英美议会制度比较

合集下载

比较英国与美国政治制度的异同。

比较英国与美国政治制度的异同。

比较英国与美国政治制度的异同。

英国和美国的政治制度有许多异同之处,下面是对它们的比较:1.君主立宪制vs. 总统制:英国采用的是君主立宪制,国家元首是君主(现为女王),而政府首脑是首相。

君主主要是象征性的角色,没有实际的行政权力。

美国则采用总统制,国家元首和政府首脑同为总统,总统既具有象征职能又拥有实际行政权力。

2.内阁制度vs. 分立和平衡:英国的政府是基于内阁制度运作的,内阁成员由选举产生,负责行政事务。

而美国采用分立和平衡的原则,将行政、立法和司法权力分散到三个独立的分支机构(行政部门、国会和最高法院),互相制衡。

3.立法机构:英国的立法机构是议会,由两个议院组成,即上议院和下议院。

上议院(伯爵院)由继承或任命产生,下议院由选举产生。

美国的立法机构是国会,由两个议院组成,即参议院和众议院。

参议院每个州有两个代表,众议院的人数则根据州人口多少而确定。

4.宪法法律地位:英国没有成文宪法,宪法权威主要来源于传统法律和惯例。

美国拥有一部成文宪法,被视为国家最高法律,并赋予了公民基本权利和制度机制。

5.地方自治:英国地方自治程度较高,设有苏格兰议会、威尔士国民议会和北爱尔兰议会,负责各自地区的特定事务。

美国的地方自治程度也相当高,各州有较大的权力范围,可以制定和执行特定的法律和政策。

6.法院系统:英国采用的是普通法体系,法官依据先例进行判决,法官的解释具有一定的权威性。

美国则采用的是法定法体系,法官依据法典和宪法等的规定进行判决,重视宪法解释和个案裁判。

7.选举制度:英国的选举制度采用的是相对多数制和议会制,以普选方式选举国会议员。

美国的选举制度则采用的是简单多数制和独立选区制,以选举人团制度选举总统,并采取单一选区多议席制选举国会议员。

总体而言,英国和美国的政治制度在君主制与总统制、内阁制与分立和平衡、立法机构、宪法地位、地方自治、法院系统和选举制度等方面有明显不同。

这些差异反映了两国的历史传统、制度安排和政治文化的不同。

了解英国、美国、法国等资本主义国家的政治制度,谈谈它们各自的特点。

了解英国、美国、法国等资本主义国家的政治制度,谈谈它们各自的特点。

了解英国、美国、法国等资本主义国家的政治制度,谈谈它们各自的特点。

英国、美国和法国都是资本主义国家,但在政治制度方面存在一些不同的特点:1.英国政治制度的特点:•君主立宪制:英国是一个君主立宪制国家,女王(国王)是国家元首,但她的权力是象征性的,实际政府首脑是首相。

•两院制:英国的议会由两个议院组成,即上议院(伯爵院)和下议院(普通人院)。

议会在立法和监督政府方面发挥着重要作用。

•内阁制:英国的政府基于内阁制度,内阁成员由首相任命,并对行政事务负责。

•具有传统法律和习惯的宪法:英国没有正式的成文宪法,宪法权威主要来源于习惯法和先例法。

2.美国政治制度的特点:•总统制:美国是一个总统制国家,总统既是国家元首也是政府首脑,拥有行政权力。

•三权分立:美国政府采用三权分立的原则,行政权由总统领导,立法权属于国会(参议院和众议院),司法权归最高法院。

•联邦制:美国是一个联邦制国家,将权力分散到中央政府和各州政府,在特定事务上享有一定的自治权。

•宪法的权威:美国有一部成文宪法,被视为国家最高法律,规定了政府的权力和公民的权利。

3.法国政治制度的特点:•半总统制:法国是一个半总统制国家,总统是国家元首,负责外交事务和国防,而政府首脑是总理,负责内政。

•单院制:法国的议会由国民议会(下议院)和参议院组成,但国民议会在立法和决策上起主导作用。

•中央集权:法国的政治体系相对较集中化,中央政府对地方政府有较大的控制权。

•宪政传统:法国政治体系承袭了法国宪政传统,法律和法典对法国政治体系有重要影响。

总体而言,英国、美国和法国的政治制度都具有资本主义国家的一些共同特点,如法治原则、选举制度和民主原则。

但由于历史、法律和政治文化的差异,它们在君主制或总统制、立法体系、权力分配和地方自治等方面有一些独特的特点。

英美国会两院制度比较

英美国会两院制度比较

英美国会两院制度比较作者:迪丽努尔来源:《商情》2016年第01期摘要:英美两国同是西方大国,同属于西方文明体系,国会制度是当代民主政治制度的重要组成部分,两院制是一种以两个独立运作的组成的,作为的政治制度。

随着时代的发展,各国都在不断地探索更好的民主实现形式,比较英美两国的国会两院制度,借鉴西方政治文明的有益成果,具有重大意义。

关键词:英美两院制比较一、英美国会两院制度的建立(一)英国1.下议院英国议会的下院,又称平民院,是由普选产生的。

下院议员全部按“单名选区制”选举,即每个选区选一名议员,选民一人一票,得票相对多数者当选。

下院由全国各选区普选产生的议员组成,每届任期五年,任期届满后全部改选,可以连选连任。

为了贯彻“权力分立”的理论和“政教分离”的原则,避免司法人员、军职人员、常人文官和教会卷入党派斗争的政治漩涡,英国法律对下院议员有个特殊的规定:凡担任了法官、事务官、军职的人员以及上院议员、主教等,都一律不能作为下院议员的候选人参加竞选。

2.上议院英国议会的上院,又称贵族院,其议员不经选举产生,由各种贵族担任。

今天的英国,“贵族”成分比较复杂,概括起来。

上院贵族可以分为四种类型:第一类是宗教贵族,第二类是世袭贵族,第三类是终身贵族,第四类是上诉审判贵族,他们是首相提名、英王任命的履行上院司法职能的终身贵族。

目前,英国上院议员共有1100多人。

法律规定,凡是承认其贵族爵位、要参加上院的人,就不能同时成为下院议员;如果要参加下院议员的竞选,就必须放弃其贵族爵位成为平民。

(二)美国美国国会两院上院称为参议院,下院称为众议院。

国会是美国的最高权力机关,它拥有立法权、财政权、行政监督权、同意权、条约批准权和部分司法权力。

1.众议院众议院由各州选民直接选举产生的众议员组成,任期两年,到期全部改选。

名,美国众议院议员435名,按各州人口比例分配给各州(50万人选出一名)。

最多的是加利福尼亚州,43名;最少的如怀俄明州、内达华州,只有1名。

英美和中国的政治制度有何不同?

英美和中国的政治制度有何不同?

英美和中国的政治制度有何不同?1. 基本概述英美和中国是两个具有不同政治制度的国家,其中英美国家采取的是议会民主制度,而中国则采取的是人民代表大会制度。

议会民主制度是一种政治制度,也称为代议制民主或西方民主,它是通过选举来选择代表人民的议会,代表议会来管理国家事务,而中国的人民代表大会制度则是在党的领导下,由全国各族人民通过选举遴选出的代表组成的最高国家权力机关,代表人民行使国家权力。

2. 政治特征比较(1) 英美国家的议会民主制度面临派系斗争,而中国的人民代表大会制度面临政治稳定问题。

英美国家采取议会制民主制度,政治生态非常开放,政治派系众多,由于在议会上采取了政治竞争制度,国家选择政府领导人的权力分散在各派系或团体手中,容易产生派系政治。

而中国是个单一的党派国家,人民代表大会制度下的国家权力高度集中,增加了政治的稳定性。

(2) 英美国家的议会民主制度下权力分散,而中国的人民代表大会制度下政府权力集中议会民主制度使得政府各部门的权力下放和权力分立,由此来保证政府的合法性。

而人民代表大会制度下的中国政府权力则集中在中央,增加了国家政治机制的效率,在处理某些问题时更为方便。

(3) 英美国家議會民主制度下主导思想是多元化,而中國的人民代表大會制度的主导思想为共產主義。

议会民主制度是一种寻求多元合作的政治体制,它倡导大众对议会事务的监督,每个议员代表自己的利益,代表本地区选民的生产力和民生福祉。

而在人民代表大会制度下,代表着中国"人民利益最大多数",是共产党掌控国家力量的工具。

3. 体制建设方面的比较(1) 英美国家采取了“三权分立”制度,而中国则采取了“人民代表大会制度”。

英美国家将国家权力划分为立法、行政和司法三部分,分别由立法机构、行政机构和司法机构行使,三个机构互相制衡。

而中国采取的是人民代表大会制度,其特点是国家权力高度集中,资源调动迅速,在政策制定上更加决策迅速,可以迅速动员资源应对外部状况。

比较美国和英国政治体制的异同点

比较美国和英国政治体制的异同点

比较美国和英国政治体制的异同点
美国:国会是立法机构;总统既是国家元首,又是政府首脑,拥有国家元首的实权,有权组织政府;政府不对议会负责,但对总统负责;联邦法院拥有司法权。

英国:议会是立法机构;国家元首由国王担任,并无实权;政府由议会产生,政府大臣包括首相,都必须是议会成员,政府对议会负责;法官由大法官和首相推荐,行政任命,行使司法权。

相同点:分权、制衡。

相异点:
(1)美国总统是拥有实权的国家元首,英国国王是没有实权的国家元首。

(2)美国政府不对议会负责,英国政府必须对议会负责。

1994年葆拉·科尔宾·琼斯起诉克林顿对其进行“性骚扰”,并指控白宫前实习员:莫妮卡·莱温斯基曾与克林顿有染,克林顿均予以否认,琼斯败诉。

但1998年8月17日,克林顿向全国发表电视讲话,承认他和莱温斯基有“不适当”的关系,并承认他和莱温斯基的关系是错误的。

不过他强调自己“在任何时候都没有要求任何人撒谎、隐藏和销毁证据或做任何其他违法的事情”。

1、面对这个问题,联邦法院能做什么?
宣布总统违宪,予以调查,向国会递交调查报告
2、国会面对联邦法院提交的报告会怎么做?
弹劾
你所知道的美国总统还有哪些,你最欣赏其中的哪一位?为什么?请查阅资料,为他写一个小传。

美利坚合众国的缔造者,美国国父——华盛顿
美国第三任总统,《独立宣言》起草者之一——杰弗逊
美国最伟大的总统之一——林肯
美国历史上惟一四届连任的总统——罗斯福。

英美法三国议会制度之比较及对我国的借鉴

英美法三国议会制度之比较及对我国的借鉴

英\美\法三国议会制度之比较及对我国的借鉴作者:肖继王薇来源:《法制与社会》2010年第02期摘要英国、法国、美国作为资产阶级民主制的国家,都采用议会代议制形式,但因各自政体的差异,因而议会的组成及特点都有着极大的差异。

我国实行的是人民代表大会制度,与西方议会制都是现代文明社会的一种政权组织形式。

本文通过对英、美、法三国议会制度的比较,对完善我国人民代表大会制度提出了相关见解。

关键词议会代议制人民代表大会制度政权组织形式中图分类号:D97 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1009-0592(2010)01-160-02西方国家的议会制度是国家政治生活的核心,在行使国家权力方面起着举足轻重的作用。

英国、法国、美国作为当今西方政治大国的典范,同样实行资产阶级民主制,同样采用议会代议制形式,但因各自政体的差异,因而议会制度的本质,议会的组成及特点都有着极大的差异,议会的作用在英、美、法三个国家中也是逐渐被削弱。

分析英、美、法的议会制度,主要有以下的区别:一、英、美、法议会的起源和发展英国。

从14世纪中叶开始,在等级会议内部形成了贵族、高级教士与骑士、城市平民两大利益集团,并逐渐分化为贵族院和平民院,形成具有封建色彩的两院制等级议会。

资产阶级性质的两院制在1688年英国资产阶级革命后才逐步形成。

1689年议会通过的《权利法案》确立了“议会至上”的资本主义议会制原则,这就使两院制议会在实行君主立宪制的英国最终确立。

法国的两院制也是由封建等级会议演变而来的,法国社会等级分为僧侣、贵族和市民三等。

自1795年以来,法国议会一直实行两院制。

1958年10月4日宪法的正式公布生效,标志着一个近乎完美的或可以称之为理性的议会制度的诞生。

美国。

十八世纪中叶,费城会议上弗吉尼亚州代表提交的法案,提出只建立一个国会,遭到了其它各小州的反对,而康涅狄克州提议采取两院制,一个是联邦议会,一个是众议院,众议院按各州人口的比例,由人民选举。

英美两国行政首脑之比较

英美两国行政首脑之比较

英美两国行政首脑之比较摘要:英国的议会内阁制与美国的总统共和制是资本主义民主制度的两种典型表现形式,为世界上许多国家所效仿。

两国的政治制度设计虽然不尽相同,但都受分权学说的深刻影响:在英国,真正掌握行政权的是首相,在美国则是总统。

本文即对首相及总统的各个方面进行比较,以期对两国的政治制度有更深刻的理解。

关键词:首相总统职权办事机构正文部分:一、宏观之比较:首相和总统的设立与地位英国于17世纪资产阶级革命以后,逐渐形成了议会内阁制政体。

在这种政体形式下,英国的行政权逐步从国王和枢密院转移到内阁和首相手里。

英国的内阁产生于18世纪初,由枢密院外交委员会演变而来。

起初国王出席内阁会议,后来至乔治一世和二世时国王就不再出席内阁会议。

一般认为,自1721年英王乔治一世不再出席并主持内阁会议,而由第一财政大臣沃尔波主持内阁会议之后,即产生了一位主持内阁会议的第一部长即首相。

首相名称第一次见之于官方文件是1878年。

1902年以后形成了首相一职只能由议会下院议员担任的宪法惯例,1905年英王正式给首相以委任状。

1937年《国王的大臣法》规定了首相的工资和津贴,这就从法律上确认了首相职位的存在,但对首相的权能则始终没有明确的法律规范,而仅依据宪法惯例来行使。

早在1783年皮特曾说过:“枢密院中应当有一位属于首领地位的大臣,权力最大又独得国王信任。

他的权力别人既不可分享,也不能竞争,这就是通常称作首相的人。

”①到了现代,皮特的这一政治设想变成了现实:首相成了内阁的中心。

②甚至有人认为,现代的英国首相是“英国体制的拱顶石”,是“无冕之王”,“首相政府”代替了“内阁政府”。

这样的判断主要基于以下①《世界政府辞书》,中国法制出版社,1991年版,第620页。

②【英】约翰·格林伍德等:《英国行政管理》,第77页。

事实:首相是一身而三任的人物——政府首脑、议会领袖和党魁。

在这样的三重身份下,首相拥有了大部分法律所没有正式规定的巨大的职能和权力。

英美政治制度特点及文化基础比较

英美政治制度特点及文化基础比较

英美政治制度特点及文化基础比较一、英国政治制度特点及其文化基础(一)英国政治制度特点1. 议会至上。

英国是世界上第一个建立议会制的国家,英国议会还有“议会之母”之称。

在英国,议会既是国家的最高立法机关,也是国家的最高权力机关。

它由英王、上院和下院组成。

上院由贵族组成,下院由平民选举产生。

权力重心渐渐向下院转移。

虽然以首相为首的内阁实质上是英国的最高行政机关,并渐渐成为英国的权力中心。

但在法律上,英国议会的地位是最高的。

2. “影子内阁”。

英国在政党制度上目前实行两党制,由工党和保守党轮流组阁,这与美国看似并无太大区别。

但其比较特别的是,当一党执政时,在野党即反对党便组织“影子内阁”,监督执政党的立法,行政等行为,参与协商决策,并领取国家支付的薪水。

英国反对党的这种特殊的地位构成了英国政治独特的风景线。

3. 女王的独特作用。

英国宪政,规定女王为国家元首。

英国女王虽然并无什么实质权力,但她却有着不可替代的政治作用。

首先,她是国家统一、民族团结的象征,在英国人心目中,女王是全体英国人民和英国文化的代表。

其次,女王在政治中的中立形象,使其成为英国各政治势力冲突的协调者。

最后,女王丰富的政治经历,为每一任首相提供正确的政治见解,有着其他政治家望尘莫及的经验和知识。

(二)英国政治文化:崇尚法治、善于妥协英国的政治文化有着其独特的特点,有学者将其概括为:保守主义与激进主义、科学理性与宗教哲学、贵族精神与公民精神相互矛盾、相互融合。

其中保守主义占主导又夹杂着激进主义,保守主义并不是一味顽固地反对进步,而是对变革的进程和方式持稳重态度,即“有保留地变革”;激进主义则从其产生之时就带着回归自然的倾向,在它超前发展的历史意识中保留着潜在的传统主义因素。

保守主义与激进主义共存,二者相互促进、相互制约。

任何政治制度的形成都是一个漫长的历史过程,都与其政治文化息息相关。

英国政治思想家洛克最早提出“分权”学说,他将国家权力分为立法权、行政权和联盟权。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

American and British parliamentary system comparative analysis(经管07级工商4班于少东20070506)Abstract: Political institutions (set) belong to Political superstructure areas, generally refers to its socialQualitative adaptation of the national authorities and basic system. "Political system and human society as the various systems,Is a product of historical development, with time and space mark. "1300 years ago, British bourgeois revolutionLater, the capitalist countries gradually establish and practice of the democratic politics and promulgated the constitution and constitutionalism, make gradually implementingCapitalism in the fields are developed.Both Britain and the political system has the same theoretical basis: "natural rights" theory and "separation"Principle; The specific content of political system includes parliamentary system, the electoral system, judicial system, the government system,Civil service system and political party system; etc. All flaunt "people's democracy", with the main forms of the representative for democracy,Power system running in the separation of powers and the characteristics of "rule by law" principle. The most fundamental capitalist countries asHome political system of two typical representative, Britain and the United Kingdom in the maintenance of bourgeois interests, safeguard endowment socialist private ownershipDegrees, carry out the bourgeois dictatorship has the same essence. But in concrete political system level and the two countriesSince the present different characteristics.Key Words: parliamentary system, culture; difference英美议会制度之比较摘要:政治制度(Political Regime)属于上层建筑范畴,一般是指与本国的社会性质相适应的国家权利机构和基本制度。

"政治制度与人类社会的各种制度一样,是历史发展的产物,带有时间与空间的烙印。

"1300多年前,英国资产阶级革命后,资本主义国家逐步建立和实践了民主政治,颁布了宪法并逐步实行宪政,使资本主义在各个领域都得到了长足的发展。

英美两国政治制度具有相同的理论基础:"天赋人权"学说和"三权分立"原则;政治制度的具体内容都包括议会制度、选举制度、司法制度、政府制度、公务员制度和政党制度等;都标榜"人民民主",以代议制为民主的主要形式;政权体制都实行分权制衡和"法治"原则的特点。

而最根本的是作为资本主义国家政治制度的两个典型代表,英美两国在维护资产阶级利益、维护资主义私有制度、实行资产阶级专政等方面具有相同的本质。

但在具体政治制度层面两国又各自呈现不同的特点.关键词:议会制度文化差异British parliamentary systemA, introductionThe British parliament is known as "parliament's mother. In Britain takes the lead in creating capitalist mode of production, and meanwhile takes the lead in creating a with the appropriate Should the constitutional system, which is the parliament for substantial part of the parliamentary system. The British parliament as the mother of parliament, reason has the following the items.The longest history. 1.If the "model in 1295 convened for the beginning, then parliament", the British continuous parliamentary practice has so far more than seven hundred years. Only BritainParliament is concerned, the history of the long world no country parliament can watch with admiration.The British parliament history's preciousness is not only lies in its time long, but because it has experienced the contradiction of deep and complex, lies in its placeAccumulate experiences and lessons of the rich, lies in the parliamentary practice contains seven hundred years of enlightenment.2. Overthrow feudal monarchy struggle extremely fully and successAs with most countries, Britain had long feudal society period and accompanied by the feudal monarchy. However apart is,Also in the feudal monarchy, the British council will tenaciously speared out, and has been indomitable to bind kingship, until the kingship resolutely placedParliament bargainees under.British Kings feudal autocratic many tendency, have a plenty of dye-in-the-wood despot, and the parliament power bitterest. Therefore, the British parliamentIn the world know only have kingship and disown parliamentary authority era of kingship, without constraint again in various ways and sceptre struggle. Lawmakers to king pleaseMay, right themselves; Borrow the king's tax advice, attacking demands and discusses the princes and evil king sin. When peace parliamentary struggle can stop the king's autocratic through When parliament with a command army, wang jun JueSi war. Parliament was even to abolish the monarchy and republicanism. After about five hundred years of innumerable backClose battle, parliament finally overcome the monarchy and aerial kingship, will be transformed into independent monarchy without ability of conduct national symbol, and make them work for parliamentary supremacySystem service.The British parliament for other countries overcome monarchy of similar revolution offers rich experience, one of the most valued is: use parliament financialRight with war beat fretting kingship, king, with overhead operation transformation kingship.3. Create new electoral systemBritain from feudal society period already formed a senate election systems, and have been used to the 19th century prophase. The feudal monarchy of parliamentThe electoral system facilitates the king called parliament, which is beneficial to the rulers and plute rig elections.Parliamentary-based, congress needs to build their own social basis. From 1832 onwards, the British parliament continuous exploration, establish new Congressman electoral.To voters' property, gender requirements gradually abolished, age requirement reduced to the administrative divisions, narrow basis and determine the constituency between population. ConstituencyDifferences. Results, eighteen years of voters team up. On the other hand, to the senator candidate's property, gender, age. Qualification corresponding abandonedLess requirements. Thus, civilian court to ambitious civilians opened the door. Party becomes campaign organizers, it set platform, nominate candidates,Raising campaign funds, stirring voters. Election into voters around the party's policies andcandidates, and make the authorized choice. Country of voters, candidatePeople, political party in the election behavior, and to make a standard election disputes render an arbitration. One constituency election a Congressman, attains the simple majority candidate Who was elected. The British parliament before other most countries parliament groping built above new electoral system, one of the many points for one anotherA national assembly quoted.4. Create melt certainty equivalent maximization model revealParliament from a monarch hand taken after the exercise of sovereignty, how sovereignty? Britain and other a few countries facing the constitutional earlier issueThe challenge, and initially made answer, namely create British melt certainty equivalent maximization model reveal.The main characteristics of British melt certainty equivalent maximization model reveal displays in: government members by the parliament civilian court majority front seat senator and companions front seat concurrently; 651 zhengMansion to civilians courtyard bear the collective responsibility and minister personal responsibility; The government arrangement the legislation of parliament. Molten certainty equivalent maximization model reveal originally in the British parliament for overhead king Administrative power, and by the parliament adopted by the executive power control, thus consolidate parliamentary supremacy system. Unexpected is, with modern British government dutyInflation, exercising administrative power of the government, the legislative council gradually manipulation of the parliamentary vote to languish.Practice showed that British melt with certainty equivalent maximization model reveal earlier it created the United States truly, convenient decentralized compared the government policy into legal and then pushDo, yet it excessive weakened state parliament in the role of decision-making procedures in parliament's image, position adverse very much. In this connection, decentralizationSystem under the U.S. congress to safeguard its addressing intrepid legislative power and financial power; Many cited British parliamentary melt certainty equivalent maximization model reveal increasingly remind ourselves not to fall intoThe mother of parliament position, they are entitled to useless tit-for-tat proposes must strengthen parliament in state of the decisions control function.5. Founded majority with opposition modeThe British parliament first frank recognition in parliamentary parties within the existence, and press the delegate count how many irrelevance seats to assign its constitutional function. get Civilian court majority seats party to exercise administrative power, namely form, but also obtain organization civilian court of the legislation and the other privileges.Obtain civilian court times most seats party led to become namely magnificence opposition, obtained with majority consultation arrangements civilian court agenda, and have the privilege of Right representing all opposition divides the motion, the government should declare etc, also has the power separate arrangement civilian court part time BianTi, and leadership institute of several civiliansKey AD hoc committee. Seats less than other led the opposition parties of the opposition also enjoy certain rights. Overall look, majority leader administrative and legislationMethod, the opposition is responsible for supervision and administration. By using the majority -- opposition relation mode, the British parliament MPS to use the pursuit of fame,Make them according to their parties undertake corresponding relationship between constitution responsibilities, broke the former political party system period government - parliament against relationship, change and the formation of the majorityThe party and the government -- the opposition against relations, political situation and constitutionalism role crossed. Quote British melt certainty equivalent maximization model reveal national parliaments most also primersWith the British pioneering majority -- the opposition system.6. Modern parliament's responsibilityThe feudal monarchy, the British council is the responsibility of the petition right themselves, decide to court: finance, legislation, supervision palace, trial respondents who were entitled to. Parliament boarded the supreme status, the modern welfare state formation, melting certainty equivalent maximization model reveal role, all of these contribute to the British parliament reassessed his responsibilities.Modern, the British council will the following as own duty: legislation, decide the state finance, nominate government, supervision and government work, trial publicComplaints, debate for voters handle affairs, state and trial of respondents who were entitled to. Practice show that, except for the highest appeals court outside, the mother of parliament liable Responsibility for all activities comply with modern society in parliament expected. Therefore, many countries parliament will also the foregoing led to his responsibilities.7. Established rulesMembers of parliament, fulfill its many many responsibilities, must have the aid of particular way and rules. The British parliament from which the century begins founded deliberation practices, To gradually expressly formulate rules, and take the lead has formed a complete set of deliberation and physical.Civilian court with its permanent rules as main body, deliberation and practices, the speaker cutting, such as the deliberation and code of auxiliary system rules, within the grandLet only deep. It classify ground deliberation stipulated each unit of composition, duty, complete legislative procedures, and questioned the way, debate way, deliberationThe timing, meeting the function of a chairman, etc.The British parliament deliberation bill's structure increasingly unsuited to modern legislative procedures of democracy and science request, be many countries parliament abandoned. howeverBut, the British parliament was initiated by the debate system, inquiring system, conference system but get many national council of identity.8. Founded parliament privilegeThe British parliament with a monarch's struggle, in order to protect yourself from the threat, undisturbed meeting, take the lead in the creation of parliament privilege. nowGeneration, parliament privilege to prevent the outside parliament strength interference, destroy parliament, still indispensable. Because of this, many countries parliament emulatedThe British council, set the respective privilege.9. Explore parliament full-time glycosylatedMedieval England council also just part-time type. In order to maintain the parliament's supremestatus, effectively fulfill parliament of modern duties, the British parliamentFirst on full-time change path. The British parliament full-time of construction involves such important content. First, obtain special office space and facilities, andDecides its development. Second, senator salary, and obtain the office expenses, equipped with assistant. Third, setting a complete range of assistant and service agencies.Fourth, equipped with the necessary auxiliary institutions. Fifth, execute conference system. The British parliament in full-time of exploration, of office space, the time of the meeting, etc Importance very early has known, its measures also proved to be worth emulated. But senator salary, equipped with assistant for parliament equipped with the necessary auxiliary machine Compose on issues such as, the British council trudged without meaning, eventually had to quote the experience of other countries parliament.Anyhow, the British parliament as the mother of parliament, and not in the sense that it provides us all successful experience, but said it took the lead in exploring the representativeRoad. It in exploring time earlier than the inter-parliamentary, content is very deep, its experience or teach and therefore have to finalize the design strength, available to us or borrow Jian, or of the incident.Modern countries, most executes similar British melt certainty equivalent maximization model reveal. So, thoroughly understand the British parliament, we know of these countries parliament and itsThe whole constitution system, is much easier. A few countries implement, and several decentralized state practices between certainty equivalent maximization model reveal and decentralized fusion between prospective pointsCertainty equivalent maximization model reveal. Understand the British council, will greatly help us to understand these two kinds of state council, and even the whole constitution system, for they are bothConsciously quoted British parliamentary-based long, remedy its short, and design of their respective constitution system and parliament.American parliamentary systemFederal regulators - congressAmerica's top legislature. Composed by the senate and the house of representatives. Congress exercise legislative power. Bill general after putting forward, committeeThe deliberation, 54%personnel congress to consider programs. A court is passed, to the other house, which in turn after the same program. Bill byAfter the President signed by the house and senate, If the President doesn't veto, or if the veto but the senate 2/3 members, namely formal into through againFor the law. Congress also has other powers prescribed by the constitution. As declared power, the right to amend the constitution etc. Houses are equipped with xuMany committee, and set up by senate lawmakers composed of joint committee, congress work mostly in each committee.Commission is divided into:(1) the SCMM each session of congress, the number is endless and same, term and each session of parliament with tenure as two years. The influence are:The house rules, tax, grant, military, judicial and foreign affairs committee, the senate diplomatic, funding, finance,Judicial and military affairs committee.(2) special investigation committee, for the treatment of temporary or set up special problems.(3) joint committee, need to make decisions about the common house and senate is formed.4 the mediation committee, its task is to draw up a bipartisan bill acceptable for. Congress also sets up the total audit room, library of congressSuch as the agencies.The senateThe President with foreign states treaties and appointed by the President of the senior officials must be approved by the senate, the senate entitled impeachment trial,Entitled to under special conditions check vice President. Senator directly elected by the states voters, each state 2, implement state representationThe principle of equality. Existing members 100. Was elected senator must be at least 30 years old, as the U.S. citizens is full already 9 years, was electedFor selected residents of the states. Term 6 years, every 2 years re-election l / 3, even for re-election. The vice President of the senate, of course the speaker.The houseThe house shall have the right to make a financial case and impeachment, be entitled to under special conditions, check the President. According to the state population than the number of representativesPatients were allocated, each state at least 1. According to the 1929 the seats allocation act, will Congressman total fixed for 435 name, and according toThe federal ministry of commerce bureau every 10 years, provide states population fluctuant circumstance, readjust states between seats allocated. Against theMember by directly elected, must be aged 25 years old, as the U.S. citizens already filled seven years, was elected as elected residents of the states. letStage 2 years, may be re-elected consecutively. House speaker by 54%personnel are elected through the meeting.Both senator long-term re-election phenomenon is very popular. Members shall not concurrently assume other government positions.Bibliography[1] Allan, K.& Burridge. Euphemism & Dysphemism. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.1991.[2] Ayto, John. Euphemisms. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Led. 1993.[3]Kluckhohn,Florence and F.Strodtbeck.Variationsin Value Orientations.Evanston,OH: Row & Peterson. 1961.[4] Leech, G..N &M.H. Short. Style in fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman. 1999.[5] Leech, G. English Grammar for Today. The Macmillan Press LTD. 1982.[6] Leech, G. Semantics. Haedmondsworth: Penguin Books, Ltd. 1985.[7] Malinowski,B. "The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Language." The Meaning of Meaning. Ed.C.K. Ogden and I.A Richards. New York: Harcount Brace Jovanovich. 1923.[8] Ayto, John, C.G. Kind Words: A Thesaurus of Euphemisms. New York: Facts On File, Inc. 1983。

相关文档
最新文档