商务谈判案例分析
史上最全的商务谈判案例分析6篇

史上最全的商务谈判案例分析6篇史上最全的商务谈判案例分析 (1) “站住!”老妈喊住了刚放下酱油瓶的我。
我疑惑中夹杂着恐惧的眼神迅速从老妈身上移开,难道……“妈,酱、酱油、买回来了,还有事吗?”我用着试探的语气问到。
“出门前怎么跟你说的,去黄阿姨那买酱油要快点回来,现在你看看,你看看,都几点了!”火药味从厨房迅速蔓延开来。
“我,我……”“你什么都别说了,晚饭别吃了,给我面壁思过去!这种状况都发生过多少遍了,你还让我骂你几遍你才改!”“不吃就不吃,面壁就面壁!不吃我还省了以后要减肥呢!”我强忍泪水,略带哭腔吼回去,不就是买酱油回来晚了吗?至于这么凶吗?我转过头,把老妈难看的脸甩在后面,跑回房间。
随之而来就是“砰”的关门声。
门隔开的是两处空间,心隔开的是两道鸿沟。
窗外的天空像在迎接一场久违的大雨,阴沉阴沉。
乌云把原本晴朗的天空遮得密不透风,是暴风雨的前兆吗?看着窗外的我,眼泪像泛滥的洪水,越过堤坝汹涌而出。
委屈堵在喉咙,想说,说不出。
“丫头!”唉,老妈肯定是问我经过一个晚上的思考悟出什么了。
又是这招,您不烦我都厌了。
刚想说:“妈,我没错。
”老妈说了一句,什么?是“对不起”?我、我没听错吧。
我瞟了老妈一眼,天呐,什么世道!强悍的老妈也会说“对不起”了!“昨天你怎么不告诉我是黄阿姨多找了钱你去还钱呀!如果今天不是她告诉我,你还真想我继续误会你呀,昨天是我不对,火气大了些,别生气呀。
你总是一声不吭我怎么知道你的想法呢?下次别这样了,有什么说出来大家一起解决,知道吗?”“嗯,我知道了,妈,昨天对你吼,对不起,不会有下次了。
”我说完不好意思地往房间溜。
“昨晚那面好吃吗?我还特意煎了两个蛋呢!”我惊讶地回过头,老妈得意地笑着。
“什么?您煮的?我还以为是老爸呢!”其实,生活就需要沟通,那是一座跨在鸿沟上的桥梁。
只要我们能换位思考,很多时候都可以化解不必要的误会。
在被怒气溢满大脑时,为什么不静下心来仔细想想呢。
请记住,母亲对子女的爱是最无私的。
商务谈判经典案例评析10篇

商务谈判经典案例评析10篇商务谈判经典案例评析 (1) 因地制宜的价格政策价格是市场营销组合中最重要的因素之一,它直接关系到产品能否为消费者接受,关系到市场占有率的高低以及需求量的变化与利润的多少。
对于多极电子管公司而言,则直接决定着企业能否赢得与科捏格公司合同,并影响着整个企业在德国乃至欧洲市场的发展。
因此,企业必须综合考虑各方面因素,制订合理的价格定位。
企业的发展现状与趋势是影响多极电子管公司报价的首要因素。
为了避免关税和促进欧洲市场销售额的增长,多极电子管公司正在德国建造一个工厂,本年度3月中旬就要开业,而现在欧洲办事处赢得的销售合同只占工厂装配能力的1/4,这说明企业还有很大的生产能力等待利用,所以该公司急需在欧洲尤其是德国寻求业务。
从这一角度来看,企业的报价应该以获取与科涅格公司的合同为基本目标,并且是“不达目的不罢休”。
从理论上来讲,这一报价思路属于以销售数量为定价目标,因而此时可适当放弃一定的利润,为将来获取长期利润打基础。
公司的价格政策是影响多极电子管公司报价的第二个因素这实际上是成本因素对企业定价的影响。
根据多极电子管公司的价格政策,向科涅格公司出售的1000X计算机的正常价格应该是20.3万马克。
津默曼感觉这样的报价偏高,但公司的政策与总体处境又不允许降低加成部分,并且,公司在欧洲市场还从来没有过背离价格政策的先例。
面对这一两难困境,为了实现上述的定价目标——一定要赢得与科涅格公司的合同,企业的定价到底是降还是保持不变,这需要进一步考察用户与竞争对手的情况。
用户的需求是影响多极电子管公司报价的第三个因素。
因为只有用户的需求才是决定商品最终价格高低的标准。
从多极电子管公司的用户——科涅格公司的情况来看,科涅格公司的需求对多极电子管公司不利的一个方面是,它此次需求的计算机并不需要太高的准确性和易操作性,主要是看可靠性和价格的高低,而这恰恰与多极电子臂公司的优点相悖。
多极电子管公司的1000X计算机的精确性,可靠性、适应性和易操作性都很高,但价格也较竞争对手高出许多。
商务沟通技巧案例分析(通用5篇)

商务沟通技巧案例分析(通用5篇)商务沟通技巧案例分析篇1中方某公司向韩国某公司出口丁苯橡胶已一年,第二年中方又向韩方报价,以继续供货。
中方公司根据国际市场行情,将价从前一年的成交价每吨下调了12美圆(前一年1200美圆/吨)韩方感到可以接受,建议中方到韩国签约.中方人员一行二人到了汉城该公司总部,双方谈了不到20分钟,韩方说:“贵方价格仍太高,请贵方看看韩国市场的价,叁天以后再谈。
”中方人员回到饭店感到被戏弄,很生气,但人已来汉城,谈判必须进行。
中方人员通过有关协会收集到韩国海关丁苯橡胶进口统计,发现从哥伦比亚、比利时、南非等国进口量较大.中国进口也不少,中方公司是占份额较大的一家。
价格水平南非最低但高于中国产品价。
哥伦比亚、比利时价格均高于南非。
在韩国市场的调查中,批发和零售价均高出中方公司的现报价30%一40%,市场价虽呈降势,但中方公司的给价是目前世界市场最低的价。
为什么韩国人员还这么说?中方人员分析,对手以为中方人员既然来了汉城,肯定急于拿回国.可以借此机会再压中方一手。
那么韩方会不会不急于订货而找理由呢?中方人员分析,若不急于订货,为什么邀请中方人员来汉城?再说韩方人员过去与中方人员打过交道.有过合同,且执行顺利,对中方工作很满意,这些人会突然变得不信任中方人员了吗?从态度看不像,他们来机场接中方人员.且晚上—起喝酒,保持下良好气氛。
从上述分析,中方人员共同认为:韩方意在利用中方人员出国心理,再压价。
根据这个分析,经过商量中方人员决定在价格条件上做文章。
总的讲,态度应强硬,(因为来前对方已表示同意中方报价),不怕空手而归。
其次,价格条件还要涨回市场水平(即1000美元/吨左右)。
再者不必用二天给韩方通知,仅一天半就将新的价格条件通知韩方。
在—天半后的中午前.中方人员电话告诉韩方人员:“调查已结束.得到的结论是:我方来汉城前的报价低了,应涨回去年成交的价位,但为了老朋友的交情,可以下调20美元,而不再是120美元。
商务谈判案例分析报告3篇

商务谈判案例分析报告3篇谈判是两方以上的交际活动,只有一方则无法进行谈判活动。
至少有两方参与是进行谈判的先决条件。
下面店铺整理了商务谈判案例分析报告,供你阅读参考。
商务谈判案例分析报告01Q品牌出身浙江义乌,是个相对成熟的皮具品牌。
2003年秋,Q 牌男装正式启动上市。
我当时恰在Q牌休闲男装任区域经理一职,负责横贯东西七省的业务。
在市场调研以后的叁个月里,我始终没有出差,只是礼节性地电话回访和寄邀请函,力图获得以静制动的效果。
其实在市场调研过程中,我已经拜访过了各地比较好的服饰代理商,并建立了初步友谊。
2003年11月23日,品牌发布会暨招商会正式召开。
公司将会议搞得很隆重,请中央级官员来现场指导,请咨询师上课,请形象代言人,还请了广东一家文化传播公司负责服饰秀。
会议地点安排在邻近Y市的一家度假山庄。
会议当天晚上是欢迎酒会,为意向客户接风。
酒会上,很多区域经理都特意将同一个市场的意向客户座位分开,严格保密。
我则相反,有意无意将同一个区的意向客户安排在一起,并逐一介绍。
表面上看,这顿饭吃得有些尴尬,但效果却出奇的好,因为第二天下午就有几位客户要与我谈。
第二天,品牌研讨,政策说明,参观公司,答谢晚宴,时间非常紧张。
晚饭刚过,山东的Z先生与陕西的L先生就已经站在我的商务房门前。
这两个客户是我非常看好的。
山东的Z先生是个天生的商人,他与L一见面,就如胶似漆地跟着,用他的话说,L先生做Q牌,他就做Q牌。
到底该以什么样的方式与他俩谈判呢?我心里也没个底,只是不断思忖,希望找到良策。
索性先拖延一下时间。
泡好茶,寒暄几句,说:“我先去和其他客户打个招唿,然后我们再详谈好不好?”征得同意后,我就去了几个重要客户那里,对每个人都说晚上有点忙,过半小时后来详谈。
大约40分钟后,我回到商务房,他们二位已经等急了。
谈判很快就开始了。
首先我抛出自己的想法,“我只是一个区域经理,真正有权签约者是营销副总C,我们今天只是谈谈,山东与陕西来的客户比较多,公司还是要有所选择的……当然,在我个人心目中,你们二位是最优秀的。
史上最全的商务谈判案例分析

史上最全的商务谈判案例分析商务谈判进行起来象是一场搏弈。
在谈判时,一定不能暴露自己的弱点。
下面店铺整理了史上最全的商务谈判案例分析,供你阅读参考。
史上最全的商务谈判案例分析篇01巴西一家公司到美国去采购成套设备。
巴西谈判小组成员因为上街购物耽误了时间。
当他们到达谈判地点时,比预定时间晚了45分钟。
美方代表对此极为不满,花了很长时间来指责巴西代表不遵守时间,没有信用,如果老这样下去的话,以后很多工作很难合作,浪费时间就是浪费资源、浪费金钱。
对此巴西代表感到理亏,只好不停地向美方代表道歉。
谈判开始以后似乎还对巴西代表来迟一事耿耿于怀,一时间弄得巴西代表手足无措,说话处处被动。
无心与美方代表讨价还价,对美方提出的许多要求也没有静下心来认真考虑,匆匆忙忙就签订了合同。
等到合同签订以后,巴西代表平静下来,头脑不再发热时才发现自己吃了大亏,上了美方的当,但已经晚了。
案例分析:这个是一个挑剔式开局策略的运用,在一开始的时候对对手的某项错误或礼仪失误严加指责,使其感到内疚,从而达到营造低调气氛,迫使对方让步的目的。
本案例中美国谈判代表成功地使用挑剔式开局策略,迫使巴西谈判代表自觉理亏在来不及认真思考的情况而匆忙签下对美方有利的合同。
但是我与此同时我们更需要注意的是,这也是一个关于国际的商务谈判,其中就没有很好的运用我们上文中所提出的观点应该在谈判之前了解对方的文化,并且应该想好一旦迟到的情况下应该如何是好,如何地应对这种文化上的差异.接下来我们来看一下另一个事例,同样是面对这种迟到的情况,日本的谈判代表是如何做的:日本有一家着名的汽车公司在美国刚刚“登陆”时,急需找一家美国代理商来为其销售产品,以弥补他们不了解美国市场的缺陷。
当日本汽车公司准备与美国的一家公司就此问题进行谈判时,日本公司的谈判代表路上塞车迟到了。
美国公司的代表抓住这件事紧紧不放,想要以此为手段获取更多的优惠条件。
日本公司的代表发现无路可煺,于是站起来说:“我们十分抱歉耽误了你的时间,但是这绝非我们的本意,我们对美国的交通状况了解不足,所以导致了这个不愉快的结果,我希望我们不要再为这个无所谓的问题耽误宝贵的时间了,如果因为这件事怀疑到我们合作的诚意,那么,我们只好结束这次谈判。
现代商务谈判案例分析(精选3篇)

现代商务谈判案例分析(精选3篇)现代商务谈判案例分析篇1Q品牌出身浙江义乌,是个相对成熟的皮具品牌。
20xx年秋,Q 牌男装正式启动上市。
我当时恰在Q牌休闲男装任区域经理一职,负责横贯东西七省的业务。
在市场调研以后的叁个月里,我始终没有出差,只是礼节性地电话回访和寄,力图获得以静制动的效果。
其实在市场调研过程中,我已经拜访过了各地比较好的服饰代理商,并建立了初步友谊。
20xx年11月23日,品牌发布会暨招商会正式召开。
公司将会议搞得很隆重,请中央级官员来现场指导,请咨询师上课,请形象代言人,还请了广东一家文化传播公司负责服饰秀。
会议地点安排在邻近Y市的一家度假山庄。
会议当天晚上是欢迎酒会,为意向客户接风。
酒会上,很多区域经理都特意将同一个市场的意向客户座位分开,严格保密。
我则相反,有意无意将同一个区的意向客户安排在一起,并逐一介绍。
表面上看,这顿饭吃得有些尴尬,但效果却出奇的好,因为第二天下午就有几位客户要与我谈。
第二天,品牌研讨,政策说明,参观公司,答谢晚宴,时间非常紧张。
晚饭刚过,山东的Z 先生与陕西的L先生就已经站在我的商务房门前。
这两个客户是我非常看好的。
山东的Z先生是个天生的商人,他与L一见面,就如胶似漆地跟着,用他的话说,L先生做Q牌,他就做Q牌。
到底该以什么样的方式与他俩谈判呢?我心里也没个底,只是不断思忖,希望找到良策。
索性先拖延一下时间。
泡好茶,寒暄几句,说:“我先去和其他客户打个招唿,然后我们再详谈好不好?”征得同意后,我就去了几个重要客户那里,对每个人都说晚上有点忙,过半小时后来详谈。
大约40分钟后,我回到商务房,他们二位已经等急了。
谈判很快就开始了。
首先我抛出自己的想法,“我只是一个区域经理,真正有权签约者是营销副总C,我们今天只是谈谈,山东与陕西来的客户比较多,公司还是要有所选择的……当然,在我个人心目中,你们二位是最优秀的。
你们做不好的市场,别人也不可能做得好。
”山东Z先生说,“以我们的市场经验,我们做不好的市场,恐怕别人也很难操作。
商务谈判案例分析(精选16篇)

商务谈判案例分析(精选16篇)商务谈判案例分析篇1天津某半导体工厂欲改造其生产线,需要采购设备、备件和技术。
适合该厂的供应商在美国、日本各地均可找到2家以上的供应商。
正在此时,香港某半导体公司的推销人员去天津访问,找到该厂采购人员表示可以协助该厂购买所需设备和技术。
由于香港客商讲中文,又是华人,很快关系就熟了,工厂同意他代为采购。
由于工厂没有外贸权,又必须委托有外贸权的公司做代理,A公司接到委托后,即与美国和日本的厂商探询,结果,美国和日本的厂家有的不报价却回函问:A公司与香港B公司的关系是什么?有的出价很高。
A公司拿的探询结果未达到预期目标,具体人员与工人进行了讨论,最后得出了一致的结论。
问题:1.A公司的探询是否成功?为什么?2 天津工厂应做何种调整?为什么?3.天津公司的探询要做何调整?为什么?分析:1.天津A公司的探询是失败的。
因为外商有的不报价,探询没结果。
有结果时,条件太苛刻,非诚意报价。
2天津工厂的委托有时序错误,必须调整。
香港公司不能代工厂签进口,直接找香港的探询可能加快进度,但存在签约和对后续工作影响的问题调整内容;让香港公司的外探纳人和天津公司的对外探询中,应以天津公司为主,避免探询混乱。
3.天津公司要与工厂、香港公司统一意见——内容和策略,并把该项目的探询统一组织起来。
同时要重新部署探询地区和对象,不给外商造成有多个同样项目在询价的错觉。
商务谈判案例分析篇2欧洲A公司代理B工程公司到中国与中国C公司谈判出口工程设备的交易。
中方根据其报价提出了批评.建议对方考虑中国市场的竞争性和该公司第一次进入市场。
认真考虑改善价格。
该代理商做了一番解释后仍不降价并说其委托人的价格是如何合理。
中方对其条件又做了分析,代理人又做解释,一上午下来.毫无结果。
中方认为其过于傲慢固执,代理人认为中方毫无购买诚意且没有理解力.双方相互埋怨之后,谈判不欢而散。
问题:1.欧洲代理人进行的是哪类谈判?2.构成其谈判因素有哪些?3.谈判有否可能不散?若可能不散欧洲代理人应如何谈判?分析:1.欧洲代理人进行的是代理地位的谈判。
十二个经典实用的商务谈判案例及解析

十二个经典实用的商务谈判案例及解析案例一:中方某公司向韩国某公司出口丁苯橡胶已一年,第二年中方又向韩方报价,以继续供货。
中方公司根据国际市场行情,将价格从前一年的成交价每吨下调了120美圆(前一年1200美圆/吨)韩方感到可以接受,建议中方到韩国签约.中方人员一行二人到了汉城该公司总部,双方谈了不到20分钟,韩方说:“贵方价格仍太高,请贵方看看韩国市场的价格,三天以后再谈。
”中方人员回到饭店感到被戏弄,很生气,但人已来汉城,谈判必须进行。
中方人员通过有关协会收集到韩国海关丁苯橡胶进口统计,发现从哥伦比亚、比利时、南非等国进口量较大.中国进口也不少,中方公司是占份额较大的一家。
价格水平南非最低但高于中国产品价。
哥伦比亚、比利时价格均高于南非。
在韩国市场的调查中,批发和零售价均高出中方公司的现报价30%一40%,市场价虽呈降势,但中方公司的给价是目前世界市场最低的价。
为什么韩国人员还这么说?中方人员分析,对手以为中方人员既然来了汉城,肯定急于拿合同回国.可以借此机会再压中方一手。
那么韩方会不会不急于订货而找理由呢?中方人员分析,若不急于订货,为什么邀请中方人员来汉城?再说韩方人员过去与中方人员打过交道.有过合同,且执行顺利,对中方工作很满意,这些人会突然变得不信任中方人员了吗?从态度看不像,他们来机场接中方人员.且晚上—起喝酒,保持了良好气氛。
从上述分析,中方人员共同认为:韩方意在利用中方人员出国心理,再压价。
根据这个分析,经过商量中方人员决定在价格条件上做文章。
总的讲,态度应强硬,(因为来前对方已表示同意中方报价),不怕空手而归。
其次,价格条件还要涨回市场水平(即1200美元/吨左右)。
再者不必用二天给韩方通知,仅一天半就将新的价格条件通知韩方。
在—天半后的中午前,中方人员电话告诉韩方人员:“调查已结束.得到的结论是:我方来汉城前的报价低了,应涨回去年成交的价位,但为了老朋友的交情,可以下调20美元,而不再是120美元。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
中国矿业大学2011~2012学年第1学期2009级英语专业《跨文化商务交际》考试班级商务英语09-6 姓名向文昭学号 12095133 分数_________Case 11.There are many underlying cultural issues in international business activities. In this case, the Belgian firm Appliances Unlimited established subsidiary in Mexico, because of different culture background, many problems appears. I will analyze these problems in several ways.Uncertainty avoidance difference is an important cause of the appearance of difficulties. Since Joe V an West, an American, who prefers to avoid any uncertainty in his work, he tries to gain a clear idea of how the things are gonging on. After the call from his friend, he first talked to several people at head- quarters, including the president for International to get detailed information about the position to get well prepared for the job. When V an West arrived, he met with all the major players at the plant. He listened carefully and asked lots of questions about production, marketing, and sales. He sent e-mails to headquarters as well as had lengthy conversations on the phone with executives there. He went to Brussels twice to discuss the plans for the plant in Mexico. A few weeks ago V an West received a phone call from the production manager of the American subsidiary which manufactures washing machines. The production manager voiced concern over the quality and the delivery schedule of the washing machine parts and the number of defective parts had increased considerably over the last three months, and five times the parts had been delivered late enough to affect production schedules for the washing machines. After he knew this problem, he tried to avoid uncertainty, so he had talked to Hernandez about the issue, but Hernandez did not seem to think it was a big deal. Just the same, he promised to look into it. Even with Hernandez's reassurance V an West was concerned and he started checking a bit on his own.While Hernandez is a typical Mexican, he has a strong tolerance toward uncertainty. When V an West talked to Hernandez about the issue, Hernandez did notseem to think it was a big deal and he just promised to look into it. When V an West talked to Hernandez about the difficulties with some of the new machines and the reasons they had broken down several times and the issue that some of the newer employees were different and not as dedicated as the long-time employee. Hernandez brushed the issue with the washing machine parts aside. He thought that Duarte Gonzales was exaggerating the problems. In his opinion, there surely had been some problems in the past, but there was nothing to worry about. Things would be just fine. And he said to V an West “Take it easy; everything will be fine. Just don't worry. Leave it to me. I know how to take care of things.”Hernandez can accept things as they are, tolerate uncertain things, and he doesn’t try to avoid uncertainty in his work.This difference is a big obstacle between V an West and Hernandez, so it is hard for them to communicate well, to cooperate well, to handle these issues in the plant well and to manage the plant well.Relationship is emphasized in many cultures, Mexicans attach great importance to relationship. They believe that good relationship with people especially those work partners, will help them a lot with their career. So they are good at building relationship with people, and building relationship with those partners is a practice in business. In this case, when Joe V an West, President of Appliances Unlimited in Mexico arrived, Antonio Hernandez, the Vice President for Manufacturing, wanted to build good relationship with V an West in order that in their work there would be more convenience and they could cooperate well to manage the plant well. So he had been wonderful in helping V an West’s family get settled. Hernandez and his wife had introduced V an West and his wife to one of the best clubs in the city, as well as many influential families in business and politics. The two women had become good friends. Mrs. Hernandez had helped with the everyday orientation, which consisted of things like shopping, schools, and house- hold personnel. Mrs. V an West was grateful for all the assistance. Because Hernandez had the concept of building good relationship with related persons, he thought V an West would have this kind of need. So he and his wife had introduced V an West and his wife to one of the best clubs in the city, as well as many influential families in business and politics, so that V an West might have more advantages in his job. This is a favor that Hernandez did for V an West to show his kindness to build good relationship.But V an West doesn’t emphasize relationship very much.In this culture he didn’t know how to behave. When he knew those problems Gonzales told him, and he wasincreasingly concerned about his nonchalant attitude towards day-to-day affairs at the plant. He did not know how to best approach Hernandez. Their close social contacts made it difficult to criticize his performance. So it is difficult for V an West and Hernandez to communicate freely, thus, the y can’t make the plant operate well.Hierarchy in Mexican culture also contributes to the problems. Frank Jones, the technician, had little direct contact with the workers. Whenever he had to talk to employees, he would go through the Vice President for Manufacturing. If Hernandez was not available, he would talk to Gonzalez. This kind of people who have hierarchical culture, prefer to communicate with people in the same class with him rather than people in lower class or upper class. As a result, the communication in a company or an organization will be limited and obstructed. In this plant, Frank Jones, the technician, as upper class person, had little direct contact with the lower class workers. Whenever he had to talk to employees, he would go through the Vice President for Manufacturing. If Hernandez was not available, he would talk to Gonzalez. In this way, the administrators didn’t know the exact situation of their plant, to solve these problems is out of the question.Hernandez holds high context culture, while V an West holds low context culture in communication. V an West prefers to speak out when he meet with problems, and he will say it in a direct way, and give detailed information. Hernandez on the contrary, doesn’t like to speak out what he mee ts with. He is implicative and inner going, he doesn’t give detailed information when he says something, he just gives an out line of it. In the case, when there appeared problems in the plant, Van West talk to him, he just say “Take it easy; everything wi ll be fine. Just don't worry. Leave it to me. I know how to take care of things.” But he didn’t say how would he solve these problems, he didn’t mention the detailed solutions to them. He didn’t want othe rs to know what he was thinking in his mind. It even made V an West increasingly concern about his nonchalant attitude towards day-to-day affairs at the plant. This difference makes it difficult for them to understand each other clearly. Therefore, they can’t solve those problems well.Hernandez is a monochronic person, while V an West is a polychronic person. V an West, a polychronic person has a detailed time schedule, he puts things in order and prefers to do one thing at a time. He will do his work only in working time, but in his private time only his private things. Hernandez, a monochronic person, usuallydoesn’t have fixed time schedule, he often uses time in a flexible way. V an West phoned Hernandez to talk about the issues in the plant, but he was out to lunch and would not be back until the next day. As V an West was walking back to his office, it occurred to him that Hernandez was gone frequently, and he didn’t like this style. He thought Hernandez should distinguish work and private life apart. Different time senses put an obstacle in their work.2.Van west should get to know the Mexico culture, especially the business culture. He should not only learn the language, he also had to earn the backstage of the culture and their cultural backgrounds, their values etc. On the other hand, he should try to adapt to the culture. Just as the famous saying goes, do as the Romans do. Then he will feel much comfortable with the surroundings.3.As we know, Mexico is a hierarchical society. The superiors have much power distance to the subordinates. As to addressing to Mr. Hernandez, he has found that Mr. Hernandez is not very concerned with his job, he has to power and duty to point out his weakness. With regard to addressing to the workers, he should try to make a harmonious atmosphere and make the employees feel like a family, because Mexico is a collective culture. Mexican value group belonging.4.For a company, the positive change is necessary. However, the employees have a negative attitude towards the new system. Van West can explain the new technology program in detail. Then he can tell advantage of the new technology to them in order to win the trust of the employees. As for hierarchy, the worker in the company are lower status so they should listen to the leaders’ orders and obey the orders to s tay in the company.Case 2In this case, there are many cultural conflicts between Japanese and Americans. And these cultural conflicts lead to many obstacles in their cooperation. Firstly, I want to analyze the High Context Culture and Low Context Culture. American culture is a typical low context culture, while Japanese culture is a typical high context culture. People who hold high context tend to prefer indirect verbal interaction, and understand meanings embedded at many socio-cultural levels, and rely more on context and felling, and employ spiral logic. But people who hold low context tend to prefer direct verbal interaction, and understand meaning at one level only, and they rely more o n logic. They communicate in highly structured messages, provide details, stress literal meanings, and give authority to written information. The negotiations had been very difficult and took much longer than executives from Health Snacks had anticipated. The Japanese were slow and in their approach to the negotiation. Everything seemed to take a long time, and once the Japanese side had made up its mind on a point, it was difficult to agree on any changes. Everything had to go back and be re-discussed by Japanese executives. When Mr. Carter objected to Mr. Ota’s going to be promoted to President of the joint venture.He first informed Mr. Sony directly that he objected to Mr. Ota. At the same time, he proposed Mr. Katsuki for the position and gave his reasons for his choice. This was the evidence for his low context culture. And then he became aware of the culture difference in Japanese culture, so he changed to adjust to it. He carefully worded his opposition to Mr. Ota and his suggestion of Mr. Katsuki. Only after he was convinced that the message was tactful, courteous, and constructive and had gone through several revisions, did he send it off. He was, therefore, rather surprised when he received a letter from Mr. Sony totally rejecting his suggestions. Mr. Sony was polite but made it quite clear that Toka Foods had carefully considered all options and that Mr. Ota was the right person, and Mr. Katsuki was out of the question. He further explained that a promotion for Mr. Katsuki would be totally unacceptable and would ruin Mr. Katsuki's career. In his letter, Mr. Sony gave no explanation as to why the appointment of Mr. Katsuki would ruin his career. This is the illustration of Japanese high context culture.Seniority is highly emphasized in Japanese culture. In Japanese culture, people don’t evaluate persons mainly by his ability or performance, but by his or her Seniority. In this case, in order to speed up the process and provide technical details, Health Snacks had initially sent an engineer from production and one from packaging: both in their early thirties with no international experience. The two engineers took detailed reports, diagrams, and illustrations with them. They knew the technology inside out, but the Japanese thought they were too young, they were not qualified to sign the agreement. So the Japanese, while asking many questions, did not move towards any' agreement. What is more apparent is that Mr. Carter proposed Mr. Katsuki for the position of the president of the joint venture and gave his reasons for his choice. Mr. Katsuki was 48 years old and had been with Toka Foods during his entire career. Currently, Mr. Katsuki was the marketing director for the joint venture. He had made quite an impression at Health Snacks headquarters in Chicago. He spoke excellent English and seemed to have the characteristics and the energy for moving the joint venture forward. Mr. Katsuki seemed to be straightforward in his communication and very dynamic compared to many of the other Japanese Mr. Carter had met. But because Mr. Katsuki was just 48 years old, he didn’t have enough seniority. As a result, he could not be nominated as the president of the joint venture.Americans and Japanese prefer different channels of communication. Health Snacks had tried to solve the problems via electronic communication, faxes and e-mails. They even had organized a teleconference to meet "face-to- face" so that each side could hear the other's viewpoint, but Japanese wanted to communicate face to face on the table. They thought it was more reliable. After much soul-searching, Ron Carter decided it was time to fly to Nagoya and face the problems head-on.Japanese culture is a hierarchical culture. Health Snacks had initially sent an engineer from production and one from packaging: both in their early thirties with no international experience. The two engineers took detailed reports, diagrams, and illustrations with them. They knew the technology inside out, but the Japanese, while asking many questions, did not move towards any' agreement. In their opinion these two young men were not high level administrators, so they didn’t have the right to make decision. When the two engineers from HealthSnacks could not answer questions relating to projections of production and sales, the Japanese became impatient. The two engineers found the talks tiring, and sitting across from a team of eight Japanese managers was intimidating and exhausting. Furthermore, the Japanese repeatedly asked the same questions. It was only after the President of the International Division at Health Snacks, Tim Davis, participated in the negotiations that progress was made. He visited several times, and an agreement was finally signed. While American culture is not hierarchical, they sent the two engineers to provide detailed information of the technology, and they were given to sign the agreement. But they were not aware of the difference in Japan, therefore, conflict appeared.To sum up, it is important to learn the local culture when we do business with another country or people from another culture, if not, conflicts will appear. And we should get well prepared for what we are going to do. We should learn how to communicate with people from different cultural backgrounds.。