They Say I Say_Debate on Obesity
He-For-She艾玛沃森联合国女权主义演讲中英对照版[修改版]
![He-For-She艾玛沃森联合国女权主义演讲中英对照版[修改版]](https://img.taocdn.com/s3/m/e7799dd97375a417876f8f46.png)
第一篇：He-For-She艾玛沃森联合国女权主义演讲中英对照版He For SheEmma Watson Today we are launching a campaign called “HeForShe。
”I am reaching out to you because I need your help. Wewant to end gender inequality—and to do this we need everyone to be involved。
今天，我们启动了一项名为“他为她”的运动。
我向你伸出手，因为我需要你的帮助。
我们希望终结性别不平等——为此，我们需要所有人都参与其中。
This is the first campaign of its kind at the UN: wewant to try and galvanize as many men and boys as possible to be advocates forgender equality. And we don’t just want to talk about it,we want to try and make sure that it’s tangible。
这是联合国同类运动中的第一项：我们希望努力并激励尽可能多的男人和男孩倡导性别平等。
而且希望这(性别平等)不只是空谈，而是确确实实的看得见摸得着。
I was appointed as a Goodwill ambassador for UN women six months ago and the more I havespoken about feminism the more I have realized that fighting for women’s rightshas has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I knowfor certain, it is that this has to stop。
英语辩论模板作文
英语辩论模板作文Debate on the Topic of Technology and Its Impact on Society。
Introduction:Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Today, we are here to discuss the impact of technology on society. With the rapid advancement of technology, it has become an integral part of our daily lives. However, there are mixed opinions on whether this is beneficial or detrimental to society. In this debate, we will explore both the positive and negative impacts of technology on society and come to a conclusion on whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.Positive Impacts of Technology on Society:Firstly, technology has revolutionized communication. With the advent of social media and instant messaging, people can now connect with each other from across theglobe in real-time. This has led to greater connectivityand the sharing of ideas and knowledge. Additionally, technology has improved access to education and information. With online learning platforms and digital libraries, individuals can now access a wealth of knowledge at their fingertips. This has led to greater opportunities for learning and skill development.Furthermore, technology has transformed various industries, leading to increased efficiency and productivity. For instance, automation and robotics have streamlined manufacturing processes, leading to higher output and reduced costs. In the medical field, technology has led to the development of advanced medical equipmentand treatments, improving the quality of healthcare. Additionally, technology has enabled the creation of newjob opportunities in the tech industry, driving economic growth.Negative Impacts of Technology on Society:On the other hand, technology has also brought aboutnegative impacts on society. One of the most pressing concerns is the issue of privacy and data security. With the widespread use of social media and online platforms, personal information is at risk of being exploited and misused. Cybersecurity threats and data breaches have become increasingly common, raising concerns about the safety of personal information.Moreover, technology has led to a sedentary lifestyle and decreased physical activity. With the rise of smartphones and video games, people, especially the younger generation, are spending more time indoors and leading a more sedentary lifestyle. This has led to a rise in health issues such as obesity and related diseases. Additionally, technology has also contributed to social isolation, as people are more inclined to communicate through screens rather than face-to-face interactions.Conclusion:In conclusion, technology has undoubtedly brought about significant changes to society, both positive and negative.While it has improved communication, access to information, and efficiency in various industries, it has also raised concerns about privacy, cybersecurity, and the impact on physical and mental health. Ultimately, it is essential for society to strike a balance and harness the benefits of technology while addressing its drawbacks. It is crucial to regulate the use of technology and promote responsible and ethical practices to ensure that it continues to benefit society in the long run. Thank you.。
文体学整理
StylisticsIntroduction to stylistics: Necessity of the course1) the ultimate aim: cultivation of creative thinking2) general education3) an interdisciplinary field of study—involves the combining of the two or more academic field into one single discipline4) the study and interpretation of texts from a linguistic perspectiveChapter 1 Style and Stylistics1.1 A T aste of StyleStyle is considered an important factor in writing, and is an important part of a writing course. But often people payFrom the perspective of the users of the language, style is speakers addressing different people in different ways.From the perspective of the function of the text, style is the functions of texts for different purposes.The definition of style used in this book is a general, linguistic-oriented one: Manners indicating prominent liguistic features,features of different varieties of language at different levels. Stylistics is an inter ‗disciplinary(跨学科的，学科间的) field of2.Spelling. → Graphology3.Words. → Lexicon4.Grammar. → Syntax5.Meaning. → SemanticsSound features:Pun双关: Using the same sound to express different meanings in the same context.1. Seven days without water makes one weak. 七天不进水，人就会虚弱。
面对歧视现象我们应该做英语作文
面对歧视现象我们应该做英语作文Title: Standing Up Against DiscriminationHave you ever felt left out or treated unfairly because of the way you look, speak, or who you are? It's a terrible feeling, isn't it? Unfortunately, discrimination happens all the time, even in our schools and communities. But that doesn't mean we should just accept it. We need to stand up and fight against it!What is discrimination, you ask? Well, it's when someone treats you differently or doesn't give you the same opportunities as others because of things like your race, religion, gender, or disability. It's not fair, and it's not right.I remember this one time when I was playing on the playground with my friends. There was a group of older kids who started making fun of my friend Ahmed because he was wearing a turban and speaking a different language. They were calling him names and telling him to "go back to his country." Ahmed looked so hurt and upset.It made me really angry to see them being so mean to him just because he was different. Ahmed is one of the nicest people I know, and he didn't deserve to be treated that way. I wanted to stand up for him, but I wasn't sure what to do.Discrimination can happen in all sorts of ways. Maybe someone gets left out of a game or activity because of the color of their skin. Or maybe a kid with a disability gets made fun of for being different. Sometimes, girls are told they can't do certain things because they're "just girls."It's not just kids who discriminate, either. Adults can do it too, and sometimes even teachers or other people in authority. That's why it's so important for all of us to learn how to recognize discrimination and stand up against it.So, what can we do about it? Here are a few ideas:Speak up: If you see someone being treated unfairly because of who they are, don't be silent. Say something to the person doing the discriminating and tell them it's not okay. Let the person being targeted know that you support them and that what's happening is wrong.Be an ally: An ally is someone who stands up for and supports people who are being discriminated against, even if they're not part of that group themselves. For example, if you're not Muslim but you see a Muslim classmate being bullied, be their ally and defend them.Educate others: Sometimes, people discriminate because they don't understand or know better. If you can, try to explain to them why what they're doing is hurtful and wrong. Share facts and information to help them learn.Report it: If you see someone being discriminated against, especially by an adult or someone in authority, report it to a teacher, principal, or other trusted adult. Discrimination is wrong and shouldn't be tolerated in our schools or communities.Celebrate diversity: One of the best ways to fight discrimination is to learn about and celebrate the differences between people. Attend cultural events, learn about different religions and traditions, and make friends with people who are different from you. The more we understand and appreciate each other's differences, the less likely we are to discriminate.Remember, discrimination hurts everyone. It makes people feel bad about themselves, and it creates divides and tensions in our communities. We should all be treated with respect and given the same opportunities, no matter what we look like or where we come from.So, the next time you see someone being discriminated against, don't just stand by and watch. Be brave and speak up. Stand up for what's right, and be an ally to those who are beingtreated unfairly. Together, we can create a world where everyone is accepted and valued for who they are.。
关于学校是否取消长跑的英语辩论作文
关于学校是否取消长跑的英语辩论作文全文共6篇示例，供读者参考篇1Certainly! Here is a 2000-word essay on the debate whether schools should cancel long-distance running events, written from the perspective of an elementary school student:Should Schools Cancel Long-Distance Running Events?Hi there! My name is Emma, and I'm a 10-year-old student at Oakwood Elementary School. Today, I want to share my thoughts on a pretty controversial topic – whether schools should get rid of long-distance running events or not. It's a hot debate, and people have strong opinions on both sides. Let me walk you through the key arguments and my personal stance.Before we dive in, let me give you some context. Every year, our school organizes a big running event called the "Oakwood Mile." All students from grades 3 to 6 have to run a full mile (that's 1.6 kilometers for you metric folks!). The fastest runners get medals and trophies, while the rest of us just try our best to finish without collapsing from exhaustion.Now, some people think this event, and others like it, should be canceled for good. Their main arguments are:Health and Safety ConcernsCritics argue that making young kids run such long distances is dangerous and could lead to injuries, especially for those who aren't very athletic or physically fit. They say the risk of heat stroke, pulled muscles, or even long-term damage to growing bodies isn't worth it.Pressure and StressRunning a mile is no easy feat, especially when you're being timed and ranked against your classmates. This can create a lot of pressure and stress for kids, which some believe is unhealthy and takes the fun out of physical activity.Favoring the Naturally AthleticNot everyone is built for long-distance running. Some kids are just naturally better at it than others due to factors like genetics, body type, or access to training. Critics say these events unfairly favor athletic kids and can be demoralizing for those who struggle.On the other hand, there are plenty of people (including many teachers and parents) who think these running events arevaluable and should continue. Here are their main counterarguments:Promoting Physical FitnessIn a world where childhood obesity is on the rise, events like the Oakwood Mile encourage kids to be active and develop healthy habits early on. Running builds endurance, strengthens the cardiovascular system, and burns calories – all good things!Teaching Perseverance and Goal-SettingCompleting a long-distance run, even if you're not the fastest, teaches kids the value of perseverance and setting achievable goals. It's篇2Title: Should Schools Ditch Long-Distance Running?Running has always been a part of my life at school. From the moment I stepped into kindergarten, we've had to run laps around the field or track as part of our physical education classes. At first, it was kind of fun, like a game of tag or catch with my friends. But as I grew older and the distances got longer, I started dreading those running sessions.Don't get me wrong; I understand the importance of exercise and staying fit. But does running have to be the only way we get our daily dose of physical activity? There are so many other sports and activities that could keep us active and healthy without making us dread gym class.I know what you're thinking – kids these days are just lazy and want to play video games all day. But hear me out.Long-distance running can be tough, especially for those of us who aren't naturally athletic. It's not just about being lazy; it's about finding an exercise we genuinely enjoy and can stick with.Imagine if we could have a variety of options to choose from during gym class. Some kids might still prefer running, and that's fine. But others could try their hand at team sports like soccer, basketball, or even ultimate frisbee. These activities not only keep us moving but also teach us valuable teamwork and communication skills.And what about those of us who aren't into team sports? Why not offer individual activities like swimming, cycling, or even dance classes? These could be just as effective at getting our hearts pumping while allowing us to explore our interests and talents.I know what you're thinking – "But long-distance running builds endurance and discipline!" And you're right, it does. But there are other ways to develop those qualities without forcing us to run until our lungs feel like they're about to explode.What if, instead of mandatory long-distance running, we had a variety of challenging physical activities that pushed us to our limits in different ways? Rock climbing, for instance, requires incredible strength, focus, and determination. Or what about martial arts, where we could learn self-discipline and respect while getting a full-body workout?And let's not forget about the mental health benefits of finding an exercise we truly enjoy. When we dread an activity, it becomes a chore – something we have to force ourselves to do. But when we look forward to it, exercise can be a stress-reliever, a mood-booster, and a source of joy.I'm not saying we should completely eliminate running from our schools. For those who love it, it should absolutely remain an option. But for those of us who struggle with it, or simply don't enjoy it, there should be alternatives that cater to our diverse interests and abilities.Imagine a world where gym class was something we looked forward to, rather than dreaded. Where we could exploredifferent activities and find the ones that truly spoke to us. Wouldn't that make us more likely to stick with an active lifestyle, even after we leave school?So, let's ditch the one-size-fits-all approach to physical education and embrace a more diverse, inclusive, and enjoyable way of keeping us healthy and active. Our bodies, minds, and spirits will thank us for it.篇3Should Schools Get Rid of Long-Distance Running?Hi there! My name is Jamie and I'm a fifth-grader at Oakwood Elementary School. My favorite subjects are math and art, but my least favorite is definitely P.E. - especially when we have to run the mile for the endurance test. I really don't like running long distances and a lot of my friends feel the same way. Some people are even saying that we should get rid oflong-distance running in schools altogether. Let me share my thoughts on this debate!On the one hand, I can understand why some kids, parents, and even teachers might want to end long-distance running requirements. For one thing, it's just not very fun for a lot of us. Running lap after lap, getting sweaty and out of breath - what'sthe point? It feels like a punishment rather than an enjoyable activity. I have friends who absolutely dread the annual mile run and it makes them super anxious in the weeks leading up to it.Running long distances can also be really hard for kids who aren't athletic or who struggle with being overweight. It's embarrassing and discouraging for them to huff and puff along while the fastest kids zoom by effortlessly. I've seen some kids get teased about being "too slow" which is just mean. No one should have to feel ashamed or bullied over their athletic abilities.There's also the fact that some kids have conditions like asthma that can make sustained running extremely difficult and uncomfortable for them. It doesn't seem fair to force these students to do an activity that could negatively impact their health and wellbeing. Substitute activities like walking orlower-impact sports might be better options in those cases.Another argument against long-distance running is that schools already have limited time and resources, so why spend it on something that many students dislike? Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on fitness activities that are more fun and engaging for kids, like games, skill-building exercises, or strength training? Just because running builds endurancedoesn't necessarily mean it's the best way to motivate kids to live active lifestyles.On the other hand, I can also see valid reasons why schools might want to keep long-distance running as part of the P.E. curriculum. For one thing, building cardiovascular fitness and endurance is crucial for overall health and wellness - especially with obesity rates so high among kids and teens these days. Running is one of the most efficient and accessible ways to work on those skills. It doesn't require any special equipment besides a pair of reasonable shoes.Learning to push through challenges and persist even when you're tired and it's difficult - isn't that an important life lesson? Long-distance running teaches kids discipline, determination, and how to set and achieve goals through sustained effort over time. These are amazing qualities that will benefit us in so many areas of life beyond just P.E. class.There's also the argument that if schools eliminatelong-distance running, some kids might not get exposure to it at all - which could limit their future interests and opportunities. What if being forced to do it in school helps some kids discover a hidden passion or talent for distance running? It could open doors for them to join the track team, pursue it as a lifelonghobby, or even work towards competitive goals like regional meets or marathons down the road.Personally, my attitude towards long-distance running has evolved over time. When I was younger, I would dread and avoid it at all costs. But as I've gotten older, I've started to experience the mood-boosting effects of a "runner's high" after getting past the tough initial stage of a long run. There's a huge sense of accomplishment after pushing yourself to go further than you thought possible. Maybe some kids just need more time, patience and encouragement to acquire an appreciation for distance running.So those are some of the biggest arguments I've heard on both sides of this debate. What's my overall stance? I think long-distance running should remain a part of the standard P.E. curriculum, but with some important modifications and allowances:First, it shouldn't be a pass/fail requirement or weighted too heavily in overall fitness scoring. For kids who have physical limitations or an extreme aversion to long-distance running, there should be alternative options to fulfill the endurance component - maybe letting them walk, swim, or bike instead.Second, the focus shouldn't just be on speed and competition. There could be a tiered system where kids can earn credits for hitting different mileage goals over time, allowing them to build up distance gradually at their own pace. The emphasis should be on individual improvement and effort rather than comparing students to each other.Third, schools could get creative by incorporating different types of runs and terrains to add variety and cultural relevance. For example, trail runs to appreciate nature, glow runs at night for fun, or mapping out historic routes through the community. Making it about more than just circling a track could go a long way towards boosting engagement and buy-in.And finally, students should get education on the skills, strategies, and mindset required for successful distance running. Things like proper warmup, pacing, breathing techniques, nutrition and hydration tips, mantras for beating mental fatigue, and cool down routines. With the right preparation and support system in place, I'll bet more kids would come to appreciate and maybe even enjoy the challenge of long-distance running.Those are just my thoughts as a10-year-old kid, but I hope I was able to capture some of the key points from both sides of this debate. While long-distance running can certainly seemgrueling and unpopular to many of us students, it's also a powerful tool for building perseverance, grit, and overall fitness. With some creative modifications, it could become a more rewarding experience that helps prepare us for a lifetime of active, healthy living.篇4Should Schools Get Rid of Long-Distance Running?Hi there! My name is Samantha and I'm in the 5th grade. Today I want to talk to you about something that a lot of kids have strong feelings about - long-distance running in school. Some people think we should get rid of it, while others think it's really important and we should keep doing it. I've given this a lot of thought, and I have some opinions I want to share with you.First off, I totally get why some kids hate long-distance running so much. It's hard work! Having to run mile after mile can be really tiring and uncomfortable, especially on hot days. My friend Tommy gets side stitches almost every time we have to run the mile in gym class. And don't even get me started on the horrible feeling of getting a dry hurilife! It's like your throat closes up and it's impossible to breathe. No fun at all.Plus, not every kid is into sports or even likes exercising very much. For those of us who prefer sedentary hobbies like reading, art, or videogames, being forced to run long distances can feel like a form of cruel and unusual punishment. Why can't we just play kickball or do some jumping jacks instead? At least those are kind of fun sometimes.I'll admit that I'm not a huge fan of long-distance running myself. I'm more of a sprinter - the 100 meter dash is my jam! Having to go long distances at a slower pace just isn't my thing. My legs start to feel like jelly after the first half mile or so. No matter how much I train, it never seems to get any easier for me. I'd much rather play a quick game of basketball or soccer where I can run in short bursts.However, despite my personal distaste for long-distance running, I can certainly see why schools think it's important enough to keep making us do it. Running builds up our cardiovascular endurance over time, which helps keep our hearts and lungs healthy. With the rise of obesity in many countries, getting regular aerobic exercise is more crucial than ever before. If we can get into the habit of running long distances from an early age, it's more likely to stick with us as a lifelong healthy practice.Running also helps build discipline, determination, and mental toughness. There's something gratifying about pushing through the pain and fatigue to reach a distant goal, like making it to the final lap around the track. It teaches us that we're capable of doing difficult things, as long as we keep putting one foot in front of the other. Those are valuable lessons that can be applied to all kinds of other challenges we'll face later in life.And let's not forget about the social benefits of running together as a group. When my class goes out to the trail for our weekly long run, we motivate and encourage each other to keep going. We sing goofy running songs, crack jokes to make the time pass more quickly, and celebrate each other's accomplishments once we've reached the finish line. It brings our class closer together and creates a real sense of camaraderie. Those are the types of bonding experiences you just can't get from sitting behind a desk or computer all day.So while I may groan and moan about it in the moment, I do recognize that long-distance running provides some significant perks. It keeps us physically healthy, mentally tough, socially connected, and on a path towards an active lifestyle. Maybe I'll even grow to enjoy it more as I get older! For now though, I'mjust focused on making it through the next few laps without my sides cramping up. Wish me luck!At the end of the day, whether schools should abolishlong-distance running probably comes down to priorities. If the main goal is to keep kids happy and make exercise as fun and enjoyable as possible, then yeah, getting rid of long runs would make sense. But if the emphasis is on building endurance, grit, and establishing sustainable healthy habits from an early age, then keeping long-distance running as part of the curriculum is logically the way to go.Personally, I can see good arguments on both sides. While I may not love every second of it, I do understand the value that long-distance running provides. As long as schools don't go totally overboard with it and make sure we get plenty of variety in our exercise routines, I think it's probably worth keeping around. Either way though, this is just one kid's perspective. What's your take on it? I'm curious to hear what others think about this topic! Let me know if you agree or disagree with any of my points.Thanks for letting me share my thoughts! I'll go reward myself with a nice cold glass of chocolate milk now. You know, to replenish those electrolytes and all. Catch you later!篇5Should Schools Abolish Long-Distance Running?Hi there! My name is Emma, and I'm a 10-year-old student in fifth grade. Today, I want to talk to you about a really important issue that's been bothering me lately – whether schools should get rid of long-distance running or not.Before I share my thoughts, let me give you a little background. Every year, our school organizes a big running event called the "Annual Cross-Country Race." All students from grades 3 to 6 have to participate, and we run a distance of 2 miles (that's a really long way for little legs like mine!). The race is supposed to promote physical fitness and endurance, but I'm not so sure it's a good idea.On one hand, I can see why some people think long-distance running is beneficial for kids. Exercise is important for staying healthy, and running can help us build strong muscles, bones, and hearts. It's also a great way to enjoy the outdoors and get some fresh air. Plus, learning to push through challenges and finish a tough race can teach us valuable lessons about perseverance and determination.However, on the other hand, there are also some pretty big downsides to forcing young kids like me to run such long distances. First of all, it's really, really hard! I'm not a very fast runner, and by the time I reach the finish line, I'm exhausted, out of breath, and my legs feel like jelly. Sometimes, I even get side stitches or cramps, which are really painful.Secondly, the long-distance running can be dangerous, especially if it's hot outside or if a student has a pre-existing medical condition like asthma or a heart problem. Last year, one of my classmates fainted from heat exhaustion during the race, and she had to be taken to the hospital. That's just not worth the risk, in my opinion.Another issue is that not all kids enjoy running or are good at it. For those of us who struggle with endurance activities, the cross-country race can be a really demoralizing and discouraging experience. It's hard to feel motivated when you're always the last one to finish, and it can even make some kids dread physical education class altogether.Finally, I think there are better ways for schools to promote physical activity and fitness without subjecting us to such a grueling and potentially harmful event. Why not offer a variety of fun, age-appropriate activities like soccer, basketball, dance, oreven just regular short-distance running? That way, every student can find something they enjoy and feel successful at, rather than feeling like failures because they can't keep up with the long-distance runners.So, those are my thoughts on the matter. I know thatlong-distance running has its advocates, but as a kid who's been through the cross-country race year after year, I just don't think it's worth the risks and downsides. I'd much rather see my school focus on promoting physical activity in a way that's safe, inclusive, and enjoyable for all students, regardless of their athletic abilities or interests.What do you think? Should schools abolish long-distance running events for elementary students, or do you believe the benefits outweigh the risks? I'd love to hear your perspective!篇6Should Schools Get Rid of Long-Distance Running?I'm just a kid, but I've got strong opinions on thislong-distance running debate happening at my school. The teachers and principals are arguing over whether we should stop having events like the mile run during gym class and annualrun-a-thon fundraisers. Some say it's too much for kids, whileothers think running builds character. I've been listening to both sides, and here's my take.In the "keep long runs" corner, we've got Ms. Jackson, my P.E. teacher. She's been making us run laps around the field since kindergarten. "Running。
天津耀华中学2024届高三第二次联考英语试卷含解析
天津耀华中学2024届高三第二次联考英语试卷注意事项：1．答卷前，考生务必将自己的姓名、准考证号、考场号和座位号填写在试题卷和答题卡上。
用2B铅笔将试卷类型（B）填涂在答题卡相应位置上。
将条形码粘贴在答题卡右上角"条形码粘贴处"。
2．作答选择题时，选出每小题答案后，用2B铅笔把答题卡上对应题目选项的答案信息点涂黑；如需改动，用橡皮擦干净后，再选涂其他答案。
答案不能答在试题卷上。
3．非选择题必须用黑色字迹的钢笔或签字笔作答，答案必须写在答题卡各题目指定区域内相应位置上；如需改动，先划掉原来的答案，然后再写上新答案；不准使用铅笔和涂改液。
不按以上要求作答无效。
4．考生必须保证答题卡的整洁。
考试结束后，请将本试卷和答题卡一并交回。
第一部分（共20小题，每小题1.5分，满分30分）1．An international team of astronomers announced Wednesday that they ________ the first-ever image of a black hole. A．have captured B．were capturingC．had captured D．would capture2．Every classroom in this modern school is ________ with a new TV set on the wall and a computer on the teacher's desk.A．equipped B．decoratedC．fixed D．placed3．Your letter will get attention! They know you’re expecting the a nswer.A．careful B．common C．instant D．general4．— Y ou could always put the decision off a little bit longer.— __________ If I leave it much longer I might miss my chance.A．That’s reasonable.B．Isn’t it a good idea?C．Do you think so? D．I can’t agree more.5．--It is really fun to hike and I often go hiking in the forest.--But hiking alone in the forest ______ be very dangerous.A．can B．must C．shall D．will6．一When he know the result of today’s job interview?一In a couple of days．A．should B．may C．shall D．must7．It’s natural that I didn’t recognize her immediately I saw her. _______, it’s almost 5 years since we met last. A．After all B．In addition C．What’s more D．In particular8．The days are gone physical strength was all you needed to make a living．A．that B．whenC．where D．which9．Sometimes we have to face embarrassing moments ________ we can only keep silent.A．who B．whichC．when D．why10．They came back from their long walk and went into bed, .A．tiredly but relaxing B．tired but relaxingC．tiredly but relaxed D．tired but relaxed11．-Oh, we have finished our task and can have a good rest．- ________．Our manager took another order yesterday．A．Y es, it will B．I don't take much of itC．It's possible D．It's hard to say12．British scientists have produced _____ they believe is the world’s smallest Christmas card．A．which B．who C．that D．what13．I keep the picture where I can see it every day, reminds me of the days in my hometown.A．that B．whichC．who D．when14．—You’ve made great progress in your English study, haven’t you?—Yes, but much .A．remains to do B．is remained to doC．remains to be done D．is remained to be done15．—What happened to the young trees we planted last week?—The trees ________ well, but I didn’t water them.A．might grow B．needn’t have grownC．would have grown D．would grow16．I'd advise anyone to put aside a proportion of their earnings — ____________.A．nothing great is easy B．nothing comes from nothingC．a bad penny always turns up D．a penny saved is a penny earned17．In time we reached a stage we had more young readers than old ones．A．where B．how C．who D．what18．_______, the dancers practise hard to make their dreams come true.A．Instead of being disabled B．Being disabledC．Disabled as they are D．In case of being disabled19．Much to their delight, their new project _____ at the conference, the excited scholars decided to have a barbecue in honour of the fantastic moment.A．to approve B．being approvedC．having approved D．having been approved20．40 grams of meat per day is ______ people should consume in order to stay fit.A．that B．whyC．how D．what第二部分阅读理解（满分40分）阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中，选出最佳选项。
全新版大学英语综合教程5课文原文及翻译@1和2单元教材
咱们吃素吧!如果有一件事，既能增进健康、减少患上食物引起的疾病的危险，又有助于保护环境、保护千万动物安全生存，你做不做？我说的这件事就是每次坐下来就餐时挑选菜肴。
一百多万加拿大人已经行动起来：他们决定不吃肉。
变化速度之快令人惊叹。
素食品的销售额大大增加，前所未有。
尤受欢迎的是无肉汉堡包和热狗，以及以蔬为主的印度、中国、墨西哥、意大利和日本的菜肴。
推动人们转向素食的是医学研究提出的关于如何增进健康的建议。
一项又一项的研究都揭示了同样的基本事实：果蔬降低患慢性病的危险；肉类食品则增加这种危险。
美国饮食学协会指出，“科学资料表明，素食与降低多种慢性变性疾病的患病危险肯定有关系。
”去年秋天，在检验了4500个饮食与癌症的研究报告之后，世界癌症研究基金会直截了当地指出：“我们一向利用不合适的养料来维持人类生理引擎的运转。
”据威尔夫大学营养科学教授布鲁斯·霍拉勃称，这一“不合适的养料”致使加拿大每年用于治疗变性疾病的费用高达4000亿（加）元。
肉类食品存在严重的营养缺陷：它们不含纤维，含有过多的饱和脂肪和胆固醇，甚至可能含有微量的激素、类固醇和抗菌素。
牛肉、猪肉、鸡肉或鱼肉都一样。
肉类食品也是越来越广为人知的大肠杆菌、弯曲菌以及其他致病细菌的孳生地。
据加拿大食品检验机构称，十分之六的鸡染有沙门氏菌。
吃肉无异于玩俄式轮盘赌，拿你的健康做赌资。
既然如此，政府为什么不采取任何措施？很遗憾，政府屈服于强有力的院外活动集团的压力，如牛肉信息中心、加拿大禽蛋营销公司、加拿大乳牛场场主协会等。
根据信息自由法案获得的有关文件记载，这些集团迫使加拿大最新食品指南在1993年公布前作出修改。
这并不奇怪。
即使建议动物蛋白质的摄入量减少一丁点儿都会给这些企业带来每年数十亿元的损失。
健康和食品安全是选择素食生活方式令人信服的理由，但此外还有更为重大的因素要考虑。
以饲养动物为基础的农业是世界上对环境破坏最严重的产业之一。
想一想培育、饲养、建牲畜栏、运输、加工和包装加拿大每年宰杀的5亿头牲畜所需的巨大资源。
《英语二新题型》
帮学堂配套电子讲义帮学堂配套讲义《英语二新题型》课程配套讲义是学习的必备资源，帮帮为大家精心整理了高质量的配套讲义，确保同学们学习的方便与高效。
该讲义是帮帮结合大纲考点及考研辅导名师多年辅导经验的基础上科学整理的。
内容涵盖考研的核心考点、复习重点、难点。
结构明了、脉络清晰，并针对不同考点、重点、难点做了不同颜色及字体的标注，以便同学们复习时可以快速投入、高效提升。
除课程配套讲义外，帮帮还从学习最贴切的需求出发，为大家提供以下服务，打造最科学、最高效、最自由的学习平台：服务项目服务内容名师高清视频课零距离跟名师学习，精讲考点，突出重点，拿下难点，掌握方习题+月考+模考精选配套习题，灵活自测，查缺补漏，时时提升真题视频解析精选整理了近十几年的真题+答案，视频详解近五年真题复习规划指导名师零距离直播/录播指导全程考研复习规划24小时内答疑24小时内详尽解答您复习中的疑点难点，确保学习无阻碍把青春托付给值得信任的平台！祝：复习愉快，天天高效，考研成功！PS:讲义中的不足之处，欢迎各位研研批评指正，我们将竭尽所能追求更好!目录一、英语二新题型概述 (1)英语二试卷题型 (1)考情概述 (1)............................................................................................................2 一、7选5信息对应题型答题技巧 .. (2)1.题型介绍 (2)2.解题技巧 (2)二、真题演练-2011年新题型 (3)1.2011年新题型导读 (3)2.2011年新题型真题 (3)3.2011年新题型答案解析 (5)三、真题演练-2012年新题型 (6)1.2012年新题型导读 (6)2.2012年新题型真题 (7)3.2012年新题型答案解析 (8)四、真题演练-2014年新题型 (9)1.2014年新题型导读 (9)2.2014年新题型真题 (10)3.2014年新题型答案解析 (12)......................................................................................................13 一、7选5小标题对应题型答题技巧 .. (13)1.题型介绍 (13)2.解题技巧 (13)二、真题演练-2016年新题型 (14)1.2016年新题型导读 (14)2.2016年新题型真题 (14)3.2016年新题型答案解析 (16)第二章7选5多项对应第三章7选5小标题对应三、真题演练-2015年新题型 (16)1.2015年新题型导读 (16)2.2015年新题型真题 (17)3.2015年新题型答案解析 (18)四、真题演练-2013年新题型 (19)1.2013年新题型导读 (19)2.2013年新题型真题 (19)3.2013年新题型答案解析 (21)第四章结束语 (22)一、英语二新题型概述英语二试卷题型考情概述1.考研英语二大纲最近的两次重大修订：2010年：取消词汇单项考试题型，加入阅读新题型（三种形式：正误判断型；7选5信息对应型；7选5加标题型）2011年：阅读新题型“三变二”：取消正误判断型。
该不该节食减肥辩论观点英语作文
该不该节食减肥辩论观点英语作文The Debate on Dieting for Weight Loss.The topic of whether or not to diet for weight loss has sparked debate among individuals for decades. With theever-growing concern about obesity and its related health issues, the discussion has become even more intense. Inthis article, we will explore both sides of the argument, weighing the pros and cons of dieting for weight loss.The Pros of Dieting for Weight Loss.1. Health Improvement: Obesity is a significant risk factor for various chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and stroke. Losing weight through dieting can significantly reduce these risks, leading to a healthier lifestyle.2. Confidence Boost: Weight loss can lead to a significant improvement in body image and self-confidence.Feeling more comfortable in one's own skin can have a positive impact on mental health and overall well-being.3. Long-Term Benefits: Adopting healthy eating habits as part of a weight loss diet can have long-term benefits, including maintaining a healthy weight and preventing weight regain.4. Social Acceptance: In many cultures, a slimmer body is highly valued, and weight loss can lead to better social acceptance and fewer instances of discrimination.The Cons of Dieting for Weight Loss.1. Yo-Yo Effect: Many dieters experience weight regain after stopping their diet, leading to a cycle of weight loss and regain known as the "yo-yo effect". This constant fluctuation can be even more unhealthy than maintaining a constant overweight status.2. Nutritional Deficiencies: Strict diets can lead to nutritional deficiencies, especially if they restrictcertain food groups or nutrients. Long-term nutritional deficiencies can have serious health consequences.3. Psychological Impact: Dieting can have a negative impact on mental health, leading to feelings of guilt, failure, and obsession with food and body image. This can lead to eating disorders and other psychological problems.4. Short-Term Solutions: Dieting is often seen as a short-term solution to weight loss, rather than a sustainable lifestyle change. Once the diet is stopped, weight regain is often inevitable.The Balanced Approach.Instead of focusing solely on dieting for weight loss, a more balanced approach is recommended. This involves adopting healthy eating habits that are sustainable in the long term, rather than following a restrictive diet. It emphasizes the importance of:1. Portion Control: Eating smaller portions of healthyfood can help control calorie intake without feeling deprived.2. Variety: Including a variety of foods in the diet ensures that all essential nutrients are obtained.3. Regular Exercise: Incorporating regular physical activity into daily life can help boost metabolism and promote weight loss.4. Mindful Eating: Taking the time to enjoy meals and being aware of hunger and fullness cues can help prevent overeating.5. Long-Term Commitment: Viewing weight loss as a lifelong commitment to healthy eating and active living, rather than a temporary fix, is key to maintaining a healthy weight in the long run.In conclusion, while dieting can be an effective tool for weight loss, it should be approached with caution. A balanced diet combined with regular exercise and a healthylifestyle is the key to achieving long-term weight loss and improved health. Focusing on sustainable changes rather than quick fixes is essential for maintaining a healthy weight in the long run.。
垃圾食品的广告应该被禁止吗辩论英语作文
垃圾食品的广告应该被禁止吗辩论英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Should Junk Food Advertising Be Banned?Junk food is everywhere these days. Open up Instagram and you're bombarded with mouthwatering burger pics. Walk down the street and you'll see giant colorful billboards promoting the latest fast food craze. Even watching your favorite YouTuber, they're likely munching on chips or candy during sponsored segments. With advertising for unhealthy snacks and meals so pervasive, it begs the question - should junk food marketing be banned altogether?On one hand, banning junk food ads could have major positive impacts on public health. Excessive consumption of fatty, sugary, and salty foods is a leading contributor to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and other harmful conditions. By allowing companies to relentlessly promote these unhealthy products through commercials, product placements, social media campaigns and more, we are gravitating towards habits that put our wellbeing at risk. If we rid our media of these enticing ads,the theory goes, we'll make smarter food choices since the temptation wouldn't be as strong.Those in favor of prohibiting junk food marketing often point to how easily impressionable children are influenced by these ubiquitous advertisements. Kids are essentially getting brainwashed from a young age into craving McDonald's, Skittles, Doritos and other branded junk foods they see glamorized on TV, online, outdoors, you name it. Banning this type of advertising to kids could help prevent unhealthy eating habits from developing early on. When I was younger, I definitely punished my parents for" unhealthy" lunches because ads taught me to associate my favorite cartoons with candy and chips. Eliminating junk food ads aimed at young people could positively shape nutritional attitudes before diets get derailed.However, there are compelling arguments against outright bans on promoting unhealthy eats. While personal health is crucial, some would argue that putting limits on food advertising violates the fundamentals of free market economics. In a capitalist society, companies should be allowed to use any legal marketing tactics to sell their products, even if those products are filled with processed garbage. As a consumer, we all have the free will to make our own dietary choices. Advertisers may try tosway us, but we individuals get to decide what we put in our bodies, not the government.From this perspective, banning junk food ads is just篇2Should Junk Food Ads Be Banned?Junk food advertisements are everywhere these days - on TV, online, even plastered on billboards and the sides of buses. With their bright colors, cartoon characters, and promises of deliciousness, these ads are hard to resist, especially for kids. But there's a growing movement to ban junk food marketing to children altogether, arguing that it's unethical and contributes to serious health issues like obesity and diabetes. As a student, this is an issue that hits close to home. Let's take a look at both sides of the debate.Those in favor of banning junk food ads point to some startling statistics about childhood obesity rates and the aggressive marketing tactics used by big food companies. According to the World Health Organization, childhood obesity has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with over 340 million children and adolescents aged 5-19 now classified as overweight or obese worldwide. And studies have shown thatkids are bombarded with ads for sugary cereals, fast food, candy, and soft drinks on a daily basis, whether watching TV or browsing online.The argument goes that these advertisements take advantage of children's natural inclinations towards junk food and their inability to discern marketing ploys at a young age. With colorful animations, free toy giveaways, and misleading health claims, critics argue that junk food marketing actively undermines parents' efforts to instill healthy eating habits. Children are essentially a captive audience, and allowing corporations to relentlessly push unhealthy products on them is unethical and exploitative.Proponents of a junk food ad ban also point to countries like Sweden, Norway, and Quebec that have implemented strict regulations on marketing to children, as well as companies like Disney that have voluntarily distanced themselves from such advertisements. They argue that if the demand and normalization of junk food is reduced from an early age through advertising restrictions, children will be less likely to develop unhealthy preferences and eating behaviors that can persist into adulthood.On the other side of the debate, there are those who feel that an outright ban goes too far and impinges on principles of free speech and consumer choice. After all, they argue, parents are still the primary decision makers when it comes to household purchases and eating habits. If advertisements alone can so easily override good parenting and personal responsibility, what does that say about us as a society?Opponents of the ban contend that some degree of marketing is permissible and even necessary for companies to survive in a capitalist, free market system. As long as claims made in advertisements are truthful and there are no outright attempts to deceive or mislead, food companies should have a right to promote their products, even if they are considered unhealthy by some standards. It's up to parents to moderate what their children ultimately consume.There's also the slippery slope argument - if we ban junk food marketing to kids, what other products or activities get banned next? Video games, TV shows, toys? At a certain point, over-regulating marketing could amount to a violation of constitutional free speech rights. The key, opponents say, is to promote better education around nutrition and healthy eatingrather than trying to censor or eliminate junk food advertising altogether.So where do I stand on this contentious issue? In my opinion, while I absolutely understand and sympathize with the concerns around childhood obesity and vulnerability to advertising, I'm not fully convinced that a total ban is the most effective or appropriate solution. I do think the food industry has a moral obligation not to willfully deceive or exploit young audiences with dishonest health claims and advertising specifically designed to undermine parental efforts. Perhaps a compromise could be stronger truth-in-advertising regulations and age guidelines, rather than a blanket ban.At the end of the day, we have to acknowledge that food companies are in business to make money, and they'll find a way to market their products one way or another. Maybe the smarter approach is to double down on nutrition education in schools, empowering children from an early age to make informed decisions. Teach kids media literacy skills to detect when they're being manipulated by advertisers. Encourage more parental involvement and open communication around healthy eating choices, rather than treating food as a taboo topic that gets pushed to the fringes.While junk food marketing is certainly problematic and exploitative, an outright ban also feels like an oversimplification of a much more complex societal issue. We need amulti-pronged approach that tackles the root causes, not just the symptoms. That means dismantling our cultural obsession with convenience and instant gratification. It means reinvesting in nutritious school meal programs and making healthy foods affordable and accessible for all communities. It means questioning a system that allows corporations to prioritize profits over public health in the first place.These are difficult challenges, but they're ones we have to tackle head-on sooner rather than later. Because in the end, junk food ads may be an easy scapegoat, but the deeper issues –poverty, lack of education, food deserts – are the real culprits we need to slay. Simply banning the ads won't solve those larger systemic problems. A more holistic approach, with input from parents, educators, policymakers and even industry itself, has a better chance of nurturing a culture of health and wellness for future generations. It won't be easy, but what's the alternative - an increasingly sick society addicted to unhealthy conveniences? That's food for thought.篇3Should Junk Food Advertising Be Banned?Junk food is everywhere these days – on TV, online, at the movies, plastered across billboards and bus stops. With slick marketing and mouth-watering visuals, the ads for chips, candy, soda and fast food are hard to resist. But are these ads just harmless promotion, or is there something more sinister at play? This has become a hot topic of debate as concerns rise over increasing obesity rates, particularly among kids and teens. Some argue junk food advertising should be banned outright to protect public health, while others contend it is a matter of personal responsibility and freedom of choice. Let's examine the major arguments on both sides.Those in Favor of Banning Junk Food AdsThe main argument for banning junk food advertising is that it encourages unhealthy eating habits, especially in young people who are the prime targets of these marketing campaigns. Critics point to studies linking exposure to food ads with increased snacking and consumption of nutrient-poor,calorie-dense foods high in salt, sugar, and fat. They argue junk food companies use deceptive tactics like celebrity endorsements, bright colors, and quirky characters to hook kids on their products from an early age. Once hooked, it becomesextremely difficult to change those ingrained preferences later in life.Advertising proponents claim these ads are simply promoting a legal product and people have a choice whether to buy or not. But opponents contend kids under a certain age (estimates range from 8-12 years old) cannot fully comprehend the persuasive intent behind ads and lack the ability to resist powerful marketing messages. Even older kids and teens are highly vulnerable to promises of being cool, popular, or rebellious if they eat certain snacks and fast foods. Those pushing for ad bans believe it's exploitative and unethical to profit from manipulating minors in this way.Another major concern is the way food companies target poorer communities and communities of color with a disproportionate amount of junk food marketing. From billboards near schools to heavy product placement inshows/movies with largely minority audiences, these groups face outsized exposure. With limited financial resources and food deserts limiting healthy options, obesity and other diet-related diseases like diabetes have reached epidemic levels in some underprivileged urban and rural areas. Banning junk food ads, atleast in kid-centered spaces like schools, is seen as a way to start leveling the nutritional playing field.Those Against Banning Junk Food AdsDespite these concerns, there is fierce opposition to any government ban on food advertising. A key argument is that it infringes on commercial free speech rights and amounts to censorship of legal businesses like restaurants, snack makers, and beverage companies. Slippery slope arguments are made that if we ban one type of ad, what's to stop the censorship of other products deemed undesirable by some? Decisions about what constitutes "junk food" could become politicized.Along those lines, critics argue ad bans don't address personal responsibility for food choices. Even without advertising, people would find ways to access less healthy fare if they so desired. A "nanny state" is created when the government tries to control what citizens can see or consume, undermining personal liberty and accountability. It's called the "Land of the Free" for a reason.There are also concerns about the economic impact of ad restrictions, which could cost companies, media outlets, and event organizers billions in lost revenue from prime advertising channels. Entire industries like professional sports that rely onjunk food sponsors could be crippled. Thousands of jobs could be lost not just in food manufacturing, but across media, advertising, and other impacted fields.Those against ad bans argue more positive messaging and education is a better path than outright censorship. If people, especially kids, are taught about balancing treats with nutritious options and maintaining an active lifestyle, they can make informed decisions themselves. Personal responsibility and moderation are key.My Analysis and ConclusionAfter examining both sides, I believe junk food advertising aimed at kids under 12 absolutely should be banned or at least dramatically curtailed, especially in spaces like schools, parks, youth media, and in disadvantaged communities facing higher obesity risks. These corporations have powerful marketing forces and insane budgets to hook kids before they are mature enough to think critically about the long-term health impacts. Some psychologists even consider food ads targeting kids a form of exploitation akin to lead paint or asbestos marketing. That's pretty unethical.However, a blanket ban on all food advertising of any kind is going too far in my opinion. I don't support governmentoverreach into personal choices and limiting advertising to adults feels like an infringement on commercial speech freedoms. Restaurants have a right to promote legal menu items. But the marketing should be honest without using predatory tactics or skewing nutrition info.Instead of a full ban, I believe more can be done with education and incentives for food makers to produce and promote healthier options through reformulating recipes, clearer labeling, featuring veggies/fruits appealing to kids, and sponsoring youth sports/activities that encourage an active lifestyle. Junk should be treated as an occasional indulgence, not a daily diet. If all we get is a barrage of manipulative ads for chips and soda, of course those are the products kids will crave constantly. If companies want to keep advertising, they need to shift towards more responsible marketing.This isn't a black and white issue and both sides have some valid points. But given soaring obesity rates, diet-linked diseases becoming much more common at younger ages, and the targeted way food companies pursue future customers through insidious kid-focused campaigns, I do believe government intervention is warranted, at least for the most aggressive advertising tactics. Education and incentivizing better industrypractices has to go hand-in-hand with reasonable marketing restrictions. Our health is too important to let these trillion dollar fast food/snack conglomerates have unchecked influence on children for the sake of profit. Some limits should absolutely be set.。