考研英语二真题：翻译(新东方版)
考研英语二全文翻译答案超详解析
考研英语二全文翻译答案超详解析Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Thinner isn’t always better. A number of studies have __1___ that normal-weight people are in fact at higher risk of some diseases compared to those who are overweight. And there are health conditions for which being overweight is actually ___2___. For example, heavier women are less likely to develop calcium deficiency than thin women. ___3___ among the elderly, being somewhat overweight is often an ___4___ of good health.Of even greater ___5___ is the fact that obesity turns out to be very difficult to define. It is often defined ___6___ body mass index, or BMI. BMI ___7__ body mass divided by the square of height. An adult with a BMI of 18 to 25 is often considered to be normal weight. Between 25 and 30 is overweight. And over 30 is consideredobese. Obesity, ___8___,can be divided into moderately obese, severely obese, and very severely obese.While such numerical standards seem 9 , they are not. Obesity is probably less a matter of weight than body fat. Some people with a high BMI are in fact extremely fit, 10 others with a low BMI may be in poor 11 .For example, many collegiate and professional football players 12 as obese, though their percentage body fat is low. Conversely, someone with a small frame may have high body fat but a 13 BMI.Today we have a(an) _14 _ to label obesity as a overweightare sometimes_15_in the media with their faces covered. Stereotypes _16_ with obesity include laziness, lack of will power,and lower prospects for ,employers,and health professionals have been shown to harbor biases against the obese. _17_very young children tend to look down on the overweight, and teasing about body build has long been a problem in schools.Negative attitudes toward obesity, _18_in health concerns, have stimulated a number of anti-obesity own hospital system has bannedsugary drinks from its facilities. Many employers have instituted weight loss and fitness initiatives. Michelle Obama launched a high-visibility campaign _20_ childhood obesity, even claiming that it represents our greatest national security threat.1. [A] denied [B] conduced [C] doubled [D] ensured、【答案】B concluded【解析】题干中，一系列的研究已经_____，事实上，正常体重的人的患病风险要高于超重的人。
2023年考研英语二翻译真题答案
2023年考研英语二翻译真题答案业务课名称：英语二考生须知：1.答案必须写在答题纸上，写在其他纸上无效。
2.答题时必须使用蓝、黑色墨水笔或圆珠笔做答，用其他答题不给分，不得使用涂改液。
考研英语二翻译真题答案【翻译原文】In the late 18th century, William Wordsworth became famous for his poems about nature. And he was one of the founders of a movement called Romanticism, which celebrated the wonders of the natural world.Poetry is powerful. Its energy and rhythm can capture a reader, transport them to another world and make them see things differently, Through carefully selected words and phrases, poems can be dramatic, funny, beautiful, moving, and inspiringNo one knows for sure when poetry began but it has been around for thousands of years, even before people could write It was a way to tell stories and pass down history. It is closely related to a song and even when written it is usually created to be performed out loud. Poems really come to life when they are recited. This can also help with understanding them too because the rhythm and sounds of the words become clearer.【参考译文】18世纪晚期，威廉·华兹华斯因其关于自然的诗歌而闻名。
【新东方版】2021年考研英语二真题及参考答案
2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语（二）Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text.Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and mark A,B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET.(10points)It's not difficult to set targets for staff.It is much harder,1,to understand their negative consequences.Most work-related behaviors have multiple components.2one and the others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you'll3see how this works with drivers.Watch people get on and show their tickets.Are they carefully inspected?Never.Do people get on without paying? Of course!Are there inspectors to4that people have paid?Possibly,but very few.And people who run for the bus?They are5.How about jumping lights?Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists.Why?Because the target is6.People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7,the number of buses and bus lanes were increased,and drivers were8or punished according to the time they took.And drivers hit these targets.But they9hit cyclists.If the target was changed to10,you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing.If the criterion changed to safety,you would get more11drivers who obeyed traftic laws.But both these criteria would be at the expense of time.There is another12:people became immensely inventive in hitting targets.Have you13 that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time?Tailwinds?Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a14is meant to take.A one-hour flight is now ballad as a two-hour flight.The15of the story is simple.Most jobs are multidimensional,with multiple criteria. Choose one criterion and you may well16others.Everything Can be done faster and made cheaper,but there is a17.Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target-setting.But it is an argument for exploring consequences first.All good targets should have multiple criteria18critical factors such as time,money,quality and customer feedback.The trick is not only to19just one or even two dimensions of the objective,but also to understand how to help people better20the objective.1. A.therefore B.however C.again D.moreover2. A.Emphasize B.Identify C.Assess D.Explain3. A.nearly B.curiously C.eagerly D.quickly4. A.claim B.prove C.check D.recall5. A.threatened B.ignored C.mocked D.blamed6. A.punctuality B.hospitality petition D.innovation7. A.Yet B.So C.Besides D.Still8. A.hired B.trained C.rewarded D.grouped9. A.only B.rather C.Once D.Also10. fort B.revenue C.efficiency D.security11. A.friendly B.quiet C.cautious D.diligent12. A.purpose B.problem C.prejudice D.policy13. A.interesting B.revealed C.abmitted D.noticed14. A.break B.trip C.departure D.transfer15. A.moral B.background C.style D.form16. A.interpret B.criticize C.sacrifice D.tolerate17. A.task B.secret C.product D.cost18. A.leading to B.calling for C.relating to D.accounting for19. A.specify B.predict C.restore D.create20. A.modify B.review C.present D.achieve参考答案：1-5：BADCB6-10：ABCDB11-15：CBDBA16-20：CDCADSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts.Answer the questions after each text by choosing A,B,C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(40points)Text1Reskilling is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future where a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind.We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly,as will the requirements of the jobs that remain.Research by the WEF detailed in the Harvard Business Review,finds that on average42per cent of the“core skill”within job roles will change by2022. That is a very short timeline,so we can only imagine what the changes will be further in the future.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one.For individual companies,the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer demand and replace them with those whose skills are.That does not always happen.AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company who decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with a fire-and-hirestrategy ultimately retraining18,000employees.Prepandemic,other companies including Amazon and Disney had also pledged to create their own plans.When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy though,the focus usually turns to government to handle.Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best,and have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers even at times and in regions where unemployment is high.With the pandemic,unemployment is very high indeed.In February,at3.5per cent and5.5 per cent respectively,unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere.As of May,those rates had spiked up to13.3per cent and13.7per cent,and although many worker shortages had disappeared,not all had done so. In the medical field,to take an obvious example,the pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages of doctors,nurses and other medical personnel.Of course,it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be doctor in few weeks,no matter who pays for it.But even if you cannot close that gap,maybe you can close others,and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned.That seems to be the case in Sweden, where the pandemic kick-started a retraining program where business as well as government had a role.Reskilling in this way would be challenging in a North American context.You can easily imagine a chorus of"you can’t do that"because teachers or nurses or whoever have special skills, and using any support staff who has been quickly trained is bound to end in disaster.Maybe.Or maybe it is something that can work well in Sweden,with its history of co-operation between business,labour and government,but not in North America where our history is very different. Then again,maybe it is akin to wartime,when extraordinary things take place,but it is business as usual after the fact.And yet,as in war the pandemic is teaching us that many things,including rapid reskilling,can be done if there is a will to do them.In any case,Swedens’work force is now more skilled,in more things,and more flexible than it was before.Of course,reskilling programs,whether for pandemic needs or the postpandemic world,are expensive and at a time when everyone’s budgets are lean this may not be the time to implement them.Then again,extending income support programs to get us through the next months is expensive,too,to say nothing of the cost of having a swath of long-term unemployed in the POST-COVID years Given that,perhaps we should think hard about whether the pandemic canjump-start us to a place where reskilling becomes much more than a buzzword.21.Research by the World Economic Forum suggestsA.an increase in full-time employmentB.an urgent demand for new job skillsC.a steady growth of job opportunitiesD.a controversy about the“core skills”22.AT&T is cited to showA.an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategyB.an immediate need for government supportC.the importance of staff appraisal standardsD.the characteristics of reskilling program23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in CanadaA.have driven up labour costsB.have proved to be inconsistentC.have met with fierce oppositionD.have appeared to be insufficient24.We can learn from Paragraph3that there wasA.a call for policy adjustment.B.a change in hiring practices.C.a lack of medical workers.D.a sign of economic recovery.25.Scandinavian Airlines decided toA.Great job vacancies for the unemployed.B.Prepare their laid-off workers for other jobs.C.Retrain their cabin staff for better services.D.finance their staff's college education.Text2With the global population predicted to hit close to10billion by2050,and forecasts thatagricultural production in some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace,food security is increasingly making headlines.In the UK,it has become a big talking point recently too,for a rather particular reason:Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importing food.The country produces only about60per cent of the food it eats,down from almost three-quarters in the late1980s.A move back to self-sufficiency,the argument goes,would boost the farming industry,political sovereignty and even the nations health.Sounds great-but how feasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds,UK,85percent of the country's total land area is associated with meat and dairy production.That supplies80 percent of what is consumed,so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn’t allow us to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures,but they are still grave.To become much more self-sufficient,the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods,and probably also farm more intensively meaning fewer green fields and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn’t help.There is a good reason why the UK is dominated by animal husbandry:most of its terrain doesn’t have the right soil or climate to grow crops on commercial basis.Just25per cent of the country’s land is suitable for crop-growing,most of which is already occupied by arable fields.Even if we converted all the suitable land to fields of fruit and veg---which would involve taking out all the nature reserves and removing thousands of people from their homes—we would achieve only a30percent boost in crop production.Just23per cent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown,so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only30per cent of our fresh produce needs. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains,sugars,seeds and oils that provide us with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self-sufficiency in the UK would____.[A]a be hindered by its population growth[B]contribute to the nations well-being[C]become a priority of the government[D]post a challenge to its farming industry27.The report by the University of Leeds showed that in the UK[A]farmland has been inefficiently utilised[B]factory style production needs reforming[C]most land is used for meat and dairy production[D]more green fields will be converted for farming28.Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to____.[A]its farming technology[B]its dietary tradition[C]its natural conditions[D]its commercial interests29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people____.[A]rely largely on imports for fresh produce[B]enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumption[C]are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intakeD]are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author's attitude to food self-efficiency in the UK is____.[A]defensive[B]doubtful[C]tolerant[D]optimisticText3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunerlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015,it picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft’s own Office dominates the market for“productivity”software,but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world.Both apps,however,were later scrapped,after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products.Their teams of engineers stayed on,making them two of the many “acqui-hires”that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for tech talent.To Microsoft’s critics,the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path.“They bought the seedlings and closed them down,”complained Paul Arnold,a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures,putting paid to businesses that might one day turn into competitors.Microsoft declined to comment.Like other start-up investors,Mr Arnold’s own business often depends on sellingstart-ups to larger tech companies,though he admits to mixed feelings about the result:“I think these things are good for me,if I put my selfish hat on.But are they good for the American economy?I don’t know.”The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question.This week,it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade.Although only a research project at this stage,the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than$5.5tm,rifling through such small deals---many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise---might seem beside the point.Between them,the five companies(Apple,Microsoft,Google,Amazon and Facebook)have spent an average of only$3.4bn a year on sub-$1bn acquisitions over the past five years---a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves,and the more than$130bn of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.However,critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum,in some cases as part of a“buy and kill”tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wuderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions?A.Their market values declined.B.Their tech features improved.C.Their engineers were retained.D.Their products were re-priced.32.Microsoft’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend to___A.ignore public optionsB.treat new tech talent unfairlyC.exaggerate their product qualityD.eliminate their potential competitors33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might___A.harm the national economyB.worsen market competitionC.discourage start-up investorsD.weaken big tech companies34.The US Federal Trade Commission intend to___A.examine small acquisitionsB.limit Big Tech’s expansionC.supervise start-ups operationsD.encourage research collaboration35.For the five biggest tech companies,their small acquisition have___A.brought little financial pressureB.raised few management challengesC.set an example for future dealsD.generate considerable profitsText4We're fairly good at judging people based on first impression,thin slices of experience ranging from a glimpse of a photo to five-minute interaction,and deliberation can be not only extraneous but intrusive.In one study of the ability she dubbed"thin slicing,"the late psychologist Nalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent10-second video clips of professors and to rate the instructor's overall effectiveness.Their ratings correlated strongly with students'end-of-semester ratings. Another set of participants had count backward from1,000by nines as they watched the clips,occupying their conscious working memory.Their ratings were just as accurate,demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically,another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for their judgment,before giving the rating.Accuracy dropped dramatically.Ambady suspected that deliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues,such as certain gestures or utterances,rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression.She found similar interference when participants watched 15-second clips of pairs of people and judged whether they were strangers,friends,or dating partners.Other research shows we're better at detecting deception an sexual orientation from thin slices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection.“It's as if you'redriving a stick shift,”says Judith Hall,a psychologist at Northeastern University,“and if you start thinking about it too much,you can't remember what you're doing.But if you go on automatic pilot,you're fine.Much of our social life is like that.”Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences.College students'ratings of strawberry jams and college course aligned better with experts' opinions when the students weren't asked to analyze their rationale.And people made car-buying decisions that were both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings rather than on details,but only if the decision was complex-when they had a lot of information to process.Intuition's special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances.In one study,participants completed a battery of eight tasks,including four that tapped reflective thinking(discerning rule comprehending vocabulary)and four that tapped intuition an creativity(generating new products or figures of speech).Then the rated the degree to which they had used intuition(“gut feelings,"＂hunches,""my heart"). Use of their gut hurt their performance on the first four tasks,as expected,and helped them on the rest.Sometimes the heart is smarter than the head.36.Nalini Ambaby's study deals withA.instructor student interactionB.the power of people's memoryC.the reliability of first impressionsD.People's ability to influence others37.In Ambaby’s study,rating accuracy dropped when participants.A.gave the rating in limited timeC.watched shorter video clipsB.focused on specific detailsD.discussed with on another38.Judith Hall mentions driving to mention that.A.memory can be selectiveB.reflection can be distractingC.social skills must be cultivatedD.deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions,it is advisable to.A.follow your feelingsB.list your preferencesC.seek expert adviceD.collect enough data40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?A.Generating mew products takes time.B.Intuition may affect reflective tasks.C.V ocabulary comprehension needs creativity.D.Objective thinking may boost intuitiveness.Part BDirections:Read the following text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subheading from the list A-G for each of the numbered paragraphs(41-45).There are two extra subheadings which you do not need to use.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(10points)A.Stay calmB.Stay humbleC.Don’t make judgmentsD.Be realistic about the risksE.Decide whether to waitF.Ask permission to disagreeG.Identify a shared goalHow to Disagree wit Someone More Powerful than YouYour boss proposes a new initiative you think won’t work.Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you think is unrealistic.What do you say when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do?How do you decide whether it’s worth speaking up?And if you do, what exactly should you say?Here’s how to disagree with someone more powerful than you. 41.You may decide it’s best to hold off on voicing your opinion.Maybe you haven’t finished thinking the problem through,the whole discussion was a surprise to you,or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks.If you think other people are going to disagree too,you might want to gather your army first.People can contribute experience or information to your think—all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid.It’s also a good idea to delay the conversation if you’re in a meeting or other public space.Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.42.Before you share your thoughts,think about what the powerful person cares about—it may be“the credibility of their team on getting a project done on time,”says Grenny.You’re more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a“higher purpose”.When you do speak up,don’t assume the link will be clear.You’ll want to state it overtly,contextualizing your statements so that you’re seen not as a disagreeable underling but as a colleague who’s trying to advance a shared goal.The discussion will then become more like a chess game than a boxing match.43.This step may sound overly deferential,but it’s a smart way to give the powerful person psychological safety and control.You can say something like,“I know we seem to be moving toward a first-quarter commitment here.I have reasons to think that won’t work.I’d like to lay out my reasoning.Would that be OK?”This gives the person a choice,allowing them to verbally opt in.And,assuming they say yes,it will make you feel more confident about voicing your disagreement.44.You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red,but do whatever you can to remainneutral in both your words and actions.When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety,it undercuts the message.It sends a mixed message,and your counterpart gets to choose what to read.Deep breaths can help,as can speaking more slowly and deliberately.When we feel panicky we tend to talk louder and faster.Simply slowing the pace and talking in an even tone helps the other person calm down and does the same for you.It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren’t.45.Emphasize that you’re offering your opinion,not gospel truth.It may be a well-informed, well-researched opinion,but it’s still an opinion,my talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence.Instead of saying something like“If we set an end-of-quarter deadline,we’ll never make it,”say,“This is just my opinion,but I don’t see how we will make that deadline.”Having asserted your perfectly willing to talk-and may even be flattered to receive your attention.答案：EGFABSection III Translation46.Directions:Translate the following text into Chinese.Write your translation on ANSWER SHEET.(15points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest source of connection，laughter and warmth.While that may well be true,researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging that we didn’t expect.In one series of studies,researchers instructed Chicago-area commuters using public transportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them.On average,participants who followed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence.The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangers,it is often due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us.Much of that time,however,this belief is false.As it turns out,many people are actually perfectly willing to talk and may even be flattered to receive your attention.参考译文：我们往往认为朋友和家人是我们关系、笑容和温暖的最大来源。
考研英语二翻译题真题及答案
考研英语二翻译题真题及答案考研英语二翻译题真题Section III Translation46. Directions：Translate the following text from English into Chinese. Write your translation on ANSWER SHEET 2. (15 points)Think about driving a route thats very familiar. It could be your commute to work， a trip into town or the way home. Whichever it is， you know every twist and turn like the back of your hand. On these sorts of trips its easy to lose concentration on the driving and pay little attention to the passing scenery. The consequence is that you perceive that the trip has taken less time than it actually has.This is the well-travelled road effect： people tend to underestimate the time it takes to travel a familiar route.The effect is caused by the way we allocate our attention. When we travel down a well-known route， because we dont have to concentrate much，time seems to flow more quickly. And afterwards， when we come to think back on it， we cant remember the journey well because we didnt pay much attention to it. So we assume it was shorter.考研英语二翻译题真题参考答案：想想看在一条非常熟悉的路上驾驶的感觉，这可能发生在上班，进城或回家的路上。
考研英语二真题：阅读Text3(新东方版)
考研英语二真题：阅读Text3（新东方版）Digital mediaOpinionThe Guardian view on digital giants: they farm us for the dataEditorialWe are neither the customers nor even the product of companies like Google, but we turn our lives into the knowledge that they sellAn astonishing project is under way to build a “digital time machine” that will show us in fine detail the lives of ordinary Venetians across a thousand years of history. It is made possible by the persistence of the republic’s bureaucracy, which, when Napoleon extinguished the Republic of Venice in 1797, left behind 80km of shelving full of records of births, deaths, trades, building, land ownership, private letters, ambassadors’reports and even medical information. All this is now to be digitised, cross-referenced, and analysed, and all its secrets laid bare to provide a picture in unprecedented richness and detail of the lives of individuals and the development of society over many centuries. Obviously, this is wonderful for historians and indeed anybody with an imagination alive today. One wonders, though, what the Venetians would have made of it, had they known their lives and letters would be so carefully anatomised after their deaths.Far more is known about us now, though, and in real time. The data in the Venetian archives was unmatched in medieval and even early modern Europe, but it is only legend and scraps of hearsay compared to the knowledge of us accumulated by the giants of the digital economy – Google, Facebook, and Amazon – who all in various ways use the data harvested from their users to make billions of dollars, fromadvertising or from direct selling, or from some combination of both. Their knowledge of our intimate lives doesn’t wait two centuries or more until we’re dead. They get it live, in real time. Sometimes they know our minds before we know them ourselves. It’s a situation quite unprecedented in history.The European commission may be about to levy the biggest fine in its history on Google for anti-competitive behaviour –potentially more than €1bn. This case, five years in the making, is the latest, and perhaps the largest, battle in the struggle to establish democratic control over the giants of the digital economy. In the US, the government has been captured by the corporations, and in China universal surveillance is openly converted to a means of government control. Only the EU attempts to balance these powers to the benefit of the ordinary citizen.The power and ambition of these companies is astonishing –Amazon has just announced the purchase of the upmarket grocery chain Whole Foods for $13.5bn, but two years ago Facebook paid even more than that to acquire the WhatsApp messaging service, which doesn’t have any physical product at all. What WhatsApp offered Facebook was an intricate and finely detailed tracery of its users’friendships and social lives. Facebook promised the European commission then that it would not link phone numbers to Facebook identities, but it broke the promise almost as soon as the deal went through. Even without knowing what was in the messages, the knowledge of who sent them and to whom was enormously revealing and still could be. What political journalist, what party whip, would not want to know the makeup of the WhatsApp groups in which Theresa May’s enemies are currently plotting? It may be that the value to Amazon of Whole Foods is not so much the 460 shops it owns, or the distribution network, but the records of which customers have purchased what.Competition law appears to be the only way to address these imbalances of power. But it is clumsy. For one thing, it is very slow compared to the pace of change within the digital economy. By the time a problem has been addressed and remedied it may have vanished in the marketplace, to be replaced by new abuses of power. But there is a deeper conceptual problem, too. Competition law as presently interpreted deals with financial disadvantage to consumers and this is not obvious when the users of these services don’t pay for them. The users of their services are not their customers. That would be the people who buy advertising from them –and Facebook and Google operate a virtual duopoly in digital advertising to the detriment of all other media and entertainment companies.The product they’re selling is data, and we, the users, convert our lives to data for the benefit of the digital giants. Just as some ants farm aphids for the honeydew that oozes from them when they feed, so Google farms us for the data that our digital lives exude. Ants keep predatory insects away from where their aphids feed; Gmail keeps the spammers out of our inboxes. It doesn’t feel like a human or democratic relationship, even if both sides benefit.This article was amended on 19 June 2017 to remove a reference to Apple which was not apt./commentisfree/2017/jun/18/the-guardian-view-on-digital-giants-they-farm-us-for-the-data。
新东方考研英语二翻译课堂例句答案
1. 许多人看到国家正准备兴修大量新的发电站以知足咱们的能源需求，若是咱们要保护大气，那么，相当重要的是这些新发电站对环境是无害的。
2. 美国人已经再也不期待公世人物在演讲或写作中运用技能和文采来驾驭英语了。
3. 纵观全世界，律师要比从事其他任何行业的人招来更多地抱怨——可能新闻业是个例外。
但是，没有哪个国家的客户比美国人更有理由抱怨。
4. 一万年前，当咱们的先人还靠狩猎和收集为生时，他们没有时间考虑寻觅食物之外的其他事情。
5. 纽约爱乐乐团决定聘请艾伦·吉尔伯特作为下一任的音乐总监，这项录用自2021年突然宣布之日起就在古典音乐界引发了热议。
6.鼓励孩子拒绝精神生活会让他们易被利用和控制。
7.这些唱片很廉价，处处都能买到，而且其艺术品质要比此刻的现场音乐会高很多。
再说，听众还能随意选择唱片的时间和地址。
8.现在的美国人不过重视智慧。
咱们心目中的英雄是运动员、娱乐明星和企业家，而不是学者。
9.拉尔夫·瓦尔多·爱默生及其他一些先验主义哲学家以为，学校教育和严格的书本知识学习对孩子们是不正常的束缚。
10.其中一名重要的权威人士表示，梦这种极为强烈地精神活动不仅能被控制，事实上还能被人类成心识地控制，以使咱们睡得更好，感觉更好。
11.“经受力”成了一个流行词，但对Ted Ning来讲，他对其含义有自己切身的体会。
12. 发展中国家的人考虑移民时，通常关心的是到硅谷或发达国家的医院和大学里工作这样最美好最光明的前景。
13.许多关于青少年犯法原因的理论将致使犯法的主要原因要么归咎于个人，要么归咎于社会。
14.有些假设是人们不敢明说的，某些群体的人比其他群体的人可能更伶俐即是这样一个假设。
可是却怎么也要斗胆说出来。
这人非同寻常，他是个科学家但不隶属于任何机构。
15.于是，埃里克森和他的同事开始研究包括足球运动员在内的各行各业的优秀人材。
16.对于古典音乐演奏者而言，一种可能的应对办法是排演出唱片上没有的、吸引人的新曲目。
全国硕士研究生统一招生考试 -英语(二)翻译-真题解析
翻译长难句三步法（杜绝逐字逐句）第一步：拆-主干+修饰（找信号词）副词、介词、从句、to do/doing/done、逗号第二步：译-分别；第三步：合-译文组合成句（逐层合并）调整顺序+独立成句2014年20141-Many people would define optimism as being endlessly happy, with a glass that’s perpetually half full.分拆：1-Many people would define optimism as being endlessly happy2- with a glass that’s perpetually half full.分译：1-大多数人会定义乐观主义为无止境的快乐2-带着一个永远是半满的玻璃杯。
润色：大多数人将乐观定义为无尽的快乐正如杯子里总有半杯水那样。
组合：大多数人将乐观定义为无尽的快乐，觉得杯子里总有半杯水。
2-But that’s exactly the kind of false cheerfulness that positive psychologistswouldn’t recommend.分拆：1-But that’s exactly the kind of false cheerfulness2- that positive psychologists wouldn’t recommend.分译：1-但是，那确实是一种错误的庆祝2-积极的心理学家们是不会推荐的。
润色：但那确实是错误的快乐积极的心理学家们并不推荐。
组合：但这恰恰不是真正的快乐，积极心理学家们并不提倡。
3-”Healthy optimism means being in touch with reality,”says T al Ben-Shahar, a Harvard professor.分拆：1- ”Healthy optimism means being in touch with reality,”2- says T al Ben-Shahar, a Harvard professor.分译：1-“健康的乐观主义意味着接触现实，”2- 一位来自哈佛大学的教授Tal Ben-Shahar 说道润色：健康的乐观意味着与现实相关哈佛大学的教授Tal Ben-Shahar 说组合：哈佛大学的教授T al Ben-Shahar 说：“健康的乐观意味着与现实相关”.4-According to Ben-Shaher, realistic optimists are those who make the best of things that happen, but not those who believe everything happens for the best. 分拆：1- According to Ben-Shaher2- realistic optimists are those3- who make the best of things that happen4-but not those who believe everything happens for the best.分译：1-根据BS2-现实的乐观主义者是那类人3-他们充分利用发生的事情4-而不是那类相信一切发生都会是最好的人润色：按照Ben-Shaher的说法现实的乐观主义是那些人那些从发生的事情中力求得到最大收获的人但不是那些指望凡事都有最好结果的人组合：按照Ben-Shaher的说法，现实的乐观主义是那些不管发生什么事情都力求从中得到最大收获的人，而不是那些指望凡事都有最好结果的人。
考研英语二真题全文翻译答案超详解析
2012年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语（二）试题答案与解析Section I Use of English一、文章题材结构分析本文是一篇关于人物介绍的说明性文章，主要讲述了 G. I. Joe 由普通人成长为英雄，是美国特种兵敢死队的象征。
二、试题解析1．【答案】B【解析】本段开篇提出主题：G. I. Joe 这个名字对于参加过第二次世界大战的人来说意义非凡。
空格中需要填动词，在定语从句中做谓语，其主语是 who（指代 men and women），动作发生的地点是 in World War II；空后的句子“the people they liberated”中 they也指代 men and women，他们有 liberate 的动作，由此推断“the men and women”指的应该是参加了第二次大战的男人和女人，即服役的军人。
只有 serve 有“服兵役”的意思，所以选 B。
A 项 perform 意为“表现；执行；表演”；C 项 rebel 意为“造反，反抗”；D 项 betray 意为”背叛，出卖”，皆不符合文意，为干扰项。
2．【答案】B【解析】空格处所指的人与下文的 the poor farm kid 和 the guy 在含义上呼应，同时与空格后的“grown intohero”逻辑含义应保持一致，因此空内信息应该是与 hero“英雄”意思相对，后面的分句说他背井离乡，经历了很多苦难，显然这里应该是说由普通人平凡人（common man）成长为英雄，所以选 B。
A 项 actual 意为“实际上，事实上的”；C 项 special 意为“特殊的，专门的”；D 项normal 意为“正常的，常态的”；皆不符合上下文语意，为干扰项。
3．【答案】A【解析】本题考查的是词语的搭配关系，需要填入动词在定语从句中做谓语，先行词是who（the guy），宾语是 all the burdens of battle，要表达“承担战争带来的负担，应该用动词 bear 或shoulder，所以这里选 A，bore。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
考研英语二真题：翻译（新东方版）
LEAD SMARTER
Why Bill Gates Reads 50 Books A Year (And How You Can Too!)
Billionaire Bill Gates’s ultimate tip for success is to read more; the entrepreneur reads 50+ books a year. Learn how to do the same with one trusty tool.
by Saba Khalid | Mar 16 2017
He meets renowned scientists and surgeons on a whim, travels far and wide on his private jet, and attends some of the most important lectures and conferences happening today. Still, Bill Gates considers sitting down with a book his favorite way to learn.
A fifth grader gets a homework assignment to select his future career path from a list of occupations. He ticks “astronaut” but quickly adds “scientist” to the list and selects it as well. The boy is convinced that if he reads enough, he can explore as many career paths as he likes. And so he reads—everything from encyclopedias to science fiction novels. He reads so fervently that his parents have to institute a “no reading policy” at the dinner table.
That boy was Bill Gates, and he hasn’t stopped reading yet—not even after becoming one of the most successful people on the planet. Nowadays, his reading material has changed from sci-fi and reference books: recently, he revealed that he reads at least 50 nonfiction books a year.
Gates chooses nonfiction titles because they explain how the world works. In 2015, he explored topics that ranged from how buildings are constructed to how diseases are eliminated.
While we might like to read as much as Gates does every year, our demanding
jobs and daily routines make it impossible to follow his example. And when we do manage to pick up a title, our focus sometimes tends to waver.
Here’s one trick that can help you catch up to Gates: choose the right books.
Not all books are created equal. Unfortunately, only a fraction of what you read will have a positive impact in your life. Unless you choose the right books, it doesn’t matter if you read 50 books in a year or 500.
Luckily, the Blinkist app can help you discover what nonfiction books are out there, so you can pick the right ones. With our app, you can read or listen to the most popular books in 15-minute takeaways. This way, you can survey these books before reading them in full.
Furthermore, if you can’t read 50 books in a year, at least you can get the main takeaways.
Download the Blinkist app & read like Bill Gates!
ABOUT THE WRITER
Saba Khalid Saba Khalid is a Pakistani journalist living between Karachi and Berlin. She’s been working on women empowerment in her country through her website Aurat Raaj. Her dog Travis, a strong cup of coffee and planning her next big vacation get her through the day!
/magazine/posts/why-bill-gates-reads-50-books-a-year-and-how-you-can-too。