国外SCI期刊投稿常识模板
SCI投稿Methods模板
SCI投稿Methods模板摘要在SCI（Science Citation Index）投稿中，方法（Methods）部分是非常重要的，它详细描述了实验设计、数据采集和数据分析等步骤。
本文档提供了一个SCI投稿Methods模板，可以帮助您快速整理和书写方法部分，以提高投稿的质量和可接受性。
1. 实验设计和样本选择在实验设计部分，首先要明确研究的目的和假设。
然后，描述实验设计的具体步骤和流程，包括实验组和对照组的设置、样本量的确定、随机分组等。
2. 数据采集和测量描述数据采集的具体方法和测量指标。
包括实验装置的选择、观测的变量、数据记录的方法等。
如果有必要，可以介绍一些标准方法或现有的测量工具。
3. 数据处理和分析说明数据处理和分析的步骤，包括数据的预处理、统计方法的选择以及相关软件的使用。
如果有使用统计学方法，要详细描述使用的具体方法，并提供相关引用。
4. 实验环境和条件描述实验进行的环境和条件。
例如，实验室的温度、湿度、光照等参数，以及实验操作员的培训和操作规范等。
5. 伦理许可和知情同意如果您的研究涉及人类或动物，必须明确描述您已经获得的伦理许可和知情同意。
同时，要遵守相关的伦理准则和法律法规。
6. 数据可靠性和统计分析强调数据的可靠性和稳定性，并说明重复实验的次数和结果的一致性。
另外，要详细描述使用的统计方法和显著性水平的选择。
7. 数据可视化对于实验中采集的数据，可以使用图表或图像进行可视化展示。
这有助于读者更好地理解和分析结果。
8. 效果评价和结果解释最后，对实验结果进行评价和解释。
解释结果的可靠性和一致性，并与已有的研究结果进行对比和讨论。
结论本文提供了一个SCI投稿Methods模板，旨在帮助作者清晰地组织和书写方法部分。
请根据具体的研究内容和SCI投稿要求进行相应的修改和调整，以确保方法部分的准确性、可重复性和可接受性。
sci投稿注意事项
sci投稿注意事项（实用版）目录1.SCI 投稿前的准备工作2.选择合适的期刊3.投稿过程中的注意事项4.修改和完善稿件5.投稿后的跟进正文作为一名科研工作者，将自己的研究成果发表在国际知名的 SCI 期刊上，不仅可以提高个人声誉，还能推动学术领域的发展。
但是，在投稿过程中有许多需要注意的细节，下面我们就来详细了解一下 SCI 投稿的注意事项。
首先，我们要做好投稿前的准备工作。
确保自己的论文符合 SCI 期刊的要求，如论文格式、字数限制、图表规范等。
同时，我们还需要对论文进行严格的审阅，确保没有语法、拼写和逻辑错误。
其次，选择合适的期刊是非常重要的。
我们需要对各个 SCI 期刊进行充分的了解，包括其影响因子、投稿周期、审稿流程等，以便选择一个与自己研究领域和论文质量相匹配的期刊。
在投稿过程中，我们需要注意以下几点：首先，投稿系统中需要填写的信息要准确无误，特别是作者联系方式和邮箱地址，以便编辑和审稿人能及时与我们取得联系。
其次，投稿时需遵循期刊的投稿要求，如投稿格式、投稿费等。
最后，在投稿过程中要保持良好的沟通，遇到问题要及时与期刊编辑部联系。
投稿后，我们还需要对稿件进行修改和完善。
在收到审稿意见后，要认真阅读并分析审稿人的意见，对论文进行相应的修改。
对于拒稿的论文，我们要保持积极的心态，分析原因并进行改进，以便将论文发表在更合适的期刊上。
最后，投稿后的跟进也是非常关键的。
我们需要密切关注投稿状态，与期刊编辑部保持良好的沟通，了解审稿进度，以便在第一时间得知审稿结果。
总之，在 SCI 投稿过程中，我们需要注意诸多细节，做好充分的准备工作，选择合适的期刊，并在投稿后及时修改和完善稿件。
Elsevier期刊投稿模板和投稿经验
General-Template[Title Page]Article TitleAuthorsAuthor affiliationsCorrespondence information: Corresponding author name,affiliation, detailed permanent address, email address,telephone number(Check the Guide for authors to see the required information onthe title page)Put the title of your abstract here using both upper and lower case letters, Times New Roman, 12?pts, bold, centered, doublespacedA.?Author a,B.?Author b,C.?Author a,*a Department, University, Street, Postal-Code City, Countryb Laboratory, Institute, Street, Postal-Code City, Country AbstractThis general template helps you on preparing manuscript for part of Elsevier Journals. Use this document as a template if you are using Microsoft Word 6.0 or later. Here comes self-contained abstract. Please read the Guide for Authors of your target journal for the requirements of Abstract. Pay special attention to the word count.PACS(optional, as per journal):Keywords:Keyword 1.D; Keyword 2.B (Read the Guide for Authors for the requirements for Keywords, including number, thesaurus, and classification indications)* Corresponding author. Tel.: +xx xxx xx xx; fax: +xx xxx xx xx.1. IntroductionThe manuscript should be prepared and submitted according to the Guide for Authors of your taget journal. . For your convenience, brief instructions on manuscript preparation are recorded below.Please DO consult a recent journal paper for style and conventions. You may find samples on ScienceDirect. You need to check your manuscript carefully before you submit it. The editor reserves the right to return manuscripts that do not conform to the instructions for manuscript preparation.2. General remarks on manuscript preparationGenerally, double line spacing, 12 pts font, and Times New Roman are preferred when you type the manuscript for review. This text formatting is provided in order to facilitate referee process and is also required for proper calculation of your manuscript length. Typing your manuscript follows the order: Title, Authors, Affiliations, Abstract, Keywords, Main text, Acknowledgements (optional), References (optional), Figure captions, Figures and Tables. Please consult the Guide for Authors for the proper organization of the main text. Ensure thateach new paragraph is clearly indicated. Some journals also require lines to be numbered throughout the manuscript. You will usually want to divide your article into numbered sections and subsections. Present figures and tables at the right places mentioned in the Guide for Authors.Most formatting codes are removed or replaced while processing your article so there is no need for you to use excessive layout styling. Please do not use options such as automatic word breaking, double columns or automatic paragraph numbering (especially for numbered references). Do use bold face, italic, subscripts, superscripts, etc., as appropriate.2.1 IllustrationsMany journals required that figures and tables to be presented on separate pages at the end of the manuscript. The preferable file formats are: EPS (for vector graphics) and TIF (for bitmaps). However, PDF and MS Office (Word, Excel, Powerpoint figures) files are also acceptable. Use file names that enable to identify their contents in terms of figure number and format (e.g. fig1.tif, fig2.eps, fig3.pdf). All artwork has to be numbered according to its sequence in the text. All of them should havecaptions. Colour figures in printed version require an extra fee for most journals. Generally, no vertical rules (lines) should be used in tables. Illustrations should not duplicate descriptions that appear elsewhere in the manuscript.Please look at for more detailed instructions on artwork preparations.2.2 EquationsConventionally, in mathematical equations variables and anything thatrepresents a value appear in italics. You are encouraged to use equation-editing tools such as mathtype to edit equations. Please make use of the numbering and referencing functions.2.3 CitationsThere are different styles of in-text citations and reference lists. DO consult the Guide for Authors to see the given examples. Pay special attention to the format of author names, journal names, publication year, volume and page span.AcknowledgementsThis section is optional.References[1].[2].Figure CaptionsFig.1 Put at this page the collected figure captions. The figure captions should be as brief as possible. It should also contain sufficient information that readers do not need to refer to the main text.Fig.2 Put here the figure caption of figure 2 (also the legend to figure 2).Fig. 3Fig.?1. Sample figure. Do not reduce or enlarge any images after placement in an MS Office application as this can lead to loss of image quality. While inserting vector graphics ensure that you use only truetype fonts. These should preferably be in one, or a combination, of the following fonts: Arial, Courier, Helvetica, Symbol, Times.Table?1Sample table: (使用三线表)Parameter Compound?1 Compound?2 a (?) 4.5832 4.9365Δ E a (eV) 1.745 1.592 ………………a This is an example of a table footnote.关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿1 关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿概述(1) Elsevier旗下共有1300多种期刊。
SCI投稿全过程信件模板一览来源
SCI投稿全过程信件模板一览来源
我希望以此信函向贵刊投稿，并希望获得贵刊对于我研究成果的评估和发表机会。
我是一名从事（研究领域）的研究人员，目前所研究的主题与贵刊的专业领域高度契合，因此我相信我的研究成果将对贵刊的读者具有重要的学术意义。
以下是我对于投稿的全过程信件模板，请您查阅：
1. 封面信（Cover Letter）
假如您对于我研究的兴趣颇高并愿意鉴定我的研究成果，请写这个关于封面信。
简要地介绍投稿的目的和研究的背景，并强调研究的重要性和新颖性。
同时，特别指出为何我选择贵刊投稿以及希望获得发表与评估的机会。
2. 摘要页（Abstract）
3. 介绍（Introduction）
4. 方法（Methods）
5. 结果（Results）
6. 讨论（Discussion）
7. 结论（Conclusion）
8. 致谢（Acknowledgements）
最后，我衷心希望贵刊能够考虑我的投稿，并给予我一个发表研究成果的机会。
我相信我的研究成果将对贵刊的学术质量和影响力有所提升。
非常感谢您的时间和关注。
顺祝商祺。
衷心。
SCI_投稿全过程信件模板一览(Cover_letter_催稿信等)
一、投稿时的Cover latter1). Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on "(Journal name)". The further information about the paper is in the following:The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThe Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXThe authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows:Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Henan Normal UniversityXinxiang City, Henan Province, 453007,P.R.ChinaE-mail:Tel: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXFax: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXThank you very much for consideration!Sincerely Yours,Dr. XXX2). Dear Dr. A:I am sending a manuscript entitled “ ” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely3). Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.4). Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an origin al research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to t he referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an erroror omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original fin dings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments c oncerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HA T media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees转载--SCI期刊投稿状态投稿术语名词解释/s/blog_6763380d01013buh.html1. Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s reader s.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript. again. Thank you in advancefor your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has beenmarred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correctionwhich we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the re feree’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.有人归纳了外刊论文撰写的五个基本要求，即5C：正确（correctness）、清楚（clarity）、简洁（concision）、完整（completion）和一致性（consistency）。
国外SCI投稿常识39页PPT
ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้ 41、学问是异常珍贵的东西，从任何源泉吸 收都不可耻。——阿卜·日·法拉兹
42、只有在人群中间，才能认识自 己。——德国
43、重复别人所说的话，只需要教育； 而要挑战别人所说的话，则需要头脑。—— 玛丽·佩蒂博恩·普尔
44、卓越的人一大优点是：在不利与艰 难的遭遇里百折不饶。——贝多芬
45、自己的饭量自己知道。——苏联
国外SCI投稿常识
16、人民应该为法律而战斗，就像为 了城墙 而战斗 一样。 ——赫 拉克利 特 17、人类对于不公正的行为加以指责 ，并非 因为他 们愿意 做出这 种行为 ，而是 惟恐自 己会成 为这种 行为的 牺牲者 。—— 柏拉图 18、制定法律法令，就是为了不让强 者做什 么事都 横行霸 道。— —奥维 德 19、法律是社会的习惯和思想的结晶 。—— 托·伍·威尔逊 20、人们嘴上挂着的法律，其真实含 义是财 富。— —爱献 生
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板(From Internet)一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original researc h article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript,again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest.A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studie d their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerni ng Figures 1 and 2 result froma misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Gannan Medical University
成功关键：Pathways to success
• 创新点originality • 语言Language
Gannan Medical University
医学科研论文的基本结构与要求（1）
1．标题 2．摘要 3．引言 4．材料与方法 5．结论 6．讨论 7．致谢 8．参考文献 Title Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgements References
1. 引言 Introduction
背景 意义 进展 目的 范围 – – – – – 说明研究问题的现状或历史 说明研究的意义或必要性 说明以前的发现、报告或研究 说明本研究的目的 说明要研究问题的具体范围
Gannan Medical University
2. 材料与方法 Materials and Methods 研究设计 （study design）
Gannan Medical University
3. 结果 Results
让研究的客观结果说话，不要添枝加叶（用叙事 方式来描述） Let your results speak for themselves and don’t embellish
• The localization of α7nAChR on macrophage in mice To observe whether α7nAChR could be localized on macrophage in mice, the abdominal solution was taken from mice, and then macrophages were isolated from abdominal solution and cultured for detection of the localization of α7nAChR. Immunofluorescence experiment was carried out as described in methods; the result is shown in Fig.2 that α7nAChR could be localized on the surface of macrophage in mice.
Gannan Medical University
国外SCI期刊投稿常识
学科办/研究生工作处
Gannan Medical University
世界六大检索系统
美国《科学文献索引》（SCI） 美国《工程索引》 （EI） 美国《国际科学技术会议》（ISTP） 美国《化学文摘》 （CA） 英国《科学文摘》 （SA） 日本科技文献速报 （CBST）
Gannan Medical University
5. 致谢 Acknowledgements
• 致谢词和致谢方式必须征得受谢人或单位的同意 （包括项目资助来源、实验方法和技术提供帮助 的人、馈赠试剂和细胞株的人、帮助修改稿件的 人等）
• Acknowledgements • We thank Dr Jaw-Kang Chang for the donation of anti-serum against EM1 and EM2 used in the present study. This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (30560145) and the Scientific and Technological Program of the Department of Education, Jiangxi Province, China. The authors thank Dr. You Wan (Neuroscience Research Institute, Peking University, China) for his help in preparing the manuscript.
研究对象性质 （identity） 处理 / 干预方法 （intervention） 测定 / 观察手段 （measurement） 统计方法与分析（statistics）
Gannan Medical University
材料与方法部分的法律、伦理问题：
•ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ• •
•
知情同意 Informed consent 伦理委员会 Ethics committee 动物保护 Animal protection
Gannan Medical University
4. 讨论 Discussion
• • • • 简要说明研究背景 background 简要介绍总的发现 general findings 介绍具体要点 introduction of points 与先有发现（若有）进行比较 comparison in the context of other studies • 意义 suggested meaning • 结论 conclusion • 前瞻研究 future studies
Gannan Medical University
医学科研论文的基本结构与要求（2）
9.插图说明 Figure legends 10.插图 Figures 11.表格 Tables 12.照片和说明 Plates and explanations
Gannan Medical University
Female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200 – 250 g were provided by the Department of Animal Sciences of Peking University Health Science Center. They were housed 4 – 5 per cage under natural light-dark cycles with food pellets and water ad libitum according to the University Animal Care and Use Committee Guidelines adopted from NIH, USA. All measures were taken to minimize pain and/or discomfort.