英语考试制度应不应该改革英语辩论(中英对照版)
英语考试不该从大学考试中取消英文作文
英语考试不该从大学考试中取消英文作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Title: English exams should not be removed from university examsIn recent years, there has been a growing debate over whether English exams should be eliminated from university exams. Some argue that the focus should be on other subjects that are more relevant to students' future careers, while others believe that English is a crucial skill that should be tested in all levels of education. This essay will argue that English exams should not be removed from university exams for several reasons.First and foremost, English is a global language that is essential for communication in today's world. As the lingua franca of business, politics, and academia, proficiency in English opens up a world of opportunities for individuals in terms of employment, travel, and education. By testing students on their English language abilities, universities ensure that they areequipped with the necessary skills to succeed in a globalized society.Additionally, English exams serve as a benchmark for students' language proficiency and provide valuable feedback on their progress. By evaluating students on their reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills, exams enable them to identify their strengths and weaknesses in English and work towards improving them. This not only benefits students academically but also helps them develop communication skills that are vital in their personal and professional lives.Furthermore, English exams contribute to a morewell-rounded education by exposing students to a wide range of texts and topics. By testing students on literature, grammar, vocabulary, and comprehension, exams encourage them to explore different genres and styles of writing, broaden their knowledge of the English language, and develop their analytical and critical thinking skills. This holistic approach to language learning is beneficial not only for students' academic growth but also for their overall development as individuals.In conclusion, English exams should not be eliminated from university exams as they play a crucial role in preparing students for the challenges of the modern world. By testing students ontheir language proficiency, providing feedback on their progress, and promoting a well-rounded education, exams contribute to students' personal and professional growth. Therefore, it is important for universities to continue to include English exams in their assessments to ensure that students are equipped with the skills they need to succeed in an increasingly interconnected world.篇2English Exam Should Not Be Removed from College ExaminationsEnglish has become a global language that is widely used in various fields such as business, education, and communication. Therefore, it is essential for students to have a solid foundation in English in order to succeed in the modern world. However, there has been a debate about whether English exams should be removed from college examination requirements. In my opinion, English exams should not be eliminated from college examinations for the following reasons.First and foremost, English exams are crucial for students to improve their language skills. By taking English exams, students are required to practice reading, writing, listening, and speakingin English, which helps them to enhance their language proficiency. Without regular English exams, students may not be motivated to study English and may neglect their language learning, leading to a decline in their language skills. Therefore, English exams serve as a useful tool for students to continuously improve their English abilities.Secondly, English exams are necessary for students to demonstrate their proficiency in the language. English language proficiency is often a requirement for many job positions and academic programs, and students need to prove their language abilities through standardized English exams. By removing English exams from college examinations, students may face difficulties in providing evidence of their English proficiency to potential employers or universities, which could hinder their career prospects and academic opportunities. Therefore, English exams play a critical role in allowing students to showcase their language skills and enhance their competitiveness in the job market and academic world.Furthermore, English exams help to maintain a high standard of education and ensure the quality of graduates. By including English exams in college examinations, institutions can assess students' language skills and ensure that graduates possess thenecessary language abilities to succeed in the workforce. Without English exams, colleges may graduate students with inadequate English proficiency, which could reflect poorly on the institution and diminish the quality of education provided. Therefore, English exams are essential for upholding educational standards and producing competent graduates who are equipped with the language skills needed in today's society.In addition, English exams are valuable for promoting international communication and understanding. English is the lingua franca of the world, and proficiency in English enables individuals to communicate effectively with people from different countries and cultures. By requiring students to take English exams, colleges can encourage students to study the language and develop cross-cultural communication skills, fostering mutual understanding and cooperation among diverse populations. Removing English exams from college examinations could hinder students' opportunities to engage in global communication and limit their ability to connect with individuals from around the world. Therefore, English exams play a vital role in promoting international exchange and building bridges between people of different backgrounds.Overall, English exams should not be eliminated from college examinations as they are essential for students to improve their language skills, demonstrate their proficiency, maintain educational standards, and promote international communication. By including English exams in college assessments, institutions can empower students to excel in their language learning and equip them with the necessary skills to succeed in a globalized world. Therefore, English exams should continue to be a requirement in college examinations to ensure that students receive a comprehensive education that prepares them for future challenges and opportunities.篇3English exam should not be canceled from university examsEnglish is considered as an essential subject in today's world, where globalization is rapidly increasing. The ability to communicate effectively in English is crucial for academic, professional, and social success. Therefore, it is important for students to have a good command of the language. However, some people argue that English exams should be canceled from university exams. In my opinion, this is a mistake, and English exams should continue to be a part of university exams.First of all, English exams help students improve their language skills. By testing students on their reading, writing, listening, and speaking abilities, English exams can identify areas where students need improvement. This feedback can then be used to tailor instruction to meet the individual needs of students. Without exams, students may not be motivated to work on their language skills, resulting in poor communication abilities.Secondly, English exams provide a standard measure of proficiency. By having a standardized exam, universities can ensure that all students have a similar level of English proficiency. This can help universities maintain their academic standards and ensure that students are prepared for the challenges of higher education and the workforce. Without exams, universities may have difficulty assessing the English proficiency of their students, leading to lower academic standards.Furthermore, English exams are important for international students. Many universities have a diverse student population, with students coming from all over the world. For these students, English exams can provide a way to demonstrate their language skills and ensure that they are prepared for university-level coursework. Without exams, international students may struggleto communicate effectively in English, causing frustration and hindering their academic success.Lastly, English exams are a reflection of the importance of the language in today's world. English is the lingua franca of the world, and having a good command of the language can open up a world of opportunities. By including English exams in university exams, universities are emphasizing the importance of English proficiency and encouraging students to work on their language skills.In conclusion, English exams should not be canceled from university exams. These exams help students improve their language skills, provide a standard measure of proficiency, are important for international students, and emphasize the importance of English in today's world. By continuing to include English exams in university exams, universities can ensure that their students are well-prepared for the academic and professional challenges that lie ahead.。
写考试制度的英语作文
写考试制度的英语作文Chinese examination system sometimes is full of controversy. When it comes to the CET-6, some people think it is necessary, while some people do not think so. Both of them have their reasons. As far as I am concerned, I think it is necessary to take part in the CET-6 examination. For the non-English major, although they can take part in other English level exams to show their ability, CET-6 is the most common certificate for them to improve themselves. And many employers think highly of CET-6. As every interview is will not last too long, in most cases, the employer can not have a better understand about the employees. So certificate would be the most powerful certification. And students in university can have two chances every year for to join this exam. They do not have too much stress for taking this exam. So, when you have chance, why not have a try.有时候中国的考试制度是有争议的。
英语不应该退出高考辩论赛
英语不应该退出高考辩论赛篇一：应不应该废除死刑英语辩论赛Debate motion: wether death penalty should be abolished or not?A(应保留): Our debate motion today is whether death penalty should be abolished or not. My side insist that it should not.Death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a felony. As early as there is a law, death penalty has come into being. Even in modern society, it is still necessary. As all the nations are trying to build a law-governed society, death penalty can work as a powerful legal method to guarantee the stability of society and protect the right of the majority of people. A criminal may stop halfway as soon as he thinks up that death is the most likely outcome of his criminal acts.B(应废除): While the government should punish the crime,but we should not curb the violence with violence.Theright to life is the most essential human rights, all of the rights are on premise of life.Criminals should enjoy life rights as the same as ordinary people.And there is no any evidence show that the incident of cases have inevitable connection with the existing of capital punishment so far. And the death penalty is not more deterrent than life imprisonment. Long terms of Imprisonment have the similar effect in In terms of crime prevention.A: My opponent say that death penalty cannot deter crime, since there is no obvious increase in crime rate after death penalty is abolished.Many variables make it hard to tell what the exact influence of death penalty has on crime rates. In addition, according to New York Times, there is only one death penalty in 300 murders. Lack of samples also makes the statistics ueliable. So there is no direct proof that can deny the deterrence of death penalty.However, those countries which banned death penalty always have a high democracy index as well as a high human development index.B: Besides being Influenced by the uncultured homomorphic revenge, death penalty has another problem---- false adjudications. False adjudications cause many innocents dead not only in abroad but also inhomeland. According to New York Times' statistics,in late 20 years, about 102 innocents was sentenced to death in the U.S.Our country also has such bloody lessons during the Cultural Revolution.What’smore, there is no opportunity to remedy the consequences of misjudgment of the death penalty.A: My opponent also mention erroneous adjudications. But nothing can be perfect. We should not abolish death penalty just because a tiny possibility of erroneous adjudications. Especially when we have other ways to reduce erroneous adjudications, like to investigate more carefully or improve the law.B: Besides this aspect,every law should suit the people's wish. Abolishing death penalty is the demand of international society and the people.According a survey from china survey,65.8% netizens approved of banning,only 34.1% insisted on remaining. From all the data above,we can draw a conclusion that banning the capital punishment is not only international demand,but also the people's needs.A: Since we mention the people's needs here,we could not forget the victim and their families' needs .Togive up putting an extreme criminal to death so easily is against the equality of life and invades the victims’dignity of life. It's better to protect cas(来自: 小龙文档网:英语不应该退出高考辩论赛)ualty rights than protect the criminal human rights.B: If one day the death penalty has no longer necessary, it will be a new chapter of the history of human civilization. of course,it will be a long process.But now,we also need to constantly improve our laws, not to put any innocent person to death execution ground.篇二：辩论赛-当前中国义务教育阶段应不应该取消英语必修课-反方四辩稿第一点、对方辩友（）。
该不该取消英语主科地位辩论作文
该不该取消英语主科地位辩论作文英文回答：Should English be removed as a core subject?In my opinion, English should not be removed as a core subject. English is a global language that is widely spoken and understood. It plays a crucial role in communication, education, and career opportunities. Removing English as a core subject would limit students' ability to communicate effectively and hinder their future prospects.Firstly, English is the language of international communication. In today's interconnected world, English serves as a common language for people from different countries to communicate with each other. It is the language used in international business, diplomacy, and academia. Without a strong foundation in English, students would struggle to participate in global conversations and collaborations.Secondly, English is essential for education. Many academic resources, research papers, and textbooks are written in English. Without proficiency in English,students would be unable to access valuable information and knowledge. They would miss out on the opportunity to learn from the global academic community and stay updated withthe latest developments in their fields of interest.Furthermore, English proficiency opens up a wide rangeof career opportunities. In today's competitive job market, employers often require candidates to have strong English skills. Many multinational companies operate in English-speaking countries or have international clients, and they prefer employees who can communicate effectively in English. Without a solid foundation in English, students may face difficulties in finding good job opportunities and advancing in their careers.Moreover, English is not just a subject to be studiedin isolation. It is a tool for personal growth and self-expression. Through literature, students can exploredifferent cultures, perspectives, and ideas. They can develop critical thinking skills, empathy, and creativity. English also provides a platform for students to express themselves confidently and assertively, which is crucialfor personal and professional success.In conclusion, English should not be removed as a core subject. It is a global language that facilitates communication, education, and career opportunities. By keeping English as a core subject, students can develop the necessary skills to thrive in an interconnected world and unlock their full potential.中文回答：英语主科地位是否应该取消？在我看来，英语不应该被取消为主科。
常见英语辩论赛辩题(3篇)
第1篇一、教育类1. 是否应该将数学和英语作为小学阶段必学科目？2. 是否应该实行素质教育，取消高考？3. 是否应该实行大学招生制度改革，引入综合素质评价？4. 是否应该将体育纳入高考科目？5. 是否应该延长义务教育年限至12年？二、文化类1. 是否应该废除春节，实行西方节日？2. 是否应该加强传统文化教育，推广传统节日？3. 是否应该禁止网络低俗文化？4. 是否应该限制外国电影、电视剧在中国的播放？5. 是否应该保护非物质文化遗产？三、经济类1. 是否应该提高最低工资标准？2. 是否应该限制企业裁员？3. 是否应该实行国有资本经营预算制度？4. 是否应该发展低碳经济，减少碳排放？5. 是否应该取消计划生育政策？四、社会类1. 是否应该加强网络安全监管？2. 是否应该实行实名制，限制网络匿名？3. 是否应该实行公共交通免费政策？4. 是否应该取消城市限行政策？5. 是否应该实行垃圾分类制度？五、国际关系类1. 是否应该加入世界贸易组织（WTO）？2. 是否应该支持自由贸易？3. 是否应该加强国际合作，共同应对全球气候变化？4. 是否应该支持发展中国家的发展？5. 是否应该加强国际反恐合作？六、科技类1. 是否应该禁止人工智能在军事领域的应用？2. 是否应该限制基因编辑技术？3. 是否应该加强网络安全，防止网络攻击？4. 是否应该鼓励发展可再生能源？5. 是否应该限制电子烟的生产和销售？七、政治类1. 是否应该实行多党制？2. 是否应该加强民主监督，防止腐败？3. 是否应该废除死刑？4. 是否应该实行财产公示制度？5. 是否应该限制政府权力，保障公民权利？八、环保类1. 是否应该实行垃圾分类制度？2. 是否应该限制塑料制品的使用？3. 是否应该加强环保宣传教育，提高公民环保意识？4. 是否应该限制化石燃料的使用，发展清洁能源？5. 是否应该加强国际合作，共同应对全球气候变化？九、医疗类1. 是否应该实行全民免费医疗？2. 是否应该加强医德医风建设，提高医疗服务质量？3. 是否应该加强公共卫生体系建设，提高应对突发公共卫生事件的能力？4. 是否应该限制医疗广告，保护患者权益？5. 是否应该鼓励发展中医药，传承中医药文化？这些常见英语辩论赛辩题涵盖了教育、文化、经济、社会、国际关系、科技、政治、环保和医疗等多个领域，为参赛者提供了丰富的素材和思考方向。
英语改革的英文作文
英语改革的英文作文英文：English is a constantly evolving language, and as such, it is important to keep up with the times and make necessary changes to ensure that it remains relevant and useful. English reform is a topic that has been debated for many years, and there are many different opinions on how it should be approached.One of the main arguments for English reform is that the language is too difficult to learn for non-native speakers. This is because English has many irregularities and exceptions to its rules, which can be confusing and frustrating for learners. For example, the spelling of certain words can be inconsistent, such as "through" and "thorough," which are pronounced differently despite having similar spellings.Another argument for English reform is that thelanguage is constantly changing and evolving, and as such,it is important to update it to reflect modern usage. For example, the use of gender-neutral pronouns has become increasingly important in recent years, and there are many people who believe that English should adopt new pronounsto reflect this.However, there are also many people who are opposed to English reform, arguing that it will lead to the loss of traditional forms of the language and make it less distinct. For example, some people argue that the use of slang and informal language in English is a valuable part of its culture, and that reforming the language to make it more standardized would take away from this.In my opinion, English reform is necessary to ensurethat the language remains accessible and useful for everyone. However, it should be approached carefully and thoughtfully, taking into account the opinions of bothnative and non-native speakers. For example, instead of completely overhauling the language, small changes could be made to make it easier to learn and use, such assimplifying spelling rules or introducing new gender-neutral pronouns.中文：英语是一门不断发展的语言，因此，保持与时俱进并进行必要的改革以确保其保持相关和有用是非常重要的。
英语改革的英文作文
英语改革的英文作文英文：English is a constantly evolving language, and as such, it is important to keep up with the times and make necessary reforms. In recent years, there have been discussions about the need for English language reform, particularly with regards to spelling and grammar.One area of English language reform that has gained traction is the simplification of spelling. Many words in English are spelled in a way that does not accurately reflect their pronunciation, which can be confusing for learners and native speakers alike. For example, the word "through" could be spelled as "thru" to better reflect its pronunciation.Another area of reform is the simplification of grammar rules. English grammar can be notoriously complex, with numerous exceptions and irregularities. Simplifying theserules could make the language easier to learn and use. For example, instead of having different verb forms fordifferent tenses, English could adopt a system similar to Chinese, where the same verb form is used for past, present, and future tenses.However, there are also arguments against English language reform. Some argue that the complexities ofEnglish grammar and spelling are what make the language unique and beautiful. Others argue that simplifying the language could lead to a loss of cultural heritage and identity.In my opinion, English language reform should be approached with caution. While simplifying the language could make it more accessible, it is important to preserve the unique qualities and nuances of English that make it such a rich and diverse language.中文：英语是一门不断发展的语言，因此，保持与时俱进并进行必要的改革是非常重要的。
考试利弊英文作文
考试利弊英文作文关于考试利弊英文作文利弊说明段万能模板一：①Some people are in favor of the idea of doing_________________ (主题). ②They point out the fact that_________________ (支持的第一个原因). ③They also argue that_________________ (支持的另一个原因).④There might be some element of truth in these people’s belief. ⑤However, other people stand on a different ground. ⑥They consider it harmful to do . ⑦They firmly point out that______________ (反对的理由)。
利弊说明段万能模板二：①Recently the issue of whether or not_________________ (讨论话题) has been in the limelight and has aroused wide concern in the public. ②There are two major arguments that can be made for. ③For one thing, can bring to (优点一). ④For another, it is widely hold that people usually when (优点二). ⑤But we must not lose sight of the fact that there are also drawbacks to , among which are____________________________ (列举缺点). ⑥For instance, it can be to (举例说明). ⑦In addition, many people find it (形容词)to (第二个缺点).以上是为大家提供的英语作文万能模板——利弊说明段，针对这一类型的作文，大家在平时的学习中，不仅仅要从书本中获得类似的知识点，同时还要同过其他渠道获取，扩宽知识面。
高考制度改革的探讨高中英语作文
高考制度改革的探讨高中英语作文Reform of the College Entrance Examination SystemThe college entrance examination system, known as 'Gaokao' in China, has long been a heated topic of discussion.It is a crucial examination that determines the future path of millions of high school students each year.However, the current system has been criticized for its emphasis on rote learning, high pressure, and lack of flexibility.This essay will explore the possible reforms that could be implemented to improve the system.Firstly, one of the major issues with the current Gaokao system is the emphasis on memorization.Students often spend countless hours studying facts and formulas, rather than developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills.To address this issue, the examination could be revised to include more practical and creative questions that assess a student's ability to apply their knowledge in real-life situations.This would encourage students to develop a deeper understanding of the subjects they are studying, rather than simply memorizing information.Secondly, the high pressure associated with the Gaokao examination needs to be addressed.The current system places immense pressure on students to perform well, which can lead to anxiety and stress.To alleviate this pressure, the examination could be spread over several days, rather than being condensed into a single day.This would allow students tofocus on one subject at a time, and reduce the overall stress associated with the examination.Finally, the current Gaokao system lacks flexibility.The examination is designed to assess a student's knowledge in a limited number of subjects, and does not take into account a student's interests, talents, or potential in other areas.To address this issue, the examination could be supplemented with additional assessments that evaluate a student's extracurricular activities, volunteer work, and personal qualities.This would provide a more comprehensive view of a student's abilities and potential, and allow for a more personalized and fair assessment process.In conclusion, the Gaokao system in China needs to be reformed to address the issues of memorization, high pressure, and lack of flexibility.By implementing these reforms, we can create a more balanced and fair examination system that assesses a student's abilities in a comprehensive and meaningful way.。
讨论应不应该考试的英语对话四个人
讨论应不应该考试的英语对话四个人Person A: Hey everyone, I think we should discuss whether exams are necessary in English classes. What are your thoughts on this?Person B: Well, I personally believe that exams are an essential part of learning English. They provide a structured way to assess our language skills and knowledge. Without exams, it would be difficult to measure our progress or identify areas where we need improvement.Person C: I understand your point, but I think exams can be quite stressful and sometimes don't accurately reflect our actual language abilities. I believe there are other effective ways to assess our English proficiency, such as continuous evaluations, projects, and presentations.Person D: I agree with Person C. Exams tend to focus more on memorization and regurgitation of information rather than practical application of language skills. English is a language meant to be spoken and used in real-life situations, so it would be more beneficial to have assessments that simulate those scenarios.Person A: I see your perspective, but I believe exams can still play a role in testing our understanding of grammar rules, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. However, I think a combination of different assessment methods, including exams and practical tasks, would be the most effective approach.Person B: That's a fair point, Person A. A balanced approach that incorporates both exams and other forms of assessment could provide a comprehensive evaluation of our language proficiency. It would also allow us to develop different skills and competencies required for English communication.Person C: I agree. Ultimately, the goal of learning English is to become proficient in using the language for practical purposes. By diversifying assessment methods, we can better prepare ourselves to apply English in real-world contexts.Person D: I think we can also consider the specific learning objectives of the English class. If the emphasis is on communication and practical language skills, exams might not be the most suitable form of assessment. However, if the focus is on grammar and vocabulary, exams could still have a place in the evaluation process.Person A: It seems like we all agree that a balanced approach to assessment, considering both exams and alternative methods, would be the most appropriate. This way, we can cater to different learning styles and goals while ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of our English abilities.Person B: Absolutely. It's important to remember that the purpose of exams is to evaluate ourprogress and provide feedback for improvement. As long as the assessments are fair, relevant, and aligned with the learning objectives, they can be valuable tools in our English education.Person C: I'm glad we could have this discussion and consider different perspectives. It's important to continually reflect on our teaching and learning methods to ensure the best outcomes for everyone involved.Person D: Agreed. By embracing a more holistic approach to assessment, we can create a more engaging and effective learning environment for English education.翻译：A：大家好，我想我们应该讨论一下英语课是否需要考试。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
英语改革辩论稿正方：应该改革一辩:大多数人现在学英语不是为了实用，而是为了考试，它们学完英语后仍无法流利的同外国人对话，而且在英语这门科目上所花费的时间并不比其他科目少，有时甚至比其他科目还多，这大大压缩了其他科目的学习时间，而且语言类学习若不注重实用性，很容易让学生感到枯燥，削弱学生的动力。
所以我方认为应该改革。
First Debater: Most people now learn English not for practical, but for the exam, they are still unable After studying English fluently with foreigners dialogue, but this time in English subjects spent no less than in other subjects, sometimes even more than in other subjects, which greatly reduced the time to learn other subjects, and language classes to learn if focus on practicality, it is easy for students to feel boring, undermine students' motivation. So we think we should reform.二辩：1.改革是无时无刻不在进行的，不能因为前人的一些努力而一劳永逸。
2.成功不成功，不知道对方是怎么定义的。
那么改革可以让现有的英语考试制度更加成功。
3.英语高考现在必然不会贸然取消，但是一定会对整个英语考试制度进行改革，包括英语高考。
Second debater:1.a reform is not carried out all the time, not because of some previous efforts once and for all.2. successful or not, I do not know how the other is defined. So reform can make the existing system more successful English exam.3. English entrance is now certainly will not rush to cancel, but must be carried out throughout the English examination system reform, including the English exam.三辩：1.请问对方为什么这么肯定说取消了英语高考会导致国人的英语水平显著下降，有进行过什么实质性的调研吗？2.随着中国的各个方面正在与国际接轨，务必会有越来越多的人接触到英语，使用英语，无论是对话还是阅读。
对方在这样的世界发展背景下还认为没有那么多中国人会去使用英语吗？Third debater:1. Why do you say for sure that I ask the other party to cancel the English entrance will lead to a significant decline in the standard of English people, there is no substantive research conducted it?2. With the various aspects of China's working with international standards, be sure there will be more and more people come into contact with English, English, either dialogue or read. Each other in such a world development background alsobelieve not so many Chinese people to use English?四辩：法国高等教育分为两个层次，精英教育和大众教育，分别对应工程师学院和大学，工程师学院毕业要求托业或者托福成绩过线，大学大多对英语没任何硬性要求。
这就造成结果是有些群体英语说的非常好，但普通人或者即使在一般的政府办事机构普遍不会英语。
这其中有法国的文化自豪因素，更重要是他们知道法国人不是离了英语就过不下去。
但这也丝毫没有影响法国的创新能力。
回到中国，答案就非常明显了。
所以我方认为，作为一个英语非母语的大国，应该改革把英语作为高等教育选拔考试的必考科目的这种英语考试制度。
英语教育应差别化，愿者多学，能者多学，需要者多学。
Forth Debater: French higher education is divided into two levels, elite education and public education, corresponding to engineering schools and universities, engineering schools graduation requirements TOEIC or TOEFL scores over the line, most of the university did not have any mandatory requirement for English. This result is caused by some groups speak English very well, but ordinary or general government offices generally do not speak English even in. Of which there are cultural factors that French pride, and more importantly, they know that the French are not from the English would not go on. But that did not affect the ability to innovate France. Back to China, the answer is very obvious. So we believe that, as a country with a non-native speakers of English, should reform the higher education entrance exams in English as compulsory subjects of this English test system. English education should be differentiated, those who are willing to learn, those who can learn, who need to learn more.反方：不应改革一辩:现在的英语考试制度是历代教育家们一次次通过汲取失败中的教训才有了现在的样子。
到目前为止，现在的英语考试制度可以说很大程度上是成功的。
高考本身是国人非常重视的一个考试，很多人会花很多精力去学习，取消英语高考会显著地下降国人的英语水平。
所以我方认为不应改革。
First debater: the current examination system is the ancient English educator who time and again by the failure to learn the lessons only now look. So far, the current English examination system can be said to be largely successful. College entrance exam itself is a very important country, many people will spend a lot of effort to learn, to cancel the English entrance will significantly decrease people's English proficiency. So we think we should reform.二辩：1.请问对方怎么定义实用的。
我只知道现在有一定英语水平的人可以阅读一定量的英文文献和英文相关文章。
2.绝大多数中国人并不需要同外国人对话，事实上，也没有那么多的外国人可供用来同中国人对话。
3.至于花费时间的问题，因人而异。
比如学习英语的方法和上课是否认真听讲等。
Second Debater:1. Will the other how to define practical. I only know that there are certain people who can read English proficiency certain amount of English literature and English related articles.2. The vast majority of Chinese people do not need a dialogue with foreigners, in fact, not so much to foreigners for dialogue with the Chinese people.3. As regards the time-consuming, vary. For example, the methods and classes to learn English is to listen carefully and so on.三辩：1.成功我们定义为现在的英语考试制度可以让很大部分的中国人的英语水平保持在一个较高水平，比如能够阅读英文文献和相关文章。
还有就是对方一定认为改革后的考试制度一定会比现在更加成功吗。
2.中国的确在国际上越来越有影响力，会有越来越多的人接触英语，但是这部分人与整个中国相比，只不过是九牛一毛。