Affirmtive Action-美国“权利法案”的英文辩论稿

合集下载

英美宪法对比英文作文

英美宪法对比英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!The Constitution of the United States is a very important document. It sets out the basic principles and structure of the government. It gives people certain rights and freedoms.In the UK, the constitution is not written in onesingle document. It is made up of many different laws and traditions. It also has its own unique features.The US Constitution emphasizes separation of powers. It divides the government into different branches to ensure checks and balances.In the UK, the parliamentary system plays a crucial role. The power of the government is centered around Parliament.The rights and freedoms protected by the USConstitution are widely known. They are an important partof American society.In the UK, the rights and freedoms are also respected, but they may be expressed and protected in different ways.。

[权利法案].United.States.Bill.of.Rights

权利法案原文第一条 Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.译文：国会不得制定关于下列事项的法律：确立国教或禁止信教自由；剥夺言论自由或出版自由；或剥夺人民和平集会和向政府请愿伸冤的权利。

第二条 Amendment IIA well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.译文：纪律严明的民兵是保障自由州的安全所必需的，人民持有和携带武器的权利不可侵犯。

第三条 Amendment IIINo Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.译文：未经房主同意，士兵平时不得驻扎在任何住宅；除依法律规定的方式，战时也不得驻扎。

第四条 Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.译文：人民的人身、住宅、文件和财产不受无理搜查和扣押的权利，不得侵犯。

如何看待配额情况英语作文

如何看待配额情况英语作文Title: Understanding Affirmative Action: A Balanced Perspective。

In today's society, affirmative action policies have sparked debates and controversies regarding their efficacy and ethical implications. Some view them as necessary measures to address historical injustices and promote diversity, while others argue that they breed inequalityand undermine meritocracy. In this essay, we will explore the multifaceted nature of affirmative action, examiningits rationale, impact, and potential alternatives.Affirmative action refers to policies that aim to increase the representation of historically marginalized groups in areas such as education, employment, and business. These policies often involve preferential treatment or quotas to ensure equal opportunities for underrepresented minorities. Proponents argue that such measures are necessary to counteract systemic discrimination and levelthe playing field for individuals who have beenhistorically disadvantaged due to factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status.One of the primary arguments in favor of affirmative action is its role in promoting diversity and inclusivity. By actively seeking out candidates from diverse backgrounds, institutions can create environments that reflect the broader society and foster understanding and cooperation among people from different walks of life. Research has shown that diverse teams are often more innovative andbetter equipped to tackle complex problems, makingdiversity not only a moral imperative but also a practical necessity in today's globalized world.Furthermore, affirmative action can serve as a form of reparative justice, addressing the lingering effects ofpast discrimination and inequality. Centuries of systemic oppression have left certain groups at a significant disadvantage, both economically and socially. Affirmative action policies acknowledge these historical injustices and seek to rectify them by providing opportunities foradvancement and upward mobility to those who have been historically marginalized.However, critics of affirmative action argue that such policies can lead to reverse discrimination and undermine the principles of meritocracy. By prioritizing diversity over qualifications, they contend, institutions risk overlooking more qualified candidates in favor of those who belong to underrepresented groups. This, they argue, not only perpetuates unfairness but also creates resentment and division among individuals who feel unfairly disadvantaged by these policies.Moreover, some critics argue that affirmative action fails to address the root causes of inequality and may even exacerbate them by perpetuating stereotypes andstigmatizing beneficiaries. Rather than focusing on superficial measures such as quotas, they suggest, society should address the underlying structural barriers that perpetuate inequality, such as inadequate access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities.In light of these criticisms, it is essential to consider alternative approaches to promoting diversity and addressing inequality. One such approach is socioeconomic affirmative action, which takes into account not only race and gender but also factors such as income, education, and geographic location. By targeting individuals who face economic hardship regardless of their race or ethnicity, socioeconomic affirmative action can help address the intersectional nature of inequality and promote social mobility for all.Another alternative is to invest in programs that target the root causes of inequality, such as improving access to quality education and healthcare, expanding economic opportunities in underserved communities, and combating systemic discrimination in all its forms. By addressing these underlying issues, society can create a more equitable playing field for all individuals, regardless of their background or identity.In conclusion, affirmative action is a complex and contentious issue that elicits strong opinions from bothproponents and critics. While it has undoubtedly played a crucial role in promoting diversity and addressinghistorical injustices, it is not without its drawbacks and limitations. Moving forward, it is essential to strike a balance between promoting diversity and meritocracy, while also addressing the root causes of inequality through targeted interventions and systemic reforms. Only by taking a comprehensive and nuanced approach can we create a more just and inclusive society for all.。

African American, Affirmative action

Class text1.Based on the text and the presentation, retell the history of African American from slavery to civil right movement.(list the major milestone events).(1)Firstly, African Americans were brought to the US against their will to be sold as slaves. And they come to the US to better their living conditions.(2)Gradually, the slavery divided the US into two increasingly different sections: the southern states, in which black slavery became the basis of the economy, and the northern states, which chose to make slavery against the law. The long-term argument caused a war,known as Civil War, between the north and the south, with a consequence that the north winned and abolished the slavery. The African Americans became the free man. Since then, the trouble between blacks and whites began. The blacks’ conditions are even worse. They didn’t have the equal status and rights. They suffered racial segregation and other forms of discrimination.(3)These state of affairs remained unchanged until the United States Supreme Court declared racially segregated pubic schools did not provide equal educational opportunities for black Americans and were therefore illegal, which encourage black leaders like Martin Luther King to end racial segregation in all areas of American life. Civil Rights Movement, risen by black Americans, together with other races, made great success. Two laws are published: one law made it illegal to segregate public facilities, the other law made it illegal to deny black people the right to vote in elections.2.What does affirmative action mean? Explain the term in you own words and cite examples if necessary?Affirmative action is a federal program requiring employers actively seek blacks workers and universities to recruit black students. The federal government distributes relative quota to each company and university according to their percentage among all races, the purpose of which was to reduce discrimination and racial segregation.。

美国法律英文作文

美国法律英文作文英文：As a legal professional in the United States, I have a deep understanding of the complexities of American law. One of the most significant aspects of American law is its federal system, which divides power between the national government and individual states. This means that each state has its own set of laws and regulations, in addition to federal laws that apply across the entire country.One example of this is the difference in gun laws between states. Some states have very strict gun laws, while others have more relaxed regulations. For instance,in California, individuals must obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon, while in Texas, anyone over the age of 21 can carry a concealed weapon without a permit. This illustrates how state laws can vary widely, even on a topic as controversial as gun control.Another important aspect of American law is the role of the judiciary. The United States has a common law system, which means that judges have the power to interpret and apply the law in individual cases. This allows for a great deal of flexibility in the legal system, as judges can adapt the law to fit the specific circumstances of each case. However, it also means that the law can be somewhat unpredictable, as different judges may interpret the law in different ways.Overall, American law is a complex and multifaceted system that requires a great deal of expertise to navigate. From the federal system to the role of the judiciary, there are many factors that contribute to the legal landscape in the United States.中文：作为美国的法律专业人士，我深刻理解美国法律的复杂性。

Affirmative action维权法案

as George Sher believe that affirmative
action devalues the accomplishments of people who are chosen based on the social group to which they belong rather than their qualifications, thus rendering affirmative action counterproductive.
March 1961. It was used to promote actions that achieve nondiscrimination. In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued Executive Order 11246 which required government employers to take "affirmative action" to "hire without regard to race, religion and national origin". In
harms, or hindrances, in particular addressing the apparent social imbalance
left in the wake of slavery and slave laws.
Criticism
OpponentBiblioteka of affirmative action such
1967, sex was added to the anti-discrimination list.
Affirmative action or positive discrimination is the policy of favoring

公正护权益的英语作文

Justice is a fundamental principle that underpins the social fabric and ensures that every individuals rights are protected and respected.In an ideal society,justice should not be a privilege for the few but a right for all.The following essay will explore the importance of justice in safeguarding rights and the role it plays in maintaining social harmony.The Concept of JusticeJustice is often defined as the principle of fairness and reasonableness in the way people are treated.It is the cornerstone of a just society where laws are applied equally to everyone,regardless of their social status,wealth,or influence.In the context of rights, justice means that every individual has the opportunity to access legal recourse and protection without bias or discrimination.The Importance of Justice in Protecting Rights1.Equal Opportunity:Justice ensures that everyone has an equal chance to express their grievances and seek redress.This is crucial for the protection of fundamental rights such as freedom of speech,the right to a fair trial,and the right to life.2.Prevention of Abuse:When justice is upheld,it acts as a deterrent against the abuse of power.It prevents those in positions of authority from exploiting their roles to infringe upon the rights of others.3.Social Stability:A society where justice is a norm experiences less conflict and unrest. People are more likely to trust the system when they believe that their rights are safeguarded and that justice will be served.4.Economic Growth:Justice creates a level playing field for economic activities.It prevents monopolies and unfair practices,allowing for fair competition and fostering an environment conducive to innovation and growth.The Role of Institutions in Upholding Justice1.Judicial System:The judiciary plays a pivotal role in interpreting and enforcing laws that protect rights.An independent and impartial judiciary is essential for the delivery of justice.2.Legislative Bodies:Lawmakers are responsible for creating laws that reflect the principles of justice and protect the rights of citizens.They must ensure that laws areupdated to address new challenges and societal changes.w Enforcement:Police and other law enforcement agencies are tasked with the enforcement of laws in a manner that is just and unbiased.They must respect the rights of individuals while carrying out their duties.cation and Awareness:Educating the public about their rights and the importance of justice is crucial.An informed society is more likely to demand and uphold justice.Challenges to JusticeDespite the importance of justice,there are numerous challenges that can impede its realization:1.Corruption:Corruption within institutions can undermine the delivery of justice, leading to the protection of the guilty and the punishment of the innocent.2.Social Inequality:Deeprooted social inequalities can result in a justice system that favors the privileged,leaving the marginalized without adequate protection.ck of Access:In some regions,access to justice is limited due to geographical, financial,or cultural barriers.ConclusionJustice is indispensable for the protection of rights and the maintenance of a stable and prosperous society.It requires the collective effort of individuals,institutions,and governments to ensure that it is upheld.By addressing the challenges and strengthening the institutions that deliver justice,we can work towards a society where everyones rights are respected and protected.。

安全与自由的英语辩论正方辩词

安全与自由的英语辩论正方辩词Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, fellow debaters, and audience members,I stand before you today as a representative of the affirmative side, arguing in favor of the proposition that security and freedom are not mutually exclusive, but rather are interdependent and complementary. It is often claimed that in the pursuit of security, we must sacrifice our freedom, or vice versa. However, I firmly believe that these two concepts can coexist harmoniously, and I will present you with several compelling reasons that support this viewpoint.First and foremost, security is inherently intertwined with freedom. Without a certain level of security, our freedom is indeed compromised. We need to feel safe and free from harm in order to exercise our rights and liberties to the fullest extent. For instance, if we live in fear of constant threats, be they physical, economic, or psychological, our ability to express ourselves, to engage in open discussions, and to actively participate in society diminishes. Security provides the foundation upon which our freedom is built. Moreover, when we ensure the safety of individuals and communities, we create an environment that fosters personal development and societal progress. By establishing safety nets and protective measures, we enable individuals to explore new ideas, take risks, and innovate. Whether it is in the fields of arts, science, or entrepreneurship, security provides the necessary peace of mind for individuals to venture beyond their comfort zones and contribute to the betterment of society. Without security, we wouldbe confined to a state of constant distress and fear, hindering our ability to reach our full potential.Furthermore, it is important to note that security does not have to result in the erosion of personal freedoms. Through responsible governance and the rule of law, it is possible to strike a balance between security and freedom. Effective legislation and policies can safeguard both individual rights and societal well-being. These measures can include strong legal frameworks for protecting civil liberties, guaranteeing due process, and maintaining checks and balances. By incorporating democratic principles, transparency, and accountability, we can ensure that security measures do not overstep their boundaries and encroach upon our freedom.In addition, advancements in technology offer us new solutions to enhance security without compromising freedom. Surveillance systems, for example, can be implemented in public spaces to improve security and prevent crime, while strict regulations ensure that privacy rights are respected. Encryption and cyber-security measures can safeguard personal information and sensitive data, maintaining individual freedoms in the digital realm. It is important to embrace these technological advancements while simultaneously safeguarding against potential abuses, striking the right balance between security and privacy.In conclusion, it is clear that security and freedom are not opposing forces, but rather mutually reinforcing. By ensuring the safety and well-being of individuals and communities, we create an environment that promotes and protects personal freedoms. Through responsible governance, the rule of law, andadvancements in technology, we can strike a delicate balance between security and freedom. It is essential that we continue to prioritize both security and freedom in order to truly thrive as individuals and as a society. Thank you.。

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

Con: When there exists discrimination, then there comes Affirmative Action. As we all can see, although racial segregation has been banned lawfully, discrimination still exists everywhere. For example, jobs and opportunities of receiving education were distributed unfairly. The colored people and woman who suffer from low levels of early education were always having trouble to find jobs or go to universities. It’s not equal at all. As minorities, they can hardly beat the majority, so it’s necessary to protect their rights lawfully.Pro: The thoughts might be good, but the action has gone too far. It is out of the question to fight against discrimination with the help of discrimination, only to change the target from minority groups to the majority group. Giving advantages to the minority when it comes to job finding or other cases is actually discrimination against the majority. It is not only against the constitution because of its actual inequality, but also hurting the better educated but less racial advantaged groups.Con: This is not a reason to blame the affirmative action. In fact, equality should not be always pursuing when you are formulating policies. For example, taxing more to the rich obviously h urts the principle of equality, but it’s fair. Fairness is better to be pursued within policy formulation. Affirmative action is such a kind of inequal but fair policy. Also, it’s not actually discrimination, it’s inclusion. It’s an effort to overcome prej udice rather than a new type of discrimination. Those who benefit from the action would say it.Pro: But how did the action proceeds? Through quota? The creed of the action is undoubtedly good, but the ways to do the action are rigid and unreasonable. The quota is a fixed number, but the real situation might be so complicated that a number can never be fitful every time. Results have shown that about half of black college students rank in the bottom 20 percent of their classes. That is eventually frustrating them, not helping them.Con: But we have offered them opportunity. Fair opportunities. Once these opportunities are offered, it will depend on themselves to achieve their success. The example you mentioned might be caused by a lot of reasons, it is unfair to just blame the affirmative action. I can give a better example that women are actually benefiting from the action. According to a 1995 study, there are at least six million women who simply wouldn't have the jobs they have today without the action.Pro: But how about Asians? The situation that Asian Americans are still suffering from low university admissive rates shows that the affirmative action doesn’t let people of all races enjoy that so-called fair opportunities. Asians are actually suffering from it. They are still facing prejudice.Con: It is not the fault of the affirmative action, but the long-standing stereotype that Asians are congenital advantageous in academics. They always have better ranks in exams, therefore, some conventional white Americans may set implicit quotas to restrict them. That’s what the affirmative action are fighting against too. The affirmative action is trying to make sure that diversity in workplaces or universities is guaranteed, and it to some extent has achieved the goal. There is no reason for the action itself to discriminate some specific races.P ro: Diversity? I don’t think specifically promoting some races’ rights would improve diversity. The implementation is often solely based on superficial factors rather than really-in-need sorts of diversity such as aspect diversity and viewpoint diversity. The truth is that taking only superficial conditions in consideration can never really achieve fairness that the action want to achieve. The inner class inequality might destroy the beautiful dreams. It turns out thatpeople benefit from the action tend to be middle- and upper-class African Americans and Hispanics. But lower-class white Americans as well as Asian Americans are suffering from it. In a word, the whole action is just like a compensation action rather than an action aiming at fairness and equality.Con: You have totally mistaken it! The affirmative action is aiming at distributing opportunity fairly among all of the racial groups. Property, family fame and other factors should not be considered in this situation. Let the welfare policy do the job. The affirmative action is made to protect the lawful rights of the minorities. I admit that there shall be more relevant policies to prevent the situations that you have mentioned, but the action itself is necessary to make them receive fair opportunities.Pro: But as I have mentioned, in regarding to the reverse discrimination that it has caused, such kinds of imperfections are harming universal human rights. And, since it may beneficial to the minorities at a short period, it is harmful in a long term. Affirmative action carries with it a stigma that can create feelings of self-doubt and entitlement in minorities, which will never contribute to racial equality.。