48届世界教育大会结论英文版
《融合教育的基本理念》(主讲人:李泽慧)

《融合教育的基本理念》主讲人:李泽慧融合教育的三个核心1.多样性2.对多样性的接纳和包容3.每个人的责任,不应区分是特教还是普教。
31秒短片:我们都一样,我们不一样。
你觉得一样的在哪?不一样的在哪?你有什么启示我国残疾儿童的教育现状:据2006年全国第二次残疾人抽样调查:1.0-14岁的残疾人口为387万;2.6-14岁学龄残疾儿童为246万;3.学龄残疾儿童入学率为63.19%,即155万,还有91万残疾儿童尚未入学。
4.15岁及以上残疾人文盲人口为3591万人,文盲率为43.29%。
教育部《2012年全国教育事业发展统计公报》全国共有特殊教育学校1853所。
特殊教育学校共有专任教师4.37万人。
讨论的问题:一、什么是融合教育?关于融合教育的重要国际文件:1.萨拉曼卡宣言(1994)2.特殊需要教育行动纲领(1994)3.联合国残疾人权利公约(2006)名称的问题对INCLUSIVE EDUCATETION的理解陈云英博士后在1993年哈尔滨会议上翻译成“全拿教育”,与integration(融合、整合)相区别,伺候在大陆地区采用台湾翻译成“融合教育”萨拉曼卡宣言:关于特殊需要教育的原则、政策与实践出发点:“认识到在普通教育体系里为残疾儿童、青少年与成人提供教育的必要性和迫切性,重申对全民教育的支持。
”因为:“许多儿童都会在他们求学生涯的某个时期经历到学习困难并由此产生特殊教育需要。
”每个儿童都有受教育的基本权力,必须给与他事先和保持可接受水平的学习之机会。
每个儿童都有独一无二的个人特点、兴趣、能力和学习需要。
教育体系的设计和教育方案的实施应充分考虑到这些特点与需要的广泛差异。
关于特殊需要教育的原则:有特殊教育需要者必须有机会进入普通学校,这些学校应该将他吸收再能满足其需要的,以儿童为中心的教育活动中。
试试此种全纳性方针的普通学校,是反对歧视、创造欢迎残疾人的社区,建立全纳性社会和事先认人受教育的最有效途径;进而言之,他们为绝大多数的儿童提供了一种有效的教育,提高了整个教育体系的效益,并从根本上改善了教育的成本——效益比。
全纳

党的十七大报告中提出要“关心特殊教育”,对汶川大地震发生后出现的大批身心难以完全复原的特殊需要儿童来说,这句话显得更加现实和具体。
从国际经验中找寻答案,我们看到了全纳教育这一可以期许的未来。
今年11月将在日内瓦举行的联合国教科文组织第48届国际教育大会的主题正是全纳教育。
——编者全纳教育:通向未来之路社会给予他们何种程度的接纳,他们便会以何种程度的发展回馈社会。
图片摘自美国“活力儿童”网站■周满生前不久,印度尼西亚巴厘岛举行了联合国教科文组织第48届国际教育大会亚太地区预备会议。
此次会议是联合国教科文组织国际教育局为国际教育大会举办的九大地区会议之一。
会议分析了全纳教育的政策趋势、实施效果及面临的挑战,分享经验和成效,为国际教育大会制订行动路线和方向指南提供政策建议。
全纳教育源于特殊教育全纳教育(香港译为和谐教育)起源于特殊教育。
特殊教育的发展经历独立设置、与主流普通教育结合到全纳教育的转变。
在某些情况下,特殊教育是普通教育的补充,在大多数情况下,它又是完全独立设置的。
近些年来,批评者或者从人权的角度,或者从效率的角度对这种分割的教育体制提出质疑和批评。
特殊教育与普通教育“结合”遇到的主要挑战是普通学校的组织、课程、教学和学习策略一直没有变化,难以满足学生多样化的特殊需要。
教育体制缺乏变化成为实施全纳教育的一个重要障碍。
学校需要改革,理念需要更新,教学法需要改进,教育制度需要探索不同途径来适应儿童的需要,以各种方式、途径接纳所有有特殊需要的学生,这些因素促成了全纳教育概念的产生。
随后,全纳教育的内容越来越宽泛,远远超出特殊教育的范围,涉及各种学习困难和具有特殊需要的学生,也包括超长儿童的教育。
联合国教科文组织2005年发布的《全纳教育指南:确保全民教育的通路》对全纳教育的定义是:“全纳教育是通过增加学习、文化和社区参与,减少教育系统内外的排斥,应对所有学习者的多样化需求,并对其作出反应的过程。
以覆盖所有适龄儿童为共识,以常规体制负责教育所有儿童为信念,全纳教育涉及教育内容、教育途径、教育结构和教育战略的变革和调整。
国际教育新思想新理念 第一章 全纳教育

(一)全纳教育的人权观
《世界人权宣言》确立了人的平等自由权利 基调
第一条 人人生而自由,在尊严和权利上一律平等。 All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
第三条
人人有权享有生命、自由和人身安全。
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
一、什么是全纳教育
二、全纳教育与人权 三、全纳教育与普世价值
第一节 全纳教育的产生与发展
全纳教育中的“全纳”(inclusive) 是针对其反义“排斥”(exclusive) 从整个教育的发展过程来看,可以看到也是一种从排斥到全纳的过 程。
教育发展过程图式 全纳 整合 隔离 排斥 ———— ———— ———— ————
全世界现有:
7700万适龄儿童失学; 7.7亿成人文盲。
残疾人受排斥更甚:
残疾人占总人口10%, 有6亿, 其中1.5亿是儿童; 在发展中国家残疾儿童入学率仅为1-5%,占总失学 率三分之一。
再看看我们的学校教育体制内: 还有不计其数的儿童或显性 或隐性地被排斥和被边缘化。 有例证表明: 在每三个被永久性排斥的学生中, 有两个是再也不会到其他学校学习了。
全纳教育是建立在以下三条教育权利之上 的:
1、有权利接受免费义务教育。
2、有权利接受平等的、无歧视的教育。 3、有权利接受优质的教育(包括内容与
过程)。
全纳教育 是一种持续的教育过程; 全纳教育 接纳所有学生,反对歧视排斥, 提倡积极参与,主张集体合作, 满足不同需求,实现全纳社会。
这种理解的理由主要是: 1、根据全纳教育的本义,“接纳”(inclusion)主要表达了学校要接纳所 有的人,是针对其反义“排斥”(exclusion) 的,所以第一层意思就要表达 出“接纳所有的人,不排斥任何人”。
Norway48届教育大会提交报告

ALL INCLUSIVE … ?Inclusive Education in Norway- Policy, Practice, Experiences and ChallengesTHE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONNational Report of Norwaytothe UNESCO / IBE conference ICE 48:Inclusive education: The way of the future Geneva, 25th– 28th November 2008bythe Norwegian Ministry of Education and ResearchOctober 2008Oslo, NorwayContentsPreface (4)Acronyms and abbreviations (5)Executive Summary (6)PART 1: INCLUSIVE EDUCATION – THE NORWEGIAN CASE (9)1Introduction (9)1.1Inclusive education – the general concept (9)1.2Inclusive education in the Norwegian context (10)1.3Emphasis of presentation and structure of report (12)2Education and Training in Norway: Structure, Policies and Tools (13)2.1Education and training in Norway - overview (13)2.2Principles and Goals in Education and Training (15)2.3Administration and delivery (17)2.4Policy documents and other regulatory instruments (18)2.5Curricula and other guiding documents (19)3Arrangements aimed at promoting inclusive education (21)3.1Social-pedagogical (21)3.1.1PPT - Pedagogical-psychological services in basic education (21)3.1.2National support system for special education (22)3.1.3Social and vocational counselling services at institutional level (23)3.1.4Needs-based priority entrance to upper secondary school (23)3.1.5Follow-up Service for dropouts and non-attendants in upper secondaryeducation and training (24)3.2Professional (24)3.2.1Local arrangements in ECCE and basic education (24)3.2.2Deviating training paths and assessment arrangements (25)3.2.3Other adapted professional arrangements that promote inclusion (26)3.3Financial (26)3.4Technical (27)3.5Stimulating prizes (27)4How Inclusive? Observations & Reflections on Policy Challenges (28)4.1Framework and access (28)4.2Implementation and outcomes (29)4.3Challenges (31)5Meeting the Challenges: Recent Reforms and Other Policy Initiatives (33)5.1Comprehensive reforms (33)5.1.1The ECCE reform (33)5.1.2Knowledge Promotion reform (34)5.1.3The quality reform in higher education (35)5.2Targeted strategies and action plans for inclusion and improved performance (36)5.2.1Early intervention (36)5.2.2Measures on language stimulation (37)5.2.3Initiatives for improving the learning environment (39)5.2.4Entrepreneurship education strategy (42)5.2.5Creative Learning. Strategy for art and culture in education (43)5.2.6Others (44)5.3Renewed Focus on Quality in Basic Education (44)5.4The further development (45)PART 2: A CLOSER LOOK AT INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN THE VARIOUSAREAS OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING (46)6Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) (46)6.1Policy goals and principles, laws and regulations (46)6.2Political and administrative responsibilities at various levels (47)6.3The Content of Kindergartens (47)6.4Participation (48)6.5Staffing. Involvement of children and their parents (49)6.6Financing (49)6.7Further development, challenges (50)7Basic Education Grades 1 to 13 (50)7.1Common framework and features (51)7.2Compulsory school: Primary and lower secondary education (51)7.3Upper secondary general education and VET (52)7.4Challenges in Basic Education (54)8Higher education (54)8.1Goals and principles, Laws and regulations (54)8.2Action plan and advisory service (55)8.3Political and administrative responsibilities, various levels (55)8.4Financing (56)8.5Quality control (56)8.6Participation (56)8.7Achievements and challenges (57)9Adult education, Life-Long Learning (58)9.1Policy and regulations (58)9.2Delivery mechanisms and participation (59)9.3Validation of informal and non-formal learning outcomes (60)9.4Targeted adult education and training to the end of inclusion (60)Literature. References (62)PrefaceA well educated population is the greatest asset of every nation. The education system organises the transfer of values and norms, knowledge and skills to new groups, it lays the foundation for social integration and economic growth and is vital to the development of a democratic and unified society. Education is also the individual right of every human being and shall ensure personal growth and intellectual development.It is a great challenge to any education and training system to ensure optimal realisation of both individual and social potentials. This is particularly valid in a context of constant change and high level of migration, where education and training needs are changing and become increasingly diversified.Norway has chosen to address this challenge by means of inclusive education. Our ambition is that the education system will give access to and accommodate optimal learning for all individuals in a friendly context that welcomes diversity.National and international studies show that we have gone part of the way: policies, regulatory instruments and funding are carefully adapted to the ambitions, and our pupils score high on indicators of well-being and satisfaction with the social environment in school. On the other hand, the performance of our pupils in basic skills such as reading and math is below the OECD average, and too many students report that the teaching is not adapted to their learning needs and capabilities.The causal relation between ones socio-economic situation and educational attainments is thoroughly established. As the current government is committed to improving the living conditions for the socially and economically vulnerable, we have to improve education and training in order to reduce inequalities.Basic skills, such as reading, writing and math, constitute the fundament for all further learning, and hence for the education and job career of the individual throughout life. The EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007 shows that early intervention is the most effective way to improve learning achievements. On this background my ministry has taken several new policy initiatives to increase the emphasis on basic skills in kindergarten and primary school, and to ensure early support intervention if so needed.All young people deserve quality education according to their needs and capabilities. Sharing ideas, experiences and good practices of inclusive education may give a new boost to the global EFA efforts as well as to the individual countries. In this perspective, we submit the present document as the Norwegian national report to the ICE 48.Oslo, October 2008Bård Vegar Solhjell, Minister of EducationAcronyms and abbreviationsECCE = Early Childhood Care and EducationEFA = Education For AllFFO = Norwegian Federation of Organisations of Disabled People ICT = Information and Communication TechnologyMOER = Ministry of Education and ResearchPPP = Public-Private PartnershipPPT = Pedagogical–Psychological ServicesUDIR = Directorate of EducationVET = Vocational Education and TrainingExecutive SummaryInclusive education has been a central policy principle and goal in Norwegian education and training since the mid-seventies. The operational understanding of and approach to inclusive education is that every individual shall be provided optimal learning conditions in the regular learning context –as far as possible. Only in exceptional cases students receive instruction outside the regular learning context.When reviewing inclusive education in Norway, one should be particularly aware of three groups that may be at risk of exclusion:The Sami population.The immigrant population.The disabled.The present report looks into relevant aspects of education and training policy and itsimplementation at the various levels:Access, recruitment to and retaining in the various types of education and training.Practical implementation of inclusive education at different levels.Results, outcomes of education and training.Principles and goals in Norwegian education and trainingThe Norwegian government presents the education and training policy in the following way:“Every individual has a pote ntial for learning, and the education system must ensure that this potential is utilised to the full amount, to the benefit of the individual and society. (..) The education system shall give all individuals the same opportunities to obtain knowledge, skills and attitudes that are important for being able to living a good life and become an active contributor in society.”Equality and freedom of choice are basic political principles that lie at the heart of the education and training policy. All residents shall be ensured equal rights to education, irrespective of gender and economic, social, geographic and cultural factors. Accordingly: All education and training in the public domain, including higher education, issupplied free of charge; costs are covered by public budgets;1Every person that has completed ten years of compulsory education is entitled by lawto three years of upper secondary general education or VET, by her or his own choice;The supply of education and training should be of high quality and broad enough toallow for a range of choices irrespective of geographical location and social factors;Education and training is regarded a means for promoting equity, and for reducing inequalities, poverty and other forms of marginalization in society.Arrangements aimed at promoting inclusive educationA number of specific measures that support and promote Inclusive Education are in operation, adapted to the various types of education and target groups. Some of them are under the auspices of other ministries than the MOER. The arrangements fall in four major categories: social-pedagogical, professional, financial and technical.1Children in kindergartens and pupils in private institutions pay a tuition fee.Social-pedagogical, including:PPT - Pedagogical-psychological services at local level, providing diagnostic andcounselling services to kindergartens and schools on adaptation of teaching forlearners that experience a difficult social or educational situation.Social and vocational counselling services at institutional level.Needs-based priority entrance to upper secondary school.Follow-up service for dropouts and non-attendants at upper secondary level.Professional, including:Formal involvement of parents, cooperation school – home.Homework support arrangements.Deviating education paths and assessment arrangements.Entrance to higher education based on assessment of formal education and workexperience.System for validation of non-formal and informal learning outcomes.“Second chance” arrangements for early school leavers.Financial, including:Subsidised loans and grants to learners organised through the State Education LoanFund.Financial support through various arrangements to families with weak economy.Tax relief to companies that invest in education of staff.Subsidised adult education arrangements.Technical, including:Free provision of necessary technical equipment to learners with specific needs.Free transport.Physical adaptation of all schools to ensure universal access.Experiences, Outcomes, ChallengesThe report shows that the national framework of Norwegian education and training, including policy, strategies, regulations, funding and administrative arrangements, to a large extent is in compliance with major inclusive education principles. All children, pupils, students and adult learners are – on equal terms - legally entitled to access to appropriate education and training. Instruction shall be adapted to the needs of the learners within the regular learning context. On the other hand, there are weaknesses in the practical implementation of the inclusive education principles and goals. The quality of Norwegian kindergartens is high and the ECCE attendance is far above most other OECD countries.But there are still some children that are denied a place in kindergarten and hence are not allowed to benefiting from the ECCE. Many children from immigrant families do not attend despite the importance of early Norwegian language stimulation and social and mental preparation for a satisfactory learning progress in basic education. A legal right to a place in kindergarten will be implemented from 2010. But there is a shortage of professional pre-school teachers.In general, institutions and teachers in basic education succeed in establishing and maintaining a positive social environment. Schools and teachers in general provide adaptedinstruction, but there are indications that many teachers lack necessary competencies in this area and that adaptation could be improved. The existing diagnostic and support system for adapted and special education represents an important competence and could possibly be used more efficiently.National and international tests show that Norwegian pupils in basic education do not perform at the expected level. Too many of them do not acquire the necessary basic skills at an early stage. This implies that too many pupils with weak school results are let through compulsory school and face severe problems and dropout when entering upper secondary education and training. Since linguistic minority students tend to score lower than linguistic majority students, and students with highly educated parents tend to get better results in basic education than learners who have parents with little education, some have argued that the education system to some degree contributes to reproducing social inequalities.Recent reforms and other policy initiatives to address the challengesSeveral policy initiatives have been designed and introduced over the last years and months to address the identified challenges. Reforms, Strategies and Action plans include: ECCE Reform.Knowledge Promotion Reform.Quality Reform in higher education.Early Intervention for Lifelong Learning.Measures on language stimulation: “Make room for reading”, “Languages OpenDoors”, “Equal education in practice” and “Languages Build Bridges”.Initiatives for improving the learning environment.Entrepreneurship education strategy.Strategy for art and culture in education: Creative Learning.Strategic plan for strengthening of Mathematics, Science and Technology.Action Plan for Gender Equality in ECCE and Basic Education.Renewed focus on Quality in Basic Education.It is still too early to expect visible effects of these initiatives on school results and the highdropout rate in upper secondary education and training.The particularly high dropout rate in upper secondary VET causes serious worries. A public committee is investigating whether policy changes and targeted measures in this part of the system could improve the performance.Two other committees are looking into the broad issues of teacher training and special education, respectively. It is expected that their reports will initiate major changes to the aim of strengthening adapted and special education at early stages of education and training.The government has appointed a committee for equal education for linguistic minorities in kindergartens, schools and higher education institutions and is also considering how compulsory education can be made more practical in order to meet the needs of and stimulate the development of talents of those with a less theoretical orientation.PART 1: INCLUSIVE EDUCATION – THE NORWEGIAN CASE1 IntroductionThe greatest asset of every nation is the combined knowledge and skills of its citizens. This is secured by quality education. The education and training system organises and coordinates the transfer of values and attitudes, norms, knowledge and skills to new population groups and new generations. It equips the individual learners for future life in the family, local community and production. Hence education and training is the foundation for economic and social growth, and vital to the development of a democratic society.Whilst recognising the importance of successful education, there are obvious and significant challenges related to the designing and operation of a relevant education system at a satisfactory quality level: Technologies and markets are global and change continuously and rapidly, and migration contributes to an increasingly heterogeneous population. This means that education and training needs are changing and becoming more diversified. Inclusive education has been held forward as a relevant approach to meet this challenge.This report will present the Norwegian approach to and experiences with inclusive education.1.1 Inclusive education – the general concept“Inclusive education”has a positive connotation as the opposite to “exclusion”. I t implies that all individuals have general access to education.Inclusive Education goes beyond physical integration. In an inclusive education system, every learner is part of what could be called a “learning community” with other peer learners that participate actively on equal terms. Relevant education and training of good quality is provided to all individuals, regardless of their personal features and social, cultural, economic and geographical factors. It is based on the fundamental principles of equity and education as a human right. Every individual – slow and fast learners alike - is given the opportunity to learn to his or her full potential in terms of pace and level, and is actively participating in the organisation and implementation of the learning process.Inclusive Education is not a final and stable condition, but rather a constant process whereby societies strive to remove obstacles and accommodate optimal learning for each and all individuals. The permanent dynamics pertain to the facts that people in the system are continuously being substituted, that individuals within the system and their learning needs change over time and that the social, cultural and economic context which often defines learning needs, is in constant development.A prerequisite for successful implementation of Inclusive Education is that the education system – and the individual teachers and trainers within that system - welcomes diversity, and addresses and responds adequately to the specific needs of the individual learners. This complies with the principle of “equality in treatment”: Provision of optimal learning opportunities to each and every learner.In order to avoid physical and social segregation, individuals would only in extreme cases be taken out from the normal learning context. Thus, special education provided in separate institutions in general fall outside the strict denotation of “inclusive education”.It seems unlikely that there will ever be found a perfectly inclusive education system complying with all criteria above. But many countries have put inclusive education on the political agenda and taken important steps in that direction. Norway is one of them.1.2 Inclusive education in the Norwegian contextIn Norway the principle of inclusive education was introduced with the implementation of new laws in compulsory and upper secondary education in 1976, and further developed in the 1980s and 1990s.2 The first Act on Child Day Care Institutions of 1975 also emphasised the importance of inclusive care and education for small children, and gave children with disabilities priority access to kindergartens.The operational understanding of and approach to inclusive education in Norway is that every individual shall be provided optimal learning conditions in the regular learning context –as far as possible. Adapted education is a principle, but not an individual right. In practical life it will always be necessary to consider and find a reasonable balance between costs and benefits to various affected parties: the individual learner (needs and learning conditions), the institutions and the greater society (money, social responsibility), the teacher (qualifications, working conditions, available resources), and fellow children, pupils and students (learning conditions, social environment, security).No individuals shall be excluded. But what is the right thing to do if the provision of optimal learning conditions to one learner inevitably will imply reduced learning opportunities for several other students? In some practical cases, the principle relating to learning arena is being disregarded. Some students need to receive all or parts of the teaching outside the normal classroom, in a specially adapted environment. This applies e.g. to learners with particular medical problems, deaf-blind learners, individuals that represent a physical threat to other students and staff, or persons that by their behaviour seriously reduce the learning opportunities for several other fellow students. In such cases, one will have to assess whether special education in a segregated learning context represents the best solution, all aspects and interests considered. Provided the student receives education adapted to her / his abilities, one might even with some right argue that this solution follows the principle of inclusive education part of the way, if not in the strict interpretation of the concept.When reviewing inclusive education in Norway, one should in particular consider the situation for the following groups that might be at risk of exclusion:The Sami population. The Sami are one of the largest indigenous people of Europe,traditionally inhabiting northern Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Kola Peninsula of Russia. The Sami population, which has its own Parliament and national flag, has beenestimated to be between 85,000 and 135,000 across the whole Nordic region, roughly half of them living in Norway, including Oslo. The Sami language, which belongs tothe Finno-Ugric family, is recognised as an official language. Sami pupils in basiceducation are legally entitled to receive instruction and textbooks in their ownlanguages. An estimated 10 000 people today have Sami as their home language; most of them live in the three northernmost counties.32 Dalen 20063 See: http://www.reisenett.no/norway/facts/culture_science/sami.html;/wiki/Sami_people#CultureThe immigrant population. The immigrant population in 2008 totals 460 000, oralmost ten per cent of the total population. It consists of people with two foreign-born parents: 381 000 first-generation immigrants who have moved to Norway and 79 000descendents, i.e. people who were born in Norway of two parents with a differentcountry of origin. They come from 213 different countries and independent regions, as refugees, labour immigrants, to study or through family reunion. 246 000 come from Turkey and countries in Asia, Africa and South America. Westerners make up around one third of the immigrant population. They are primarily labour immigrants (somewith families), are often well-educated and high earners and differ greatly from thenon-western immigrants with regard to most living condition indicators.4 AllNorwegian municipalities are home to immigrants. Oslo has the largest proportion of immigrants with 25 per cent, or 140 000 people. Half of all first-generationimmigrants from Africa, Asia (including Turkey), Eastern Europe and South andCentral America arrived in Norway as refugees.5People with defined disabilities – physical, mental or multiple challenges. It isdifficult to find accurate statistics on this group, partly due to the different ways ofdefining “disability”: In many cases, “disabled” individuals will not be disabled butfunction very well if material and social conditions are being duly adapted. In 2007,the Ministry of Education and Research (MOER) gave financial support to adaptation of conditions for 5 900 children in kindergartens. In 2005, 25 per cent of students inhigher education stated that they suffered from “lo ng-term illness” that was hampering their study activities. In the 2nd quarter 2007, some 495 000 people or slightly above15 per cent of the population aged 16-66, reported to have a disability, definedas:”long-term health problems that may limit everyda y life”. 45.3 per cent of thedisabled persons had a job, whilst 2.4 per cent were unemployed. Thus, about 48 percent of the disabled persons were economically active, compared to 77 per cent of the total population aged 16-66. The correlation between education level and level ofeconomic activity is significant: Whilst only 30 per cent of those with compulsoryeducation as the highest education attainment are economically active, thecorresponding figure is as high as 70 per cent for those with a tertiary education ofmore than four years. 6Inclusive education relates to many different factors at the various levels:Political level, i.e. national, regional and local levels. Decisions at these levels determine the framework for provisions, access and activities in the various parts of the education system. Whereas the overall education policy is always the fundament, legal acts and other formal regulations, budgets, provision structure and total system capacity, policy of teacher administration and training have implications for practices of the individual kindergarten / school and the individual teacher.Institutional level. Institutions involved in education and training to a varying degree have autonomy in professional and budgetary matters. This means that the management and staff4 Olsen, Bjørn 2007. URL: http://www.ssb.no/vis/english/magazine/art-2007-04-03-01-en.html5 Statistics Norway 2008. URL: http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/00/00/10/innvandring_en/6 Olsen and Van 2007. URL:http://www.ssb.no/emner/06/01/rapp_funksjonshemmede/rapp_200740/rapp_200740.pdfmake decisions regarding the internal allocation of resources and the level of professional and social services to the learners, recruitment and further training of teachers, as well as prioritisation between various strategic measures and activities. The latter can e.g. be campaigns or other social efforts aiming to create a friendly kindergarten / school environment, to reduce conflicts and bullying, or to ensure an optimal allocation of resources (time) for adaptation of te aching to learners‟ needs.Micro level, i.e. class, group and individual levels. Whether or not the individual learner actually is given optimal learning opportunities, is directly and strongly influenced by several factors in the immediate learning environment, including:Teacher qualifications and motivationPersonal relation between the teacher and the individual learnerPersonal relations among the learners, and their attitudes and behaviourAvailability of relevant teaching aids and technical equipmentCommunication and collaboration between the teacher and the learners‟ families1.3 Emphasis of presentation and structure of reportBased on the operational review of the concept, the present report aims to answer the following questions relating to Norwegian education and training:What is the Norwegian policy with regard to Inclusive Education and how is thispolicy reflected in strategic plans, formal regulations, funding and administrativearrangements?To which degree, and how, is inclusive education being practiced in the various parts of Norwegian education and training?What are major experiences from the practicing of inclusive education in theNorwegian education system; is it successful in terms of goal achievements?What are major challenges with regard to further improvement of inclusive educationin Norwegian education and training, and how is the education system responding tothese challenges?The answers to these questions can be found by taking a closer look at three main issues: Access, recruitment to the various types of education. Does everyone have theopportunity to attend? Have barriers to participation been removed? Are efforts being made to motivate the parents and learners and to make the relevant educationalternatives attractive? Is sufficient counselling being provided regarding the variousalternative training paths?Implementation of education. Is adapted education being provided to all students? Isthe learning environment good enough to promote learning? Are the necessary efforts being made to prevent dropout? Are sufficient efforts being made to get those whodrop out, back into the system?Results, outcomes. Are participation rates by different groups in the various parts ofeducation satisfactory, or are some groups being excluded from taking part in theregular education settings? Are the learning outcomes for the various groupssatisfactory, in terms of subject marks and results in international comparative tests? Is the dropout rate acceptably low and the completion rate sufficiently high in the various parts of education? Is the education system actually contributing to social equalisation, reduction of poverty and social disparities?。
沈祖芸2023全球教育报告观后感

沈祖芸2023全球教育报告观后感(中英文实用版)英文文档:Reflections on Shen Zuyi"s 2023 Global Education ReportThe 2023 Global Education Report by Shen Zuyi offers a profound insight into the current state and future trends of education worldwide.It is a comprehensive analysis that delves into the various challenges and opportunities in the field of education.One of the key takeaways from the report is the importance of adaptability in the educational system.With the rapid advancement of technology and the changing demands of the job market, it is crucial for the education system to be flexible and responsive to these changes.The report highlights the need for a more personalized and student-centered approach to education, which emphasizes critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity.Another significant aspect of the report is the emphasis on equity and inclusion in education.The report recognizes that education is not a one-size-fits-all concept and that different students have different needs and backgrounds.It calls for a more inclusive education system that caters to the diverse needs of students, regardless of their socio-economic status, cultural background, or disability.Furthermore, the report discusses the impact of the COVID-19pandemic on education and the importance of investing in digital infrastructure and online learning platforms to ensure that education is accessible to all, especially in the context of the global south.Overall, Shen Zuyi"s 2023 Global Education Report provides an informative and thought-provoking overview of the state of education worldwide.It underscores the need for transformative changes in the educational system to meet the challenges of the future.中文文档:沈祖芸2023全球教育报告观后感沈祖芸的2023全球教育报告深刻地洞察了全球教育现状及其未来趋势,全面分析了教育领域面临的各种挑战和机遇。
全纳教育:未来之路

全纳教育:未来之路作者:来源:《世界教育信息》2009年第02期编者按:2008年12月底,由联合国教科文组织国际教育局组织召开的第48届国际教育大会,主题为“全纳教育:未来之路”。
全纳教育确保全民受到教育、所有学习者都享有基本学习机会并能丰富高质量学习的权利。
它特别关注残疾人群体及各类特殊人群,致力于发掘每个个体的全部潜能。
全纳教育的最终目标是结束各种形式的歧视,促进社会融合。
本刊2008年第12期刊登的国务委员刘延东在会议上的主旨发言,在广大读者中引起了强烈的反响。
本期再刊登大会的结论和建议,以飨读者。
我们,各国教育部长、153个会员国代表团的团长和代表,与20 个政府间组织和25 个非政府组织、基金会和其他民间社会机构的代表一起,在第48届教科文组织国际教育大会上(2008年11月25~28日,日内瓦)就“全纳教育:未来之路”的主题开展了建设性的和具有挑战性的辩论。
在会议结束之际,与会代表忆及《联合国人权宣言》第26 条规定:每个人都有接受教育的权利。
我们也在此重申:全纳的、有质量的教育对人类发展、社会发展和经济发展都具有极其重要的意义。
我们认同,各国政府和所有社会行动者在提供高质量的全民教育方面发挥着重要的作用。
与此同时,政府和社会部门应该认识到,应拓展全纳教育的概念,使之面向所有学习者的不同需要,合理、公平和切实有效。
所有预测都显示,当前的全球金融危机对贫困人口的影响将尤为严重,尽管他们最不应该为此付出代价。
为此,我们重申,全纳教育对消除贫困、改善健康、提高收入和生活水平具有重要意义。
因此,尽管面临着全球金融危机,我们依然强调,教育拨款应占首要地位,决不能因为金融危机而在国家和国际的层面削减教育拨款。
此前,教科文组织国际教育局就全纳教育问题组织召开了九次预备会议和四次地区会议,基于这些会议的成果以及这次大会全体会议和小组辩论的结果,我们呼吁会员国采用全纳教育的视角来制定、实施、监督和评估教育政策,以加快实现全民教育的目标,并促进建设更加包容的社会。
融合教育在特需儿童中的应用
一、课题提出融合教育的起源可追溯至北欧特殊教育领域提出的“正常化”原则。
自20世纪70年代起,该理念在美国等发达国家的特殊教育界得到广泛推广,并逐步成为特殊教育体制的同义词。
2008年,第48届国际教育大会(ICE)将“全纳教育:未来之路”作为会议主题,标志着融合教育在全球教育发展中的重要地位。
目前,融合教育已成为全球广泛关注的教育议题,并成为多数发达国家的基本教育政策之一。
在中国,融合教育主要通过随班就读的形式得以体现。
1994年,《中华人民共和国教育法》的颁布明确保障了特殊儿童接受特殊教育的权利,开始重视融合教育师资的培养。
2004年,教育部等部门发布的《国民教育条例实施办法的通知》进一步明确了融合教育的目标与指导原则。
2014年,《特殊教育提升计划(2014-2016)》提出全面推进融合教育,扩大随班就读规模,并支持幼儿园接收残疾儿童入学。
《第二期特殊教育提升计划(2017-2020)》进一步强调了普教与特教相结合的重要性,大力推进融合教育的发展。
本园位于资源丰富的大佳何镇,该处依山傍水、资源丰富。
随着疫情的消散,大佳何这个企业乡镇正在蓬勃发展,所面对的群体也更加庞大和复杂。
面对的群体也日益庞大和复杂。
父母的年轻化、教育理念的消极化、家庭氛围等因素,导致出现了一群没有医学定义的特殊儿童,但实际上存在问题行为的特需儿童。
调查显示,许多家长选择让特殊儿童随班就读,但更多家长不愿对这些特需儿童进行医学干预,而是选择相信“孩子还小,长大了就好”,任由孩子自由发展。
特殊教育的本质并非特殊化特殊儿童,而是通过更多的耐心和智慧,使他们的学习生活趋向正常化,将“特殊”转变为“一般”。
在幼儿时期,若未进行有效干预,其智力和行为可能退化至婴儿时期,成人后将难以适应集体和社会生活。
我们尝试通过关键事件的反思,让特需儿童从小认识社会的多元化,通过有针对性地交往,学会尊重、包容、理解和共情。
自2019年本园开放资源教室以来,在实践中我们面对的是面向个体、面向分层、面向全体的教育模式,同时依托特需学生进行个性化调整,融合班级课程,构建资源教室课程。
江苏省中小学教师特殊需要学生的融合教育知识竞赛题库整合
江苏省中小学教师特殊需要学生的融合教育知识竞赛题库整合补充:“一体化”运动主要发生在北美——错误针对肢体障碍学生,Berdine和Blackhurst在1985年提出了优先关心的问题,提供教师逐一自我检查,他们共提出了十大问题1.后天致病和外伤造成的。
如视觉器官的疾病,大致有眼球的屈光不正、眼球震颤、角膜炎、结膜炎、巩膜病变、晶体病变、玻璃体病变、青光眼、沙眼、视网膜色素变性、视神经萎缩等;还有一些全身性疾病、心因性因素、眼外伤等也可能致盲或低视力。
视觉障碍包括盲和低视力两类。
与普通儿童相比,多数听觉障碍儿童的社会性发展落后于同龄普通儿童四肢运动功能重度丧失(四肢瘫),不能独立实现日常生活活动,属于肢体残疾一级以下有关融合教育的重要会议和重要文件对应不一致的是世界特殊需要教育大会——《全纳教育指导方针》第48届世界教育大会——《全纳教育:未来之路》世界特殊需要教育大会——《萨拉曼卡宣言》全民教育大会——《世界全民教育宣言》内向型情绪行为障碍儿童,他们的发病年龄大约在15-30岁1.依肢体障碍学生的需要协助其转移与生活自理:他能做到的事,尽量让他学习自己做;协助他们离开教室、上下坡道及厕所;小心协助推轮椅或使用拐杖上下车、开关车门、拿取拐杖及随身物品,并记得将轮椅刹住。
教师需注意不可让帮助他的同学,玩弄他的辅具和伤害他的自尊心。
写信主要利用了文字这种沟通形式。
随班就读的特殊儿童,参与普通课程的学习,需要任课老师在班级教学中关注差异,并且在资源教室进行适当的补救教学随班就读的特殊儿童,参与普通课程的学习,需要进行课程调整。
以下哪一项的表述是不正确的需要调整学习的科目,对于学生学习困难的科目,就可以取消,如听障学生的英语课需要调整作业、测验的时间,根据学生的实际,延长作业、测验的时间需要调整学习内容的数量,根据学生的实际情况,增加或减少学习内容的数量需要调整教学内容的呈现方式,让学生能采用看、听、触等多种形式了解教学内容30、题型:单选题分值:22.头无法稳定直立控制者,这种情况提示患儿动作发展训练阶段属于头颈控制阶段。
关于融合教育的几点思考
关于融合教育的几点思考摘要]“融合教育”强调为身心障碍儿童提供正常化的教育环境,在普通班中提供所有的特殊教育和相关服务措施,使特殊教育和普通教育融为一体,这是国际教育的发展趋势。
融合教育的核心是保障有质量的教育公平。
融合教育要把随班就读作为融合教育的主要发展方向,在主流教育的环境中给予特殊儿童特殊的关怀、辅导、心理咨询。
融合教育是可持续发展教育、生命教育的重要组成部分,加强学校文化建设是推进融合教育的重要保障。
关键词]融合教育;教育公平;特殊教育;学校文化2013年3月25日,XXX颁发了《北京市中小学融合教育行动计划》,提出要“把握‘十二五’时期教育发展趋势,尊重残疾学生的身心特点和特殊需求,尊重特殊教育规律,坚持以人为本、促进融合,落实责任、政策倾斜,项目带动、分步实施的原则,实现首都特殊教育事业科学发展”。
这个计划很有时代意义,也符合国际教育的发展趋势。
一、融合教育的核心是保障有质量的教育公平2008年6月和11月,我作为XXX的代表,先后参加了在印度尼西亚巴厘岛召开的亚太地区全纳教育大会和在瑞士日内瓦召开的XXX第48届国际教育大会,并参加了第48届国际教育大会文件起草组的文本讨论和修订工作,该会主题是“全纳教育(Inclusive XXX):未来之路”,这次大会对国际教育界的影响相当深远。
全纳教育,包括有特殊需要儿童的教育、社会边缘人群、少数民族、女童、艾滋病病毒携带者和艾滋病患者、移民和难民儿童的教育,而我们现在所用的“融合教育”n。
融合教育略有别于全纳教育,其强调为身心障碍儿童提供正常化的教育环境,在普通班中提供所有的特殊教育和相关服务措施,使特殊教育和普通教育融为一体。
全纳教育中所指的有特殊需要的学生包括:肢体伤残、视觉受损、听觉受损、智力障碍、自闭症、研究困难、语言障碍、长期病患者等,与融合教育的工作对象是一致的。
第48届国际教育大会总干事提出,教育要走向全纳,遇到的第一个挑战是如何制定政策使大多数被边缘化和处境不利的孩子入学;第二个挑战是教育走向全纳的质量问题。
全纳教育一种与时俱进的教育思想
全纳教育:一种与时俱进的教育思想作者:唐如前甘昭良来源:《教学与管理(理论版)》2011年第04期“全纳教育”是1994年世界特殊需要教育大会通过的《萨拉曼卡宣言》中提出的一个教育概念。
全纳教育认为:不管受教育者的文化或社会背景有什么不同,能力存在多大差异,都应该拥有平等的学习机会和接受高质量的教育机会。
之后,全纳教育成了国际上最流行的教育词汇和重要的教育思想。
第48届国际教育大会于2008年11月25日~28日在日内瓦召开,会议的主题是“全纳教育:未来之路”。
本届国际教育大会实际上是讨论全纳教育未来发展的一届大会,即如何促进以公平与平等为基础的全纳教育,政府在全纳教育中如何发挥作用。
大会讨论了“全纳教育的方式、范围与内容、公共政策、体系、联系与过渡、学习者与教师、从全纳教育到全纳社会、从全纳教育观念到实践”等议题。
自第一次提出“全纳教育”概念,到本届大会的主题——“全纳教育:未来之路”,可以看出,全纳教育是一个不断变化的过程,是一种与时俱进的教育思想。
这种与时俱进的教育思想主要反映在以下几个方面。
一、全纳教育:一次教育思想的重要创新全纳教育是继1965年提出终身教育和1990年提出全民教育之后,联合国教科文组织提出的又一个新的教育思想。
全纳教育的思想,超越了历史文化、社会制度和发展阶段,反映了不同国家、民族和信仰的人们对没有排斥、没有歧视的教育的向往[1]。
放眼世界,各国教育虽然取得很大成就,但教育歧视、不平等和排斥现象依然存在,全世界仍有7500万失学儿童和7.7亿文盲[1]。
全纳教育的提出,体现了对所有人的尊重和对人权的保护,顺应了时代要求和未来趋势,对建设和谐世界将产生积极而重要的影响。
全纳教育强调通过公共政策的制定和实施,重视多样性,消除各种学习障碍,以终身学习为依托,发展有质量的教育体系,建立更加全纳、公正和公平的社会。
全纳教育反对各种排斥,它涉及所有校内外的儿童、青年和受教育者,关心他们的生存、参与和成就。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
ED/BIE/CONFINTED 48/5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 48TH SESSIONOF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION (ICE) Meeting at the forty-eighth session of the UNESCO International Conference on Education (Geneva, 25-28 November 2008), we, the Ministers of Education, heads of delegation and delegates from 153 Member States have, alongside representatives of 20 intergovernmental organizations, 25 NGOs, foundations and other institutions of civil society, taken part in constructive and challenging debates on the theme of “Inclusive Education: The Way of the Future.”At the conclusion of our work, participants recalled Article 26 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights that states that everyone has a right to education. We also affirm that inclusive quality education is fundamental to achieving human, social and economic development.We agreed that governments as well as all the other social actors have an important role in providing a quality education for all and, in doing so, should recognize the importance of a broadened concept of inclusive education that addresses the diverse needs of all learners and that is relevant, equitable and effective.All forecasts suggest that the global financial crisis will have a disproportionate impact on the poor – those who carry the least responsibility for these events. In this context, we reaffirm the importance of inclusive education for reducing poverty, and improving health, incomes and livelihoods. Therefore, despite the current global financial crisis, we emphasize that funding for education should be a top priority and that the financial crisis should not serve as a justification for a reduction in the allocation of resources to education at both the national and international levels.Building on the outcomes of the nine preparatory meetings and four regional conferences on inclusive education organized by UNESCO’s International Bureau of Education, and based on the results of plenary sessions and workshop debates which took place during this Conference, we call upon Member States to adopt an inclusive education approach in the design, implementation, monitoring and assessment of educational policies as a way to further accelerate the attainment of Education for All (EFA) goals as well as to contribute to building more inclusive societies. To this end, a broadened concept of inclusive education can be viewed as a general guiding principle to strengthen education for sustainable development, lifelong learning for all and equal access of all levels of society to learning opportunities so as to implement the principles of inclusive education.Therefore, we recommend to Member States to:I. Approaches, Scope and Content1. Acknowledge that inclusive education is an ongoing process aimed atoffering quality education for all while respecting diversity and the differentneeds and abilities, characteristics and learning expectations of the studentsand communities, eliminating all forms of discrimination.2. Address social inequity and poverty levels as priorities, as these are majorobstacles to the implementation of inclusive education policies andstrategies, and deal with these problems within a framework of intersectoralpolicies.3. Promote school cultures and environments that are child-friendly, conduciveto effective learning and inclusive of all children, healthy and protective,gender-responsive, and encourage the active role and the participation ofthe learners themselves, their families and their communities.II. Public Policies4. Collect and use relevant data on all categories of the excluded to betterdevelop education policies and reforms for their inclusion, as well as todevelop national monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.5. Consider as appropriate the ratification of all international conventionsrelated to inclusion and, in particular, the Convention on the Rights ofPersons with Disabilities adopted in December 2006.6. Pursue education in the public interest and strengthen the government’scapacity to orientate, promote and follow up on the development of equitableeducation of high quality in close partnership with civil society and theprivate sector.7. Develop policies that provide educational support for different categories oflearners in order to facilitate their development in regular schools.8. View linguistic and cultural diversity in the classroom as a valuable resourceand promote the use of the mother tongue in the early years of instruction.9. Encourage educational stakeholders to design effective curricularframeworks from childhood onwards, while adopting a flexible approach inorder to accommodate local needs and situations, as well as to diversifypedagogical practices.III. Systems, Links and Transitions10. Provide for the participation and consultation of all stakeholders in decision-making processes, as the overall responsibility of fostering inclusion impliesthe active engagement of all social actors, with the government playing aleading and regulatory role in accordance with national legislation whenapplicable.11. Strengthen the links between schools and society to enable families and thecommunities to participate in and contribute to the educational process.12. Develop early childhood care and education (ECCE) programmes thatpromote inclusion as well as early detection and interventions related towhole child development.13. Strengthen the use of ICTs in order to ensure greater access to learningopportunities, in particular in rural, remote and disadvantaged areas.14. Provide high-quality, non-formal educational opportunities that offer thepossibilities for formal recognition of competencies acquired in non-formalsettings.15. Enhance efforts to reduce illiteracy as a mechanism of inclusion, bearing inmind the importance of literate parents on the education of their children.IV. Learners and Teachers16. Reinforce the role of teachers by working to improve their status and theirworking conditions, and develop mechanisms for recruiting suitablecandidates, and retain qualified teachers who are sensitive to differentlearning requirements.17. Train teachers by equipping them with the appropriate skills and materials toteach diverse student populations and meet the diverse learning needs ofdifferent categories of learners through methods such as professionaldevelopment at the school level, pre-service training about inclusion, andinstruction attentive to the development and strengths of the individuallearner.18. Support the strategic role of tertiary education in the pre-service andprofessional training of teachers on inclusive education practices through,inter alia, the provision of adequate resources.19. Encourage innovative research in teaching and learning processes relatedto inclusive education.20. Equip school administrators with the skills to respond effectively to thediverse needs of all learners and promote inclusive education in theirschools.21. Take into consideration the protection of learners, teachers and schools intimes of conflict.International Cooperation22. Recognize UNESCO’s leading role with regard to inclusive educationthrough:•Promoting the exchange and dissemination of best practices;•Providing, upon request, advice to countries on how they can develop and implement policies on inclusive education;• Encouraging South-South and North-South-South cooperation for the promotion of inclusive education;• Encouraging efforts to increase resources for education both at national and international levels.•Making special efforts to assist the Least Developed Countries and countries affected by conflict in the implementation of therecommendations.23. Request other international organizations also to support Member States inthe implementation of those recommendations as appropriate.24. Disseminate the Conclusions and Recommendations, unanimously adoptedat the closing of the forty-eighth session of the ICE among the actors andpartners of the international educational community so as to inspire, guide,support and develop renewed and resolutely inclusive educational policies.。