雅思作文真题范文关于环境
环境问题雅思大作文范文(精选7篇)
环境问题雅思大作文范文(精选7篇)（经典版）编制人：__________________审核人：__________________审批人：__________________编制单位：__________________编制时间：____年____月____日序言下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文，如工作总结、工作计划、合同协议、条据文书、策划方案、句子大全、作文大全、诗词歌赋、教案资料、其他范文等等，想了解不同范文格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!Moreover, our store provides various types of classic sample essays for everyone, such as work summaries, work plans, contract agreements, doctrinal documents, planning plans, complete sentences, complete compositions, poems, songs, teaching materials, and other sample essays. If you want to learn about different sample formats and writing methods, please stay tuned!环境问题雅思大作文范文(精选7篇)环境问题雅思大作文范文第1篇环保从我做起每一丝期望，都在绿色中萌芽，每一颗种子，都渴望绿色。
雅思写作话题总结之环境保护（5篇）
雅思写作话题总结之环境保护（5篇）第一篇：雅思写作话题总结之环境保护雅思写作话题总结之环境保护雅思写作话题的总结和归类对于大家更加有效率的备考雅思写作考试帮助很大，下面南京环球雅思培训专家为大家整理了关于环境保护的雅思写作话题，供大家在备考的时候进行参考。
以上就是6个关于与环境保护的雅思写作话题的总结，后面都附有汉语翻译。
Environmental Protection1.Environmental hazards are often too great for particular countries or individuals to tackle.We have arrived at a point in time where the only way to lessen environmental problems is at an international level.环境问题现在非常严重了，严重到单个的国家或者是个人没法解决的程度。
换言之，我们已经到了一个只有在全世界范围内才可以解决这个问题的地步。
从多大程度上你同意或者不同意这种观点?2.As a result of countries becoming more and more industrialized, pollution has become a serious problem.Discuss some ways that can mitigate the pollution problems.随着国家的工业化程度加深，环境污染成了一个严重的问题。
请谈一下哪些方法可以减轻环境污染问题。
3.Forests are the lungs of the earth.Their destruction will accelerate extinction of animals and ultimately mankind.For this reason, logging in the world’s rainforests should be phased out over the next decade.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?森林是地球的呼吸器。
雅思写作高分范文-环境类9篇
环境1. The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?It is argued that the International Community should put more efforts to encourage all countries in the world to decrease their fossil fuel’s utilization such as gas, oil, and coal. Personally, I strongly agree with this idea for many reasons.The most important thing we should mention is that fossil fuels’ consumpt ion in all over the world is considered to be the main culprit of global warming and other environmental problems. First of all, it can be undeniable that burning oil and coal in domestic and industrial activities is producing tons of carbon dioxide and other detrimental chemical substances per year. Moreover, with the fast-developing pace of life and overpopulation, a significant number of transportations are being used, which is generating exhausted fumes and green-house gases in most of nations in the wo rld. That’s the reasons why a huge number of environmental issues are alarmingly emerging recently such as global warming, ice melting in all poses, sea level rising and the other severe weather conditions.Besides, it is clearly seen that the amount of fossil fuels in all over the world are restricted and nonrenewable. Each kind of fossil fuels energies needs millions of years to form, thus, with an enormous human beings’ demand, it will result in energy depletion in the near future. Furthermore, technologies producing alternative power resources have not reached the point in which people in all countries of the world can use renewable energies replacing fossil fuels. Notall of nations can have enough financial and technological resources to invest in alternative power resources, so that the use of these energies is extremely expensive. Ultimately, because of the energy shortages, industrial activities and global economic development will experience negative and pessimistic impacts.In conclusion, I will reaffirm that International Community should take actions urgently to decrease the consumption of fossil fuels and other harmful energy in all nations.2. In some countries there is not enough recycling of waste materials (e.g. paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions?Waste recycling and people’s participation in it is a moot issue and a lot of arguments could be observed among people as well as in the media regarding whether people should spontaneously take part in recycling process or the government should make it a legal obligation. I personally believe that government should impose laws and severely fine the violation of it to ensure proper waste recycling.First, waste recycling is done by the state and citizens are expected to properly divide the recyclable and non-recyclable wastages and pack them accordingly while dumping them in recycle bins. They are expected to cooperate greatly in the recycling process. However, it is a strange fact that manypeople do not participate in it spontaneously either from their negligence or from their lack of time to do so.Second, it is a harsh truth that people in many cases abide by a rule only from the concern of punishment or fine, not from their conscience. For instance, when the penalty for traffic rule violation went up, people started following them in my city. Similarly, if laws are introduced and the authority starts penalizing, more people would recycle more of their wastages.Third, waste recycling is a very handy process to save our environment and we already have many rules to protect our environment. While deforesting is a severe crime in my country, there is no visible law for not recycling the waste. This is why people are very careless about their waste production and this has created a throwaway society in our country. This is why proper laws are required.In conclusion, most of the citizens in our country already know about the importance of saving the environment and how individual efforts of recycling can improve environmental conditions. Since many of them still do not participate in waste recycling, there is no alternative than to impose laws to have this done.3. The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What danger is caused? How can we solve these problems?The depletion of consumable natural resources at an accelerated speed is a matter of grave concern since it has given birth to several problems in the world. Nevertheless, these issues can be resolved by taking some effective remedial steps.The reduction in the green cover has had a negative effect on earth’s weather conditions. To elaborate, forests help to maintain the temperature of earth. The cutting down of trees at a fast pace for fulfilling h uman’s greed has created a climatic imbalance in the last ten years. One of the biggest consequences of global warming is that our summers are getting hotter and hotter.Further, because of the depletion of fresh water resources, people are now forced to buy drinking water. The poor and the weaker sections of the society are the worst hit by the water crisis. Consequently, many people are dying due to lack of drinking water in African states and several others are left with only contaminated water for their daily use. Depleting oil resources also have had a negative impact on the automobile industry which relies almost wholly on oil for its operation.However, some viable solutions do exist and it is possible to solve the aforementioned problems to a great extent. First, cutting down of trees should be checked, and industries which use wood for manufacturing their products, such as furniture and houses, should be encouraged to find eco-friendly alternatives. Second, the government and the media shouldlaunch campaigns that make people aware of the importance of saving water. It is also important to set a limit on the amount of water that can be used for domestic and industrial purposes. Third, scientists should be encouraged to find renewable fuels for vehicles. For instance, chargeable electric cars are gaining popularity in the US because they are eco-friendly and economical.In conclusion, although the fast paced consumption of natural resources has directly influenced the climate of earth, the collaborative efforts of governments, scientists and the public can reduce the impact.4. Development in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.People argue about the negative effect of technology on the environment. A group of people think that rather than following the development of technology, we should have a simpler way of life. However, others disagree as they believe that technology could address environmental issues.On the one hand, it is undeniable that the rapid development of technology has caused some environmental problems. Many inventions are beneficial for human beings, but they have a catastrophic effect on the environment. For example, the invention of cars that use fossil fuel has caused some serious effect on the world. The cars produce carbon monoxidewhich is not only dangerous for living creatures, but it also becomes the main cause of global warming. Therefore, some people believe that we should change our lifestyle into a simpler one. One of the ways is by using a friendly environmental transportation such as using a bicycle to commute.On the other hand, other people believe that technology could be used as a way to resolve environmental problems. As we can see that one of the biggest threat to the earth civilization is the usage of the plastic bag. The waste of plastic bags has become a big issue, as they could only be composed for about ten decades. However, with the new technology, scientists have found a new way of producing plastic bags. With the new formula, plastic bags could be recycled; therefore it would resolve one of the environmental issues.In my opinion, I do believe that technology is beneficial for human beings if we used it wisely and proportionately. I personally believe that research for new technology should be continued, as we need to have improvements in life, but the government should review and monitor this research properly.5. Some people think that the amount of noise people make should be controlled strictly, while others say people are free to make as much noise as they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.It is often considered by many that they can make noises as they wish, while other people believe that there should have strict rules to control the amount of noise individual makes. In my opinion, I think noise pollution causes ample social and physical issues, hence it should be controlled.On the one hand, freedom to speak and making noise is one of the human rights. In other words, every citizen has a right to make sounds or noise as they prefer. For instance, in some special events such as birthday celebrations, dancing parties making noise is accepted in the current society. Moreover, making sounds is often considered as accepted behavior especially among small children. Making noise provides enjoyment among people obviously during joyful occasions. It helps to ventilate one’s emotions, particularly anger and sorrow.On the other hand, noise pollution is often accepted as one of the major concerns of the current world due to several drawbacks. Firstly, unpleasant sound causes ample health issues. For instance, the high-intensity sound could cause increased stress level, deafness, and cardiovascular problems and even sleep disturbances. Secondly, noise would often affect wild life. Animals would probably develop aggressive behavior and get irritated due to the high-frequency of unpleasant sounds. To cite an example, during thunder and lightning pet animals became frustrated as a result of high pitch sounds. Finally, it leads to trouble communicating. In other sense, communication between individuals becomes difficult owing to noise from the surrounding. In other words, communication gets distracted.In conclusion, the noise would adversely affect society andone’s body .Hence, necessary steps to be taken t o control it. In my opinion, people should abide rules to control noise formation for the welfare of the society and inhabitants.6. Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?Natural places like the South Pole have become attractive to scientists and tourists recently. However, whether the trend will have any negative influence on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.Firstly, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches. This is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.Moreover, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which cannot be compared to other places they have been to. This could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature, such as the South Pole which cannot be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.That does not mean that there is no drawbacks of the practice. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere. Consequently the loss will be immense.In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors; meanwhile, these new comers need to restrict their behaviors. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.7. With the increasing demand of energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remoteand untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?It is suggested that people should search for energy and natural resources in distant and inhospitable areas to cater to the growing need for oil and gas. This essay believes that the benefits of exploiting remote places do not outweigh the drawbacks simply because the environment itself is far more important than human desire.The main reason to extract oil and gas from untouched places is that most easily accessible sources of oil and gas have already been developed. This means human are draining the earth and will probably never be satisfied. Meanwhile, the main disadvantage is that extracting these sources can result in permanent damage to the environment, which can be devastating to the wildlife and human who depend on these ecosystems. Another negative view is that we cannot rule out the possibility of tragedies like oil spills, pipeline leaks and even shipping accidents. These contaminants pose a serious threat to the sensitive species and habitats since tons of harmful pollutants will be released in the air and all the toxic chemicals will be discharged into the water, which in turn, will undoubtedly bring severe punishment to human themselves.Those opposed to this say that remote places shall be benefited with boost economy and more job opportunities. However, this standpoint can be seen in an opposite way. With large-scale infrastructures being constructed as well as more roads and buildings being built for workers, the biodiversity and ecosystem are surely at greater risk. Therefore, economy development in such areas cannot be stimulated this way.In conclusion, the advantages of exploiting distant places are overshadowed by the drawbacks. It is not sensible also morally flawed to stake our environment for progress, let alone to fulfill our own needs.8. Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Environmental problems have dramatically increased over the last few years. Population change and other problems such as pollution, deforestation have further exacerbated the situation. Some people argue that these problems are too large to be addressed by individual being. I believe that it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and countries to take pragmatic measures for its solution.Overpopulation is one of the pivotal reasons that have detrimental effects on the environment. Increase in population demand more food resources and living space. For instance, for the sake of accommodation many natural parks and forests have been wiped out to fulfil the need of livingspace. This has led to severe consequences that could damage both for the people and the environment.Individual efforts can contribute a lot to address the pressing environmental problems. Steps taken in individual level can be an effective solution for the world. For example, if the government of a country takes initiatives to reduce the rubbish produced daily, can’t do much. However, if the citizens take effort from their personal level, the rubbish production could be controlled observably. Similarly, if administration of a country starts planting trees, the effort would not go further without the collaboration of the individuals.Pollution is also a great menace to the environment. It is not only the reason of environmental problems but also has a dire effect on people. Factories operating within cities emit dangerous smoke and others harmful toxic. Furthermore, pollution also contributes to global warming. There has been a drastic increase in temperature around the globe, which in turn, melts glaciers across the world. That is why prudent decisions are required from the government level and the ordinary citizens should be encouraged and participate in every way possible to make the world a better place to live in.To sum up, I would like to say that environmental problems should be addressed on large scale. Everyone have to contribute in order to mitigate its vulnerable effects on the world.9. Some people think that too much attention and too manyresources have been given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?The habitat conditions of wildlife, particularly those endangered species have been significantly improved due to relentless efforts from animal protectionists. However, some people think it is unwise to allocate too many resources to wildlife conservation.It is easy to understand people’s consideration. One the one hand, it is true that wild animals and birds of rare species are well protected in some developed countries where large natural preserves are well built and maintained. Tourists are more civilized and laws have been established to ban abuse or murdering of animals. On the other hand, there are still people starving and being deprived of basic sanitary conditions around the world. For many people, It is justified that people's wellbeing should be taken into consideration before animals are taken good care of.However, it is not always the same case all around the world and wild animals are still being hunted and slaughtered inhumanely in many places. Although there are laws that forbid poaching rare animals, endangered animals are still seen on dining table as gourmet dishes. Besides, as people's preference for leather products as fashion continues, each year hundreds of thousands of tigers and seals are shot to death and illegal profits are gained from fur trades. What is worse, wildlife habit is rapidly disappearing due to development and other human-caused changes. Considering all these factors, it is hard to say that too much has been done to protect wild animals.In conclusion, I think preserving wild animals is necessaryand calls for efforts from both governments and individual citizens. While progress has been made during the past decades to provide livable habitats for those endangered species, there is still a long way to go before we can live harmony with our wild neighbors.。
雅思写作高分范文-环境类9篇.docx
环境1.The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?It is argued that the International Community should put more efforts to encourage all countries in the world to decrease their fossil fuel ’ sutilization such as gas, oil, and coal. Personally, I strongly agree with this idea for many reasons.The most important thing we should mention is that fossil fuels ’consumption in all over the world is considered to be the main culprit of global warming and other environmental problems. First of all, it can be undeniable that burning oil and coal in domestic and industrial activitiesis producing tons of carbon dioxide and other detrimental chemical substances per year. Moreover, with the fast-developing pace of life and overpopulation, a significant number of transportations are being used, which is generating exhausted fumes and green-house gases in most of nations in the world. That ’thes reasons why a huge number of environmental issues are alarmingly emerging recently such as global warming, ice melting in all poses, sea level rising and the other severe weather conditions.Besides, it is clearly seen that the amount of fossil fuels in all over theworld are restricted and nonrenewable. Each kind of fossil fuels energies needs millions of years to form, thus, with an enormous human beings demand, it will result in energy depletion in the near future. Furthermore, technologies producing alternative power resources have not reached the point in which people in all countries of the world can use renewable energies replacing fossil fuels. Not all of nations can have enoughfinancial and technological resources to invest in alternative power resources, so that the use of these energies is extremely expensive. Ultimately, because of the energy shortages, industrial activities andglobal economic development will experience negative and pessimistic impacts.In conclusion, I will reaffirm that International Community should take actions urgently to decrease the consumption of fossil fuels and other harmful energy in all nations.2.In some countries there is not enough recycling of waste materials (e.g. paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions?Waste recycling and people’ s participation in it is a moot issue and a lotof arguments could be observed among people as well as in the media regarding whether people should spontaneously take part in recycling process or the government should make it a legal obligation. I personally believe that government should impose laws and severely fine the violation of it to ensure proper waste recycling.First, waste recycling is done by the state and citizens are expected to properly divide the recyclable and non-recyclable wastages and pack them accordingly while dumping them in recycle bins. They are expected to cooperate greatly in the recycling process. However, it is a strange fact that many people do not participate in it spontaneously either from their negligence or from their lack of time to do so.Second, it is a harsh truth that people in many cases abide by a rule only from the concern of punishment or fine, not from their conscience. For instance, when the penalty for traffic rule violation went up, people started following them in my city. Similarly, if laws are introduced and the authority starts penalizing, more people would recycle more of their wastages.Third, waste recycling is a very handy process to save our environment and we already have many rules to protect our environment. While deforesting is a severe crime in my country, there is no visible law for not recycling the waste. This is why people are very careless about their waste production and this has created a throwaway society in our country. This is why proper laws are required.In conclusion, most of the citizens in our country already know about the importance of saving the environment and how individual efforts of recycling can improve environmental conditions. Since many of them still do not participate in waste recycling, there is no alternative than to impose laws to have this done.3.The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What danger is caused? How can we solve these problems?The depletion of consumable natural resources at an accelerated speed is a matter of grave concern since it has given birth to several problems in the world. Nevertheless, these issues can be resolved by taking some effective remedial steps.The reduction in the green cover has had a negative effect on earth ’ s weather conditions. To elaborate, forests help to maintain the temperature of earth. The cutting down of trees at a fast pace for fulfilling human greed has created a climatic imbalance in the last ten years. One of thebiggest consequences of global warming is that our summers are getting hotter and hotter.Further, because of the depletion of fresh water resources, people are now forced to buy drinking water. The poor and the weaker sections of the society are the worst hit by the water crisis. Consequently, many people are dying due to lack of drinking water in African states and several others are left with only contaminated water for their daily use. Depleting oil resources also have had a negative impact on the automobile industry which relies almost wholly on oil for its operation.However, some viable solutions do exist and it is possible to solve the aforementioned problems to a great extent. First, cutting down of trees should be checked, and industries which use wood for manufacturing their products, such as furniture and houses, should be encouraged to findeco-friendly alternatives. Second, the government and the media should launch campaigns that make people aware of the importance of saving water. It is also important to set a limit on the amount of water that can be used for domestic and industrial purposes. Third, scientists should be encouraged to find renewable fuels for vehicles. For instance, chargeable electric cars are gaining popularity in the US because they are eco-friendly and economical.In conclusion, although the fast paced consumption of natural resources has directly influenced the climate of earth, the collaborative efforts of governments, scientists and the public can reduce the impact.4.Development in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.People argue about the negative effect of technology on the environment.A group of people think that rather than following the development of technology, we should have a simpler way of life. However, others disagree as they believe that technology could address environmental issues.On the one hand, it is undeniable that the rapid development of technology has caused some environmental problems. Many inventions are beneficial for human beings, but they have a catastrophic effect on the environment. For example, the invention of cars that use fossil fuel has caused some serious effect on the world. The cars produce carbon monoxide which is not only dangerous for living creatures, but it alsobecomes the main cause of global warming. Therefore, some people believe that we should change our lifestyle into a simpler one. One of the ways is by using a friendly environmental transportation such as using a bicycle to commute.On the other hand, other people believe that technology could be used as a way to resolve environmental problems. As we can see that one of the biggest threat to the earth civilization is the usage of the plastic bag. The waste of plastic bags has become a big issue, as they could only be composed for about ten decades. However, with the new technology, scientists have found a new way of producing plastic bags. With the new formula, plastic bags could be recycled; therefore it would resolve one of the environmental issues.In my opinion, I do believe that technology is beneficial for human beings if we used it wisely and proportionately. I personally believe that research for new technology should be continued, as we need to have improvements in life, but the government should review and monitor this research properly.5.Some people think that the amount of noise people make should be controlled strictly, while others say people are free to make as much noise as they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.It is often considered by many that they can make noises as they wish, while other people believe that there should have strict rules to control the amount of noise individual makes. In my opinion, I think noise pollution causes ample social and physical issues, hence it should be controlled.On the one hand, freedom to speak and making noise is one of the human rights. In other words, every citizen has a right to make sounds or noise as they prefer. For instance, in some special events such as birthday celebrations, dancing parties making noise is accepted in the current society. Moreover, making sounds is often considered as accepted behavior especially among small children. Making noise provides enjoyment among people obviously during joyful occasions. It helps to ventilate one ’ s emotions, particularly anger and sorrow.On the other hand, noise pollution is often accepted as one of the major concerns of the current world due to several drawbacks. Firstly, unpleasant sound causes ample health issues. For instance, the high-intensity sound could cause increased stress level, deafness, and cardiovascular problems and even sleep disturbances. Secondly, noise would often affect wild life. Animals would probably develop aggressive behavior and get irritated due to the high-frequency of unpleasant sounds.To cite an example, during thunder and lightning pet animals became frustrated as a result of high pitch sounds. Finally, it leads to trouble communicating. In other sense, communication between individuals becomes difficult owing to noise from the surrounding. In other words, communication gets distracted.In conclusion, the noise would adversely affect society and one’ sbody .Hence, necessary steps to be taken to control it. In my opinion, people should abide rules to control noise formation for the welfare of the society and inhabitants.6.Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?Natural places like the South Pole have become attractive to scientists and tourists recently. However, whether the trend will have any negative influence on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.Firstly, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches. This is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.Moreover, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which cannot be compared to other places they have been to. This could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature, such as the South Pole which cannot be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.That does not mean that there is no drawbacks of the practice. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere. Consequently the loss will be immense.In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors; meanwhile, these new comers need to restrict their behaviors. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.7. With the increasing demand of energy sources of oil and gas, peopleshould look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?It is suggested that people should search for energy and natural resources in distant and inhospitable areas to cater to the growing needfor oil and gas. This essay believes that the benefits of exploiting remote places do not outweigh the drawbacks simply because the environment itself is far more important than human desire.The main reason to extract oil and gas from untouched places is that most easily accessible sources of oil and gas have already been developed. This means human are draining the earth and will probably never be satisfied. Meanwhile, the main disadvantage is that extracting these sources can result in permanent damage to the environment, which can be devastating to the wildlife and human who depend on these ecosystems. Another negative view is that we cannot rule out the possibility of tragedies likeoil spills, pipeline leaks and even shipping accidents. These contaminants pose a serious threat to the sensitive species and habitats since tons of harmful pollutants will be released in the air and all the toxic chemicals will be discharged into the water, which in turn, will undoubtedly bring severe punishment to human themselves.Those opposed to this say that remote places shall be benefited with boost economy and more job opportunities. However, this standpoint can be seen in an opposite way. With large-scale infrastructures being constructed as well as more roads and buildings being built for workers, the biodiversity and ecosystem are surely at greater risk. Therefore, economy development in such areas cannot be stimulated this way.In conclusion, the advantages of exploiting distant places are overshadowed by the drawbacks. It is not sensible also morally flawed to stake our environment for progress, let alone to fulfill our own needs.8. Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions. Discuss both these viewsand give your own opinion.Environmental problems have dramatically increased over the last few years. Population change and other problems such as pollution, deforestation have further exacerbated the situation. Some peopleargue that these problems are too large to be addressed by individual being. I believe that it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and countries to take pragmatic measures for its solution.Overpopulation is one of the pivotal reasons that have detrimental effects on the environment. Increase in population demand more food resources and living space. For instance, for the sake of accommodation many natural parks and forests have been wiped out to fulfil the need of living space. This has led to severe consequences that could damage both for the people and the environment.Individual efforts can contribute a lot to address the pressing environmental problems. Steps taken in individual level can be an effective solution for the world. For example, if the government of a country takes initiatives to reduce the rubbish produced daily, can ’dot much. However, if the citizens take effort from their personal level, the rubbish production could be controlled observably. Similarly, if administration of a country starts planting trees, the effort would not go further without the collaboration of the individuals.Pollution is also a great menace to the environment. It is not only the reason of environmental problems but also has a dire effect on people. Factories operating within cities emit dangerous smoke and others harmful toxic. Furthermore, pollution also contributes to global warming. There has been a drastic increase in temperature around the globe, which in turn, melts glaciers across the world. That is why prudent decisions are required from the government level and the ordinary citizens should be encouraged and participate in every way possible to make the world a better place to live in.To sum up, I would like to say that environmental problems should be addressed on large scale. Everyone have to contribute in order to mitigate its vulnerable effects on the world.9.Some people think that too much attention and too many resources have been given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?The habitat conditions of wildlife, particularly those endangered species have been significantly improved due to relentless efforts from animal protectionists. However, some people think it is unwise to allocate too many resources to wildlife conservation.It is easy to understand people ’consideration. One the one hand, it istrue that wild animals and birds of rare species are well protected in some developed countries where large natural preserves are well built and maintained. Tourists are more civilized and laws have been establishedto ban abuse or murdering of animals. On the other hand, there are still people starving and being deprived of basic sanitary conditions aroundthe world. For many people, It is justified that people's wellbeing shouldbe taken into consideration before animals are taken good care of. However, it is not always the same case all around the world and wild animals are still being hunted and slaughtered inhumanely in many places. Although there are laws that forbid poaching rare animals, endangered animals are still seen on dining table as gourmet dishes. Besides, as people's preference for leather products as fashion continues, each year hundreds of thousands of tigers and seals are shot to death and illegal profits are gained from fur trades. What is worse, wildlife habit is rapidly disappearing due to development and other human-caused changes. Considering all these factors, it is hard to say that too much has been done to protect wild animals.In conclusion, I think preserving wild animals is necessary and calls for efforts from both governments and individual citizens. While progresshas been made during the past decades to provide livable habitats for those endangeredspecies, there is still a long way to go before we canlive harmony with our wild neighbors.。
生态环境保护雅思作文
生态环境保护雅思作文作文一：我们的地球小伙伴需要保护。
我们生活的地球就像一个超级大的乐园，有高高的大树，清澈的小河，还有各种各样可爱的小动物。
可是现在，这个乐园有点生病了呢。
我家附近原来有个小池塘，池塘里的水可清啦。
我能看到小鱼在水里游来游去，有时候还能看到小蝌蚪找妈妈。
我和小伙伴们常常在池塘边看小鱼，觉得特别有趣。
可是现在呀，池塘变得脏脏的，水也不清了，小鱼都不见了。
原来是有人把垃圾扔到池塘里，还有一些工厂排出的脏水也流进了池塘。
这让我好难过呀。
森林也是地球乐园里很重要的一部分。
森林里的大树就像一把把大伞，给小动物们遮风挡雨。
小鸟在树上做窝，小松鼠在树上跳来跳去。
可是有些人为了赚钱，就去砍树。
树被砍了，小动物们就没有家了。
我在电视上看到小猴子在被砍光树的地方，看起来特别无助，那模样真让人心疼。
我们大家都要行动起来保护我们的地球乐园。
不随便扔垃圾，看到别人扔垃圾要勇敢地去制止。
我们也可以在植树节的时候种上小树苗，让地球重新变得绿油油的。
只要我们每个人都出一点力，我们的地球小伙伴就会慢慢好起来的。
作文二：保护生态环境，让世界更美好。
我们都希望生活在一个超级美的世界里，到处都是花花草草，天空湛蓝湛蓝的，空气里都是香香的味道。
就像我们学校的小花园，以前开满了各种各样的花。
春天的时候，桃花粉粉的，像小姑娘的脸蛋。
还有那些五颜六色的小花，在微风里轻轻摇晃，就像在跳舞一样。
小蜜蜂和小蝴蝶也都被吸引过来了，在花丛中忙个不停。
可是有一段时间，有些同学在小花园里乱跑，还摘花，小花园就没有以前那么美了。
后来老师告诉我们，要爱护小花园，就像爱护我们自己的家一样。
现在我们都很小心地照顾小花园，它又慢慢变得漂亮起来了。
大海也是我们这个世界很美的一部分。
大海里有好多神奇的东西，像珊瑚礁，它们的样子千奇百怪，有的像树枝，有的像蘑菇。
还有大海龟，慢悠悠地在海里游着。
但是现在大海也遇到了麻烦。
我听爸爸说，有些地方的大海被污染了，海面上有很多垃圾。
关于环保英文雅思作文
关于环保英文雅思作文环境保护又是指人类有意识地保护自然资源并使其得到合理的利用，防止自然环境受到污染和破坏，那么它的英文雅思作文又该怎样的写呢？关于环保英文雅思作文一题目：Many people believe that we have developed into a “throw-away society” which is filling with plastic bags and rubbish. What do you think?范文：Wind blows up bags higher and higher in the sky. It is a scary thought that some day the earth will turn into a hugegarbage land. Wastes, if not treated properly, will make ourlife a living nightmare.The environmental issue is getting worse almost every day in cities with very large population. As is often the case, city development outpaces environmental protection. People consume great amount of natural resouces and produce wastes.To effectively address such problems, cities need to spend big money. In addition, they need to call to the attention of people to become more environmentally responsible.Many people are becoming less responsible and easily influenced by bad behaviors. “Why should I care while others don’t care?” Such idea makes some people only concern with places where they live and work. Furthermore, people sometimes even purposely litter for revenge to other people.Although media promotes environmental awareness, good people are often snubbed as posers who try to set up a superior image in real life. Consequently, they are intimated of receiving negative comments for doing the right thing. Wrongas it is, such phenomenon is widespread especially among youngsters and people with low income and little education.However, our society is waging a campaign against environmental pollution. People learn the harms of undegradable lunch boxes and other polluting wastes. Laws inmany countries prohibit or limit excessive use of pollutingbags. Companies a re continuely replacing the old materials with more environmental friendly and recyclable kinds. Scientistshave developed more effective technologies in waste treatment. As time goes by, more and more people put high priority on the protection of environment for a healthier life.To sum up, people produce huge amount of garbage andthe environment is seriously polluted because of lack offinancial resources, sense of responsibility, or efforts. But the world will not turn into a “throw away” society if people put in sufficient efforts to protect our environment.关于环保英文雅思作文二Environmental hazards are often too great for particular countries or individuals to tackle. We h ave arrived at a point in time where the only way to lessen environmental problems is at an international level.Environmental problems have reached such proportionsthat people feel international organizations must be set up to intervene in world affairs to resolve these problems. Whetherthis will resolve the problem is very unlikely as international organizations are just an extension of human b ehavior. That is, if human conflicts cannot be resolved at home, then they areunlikely to be resolved at the international level. Nevertheless, international organizations do attract attention to the growing problem of aims of the international community to resolve the issue of environmental pollution andsupport their cause, I do not believe it is the best or onlyway to protect the environment; in fact, it is only a small part of what is needed in a global initiative.All world problems, whether it is environmentalpollution, war, energy insufficiency, or famine, arise from the abusive behavior of all individuals. Therefore, the solutionto all these problems is the need for a collective consciousness. What is meant by this is that each individual must be aware ofthe impact he or she has on the world and their unique part toplay in this world. After all, if one is happy with his life,he will surely not endeavor to harm the environment or anyoneelse. His behavior will be that of a responsible individual.What is needed, therefore, is education. Education is the key to all problems and it starts from pregnancy all theway to adulthood and beyond. Furthermore, education means t hat children all over the world should be allowed to go to schools with good teachers and where teaching materials and methods can be adapted to each individual. Education means r aising children to be responsible individuals.This may s ound like utopia, but it is not: if a country had important problems in its educational system, then it should realize that it is contributing to the world’s problems. These are perhaps long term solutions, but they are more realistic solutions than setting up yet another international organization.[关于环保英文雅思作文]。
雅思写作高分范文环境类9篇
环境1. The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?It is argued that the International Community should put more efforts to encourage all countries in the world to decrease their fossil fuel’s utilization such as gas, oil, and coal. Personally, I strongly agree with this idea for many reasons.The most important thing we should mention is that fossil fuels’ consumption in all over the world is considered to be the main culprit of global warming and other environmental problems. First of all, it can be undeniable that burning oil and coal in domestic and industrial activities is producing tons of carbon dioxide and other detrimental chemical substances per year. Moreover, with the fast-developing pace of life and overpopulation, a significant number of transportations are being used, which is generating exhausted fumes and green-house gases in most of nations in the world. That’s the reasons why a huge number of environmental issues are alarmingly emerging recently such as global warming, ice melting in all poses, sea level rising and the other severe weather conditions.Besides, it is clearly seen that the amount of fossil fuels in all over the world are restricted and nonrenewable. Each kind of fossil fuels energies needs millions of years to form, thus, with an enormous human beings’ demand, it will result in energy depletion in the near future. Furthermore, technologies producing alternative power resources have not reached the point in which people in all countries of the world can use renewable energies replacing fossil fuels. Not all of nations can have enough financial and technological resources to invest in alternative power resources, so that the use of these energies is extremely expensive. Ultimately, because of the energy shortages, industrial activities and global economic development will experience negative and pessimistic impacts.In conclusion, I will reaffirm that International Community should take actions urgently to decrease the consumption of fossil fuels and other harmful energy in all nations.2. In some countries there is not enough recycling of waste materials (e.g. paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions?Waste recycling and people’s participation in it is a moot issue and a lot of arguments could be observed among people as well as in the media regarding whether people should spontaneously take part in recycling process or the government should make it a legal obligation. I personally believe that government should impose laws and severely fine the violation of it to ensure proper waste recycling.First, waste recycling is done by the state and citizens are expected to properly divide the recyclable and non-recyclable wastages and pack them accordingly while dumping them in recycle bins. They are expected to cooperate greatly in the recycling process. However, it is a strange fact that many people do not participate in it spontaneously either from their negligence or from their lack of time to do so.Second, it is a harsh truth that people in many cases abide by a rule only from the concern of punishment or fine, not from their conscience. For instance, when the penalty for traffic rule violation went up, people started following them in my city. Similarly, if laws are introduced and the authority starts penalizing, more people would recycle more of their wastages.Third, waste recycling is a very handy process to save our environment and we already have many rules to protect our environment. Whiledeforesting is a severe crime in my country, there is no visible law for not recycling the waste. This is why people are very careless about their waste production and this has created a throwaway society in our country. This is why proper laws are required.In conclusion, most of the citizens in our country already know about the importance of saving the environment and how individual efforts of recycling can improve environmental conditions. Since many of them still do not participate in waste recycling, there is no alternative than to impose laws to have this done.3. The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What danger is caused? How can we solve these problems?The depletion of consumable natural resources at an accelerated speed is a matter of grave concern since it has given birth to several problems in the world. Nevertheless, these issues can be resolved by taking some effective remedial steps.The reduction in the green cover has had a negative effect on earth’s weather conditions. To elaborate, forests help to maintain the temperature of earth. The cutting down of trees at a fast pace for fulfilling human’s greed has created a climatic imbalance in the last ten years. One of the biggest consequences of global warming is that our summers are getting hotter and hotter.Further, because of the depletion of fresh water resources, people are now forced to buy drinking water. The poor and the weaker sections of the society are the worst hit by the water crisis. Consequently, many people are dying due to lack of drinking water in African states and several others are left with only contaminated water for their daily use. Depleting oil resources also have had a negative impact on the automobile industry which relies almost wholly on oil for its operation.However, some viable solutions do exist and it is possible to solve the aforementioned problems to a great extent. First, cutting down of trees should be checked, and industries which use wood for manufacturing their products, such as furniture and houses, should be encouraged to find eco-friendly alternatives. Second, the government and the media should launch campaigns that make people aware of the importance of saving water. It is also important to set a limit on the amount of water that can be used for domestic and industrial purposes. Third, scientists should be encouraged to find renewable fuels for vehicles. For instance, chargeable electric cars are gaining popularity in the US because they are eco-friendly and economical.In conclusion, although the fast paced consumption of natural resources has directly influenced the climate of earth, the collaborative efforts of governments, scientists and the public can reduce the impact.4. Development in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.People argue about the negative effect of technology on the environment.A group of people think that rather than following the development of technology, we should have a simpler way of life. However, others disagree as they believe that technology could address environmental issues.On the one hand, it is undeniable that the rapid development of technology has caused some environmental problems. Many inventions are beneficial for human beings, but they have a catastrophic effect on the environment. For example, the invention of cars that use fossil fuel has caused some serious effect on the world. The cars produce carbon monoxide which is not only dangerous for living creatures, but it also becomes the main cause of global warming. Therefore, some people believe that we should change our lifestyle into a simpler one. One of the ways is by using a friendly environmental transportation such as using a bicycle to commute.On the other hand, other people believe that technology could be used as a way to resolve environmental problems. As we can see that one of the biggest threat to the earth civilization is the usage of the plastic bag. The waste of plastic bags has become a big issue, as they could only be composed for about ten decades. However, with the new technology, scientists have found a new way of producing plastic bags. With the new formula, plastic bags could be recycled; therefore it would resolve one of the environmental issues.In my opinion, I do believe that technology is beneficial for human beings if we used it wisely and proportionately. I personally believe that research for new technology should be continued, as we need to have improvements in life, but the government should review and monitor this research properly.5. Some people think that the amount of noise people make should be controlled strictly, while others say people are free to make as much noise as they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.It is often considered by many that they can make noises as they wish, while other people believe that there should have strict rules to control the amount of noise individual makes. In my opinion, I think noise pollution causes ample social and physical issues, hence it should be controlled.On the one hand, freedom to speak and making noise is one of the human rights. In other words, every citizen has a right to make sounds or noise as they prefer. For instance, in some special events such as birthday celebrations, dancing parties making noise is accepted in the current society. Moreover, making sounds is often considered as accepted behavior especially among small children. Making noise provides enjoyment among people obviously during joyful occasions. It helps to ventilate one’s emotions, particularly anger and sorrow.On the other hand, noise pollution is often accepted as one of the major concerns of the current world due to several drawbacks. Firstly, unpleasant sound causes ample health issues. For instance, the high-intensity sound could cause increased stress level, deafness, and cardiovascular problems and even sleep disturbances. Secondly, noise would often affect wild life. Animals would probably develop aggressive behavior and get irritated due to the high-frequency of unpleasant sounds. To cite an example, during thunder and lightning pet animals became frustrated as a result of high pitch sounds. Finally, it leads to trouble communicating. In other sense, communication between individuals becomes difficult owing to noise from the surrounding. In other words, communication gets distracted.In conclusion, the noise would adversely affect society and one’s body .Hence, necessary steps to be taken to control it. In my opinion, people should abide rules to control noise formation for the welfare of the society and inhabitants.6. Scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?Natural places like the South Pole have become attractive to scientists and tourists recently. However, whether the trend will have any negative influence on the local environments remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that if they can abide by certain rules during their stay, the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages.Firstly, it is obvious that for scientists, going to less known natural environments can make a difference in their researches. This is because these places have distinct eco-systems which are good resources for scientists to explore and expand their knowledge in different areas. Normally, researchers will collect samples, take pictures and observe the environment in order to achieve certain research goals.Moreover, for tourists, top advantage is that they get to see distinctive scenery which cannot be compared to other places they have been to. This could be once-in-a-life-time experience as not many people can afford or get the chance to experience an extraordinary side of nature, such as the South Pole which cannot be duplicated in the other parts of the Earth.That does not mean that there is no drawbacks of the practice. If these activities are not deliberately planned out, local scenery spots can be affected when perilous experiments are done in places where the eco-system is fragile to human activities, or at least make endless noise, leave trash everywhere. Consequently the loss will be immense.In sum, visiting remote natural places is definitely beneficial to both scientists and visitors; meanwhile, these new comers need to restrict their behaviors. Only by doing so will the pros outweigh the cons.7. With the increasing demand of energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?It is suggested that people should search for energy and natural resources in distant and inhospitable areas to cater to the growing need for oil and gas. This essay believes that the benefits of exploiting remote places do not outweigh the drawbacks simply because the environment itself is far more important than human desire.The main reason to extract oil and gas from untouched places is that most easily accessible sources of oil and gas have already been developed. This means human are draining the earth and will probably never be satisfied. Meanwhile, the main disadvantage is that extracting these sources can result in permanent damage to the environment, which can be devastating to the wildlife and human who depend on these ecosystems. Another negative view is that we cannot rule out the possibility of tragedies like oil spills, pipeline leaks and even shipping accidents. These contaminants pose a serious threat to the sensitive species and habitats since tons of harmful pollutants will be released in the air and all the toxic chemicalswill be discharged into the water, which in turn, will undoubtedly bring severe punishment to human themselves.Those opposed to this say that remote places shall be benefited with boost economy and more job opportunities. However, this standpoint can be seen in an opposite way. With large-scale infrastructures being constructed as well as more roads and buildings being built for workers, the biodiversity and ecosystem are surely at greater risk. Therefore, economy development in such areas cannot be stimulated this way.In conclusion, the advantages of exploiting distant places are overshadowed by the drawbacks. It is not sensible also morally flawed to stake our environment for progress, let alone to fulfill our own needs. 8. Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Environmental problems have dramatically increased over the last few years. Population change and other problems such as pollution, deforestation have further exacerbated the situation. Some people argue that these problems are too large to be addressed by individual being. I believe that it is a mutual responsibility of both individuals and countries to take pragmatic measures for its solution.Overpopulation is one of the pivotal reasons that have detrimental effects on the environment. Increase in population demand more food resources and living space. For instance, for the sake of accommodation many natural parks and forests have been wiped out to fulfil the need of living space. This has led to severe consequences that could damage both for the people and the environment.Individual efforts can contribute a lot to address the pressing environmental problems. Steps taken in individual level can be an effective solution for the world. For example, if the government of a country takes initiatives to reduce the rubbish produced daily, can’t do much. However, if the citizens take effort from their personal level, the rubbish production could be controlled observably. Similarly, if administration of a country starts planting trees, the effort would not go further without the collaboration of the individuals.Pollution is also a great menace to the environment. It is not only the reason of environmental problems but also has a dire effect on people. Factories operating within cities emit dangerous smoke and others harmful toxic. Furthermore, pollution also contributes to global warming. There has been a drastic increase in temperature around the globe, which in turn, melts glaciers across the world. That is why prudent decisions are required from the government level and the ordinary citizens should be encouraged and participate in every way possible to make the world a better place to live in.To sum up, I would like to say that environmental problems should be addressed on large scale. Everyone have to contribute in order to mitigate its vulnerable effects on the world.9. Some people think that too much attention and too many resources have been given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?The habitat conditions of wildlife, particularly those endangered species have been significantly improved due to relentless efforts from animal protectionists. However, some people think it is unwise to allocate too many resources to wildlife conservation.It is easy to understand people’s consideration. One the one hand, it is true that wild animals and birds of rare species are well protected in some developed countries where large natural preserves are well built and maintained. Tourists are more civilized and laws have been established to ban abuse or murdering of animals. On the other hand, there are still people starving and being deprived of basic sanitary conditions around the world. For many people, It is justified that people's wellbeing should be taken into consideration before animals are taken good care of. However, it is not always the same case all around the world and wild animals are still being hunted and slaughtered inhumanely in many places. Although there are laws that forbid poaching rare animals, endangered animals are still seen on dining table as gourmet dishes. Besides, as people's preference for leather products as fashion continues, each year hundreds of thousands of tigers and seals are shot to death and illegal profits are gained from fur trades. What is worse, wildlife habit is rapidly disappearing due to development and other human-caused changes. Considering all these factors, it is hard to say that too much has been done to protect wild animals.In conclusion, I think preserving wild animals is necessary and calls for efforts from both governments and individual citizens. While progress has been made during the past decades to provide livable habitats for those endangered species, there is still a long way to go before we can live harmony with our wild neighbors.。
保护环境范文雅思写作保护环境范文
保护环境范文雅思写作保护环境范文保护环境范文篇一《保护环境的范文》让我们的地球更美丽地球是我们的母亲，是我们赖以生存的家园。
随着生活水平的提高，人类在享受的同时，却在不知不觉地破坏她，我们的生存环境不断恶化。
平时没事时，我们就吃一块口香糖，嚼完后随口吐在地上，口香糖牢牢地粘在地上，清洁工人得用铲子才能把它弄掉，而且口香糖也污染土地。
我们经常在购物时，会用到大大小小的塑料袋，却不知塑料袋被火烧后会制造有毒气体，填埋后还不容易降解，还会导致土地被破坏，中国人口这么多，可想而知会有多少塑料袋在污染我们的环境。
一个人的环保行动就像是一盏灯，当大家都点燃自己的那盏灯，整个世界就会一片光明！让我们行动起来吧！不吃口香糖；不用塑料袋；不用一次性筷子…保护环境，人人有责！让我们的地球更加美丽！保护环境，人人有责一天，我在校园里走了一圈，发现垃圾还真不少，有同学们撕下的碎纸，有同学们吃完扔下的雪糕袋，还有一些破坏环境的塑料袋。
这些引起了我的反思。
我们天天都生活在大自然中，生活在美好的一切当中。
地球妈妈慷慨地为我们提供无限的资源，让我们丰衣足食，反而还破坏地球妈妈。
现在由于人类大量的砍树荒漠正推着大自然，吞噬着整个地球难道就心该情愿的看着地球被破坏？有的塑料袋很难腐烂，被成为白色污染。
每想到，一个小小的塑料袋竟然有这么大的危害。
中国自古以来就是礼仪之帮。
古代昌盛的儒家思想，也都把“仁”和“礼”放在首位。
古代的道德方面也是数不胜数，孔融让梨也是把最大的让给长辈。
我呼吁：不要再破坏我们的家园了，保护环境人人有责，保护环境从我做起，从现在开始。
保护环境，捍卫家园我们人类生活在地球上，地球上有许多东西需要我们保护，但是我们却没有在意。
有些人不珍惜地球赐予我们的一切，例如人们乱砍乱伐，大量使用一次性筷子和乱扔塑料袋，制造白色垃圾等已经给大自然带来了许多环境问题，严重影响了我们的生活。
还有大气污染，酸雨和臭氧层等带来的危害都是大自然给人类带来的灾害，人们乱砍乱伐，乱扔塑料袋和使用一次性筷子等，这些就是人们不尊重大自然而造成的，没有自然，便没有人类。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
雅思作文真题范文关于环境Climate change has become a worldwide issue in recent decades. The Earth, according to some scientists, is becoming warmer and warmer and this is analert signal for the future safety of the Earth. For these scientists, we must do something to prevent the climate from becoming worse. Meanwhile, there are also scientists who do not think much of the climate change and therefore suggest that we do nothing but find a way to live with it. For my part, Iagree with the second group of scientists.To reverse the climate change is never an easy undertaking. The widely acknowledged causes of climate change include the automobile gas emissions, factory pollution, deforestation, among others. If we wish to prevent the climate change, we will have to significantly reduce the use of cars and airplanes, close most of the factories and stop people from cutting trees.This means that, in order to make the Earth become cooler by one or two centigrade degree, our normal life will have to sacrifice. This is a cost most of us would never want to pay, although we have been repeatedly told of the benefits of doing so to the future generation.Then, in face of climate change, rather than trying to prevent it, we'd better try to find a way to live with it. For instance, when the hotterclimate makes it impossible to grow a certain vegetable in summer, we can grow it earlier than now, store it and then eat it when the weather becomes too hot. Also, we can develop new technologies to grow the vegetable we need even when the climate has changed. Furthermore, when it is necessary, we can make adjustments about our work hours. If the weather has become intolerably hot,we can have a few days off and make up when it gets back to normal. Such flexibilities will help us solve the climate change problem and at the sametime will not bring down our productivity.Climate change is not a good thing, but for the time being, I do not think we should take expensive and costly measures to prevent it. Rather, I believe we should find a way to live with it.题目：Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment.What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?中文翻译：解释一些人类破坏环境的方式。
政府可以做些什么来解决这些问题? 个人能做什么?范文：Humans are responsible for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals can take to address these problems.Two of the biggest threats to the environment are air pollution and waste. Gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles lead to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the planet in the future. As the human population increases, we are also producing ever greater quantities of waste, which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.In conclusion, both national governments and individuals must play their part in looking after the environment.雅思资源快速消耗话题作文Task：The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?Sample answer：The universal phenomenon of excessive consumption of natural resources actually remains a subject of public interest and concern. The objective of this essay is to outline both the potential problems of this negative tendency and appropriate ways of dealing with it.Consuming considerable resources will cause inevitable environmental pollution. The low efficiency of resources use in factories may aggravate this problem. One of the best solutions may be encouraging companies to adopt more eco-friendly equipment, making optimal use of materials. Meanwhile, local governments can enact stricter environment-protection standards to normalize the enterprise operations.In addition, since available natural resources are quite limited on the earth, the overuse of these restricted resources will worsen the shortage of natural materials and lower people’s standard of living indirectly. It is well-recognized that only a few natural resources can be used directly in our daily life. For example, the drinkable water accounts for just less than 1% of all the world water resources. Also, to meet the basic needs of people, some alternative materials have been invented when some resources are in a short supply. For instance, artificial cotton, a material which is made from rice straw, has replaced cotton in clothing industry in recent years. However, the clothes made of artificial cotton are definitely not as comfortable as the natural ones. Wearing these clothes means a lower life quality to some people to some extent. To address this problem, people should develop a more active attitude towards economizing resources, leading a low carbon life.To summarize, consuming natural resources at an increasing rate may pose a threat on environment and people’s life. B usiness, governments and society should work together to solve these problems.雅思大作文环境类话题技巧首先我们一起来看一下两道雅思小作文题目:(1) In many countries, there is no enough recycling of waste materials(e.g. paper, glass, cans). What are the reasons and solutions?(2) Some people think governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?读完这两道题目，可能很多考生还是无法理解这2道题目的共同点在哪里。