天津高考英语卷子阅读c、d翻译.doc

2017 6月

D

I read somewhere that we spend a full third of our lives w aiting.But where are we doing all of this waiting,and what doe s it mean to an impatient society like ours? To understand the i ssue, let ?s take a look at three types of “waits ”.

The very purest form of waiting is the Watched-Pot Wait.It i s without doubt the most annoying of all.Take filling up the ki tchen sink ( 洗碗池 )

as an example. There is absolutely is going on but keep both eyes ull.During these waits,the brain wanders about until the water runs and onto your socks. This kind of and mindless.

nothing you can do while this fixed on the sink until it ?s f slips away from the body and over the edge of the counter wait makes the waiter helpless

A cousin to the Watched-Pot Wait is the Forced Wait. This o ne requires a bit of discipline. Properly preparing packaged noodle soup requires a Forced Wait. Directions are very specific. “Brin g three cups of water to boil, add mix, simmer three minutes, re move from heat, let stand five minute s. ”I have my doubts that anyone has actually followed the procedures strictly. After all, Fo rced Waiting requires patience.

Perhaps the most powerful type of waiting is the Lucky-Break Wait. This type of wait is unusual in that it is for the most part voluntary. Unlike the Forced Wait, which is also voluntary, waiting for your lucky break does not necessarily mean that it will happen.

Turning one?s life into a waiting game requires faith and hope , and is strictly for the optimists among us. On the surface it seems as ridiculous as following the directions on soup mixes, b ut the Lucky-Break Wait well serves those who are willing to do it. As long as one doesn?t come to rely on it, wishing for a f ew good things to happen never hurts anybody.

We certainly do spend a good deal of our time waiting. The n ext time you?rstanding at the sink waiting for it to fill while cooking noodle soup that you?ll have to eat until a large bag of cash falls out of the sky, don?t be desperate. You?re probably just as busy as the next guy.

我在某个地方读到过，我们花了整整三分之一的时间在等待。但是，我们在哪里做

这些等待呢 ?对于像我们这样一个没有耐心的社会来说，这意味着什么呢 ?为了理解这个问题，让我们来看看三种类型的“等待” 。

等待是最纯粹的等待。毫无疑问，这是最令人讨厌的。以厨房洗涤槽为例。当这一

切发生的时候，你绝对不能做任何事情，但要让双眼紧盯着水槽，直到它满了为止。在

等待的过程中，大脑会从身体上滑出，四处游荡，直到水从柜台边缘流到你的袜子上。

这种等待使侍者变得无助和没有头脑。

守望者的表弟是被迫等待的。这需要一点自律。做好包装的面汤，需要有强迫的等

待。非常具体的方向。将三杯开水煮沸，加入混合物，煮三分钟，从火中取出，放五分

钟。我怀疑是否有人严格遵守了程序。毕竟，强迫等待需要耐心。

也许最强大的等待是幸运的等待。这种等待是不寻常的，因为它大部分是自愿的。

不像强迫等待，这也是自愿的，等待你的幸运休息并不一定意味着它会发生。

把一个人的生命变成等待的游戏需要信念和希望，这对我们中间的乐观主义者是严

格的。表面上看，这似乎很荒谬，就像在汤混合上的说明一样，但幸运的是，那些愿意

去做的人却在等待。只要你不依赖它，希望有几件好事不会伤害到任何人。

我们确实花了很多时间等待。下次你“站在水池边，等着它装满你要吃的面条汤，

直到一大袋现金从天上掉下来，不要绝望。”你可能和下一个人一样忙。

C

This month, Germany?s transport minister, Alexander Dobrindt, pro posed the first set of rules for autonomous vehicles( 自主驾驶车辆 ). They would define the driver ?s role in such cars and govern how such cars perform in crashes where lives might be lost.

The proposal attempts to deal with what some call the “death valley ”of autonomous vehicles: the grey area between semi-autono mous and fully driverless cars that could delay the driverless fut ure.

( Dobrindt wants three things: that a car always chooses property

财

产 )damage over personal injury; that it never distinguishes between humans based on age or race; and that if a human removes his

or her hands from the driving wheel —to check email, say—the car ? s maker is responsible if there is a crash.

“ The change to the road traffic law will permit fully automat ic driving, ”says Dobrindt. It will put fully driverless cars on an equal legal footing to human drivers, he says.

Who is responsible for the operation of such vehicles is not clear among car makers, consumers and lawyers. “The liability( 法律责任 )issue is the biggest one of them all, ”says Natasha Merat at the University of Leeds, UK.

An assumption behind UK insurance for driverless cars, introduce

d earlier this year, insists that a human “b

e watchful and mon itoring the road ”at every moment.

But that is not what many people have in mind when thinking

of driverless cars. “ When you say ,driverless cars ?, people expect driverless cars, ”Merat says. “You know—no driver. ”

Because of the confusion, Merat thinks some car makers will wa it until vehicles can be fully automated without human operation.

Driverless cars may end up being a form of public transport r ather than vehicles you own, says Ryan Calo at Stanford University

,California.That is happening in the UK and Singapore, where go vernment-provided driverless vehicles are being launched.

That would go down poorly in the US, however.“The the government would take over driverless cars and treat a public good would get absolutely nowhere here, ”says idea that them as Calo.

本月，德国交通部长亚历山大· 多布林特 (Alexander Dobrindt) 提出了自动驾驶汽车的第一套规则。他们将定义驾驶员在这些汽车中的角色，并控制这种汽车在可能失去生命的车祸中表现如何。

该提案试图解决一些人所说的自动驾驶汽车的“死亡谷” : 半自治和完全无人驾驶汽车之间的灰色地带，可能会延误无人驾驶的未来。

brindt 想要三件事 : 一辆车总是选择财产损害而不是人身伤害 ; 它从来没有区分出基于年龄或种族的人

类 ; 如果一个人把他或她的手从驾驶轮上拿下来检查电子邮件，那么，如果发生撞车事故，汽车制

造商就会负责。

Dobrindt 说: “道路交通法规的改变将允许全自动驾驶。”他说，它将把完全无人驾驶的汽车与人类

司机同等的法律地位。

在汽车制造商、消费者和律师中，谁负责此类车辆的运营尚不清楚。英国利兹大学的娜塔莎?默拉特说: “这个问题是最大的问题。”

今年早些时候推出的英国无人驾驶汽车保险的设想，坚持认为，人类每时每刻都要“警惕和监控道路”。

但这并不是许多人在考虑无人驾驶汽车时的想法。“当你说 , 无人驾驶汽车” , 人们期望无人驾驶汽车,”Merat 说。“你不知道司机。”

由于混乱，梅拉特认为一些汽车制造商将会等到汽车完全自动化而无需人工操作。

加州斯坦福大学的 Ryan Calo 说，无人驾驶汽车最终可能成为一种公共交通工具，而不是你拥有的

汽车。这种情况正在英国和新加坡发生，政府提供的无人驾驶汽车正在那里启动。

然而，这种情况在美国将会很糟糕。卡罗说 : “政府将接管无人驾驶汽车并将其视为公共产品的想法

在这里绝对行不通。”