雅思大作文经济类话题解析
雅思大作文经济类话题解析
朗阁海外考试研究中心分析发现，在最近的几次雅思写作考试中，经济类的话题占据了越来越大的比重。
对于考生来说，其中的一个难点就在于经济类的话题可能会涉及到一些题目是考生所不了解的。
学生很多时候看到这类话题并没有什么很清晰的思路，或者说就算有思路，也不知道该如何用英文进行表达。
所以，在准备经济类话题的过程中，考生应该注重多去积累这方面的内容。
比如说，可以多阅览一些经济类的文章，积累一下这方面的思路。
ØSome people think that it is helpful to invite large companies to set up factories in developing countries to grow their economies. Others think that developing countries should keep out foreign companies and develop local companies instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
这个题目的意思是在发展本土经济的时候，应该邀请外来的大公司进来建厂还是应该将他们拒之门外，发展本土的公司。
这篇文章在写作的过程中，需要注意以下几个问题：首先，这里讲的是邀请外来公司建厂。
所以，这里所讲的大公司主要指的是建工厂的公司，也就是说主要以制造业为主。
所以，一些网络公司可能并不适合。
这个话题的另一个限制性条件就是发展中国家。
当然，朗阁海外考试研究中心的专家建议考生们最好不要把所有的写作重点都放到中国，而是应该更多的去说发展中国家。
国外大公司：
ü国外大公司进入到发展中国家后，能够给当地带来巨大的资金和投资。
首先，大公司需要从政府那里购置大量的土地进行建厂用途。
现在很多地方土地价格昂贵，而且大公司资金实力雄厚，所以通常会建大面积的厂房，在很多的城市建厂，这必然会是一笔巨大的投入，给当地政府带来很大的经济效益。
其次，要建厂房，大公司还需要雇佣当地的建筑公司，从当地引进先进的工业设备和设施，这也会带动当地的中上游企业的发展。
大公司建立大型的工厂，也会创造出很多的劳动力机会。
工厂都是劳动密集型产业，所以一个国外大公司可能会建立起来几万，几十万的就业机会。
而且，国外公司通常资金充足，实力雄厚，所以最终营业额会相比本土公司来说高很多，这也意味着他们要向政府缴纳很高的税。
这部分税收最终会被政府利用，用于这个行业的持续发展。
比如说，政府可以用这笔钱向当地的本土企业提供低利息的贷款，或者用于扶持本土企业。
这都会带动整个行业的发展，尤其是本土企业的发展。
ü其次，国外的公司会带来先进的科技和管理理念。
这些先进的技术和管理理念能够对本土企业的发展起到很好的推动作用。
因为国外的大公司通常来说已经在这个行业发展了几十年，甚至说更长的时间，他们已经积累了很多的经验和尖端的科学技术。
如果这些东西能够
提供给本土公司的话，这可以大大的减少本土公司在科技探索过程中所花费的时间。
同时，先进的科技也能够给本土公司带来很强的竞争力和优势，让本土公司不光能够在低廉产品的市场里生存，也可以凭借这些尖端的技术去争取高端市场，从而与外来公司形成激烈的竞争关系，进一步推动整个行业的发展。
而且，先进的管理理念还可以帮助本土公司很大程度上提高工作效率，节约成本。
国内公司：
ü如果当地政府一味的发展外来公司的话，那必然会对本土的公司带来巨大的冲击。
先进的科技和理念往往是一个公司的生存之本，外来公司不太可能很轻易的放弃这些关键的核心竞争力给本土公司。
所以，当外来公司进来后，就必然会凭借其强大的经济实力和技术快速的占据本土市场。
而本土公司，无论从任何方面来说，都无法与外来公司竞争，所以，他们会受到很大的威胁，很有可能会被外来公司的垄断而导致破产。
当这个国家的经济过于依赖外来公司的时候，这个国家的产业就会不稳定，并且充满了很多的不确定性。
Expressions:
1. Invest heavily in something 对什么进行大量的投入
2. Make a purchase 购买
3. Ruinously expensive 非常的昂贵
4. Levy tax on somebody 对某人征税
5. Hire local contractors in construction industry 雇佣当地的建筑商
6. Labor-intensive industry 劳动密集型产业
7. Sustainable development 可持续发展
8. Provide subsidies to domestic companies 对本土公司提供资助
9. Provide a strong impetus to 对…提供了推动力
10. High-end market 高端市场
更多雅思学术文章可关注朗阁官方易信。
雅思阅读经济类文章精选
雅思阅读经济类文章精选雅思阅读中经常考到经济题材的阅读，为了帮助大家提高分数，下面小编为大家分享几篇雅思阅读经济类文章精选，供大家参考。
雅思阅读经济类文章精选1The magic of diasporasImmigrant networks are a rare bright spark in the world economy. Rich countries should welcome themTHIS is not a good time to be foreign. Anti-immigrant parties are gaining ground in Europe. Britain has been fretting this week over lapses in its border controls. In America Barack Obama has failed to deliver the immigration reform he promised ，and Republican presidential candidates would rather electrify the border fence with Mexico than educate the children of illegal aliens. America educates foreign scientists in its universities and then expels them， a policy the mayor of New York calls "national suicide".This illiberal turn in attitudes to migration is no surprise. It is the result of cyclical economic gloom combined with a secular rise in pressure on rich countries' borders. But governments now weighing up whether or not to try to slam the door should consider another factor： the growing economic importance of diasporas， and the contribution they can make to a country's economic growth.Old networks， new communicationsDiaspora networks—of Huguenots， Scots， Jews and many others—have always been a potent economic force，but the cheapness and ease of modern travel has made them larger and more numerous than ever before. There are now 215m first-generation migrants around the world： that's 3% of the world'spopulation. If they were a nation， it would be a little larger than Brazil. There are more Chinese people living outside China than there are French people in France. Some 22m Indians are scattered all over the globe. Small concentrations of ethnic and linguistic groups have always been found in surprising places—Lebanese in west Africa，Japanese in Brazil and Welsh in Patagonia， for instance—but they have been joined by newer ones， such as west Africans in southern China.These networks of kinship and language make it easier to do business across borders. They speed the flow of information： a Chinese trader in Indonesia who spots a gap in the market for cheap umbrellas will alert his cousin in Shenzhen who knows someone who runs an umbrella factory. Kinship ties foster trust，so they can seal the deal and get the umbrellas to Jakarta before the rainy season ends. Trust matters，especially in emerging markets where the rule of law is weak. So does a knowledge of the local culture. That is why so much foreign direct investment in China still passes through the Chinese diaspora. And modern communications make these networks an even more powerful tool of business.Diasporas also help spread ideas. Many of the emerging world's brightest minds are educated at Western universities. An increasing number go home， taking with them both knowledge and contacts. Indian computer scientists in Bangalore bounce ideas constantly off their Indian friends in Silicon Valley. China's technology industry is dominated by "sea turtles" (Chinese who have lived abroad and returned).Diasporas spread money， too. Migrants into rich countries not only send cash to their families; they also help companies in their host country operate in their home country. A HarvardBusiness School study shows that American companies that employ lots of ethnic Chinese people find it much easier to set up in China without a joint venture with a local firm.Such arguments are unlikely to make much headway against hostility towards immigrants in rich countries. Fury against foreigners is usually based on two (mutually incompatible) notions： that because so many migrants claim welfare they are a drain on the public purse; and that because they are prepared to work harder for less pay they will depress the wages of those at the bottom of the pile.The first is usually not true (in Britain，for instance，immigrants claim benefits less than indigenous people do)， and the second is hard to establish either way. Some studies do indeed suggest that competition from unskilled immigrants depresses the wages of unskilled locals. But others find this effect to be small or non-existent.Nor is it possible to establish the impact of migration on overall growth. The sums are simply too difficult. Yet there are good reasons for believing that it is likely to be positive. Migrants tend to be hard-working and innovative. That spurs productivity and company formation. A recent study carried out by Duke University showed that， while immigrants make up an eighth of America's population， they founded a quarter of the country's technology and engineering firms. And，by linking the West with emerging markets， diasporas help rich countries to plug into fast-growing economies.Rich countries are thus likely to benefit from looser immigration policy; and fears that poor countries will suffer as a result of a "brain drain" are overblown. The prospect of working abroad spurs more people to acquire valuable skills， and not allsubsequently emigrate. Skilled migrants send money home，and they often return to set up new businesses. One study found that unless they lose more than 20% of their university graduates，the brain drain makes poor countries richer.Indian takeawaysGovernment as well as business gains from the spread of ideas through diasporas. Foreign-educated Indians，including the prime minister， Manmohan Singh (Oxford and Cambridge) and his sidekick Montek Ahluwalia (Oxford)， played a big role in bringing economic reform to India in the early 1990s. Some 500，000 Chinese people have studied abroad and returned，mostly in the past decade; they dominate the think-tanks that advise the government，and are moving up the ranks of the Communist Party. Cheng Li of the Brookings Institution，an American think-tank，predicts that they will be 15-17% of its Central Committee next year，up from 6% in 2002. Few sea turtles call openly for democracy. But they have seen how it works in practice，and they know that many countries that practise it are richer， cleaner and more stable than China.As for the old world，its desire to close its borders is understandable but dangerous. Migration brings youth to ageing countries，and allows ideas to circulate in millions of mobile minds. That is good both for those who arrive with suitcases and dreams and for those who should welcome them.雅思阅读经济类文章精选2Euro zone's unexplodedTHE euro-zone crisis is not solved and is not likely to be solved soon, but the greatest immediate danger has been avoided. Two points worth stressing.1) The euro-zone economy has some "unexplodedordinance" in it that is likely to explode eventually, but no one really knows whether it is a grenade, a 1000kg bomb, or a nuclear device; what leaders did last week and are doing this week is making sure it is NOT a nuclear device.Europe still faces a number of vortices that could pull down the euro zone if allowed to get going: the "Greek" austerity-budget deficit vortex, and the "Lehman vortex" that sucked Dexia below water, as per the diagram below.However, euro-zone leaders seen to have finally rendered the worst vortex inoperable, namely the "Irish" vortex where by shocks pull down banks, banks pull down governments and then the vortex spreads to the next government in line. In this case it would have been Greek restructuring pulling down banks that forced nationalisation that forced downgrades that drove up yields which then made the governments insolvent. As this might rapidly have reached Italy and Spain, the "nuclear" outcome was truly scary—the sort of thing that had Charles Wyplosz talking about 1930s-like outcomes.The first revelation is that they have now finally 三立在线 that backstopping the banks is absolutely essential, mostly via recapitalisation. I’d guess that they’ll flub the job at the EU and G20 summits but that doesn’t really matter. They are now at "battle stations" when it comes to the banks, so we won’t have a Lehman-like moment that then brings down the world’s third largest debtor (Italy). Either national governments, or the EFSF will make sure the banks remain intact regardless.The second revelation is that regardless of what they do to scale up the EFSF, it won’t be big enough to backstop sovereigns in a way that will prevent contagion. However, this doesn’t matter as the ECB will be forced to step in—just as itdid in August and for exactly the same reason. Contagion spreading to Italy, Spain, Belgium, Malta, France etc would spell a very rapid and very ugly end to the euro zone. Besides, they have the ready excuse that they employed in August about orderly markets and monetary policy. But not all is for the best in this best of all possible worlds. The law of unintended consequences will be fully enforced.雅思阅读经济类文章精选3雅思阅读：Whose lost decade?Japan's economy works better than pessimists think—at least for the elderly.THE Japanese say they suffer from an economic disease called "structural pessimism". Overseas too， there is a tendency to see Japan as a harbinger of all that is doomed in the economies of the euro zone and America—even though figures released on November 14th show its economy grew by an annualised 6% in the third quarter， rebounding quickly from the March tsunami and nuclear disaster.Look dispassionately at Japan's economic performance over the past ten years， though， and "the second lost decade"， if not the first，is a misnomer. Much of what tarnishes Japan's image is the result of demography—more than half its population is over 45—as well as its poor policy in dealing with it. Even so， most Japanese have grown richer over the decade.In aggregate，Japan's economy grew at half the pace of America's between 2001 and 2010. Yet if judged by growth in GDP per person over the same period，then Japan has outperformed America and the euro zone (see chart 1). In part this is because its population has shrunk whereas America's population has increased.Though growth in labour productivity fell slightly short of America's from 2000 to 2008，total factor productivity， a measure of how a country uses capital and labour， grew faster，according to the T okyo-based Asian Productivity Organisation. Japan's unemployment rate is higher than in 2000，yet it remains about half the level of America and Europe (see chart 2).Besides supposed stagnation， the two other curses of the Japanese economy are debt and deflation. Yet these also partly reflect demography and can be overstated. People often think of Japan as an indebted country. In fact， it is the world's biggest creditor nation，boasting ￥253 trillion ($3.3 trillion) in net foreign assets.To be sure， its government is a large debtor; its net debt as a share of GDP is one of the highest in the OECD. However， the public debt has been accrued not primarily through wasteful spending or "bridges to nowhere"，but because of ageing，says the IMF. Social-security expenditure doubled as a share of GDP between 1990 and 2010 to pay rising pensions and health-care costs. Over the same period tax revenues have shrunk.Falling tax revenues are a problem. The flip side， though，is that Japan has the lowest tax take of any country in the OECD，at just 17% of GDP. That gives it plenty of room to manoeuvre. Takatoshi Ito，an economist at the University of T okyo，says increasing the consumption tax by 20 percentage points from its current 5%—putting it at the level of a high-tax European country—would raise ￥50 trillion and immediately wipe out Japan's fiscal deficit.That sounds draconian. But here again， demography plays a role. Officials say the elderly resist higher taxes or benefit cuts，and the young， who are in a minority， do not have the politicalpower to push for what is in their long-term interest. David Weinstein，professor of Japanese economy at Columbia University in New York，says the elderly would rather give money to their children than pay it in taxes. Ultimately that may mean that benefits may shrink in the future. "If you want benefits to grow in line with income，as they are now，you need a massive increase in taxes of about 10% of GDP，" he says.Demography helps explain Japan's stubborn deflation， too，he says. After all， falling prices give savers—most of whom are elderly—positive real yields even when nominal interest rates are close to zero. Up until now，holding government bonds has been a good bet. Domestic savers remain willing to roll them over，which enables the government to fund its deficits. Yet this comes at a cost to the rest of the economy.In short， Japan's economy works better for those middle-aged and older than it does for the young. But it is not yet in crisis， and economists say there is plenty it could do to raise its potential growth rate， as well as to lower its debt burden.Last weekend Yoshihiko Noda， the prime minister， took a brave shot at promoting reform when he said Japan planned to start consultations towards joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This is an American-backed free-trade zone that could lead to a lowering of tariffs on a huge swath of goods and services. Predictably it is elderly farmers， doctors and small businessmen who are most against it.Reforms to other areas， such as the tax and benefit system，might be easier if the government could tell the Japanese a different story： not that their economy is mired in stagnation，but that its performance reflects the ups and downs of an ageing society，and that the old as well as the young need to makesacrifices.The trouble is that the downbeat narrative is deeply ingrained. The current crop of leading Japanese politicians，bureaucrats and businessmen are themselves well past middle age. Many think they have sacrificed enough since the glory days of the 1980s， when Japan's economy seemed unstoppable. Mr Weinstein says they suffer from "diminished-giant syndrome"，nervously watching the economic rise of China. If they compared themselves instead with America and Europe， they might feel heartened enough to make some of the tough choices needed.Immigrant networks are a rare bright spark in the world economy. Rich countries should welcome themTHIS is not a good time to be foreign. Anti-immigrant parties are gaining ground in Europe. Britain has been fretting this week over lapses in its border controls. In America Barack Obama has failed to deliver the immigration reform he promised ，and Republican presidential candidates would rather electrify the border fence with Mexico than educate the children of illegal aliens. America educates foreign scientists in its universities and then expels them， a policy the mayor of New York calls "national suicide".This illiberal turn in attitudes to migration is no surprise. It is the result of cyclical economic gloom combined with a secular rise in pressure on rich countries' borders. But governments now weighing up whether or not to try to slam the door should consider another factor： the growing economic importance of diasporas， and the contribution they can make to a country's economic growth.Old networks， new communicationsDiaspora networks—of Huguenots， Scots， Jews and manyothers—have always been a potent economic force，but the cheapness and ease of modern travel has made them larger and more numerous than ever before. There are now 215m first-generation migrants around the world： that's 3% of the world's population. If they were a nation， it would be a little larger than Brazil. There are more Chinese people living outside China than there are French people in France. Some 22m Indians are scattered all over the globe. Small concentrations of ethnic and linguistic groups have always been found in surprising places—Lebanese in west Africa，Japanese in Brazil and Welsh in Patagonia， for instance—but they have been joined by newer ones， such as west Africans in southern China.These networks of kinship and language make it easier to do business across borders. They speed the flow of information： a Chinese trader in Indonesia who spots a gap in the market for cheap umbrellas will alert his cousin in Shenzhen who knows someone who runs an umbrella factory. Kinship ties foster trust，so they can seal the deal and get the umbrellas to Jakarta before the rainy season ends. Trust matters，especially in emerging markets where the rule of law is weak. So does a knowledge of the local culture. That is why so much foreign direct investment in China still passes through the Chinese diaspora. And modern communications make these networks an even more powerful tool of business.Diasporas also help spread ideas. Many of the emerging world's brightest minds are educated at Western universities. An increasing number go home， taking with them both knowledge and contacts. Indian computer scientists in Bangalore bounce ideas constantly off their Indian friends in Silicon Valley. China's technology industry is dominated by "sea turtles" (Chinese whohave lived abroad and returned).Diasporas spread money， too. Migrants into rich countries not only send cash to their families; they also help companies in their host country operate in their home country. A Harvard Business School study shows that American companies that employ lots of ethnic Chinese people find it much easier to set up in China without a joint venture with a local firm.Such arguments are unlikely to make much headway against hostility towards immigrants in rich countries. Fury against foreigners is usually based on two (mutually incompatible) notions： that because so many migrants claim welfare they are a drain on the public purse; and that because they are prepared to work harder for less pay they will depress the wages of those at the bottom of the pile.The first is usually not true (in Britain，for instance，immigrants claim benefits less than indigenous people do)， and the second is hard to establish either way. Some studies do indeed suggest that competition from unskilled immigrants depresses the wages of unskilled locals. But others find this effect to be small or non-existent.Nor is it possible to establish the impact of migration on overall growth. The sums are simply too difficult. Yet there are good reasons for believing that it is likely to be positive. Migrants tend to be hard-working and innovative. That spurs productivity and company formation. A recent study carried out by Duke University showed that， while immigrants make up an eighth of America's population， they founded a quarter of the country's technology and engineering firms. And，by linking the West with emerging markets， diasporas help rich countries to plug into fast-growing economies.Rich countries are thus likely to benefit from looser immigration policy; and fears that poor countries will suffer as a result of a "brain drain" are overblown. The prospect of working abroad spurs more people to acquire valuable skills， and not all subsequently emigrate. Skilled migrants send money home，and they often return to set up new businesses. One study found that unless they lose more than 20% of their university graduates，the brain drain makes poor countries richer.Indian takeawaysGovernment as well as business gains from the spread of ideas through diasporas. Foreign-educated Indians，including the prime minister， Manmohan Singh (Oxford and Cambridge) and his sidekick Montek Ahluwalia (Oxford)， played a big role in bringing economic reform to India in the early 1990s. Some 500，000 Chinese people have studied abroad and returned，mostly in the past decade; they dominate the think-tanks that advise the government，and are moving up the ranks of the Communist Party. Cheng Li of the Brookings Institution，an American think-tank，predicts that they will be 15-17% of its Central Committee next year，up from 6% in 2002. Few sea turtles call openly for democracy. But they have seen how it works in practice，and they know that many countries that practise it are richer， cleaner and more stable than China.As for the old world，its desire to close its borders is understandable but dangerous. Migration brings youth to ageing countries，and allows ideas to circulate in millions of mobile minds. That is good both for those who arrive with suitcases and dreams and for those who should welcome them.。
托福高分作文：经济增长能否提高国民幸福度
托福高分作文：经济增长能否提高国民幸福度雅思大作文题目：You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Some experts suppose that when a country is already rich, any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words.【话题分类】抽象类【题目解析】该题目翻译为："一些专家认为，当一个国家已经很富裕时，经济财富的任何额外增加都不会使其国民更幸福。
你在多大程度上同意或不同意?"乍一看，很多同学可能会觉得这个题目有一定难度，不知道从何写起。
我们在看到类似自己不熟悉的话题时，可以采用"关键词突破"的方式，比如题目中提到"rich country" 我们可以思考富有的国家意味着什么？全民富有？哪些国家是现在所谓富有的国家？"additional economic wealth" 额外的经济财富意味着什么？可以给国家，给个体带来什么？仅仅是额外的经济财富就足够了吗？"make citizens happier" 幸福感除了有钱，还需要什么？一个很有钱的人幸福吗？为什么？如何能够更加幸福？和金钱有关系吗？实际上，题目中虽然谈论的是国家，同学们在思考的时候，完全可以看作成"一个非常非常有钱的人，继续追求财富还会给他带来幸福吗？"【写作思路】开头段：改写题目，阐述个人立场主体1段：有些人认为经济的不断发展可以有效的消除贫富差距，让人们的生活更加美好，但在一些富裕国家，经济的发展以环境和人的健康为代价，人民的幸福指数并没有随着经济增长而提升。
剑桥雅思11 test4 写作 task2考点解析
雅思为各位考生推荐复习材料-剑11 test4 写作 task2考点解析，本单元其他相关写作解析，请点击：剑11 test4写作 task1-“饼状图分析”。
剑桥雅思11Test4写作大作文写作思路解析：
1. 话题和题型分类
政府类;双边讨论题型
2. 题目分析
很多政府机构认为经济发展才是他们最重要的目标，而有些人认为对于一个国家而言，其他方面的发展进步有同等的重要性
3. 思路提示
A. 认为经济发展是最重要目标：
经济发展是衡量一个国家实力的重要因素，它是保障人民生活水平的重要指标
没有经济上的发展和进步，就无从说其他方面的发展
经济发展的好，才有更多的资金投入在相对落后的方面，促进它们的发展
B. 认为其他方面的发展进步有同等重要性:
光发展经济，而不注重其他方面的发展，比如文化艺术，人们的精神生活得不到满足
经济发展和某些方面的发展是相辅相成，相互促进的，比如说科技发展等，不关注这些方面
的发展进步，也不能保证良好的经济发展
社会日益进步，全球化发展也日新月异，经济发展不再是衡量一个国家综合实力的唯一标准。
雅思考试阅读全面解析及答案(17)
第一个是选择他的著作流行和对世界的广泛影响；第二个是他早期的publishing；第三个是写BLALANCED MANAGEMENT；第四个是PRO AND CON； 第五个是find fault with DRUKER；第六个是the changing role of the employee.（不太肯定的有一个）
题目类型
Heading
Y/N/NG (3)
多选
参考答案
List of headings：
答案一：
第一段 总述了一下他的成就，写过n本书，影响遍布各个角落第二段 他早期的三本书及大致内容，其中有一本现在还在印刷第三段 写此人的几个重要思想, 其中有好多他的经典理论
第四段 一些人的针对性批评第五段 这些批评有的对有的不对，举了例子来辩护后面还有一段/2段，不太记得了
雅思考试阅读全面解析及答案(17)
文章标题
A Famous Management scholar彼得德鲁克
文章大意
讲一个人，他是管理学的开创者（pioneer of the business management），第一个把管理学从经济领域扩大到其他行业的。文中大篇幅的讲了管理者应该转变观念，视员工为knowledge source 而不是work machine。 管理者和员工不仅仅是老板和雇员的系，而是更介于其中的一种，有一个词不会翻译, 还有提到管理者应该来制定长远计划，而员工应该有自由来决定用什么方法去实现。
Y/N/NG: 1. 此人认为员工和老板应该有一样的地位 (yes/ NG 不详) 2. 第二题:政府能决定经济(NG) 3. 政治家无法控制经济发展这一项 选择NG
多选：
1，哪两项是他的观点
貌似是CD 选项是他认为管理学应该超出管理的范围；员工管理要平衡（大意，记不清了）
工业化雅思大作文
工业化雅思大作文说起工业化呀，那可真是个超级有趣又复杂的事儿呢。
一、工业化的好处。
1. 经济增长方面。
首先啊，工业化就像是给一个国家或地区打了一针经济强心剂。
你看啊，那些大工厂一个个建立起来，就像魔法盒子一样，不断生产出各种各样的产品。
比如说汽车工厂，一辆辆汽车从流水线上开下来，这些汽车不仅可以满足国内人们的出行需求，还能出口到其他国家，赚大把大把的外汇呢。
这就使得国家的经济总量蹭蹭往上涨，就像气球被吹起来一样，老百姓的口袋也慢慢鼓起来了。
2. 就业机会方面。
工业化就像一个超级大的就业市场。
大工厂需要各种各样的工人，从操作机器的普通工人，到设计产品的工程师，再到管理工厂运营的管理人员。
那些原本可能只能在农田里种地或者无所事事的人，现在有机会进入工厂工作，每个月能拿到稳定的工资。
这就像给人们打开了一扇新的大门，让大家有机会过上更好的生活。
我有个朋友，他以前在农村老家，收入很低。
后来到了一个工业化城市的工厂工作，现在都能在城里买房了呢。
3. 科技创新方面。
在工业化的进程中，科技创新就像一个调皮的小精灵，总是在旁边蹦跶着给我们惊喜。
工厂为了提高生产效率、降低成本、生产出更好的产品，就会不断投入资金进行研发。
就拿手机来说吧，以前的手机又大又笨，只能打电话和发短信。
但是随着工业化带动的科技发展，现在的手机简直就是一个超级小电脑，能拍照、能上网、能玩各种各样的游戏。
这都是因为工业化的环境促使企业不断竞争、创新，就像一群小朋友在比赛看谁能做出最酷的东西一样。
二、工业化的坏处。
1. 环境问题方面。
不过呢，工业化这个家伙有时候也会调皮捣蛋，给我们带来不少麻烦，环境问题就是其中一个大麻烦。
那些工厂的大烟囱就像一个个张着大口的怪物，不停地往外吐黑烟。
还有工厂排放的污水，就像一条条黑色的毒蛇，流进河流、湖泊里，把原本清澈的水变得又脏又臭。
我记得有一次去一个工业小镇，那里的天空总是灰蒙蒙的，河水也是黑乎乎的，鱼都死光光了，周围的居民也老是生病。
经济essay范文-概述说明以及解释
经济essay范文-范文模板及概述示例1:标题：全球化对经济的影响导论：全球化是当今世界经济中一个日益重要的趋势。
自从20世纪90年代以来，随着技术的发展和交通的便利，全球化已经成为加速国际贸易和跨国投资的推动力。
本文将探讨全球化对经济的影响，并分析其带来的优势和挑战。
主体段落1：全球化促进了经济增长全球化扩大了市场规模，促进了国际贸易的发展。
它消除了贸易壁垒，降低了跨国贸易的成本。
跨国公司能够利用全球供应链，获得更多的资源和市场机会。
此外，全球化还推动了知识和技术的传播，促进了创新和技术进步。
这些因素共同作用，为各国经济带来了更多的机会和更高的增长潜力。
主体段落2：全球化带来了经济合作与互相依存全球化加强了国家之间的经济合作与互相依存。
国家之间通过各种贸易协议和经济合作组织加强联系，共同应对全球经济挑战。
国际金融体系的发展使得金融市场更加连通，为资金流动和投资提供了更多机会。
同时，国家之间的合作也推动了技术和知识的交流与共享，加速了创新和发展。
主体段落3：全球化面临的挑战尽管全球化带来了很多好处，但也存在一些挑战。
贫富差距扩大、劳工条件恶化、环境破坏等问题引起了关注。
全球化也可能加剧了一些国家和地区之间的不平等，增加了社会和经济的不稳定性。
此外，全球化也可能导致国家失去经济自主权，过度依赖外国资本和技术。
这些挑战要求国家制定更好的政策和措施，确保全球化的效益可以被更广泛地分享。
结论：全球化已经深刻地改变了世界经济格局。
它促进了经济增长、增加了国家间的经济合作与依存，并推动了技术和知识的传播。
然而，全球化也面临一些挑战，包括不平等、不稳定性和失去经济自主权等问题。
为了更好地应对这些挑战，国家需要采取合适的政策和措施来确保全球化的益处能够更加广泛地惠及人民。
只有通过合作与协商，我们才能共同推动全球经济的可持续发展。
示例2:以下是一个关于经济的essay范文：题目：全球贸易对经济增长的影响引言：全球贸易已成为现代经济的重要组成部分，对于促进经济增长、创造就业机会以及提升国家竞争力都起到了重要作用。
palm oil雅思阅读解析
1.引言Palm oil这个话题在当今社会中备受关注。
它是世界上最重要的农业原料之一，用作食品、生物燃料、化妆品等。
然而，与此它也引发了一系列的争议和讨论。
在本文中，我们将对palm oil进行深入探讨，了解它的产地、用途、影响以及相关的雅思阅读解析。
2.产地在讨论palm oil的使用和影响之前，了解它的产地是很重要的。
全球有几个主要的产油地区，其中包括东南亚国家，如印度尼西亚和马来西亚。
这些国家的热带气候和丰富的土壤使得它们成为了palm oil的主要生产地。
3.用途不同于其他植物油，palm oil在食品工业、生物燃料和化妆品等领域都有着广泛的应用。
在食品工业中，它可以用来制作巧克力、饼干、面包等；在生物燃料领域，它可以被提炼成生物柴油；而在化妆品方面，它则被用作皮肤护理产品的原料。
4.影响然而，palm oil的广泛使用也带来了诸多负面影响。
首先是对环境的影响。
大量的棕榈油种植导致了热带雨林的砍伐和生态系统的破坏，这对于全球的生态环境造成了严重的影响。
其次是对当地社区和居民的影响。
种植棕榈油往往伴随着土地占用、人口迁徙以及劳工问题，这些都会对当地的社会稳定和居民的生活产生负面影响。
5.雅思阅读解析在雅思阅读考试中，palm oil往往也会成为一道热门的阅读题目。
通过阅读相关文章和资料，考生可以了解关于palm oil的背景信息、当前的使用情况以及可能的解决方案。
在解析这类文章时，考生需要注意抓住关键信息，理清文章的逻辑结构，同时也要学会运用正确的阅读技巧，比如定位关键词、猜测词义等。
6.讨论和总结palm oil作为一种重要的农业原料，其产地、用途和影响都备受关注。
然而，其广泛使用也同时引发了诸多争议和讨论。
在解析相关文章时，考生需要对这些争议有所了解，并且学会从客观的角度去分析和评价。
也希望相关产业和科研机构能够加强对palm oil的管理和监测，从而使其在保障全球供应的也能够更好地保护环境和社会利益。
c9t1p1雅思写作范文
c9t1p1雅思写作范文
关于这个主题，有大量的论点和证据可以呈现。
一方面，可以论证该行业对社会产生了积极影响，因为它提供了就业机会、税收收入和对其他行业的支持。
另一方面，也可以提出论据证明该行业造成了负面后果，例如环境污染、社会不公正和消费者剥削。
在评估该行业的整体影响时，重要的是要考虑所有这些因素。
该行业既带来了好处，也带来了挑战，在形成意见之前权衡这些因素至关重要。
该行业的经济影响是显而易见的。
它创造了大量的就业机会，为个人和家庭提供了收入来源。
它还为政府提供了税收收入，可用于资助公共服务。
此外，该行业还为其他行业提供了支持，例如运输、零售和制造业。
然而，该行业也对环境产生了重大影响。
其运营过程产生了空气和水污染，其产品的使用也产生了废物。
此外，该行业被指控对其工人的待遇不公平和剥削。
工人可能面临低工资、危险的工作条件和缺乏基本权利。
该行业对消费者也有重大影响。
行业内的企业经常被指控使用
不公平的营销策略、销售劣质产品以及从事欺骗性行为。
这可能导
致消费者信任受损和财务损失。
在权衡该行业的利弊时，重要的是要考虑所有这些因素。
该行
业既有积极的影响，也有消极的影响，在形成意见之前权衡这些因
素至关重要。
最终，该行业的总体影响是一个复杂的问题，没有简单的答案。
在形成意见之前，权衡所有证据并考虑行业对经济、社会和环境的
影响至关重要。
雅思写作之6大写作话题解析
雅思写作之6大写作话题解析雅思大作文写作话题许多，雅思写作高频话题有政府类，社会类，教育类，环境类，科技类，媒体类及犯罪类等。
今日我给大家带来了雅思写作之6大写作话题解析,盼望能够关心到大家，一起来学习吧。
雅思写作之6大写作话题解析雅思写作解析—政府类写作话题政府类的考题基本围绕政府的责任和政府投资进行。
比如政府是否应当禁烟，政府的钱应当花在哪些方面，艺术，体育，健康，教育，养老，国际救济等等。
1. Some people say the government should not put money in the arts, such as music, opera and paintings, but instead should spend more money on basic facility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 政府投资艺术还是基础设施建设。
2. Some people said the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums, and they should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree? 政府投资体育消遣还是医疗教育。
3. Some people say that the government should pay for the health and education of its citizens, but other people say that it is not the government’s responsibility. What is your opinion? 政府是否应当担当人们的医疗教育。
雅思大作文高分范文其实，经济和环境可以平衡！
雅思大作文高分范文其实，经济和环境可以平衡！听说每个高分烤鸭都星标了新航道3分钟学雅思雅思大作文真题直击 | | 栏目推送说明分享雅思考试大作文真题范文。
每一篇范文都经由专业团队反复校对，最终外教审查定稿。
成功就是日复一日那一点点小小努力的积累。
本期大作文供稿：章跃9月7日大作文题目☟☟☟Some people say that the economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger; while some say that economic growth is harmful to the environment, so we must stop it now.Discuss both of the views and give your own opinion.高分范文☟☟☟Although pharmaceutical sales make trillions of dollars every year, it is unfair to say that pharmaceutical companies rake in money and do nothing else. As a matter of fact, many of the companies fare with good ethics and g lobal citizenship, and are rather generous in developing medications to help poorcountries. That does not conflict with their business nature.习作（黑色）--- 修改（橘色）：Admittedly, economic growth needs to exploit energy and build plants which may produce pollution and damage the environment 措辞方式/说法可以变一变→pollution often comes with economic growth, and humans often rob the environment of natural resources ←动词概念更形象. For instance, in some countries, severe deforestation is attributed to←动词是句子的核心，选用这个动词词组，会让人误解为句子想表达的是“因果关系”，其实肯定想表达的是“发生了什么不好的事情”，所以用→happens because of excessive logging for constructing houses 当动词后的宾语不明确的时候，把动词变成名词→construction or manufacturing. However, it does not mean that economic growth should be stopped. As a matter of fact, recent years have witnessed a growing trend that countries developing green economy, and such as using clean energy and producing energy-saved energy-efficient machines those counties have seen a harmonious relation between the development of economy and environmental preservation. ←措辞方式/说法可以变一变is promoted in recent years and the awareness of protecting environment is improved among people.习作（黑色）--- 修改（橘色）：when a nation has enough wealth that the nation’s people do not struggle with poverty or hunger. ←强调原因状语的强调句。