非致命性武器有关论文(英文版)
论废除大规模杀伤性武器的必要性英文作文
论废除大规模杀伤性武器的必要性英文作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1The Necessity of Abolishing Weapons of Mass DestructionIntroductionIn this modern world, the threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) looms large over humanity. Nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons pose a grave danger to global security and stability. The devastating potential of these weapons cannot be overstated, and their continued existence poses an existential threat to all life on Earth. In order to ensure the safety and security of future generations, it is imperative that we work towards the complete abolition of all weapons of mass destruction.The Dangers of WMDsWeapons of mass destruction are unique in their ability to cause widespread destruction and loss of life. Nuclear weapons, for example, have the power to decimate entire cities in a single strike, leaving behind a trail of death and destruction. Chemical weapons are equally deadly, causing excruciating pain andsuffering to those exposed to them. Biological weapons, while less commonly used, have the potential to spread disease and death on a global scale.The use of WMDs in armed conflicts has the potential to escalate into full-scale war, with catastrophic consequences for all involved. The threat of nuclear proliferation, in particular, poses a grave danger to global security, as more countries seek to acquire these destructive capabilities. The mere presence of these weapons heightens tensions between nations and increases the likelihood of conflict, making the world a more dangerous and unstable place.The Moral ImperativeBeyond the immediate dangers posed by WMDs, there is a strong moral imperative to abolish these weapons. The use of weapons of mass destruction goes against the fundamental principles of humanity, causing untold suffering and devastation to innocent civilians. The indiscriminate nature of these weapons makes them inherently immoral, as they do not distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, and have the potential to cause immense harm to future generations.The development and stockpiling of WMDs also divert precious resources away from addressing pressing globalchallenges, such as poverty, disease, and climate change. The billions of dollars spent on these weapons could be better used to improve the lives of millions of people around the world, lifting them out of poverty and providing them with access to basic necessities such as food, water, and healthcare.The Path to AbolitionIn order to achieve the abolition of weapons of mass destruction, it is necessary for the international community to come together in a spirit of cooperation and unity. Multilateral disarmament agreements, such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, provide a framework for countries to work together towards the elimination of these destructive weapons. Dialogue and diplomacy are essential in building trust and confidence between nations, paving the way for meaningful progress towards disarmament.Civil society and grassroots movements also have a crucial role to play in raising awareness about the dangers of WMDs and advocating for their abolition. By mobilizing public opinion and putting pressure on governments to take action, ordinary citizens can help to drive change at the highest levels of power. It is only through collective action and solidarity that we can hope to rid the world of these weapons once and for all.ConclusionThe abolition of weapons of mass destruction is not only a moral imperative, but a practical necessity for the future survival of humanity. The dangers posed by these weapons are too great to ignore, and the time has come for decisive action to be taken. By working together as a global community, we can create a safer and more secure world for all, free from the threat of WMDs. Let us not squander this opportunity to make a lasting impact on the course of history.篇2The Need to Abolish Weapons of Mass DestructionWeapons of mass destruction (WMDs) have long been a source of fear and concern for people around the world. These powerful and destructive weapons have the potential to cause immense harm and devastation, not only to individuals and communities, but also to entire nations and the environment. In recent years, there has been a growing call for the global abolition of WMDs, and it is clear that such a move is not only desirable but also necessary for a peaceful and secure world.One of the main reasons why the abolition of WMDs is essential is the simple fact that such weapons pose a seriousthreat to humanity as a whole. The use of WMDs in armed conflicts or acts of terrorism can lead to catastrophic consequences, resulting in widespread death and destruction on a scale that is almost unimaginable. In addition, the possession of WMDs by certain countries can create a sense of insecurity and instability, leading to a dangerous arms race as other nations seek to acquire similar weapons in order to defend themselves.Furthermore, the existence of WMDs poses a threat to the environment and the future of our planet. The use of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons can have devastating effects on ecosystems and wildlife, as well as on the health and well-being of human beings. The long-term consequences of a nuclear detonation, for example, can include nuclear fallout, radiation poisoning, and the destruction of entire cities, leaving a lasting impact that can be felt for generations to come.In addition to the humanitarian and environmental concerns, the continued existence of WMDs also raises serious ethical and moral questions. The use of such weapons is often seen as a violation of human rights and international law, as it targets innocent civilians and causes indiscriminate harm. The possession of WMDs by certain countries can also create a powerimbalance and promote aggression and violence, leading to further conflict and instability.Given these reasons, it is clear that the abolition of WMDs is a crucial step towards building a more peaceful and secure world. There are a number of ways in which this goal can be achieved, including through international treaties and agreements, disarmament programs, and the promotion of peaceful dialogue and cooperation. It is important for all nations to come together and work towards this common goal, setting aside their differences and prioritizing the well-being of humanity and the planet.In conclusion, the abolition of weapons of mass destruction is not only desirable but also necessary for the sake of global peace and security. By eliminating these destructive weapons, we can create a safer and more sustainable world for future generations. It is time for all nations to take a stand against the use and proliferation of WMDs, and to work together towards a world free from the threat of mass destruction.篇3The Necessity of Abolishing Weapons of Mass DestructionWeapons of mass destruction (WMDs) have the capability to cause immense destruction, loss of lives, and damage to the environment on a large scale. These weapons, which include nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, pose a serious threat to global security and stability. Therefore, it is essential to abolish these weapons in order to create a safer and more peaceful world.One of the main reasons why it is necessary to abolish WMDs is their potential to cause catastrophic consequences. Nuclear weapons, for example, have the power to wipe out entire cities and kill millions of people in a matter of seconds. The use of biological and chemical weapons can also result in mass casualties and long-term environmental damage. The destructive power of these weapons makes them too dangerous to be used in warfare, as their effects cannot be contained and will impact not only the immediate combatants but also innocent civilians and future generations.Furthermore, the possession of WMDs by states or terrorist organizations can lead to an escalation of conflicts and increase the likelihood of their use. The presence of these weapons heightens tensions between nations and creates a sense of insecurity that can trigger a chain reaction of arms races andproliferation. The fear of an attack using WMDs can also lead to preemptive strikes, military interventions, and a lack of trust among nations. Therefore, abolishing these weapons is crucial to prevent the spread of fear, mistrust, and violence on a global scale.Moreover, the development and maintenance of WMDs divert resources, manpower, and attention away from addressing pressing global issues such as poverty, hunger, disease, and climate change. The enormous costs of producing, testing, and securing these weapons could be better spent on social welfare programs, infrastructure development, education, and healthcare. By eliminating WMDs, nations can redirect their resources towards promoting human security, sustainable development, and international cooperation.In addition, the use of WMDs violates ethical and moral principles by endangering human lives, violating human rights, and undermining the principles of dignity and respect. The indiscriminate nature of these weapons makes them incompatible with the principles of proportionality, distinction, and necessity in warfare. The suffering and devastation caused by WMDs go against the fundamental values of compassion,empathy, and solidarity that are essential for building a more just and humane world.Furthermore, the existence of WMDs undermines the credibility of international agreements, treaties, and institutions that seek to promote disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control. The failure of nuclear-armed states to fulfill their obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), and the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) undermines the legitimacy and effectiveness of the global disarmament regime. To strengthen the rule of law, uphold the norms of international humanitarian law, and protect the international community from the threats posed by WMDs, it is imperative to abolish these weapons once and for all.In conclusion, the abolition of weapons of mass destruction is essential to ensure global security, promote human welfare, uphold ethical values, and strengthen international cooperation. By eliminating the risks, dangers, and consequences associated with WMDs, nations can build a more peaceful, just, and sustainable world for present and future generations. It is time for the international community to take bold and decisive actions to banish these weapons from the face of the earth andwork together towards a world free from the threat of mass destruction.。
禁止大规模杀伤性武器的必要性英文作文
禁止大规模杀伤性武器的必要性英文作文Nuclear power is better than other forms of energy: the threat of nuclear weapons, the maintenance of world peace, the advantages of nuclear energy providing cheap and clean energy, the advantages of nuclear energy outweigh the disadvantages. Please give us your reasons for your answer. Our sense of doom today is not the fear of nuclear energy, but the fear of nuclear energy.Nuclear weapons expand the mechanism of war, and the threat is more secret and terrifying than in the past Hiroshima's nightmare is a vivid memory, because there is no way to outlaw war. The only choice is to go to nuclear weapons, hoping that the nuclear weapons hidden somewhere can maintain the world. If anything goes wrong, it may mean mass destruction of human life.Let's expect the best. Nuclear energy is cheap and clean, which is one of the solutions to the energy crisis At a time when other forms of power generation face constraints, power plants are already in operation in some countries. These are successful examples worthy of emulation, and it is not surprising that more and more power plants are being used for peaceful purposes.In my opinion, the fear of war has been overcome by the need for economic development. In the long run, the advantages of nuclear power will outweigh the disadvantages. There is no way back.To ensure lasting peace, mutual trust on the international front must prevail. It is generally believed that nuclear weapons should be the least seen as a means to win wars, because there will be no winners in any nuclear conflict - the destruction of human life and civilization is beyond imagination. I think nuclear technology is not belligerent.It is a by-product of a belligerent society. Nuclear science and technology provide the means. Whether it is good or bad, the world must do it for the good To seize it for the sake of peace should be a global dream that must be observed.。
关于核武器的话题英语作文
关于核武器的话题英语作文The Complexity and Challenges of Nuclear Weapons.Nuclear weapons stand as a testament to the terrifying potential of human ingenuity. Their existence, and the ever-present danger they pose, is a reminder of the precarious balance between our species' capacity for innovation and our capacity for destruction. This essay delves into the complexities and challenges surrounding nuclear weapons, examining their historical context, their current status, and the future prospects for disarmament and non-proliferation.The history of nuclear weapons is inextricably linked to the Cold War and the race for technological supremacy between the United States and the Soviet Union. The development of these weapons was a direct response to the horrors of the Second World War, when the atomic bombs detonated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed tens of thousands of people and left cities in ruins. Thesebombings underscored the potential for human-made catastrophes on an unprecedented scale, sparking a global conversation about the ethics and consequences of nuclear technology.Since then, nuclear weapons have remained a divisive topic, with different nations and ideologies holding vastly differing views on their role and value. On one hand, nuclear weapons are seen as a deterrent, a guarantee of national security and a means of maintaining global stability. On the other hand, they are批判为a threat to international peace and security, a destabilizing factor that could potentially lead to catastrophic consequences.The current state of nuclear weapons is a mixed bag. While the number of nuclear weapons in the world has decreased since the Cold War, they remain a significant threat. The nine nuclear-armed states—the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel—hold enough nuclear warheads to destroy humanity several times over. This fact alone is a stark reminder of the danger we face.Moreover, the threat of nuclear weapons is not just about the potential for direct, intentional use. There are also concerns about accidental detonations, cyber-attacks on nuclear facilities, and the potential for nuclear materials to fall into the wrong hands. These risks are particularly acute in regions where political instability and conflict are endemic.The challenges in addressing nuclear weapons are numerous and complex. Disarmament and non-proliferation efforts have made progress, but they have also hit significant roadblocks. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote disarmament, has been ratified by the majority of the world's nations. However, implementation remains challenging, particularly when it comes toverifying compliance and enforcing sanctions against those who violate the treaty.In addition, the political will to make meaningful progress on disarmament is often lacking. National securityinterests often trump global interests, leading to a situation where nuclear weapons are seen as a necessary evil rather than a liability that needs to be eliminated.The future of nuclear weapons remains uncertain. The international community faces a choice between maintaining a status quo that is both unstable and potentially catastrophic, and embarking on a path towards disarmament and non-proliferation that is both risky and uncertain.One hopeful sign is the increasing awareness among the global public about the dangers of nuclear weapons. Public outcry and activism have led to greater transparency and accountability in nuclear weapons policies. In addition, there are growing calls for international cooperation and dialogue to address these weapons of mass destruction in a comprehensive and sustainable manner.In conclusion, nuclear weapons pose a unique and existential threat to humanity. Addressing this threat requires a global effort that is both comprehensive and sustainable. It is a challenge that demands the utmost indiplomatic skill, political will, and public engagement. Only by working together can we hope to ensure that these weapons of mass destruction are never used again and that the world is safe from their destructive power.。
非致命武器概念界定及意义
公安法治研究Rule。
‰。
in Publi。
s。
埘ty w。
rk非致命武器概念界定及意义魏莲芳(四川警察学院，四川泸州646000)摘要：非致命武器是近年来各国军警界最为热门的话题，其中涉及非致命武器的概念一直存在多种观点，至今没有形成统一的认识，这将对我国非致命武器警用配备工作的进一步开展形成较大的制约。
非致命武器的概念可界定为：依法安全使用时能使人员暂时失去抵抗力而不剥夺其生命或者使装备、设施和设备失去功能的专门武器。
同时，应弄清楚与非致命武器概念有关的两个争议问题，其概念的界定对我国警用配备有重要意义。
关键词：非致命武器；新概念武器；警械Den ni ti on of N o n—l e t h a l WeapOn an d Its S ign i6ca nce删￡iⅡn币增(Sichuan Police Coll eg e，Lu zh ou646000，Chi na)Abst rac t：In recent years，no n—l et hal weapon has be c o m ea hot issue in the police an d militaIv circles of m anvco u nn’i es．H o we v er，p e op l e have m u l“p l e views about the concepI of non—lethal weapon a n d un ani mou s view ha sf0丌TIed yet，thus caus ing a big obstacle fbr the police to employ non一1elhal weapons in Ch i n a．T h e co n c ep t(谭n o n—l et h a lweapon c a n be defined a s”a special w e ap on，i f a pp l ie d legally and safbly，can tempo州1y de pr i v e person’s res is t an c emthe r than his life，or ma ke some equip men t and facilities lose their f un c“o ns”．M e an wh i le，1wo co nt m ve r si al is s ue sItlated to the concepf of non—lethal weapon should also he cla—fied and the pm p er definition of non—lethal weapon issi g ni6c a nt l y me a ni ng f ul to the equipmenl of police weapons．1(ey wo r ds：n o n—l e Ih a l weapon；new concepl weap on；p o l i ce weapons[中图分类号：D922．14 文献标识码：A文章编号：167卜5195(2015)叭一0014一05】DoI：10．13310／j．cnk i朗y．2015．01．003一、非致命武器概念的合理界定“非杀伤性武器”和“非致命性武器”的叫法。
枪支管控 英文作文
枪支管控英文作文英文：Gun control is a highly debated topic in many countries, including the United States. Some argue that stricter gun laws will reduce gun violence, while others believe that it is a violation of their Second Amendment rights. Personally, I believe that there should be some level of gun control to ensure public safety.One argument for gun control is that it can prevent mass shootings. For example, in Australia, after a mass shooting in 1996, the government implemented stricter gun laws, including a ban on assault weapons. Since then, there have been no mass shootings in the country. This shows that gun control can be effective in preventing such tragic events.Another argument for gun control is that it can reduce homicides and suicides. In countries with stricter gun laws,such as Japan and the United Kingdom, the rates of gun-related deaths are much lower than in the United States. This suggests that gun control can save lives.However, some argue that gun control is not thesolution to gun violence. They believe that criminals will still be able to obtain guns illegally, and that law-abiding citizens should have the right to defend themselves with firearms. While this may be true to some extent, I believe that stricter gun laws can still make it more difficult for criminals to obtain guns, and can also prevent impulsive acts of violence by individuals who have access to firearms.In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the gun control debate, I believe that some level of gun control is necessary to ensure public safety. By implementing stricter gun laws, we can prevent mass shootings and reduce gun-related deaths. However, it is important to find a balance between protecting Second Amendment rights and protecting public safety.中文：枪支管控是许多国家，包括美国，都在激烈争议的话题。
非致命武器发展趋势
（ ２ ）高技术化 。非致命性 武器技术涵盖 声 、光 、电
磁 、机 械 、化学 、生物 、材 料等诸 多 技术领 域 ，随着 工智能技 术 、
（ ４ ）小型化 。非致命 武器的小型化 ，将提 高非致命
武器的机 动性 、勤务性和作战效能 。例如 以色列手持喷射
器重７ ． ５ ｋ ｇ ，可单手操作 ，射程达６ ０ ｍ ，非常轻便 、实用 ， 但有些非致命武器体积 大，比较笨重 ，影响操作使 用。如
果能使其小型化将会提 高武器 的机动性和勤务性。许多非 致命 武器从 原理上 、技术 上都 是可行 的 ，由于难 以解 决 小型 化 的问题 ，故而 一直未 能取得 突破性 的进展 。随着
代社会 和 平与发 展 的需要 ，使 以往通 过化 学能转 化为 动
载 投射 系统分 别利用 现有 的 “ 火 山 ”布 雷系统 和车辆 烟 幕 施放 系统 ，在 其基 础上增 加非致 命 能力 ，实 现 多种 用
途 ，具有 很好的经济性和作战灵活性 。
能 ，推动 钢铁 等刚 性物质 杀伤 对方 转变成 通过 非致命 声
计算机 和信 息技 术为 代表 的各种 高新 技术迅 猛发 展及在
非致命 武 器领域 广泛 应用 ，未来 非致命 武器 会 以这些 高 新技 术为 支撑 ， 向高技术化 方 向发展 。例 如 ，美 国现 阶
段 己部署 的高 能毫 米波 非致命 性武器 一一主 动拒 止系 统
（ ５ ）精 确 化 。未 来 非致命 武 器 尤其 是高 技 术动 能
Ｅ Ｌ Ｅ Ｃ Ｔ Ｒ ＯＮＩ Ｃ Ｓ ＷＯＲ Ｌ Ｄ ・技 术 交 流
用笔制作发射器的危害英语作文
用笔制作发射器的危害英语作文English Answer:The construction of a pen-based projectile launcher can pose significant risks and legal implications that should not be taken lightly. These dangers stem from the potential for injury, the likelihood of property damage, and the violation of various laws.Injury potential:The main safety concern with building a pen launcher is the risk of injury. The projectile launched from such a device can travel at significant speeds, potentially causing bodily harm to the person firing the launcher or others nearby. The pen's construction materials, such as metal or plastic, can also pose a hazard if they break or shatter upon impact.Property damage:Another risk associated with pen launchers is the potential for property damage. The projectile fired from the launcher can have enough force to break windows, dent walls, or damage other objects. Additionally, the launcher itself, if not constructed properly, can malfunction and cause damage to the user's surroundings.Legal implications:The construction of a pen launcher may also violate various laws. In many jurisdictions, it is illegal to possess or use a weapon that is not registered or licensed. Since a pen launcher can be considered a weapon under the law, its construction and use could result in criminal charges.Additional considerations:Beyond the safety and legal implications, there are also ethical considerations to take into account. Constructing a pen launcher for non-legitimate purposes,such as pranks or vandalism, can be seen as irresponsible and could have negative consequences.It is important to note that the dangers associated with pen launchers are not limited to the individual who constructs and uses them. Others in the vicinity may also be at risk of injury or harm. Therefore, it is imperative to exercise extreme caution and to avoid engaging in such activities.Chinese Answer:危害性：制造一支笔式发射器会带来极大的风险和法律问题，这些问题不容轻视。
美国猴子武器介绍英文作文
美国猴子武器介绍英文作文英文：Monkey weapons are a type of unconventional weapon used by the United States military. These weapons are designedto be used by specially trained monkeys who are able to perform tasks that would be difficult or dangerous for humans. The use of monkey weapons is a controversial topic, with some people arguing that it is unethical to useanimals in this way.One type of monkey weapon is the "monkey bomb". This is a small explosive device that is strapped to a monkey's back. The monkey is then trained to run towards enemytargets and detonate the bomb, causing damage and confusion. Another type of monkey weapon is the "monkey gun". This isa small firearm that is attached to a monkey's arm,allowing it to fire at targets. Monkey guns are often used for reconnaissance missions, where the monkeys are able to gather information about enemy positions.While the use of monkey weapons may seem cruel, it is important to remember that these animals are specially trained and cared for by their handlers. They are not forced to perform tasks that they are not comfortable with, and their safety is always a top priority. In addition, monkey weapons can be incredibly effective in certain situations where human soldiers would be at risk.In conclusion, the use of monkey weapons is a controversial topic that raises many ethical questions. While some people may argue that it is wrong to use animals in this way, others believe that it is a necessary part of modern warfare. Ultimately, the decision to use monkey weapons should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the risks and benefits of each situation.中文：猴子武器是美国军队使用的一种非常规武器。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
1 Introduction after the end of the cold war, peace and development have become the theme of the times. Small the possibility of large-scale war, army, police to participate in "the maintenance of peace" and "non-war actions" growing at the same time, calls for peace in the world, call for humane voices rising, the practice of relying on mass destruction and failure to win will be strongly condemned, but to weaken or under the control of the enemy's fighting power of non-lethal weapons increasingly obvious. Non-lethal weapons, also known as non-lethal weapons, weak anti-personnel weapons, deactivation of weapons, mainly refers to the use of acoustic, optical, electromagnetic, chemical means such as enemy officers or the combat capability of weapon equipment loss or reduced, but does not cause a large number of casualties and weapon equipment badly damaged new weapons, and by reason of its "non-lethal, is billed as the" inhumane weapons ". The US military believes that non-lethal weapons can reduce loss of life, enable us to win support at home and abroad, subject to guarantees for the ultimate purpose of the US military. Since the 90 's, especially after the Gulf war, the developed countries were committed to the development of non-lethal technology, in the context of a new round of high technology race. Non-lethal weapons after more than 10 years of development, both in theory and in practice has made great progress, 21st century is a century of rapid development of deadly weapons, actively carry out famous weapons research was undoubtedly profound. Military experts predict that the "non-lethal weapons have the potential to dramatically change the nature of the war, the fundamental change in the future operations of the war. "Non-lethal weapon2 2.1 background and present situation of development of non-lethal weapons development background trace the real rise of non-lethal weapons, had to go back to 1995. At that time, to protect the last of the safety of United Nations peacekeeping personnel evacuated out of Somalia, the United Nations carried out a "United Shield" action to avoid an escalation of conflict, peacekeepers used non-lethal weapons. The whole operation period, no casualties of United Nations peacekeeping forces. Since then, defense based on the experience in Somalia began to expand the joint non-lethal weapon project, also followed in other countries, intensive research and development in the field of special use of such new weapons. In 1997, entrusted by the Congress, United States Department of Defense established the joint non-lethal weapon project, United States Marine Corps as the executing agency and is responsible for leadership, whose mission is to "support, discovery, research, development, test and assess the advantages of supporting force protection, mobility and precision strike has bright application prospects of joint operational concepts, and the unique role of non-lethal weapons, concepts and capabilities. "These efforts will increase the level of existing non-lethal weapons, provide non-lethal weapons far distances beyond the range of light projection capability, and can find innovative, can provide advantages in various levels of threat and crisis and solution of non-lethal technologies and concepts. United States civil and military sector has repeatedly stressed that non-lethal weapon used in the military operations will never replace conventional destruction weapons, but for responding to the threat and the control of the military commander to provide greater flexibility. NATO has gradually begun to set foot in this very special project officially published and in 1999 the definition of non-lethal weapons: "non-lethal weapons is a clear for making people lose and disperse the crowd, while people are less likely to cause fatal or permanent damage, or loss of equipment, equipment damage, and at the same time with minimal impact on the environment. "With the United States, NA TO's Policy Committee has made it clear that non-lethal weapons are conventional weapons complement, rather than their replacement, which allow officers on the battlefield to determine what kind of weapons mostsuitable for tactical environments to avoid completely the use of anti-personnel weapons to protect the force and complete tasks. 2.2 foreign status of foreign non-lethal weapons development earlier, and the technology matures, leading international. With the rapid development of science and technology, especially the last 20 years, various high-tech applications in non-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapons have seen significant development, Germany and the United Kingdom and France and other Western countries in the area of non-lethal weapons are new products have emerged. United States has been a pioneer of new technology, in addition to continue to develop improved traditional non-lethal weapons, also vote in person a lot of human and financial resources to the development of new high-tech non-lethal weapons. Especially after the end of the Gulf war, United States naval Mcmartin's concept of non-lethal war, received the United States Government and the military's attention and support, resulting in non-lethal weapon as the center of the new development of military theory and doctrine. In addition to United States, it is also in many other countries added their own national project, aimed at evaluating new technologies for non-lethal weapons and develop solutions. But many problems remain unresolved. 2.3 starting low domestic status of China's non-lethal weapons technology, financial investment and limited, comparison of gap gap with developed countries. In China of counter-terrorism concept is from "following the" yihou only began of, non-fatal theory system and framework also to be improve, apart from need carried out non-fatal weapons of standard, and trauma ballistic learn technology research, and shock wave damage hinder value and non-fatal weapons on people of effect, basic theory research outside, also must carried out counter-terrorism information technology, and network security protection technology, and sensor and detection recognition technology, and warning detection technology, and electromagnetic pulse weapons, and laser weapons, and Sonic weapons, and non-fatal weapons and fatal weapons integrated technology, and counter-terrorism equipment technology intelligence, project of research work. At present, China's development of a non-lethal weapons are mainly concentrated in tear, combat shock Halo, kinetic energy, capture network and blinding flash on the lower level, type is not complete enough, model comparison of a single non-lethal weapons launch means backward, it is difficult to achieve against long-range, accurate, difficult to enclosed spaces for effective control and innovative, high levels of non-lethal weapons in the fight to come out. To non-lethal weapon 3 display the non-lethal weapons is based on a modern military technology of the 20th century of the history of mankind's most brilliant achievements in science and technology, biotechnology, computer technology, the rapid development of information technology, new materials technology for military use and provide a powerful impetus to the development of high technology. Its wide range of applications in the military, police, species diverse, is the new favorite of modern weapons. 3.1 non-fatal weapons of defined non-fatal weapons, also said non-anti sexual weapons, and weak anti weapons, and lost can weapons, main is means using sound, and light, and electromagnetic, and chemical, means, makes enemy personnel or weapons equipment of fighting ability lost or reduce, but does not caused personnel large casualties and weapons device serious damage of new weapons, due to has non-fatal sexual, was flaunted for "humanitarian weapons". 3.2 non-lethal weapons of category 3.2.1 and the mechanism of non-lethal weapon 1 chemical incapacitating agent, chemical loss through drive target or targeted disability, usually using chemical tear agent. CN is the most commonly used tear agent (phenyl ethyl chloride), CS (o-chlorobenzaldehyde methylene malononitrile) and OC (Oleoresin capsicum). CN is a tear that can cause respiratory tract irritation on substance can cause skin irritation. CN is Germany chemist Graeber found in 1869, most of itsuses have been replaced by CS. But it to pollution in the urban environment and cross-contamination is a very big problem. OC is an acronym for pepper oil resin. It is a red pepper food products obtained after drying powder, can act as a stimulant with a variety of Jet blast to safety to control violence or dangerous animals, restoring and maintaining law and order. Now, thanks to increasing use of OC,CN, CS is gradually being replaced. PepperBall paprika projectile is a new development in recent years OC riot control weapons. 2, against loss of kinetic energy can be achieved by projectiles in General. Kinetic energy with emission targets make it lose resistance capacity. Is one of the most familiar with rubber bullets and plastic bullets against kinetic energy projectiles. In recent years has developed a wide variety of projectiles, such as the Spring bean bundle (with lead and sand package), pain ball, ring-wing projectiles, and so on. 3, a shock loss by releasing high voltage low current electric shock the target disability. Electric shock weapons at present there are basically 4 types: Taser (Manager), including electric shocks and shock batons; this kind of electric shock weapons range is short (only an arm's length), an efficient low (only about 50% per cent), and open to abuse. Cable electric shock represented by taser gun projectiles, is in development and evaluation of radio hit projectiles and can make muscles of patients of UV laser shock weapon. 4, sound and light interference (attention shift) weapons by bright light, high intensity sound makes people temporarily to blind or deaf to distribute targeted attention, helping to achieve the purpose of control of the target. These weapons include a variety of acoustic light grenades and light projectiles, light torches, laser torches. 5, other weapon other than the above 4 categories, such as blocking nailed row, using winding technology catching NET. 3.2.2 role object-1 by non-lethal weapons, non-lethal weapon against anti-sensor sensor non-lethal weapons are mainly used to deal with intelligence collection and object detection sensor, through the optical system of attack weapons, electronic equipment, complete equipment, or system failure, not working properly. Typical anti-sensor non-lethal weapons include low energy laser weapon, high power microwave weapons and other radiation light ammunition. Rapid development of low energy laser weapon, United States, Britain, Russia, France and Germany have already come out there are several prototypes, and has some of the troops. Blinding it can interfere with, or even undermine the seeker, Tracker, target indicators, Ranger and view sight equipment, can also make people blind, disrupt, block, deter or suppress enemy action. As United States Army AN/PLQ 15 type laser confrontation system, and United States Marine Corps "saber" (Saber) 203 laser lighting device, and United States Army handheld type laser "caused by Xuan device" (Daz-er), and United States Army "riding attendants" (Outrid-er) car laser caused by blind weapons, and United States forces directed infrared interference system (DIRCM), and United Kingdom "revenge goddess" (Nemsis) directed infrared interference system, and United Kingdom laser caused by Xuan device, and Qian Soviet laser caused by blind weapons,. 2, non-lethal weapons against non-lethal weapon against personnel is the use of low energy laser weapon, high power microwave weapons, non-lethal chemical warfare agents, optical, acoustic weapons ammunition, non-penetrating warheads and other weapons, affect the operations or operational capabilities of staff, temporary disability, resulting in non-casualty battle of attrition, so as to weaken the opponent's combat strength, can even be directly reached operational purpose. Non-lethal weapons against personnel, first tried in Viet Nam war. In August 1969, after Vietnamese troops wiped out a large number of US forces, took at l Highway 824 PLEI groups positions on high ground. The US military to take immediate retaliatory action, to the Highlands, the position of non-lethal projectile fired a number of anti-personnel, all positions after a fewminutes, the army lost the battle, the US military cake recaptured positions. This weapon with so-called "humanitarian color", so interest States. At present, non-lethal weapons against personnel has the following broad categories: non-lethal "Cannon", non-lethal chemical warfare agents, non-fatal virus, non-lethal ammunition. Non-lethal weapon 3, reverse maneuvering against mobile mainly uses some non-lethal weapons have a special function of chemical substances or net-like device, prevent aircraft took off normally, vehicle normal, normal navigation of ships, equipment functioning, affect the enemy's combat operations, securing favorable opportunity for home. Typical anti-mechanized Super lubricant, Super caustic, non-lethal weapons include material embrittlement agent and combustion agent "virus". For example: Super lubricant, material embrittlement agent and fuel "virus". 4, against the infrastructure of non-lethal weapons against non-lethal weapons to power energy infrastructure, water and other strategic resources and information infrastructure and other infrastructure targets, undermining energy supply, the destruction of infrastructure, affecting the material base of the war. Typical anti-infrastructure of non-lethal weapons, including ammunition, power failure damage hydro chemical warfare agent non-deadly computer virus and non-fatal bacterial bomb, weapons and so on. 3.2.3 according to the principle of non-lethal weapon 1, laser weapons. Laser weapons are a distinct from the traditional weapons of the new concept of beam weapons. Blinding laser weapons were made of low-energy laser beam irradiation for the human eye, so that the loss of retinal, cause a temporary or permanent blindness and loss of combat effectiveness. United States maidao electronic systems company developed the "snake eyes" laser gun, was a soldier to carry and use of laser guns, shape and M-16 similar to rifle, charge to launch 2000 "bullet", its effective range to 1 km. 2, chemical and biological weapons. Biological weapons, is a traditional weapon, but the power of modern biological weapons has greatly exceeds the efficiency of biochemical weapons in the traditional sense, it can cause the enemy army team。