confederacy, who had become unhappy with colonial land-grabbing. land-
The Conquest of Canada
William Pitt became British Prime Minister promising to win the war. Pitt's plan called for the conquest of Canada and the elimination of all French competition from North America. The British gained Iroquois Confederacy and Ohio Indians and committed over 50,000 British and colonial troops to the Canada campaign. British forces captured Louisburg, the French forts on the New York border, Quebec, and, lastly, Montreal in 1760.
Chronology
1713 1745 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1763 France cedes Acadia to Britain New Englanders capture Louisburg French begin forts - Lake Erie to Ohio R Albany Congress British General Edward Braddock defeated by a combined force of French and Indians Seven Years War begins in Europe William Pitt becomes prime minister Louisburg captured by the British for the second time British capture Quebec Treaty of Paris; Pontiac's uprising; Proclamation of 1763 creates "Indian Country"; Paxton Boys massacre
A: The First Continental Congress Shapes a National Political Commental Congress
In 1774, delegates from 12 colonies met for seven weeks in Philadelphia at the First Continental Congress forging a community of national leaders. The Congress took the first step toward creating a national political community.
Colonial Aims and Indian Interests
The 3 principal flash points of conflict in North America were:
1. The northern Atlantic coast where British Nova Scotia and French Louisburg faced each other. 2. The border region between New France and New York from Niagara Falls to Lake George where competition for the Indian trade was fierce. 3. The Ohio country was the primary focus of British and French attention due to competition over land.
相关文档
最新文档