ch04
市场营销重点课程Ch04 消费者市场和购买行为分析

第四章第一部分消费者市场和购买行为分析(一)单项选择题(在下列每小题中,选择一个最合适的答案。
)1、_________是人类欲望行为最基本的决定因素。
A.文化B.性格C.国家D.社会2、消费者的购买单位是个人或_________。
A.集体B.家庭C.社会D.单位3、大多数消费者只能根据个人好恶和做出购买决策。
A.智慧B.经验C.感觉D.能力4、某种相关群体的有影响力的人物称为。
A.“意见领袖”B.“道德领袖”C.“精神领袖”D.“经济领导者”5、一个人的_________影响着消费需求和对市场营销因素的反应。
A.能力B.个性C.联系D.精神6、不同生活方式_________对产品和品牌有不同的需求。
A.群体B.社会C.模型D.艺术7、马斯洛认为需要按其重要程度分,最低层次需要是指_________。
A.生理需要B.社会需要C.尊敬需要D.安全需要8、_________在人格诸领域中最后形成,反映社会的各项准则,由理想、道德、良心等组成。
A.本我B.超我C.自我D.含我9、_________指存在于人体内驱使人们产生行为的内在刺激力,即内在需要。
A.刺激物B.诱因C.反应D.驱使力10、消费者购买过程是消费者购买动机转化为_________的过程。
A.购买心理B.购买意志C.购买行动D.购买意向11、体育明星和电影明星是其崇拜者的。
A.成员群体B.直接参照群体12、下列哪个因素不是影响消费者购买行为的主要因素_________。
A.文化因素B.社会因素C.自然因素D.个人因素13、对于减少失调感的购买行为,营销者要提供完善的_________,通过各种途径提供有利于本企业和产品的信息,使顾客确信自己购买决定的正确性。
A.售前服务B.售后服务C.售中服务D.无偿服务14、在复杂的购买行为中,消费者购买决策过程的第三个阶段是。
A.确认B.收集信息C.备选产品评估D.决定购买15、消费者对于有些产品品牌差异明显,但消费者不愿花长时间来选择和估价,而是不断变换所购产品的品牌,这种购买行为称为_________。
机器人机构学【ch04】串联机器人机构拓扑结构特征与综合 培训教学课件

串联机器人机构拓扑结构特征
4)同一连杆上两运动副轴线相交于 一点,两者共用“⌒”表示。
5)若干个P副平行于同一平面,用 (-P-P-…-P-)表示。
“
6)同一连杆上两运动副轴线垂直,两者之间用“⊥”表示。
i(扭角):两相邻运动副轴线之间的夹角,即按右手坐标 系,绕xi轴线由zi到zi+1的转角。
串联机器人机构拓扑结构特征
1)两运动副轴线重合,即 αi=0,ai=0。
2)两运动副轴线平行,即 αi=0,ai≠0。
上述机器人连 杆的关节运动 副可特殊配置
如下:
3)两运动副轴线相交于一 点,即αi≠0,ai=0。
”
串联机器人机构拓扑结构特征
串联机器人机构的活动度公式
串联机器人机构的活动度公式为
m
F fi i1
式中,F为机构活动度;m为机构运动副数;fi为第i个运动副自由度数。
串联机器人机构拓扑结构特征
串联机器人机构运动输出特征矩阵
串联机器人机构的位移输出与速度输出
串联机器人机构的位移输出是末端连杆的位置与方向(位姿),为机构运动输入的函数。串
串联机器人机构运动输出特征方程
4)相互平行(重合)的两个转动必相关, 只对应一个独立转动输出。
5)平行于同一平面的三个转动必 相关。
“ 6)不平行于同一平面的四个转动必相关,三维空间内最多有三个独立的转动输出。 ”
03
串联机器人机构运动 输出特征矩阵运算
串联机器人机构运动输出特征矩阵运算 运动输出特征矩阵运算规则
步骤1 选定单开链的运动 输出特征矩阵MS。
ch04决策支持系统(新)

Is
中国的陆地面积
960万平方公里
Is型语义网络
3 语义网络
基本的语义关系 (2)属性(类属)关系
Have :表示一个结点具有另一个结点所描述的属性
Have
鸟
翅膀
Have属性关系语义网络
3 语义网络
基本的语义关系 (2)属性(类属)关系
A-Kind-of :表示一个事物是另一个事物的一 种类型,表示隶属关系。
❖ 按此规则前提的判断得出结论的判断,由此回溯到上一 个规则的推理,一直回溯到目标的判断。
(2)逆向推理
V V
1、A B->G 2、C D->A 3、E->D
产生式规则库
推理过程:
G
A
B
B、C、E
事实库
D
E
C
3 语义网络
由J.R.Quilian于1968年在研究人类联想记忆时提出 的一种心理学模型。 基本思想: ❖ 用结点表示概念,用弧线表示概念之间的关系,将领
弧是有方向和标注的,方向体现了结点所代表的实体的 主次关系,即结点1为主,结点2为辅;
标注表示所连接的两个实体之间的语义联系。
3 语义网络
试用语义网络表示命题“某学校小学生坐车去春 游”。
某学校
属于 小学生 动作目的 春游
动作方式
坐车
3 语义网络
基本的语义关系
(1)Is-a和Part-of型关系 Is-a:表示一个事物是另一个事物的实例,表示 具体与抽象关系,此关系的一个最主要的特点是 属性的继承关系。
系统工程专业本科学员必修课
决策支持系统
第四章 智能决策支持系 统和智能技术的决策支持
本章内容
➢智能决策支持系统概述 ➢人工智能基本原理 ➢专家系统与智能决策支持系统 ➢神经网络的决策支持 ➢遗传算法的决策支持 ➢机器学习的决策支持
Ch04 一阶过程和二阶过程的动态特性

峰值时间 最大超调nput Signals
Ramp function
xi
a
a=1 称为单位斜坡函数
0
1
t
Sinusoidal function
§4-1 Typical Input Signals
究竟采用哪种典型信号?
取决于系统在正常工况下最常见的输入信号形式 斜坡信号 阶跃信号 脉冲信号 正弦信号 随时间逐渐变化的输入 突然的扰动量、突变的输入 冲击输入 随时间往复变化的输入
1 0
5
wnt
10
15
阻尼系数、特征根与二阶系统单位阶跃响应
阻尼系数 特征根
[s]
二阶系统单位阶跃响应
[s]
[s]
阻尼系数、特征根与二阶系统单位阶跃响应
阻尼系数 特征根
[s]
二阶系统单位阶跃响应
[s]
[s]
§5-4 Time-domain Performance Specifications
时域分析性能指标是以系统对单位阶跃输入的瞬态响应 形式给出的。
§4-3 Transient Response of Second-order Systems
二阶系统:
能够用二阶微分方程描述的系统。 它的典型形式是二阶振荡环节。
形式一:
形式二:
二阶系统的单位阶跃响应
单位阶跃输入
则:
根据二阶系统的 极点分布特点, 分五种情况进行 讨论。
欠阻尼 临界阻尼 过阻尼 零阻尼 负阻尼
t
瞬态响应
稳态响应
——动态性能描述
——稳态性能描述
标准过程输入 一阶系统的瞬态响应 二阶系统的瞬态响应
Ch04螺纹联接及螺纹传动-4

螺杆直径和长度、螺距、螺旋线头数、螺母高度。 5、螺纹公差的确定 6、螺旋副零件与滑板联接结构的确定
主要有刚性、弹性和活动联接结构。
三、滑动螺旋传动设计 1、滑动螺旋副的材料和结构
(1)滑动螺旋副的材料 (常用材料见表4-10) 1) 螺杆的材料应具有足够的强度和耐磨性,良好的可加工 性,对于精密传动螺旋,还要求在热处理后有较好的尺寸稳 定性。 2)螺母的材料除要求具有足够的强度外,还要求与螺杆配合 传动时摩擦因数小和耐磨性好,抗胶合能力强。 螺杆的材料:常用35、45号钢;需经热处理以达到高硬度的重 要螺杆,常用合金钢,如65Mn、40Cr、T12、20CrMnTi等。 螺母材料:常用材料有铸造青铜,如ZCuSn10Pb1, ZCuSn5Pb5Zn5;重载低速使用强度较高的铸造青铜ZCuAl10Fe3 或铸造黄铜ZCuZn25Al6Fe3Mn3 ;低速不重要的螺旋传动也可 用耐磨铸铁或灰铸铁。
螺 母
ZcuAl9Fe4Ni4 Mn2 ZCuZn25Al6Fe 3Mn3
注意:①要求强度耐磨性高,配对后f小,加工性好。 ②螺杆硬度高于螺母 (2)滑动螺旋副的结构
滑动螺旋副的结构主要是指螺杆、螺母的固定和支承的结构 形式。螺旋传动的工作刚度与精度等和支承结构有直接关系。
滑动螺旋传动采用梯形、矩形或锯齿形螺纹(多用梯形螺 纹,重载起重螺旋可用锯齿形螺纹, 对效率要求高时可用矩形 螺纹)。 螺母结构: 1)整体式——结构简单,但磨损后精度较差。 2)组合式——磨损后可补偿间隙、精度较高。 3)开合式——适合于双向传动,可提高传动精 度,消除空回误差。
螺距
F F FP p [ p] A d 2 h z d 2 h H
承载螺纹的圈数 一圈螺纹的承载面积
ch04 国际经济学课后答案与习题(萨尔瓦多)

*CHAPTER 4(Core Chapter)THE HECKSCHER-OHLIN AND OTHER TRADE THEORIESOUTLINE4.1 Introduction4.2 Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory4.3 The Formal Heckscher-Ohlin ModelCase Study 4-1 The Revealed Comparative Advantage of Various Countries and Regions4.4 Factor-Price Equalization and Income DistributionCase Study 4-2 Has International Trade Increased U.S. Wage Inequalities?4.5 Empirical Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory4.6 Economies of Scale and International TradeCase Study 4-3 The New International Economies of Scale4.7 Trade Based on Product DifferentiationCase Study 4-4 Growth of Intra-Industry Trade4.8 Technological Gap and Product Cycle ModelsCase Study 4-5: The United States as the Most Competitive Economy in the World4.9 Transportation Costs and International Trade4.10 Environmental Standards and International TradeAppendix The Specific-Factors Model and Intra-Industry Trade ModelsA4.1 The Specific-Factors ModelA4.2 A Model of Intra-Industry TradeKey TermsInternationalofscaleeconomies pricesRelativefactorproducts Heckscher–Ohlin (H–O) theory DifferentiatedtradeIntra-industryHeckscher–Ohlintheorem(H–O)Factor-proportions or factor-endowment theory Technological gap modelcyclemodelProductFactor–price equalization theoremcostsTransportationStolper-Samuelsontheoremmodel Nontraded goods and services Specific-factorsparadox Environmental standardsLeontiefMonopolisticcompetitionscalereturnsIncreasingtoLecture Guide1. This is one of the most important and difficult chapters in the book. It is also a long chapter andrequires four lectures to cover adequately.2. In the first lecture, I would cover sections 1-3. Section 3 is one of the most important sections inthe book because it presents the H-O model. I would proceed slowly and carefully in explaining Figure 4.1 and compare it to the standard trade model of Figure 3.4.3. In the second lecture, I would cover sections 4 and 5. Section 4 on the factor-price equalizationtheorem and income distribution is a difficult section. Case Study 4-2 should be of great interest to the students and give rise to a great deal of class discussion.4. In third lecture, I would cover sections sections 6-7, paying a great deal of attention to section 7on trade in differentiated products.5. In fourth lecture, I would cover the rest of the chapter.Answers to Review Questions and Problems1. a. The Heckscher–Ohlin (H-0) theorem postulates that a nation will export those commodi- ties whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodities whose production requires the intensive useof the nation’s relatively scarce and expensive factor. In short, the relatively labor-richnation exports relatively labor-intensive commodities and imports the relativelycapital-intensive commodities.b. Heckscher and Ohlin identify the relative difference in factor endowments amongnations as the basic determinant of comparative advantage and international trade.c. The H-O Theory represent an extension of the standard trade model because it explains the basis for comparative advantage (classical economists, such as Ricardo had assumed it) and examines the effect of international trade on factor prices and income distribution (which classical economists had left unanswered).2. See Figure 1 on the next page.3. a. The factor–price equalization theorem postulates that international trade will bring about the equalization of the returns to homogeneous or identical factors across nations.b. The Stopler-Samuelson theorem postulates that free international trade reduces the realincome of the nation’s relatively scarce factor and increases the real income of the nation’s relatively abundant factor.Fig 4.1Fig 4.2XXb. The specific-factors model postulates that the opening of trade (1) benefits the specific factorused in the production of the nation’s export commodity, (2) harms the specific factor used in the production of the nation’s import-competing industry, and (3) leads to an ambiguouseffect (i.e., it may benefit or harm) the mobile factor.c. Trade acts as a substitute for the international mobility of factors of production in itseffect on factor prices. With perfect mobility, labor would migrate from the low-wagenation to the high-wage nation until wages in the two nations are equalized. Similarly,capital would move from the low-interest to the high-interest nation until the rate ofinterest was equalized in the two nations.4. a. The Leontief paradox refers to the original Leontief’s finding that U.S. import substituteswere more K-intensive than U.S. exports. This was the opposite of what the H-O theorempostulated.b. The Leontief paradox was resolved by including human capital into the calculations andexcluding industries based on natural resources. Recent research using data on many sectors, for many countries, over many years, and considering that countries could specialize in aparticular subset or group of commodities that were best suited to their specific factorendowments, provides strong support for the H-O theorem.c. The Hecksher-Olhin theory remains the centerpiece of modern trade theory for explaininginternational trade today. To be sure, there are other forces (such as economies of scale,product differentiation, and technological differences across countries) that provide additional reasons and explanations for some international trade not explained by the basic H-O model.These other trade theories complement the basic H-O model in explaining the pattern ofinternational trade in the world today.5. International trade with developing economies, especially newly industrializing economies (NIEs), contributed in two ways to increased wage inequalities between skilled and unskilled workers in the United States during the past two decades. Directly, by reducing the demand for unskilledworkers as a result of increased U.S. imports of labor-intensive manufactures and, indirectly, byspeeding up the introduction of labor-saving innovations, which further reduced the U.S.demand for unskilled workers. International trade, however, was only a small cause of increased wage inequalities in the United States. The most important cause was technological change.6. a. Economies of scale refer to the production situation where output grows proportionatelymore than the increase in inputs or factors of production. For example, output may morethan double with a doubling of inputs.b. Even if two nations were identical in every respect, there is still a basis for mutually bene-ficial trade based on economies of scale. When each nation specializes in the production of one commodity, the combined total world output of both commodities will be greater thanthan without specialization when economies of scale are present. With trade, each nationthen shares in these gains.c. The new international economies of scale refers to the increase in productivity resultingfrom firms purchasing parts and components from nations where they are made cheaperand better, and by establishing production facilities abroad-26-7. a. Product differentiation refers to products that are similar, but not identical. Intra-industrytrade refers to trade in differentiated products, as opposed to inter-industry trade incompletely different products.b. Intra-industry trade arises in order to take advantage of important economies of scale inproduction. That is, with intra-industry trade each firm or plant in industrial countries canspecialize in the production of only one, or at most a few, varieties and styles of the sameproduct rather than many different varieties and styles of a product and achieve economies of scale.c. With few varieties and styles, more specialized and faster machinery can be developedfor a continuous operation and a longer production run. The nation then imports othervarieties and styles from other nations. Intra-industry trade benefits consumers because ofthe wider range of choices (i.e., the greater variety of differentiated products) available atthe lower prices made possible by economies of scale in production.8. a. According to the technological gap model, a firm exports a new product until imitators incountries take away its market. In the meantime, the innovating firm will have introduced a new product or process.b. The criticism of the technological gap model are that it does not explain the size of techno- logical gaps and does not explore the reason for technological gaps arising in the first place, or exactly how they are eliminated over time.c. The five stages of the product cycle model are: the introduction of the product, expansion of production for export, standardization and beginning of production abroad through imitation, foreign imitators underselling the nation in third markets, and foreigners underselling theinnovating firms in their home market as well.9. See Figure 2 on page 25.10. A nation with lower environmental standards can use the environment as a resource endow-ment or as a factor of production in attracting polluting firms from abroad and achieving acomparative advantage in the production of polluting goods and services. This can lead totrade disputes with nations with more stringent environmental standards.-27-Multiple-Choice Questions1. The H-O model extends the classical trade model by:a. explaining the basis for comparative advantageb. examining the effect of trade on factor prices*c. both a and bd. neither a nor b2. A nation is said to have a relative abundance of K if it has a:a. greater absolute amount of Kb. smaller absolute amount of Lc. higher L/K ratio*d. lower price of K in relation to the price of L3. A difference in relative commodity prices between nations can be based on a difference in:a. technologyb. factor endowmentsc. tastes*d. all of the above4. In the H-O model, international trade is based mostly on a difference in:a. technology*b. factor endowmentsc. economies of scaled. tastes5. According to the H-O theory, trade reduces international differences in:a. commodity pricesb. in factor prices*c. both commodity and factor pricesd. neither relative nor absolute factor prices6. According to the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, international trade leads toa. reduction in the real income of the nation’s relatively abundant factor*b. reduction in the real income of the nation’s relatively scarce factorc. increase in the real income of the nation’s relatively scarce factord. none of the above7. Which of the following is false with regard to the specific factors theorem, international trade *a. harms the immobile factors that are specific to the nation’s export commodities or sectorsb. harms the immobile factors that are specific to the nation’s import-competing commoditiesc. has an ambiguous effect on the nation’s mobile factorsd. may benefit or harm the nation’s mobile factors8. Perfect international mobility of factors of productiona. leads to a reduction in international differences in the returns to homogenous factorsb. acts as a substitute for international trade in its effects on factor pricesc. operates on the supply of factors in affecting factor prices*d. all of the above9. The Leontief paradox refers to the empirical finding that U.S.*a. import substitutes were more K-intensive than exportsb. exports were more L-intensive than importsc. exports were more K-intensive than import substitutesd. all of the above10. From empirical studies, we conclude that the H-O theory:a. must be rejectedb. must be accepted without reservations*c. can generally be acceptedd. explains all international trade11. International trade can be based on economies of scale even if both nations have identical:a. factor endowmentsb. tastesc. technology*d. all of the above12. A great deal of international trade:a. is intra-industry tradeb. involves differentiated productsc. is based on monopolistic competition*d. all of the above13. Intra-industry trade takes place:a. because products are homogeneous*b. in order to take advantage of economies of scalec. because perfect competition is the prevalent form of market organizationd. all of the above14. Which of the following statements is true with regard to the product-cycle theory?a. it depends on differences in technological changes over time among countriesb. it depends on the opening and the closing of technological gaps among countriesc. it postulates that industrial countries export more advanced products to lessadvanced countries*d. all of the above15. Transport costs:a. increase the price in the importing countryb. reduces the price in the exporting countryc. falls less heavily on the nation with the more elastic demand and supply curves of the traded commodity*d. all of the above-30-ADDITIONAL ESSAYS AND PROBLEMS FOR PART ONE1. Assume that both the United States and Germany produce beef and computer chips with the following costs:United States Germany(dollars) (marks)Unit cost of beef (B) 2 8Unit cost of computer chips (C) 1 2(a) What is the opportunity cost of beef (B) and computer chips (C) in each country?(b) In which commodity does the United States have a comparative cost advantage?What about Germany?(c) What is the range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germanyfor each computer chip traded?(b) How much would the United States and Germany gain if 1 unit of beef is exchangedfor 3 chips?Answ. (a) In the United States:the opportunity cost of one unit of beef is 2 chips;the opportunity cost of one chip is 1/2 unit of beef.In Germany:the opportunity cost of one unit of beef is 4 chips;the opportunity cost of one chip is 1/4 unit of beef.(b) The United States has a comparative cost advantage in beef with respect to Germany,while Germany has a comparative cost advantage in computer chips.(c) The range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germany foreach unit of beef that the United States exports is2C < 1B < 4C(d) Both the United States and Germany would gain 1 chip for each unit of beef traded.2. Given: (1) two nations (1 and 2) which have the same technology but different factor costs conditions, and (3) no transportation costs, tariffs, or other obstructions to trade.Prove geometrically that mutually advantageous trade between the two nations is possible.Note: Your answer should show the autarky (no-trade) and free-trade points of production and consumption for each nation, the gains from trade of each nation, and express the equilibrium condition that should prevail when trade stops expanding.)Ans.: See the figure below.Fig 4.3Fig 4.4Nations 1 and 2 have different production possibilities curves and different community indifference maps. With these, they will usually end up with different relative commodity prices in autarky, thus making mutually beneficial trade possible.In the figure, Nation 1 produces and consumes at point A and Px/Py=P A in autarky, while Nation 2 produces and consumes at point A' and Px/Py=P A'. Since P A < P A', Nation 1 has a comparative advantage in X and Nation 2 in Y. Specialization in production proceeds until point B in Nation 1 and point B' in Nation 2, at which P B =P B' and the quantity supplied for export of each commodity exactly equals the quantity demanded for import.Thus, Nation 1 starts at point A in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B in production, and by exchanging BC of X for CE of Y reaches point E in consumption. E > A since it involves more of both X and Y and lies on a higher community indifference curve.Nation 2 starts at A' in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B' in production, and by exchanging B'C' of Y for C'E' of X reaches point E'in consumption (which exceeds A').At Px/Py=P B =P B', Nation 1 wants to export BC of X for CE of Y, while Nation 2 wants to export B'C' (=CE) of Y for C'E' (=BC) of X. Thus, P B =P B' is the equilibrium relative commodity price because it clears both (the X and Y) markets.3. (a) Identify the conditions that may give rise to trade between two nations. (b) What aresome of the assumptions on which the Heckscher-Ohlin theory is based? (c) What does this theory say about the pattern of trade and effect of trade on factor prices?Ans. (a) Trade can be based on a difference in factor endowments, technology, or tastesbetween two nations. A difference either in factor endowments or technology results in a different production possibilities frontier for each nation, which, unlessneutralized by a difference in tastes, leads to a difference in relative commodity price and mutually beneficial trade. If two nations face increasing costs and have identical production possibilities frontiers but different tastes, there will also be a differencein relative commodity prices and the basis for mutually beneficial trade between the two nations. The difference in relative commodity prices is then translated into adifference in absolute commodity prices between the two nations, which is the immediate cause of trade.(b) The Heckscher-Ohlin theory (sometimes referred to as the modern theory – asopposed to the classical theory - of international trade) assumes that nations have the same tastes, use the same technology, face constant returns to scale (i.e., a givenpercentage increase in all inputs increases output by the same percentage) but differ widely in factor endowments. It also says that in the face of identical tastes or demand conditions, this difference in factor endowments will result in a difference in relative factor prices between nations, which in turn leads to a difference in relativecommodity prices and trade. Thus, in the Heckscher-Ohlin theory, the internationaldifference in supply conditions alone determines the pattern of trade. To be noted is that the two nations need not be identical in other respects in order for internationaltrade to be based primarily on the difference in their factor endowments.(c) The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem postulates that each nation will export the commodityintensive in its relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodityintensive in its relatively scarce and expensive factor. As an important corollary, itadds that under highly restrictive assumptions, trade will completely eliminate thepretrade relative and absolute differences in the price of homogeneous factors amongnations. Under less restrictive and more usual conditions, however, trade will reduce, but not eliminate, the pretrade differences in relative and absolute factor prices among nations. In any event, the Heckscher-Ohlin theory does say something very useful onhow trade affects factor prices and the distribution of income in each nation. Classical economists were practically silent on this point.-33-4. Suppose that tastes change in Nation 1 (the L-abundant and L-cheap nation) so that consumers demand more of commodity X (the L-intensive commodity) and less of commodity Y (the K- intensive commodity). Suppose that Nation 1 is India, commodity X is textiles, and commodi- ty Y is food. Starting from the no-trade equilibrium position and using the Heckscher-Ohlinmodel, trace the effect of this change in tastes on India's (a) relative commodity prices anddemand for food and textiles, (b) production of both commodities and factor prices, and(c) comparative advantage and volume of trade. (d) Do you expect international trade to leadto the complete equalization of relative commodity and factor prices between India and theUnited States? Why?Ans. (a) The change in tastes can be visualized by a shift toward the textile axis in India'sindifference map in such a way that an indifference curve is tangent to the steepersegment of India's production frontier (because of increasing opportunity costs) after the increase in demand for textiles. This will cause the pretrade relative commodity price of textiles to rise in India.(b) The increase in the relative price of textiles will lead domestic producers in India toshift labor and capital from the production of food to the production of textiles. Since textiles are L-intensive in relation to food, the demand for labor and therefore the wage rate will rise in India. At the same time, as the demand for food falls, thedemand for and thus the price of capital will fall. With labor becoming relative more expensive, producers in India will substitute capital for labor in the production of both textiles and food.(c) Even with the rise in relative wages and in the relative price of textiles, India stillremains the L-abundant and low-wage nation with respect to a nation such as theUnited States. However, the pretrade difference in the relative price of textilesbetween India and the United States is now somewhat smaller than before the change in tastes in India. As a result the volume of trade required to equalize relativecommodity prices and hence factor prices is smaller than before. That is, India need now export a smaller quantity of textiles and import less food than before for therelative price of textiles in India and the United States to be equalized. Similarly, the gap between real wages and between India and the United States is now smaller and can be more quickly and easily closed (i.e., with a smaller volume of trade).(d) Since many of the assumptions required for the complete equalization of relativecommodity and factor prices do not hold in the real world, great differences can be expected and do in fact remain between real wages in India and the United States.Nevertheless, trade would tend to reduce these differences, and the H-O model does identify the forces that must be considered to analyze the effect of trade on thedifferences in the relative and absolute commodity and factor prices between Indiaand the United States.-34-5. (a) Explain why the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model needs to be extended. (b) Indicate in what important ways the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model can be extended. (c) Explain what ismeant by differentiated products and intra-industry trade.Ans. (a) The Heckscher-Ohlin trade model needs to be extended because, while generallycorrect, it fails to explain a significant portion of international trade, particularly the trade in manufactured products among industrial nations.(b) The international trade left unexplained by the basic Heckscher-Ohlin trade model canbe explained by (1) economies of scale, (2) intra-industry trade, and (3) trade based on imitation gaps and product differentiation.(c) Differentiated products refer to similar, but not identical, products (such as cars,typewriters, cigarettes, soaps, and so on) produced by the same industry or broadproduct group. Intra-industry trade refers to the international trade in differentiated products.-35-。
ch04国际经济学课后答案与习题(萨尔瓦多)

ch04国际经济学课后答案与习题(萨尔⽡多)*CHAPTER 4(Core Chapter)THE HECKSCHER-OHLIN AND OTHER TRADE THEORIESOUTLINE4.1 Introduction4.2 Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory4.3 The Formal Heckscher-Ohlin ModelCase Study 4-1 The Revealed Comparative Advantage of Various Countries and Regions4.4 Factor-Price Equalization and Income DistributionCase Study 4-2 Has International Trade Increased U.S. Wage Inequalities?4.5 Empirical Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory4.6 Economies of Scale and International TradeCase Study 4-3 The New International Economies of Scale4.7 Trade Based on Product DifferentiationCase Study 4-4 Growth of Intra-Industry Trade4.8 Technological Gap and Product Cycle ModelsCase Study 4-5: The United States as the Most Competitive Economy in the World4.9 Transportation Costs and International Trade4.10 Environmental Standards and International TradeAppendix The Specific-Factors Model and Intra-Industry Trade ModelsA4.1 The Specific-Factors ModelA4.2 A Model of Intra-Industry TradeKey TermsInternationalofscaleeconomies pricesRelativefactorproducts Heckscher–Ohlin (H–O) theory DifferentiatedtradeIntra-industryHeckscher–Ohlintheorem(H–O)Factor-proportions or factor-endowment theory Technological gap modelcyclemodelProductFactor–price equalization theoremcostsTransportationStolper-Samuelsontheoremmodel Nontraded goods and services Specific-factorsparadox Environmental standardsLeontiefMonopolisticcompetitionscalereturnsIncreasingtoLecture Guide1. This is one of the most important and difficult chapters in the book. It is also a long chapter andrequires four lectures to cover adequately.2. In the first lecture, I would cover sections 1-3. Section 3 is one of the most important sections inthe book because it presents the H-O model. I would proceed slowly and carefully in explaining Figure 4.1 and compare it to the standard trade model of Figure 3.4.3. In the second lecture, I would cover sections 4 and 5. Section 4 on the factor-price equalizationtheorem and income distribution is a difficult section. Case Study 4-2 should be of great interest to the students and give rise to a great deal of class discussion.4. In third lecture, I would cover sections sections 6-7, paying a great deal of attention to section 7on trade in differentiated products.5. In fourth lecture, I would cover the rest of the chapter.Answers to Review Questions and Problems1. a. The Heckscher–Ohlin (H-0) theorem postulates that a nation will export those commodi- ties whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodities whose production requires the intensive useof the nation’s relatively scarce and expensive factor. In short, the relatively labor-richnation exports relatively labor-intensive commodities and imports the relativelycapital-intensive commodities.b. Heckscher and Ohlin identify the relative difference in factor endowments amongnations as the basic determinant of comparative advantage and international trade.c. The H-O Theory represent an extension of the standard trade model because it explains the basis for comparative advantage (classical economists, such as Ricardo had assumed it) and examines the effect of international trade on factor prices and income distribution (which classical economists had left unanswered).2. See Figure 1 on the next page.3. a. The factor–price equalization theorem postulates that international trade will bring about the equalization of the returns to homogeneous or identical factors across nations.b. The Stopler-Samuelson theorem postulates that free international trade reduces the realincome of the nation’s relatively scarce factor and increases the real income of the nation’s relatively abundant factor.Fig 4.1Fig 4.2XXb. The specific-factors model postulates that the opening of trade (1) benefits the specific factorused in the production of the nation’s export commodity, (2) harms the specific factor used in the production of the nation’s import-competing industry, and (3) leads to an ambiguouseffect (i.e., it may benefit or harm) the mobile factor.c. Trade acts as a substitute for the international mobility of factors of production in itseffect on factor prices. With perfect mobility, labor would migrate from the low-wagenation to the high-wage nation until wages in the two nations are equalized. Similarly,capital would move from the low-interest to the high-interest nation until the rate ofinterest was equalized in the two nations.4. a. The Leontief paradox refers to the original Leontief’s finding that U.S. import substituteswere more K-intensive than U.S. exports. This was the opposite of what the H-O theorempostulated.b. The Leontief paradox was resolved by including human capital into the calculations andexcluding industries based on natural resources. Recent research using data on many sectors, for many countries, over many years, and considering that countries could specialize in aparticular subset or group of commodities that were best suited to their specific factorendowments, provides strong support for the H-O theorem.c. The Hecksher-Olhin theory remains the centerpiece of modern trade theory for explaininginternational trade today. To be sure, there are other forces (such as economies of scale,product differentiation, and technological differences across countries) that provide additional reasons and explanations for some international trade not explained by the basic H-O model.These other trade theories complement the basic H-O model in explaining the pattern ofinternational trade in the world today.5. International trade with developing economies, especially newly industrializing economies (NIEs), contributed in two ways to increased wage inequalities between skilled and unskilled workers in the United States during the past two decades. Directly, by reducing the demand for unskilledworkers as a result of increased U.S. imports of labor-intensive manufactures and, indirectly, byspeeding up the introduction of labor-saving innovations, which further reduced the U.S.demand for unskilled workers. International trade, however, was only a small cause of increased wage inequalities in the United States. The most important cause was technological change.6. a. Economies of scale refer to the production situation where output grows proportionatelymore than the increase in inputs or factors of production. For example, output may morethan double with a doubling of inputs.b. Even if two nations were identical in every respect, there is still a basis for mutually bene-ficial trade based on economies of scale. When each nation specializes in the production of one commodity, the combined total world output of both commodities will be greater thanthan without specialization when economies of scale are present. With trade, each nationthen shares in these gains.c. The new international economies of scale refers to the increase in productivity resultingfrom firms purchasing parts and components from nations where they are made cheaperand better, and by establishing production facilities abroad-26-7. a. Product differentiation refers to products that are similar, but not identical. Intra-industrytrade refers to trade in differentiated products, as opposed to inter-industry trade incompletely different products.b. Intra-industry trade arises in order to take advantage of important economies of scale inproduction. That is, with intra-industry trade each firm or plant in industrial countries canspecialize in the production of only one, or at most a few, varieties and styles of the sameproduct rather than many different varieties and styles of a product and achieve economies of scale.c. With few varieties and styles, more specialized and faster machinery can be developedfor a continuous operation and a longer production run. The nation then imports othervarieties and styles from other nations. Intra-industry trade benefits consumers because ofthe wider range of choices (i.e., the greater variety of differentiated products) available atthe lower prices made possible by economies of scale in production.8. a. According to the technological gap model, a firm exports a new product until imitators incountries take away its market. In the meantime, the innovating firm will have introduced a new product or process. b. The criticism of the technological gap model are that it does not explain the size of techno- logical gaps and does not explore the reason for technological gaps arising in the first place, or exactly how they are eliminated over time.c. The five stages of the product cycle model are: the introduction of the product, expansion of production for export, standardization and beginning of production abroad through imitation, foreign imitators underselling the nation in third markets, and foreigners underselling theinnovating firms in their home market as well.9. See Figure 2 on page 25.10. A nation with lower environmental standards can use the environment as a resource endow-ment or as a factor of production in attracting polluting firms from abroad and achieving acomparative advantage in the production of polluting goods and services. This can lead totrade disputes with nations with more stringent environmental standards.-27-Multiple-Choice Questions1. The H-O model extends the classical trade model by:a. explaining the basis for comparative advantageb. examining the effect of trade on factor prices*c. both a and bd. neither a nor b2. A nation is said to have a relative abundance of K if it has a:a. greater absolute amount of Kb. smaller absolute amount of Lc. higher L/K ratio*d. lower price of K in relation to the price of L3. A difference in relative commodity prices between nations can be based on a difference in:a. technologyb. factor endowmentsc. tastes*d. all of the above4. In the H-O model, international trade is based mostly on a difference in:a. technology*b. factor endowmentsc. economies of scaled. tastes5. According to the H-O theory, trade reduces international differences in:a. commodity pricesb. in factor prices*c. both commodity and factor pricesd. neither relative nor absolute factor prices6. According to the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, international trade leads toa. reduction in the real income of the nation’s relatively abundant factor*b. reduction in the real income of the nation’s relatively scarce factorc. increase in the real income of the nation’s relatively scarce factord. none of the above7. Which of the following is false with regard to the specific factors theorem, international trade *a. harms the immobile factors that are specific to the nation’s export commodities or sectorsb. harms the immobile factors that are specific to the nation’s import-competing commoditiesc. has an ambiguous effect on the nation’s mobile factorsd. may benefit or harm the nation’s mobile factors8. Perfect international mobility of factors of productiona. leads to a reduction in international differences in the returns to homogenous factorsb. acts as a substitute for international trade in its effects on factor pricesc. operates on the supply of factors in affecting factor prices*d. all of the above9. The Leontief paradox refers to the empirical finding that U.S.*a. import substitutes were more K-intensive than exportsb. exports were more L-intensive than importsc. exports were more K-intensive than import substitutesd. all of the above10. From empirical studies, we conclude that the H-O theory:a. must be rejectedb. must be accepted without reservations*c. can generally be acceptedd. explains all international trade11. International trade can be based on economies of scale even if both nations have identical:a. factor endowmentsb. tastesc. technology*d. all of the above12. A great deal of international trade:a. is intra-industry tradeb. involves differentiated productsc. is based on monopolistic competition*d. all of the above13. Intra-industry trade takes place:a. because products are homogeneous*b. in order to take advantage of economies of scalec. because perfect competition is the prevalent form of market organizationd. all of the above14. Which of the following statements is true with regard to the product-cycle theory?a. it depends on differences in technological changes over time among countriesb. it depends on the opening and the closing of technological gaps among countriesc. it postulates that industrial countries export more advanced products to lessadvanced countries*d. all of the above15. Transport costs:a. increase the price in the importing countryb. reduces the price in the exporting countryc. falls less heavily on the nation with the more elastic demand and supply curves of the traded commodity*d. all of the above-30-ADDITIONAL ESSAYS AND PROBLEMS FOR PART ONE1. Assume that both the United States and Germany produce beef and computer chips with the following costs: United States Germany(dollars) (marks)Unit cost of beef (B) 2 8Unit cost of computer chips (C) 1 2(a) What is the opportunity cost of beef (B) and computer chips (C) in each country?(b) In which commodity does the United States have a comparative cost advantage?What about Germany?(c) What is the range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germanyfor each computer chip traded?(b) How much would the United States and Germany gain if 1 unit of beef is exchangedfor 3 chips?Answ. (a) In the United States:the opportunity cost of one unit of beef is 2 chips;the opportunity cost of one chip is 1/2 unit of beef.In Germany:the opportunity cost of one unit of beef is 4 chips;the opportunity cost of one chip is 1/4 unit of beef.(b) The United States has a comparative cost advantage in beef with respect to Germany,while Germany has a comparative cost advantage in computer chips.(c) The range for mutually beneficial trade between the United States and Germany foreach unit of beef that the United States exports is2C < 1B < 4C(d) Both the United States and Germany would gain 1 chip for each unit of beef traded.2. Given: (1) two nations (1 and 2) which have the same technology but different factor costs conditions, and (3) no transportation costs, tariffs, or other obstructions to trade.Prove geometrically that mutually advantageous trade between the two nations is possible.Note: Your answer should show the autarky (no-trade) and free-trade points of production and consumption for each nation, the gains from trade of each nation, and express the equilibrium condition that should prevail when trade stops expanding.) Ans.: See the figure below.Fig 4.3Fig 4.4Nations 1 and 2 have different production possibilities curves and different community indifference maps. With these, they will usually end up with different relative commodity prices in autarky, thus making mutually beneficial trade possible.In the figure, Nation 1 produces and consumes at point A and Px/Py=P A in autarky, while Nation 2 produces and consumes at point A' and Px/Py=P A'. Since P A < P A', Nation 1 has a comparative advantage in X and Nation 2 in Y. Specialization in production proceeds until point B in Nation 1 and point B' in Nation 2, at which P B =P B' and the quantity supplied for export of each commodity exactly equals the quantity demanded for import.Thus, Nation 1 starts at point A in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B in production, and by exchanging BC of X for CE of Y reaches point E in consumption. E > A since it involves more of both X and Y and lies on a higher community indifference curve.Nation 2 starts at A' in production and consumption in autarky, moves to point B' in production, and by exchanging B'C' of Y for C'E' of X reaches point E'in consumption (which exceeds A').At Px/Py=P B =P B', Nation 1 wants to export BC of X for CE of Y, while Nation 2 wants to export B'C' (=CE) of Y for C'E' (=BC) of X. Thus, P B =P B' is the equilibrium relative commodity price because it clears both (the X and Y) markets.3. (a) Identify the conditions that may give rise to trade between two nations. (b) What aresome of the assumptions on which the Heckscher-Ohlin theory is based? (c) What does this theory say about the pattern of trade and effect of trade on factor prices?Ans. (a) Trade can be based on a difference in factor endowments, technology, or tastesbetween two nations. A difference either in factor endowments or technology results in a different production possibilities frontier for each nation, which, unlessneutralized by a difference in tastes, leads to a difference in relative commodity price and mutually beneficial trade. If two nations face increasing costs and have identical production possibilities frontiers but different tastes, there will also be a differencein relative commodity prices and the basis for mutually beneficial trade between the two nations. The difference in relative commodity prices is then translated into adifference in absolute commodity prices between the two nations, which is the immediate cause of trade.(b) The Heckscher-Ohlin theory (sometimes referred to as the modern theory – asopposed to the classical theory - of international trade) assumes that nations have the same tastes, use the same technology, face constant returns to scale (i.e., a givenpercentage increase in all inputs increases output by the same percentage) but differ widely in factor endowments. It also says that in the face of identical tastes or demand conditions, this difference in factor endowments will result in a difference in relative factor prices between nations, which in turn leads to a difference in relativecommodity prices and trade. Thus, in the Heckscher-Ohlin theory, the internationaldifference in supply conditions alone determines the pattern of trade. To be noted is that the two nations need not be identical in other respects in order for internationaltrade to be based primarily on the difference in their factor endowments.(c) The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem postulates that each nation will export the commodityintensive in its relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodityintensive in its relatively scarce and expensive factor. As an important corollary, itadds that under highly restrictive assumptions, trade will completely eliminate thepretrade relative and absolute differences in the price of homogeneous factors amongnations. Under less restrictive and more usual conditions, however, trade will reduce, but not eliminate, the pretrade differences in relative and absolute factor prices among nations. In any event, the Heckscher-Ohlin theory does say something very useful onhow trade affects factor prices and the distribution of income in each nation. Classical economists were practically silent on this point.4. Suppose that tastes change in Nation 1 (the L-abundant and L-cheap nation) so that consumers demand more of commodity X (the L-intensive commodity) and less of commodity Y (the K- intensive commodity). Suppose that Nation 1 is India, commodity X is textiles, and commodi- ty Y is food. Starting from the no-trade equilibrium position and using the Heckscher-Ohlinmodel, trace the effect of this change in tastes on India's (a) relative commodity prices anddemand for food and textiles, (b) production of both commodities and factor prices, and(c) comparative advantage and volume of trade. (d) Do you expect international trade to leadto the complete equalization of relative commodity and factor prices between India and theUnited States? Why?Ans. (a) The change in tastes can be visualized by a shift toward the textile axis in India'sindifference map in such a way that an indifference curve is tangent to the steepersegment of India's production frontier (because of increasing opportunity costs) after the increase in demand for textiles. This will cause the pretrade relative commodity price of textiles to rise in India.(b) The increase in the relative price of textiles will lead domestic producers in India toshift labor and capital from the production of food to the production of textiles. Since textiles are L-intensive in relation to food, the demand for labor and therefore the wage rate will rise in India. At the same time, as the demand for food falls, thedemand for and thus the price of capital will fall. With labor becoming relative more expensive, producers in India will substitute capital for labor in the production of both textiles and food.(c) Even with the rise in relative wages and in the relative price of textiles, India stillremains the L-abundant and low-wage nation with respect to a nation such as theUnited States. However, the pretrade difference in the relative price of textilesbetween India and the United States is now somewhat smaller than before the change in tastes in India. As a result the volume of trade required to equalize relativecommodity prices and hence factor prices is smaller than before. That is, India need now export a smaller quantity of textiles and import less food than before for therelative price of textiles in India and the United States to be equalized. Similarly, the gap between real wages and between India and the United States is now smaller and can be more quickly and easily closed (i.e., with a smaller volume of trade).(d) Since many of the assumptions required for the complete equalization of relativecommodity and factor prices do not hold in the real world, great differences can be expected and do in fact remain between real wages in India and the United States.Nevertheless, trade would tend to reduce these differences, and the H-O model does identify the forces that must be considered to analyze the effect of trade on thedifferences in the relative and absolute commodity and factor prices between Indiaand the United States.5. (a) Explain why the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model needs to be extended. (b) Indicate in what important ways the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model can be extended. (c) Explain what ismeant by differentiated products and intra-industry trade.Ans. (a) The Heckscher-Ohlin trade model needs to be extended because, while generallycorrect, it fails to explain a significant portion of international trade, particularly the trade in manufactured products among industrial nations.(b) The international trade left unexplained by the basic Heckscher-Ohlin trade model canbe explained by (1) economies of scale, (2) intra-industry trade, and (3) trade based on imitation gaps and product differentiation.(c) Differentiated products refer to similar, but not identical, products (such as cars,typewriters, cigarettes, soaps, and so on) produced by the same industry or broadproduct group. Intra-industry trade refers to the international trade in differentiated products.。
ch04 苯系物含量的气相色谱法测定

• 2.校正因子测定及定性分析 (1)在最佳柱温下,用1µL微量注射器分 别取纯苯、甲苯和二甲苯各0.5µL进样,记 录色谱图中各色谱峰保留时间,与步骤(5) 所得结果相比较,进行定性分析。 (2)取一支1µL微量注射器取混合标样 0.5µL进样,记录各峰的峰面积和保留时间, 重复测定两三次,计算各组分的校正因子。
八、苯系物含量的气相色谱法测定
(一)、实验目的
掌握气相色谱分离的基本原理和色谱分析的基本 工作方法。 掌握保留值的测定及用保留值定性的方法。 学习校正因子的测定和校正归一化法定量的方法。
(二)实验原理 • 气相色谱的流动相为惰性气体,具有一 定活性的吸附剂作为固定相。当多组分的 混合样品进入色谱柱后,由于吸附剂对每 个组分的吸附力不同,经过一定时间后, 各组分在色谱柱中的运行速度也就不同。 吸附力弱的组分容易被解吸下来,最先离 开色谱柱进入检测器,而吸附力最强的组 分最不容易被解吸下来,因此最后离开色 谱柱。如此,各组分得以在色谱柱中彼此 分离,顺序进入检测器中被检测、记录下 来。
(七)仪器操作规程
1打开稳压电源; 2打开氮气阀,打开净化器上的载气开关阀,然后检查是 否漏气,保证气密性良好; 3调节总流量为适当值(根据刻度的流量表测得); 4调节分流阀使分流流量为实验所需的流量(用皂膜流量 计在气路系统面板上实际测量),柱流量即为总流量减去 分流量; 5打开空气、氢气开关阀,调节空气、氢气流量为适当值; 6根据实验需要设臵柱温、进样口温度和FID检测器温度; 7打开计算机与工作站; 8FID检测器温度达到150℃以上,按FIRE键点燃FID检 测器火焰; 9设臵FID检测器灵敏度和输出信号衰减; 10待所设参数达到设臵时,即可进样分析; 11实验完毕后,先关闭氢气与空气,用氮气将色谱柱吹净 后关机。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2
A Numerical Illustration数例说明
• Assume that the individual’s MRS = 1 假定个人的MRS=1
– willing to trade one unit of x for one unit of y 愿意用一单位的x换取 一单位的y
• Suppose the price of x = $2 and the price of y = $1 假定x的 价格为$2,y的价格为$1 • The individual can be made better off trade 1 unit of x for 2 units of y in the marketplace如果在市场中,用1单位x换取2单位的 y,个人的境况可以变得更好
I = p1x1 + p2x2 +…+ pnxn
• Set up the Lagrangian建立拉格朗日函数:
L = U(x1,x2,…,xn) + (I - p1x1 - p2x2 -…- pnxn)
12
The n-Good Case n种商品的情况
• First-order conditions for an interior maximum 内部最大值的 一阶条件为: L/x1 = U/x1 - p1 = 0 L/x2 = U/x2 - p2 = 0
• • • L/xn = U/xn - pn = 0 L/ = I - p1x1 - p2x2 - … - pnxn = 0
13
Implications of First-Order Conditions 一阶条件的含义
• For any two goods对于任意两种商品
U / xi pi U / x j p j
• Add the individual’s utility map to show the utility-maximization process 加入个人的效用函数图,来说明效用最大化的过程
Quantity of y
A
The individual can do better than point A by reallocating his budget 通过重新分配他的预算,个人的情况可以变得比点A处更好 The individual cannot have point C because income is not large enough 个人不能达到点C,因为其收入不够
I py
If all income is spent on y, this is the amount of y that can be purchased 如果所有的收入用于y ,这是所能购 买的y的数量
The individual can afford to choose only combinations of x and y in the shaded triangle 个人只能够负担阴影三角形中的x和y的组合
L = U(x1,x2) + (I - p1xst-Order Conditions for a Maximum最大值的一阶条件
• First-order conditions for an interior maximum 内部最大值的 一阶条件为:
L/x1 = U/x1 - p1 = 0
– Similar reasoning applies whenever the MRS and the price ration differ同样推论适用于任何MRS与价格比不等的情况 – The condition for maximum utility must be the equality of these two 效用最大化的条件一定是这两者相等
Quantity of y
U1 U2 U3
At point A, the indifference curve is not tangent to the budget constraint 在点A,无差异曲线与预算约束线并不相切
Utility is maximized at point A 在点A处,效用达到最大化 A
Chapter 4 第四章
UTILITY MAXIMIZATON AND CHOICE 效用最大化和选择
1
Optimization Principle 最优化准则
• To maximize utility, given a fixed amount of income to spend, an individual will buy the goods and services为了最大化效 用,给定一定数量的收入,个人会购买商品和服务,直 到:
Quantity of x
11
The n-Good Case n种商品的情况
• The individual’s objective is to maximize 个人的目标为最大化
utility = U(x1,x2,…,xn) subject to the budget constraint 受限于预算约束
• The individual’s objective is to maximize 个人的目标为最大化 utility = U(x1,x2) subject to the budget constraint 受限于预算约束 I = p1x1 + p2x2 • Set up the Lagrangian建立拉格朗日函数:
15
Interpreting the Lagrangian Multiplier 拉格朗日乘子的含义
• At the margin, the price of a good represents the consumer’s evaluation of the utility of the last unit consumed在边际的概念上,商品的价格代表了消费者 对所消费的最后一个单位的效用的评价
C
B
U3 U2 U1 Point B is the point of utility maximization 点B是效用最大化的点
Quantity of x
5
First-Order Conditions for a Maximum 最大值的一阶条件
• Utility is maximized where the indifference curve is tangent to the budget constraint 效用在无差异曲线与预算约束线相切处,达到最大
B A
U2 U1
Quantity of x
10
Corner Solutions角解
• In some situations, individuals’ preferences may be such that they can maximize utility by choosing to consume only one of the goods 有些时候,个人的偏好可能使得他们可以在只消费一种商品时,达到 效用最大化
• The tangency rule is only a necessary condition 相切原则仅仅 是必要条件
– we need MRS to be diminishing 我们需要MRS是递减的
Quantity of y There is a tangency at point A, but the individual can reach a higher level of utility at point B 点A为一个切点,但个人可以在点B获得更高的效用
Quantity of y
slope of budget constraint
px py
dy dx U constant
B
slope of indifferen ce curve
U2
px dy MRS py dx U constant
Quantity of x
6
First-Order Conditions for a Maximum 最大值的一阶条件
L/x2 = U/x2 - p2 = 0
U / x1 p1 U / x2 p2
• This implies that at the optimal allocation of income
这意味着在最优的收入分配处
p1 MRS (x1 for x2 ) p2
8
Second-Order Conditions for a Maximum 最大值的二阶条件
– how much the consumer is willing to pay for the last unit 消费者愿意为最后一个单位 商品支付多少钱
pi
MUxi
16
Corner Solutions角解
– that exhaust his or her total income 耗尽他(她)所有的收入 – for which the psychic rate of trade-off between any goods (the MRS) is equal to the rate at which goods can be traded for one another in the marketplace 任意商品间进行交换的比率(MRS)与商品间在 市场中交换的比率相同
• This implies that at the optimal allocation of income 这意味着在最优的收入分配处
pi MRS ( xi for x j ) pj
14
Interpreting the Lagrangian Multiplier 拉格朗日乘子的含义