河道采砂条件下堤防工程边坡稳定风险分析(英文)
外文翻译外文文献英文文献国际建设工程风险分析

外文文献:This analysis used a case study methodology to analyze the issues surrounding the partial collapse of the roof of a building housing the headquarters of the Standards Association of Zimbabwe (SAZ). In particular, it examined the prior roles played by the team of construction professionals. The analysis revealed that the SAZ’s traditional construction project was generally characterized by high risk. There was a clear indication of the failure of a contractor and architects in preventing and/or mitigating potential construction problems as alleged by the plaintiff. It was reasonable to conclude that between them the defects should have been detected earlier and rectified in good time before the partial roof failure. It appeared justified for the plaintiff to have brought a negligence claim against both the contractor and the architects. The risk analysis facilitated, through its multi-dimensional approach to a critical examination of a construction problem, the identification of an effective risk management strategy for future construction prject and riskThe structural design of the reinforced concrete elements was done by consulting engineers Knight Piesold (KP). Quantity surveying services were provided by Hawkins, Leshnick & Bath (HLB). The contract was awarded to Central African Building Corporation (CABCO) who was also responsible for the provision of a specialist roof structure using patented “gang nail” roof trusses. The building construction proceeded to completion and was handed over to the owners on Sept. 12, 1991. The SAZ took effective occupation of the headquarters building without a certificate of occupation. Also, the defects liability period was only three months .The roof structure was in place 10 years At first the SAZ decided to go to arbitration, but this failed to yield an immediate solution. The SAZ then decided toproceed to litigate in court and to bring a negligence claim against CABCO. The preparation for arbitration was reused for litigation. The SAZ’s quantified losses stood at approximately $ 6 million in Zimbabwe dollars (US $1.2m) .After all parties had examined the facts and evidence before them, it became clear that there was a great probability that the courts might rule that both the architects and the contractor were lia ble. It was at this stage that the defendants’ lawyers requested that the matter be settled out of court. The plaintiff agreed to this suxamined the prior roles played by the project management function and construction professionals in preventing/mitigating potential construction problems. It further assessed the extent to which the employer/client and parties to a construction contract are able to recover damages under that contract. The main objective of this critical analysis was to identify an effective risk management strategy for future construction projects. The importance of this study is its multidimensional examination approach.Experience sugge be misleading. All construction projects are prototypes to some extent and imply change. Change in the construction industry itself suggests that past experience is unlikely to be sufficient on its own. A structured approach is required. Such a structure can not and must not replace the experience and expertise of the participant. Rather, it brings additional benefits that assist to clarify objectives, identify the nature of the uncertainties, introduces effective communication systems, improves decision-making, introduces effective risk control measures, protects the project objectives and provides knowledge of the risk history .Construction professionals need to know how to balance the contingencies of risk with their specific contractual, financial, operational and organizational requirements. Many construction professionals look at risks in dividually with a myopic lens and donot realize the potential impact that other associated risks may have on their business operations. Using a holistic risk management approach will enable a firm to identify all of the organization’s business risks. This will increas e the probability of risk mitigation, with the ultimate goal of total risk elimination .Recommended key construction and risk management strategies for future construction projects have been considered and their explanation follows. J.W. Hinchey stated th at there is and can be no ‘best practice’ standard for risk allocation on a high-profile project or for that matter, any project. He said, instead, successful risk management is a mind-set and a process. According to Hinchey, the ideal mind-set is for the parties and their representatives to, first, be intentional about identifying project risks and then to proceed to develop a systematic and comprehensive process for avoiding, mitigat and its location. This is said to be necessary not only to allow alternative responses to be explored. But also to ensure that the right questions are asked and the major risks identified. Heads of sources of risk are said to be a convenient way of providing a structure for identifying risks to completion of a participant’s pa rt of the project. Effective risk management is said to require a multi-disciplinary approach. Inevitably risk management requires examination of engineering, legal and insurance related solutions .It is stated that the use of analytical techniques based on a statistical approach could be of enormous use in decision making . Many of these techniques are said to be relevant to estimation of the consequences of risk events, and not how allocation of risk is to be achieved. In addition, at the present stage of the development of risk management, Atkinson states that it must be recognized that major decisions will be made that can not be based solely on mathematical analysis. The complexity ofconstruction projects means that the project definition in terms of both physical form and organizational structure will be based on consideration of only a relatively small number of risks . This is said to then allow a general structured approach that can be applied to any construction project to increase the awareness of participants .The new, simplified Construction Design and Management Regulations (CDM Regulations) which came in to f 1996, into a single regulatory package.The new CDM regulations offer an opportunity for a step change in health and safety performance and are used to reemphasize the health, safety and broader business benefits of a well-managed and co-ordinated approach to the management of health and safety in construction. I believe that the development of these skills is imperative to provide the client with the most effective services available, delivering the best value project possible.Construction Management at Risk (CM at Risk), similar to established private sector methods of construction contracting, is gaining popularity in the public sector. It is a process that allows a client to select a construction manager (CM) based on qualifications; make the CM a member of a collaborative project team; centralize responsibility for construction under a single contract; obtain a bonded guaranteed maximum price; produce a more manageable, predictable project; save time and money; and reduce risk for the client, the architect and the CM.CM at Risk, a more professional approach to construction, is taking its place along with design-build, bridging and the more traditional process of design-bid-build as an established method of project delivery.The AE can review to get the projec. Competition in the community is more equitable: all subcontractors have a fair shot at the work .A contingency within the GMP covers unexpected but justifiable costs, and a contingency above the GMP allows for client changes. As long as the subcontractors are within the GMP they are reimbursed to the CM, so the CM represents the client in negotiating inevitable changes with subcontractors.There can be similar problems where each party in a project is separately insured. For this reason a move towards project insurance is recommended. The traditional approach reinforces adversarial attitudes, and even provides incentives for people to overlook or conceal risks in an attempt to avoid or transfer responsibility.A contingency within the GMP covers unexpected but justifiable costs, and a contingency above the GMP allows for client changes. As long as the subcontractors are within the GMP they are reimbursed to the CM, so the CM represents the client in negotiating inevitable changes with subcontractors.There can be similar problems where each party in a project is separately insured. For this reason a move towards project insurance is recommended. The traditional approach reinforces adversarial attitudes, and even provides incentives for people to overlook or conceal risks in an attempt to avoid or transfer responsibility.It was reasonable to assume that between them the defects should have been detected earlier and rectified in good time before the partial roof failure. It did appear justified for the plaintiff to have brought a negligence claim against both the contractor and the architects.In many projects clients do not understand the importance of their role in facilitating cooperation and coordination; the desi recompense. They do not want surprises, and are more likely to engage in litigation when things go wrong.中文译文:国际建设工程风险分析索赔看来是合乎情理的。
堤防工程施工风险评估方案

堤防工程施工风险评估方案1. 项目背景堤防工程是为了防止河流、湖泊、海洋等水体泛滥而建设的一种重要工程。
在施工过程中,受天气、地质、水文等因素的影响,存在着一定的风险。
因此,对堤防工程的施工风险进行评估是非常必要的。
2. 施工风险评估的意义通过对堤防工程施工风险的评估,可以及早发现潜在的危险,制定相应的风险防控措施,减少事故的发生,确保施工工程的安全进行。
同时,风险评估还可以为项目的安全生产提供参考依据,保障施工人员生命财产安全,避免造成不可挽回的损失。
3. 施工风险评估的内容堤防工程施工风险评估主要涉及以下内容:(1)地质条件评估:包括地质构造、地层特征、地形地貌等方面的评估,评估可能存在的滑坡、崩塌、沉陷等地质灾害风险。
(2)水文气象条件评估:对施工区域的水文、气象条件进行评估,预测可能出现的水患、风暴潮、风暴等自然灾害的影响。
(3)施工现场安全评估:对施工现场的安全条件进行评估,包括现场交通、作业环境、设施设备等方面的安全状况。
(4)人员素质与技术水平评估:对施工人员的素质和技术能力进行评估,确保施工人员具备相应的技能和安全意识。
(5)外部环境评估:包括项目所在地的社会、政治、环境等方面的评估,预测可能对施工造成影响的外部因素。
4. 施工风险评估方法为了全面评估堤防工程施工风险,可以采用以下方法:(1)文献资料分析:收集与施工地区相关的地质、水文气象、安全管理、工程勘测等方面的文献资料,进行综合分析。
(2)现场实地调查:对施工区域进行实地调查,获取相关现场数据,了解实际情况。
(3)专家咨询:邀请相关领域的专家进行咨询,获得专业意见。
(4)风险评估工具:使用专业的风险评估工具,对施工风险进行定量化评估。
5. 风险评估结果分析在完成风险评估后,需要对评估结果进行分析,识别出可能存在的风险点和风险因素,确定风险的等级和程度,为风险防控提供依据。
(1)风险点识别:根据评估结果,识别出可能的风险点,包括地质灾害、水患、安全事故等方面的风险。
基于Geo-Studio的堤防渗流与稳定分析

AutoBank软件分析河道堤防的渗流稳定性

AutoBank软件分析河道堤防的渗流稳定性李宇【摘要】我国河流众多,河系情况十分复杂.目前大部分河道堤防存在严重的渗漏问题,威胁水利工程及沿岸人民群众生命财产安全.AutoBank软件是对水利建筑物进行渗流分析的重要软件,文章以应用钠基膨润土防水毯作为防水材料的抚河河道为例,利用AutoBank软件计算渗流场,计算典型断面的单宽渗流量、水力梯度及浸润线,分析及评价钠基膨润土防水毯的实际防渗效果.【期刊名称】《中国水能及电气化》【年(卷),期】2019(000)001【总页数】5页(P50-54)【关键词】AutoBank;钠基膨润土防水毯;渗流分析【作者】李宇【作者单位】江西省赣抚平原水利工程管理局,江西南昌 330096【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TV223.41 概述AutoBank软件是用于渗流计算和稳定性分析的重要软件,其研究对象为堤防、水库大坝等水工建筑物,它既能计算稳定渗流场问题,又能处理非稳定饱和渗流场的问题。
AutoBank软件将三维的空间问题巧妙地简化为二维平面问题,其主界面是依托AutoCAD的界面设计的,使用者可以在界面中直接绘制简化模型。
在构建模型时,使用者应定义其宽度、高度、边坡比等,确定土层的材料和渗透系数,绘制出临界水位的高度,根据这些数据AutoBank软件利用有限元的原理进行渗流计算,求解渗流场,并将渗流场的计算结果以图表或数值的型式直观显示出来,包括等势线、浸润线、流速等值线图、流速矢量图、水力坡降等值线图等 [1]。
本文以江西省抚河河道为研究对象,防渗材料采用钠基膨润土防水毯,利用AutoBank软件进行渗流计算,分析其实际的作用效果。
钠基膨润土防水毯是新型的复合材料,是由两层土工合成材料夹封膨润土,利用针刺、黏结或缝合工艺等制作而成的,其中起防水作用的主要成分为蒙脱石[2]。
在遇水情况下,膨润土颗粒会迅速膨胀,挤压颗粒间存在的空气,形成一层致密的不透水层,从而起到挡水作用。
水位骤降和降雨条件下生态护坡稳定性分析

本, 还更利于渠坡和水体生态安全。 丰田等[4] 以乔 型) 、 Plate( 水平根型) 和 Heart( 散生根型) 3 种类型
木根和红黏土为材料开展了一系列大型直剪试验, 对 ( 见图 1) [14]。 其中: 油松、 云南松、 栓皮栎、 侧柏等
植被护坡中根土复合体抗剪强度与树根和土体间组合 植物的根系垂直向下延伸, 多为 Tap 型; 刺槐、 椎栗
Байду номын сангаас
Stability analysis of eco-slope protection under conditions of water level sudden drop and rainfall HU Wei1,2, CHEN Jianling3, LI Weihua3, SU Jingyi3, JIANG Zhongming1,2
况和工程成本合理选择生态护坡类型。
关键词: 生态护坡; 水位骤降; 降雨; 渗流场; 安全系数
doi: 10. 13928 / j. cnki. wrahe. 2021. 05. 018
开放科学( 资源服务) 标志码( OSID) :
中图分类号: TV 223
文献标志码: A
文章编号: 1000- 0860(2021)05- 0167- 08
Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Vol.52 No.5
167
胡 炜, 等 / / 水位骤降和降雨条件下生态护坡稳定性分析
influencing degree of the frontal rainfall is to be as well. The eco-slope protection can effectively alleviate the adverse impacts from water level sudden drop and rainfall on the seepage field and stability of the slope, for which the effect of the turf + arbor slope protection is the best, and then are arbor slope protection and turf slope protection; which is because the root systems of most of trees are Tap typed with more larger covering ranges. In the actual project, it is necessary to reasonably select the type of eco-slope in combination with the specific condition and the relevant construction cost. Keywords: eco-slope protection; water level sudden drop; rainfall; seepage field; safety coefficient
堤防工程服务中的风险评估与管理

堤防工程服务中的风险评估与管理堤防工程是为了保护河流、湖泊、海岸线等区域免受洪水、海潮侵袭的重要设施。
然而,在堤防工程的建设和运营过程中,存在着一定的风险,包括自然灾害、设计、施工和维护等方面的风险。
因此,进行堤防工程服务中的风险评估与管理是非常重要的。
首先,在堤防工程服务中进行风险评估是为了了解并识别潜在的风险,以便采取预防措施来降低风险的发生概率和影响程度。
风险评估应该综合考虑自然灾害、气候变化、地质条件和工程设计等因素,并对可能的风险进行定量或定性评估。
评估的结果应该提供给相关的决策者和利益相关者,以便他们可以制定相应的应对措施。
其次,堤防工程服务中的风险管理是指根据风险评估结果,制定并实施相应的管理措施,以减少风险的发生和影响。
风险管理包括风险控制、监测和应急响应等方面的内容。
在风险控制方面,可以采取一系列的技术措施来降低堤防工程的风险。
首先,在设计阶段应该考虑到各种可能的自然灾害情景,并根据设计要求和标准进行合理的设计。
其次,在施工阶段应该严格按照设计要求进行施工,确保堤防工程的质量和稳定性。
此外,对于一些特殊情况,如水位异常上升、土壤松动等,应该制定相应的应对措施,比如加固堤坝、排水等。
在监测方面,应该建立健全的监测系统来实时监测堤防工程的运行状态和变形情况。
这样可以及时发现堤防工程存在的异常情况,并采取相应的措施来进行修复和加固,以保证工程的安全运行。
在应急响应方面,应该建立完善的应急预案,制定应对不同风险情景的措施和紧急行动计划。
当发生风险事件时,可以快速、有效地进行救援和应急处置,减少损失和危害。
此外,堤防工程服务中的风险评估与管理还需要进行定期的评估和审核,以确保风险管理措施的有效性和可行性。
这样可以根据实际情况对措施进行调整和改进,提高风险管理的能力和水平。
总之,堤防工程服务中的风险评估与管理是非常重要的,它可以帮助我们识别风险、降低风险的发生概率和影响程度,并制定相应的措施来减少损失和危害。
水利危险源辨识与风险评价报告范文

水利危险源辨识与风险评价报告范文英文回答:Water resources are essential for human survival and development, but they can also pose risks and hazards if not properly managed. The identification and assessment of water-related hazards and risks is crucial for effective water resource management. In this report, I will provide a sample framework for identifying and evaluating water hazards and risks.Firstly, it is important to identify potential water hazards. These can include natural hazards such as floods, droughts, and landslides, as well as human-induced hazards such as water pollution and dam failures. By conducting a thorough assessment of the local environment, climate, and infrastructure, we can identify the specific hazards that are relevant to a particular area.Once the hazards are identified, the next step is toassess the risks associated with these hazards. Risk assessment involves evaluating the likelihood of a hazard occurring and the potential consequences it may have. This can be done through various methods, such as historical data analysis, modeling, and expert judgment.For example, let's consider the risk assessment for flooding in a coastal city. By analyzing historical flood data, we can determine the frequency and magnitude of past floods. We can also use hydrological modeling to simulate different flood scenarios and assess the potential impact on infrastructure, agriculture, and human lives. Additionally, consulting with local residents and experts can provide valuable insights into the vulnerabilities and coping capacities of the community.Based on the risk assessment, it is then possible to prioritize and develop appropriate risk management strategies. These can include structural measures like building flood defenses and reservoirs, as well as non-structural measures like early warning systems and land-use planning. The effectiveness of these strategies should beregularly evaluated and adjusted as necessary.In conclusion, the identification and assessment of water hazards and risks are essential for effective water resource management. By understanding the potential hazards and their associated risks, we can develop appropriate strategies to mitigate these risks and ensure the sustainable use of water resources.中文回答:水资源对于人类的生存和发展至关重要,但如果管理不当,也可能带来风险和危害。
河道施工安全风险评估

河道施工安全风险评估
对于河道施工的安全风险评估,可以考虑以下几个方面:
1. 河道水流:评估施工期间的水流情况,包括水流速度、水位变化等因素。
高速水流和水位变化可能导致施工人员被冲走或淹没的风险。
2. 地质和土壤条件:评估施工区域的地质和土壤条件,包括土质稳定性、滑坡、坍塌等风险。
地质条件差的地方可能存在施工过程中地面塌陷或滑坡的风险。
3. 施工设备和材料:评估使用的施工设备和材料是否符合安全标准,确保设备正常工作并防止发生意外事故。
4. 交通安全:评估施工期间的交通安全情况,包括道路交通是否受到影响、交通管制措施是否到位等。
5. 环境保护:评估施工对周围环境的影响,包括水污染、噪音污染等,确保施工不会对周围环境造成损害。
6. 人员安全培训:评估施工人员的安全培训情况,确保他们具备必要的安全意识和应对紧急情况的能力。
评估中还应考虑特定的施工方案和具体情况,根据评估结果采取相应的安全措施和应急预案,以最大程度地减少施工过程中的安全风险。
同时,施工方也应密切监测施工过程中的风险情况,及时采取措施进行管控和调整。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
governments in different places, on the one hand, have attacked the illegal activities of sand mining, and, on the other hand, have utilized river sand resources scientifically and rationally with sand exploitation planning as guidance. But there still exist two problems: first, sand mining contractors always try their best to over-exploit beyond the scope or depth, driven by their interests, and even under strict supervision; and second, the state of river flow changes after sand mining pits come into being, corroding the river bank or the slope of the levee. Experts and scholars are paying close attention to the heavy risk of slope instability caused by these two factors. River sand mining affects not only the levee of the reach containing the pit, but also the upper reaches of the pit in both vertical and horizontal directions, which causes incision deformation of riverbed. In the Chiding reach of the Xijiang River levee in Guangdong Province, after sand mining caused a sand pit in 1998, the riverbed was cut down by almost 2 m (Wang et al. 2004). Macdonald (1988) conducted systematic analyses of riverbed recovery in the sand mining reach of the American Naugatuck River and the floodplain near it. He predicted that channel recovery to pre-mining morphology was expected to require up to several hundred years for instream sites and longer for riparian pits. Mao (2003) simulated and studied the secondary flow problem of sand mining pits in natural rivers with the anisotropic three-dimensional algebraic stress turbulent model. The result demonstrated that sand mining changed the original steady state of the river, caused a vertical vortex along the mainstream direction, and scoured the upper edge of the sand pit, while the transverse secondary flow in the sand pit caused transversal erosion. Research on turbulent characteristics has indicated that sand mining have some negative influences on riverbed stability. Li (2008) indicated that sand mining lowered the upstream water level, and the height of the pit played a decisive role. Transverse circulation took place in some parts of the pits and scoured the lateral riverbed. The deeper the pit was and the larger the area was, the stronger the circulation flow would be. The speed of backward erosion was very fast, but the influencing distance was limited, and the stream-wise erosion downstream did not scour deeply, but the influencing distance was relatively large and deposition phenomena occurred after scouring. Consequently, in this study on the instability risk of levees under river sand mining conditions, we mostly focus on levees in reaches containing pits and in reaches upstream of the pits, as well as the instability risk caused by the uncertainty of slopes or levees. To study the instability risk of levee and dam projects, Wang et al. (1998) calculated the risk taking into account the physical and mechanical indices of the soil body under uncertain flood-preventing water levels, and calculated probability using the Monte Carlo (MC) method. By combining the reality of safe operation and management of the levee, Wu and Zhao (2003) proposed a risk estimation model and solution method based on the reliability theory with consideration of slope stability and seepage stability. The model was applied to the risk estimation system of parts of the Yangtze River levee. Cao (2006) and Srivastava and
Water Science and Engineering, 2012, 5(3): 340-349 doi:10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2012.03.009
e- slope instability of levees under river sand mining conditions
—————————————
This work was supported by the Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Water Resources of China (Grant No. 201001007). *Corresponding author (e-mail: zfwang@) Received Jun. 13, 2011; accepted Feb. 22, 2012
1 Introduction
Sand resources are abundant in some rivers, such as the Yangtze River and Pearl River in China. Sand is one of the components of the riverbed and also a construction material with high economic value. Since the beginning of the last century, illegal sand mining activities have been rampant in many rivers in China, which have caused a serious threat to the safety of levees. Take the Chiding reach of the Xijiang River in Guangdong Province of China as an example: its levee is an earth embankment with a total width of 6 m and a 5-m-wide concrete pavement. Illegal sand mining activities taking place before 2000 seriously corroded the lower part of this levee, and its bottom was heavily incised, which threatened the safety of the levee. Under these circumstances, a landslide finally took place in February of 2001, causing a 100-m-long levee to slip into the river (Wang et al. 2004). The largest river in South India, the Pamba River, also encountered similar incidents (Padmalal et al. 2008). In recent years, local