Prognostic Value of Serum Concentration of Heart-TypeFatty Acid-Binding Protein

合集下载

脂蛋白(a)颗粒浓度评估原发性高血压患者心血管风险的临床价值

脂蛋白(a)颗粒浓度评估原发性高血压患者心血管风险的临床价值

DOI:10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2020.10.06㊃临床实验研究㊃脂蛋白(a)颗粒浓度评估原发性高血压患者心血管风险的临床价值∗印中鹏1,吴嘉2,汪俊军1,2(1.南京医科大学附属金陵临床医学院,南京210002;2.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院临床检验科,南京210002)摘要:目的㊀通过分析原发性高血压患者血清脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]颗粒浓度与质量浓度,探讨血清Lp(a)水平对高血压患者心血管疾病风险评估的预测价值㊂方法㊀选取122例原发性高血压患者,按照中国高血压防治指南分为高风险组96例㊁低风险组26例;分别检测血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度以及血脂等其他生化参数㊂采用多元Logistic回归分析血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度对高血压患者心血管疾病风险分层的预测比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)㊂结果㊀高风险高血压患者的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度27.7(8.58,64.65)nmol/L㊁质量浓度148.00(54.00,338.50)mg/L均高于低风险患者5.80(2.75,14.53)nmol/L㊁42.50(23.75,84.00)mg/L,P均<0.001㊂相关性分析显示,高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度呈正相关(r=0.979,P<0.001),均与HDL⁃C浓度呈负相关(r=-0.233,P=0.012及r=-0.233,P=0.013)㊂多因素Logistic回归分析显示,血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度(OR=1.105,95%CI=1.017 1.199,P=0.018)㊁质量浓度(OR=1.016,95%CI=1.003 1.030,P=0.016)的升高与高血压患者心血管疾病风险的增高相关㊂结论㊀高心血管疾病风险的原发性高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度高于低风险患者;Lp(a)颗粒浓度有望成为高血压患者心血管疾病风险分层体系的辅助指标㊂关键词:原发性高血压;脂蛋白(a)颗粒;冠心病;风险评估中图分类号:R446㊀㊀㊀㊀文献标志码:AClinicalvalueoflipoprotein(a)particlesconcentrationforevaluatingcardiovascularriskinpatientswithessentialhypertensionYINZhongpeng1,WUJia2,WANGJunjun1,2(1.JinlingSchoolofClinicalMedicine,NanjingMedicalUniversity,Nanjing210002,Jiangsu;2.DepartementofClinicalLaboratory,EasternTheaterGeneralHospitalofPLA,Nanjing210002,Jiangsu,China)Abstrcat:Objective㊀Toanalyzetheconcentrationsofserumlipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)]particleandmassinpatientswithessentialhy⁃pertension,andexploretheprognosticvalueforcardiovascularriskassessmentofserumLp(a).Methods㊀Atotalof122patientswithessentialhypertensionweredividedintohigh⁃riskgroup(n=96)andlow⁃riskgroup(n=26)accordingtotheGuidelinesforPreven⁃tionandTreatmentofHypertensioninChina.Theparticleconcentration,massconcentrationofLp(a)inserumandotherrelatedbio⁃chemicalparametersweremeasuredrespectively.Multiplelogisticregressionanalysiswasusedtoanalyzetheoddratio(OR)and95%confidenceinterval(CI)ofserumLp(a)particleamountandmassconcentrationforstratificationofcardiovascularriskinthepatientswithessentialhypertension.Results㊀Theparticleconcentration[27.7(8.58to64.65)nmol/L]andmassconcentration[148.00(54.00to338.50)mg/L]ofserumLp(a)inthehypertensivepatientswithhighcardiovascularriskweresignificantlyhigherthanthosewithlowrisk[5.80(2.75to14.53)nmol/Land42.50(23.75to84.00)mg/L](P<0.001).TherewasasignificantpositivecorrelationbetweenserumLp(a)particleconcentrationandmassconcentrationinthepatientswithhypertension(r=0.979,P<0.001),butasignificantnegativecorrelationwithHDL⁃Cconcentration(r=-0.233,P=0.012andr=-0.233,P=0.013).MultipleLogisticregressionanalysisshowedthattheincreasesofserumLp(a)particleconcentration(OR=1.105,95%CI=1.017to1.199,P=0.018)andmassconcentration(OR=1.016,95%CI=1.003to1.030,P=0.016)werecloselyrelatedtoincreasesofcardiovascularriskinthepatientswithhypertension.Conclusion㊀TheconcentrationsofparticleandmassofserumLp(a)inthepatientswithessen⁃tialhypertensionwithhighcardiovascularriskwerehigherthanthosewithlowrisk.Lp(a)particleconcentrationisexpectedtobeaauxiliaryindicatorsforstratificationsystemofcardiovascularriskinthepatientswithhypertension.Keywords:essentialhypertension;lipoprotein(a)particles;coronaryheartdisease;riskassessment㊀㊀高血压和血脂异常均是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(arterioscleroticcardiovasculardisease,AsCVD)的重要危险因素,高血压伴有血脂异常可增加心血管事件的发生风险[1]㊂我国居民高血压的患病率呈逐年上升趋势,分析高血压患者血脂水平,并进行综合的心血管疾病风险评估,进而实施患者的综合㊃647㊃临床检验杂志2020年10月第38卷第10期㊀ChinJClinLabSci,Oct.2020,Vol.38,No.10∗基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81572074,81871702)㊂㊀㊀㊀㊀作者简介:印中鹏,1988年生,男,主管技师,大学本科,从事医学检验工作㊂㊀㊀㊀㊀通信作者:汪俊军,主任技师,教授,博士研究生导师,E⁃mail:wangjj9202@163.com㊂管理,是AsCVD整体防治工作的重要策略[2⁃3]㊂临床上常用的血脂指标有高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL⁃C)㊁低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL⁃C)㊁总胆固醇(TC)和三酰甘油(TG),但上述指标易受饮食㊁药物等影响,且无法准确反映病情严重程度,在评估心血管疾病风险方面的预测能力尚显不足;其他指标如脂蛋白(a)[lipoprotein(a),Lp(a)]等的应用价值则日益受到关注[4]㊂Lp(a)是国际动脉粥样硬化学会认定的AsCVD独立危险因素,具有明确的致动脉粥样硬化和促血栓形成的作用,其致病性甚至强于LDL⁃C等传统危险因子[5];Lp(a)浓度每增加3.5倍,罹患冠心病的风险将提高13%[6]㊂既往针对Lp(a)的检测多为质量浓度,但易受其多态性的影响造成检测结果高估或低估,导致风险分层错误;近年来,Lp(a)颗粒浓度逐渐受到临床关注;研究表明,Lp(a)颗粒浓度可准确检测Lp(a)微粒数量从而更好地预测心血管疾病风险[7⁃8]㊂目前尚未见有关高血压患者血清Lp(a)水平尤其是颗粒浓度对于其心血管疾病风险分层评估价值的报道㊂因此,本研究旨在分析不同心血管疾病风险高血压患者的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度与质量浓度,探讨血清Lp(a)水平对高血压患者心血管疾病风险评估的预测价值,以期为临床高血压患者心血管疾病风险分层体系提供新的辅助指标㊂1㊀对象与方法1.1㊀研究对象㊀连续选取2018年6月至2019年6月在解放军东部战区总医院心血管内科和神经内科首次确诊为原发性高血压的患者122例,其中男85例,女37例,年龄(55.0ʃ11.6)岁㊂诊断标准按照‘中国高血压防治指南2018年修订版“[9]:在未使用降压药物的情况下,非同日3次测量诊室血压,收缩压ȡ140mmHg和(或)舒张压ȡ90mmHg㊂所有入选病例均排除肾炎㊁贫血㊁肌无力或发作性瘫痪㊁阵发性头痛㊁心悸㊁多汗等与继发性高血压相关的疾病;同时排除脑卒中㊁瓣膜性心脏病㊁心肌病㊁肝肾功能不全㊁甲状腺功能异常㊁恶性肿瘤㊁血液系统疾病㊁全身免疫病㊁急慢性感染等㊂所有研究对象抽血前均未使用任何降压药㊁降脂药及消炎止痛药物㊂所有研究对象对标本科研用途均知情同意并签署书面函,本研究获得医院医学伦理学委员会批准许可(批准文号:2018NZGKJ⁃096)㊂1.2㊀标本采集与处理㊀采用分离胶真空采血管采集研究对象禁食8h以上的静脉血标本各5mL,采集后迅速分离血清,于当天完成检测或-80ħ保存并于3个月内完成检测㊂所有标本均须避免溶血㊁凝血㊁严重脂血㊂1.3㊀标本检测㊀血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度检测采用Co⁃basc8000全自动生化仪及其配套试剂(德国Roche公司)以胶乳增强免疫比浊法检测,单位为nmol/L㊂血清Lp(a)质量浓度检测采用日本关东化学株式会社试剂,以免疫比浊法检测,单位为mg/L;TC㊁TG㊁葡萄糖(Glu)检测采用日本Wako公司试剂;HDL⁃C㊁LDL⁃C㊁肌酐(Cr)㊁清蛋白(Alb)㊁高半胱氨酸(Hcy)检测采用日本第一化学药品株式会社试剂;C-反应蛋白(CRP)检测采用日本关东化学株式会社试剂;上述指标检测仪器均为日立7600全自动生化分析仪㊂各指标测定前均采用相应公司校准品定标,采用低㊁中和高值质控品进行室内质控,以保证结果准确性㊂1.4㊀高血压患者风险分层㊀所有入选高血压患者按照‘中国高血压防治指南2018年修订版“标准[9],根据血压水平的分类㊁心血管危险因素(如吸烟或被动吸烟㊁糖耐量受损㊁血脂异常㊁腹型肥胖㊁高Hcy血症等)㊁靶器官损害(如左心室肥厚㊁肾功能下降㊁微量Alb尿等)㊁临床并发症(包括脑血管病㊁心脏疾病㊁肾脏疾病㊁外周血管病㊁视网膜病变及糖尿病控制情况)综合评估心血管疾病风险水平,分为低危㊁中危㊁高危和很高危4个层次㊂1.5㊀统计学分析㊀采用SPSS19.0软件进行㊂数据分析前各组数据均采用Kolmogorov⁃Smirnov法检验其分布特征㊂正态分布数据以 xʃs表示,非正态分布数据以M(P25,P75)表示㊂正态分布数据两组间比较采用两组独立样本的t检验;偏态分布数据两组间比较采用Mann⁃WhitneyU检验㊂各组间率或构成比的比较采用卡方检验㊂采用Spearman相关性分析Lp(a)浓度与其他生化指标之间的相关性㊂采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析Lp(a)浓度预测高血压患者心血管疾病风险分层的比值比(oddsratio,OR)和95%置信区间(confidenceinter⁃val,CI)㊂以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义㊂2㊀结果2.1㊀不同心血管疾病风险高血压患者的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度和质量浓度㊀原发性高血压患者的临床和生化参数比较结果见表1㊂根据高血压患者心血管疾病风险分层标准,122例高血压患者中有6例低危㊁20例中危㊁26例高危和70例很高危患者;由于低危患者人数相对较少,本研究合并了低危和中危患者为低风险组,且鉴于临床针对高危和很高危患者的干预治疗策略基本一致,本研究也合并了高危和很高危患者为高风险组㊂按照试剂盒标注的参考区间,Lp(a)颗粒浓度判断限为75mmol/L㊁质量浓度判断限为300mg/L㊂高㊁低风险组高血压患者年龄㊁性别㊁收缩压㊁舒张压等差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)㊂与低风险组比较,高风险组血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度均升高(P均<0.05)㊂表1㊀不同心血管疾病风险高血压患者的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度和质量浓度参数高风险组(n=96)低风险组(n=26)统计量P值年龄(岁)55.77ʃ11.6951.92ʃ10.76t=-1.5130.133男性[n(%)]65(67.71)20(76.92)χ2=0.8220.365收缩压(mmHg)159.51ʃ21.50151.00ʃ16.56t=-1.6600.100舒张压(mmHg)92.50(80.25,100.00)95.50(90.00,100.00)Z=-0.3870.699Lp(a)颗粒浓度(nmol/L)27.7(8.58,64.65)5.8(2.75,14.53)Z=404.000<0.001Lp(a)质量浓度(mg/L)148.00(54.00,338.50)42.50(23.75,84.00)Z=468.500<0.001TC(mmol/L)4.17ʃ1.044.57ʃ1.17t=0.9390.122TG(mmol/L)1.44(0.97,2.01)1.82(1.12,2.64)Z=-1.3380.181HDL⁃C(mmol/L)1.05(0.89,1.29)0.96(0.87,1.12)Z=-1.2570.209LDL⁃C(mmol/L)2.52ʃ0.862.79ʃ0.98t=0.9800.201Glu(mmol/L)5.10(4.70,5.80)4.95(4.50,5.60)Z=-1.1830.237Cr(μmol/L)75.14ʃ23.9365.72ʃ15.61t=-1.9420.055Alb(mmol/L)41.10ʃ3.6341.81ʃ3.33t=0.8320.407Hcy(μmol/L)11.20(8.70 13.85)8.70(7.63 12.10)Z=749.5000.052CRP(mg/L)1.30(0.70,2.45)1.10(0.68,2.28)Z=964.5000.6772.2㊀高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度与其他生化参数的相关性㊀Spearman相关性分析见表2,高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度与质量浓度呈正相关(P<0.05);血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度均与HDL⁃C水平呈负相关(P均<0.05)㊂表2㊀高血压患者血清Lp(a)浓度与其他生化参数的相关性参数Lp(a)颗粒浓度TCTGHDL⁃CLDL⁃CGluCrAlbHcyCRPLp(a)颗粒浓度-r=0.057r=0.072r=-0.233r=0.046r=0.117r=0.071r=-0.085r=0.100r=0.040-P=0.540P=0.442P=0.012P=0.630P=0.217P=0.450P=0.368P=0.286P=0.673Lp(a)质量浓度r=0.979r=0.049r=0.085r=-0.233r=0.039r=0.099r=0.051r=-0.125r=0.104r=0.016P<0.001P=0.604P=0.363P=0.013P=0.682P=0.295P=0.589P=0.186P=0.268P=0.862㊀㊀注: - 为不适用㊂2.3㊀高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度的预测价值㊀Logistic回归分析见表3,单因素模型显示:血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度均与高血压患者心血管疾病风险水平相关;多因素模型显示:在校正了年龄㊁性别㊁其他血脂参数的影响后,血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度升高,仍与高血压患者心血管疾病风险增高密切相关㊂表3㊀血清Lp(a)浓度对高血压患者心血管风险的预测价值参数单因素模型OR(95%CI)P值多因素模型OR(95%CI)P值Lp(a)颗粒浓度1.107(1.039 1.180)0.0021.105(1.017 1.199)0.018Lp(a)质量浓度1.016(1.006 1.027)0.0011.016(1.003 1.030)0.016㊀㊀注:非独立变量为 高血压患者低风险组㊁高风险组 的二分类变量,以 低风险组 为参考类别;单因素分析,独立变量为血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度或质量浓度;多因素分析,独立变量为血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度或质量浓度,以及年龄㊁性别㊁其他血脂参数;OR值95%CI下限大于1.0,且P<0.05为差异有统计学意义㊂3㊀讨论㊀㊀Lp(a)是一种由载脂蛋白(a)[Apo(a)]与载脂蛋白B⁃100(ApoB⁃100)通过二硫键相连而成的低密度脂蛋白颗粒,结构与纤维蛋白溶解酶原相似[10]㊂循环Lp(a)浓度在人群中呈偏态分布,一般情况下保持恒定,基本不受饮食㊁生活方式和环境的影响[11⁃12]㊂Lp(a)分子可损伤血管内皮,减少内皮细胞扩血管物质一氧化氮(NO)等的分泌,从而降低舒张血管和抑制平滑肌增殖作用;同时Lp(a)进入血管内膜,诱导多种炎症因子释放,造成内膜进一步损伤,与抗纤溶机制共同作用导致动脉粥样斑块形成,血管硬化[13]㊂上述机制促进了高血压的进展,并与AsCVD的发生㊁发展密切相关㊂高血压是影响心血管事件发生和预后的独立危险因素,血压水平与心血管疾病风险呈连续㊁独立㊁直接的正相关关系[3]㊂对高血压患者进行心血管疾病综合风险的评估,有利于确定启动降压治疗的时机,进而优化降压治疗方案㊂本研究以原发性高血压人群为研究对象,结果发现高血压患者中高心血管疾病风险组血清Lp(a)浓度高于低风险组;相较于其他常规血脂参数,Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度变化在不同心血管疾病风险水平的高血压患者中都更为明显㊂然而,既往无法准确检测Lp(a)质量浓度的主要难度在于Lp(a)中Apo(a)分子具有高度多态性,导致不同类型Lp(a)分子的质量浓度存在巨大差异[14]㊂2003年国际临床化学和检验医学联合会(IFCC)建立了Lp(a)检测的参考方法,并推荐以nmol/L为单位检测Lp(a)的颗粒浓度[15]㊂本研究采用新一代Lp(a)颗粒浓度检测试剂,首次分析了不同心血管疾病风险水平高血压患者的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度,结果显示心血管疾病风险分层越高的高血压患者,其血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度也越高;提示不受Lp(a)多态性影响的血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度,具有作为高血压患者心血管疾病综合风险评估指标的潜能㊂本研究进一步分析了血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度与高血压患者其他血脂等生化参数的关系,发现高血压患者血清Lp(a)的颗粒浓度与质量浓度结果相关,且均与HDL⁃C水平呈负相关㊂既往大量流行病学资料表明,血清HDL⁃C水平与AsCVD发病风险呈负相关[4]㊂为明确血清Lp(a)浓度对高血压患者心血管疾病风险评估的预测价值,本研究再进一步通过多元Logistic回归分析发现,血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度㊁质量浓度的升高与高血压患者心血管疾病风险的增高密切相关,并且颗粒浓度的OR值更高㊂可见,高血压患者血清Lp(a)颗粒浓度可作为高血压患者心血管疾病风险评估的潜在标志物㊂高血压患者在检测常规血脂项目的同时,早期完善血清Lp(a)浓度检测,尤其是Lp(a)颗粒浓度的检测,将有助于早期评估其心血管疾病综合风险,确保个体化降压治疗方案及早实施[16]㊂本研究仍存在病例数有限㊁未进行随访和预后分析等不足之处,我们将在后续研究中加以完善㊂4 参考文献[1]PerrotN,VerbeekR,SandhuM,etal.Idealcardiovascularhealthinfluencescardiovasculardiseaseriskassociatedwithhighlipoprotein(a)levelsandgenotype:TheEPIC⁃Norfolkprospectivepopulationstudy[J].Atherosclerosis,2017,256:47⁃52.[2]李勇.对2017美国高血压指南与我国高血压防治策略的思考[J].心脑血管病防治,2018,18(1):1⁃3.[3]张楠,吴嘉,汪俊军,等.原发性高血压患者血清补体C1q水平及其对心血管疾病发生风险的评估价值[J].临床检验杂志,2019,37(4):287⁃289.[4]宋佳希,汪俊军.血脂管理新理念助推临床血脂检验的发展[J].中华检验医学杂志,2018,41(6):409⁃414.[5]KellyE,HemphillL.Lipoprotein(a):Alipoproteinwhosetimehascome[J].CurrTreatOptionsCardiovascMed,2017,19(7):48.[6]KamstrupPR,Tybjærg⁃HansenA,NordestgaardBG.Extremelipo⁃protein(a)levelsandimprovedcardiovascularriskprediction[J].JAmCollCardiol,2013,61(11):1146⁃1156.[7]StiekemaLotteCA,StroesErikSG,VerweijSimoneL,etal.Aper⁃sistentarterialwallinflammationinpatientswithelevatedlipoprotein(a)despitestronglow⁃densitylipoproteincholesterolreductionbyproproteinconvertasesubtilisin/kexintype9antibodytreatment[J].EurHeartJ,2019,40(33):2775⁃2781.[8]BarisG,FlorianK,StroesES,etal.Lipoprotein(a):therevenant[J].EurHeartJ,2017,38(20):1553⁃1560.[9]‘中国高血压防治指南“修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J].中国心血管杂志,2019,19(1):24⁃56.[10]温文慧,匡泽民,王绿娅.重新认识脂蛋白(a)促进动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的作用[J].临床检验杂志,2018,36(3):190⁃192.[11]石艳璞,曹晔萱,靳景璐,等.血浆脂蛋白(a)浓度与青年人群冠心病关系的横断面研究[J].中国循环杂志,2020,35(4):343⁃348.[12]ContoisJH,NguyenR,AlbertAL,etal.Lipoprotein(a)particlenumberassaywithouterrorfromapolipoprotein(a)sizeisoforms[J].ClinChimActa,2020,505:119⁃124.[13]SaeedA,ViraniSS.Lipoprotein(a)andcardiovasculardisease:currentstateandfuturedirectionsforanenigmaticlipoprotein[J].FrontBiosci(LandmarkEd),2018,23:1099⁃1112.[14]SaleheenD,HaycockPC,ZhaoW,etal.Apolipoprotein(a)iso⁃formsize,lipoprotein(a)concentration,andcoronaryarterydis⁃ease:amendelianrandomisationanalysis[J].LancetDiabetesEn⁃docrinol,2017,5(7):524⁃533.[15]冯仁丰.脂蛋白(a)检测的标准化[J].检验医学,2017,32(7):555⁃560.[16]GuddetiRR,PatilS,AhmedA,etal.Lipoprotein(a)andcalcificaorticvalvestenosis:Asystematicreview[J].ProgCardiovascDis,2020,63(4):496⁃502.(收稿日期:2020⁃07⁃31)(本文编辑:王海燕)。

急性白血病患儿血清转铁蛋白受体的表达变化及其意义

急性白血病患儿血清转铁蛋白受体的表达变化及其意义

急性白血病患儿血清转铁蛋白受体的表达变化及其意义许惠敏; 马志英; 郭楠【期刊名称】《《癌症进展》》【年(卷),期】2019(017)023【总页数】4页(P2855-2858)【关键词】急性白血病; 铁蛋白; 转铁蛋白; 转铁蛋白受体; TFRmRNA; 疗效; 预后【作者】许惠敏; 马志英; 郭楠【作者单位】开封市儿童医院儿童重症监护室河南开封 4750000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R733.71铁元素是细胞增殖所必须的元素,与细胞周期调控、遗传物质合成和表达、能量代谢等均有密切关系[1]。

铁蛋白(ferritin,SF)是水溶性氧化铁磷酸化合物,其主要功能为储存铁。

研究表明,铁代谢异常与肿瘤细胞的增殖密切相关[2]。

肿瘤组织分化早期,幼稚细胞增殖与分化需要大量铁元素参与,肿瘤细胞转铁蛋白受体(transferrin receptor,TFR)大量表达,因而推测转铁蛋白(transferrin,TF)、TFR可能与肿瘤的发生发展有着一定联系,可用于评估肿瘤的侵袭程度。

本研究对急性白血病患儿血清TFR的表达情况进行分析,并对其与白血病患儿临床特征、疗效和预后的关系进行探讨,现报道如下。

1 对象与方法1.1 研究对象选取2015年1月至2018年1月开封市儿童医院收治的82例急性白血病患儿为观察组,所有患儿均经外周血细胞分析、骨髓形态学、免疫学等检查确诊为急性白血病;符合急性髓系白血病(复发难治性)中国诊疗指南(2011年版)[3]中相关诊断标准,且均未合并其他系统肿瘤、肝肾功能严重不全、认知障碍或精神疾病。

观察组中,男52例,女30例;年龄2~16岁,平均(10.95±4.27)岁;疾病类型:急性淋巴细胞白血病(acute lymphoblastic leukemia,ALL)31例,急性髓细胞性白血病(acute myeloid leukemia,AML)51例;初诊53例,复发29例;白细胞(white blood cell,WBC)计数为(16~128)×109/L,平均WBC计数为(32.15±26.34)×109/L;白血病细胞计数为(0.62~1.35)×109/L,平均白血病细胞计数为(1.05±0.31)×109/L;白血病危险分级:低危20例,中危29例,高危33例。

血清胱抑素C的非肾脏影响因素

血清胱抑素C的非肾脏影响因素

血清胱抑素C的非肾脏影响因素谷红霞;陈香美【摘要】@@ 胱抑素C(CysC)是一种内源性半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂,属于2型半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂超家族,存在于所有类型细胞中.既往研究认为,血清CysC不受性别、年龄等影响,被认为是优于血清肌酐的肾小球滤过率(GFR)的标志.最近研究发现,血清CysC浓度也受年龄、性别、心血管疾病、恶性肿瘤、糖皮质激素、甲状腺素等影响,并作为一些肾脏外疾病的标志.本文对CysC的在肾外疾病中的变化及应用进行综述.【期刊名称】《泰山医学院学报》【年(卷),期】2009(030)011【总页数】2页(P887-888)【关键词】胱抑素C;增龄;肿瘤;动脉粥样硬化;激素【作者】谷红霞;陈香美【作者单位】解放军总医院全军肾病研究所暨肾病重点实验室,北京,100853;解放军总医院全军肾病研究所暨肾病重点实验室,北京,100853【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R446.11胱抑素C(CysC)是一种内源性半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂,属于2型半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂超家族,存在于所有类型细胞中。

既往研究认为,血清CysC不受性别、年龄等影响,被认为是优于血清肌酐的肾小球滤过率(GFR)的标志。

最近研究发现,血清CysC浓度也受年龄、性别、心血管疾病、恶性肿瘤、糖皮质激素、甲状腺素等影响,并作为一些肾脏外疾病的标志。

本文对CysC的在肾外疾病中的变化及应用进行综述。

1 受性别、年龄、体重等影响Knight等[1]发现老年、男性、高体重、高身高、近期吸烟、血清CRP升高可导致血清CysC升高。

体重指数升高与血清CysC升高呈等级相关[2]。

健康日本人血清CysC,男性高于女性,并与年龄、体脂、吸烟呈正相关,与饮酒呈负相关;亚组分析发现大于50岁没有性别差异;对既往文献分析发现亚洲人较高加索人血清CysC具有性别差异[3]。

12-19岁青少年血清CysC与性别、年龄、种族、血尿酸、血尿素相关[4]。

HS-CRP(High Sensitive CRP)高感度C-反应性蛋白

HS-CRP(High Sensitive CRP)高感度C-反应性蛋白

IMMAGE Immunochemistry System Wash Solution (P/N 447060) IMMAGE Immunochemistry System Buffer 4 (P/N 447420) IMMAGE Immunochemistry System Diluent 1 (P/N 447640) Calibrator 5 Plus (P/N 469975) 2 3.1.1 CRPH ( Sodium Azide ( ) 3.1.2 3.1.2.1 7.8ml -CRP ) 7.8ml < 0.1%
0.02mg/dl,

10.3.1.1 Lipemic 10.3.1.2
(90,000 x g for 10 minutes) , , ,
Lab.SOP-C-02013 3
92.04.20
6
8
HS-CRP(High Sensitive CRP)
C-
1.Pepys, M.B., et al., C-reactive protein fifty years on., Lancet, 21:653 (1981) 2. Pepys, M.B. and Baltz, M.L., Acute phase proteins with special reference to C-reactive protein and related proteins (Pentraxins) and serum amyloid A protein. Adv. Immunol., 34:141 (1983). 3. Dati, F., et al., Consensus of a group of professional societies and diagnostic companies on guidelines for interim reference ranges for 14 proteins in serum based on the standardization against the IFCC/BCR/CAP reference material. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 34:517-520 (1996). 4. Kushner, D.L. and Rzewricki, D.L., The Acute Phase Response: General Aspects, Ballicre's Clinical Rheumatology., 8:513-530 (1994). 5. Hind, C.R.H. and Pepys, P.M., The role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement in clinical practice. Int. Med. 5:112-151 (1984). 6. Burtis, C.A. and Ashwood. E.R., "Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry," 3rd Edition. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. (1999). 7. Thompson, S.B., et al., Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. N. Eng. J. Med., 332:635-641 (1995). 8. Liuzzo, G., et al., The prognostic value of CRP and serum amyloid A protein in severe unstable angina. N. Eng. J. Med., 331:417-424 (1994). 9. Pietila, K.O., et al., Serum CRP concentration in acute myocardial infarction and its relationship to mortality during 24 months of follow-up in patients under thrombolytic treatment. Eur. Heart J., 17:1345-1349 (1996). 10. Pietila, K.O., et al., Acute phase reaction infarct size, and in-hospital morbidity in myocardial infarction patients treated with streptokinase or recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Ann. Med., 23:529-535 (1991). 11. George, D.A., C-Reactive Protein, Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease. Part 2: The Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Scripps News: Volume 14 Number 2.

血清特异性IgG抗体检测对慢性肺曲霉病预后的判断价值

血清特异性IgG抗体检测对慢性肺曲霉病预后的判断价值

作者简介:邹外龙,硕士学历,主任医师。

作者单位:100049北京,航天中心医院呼吸科通讯作者:陈济超,E-mail :chen_htzxyy@163.com 血清特异性IgG 抗体检测对慢性肺曲霉病预后的判断价值邹外龙,张佳,陈济超,李昱霖【摘要】目的初步探讨慢性肺曲霉病(chronic pulmonary aspergillosis ,CPA )患者血清曲霉特异性IgG 抗体对预后的判断价值。

方法回顾性分析2017-03至2019-02收治的27例CPA 患者,根据治疗后第90天情况分为改善组(19例)和进展组(8例)。

所有患者入院后进行第1个24h 的急性生理与慢性健康评估Ⅱ(APACHEII )评分,并采用ELISA 法检测血清曲霉特异性IgG 抗体及血常规、G 试验、GM 试验等。

比较两组患者入院后APACHEII 评分、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、血小板计数、C 反应蛋白(CRP )、降钙素原(PCT )、血清G 试验、GM 试验,以及曲霉特异性IgG 抗体值水平。

评估其对预后的预测效果。

结果两组患者入院第1个24h 的APACHEII 评分差异无统计学意义;入院后的血白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、血小板计数、CRP 、PCT 、血清G 试验、GM 试验水平相近。

进展组血清特异性IgG 水平为(178.8ʃ24.6)AU /ml ,明显高于改善组的(122.3ʃ19.5)AU /ml ,差异有统计学意义(t =-3.625,P <0.05)。

结论血清曲霉特异性IgG 值可作为CPA 患者预后判断的有用指标。

【关键词】慢性肺曲霉病;血清曲霉特异性IgG 抗体;预后【中国图书分类号】R519.8Correlations betweenserum anti-aspergillus IgG antibody and prognosis of patients withchronic pulmonary aspergillosisZOU Wailong ,ZHANG Jia ,CHEN Jichao ,and LI Yulin.Department of Respiratory Disease ,Aero Space Center Hospital ,Bei-jing 100049,China 【Abstract 】ObjectiveTo assess the value of serum anti-aspergillus IgG antibody in predicting the prognosis of patients withchronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA ).MethodsThe clinical data on 27cases of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis treated betweenMarch 2017and February 2019was retrospectively analyzed.According to their conditions 90days after treatment ,these patients were divided into the improvement group (19cases )and progress group (8cases ).After admission ,all the patients were assessed in terms of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHEII )scores for the first 24hours.Serum aspergillus specific IgG anti-body was detected by ELISA ,and blood routine test ,serum-G and serum-GM test were conducted.APACHEII scores ,white blood cell count ,neutrophil count ,platelet count ,C-reactive protein (CRP ),procalcitonin (PCT ),serum-G ,serum-GM assay and aspergillus specific IgG antibody levels were compared between the two groups after admission.The predictive value for prognosis was determined.ResultsThere was no significant difference in APACHEII scores between the two groups during the first 24hours of admission.Afteradmission ,the levels of leukocyte count ,neutrophil ,platelet count ,CRP ,PCT ,serum-G and serum-GM assay in these two groups were similar.The serum specific IgG level in the progress group was (178.8ʃ24.6)AU /ml ,which was significantly higher than that of the improvement group (122.3ʃ19.5)AU /ml (t =-3.625,P <0.05).Conclusions Serum aspergillus specific IgG can be usedas a useful prognostic indicator of prognosis for patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.【Key words 】chronic pulmonary aspergillosis ;serum specific anti-aspergillus IgG antibody ;prognosis慢性肺曲霉病(chronic pulmonary aspergillosis ,CPA )是由曲霉菌属引起的缓慢进展的肺部真菌感染性疾病,病程常达3个月,好发生于有肺部基础疾病或免疫功能轻度低下的患者中,如肺结核、肺结节、支气管扩张症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病等患者[1,2],也可发生于免疫功能正常的患者中。

百草枯血浆浓度的不同预测方法对评估病人预后的作用

百草枯血浆浓度的不同预测方法对评估病人预后的作用

百草枯血浆浓度的不同预测方法对评估病人预后的作用庞爱华【摘要】[目的]探讨百草枯血浆浓度的3种预测方法在评估急性百草枯中毒(APP)病人预后中的作用。

[方法]回顾性分析162例急性百草枯中毒病人的血浆百草枯(PQ)浓度、服毒量、服毒时间及病人年龄,通过 Proudfoot 生存曲线、Jones 生存回归方程和百草枯中毒严重指数(SIPP)评估病人预后,并比较每种方法的预测价值。

[结果]存活组的服毒量、百草枯浓度和年龄、中毒时间均小于死亡组,百草枯浓度及中毒时间进入 Logistic 回归方程(P <0.05)。

SIPP 受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.916。

中毒24 h 内SIPP 的特异度、阳性预测值和阳性似然比最高;中毒0 h~4 h 的 Jones 生存回归方程敏感度、阴性预测值最高,中毒4 h~24 h 的Proudfoot 生存曲线敏感度、阴性预测值最高。

[结论]SIPP 对死亡的预测价值较好,Jones 生存回归方程和 Proudfoot 生存曲线分别对预测中毒0 h~4 h 和4h~24 h 病人存活率有优势。

【期刊名称】《护理研究》【年(卷),期】2015(000)026【总页数】3页(P3298-3300)【关键词】百草枯中毒;血药浓度;预后;价值【作者】庞爱华【作者单位】274031,山东省菏泽市立医院【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R473.5百草枯(paraquat,PQ)又名克无踪,化学名1,1-二甲基-4,4-二氯二吡啶,是一种强烈的灭草剂,对人、畜有很强的毒性作用。

中毒后可导致机体多器官功能损害,但目前临床尚无特效解毒药,病死率高达85%~95%[1]。

早期对病人预后进行较为准确的评估有助于指导临床治疗和护理,利于医患沟通,减少医患矛盾。

尽管有诸多报道评估百草枯中毒病人的预后方法,但临床证明,病人就诊时血浆百草枯浓度及中毒时间仍是较为准确的预测指标[2],常用的方法有Jones 生存回归方程[3]、Proudfoot生存曲线[4]和百草枯中毒严重指数(SIPP)[5]。

血清Presepsin、PCT、CRP联合检测在脓毒症诊断中的价值

Doi :10.13621/j.1001-5949.2019.07.0594·论著·血清Presepsin 、PCT 、CRP 联合检测在脓毒症诊断中的价值孙燕燕1,王会峰2,胡小芮2,季伟1[摘要]目的通过联合检测血清中Presepsin 、降钙素原(PCT )、C 反应蛋白(CRP )、IL -6水平,探讨血清标记物联合检测对脓毒症的诊断价值。

方法选取30例脓毒症、20例严重脓毒症、30例非感染SIRS 患者及体检健康者30例,分别监测血清Presepsin 、PCT 、CRP 、IL -6表达水平,分析表达差异性与APACHE Ⅱ的相关性,并采用ROC 曲线分析单个及联合检测对脓毒症患者的诊断价值。

结果非感染SIRS 患者与脓毒症患者间血清Presep-sin 、PCT 、CRP 水平差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);IL -6水平无差异性(P >0.05);Presepsin 、PCT 、CRP 的含量与APACHE Ⅱ具有强正相关性(P <0.05);Presepsin 、PCT 、CRP 、IL -6的AUC 值分别为0.876、0.851、0.784、0.548;Presepsin 、PCT 、CRP 三者联合诊断的AUC 值为0.957,高于单独及其他联合分组。

结论血清Presepsin 、PCT 和CRP 三者联合检测能提高脓毒症患者的诊断率。

[关键词]脓毒症;降钙素原;C 反应蛋白;诊断价值[中图分类号]R446.8[文献标识码]AThe value of combined detection of serum Presepsin ,PCT and CRP in the diagnosis of sepsisSUN Yanyan 1,WANG Huifeng 2,HU Xiaorui 2,JI Wei 1.1.Department of Infectious Diseases ,Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People ’s Hospital ,Yinchuan 750001,China ;2.Tumor Hospital ,General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University ,Yinchuan 750004,China Corresponding author :JI Wei ,Email :47465483@qq.com [Abstract ]ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of combined detection of serum markers in sepsis by combined detec-tion of serum levels of Presepsin ,PCT ,CRP and IL6.Methods Thirty patients with sepsis ,20patients with severe sepsis and 30patientswith non -infected SIRS were enrolled.Serum levels of Presepsin ,PCT ,CRP and IL6were monitored ,and the difference in expression was analyzed and correlated with APACHE Ⅱ.The ROC curve was used to analyze the value of single and combined detection in patients with sepsis.ResultsThere were significant differences in serum Presepsin ,PCT and CRP between non -infected SIRS patients and sep-sis patients (P <0.05).There was no difference in IL6levels (P >0.05).Presepsin ,PCT and CRP levels were positive correlated with APACHE Ⅱ(P <0.05);the AUC values of Presepsin ,PCT ,CRP ,and IL6were 0.876,0.851,0.784,and 0.548,respectively ;the com-bined diagnostic AUC values of Presepsin ,PCT and CRP were 0.957,which were all higher than that of the combined group alone and other groups.ConclusionThe combined detection of serum Presepsin /PCT /CRP can improve the diagnosis rate of patients with sepsis.[Key words ]Sepsis ;PCT ;CRP ;Diagnostic value[基金项目]宁夏回族自治区人民医院培育振兴科研计划项目(2017)[作者单位]1.宁夏回族自治区人民医院感染疾病科,宁夏银川7500022.宁夏医科大学总医院肿瘤医院,宁夏银川750004[作者简介]孙燕燕(1984-),女,硕士,副主任医师,从事感染疾病诊治工作。

肾功能不全患者血清胃泌素释放肽前体水平升高

肾功能不全患者血清胃泌素释放肽前体水平升高赵敏利;孙桂荣;王盼;初开秋【摘要】目的观察肾功能不全对血清胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)水平的影响.方法用化学发光法检测120例肾功能不全患者、40例肾功能正常患者、40例小细胞肺癌( SCLC)患者和56例体检健康者的血清ProGRP水平,用脲酶法和苦味酸法分别测定血清尿素(Urea)和肌酐(Cr)水平,并计算内生肌酐清除率(CCr).结果肾功能不全患者组血清ProGRP水平高于肾功能正常患者组、健康人对照组(P<0.01),但低于SCLC组(P<0.01).肾功能不全患者代偿期、失代偿期和衰竭期血清ProGRP 水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).肾功能不全患者血清ProGRP水平(Y,pg/mL)与血清Urea(X,mmol/L)呈正相关(Y =4.039X +14.220,r=0.629),与Cr水平(X,μmol/L)呈正相关(Y=0.134X +22.394,r=0.795).结论肾功能不全患者血清ProGRP水平升高,用ProGRP辅助诊断SCLC时应排除肾功能不全.【期刊名称】《临床检验杂志》【年(卷),期】2012(030)008【总页数】3页(P580-582)【关键词】肾功能不全;小细胞肺癌;胃泌素释放肽前体;尿素;肌酐【作者】赵敏利;孙桂荣;王盼;初开秋【作者单位】青岛大学医学院附属医院检验科,山东青岛266003;青岛大学医学院附属医院检验科,山东青岛266003;青岛大学医学院附属医院检验科,山东青岛266003;青岛大学医学院附属医院检验科,山东青岛266003【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R734.2胃泌素释放肽前体(progastrin-releasing peptide,ProGRP)是小细胞肺癌(small cell lung cancer,SCLC)的一种肿瘤标志物。

外周血ProGRP检测有助于SCLC的早期诊断、疗效观察和预后判断[1-2],较神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)有更高的敏感性和特异性[3]。

手足口病患儿血清25-羟维生素D水平的临床意义及预后影响


0.047)和 PCIS(OR=1.51,95%CI:1.06-2.14,P=0.033)是影响重度和危重 手 足 口 病 患 儿 14 天 死 亡 率 的 独 立 因 素。
结 论 患有危重手足口病的儿童血清25(OH)D 浓度显著降低,并且与手足口病的严重程度和预后相关。
关键词:手足口病;25-羟维生素 D;重症;预后;儿童
(1.三亚市人民医院 儿科,海南 三亚572000;2.海口市琼山区妇幼保健院 儿科,海南 海口571100; 3.海南省妇幼保健院 儿科,海南 海口570206)
摘要:目的 探讨手足口病患儿血清25-羟维生素 D[25(OH)D]水平的临床 意 义 及 预 后 影 响。 方 法 对 2016 年 6月 至2018年6月在本院收治的手足口病儿童进行了一 项 前 瞻 性 观 察 研 究 。69 名 住 院 的 手 足 口 病 患 者 分 为 不 严 重
— 1688 —
文 章 编 号 :1007-4287(2019)10-1688-05
Chin J Lab Diagn,October,2019,Vol 23,No.10
手足口病患儿血清25- 羟维生素 D 水平的 临床意义及预后影响
吉才润1,邱成英1,邓颖云1,匡晓玲1,吉晓理1,蔡 祥2* ,雷智贤3
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical significance and prognostic effect of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25 (OH)D]level in children with hand-foot-mouth disease.Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on

血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy联合检测对冠心病的临床诊断价值

·经验交流·血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy联合检测对冠心病的临床诊断价值吕华【摘要】目的探讨血清D-二聚体、C反应蛋白(C-Reactive Protein,CRP)、同型半胱氨酸(Homocysteine,Hcy)联合检测对冠心病的临床诊断价值。

方法选择2018年1—5月本院收治的70例冠心病患者作为研究对象,纳入观察组;将同期来本院体检的70名健康志愿者纳入对照组,比较两组入选者血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy检测结果,计算D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy阳性率,进一步分析血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy检测诊断冠心病的灵敏度、特异度。

结果观察组患者血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy检测结果均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy阳性率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy联合检测诊断冠心病灵敏度和特异度均良好,显著高于单独检测或二联检测,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论血清D-二聚体、CRP、Hcy检测能够为冠心病的早期诊断提供可靠依据,三者联合能够有效提高灵敏度和特异度。

【关键词】冠心病;D-二聚体;CRP;Hcy;联合检测[中图分类号]R541[文献标识码]A DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2019.18.008Clinical diagnostic value of combined detection of serum D-Dimer,CRP and Hcy for coronary heartdisease LV Hua.Department of clinical laboratory,hospital of traditional Chinese medicine of Hebi,Hebi,Henan,458030,China.【Abstract】Objective To investigate the clinical value of combined detection of serum D-dimer,c-reactive protein(CRP)and homocysteine(Hcy)for coronary heart disease.Methods Seventy patients withcoronary heart disease admitted to our hospital from January2018to May2018were enrolled in the observationgroup.70healthy volunteers who were admitted to our hospital during the same period were included in the controlgroup.The serum concentrations of body,CRP and Hcy were compared and used to calculate the positive rates ofD-dimer,CRP and Hcy,and the sensitivity and specificity of serum D-dimer,CRP and Hcy in the diagnosisand treatment of coronary heart disease were further analyzed.Results The serum levels of D-dimer,CRP andHcy in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The positiverates of D-dimer,CRP and Hcy were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group,there was a statistical difference(P<0.05).Both sensitivity and specificity of combined detection of serum D-dimer,CRP,and Hcy in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease were excellent,they were significantly higherthan the single detection or the double combination detection,differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions The detection of serum D-dimer,CRP and Hcy could provide a reliable basis for the earlydiagnosis of coronary heart disease.The combination of the three indicators could effectively improve the sensitivityand specificity.【Key words】Coronary heart disease;D-dimer;CRP;Hcy;Joint detection冠心病是临床发病率较高的一种心血管疾病,影像学检查是诊断冠心病的常用手段之一,目前临床上尚缺乏敏感而特异的实验室诊断手段[1]。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Prognostic Value of Serum Concentration of Heart-Type Fatty Acid–Binding Protein Relative to Cardiac Troponin T on Admission in the Early Hours of Acute Coronary SyndromeJunnichi Ishii,1*Yukio Ozaki,2Jingchao Lu,2Fumihiko Kitagawa,3Takahiro Kuno,3 Tadashi Nakano,2Yuu Nakamura,2Hiroyuki Naruse,2Yoshihisa Mori,2Shigeru Matsui,2Hisaji Oshima,3Masanori Nomura,2Kouji Ezaki,2andHitoshi Hishida2Background:Heart-type fatty acid–binding protein(H-FABP)is proposed as an early biomarker for acute myocardial infarction(AMI),but its prognostic value is unclear in acute coronary syndrome(ACS).We evaluated the prognostic value of the H-FABP concentration relative to cardiac troponin T(cTnT)in the early hours of ACS. Methods:Serum concentrations of H-FABP and cTnT were measured on admission in328consecutive patients hospitalized for ACS within6h after the onset of chest pain[AMI,241(73.5%)patients;ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,154(47.0%)patients;and emer-gent coronary angiography within24h after admission, 287(87.5%)patients].Cardiac events,which were de-fined as cardiac death or subsequent nonfatal AMI, were monitored for6months after admission. Results:During the6-month follow-up period,there were 25cardiac events,including15cardiac deaths and10 subsequent nonfatal AMIs.Stepwise multivariate analy-ses including clinical,electrocardiographic,and biochem-ical variables revealed that increased H-FABP(above the median of9.8␮g/L),but not increased cTnT(above the median of0.02␮g/L),was independently associated with cardiac events in all patients[relative risk(RR)؍8.96;P؍0.0004],the subgroup of patients with ST-segment eleva-tion myocardial infarction(RR؍11.3;P؍0.02),and the subgroup of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(RR؍8.31;P؍0.007).The area under the ROC curve was higher for H-FABP than for cTnT(0.711vs0.578;P؍0.08),suggesting that H-FABP concentrations have a greater predictive ca-pacity for cardiac events than cTnT.Conclusion:Serum H-FABP is a potential independent predictor of cardiac events within6months of patient admission and may provide prognostic information su-perior to cTnT in the early hours of ACS.©2005American Association for Clinical ChemistryHeart-type fatty acid–binding protein(H-FABP)4is a low–molecular-mass(14–15kDa)cytoplasmic protein that,along with myoglobin,is among the earliest markers released into circulation after myocardial damage.The H-FABP content of skeletal muscle is only10%–20%of that found in cardiac muscle,whereas the skeletal muscle content of myoglobin is approximately twice that of cardiac muscle(1–3).Along with other groups,we have shown that quantitative measurement of the serum H-FABP concentration is more sensitive and specific than myoglobin for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction(AMI)(4,5).The value of serum H-FABP1Division of Critical Care,Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences,Toyoake,Japan.2Department of Internal Medicine,Fujita Health University School of Medicine,Toyoake,Japan.3Department of Joint Research Laboratory of Clinical Medicine,Fujita Health University Hospital,Toyoake,Japan.*Address correspondence to this author at:Division of Critical Care,Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences,1-98Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho,Toyoake470-1192,Japan.Fax81-562-93-2315;e-mail jishii@fujita-hu.ac.jp.Received December31,2004;accepted May3,2005.Previously published online at DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2004.0476624Nonstandard abbreviations:H-FABP,heart-type fatty acid–binding pro-tein;AMI,acute myocardial infarction;ACS,acute coronary syndrome;cTnT, cardiac troponin T;CK-MB,creatine kinase MB isoenzyme;CI,confidence interval;STEMI,ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction;and UA/ NSTEMI,unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarc-tion.Clinical Chemistry51:81397–1404(2005)Proteomics andProtein Markers1397measurements in the early diagnosis of AMI was high-lighted recently by a prospective multicenter trial in Japan for a newly developed qualitative whole-blood rapid panel test for H-FABP that positively detects serum H-FABP concentrationsՆ6.2␮g/L(6).The prognostic value of serum H-FABP concentrations has not been established for acute coronary syndrome(ACS).The present study was designed to prospectively as-sess the prognostic value of serum concentrations of H-FABP relative to cardiac troponin T(cTnT)determined on admission for adverse cardiac outcomes within6 months in patients presenting with ACS in the first6h after the onset of chest pain.Materials and Methodsstudy populationBetween March2000and December2001,a total of328 consecutive patients admitted to the coronary care unit of Fujita Health University for ACS within6h after the onset of chest pain were enrolled in this study.Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had,within the6h before admission,an episode of resting anginal pain lastingϾ10 min and at least one of the following:ST-segment eleva-tion of at least0.05mV,ST-segment depression of at least 0.05mV,T-wave inversion of at least0.1mV in at least2 contiguous leads,or presumed new left-bundle branch block.Patients with a history of coronary revasculariza-tion within the preceding6months or a serum creatinine concentrationϾ15mg/L were rmed consent was obtained from all patients before participation,and the protocol was approved by the local ethics committee.All patients were treated according to routine clinical protocols.Early invasive management,including emergent coronary angiography within24h of admission followed by percutaneous coronary intervention,was routinely per-formed in our institution.Demographics and clinical data, including age,sex,diagnosis,revascularization,coronary risk factors,and Killip class(7)on admission,were collected from hospital medical records and patient interviews. laboratory analysesVenous whole blood samples were drawn and centri-fuged within30min of collection,and the serum obtained was stored atϪ70°C.H-FABP was measured by2-step direct sandwich ELISA(Market-M H-FABP;Dainippon Pharmaceutical).The calibrators for the ELISA covered the range0–250␮g/L.The lower limit of detection for the H-FABP assay was1.25␮g/L,and a value of6.2␮g/L has been used for an AMI cutoff(5,8).The assay was linear within the range0–220␮g/L.Myoglobin(200mg/L)and myosin(84mg/L)did not cross-react in the H-FABP assay. The total imprecision for the H-FABP assay was8.2%at6.2␮g/L,7.9%at12.0␮g/L,and5.6%at33.7␮g/L.cTnT and creatine kinase MB(CK-MB)were deter-mined routinely at admission,as well as16or24h after admission.For the cTnT measurements(Elecsys2010 analyzer;Roche Diagnostics),the manufacturer-stated de-tection limit and cutoff for AMI were0.01and0.1␮g/L, respectively.The total imprecision for the cTnT assay was14%at0.012␮g/L and8.7%at0.024␮g/L.For the CK-MB measurements(Dade Dimension RxL Max analyzer;Di-mension Flex reagent cartridge MMB;Dade Behring),thedetection limit and upper limit of the reference interval were0.5and3.6␮g/L,respectively.The total imprecision for the CK-MB assay was4.6%at2.9␮g/L and2.3%at9.1␮g/L. study end point and follow-upCardiac events were defined as cardiac death or subse-quent nonfatal AMI.Cardiac death was defined as anydeath for which there was no clearly documented noncar-diac cause.Sudden death occurring outside the hospitalfor which no other cause was assigned was also regardedas cardiac death.Patients were defined as having admis-sion AMI when serum cTnT concentrations wereՆ0.1␮g/L in blood samples collected within24h of admission. Only a new AMI occurringϾ24h after admission wasconsidered a subsequent AMI.Patients were defined ashaving a subsequent AMI if they presented with symp-toms suggestive of ACS and typical increased concentra-tions of biochemical markers with CK-MB greater thanthe upper reference limit(and a CK-MB increaseՆ50%from the previous concentration in the case of an AMIoccurring soon after the admission AMI).The study endpoint was a cardiac event at6monthsafter admission.A review of medical records and fol-low-up telephone interviews were conducted to surveyfor patient cardiac events.The review of case notes forfollow-up was performed by2of the authors(J.L.andH.N.),who were blinded to H-FABP concentrations. statistical analysisContinuous variables were analyzed(Ver.11.0,StatisticalPackage for the Social Sciences)with the Mann–WhitneyU-test,Wilcoxon paired sign-rank test,or linear regres-sion analysis,and data were expressed as mean(SD)ormedian(25th–75th percentiles).Values below the detec-tion limit of the assay were defined as zero.Categoricalvariables were compared by the␹2test.The relative risk with the95%confidence interval(CI)is presented.Uni-variate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic value of variables. The log-rank test was performed for the Kaplan–Meier probability estimates.The ROC curve was used to assess the discriminatory ability of biomarkers(9).A univariate Z-test was used to compare the area under the ROC curve of biomarkers,as described by Hanley and McNeil(10).P Ͻ0.05was considered significant.ResultsOf the328patients(Table1),241(73.5%)were diagnosed with AMI at admission.On the basis of electrocardio-graphic findings on admission,154patients who had a persistent(Ͼ30min)ST-segment elevation of at least0.05 mV in at least2contiguous leads or presumed new1398Ishii et al.:FABP in ACSleft-bundle branch block were assigned to the ST-segmentelevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)group,and theother174patients were placed in the unstable angina andnon-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(UA/NSTEMI)group.Mean(SD)serum concentrations of bothH-FABP[63.8(92.4)␮g/L vs25.2(46.4)␮g/L;PϽ0.0001] and cTnT[0.552(1.77)␮g/L vs0.093(0.211)␮g/L;P Ͻ0.0001]on admission in the STEMI group were signifi-cantly higher than those in the UA/NSTEMI group.Ofthe patients with STEMI,139(90.3%)underwent emer-gent coronary angiography within24h after admission[median of0.8(0.4–1.1)h after admission],with123(79.9%)of these subsequently undergoing coronaryrevascularization.Of the patients with UA/NSTEMI,148(85.1%)underwent emergent coronary angiographywithin24h after admission[median of3.2(1.0–17.5)h],with76(43.7%)of these subsequently undergoing coro-nary revascularization.The serum concentration of H-FABP on admission was Ͻ1.25␮g/L in3patients(0.9%), 1.25–6.2␮g/L in 113(34.5%),andՆ6.2␮g/L in212(64.6%).The cTnT concentration on admission wasϽ0.01␮g/L in136pa-tients(41.5%),0.01–0.1␮g/L in95(29.0%),andՆ0.1␮g/L in97(29.6%).A significantly higher percentage of patients had H-FABP concentrationsՆ6.2␮g/L(64.6%) than cTnT concentrationsՆ0.01␮g/L(58.5%;Pϭ0.02)or Ն0.1␮g/L(29.6%;PϽ0.0001),suggesting that H-FABP concentration is a more sensitive indication than cTnT of myocardial damage in patients with ACS within6h after the onset of chest pain.The time from the onset of chest pain to admission correlated significantly with H-FABP concentration(rϭ0.197;Pϭ0.0003),but not with cTnT concentration.There was a weak but significant correlation between H-FABP and cTnT concentrations at admission(rϭ0.17;Pϭ0.002).During the6months after admission,there was 1(0.3%)noncardiac death(gastric cancer)and25(7.6%) cardiac events,including15(4.6%)cardiac deaths and 10(3.0%)subsequent nonfatal AMIs.The causes of cardiac death were fatal AMI in10patients,heart failure in3 patients,and sudden death occurring outside hospital in2 patients.A comparison of patients who had subsequent cardiac events with those who did not revealed that cardiac events were associated with patient age(mean age,69.8vs 64.5years;Pϭ0.02),higher serum concentrations of H-FABP(119vs46.6␮g/L;Pϭ0.0004)and cTnT(1.72vs 0.45␮g/L;Pϭ0.01),AMI(96%vs71.6%;Pϭ0.008)or anterior AMI(56%vs30%;Pϭ0.01),hypertension(72% vs53.5%;Pϭ0.09),and a tendency not to receive emergent coronary angiography within24h after admis-sion(64%vs89.4%;Pϭ0.001;Table1).A comparison of patients who experienced a cardiac event and those whoparison of demographics and clinical characteristics for328ACS patients who did or did not have acardiac event.All patients(n؍328)No cardiac event(n؍303)Cardiac event(n؍25)P Mean(SD)age,years64.9(10.4)64.5(10.4)69.8(9.9)0.02 Men,n(%)264(80.5)246(81.2)18(72.0)NS a Mean(SD)time from onset,h 3.2(1.6) 3.2(1.6) 3.3(1.6)NS AMI,n(%)241(73.5)217(71.6)24(96.0)0.008 STEMI,n(%)154(47.0)139(45.9)15(60.0)NS AdmissionMean(SD)heart rate,beats/min76(17)75(16)82(19)NS Mean(SD)systolic BP,a mmHg138(28)138(28)141(27)NS Mean(SD)diastolic BP,mmHg73(17)73(17)76(15)NS Mean(SD)serum H-FABP,␮g/L52.1(99.2)46.6(86.5)119(187)0.0004 Mean(SD)serum cTnT,␮g/L0.54(3.22)0.45(2.5) 1.72(7.83)0.01 Mean(SD)serum creatinine,mg/L7.9(3.2)7.8(3.1)8.6(3.6)NS Killip classϾ1,n(%)10(3.0)8(2.6)2(8)NS Anterior AMI,n(%)105(32.2)91(30)14(56)0.01 Previous historyMyocardial infarction,n(%)58(17.6)51(16.8)7(28)NS Heart failure,n(%)3(0.9)3(1)0(0)NS Coronary risk factorsDiabetes,n(%)105(32)96(31.7)9(36)NS Hypertension,n(%)180(54.9)162(53.5)18(72)0.09 Hyperlipidemia,n(%)145(44.2)133(43.9)12(48)NS Current smoking,n(%)178(54.3)165(54.5)13(52)NS Emergent coronary angiography,n(%)287(87.5)271(89.4)16(64)0.001 PCI,n(%)182(55.5)168(55.4)14(56)NS CABG,n(%)17(5.2)16(5.3)1(4)NSa NS,not significant;BP,blood pressure;PCI,percutaneous coronary intervention;CABG,coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Clinical Chemistry51,No.8,20051399did not revealed that there was no difference in the number of patients who had diabetes or hyperlipidemia,currently smoked,or had received early coronary revas-cularization.Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that patients with H-FABP concentrations above the median value of 9.8␮g/L on admission had a significantly higher risk of cardiac mortality (P ϭ0.0006)and cardiac events (P Ͻ0.0001)within 6months after admission compared with those who did not (Fig.1).Although weaker (P ϭ0.018and 0.012,respectively),a similar relationship was observed for H-FABP Ն6.2␮g/L;we therefore used the median H-FABP value of 9.8␮g/L as the cutoff for predicting cardiac death and cardiac events.Patients with increased H-FABP (above the median value of 9.8␮g/L)on admission had a significantly higher risk of cardiac death and cardiac events within 30days (P ϭ0.002and 0.006,respectively)and 6months (P ϭ0.0008and P Ͻ0.0001,respectively)after admission com-pared with those who did not (Table 2).Although weaker,a similar relationship was observed for increased cTnT (above the median value of 0.02␮g/L;Table 3).The relationship between increased H-FABP and car-diac death or cardiac events within 6months after admis-sion in patients with or without increased cTnT is shown in Fig.2.Increased H-FABP was significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiac events within 6months after admission in patients with or without increased cTnT concentrations (P ϭ0.0001and 0.003,respectively).There was a greater tendency for cardiac death within 6months after admission among patients with increased cTnT and H-FABP concentrations compared with those patients with only increased cTnT concentrations (P ϭ0.07).In the subgroup of patients with STEMI or UA/NSTEMI,patients with increased H-FABP also had a higher risk of cardiac events within 6months after admis-sion compared with those who did not (P ϭ0.04and 0.005,respectively;Table 2).There was no significantdifference in the tendency for cardiac event risk within 6months after admission between patients with and with-out increased cTnT (Table 3).The relationship between early invasive management and incidence of cardiac events within 6months after admission for UA/NSTEMI patients with or without increased H-FABP or cTnT is shown in Fig.3.Patients with increased H-FABP who received early invasive man-agement had a significantly lower risk of cardiac events within 6months after admission compared with those who did not (P ϭ0.015).However,the risk of cardiac events within 6months after admission did notdifferFig.1.Kaplan–Meier curves showing incidence of cardiac death (A )and cardiac events (B )within 6months after admission according to H-FABP (above vs at or below the median value of 9.8␮g/L).Table 2.Risk stratification of ACS patients based on increased H-FABP (above the median value of 9.8␮g/L).H-FABP,␮g/L P>9.8<9.8All patients (n ϭ328)n16416430-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)13(7.9)1(0.6)0.00230-Day cardiac event,n (%)15(9.1)3(1.8)0.0066-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)14(8.5)1(0.7)0.00086-Month cardiac event,n (%)22(13.4)3(1.8)Ͻ0.0001STEMI (n ϭ154)n10648Coronary revascularization,n (%)82(77.3)41(85.4)NS a 30-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)11(10.4)1(2.1)0.130-Day cardiac event,n (%)12(11.3)1(2.1)0.066-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)12(11.3)1(2.1)0.066-Month cardiac event,n (%)14(13.2)1(2.1)0.04UA/NSTEMI (n ϭ174)n58116Coronary revascularization,n (%)39(67.2)37(31.9)Ͻ0.000130-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)2(3.4)0(0)NS 30-Day cardiac event,n (%)3(5.2)2(1.7)NS 6-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)2(3.4)0(0)NS 6-Month cardiac event,n (%)8(13.8)2(1.7)0.005aNS,not significant.1400Ishii et al.:FABP in ACSsignificantly between patients without increased H-FABP who received early invasive management and those who did not.Similar results were observed for increased cTnT.Univariate Cox proportional regression analyses re-vealed that increased H-FABP and cTnT were signifi-cantly associated with cardiac death (P ϭ0.009and 0.01,respectively)and cardiac events (P ϭ0.0009and 0.03,respectively;Table 4).Stepwise multivariate analyses in-cluding age,gender,time from the onset of chest pain,STEMI,increased H-FABP,increased cTnT,creatinineconcentration,Killip class Ͼ1,anterior AMI,and previous history of myocardial infarction revealed that increased H-FABP,but not increased cTnT,was independently associated with cardiac death (P ϭ0.04)and cardiac events (P ϭ0.0004)within 6months after admission (Table 5).Similar to all patients,for patients with STEMI stepwise multivariate analyses including age,gender,time from the onset of chest pain,increased H-FABP,increased cTnT,creatinine concentration,Killip class Ͼ1,anterior AMI,and previous history of myocardial infarc-tion revealed that increased H-FABP (P ϭ0.02),age (P ϭ0.004),and a history of myocardial infarction (P ϭ0.006)were independent predictors of cardiac events within 6months after admission (Table 5).For patients with UA/NSTEMI,only increased H-FABP was independently as-sociated with cardiac events within 6months after admis-sion (P ϭ0.007).Comparison of the areas under the ROC curves for H-FABP and cTnT revealed that H-FABP (0.711;95%CI,0.810–0.612)was a better predictor of cardiac events within 6months after admission than cTnT (0.578;95%CI,0.695–0.462;P ϭ0.08;Fig.4A).The area under the H-FABP ROC curve for patients with STEMI was 0.684(95%CI,0.814–0.553),and the H-FABP concentra-tion associated with maximum sensitivity (60%)and specificity (65%)was 35␮g/L (Fig.4B).For patients with UA/NSTEMI,the area under the H-FABP ROC curve was 0.730(95%CI,0.893–0.567),and the H-FABP concentra-tion associated with maximum sensitivity (80.0%)and specificity (71%)was 10.4␮g/L.DiscussionThis prospective study demonstrated that measurement of serum H-FABP concentrations on admission provides important and independent information for risk stratifi-cation of patients presenting with ACS in the first 6h afterTable 3.Risk stratification of ACS patients based on increased cTnT (above the median value of 0.02␮g/L).cTnT,␮g/L P>0.02<0.02All patients (n ϭ328)n16416430-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)12(7.3)2(1.2)0.0130-Day cardiac event,n (%)13(7.9)5(3.0)0.096-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)13(7.9)2(1.2)0.0066-Month cardiac event,n (%)18(11.0)7(4.3)0.04STEMI (n ϭ154)n9658Coronary revascularization,n (%)74(77.1)49(84.5)NS a 30-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)10(10.4)2(3.4)NS 30-Day cardiac event,n (%)10(10.4)3(5.2)NS 6-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)11(11.5)2(3.4)NS 6-Month cardiac event,n (%)12(12.5)3(5.2)NSUA/NSTEMI (n ϭ174)n68106Coronary revascularization,n (%)41(60.3)35(33.0)0.000530-Day cardiac mortality,n (%)2(2.9)0(0)NS 30-Day cardiac event,n (%)3(4.4)2(1.9)NS 6-Month cardiac mortality,n (%)2(2.9)0(0)NS 6-Month cardiac event,n (%)6(8.8)4(3.8)NSaNS,notsignificant.Fig.2.Association of increased H-FABP concentra-tions (above the median value of 9.8␮g/L)with cardiac death (A )and cardiac events (B )within 6months after admission in patients with or without increased cTnT (above the median value of 0.02␮g/L).Clinical Chemistry 51,No.8,20051401the onset of chest pain.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first time that an increase in the concentration of serum H-FABP early after symptomatic onset has been shown to have a profound and independent impact on adverse outcome within 6months of admission for pa-tients with STEMI or UA/NSTEMI.Such findings may have important implications for immediate management of high-risk patients in the early hours of ACS.Although there was a relationship between increased serum cTnT concentrations and adverse outcomes within 6months after admission,the predictive ability of H-FABP concentration was higher.Increased H-FABP con-centrations,but not cTnT concentrations,retained inde-pendent significance based on a stepwise Cox regression analysis.Supporting these findings,ROC curve analyses revealed that H-FABP concentrations tended to have a higher predictive ability than cTnT concentrations.Fur-thermore,increased H-FABP was associated with an increased risk of cardiac events within 6months after admission independent of increased cTnT (Fig.2).These findings show that serum H-FABP concentrations provide prognostic information superior to that provided by cTnT concentrations for patients presenting with ACS in the first 6h after the onset of chest pain.The superiority of H-FABP over cTnT may result from its higher sensitivity for the detection of myocardial damage in the early hours of ACS.A recent report on 134patients with suspected ACS,including 74(55%)patients presenting within 6h after symptom onset,showed that H-FABP Ն6.2␮g/L had higher sensitivities than cTnT Ն0.1␮g/L for identifying patients requiring emergency hospitalization (64%vs 43%;P Ͻ0.05),emergency angiography (63%vs 41%;P Ͻ0.05),and early coronary intervention within 7days after admission (78%vs 58%;P Ͻ0.05)(11).This study,however,showed no correlation of H-FABP and subsequent AMI or death because the authors reported no subsequent AMI and death during the 1-month follow-up period.These differences between the 2studies might result from differ-ences in population sizes (larger in our study)and the severity of patient condition (more severe in our study).Given the diagnostic and prognostic properties of cTnT for patients with ACS during the first 6h after the onset of chest symptoms (12–14),our findings clearly demonstrate the need to consider either serum H-FABP or cTnT for diagnosis of AMI and risk stratification,depending on the ischemic interval at presentation.Our findings indicate that if patients present within 6h after the onset of chest pain,measurement of serum H-FABP concentrationspro-Fig.3.Association of early invasive management with cardiac events within 6months after admission in UA/NSTEMI patients with or without increased H-FABP (above the median value of 9.8␮g/L;A )or increased cTnT (above the median value of 0.02␮g/L;B ).Table 4.Univariate predictors of cardiac death and cardiac events within 6months after admission in 328ACS patients.VariablesCardiac deathCardiac event RR a95%CIPRR95%CIPAge (years)1.09 1.03–1.160.004 1.05 1.01–1.100.02Gender (male ϭ1) 3.75 1.36–10.40.01 1.660.70–3.98NS Time from onset (h)0.950.67–1.32NS 1.040.82–1.32NS STEMI (yes ϭ1)7.58 1.71–33.60.008 1.750.79–3.89NS H-FABP Ͼ9.8␮g/L (yes ϭ1)14.5 1.91–110.50.0097.70 2.30–25.70.0009cTnT Ͼ0.02␮g/L (yes ϭ1) 6.69 1.51–29.60.01 2.65 1.11–6.340.03Serum creatinine (mg/L) 1.110.98–1.250.10 1.060.96–1.18NS Killip class Ͼ1(yes ϭ1) 5.19 1.17–23.00.03 2.990.70–12.7NS Anterior AMI (yes ϭ1)1.880.68–5.18NS2.78 1.26–6.120.01History of myocardial infarction (yes ϭ1)1.170.33–4.13NS 1.850.77–4.43NSaRR,relative risk;NS,not significant.1402Ishii et al.:FABP in ACSvides a more appropriate platform for diagnosis and prognosis than measurement of cTnT concentrations;con-versely,if patients present later than the first 6h after the onset of chest pain,measurement of serum cTnT concen-trations is appropriate.Because accurately predicting the ischemic interval in ACS is difficult (15,16),a combina-tion of serum H-FABP and cTnT measurements would provide a better early risk assessment for patients with ACS than would measurement of either of these markers rger prospective studies would allow the effec-tiveness of combined H-FABP and cTnT serum measure-ments for patients presenting with ACS to be ascertained.Recent multicenter studies demonstrated the use of cTnT concentrations to identify UA/NSTEMI patients,who par-ticularly benefit from early invasive management (17,18).By comparing the serum H-FABP concentrations of UA/NSTEMI patients,the present study showed that early invasive management reduced cardiac event rates within 6months after admission in patients with increased serum H-FABP on admission but had no significant effect when H-FABP concentrations were not increased (Fig.3).These results provide evidence that measurement of serum H-FABP concentrations on admission would allow identifica-tion of high-risk patients presenting in the early hours of ACS,who would benefit greatly from an early invasive strategy.A disadvantage of this study is that because the population of patients who did not receive early invasive management was small,the treatments were not rger prospective studies would confirm the results from this study and clarify the utility of H-FABP for identi-fying appropriate therapeutic options.This study highlights the advantages of using serum H-FABP concentrations for risk assessment of patients only with a high clinical probability of ACS.Further investigations are required to explore the application of this approach to a broad spectrum of patients presenting with chest pain and a low to intermediate probability of ACS.Because H-FABP has a very low molecular mass,its elimination rate is partly determined by the patient’s kidney function (19).It would be interesting to determine whether our findings might apply to patients with chronic renal failure.To minimize the effects of renal clearance,however,we excluded patients with serum creatinine concentrations Ͼ15mg/L.In addition,it would be useful to calculate the H-FABP/creatinine concentration ratio in serum.Further studies are needed to clarify the useful-ness of this ratio in patients with ACS.A further limitation of this study is the potential increase in H-FABP concen-trations in patients with skeletal muscle damage (3,4)or heart failure (20).Recent studies have also suggested that H-FABP concentrations may be increased in patients with minor brain injuries (21)or neurodegenerative disease (22).It is important to ascertain whether the prognosticTable 5.Multivariate predictors of cardiac death and cardiac events within 6months after admission in 328ACS patients.VariablesRR a95%CIPCardiac death within 6months All patients (n ϭ328)H-FABP Ͼ9.8␮g/L (yes ϭ1)8.92 1.15–69.40.04Age (years)1.09 1.03–1.150.002STEMI (yes ϭ1)5.22 1.16–23.50.03Cardiac event within 6months All patients (n ϭ328)H-FABP Ͼ9.8␮g/L (yes ϭ1)8.96 2.64–30.40.0004Age (years)1.05 1.00–1.090.03History of myocardial infarction (yes ϭ1)2.52 1.03–6.160.04STEMI (n ϭ154)H-FABP Ͼ9.8␮g/L (yes ϭ1)11.3 1.41–90.60.02Age (years)1.08 1.02–1.140.004History of myocardial infarction (yes ϭ1)5.41 1.64–17.80.006UA/NSTEMI (n ϭ174)H-FABP Ͼ9.8␮g/L (yes ϭ1)8.31 1.76–39.10.007aRR,relativerisk.Fig. 4.ROC curves for cardiac events within 6months after admission based on increased H-FABP and cTnT concentrations in the study population (A )and for increased H-FABP in patients with STEMI or UA/NSTEMI (B ).Clinical Chemistry 51,No.8,20051403。

相关文档
最新文档