愤怒的葡萄论文
《愤怒的葡萄》的叙事及象征意义

《愤怒的葡萄》的叙事及象征意义摘要:《愤怒的葡萄》一般被看成是反映美国特定历史时期的社会和经济问题的纪实性作品,然而本文从叙述方式和象征手法入手,发掘出了它的不同意蕴,那就是暴露了一个根深蒂固的民族意识问题——美国神话的危害性,讲述了一个有关人类努力认识和理解他们对同胞及其赖以生存的大地应尽的义务和责任的故事。
关键词:《愤怒的葡萄》;叙事;象征《愤怒的葡萄》是美国著名作家 ,诺贝尔文学奖获得者斯坦贝克的代表作。
描述在 30 年代美国经济大萧条的时期,乔德一家随著成千上万的破产农民一样,忍痛离乡背景到加利福尼亚谋生,尽管现实不如理想,遭人排挤、压柞,但他们仍不放弃希望。
它是反映 30 年代美国大萧条时期的一部史诗。
小说以乔德一家的悲惨遭遇为发展主线,记述了乔德一家从俄克拉何马州逃荒的痛苦经历。
为了使小说的表现技巧独树一帜,富有新意,作者主要着眼于小说结构的构建,运用了大量的象征手法,通过巧妙的构思,在不同的层次上创造了众多栩栩如生的意象。
1独具特色的叙述方式《愤怒的葡萄》一共分为30章,其中有16章是斯坦贝克所谓的插叙章节,占小说篇幅的20%。
乔德一家绝不出现在这些插叙章节之中。
插叙章节不仅提供了作品主要人物活动的社会背景,而且还勾勒出一幅反映广大移民家庭受苦受难的全景画。
初看起来插叙章节的相互交替似乎会更加严重地打断故事叙述,把全书分裂成为各自独立的两个部分或互不连贯的章节,使读者感到枯燥乏味。
然而对此斯坦贝克却早有防备,他采用了下述几种方法,把这两类章节有机地联系起来。
第一种方法是让插叙章节中描写广大逃荒移民的经历或遭遇的某些细节在紧接其后的记叙章节中重现,成为描写乔德一家的细节。
例如小说的第5章(插叙章节)末尾的一个细节:拖拉机从一家佃农房屋的一只角切入,推倒了房墙,使小屋脱离地基而斜向一边垮塌;一个男子手握一枝步枪,两眼盯住奉命强行拆房的拖拉机驾驶员。
而在第6章一开头,作品的叙述者就告诉我们,乔德家房屋已被拖拉机推垮了一只角,屋身倾斜,脱离了原来的地基。
《愤怒的葡萄》:一部揭示社会不公与人民愤怒的史诗

《愤怒的葡萄》:一部揭示社会不公与人民愤怒的史诗《愤怒的葡萄》是一部震撼人心的作品,其深刻的主题、鲜活的人物和真实的社会背景令人难以忘怀。
通过阅读这部小说,我得以一窥20世纪30年代美国经济大萧条时期的社会景象,见证了农民在困境中的坚韧与斗争。
首先,作品中的故事情节引人入胜。
在经济萧条的背景下,大批农民失去了土地和家园,被迫背井离乡,寻找新的生存之地。
他们面临着失业、饥饿和困苦,而社会的冷漠与不公更让他们深感绝望。
然而,即使在如此恶劣的环境下,他们并未放弃希望,而是团结起来,为争取自己的权益而抗争。
这种坚韧不拔的精神让人深感敬佩。
在人物塑造方面,《愤怒的葡萄》同样精彩。
小说中的母亲形象给人留下了深刻的印象。
她不仅是一个家庭的支柱,更是一个充满智慧和慈悲的女性。
在颠沛流离的生活中,她始终保持着对未来的憧憬与希冀,用坚韧与忍耐维系着一家人的希望。
此外,小说中还塑造了许多充满个性的农民形象,他们各有各的苦难与抗争,但共同的是对自由和公正的渴望。
除了故事情节和人物塑造,《愤怒的葡萄》还揭示了深刻的社会主题。
在经济大萧条时期,社会贫富悬殊,农民成为了牺牲品。
他们努力工作,却饱受剥削和压迫。
小说中的农场主形象则代表了贪婪与冷漠的势力,他们为了自己的利益而不顾农民的死活。
这种社会不公引发了农民的愤怒与抗争,成为了小说中贯穿始终的主题。
在阅读这部小说的过程中,我深受感动。
作者通过细腻的笔触描绘了农民的苦难与抗争,让我深刻认识到社会不公对普通人的摧残。
同时,小说中的感人场景也让我动容。
例如,极度虚弱的母亲仍以乳汁救活了一个将死的穷人,展现了人性的善良与悲悯。
总的来说,《愤怒的葡萄》是一部具有深刻社会意义的作品。
它让我重新审视了社会的不公与不平等,激发了我对社会公正的关注与思考。
这部小说以其震撼人心的故事、鲜活的人物和深刻的主题成为了文学史上的经典之作,值得每一个关注社会问题的人仔细品读。
从空间批评视角解读《愤怒的葡萄》中裘德一家的生存困境

从空间批评视角解读《愤怒的葡萄》中裘德一家的生存困境从空间批评视角解读《愤怒的葡萄》中裘德一家的生存困境《愤怒的葡萄》是美国作家约翰·斯坦贝克于1939年出版的长篇小说,主要叙述了20世纪30年代大萧条时期加州一家农民裘德一家的艰难生活。
本文从空间批评的角度出发,探讨裘德一家所面临的生存困境,并揭示其中蕴含的社会问题。
首先,通过空间批评的视角可以看出,《愤怒的葡萄》中裘德一家的生存困境与地理空间的关系密切。
小说的背景设定在加州中部的农业地区,裘德一家是农民,他们的生活与土地息息相关。
然而,当时正值大萧条时期,经济困难、灾难性的干旱以及土地的经济利益被剥夺,给裘德一家带来了极大的苦难。
其次,在空间批评的视角下,我们注意到裘德一家所处的地理空间是一个被资本主义剥削的空间。
小说中描绘出了大农庄富豪财富的宏大景象,与之形成鲜明对比的是农民们的贫困困境。
裘德一家面临着种种困难,无法租到土地,生计困难。
在这一空间中,资本主义经济制度对农民的剥削和掠夺,使裘德一家陷入了无尽的困境。
此外,在空间批评的视角下,我们还注意到裘德一家的生存困境与社会空间的关系。
小说中描绘了加州中部农业地区被大农庄富豪把持的局面,裘德一家只能默默受苦,无力改变现状。
作者通过描写裘德一家努力生存,却无法摆脱贫穷的命运,揭示了社会空间中的阶级差距和社会不公。
正是因为裘德一家处于弱势位置,被迫接受一切压迫和剥削。
最后,在空间批评的视角下,我们还可以看到裘德一家的生存困境与日常生活空间的关系。
小说中通过对农民们艰难生活的描写,展现了贫脊、肮脏的生活环境。
那些贫穷的农民们,整天奔波于劳动、生存和生活所困扰的苦境之中,他们身处日常生活空间与社会制度压迫的夹缝之中。
他们没有时间也没有精力去追求更美好的生活。
总结起来,从空间批评的视角解读《愤怒的葡萄》中裘德一家的生存困境,我们可以看到地理空间、资本主义剥削、社会空间以及日常生活空间对裘德一家的影响。
愤怒的葡萄论文选题参考

愤怒的葡萄论文选题参考“苦难既然把我推到了悬崖的边缘,那么就让我在这悬崖的边缘坐下来,顺便看看悬崖下的浏岚雾霭,唱支歌给你听。
”我觉得没有比这句话更适合《愤怒的葡萄》这本书了。
《愤怒的葡萄》是诺贝尔文学奖得主约翰斯坦贝克的长篇小说,故事以20世界30年代美国经济大萧条为背景,讲述了破产的农民大批逃荒的经历。
汤姆乔德因为杀人蹲了四年监狱,在获得假释回家的路上遇到了从前的牧师凯西,他们回到家乡才发现家乡已经空无一人,找到了家人之后得到了不得不不离开家乡的消息。
他们变卖了家产,拼凑了一辆卡车,把家当都装上卡车。
一切都收拾妥当后,乔德一家和牧师凯西一共十二口,开上了往加州的66号公路。
爷爷最终留在了自己的家乡,车子开出去没多久,爷爷就过世了。
这一路向西的路途,汤姆乔德一家克服了各种各样的艰难险阻,他们善良,团结,怀揣希望,最终到达了加州,但却发现加州并不是想象中的天堂。
苦难不值得追求,磨练意志是因为苦难无法躲开。
整本书的核心围绕着贫穷和苦难,农民被剥夺了土地,被逐出自己的家园,他们世世代代生活在这片土地,他们的祖辈生在这里长在这里,如今却要面临被强制赶走的境遇。
失去了工作,没有钱,每天都在为了生存苦苦挣扎。
“我们一直在找啊,妈。
现在买不起汽油了,所以只能带出走着去。
每扇门我们都进去了,每间屋子我们都跑过了,哪怕是明知道找不到活的地方,我们也都去了。
让人觉得很有压力啊,明明知道找不到,还要出去找。
”妈严厉的说:“你们千万不能泄气。
现在这就是全家人的难关。
你们可千万不能泄气。
”妈是这个故事中最作者塑造的一个伟大善良的女性形象,她坚毅果敢,她是全家人的精神支柱。
书中这么写她:在苦难的生活中,她就像一位船长,只要她不倒下,她不绝望,她不走偏,整个家庭的小船就会继续向前。
在全家人找不到工作,身无分文填不饱肚子的时候,所有的人都在犹豫不决要不要往前继续走的时候,妈却斩钉截铁的做出决定,马上往前走。
一家人准备穿越沙漠之时,奶奶病重去世,她一个人瞒着大家,与死去的奶奶一起睡了一夜。
《愤怒的葡萄》读后感500字作文精选

《愤怒的葡萄》读后感500字作文精选在读完《愤怒的葡萄》后,我产生了种种复杂的情绪和思考。
这部小说以其深刻的描写和强烈的情感打动着我,让我对生活和人性产生了深度的思考。
《愤怒的葡萄》是美国作家斯坦贝克的作品,他以其深厚的文学功底和细腻的笔触塑造了一个个鲜活的人物形象。
小说以大萧条时期的美国为背景,讲述了一家农场主和一群苦力们的辛酸故事。
他们受着剥削和压迫,生活在贫困和艰难中,但他们依然坚持着对美好未来的期望。
小说中描写农场主的冷酷无情和苦力们的挣扎与反抗让我感到非常震撼。
小说中最令我印象深刻的是苦力汤姆·焦克斯和吉姆·凯西这两个角色。
他们是平凡的农民,但他们内心深处却蕴藏着巨大的力量和对正义的渴望。
焦克斯舍弃了自己的家庭,去参与工人运动,为苦力争取更好的待遇和权益。
他的坚持和勇气感动了我,让我思考起人性中最美好的一面。
而吉姆·凯西则是一个让人无法忽视的角色。
他是一个被打倒的牧师,但他却在黑暗中寻找希望,试图通过宗教信仰找到自己的存在意义。
他的言行充满了智慧和力量,他用自己的生命向人们证明了爱与牺牲的可贵。
凯西的形象给予了我对人性的新的思考,使我意识到人性中所包含的复杂性和多样性。
在阅读《愤怒的葡萄》的过程中,我也反思了自己对权力和财富的态度。
小说中农场主对苦力的剥削和压迫让我对社会不公感到愤怒,同时也让我反思了自己是否也会因为权力和财富而忽视他人的利益。
通过反思,我发现自己已经开始逐渐学会关注他人,关注弱者,而这正是小说想要向我们传递的信息之一。
总的来说,读完《愤怒的葡萄》让我感受到了生活的苦难和坚韧,也让我更加关注社会问题和他人的需要。
小说通过描写农场主和苦力们的斗争,展现了人性的复杂性和多样性,使我对人性和社会产生了新的思考。
这部小说不仅是一部文学作品,更是关注社会问题和人性的探索之旅。
读完《愤怒的葡萄》,我深感被触动,思考的思绪久久不能平静。
约翰·斯坦贝克的《愤怒的葡萄》 - 分析农民运动和社会公正

约翰·斯坦贝克的《愤怒的葡萄》- 分析农民运动和社会公正1. 引言1.1 概述《愤怒的葡萄》是美国作家约翰·斯坦贝克的经典之作,这部小说以描写20世纪三十年代美国农民运动为背景,深入探讨了社会公正的重要性。
斯坦贝克通过细致入微的描写和鲜活的人物形象,帮助读者更好地理解农民运动的历史背景和社会公正问题。
1.2 文章结构本文将分为五个主要部分来探讨《愤怒的葡萄》中农民运动和社会公正的相关内容。
首先,我们将在引言部分概述文章内容并介绍文章结构。
接下来,在第二部分中,我们将背景介绍农民运动以及斯坦贝克对该运动进行的描写。
第三部分将讨论社会公正的定义与重要性,并分析小说中体现出来的社会公正问题。
接着,在第四部分中,我们将详细分析斯坦贝克对农民运动和社会公正态度和观点,并评价他在小说中刻画形象所体现出来的立场。
最后,在结论部分中,我们将总结全文并回顾论点和观点,思考《愤怒的葡萄》对农民运动和社会公正的启示与反思,并提出未来研究的方向与展望。
1.3 目的本文旨在通过分析约翰·斯坦贝克的《愤怒的葡萄》,深入探讨农民运动和社会公正这两个重要主题。
通过准确而细致的分析,我们将揭示斯坦贝克对农民运动及其背后的社会公正问题所持有的态度和观点,并分析其对于我们当今社会的启示和价值。
希望通过此文能够进一步理解历史中农民运动以及社会公正问题所扮演的重要角色,为当前社会公正问题提供一定程度上的借鉴和思考。
2. 农民运动:2.1 背景介绍:农民运动是指一种由农村地区农民自发组织起来争取权益和改变社会现状的行动。
在《愤怒的葡萄》这部小说中,约翰·斯坦贝克描绘了上世纪三十年代美国加利福尼亚州的一个农民家庭,他们因为遭受到经济危机、剥削和不公平对待而开始参与农民运动。
2.2 约翰·斯坦贝克对农民运动的描写:斯坦贝克通过《愤怒的葡萄》中的情节和人物形象生动地刻画了那个时期农民运动的景象。
揭示社会道德败坏对斯坦贝克愤怒的葡萄的文学批评

揭示社会道德败坏对斯坦贝克愤怒的葡萄的文学批评斯坦贝克的长篇小说《愤怒的葡萄》向我们展现了一个荒芜贫瘠的土地上的人性之悲剧。
故事发生在美国大萧条时期,描绘了一群移民农民的苦难生活和他们内心的愤怒与绝望。
然而,葡萄园里的葡萄似乎不仅仅是象征着农民们辛酸的劳作,更是反映了整个社会的道德败坏。
《愤怒的葡萄》不仅仅是一部农民起义的描写,更是一部对社会道德败坏的揭示。
斯坦贝克通过描述农民家庭的困境以及大庄园主的剥削行为,探索了现代资本主义社会中的道德沦丧与人性扭曲。
首先,斯坦贝克以与葡萄园为背景,刻画了土地承载着人们对生活的期待,但却被社会现实所击碎的残酷现实。
葡萄园象征着希望和繁荣,然而农民们辛勤的劳作和流汗付出,却只换来了庄园主的无情剥削和不公平的待遇。
这种对土地的拥有权利的争夺,揭示了社会的道德败坏以及资本主义社会中的阶级差距。
其次,斯坦贝克通过描写人物形象展示了社会道德败坏对人性的摧残与腐蚀。
主人公汤姆·乌杜斯作为一个移民工人,他不仅要面对土地问题,还要应对与家人的关系紧张和无法摆脱的贫困。
在社会底层被剥削的乌杜斯终于爆发出愤怒的情绪,他试图团结其他农民们进行起义,希望改变他们的困境。
然而,这种反抗行为在社会道德沦丧的环境中注定是徒劳的,最终只得以失败告终。
另外,斯坦贝克通过描写女性角色迪西的遭遇,展示了社会道德败坏对弱势群体的侵害。
迪西作为乌杜斯的妻子,她面对生活的痛苦和挫折,逐渐沦为庄园主的情妇。
她无法摆脱社会对女性身份的压迫和束缚,最终只能陷入恶性循环之中。
迪西的遭遇不仅展示了弱势群体在社会道德败坏面前的无力,也暴露了资本主义社会对女性权益的无视和剥削。
通过揭示社会道德败坏对斯坦贝克的《愤怒的葡萄》的影响,我们深刻地反思了当代社会的一些问题。
这部小说不仅告诉我们在一个道德败坏的社会中,个体的挣扎往往是无法改变社会现实的,更重要的是引导我们思考如何在现实中寻找到真正的公平与正义。
斯坦贝克以其独特的文学视角,生动有趣的描写方式,向我们展示了一个困苦农民们的生活,揭示了社会道德败坏对个体和群体的摧残。
英美文学论文--从文体学角度分析愤怒的葡萄

Stylistic Analysis of the Grapes of WrathXu ShaohanClass 4, 2008, Foreign Languages School, Qingdao Agricultural UniversityAbstract:T his paper takes Steinbeck’s masterpiece the grapes of Wrath for example, the purpose is to analyze how the Mind Style is showed through the use of language, which including vocabulary,structure, figure of speech and so on. The analyzing of this question is useful for us to understand and appreciate the work’s ideological content from different aspect.deological content.Key words: style; The Graps of Wrath; Analyze从文体学学角度分析愤怒的葡萄摘要:文章以Steinbeck的小说《愤怒的葡萄》为例,探讨了文体学中的Mind Style是如何通过作者在作品中的语言选择来实现的,包括词汇,结构,修辞等,对这一问题的研究有利于从不同的角度来理解和欣赏作品的思想内容。
关键词:文体学;《愤怒的葡萄》;分析1. IntroductionMind style is just one aspect of style. Style reflect the way of the author how to understand different things. It exists in language and is shown through choosing language. Wales points out that, generally speaking,style is the way to write and speak. Mind style is to express someone’s thought through his language style. The purpose of this research is to understand the author by analyzing the work’s language style, how the author send the message to the readers through potential and inangible language. By stylisic analyze, we can tap the implied meaning and this kind of method can open up a new view to us, and then it can strengthen our understandingof the literary work. This passsage prefers to take the Grapes of Wrath for example, talking about how to research Mind Style.The Grapes of Wrath is one of the masterpieces in the 1930s. It is a novel that reflects the famers’ miserable conditions, castigates American society and portraitures the history in the 1930s. Under the pressure of the large companies, many farmers is forced to leave their hometown, they hope to find a promised land to make a living, but they suffer repeated setbacks. This novel describes the difficult experience of Tom’s family from Oklahama to California. They sell off all the property and buy a old car. The whole family flee from famine. On the way to the west, grandfather and grandmather can not bear the difficulties any more, they pass away one after the other. The youth Noah and Connie deserts from the family whichis enduring the hardships. But when they arrive Cllifornia, things are not as good as they expected. They still have to suffer unemployment, hunger and poverty. This novel show the theme of the ruin of Amrecan Dream.2.Analytical ApprochGenerally speaking, stylisic analyzing is to explain “what is it”rather than “what’s the reason” or “in which way”. For example, why does the author use this word, how is it used, what kind of language environment was it used in. In simpson’s opinion, any kind of stylistic analyze must choose some charicteristics of the literary work, and neglect other characteristics. V ocabulary, grammer, structure, word class, cohesion and so on. This analyze on Mind Style will emphsis on vocabulary, strcture and figure of speech。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
1. Introduction1.1 The authorJohn Ernst Steinbeck was born in Salinas, California on February 27, 1902. His mother, Olive, nourished a love of reading and writing in her son who, at age fourteen, declared his intention to become a writer. He attended Stanford University from 1919-1925, studying English literature but never receiving a degree. He worked with ranchers and migrants, relationships which clearly inform his body of work. As Shillinglaw observes, these relationships led Steinbeck, in his earliest fiction of the 1930s, to “claim his people…common people shaped by the environments theyhumorous look at the peasants of Monterey, received both critical acclaim and popular success.L ike many 1930s intellectuals, Steinbeck sympathized with communism’s concern for the working class (though Steinbeck himself was never a communist, nor did he approve of the Soviet system’s repression of the individual). This concernalso met with controversy, however. While widely regarded as Steinbeck’s finest work, it aroused the anger of Oklahomans and Californians. Still others objected to its “crass” language.Steinbeck served as a correspondent for the New Y ork Herald Tribune during(1961), a critique of what Steinbeck regarded as the overly materialistic Americanin 1968.Steinbeck won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1962 for “his realistic as well as imaginative writings, distinguished by a sympathetic humor and a keen socialperception” (Shillinglaw 46).1.2 The novelThe novel The Grapes of Wrath tells the specific story of the Joad family, featuring the hardship and oppression suffered by migrant laborers during the Great Depression. “It is Steinbeck’s epic masterpiece of social consciousness in its picture of helpless people crushed by drought and depression” (Hu and Liu 392). It is an explicitly political statement that champion collective action by the lower classes and chastise corporate and banking elites for shortsighted policies meant to maximize profit even while forcing farmers into destitution and even starvation.Tom Joad was released from the Oklahoma state penitentiary where he had served a sentence for killing a man in self-defense. He traveled homeward through a region made barren by drought and dust storms. On the way he met Jim Casy an ex-preacher, the pair went together to the home of Tom’s people. They found the Joad place deserted. While Tom and Casy were wondering what had happened, Muley Graves, a diehard tenant farmer, came by and disclosed that all of the families in the neighborhood had gone to California or were going. Tom’s folks, Muley said, had gone to a relative’s place preparatory to going west. Muley was the only sharecropper to stay behind.Spurred by handbills stating that agricultural workers were badly needed in California, the Joads, along with thousands of others, made their tortuous way, in a worn out vehicle across the plains toward the mountains. Grandpa died of a stroke during their first overnight stop. And, to add to the general misery, returning migrants told the Joads that there was no work to be had in California, that conditions were even worse than they were in Oklahoma. But the dream of a bountiful West Coast urged the Joads onward.However, Circumstances eventually forced them to leave the camp where they lived when they arrived in California because there was no work in the district. While Tom and Casy were talking, deputies, who had been searching for Casy, closed in on them. The pair fled, but was caught. Casy was killed. Tom received a cut on his head,but not before he had felled a deputy with an ax handle. The family concealed Tom in their shack. The rate for a box of peaches dropped, meanwhile, to two-and-a-half cents. Tom’s danger and the futility of picking peaches drove the Joads on their way. They hid the injured Tom under the mattresses in the back of the truck.The autumn rains began and the stream which ran beside the camp overflowed and water entered the boxcars. Under these all but impossible conditions, Rose of Sharon, Tom’s sister, gave birth to a dead baby. When the rising water made their position no longer bearable, the family moved from the camp on foot. The rains had made their old car useless. They came to a barn, which they shared with a boy and his starving father. Rose of Sharon, bereft of her baby, nourished the famished man with the milk from her breasts. So the poor kept each other alive in the depression years.1.3 Literature reviewconditions under which the migratory farm families of America during the 1930s live under. The novel tells of one family’s migration west to California through the great economic depression of the 1930s. The Joad family had to abandon their home and their livelihoods. They had to uproot and set adrift because tractors were rapidly industrializing their farms. The bank took possession of their land because the owners could not pay off their loan. The novel shows how the Joad family deals with moving to California. How they survive the cruelty of the land owners that take advantage of them, their poverty and willingness to work.In the book In Search of Steinbeck the author Anne-Marie Schmitz discussesthathatred of corruption resulting from materialism (money) and his abiding faith in the common people to overcome the hostile environment. The author also analyses Steinbeck’s Language. Easygoing and plainspoken for the most part, Steinbeck’s language is richly evocative. Indeed, his example shows these qualities are not at odds, but, in fact, related. In Steinbeck’s passages of description, he never gets bogged down in detail, never lets the eye linger too long. In addition, Steinbeck also has a perfectly tuned ear for the rhythms of American speech and idiom. He renders the simple beauty of American dialects so well that his writings serve as a declaration oftheir value. He manages to avoid ever writing any “throw-away” dialogue, and sometimes achieves this by relying on the natural power and beauty of speech alone.idea of Christian goodness exhibited in the Joads and other migrant workers. Those in the book representing this type of selfless sharing are a Christian concept of good fellowship. Particularly, Ma shows her caring towards others from the beginning and urges others to do the same. Jim Casy, while struggling with the orthodox view of Christianity, still displays a general concern for his fellow man. Repeatedly the family and others associated sacrifice comfort for the requirements of others. When people are in need, a sacrifice for their behalf makes society more pleasant to inhabit.Timmerman explains that Steinbeck describes the unrelenting struggle of the people who depend on the soil for their livelihood. Steinbeck uses the journey and its ever-changing environment to put the Joads through many situations and the journey of the Joads can be seen as the same that forced farmers to become migrants from the dust bowl westward or of any mass migration since the beginning of time. Through this way Timmerman reveals the beauty of man’s endurance and struggle he sees ina life journey in which man is searching for truth.This paper aims to analyze the great influence of the Great Depression on American farmers from different aspects which include the influence on their life, their connection with land; the influence on the changes of their characters and the influence on all kinds of human relationships.2. The Influence of the Great Depression on Relationbetween Man and Nature2.1 Man and landIn the novel The Grapes of Wrath, the author John Steinbeck conveys the connection people have with their land, without which they feel they cannot survive mentally or physically. Initially, back in Oklahoma, each family feels a strongattachment to the land because the ancestors of these farmers fought and cleared the Indians out of the land, made it suitable for farming, and worked year after year in the fields so that each generation would be provided for. Passing down the land to successive generations, Human beings can become proprietary about their land. They believe that the land belongs to them, and they belong to it. Before the Joads is finished packing, Grandpa decides he does not want to leave. He says, “This country ain’t no good, but it’s my country. No, you all go ahead. I’ll jus’ stay right here where I b’long” (Steinbeck 143). Grandpa knows that it is better if he goes, but he is tied to the land and cannot break himself free. He cannot go on, neither mentally nor physically, away from the land where he feels he belongs. Jim Casy makes this observation after Grandpa’s death. “He was foolin’, all the time. I think he knowed it. An’Grampa didn’t die tonight. He died the minute you took ’im off the place…He was that place, an’ he knowed it” (Steinbeck 187). Mentally, Grandpa is dead by the time the Joad family crosses the Oklahoma border. Physically, he dies soon afterwards. This breaking of his connection to the land forces him to die. It shows that the farmers here come to realize that the land is all that they own. It is their family’s source of sustenance. However, the strong bond between man and the land is broken when the bank comes to vacate the tenants during hard times. Just as said in the novel “Sure, cried the tenant men, but it’s our land. We measured it and broke it up. We were born on it, and we got killed on it, died on it. That’s what makes it ours being born o n it, working it, dying on it. That makes ownership, not a paper with numbers on it” (Steinbeck 45).The tractors hired by the bank literally tear down the bond between man and the land. The fa rmers’ lands are confiscated by big firms and they not only have no places to go but also loose the lands where their forefathers have worked and planted from generation to generation. Due to the eviction, the farmers are forced to move to California, where work is supposedly in demand. As each family takes off for California, it no longer feels a connection to the lands through which it is traveling. Once it reaches California, there are still hunger and unemployment which are waiting for them. Although they are hired to work in big farms, the working hours are longand the pay is so low that they can not even afford a decent meal. Again, they are disposed and feel no connection to the lands.2.2 Man and environmentFrom ancient times till now, environment is closely connected with human activities. The influence between human beings and environment is mutual. The environmental changes in The Grapes of Wrath are the consequence of exasperate relations between man and environment.2.2.1 The “Dust-bowl” dro ughtThe Dust Bowl which brought starvation to southerners is a main reason to force Oklahoma farmers to move.The dust from the roads fluffed up and spread out and fell on the weedsbeside the fields, and fell into the fields a little way. Now the wind grewstrong and hard and it worked at the rain crust in the corn fields. Little bylittle the sky was darkened by the mixing dust, and the wind felt over theearth, loosened the dust, and carried it away. (Steinbeck 4)During the Dust Bowl, hundreds of thousands of southerners faced many hardships. It was an ecological and human disaster in the Southwestern Great Plains regions of the United States in the 1930s.The areas affected were Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado.Misuse of land and years of sustained drought caused it. Millions of acres of farmland became useless. During this time the “Okies”,a name given to the migrants that traveled from Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, or anywhere in the Southwest or the northern plains to California—encountered many hardships. These hardships are brilliantly shown in John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath. Scholars agree, “The most important fact about the dust storms was not scientific but human: their tragic effect upon people seeking livelihood on the stricken Midwestern farms” (French 4). Steinbeck believed society was inhumane to the Okies.2.2.2 The heavy rainfall and floodAlthough many of the migrants were able to escape the dryness of the dust bowl, it becomes ironic how flood causes suffering in California. Steinbeck implements the readers the suffering and destruction of the rain.And the rain pattered relentlessly down, and the streams broke theirbanks and spread out over the country. In the wet hay of leaking barnsbabies were born to women who panted with pneumonia. And old peoplecurled up in corners and died that way… At night the frantic men walkedboldly to hen roosts… if they were shot at, they did not run, but splashedsullenly away; and if they were hit, they sand tiredly in the mud.(Steinbeck 592)The heavy rain in California at the end of this novel lasted three days long which deepened the farmers’misery that the Great Depression had brought. The migrant families wondered how long the rain would last. They fear that the creek will flood. The rain damaged cars and penetrated tents. During the rain storms some people went to relief offices, but there were rules: one had to live in California a year before he could collect relief. The greatest terror had arrived no work would be available for three months. Hungry men crowded the alleys to beg for bread; a number of people died. Anger festered, causing sheriffs to swear in new deputies. There would be no work and no food. The migrant workers must face yet another hardship, this one perhaps the worst of all. With the coming of the rains is the end of the harvest season. The migrant workers face starvation, yet cannot receive any government relief. For Steinbeck, the treatment of these workers is not only inhumane, but below even the treatment of livestock; he makes the point that no farm owner would leave his horse to starve when it was not used. However, the farm owners are doing just that for the migrant labor force. And the rain (Ironically in the beginning lack of rain was a cause of the problem) now is keeping them from working. No work for three months. The migrants are faced with hunger and sickness.3. The Economic Deprivation and Exploitation3.1 PovertyIn the 1920s, after World War I, danger signals were apparent that a great Depression was coming. Farmers weren’t doing to well because they were producing more crops and farm products than could be sold at high prices. Therefore, they made a very small profit. “This insufficient profit wouldn’t allow the farmers to purchase new machinery and because of this they couldn’t produce goods quickly enough” (Timmerman 559). Also the new agricultural technology destroyed the rich farming land in the Great Plains and the manmade desperation pushed the residents into migrating to California for another chance in life. The government didn’t realize how the new technology destroyed the soil. New farming devices like reapers and tractors destroyed the soil as the farmers overused them. The tractors loosened up the soil and the windstorms blew the soil easily. From viewing this, it is easy to see the push factor that made the Okies migrate to the west. There is nothing but the house that the Okies could keep in the Great Plains. The storms and the tractors dramatically destroyed their farmland and if they didn’t move, the only option to their life was starving to death.The Grapes of Wrath sets the picture of an area which has been ravished by harsh weather. “The sun flared down on the growing corn day after day until a line of brown spread along the edge of each green bayonet. The surface of the earth crusted, a thin hard crust, and as the sky became pale, so the earth became pale, pink in the red country, and white in the gray country” (Steinbeck 3). The families of the areas were bombarded by high winds and dust storms which barraged their houses, crops, and moral. The idea was clear that the farming plains of Oklahoma were a cruel and difficult place for a family to make a successful living. It impoverished the farmers and bought great threaten to their lives. The soil, the people (farmers) have been drained of life and are exploited. “The last rain fell on the red and gray country of Oklahoma in early May. The weeds became a dark green to protect themselves from the sun’s unyielding rays…The wind grew stronger, uprooting the weakened corn,and the air became so filled with dust that the stars were not visible at night” (Steinbeck 5). The farming in Oklahoma becomes even more difficult for the heavy winds uplift the soil and carry it great distances. Then the farmers are left with no soil to grow their crops. The Joads livelihood depends on the soil. If the soil is rich, then it will feed hundreds. But if the soil is dry, it destroys crops and causes famine.3.2 Causes for immigrationThe Joads is forced to move to California because of the Oklahoma Dust Bowl, which has made it impossible for them to earn a livelihood through farming. The motivation of leaving for California is to look for better life. Drought and depression has made it impossible for farmers to grow a substantial amount to live on. As inflation rises and wages drop, a gigantic worker migration heads west in search of Jobs. They have seen notices asking for workers in the western part of the United States, and travel thinking that they will find gainful employment. However there is much to learn about the United States in its economic turmoil. During the depression, thousands of people looked for work, and were cheated every step of the way. Many families were hurt by the depression.Due to dust bowl, farmers can’t survive on dehydrated land. Nor can the banks that own the l and make an income when the tenant farmers don’t produce enough to nourish even themselves. In contrast to the dry Dust Bowl, California is fruitful and lush. Its orchards and fields grow fruit, nuts, cotton, and vegetables of every sort. It’s the Promised Land, the land of milk and honey. It’s paradise, except for the people trying madly to keep the migrants at bay. For hundreds of thousands of migrants, including the Joads, of course, California turns out to be a lost heaven. When describing California Steinbeck used beautiful words to make great comparison to the situation in Oklahoma.They drove through Tehachapi in the morning glow, and the sun came upbehind them, and then—suddenly they saw the great valley below them.Al jammed on the brake and stopped in the middle of the road, and,“Jesus Christ! Look!” he said. The vineyards, the orchards, the great flatvalley, green and beautiful, the trees set in rows and the farm houses.(Steinbeck 309-310)Also California has great attraction to people in Oklahoma as Ma expresses her optimistic expectation for this migration “I like to think how nice it’s going to be in California. It’s never cold. Fruits grow everyplace, and people just living in the nicest place, little white houses among the orange trees. I wonder, that is, if we all get jobs and all work, maybe we can get one of those little white houses” (Steinbeck 61). For the Okies, California is a “promised land” which could give them the comfortable life they desire .The attraction of California is another important factor to make the Okies have the motivation to immigrate.3.3 Exploitation and unemployment in CaliforniaOnce in California, the Joads are floored by its beauty and by its rich, lush land. There are orchards and fields everywhere, and the soil is rich and moist. However, life is dangerous and it is harrowing in the beautiful state. Many migrant families continue to move from place to place, setting up campgrounds called Hoovervilles (named after President Herbert Hoover) on the outskirts of towns.The Joads set up camp at one such Hooverville, but it’s not that fun. In fact, it’s downright un-fun. The Hooverville is full of starving people who have little left and who are fighting to feed their children. Their tents are tattered, they live in makeshift shacks, and they are unkempt. Weedpatch, by contrast, is a government camp with beautiful restrooms, running water, hot showers, self-elected committees, dances, string bands, and occupants who look out for one another. The Joads live for a time in an abandoned boxcar near Tulare, CA. They are one of the first families to discover the boxcar, and, soon after, many other families flood the land and camp around the boxcars. The Joads feel like royalty, because their home is warm, dry, and has a roof. But then the California winter comes and, with it, heavy rains. The rains soak and flood the land, and the Joads must flee. California is depicted as fiercely beautiful, but incredibly dangerous. Against the backdrop of growth and cultivation, families starve.At the same time, Dust Bowl immigrants like the fictional Joads did not get awarm welcome from California’s farmers and politicians. The newcomers were herded into slum-like migrant camps, given low wages for back-breaking work and treated like criminals. Much of this was an effort by local farmers to take advantage of a cheap labor pool and to prevent labor organizing that would raise wages. Much of it was the result of fear on the part of Californians who were faced with a huge influx of ragged families. The people are migrants now. People in the west terrified of the migrants. Worry about safety and competition for jobs.Steinbeck follows the Joads as they leave their farm to forge a new life in California where life is golden and jobs ar e abundant …or so they think. They are met with distrust and dislike by the residents of the cities they pass through, and they have little success in finding jobs with salaries that they can survive on. Once the Joads reach California, they discover that the situation there is much the same. A whole migrant family working from sunrise to sunset earned hardly enough to buy food for that day. After the harvest season, they were out of work for several months and even the lowest paid jobs were not available. Many migrants survived through begging or scrounging garbage dumps. This situation becomes a great obstacle, not only for the Joads, but for the suffering people of the depression.4. The Influence of the Great Depression on Human Relationship 4.1 Significance of familySteinbeck places much more importance on family values. Each of the twelve characters which make up the family the novel has a distinct purpose in the group. When one leaves, the group suffers for it, making the chance for success not as strong. As families move along in their journeys to California, they begin to trust one other and begin to camp together at night. When this happens, they learn to create sophisticated little worlds in their campgrounds, replete with unspoken laws and codes that cannot be broken, and that, if broken, will result in either death or isolation. The worlds function as efficiently and as intricately as any town or city might. Family is all the Joads have to hold onto in the uncaring world in which they live. It is theonly way they survive in the system which thrives on the exploitation of the poor. The best way for the Joads to gain strength was through groups. Each time a fairly stable group or community was achieved, those in power attempted to destroy the group, effectively taking their strength away. Heavilin explains the theme of teamwork “a more positive characterization of group behavior emerged…where workers could acquire dignity, strength, and power, all inaccessible to the exploited and impotent individual” (Heavilin 56).There is also separation of family during the immigration in Grapes of Wrath. Connie is Rose of Sharon’s nineteen-year-old husband who is “frightened and bewildered” by the changes his wife’s pregnancy has brought upon her. He constantly talks of educating himself by correspondence in order to get a good job, but he is all talk and no action. He often tells Rose of Sharon that he should have stayed behind in Oklahoma and ta ken a job driving a tractor. Connie is devoted to his wife, but he’s a little fearful of her too “Whenever he could, he put a hand on her stood close, so that his body touched her at hip and shoulder, and he felt that this kept a relation that might be dep arting”(Steinbeck 46). He’s a moderate kind of guy “He drank enough, but not too much; fought when it was required of him; and never boasted. He sat quietly in a gathering and yet managed to be there and to be recognized” (Steinbeck 46). Although he is des cribed as “a good hard worker who would make a good husband” (Steinbeck 38) he eventually deserts Rose of Sharon because he has no faith in the family’s struggle to find a better life in California. Connie leaves the Joads for good, abandoning his pregnant wife, when he realizes just how grim the situation is in California. This act of selfishness and immaturity surprises no one but his naïve wife Rose. Connie’s action in this immigration shows the dark side of human beings. It also shows that the destruction of great depression is so tremendous that some people lose their faith and hope.4.2The influence on the Joads and their friendThe Great Depression also brings some changes to some important characters in The Grapes of Wrath. These characters undergo a baptism during this harsh periodand they get to know themselves all over again and turn to be more mature.4.2.1 Ma Joad and RoseThe mother after all, is holding her family together. She becomes stronger and stronger through the migration. She represents the endurance and perseverance of the people in great depression years. Regardless of how bleak circumstances become, Ma Joad meets every obstacle unflinchingly. Time and again, Ma displays a startling capacity to keep herself together and to keep the family together in the face of great turmoil. At one point in the story, Tom Joad considers leaving home rather than possibly endangering his family, however his mother reminds him that without his family, he has nothing. There is no question that in this model the mother makes the most important contributions to the family stability. Ma is always an optimistic person who keeps the whole family going and unified. In California, among family members, only Tom finds a job which lasts just 5 days. Other men remain unemployed and become dismayed. However, Ma does not lose her morale. She encourages them to go on finding jobs. She says “Y ou don’t get the right to be discouraged. This here the family is going under. Y ou just don’t get the right” (Steinbeck 63).Under Ma’s guidance, the Joads continue to search for work in California’s countryside. When Pa Joad expresses his anxiety and sees no hope for the future, Ma encourages him that they will overcome the obstacles as long as they make the greatest effort. She expresses her optimistic attitude toward life in a conversation with her husband “We aren’t going to die out. People are going on changing a little, maybe, but going right on. Everything we do seem to me is aimed right at going on. It seems that way to me. Even getting hungry, even being sick; someone dies, but the rest is tougher. Just try to live the day, just the day”(Steinbeck 64).Under the instruction of these encouraging words, Ma Joad illuminates her family to Triumph over their difficulties and survive in the Great Depression. “She speaks for no particular class but for all human beings” (Hayashi 94).A change is also evident in Rose of Sharon. At the beginning of the novel, she is a self-centered person who does not think very highly of the family or of the people insimilar circumstances. She is pregnant for the first time and in love with her husband so her little world is complete. She constantly bemoans the fact that she needs nutritious food so her baby will be healthy. She is always concerned that what she does or what others do to her will hurt her baby in some way. She is so wrapped up in herself and the baby she is carrying that she does not realize that her family is falling apart. She whines and moans her way through most of the book. However, her attitude undergoes a change at the end of the novel. The death of her child seems to transform her. “Wit h the loss of her husband, Connie, and her still-born baby, she transforms into a dynamic character that puts the cause of the group, survival, before the well-being of herself” (Owens 4). This is shown in the end of the story when she makes the greatest sacrifice and gives dying man sustenance through the milk from her breast. She couldn’t give life to her baby, and feels that being able to give life to another could make up for the lost life. She too is learning about the fellowship of man. “Her hand mov ed behind his head and supported it. She looked up and across the barn, and her lips came together and smiled mysteriously” (Steinbeck 581). She is satisfied that she is able to help give life to another person in need because that is her goal in life. “Ju st as Christ did she is able to give up a part of herself for others benefit a decision she made on her own that shows her true maturity level that she has gained from experiences like these”(Shockley 106).Y et it took a deep personal loss, the delivery of a stillborn child, to enable Rose of Sharon to aid the man. She cares for the anonymous man with the same love as she would her child, eschewing her selfish individual concerns for a communal good. With this sacrifice she finally understands her mother and her role as a woman. With her sacrifices Rose of Sharon depicts the ruined aspirations of the Okies and truly becomes a woman. This illustrates the growth of Rose Sharon’s individual soul under the force and suffering of the Great Depression.4.2.2 Tom Joad and CasyTom Joad is capable of many different actions throughout the story, including intimidation, guile, support, love, and even murder. Tom is depicted as wary,。