难以忽视的真相观后感~英文版
难以忽视的真相观后感
难以忽视的真相观后感第一篇：难以忽视的真相观后感《难以忽视的真相》观后感曾经以为，环境问题只是那些科学家或者政治家的事，科学家应找出环境问题的原因并加以解决，而政治家应该实行更多政策来抑制导致环境问题的项目，但是看完《难以忽视的真相》后，我才发觉，这是全人类的问题，全世界的人们应该共同做出自己可以做的所有努力来解决的。
温室效应导致的全球变暖问题，已经出现了很多年了，不知道从什么时候起，认识到这个问题的不仅仅是科学家们，越来越多的普通人都意识到了全球变暖。
可是没有多少人意识到，因为我们人类活动的影响，温室气体的含量会以指数形式的不断增大，与其一同增长的会是我们地球的温度,想起影片中那条径直伸长的曲线，不禁令人不寒而栗。
如果我们真的还不有所行动的话，放任这条曲线由科学家的预测发展下去，世界会变成什么样子。
正如戈尔所说的：如果我们听之任之，就是极端不道德的行为！当我们的后代来质问我们在还能改变的时候无所作为，我们该如何回应他们，我们该如何还给他们一个崭新的地球。
另一些人则认为这只是杞人忧天，我们的科学技术在飞快的发展，在全球变暖问题真正影响到我们的之前，我们一定能找出解决的方案。
但事实是，全球变暖问题已经开始，而且很严重的影响到我们的生活了！首先:随着海洋温度的升高，飓风会变得更加的频繁和严重。
根本不用预测未来会怎么样，这几年的台风已经证明了这一切。
此外洪水和干旱也会更加严重，中国这两年的遇到的都是百年难见的洪水和干旱，这并不是运气的问题，而是我们所作所为导致的。
并且之后我们会习以为常，因为它们可能频繁到年年可见。
另外生态环境随着温度升高被破坏，大量的动植物会应来不及适应飞速改变的生态坏境而灭绝。
更多疾病会蔓延开来，更多的威胁会出现在我们身边。
而期中最严重应该是北极和南极的冰川融化，冰川融化后海平面会上升，这个已经众所周知了，许多海拔过低的国家或者城市会被海水所淹没。
而这并不仅仅似乎冰川融化所会带来的所有后果。
难以忽视的真相观后感5篇
难以忽视的真相观后感5篇《难以忽视的真相》(英文：An Inconvenient Truth 香港译名：：绝望真相台湾译名：不愿面对的真相)是一部有关气候变迁的纪录片，其中特别关注全球暖化现象。
下面是店铺的小编为你们整理的文章，希望你们能够喜欢难以忽视的真相观后感前一个星期六的晚上，为了获得种子，试试种花的乐趣，就和同学们观看了一部具有教育意义的影片，片名叫《难以忽视的真相》，看后如醍醐灌顶，了解到不少有教育意义的东西。
电影由戴维斯·古根汉执导、前美国副总统戈尔主演。
这部纪录片是根据高尔研究多年的多媒体简报所摄制，这份简报是关于全球暖化教育活动的一部份。
此片获得第79届奥斯卡金像奖最佳纪录片，由Melissa Etheridge演唱的主题曲I Need To Wake Up获得最佳歌曲奖。
我个人认为，在这部电影中，戈尔很成功的脱离了政治性演讲的外壳，充分地展示了他的个人魅力，以一种幽默而又客观的态度给观众们罗列了种种事实，让他们自己去得出结论。
到了最后，所有的观众都被这些让人难以忘怀的画面深深打动，以至于他们都在座位上坐不住了。
戈尔在影片中对大家说：“这并不是一部表现绝望情绪的电影，但也不是仅仅喊出一个保护地球的口号而已……很显然，我们现在面临着一个逐步加深的全球气候危机，这要我们尽快地行动起来，以最聪明有效的方式解决问题。
”是的，随着科技的发展，特别是第1。
第2工业革命完成后，人类对大自然赠与的宝贵资源的需求越来越大，甚至有点贪得无厌，毫无节制地用石油，天然气，不只浪费资源，由此产生的废气严重污染着我们唯一的地球，更严重的是由此产生的二氧化碳气体具有吸热和隔热的功能。
它在大气中增多的结果是形成一种无形的玻璃罩，使太阳辐射到地球上的热量无法向外层空间发散，其结果是地球表面变热起来。
因此，二氧化碳也被称为温室气体。
人类活动和大自然还排放其他温室气体，它们是：氯氟烃(CFC〕、甲烷、低空臭氧、和氮氧化物气体、地球上可以吸收大量二氧化碳的是海洋中的浮游生物和陆地上的森林，尤其是热带雨林。
观后感
观《难以忽视的真相》有感《难以忽视的真相》（英文：An Inconvenient Truth）是哥伦比亚广播公司、派拉蒙家庭视频公司等七家公司于2006年联合发行的一部环保纪录片。
由戴维斯·古根海姆根据同名图书编导，美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔进行讲解。
该片讲述了全球气候变暖及环境恶化所带来的明显的灾难性的片段，并在最后呼吁保护环境、减缓暖化。
之所以选取这部电影，是因为近期的雾霾严重的影响了人们的健康以及出行。
空气污染指数每天都在二百七十以上，不适宜户外出行，首都更是拉响了雾霾红色预警。
在这样的情况下，我想起了前段时间在网络上收到热议的柴静的雾霾纪录片《穹顶之下》。
当时观之可谓惊心动魄。
初观这部纪录片，我第一时间想到的就是《难以忽视的真相》，二者有着异曲同工之妙。
抛开政治因素，这部电影不失为一部非常值得人反思的环境素材电影。
过去很多人，包括我们，很大程度上觉得，环境污染还离我们很远，那是科学家的事情，那是他们要解决要研究的问题。
是的，小时候的天空很蓝，河水很清，雾就是雾，太阳出来了空气就会很清新。
然而，现在呢，整整一天的灰蒙蒙，河水的腥臭浑浊，很长时间看不见天空是什么样子。
这部电影就是在告诉我们，真相是什么，这是每个人应该关心，应该解决的事情。
戈尔先生在电影里的课堂上为我们详细的用90多分钟对多年来科学家们关于Global Warming本身的起因,造成的结果和以后发展的研究做了详细而清楚接阐述. 里面用了许多做的精美的图表和照片.证据确凿,很难不让人信服。
这和《穹顶之下》十分相似，先有结论，然后找出论据。
当这一条条有说服力的论据摆在众人面前的时候，你已经很难忽视摆在你面前的真相了。
影片的开头，是对我们生活的这个星球的大致介绍。
他让我们从不同的角度欣赏了一下这个我们生存的星球,以便让你知道大概的一些地理知识。
当然，这个手法很巧妙，让我们欣赏完这个蓝色的美丽星球后，会更为亲手把这个星球毁掉感到深深的自责。
难以忽略的真相观后感5000字
难以忽略的真相观后感5000字难以忽略的真相观后感5000字篇一《难以忽视的真相》是一部纪录片，其中揭露了气候变迁的资料并对此做出预测，同时也在电影中穿插了高尔的个人活动。
透过巡回全球的简报发表，戈尔指出全球变暖的科学证据、讨论全球变暖经济和政治的层面，并阐述他相信人类制造的温室气体若没有减少，在不久后全球气候将发生重大变化。
电影包含许多段落是为了反驳认为全球变暖不明显或尚未被证实的人。
例如，戈尔探讨了南极洲冰床溶解的风险，可能使全球海平面升高近6公尺，沿海地区将会被淹没，也会让约一亿人因此成为难民。
格陵兰冰雪融化后的水盐分含量较低，可能会中断湾流而造成北欧地区气温骤降。
为了解释全球变暖现象，电影引用了对南极洲冰层中心样本在过去六十万年间的温度和二氧化碳含量数值的检测。
飓风卡特里娜也被用来推论9-14公尺高的海浪对沿岸地区造成的破坏。
戈尔在纪录片的最后说到，若是尽快采取适当的行动，例如减少二氧化碳的排放量并种植更多植物，将能阻止全球变暖带来的影响。
高尔也告诉观众如何能帮助减缓暖化现象。
同名的书籍也在电影上映后不久推出，其中包含了更详细的附加内容、科学分析，以及戈尔对于纪录片中探讨之议题的评论。
第一次看一部这样的纪录片，看完后最深刻的感觉是：震撼！管理学里讲的一个例子：把青蛙放进沸水里，它会马上反应跳出来，而放到冷水里慢慢加热，它却会若无其事的呆在里面，知道死亡！没想到这个例子会出现在这里，以此来警醒我们，人类正在这样一个被加热的冷水里，而加热的人就是我们自己！当冰糕一拿出冰箱就会融化，我们该在么做?把世界都变成一个冰箱嘛?那压缩机又从哪里来?当北极熊因为没有广阔的冰层而溺死水中，我们有怎么来拯救他们?当山上的积雪都融化掉，长江之水又从那里来?我们生活的世界正在变得越来越暖，但就在这暖的同时，却产生了更多的问题。
就拿我国为例，越来越暖的冬天和今年冬天南方雪灾;不断增多的飓风袭击;临近省市一边洪涝一边干旱。
《难以忽视的真相》观后感范文
《难以忽视的真相》观后感范文难以忽视的真相观后感篇一曾经以为，环境问题只是那些科学家或者政治家的事，科学家应找出环境问题的原因并加以解决，而政治家应该实行更多政策来抑制导致环境问题的项目，但是看完《难以忽视的真相》后，我才发觉，这是全人类的问题，全世界的人们应该共同做出自己可以做的所有努力来解决的。
温室效应导致的全球变暖问题，已经出现了很多年了，不知道从什么时候起，认识到这个问题的不仅仅是科学家们，越来越多的普通人都意识到了全球变暖。
可是没有多少人意识到，因为我们人类活动的影响，温室气体的含量会以指数形式的不断增大，与其一同增长的会是我们地球的温度，想起影片中那条径直伸长的曲线，不禁令人不寒而栗。
如果我们真的还不有所行动的话，放任这条曲线由科学家的预测发展下去，世界会变成什么样子。
正如戈尔所说的：如果我们听之任之，就是极端不道德的行为！当我们的后代来质问我们在还能改变的时候无所作为，我们该如何回应他们，我们该如何还给他们一个崭新的地球。
另一些人则认为这只是杞人忧天，我们的科学技术在飞快的发展，在全球变暖问题真正影响到我们的之前，我们一定能找出解决的方案。
但事实是，全球变暖问题已经开始，而且很严重的影响到我们的生活了！首先:随着海洋温度的升高，飓风会变得更加的频繁和严重。
根本不用预测未来会怎么样，这几年的台风已经证明了这一切。
此外洪水和干旱也会更加严重，中国这两年的遇到的都是百年难见的洪水和干旱，这并不是运气的问题，而是我们所作所为导致的。
并且之后我们会习以为常，因为它们可能频繁到年年可见。
另外生态环境随着温度升高被破坏，大量的动植物会应来不及适应飞速改变的生态坏境而灭绝。
更多疾病会蔓延开来，更多的威胁会出现在我们身边。
而期中最严重应该是北极和南极的冰川融化，冰川融化后海平面会上升，这个已经众所周知了，许多海拔过低的国家或者城市会被海水所淹没。
而这并不仅仅似乎冰川融化所会带来的所有后果。
北极的冰川消失后，太阳光会更多的被地球所吸收，全球变暖的速度可能会翻倍的加快。
难以忽视的真相观后感影评精选6篇
难以忽视的真相观后感影评精选6篇难以忽视的真相观后感我们暂且不论全球变暖是不是一场政治阴谋论，从政治学的角度去分析问题，很多时候就带有着阴谋、目的性，而忽视了背后存在的客观自然问题。
地球原始只是存在物的状态，随着生物自然的发展产生人类后，开始了以人类为中心的人物关系、人人关系。
而又因为是以人为中心，人性的好奇求知欲慢慢的转变为贪婪，欲望迷失自我的人类开始忘记了地球原生的只存物的状态。
我们思考问题都是以我们人类为出发点，却开始忽视整个环境才是我们存在的根本点。
影片中穿插戈尔个人成为一个环保主义者的心路历程，还有他为环保四处奔波呼吁的情景，这使戈尔的行为更能得到观众的认同和敬佩，也使其形象更加丰满高大，也许这就是心理阴暗者揣度他自我宣扬的原因所在吧。
但是从影片的角度来说，穿插这样的情节，能在枯燥生冷的数据堆砌之外增加感情方面的感染力，更能引起观众的共鸣虽然网络上对全球气候变暖的成因产生了争论，未能达成一致意见。
但2010年2月2日，联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会发表了《第四次气候评估报告》梗概。
这份报告综合了数千份研究成果，是迄今为止对全球变暖问题的最权威科学报告，就全球变暖对人类提出最严重警告：即这一变化“很可能”由人类活动导致，人类要负90%的责任。
报告称：“已观测到的大范围的大气和海洋升温以及冰层大量融化，支持了这一结论”。
虽然片中把全球气候变化归结为大气中二氧化碳含量的剧增有些偏颇(当然，也并非无理，只是还存在争议)，但是，不管气候变化是不是归因于二氧化碳含量的剧增，只要是我们人类的活动必须对气候变化负主要责任，我们现在就必须大力提倡节约能源，并加速开发可持续能源。
看完这个影片，更坚信了我一直持有的价值观，人应该是一个社会人，我这里指的社会人不是指离不开这个社会群体，需要人与人之间相互依存的意思。
我指的社会人是，每一个有社会良知的人应该认清自己站在这个地球上的身份，我们从一出生就决定了自己的国家，地球上的地理位置。
难以忽视的真相AnInconvenientTruth英文影评
难以忽视的真相AnInconvenientTruth英文影评第一篇：难以忽视的真相 An Inconvenient Truth 英文影评难以忽视的真相An Inconvenient Truth 英文影评review by James Berardinelli The problem with An Inconvenient Truth isn't the message;it's the messenger.If the film's goal is to educate and warn about Global Warming, why use one of the most divisive political figures of the last decade as the spokesman? I don't have a problem with Al Gore, but how many Republicans(and possibly even Independents)are going to be interested in spending 100 minutes listening to the ex-Vice President talking about Global Warming? Thus, instead of a wake-up call, this filmturns into a sermon for the choir.The documentary makes two additional missteps that hurt its credibility and will diminish its widespread acceptance.There are times when, via biographical snippets and personal reflections from its central figure, it seems to be more about Gore than Global Warming.And, despite what others have written, there is a clear, albeit subtle, political bias.When the film wants to illustrate the obtuseness of politicians concerning Global Warming, it uses sound bytes from several prominent mendirector Davis Guggenheim has a right to slant his film any way he wants todon't worry, Al Gore don't pretend he's on American Idol), since it's essentially a filmed version of one of Gore's well-known Global Warming slideshows.For about 90 minutes of the 100-minute running time, Gore talks to us(he doesn't lecture)about the subject, using a variety of slides(and even an animated cartoon)to make his point.It should be no surprise that the presentation is as polished as it is-Gore estimates he has given it more than 1000 times over a span of more than 20 years.Despite its flaws and the familiarity of thematerial, I was engaged by the movie.The clarity and simplicity of the presentation is remarkable.Gore is a likable, confident, humorous speaker.And the material reminds us of the need for vigilance.If only a few viewers learn some things about Global Warming, then the movie has done a worthy job.However?Critics are constantly reminded to review the movie that exists, not the one that doesn't, but in the case of An Inconvenient Truth, the message is so important that I can't help but wonder if this doesn't constitute, on some level, a missed opportunity.Critics have labeled Al Gore and his decades-long crusade to curb global warming as “alarmist.” But i f you've been warning people that the sky is falling for more than 20 years and it really is falling(or at least heating up), don't you have an obligation to sound an alarm? The highly persuasive documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” captures Gore delivering a multimedia presentation he has given an estimated 1,000 times since 1989.The talk is augmented with an impressive array of graphs, animation, anecdotes and statistics that convey a flurry of facts, projections and conjecture, all pointing to the ill effects the present rate of emissions has on the environment.A film with a clear point of view(and little room for others), it is the inspiration of producers Laurie David and Lawrence Bender, who attended Gore's lecture, decided it had to be made into a film to broaden the reach of its message and recruited director Davis Guggenheim to shoot it.Guggenheim intercuts the lecture with footage of Gore on the road, studiously working out his presentation on his ubiquitous laptop, and segments that effectively show the crucible moments in his life that led him to continually rededicate himself to this topic.There's the college professor who first taught him about climate change in the late1960s, the death of Gore's sister Nancy from cancer and the 1989 accident that nearly claimed the life of his son.While the vignettes establish Gore's long-term commitment, unfortunately there's a slickness to them that plays like a campaign film that might be shown at a political convention.Gore might not be anybody's idea of a pitchman, but here he's matched with the right topic, one for which he demonstrates real passion.He's charming, intelligent, professorial and one might even say … presidential.In fact, more than one observer has commented that if this Al Gore had been more visible during the 2000 election there may have been a different outcome.Rather than alarmed, Gore comes off as poised, relaxed and confident.Guggenheim sets up Citizen Al as part rock star, part eco-Buddha.He introduces himself to a small audience saying, “I'm Al Gore, and I used to be the next president of the United States.” The line gets a laugh and quickly addresses the considerable baggage that comes with being on the losing end of one of the most divisive political outcomes in U.S.history.This position has its pros and cons for the film.On the plus side, Gore stands tall as an insider pushed to the fringe, a man on a mission with nothing to lose.He's able to attack the issue without equivocation.On the minus side, it's easy for naysayers to claim that the digs he makes at conservatives are sour grapes and he's merely positioning himself to run again in 2008 —though this would appear to be a longshot issue on which to do so.The environment has not resonated much with voters or politicians in the past, though the increasing popularity of hybrid cars and eco-friendly products and services might indicate a shift in attitudes.That something so important could be largely ignored for so long is almost inconceivable, and among the things the film does well is an analysis as to why thatis.A 2004 Science magazine survey of more than 900 peer-reviewed academic papers on the subject of global warming found that all supported the reality while none contested it.However, a like sampling of mainstream media found that 53% of the stories portrayed global warming as something that was in doubt in the scientific community.The mixed message has kept the automobile and oil industries in the driver's seat and the issue out of political debates.Gore also does an excellent job of explaining the basic science behind climate change and the accelerated rise in temperatures since the 1970s.What could be very dry material is enlivened by Gore's geniality and desire to share the information.The potential for dreaded heaviosity is leavened at times by his dry wit and humorous moments, such as a clip from Matt Groening's animated series “Futurama.” Real and projected catastrophes reveal what is at stake.Glacier erosion, the threat to wildlife and the spread of deadly viruses make for some terrifying scenarios.Hurricane Katrina and other weather-related disasters that occurred in late 2005 are included, giving the film a sense of timeliness and a powerful visual element, which Gore compares to “a nature hike through the Book of Revelation s.” The other strong point that Gore makes is to dispute the “either/or” argument presented by big business when it comes to making the necessary changes.He uses Upton Sinclair's quote, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it,” to not-so-subtly stress the motivation behind this line of thinking.The film's title refers to politicians' apprehensiveness in addressing the problem.Attempts at strict environmental reform have long been met with gloomy projections from the right of economic disaster in the form of lost jobs and factory closures,and Gore rebuts this by suggesting that green business can be good business.Although the message of the film sounds bleak, it is actually quite rousing.Gore offers measures that can be taken on personal and community levels but also stresses that major changes require a larger response.The film's ultimate significance is that this requires political will —which Gore labels a “renewable resource” — and that if our present representatives are not up to the challenge, we elect men and women who are.I want to write this review so every reader will begin it and finish it.I am a liberal, but I do not intend this as a review reflecting any kind of politics.It reflects the truth as I understand it, and it represents, I believe, agreement among the world's experts.Global warming is real.It is caused by human activity.Mankind and its governments must begin immediate action to halt and reverse it.If we do nothing, in about 10 years the planet may reach a “tipping point” and begin a slide toward destruction of our civilization and most of the other species on this planet.After that point is reached, it would be too late for any action.These facts are stated by Al Gore in the documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” Forget he ever ran for office.Consider him a concerned man speaking out on the approaching crisis.“There is no controversy about these facts,” he says in the film.“Out of 925 recent articles in peer-review scientific journals about global warming, there was no disagreement.Zero.” He stands on a stage before a vast screen, in front of an audience.The documentary is based on a speech he has been developing for six years, and is supported by dramatic visuals.He shows th e famous photograph “Earthrise,” taken from space by the first American astronauts.Then he shows a series of later space photographs, clearly indicating that glaciersand lakes are shrinking, snows are melting, shorelines are retreating.He provides statistics: The 10 warmest years in history were in the last 14 st year South America experienced its first hurricane.Japan and the Pacific are setting records for typhoons.Hurricane Katrina passed over Florida, doubled back over the Gulf, picked up strength from unusually warm Gulf waters, and went from Category 3 to Category 5.There are changes in the Gulf Stream and the jet stream.Cores of polar ice show that carbon dioxide is much, much higher than ever before in a quarter of a million years.It was once thought that such things went in cycles.Gore stands in front of a graph showing the ups and downs of carbon dioxide over the centuries.Yes, there is a cyclical pattern.Then, in recent years, the graph turns up and keeps going up, higher and higher, off the chart.The primary man-made cause of global warming is the burning of fossil fuels.We are taking energy stored over hundreds of millions of years in the form of coal, gas and oil, and releasing it suddenly.This causes global warming, and there is a pass-along effect.Since glaciers and snow reflect sunlight but sea water absorbs it, the more the ice melts, the more of the sun's energy is retained by the sea.Gore says that although there is “100 percent agreement” among scientists, a database search of newspaper and magazine articles shows that 57 percent question the fact of global warming, while 43 percent support it.These figures are the result, he says, of a disinformation campaign started in the 1990s by the energy industries to “reposition global warmi ng as a debate.” It is the same strategy used for years by the defenders of tobacco.My father was a Luckys smoker who died of lung cancer in 1960, and 20 years later it was still “debatable” that there was a link between smoking and lungcancer.Now we are talking about the death of the future, starting in the lives of those now living.“The world won't 'end' overnight in 10 years,” Gore says.“But a point will have been passed, and there will be an irreversible slide into destruction.” In England, Sir James Lovelock, the scientist who proposed the Gaia hypothesis(that the planet functions like a living organism), has published a new book saying that in 100 years mankind will be reduced to “a few breeding couples at the Poles.” Gore thinks “that's too pessimist ic.We can turn this around just as we reversed the hole in the ozone layer.But it takes action right now, and politicians in every nation must have the courage to do what is necessary.It is not a political issue.It is a moral issue.” When I said I was goin g to a press screening of “An Inconvenient Truth,”a friend said, “Al Gore talking about the environment!Bor...ing!” This is not a boring film.The director, Davis Guggenheim, uses words, images and Gore's concise litany of facts to build a film that is fascinating and relentless.In 39 years, I have never written these words in a movie review, but here they are: You owe it to yourself to see this film.If you do not, and you have grandchildren, you should explain to them why you decided not to.Am I acting as an advocate in this review? Yes, I am.I believe that to be “impartial” and “balanced” on global warming means one must take a position like Gore's.There is no other view that can be defended.Sen.James Inhofe(R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment Com mittee, has said, “Global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.” I hope he takes his job seriously enough to see this film.I think he has a responsibility to do that.What can we do? Switch to and encourage the development of alternative energy sources: Solar, wind, tidal, and, yes, nuclear.Move quickly toward hybrid andelectric cars.Pour money into public transit, and subsidize the fares.Save energy in our houses.I did a funny thing when I came home after seeing “An Inconvenient Truth.” I went around the house turning off the lights.You can say whatever you like about the politics of former Senator and Vice President Al Gore, and you can even be skeptical about his message as delivered in his documentary about global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, but at the very least, he does make a compelling case for anyone that watches it to find out more about the situation.While most Liberal viewers out there will believe everything Gore says chapter and verse, and Conservatives will no doubt dismiss it as more misguided, tree-hugging scare tactics, if you keep an open mind to the presentation as delivered, it's almost impossible not to feel that self-education regarding the global warming issue has become an immediate concern that merits thorough investigation before dismissing as “Chicken Little” nonsense.The strength of the documentary's impetus comes from the affability and mild-mannered approach by the main presenter of its information.The main weakness of it is that that person is Al Gore.It's not because Al Gore isn't an eloquent speaker and respectable leader worthy of presenting such volatile, and potentially cataclysmic, information--as a famous politician that has been on the forefront of the environmental movement, there are few other recognizable names that could have even gotten this film made.The fact is that Gore's presence has the double-edged quality that will galvanize the political base that firmly believes in the environmental movement while keeping those that should rightfully hear the information, namely, closed-minded Conservatives, completely at bay.Most staunch Conservatives will refuse to believe anything Gore has to say onthe matter, regardless of how many facts he is able to back up, probably dismissing every learned scientist, scholarly journal, and news article as more evidence of a Liberal political agenda that seeks to take away prime and lucrative industries in the world that employ millions of hard-working people.Ironic that the same people that see every syllable uttered by Gore as tainted lies will take everything said by provocateurs like Rush Limbaugh as gospel, without the need for scientific evidence to support his theories to label them as indubitable truth.Another double-edged quality to the film lies in the amount of personal information about Al Gore that director Guggenheim deemed necessary to include.Within the construct of the slide presentation, we are taken outside of it to learn several anecdotes about Gore's upbringing and tidbits regarding the most interesting facets of his life.The intended effect is to make Gore seem more trustworthy and likeable, and therefore, not some empty suit lobbyist or wacko with a crazy agenda.While it is successful on this front, there are moments when you begin to wonder if the film isn't driven by the need to compel us into more environmentally friendly pursuits than in the redemption of Al Gore as a person and political entity ruined by the divisive election of 2000.However, on the other hand, Gore actually does manage to tie in this anecdotal material into the overall message, even if only tangentially, so credit them for trying to take a more personal, emotionally resonant, and friendly approach, while still sticking to theme.An Inconvenient Truth may not be the most exciting film released in the Summer of 2006, but it is probably the most important, especially for those that don't want to believe such a dire situation exists.You may not have voted for Gore, and you may not even like him personally;listen to themessage, if not the messenger, and then do your own studies on the situation from actual scientific sources--not radio personality political pundits with knee-jerk claims of “Chicken Little” like boys who cry wolf.Removing my own personal and political beliefs and just taking this as a film, it is effectively presented and fascinating in its information, even if somewhat dry at times for those not accustomed to listening to what amounts to be a lecture, albeit a flashy one.Perhaps having excerpts of interviews with actual scientific scholars and leaders would have been a better way to strengthen Gore's claims than showing his boyhood home and family, but Gore's message still is able to get out there, and possibly affect thousands of people and the way they think--perhaps even millions once it hits video and TV, An Inconvenient Truth may have shortcomings in certain respects, and it may not alter the course of the world as it intends, but it just might change your life, and for that alone, it deserves to be called one of the most powerful and important films of 2006.第二篇：难以忽视的真相︽难以忽视的真相︾观后感院系：化学与环境科学学院班级：环境131 学号：20***5 姓名：高秉婷日期：2014.4.28《难以忽视的真相》观后感《难以忽视的真相》是一部纪录片，令我感触很深的电影，它是美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔主演的，当我看到他深情的演说，把全球变暖描述的如此的淋漓尽致，其中揭露了气候变迁的资料并对此做出预测，同时也在电影中穿插了高尔的个人活动。
电影《难以忽视的真相》观后感五篇
电影《难以忽视的真相》观后感五篇《难以忽视的真相》(英文：AnInconvenientTruth)是哥伦比亚广播公司、派拉蒙家庭视频公司等七家公司于2006年联合发行的一部环保纪录片。
由戴维斯·古根海姆根据同名图书编导，美国前副总统阿尔·戈尔进行讲解。
该片讲述了全球气候变暖及环境恶化所带来的明显的灾难性的片段，并在最后呼吁保护环境、减缓暖化。
该片获得2007年第79届奥斯卡金像奖。
《难以忽视的真相》是一部纪录片，其中揭露了气候变迁的资料并对此做出预测，同时也在电影中穿插了高尔的个人活动。
透过巡回全球的简报发表，戈尔指出全球变暖的科学证据、讨论全球变暖经济和政治的层面，并阐述他相信人类制造的温室气体若没有减少，在不久后全球气候将发生重大变化。
电影包含许多段落是为了反驳认为全球变暖不明显或尚未被证实的人。
例如，戈尔探讨了南极洲冰床溶解的风险，可能使全球海平面升高近6公尺，沿海地区将会被淹没，也会让约一亿人因此成为难民。
格陵兰冰雪融化后的水盐分含量较低，可能会中断湾流而造成北欧地区气温骤降。
为了解释全球变暖现象，电影引用了对南极洲冰层中心样本在过去六十万年间的温度和二氧化碳含量数值的检测。
飓风卡特里娜也被用来推论9-14公尺高的海浪对沿岸地区造成的破坏。
戈尔在纪录片的最后说到，若是尽快采取适当的行动，例如减少二氧化碳的排放量并种植学校组织观看了电影《雨中的树》，该片以李林森的儿子李东阳追寻父亲生前足迹为线索，串联起李林森曾生活工作过的地方、交往过的人物，以及他生前说的那些朴实却铿锵的言语，将李林森短短42年的人生通过父子间跨越时空的对话，生动地展示在观众面前。
虽然观影已经过去好多天了，但许多感人的画面仍历历在目，让我久久不能忘记：忘不了，牵着水牛、几次把鞋子脱给逃命的灾民，风雨中背起80岁的老人，与暴雨搏击与死亡抗争的救命书记;忘不了，一手打吊针，一手掏手机询问灾情，靠在床上组织会议，即便是在自己生命的最后时刻，心里装的还是工作的倔强病人;忘不了，面对妻子心有遗憾，捧。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
After Watching the Program of An Inconvenient Truth
Global Warming is a really hot topic in our time , and even though primary students also can say something about it . I ever believed that the global warming was caused by human beings’action , just like Albert Arnold Gore Jr introduced to us.Yet , I can not judge it now.
Because there are mainly two opposite viewpoints around our ears . Large number of people hold the standpoint like Albert Arnold Gore Jr that due to too much greenhouse gas like CO2 and CH4 which produced from factory , infrared light can not go back to space from earth so that our earth become warmer and warmer . While some scientists support that global warming is a normal phenomenon , the changes in the Earth's natural law and human did limited about it . Besides they said Global warming is more of a propaganda, a political activity . Both of them listed a lot of evidents to prove their standpoint was right .
As a student of college I can not recognize which one is right . But one thing I can make sure that pollution in our country is really serious , and there is no doubt that we should do every thing we can do to protect and improve our environment , and now it is the just time to master the knowledge which we will use them to make our environment better.。