PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
绩效评估的英语

绩效评估的英语
绩效评估是现代企业管理中非常重要的一环,它通过评估员工的工作表现,从而决定他们的晋升、奖励或惩罚。
绩效评估需要进行科学、客观、公正的评价,同时需要考虑不同员工的特点和不同工作的性质。
在这篇文章中,我们将介绍一些与绩效评估相关的英语词汇和表达,以帮助读者更好地理解和应用这一概念。
1. Performance evaluation / appraisal 绩效评估/考核
2. Job responsibilities 工作职责
3. Performance goals 绩效目标
4. Performance indicators 绩效指标
5. Key performance indicators (KPIs) 关键绩效指标
6. Performance metrics 绩效指标
7. Performance review 绩效评审
8. Performance improvement plan (PIP) 绩效改进计划
9. Performance rating 绩效评分
10. Performance feedback 绩效反馈
11. Self-assessment 自我评估
12. Peer assessment 同事评估
13. 360-degree assessment 全方位评估
14. Performance-based pay 绩效工资
15. Bonus 奖金
16. Promotion 晋升
17. Demotion 降职
18. Termination 终止
以上是一些常用的绩效评估相关英语词汇和表达。
希望这些内容能够帮助读者更好地掌握这一概念,从而在工作中更加高效和成功。
Performance-Appraisal-绩效评估

30
Midterm Exam
範圍:
人力資源介紹 (~10%) 工作分析 (10~15%) 招募 (10~15%) 訓練 (20~30%) 績效評估 (20~30%)
31
Job analysis
特質、行為、結果
績效管理
P = (能力 X 動機 X 機會)
2
個人績效的決定因素
個人績效= f (能力,動機,機會)
招募甄選 教育訓練與發展
績效管理
薪酬制度 授權
頭銜與地位 成就慾望
資源 時間
3
績效評估的用途
調薪 (94%) 升遷 (88%) 員工發展 (56%) 員工訓練 (45%) 人事研究 (18%)
提出績效改善方案 發展行動方案、並解決問題 雙向溝通、有回饋的管道
24
績效管理
探討績效不佳的原因
P = (能力 X 動機 X 機會)
三個主要因素可以來探討:
能力 動機 情境/系統因素
25
Directing attention to the causes of problem.
Performance Appraisal 績效評估
Lecture 6 11/2/2005
HRM-MBA
Prepared by Ying-Jung Yeh - NCU, Fall, 2005
1
Agenda
績效評估的用途 評估者誤差 (Rater bias) 如何做好績效評估? 360度評估/回饋 (360-degree feedback) 績效評估的方法
22
Summary of Appraisal Methods
绩效 翻译

绩效翻译Performance appraisal (also known as performance evaluation or performance review) is a process that involves assessing an individual or a group's performance in relation to predefined goals and objectives. It is typically conducted by the organization's managers or supervisors, and serves as a tool for measuring and improving employee productivity and development.The main purpose of performance appraisal is to ensure that employees' performance meets the organization's expectations, and to provide feedback and guidance for improvement. It helps identify strengths and weaknesses, and sets the basis for further training and development opportunities. By evaluating performance, organizations can reward high performers, motivate underperformers, and establish a fair and objective system for determining compensation and promotions.There are different methods and approaches that can be used for performance appraisal, depending on the organization's culture, resources, and goals. Some of the commonly used methods include:1. Rating scales: This method involves the use of a predefined set of criteria against which the individual's performance is rated. The criteria may include factors such as job knowledge, quality of work, problem-solving abilities, communication skills, and teamwork.2. 360-degree feedback: In this approach, feedback is collected from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes even clients or customers. This provides a more holistic view of the individual's performance, as it takes intoaccount different perspectives and opinions.3. Management by objectives (MBO): This method involves setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for employees, and then assessing their performance based on the extent to which these goals are achieved. It focuses on outcomes and results, rather than on the process or the means used to achieve them.4. Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS): This technique involves defining specific behavioral indicators that are linked to different levels of performance. Supervisors then observe and assess the employee's behavior against these indicators, and rate their performance accordingly.Regardless of the method used, it is important that the performance appraisal process is conducted in a fair, objective, and transparent manner. Employees should be provided with clear and timely feedback on their performance, and given the opportunity to discuss and provide their own input. The process should also be linked to the organization's overall goals and objectives, and used as a tool for continuous improvement and development.In conclusion, performance appraisal plays a crucial role in managing and developing employees. It helps in aligning individual and organizational goals, identifying areas for improvement, and recognizing and rewarding high performers. By implementing an effective performance appraisal system, organizations can enhance their overall performance and competitiveness.。
考核管理制度 英语

考核管理制度英语1. IntroductionPerformance appraisal is a formal evaluation process used by organizations to assess employees’ job performance and productivity. It is an important tool for managing and improving employee performance, and for making decisions about promotions, compensation, and training and development opportunities. A well-designed performance appraisal system can motivate employees, enhance job satisfaction, and contribute to organizational success.2. Purpose of Performance AppraisalThe purpose of performance appraisal is to provide employees with feedback on their job performance, to identify areas for improvement, and to recognize and reward excellent performance. Appraisals also help in setting performance goals and objectives, and in determining training and development needs. Another important purpose of performance appraisal is to support decision making on pay and promotions.3. Features of Performance AppraisalThe features of a good performance appraisal system include:- Clear Objectives: The objectives and criteria for appraisal should be clearly communicated to employees.- Fair and Objective: The appraisal should be fair, objective, and free from bias or discrimination.- Regular Feedback: Regular and ongoing feedback should be provided to employees, not just annually during the performance appraisal.- Two-way Communication: The process should be a two-way communication between the employee and the manager, with both parties able to express their views and concerns.- Continuous Improvement: The system should support continuous improvement and development of employees’ skills and capabilities.4. Components of Performance AppraisalThe components of a performance appraisal system typically include:- Setting Objectives: Employees and managers should collaborate to set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives and goals.- Regular Feedback: Managers should provide regular feedback to employees on their performance, not just during the formal annual appraisal.- Evaluation: A formal assessment of the employee’s performance against the set objectives and criteria.- Development Plan: Identification of training and development needs, and creation of a development plan to address areas for improvement.- Rewards and Recognition: Recognition of outstanding performance, and providing opportunities for career advancement and rewards.5. Benefits of Performance AppraisalA good performance appraisal system can bring several benefits to the organization and its employees, including:- Motivation and Job Satisfaction: Feedback and recognition of good performance can motivate employees and enhance job satisfaction.- Improved Performance: Performance appraisals can lead to improved job performance and productivity.- Clarified Expectations: Clear communication of objectives and expectations can help employees understand what is expected of them.- Training and Development: Identification of development needs can lead to targeted training and development activities.- Communication and Feedback: Regular feedback can improve communication and relations between employees and managers.6. Challenges of Performance AppraisalDespite the benefits, performance appraisal systems can also face several challenges, such as:- Bias and Discrimination: Appraisals can suffer from bias and discrimination, leading to unfair outcomes.- Lack of Training: Managers may lack the training and skills to conduct fair and objective appraisals.- Negative Impact on Morale: Poorly conducted appraisals can have a negative impact on employee morale and job satisfaction.- Inaccuracy: Appraisals may not accurately reflect an employee’s true performance due to subjective assessments or inaccurate information.- Legal Compliance: Appraisals must be conducted in a way that complies with legal requirements and prevents potential liabilities for the organization.7. Best Practices in Performance AppraisalWhen designing and implementing a performance appraisal system, organizations should follow best practices, including:- Training for Managers: Managers should receive training on how to conduct fair and objective appraisals, and on providing effective feedback.- Employee Involvement: Employees should be involved in setting their own objectives and in the appraisal process, promoting a sense of ownership and accountability.- Multiple Feedback Sources: Managers should seek feedback from multiple sources, not just their own assessment, to gain a comprehensive view of an employee’s performance.- Performance Management Software: The use of performance management software can streamline the appraisal process and provide a central platform for recording and tracking performance data.- Continuous Improvement: The system should be continuously reviewed and improved based on feedback and lessons learned from previous appraisals.8. ConclusionA well-designed performance appraisal system can be a valuable tool for managing and improving employee performance, and for making key HR decisions. By setting clear objectives, providing regular feedback, and supporting training and development, organizations can benefit from increased productivity, improved morale, and better business performance. Despite the challenges, best practices and continuous improvement can help organizations create an effective performance appraisal system that contributes to their overall success.。
绩效评估考核(Performanceappraisalandassessment)

绩效评估考核(Performance appraisal and assessment)The so-called performance appraisal, is through the system method and principle to assess and measure employees in the work of the behavior and effect. The results can affect the staff salary adjustment, bonuses and job rise and fall, career design and many other vital interests. The ultimate goal is to improve the performance of employees, while achieving business goals, improve employee satisfaction and future sense of accomplishment, and ultimately to achieve "win-win" development of enterprises and individuals". But it is also a "double-edged sword", well used to maximize the enthusiasm of employees and tap the potential of employees; on the contrary, it will undermine employees, and bring negative impact on enterprise development. The following 10 years of work experience, we should talk about the current situation and existing problems of enterprise staff performance appraisal, as well as suggestions for effective performance appraisal.First, the correct management idea of performance appraisal has not been successfully implanted in EnterprisesTo carry out performance appraisal work, the first question is why we should carry out performance appraisal work. This problem is not clear, and it will inevitably lead to blind performance appraisal. To carry out performance appraisal, the core problem is to achieve the strategic goal of the enterprise. Enterprises in the implementation of the performance appraisal, it is necessary to do a good job of propaganda and training, but the training and publicity if there is no real intention to highlight the performance appraisal, performance appraisal can not let employees understand very well, so the performanceappraisal is very difficult to achieve the goal.But in many enterprises, performance management is only senior managers in the little master, did not get a good promotion at the grassroots level, in the implementation process will inevitably lead to such problems, and some departments will think the performance appraisal is the human resources department that has nothing to do with other departments within the enterprise. At the same time, in the performance evaluation system design, the pursuit of one step in the design of indicators, without considering the actual situation of the enterprise, then some of the assessment will be difficult to achieve good results in actual operation.Two, the assessment indicators are primary and secondary, and the design is not reasonable enoughPerformance appraisal is a scientific measurement and evaluation of employees' job performance with various techniques and methods to meet the needs of personnel selection, allocation and training, as well as organizational change and development. There is no doubt that performance appraisal is a work, and it is a highly technical work. Therefore, the performance evaluation of the program design and formulation of a high demand. Normally, we are used to complete the mission, from the perspective of organization development, to design and establish evaluation scheme, and the scheme is the result of some cover and contain everything, non quantitative indicators were artificially "quantified", the "quantitative index" ready to accept either course caused by the examiners and examinees were at a loss.Three, the implementation of the organization is not enoughAmerican management scientist Larry Idy and Ram Charan in "execution: put forward how to complete the task of learning" in the book: not because of business failure often take the wrong strategy, but because of the good strategy is not performed correctly, ineffective implementation is the real cause of business failure.Business strategy and planning are important, but only execution can make them potentially useful. A lack of executive power of enterprise will make it work out the strategy and eventually become a mere scrap of paper, so is the performance appraisal. A good assessment system can not be carried out well, but it is also a waste of effort. There is a process to realize the strategic goal of an enterprise. The concrete process is execution, and executive ability is the ability to change the strategic vision into reality. The executive power of an enterprise is determined by three key factors, namely strategy, personnel and operation process. The effective implementation of performance appraisal also needs the coordination of personnel and the selection of the method of implementation and the process control.The author knows from many enterprises,More and more workers and even some executives believe that the performance appraisal is a kind of form, not to play its due role in the human face, not essential; performance appraisal is so feeble. The author believes that the main reason for thisdecline in the execution may be: (1) performance evaluation related to inadequate training; (2) the performance appraisal is not high-level practical support; (3) the performance appraisal index itself is unreasonable, contributed to the subjectivity and uncontrollable sex; (4) effect interpersonal relationship; (5) subordinate departments, the lack of effective communication mechanism; (6) "to advance inertia and culture to the people".Four, performance appraisal results and rewards and punishments are not equalFor enterprises, performance management is a part of corporate culture, fair and scientific performance appraisal can optimize its organizational structure, improve the overall performance, performance management for employees, create a positive work environment, through the performance appraisal, the staff to correctly understand their own advantages and disadvantages, and the development direction of the self correction, so as to get more opportunities and greater development performance.But at present, many enterprise managers regard performance appraisal as the task and requirement of the enterprise or superior. Therefore, in the process of assessment, the work attitude is not serious, the examination form is unitary, and the work is done carelessly. After that, the performance appraisal results are shelved. On the whole, performance appraisal results will have little impact on the final pay of the person being evaluated and the promotion of the future position. The intensity of punishment is not consistent withthe results of performance appraisal, to give material and spiritual rewards for the performance of employees are not significant, employee punishment for poor performance is not enough, this will inevitably lead to employees' work enthusiasm is not high, thus losing the purpose of the performance appraisal. In dealing with the assessment results on the one hand to ensure the fairness and justice, on the other hand also from the human point of view, considering the differences in temperament of employees, take individual mode of communication, the performance feedback to be assessed, and help them to find causes analysis, the result is good or bad, so as to arouse by re assessment of the rise of hope, to establish confidence in the work, and they help enterprises grow together and progress.。
PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL-FORM(企业绩效考核)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM1. This review is for the period from 1st Nov 2009 to 31st Oct 20102. Approved recommendations to be made effective from_____________ Name: _______________________________________ Emp_Code: ___________________________________ Designation: __________________________________ Grade/Category: _______________________________ Qualification: __________________________________ Division / Department:__________________________Date of joining:_________________________________ Date of Last review:_____________________________ Present CTC : _________________________________APPRAISAL GUIDELINES :01. The appraisal rating form ‘contains factors that are relevant in performing an employee job.02. Base your ratings and judgment on the entire period covered and not upon isolated/recentincident.03. Consider only one factor at a time. Do not let your rating in one trait influence your rating ofanother.04. Base your judgment on the requirements of the job and the performance of the appraisee in it.05. The Superior of the employee shall be the reporting Officer and the immediatesupervising superior/officer shall be the reviewing Officer.06. Whenever the shift duty operation is involved, the concerned Shift-in-charge shall be the reporting officer.07. While assessing, the Reporting Officer and Reviewing Officer shall give the scores for all theindividual points that are mentioned below the factors.08. Upon completion, review and check your scores & overall rating.09. The rating for factor analysis is as follows80 & above70 and above & below 79 60 and above & below 69 50 and above & below 59 Below 50 ‘O’ – OUTSTANDING‘A’ – VERY GOOD‘B’ – GOOD‘C’ – SATISFACTORY ‘D’ – UNSATISFACTORY10. Concrete evidence / Justification is necessary in support of “Outstanding” or Unsatisfactory rating.11. Guide Note to attendance (Including leave approved)No. of Days ofAttendanceMarksA) OUTSTANDING 300 & Above 20B) VERY GOOD 285 – 299 16C) GOOD 275-284 12D) SATISFACTORY 240-274 8E) POOR Below 239 0Page-1PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name :________________________________________Emp_Code: ___________________________________Page 2The head of the Department in consultation with the Manager/ Section incharge to review and to give the over all rating and recommendations. Reporting Officer Reviewing HODOBSERVATION BY HR DEPARTMENT。
英语作文-绩效考核审批

英语作文-绩效考核审批Performance Appraisal Approval Process。
Performance appraisal is a critical process in any organization, serving as a cornerstone for assessing employee contributions, setting expectations, and facilitating career development. This document outlines the procedures and considerations involved in approving performance appraisals within our company.Purpose of Performance Appraisal。
Performance appraisal aims to evaluate individual job performance against predefined goals and competencies. It provides a structured approach for recognizing achievements, identifying areas for improvement, and aligning employee efforts with organizational objectives. By conducting fair and objective assessments, we foster a culture of accountability and continuous growth.Initiating the Appraisal。
The performance appraisal process begins with the employee and their immediate supervisor. Both parties engage in a dialogue to review job responsibilities, performance expectations, and any relevant metrics or KPIs established at the beginning of the appraisal period. This initial discussion sets the foundation for evaluating the employee's contributions and achievements over the specified timeframe.Documentation and Evidence Gathering。
英语作文-员工绩效考核审批

英语作文-员工绩效考核审批Performance Appraisal Approval。
Introduction:Performance appraisal is an essential process for evaluating the performance of employees in an organization. It helps in identifying the strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement for each employee. This document aims to provide guidelines for the approval of performance appraisals.1. Purpose:The purpose of the performance appraisal approval is to ensure fairness, consistency, and transparency in evaluating employee performance. It allows managers to make informed decisions regarding promotions, salary increments, and training needs.2. Process:2.1 Performance Evaluation:The performance evaluation process should be conducted annually or as per the organization's policy. It involves assessing various aspects such as job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, teamwork, communication skills, and adherence to deadlines.2.2 Appraisal Form:A standardized appraisal form should be used to evaluate employees. The form should include clear performance criteria, rating scales, and space for comments. It should be designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance.2.3 Appraiser Training:Managers responsible for conducting performance appraisals should receive appropriate training on the evaluation process. They should understand the criteria, rating scales, and how to provide constructive feedback to employees.2.4 Self-Assessment:Employees should be given an opportunity to self-assess their performance. This allows them to reflect on their achievements, challenges, and future goals. Self-assessment can provide valuable insights for the appraisal process.2.5 Performance Discussion:After completing the appraisal, managers should schedule a meeting with each employee to discuss the evaluation results. This discussion should be conducted in a private and supportive environment, focusing on strengths, areas of improvement, and career development opportunities.3. Approval Criteria:3.1 Consistency:The performance appraisal should be consistent across employees in similar roles. It should ensure that similar performance levels receive similar ratings and rewards. Any deviations from the set criteria should be justified with valid reasons.3.2 Fairness:The appraisal process should be fair and unbiased. It should not be influenced by personal preferences, biases, or discrimination. Managers should base their evaluations on objective evidence and performance data.3.3 Performance Improvement Plans:If an employee's performance falls below expectations, a performance improvement plan should be implemented. This plan should outline specific goals, timelines, and support mechanisms to help the employee improve their performance.3.4 Calibration:Calibration sessions should be conducted to review and discuss the appraisal ratings of employees across different teams or departments. This helps in ensuring consistency and fairness in the overall appraisal process.4. Approval Process:4.1 Review by Immediate Supervisor:The immediate supervisor should review the performance appraisal and provide their feedback and recommendations. They should ensure that the appraisal aligns with the employee's job responsibilities and performance expectations.4.2 Review by HR Department:The HR department should review the performance appraisal to ensure compliance with the organization's policies and procedures. They should verify the accuracy of the ratings, comments, and adherence to the appraisal timeline.4.3 Final Approval:The final approval of the performance appraisal should be given by the designated authority, such as the department head or HR manager. They should ensure that the appraisal process has been followed correctly and that it aligns with the organization's goals and values.Conclusion:The approval of performance appraisals plays a crucial role in recognizing and rewarding employee performance. It ensures fairness, consistency, and transparency in the evaluation process. By following the guidelines outlined in this document, organizations can effectively manage performance and support employee development.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
CHAPTER SEVEN: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL第七章绩效考评CHAPTER OBJECTIVES本章目标第一节绩效考评概述AN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL1. The Significance of Performance Appraisal2. Roles (作用) of Performance Appraisal3. Principle of Performance Appraisal4. Who Performance AppraisalPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS第二节绩效考评的过程1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standardfor each position2. Conducting Performance Appraisal3.To Coach (辅导阶段)4.To improveTYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS第三节绩效考评的方法1.Alternation Ranking Scale2.Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)3.Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)FEEDBACK INTERVIEW第四节绩效考评的面谈EXERCISES作业Reference参考文献CHAPTER OBJECTIVES(本章目标)After you learn this chapter, you should be able to:1. To cite the various objectives of performance appraisal.2. To identify the basic consideration in selecting standards for appraisal3. To identify and discuss the major performance appraisal method.4. To identify the different approaches to performance appraisal interview.5.To describe the types of errors those are commonly found in performance appraisalAN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (第一节绩效考评概述)CASE:“ Why did Zhang jump ship?”After graduated from the college, Zhang was recruited to be a salesman in Company Z .In the first two years, his performance was not so satisfactory because of lacking experience. But at the end of the third year, His performance was greatly improved.Last year, Zhang did a very good job, and he accomplished his sale-volume at the end of September. But the sales manager didn’t show any response to it, so Zhang felt quite disappointed. Zhang left the company in October since the company had no formal appraisal system. In the Company z, an HR professional appraised employees only based on informal conversations between the HR professional and the employees’ supervisor. This system yields no information regarding employee strengths and weaknesses. To make matter worse, this system provided no information regarding company expectation, leaving the employees in the dark as to what they needed to do to achieve favorable performance.In this chapter we turn to discuss performance appraisal programs, which are among the most helpful tools an organization can use to maintain and enhance competitive advantage and facilitate progress toward organization goals.Performance appraisal (绩效评估) refers to a formal, structured system for measuring, evaluating, an employee’s job-related attributes, behavior, and outcomes.1. The Significance of Performance AppraisalIt may understand at first glance that performance appraisals are used for evaluating who is doing a good job and who is doing a bad one. The significance of performance appraisals can be reviewed from the point of employees as well as the organization’s. The following are just a sample of those significance.For Employees a. Understand more clearly about their own duties, tasks and requirements.b. Understand more about what the organization expects from them and their future goals for achieving high performance.c. Employees who are performing well can receive formal recognition (认可)for their performance.d. To provide Employees with the opportunity to participate in performance appraisal.For Organizationa. To provide the supervisor with a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an employe e’s performance.b. To provide a format enabling managers and employees to jointly establish future development and growth plan for the employees.c. To establish a communication channel between managers and employees.d. To express what managers wish to expect from employees.2. Roles (作用) of Performance AppraisalIn HRM activities, a lot decisions have to be based on performance appraisal process, which implies that performance appraisal provides input into all aspects of HRM. The interrelationship between the performance appraisal function and other major HR functions is shown in following Figure:Training: It can determined which employee needs more training and what should be trained (培训内容)b. Administrative decisions: It helps the organization to decide who should be receive pay raises, promoted, laid off, transferred.c. Rewards: It provides basis for judging Pay System (薪酬制度) and pay adjustment.d. Motivation: It encourages initiative, develops a sense of responsibilities, and stimulates efforts to perform better.e. HR planning: Performance appraisal data can also be used in HR planning, in determining the relative worth of jobs under a job evaluation program.f. Selection: It can be used to validate selection tool such as a testing program.3. Principle of Performance Appraisala. Transparency (透明):A supervisor should communicate appraisal criteria (评估项目)or dimension, appraisal procedures, results openly with employees.b. Objectiveness(客观): Employees’ outcome must be assessed by supervisors fairly without inserting their own Likes or dislikes.c. Practical(实用): The appraisal scheme should be simple but practical.d. Training(培训): Supervisor should be trained how to apply appraisal standards, when making judgments.e. Clear performance standards: It must be so clear that employees know exactly when the company expects of them,f. Relented: Appraisal form must exclude criteria that are irrelevant to job performance.g. Difference (差别化): The result of appraisal must be able to reflect the difference between high and low performers.4. Who Performance Appraisala. Appraisal by supervisor (主管评估) The superior knows the subordinate’sperformance better. He knows his ability and behaviors and attitude. However, appraisal by supervisor has drawbacks. Supervisor appraisal has been the traditional approach to evaluating an employee’s performance. Supervisor has the power to reward and pu nish.b. Peer Appraisals (同事评估) Some companies use it to replace or supplement the appraisal given by supervisor. The co-worker who is at an individual’s side all day has an excellent opportunity to observe the individual’s behavior and even can observe the o ther facets of the employee’s behavior that his supervisor can not because employees often be have differently when the boss is present.c. Self-Appraisal (自评)A worker knows clearly what he has done. Self-appraisal can reduce the defensive of the employee and make the employee to evaluate his performance with his responsibility.d. Subordinate Appraisal(下属评价)Subordinates are in a good position to evaluate their managers since they are in frequent contact with many performance-related behaviors. Those performance dimensions judged most appropriate for subordinate appraisals include leadership, oral communication, delegation of authority, coordination of team efforts, and interest in subordinates.e. Customers (客户评估) Some companies like restaurants will ask the customers to assess their employees’ performance.E. 360-Degree Feedback(360度评估)Performance information is collected all round an employee, from his or her supervisors, subordinates, peers, and internal or external customers; this approach is increasingly popular. It is generally used for management and career development.PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS(第二节绩效考评的过程)1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standard for each positiona.Types of Performance Criteria (考评项目)Criteria are dimensions against which the performance of an employee team or a work unit is evaluated.Trait-based criteria: They focus on the personal moral character, value and work attitude such as team-sprit, locality, initiative or creativity of an employee.Behaviour-based criteria: They focus on how the work is performed. With behaviour clearly defined, an employee is more likely to exhibit the acts that lead to peak performance. Behaviour is difficult to be measured in figures or amounts. As a matter of fact, an organization generally uses frequency to describe the employee s’ behavior.Outcome-based criteria: They focus on what was produced rather than on how it was produced. (focus on output and contribution which can be reflected in quality, quantity, efficiency). This kind of criteria can be easily measured. It doesn’t c are how the result achieved. Aresult-at-all-cost may plague outcome-based appraisal.Unfortunately, when used alone, any one of these performance criteria is deficient for accurately evaluating performance. Thus, many organizations use several criteria in making judgments about an employee’s performance.Realistic, measurable, clearly understood performance standards benefit both the organization and the employee. It is important to establish standards before the work is performed so that all involved will understand the level of accomplishment expected.b.To set performance standard Ensure that the targets set are in the smart model.Specific means that they are transparent and not open to dispute.Targets should be measurable so that all sides can agree when they are achieved or not. Thirdly, Targets should be agreed and achievable. If employees disagree with the target because they find them too difficult to achieve, then they may set out to prove this by determining to fail.Fourthly, targets should be realistic and relevant, which makes them more attractive to all parties. Finally, they should be time-related, so that it is clear at what point they should be achieved.An organization may use three approaches to performance evaluations. The first evaluates employees against preestablished common criteria or standards, similar to the way many professors evaluate students’ performance.The second evaluation approach is based on individualized performance criteria and standards. Performance goals for each individual are derived from the overall departme nt’s performance requirements for a specified period. Each employee may have unique performance goals (criteria and standards), and each employee is evaluated on the basis of how well he or she meets those goals.A third evaluation approach entails rankin g one employee’s performance against the performance of other employees.2. Conducting Performance AppraisalAfter an appraisal system is designed, must be properly implemented. Managers are chiefly responsible for implementation; they must complete the real ratings for employees and provide feedback to employees.One of the key objectives of feedback is to improve employee performance by giving them constructive criticism, when necessary, to make them aware of their shortcomings.3.To Coach (辅导阶段)After completing performance Appraisal, some employees’ result may turn out to be comparatively dissatisfactory which may be resulted from lacking knowledge or skills. In reality, it is supervisor’s responsibility to establish a performan ce improvement plan as follows.4.To improveThe supervisor must evaluate whether the employees have improved their outcome or not after caring out the plan for some time.TYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS(第三节绩效考评的方法)1.Alternation Ranking ScaleFor the trait you are measuring, list all the employees you want to rank. Put the highest-rankingemployee’s name on line 1. Put the lowest-ranking employee’s mane on line 10. Then list the next highest ranking on line 2, the next lowest ranking on ling 9, and so on Continue all names are on the scale.Highest-ranking employeeLowest –ranking employee2..Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)The forced distribution method is similar to grading on a curve. With this method, predetermined percentages of rates are placed in performance categories. For example, you may decide to distribute employees as follows:5% high performers20% high-average performers50% average performers20% low-average performers5% low performers3..Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)The paired comparison method helps make the ranking method more precise. For every trait (quantity of work, quality o f work, and so on), every subordinate is paired with and compared to4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)A graphic rating scale (GRS) presents a list of traits (e.g., cooperativeness, adaptability, maturity,motivation). Each trait is accompanied by a five or seven-point rating scale. The points along the scale are defined by numbers and/or descriptive words or phrases that indicate the level of performance.Many organizations use graphic rating scales because they are practical and cost little to develop. But Graphic rating scales do present a number of problems. Such scales do not effectively direct behavior; that is, the rating scale does not clearly indicate what a person must do to achieve a given rating. Another problem with GRS is the points on the rating scale are not clearly defined. An example of GRS is showed as followsEvaluate the worker on each quality using the following ratting scale:5=Outstanding; one of the best workers you have known4=Good; meets all job standards; exceeds some3=Adequate; meets all job standards2=Needs improvement; needs improvement in some way1=Unsatisfactory; not acceptableA. Dress and appearanceB. Self-confidenceC. DependabilityD. Tact and diplomacyE. AttitudeF. CooperationG. EnthusiasmH. Knowledge1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)A behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS), is a combination of a graphic rating scale, and Critical Incident Method. It requires appraisers to rate employees on their traits. The typical BARS includes seven or eight traits, referred to as ―dimensions,‖ each anchored by a seven-or nine-point scale.6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)With the critical incident method, the supervisor keeps a record good or bad or so, the supervisor and subordinate meet and discuss the latter’s performance using the specific incidents as examples.This method has several advantages. It provides you with specific hard example true facts of good and poor performance for explaining the appraisal. A BARS anchors each trait with examples of specific job behaviors that reflect varying levels of performance. An example is shown in Exhibit below.DIMENSION: CLASSROOM TEACHICG SKILLSOutstanding7 ·The instructor answers students questions in a clear, concise, and accurate manner.6 ·The instructor uses examples when trying to emphasize a point.54 ·The instructor exhibits a number of annoying habits when lecturing.3 ·The instructor singles out students in class for unreasonable criticism.2Extremely Poor 1The greatest strength of BARS is to let employees know what types of behaviors are expected of them and gives appraisers the opportunity to provide behaviorally based feedback.The failure of BARS may lie in the difficulty raters experience when trying to select the one behavior on the scale that is most indicative of the employees performance level. Sometimes an employee may exhibit behaviors at both ends of the scale, so the rater would not know which rating to assign.7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)Management-by-objectives (MBO) is a management system designed to achieve organizational effectiveness by steering each empl oyees behavior toward the organization’s mission. The MBO process includes goal setting, planning, and evaluation.GOAL SETTING Goal setting starts at the top of the organization. The goal then cascades down through the organizational hierarchy to the level of the individual employee.In most instances individual goals are mutually set by employees and their supervisors, at which time mine how goal attainment will be measured. As will as to identify potential obstacles to reaching goals and devise strategies to overcome these obstacles.EVALUATION In the final phase, the employee’s success at meeting goals is evaluated against the agreed-on performance standards.MBO lets people know what is expected of them so that they can spend their time and energy in ways that maximize the attainment of important organizational objectives.But MBO presents several potential problems, it does not specify the behaviors required to reach them. This may be a problem for some employees, especially new ones.MBO also tends to focus on short-term goals.The successful achievement of MBO goals may be partly affect by some factors which are outside the worker’s control.Common appraisal problemHalo Effect :It means that the rating of a subordinate on one trait influences the way the person is rated on other traits. Managers may rate employees on the basis of their personal relationships rather than by an objective measure of their competencies and abilities.Central Tendency :It refers to a tendency to rate all employees above average.Leniency or Strictness: Some supervisors tend to rate all subordinates consistently high or low Recency Error: Some supervisors tend to be too influenced by an event that happened a few days or weeks ago that is fresh in their mind.Bias :It refers to the tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal rating employees receive.FEEDBACK INTERVIEW (第四节绩效考评的面谈)Before the InterviewAdequate preparation, including giving notice, reviewing the job description and choosing the right place.During the InterviewListen and questionConcentrate on performance not personalityBe specific about specificDon’t impose your ideasDon’t be instructiveAfter the InterviewMonitor progressFollow-up any issuesEXERCISES (作业)QURSTION1.. What is meant by the term ―relevance‖ in the context of performance appraisal? And what canan organization do to ensure its rating instruments are relevant?2. What are some of the causes of inaccurate ratings? How can ratings be made more accurate?3. Why are graphic rating scales so frequently used? What are major problems associated with their use?4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MBO as a performance appraisal technique.5. Why are peer ratings sometimes used to supplement supervisory ratings? What are some problems associated with their use?6. What steps can an organization take to help ensure that its appraisal system is a fair one?7.What sources could be used to evaluate the performance of people working in the following jobsa. Taxi driverb. GMc. HR Managerd. Lathe operatorA spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.8.Suppose you are the HR manager of Foshan University, how you should develop a performance appraisal system for teachers. Please follow the steps as below■ Gain support for system: gain support of President and seek employee input when developing the system■ Develop rating instruments: instrument o f choice depends on practicality, cost, and the nature of jobs being evaluated■ Chose raters: supervisors, peers, self, and 360-degree feedback■ Determine when appraisals will be given■ Include safeguards to ensure fairness: should include an u pper-management review and an appeals system,A spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.CASE STUDY华夏银行商业信贷部的绩效评估华夏银行商业信贷部总共有4名出纳员,其中一名是资深出纳员马丽,部门主管张岚负责信贷部的工作,已经有3年了。