中国扶贫基金会副会长何道峰

• ③ 政府
处理公共事务的组织载体
the carrier for public affairs;
• ③ Government
• ④ 非政府 公民自组织协助政府处理公共 事务的组织载体
• ④ Non-governmental (Non-profitable) organizations
the carrier for citizen’s autonomous organizations
• 家庭的社会功能：私务（人类再生产,财富创造）
• Family’s Social Function: private affairs (reproduction, wealth generation)
• 政府的社会功能：公务(赋税、公共秩序与安全)
• Government’s Social Function: public affairs (taxes, social order and security)
• ①卡内基、洛克菲勒、斯坦福、福特等等。
• Carnegie, Rockefeller, Stanford, Ford etc.
• ②非政府成为公共事务中不可忽视的力量。
• NGOs have become a non-negligible new force in social structure
• 2）市场经济后的工业文明和后工业文明,
其组织载体分化：
• 2）In the Industrial civilization and post industrial civilization after the marketization economy, the organizational carriers divided as:
3、产生非政府组织的社会根源
3．The social root of NGO’s birth
• 1）财富与闲瑕的增加 • 1) The increase of wealth and leisure • 2）社会同情心与贫富差距的存在 • 2) Social sympathy and the existence of rich and poor gap
3、这种定义促成了快速分蘖及双重管理 体制的诞生
3. Such definition facilitated the rapid growth and the emergence of dual administration models for Chinese NGOs
• 1）登记制管理
• 1) Registration system
to assist the government in addressing public affairs.
2、政府与非政府的区别
（动员资源的方式差别） 2、Differences between government and NGO (the difference in mobilizing resources)
一、学术层面——
政府与非政府的分野及社会根源
I. Academic Dimension – Government —NGO Division and its Social Root
1、非政府组织是市场经济发展到一定阶 段的产物， 是一种公共事务社会分工的 组织载体。
1. NGO is a product of market economy at a certain development period and an organizational carrier of the division of social public affairs.
2、定位
2. Definition: • ―帮助政府找钱扶贫” 有用
usefulness
• “Helping the government locate money‖
• ―老干部发挥余热”
retirement‖ reassu officials contributing and working after their
2、建立信任、互动减贫经历了长期的历史过程。 2. It has been a long historical period for establishing mutual understanding and interaction for poverty alleviation
3、无数志愿人员付出了艰辛的努力， 而不是等那个假想的“政府”睡醒。 3. Innumerable pioneers had worked so hard and did not wait for the fictitious ―government‖ to wake up
2. NGO’s dependence on government imposed bad influence on the growth of volunteering market.
3、缺乏规划与管理使NGO的行业公信力 受到质疑。
3. Lack of planning and management leads to the query in NGO sectoral accountability
1、“片面定义”和“双重管理”体制 导致NGO的政府依赖性。
1． “Lopsided definition‖ and ―Dual administration‖ system resulted in the NGO’s dependence on government.
2、NGO的政府依赖性对志愿市场发育的 不良影响。
• ―家庭
• “Family
公司”：
私务
Corporation‖: Private affaires
• ―政府
非政府”：公务
NGO‖: Public affaires
• “Government
• 3）“三大部门”还是“四大部门”
• “Three Sectors‖ or ―Four Sectors‖
五、如何在双轨制下加强NGO与 GO的互动来促进减贫
Ⅴ. How to Strengthen Under the Dual System Interaction Between Government Organizations and NGOs to Facilitate Poverty Reduction
矛盾和摩擦
contradictions and onflicts
• 2）行政部门管理
• 2) Administration system
四、中国非政府组织的困惑及其 与政府的互动减贫
Ⅳ. Perplexities Faced by Chinese NGOs and Their Interaction with Government Organization
4、非政府与政府的互动常常带有很强的 “跑部”和“照顾”色彩,从而缺乏互动 或互动不足。
4. The so-called Government—NGO interaction is usually featured by ―lobbying the government‖ and ―taking care by the government‖ and lack of real interaction or insufficient of interaction.
• ③非政府的行业自律与公信力建设。
• NGO’s sectoral self-discipline and accountability building.
三、中国政府对非政府组织的 心理困惑及其互动减贫的影响。
Ⅲ. Psychological Perplexity of China’s Government Organizations on NGOs and Their Impact on Interaction
二、政府与非政府组织互动 减贫的国际经验辨析
II. Analysis of International Experience in Government-NGO Interaction for Poverty Reduction
1、非政府组织天生与政府组织是不平 等的，互动要跨越传统的僣越观念。 1. Since NGOs and government organizations are innately unequal, interaction
• 责任来自双方及其幼稚的社会志愿市 场，随着人均GDP进入快速成长期,市 场变化很快，机遇与挑战并存。
• Responsibility lies in both Governments and NGOs, and the puerile volunteer market. However, with China’s per capita GDP entering a rapid growth period, volunteer market will also experience rapid expansion. Both chances and challenges existed.
• ① 公司
创造社会财富的组织载体
the social carrier for wealth generation
• ① Corporations
• ② 家庭
人类再生产及辅助创造财富的组织载体
• ② Corporations the social carrier for human reproduction and assistance to wealth generation
1、中国的非政府组织不是从社会分工中自然 发育出来,而是从西方照搬从政府组织中分蘖 出来，因此具有早产的诸多特性。 1. Since China’s NGOs are separated from governmental organizations by copying the western pattern rather than naturally born from social division, they have many abortive features.