Large N wormhole approach to spacetime foam

合集下载

Nariai--Bertotti--Robinson spacetimes as a building material for one-way wormholes with hor

Nariai--Bertotti--Robinson spacetimes as a building material for one-way wormholes with hor

or a static region if Λ > k2. These types of wormholes are observed in
arXiv:0707.3193v1 [gr-qc] 21 Jul 2007
Nariai–Bertotti–Robinson spacetimes as a building material for one-way wormholes with
horizons, but without singularity
‡gos de la UdeG, Enr´ıque D´ıaz de Le´on S/N, Lagos de Moreno, Jal., C.P. 47460, M´exico. E-mail: hv−8@
1
The Nariai–Bertotti–Robinson (NBR) solution[2, 7, 8, 9, 10] (about the
result of Robinson[9] see however Ref. 3) can be described as ds2 = e2α(r)dt2−
e−2α(r)dr2 − λ2(dϑ2 + sin2 ϑdϕ2) where e2α = (k2 − Λ)r2 + Br + C and
λ
=
1 √Λ+k2
and
TRNK
=
e21,2 κr¯4
{dT
⊗ dT −
E2dR ⊗ dR + r¯2 dϑ ⊗ dϑ + sin2 ϑdϕ ⊗ dϕ , thus
[Tµν ] = 0 ⇒
k2
=
e21,2 r¯4
.
(4)

人教版高中英语选择性必修四 Unit 1 SCIENCE FICTION Section A

人教版高中英语选择性必修四 Unit 1 SCIENCE FICTION Section A

2.What did Claire think ridiculous? A.A robot showed sympathy towards her. B.She was always treated with dignity. C.She was being looked after by a robot. D.She admired the robot’s wisdom. 答案 A 3.Who did Claire turn to for help when the clerk at the counter was rude to her? A.Her husband. B.Gladys Claffern. C.Tony,the robot. D.The manager of the shop. 答案 C
“Whenever you travel close to the speed of light,anything that you hit will be problematic⑥.Even a photon(光子) would cause you trouble,” says Maldacena.“So that’s a word of caution.”
to Tony
when she first saw him.
•He gave her a new 4. hairstyle and improved her makeup
Tony’s help to to make Claire more 5. beautiful and more confident.
B.根据P2-3课文内容,选择正确答案。 1.Why did Claire feel alarmed when she first saw Tony? A.His name was Tony. B.He was a machine. C.He was tall and handsome. D.He seemed more like a human. 答案 D

时空虫洞的作文400字左右

时空虫洞的作文400字左右

时空虫洞的作文400字左右英文回答, The concept of a time-space wormhole has been a popular topic in science fiction for many years. A wormhole is a hypothetical tunnel-like structure that connects different points in spacetime, allowing for instantaneous travel between them. In theory, a wormhole could allow for time travel as well as travel to distant parts of the universe.One of the key ideas behind a wormhole is that it bends spacetime, creating a shortcut between two points that would otherwise be far apart. This bending of spacetime is often depicted as a tunnel, with one end of the wormhole in one location and the other end in another location.The concept of a time-space wormhole raises many fascinating questions about the nature of spacetime and the possibilities for travel and exploration in the universe. It also raises questions about the potential dangers and ethical implications of time travel.中文回答,时空虫洞的概念在科幻小说中已经流行了很多年。

时光穿梭机100字作文

时光穿梭机100字作文

时光穿梭机100字作文英文回答:Inventing a time machine has been a longstanding aspiration of humankind, driven by an unquenchable thirst to explore the annals of history and glimpse potential futures. While the concept of time travel remains firmly rooted in the realm of science fiction, advancements in theoretical physics have tantalized us with the possibility that it may not be an entirely unattainable dream.The theoretical framework for time travel was firstlaid out by Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, which posits that time is not an absolute quantity but is relative to the observer's frame of reference. This groundbreaking theory paved the way for the development of more advanced theories, such as wormholes and closed timelike curves, which offer potential mechanisms for traversing the temporal dimension.Wormholes, as theorized by physicists like Kip Thorne and Michael Morris, are hypothetical tunnels that connect two distinct points in spacetime. By manipulating the curvature of spacetime, it may be possible to create a wormhole that would allow an object to travel faster than the speed of light, effectively enabling time travel.Closed timelike curves, on the other hand, are hypothetical paths through spacetime that loop back on themselves, creating a closed circuit. If such curves could be realized, they would allow an object to travel back to its own past or into the future. However, the existence of closed timelike curves raises complex paradoxes that have yet to be fully resolved.Despite the theoretical possibilities, the practical realization of a time machine remains a daunting challenge. The energy requirements for creating and maintaining a wormhole or manipulating spacetime to form a closedtimelike curve are likely to be astronomical. Additionally, the effects of time travel on causality and the stability of the universe are not fully understood.Nonetheless, the pursuit of time travel continues to captivate scientists and science fiction enthusiasts alike. The potential to witness firsthand the great events of history, to learn from the mistakes of the past, and to glimpse possible futures holds an irresistible allure. While the challenges are immense, the dream of time travel remains an enduring testament to human ingenuity and our enduring fascination with the mysteries of time.中文回答:时光穿梭机是人类长久以来的愿望,源于我们对探索历史长河和展望未来可能性的无尽渴望。

STEPHEN HAWKING-How to build a time machine

STEPHEN HAWKING-How to build a time machine

'Through the wormhole, the scientist can seehimself as he was one minute ago. But what if ourscientist uses the wormhole to shoot his earlierself? He's now dead. So who fired the shot?'STEPHEN HAWKING: How to build a time machine2010-05-06 11:07All you need is a wormhole, the Large Hadron Collider or a rocketthat goes really, really fastHello. My name is Stephen Hawking. Physicist, cosmologist andsomething of a dreamer. Although I cannot move and I have to speakthrough a computer, in my mind I am free. Free to explore the universeand ask the big questions, such as: is time travel possible? Can we opena portal to the past or find a shortcut to the future? Can we ultimatelyuse the laws of nature to become masters of time itself?Time travel was once considered scientific heresy. I used to avoidtalking about it for fear of being labelled a crank. But these days I'm notso cautious. In fact, I'm more like the people who built Stonehenge. I'mobsessed by time. If I had a time machine I'd visit Marilyn Monroe in herprime or drop in on Galileo as he turned his telescope to the heavens.Perhaps I'd even travel to the end of the universe to find out how ourwhole cosmic story ends.To see how this might be possible, we need to look at time asphysicists do - at the fourth dimension. It's not as hard as it sounds.Every attentive schoolchild knows that all physical objects, even me in my chair, exist in three dimensions. Everything has a width and a height and a length.But there is another kind of length, a length in time. While a human may survive for 80 years, the stones at Stonehenge, for instance, have stood around for thousands of years. And the solar system will last for billions of years. Everything has a length in time as well as space. Travelling in time means travelling through this fourth dimension.To see what that means, let's imagine we're doing a bit of normal, everyday car travel. Drive in a straight line and you're travelling in one dimension. Turn right or left and you add the second dimension. Drive up or down a twisty mountain road and that adds height, so that's travelling in all three dimensions. But how on Earth do we travel in time? How do we find a path through the fourth dimension?Let's indulge in a little science fiction for a moment. Time travel movies often feature a vast, energy-hungry machine. The machine creates a path through the fourth dimension, a tunnel through time. A time traveller, a brave, perhaps foolhardy individual, prepared for who knows what, steps into the time tunnel and emerges who knows when. The concept may be far-fetched, and the reality may be very different from this, but the idea itself is not so crazy.Physicists have been thinking about tunnels in time too, but we come at it from a different angle. We wonder if portals to the past or the future could ever be possible within the laws of nature. As it turns out, we think they are. What's more, we've even given them a name: wormholes. The truth is that wormholes are all around us, only they're too small to see. Wormholes are very tiny. They occur in nooks and crannies in space and time. You might find it a tough concept, but stay withme.A wormhole is a theoretical 'tunnel' or shortcut, predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity, that links two places in space-time - visualised above as the contours of a 3-D map, where negative energy pulls space and time into the mouth of a tunnel, emerging in another universe.They remain onlyhypothetical, asobviously nobodyhas ever seen one,but have been usedin films as conduitsfor time travel - inStargate (1994),for example,involving gatedtunnels betweenuniverses, and inTime Bandits (1981),where theirlocations are shownon a celestial map.Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity Nothing is flat or solid. If you look closely enough at anything you'll find holes and wrinkles in it. It's a basic physical principle, and it even applies to time. Even something as smooth as a pool ball has tiny crevices, wrinkles and voids. Now it's easy to show that this is true in the first three dimensions. But trust me, it's also true of the fourth dimension. There are tiny crevices, wrinkles and voids in time. Down at the smallest of scales, smaller even than molecules, smaller than atoms, we get to a place called the quantum foam. This is where wormholes exist. Tiny tunnels or shortcuts through space and time constantly form, disappear, and reform within this quantum world. And they actually link two separate places and two different times.Unfortunately, these real-life time tunnels are just a billion-trillion-trillionths of a centimetre across. Way too small for a human to pass through - but here's where the notion of wormhole time machines is leading. Some scientists think it may be possible to capture a wormhole and enlarge it many trillions of times to make it big enough for a human or even a spaceship to enter.Given enough power and advanced technology, perhaps a giant wormhole could even be constructed in space. I'm not saying it can be done, but if it could be, it would be a truly remarkable device. One end could be here near Earth, and the other far, far away, near some distant planet.Theoretically, a time tunnel or wormhole could do even more than take us to other planets. If both ends were in the same place, and separated by time instead of distance, a ship could fly in and come out still near Earth, but in the distant past. Maybe dinosaurs would witness the ship coming in for a landing.The fastest manned vehicle in history was Apollo 10. It reached 25,000mph. But to travel in time we'll have to go more than 2,000 times fasterNow, I realise that thinking in four dimensions is not easy, and that wormholes are a tricky concept to wrap your head around, but hang in there. I've thought up a simple experiment that could reveal if human time travel through a wormhole is possible now, or even in the future. I like simple experiments, and champagne.So I've combined two of my favourite things to see if time travel from the future to the past is possible.Let's imagine I'm throwing a party, a welcome reception for future time travellers. But there's a twist. I'm not letting anyone know about it until after the party has happened. I've drawn up an invitation giving the exact coordinates in time and space. I am hoping copies of it, in one form or another, will be around for many thousands of years. Maybe one day someone living in the future will find the information on the invitation and use a wormhole time machine to come back to my party, proving that time travel will, one day, be possible.In the meantime, my time traveller guests should be arriving any moment now. Five, four, three, two, one. But as I say this, no one has arrived. What a shame. I was hoping at least a future Miss Universe was going to step through the door. So why didn't the experiment work? One of the reasons might be because of a well-known problem with time travel to the past, the problem of what we call paradoxes.Paradoxes are fun to think about. The most famous one is usually called the Grandfather paradox. I have a new, simpler version I call the Mad Scientist paradox.I don't like the way scientists in movies are often described as mad, but in this case, it's true. This chap is determined to createa paradox, even if it costs him his life. Imagine, somehow, he's built a wormhole, a time tunnel that stretches just one minute into the past.Hawking in a scene from Star Trek with dinner guests from the past, and future: (from left) Albert Einstein, Data and Isaac NewtonThrough the wormhole, the scientist can see himself as he was one minute ago. But what if our scientist uses the wormhole to shoot his earlier self? He's now dead. So who fired the shot? It's a paradox. It just doesn't make sense. It's the sort of situation that gives cosmologists nightmares.This kind of time machine would violate a fundamental rule that governs the entire universe - that causes happen before effects, and never the other way around. I believe things can't make themselves impossible. If they could then there'd be nothing to stop the whole universe from descending into chaos. So I think something will always happen that prevents the paradox. Somehow there must be a reason why our scientist will never find himself in a situation where he could shoot himself. And in this case, I'm sorry to say, the wormhole itself is the problem.In the end, I think a wormhole like this one can't exist. And the reason for that is feedback. If you've ever been to a rock gig, you'll probably recognise this screeching noise. It's feedback. What causes it is simple. Sound enters the microphone. It's transmitted along the wires, made louder by the amplifier, and comes out at the speakers. But if too much of the sound from the speakers goes back into the mic it goes around and around in a loop getting louder each time. If no one stops it, feedback can destroy the sound system.The same thing will happen with a wormhole, only with radiation instead of sound. As soon as the wormhole expands, natural radiation will enter it, and end up in a loop. The feedback will become so strong it destroys the wormhole. So although tiny wormholes do exist, and it may be possible to inflate one some day, it won't last long enough to be of use as a time machine. That's the real reason no one could come back in time to my party.Any kind of time travel to the past through wormholes or any other method is probably impossible, otherwise paradoxes would occur. So sadly, it looks like time travel to the past is never going to happen. A disappointment for dinosaur hunters and a relief for historians.But the story's not over yet. This doesn't make all time travel impossible. I do believe in time travel. Time travel to the future. Time flows like a river and it seems as if each of us is carried relentlessly along by time's current. But time is like a river in another way. It flows at diff erent speeds in diff erent places and that is the key to travelling into the future. This idea was first proposed by Albert Einstein over 100 years ago. He realised that there should be places where time slows down, and others where time speeds up. He was absolutely right. And the proof is right above our heads. Up in space.This is the Global Positioning System, or GPS. A network of satellites is in orbit around Earth. The satellites make satellite navigation possible. But they also reveal that time runs faster in space than it does down on Earth. Inside each spacecraft is a very precise clock. But despite being so accurate, they all gain around a third of a billionth of a second every day. The system has to correct for the drift, otherwise that tiny di fference would upset the whole system, causing every GPS device on Earth to go out by about six miles a day. You can just imagine the mayhem that that would cause.The problem doesn't lie with the clocks. They run fast because time itself runs faster in space than it does down below. And the reason for this extraordinary e ffect is the mass of the Earth. Einstein realised that matter drags on time and slows it down like the slow part of a river. The heavier the object, the more it drags on time. And this startling reality is what opens the door to the possibility of time travel to the future.Right in the centre of the Milky Way, 26,000 light years from us, lies the heaviest object in the galaxy. It is a supermassive black hole containing the mass of four million suns crushed down into a single point by its own gravity. The closer you get to the black hole, the stronger the gravity. Get really close and not even light can escape. A black hole like this one has a dramatic e ffect on time, slowing it down far more than anything else in the galaxy. That makes it a natural time machine.I like to imagine how a spaceship might be able to take advantage of this phenomenon, by orbiting it. If a space agency were controlling the mission from Earth they'd observe that each full orbit took 16 minutes. But for the brave people on board, close to this massive object, time would be slowed down. And here the e ffect would be far more extreme than the gravitational pull of Earth. The crew's time would be slowed down by half. For every 16-minute orbit, they'd only experience eight minutes of time.Inside the Large Hadron ColliderAround and around they'd go, experiencing just half the time of everyone far away from the black hole. The ship and its crew would be travelling through time. Imagine they circled the black hole for five of their years. Ten years would pass elsewhere. When they got home, everyone on Earth would have aged five years more than they had.So a supermassive black hole is a time machine. But of course, it's not exactly practical. It has advantages over wormholes in that it doesn't provoke paradoxes. Plus it won't destroy itself in a flash of feedback. But it's pretty dangerous. It's a long way away and it doesn't even take us very far into the future. Fortunately there is another way to travel in time. And this represents our last and best hope of building a real time machine.You just have to travel very, very fast. Much faster even than the speed required to avoid being sucked into a black hole. This is due to another strange fact about the universe. There's a cosmic speed limit, 186,000 miles per second, also known as the speed of light. Nothing can exceed that speed. It's one of the best established principles in science. Believe it or not, travelling at near the speed of light transports you to the future.To explain why, let's dream up a science-fiction transportation system. Imagine a track that goes right around Earth, a track for a superfast train. We're going to use this imaginary train to get as close as possible to the speed of light and see how it becomes a time machine. On board are passengers with a one-way ticket to the future. The train begins to accelerate, faster and faster. Soon it's circling the Earth over and over again.To approach the speed of light means circling the Earth pretty fast. Seven times a second. But no matter how much power the train has, it can never quite reach the speed of light, since the laws of physics forbid it. Instead, let's say it gets close, just shy of that ultimate speed. Now something extraordinary happens. Time starts flowing slowly on board relative to the rest of the world, just like near the black hole, only more so. Everything on the train is in slow motion.This happens to protect the speed limit, and it's not hard to see why. Imagine a child running forwards up the train. Her forward speed is added to the speed of the train, so couldn't she break the speed limit simply by accident? The answer is no. The laws of nature prevent the possibility by slowing down time onboard.Now she can't run fast enough to break the limit. Time will always slow down just enough to protect the speed limit. And from that fact comes the possibility of travelling many years into the future.Imagine that the train left the station on January 1, 2050. It circles Earth over and over again for 100 years before finally coming to a halt on New Year's Day, 2150. The passengers will have only lived one week because time is slowed down that much inside the train. When they got out they'd find a very diff erent world from the one they'd left. In one week they'd have travelled 100 years into the future. Of course, building a train that could reach such a speed is quite impossible. But we have built something very like the train at the world's largest particle accelerator at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland.Deep underground, in a circular tunnel 16 miles long, is a stream of trillions of tiny particles. When the power is turned on they accelerate from zero to 60,000mph in a fraction of a second. Increase the power and the particles go faster and faster, until they're whizzing around the tunnel 11,000 times a second, which is almost the speed of light. But just like the train, they never quite reach that ultimate speed. They can only get to 99.99 per cent of the limit. When that happens, they too start to travel in time. We know this because of some extremely short-lived particles, called pi-mesons. Ordinarily, they disintegrate after just 25 billionths of a second. But when they are accelerated to near-light speed they last 30 times longer.It really is that simple. If we want to travel into the future, we just need to go fast. Really fast. And I think the only way we're ever likely to do that is by going into space. The fastest manned vehicle in history was Apollo 10. It reached 25,000mph. But to travel in time we'll have to go more than 2,000 times faster. And to do that we'd need a much bigger ship, a truly enormous machine. The ship would have to be big enough to carry a huge amount of fuel, enough to accelerate it to nearly the speed of light. Getting to just beneath the cosmic speed limit would require six whole years at full power.The initial acceleration would be gentle because the ship would be so big and heavy. But gradually it would pick up speed and soon would be covering massive distances. In one week it would have reached the outer planets. After two years it would reach half-light speed and be far outside our solar system. Two years later it would be travelling at 90 per cent of the speed of light. Around 30 trillion miles away from Earth, and four years after launch, the ship would begin to travel in time. For every hour of time on the ship, two would pass on Earth. A similar situation to the spaceship that orbited the massive black hole.After another two years of full thrust the ship would reach its top speed, 99 per cent of the speed of light. At this speed, a single day on board is a whole year of Earth time. Our ship would be truly flying into the future.The slowing of time has another benefit. It means we could, in theory, travel extraordinary distances within one lifetime. A trip to the edge of the galaxy would take just 80 years. But the real wonder of our journey is that it reveals just how strange the universe is. It's a universe where time runs at different rates in different places. Where tiny wormholes exist all around us. And where, ultimately, we might use our understanding of physics to become true voyagers through the fourth dimension.。

插上科学的翅膀飞时光穿梭机英语作文

插上科学的翅膀飞时光穿梭机英语作文

全文分为作者个人简介和正文两个部分:作者个人简介:Hello everyone, I am an author dedicated to creating and sharing high-quality document templates. In this era of information overload, accurate and efficient communication has become especially important. I firmly believe that good communication can build bridges between people, playing an indispensable role in academia, career, and daily life. Therefore, I decided to invest my knowledge and skills into creating valuable documents to help people find inspiration and direction when needed.正文:插上科学的翅膀飞时光穿梭机英语作文全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1Time Travel with the Wings of ScienceEver since I was a young child, I've been fascinated by the concept of time travel. The idea of journeying through the fabric of the past and future has captivated my imagination for as longas I can remember. What wonders would we discover by unlocking the secrets of the space-time continuum? Whatlong-forgotten civilizations could we explore? What terrible future catastrophes might we prevent? The possibilities seem endless and exhilarating.Of course, time travel has long been confined to the realms of science fiction, from H.G. Wells' seminal novel The Time Machine to the beloved Back to the Future film trilogy. Authors, filmmakers, and dreamers have spun incredible tales transporting us across the centuries. However, could the wings of science one day make this fantasy a reality? Might our technological progress eventually allow us to slip the bonds of the present? I certainly hope so.The core scientific concepts underlying time travel arise from Einstein's theories of relativity. The great physicist fundamentally altered our understanding of space and time, demonstrating that they are inextricably interwoven into a single continuum known as space-time. In this four-dimensional reality, time is no longer constant or absolute, but can dilate based on factors like velocity and gravity.The effects of time dilation predicted by relativity may seem minor in our daily lives on Earth, but they become extreme undermore significant gravitational forces or as objects approach the speed of light. A thought experiment can help illustrate this. Imagine twin paradox scenario where one identical twin remains on Earth while the other embarks on an interstellar voyage moving at an appreciable fraction of light speed. From the perspective of the Earth-bound twin, their sibling will have aged much more slowly due to the effects of time dilation.This bizarre consequence of relativity implies that by moving through space at sufficiently high velocities or by harnessing immense gravitational forces, we could theoretically propel ourselves forward through the river of time relative to another observer. In essence, we would be time traveling into the future, though not in the controlled manner typically depicted in science fiction tales of leaping centuries with technology like a "time machine."Still, even this limited form of time travel into the future demonstrated by Einstein's theories is a profound revelation overturning our classical notions of time as a constant, universal flow marching lockstep across the cosmos. If we can leverage these relativistic effects through future technological marvels like hyper-fast spaceships or artificially generated black holes, could we then possibly learn to navigate the timestream at will?A more daring notion inspired by quantum physics is that backward time travel might also be achievable through exploiting exotic properties of the universe like wormholes –hypothetical tunnels through space-time. While hotly debated, some interpretations of quantum theory leave open the possibility that under the correct conditions it may be possible to create traversable wormholes capable of looping back on themselves in four-dimensional space-time.If feasible engineering solutions could be found to stabilize these wormholes against collapse and usher travelers through their quantum gateways, they could provide portals into the past or future. The energy requirements predicted by calculations are absolutely staggering, however, and may forever remain science fiction. Some theorists have proposed that future civilizations perhaps trillions of years from now could possibly harness energies on that cosmic scale by exploiting exotic physical phenomena. For now, such notions can only serve as mathematical daydreams.The most speculative concepts for achieving time travel arise from fringe theories exploring the fundamental building blocks of reality. Perhaps our current models represent just the first baby steps in a grander unified theory fully describingspace-time. If discovered, such a "Theory of Everything" could potentially reveal loopholes in our present comprehension, allowing scientists to manipulate the cosmic fabric in currently unimaginable ways.While purely hypothetical at this stage, fringe thinkers have proposed such radical possibilities as using cosmic strings or constructing Traversable Acausal Retrohandled Hyperfinite (TARH) pathways looping through space-time to bypass entropy restrictions and accomplish causality violations. Without empirical evidence, however, such fanciful ideas remain the stuff of science fiction writers rather than legitimate theory. They remind us how little we may actually understand about deep aspects of reality.Despite the uncertainties of cutting-edge theorizing, history shows that making leaps into the unknown can unleash tremendous progress. The foundations of modern physics itself were seeded by a handful of wild ideas that flew in the face of prevailing scientific dogmas. Perhaps by following the wings of our curiosity to map the unexplored territory of space-time, we might eventually gain mastery over it. If so, could a fantastic age of time tourism one day open篇2Soaring on the Wings of Science Through a Time MachineEver since I was a young child, I've been fascinated by the concept of time travel. The idea of journeying through the cosmic ocean of the fourth dimension, transcending the linear constraints of chronology, has sparked an insatiable sense of wonder and curiosity within me. Time machines have long been the stuff of science fiction – the iconic DeLorean from Back to the Future, the intricate machinery of H.G. Wells' Time Machine, or the sleek, metaphysical wormholes that theoretical physicists speculate could breach the fabric of space-time itself.However, as I've delved deeper into the realms of science, particularly physics, I've come to realize that the prospect of time travel may not be as far-fetched as it seems. In fact, it might well be an inevitable consequence of our universe's fundamental laws, waiting to be unlocked by the boundless potential of human ingenuity and the relentless march of scientific progress.The theoretical underpinnings of time travel find their roots in Albert Einstein's revolutionary theory of relativity. According to this paradigm-shifting framework, time is not an absolute, universal constant, but rather a malleable dimension inextricably intertwined with space, matter, and energy. The very fabric of space-time can be warped and distorted by the presence ofmassive gravitational fields, opening up tantalizing possibilities for traversing the temporal domain.One of the most intriguing concepts arising from Einstein's theories is that of the "closed timelike curve" – a hypothetical trajectory in space-time that loops back on itself, allowing an object or traveler to theoretically return to their own past. While the precise mechanics of such a phenomenon remain shrouded in mystery, it has captured the imaginations of physicists and science fiction enthusiasts alike.Another intriguing avenue for potential time travel lies in the realm of wormholes – hypothetical tunnels or shortcuts through the cosmic fabric that could, in theory, connect two distant regions of space-time. Traversing a wormhole could potentially enable a traveler to bypass the conventional flow of time, effectively traveling into the future or even the past, depending on the wormhole's properties.Of course, the realization of time travel is fraught with mind-bending paradoxes and logical conundrums that have perplexed philosophers and scientists for decades. The infamous "grandfather paradox," for instance, poses a seemingly insurmountable logical obstacle: if you were to travel back in time and inadvertently (or perhaps intentionally) prevent yourgrandparents from meeting, you would effectively erase your own existence from the timeline – a self-contradictory scenario that challenges our very notions of causality and free will.Despite these daunting challenges, the pursuit of time travel remains an irresistible lure for the human intellect, driving us to push the boundaries of our understanding and to unravel the deepest mysteries of the cosmos. After all, if we were to achieve even the slightest degree of temporal maneuverability, the implications would be nothing short of revolutionary.Imagine being able to witness pivotal moments in human history firsthand, to walk alongside luminaries like Socrates, Leonardo da Vinci, or Marie Curie, and to gain invaluable insights into the triumphs and tribulations that have shaped our collective journey. Or consider the tantalizing prospect of peering into the future, glimpsing the technological marvels and societal transformations that await us, and using that knowledge to steer humanity towards a brighter, more sustainable path.Of course, such power would also carry immense responsibility, as the potential for abuse or unintended consequences could be catastrophic. Any successful time travel endeavor would necessitate a profound ethical framework,rigorously developed and adhered to, to ensure that the delicate tapestry of causality is not irreparably disrupted.As a student of science, I find myself both awed and humbled by the audacious quest for time travel. It represents the pinnacle of human curiosity and intellectual daring, a bold venture into realms once deemed utterly fanciful and impossible. Yet, it is precisely this unquenchable thirst for knowledge, this relentless drive to push against the boundaries of the known, that has propelled humanity's greatest achievements throughout history.From the rudimentary tools of our prehistoric ancestors to the awe-inspiring marvels of modern technology, our species has consistently defied the limitations imposed by our finite comprehension, venturing forth into uncharted territories with a spirit of fearless exploration. The pursuit of time travel is simply the latest, and perhaps the most ambitious, chapter in this grand narrative of human discovery.As I stand on the precipice of adulthood, poised to embark on my own scientific journey, I cannot help but feel a profound sense of excitement and anticipation. The challenges that lie ahead are daunting, the obstacles seemingly insurmountable,but it is in the crucible of such adversity that true innovation is forged.Perhaps, one day, I will have the privilege of contributing, even in the smallest of ways, to the realization of this age-old dream – to soar on the wings of science, transcending the shackles of linear time, and unlocking the secrets of the cosmic tapestry that binds us all. For now, I can only marvel at the audacity of such an endeavor and embrace the endless possibilities that await us at the forefront of human knowledge.Time travel may yet remain a tantalizing fantasy, a thought experiment to be pondered and debated. But in theever-expanding realm of science, where the impossible is routinely transmuted into reality, one can never discount the power of human ingenuity and the boundless potential that lies waiting to be unveiled. As I gaze skyward, I see not merely the vast expanse of the cosmos, but a canvas upon which the most extraordinary dreams of humanity may one day be etched – a tapestry woven from the threads of curiosity, perseverance, and an unwavering commitment to pushing the frontiers of knowledge ever further.And who knows? Perhaps, in some distant future, or even some long-forgotten past, a traveler from another era willstumble upon these very words, a testament to the enduring spirit of human inquiry and our eternal quest to unravel the mysteries of time itself.篇3Soaring Through Time with the Wings of ScienceEver since I was a young child, my imagination has been captivated by the concept of time travel. The idea of journeying through the cosmic ocean of the past and future has kindled an insatiable curiosity within me. However, as I matured and delved deeper into the realms of science, I realized that this fantasy might not be as implausible as it seems. With the wings of scientific advancement, we may one day conquer the barriers of time itself.The notion of time travel has long been a subject of fascination for scientists, philosophers, and storytellers alike. From H.G. Wells' seminal novel "The Time Machine" to the mind-bending scientific theories of Albert Einstein, the concept has transcended mere fiction and entered the realm of theoretical possibility. Einstein's theory of relativity introduced the groundbreaking idea that time is not an absolute constant,but rather a malleable dimension intricately intertwined with space and matter.This revolutionary understanding paved the way for further exploration into the nature of time and its potential manipulability. Physicists have proposed various hypothetical mechanisms for time travel, including wormholes, cosmic strings, and even the exploitation of the quantum realm. While these concepts may seem outlandish, they are grounded in the fundamental principles of modern physics and have sparked intense scientific debate and investigation.One particularly intriguing avenue of research is the study of wormholes – hypothetical tunnels in the fabric of spacetime that could potentially connect distant regions of the universe or even different eras. Although the existence of traversable wormholes remains purely theoretical, some scientists have proposed methods to stabilize them using exotic matter or cosmic strings. The implications of such a discovery would be nothing short of revolutionary, allowing us to transcend the linear constraints of time and explore the vast tapestry of the cosmos.Another tantalizing possibility lies in the realm of quantum mechanics, where the strange and counterintuitive behavior of subatomic particles defies our classical understanding of reality.Some theories suggest that quantum entanglement, a phenomenon where particles become inextricably linked regardless of distance, could potentially facilitate a form of time travel through the manipulation of information. While the practical applications of such concepts are still the subject of intense speculation, they open up a fascinating realm of possibilities that challenge our fundamental assumptions about the nature of time.Beyond the realm of theoretical physics, technological advancements in fields such as nanotechnology, quantum computing, and advanced propulsion systems may also play a pivotal role in our quest to conquer time. As our understanding of the universe deepens and our capabilities expand, we inch closer to the possibility of engineering solutions that could one day make time travel a tangible reality.Of course, the implications of such a monumental achievement extend far beyond mere scientific curiosity. Time travel could revolutionize our understanding of history, allowing us to witness pivotal moments firsthand and unravel the mysteries of the past. It could also provide invaluable insights into the future, enabling us to anticipate and prepare for potential challenges or disasters before they occur. Furthermore,the ability to traverse time could have profound implications for fields such as medicine, archaeology, and even space exploration, opening up new avenues of discovery and understanding.Yet, as we contemplate the exhilarating prospects of time travel, we must also confront the ethical and philosophical quandaries that accompany such a transformative technology. The potential for abuse or unintended consequences is not to be taken lightly. Would altering the past irrevocably alter the present? Could knowledge of the futureundermine the very fabric of human agency and free will? These are but a few of the complex questions that must be grappled with as we inch closer to this incredible feat.Despite these challenges, the allure of time travel remains undeniable. It represents the pinnacle of human curiosity and ambition, a testament to our relentless pursuit of knowledge and understanding. As a student of science, I am both awed and humbled by the prospect of one day soaring through the vast expanse of time, carried aloft by the wings of our collective scientific endeavors.While the path ahead is shrouded in uncertainty, one thing remains clear: the quest to unlock the secrets of time travel is a testament to the boundless potential of the human mind and ourunwavering determination to push the boundaries of what is possible. With each new discovery, with each theoretical breakthrough, we inch closer to realizing this age-old dream, and I am honored to be a part of this incredible journey.As I stand on the precipice of a future where the constraints of time may be transcended, I am filled with a profound sense of awe and anticipation. The wings of science have carried us this far, and I have no doubt that they will continue to propel us towards even greater heights of understanding and exploration. Time travel may once have been the stuff of dreams and fanciful tales, but today, it stands as a tantalizing reality, beckoning us to take flight and soar through the vast expanse of the cosmic tapestry.。

WormholesandaHoneyfarmAutomaticallyDetectingNovel


Wormhole
IP: .dd
• Niels Provos suggested: Use honeyd as a first pass filter
– Completes the illusion that a honeypot exists at every wormhole location
Decision (Hypothesis)
Feed Forward
Action (Test)
Unfolding Interaction
With Environment
Note how orientation shapes observation, shapes decision, shapes action, and in turn is shaped by the feedback and other phenomena coming into our sensing or observing window.
Wormholes and a Honeyfarm:
Automatically Detecting Novel Worms
(and other random stuff)
Wormholes and a Honeyfarm: Automatically Detecting New Worms
Nicholas Weaver
UC Berkeley ICIR
Vern Paxson
ICIR
Stuart Staniford
Silicon Defense
1
Problem: Automatically
Detecting New Worms
Wormholes and a Honeyfarm: Automatically Detecting Novel Worms

wormhole

WormholeA wormhole, officially known as an Einstein–Rosen bridge, is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that would fundamentally be a shortcut through spacetime. A wormhole is much like a tunnel with two ends, each in separate points in spacetime.For a simplified notion of a wormhole, visualize spaceas a two-dimensional (2D) surface. In this case, awormhole can be pictured as a hole in that surfacethat leads into a 3D tube (the inside surface of acylinder). This tube then re-emerges at anotherlocation on the 2D surface with a similar hole as theentrance. An actual wormhole would be analogous tothis, but with the spatial dimensions raised by one.For example, instead of circular holes on a 2D plane, areal wormhole's mouths could be spheres in 3Dspace.Researchers have no observational evidence for wormholes, but the equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes. Because of its robust theoretical strength, a wormhole is one of the great physics metaphors for teaching general relativity. The first type of wormhole solution discovered was the Schwarzschild wormhole, which would be present in the Schwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole, but it was found that it would collapse too quickly for anything to cross from one end to the other. Wormholes that could be crossed in both directions, known as traversable wormholes, would only be possible if exotic matter with negative energy density could be used to stabilize them.The Casimir effect shows that quantum field theory allows the energy density in certain regions of space to be negative relative to the ordinary vacuum energy, and it has been shown theoretically that quantum field theory allows states where energy can be arbitrarily negative at a given point.[1]Many physicists, such as Stephen Hawking,[2]Kip Thorne[3]and others,[4][5][6] therefore argue that such effects might make it possible to stabilize a traversable wormhole. Physicists have not found any natural process that would be predicted to form a wormhole naturally in the context of general relativity, although the quantum foam hypothesis is sometimes used to suggest that tiny wormholes might appear and disappear spontaneously at the Planck scale,[7][8]and stable versions of such wormholes have been suggested as dark matter candidates.[9][10] It has also been proposed that, if a tiny wormhole held open by a negative-mass cosmic string had appeared around the time of the Big Bang, it could have been inflated to macroscopic size by cosmic inflation.[11]The American theoretical physicist John Archibald Wheeler coined the term wormhole in 1957; the German mathematician Hermann Weyl, however, had proposed the wormhole theory in 1921, in connection with mass analysis of electromagnetic field energy.[12]This analysis forces one to consider situations... where there is a net flux of lines of force, through what topologists would call "a handle" of the multiply-connected space, and what physicists might perhaps be excused for more vividly terming a "wormhole".DefinitionThe basic notion of an intra-universe wormhole is that it is a compact region of spacetime whose boundary is topologically trivial, but whose interior is not simply connected. Formalizing this idea leads to definitions such as the following, taken from Matt Visser's Lorentzian Wormholes.If a Minkowski spacetime contains a compact region Ω, and if the topology of Ω is of the form Ω ~ R x Σ, whereΣ is a three-manifold of the nontrivial topology, whose boundary has topology of the form ∂Σ ~ S2, and if, furthermore, the hypersurfaces Σ are all spacelike, then the region Ω contains a quasipermanent intra-universe wormhole.Characterizing inter-universe wormholes is more difficult, with little consideration being given to available technology. For example, one can imagine a baby universe connected to its parent by a narrow umbilicus. One might like to regard the umbilicus as the throat of a wormhole, but the spacetime is simply connected. For this reason, wormholes have been defined geometrically, as opposed to topologically, as regions of spacetime that constrain the incremental deformation of closed surfaces. For example, in Enrico Rodrigo’s The Phys ics of Stargates, a wormhole is defined informally as:a region of spacetime containing a "world tube" (the time evolution of a closed surface) that cannot be continuously deformed (shrunk) to a world line (the time evolution of a point).Lorentzian wormholes known as Schwarzschild wormholes or Einstein–Rosen bridges are connections between areas of space that can be modeled as vacuum solutions to the Einstein field equations, and which are now understood to be intrinsic parts of the maximally extended version of the Schwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole with no charge and no rotation. Here, "maximally extended" refers to the idea that the spacetime should not have any"edges": for any possible trajectory of a free-falling particle (following a geodesic) in the spacetime, it should be possible to continue this path arbitrarily far into the particle's future or past, unless the trajectory hits a gravitational singularity like the one at the center of the black hole's interior. In order to satisfy this requirement, it turns out that in addition to the black hole interior region which particles enter when they fall through the event horizon from the outside, there must be a separate white hole interior region which allows us to extrapolate the trajectories of particles which an outside observer sees rising up away from the event horizon. And just as there are two separate interior regions of the maximally extended spacetime, there are also two separate exterior regions, sometimes called two different "universes", with the second universe allowing us to extrapolate some possible particle trajectories in the two interior regions. This means that the interior black hole region can contain a mix of particles that fell in from either universe (and thus an observer who fell in from one universe might be able to see light that fell in from the other one), and likewise particles from the interior white hole region can escape into either universe. All four regions can be seen in a spacetime diagram which uses Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates.In this spacetime, it is possible to come up with coordinate systems such that if you pick a hypersurface of constant time (a set of points that all have the same time coordinate, such that every point on the surface has a space-like separation, giving what is called a 'space-like surface') and draw an "embedding diagram" depicting the curvature of space at that time, the embedding diagram will look like a tube connecting the two exterior regions, known as an "Einstein–Rosen bridge". Note that the Schwarzschild metric describes an idealized black hole that exists eternally from the perspective of external observers; a more realistic black hole that forms at some particular time from a collapsing star would require a different metric. When the infalling stellar matter is added to a diagram of a black hole's history, it removes the part of the diagram corresponding to the white hole interior region, along with the part of the diagram corresponding to the other universe.[13]The Einstein–Rosen bridge was discovered by Albert Einstein and his colleague Nathan Rosen, who first published the result in 1935. However, in 1962 John A. Wheeler and Robert W. Fuller published a paper showing that this type of wormhole is unstable if it connects two parts of the same universe, and that it will pinch off too quickly for light (or any particle moving slower than light) that falls in from one exterior region to make it to the other exterior region.The motion through a Schwarzschild wormhole connecting two universes is possible in only one direction. The analysis of the radial geodesic motion of a massive particle into an Einstein–Rosen bridge shows that the proper time of the particle extends to infinity. Timelike and null geodesics in the gravitational field of a Schwarzschild wormhole are complete because the expansion scalar in the Raychaudhuri equation has a discontinuity at the event horizon, and because an Einstein–Rosen bridge is represented by the Kruskal diagram in which the two antipodal future event horizons are identified. Schwarzschild wormholes and Schwarzschild black holes are different, mathematical solutions of general relativity and Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity. Yet for distant observers, both solutions with the same mass are indistinguishable. These results suggest that all observed astrophysical black holes may be Einstein–Rosen bridges,each with a new universe inside that formed simultaneously with the black hole. Accordingly, our own Universe may be the interior of a black hole existing inside another universe.[14]According to general relativity, the gravitational collapse of a sufficiently compact mass forms a singular Schwarzschild black hole. In the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity, however, it forms a regular Einstein–Rosen bridge. This theory extends general relativity by removing a constraint of the symmetry of the affine connection and regarding its antisymmetric part, the torsion tensor, as a dynamical variable. Torsion naturally accounts for the quantum-mechanical, intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of matter. The minimal coupling between torsion and Dirac spinors generates a repulsive spin–spin interaction which is significant in fermionic matter at extremely high densities. Such an interaction prevents the formation of a gravitational singularity. Instead, the collapsing matter reaches an enormous but finite density and rebounds, forming the other side of the bridge.[15]Before the stability problems of Schwarzschild wormholes were apparent, it was proposed that quasars were white holes forming the ends of wormholes of this type.[citation needed]While Schwarzschild wormholes are not traversable in both directions, their existence inspired Kip Thorne to imagine traversable wormholes created by holding the 'throat' of a Schwarzschild wormhole open with exotic matter (material that has negative mass/energy).Lorentzian traversable wormholes would allow travel in both directions from one part of the universe to another part of that same universe very quickly or would allow travel from one universe to another. The possibility of traversable wormholes in general relativity was first demonstrated by Kip Thorne and his graduate student Mike Morris in a 1988 paper. For this reason, the type of traversable wormhole they proposed, held open by a spherical shell of exotic matter, is referred to as a Morris–Thorne wormhole. Later, other types of traversable wormholes were discovered as allowable solutions to the equations of general relativity, including a variety analyzed in a 1989 paper by Matt Visser, in which a path through the wormhole can be made where the traversing path does not pass through a region of exotic matter. However, in the pure Gauss–Bonnet gravity (a modification to general relativity involving extra spatial dimensions which is sometimes studied in the context of brane cosmology) exotic matter is not needed in order for wormholes to exist—they can exist even with no matter.[17]A type held open by negative mass cosmic strings was put forth by Visser in collaboration with Cramer et al.,[11]inwhich it was proposed that such wormholes could have been naturally created in the early universe.Wormholes connect two points in spacetime, which means that they would in principle allow travel in time, as well as in space. In 1988, Morris, Thorne and Yurtsever worked out explicitly how to convert a wormhole traversing space into one traversing time.[3] However, according to general relativity, it would not be possible to use a wormhole to travel back to a time earlier than when the wormhole was first converted into a time machine by accelerating one of its two mouths.[18]Raychaudhuri's theorem and exotic matterTo see why exotic matter is required, consider an incoming light front traveling along geodesics, which then crosses the wormhole and re-expands on the other side. The expansion goes from negative to positive. As the wormhole neck is of finite size, we would not expect caustics to develop, at least within the vicinity of the neck. According to the optical Raychaudhuri's theorem, this requires a violation of the averaged null energy condition. Quantum effects such as the Casimir effect cannot violate the averaged null energy condition in any neighborhood of space with zero curvature,[19] but calculations in semiclassical gravity suggest that quantum effects may be able to violate this condition in curved spacetime.[20]Although it was hoped recently that quantum effects could not violate an achronal version of the averaged null energy condition,[21] violations have nevertheless been found,[22]so it remains an open possibility that quantum effects might be used to support a wormhole.Faster-than-light travelFurther information: Faster-than-lightThe impossibility of faster-than-light relative speed only applies locally. Wormholes might allow superluminal (faster-than-light) travel by ensuring that the speed of light is not exceeded locally at any time. While traveling through a wormhole, subluminal (slower-than-light) speeds are used. If two points are connected by a wormhole whose length is shorter than the distance between them outside the wormhole, the time taken to traverse it could be less than the time it would take a light beam to make the journey if it took a path through the space outside the wormhole. However, a light beam traveling through the wormhole would always beat the traveler.Time travelMain article: Time travelThe theory of general relativity predicts that if traversable wormholes exist, they could allow time travel.[3] This would be accomplished by accelerating one end of the wormhole to a high velocity relative to the other, and then sometime later bringing it back; relativistic time dilation would result in the accelerated wormhole mouth aging less than the stationary one as seen by an external observer, similar to what is seen in the twin paradox. However, time connects differently through the wormhole than outside it, so that synchronized clocks at each mouth will remain synchronized to someone traveling through the wormhole itself, no matter how the mouths move around.[23]This means that anything which entered the accelerated wormhole mouth would exit the stationary one at a point in time prior to its entry.For example, consider two clocks at both mouths both showing the date as 2000. After being taken on a trip at relativistic velocities, the accelerated mouth is brought back to the same region as the stationary mouth with the accelerated mouth's clock reading 2004 while the stationary mouth's clock read 2012. A traveler who entered the accelerated mouth at this moment would exit the stationary mouth when its clock also read 2004, in the same region but now eight years in the past. Such a configuration of wormholes would allow for a particle's world line to form a closed loop in spacetime, known as a closed timelike curve. An object traveling through a wormhole could carry energy or charge from one time to another, but this would not violate conservation of energy or charge in each time, because the energy/charge of the wormhole mouth itself would change to compensate for the object that fell into it or emerged from it.[24][25]It is thought that it may not be possible to convert a wormhole into a time machine in this manner; the predictions are made in the context of general relativity, but general relativity does not include quantum effects. Analyses using the semiclassical approach to incorporating quantum effects into general relativity have sometimes indicated that a feedback loop of virtual particles would circulate through the wormhole and pile up on themselves, driving the energy density in the region very high and possibly destroying it before any information could be passed through it, in keeping with the chronology protection conjecture. The debate on this matter is described by Kip S. Thorne in the book Black Holes and Time Warps, and a more technical discussion can be found in The quantum physics of chronology protection by Matt Visser.[26]There is also the Roman ring, which is a configuration of more than one wormhole. This ring seems to allow a closed time loop with stable wormholes when analyzed using semiclassical gravity, although without a full theory of quantum gravity it is uncertain whether the semiclassical approach is reliable in this case.Inter-universe travelA possible resolution to the paradoxes resulting from wormhole-enabled time travel rests on the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. In 1991 David Deutsch showed that quantum theory is fully consistent (in the sense that the so-called density matrix can be made free of discontinuities) in spacetimes with closed timelike curves.[27]However, later it was shown that such model of closed timelike curve can have internal inconsistencies as it will lead to strange phenomena like distinguishing non orthogonal quantum states and distinguishing proper and improper mixture.[28][29]Accordingly, the destructive positive feedback loop of virtual particles circulating through a wormhole time machine, a result indicated by semi-classical calculations, is averted. A particle returning from the future does not return to its universe of origination but to a parallel universe. This suggests that a wormhole time machine with an exceedingly short time jump is a theoretical bridge between contemporaneous parallel universes.[30]Because a wormhole time-machine introduces a type of nonlinearity into quantum theory, this sort of c ommunication between parallel universes is consistent with Joseph Polchinski’s discovery of an “Everett phone” in Steven Weinberg’s formulation of nonlinear quantum mechanics.[31]MetricsTheories of wormhole metrics describe the spacetime geometry of a wormhole and serve as theoretical models for time travel. An example of a (traversable) wormhole metric is the following:One type of non-traversable wormhole metric is the Schwarzschild solution (see the first diagram):In fictionMain article: Wormholes in fictionWormholes are a common element in science fiction as they allow interstellar, intergalactic, and sometimes interuniversal travel within human timescales. They have also served as a method for time travel.See alsoBlack holeClosed timelike curveFaster-than-lightExotic starGödel metricKrasnikov tubeNon-orientable wormholeSelf-consistency principleRetrocausalityRing singularityRoman ringWhite holeUniverseNotes1. Everett, Allen; Roman, Thomas (2012). Time Travel and Warp Drives. University of Chicago Press. p. 167. ISBN 0-226-22498-8.2. "Space and Time Warps". . Retrieved 2010-11-11.3. Morris, Michael; Thorne, Kip; Yurtsever, Ulvi (1988). "Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition". Physical Review Letters 61 (13): 1446–1449. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..61.1446M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446. PMID 10038800.4. Sopova; Ford (2002). "The Energy Density in the Casimir Effect". Physical Review D 66 (4): 045026. arXiv:quant-ph/0204125. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..66d5026S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.045026.5. Ford; Roman (1995). "Averaged Energy Conditions and Quantum Inequalities". Physical ReviewD 51 (8): 4277–4286. arXiv:gr-qc/9410043. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.4277F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4277.6. Olum (1998). "Superluminal travel requires negative energies". Physical Review Letters 81 (17): 3567–3570. arXiv:gr-qc/9805003. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.3567O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3567.7. Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. pp. 494–496. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.8. Ian H., Redmount; Wai-Mo Suen (1994). "Quantum Dynamics of Lorentzian Spacetime Foam". Physical Review D 49 (10): 5199. arXiv:gr-qc/9309017. Bibcode:1994PhRvD..49.5199R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5199.9. Kirillov, A.A.; E.P. Savelova (21 February 2008). "Dark Matter from a gas of wormholes". Physics Letters B 660 (3): 93. arXiv:0707.1081. Bibcode:2008PhLB..660...93K. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.034.10. Rodrigo, Enrico (30 November 2009). "Denouement of a Wormhole-Brane Encounter". International Journal of Modern Physics D 18 (12): 1809. arXiv:0908.2651. Bibcode:2009IJMPD..18.1809R. doi:10.1142/S0218271809015333.11. John G. Cramer, Robert L. Forward, Michael S. Morris, Matt Visser, Gregory Benford, and Geoffrey A. Landis (1995). "Natural Wormholes as Gravitational Lenses". Physical Review D 51 (6): 3117–3120. arXiv:astro-ph/9409051. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3117C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3117.12. Coleman, Korte, Hermann Weyl's Raum - Zeit - Materie and a General Introduction to His Scientific Work, p. 19913. "Collapse to a Black Hole". . 2010-10-03. Retrieved 2010-11-11. This is a tertiary source that clearly includes information from other sources but does not name them.14. Poplawski, Nikodem J. (2010). "Radial motion into an Einstein–Rosen bridge". Physics LettersB 687 (2–3): 110–113. arXiv:0902.1994. Bibcode:2010PhLB..687..110P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.029.15. Poplawski, Nikodem J. (2010). "Cosmology with torsion: An alternative to cosmic inflation". Phys. Lett. B 694 (3): 181–185. arXiv:1007.0587. Bibcode:2010PhLB..694..181P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.056.16. Other computer-rendered images and animations of traversable wormholes can be seen on this page by the creator of the image in the article, and this page has additional renderings.17. Elias Gravanis; Steven Willison (2007). "`Mass without mass' from thin shells in Gauss-Bonnet gravity". Phys. Rev. D 75 (8). arXiv:gr-qc/0701152. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75h4025G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.084025.18. Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. p. 504. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.19. Fewster, Christopher J.; Ken D. Olum; Michael J. Pfenning (10 January 2007). "Averaged null energy condition in spacetimes with boundaries". Physical Review D 75 (2): 025007. arXiv:gr-qc/0609007. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75b5007F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.025007.20. Visser, Matt (15 October 1996). "Gravitational vacuum polarization. II. Energy conditions in the Boulware vacuum". Physical Review D 54 (8): 5116. arXiv:gr-qc/9604008. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..54.5116V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5116.21. Graham, Noah; Ken D. Olum (4 September 2007). "Achronal averaged null energy condition". Physical Review D 76 (6): 064001. arXiv:0705.3193. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..76f4001G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064001.22. Urban, Douglas; Ken D. Olum (1 June 2010). "Spacetime averaged null energy condition". Physical Review D 81 (6): 124004. arXiv:1002.4689. Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81l4004U. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.124004.23. Thorne, Kip S. (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps. W. W. Norton. p. 502. ISBN 0-393-31276-3.24. "Wormholes and Time Travel? Not Likely". Retrieved 4 October 2014.25. Everett, Allen; Roman, Thomas (2012). Time Travel and Warp Drives. University of Chicago Press. p. 135. ISBN 0-226-22498-8.26. "The quantum physics of chronology protection". Retrieved 4 October 2014.27. Deutsch, David (1991). "Quantum Mechanics Near Closed Timelike Lines". Physical Review D 44 (10): 3197. Bibcode:1991PhRvD..44.3197D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197.28. Brun et.al (2009). "Localized Closed Timelike Curves Can Perfectly Distinguish Quantum States". Physics Review Letters 102 (21): 210402. Bibcode:2009PhRvL..102.210402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.210402.29. Pati, Chakrabarty, Agrawal (2011). "Purification of mixed states with closed timelike curve is not possible". Physical Review A 84 (6): 062325. arXiv:1003.4221. Bibcode:2011PhRvA..84f2325P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062325.30. Rodrigo, Enrico (2010). The Physics of Stargates. Eridanus Press. p. 281. ISBN 0-9841500-0-5.31. Polchinski, Joseph (1991). "Weinberg’s Nonlinear quantum Mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox". Physical Review Letters 66 (4): 397. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..66..397P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.397.。

The Theory of Wormholes

The Theory of WormholesWormholes, also known as Einstein-Rosen bridges, are hypothetical tunnels through spacetime that could potentially connect different points in the universe. The concept of wormholes emerged from the theory of general relativity, which describes the curvature of spacetime and the interactions between matter and energy. Although there is currently no direct evidence for the existence of wormholes, they remain a topic of fascination for scientists and science fiction enthusiasts alike.The idea of wormholes is closely related to the concept of black holes, which are regions of spacetime with such strong gravitational forces that nothing, not even light, can escape them. According to general relativity, the most massive black holes could be capable of creating wormholes by distorting spacetime in a certain way. It is thought that such a wormhole would have two mouths, or openings, that could be separated by vast distances.One of the most intriguing aspects of wormholes is the possibility of using them for faster-than-light travel. Since the distance between two points in spacetime could be significantly shorter through a wormhole, a spacecraft travelling through it could potentially reach its destination much faster than if it had to travel through regular space. This idea has been explored in many works of science fiction, including the movie Interstellar, but it remains purely speculative at this time.A more realistic use for wormholes could be for communication between distant locations in the universe. If a wormhole could be created and stabilized, it might be possible to send information through it. However, this raises several challenges, including the difficulty of creating a stable wormhole, the issue of whether information could survive intact through the wormhole, and the fact that we currently have no way of detecting or manipulating a wormhole even if it did exist.Despite these challenges, scientists continue to explore the theoretical and practical implications of wormholes. Some researchers are investigating whether it might be possible to create a wormhole artificially using exotic matter, a hypothetical substancewith negative energy density that could counteract the positive energy of matter. Others are looking at the possibility of detecting wormholes indirectly by studying their effects on nearby objects or by searching for gravitational anomalies in space.Overall, the theory of wormholes represents one of the most intriguing and complex ideas in the field of physics. While there is still much we don't know about the nature of spacetime and the laws that govern it, the concept of wormholes invites us to imagine what might be possible if we could one day unlock the secrets of the universe.。

时光机介绍英语作文

时光机介绍英语作文In the realm of science fiction, the concept of a time machine has captivated the imaginations of many. A time machine is a theoretical device that allows an individual to travel through time, either to the past or the future. This essay will explore the idea of time machines, their portrayal in literature and film, and the scientific theories that underpin the concept.Firstly, the notion of a time machine has been a staple in science fiction since H.G. Wells' seminal work "The Time Machine," published in 1895. In this novel, Wells introduces a Victorian scientist who constructs a machine that enables him to travel to the year 802,701. The story serves as a commentary on the evolution of humanity and the potential consequences of unchecked technological advancement.The portrayal of time machines in popular culture has varied widely. In films like "Back to the Future," the time machine takes the form of a DeLorean car, which is powered by a plutonium reactor. This lighthearted depiction contrasts with more serious and complex narratives, such as those found in "Doctor Who," where the TARDIS is a time-traveling spaceship that can blend into its surroundings.Scientifically, the idea of time travel is rooted inEinstein's theory of relativity. According to this theory, time is relative and can be influenced by the speed at whichan object travels and the strength of the gravitational field it is in. The concept of a wormhole, a theoretical tunnel through spacetime, has also been proposed as a potential means of time travel. However, the creation and manipulation of wormholes remain purely speculative and are not currently supported by empirical evidence.Despite the lack of practical time machines, the concept continues to intrigue and inspire. It raises profound questions about the nature of time, the possibility of altering history, and the ethical implications of such power. While the feasibility of time travel remains a topic of debate among physicists, the allure of time machines in fiction provides a rich ground for exploring these complex issues.In conclusion, time machines, though currently existing only in the realm of imagination and fiction, serve as a powerful metaphor for our desire to understand and control time. They challenge us to consider the implications of our actions and the potential futures that await us. Whether through the pages of a novel or the screen of a movie, time machinesoffer a fascinating lens through which we can examine our relationship with time and the universe.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
3 ij kl 2 lp √ g
Σ


g
2 lp
R(3) .
Instead of looking at perturbations on the whole manifold M, we consider perturbations at Σ of the type gij = g ¯ij + hij . g ¯ij is the spatial part of the background considered in eq.(1)In Ref. [9], we have defined ∆E (m) as the difference of the expectation value of the Hamiltonian approximated to second order calculated with respect to different backgrounds which have the asymptotic flatness property. This quantity is the natural extension to the volume term of the subtraction procedure for boundary terms and is interpreted as the Casimir energy related to vacuum fluctuations. Thus ∆E (m) = E (m) − E (0) = Ψ H Schw. − H F lat Ψ Ψ| Ψ + Ψ |Hquasilocal | Ψ . Ψ| Ψ (8)
The trace associated with the subtraction term is taken to be k 0 = −2/r for B+ and k 0 = 2/r for B− . Then the quasilocal energy with subtraction terms included is Equasilocal = E+ − E− = (r [1 − |r,y |])y=y+ − (r [1 − |r,y |])y=y− . (6)R源自3) = 0,(3)
−2π|ij j
=0
(gik gjl + gil gjk − gij gkl ) and R(3) denotes the scalar curvature of the surface where Gijkl = 1 2 Σ. By using the expression of the trace 1 √ µ k = −√ hn h ,
1

(4)
µ . The with the normal to the boundaries defined continuously along Σ as nµ = (hyy ) 2 δy
value of k depends on the function r,y , where we have assumed that the function r,y is positive for S+ and negative for S− . We obtain at either boundary that k= −2r,y . r (5)
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the most fascinating problem of our century is the possibility of combining the principles of Quantum Mechanics with those of General Relativity. The result of this combination is best known as Quantum Gravity. However such a theory has to be yet developed, principally due to the UV divergences that cannot be kept under control by any renormalization scheme. J.A. Wheeler [1] was the first who conjectured that fluctuations of the metric have to appear at short scale distances. The collection of such fluctuations gives the spacetime a kind of foam-like structure, whose topology is constantly changing. In this
Large N -wormhole approach to spacetime foam
Remo Garattini
M´ ecanique et Gravitation, Universit´ e de Mons-Hainaut, Facult´ e des Sciences, 15 Avenue Maistriau, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
Note that the total quasilocal energy is zero for boundary conditions symmetric with respect to the bifurcation surface S0 and this is the necessary condition to obtain instability with respect to the flat space. A little comment on the total Hamiltonian is useful to further proceed. We are looking at the sector of asymptotically flat metrics included in the space of all metrics, where the Wheeler-DeWitt equation HΨ = 0 3 (7)
and we consider the physical Hamiltonian defined on Σ HP = H − H0 = 1 2 lp d3 x N H + Ni Hi + H∂ Σ+ + H∂ Σ−
Σ
2
=
1 2 lp
Σ
d3 x N H + Ni Hi √ d2 x σ k − k 0 ,
+
2 2 lp
√ 2 d2 x σ k − k 0 − 2 lp S+
S−
(2)
2 where lp = 16πG. The volume term contains two contstraints

H = Gijkl π ij π kl H =
i
2 lp √ g


g 2 lp
1
foamy spacetime a fundamental length comes into play: the Planck length. Its inverse, the Planck mass mp , can be thought as a natural cut-off. It is believed that in such spacetime, general relativity can be renormalized when a density of virtual black holes is taken under consideration coupled to N fermion fields in a 1/N expansion [2]. It is also argued that when gravity is coupled to N conformally invariant scalar fields the evidence that the ground-state expectation value of the metric is flat space is false [3]. However instead of looking at gravity coupled to matter fields, we will consider pure gravity. In this context two metrics which are solutions of the equations of motion without a cosmological constant are known with the property of the spherical symmetry: the Schwarzschild metric and the Flat metric. We will focus our attention on these two metrics with the purpose of examining the energy contribution to the vacuum fluctuation generated by a collection of N coherent wormholes. A straightforward extension to the deSitter and the Schwarzschild-deSitter spacetime case is immediate. The paper is structured as follows, in section II we briefly recall the results reported in Ref. [9], in section III we generalize the result of section II to Nw wormholes. We summarize and conclude in section III.
相关文档
最新文档