Large Deviations for Random Power Moment Problem

合集下载

三亚2024年09版小学第10次英语第6单元期末试卷

三亚2024年09版小学第10次英语第6单元期末试卷

三亚2024年09版小学英语第6单元期末试卷考试时间:100分钟(总分:140)B卷考试人:_________题号一二三四五总分得分一、综合题(共计100题)1、What is the capital of Vanuatu?A. Port VilaB. LuganvilleC. VilaD. Santo答案:A2、听力题:I want to ________ a new bike.3、听力题:Oxidation reactions involve the ________ of electrons.4、填空题:A ______ (鱼) can be colorful and beautiful.5、填空题:Many plants have medicinal ______ (用途).6、听力题:A reaction that releases gas is called a ______ reaction.7、What is the term for a baby lion?A. CubB. KitC. PupD. Foal答案:A8、听力题:The Earth's surface is covered by various types of ______ ecosystems.The ______ (小鸟) sings a beautiful melody in the ______ (清晨).10、填空题:The ancient Greeks held ________ to celebrate athletic competition.11、填空题:The artist exhibits her work in a _____ (画廊).12、填空题:I enjoy playing _________ with my sister. (桌面游戏)13、What do we call the process of converting a liquid into a gas?a. Evaporationb. Condensationc. Sublimationd. Filtration答案:a14、听力题:His favorite sport is ________.15、听力题:The capybara is very ____.16、What do we call the study of the Earth's physical structure?A. GeographyB. GeologyC. BiologyD. Meteorology答案:B17、填空题:The artist held an _____ (展览) of his work.18、填空题:The coach, ______ (教练), leads our team to victory.19、选择题:What do you call a person who writes plays?A. AuthorB. PlaywrightC. DirectorD. ProducerThe Earth's layers have different ______ characteristics.21、What do we call the process of plants making food using sunlight?A. RespirationB. PhotosynthesisC. DigestionD. Fertilization答案:B22、听力题:The chemical symbol for neon is _______.23、听力题:The ______ is very passionate about education.24、听力题:My brother likes to _____ video games. (play)25、听力题:The __________ is the imaginary line at degrees longitude.26、听力题:The __________ is the imaginary line that circles the Earth halfway between the poles.27、What is the name of the famous ancient ruin in Peru?A. Machu PicchuB. TikalC. PetraD. Stonehenge答案:A. Machu Picchu28、听力题:I have a brown ___. (dog)29、填空题:The blue whale is the largest animal on ________________ (地球).30、What do you call the person who studies stars and planets?a. Biologistb. Geologistc. Astronomerd. Chemist答案:CShe has two ___ and one brother. (sisters, sister, brother)32、听力题:The Earth's surface is shaped by both ______ and geological processes.33、Which of these is a vegetable?A. AppleB. CarrotC. BananaD. Grape34、填空题:A ________ (植物数据分析) informs research.35、Which animal is known as the "King of the Jungle"?A. ElephantB. LionC. TigerD. Bear答案:B36、听力题:A reaction that releases light is called a ______ reaction.37、填空题:A porcupine can defend itself with its ________________ (刺).38、听力题:They like to _____ (play/work) outside.39、填空题:Mount Fuji is a famous ________ (富士山是著名的________) in Japan.40、What is the opposite of "young"?A. OldB. NewC. FreshD. Young41、填空题:A sloth spends most of its time in ______ (树上).42、What do we call a place where people go to watch movies?A. TheatreB. CinemaC. AuditoriumD. Concert Hall答案:B43、What is the capital of Ethiopia?A. NairobiB. Addis AbabaC. DakarD. Cairo答案:B44、填空题:I love watching ______ (星星) at night, especially during a ______ (流星雨).45、听力题:The _______ can be a beautiful addition to any room.46、What do you call the outer layer of the Earth?A. CoreB. MantleC. CrustD. Shell47、填空题:The ________ (生态灾害) can harm wildlife.48、填空题:The _______ (The Magna Carta) limited the power of the monarchy.49、听力题:She is studying to be a ________.50、填空题:The coach, ______ (教练), motivates us to improve.51、听力题:We strive for ________ (excellence) in our work.52、听力题:The _____ (tree) is tall.53、听力题:He drinks ___ in the morning. (milk)54、What do we use to see underwater?A. BinocularsB. TelescopeC. GogglesD. Glasses答案: C55、填空题:The __________ (历史的真相) can be complex.56、What do you call a large, round cheese?A. CheddarB. GoudaC. BrieD. Wheel答案:D57、填空题:The ________ is a fun game to play with friends.58、How many Earth years does it take for Neptune to orbit the sun?A. 15B. 84C. 165D. 25059、听力题:The chemical formula for potassium hydroxide is _____.60、填空题:We have a ______ (丰富的) schedule for learning activities.61、What do we call the act of encouraging personal responsibility?A. AccountabilityB. OwnershipC. LeadershipD. All of the Above答案:D62、听力题:I like to play ______ (musical) instruments.63、听力题:A _______ reaction occurs when a substance is oxidized.64、What do you call the person who helps you in a gym?A. TrainerB. ChefC. DoctorD. Teacher答案: A65、听力题:A solution that contains a small amount of solute is called ______.66、听力题:The chemical formula for potassium nitrate is _______.67、填空题:I love to _______ with my dog.68、听力题:The __________ is the center of the earth.69、填空题:The country known for its lighthouses is ________ (美国).70、填空题:The ________ was a significant period of artistic achievement.71、填空题:In the fall, we can see many ______ (南飞的鸟).72、填空题:I believe that practice makes _______ (完美). I will keep trying to improve my _______ (技能).73、选择题:Which instrument has keys and is played by pressing them?A. GuitarB. DrumsC. PianoD. Flute74、What is the capital of the United States?A. New YorkB. Washington, D.C.C. Los AngelesD. Chicago75、填空题:The ________ was a period of time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.The ________ (initiative) drives progress.77、What is the capital city of Mongolia?A. UlaanbaatarB. ErdenetC. DarkhanD. Choibalsan答案: A78、填空题:I saw a rabbit hopping in the ______.79、听力题:A physical change can be easily ______.80、What do we call the outer layer of the Earth?A. CoreB. MantleC. CrustD. Atmosphere答案: C81、听力题:The chemical formula for sodium sulfate is ______.82、听力题:I _____ (play/learn) the guitar.83、听力题:The ancient Egyptians used ________ to construct their pyramids.84、听力题:Chemical properties describe how a substance _____ with other substances.85、选择题:What do you call a house for bees?A. NestB. HiveC. DenD. Burrow86、填空题:The rabbit has big _________ (耳朵).The flowers in the garden attract _______ and happy bees.88、听力题:A ______ is a representation of scientific principles.89、What color is a typical fire truck?A. BlueB. GreenC. RedD. Yellow答案:C90、填空题:My family enjoys having ________ (周末聚会) together.91、What is the name of the toy that you can pull apart and put back together?A. PuzzleB. LegoC. Action FigureD. Doll答案:B92、听力题:The process of osmosis involves the movement of __________.93、填空题:My cat purrs when it feels ______ (放松).94、What do we call a person who studies the impact of technology on society?A. SociologistB. TechnologistC. AnthropologistD. Historian答案: A95、Which animal lives in the Arctic?A. LionB. Polar BearC. KangarooD. Elephant答案: B96、填空题:The __________ is a large body of water surrounded by land. (湖泊)What is 40 - 15?A. 25B. 20C. 30D. 3598、听力题:The chemical symbol for xenon is ______.99、听力题:A chemical reaction that involves the exchange of ions is called a _____.100、听力题:My cousin is interested in ____ (robotics).。

Products of random rectangular matrices

Products of random rectangular matrices
பைடு நூலகம்
Introduction
Matrix products might de ne the simplest dynamical systems possible, but nevertheless they still play an important role in investigations of dynamics. They arise naturally as linearizations of smooth systems and also as transition matrices in population dynamics or economic models. Moreover they can be found in the form of stochastic matrices in the theory of random walks and Markov chains. In the trivial case of just one matrix A, linear algebra allows a complete description and characterization of the dynamics given by the iteration of the matrix in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenspaces of A. For the case of inhomogeneous matrix products An An?1 : : : A1 the situation immediately becomes very complicated. In the case of products of random matrices, where the Ai form a stochastic process, there is at least a possibility to describe the asymptotic behaviour of the dynamics using ergodic theory. This requires that the matrices are chosen in a stationary way according to some probability measure. The history of ergodic theory for products of random matrices really starts with a result of Furstenberg and Kesten 8] on the dominating growth rate which can be described as follows. If ( ; F ; P) is a probability space and # is a P-preserving transformation consider a random variable A : ! Rd d , d 2 Z+ such that log+ kA(:)k 2 L1 ( ; F ; P). Then there exists a measurable #-invariant function + 1 : ! R f?1g with 1 2 L1 ( ; F ; P) such that for P-almost all ! 2 lim 1 log kA(#n?1 !) : : : A(#!)A(!)k = (!):

煤焦催化气化中非均相反应动力学的研究

煤焦催化气化中非均相反应动力学的研究

科技创新导报 Science and Technology Innovation Herald 166技报告导读unit injection mode, Optimize the injection parameters vuggy reservoir water injection unit, Further improve the different types of karst fractured reservoir provides water technology policy. The subject completed the annual research program content and objectives.Key Words :Tahe Oilfield;fractured-vuggy reserviors;Water flooding development;Water injection;Injection-production parameters阅读全文链接(需实名注册):htt p://w w w.nstr s.c n/x ian g x iBG.as px?id=47982&f lag=1煤焦催化气化中非均相反应动力学的研究李伟伟1 张荣1 毕继诚1 郑岩2(1.中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所;2.新奥集团煤基低碳能源国家重点实验室)摘 要:以神木煤焦为研究对象,在小型加压固定床上考察了不同气化剂(水蒸气、二氧化碳、氢气)、催化剂负载量、水蒸气分压、氢气分压和一氧化碳分压对碳转化率和气化反应速率的影响。

结果表明,对于非均相的催化气化反应来说,反应速率顺序为C-H 2O>C-CO 2>C-H 2。

H 2和CO不同程度地抑制煤焦水蒸气气化反应,CO的抑制作用明显大于H 2。

在700 ℃,当添加5%的CO,碳转化率降低约50%。

基于Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H)方程,结合随机孔模型,同时考虑催化剂负载量及气化产物分压的影响,建立了煤焦催化水蒸气气化动力学模型,模型预测反应速率常数与实验值误差在10%以内,说明建立的动力学模型可以较好地模拟煤焦的催化水蒸气气化反应过程。

Interaction Matrix Element Fluctuations in Ballistic Quantum Dots Random Wave Model

Interaction Matrix Element Fluctuations in Ballistic Quantum Dots Random Wave Model
Interaction matrix element fluctuations in ballistic quantum dots: random wave model
Department of Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA Center for Theoretical Physics, Sloane Physics Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA We study matrix element fluctuations of the two-body screened Coulomb interaction and of the one-body surface charge potential in ballistic quantum dots. For chaotic dots, we use a normalized random wave model to obtain analytic expansions for matrix element variances and covariances in the limit of large kL (where k is the Fermi wave number and L the linear size of the dot). These leading-order analytical results are compared with exact numerical results. Both two-body and onebody matrix elements are shown to follow strongly non-Gaussian distributions, despite the Gaussian random nature of the single-electron wave functions.

A Large Distance Expansion for Quantum Field Theory

A Large Distance Expansion for Quantum Field Theory

a r X i v :h e p -t h /9608097v 1 15 A u g 1996DTP 96/33A Large Distance Expansion for Quantum Field TheoryPaul Mansfield Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham South Road Durham,DH13LE,England P.R.W.Mansfield@ Abstract Using analyticity of the vacuum wave-functional under complex scalings,the vacuum of a quantum field theory may be reconstructed from a derivative expansion valid for slowly varying fields.This enables the eigenvalue problem for the Hamiltonianto be reduced to algebraic equations.Applied to Yang-Mills theory this expansion leads to a confining force between quarks.Invited talk at the Second International Sakharov Conference on Physics1IntroductionI will describe an approach to the eigenvalue problem for the Hamiltonian of a quantum field theory,ˆH|E =E|E ,in which states are constructed from their simple large distance behaviour.[1]This is in contrast to the usual approach to,say,Yang-Mills theory, which is built up from simple short-distance behaviour.For simplicity,I will concentrate on scalarfield theory,although the results also apply to Yang-Mills theory where the leading order in the expansion which I will describe leads to an area law for the Wilson loop[2]via a kind of dimensional reduction.[3]In the Schr¨o dinger representation thefield operator,ˆϕ,is diagonal and its conjugate momentum represented by functional differentiationϕ|ˆϕ(x)= ϕ|ˆϕ(x), ϕ|ˆπ(x)=−iδThe boundary condition on the integration variable,φ,implied by D|is that it should vanish on the boundary surfaces t=0and t=−T.(In replacingˆπby˙φ,the time derivative ofφ,we should also include delta functions in time,coming from the time-ordering.)So W[ϕ]is the sum of connected Euclidean Feynman diagrams in whichϕis a source for˙φon the boundary.The only major difference from the usual Feynman diagrams encountered infield theory is that the propagator vanishes when either of its arguments lies on the ing this,Symanzik discovered the remarkable result that in3+1dimensionalφ4theory W[ϕ]isfinite as the cut-offis removed.For a free scalarfield with mass m this gives W=−1−∇2+m2ϕ,so that if the Fourier transform ofϕvanishes for momenta with magnitude greater than the mass,W can be expanded in the convergent series− d x m4m(∇ϕ)2−1s)where s is real and greater than zero.I will now show that W[ϕs]extends to an analytic function of s with singularities only on the negative real axis(at least within an expansion in powers ofϕ)from which W[ϕ]can be obtained using Cauchy’s theorem.As T→∞in(4),Ψbecomes a functional integral on the Euclidean space-time t≤0.By rotating the co-ordinates we can view this instead as a functional integral over the Euclidean space-time x≥0,soe W[ϕs]= Dφe−S r E+ dtφ′(0,t)ϕs(t),(5) whereφ′=∂φ/∂x,and S r E is the action for the rotated space-time.This can be re-interpreted as the time-ordered expectation value of exp dt(ϕs(t)ˆφ′(0,t)−ˆH r)in the ground-state,|E r ,of the rotated Hamiltonian,ˆH r.The time integrals can be done if this is expanded in powers ofϕs,and the sources Fourier analysed using˜ϕs(k)=√s). This yieldsΨ[ϕs]=∞n=0dk n..dk1˜ϕ(k n)...˜ϕ(k1)δ( n1k i)×√√√between connected and disconnected pieces.Now defineI(λ)≡1s−1eλ(s−1)W[ϕs](7)Where C is a very large circle centred on the origin,beginning just below the negative real axis and ending just above.On C,ϕs(x)=ϕ(x/√2 k2<1/ǫdkδ22(ϕ′2+M2(ǫ)ϕ2)+g 2πiCdsReferences[1]P.Mansfield,Phys.Lett.B358,287(1995);Phys.Lett.B365,207(1996).[2]P.Mansfield,Nucl.Phys.B418,113(1994).[3]J.Greensite,Nucl.Phys.B158,469(1979);Nucl.Phys.B166,113(1980);Phys.Lett.B191,431(1987);J.Greensite and J.Iwasaki,Phys.Lett.B223,207(1989);H.Arisue,Phys.Lett.B280,85(1992);Q.Z.Chen,X.Q.Luo,and S.H.Guo,Phys.Lett.B341,349(1995);M.Halpern,Phys.Rev.D19,517(1979);J.Ambjorn,P.Olesen,C.Petersen,Nucl.Phys.B240,189(1984).[4]K.Symanzik,Nucl.Phys.B190,1(1983).4。

Large Deviations and Random Energy Models

Large Deviations and Random Energy Models

1. Introduction. The purpose of this note is to bring out the essence involved in the existence theorems for the limiting free energy in several random energy models. Basically, they are corollaries to the large deviation principle (LDP) obeyed by certain empirical measures coupled with Varadhan’s lemma. Since this note is addressed to probabilists, the results are first formulated in the large deviation setting and then the consequences to the spin glass models are explained in each section. At the first sight it may appear that the large deviation principles proved here are nothing but the well known principles for empirical measures, but however a little reflection shows that it is not so. For large deviation terminology, we refer to [4, 9]. We could have given the most general result of section 5 and then deduced all the results from it. Instead, we decided to go from simple model to the more general one, so that it is easier for the reader to follow. 2. Random Energy Model (REM). Let (λN , N ≥ 1) be a sequence of probabilities on the real line R. Assume that λN ⇒ λ and satisfy large deviation principle with a convex rate function I (x) on R. For every N , suppose ξi , 1 ≤ i ≤ 2N be i.i.d. random variables having distribution λN . Define for each ω , µN (ω ) to be the empirical measure, namely µN (ω ) = 1 δ(ξi (ω )). 2N Theorem 2.1. For a.e. ω the above sequence {µN (ω )} satisfies LDP with rate function J given by, J (x) = I (x) if =∞ if I (x) ≤ log 2 I (x) > log 2.

试题英文数理统计

试题英文数理统计

一、填空(一)各章节的introduction1、Continuous variables or interval data can assume any value in some interval of real numbers.连续变量或间隔数据可以假设在某个实数间隔中的任意值。

(measurement)Discrete variables assume only isolated values.离散变量只假定孤立的值。

(counting)11、The lower or first quartile is the 25th percentile and the upper or third quartile is the 75th percentile.12、The fist qurtile Q1 is the median of the observations falling below the median of the entire sample and the third quartile Q3 is the median of the observations falling above the median of the entire sample.The interquartile range is defined as IQR=Q3-Q1.第一个四分位数Q1是低于整个样本中位数的观测值的中位数,第三个四分位数Q3是高于整个样本中位数的观测值的中位数。

四分位数范围定义为IQR=Q3-Q1。

2、Statistics applied to the life sciences in often called biostatistics or biometry.统计学应用于生命科学,通常称为生物统计学或生物计量学。

3、A descriptive measure associated with a random variable when it is considered over the entire population is called a parameter.当在整个总体中考虑一个随机变量时,与它相关的描述性度量称为参数4、One is forced to examine a subset or sample of the population and make inferences about the entire variable of a sample is called a statistic.人们被迫检查总体中的一个子集或样本,并对样本中的整个变量做出推断,这被称为统计量。

Threshold Perspectives on Meson Production

Threshold Perspectives on Meson Production

a rXiv:n ucl-e x /31111v112N ov23Threshold Perspectives on Meson Production M.Wolke 1The Svedberg Laboratory,Uppsala University,Box 533,75121Uppsala,Sweden ∗Abstract.Studies of meson production in nucleon–nucleon collisions at threshold are characterised by few degrees of freedom in a configuration of well defined initial and final states with a transition governed by short range dynamics.Effects from low–energy scattering in the exit channel are inherent to the data and probe the interaction in baryon–meson and meson–meson systems otherwise difficult to access.From dedicated experiments at the present generation of cooler rings precise data are becoming available on differential and eventually spin observables allowing detailed comparisons between complementary final states.To discuss physics implications of generic and specific properties,recent experimental results on meson production in proton–proton scattering obtained at CELSIUS and COSY serve as a guideline.INTRODUCTION High precision data from the present generation of cooler rings,IUCF,CELSIUS,and COSY ,have contributed significantly over the last decade to our present knowledge and understanding of threshold meson production (for a recent review see [1]).Due to the high momentum transfers required to create a meson or mesonic system in production experiments close to threshold the short range part of the interaction is probed.In nucleon–nucleon scattering,for mesons in the mass range up to 1GeV /c 2distances from 0.53fm (π0)down to less than 0.2fm (φ)are involved.At such short distances it is a priori not clear,whether the relevant degrees of freedom are still baryons and mesons,or rather quarks and gluons.As there is no well defined boundary,one goalof the threshold production approach is to explore the limits in momentum transfer for a consistent description using hadronic meson exchange models.Within this framework,questions concerning both the underlying meson exchange contributions and especially the role of intermediate baryon resonances have to be answered.Another aspect which enriches the field of study arises from the low relative centre–of–mass velocities of the ejectiles:Effects of low energy scattering are inherent to the observables due to strong final state interactions (FSI)within the baryon–baryon,baryon–meson,and meson–meson subsystems.In case of short–lived particles,low energy scattering potentials are otherwise difficult or impossible to study directly.DYNAMICS OF THE TWO PION SYSTEMInγandπinduced double pion production on the nucleon the excitation of the N∗(1440) P11resonance followed by its decay to the Nσchannel,i.e.N∗(1440)→p(ππ)I=l=0, is found to contribute non–negligibly close to threshold[2,3,4].Nucleon–nucleon scattering should provide complementary information,eventually on theππdecay mode of the N∗(1440),which plays an important part in understanding the basic structure of the second excited state of the nucleon[5,6,7].Exclusive CELSIUS data from the PROMICE/W ASA setup on the reactions pp→ppπ+π−,pp→ppπ0π0and pp→pnπ+π0[8,9,10]are well described by model cal-culations[11]:For theπ+π−andπ0π0channels,the reaction preferentially proceeds close to threshold via heavy meson exchange and excitation of the N∗(1440)Roper resonance,with a subsequent pure s–wave decay to the Nσchannel1.While nonres-onant contributions are expected to be small,resonant processes with Roper excita-tion and decay via an intermediate∆(pp→pN∗→p∆π→ppππ)and∆∆excitation (pp→∆∆→pπpπ)are strongly momentum dependent and vanish directly at thresh-old.Double∆excitation,which is expected to dominate at higher excess energies be-yond Q=250MeV[11]involves higher angular momenta and consequently strongly anisotropic proton and pion angular distributions.On the other hand,the Roper decay amplitude via an intermediate∆depends predominantly on a term symmetric in the pion momenta(eq.(1)),leading to the p(π+π−)I=l=0channel and an interference with the direct Nσdecay.Experimentally,for the reaction pp→ppπ+π−at excess energies of Q=64.4MeV and Q=75MeV angular distributions give evidence for only s–waves in thefinal state,in line with a dominating pp→pN∗→pp(π+π−)I=l=0process,with the initial inelastic pp collision governed by heavy meson(σ,ρ)exchange.Roper excitation is disclosed in the pπ+π−invariant mass distribution(Fig.1a),where the data are shifted towards higher invariant masses compared to phase space in agreement with resonance excitation in the low energy tail of the N∗(1440).Compared with Monte Carlo simulations including both heavy meson exchange for N∗excitation,and pp S–wave final state interaction,but only the direct decay N∗→p(π+π−)I=l=0(dotted lines),the production process involves additional dynamics,which is apparent from discrepancies especially in observables depending on theπmomentum correlation k1· k2,i.e.π+π−invariant mass Mππ(Fig.1b)and opening angleδππ=1For the pnπ+π0final state,this reaction mechanism is trivially forbidden by isospin conservation.An underestimation of the total cross section data[9]by the model predictions[11]might be explained by the neglect of effects from the pnfinal state interaction in the calculation[12].M π+π- [MeV/c 2]d σ/d M π+π- [n b /(M e V /c 2)]-π+πδcos d σ/d c o s δπ+π- [n b ]a)M p π+π- [MeV/c 2]d σ/d M p π+π- [n b /(M e V /c 2)]b)c)FIGURE 1.Differential cross sections for the reaction pp →pp π+π−at an excess energy of Q =75MeV.Experimental data (solid circles)for invariant mass distributions of the (p π+π−)–(a)and(π+π−)–subsystems (b),and the π+π−opening angle (c)are compared to pure phase space (shaded areas)and Monte Carlo simulations for direct decays N ∗→N σ(dotted lines),decays via an intermediate ∆resonance N ∗→∆π→N σ(dashed lines)and an interference of the two decay routes (solid lines)according to eq.(1).Figures are taken from [10].allows to determine the ratio of partial decay widths R (M N ∗)=ΓN ∗→∆π→N ππ/ΓN ∗→N σat average masses <M N ∗>corresponding to excess energies Q =64.4MeV and Q =75MeV relative to the π+π−threshold.The numerical results,R (1264)=0.034±0.004and R (1272)=0.054±0.006,exhibit the clear dominance of the direct decay to the N σchannel in the low energy region of the Roper resonance.On the other hand they indicate the strong energy dependence of the ratio from the momentum dependence in the decay branch via an intermediate ∆,which will surpass the direct decay at higher energies [10].A model dependent extrapolation based on the validity of ansatz (1)leads to R (1440)=3.9±0.3at the nominal resonance pole in good agreement with the PDG value of 4±2[13].Within the experimental programme to determine the energy dependence of the N ∗→N ππdecay exclusive data (for details see [14])have been taken simultaneously at the CELSIUS/W ASA facility on both the pp π+π−and pp π0π0final states.In case of the π+π−system the preliminary results at an excess energy of Q =75MeV are in good agreement with the relative strength of the decay routes adjusted to an extrapolated ratio R (1440)=3.However,at slightly higher excess energy (Q =127MeV)the data might be equally well described by a value R (1440)=1,which is noticeably favoured at both excess energies by the data on π0π0production,indicating distinct underlying dynam-ics in π0π0and π+π−production.One difference becomes obvious from the isospin decomposition of the total cross section [9]:An isospin I =1amplitude in the ππsys-tem,and accordingly a p–wave admixture,is forbidden by symmetry to contribute to the neutral pion system in contrast to the charged complement.A p–wave component was neglected so far in the analysis,since the unpolarized angular distributions show no devi-ation from isotropy.However,there is evidence for small,but non–negligible analysing powers from a first exclusive measurement of π+π−production with a polarized beam at the COSY–TOF facility [14,15],suggesting higher partial waves especially in the ππsystem.At higher energies,i.e.Q =208MeV and Q =286MeV with respect to the π+π−threshold,preliminary data for both π+π−and π0π0from CELSIUS/W ASA rather fol-low phasespace than expectations based on a dominating pp →pN ∗→pp σreaction mechanism[14].At these energies,the ∆∆excitation process should influence observ-ables significantly,and,thus,a phase space behaviour becomes even more surprising,unless the ∆∆system is excited in a correlated way.THE PROTON–PROTON–ETA FINAL STATEAs a general trait in meson production in nucleon–nucleon scattering,the primary pro-duction amplitude,i.e.the underlying dynamics can be regarded as energy independent in the vicinity of threshold [16,17,18].Consequently,for s–wave production processes,the energy dependence of the total cross section is essentially given by a phase space behaviour modified by the influence of final state interactions.In Fig.2total cross sec-tion data obtained in proton–proton scattering are shown for the pseudoscalar isosinglet mesons ηand η′[19].In both cases,the energy dependence of the total cross sec-σ[n b ]10101010excess energy [MeV]110102FIGURE 2.Total cross section data for η(squares [20,21,22,23,24,25])and η′(circles [24,26,27,28,29])production in proton–proton scattering versus excess energy Q [19].In comparison,the energy dependences from a pure phase space behaviour (dotted lines,normalized arbitrarily),from phase space modified by the 1S 0proton–proton FSI including Coulomb interaction (solid lines),and from additionally including the proton–ηinteraction phenomenologically (dashed line),are shown.Meson exchange calculations for ηproduction including a P–wave component in the proton–proton system [30]are depicted by the dashed–dotted line,while the dashed–double–dotted line corresponds to the arbitrarily normalized energy dependence from a full three–body treatment of the pp ηfinal state [31](see also [32]).tion deviates significantly from phase space expectations.Including the on–shell 1S 0proton–proton FSI enhances the cross section close to threshold by more than an order of magnitude,in good agreement with data in case of η′.As expected from kinemat-ical considerations[1]the cross section for ηproduction deviates from phase space including the pp FSI at excess energies Q ≥40MeV,where the 1S 0final state is no longer dominant compared to higher partial waves.Deviations at low excess energies seem to be well accounted for by an attractive proton–ηFSI (dashed line),treated phe-nomenologically as an incoherent pairwise interaction [1,17,33].In comparison to the proton–η′(Fig.2)and proton–π0systems only the p ηinteraction is strong enough to become apparent in the energy dependence of the total cross section [34].In differen-tial observables,effects should be more pronounced in the phase space region of low proton–ηinvariant masses.However,to discern effects of proton–ηscattering from the influence of proton–proton FSI,which is stronger by two orders of magnitude,requires high statistics measurements,which have only become available recently [19,35,36]:Close to threshold,the distribution of the invariant mass of the proton–proton subsys-s pp [GeV 2/c 4]d σ/d s p p [µb /(Ge V 2/c 4)]FIGURE 3.Invariant mass squared of the (pp )–subsystem in the reaction pp →pp ηat excess energies of Q =15.5MeV (COSY–11,solid circles [19],Q =15MeV (COSY–TOF,open circles [36]and Q =16MeV (PROMICE/W ASA,open triangles [35]).The dotted and dashed lines follow a pure phase space behaviour and its modification by the phenomenological treatment of the three–body FSI as an incoherent pairwise interaction,respectively.The latter was normalized at small invariant mass values.Effects from including a P–wave admixture in the pp system are depicted by the dashed–dotted line [30],while the dashed–double–dotted line corresponds to a pure s–wave final state with a full three–body treatment [32].tem is characteristically shifted towards low invariant masses compared to phase space (dotted line in Fig.3).This low–energy enhancement is well reproduced by modifying phase space with the 1S 0pp on–shell interaction.A second enhancement at higher pp invariant masses,i.e.low energy in the p ηsystem,is not accounted for even when including additionally the proton–ηinteraction incoherently (dashed line).However,in-cluding a P–wave admixture in the pp system by considering a 1S 0→3P 0s transition in addition to the 3P 0→1S 0s threshold amplitude,excellent agreement with the ex-perimental invariant mass distribution is obtained (dashed–dotted line [30]).In return,with the P–wave strength adjusted to fit the invariant mass data,the approach fails to reproduce the energy dependence of the total cross section (Fig.2)below excess ener-gies of Q =40MeV.Preliminary calculations considering only s–waves in the final statebut using a rigorous three–body treatment of the ppηfinal state actually decrease the cross section at large values of the pp invariant mass(dashed–double–dotted lines[32]) compared to an incoherent two–body calculation within the same framework.However, close to threshold the energy dependence of the total cross section is enhanced com-pared to the phenomenological incoherent treatment and the data(Fig.2).Although part of this enhancement has to be attributed to the neglect of Coulomb repulsion in the pp system,consequently overestimating the pp invariant mass at low values,qualitatively the full three–body treatment has opposite effects compared to a P–wave admixture in the proton–proton system in view of both the total cross section as well as the pp in-variant mass distribution.In the approximate description of the total cross section by the phenomenological s–wave approach with an incoherent FSI treatment these two effects seem to cancel casually.Close to threshold,resonance excitation of the S11(1535)and subsequent decay to the pηfinal state is generally2believed to be the dominantηproduction mechanism [17,30,38,39,40,41,42,43].In this context,the issue of the actual excitation mechanism of the S11(1535)remains to be addressed.Theηangular distribution is sensitive to the underlying dynamics:A dominantρexchange favoured in[41]results in an inverted curvature of theηangular distribution compared toπandηexchanges which are inferred to give the largest contribution to resonance excitation in[42].In the latter approach the interference of the pseudoscalar exchanges in the resonance current with non–resonant nucleonic and mesonic exchange currents turns the curvature to the same angular dependence as expected forρexchange.Presently,due to the statistical errors of the available unpolarised data at an excess energy of Q≈40MeV[35,36]it is not possible to differentiate between a dominantρorπ,ηexchange,as discussed in [36].Data recently taken at the CELSIUS/W ASA facility with statistics increased by an order of magnitude compared to the available data might provide an answer in the near future[44].Spin observables,like theηanalyzing power,should even disentangle a dominantρmeson exchange and the interference ofπandηexchanges in resonance excitation with small nucleonic and mesonic currents[42],which result in identical predictions for the unpolarisedηangular distribution.First data[45]seem to favour the vector dominance model,butfinal conclusions both on the underlying reaction dynamics and the admixture of higher partial waves[30]have to await the analysis of data taken with higher statistics for the energy dependence of theηanalysing power[46].ASSOCIATED STRANGENESS PRODUCTIONIn elementary hadronic interactions with no strange valence quark in the initial state the associated strangeness production provides a powerful tool to study reaction dynamicsby introducing a“tracer”to hadronic matter.Thus,quark model concepts might even-tually be related to mesonic or baryonic degrees of freedom,with the onset of quark degrees of freedom expected for kinematical situations with large enough transverse momentum transfer.First exclusive close–to–threshold data onΛandΣ0production[47,48]obtained at the COSY–11facility showed at equal excess energies below Q=13MeV a cross section ratio ofRΛ/Σ0(Q≤13MeV)=σ(pp→pK+Λ)3For further complementary theoretical approaches see references in[1,58,59].Σ0p FSI being much weaker compared to the Λp system.However,the interpretation implies dominant S–wave production and reaction dynamics that can be regarded as energy independent.Within the present level of statistics,contributions from higher partial waves can be neither ruled out nor confirmed at higher excess energies for Σ0production.The energy dependence of the production ratio RΛ/Σ0is shown in Fig.4in comparisonwith theoretical calculations obtained within the approach of [50]assuming a destructive interference of πand K exchange and employing different choices of the microscopic hyperon nucleon model to describe the interaction in the final state [61].The resultexcess energy [MeV]4060200σ (p p → p K +Λ)σ (p p→p K +Σ)010203040FIGURE 4.Λ/Σ0production ratio in proton–proton scattering as a function of the excess energy.Data are from [48](shaded area)and [60].Calculations [61]within the Jülich meson exchange model imply a destructive interference of K and πexchange using the microscopic Nijmegen NSC89(dashed line [62])and the new Jülich model (solid line [63])for the Y N final state interaction.crucially depends on the details —especially the off–shell properties —of the hyperon–nucleon interaction employed.At the present stage both the good agreement found in[50]with the threshold enhancement (2)and for the Nijmegen model (dashed line in Fig.4)with the energy dependence of the cross section ratio should rather be regarded as accidental 4.Calculations using the new Jülich model (solid line in Fig.4)do not reproduce the tendency of the experimental data.It is suggested in [61]that neglecting the energy dependence of the elementary amplitudes and higher partial waves might no longer be justified beyond excess energies of Q =20MeV.However,once the reaction mechanism for close–to–threshold hyperon production is understood,exclusive data should provide a strong constraint on the details of hyperon–nucleon interaction models.PRESENT AND FUTUREIntermediate baryon resonances emerge as a common feature in the dynamics of the exemplary cases for threshold meson production in nucleon–nucleon scattering dis-cussed in this article.However,this does not hold in general for meson production in the1GeV/c2mass range(for a discussion onη′production see[64]).Moreover,the extent to which resonances are evident in the observables or actually govern the reaction mechanism depends on the specific channels,which differ in view of the level of present experimental and theoretical understanding.The N∗(1440)resonance dominatesπ+π−production at threshold,and exclusive data allow to extract resonance decay properties in the low–energy tail of the Roper. Dynamical differences between the different isospin configurations of theππsystem and the behaviour at higher energies remains to be understood withfirst experimental clues appearing.With three strongly interacting particles in thefinal state,a consistent description ofηproduction close to threshold requires an accurate three–body approach taking into account the possible influence of higher partial waves.High statistics differential cross sections and polarization observables coming up should straighten out both the excitation mechanism of the N∗(1535)and the admixture of higher partial waves.At present,the available experimental data on the elementary strangeness produc-tion channels give evidence for both an important role of resonances coupling to the hyperon–kaon channels and on a dominant non–resonant kaon exchange mechanism. Experiments on different isospin configurations,high statistics and spin transfer mea-surements close to threshold should disentangle the situation in future.From the cornerstone of total cross section measurements,it is apparent from the above examples to what extent our knowledge is presently enlarged by differential observables and what will be the impact of polarization experiments in future to get new perspectives in threshold meson production.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe author gratefully acknowledges the pleasure to work with the CELSIUS/W ASA and COSY–11collaborations,and,in particular,thanks M.Bashkanov,H.Clement,R. Meier,P.Moskal and W.Oelert for helpful discussions.This work has been supported by The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education(STINT Kontrakt Dnr02/192).REFERENCES1.Moskal,P.,Wolke,M.,Khoukaz,A.,and Oelert,W.,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.,49,1–90(2002).2.Oset,E.,and Vicente-Vacas,M.J.,Nucl.Phys.,A446,584–612(1985).3.Bernard,V.,Kaiser,N.,and Meißner,U.-G.,Nucl.Phys.,B457,147–174(1995).4.Gómez Tejedor,J.A.,and Oset,E.,Nucl.Phys.,A600,413–435(1996).5.Morsch,H.P.,and Zupranski,P.,Phys.Rev.,C61,024002(2000).6.Krehl,O.,Hanhart,C.,Krewald,S.,and Speth,J.,Phys.Rev.,C62,025207(2000).7.Hernández,E.,Oset,E.,and Vicente Vacas,M.J.,Phys.Rev.,C66,065201(2002).8.Brodowski,W.,et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,88,192301(2002).9.Johanson,J.,et al.,Nucl.Phys.,A712,75–94(2002).10.Pätzold,J.,et al.,Phys.Rev.,C67,052202(2003).11.Alvarez-Ruso,L.,Oset,E.,and Hernández,E.,Nucl.Phys.,A633,519–546(1998).12.Alvarez-Ruso,L.(2002),private communications.13.Hagiwara,K.,et al.,Phys.Rev.,D66,010001(2002).14.Bashkanov,M.,et al.,proceedings of this conference(2003).15.Clement,H.,et al.,Annual Report2002,Forschungszentrum Jülich(2003),Jül–4052.16.Moalem,A.,Gedalin,E.,Razdolskaja,L.,and Shorer,Z.,Nucl.Phys.,A600,445–460(1996).17.Bernard,V.,Kaiser,N.,and Meißner,U.-G.,Eur.Phys.J.,A4,259–275(1999).18.Gedalin,E.,Moalem,A.,and Razdolskaja,L.,Nucl.Phys.,A650,471–482(1999).19.Moskal,P.,et al.,e–Print Archive:nucl–ex/0307005(2003),Phys.Rev.C,in print.20.Bergdolt,A.M.,et al.,Phys.Rev.,D48,2969–2973(1993).21.Chiavassa,E.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B322,270–274(1994).22.Calén,H.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B366,39–43(1996).23.Calén,H.,et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,79,2642–2645(1997).24.Hibou,F.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B438,41–46(1998).25.Smyrski,J.,Wüstner,P.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B474,182–187(2000).26.Moskal,P.,et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,80,3202–3205(1998).27.Moskal,P.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B474,416–422(2000).28.Balestra,F.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B491,29–35(2000).29.Khoukaz,A.,et al.,Annual report2000/01,Institute of Nuclear Physics,University of Münster(2001),URL http://www.uni-muenster.de/Physik/KP/anrep.30.Nakayama,K.,Haidenbauer,J.,Hanhart,C.,and Speth,J.,Phys.Rev.,C68,045201(2003).31.Fix,A.(2003),private communications.32.Fix,A.,and Arenhövel,H.,Nucl.Phys.,A697,277–302(2002).33.Schuberth,U.,Phd thesis,Uppsala University(1995).34.Moskal,P.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B482,356–362(2000),and references therein.35.Calén,H.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B458,190–196(1999).36.Abdel-Bary,M.,et al.,Eur.Phys.J.,A16,127–137(2003).37.Peña,M.T.,Garcilazo,H.,and Riska,D.O.,Nucl.Phys.,A683,322–338(2001).38.Batini´c,M.,Švarc,A.,and Lee,T.-S.H.,Phys.Scripta,56,321–324(1997).39.Santra,A.B.,and Jain,B.K.,Nucl.Phys.,A634,309–324(1998).40.Gedalin,E.,Moalem,A.,and Razdolskaja,L.,Nucl.Phys.,A634,368–392(1998).41.Fäldt,G.,and Wilkin,C.,Phys.Scripta,64,427–438(2001).42.Nakayama,K.,Speth,J.,and Lee,T.-S.H.,Phys.Rev.,C65,045210(2002).43.Baru,V.,et al.,Phys.Rev.,C67,024002(2003).44.Zlomanczuk,J.(2003),private communications.45.Winter,P.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B544,251–258(2002).46.Czy˙z ykiewicz,R.,et al.,proceedings of this conference(2003).47.Balewski,J.T.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B420,211–216(1998).48.Sewerin,S.,Schepers,G.,et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,83,682–685(1999).49.Baldini,A.,Flaminio,V.,Moorhead,W.G.,and Morrison,D.R.O.,Total Cross-Sections forReactions of High–Energy Particles,vol.12B of Landolt–Börnstein:New Series.Group1,edited by H.Schopper,Springer,Heidelberg,Germany,1988,ISBN3–540–18412–0.50.Gasparian,A.,et al.,Phys.Lett.,B480,273–279(2000).51.Siebert,R.,et al.,Nucl.Phys.,A567,819–843(1994).52.Tan,T.H.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,23,395–398(1969).53.Balestra,F.,et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,83,1534–1537(1999).54.Maggiora,M.,πN Newslett.,16,273–279(2002).get,J.M.,Phys.Lett.,B259,24–28(1991).56.Ro˙z ek,T.,and Grzonka, D.,COSY Proposal117,IKP,FZ Jülich,Germany(2002),URLhttp://www.fz-juelich.de/ikp/en/publications.shtml.57.Shyam,R.,Penner,G.,and Mosel,U.,Phys.Rev.,C63,022202(2001).58.Kowina,P.,et al.,proceedings of this conference(2003).59.Wagner,M.,et al.,proceedings of this conference(2003).60.Kowina,P.,Wolke,M.,et al.,e–Print Archive:nucl–ex/0302014(2003).61.Gasparyan,A.,Symposium on Threshold Meson Production in pp and pd Interaction,Forschungs-zentrum Jülich,Germany,2002,vol.11of Matter and Material,pp.205–211.62.Maessen,P.M.M.,Rijken,T.A.,and de Swart,J.J.,Phys.Rev.,C40,2226–2245(1989).63.Haidenbauer,J.,Melnitchouk,W.,and Speth,J.,AIP Conf.Proc.,603,421–424(2001).64.Moskal,P.,et al.,proceedings of this conference(2003).。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

RANDOM MOMENT PROBLEM
3
Kullback information (or cross entropy) with respect to ν . Moreover, this computation gives quantitative evaluations of the (n + 1)th moment range size of the set of all probability measures having the same prescribed n first moments in term of the reversed Kullback information. To our knowledge these results on power moment problem are new, they are developed in Section 3. In Section 2.5, we give large and moderate deviation principles for the ran(k ) dom vector Zn . Hence, we study exponential rates of convergence, between (3) and (4), for this vector. All the proofs are postponed to Section 4. This last section begin with a section on canonical moments [Dette and Studden (1997)] which are the main tool to prove our results. 2. Main results. 2.1. Large deviations. Let us first recall what is a LDP [see, e.g., Dembo and Zeitouni (1998)]. Let (un ) be a decreasing positive sequence of real numbers. Definition 2.1. We say that a sequence (Rn ) of probability measures on a measurable Hausdorff space (U, B (U )) satisfies a LDP with rate function I and speed (un ) if: (i) I is lower semicontinuous (l.s.c.), with values in R+ ∪ {+∞}. (ii) For any measurable set A of U , −I (int A) ≤ lim inf un log Rn (A) ≤ lim sup un log Rn (A) ≤ −I (clo A),
2
F. GAMBOA AND L.-V. LOZADA-CHANG
probability Pn on Mn . Mn is a very “small” set. Indeed, its volume has 2 order 2−n for large n. Moreover, this set “concentrates” (in some sense) on a single point. More precisely, Chang, Kemperman and Studden (1993) have shown that for any fixed k ∈ N∗ and under the probability Pn , the k first components of c(n) ∈ Mn converge in probability to the k first moments of the arcsine law. That is, (1) c ¯1 c1 . . . lim Pn . . − . ≥ ξ = 0, n→∞ (n) c ¯k ck ν (dx) = dx . π x(1 − x)
Received June 2002; revised December 2003. AMS 2000 subject classifications. 60F10, 30E05. Key words and phrases. Large deviations, power moment problem, canonical moments.
n ∈ N∗ .
This is an electronic reprint of the original article published by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics in The Annals of Probability, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 3B, 2819–2837. This reprint differs from the original in pagination and typographic detail. 1
1. Introduction. In this work we will study the asymptotic behavior in large deviations of random power moment problem. Let P([0, 1]) denote the set of all probability measures (p.m.s) on the interval [0, 1]. In the whole paper this set will be endowed with the weak topology [see Billingsley (1999)]. For any µ in P([0, 1]) the k th (power) moment of µ will be denoted by ck (µ): ck (µ) = xk dµ(x).
[0,1]
In this paper we focus on some asymptotic properties of the finite moment space Mn : Mn = {c(n) (µ) = (c1 (µ), . . . , cn (µ))T : µ ∈ P([0, 1])}, Mn is the closed convex hull of the curve {(x, x2 , . . . , xn )T : x ∈ [0, 1]} [see Karlin and Studden (1966) and Kre˘ ın and Nudelman (1977)]. As Mn is a compact subset of Rn having nonvoid interior, we may define the uniform
n→∞
where Zn denotes the random vector built with the k first coordinates of Zn = c(n) (drawn randomly with distribution Pn ). c ¯(k) = (¯ c1 , c ¯2 , . . . , c ¯k )T is the vector of the k first moment of ν . The covariance matrix Σk will be described in Section 2.5. The main result of this paper is a functional (k ) (k ) large deviations principle for the sequence (Zn ). This means that Zn “concentrates” exponentially fast. More precisely, for any c(n) ∈ Mn , there + (c(n) ) whose n first moments are c(n) and maxexists a unique measure σn imizing the (n + 1)th moment [see Section 2.3, Karlin and Studden (1966), Kre˘ ın and Nudelman (1977) and Dette and Studden (1997)]. In Section 2.4 + (Z ) satisfies a large deviations principle (LDP). Roughly we show that σn n + (Z ) concentrates exponentially fast on ν . In speaking, this means that σn n other words, for large n, (4)

(n)



ξ > 0,
where c ¯j = cj (ν ), j ∈ N∗ , and (2)
Hence, Mn is concentrated around the nth first moments of the arcsine law. Moreover, Chang, Kemperman and Studden (1993) have studied the fluctuation limit law in (1). They have shown that the limit distribution of the fluctuations is Gaussian: √ L−Pn (k ) n(Zn −c ¯(k) ) −→ (3) Nk (0, Σk ),
The Annals of Probability 2004, Vol. 32, No. 3B, 2819–2837 DOI: 10.1214/009117904000000559 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004
相关文档
最新文档