【英语二】2021考研-全真模拟题2套试卷及答案解析

合集下载

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试 英语(二)真题+解析答案

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试 英语(二)真题+解析答案

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)(科目代码:204)考生注意事项1. 答题前,考生须在试题册指定位置上填写考生编号和考生姓名;在答题卡指定位置上填写报考单位、考生姓名和考生编号,并涂写考生编号信息点。

2. 选择题的答案必须涂写在答题卡相应题号的选项上,非选择题的答案必须书写在答题纸指定位置的边框区域内,写在其它地方无效。

3. 填(书)写部分必须使用黑色字迹签字笔或钢笔书写,涂写部分必须使用2B铅笔填涂。

4. 考试结束,将答题卡和试题册一并装入试题袋中交回。

Section ⅠUse of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)It's not difficult to set targets for staff. It is much harder, ___1___ to understand their negative harder, consequences. Most work-related behaviors have multiple components. ___2___ one and the others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you’ll ___3___ see how this works with drivers. Watch people get on and show their tickets. Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get on without paying? Of course! Are there inspectors to, ___4___ that people have paid? Possibly, but very few. And people who run for the bus? They are ___5___. How about jumping lights? Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists.Why? Because the target is ___6___. People complained that buses were late and infrequent. ___7___, the number of buses and bus lanes were increased, and drivers were ___8___ or punished according to the time they took. And drivers hit these targets. But they_ ___9___ hit cyclists. If the target was changed to ___10___ you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing. If the criterion changed to safety, you would get more ___11___ drivers who obeyed traffic laws. But both these criteria would be at the expense of time.There is another ___12___: people became immensely inventive in hitting targets. Have you ___13___ that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a ___14___ is meant to take. A one-hour flight is now billed as a two-hour flight.The ___15___ of the story is simple. Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiplecriteria. Choose one criterion and you may well ___16___ others. Everything can be done faster and made cheaper, but there is a ___17___. Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first. All good targets should have multiple criteria ___18___ critical factors such as time, money, quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to ___19___ just one or even two dimensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better ___20___ the objective.1.A. therefore B. again C. moreover D. however2.A. identify B. assess C. emphasize D. explain3.A. curiously B. quickly C. eagerly D. nearly4.A. check B. prove C. recall D. claim5.A threatened B mocked C. ignored D. blamed6.A. hospitality B. competition C. punctuality D. innovation7.A. Yet B. Besides C. Still D. So8.A. rewarded B. trained C grouped D. hired9.A. rather B. also C. once D. only10.A comfort B. efficiency C. security D. revenue11.A cautious B. quiet C. diligent D. friendly12.A. purpose B prejudice C. policy D. problem13.A. revealed B noticed C. admitted D. reported14.A. break B. departure C. transfer D. trip15.A. background B. moral C. style D. form16.A. sacrifice B. criticize C. tolerate D. interpret17.A. secret B. cost C. product D. task18.A. relating to B. calling for C. accounting for D. leading to19.A. predict B restore C. specify D. create20.A. review B. achieve C. present D. modifySection ⅡReading ComprehensionPart ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1"Reskilling" is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future in which a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind.We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as will the requirements of the jobs that remain. Research by the World Economic Forum finds that on average 42 percent of the "core skills" within job roles will change by 2022. That is a very short timeline.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one. For individual companies, the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace them with those whose skills are. That does not always happen. AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company that decided to do massive reskilling program rather than go with a fire-and-hire strategy. Other companies had also pledged to create their own plans. When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy, though, the focus usually turns to government to handle. Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best, and have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers, even at times and in regions where unemployment is high.With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February.at 3.5 per cent and 5.5 per cent respectively, unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to 13.3 per cent and 13.7 per cent, and although many worker shortages had disappeared, not all had done so. In the medical field, to take an obvious example, the pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel.Of course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in a few weeks, no matter who pays for it. But even if you cannot close that gap, maybe you can close others, and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned. That seems to be thecase in Sweden, where the pandemic kick-started a retraining program where business as well as government had a role.Reskilling in this way would be challenging in a North American context. You can easily imagine a chorus of "you can’t do that," because teachers or nurses or whoever have special skills, and using any support staff who has been quickly trained is bound to end in disaster. Maybe. Or maybe it is something that can work 'ell in Sweden, with its history of Co-operation between business, labor and government, but not in North America where our history is very different. Then again, maybe it is akin to wartime, when extraordinary things take place, but it is business as usual after the fact. And yet, as in war the pandemic is teaching us that many things, including rapid reskilling, can be done if there is a will to do them. In any case Sweden’s work force is now more skilled, in more things, and more flexible than it was before.Of course, reskilling programs, whether for pandemic needs or the post pandemic world, are expensive and at a time when everyone’s budgets are lean this may not be the time to implement them. Then again, extending income support programs to get us through the next months is expensive, too, to say nothing of the cost of having a swath of long-term unemployed in the POST-COVID years. Given that, perhaps we should think hard about whether the pandemic can jump-start us to a place where reskilling becomes much more than a buzzword.21.Research by the World Economic forum suggests_________.A. an urgent demand for new job skillsB. an increase in full-time employmentC. a steady growth of job opportunitiesD. a controversy about the "core skills"22.AT&T is cited to show _________.A. the characteristics of reskilling programsB. the importance of staff appraisal standardsC. an immediate need for government supportD. an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada_________.A. have proved to be inconsistentB. have driven up labor costsC. have appeared to be insufficientD. have met with fierce opposition24.We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was__________.A. a sign of economic recoveryB. a call for policy adjustmentC. a change in hiring practicesD. a lack of medical workers25.Scandinavian Airlines decided to __________.A. create jobs vacancies for the unemployedB. prepare their laid-off workers for other jobsC. retrain their cabin staff for better servicesD. finance their staff's college educationText 2With the global population predicted to hit close to 10 billion by 2050, and forecasts that agricultural production in, some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace, food security is increasingly making headlines. In the UK, it has become a big talking point recently too, for rather particular reason: Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importing food. The country produces only about 60 percent of the food it eats, down from almost three-quarters in the late 1980s. A move back to self-sufficiency, the argument goes, would boost the farming industry, political sovereignty and even the nation’s health. Sounds great—but bow feasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds, UK, 85 per cent of the country's total land area is associated with meat and dairy production. That supplies 80 per cent of what is consumed, so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn't allow us to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures, but they are still grave. To become much more self-sufficient, the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods, and probably also farm more intensively—meaning fewer green fields, and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn't help. There is a good reason why the UK is dominated by animal husbandry: most of its terrain doesn't have the right soil or climate to grow crops on a commercial basis. Just 25 percent of the county's land is suitable for crop-growing, most of which is already occupied by arable fields. Even if we converted all thesuitable land to fields of fruit and veg—which would involve taking out all the nature reserves and removing thousands of people from their homes—we would achieve only a 30 percent boost in crop production.Just 23 percent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown, so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only 30 percent of our fresh produce needs. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains, sugars, seeds and oils that provide us with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self-sufficient in UK would_________.A. be hindered by its population groundB. become a priority of governmentC. pose a challenge to its farming industryD. contribute to the nation's well-being27.The report by the University of Leeds shows that in the UK_________.A. farmland has been inefficiently utilizedB. factory-style production needs reformingC. most land is used for meat and dairy productionD. more green fields will be converted for farming28.Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to__________.A. its farming technologyB. its dietary traditionC. its natural conditionsD. its commercial interests29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people__________.A. rely largely on imports for fresh produceB. enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumptionC. are seeking effective ways to cut caloorie intakeD. are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author's attitude to food self-sufficient in the UK is__________.A. defensiveB. doubtfulC. tolerantD. optimisticText 3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in2015, it picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft's own Office dominates the market for "productivity" software, but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world.Both apps, however, were later scrapped after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many acqui-hires" that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for tech talent.To Microsoft's critics, the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path. "They bought the seedlings and closed them down," complained Paul Arnold, a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures, putting paid to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoft declined to comment.Like other start-up investors, Mr Arnold’s own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result: “I think these things are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy?I don't know”The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. This week, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than 5.5tn dollars, rifling through such small deals -many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise might seem beside the point. Between them, the five companies (Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook) have spent an average of only 3.4bn dollars a year on sub-1bn dollars acquisitions over the past five years a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than$130bn of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.However, critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a “buy and kill” tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wunderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions?A. Their market values declinedB. Their engineers were retainedC. Their tech features improvedD. Their products were re-priced32.Microsoft's critics believe that the big tech companies tend to __________.A. exaggerate their product qualityB. treat new tech talent unfairlyC. eliminate their potential competitionsD. ignore public opinions33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might__________.A. harm the national economyB. worse market competitionC. discourage start up investorsD. weaken big tech companies34.The US Federal Trade Commission intends to__________.A. supervise start-up's operationsB. encourage research collaborationC. limit Big Tech's expansionD. examine small acquisitions35.For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisitions have_________.A. raised few management challengesB. brought little financial pressureC. set an example for future dealsD. generated considerable profitsText 4We’re fairly good at judging people based on first impressions, thin slices of experience ranging from a glimpse of a photo to five-minute interaction, and deliberation can be not only extraneous but intrusiv e. In one study of the ability she dubbed "thin slicing,” the late psychologist Nalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent 10-second video clips of professors and to rate the instructor’s overall effectiveness. Their ratings correlated strongly with students end-of-semester ratings. Another set of participants had to count backward from 1,000 by nines as they watched the clips, occupying their conscious working memory. Their ratings were just as accurate, demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically, another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for theirjudgment, before giving the rating. Accuracy dropped dramatically. Ambady suspected that deliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues, such as certain gestures of utterances, rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression. She found similar interference when participants watched 15-second clips of pairs of people and judged whether they were strangers, friends, or dating partners.Other research shows we 're better at detecting deception and sexual orientation from thin slices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection. "It' s as if you' re driving a stick shift," says Judith Hall, a psychologist at Northeastern University, " and if you start thinking about it too much, you can' t remember what you' re doing. But if you go on automatic pilot, you re fine. Much of our social life is like that."Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferenc es. College students’ ratings of strawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts' opinions when the students weren’t asked to analyze their rationale. And people made car-buying decisions that were both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings rather than on details, but only if the decision was complex —when they had a lot of information to process.Intuition’s special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances. In one study, participants completed a battery of eight tasks, including four that tapped reflective thinking (discerning rules comprehending vocabulary) and four that tapped intuition and creativity (generating new products or figures of speech). Then they rated the degree to which they had used intuition ("gut feelings," "hunches," "my heart"). Use of their gut hurt their performance on the first four tasks, as expected, and helped them on the rest. Sometimes the heart is smarter than the head.36.Nalini Ambaby's study deals with__________.A. instructor-student interactionB. the power of people's memoryC. the reliability of first impressionsD. people's ability to influence others37.In Ambaby's study, rating accuracy dropped when participantsA. focused on specific detailsB. discussed with one anotherC. watched shorter video clipsD. gave the rating in limited time38.Judith Hall mentions driving to mention that___________.A. memory can be selectiveB. reflection can be distractingC. social skills must be cultivatedD. deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions, it is advisable to__________.A. follow your feelingsB. list your preferencesC. seek expert adviceD. collect enough data40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?A. Generating new products takes timeB. Objective thinking may boost intuitivenessC. Vocabulary comprehension needs creativityD. Intuition may affect reflective tasksPart BDirections: Read the following text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subtitle from the list A-G for each of the numbered paragraphs (41-45). There are two extra subtitles which you do not need to use. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)A. Stay calmB. Stay humbleC. Don't make judgmentsD. Be realistic about the risksE. Decide whether to waitF. Ask permission to disagreeG. Identify a shared goalHow to Disagree with Someone More Powerful than YouYour boss proposes a new initiative you think won't work. Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you think is unrealistic. What do you say when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do? How do you decide whether it's, worth speaking up? And if you do, what exactly should you say? Here's how to disagree with someone more powerful than you.41._________________________________You may decide it's best to hold off on voicing your opinion. Maybe you haven't finished thinking the problem through, the whole discussion was a surprise to you, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks. If you think other people are going to disagree too, you might want to gather your army first. People can contribute experience or information to your thinking —all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid. It's also a good, idea to delay the conversation if you are in a meeting or other public space. Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.42.__________________________________Before you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about —it may be “the credibility of their team on getting a project done on time,” says Grenny. You're more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose.” When you do speak up, don't assume the link will be clear. You'll want to state it overtly, contextualizing your statements so that you're seen not as a disagreeable underling but as a colleague who's trying to advance a shared goal. The discussion will then become more like a chess game thana boxing match.43.__________________________________This step may sound overly deferential, but it's a smart way to give the powerful person psychological safety and control. You can say something like, “I know we seem to be moving toward a first-quarter commitment here. I have reasons to think that won't work. I'd like to lay out my reasoning. Would that be OK?” This gives the person a choice, allowing them to verbally opt in, says Grenny. And, assuming they say yes, it will make you feel more confident about voicing your disagreement.44.___________________________________You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red, but do whatever you can to remain neutral in both your words and actions. When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety, it undercuts the message. It sends a mixed message, and your counterpart gets to choose what to read, she explains. Deep breaths can help, as can speaking more slowly and deliberately. When we feel panicky, we tend to talk louder and faster. Simply slowing thepace and talking in an even tone helps the other person calm down and does the same for you. It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren't.45.___________________________________Emphasize that you’re offering your opinion, not gospel truth. “It may be a well-informed, well-researched opinion, but it's still an opinion, so talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence. Instead of saying something like, “If we set an end-of-quarter deadline, we'll never make it,” say, “This is just my opinion, but I don’t see how we will make that deadline.” Having asserted your position, “demonstrate equal curiosity about other views," says Grenny. Remind the person that this is your point of view," and then invite critique. Be genuinely open to hearing other opinions.Section ⅢTranslationDirections: In this section there is a text in English. Translate it into Chinese, write your translation on ANSWER SHEET 2. (15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection, laughter and warmth. While that may well be true, researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belong that we didn't expect.In our series of studies, researchers instructed Chicago area commuters using public transportation to strike up а conversation with someone near them. On average, participants who followed the instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence. The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interaction with strangers, it is often due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of the time, however, this belief is false. As it turns out, many people are actually perfectly willing to talk and may even be flattered to receive your attention.Section ⅣWritingPart A47. Directions:Suppose you are organizing an online meeting. Writing an email to Jack, an international student, to1)invite him to participate, and2)tell him the details.You should write about 100 words on ANSWER SHETE.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use “Zhang Wei” instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)Part B48. Directions:Write an essay based on the chart below. In your writing, you should1) interpret the chart, and2) give your commentsYou should write about 150 words on the ANSWER SHEET. (15 points)2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语(二)参考答案Section I Use of English1. D however2. C emphasize3. B quickly4. A check5. C ignored6. C punctuality7. D So8. A rewarded9. B also10. D revenue11. A cautious12. D problem13. B noticed14. D trip15. B moral16. A sacrifice17. B cost18. A relating to19. C specify20. B achieveSection ⅡReading Comprehension Text121. A. an urgent demand for new job skills22. D. an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy23. C. have appeared to be insufficient24. D. a lack of medical workers25. B. prepare their laid-off workers for other jobsText226. D contribute to the nation's well-being27. C most land is used for meat and dairy production28. C its natural conditions29. A rely largely on imports for fresh produce30. B doubtfulText331. B Their engineers were retained32. C eliminate their potential competitions33. A harm the national economy34. D examine small acquisitions35. B brought little financial pressureText436. C the reliability of first impressions37. A focused on specific details38. B reflection can be distracting39. A follow your feelings40. D Intuition may affect reflective tasksPart B41 E. Decide whether to wait42 G. Identify a shared goal43 F. Ask permission to disagree44 A. Stay calm45 B. Stay humbleSection Ⅲ Translation46【参考译文】我们通常认为朋友和家人是我们关系、快乐和温暖的最大源泉。

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题及答案

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题及答案

2021年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1.(10 points)It's not difficult to set targets for staff. It is much harder, 1 to understand their negative consequences.Most work-related behaviors have multiple components. 2 one and the others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you'll 3 see how this works with drivers.Watch people get on and show their tickets.Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get on without paying? Of course! Are there inspectors to 4 that people have paid?Possibly, but very few.And people who run for the bus? They are5.How about jumping lights? Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists.Why? Because the target is 6.People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7 the number of buses and bus lanes were increased,and drivers were 8 or punished according to the time they took. And drivers hit these targets.But they 9 hit cyclists.If the target was changed to 10,you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing.If the criterion changed to safety, you would get more 11 drivers who obeyed traffic laws.But both these criteria would be at the expense of time.There is another 12:people became immensely inventive n hinting targets.Have you 13 that you can leave on a flight an hour late but stile arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a 14 is meant to take.A one-hour light is now ballad as a two-hour flight.The 15 of the story is simple. Most jobs are muti dimensional, with multiple criteria. Choose one criterion and you may well 16 others.Everything Can be done faster and made cheaper,but there is a 17. Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first.All good targets should have multiple criteria 18 critical factors such as time,money.quality and customer feedback.The trick is not only to 19 just one or even two dimensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better 20 the objective.1.[A] therefore [B]however [C] again [D] moreover2.[A] Emphasize [B]Identify [C] Assess [D] Explain3.[A] nearly [B]curio [C] eagerly [D] quickly4.[A] claim [B] prove [C] check [D] recall5.[A] threatened [B] ignored [C] mocked [D] blamed6.[A] punctuality [B] hospitality [C] competition [D] innovation7.[A] Yes [B] So [C] Besides [D] Slit8.[A] hired [B] trained [C] rewarded [D] grouped9.[A] only [B] rather [C] once [D] also10.[A]comfort [B] revenue [C]efficiency [D]security11.[A] fried [B] quiet [C] cautious [D] diligent12. [A] purpose [B] problem [C] prejudice [D] policy13.[A] report [B] revealed [C] admitted [D] noticed14.[A] break [B] trip [C] departure [D] transfer15.[A] moral [B] background [C] style [D] form16.[A] interpret [B] criticize [C] sacrifice [D] tolerate17.[A] task [B] secret [C] product [D] cast18.[A] leading to [B] calling for [C] relating to [D] accounting for19.[A] specify [B]predict [C] restore [D]create20.[A] modify [B] review [C] present [D] achieveSection II Reading ComprehensionPart A Directions:Read the foll owing four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C, or D.Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1(40 points)Text 1"Deskilling" is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future in which a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind. We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as will the requirements of the jobs that remain. Research by the World Economic Forum finds that on average 42 percent of the "core skills" within job roles will change by 2022. That is a very short timeline.The question of who should pay for res killing is a thorny one. For individual companies, the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace them with those whose skills are. That does not always happen. AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company that decided to do massive res killing program rather than go with a fire-and-hire strategy. Other companies had also pledged to create their own plans. When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy, though, the focus usually turns to government to handle. Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best, and have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers, even at times and in regions where unemployment is high.With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February, at 3.5 United States were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to13.3 per cent and 13.7 per cent, and although many worker shortages had disappeared, not all had done so. In the medical field, to take an obvious example, the pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel.Of course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in a few weeks. But even if you cannot close that gap, may be you can close others, and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned. That seems to be the case in Sweden: When forced to furlough 90 per cent of their cabin staff, Scandinavian Airlines decided to start up a short retraining program that reskilled the laid-off workers to support hospital staff. The effort was a collective one and involved other companies as well as a Swedish university.21.Research by the World Economic forum suggests_________.A.an urgent demand for new job skillsB.an increase in full-time employmentC.a steady growth of job opportunitiesD.a controversy about the " core skills"22.AT&T is cited to show _________.A.the characteristics of res killing programsB.the importance of staff appraisal standardsC.an immediate need for government supportD.an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in CanadaA. have driven up labour costsB. have proved to be inconsistentC. have met with fierce oppositionD. have appeared to be insufficient24. We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there wasA. a call for policy adjustment.B. a change in hiring practices.C.a lack of medical workersD.a sign of economic recovery.25. Scandinavian Airlines decided to_A. Great job vacancies for the unemployed.B.Prepare their laid-off workers for other jobs.C.Retrain their cabin staff for better servicesD.finance their staff′s college educationText 2With the global population predicted to hit close to 10 blini by 2050,and forecasts that agricultural production in some regions will bed to nearly double to keep pace,food security is increasingly making headlines. In the UK, it has become a big talking point recently too,for a rather particular reason: Br exit.Br exit is sen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importing food.The country produces only about 60 per cent of the food it eats,down form almost the-quarters in the late 1980s.A move back to sufficient,the argument goes, would bots the farming industry.political sovereignty and even the nation's health. Sounds great — but how feasible is this vision?According to are port on UK food production from the University of Leeds,UK,85 per cent of the country's total land area disassociated with meat and dairy production. That supplies 80 per cent of what is consumed,so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn't allow us to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures, but they are still grave. To become much more self sufficient, the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods,and probably also farm more intensively —meaning fewer green fields and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn't help. There is a good reason why the UK is dominated by animal husbandry: most of its terrain doesn't have the right soil or climate to grow crops on commercial basis.Just 25 per cent of the country's land is suitable for crop-growing, most of which is already occupied by arable fields. Even if we converted all the suitable land to fields of fruit and veg — which would involve taking out all he nature reserves and removing thousands of people from their homes — we would achieve only a 30 per centboost in crop production.Just 23 per cent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown,so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only 30 per cent of our fresh produce needs. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains,sugars, seeds and oils that provide us with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self sufficiency in the UK would[A] be hindered by its population growth[B] contribute to the nations well-being[C] become a priority of the government[D] post a challenge to its farming industry27.The report by the University of Leeds showed that in the UK[A] farmland has been inefficient[B] factory style production needs reforming[C]most land is used for meat and dairy production[D] more cornfields will be converted for farming28.Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to_—[A] its farming technology[B] its dietary tradition[C] its natural conditions[D] its commercial interests29.It can bel eared from the last paragraph that British people__[A] rely largely on imports for fresh produce[B]enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumption[C] are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intake[D] are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author's attitude to food self-efficiency in the UK is____[A] defensive[B] doubtfu1[C] tolerant[D] optimisticText 3Big Tech's 'buy and kill' tactics come under scrutiny When Microsoft bought task management app W under list an c mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015, it picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft′s owe Office dominates the market for "productivity" software, but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smart phone world.Both apps, however, were later scrapped, after Microsoft said it has used their best features in its own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many "Acquit-hires" that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for tech talent.To Microsoft's critics, the fates of W under list and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path. "They bought the seedlings and closed them down," complained Paul Arnold, a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures, putting paid to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoft declined tc comment.Like other start-up investors,Mr Harold's own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result: "I think these things are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? I don' t know."The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. This week, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions oven the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, there quest has raised the prospect ofregulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than $5.5tn, rifling ugh such small deals — many of them much less prominent Thar Wanderlust and Sunrise — might seem beside the point. Between them, the five companies(Apple,Microsoft, Google,Amazon an ace book) have spent an average of only $3.4bn a year on sub-$1br intuitions over the past five years — a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than$130bn of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.However,critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a "buy and kill" tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wanderlust and Sunrise after their acquisitions?A. Their engineers were retained.B. Their market values declined.C.Their tech features improved.D. Their products were re-priced.32.Microsoft's critics believe that the big tech companies tend to_A. exaggerate their product qualityB.eliminate their potential competitorsC.treat new tech talent unfairlyD.ignore public opinions33.Paula mold is concerned that small acquisitions might_A. weaken big tech companiesB. worsen market competitionC. harm the national economyD. discourage start-up investors34.The US Federal Trade Commission intends to_A. limit Big Tech's expansionB. encourage research collaborationC. examine small acquisitionsD.supervise start-operatives35.For the five biggest tech companies,their small acquisitions haveA. brought tilt financial pressureB.raised few management challengesC.set an example for future dealsD. generated considerable profitsText4We're fairly good a judging people based on frat impressions thin slices of experience ranging from a grim photographs to a five-minute interaction.and deliberation can be not only extraneous but intrusive l none study of the ability she dubbed"thin slicing."the late psychologist Na line Lambada asked participants to watch silentI0-second video clips of professors and to rate the instructor' coverall effectiveness. Their ratings correlated strongly with students' end-of-semester ratings. Another set of participants had to count backward from 1(00) by nines as they watched the clips. occupying their conscious working memory. Their ratings were just as accurate,demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically,another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for their judgment. before giving the rating. Accuracy dropped dramatically. Lambada suspected that deliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues,such as certain gestures or utterances,rather than letting the complex interplay of sublet signals form a holistic impression.She found similarinterference where participants watched 15-second clips of pairs of people and judged whether they were strangers, friends, or dating partners.Other research shows we' re better at detecting deception and sexual orientation from thin slices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection."It's as if you re driving a stick shift,"says Judith Hall,a psychologist a No rhea stem University,"and if you start thinking about it too much,you can't remember what you're doing.But if you go on automatic pilot, you're fine.Much of our social life is like that."Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences College studentships of strawberry jams and college courses aligned better with expressionists when the students weren't t asked to analyze their rationale, And people made car-buying decisions that were both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feigns rather than on details but only if the decision was complex-when they had a lot of information to process — Intuition's special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances.In one study, particle completed a battery of eight tasks.including four that tapped reflective thinking (discerning rules. Comprehending vocabulary)and four that tapped intuition and creativity(generating new products or figures of speech)Then they rated the degree to which they had used intuition"gut feelings," hunches,"my heart"),Us of their gut hurt their performance on the fist four tasks,as expected, and helped them on the rest Sometimes the heart is smarter than the head.36.Catalina Milady's study deals with[A] the power of people's memory[B] the reliability of first impressions[C] instructor- student interaction[D] people's ability to influence others37.In Milady's study, rating accuracy dropped when participants_[A] focused on specific details[B] gave the rating in limited time[C] watched shorter video clips[D] discussed with one another38.Judith Hall mentions driving to show that ____.[A] reflection can be distracting[B] memory may be selective[C] social skills must be cultivated[D] deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions,it is advisable to_[A] collect enough data[B] list your preferences[C] seek expert advice[D] follow your feelings40.What can agleam form the last paragraph?[A] Generating new products takes time[B] Intuition may affect reflective tasks[C] Vocabulary comprehension needs creativity CATION GROUP[D] Objective thinking may boost intuitivenessPart BDirections:Read the flowing text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subheading from the list A-G for each numbered paragraphs(41-45).There are two extra subheadings which you do Ned to use.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)A. Stay calm.B. Stay humble.C. Decide whether to waitD. Be realistic about the risks.E. Don't make judgement.F. Identify a shared goal.G. Ask permission to disagree.How to disagree with someone more powerful than you Your boss proposes a new initiative you think won't work.Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you believe is unrealistic. What do you see when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do? How do you decide whether it's worth speaking up? And if you do, what exactly should you say? Here's how to disagree with someone more powerful than you.41. CYou may decide it's best to hold off on voicing your opinion.Maybe you haven't finished thinking the problem through, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks.If you think other people are going to disagree too,you might want to gather your army first.People can contribute experience or information to your thinking — all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid.It's also a good idea to delay the conversation if you are in a meeting or other public space.Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.42. FBefore you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about — it may be the credibility of their team or getting a project done on time.You're more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose. State it overtly, contextualizing your statements so that you're seen not as a disagreeable subordinate but as a colleague who's trying to advance a common objective. The discussion will then become more like a chess game than a boxing match.43. GThis step may sound overly deferential but it's a smart way to give the powerful person psychological safety and control.You can see something like,"I know we sen to be moving toward a is t quarter commitment here.I have reasons to think that won't work. I'd like to layout my reasoning. Would that be OK?"This gives the person a choice,allowing him to verbally opt in. And,assuming he says yes,it will make you fell more confident about voicing your disagreement.44. AYou might feel your heart racing or your face tuning red,but do whatever you can to remain natural in both your words and actions. When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety, it undercuts the ms sage. It sends a mixed message,and your counterpart gets to choose what signals to read.Deep breaths can help,as can speaking more slowly and deliberately. When we fell panicky,we tend to talk louder and faster.Simply slowing the pace and talking in an even tone helps the other person cool down and does the same for you. It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren't.45. BEmphasize that you're only offering your opinion,not gospel truth.It may be a well-informed, well-researched opinion,but it's till an opinion, so talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence.Instead of saying,"If we set an end-of-quarter deadline,we will never make it,"say,"This is just my opinion,but I don't see how we will make that deadline."Having asserted your opinion(as a position,not as a fact),demonstrate equal curiosity about other views. Remind the person that this is your point of view,and then invite critique. Be open to hearing other opinions.Section III Translation46. Directions;Translate the following text from English into Chinese.Write your translation on ANSWER SHEET.(15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection. laughter,and warmth. While that may well be-true,researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging that we didn't expect.In one series of studies,researchers instructed Chicago-area commuters using public transportation to strike up a conversation with some one near them.On average,participants who followed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence.The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangest, it's fen due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of thetime,however, this be lief is false.As it tuns out,many people are actually perfectly willing to talk—and may even be flattered to receive your attention.【参考范文】我们通常认为朋友和家庭成员是我们交流,快乐和温暖的最大源泉。

2021年考研英语二真题及答案

2021年考研英语二真题及答案

2021年考研英语二真题及答案Section ⅠUse of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, Cor D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)It's not difficult to set targets for staff . It is much harder, 1 ,to understand their negativeconsequences. Most work-related behaviors have multiple components. 2 one and the othersbecome distorted. Travel on a London bus and you'll 3 see how this works with drivers. Watch people get on and show their tickets. Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get on without paying? Of course ! Are there inspectors to 4 that people have paid? Possibly, but very few. And people who run for the bus? They are 5 . How about jumping lights? Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists. Why? Because the target is 6 . People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7 , the number of buses and bus lanes were increased, and drivers were 8 or punished according to the time they took. And drivers hit these targets. But they 9 hit cyclists. If the target was changed to 10 , you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing. If the criterion changed to safety, you would get more 11 drivers who obeyed traffic laws. But both these criteria would be at the expense of time. There is another 12 : people became immensely inventive in hitting targets. Have you 13 that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a 14 is meant to take. A one-hour fight is now ballad as a two-hour flight. The 15 of the story is simple. Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiple criteria. Choose one criterion and you may well 16 others. Everything Can be done faster and made cheaper, but there is a 17 . Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negativeconsequences. This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first. All good targets should have multiple criteria 18 critical factors such as time, money, quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to 19 just one or even two dimensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better 20 the objective.1. [A] therefore[B] however[C] again[D] moreover2 .[A] Emphasizes[B] Identify[C] Asses[D] Explain[B] curiously[C] eagerly[D] quickly4. [A] claim[B] prove[C] check[D] recall5. [A] threatened[B] ignored[C] mocked[D] blamed6. [A] punctuality[B] hospitality[C] competition[D] innovation7. [A] Yes[B] So[C] Besides[D] Still8. [A] hired[B] trained[C] rewarded[D] grouped9. [A] only[B] rather[C] once[D] also10. [A] comfort[B]revenue[C] efficiency[D] security11. [A] friendly[B] quiet[C] cautious[D] diligent12. [A] purpose[B] problem[C] prejudice[D] policy13. [A] reported[B] revealed[C] admitted[D] noticed[B] trip[C] departure[D] transfer15. [A] moral[B] background[C] style[D] form16. [A] interpret[B] criticize[C] sacrifice[D] tolerate17. [A] task[B]secret[C] product[D] cast18. [A] leading to[B] calling for[C] relating to[D] accounting for19. [A] specify[B] predict[C] restore[D] create20. [A] modify[B]review[C] present[D]achieve参考答案:1.[B] however2.[A] Emphasize3. [D] quickly4. [C] check5. [B] ignored6. [A] punctuality7. [B]So8. [C] rewarded9. [D] also10.[B] revenue11.[C] cautious12.[B] problem13.[D] noticed14. [B] trip15.[B] background16.[C] sacrifice17.[D] cost18. [C] relating to19.[A]specify20. [D] achieveSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1‘Reskilling’ is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we planto have a future where a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind.We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as willthe requirements of the jobs that remain Research by the WEF detailed in the Harvard BusinessReview, finds that on average 42 percent of the “core skills " within job roles will change by 2022.That is a very short timeline, so we can only imagine what the changes will be further in thefuture.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one. For individual companies, thetemptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace themwith those whose skills are. That does not always happen. AT&T is often given as the goldstandard of a company who decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with afire-and-hire strategy. Other companies had also pledged to create their own plans. When the skillsmismatch is in the broader economy. Though, the focus usually tums to government to handle.Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best. And have given us a situationwhere we frequently hear of employers begging for workers. Even at times and in regions whereunemployment is high.With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February at 3.5 per cent and 5.5P.C. respectively, unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generational lowsand worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to 13.3 per centand 13.7 per cent, and although many worker shortages had disappeared, not all had done so. Inthe medical field, to take an obvious example, the pandemic meant that there were still cleanshortages of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel.Of course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in afew weeks, no matter who pays for it. But even if you cannot close the gap, maybe you can closeothers and doing so would be to the benefit of all concern. That seems to be the case in Sweden:when forced to furlough 90 PC. of their cabin staff. Scandinavian Airline decided to start up ashort retaining program that reskilled the laid-off workers to support hospital staff. The effort wasa collective one and involved other companies as well as a Swedish university.21. Research by the World Economic Forum suggests.[A] an increase in full time employment[B]an urgent demand for new job sills[C]a steady growth of job opportunities[D]a controversy re about the“ core skills”22. AT&T is cited to show .[A] an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy[B] an immediate need for government support[C] the importance of staff appraisal standards[D]the characteristics of res- killing programs23. Eflor1s to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada[A] have driven up labour costs[B] have proved to be inconsistent[C] have met with fierce opposition[D] have appeared to be insufficient24. We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was[A] a call for policy adjustment[B] a change in hiring practices[C] a lack of medical workers[D]a sign of economic recovery25. Scandinavian Airlines decided to .[A] create job vacancies for the unemployed[B] prepare their laid of workers for other jobs[C] retrain their cabin staff for better services[D] finance their staff" s college education参考答案:21、[B] an urgent demand for new job skills22、[A]an alternative to the fire and hire strategy23、[D ]have appeared to be insufficient24、[C]a lack of medical workers25、[B] prepare their laid-off workers for other jobsText2With the global population predicted to hit close to 10 billion by 2050, and forecasts thatagricultural production in some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace, food security isincreasingly making headlines. In the UK, it has become a big talking point recently too, for arather particular reason: Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importingfood. The country produces only about 60 per cent of the food it eats, down from almostthree-quarters in the late 1980s. A move back to self-sufficiency, the argument goes, would boostthe farming industry, political sovereignty and even the nation's health. Sounds great 一 but howfeasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds, UK, 85 per centof the country's total land area is associated with meat and dairy production. That supplies 80 percent of what is consumed, so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn't allowus to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures, but they are still grave. To become much moreself-sufficient, the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods, andprobably also farm more intensively 一 meaning fewer green fields, and more factory-styleproduction.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn't help. There is a good reason why the UKis dominated by animal husbandry: most of its terrain doesn't have the right soil or climate to growcrops on a commercial basis. Just 25 per cent of the country's land is suitable for crop-growing,most of which is already occupied by arable fields. Even if we converted all the suitable land tofields of fruit and veg - which would involve taking out all the nature reserves and removingthousands of people from their homes - we would achieve only a 30 per cent boost in cropproduction.Just 23 per cent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown, soeven with the most extreme measures we could meet only 30 per cent of our fresh produce needs.That is before we look for the space to grow the grains, sugars, seeds and oils that provide us withthe vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26. Some people argue that food self-sufficiency in the UK would_______.A. be hindered by its population growthB. contribute to the nation's well-beingC. become a priority of the governmentD. pose a challenge to its farming industry27. The report by the University of Leeds shows that in the UK_______.A. farmland has been inefficiently utilizedB. factory-style production needs reformingC. most land is used for meat and dairy productionD. more green fields will be converted for farming28. Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to_______.A. its farming technologyB. its dietary traditionC. its natural conditionsD. its commercial interests29. It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people_______.A. rely largely on imports for fresh produceB. enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumptionC. are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intakeD. are trying to grow new varieties of grains30. The author's attitude to food self-sufficiency in the UK is_______.A. defensiveB. doubtfulC. tolerantD. Optimistic参考答案26.[B] contribute to the nation's well. being27.[C] most land is used for meat and dairy production28. [C] its natural conditions29. [A] rely largely on imports for fresh produce30. [B] doubtfulText 3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in2015, it picked two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley.Microsoft's own Office dominates the market for "productivity” software, but the start-upsrepresented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world.Both apps, however, were later scrapped after Microsoft said it had used their best features inits own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many “acqui-hires"that the biggest companies have used to feed their great hunger for tech talent To Microsoft's critics, the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorselessdrive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path. "They bought theseedlings and closed them down," complained Paul Arnold, a partner at San Francisco-basedSwitch Ventures, putting an end to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoftdeclined to comment.Like other start-up investors, Mr Arnold's own business often depends on selling start: ups tolarger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result:“I think these thingsare good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy?I don'tknow."The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. Thisweek, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many smallacquisitions over the past decade. Although only a rescarch project at this stage, the request hasraised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have beenbeyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than $5.5 trillion, rifling through such smallDeals - many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise- might seem besidethe point. Between them, the five biggest tech companies have spent an average of only $3.4billion a year on sub-$1 billion acquisitions over the past five years- a drop in the oceancompared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than $ 130 billion of venturecapital that was invested in the Us last year.However, critics say the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potentialcompetitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a"buy and kill tactic to simply close them down.31. What is true about Wunderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions?A. Their engineers were retained.B. Their market values declined.C. Their tech features improved.D. Their products were re priced.32. Microsoft's critics believe that the big tech companies tend to_A exaggerate their product qualityB. eliminate their potential competitorsC. treat new tech talent unfairlyD. ignore public opinions33. Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might.A. weaken big tech companiesB. worsen market competitionC. harm the national economyD. discourage start-up investors34. The US Federal Trade Commission intends to_.A. limit Big Tech's expansionB. encourage research collaborationC. examine small acquisitionsD. supervise start-ups operations35. For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisitions have.A. brought little financial pressureB. raised few management challengesC. set a example for future dealsD. generated considerable profits参考答案:31. [A] Their engineers were retained.32.[B] eliminate their potential competitors33.[C] harm the national economy34.[C] examine small acquisitions35.[A]brought little financial pressureText 4We're fairly good at judging people based on first impressions, thin slices of experienceranging from a glimpse of a photo to a five minute interaction, and deliberation can be not onlyextraneous but intrusive. In one study of the ability she called“thin slicing." the late psychologistNalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent 10-second video clips of professors and to ratethe instructor's overall effectiveness. Their ratings correlated strongly. with students'end-of-semester ratings. Another set of participants had to count backward from 1,000 by nines asthey watched the clips, occupying their conscious working memory. Their ratings were just asaccurate, demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing . Critically, another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for their judgment, before giving the rating. Accuracy, dropped dramatically. Ambady suspected thatdeliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues, such as certain gestures or utterances,rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression. She foundsimilar interference when participants watched 15- second clips of pairs of people and judgedwhether they were strangers, friends, or dating partners.Other research shows we 're better at detecting deception from thin slices when we rely onintuition instead of reflection. "It's as if you're driving a stick shit," says Judith Hall, apsychologist at Northeastern University, “and if you start thinking about it too much, you can'tremember what you' re doing. But if you go on automatic pilot, you' re fine. Much of our sociallife is like that."Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences. College students' ratings ofstrawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts' opinions when the studentsweren't asked to analyze their rationale. And people made car-buying decisions that were bothobjectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings rather thanon details, but only if the decision was complex- -when they had a lot of information to process.Intuition's special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances. In one study,participants completed a battery of eight tasks, including four that tapped relctive thinking(discerning nules, comprehending vocabulary) and four that tapped intuition and creativity(generating new products or figures of speech). Then they rated the degree to which they had usedintuition (" gut feelings." "hunches,"“my heart"). Use of their gut hurt their performance on thefirst four tasks, as expected, and helped them on the rest. Sometimes the heart is smarter than thehead.36. Nalini Ambady's study deals with[A] the power of people S memory[B] the reliability of first impressions[C] instructor- student interaction[D] people' s ability to influence others37. In Ambady's study, rating accuracy dropped when participants.[A] focused on specific details[B] gave the rating in limited time[C] watched shorter video clips[D] discussed with one another38. Judith Hall mentions driving to show that[A] reflection can be distracting[B] memory may be selective[C] social skills must be cultivated[D] deception is difficult to detect39. When you are making complex decisions, it is advisable to_[A] collect enough data[B] list your preferences[C] seek expert advice[D] follow your feelings40. What can we learn from the last paragraph?[A] Generating new products takes time[B] Intuition may affect reflective tasks[C] Vocabulary comprehension needs creativity[D]Objective thinking may boost intuitiveness.参考答案36. [B] the reliability of first impression37.[A] focused on specific details38. [A] reflection cam be distracting39.[D] follow your feelings40. [B] intuition may affect reflective tasksPart BDirections:The following paragraphs are given in a wrong order. For Questions 41-45, you are requiredto reorganize these paragraphs into a coherent article by choosing from the list A-G andfilling them into the numbered boxes. Paragraphs C and F have been correctly placed. Markyour answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)A.Stay calm.B. Stay humble.C. Decide whether to wait.D. Be realistic about the risks.E. Don't make judgements.F. Identify a shared goal.G. Ask permission to disagreeHow to disagree with someone more powerful than youYour boss proposes a new initiative you think won't work. Your senior colleague outlines aproject timeline you believe is unrealistic. What do you see when you disagree with someone whohas more power than you do? How do you decide whether it's worth speaking up? And if you do,what exactly should you say? Here's how to disagree with someone more powerful than you.41._______________________You may decide it's best to hold off on voicing your opinion. Maybe you haven't finishedthinking the problem through, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks. If youthink other people are going to disagree, too, you might want to gather your army first. People cancontribute experience or information to your thinking 一 all the things that would make thedisagreement stronger or more valid. It's also a good idea to delay the conversation if you are in ameeting or other public space. Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feelless threatened.42._________________________Before you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about 一 it maybe the credibility of their team or getting a project done on time. You're more likely to be heard ifyou can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose. State it overtly, contextualizing yourstatements so that you' re seen not as a disagreeable subordinate but as a colleague who's trying toadvance a common objective. The discussion will then become more like a chess game than aboxing match.43._______________________This step may sound overly deferential, but it's a smart way to give the powerful personpsychological safety and control. You can see something like, “I know we seem to be movingtoward a first quarter commitment here. I have reasons to think that won't work. I'd like to layoutmy reasoning- Would that be OK?" This gives the person a choice, allowing him to verbally optin.And, assuming he says yes, it will make you feel more confident about voicing yourdisagreement.44._________________________You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red, but do whatever you can to remainnatural in both your words and actions. When your body language communicates reluctance oranxiety, it undercuts the message. It sends a mixed message, and your counterpart gels to choosewhat signals to read. Deep breaths can help, a can speaking more slowly and deliberately. Whenwe feel panicky, we tend to talk louder and faster. Simply slowing the pace and talking in an eventone helps the other person cool down and does the same for you. It also makes you seemconfident, even if you aren't.45.__________________________Emphasize that you're only offering your opinion, not gospel truth. It may be a well-informed,well-researched opinion, but it's still an opinion, so talk tentatively and slightly understate yourconfidence. Instead of saying,“If we set an end of quarter deadline, we will never make it" say,"This is just my opinion, but I don't see how we will make that deadline." Having asserted youropinion (as a position, not as a fact), demonstrate equal curiosity about other views. Remind theperson that this is your point of view, and then invite critique. Be open to hearing other opinions.参考答案:41. [C]Decide whether to wait42.[F] Identify a shared goal43.[G]Ask permission to disagree44.[A] Stay calm45.[B] Stay humblePart C46. Directions:Translate the following text from English into Chinese. Write your translation on ANSIWERSHIEET.(15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection,laughter, and warmth. While that may well be true, researchers have also recently found thatinteracting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging that we didn'texpect.In one series of studies, researchers instructed Chicago -area commuters using publictransportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them. On average, participants whofollowed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence. Theresearchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangers, it is oftendue to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of the time, however, thisbelief is false. As it tums out, many people are actually perfectly willing to talk and may even beflattered to receive your attention.参考译文:我们倾向于认为朋友和家人是我们关系、欢乐和温暖的最大来源。

2021年研究生英语二模拟试卷与答案解析28

2021年研究生英语二模拟试卷与答案解析28

2021年研究生英语二模拟试卷与答案解析28一、单选题(共30题)1.Highercognitiveabilitiesmaycomewithapitfall-asusceptibili tytojudgingpeoplebasedonstereotypes.AnewstudyfromNewYorkUni versitylthathighlyintelligentpeoplearequickertolearnstereot ypesandbasedecisionsoffthem.Itmaycomedown2someone'sabilityt odetectandencodepatterns.It'snotallbadnews3,asthesehigh-int elligencepeoplearelikelytoquicklyupdateand4theirideasonster eotypeswhenintroducedtonewinformation.Forthestudy,1,257indi vidualswereshowna(n)50fcomputerizedmalefacesthatwerepairedwithadescriptionofpas tbehavior,eitherpositiveornegativeHowever,theresearchersman ipulatedavatarfaces6peoplewithnosesthatwerepurposelywiderwe reassociatedwithnegativetraits,7.thosewithmorenarrownoseswe reassociatedwithpositivetraits.8this,individualswereaskedto completeataskin9theyhadtotrustanindividualonlinewhowasrepre sentedbyanavatarface10thosethevolunteerswereshowninthetrait associationtask.Individualswho11higheronpatterndetection,12 0fhigherintelligence,werealsomorelikelytoassociatewidernose swithnegativetraits,andwere13likelytotrustwide-nosedavatars inthefinaltask.Patterndetectionisanessentialpartofhumaninte lligence,andisoneofthemainfeaturesthathelpedourbrainsevolve14whattheyaretoday,buttheskillhasitslimits."Findingthathigh erpatterndetectionability15peopleatgreaterrisktodetectandap plystereotypes,butalsotoreversethem,implicatesthisabilityas acognitivemechanism16stereotyping,"addedco-authorJonathanFr eemaninastatement.Whilestereotypescanbeusefulandawaytoavoid danger,17associatingpoliceofficerswithsafetyorgunmenwithdan ger,therearepitfallst018peoplebasedonagenerallyheldidea.Ste reotypescauseyoutojudgepeople19.knowinganythingaboutthem-we wouldn'twantotherstodothattous,20whynotaffordthemthesameCou rtesy16选?A:underlyingB:owingC:concerningD:suggesting【答案】:A【解析】:本题考查句内语义。

2021年考研英语二试题+答案

2021年考研英语二试题+答案

2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语(二)试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text.Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and mark[A],[B],[C] or[D]on the ANSWER SHEET.(10points)It’s not difficult to set targets for staff.It is much harder,1,to understand their negative consequences.Most work-related behaviors have multiple components.2one and the others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you’ll3see how this works with drivers.Watch people get on and show their tickets.Are they carefully inspected?Never.Do people get on without paying?Of course!Are there inspectors to4that people have paid?Possibly,but very few.And people who run for the bus?They are5.How about jumping lights?Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists.Why?Because the target is6.People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7,the number of buses and bus lanes were increased,and drivers were8or punished according to the time they took.And drivers hit these targets.But they9hit cyclists.If the target was changed to10,you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing. If the criterion changed to safety,you would get more11drivers who obeyed traffic laws. But both these criteria would be at the expense of time.There is another12:people became immensely inventive in hitting targets.Have you 13that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time?Tailwinds?Of course not!Airlines have simply changed the time a14is meant to take.A one-hour flight is now billed as a two-hour flight.The15of the story is simple.Most jobs are multidimensional,with multiple criteria. Choose one criterion and you may well16others.Everything can be done faster and made cheaper,but there is a17.Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target-setting.But it is an argument for exploring consequences first.All good targets should have multiple criteria18critical factors such as time,money,quality and customer feedback.The trick is not only to19just one or even two dimensions of the objective,but also to understand how to help people better20 the objective.1.[A]therefore[B]however[C]again[D]moreover2.[A]Emphasize[B]Identify[C]Access[D]Explain3.[A]nearly[B]curiously[C]eagerly[D]quickly4.[A]claim[B]prove[C]check[D]recall5.[A]ignored[B]threatened[C]mocked[D]blamed6.[A]punctuality[B]hospitality[C]competition[D]innovation7.[A]Yet[B]So[C]Besides[D]Still8.[A]hired[B]trained[C]rewarded[D]grouped9.[A]only[B]rather[C]once[D]also10.[A]comfort[B]revenue[C]efficiency[D]security11.[A]friendly[B]quiet[C]cautious[D]diligent12.[A]purpose[B]problem[C]prejudice[D]policy13.[A]reported[B]revealed[C]admitted[D]noticed14.[A]break[B]trip[C]department[D]transfer15.[A]moral[B]background[C]style[D]form16.[A]interpret[B]criticize[C]sacrifice[D]tolerate17.[A]task[B]secret[C]protect[D]cost18.[A]leading to[B]calling for[C]relating to[D]accounting for19.[A]specify[B]predict[C]restore[D]create20.[A]modify[B]review[C]present[D]achieveSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts.Answer the questions after each text by choosing[A],[B],[C]or [D].Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(40points)Text1“Reskilling”is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future where a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind.We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly,as will the requirements of the jobs that remain.Research by WEF detailed in the Harvard Business Review,finds that on average42per cent of the“core skills”within job roles will change by2022.That is a very short timeline,so we can only imagine what the changes will be further in the future.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one.For individual companies,the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace them with those whose skills are.That does not always happen.AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company who decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with a fire-and-hire strategy,ultimately retraining18,000employers.Prepandemic,other companies including Amazon and Disney had also pledged to create their own plans.When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy though,the focus usually turns to government to handle. Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best,and have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers,even at times and in regions where unemployment is high.With the pandemic,unemployment is very high indeed.In February,at3.5per cent and5.5 per cent respectively,unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere.As of May,those rates had spiked up to13.3per cent and13.7per cent,and although many worker shortages had disappeared,not all had done so. In the medical filed,to take an obvious example,the pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages of doctors,nurses and other medical personnel.Of course,it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in a few weeks,no matter who pays for it.But even if you cannot close that gap,maybe you can close others,and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned.That seems to be the case in Sweden: when forced to furlough90per cent of their cabin staff,Scandinavian Airlines decided to start up a short retraining program that reskilled the laid-off workers to support hospital staff.The effort was a collective one and involved other companies as well as a Swedish university.21.Research by the World Economic Forum suggests________.[A]a controversy about the“core skills”[B]an increase in full-time employment[C]an urgent demand for new job skills[D]a steady growth of job opportunities22.AT&T is cited to show________.[A]an immediate need for government support[B]an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy[C]the characteristics of reskilling programs[D]the importance of staff appraisal standards23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada________.[A]have appeared to be insufficient[B]have driven up labour costs[C]have proved to be inconsistent[D]have met with fierce opposition24.We can learn from Paragraph3that there was________.[A]a sign of economic recovery[B]a call for policy adjustment[C]a change on hiring practices[D]a lack of medical workers25.Scandinavian Airlines decided to________.[A]create job vacancies for the unemployed[B]retrain their cabin staff for better services[C]prepare their laid-off workers for other jobs[D]finance their staff’s college educationText2With the global population predicted to hit close to10billion by2050,and forecasts that agricultural production in some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace,food security is increasingly making headlines.In the UK,it has become a big talking point recently too,for a rather particular reason:Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importing food.The country produces only about60per cent of the food it eats,down from almost three-quarters in the late1980s.A move back to self-sufficiency,the argument goes,would boost the farming industry,political sovereignty and even the nation’s health.Sounds great–but how feasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds,UK,85per cent of the country’s total land area is associated with meat and dairy production.That supplies80per cent of what is consumed,so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn’t allow us to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures,but they are still grave.To become much more self-sufficient,the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods,and probably also farm more intensively–meaning fewer green fields,and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn’t help.There is a good reason why the UK is dominated by animal husbandry:most of its terrain doesn’t have the right soil or climate to grow crops on a commercial basis.Just25per cent of the country’s land is suitable for crop-growing,most of which is already occupied by arable fields.Even if we converted all the suitable land to fields of fruit and veg–which would involve taking out all the nature reserves and removing thousands of people from their homes–we would achieve only a30per cent boost in crop production.Just23per cent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown,so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only30per cent of our fresh produce needs. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains,sugars,seeds and oils that provide us with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self-sufficiency in the UK would.[A]be hindered by its population growth[B]contribute to the nation's well-being[C]become a priority of the government[D]pose a challenge to its farming industry27.The report by the University of Leeds shows that in the UK.[A]farmland has been inefficiently utilized[B]factory-style production needs reforming[C]most land is used for meat and dairy production[D]more green fields will be converted for farming28.Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to.[A]its farming technology[B]its dietary tradition[C]its natural conditions[D]its commercial interests29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people.[A]rely largely on imports for fresh produce[B]enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumption[C]are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intake[D]are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author's attitude to food self-sufficiency in the UK is.[A]defensive[B]doubtful[C]tolerant[D]optimisticText3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015.It picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft’s own Office dominates the market for“productivity”software,but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world.Both apps,however,were later scrapped,after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products.Their teams of engineers stayed on,making them two of the many “acqui-hires”that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for tech-talent.To Microsoft’s critics,the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path.“They bought the seedlings and closed them down,”complained Paul Arnold,a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures,putting paid to businesses that might one day turn into competitors.Microsoft declined to comment.Like other start-up investors.Mr.Arnold’s own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies,though he admits to mixed feelings about the result:“I think these things are good for me,if I put my selfish hat on.But are they good for the American economy?I don't know.”The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question.This week,it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade.Although only a research project at this stage,the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than$5.5tn,rifling through such small deals—many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise—might seem beside the point.Between them,the five companies(Apple,Microsoft,Google,Amazon and Facebook)have spent an average of only$3.4bn a year on sub-$1bn acquisitions over the past five years—a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves,and the more than$130bn of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.However,critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum,in some cases as part of a“buy and kill”tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wunderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions?[A]Their engineers were retained.[B]Their market values declined.[C]Their tech features improved.[D]Their products were re-priced.32.Microsoft’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend to.[A]exaggerate their product quality[B]eliminate their potential competitors[C]treat new tech talent unfairly[D]ignore public opinions33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might.[A]weaken big tech companies[B]worsen market competition[C]harm the national economy[D]discourage start-up investors34.The US Federal Trade Commission intends to.[A]limit Big Tech’s expansion[B]encourage research collaboration[C]examine small acquisitions[D]supervise start-ups’operations35.For the five biggest tech companies,their small acquisitions have.[A]brought little financial pressure[B]raised few management challenges[C]set an example for future deals[D]generated considerable profitsText4We’re fairly good at judging people based on first impressions,thin slices of experience ranging from a glimpse of a photo to a five-minute interaction,and deliberation can be not only extraneous but intrusive.In one study of the ability she dubbed“thin slicing,”the late psychologist Nalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent10-second video clips of professors and to rate the instructor’s overall effectiveness.Their ratings correlated strongly with students’end-of-semester ratings.Another set of participants had to count backward from1,000by nines as they watched the clips,occupying their conscious working memory.Their ratings were just as accurate,demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically,another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for their judgment,before giving the rating.Accuracy dropped dramatically.Ambady suspected thatdeliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues,such as certain gestures or utterances, rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression.She found similar interference when participants watched15-second clips of pairs of people and judged whether they were strangers,friends,or dating partners.Other research shows we’re better at detecting deception and sexual orientation from thin slices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection.“It’s as if you’re driving a stick shift,”says Judith Hall,a psychologist at Northeastern University,“and if you start thinking about it too much, you can’t remember what you’re doing.But if you go on automatic pilot,you’re fine.Much of our social life is like that.”Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences.College students’ratings of strawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts’opinions when the students weren’t asked to analyze their rationale.And people made car-buying decisions that were both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings rather than on details,but only if the decision was complex—when they had a lot of information to process.Intuition’s special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances.In one study, participants completed a battery of eight tasks,including four that tapped reflective thinking (discerning rules,comprehending vocabulary)and four that tapped intuition and creativity (generating new products or figures of speech).Then they rated the degree to which they had used intuition(“gut feelings,”“hunches,”“my heart”).Use of their gut hurt their performance on the first four tasks,as expected,and helped them on the rest.Sometimes the heart is smarter than the head.36.Nalini Ambady’s study deals with_________.[A]the power of people’s memory[B]the reliability of first impressions[C]instructor student interaction[D]people’s ability to influence others37.In Ambady’s study,rating accuracy dropped when participants_________.[A]focused on specific details[B]gave the rating in limited time[C]watched shorter video clips[D]discussed with one another38.Judith Hall mentions driving to show that_________.[A]reflection can be distracting[B]memory can be selective[C]social skills must be cultivated[D]deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions,it is advisable to_________.[A]collect enough data[B]list your preferences[C]seek expert advice[D]follow your feelings40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?[A]Generating new products takes time.[B]Intuition may affect reflective tasks.[C]Vocabulary comprehension needs creativity.[D]Objective thinking may boost inventiveness.Part BDirections:Read the following text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subheading from the list A-G for each of the numbered paragraphs(41-45).There are two extra subheadings.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(10points)A.Stay calmB.Stay humbleC.Be realistic about the risksD.Identify a shared goalE.Decide whether to waitF.Ask permission to disagreeG.Don't make judgmentsHow to Disagree with Someone More Powerful than You Your boss proposes a new initiative you think won’t work.Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you think is unrealistic.What do you say when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do?How do you decide whether it’s worth speaking up?And if you do, what exactly should you say?41.You may decide it’s best to hold off on voicing your opinion.Maybe“you haven’t finished thinking the problem through,the whole discussion was a surprise to you,or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks,”says Weeks.“If you think other people are going to disagree too,you might want to gather your army first.People can contribute experience or information to your thinking—all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid.”It’s also a good idea to delay the conversation if you’re in a meeting or other public space. Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.42.Before you share your thoughts,think about what the powerful person cares about—it may be“the credibility of their team or getting a project done on time,”says Grenny.You’re more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a“higher purpose.”When you do speak up,don’t assume the link will be clear.You’ll want to state it overtly,contextualizing your statements so that you’re seen not as a disagreeable underling but as a colleague who’s trying to advance a shared goal.The discussion will then become“more like a chess game than a boxing match,”says Weeks.43.This step may sound overly deferential,but,according to Grenny,it’s a smart way to give the powerful person“psychological safety”and control.You can say something like,“I know we seem to be moving toward a first-quarter commitment here.I have reasons to think that won’t work.I’d like to lay out my reasoning.Would that be OK?”This gives the person a choice,“allowing them to verbally opt in,”says Grenny.And,assuming they say yes,it will make you feel more confident about voicing your disagreement.44.You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red,but do whatever you can to remain neutral in both your words and actions.When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety,it undercuts the message,Weeks says.It sends“a mixed message,and your counterpart gets to choose what to read,”she explains.Deep breaths can help,as can speaking more slowly and deliberately.“When we feel panicky we tend to talk louder and faster.You don’t want to be mousey or talk in a whisper,but simply slowing the pace and talking in an even tone helps calm the other person down and does the same for you,”says Grenny.It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren’t.45.Emphasize that you’re offering your opinion,not“gospel truth,”says Grenny.“It may be a well-informed,well-researched opinion,but it’s still an opinion,so talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence.”Instead of saying something like,“If we set an end-of-quarter deadline,we’ll never make it,”say,“This is just my opinion,but I don’t see how we will make that deadline.”Weeks suggests adding a lot of“guiding phrases”like“I’m thinking aloud here.”This will leave room for dialogue.Having asserted your position(as a position,not as a fact),“demonstrate equal curiosity about other views,”says Grenny.Remind the person that this is your point of view,and then invite critique.Weeks suggests trying something like,“Tell me where I’m wrong with this.”Be genuinely open to hearing other opinions.”Section III Translation46.Directions:Translate the following text into Chinese.Write your translation on the ANSWER SHEET.(15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection, laughter,and warmth.While that may well be true,researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging that we didn't expect.In one series of studies,researchers instructed Chicago-area commuters using public transportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them.On average,participants who followed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence.The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangers,it is often due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us.Much of the time,however,this belief is false.As it turns out,many people are actually perfectly willing to talk—and may even be flattered to receive your attention.SectionⅣWritingPart A47.Directions:Suppose you are organizing an online meeting.Write an email to Jack,an international student,to1)invite him to participate,and2)tell him the details.You should write about100words on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not use your own e“Li Ming”instead.Do not write your address.(10points)Part B48.Directions:Write an essay based on the chart below.In your writing,you should1)interpret the chart,and2)give your comments.You should write about150words on the ANSWER SHEET.(15points)2021年答案速查表Section I Use of English(10points)1.B2.A3.D4.C5.A6.A7.B8.C9.D10.B11.C12.B13.D14.B15.A16.C17.D18.C19.A20.DSection II Reading Comprehension(50points)Part A(40points)Text121.C22.B23.A24.D25.CText226.B27.C28.C29.A30.BText331.A32.B33.C34.C35.AText436.B37.A38.A39.D40.BPart B(10points)41.E42.D43.F44.A45.BSection III(15points)我们通常认为,情感、欢笑和温暖最主要的来源是朋友及家人。

2021 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题及答案

2021 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题及答案

2021 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word (s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, Cor D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)It’s not difficult to set targets for staff. It is much harder, 1 ,to understand their negative consequences. Most work-related behaviors have multiple components. 2 one and the others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you’ll 3 see how this works with drivers. Watch people get on and show their tickets. Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get on without paying? Of course! Are there inspectors to 4 that people have paid? Possibly, but very few. And people who run for the bus? They are 5 . How about jumping lights? Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists. Why? Because the target is 6 . People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7 ,the number of buses and bus lanes were increased, and drivers were 8 or punished according to the time they took. And drivers hit these targets. But they 9 hit cyclists. If the target was changed to 10 , you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing. If the criterion changed to safety, you would get more 11 drivers who obeyed traffic laws. But both these criteria would be at the expense of time. There is another 12 : people became immensely inventive in hitting targets. Have you 13 that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a 14 is meant to take. A one-hour flight is now ballad as a two-hour flight.The 15 of the story is simple. Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiple criteria.Choose one criterion and you may well 16 others. Everything Can be done faster and made cheaper, but there is a 17 . Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first. All good targets should have multiple criteria 18 critical factors such as time, money, quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to 19 just one or even two dimensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better 20 the objective. 1. [A] therefore [B] however [C] again [D] moreover2. [A] Emphasize[B] Identify [C] Assess [D] Explain3. [A] nearly [B] curiously [C] eagerly [D] quickly4. [A] claim [B] prove [C] check[D] recall5. [A] threatened [B] ignored[C] mocked [D] blamed6. [A] punctuality[B] hospitality [C] competition [D] innovation7. [A] Yes [B] So[C] Besides [D] Still8. [A] hired [B] trained [C] rewarded[D] grouped9. [A] only [B] rather [C] once [D] also10. [A] comfort [B] revenue[C] efficiency [D] security11. [A] friendly [B] quiet [C] cautious[D] diligent12. [A] purpose [B] problem[C] prejudice [D] policy13. [A] reported [B] revealed [C] admitted [D] noticed14. [A] break [B] trip[C] departure [D] transfer15. [A] moral [B] background[C] style [D] form16. [A] interpret [B] criticize [C] sacrifice[D] tolerate17. [A] task [B] secret [C] product [D] cast18. [A] leading to [B] calling for [C] relating to[D] accounting for19. [A] specify[B] predict [C] restore [D] create20. [A] modify [B] review [C] present [D] achieveSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C orD. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1“Reskilling” is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future in which a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind. We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as will the requirements of the jobs that remain. Research by the World Economic Forum finds that on average 42 percent of the “core skills” within job roles will change by 2022. That is a very short timeline.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one. For individual companies, the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace them with those whose skill are. That does not always happen. AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company that decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with afire-and-hire strategy. Other companies had also pledged to create their own plans. When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy. Though, the focus usually turns to government to handle. Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best. And have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers. Even at times and in regions where unemployment is high.With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February, at 3.5 percent and 5.5 P.C. respectively, unemployment rates in Canada and the U.S. were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to 13.3 P.C. and 13.7 percent, and although may worker shortages, has disappeared, not all had done so. In the medical field, to take an obvious example. The pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages, of doctors, nurse and other medical personnel.Of course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor. In a few weeks. But even if you cannot close the gap, maybe you can close others and doing so would be to the benefit of all concern. That seems to be the case in Sweden: when forced to furlough 90 P.C. of their cabin staff. Scandinavian Airline decided to start up a short retaining program that res killed the laid-off workers to support hospital staff. The effort was a collective one and involved other companies as well as a Swedish university.21.Research by the World Economic Forum suggests .[A] an increase in full-time employment[B]an urgent demand for new job skills[C] a steady growth of job opportunities[D]a controversy re about the “core skills”22.AT&T is cited to show .[A]an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategy[B]an immediate need for government support[C]the importance of staff appraisal standards[D]the characteristics of res-killing programs23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada .[A]have driven up labour costs[B]have proved to be inconsistent[C]have met with fierce opposition[D]have appeared to be insufficient24.We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was .[A]a call for policy adjustment[B]a change in hiring practices[C]a lack of medical workers[D]a sign of economic recovery25.Scandinavian Airlines decided to .[A]create job vacancies for the unemployed[B]prepare their laid-off workers for other jobs[C]retrain their cabin staff for better services[D]finance their staff’s college educationText 2With the global population predicted to hit close to 10 billion by 2050, and forecasts that agricultural production in some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace, food security is increasingly making headlines. In the UK, it has become a big talking point recently too, for a rather particular reason: Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importing food. The country produces only about 60 per cent of the food it eats, down from almostthree-quarters in the late 1980s. A move back to self-sufficiency, the argument goes, would boost the farming industr y, political sovereignty and even the nation’s health. Sounds great — but how feasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds,UK,85 per cent of the country’s total land area is associated with meat and dairy production. That supplies 80 per cent of what is consumed, so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn’t allow us to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures, but they are still grave. To become much moreself-sufficient, the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods, and probably also farm more intensively — meaning fewer green fields and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based die t wouldn’t help. There is a good reason why the UK is dominated by animal husbandry: most of its terrain doesn’t have the right soil or climate to grow crops on commercial basis. Just 25 per cent of the country’s land is suitable forcrop-growing, most of which is already occupied by arable fields. Even if we converted all the suitable land to fields of fruit and veg — which would involve taking out all the nature reserves and removing thousands of people from their homes — we would achieve only a 30 per cent boost in crop production.Just 23 per cent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home-grown, so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only 30 per cent of our fresh produce needs. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains, sugars, seeds and oils that provide us with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self-sufficiency in the UK would .[A]be hindered by its population growth[B]contribute to the nations well-being[C]become a priority of the government[D]post a challenge to its farming industry27.The report by the University of Leeds showed that in the UK .[A]farmland has been inefficiently utilised[B]factory style production needs reforming[C]most land is used for meat and dairy production[D]more green fields will be converted for farming28.Crop-growing in the UK is restricted due to .[A]its farming technology[B]its dietary tradition[C]its natural conditions[D]its commercial interests29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people .[A]rely largely on imports for fresh produce[B]enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumption[C]are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intake[D]are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author’s attitude to food self-efficiency in the UK is .[A]defensive[B]doubtful[C]tolerant[D]optimisticText 3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015, it picked two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft’s own Office dominates the market for “productivity” software, but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smartphone world. Both apps, however, were later scrapped after Microsoft said it had used their best features inits own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many “acqui-hires” that the biggest companies have used to feed their great hunger for tech talent.To Microsoft’s critics, the fates of Wunder list and Sunrise are exa mples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path. “They bought the seedlings and closed them down,” complained Paul Amold, a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures, putting an end to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoft declined to comment.Like other start-up investors, Mr Arnold’s own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result: “I think these t hings are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? I don’t know.”The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. This week, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, the request hasraised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than $5.5 trillion, rifling through such small deals — many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise — might seem beside the point. Between them, the five biggest tech companies have spent an average of only $3.4 billion a year on sub-$1 billion acquisitions over the past five years —a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than $130 billion of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.However, critics say the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a “buy and kill” tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wunderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions?A.Their engineers were retained.B.Their market values declined.C.Their tech features improved.D.Their products were re-priced.32.Microsoft’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend to .A.exaggerate their product qualityB.eliminate their potential competitorsC.treat new tech talent unfairlyD.ignore public opinions33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might .A.weaken big tech companiesB.worsen market competitionC.harm the national economyD.discourage start-up investors34.The US Federal Trade Commission intends to .A.limit Big Tech’s expansionB.encourage research collaborationC.examine small acquisitionsD.supervise start-ups’ operations35.For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisitions have .A.brought little financial pressureB.raised few management challengesC.set an example for future dealsD.generated considerable profitsText 4We’re fairly good at judging people based on first impressions, thin slices of experience ranging from a glimpse of a photo to a five-minute interaction, and deliberation can be not only extraneous but intrusive. In one study of the ability she called “thin slicing,” the late psychologist Nalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent 10-second video clips of professors and to rate the instructor’s overall effectiveness. Their ratings correlated strongly with students’end-of-semester ratings. Another set of participants had to count backward from 1,000 by nines as they watched the clips, occupying their conscious working memory. Their ratings were just as accurate, demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically, another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons for their judgment, before giving the rating. Accuracy dropped dramatically. Ambady suspected that deliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues, such as certain gestures or utterances, rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression. She found similar interference when participants watched 15-second clips of pairs of people and judged whether they were strangers, friends, or dating partners.Other research shows we’re better at detecting deception from thin slices when we rely on in tuition instead of reflection. “It’s as if you’re driving a stick shift,” says Judith Hall, a psychologist at Northeastern University, “and if you start thinking about it too much, you can’t remember what you’re doing. But if you go on automatic pilot, you’re fine. Much of our social life is like that.”Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences. College students’ ratings of strawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts’ opinions when the students weren’t asked to analyze their rationale. And people made car-buying decisions that were both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings rather thanon details, but only if the decision was complex—when they had a lot of information to process. Intuition’s special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances. In one study, participants completed a battery of eight tasks, including four that tapped reflective thinking (discerning rules, comprehending vocabulary) and four that tapped intuition and creativity (generating new products or figures of speech). Then they rated the degree to which they had used intuition (“gut feelings,” “hunches,” “my heart”). Use of their gut hurt their performance on the first four tasks, as expected, and helped them on the rest. Sometimes the heart is smarter than the head.36.Nalini Ambady’s study deals with .[A]the power of people’s memory[B]the reliability of first impressions[C]instructor- student interaction[D]people’s ability to influence others37.In Ambady’s study, rating accuracy dropped when participants .[A]focused on specific details[B]gave the rating in limited time[C]watched shorter video clips[D]discussed with one another38.Judith Hall mentions driving to show that .[A]reflection can be distracting[B]memory may be selective[C]social skills must be cultivated[D]deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions, it is advisable to .[A]collect enough data[B]list your preferences[C]seek expert advice[D]follow your feelings40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?[A]Generating new products takes time[B]Intuition may affect reflective tasks[C]Vocabulary comprehension needs creativity[D]Objective thinking may boost intuitivenessPart BDirections:Read the following text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subheading from the list A-G for each numbered paragraphs (41-45). There are two extra subheadings which you do ned to use. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)A.Stay calm.B.Stay humble.C.Decide whether to wait.D.Be realistic about the risks.E.Don’t make judgements.F.Identify a shared goal.G.Ask permission to disagree.How to disagree with someone more powerful than youYour boss proposes a new initiative you think won’t work. Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you believe is unrealistic. What do you see when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do? How do you decide whether it’s worth speaking up? And if you do, what exactly should y ou say? Here’s how to disagree with someone more powerful than you. 41. CYou may decide it’s best to hold off on voicing your opinion. Maybe you haven’t finished thinking the problem through, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks. If you think other people are going to disagree, too, you might want to gather your army first. People can contribute experience or information to your thinking —all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid. It’s also a g ood idea to delay the conversation if you are in a meeting or other public space. Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.42. FBefore you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about — it maybe the credibility of their team or getting a project done on time. You’re more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose. State it overtly, contextualizing your statements so that you’re seen not as a disagreeable subordinate but as a colleague who’s trying to advance a common objective. The discussion will then become more like a chess game than a boxing match.43. GThis step may sound overly deferential, but it’s a smart way to give the power ful person psychological safety and control. You can see something like, “I know we seem to be moving toward a first-quarter commitment here. I have reasons to think that won’t work. I’d like to layout my reasoning. Would that be OK?” This gives the person a choice, allowing him to verbally opt in.And, assuming he says yes, it will make you feel more confident about voicing your disagreement.44. AYou might feel your heart racing or your face turning red, but do whatever you can to remain natural in both your words and actions. When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety, it undercuts the message. It sends a mixed message, and your counterpart gets to choose what signals to read. Deep breaths can help, as can speaking more slowly and deliberately. When we feel panicky, we tend to talk louder and faster. Simply slowing the pace and talking in an even 英语(二)试题第9页(共10 页)tone helps the other person cool down and does the same for you. It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren’t.45. BEmphasize that you’re only offering your opinion, not gospel truth. It may be awell-informed, well-researched opinion, but it’s still an opinion, so talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence. Instead of saying, “If we set an end-of-quarter deadline, we will never make it,” say, “This is just my opinion, but I don’t see how we will make that deadline.” Having asserted your opinion (as a position, not as a fact), demonstrate equal curiosity about other views. Remind the person that this is your point of view, and then invite critique. Be open to hearing other opinions.Section III Translation46.Directions:Translate the following text from English into Chinese. Write your translation on ANSWER SHEET.(15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection, laughter, and warmth. While that may well be true, researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging t hat we didn’t expect.In one series of studies, researchers instructed Chicago-area commuters using public transportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them. On average, participants who followed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence. The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangers, it is often due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of the time, however, this belief is false. As it turns out, many people are actually perfectly willing to talk—and may even be flattered to receive your attention.我们经常认为朋友和家庭成员是我们交流、大笑和温暖的最主要来源。

2021考研英语二真题及答案(详细版)

2021考研英语二真题及答案(详细版)考研英语真题频道为您提供20__考研英语二真题及答案(详细版),。

20__考研英语二真题及答案(详细版)Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the follog te_t.Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C orD on ANSWER SHEET 1.(10 points)Given the advantages of electronic money, you might think that we would move quickly to the cashless society in which all payments are made electronically.___1___, a true cashless society is probably not around the corner.Indeed, predictions of such a society have been ___2___for two decades but have not yet e to fruition.For e_le, Business Week predicted in 1975 that electronic means of payment “would soon revolutionize the very ___3___of money itself,” only to ___4___itself several years later.Why has the movement to a cashless society been so ___5___in ing?Although e-money might be more convenient and may be more efficient than a payments system based on paper, several factors work __6___ the disearance of the paper system.First, it is very ___7___to set up the puter, card reader, and telemunications works necessary to make electronic money the ___8___form of payment.Second, paper checks have the advantage that they ___9___receipts, something that many consumers are unwilling to ___10___.Third, the use of paper checks gives consumers several days of “float”-it takes several days ___11___a check is cashed and funds are ___12___from the issuer&rs;s account, which means that the writer of the check can earn interest on the funds in the meantime.___13___electronic payments are immediate, they eliminate the float for the consumer.Fourth, electronic means of payment ___14___security and privacy concerns.We often hear media reports that an unauthorized hacker has been able to access a puter database and to alter information ___15___ there.Because this is not an ___16___occurrence, unscrupulous persons might be able to access bank accounts in electronic payments systems and ___17___funds by moving them from someone else&rs;s accounts into their own.The ___18___of this type of fraud is no easy task, and a whole new field of puter science has developed to ___19___security issues.A further concern is that the use of electronic means of payment leaves an electronic ___20___that contains a large amount of personal data on buying habits.There are worries that government, employers, and marketers might be able to access these data, thereby encroaching on our privacy.1.[A] However [B] Moreover [C] Therefore [D] Otherwise2.[A] off [B] back [C] over [D] around3.[A] power [B] concept [C] history [D] role4.[A] reward [B] resist [C] resume [D] reverse5.[A] silent [B] sudden [C] slow [D] steady6.[A] for [B] against [C]with [D] on7.[A] imaginative [B] e_pensive [C] sensitive [D] productive8.[A] similar [B] original [C] temporary [D] dominant9.[A] collect [B] provide [C] copy [D] print10.[A] give up [B] take over [C] bring back [D] pass down11.[A] before [B] after [C] since [D] when12.[A] kept [B] borrowed [C] released [D] withdrawn13.[A] Unless [B] Until [C] Because [D] Though14.[A] hide [B] e_press [C] raise [D]ease15.[A] analyzed [B] shared [C] stored [D] displayed16.[A] unsafe [B] unnatural [C] unmon [D] unclear17.[A] steal [B] choose [C] benefit [D] return18.[A] consideration [B] prevention [C] manipulation [D] justification19.[A] cope with [B] fight against [C] adapt to [D] call for20.[A] chunk [B] chip [C] path [D] trail答案:1-5: ADBDC6-10: BBDBA11-15: ADCCC16-20: CABAD考研英语真题考研数学真题政治真题专业课真题英语一真题英语二真题数学一真题数学二真题数学三真题数农真题考研英语答案考研数学答案政治答案专业课答案英语一答案英语二答案数学一答案数学二答案数学三答案数农答案。

2021年考研《英语二》阅读答案及解析(文字版)

2021年考研《英语二》阅读答案及解析(文字版)Part AText 121、[答案][A] practical ability[解析]根据题干可知这是一道典型的例证题。

根据题干关键词“a broken bike chain”定位到第二段第二句,向前找其论点句“He is a teacher at a New Hampshire high school where learning is not something of books and tests and mechanical memorization, but practical。

由该句可知,在他(Mr。

Koziaek)任教的这个学校里,学习不是书本、测试和机械记忆这些事情,而是实践。

所以举“a broken bike chain”的例子是说明学生们缺乏实践能力,选A选项practical ability。

22、[答案][C] are not academically successful[解析]根据题干可以定位到第四段,相关语句为“that it’s for kids who can’t make it academically,” he says。

其中,“can’t make it academically”就是对应答案C中的“are not academically successful”,因此,正确答案为 C 选项are not academically successful。

23、[答案][B] used to have more job opportunities[解析]根据题干要求定位到第五段,解决本题的关键是对第三句话“The job security that the US economy once offered to high school graduates has largely evaporated。

”的理解,尤其需要注意本句的时态,定语从句“that the US economy once offered to high school graduates”是过去时态,表明“美国经济曾经为高中毕业生提供了工作保障”,而主句“The job security has largely evaporated”却是现在完成时,意为“这种工作保障在很大程度上已经蒸发了”,说明曾经的工作机会现在已经不再拥有了,故而[B]选项是正确选项。

2021年考研《英语二》答案(完整 海文版)

2021年考研《英语二》答案(完整海文版)Section I Use of English1、【答案】[C] However【解析】此处考察逻辑关系。

首段提出文章中心:定期称量自己是一种解任何显著的的体重波动的好方法。

空格所在句指出:____,如果太频繁,这种习惯有时会造成损害。

前文wonderful way(好方法)与后文hurt(损害)形成转折关系,故填入however(然而)。

另外,however也是考研完形填空中的高频词。

其他选项:therefore(因此),otherwise(否则)和besides(此外)此处不符合语境,故正确答案为[C] However。

2、【答案】[D] helps【解析】此处考察反义复现。

空格所在句指出:this habit can sometimes hurt more than it ____(这种习惯的坏处要比____多),应该是help(有帮助,有好处),与前文hurt(损害)形成反义复现。

其他选项:Cares(关心),warns(警告),reduces(减少,致使)均不能与hurt形成呼应,故正确答案为[D] helps。

3、【答案】[A] solely【解析】此处考察同义复现+词义辨析。

空格所在句指出:至于我,每天称自己的重量让我把注意力从保持健康和好动转移到____专注于体重秤。

填入solely(仅仅)语义通顺。

另外本句focusingsolely on the scale中的solely(仅仅)与本段后文thinking only of ____ the number on the scale的only形成了同义复现。

故正确答案为[A] solely。

4、【答案】[A] lowering【解析】此处考察词义辨析+反义复现。

空格所在句指出:我曾经以增加肌肉含量而增重,但后来只考虑____体重的数量,我改变了我的训练方案。

填入lowering(减少)语义通顺。

2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试《英语二》真题及答案

2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试《英语二》真题及答案下列每小题的四个选项中,只有一项是最符合题意的正确答案,多选、错选或不选均不得分。

材料题根据下面资料,回答1-20题 It’s not difficult to set targets for staff.It is much harder, 1 ,to understand their negative consequences.Most work-related behaviors have multiple components. 2 one and the others become distorted. Travel on a London bus and you’ll 3 see how this works with drivers.Watch people get on and show their tickets.Are they carefully inspected?Never.Do people get on without paying?Of course!Are there inspectors to 4 that people have paid?Possibly,but very few.And people who run for the bus?They are 5 .How about jumping lights?Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists. Why? Because the target is 6 .People complained that buses were late and infrequent. 7 , the number of buses and bus lanes were increased,and drivers were 8 or punished according to the time they took.And drivers hit these targets.But they 9 hit cyclists.If the target was changed to 10 ,you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing.If the criterion changed to safety,you would get more 11 drivers who obeyed traffic laws.But both these criteria would be at the expense of time. There is another 12 :people became immensely inventive in hitting targets.Have you 13 that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time?Tailwinds?Of course not!Airlines have simply changed the time a 14 is meant to take.A one-hour flight is now billed as a two-hour flight. The 15 of the story is simple.Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiple criteria.Choose one criterion and you may well 16 others.Everything can be done faster and made cheaper,but there is a 17 .Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences. This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first.All good targets should havemultiple criteria 18 critical factors such as time,money,quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to 19 just one or even two dimensions of the objective,but also to understand how to help people better 20 the objective.1.【完形填空】第(1)题选______.A.thereforeB.againC.moreoverD.however正确答案:D2.【完形填空】第(2)题选_____.A.IdentifyB.AssessC.EmphasizeD.Explain正确答案:C3.【完形填空】第(3)题选______.A.curiouslyB.quicklyC.eagerlyD.nearly正确答案:B4.【完形填空】第(4)题选______.A.checkB.proveC.recallD.claim正确答案:A5.【完形填空】第(5)题选______.A.threatenedB.mockedC.ignoredD.blamed正确答案:C6.【完形填空】第(6)题选_____.A.hospitalitypetitionC.punctualityD.innovation正确答案:C7.【完形填空】第(7)题选_____.A.YetB.BesidesC.StillD.So正确答案:D8.【完形填空】第(8)题选______.A.rewardedB.trainedC.groupedD.hired正确答案:A9.【完形填空】第(9)题选_______.A.ratherB.alsoC.onceD.only正确答案:B10.【完形填空】第(10)题选______.fortB.efficiencyC.securityD.revenue正确答案:D11.【完形填空】第(11)题选______.A.cautiousB.quietC.diligentD.friendly正确答案:A12.【完形填空】第(12)题选_____.A.purposeB.prejudiceC.policyD.problem正确答案:D13.【完形填空】第(13)题选_____.A.revealedB.noticedC.admittedD.reported正确答案:B14.【完形填空】第(14)题选______.A.breakB.departureC.transferD.trip正确答案:D15.【完形填空】第(15)题选______.A.moralB.backgroundC.styleD.form正确答案:B16.【完形填空】第(16)题选______.A.sacrificeB.criticizeC.tolerateD.interpret正确答案:A17.【完形填空】第(17)题选______.A.secretB.costC.productD.task正确答案:B18.【完形填空】第(18)题选______.A.relating toB.calling forC.accounting forD.leading to正确答案:A19.【完形填空】第(19)题选______.A.predictB.restoreC.specifyD.create正确答案:C20.【完形填空】第(20)题选_____.A.reviewB.achieveC.presentD.modify正确答案:B下列每小题的四个选项中,只有一项是最符合题意的正确答案,多选、错选或不选均不得分。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语(二)模拟试题2Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)The beauty of poker is that on the surface it is a game of utter simplicity, yet beneath the surface it is profound, rich and full of subtlety. Children can learn the 1 in just a few open hands—that is, rounds played with all cards visible and all the principles 2 . The lessons they gather will last a lifetime.To sceptics, poker 3 them of images of casinos, late nights and smoky back rooms—all places 4 for kids. And, yes, poker is a form of gambling, 5 it is primarily a game of skill and nerve.6 plays a larger role than in purely skill-driven games such as chess, but that is what makes poker so appealing for oppressed parents: you will be a better player than your children, but the children will still7 often enough to keep them interested.Just as a parent is excited to see their offspring reading, even if what the child chooses to read is not what the adult would, a poker-enthusiast parent will 8 play Five-card Draw with his child. The 9 is always straightforward: collect a better five-card hand than your opponents. But the paths to success are many and 10 . Sometimes it involves deceiving, a practice that, initially, children embrace with reckless 11 . However, 12 they will learn that they cannot always 13 their way to victory. They will also learn the lesson: sometimes deceiving works.Soon they will figure out how to read their opponents— 14 that arrogance can be a cover for 15 , and silence a maneuver to 16 others into overconfidence. They will see that a lost hand is not a lost game, and a lost game today does not signal the same tomorrow.1But the only way they will learn any of these lessons is if these lessons can hurt them. 117 a few practice rounds, the stakes must be actual money—and adults must keep it when they win. But this may be 18 : children come into the world lovable but penniless, and no parent wants to make their own children further 19 . On the other hand, raising children is 20 . Consider any victory a partial repayment for their upbringing.1.[A] results[B]letters[C]pictures[D]rules2.[A] rewarded[B]counted[C]explained[D]watched3.[A] reminds[B]deprives[C]accuses[D]convicts4.[A] unnecessary[B]inappropriate[C]unavoidable[D]invariable5.[A] and[B]but[C]or[D]so6.[A] Temper[B]Luck[C]Analysis[D]Proficiency7.[A] win[B]pause[C]exit[D]calculate8.[A] intentionally[B]gradually[C]happily[D]irregularly9.[A] notice[B]trial[C]goal[D]concept10.[A] direct[B]controversial[C]exclusive[D]diverse11.[A] caution[B]generosity[C]patience[D]enthusiasm12.[A] immediately[B]eventually[C]conversely[D]similarly13.[A] battle[B]cheer[C]lie[D]innovate14.[A] observing[B]mentioning[C]promising[D]determining15.[A] weakness[B]suspicion[C]illusion[D]indifference16.[A] turn[B]persuade[C]tempt[D]force17.[A] Below[B]After[C]Above[D]Before18.[A] necessary[B]interesting[C]promising[D]difficult19.[A] sillier[B]lazier[C]fatter[D]poorer20.[A] expensive[B]perplexing[C]enlightening[D]accessibleSection II Reading ComprehensionPart A2Directions:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1Two decades ago Microsoft was a technological walled garden. One of its bosses called free open-source programs a “cancer”. That was then. On April 21st the tech firm joined a movement to liberate data. The company plans to launch 20 data-sharing groups by 2022 and give away some of its digital information.Microsoft is not alone in its recent fondness for sharing. Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Facebook, regarded the ability to share data as a superpower in the face of crisis. Despite the EU’s strict privacy rules, some Eurocrats now argue for data-sharing, too.The benefits of data-sharing have been confirmed by many individuals and organizations. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reckons that if data were more widely exchanged, many states could enjoy gains worth 1–2.5% of GDP. Economists agree that readier access to data is generally beneficial, because data are “non-rivalrous”: unlike oil, say, they can be used and re-used without being used up.Many governments have recognized the potential. Cities from Berlin to San Francisco have “open data” initiatives. Companies have been more cautious. Firms fear losing intellectual property, endangering users’ privacy and hitting technical obstacles. Less than half of “data collaboratives” involve corporations. Those that do have been small or limited in scope.Microsoft’s campaign is the most consequential by far. Besides encouraging non-commercial sharing, the firm is developing software, licences and rules frameworks to let firms trade data or provide access without losing control. Optimists believe that the foresight behind the giant’s move is novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.Brad Smith, Microsoft’s president, notes that fewer than 100 firms collect more than half of all data generated online. More sharing would counteract the concentration of economic—and political—power. Bridging the “data divide” won’t be easy. People in charge of data often come from different industries without a common vocabulary.Indeed, Microsoft has reasons other than unselfishness to support open data. It makes3most of its money not by extracting value from data through targeted advertising, like Facebook, but by selling services and software to help others process digital information. The more data that are shared, the better for Microsoft. Mr. Smith argues that this makes his firm the perfect campaigner for open data.That may be so. But this also points to a bigger obstacle. Even if technical and legal barriers to sharing could be removed, many data-rich firms will be reluctant to loosen their lucrative grip on user information. Despite Mr. Zuckerberg’s declarations, don’t expect Facebook to follow Microsoft’s lead any time soon.21.What does Microsoft plan to do according to the first paragraph?[A]To upgrade environmental technology.[B]To provide a health care program.[C]To lead a movement to analyze data.[D]To share some digital information for free.22.According to Paragraph 4, companies have been more cautious about “open data” becausethey are fearful of ______.[A]being cheated by governments[B]breaking the intellectual property law[C]violating their users’ privacy[D]competing with other corporations23.Brad Smith believes that bridging the “data divide” won’t be easy because ______.[A]data generated online are hard to collect and manage[B]the movement may be hindered by economic power[C]people from different industries have conflicting interests[D]data holders have difficulty communicating with each other24.In addition to unselfishness, what motivates Microsoft to support open data?[A]Economic benefit[B]Moral concern4[C]Legal obligation[D]Prior commitment25.Which of the following would be the best title for the text?[A]Microsoft Allies With Facebook[B]Microsoft Embraces Big Data[C]Microsoft: A Technological Walled Garden[D]Microsoft: A New Business Model PromoterText 2Interruptions have always been a reality of work, as meetings, text or chat messages, emails, and conversations with coworkers endlessly fragment our time and thus our attention. Research across several surveys suggest that employees—from IT professionals to health care providers—are interrupted every six to 12 minutes.Earlier research by Sophie Leroy, a professor at the University of Washington Bothell, has shown that our brains find it difficult to switch attention between tasks. More often than not, part of our attention stays focused on the interrupted task and does not fully switch to the interrupting demand—a term she coined attention residue. This happens because we have a fundamental need for completion that makes switching our attention quite difficult for the brain to execute; we hold on to incomplete work instead of putting it aside even when a switch of focus is necessary.Leroy proposes the “Ready-to-Resume Plan” as a way to manage interruptions, prevent attention residue, and perform at full capacity on interrupting tasks. The premise of the plan is that if we can put the brain at ease about our ability to complete the interrupted task upon return, we would be able to switch our attention more effectively.To test this idea, Leroy and her team ran a series of lab experiments. Participants started working on Task A and were interrupted to switch to another task, Task B. In the control group, participants immediately switched to the interrupting task, Task B, following the interruption. In the treatment group, the researchers asked participants to take a few minutes before switching to create a “Ready-to-Resume” plan; essentially, to take a minute to note where they5were on the interrupted task, Task A, and what they wanted to do and focus on upon return. Then they switched to Task B.The researchers have found that those who engaged in the Ready-to-Resume plan were 79% more likely to choose an optimal candidate when Task B asked them to evaluate profiles for a job position, revealing better decision making when dealing with complex information. The Ready-to-Resume plan took participants less than a minute and yet it yielded significant benefits. This simple and brief practice of taking stock of where one stands on an interrupted task and briefly planning one’s return helps the brain feel more at ease with putting it aside and switching attention to an interrupting demand.It’s shown that we don’t have to passively succumb to the negative effects of inevitable interruptions. The Ready-to-Resume plan provides the brain the cognitive closure it needs to reduce attention residue so that we can be more present and perform at our full capacity. Yes, interruptions at work may be a fact of organizational life; but with the Ready-to-Resume Plan, we can mitigate their effects.26.According to Paragraph 1, findings of the surveys are used to show that interruptions______.[A]are unnecessary[B]are unavoidable[C]can worsen job performance[D]will increase our time pressure27.The word “residue” (Para. 2) is closest in meaning to _______.[A]remainder[B]deficit[C]control[D]span28.The premise for the plan proposed by Leroy is ______.[A]preparing to get back to the task interrupted[B]reducing our exposure to interruptions6[C]completing the current task immediately[D]communicating the priority of the urgent task29.What did the participants in the treatment group do during the experiment?[A]They wrote a plan for how to complete Task B.[B]They noted down their progress of Task A.[C]They consulted with researchers on the plan.[D]They diverted their attention to Task B instantly.30.According to Paragraph 6, the Ready-to-Resume plan ______.[A]reduces disruptive interruptions effectively[B]helps us be mentally engaged in the present[C]optimizes the benefits of organizational life[D]leaves little cognitive capacity for multi-tasksText 3At 2018’s awards, Caltech’s Frances Arnold became only the fifth female Nobel chemistry laureate since the prize was first given in 1901, while Donna Strickland of the University of Waterloo in Canada became only the third female recipient of the Nobel Prize in physics in its 118-year history.For too long, women have been marginalized by the profession. Of nearly 18 million scientists and engineers in the EU, 41 percent are women. However, just in 2018, a leading professor declared that “physics was invented and built by men, it’s not by invitation.” The almost laughable irony is that he said this at an event convened to explore the discrepancy between gender and science by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research.This mindset is also reflected in the findings of a 2017 report by Elsevier that looked at the authorship of more than 62 million peer-reviewed papers published over the previous two decades. The analysis found that in 8 of 11 countries studied, the share of women authors grew from about 30 percent in the late 1990s to about 40 percent in recent years. However, female authors were more likely to be represented in health-care-related fields such as nursing and7psychology than in the “hard” sciences. This may be due to gender bias in peer review: a self-assessment by the journal eLife found that men had greater chances of getting published than women when facing all-male review panels.While scientists might measure their achievements in publications and citations, the rest of the world is more likely to appreciate their accomplishments from the media coverage surrounding major scientific awards. Despite the triumphs of Arnold and Strickland at last year’s Nobel Prizes, here, too, there has been a distinct gender bias. Since the Nobel Prize was established, 97 percent of science prize winners have been men.The fact remains that women in general are still overlooked by research prize–awarding committees. Earlier this year, a study by Brian Uzzi and Teresa Woodruff of Northwestern University found that while that’s changing—women awardees are up from 5 percent between 1968 and 1977 to 27 percent in the last decade—women earn 64 cents of prize money for every dollar a man receives.Of course, there should not be positive discrimination; female scientists should win awards on merit alone. But there are certainly candidates who are overlooked by nominators and evaluators because of gender biases in the sciences. Only by redressing the balance of work and gender can we ever hope the day when a woman receiving a prestigious award in science is newsworthy only for her work and not for her gender will come.31.According to Paragraph 2, CERN summoned the convention to discuss ______.[A]the gender gap in science[B]the drop of women researchers[C]the rise of women’s publishing[D]the gender bias in peer review32.The result of the self-assessment reflected that women have ______.[A]suffered unfair treatment[B]broken gender stereotypes[C]gained health coverage[D]experienced peer pressure833.For the public, a scientist’s accomplishment is recognized mainly through ______.[A]academic conferences[B]enormous published papers[C]press reports on scientific prizes[D]international publication websites34.According to the author, the key for women scientists to win more prestigious awards is to______.[A]offer them guidance on academic publishing[B]drive gender balance in academic publishing[C]improve the media coverage of their work[D]raise the standards for reviewing papers35.Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the text?[A]Prestigious Science Awards: An Opportunity to Prevent Inequality[B]Prestigious Science Awards: A Path to Financial Freedom[C]Prestigious Science Awards: A Ladder to Career Progression[D]Prestigious Science Awards: A Glass Ceiling for Women to BreakText 4Perfect fluency in a second language can make someone seem so worldly and intelligent. But does knowing more than one language really make a person smarter?The answer is a matter of debate, and the pendulum has swung back and forth. In the first half of the 20th century, hearing two languages at the same time was considered to be a confusing experience for small children. But in the late 1970s, a turnaround was under way. Early exposure to two languages was considered not a handicap but a cognitive advantage.Now the consensus is changing again. A vast online study published in the journal Psychological Science suggests that bilingualism can be handy but doesn’t make people more intelligent.Emily Nichols, the lead author and a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Western9Ontario, noted that the study enlisted 11,000 people to complete 12 online cognitive tests. Participants included “people who hadn’t finished high school and others with professional degrees.” The researchers then selected 372 pairs comprising one bilingual and one monolingual subject, matching people who were equivalent in age, education, income and gender. Satisfied that they had controlled for these confounding factors, the researchers compared the performance of the pair in online tests of their intelligence.The study found almost no cognitive differences between people who speak just one language and those who said they speak at least two. Bilinguals had a slight leg up on Digit Span, a task that requires a person to remember increasingly long strings of numbers by heart. Otherwise, the performance of the two groups was a wash.That “no difference” finding might be partly explained by the fact that the study “treated all bilinguals as a single group,” said Prof. Genesee. In a 2015 study, he and his colleagues looked at neural differences between children who learned two languages simultaneously in infancy and those who learned a second language later. The very early learners, Prof. Genesee said, “engaged neural areas related to language but also areas of executive control,” such as planning and problem solving.The degree of mastery of a second language also matters, said Richard Haier, author of “The Neuroscience of Intelligence”. “Proficiency can range from barely adequate to excellent; lumping everyone into the same group obscures effects.”Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence, as the saying goes. We don’t know all the details about this new study’s participants, so we can’t yet close the book on whether their bilingualism boosts their smarts. But there are clearly other benefits, said Prof. Owen: “You can speak to more people, qualify for more jobs and fall in love with more people.” And for most of us, that’s enough.36.By saying “the pendulum has swung back and forth” (Para. 2), the author means that______.[A]people are prone to be confused by bilingualism[B]early access to bilingualism is detrimental to people[C]no relationship exists between bilingualism and cognitive development[D]whether bilingualism makes people more intelligent is controversial10版权所有翻版必究37.According to Paragraph 5, the online study showed that bilinguals ______.[A]were equipped with higher degree[B]didn’t have cognitive advantages[C]failed to remember long numbers[D]performed worse than monolinguals38.An additional study conducted by Prof. Genesee and his colleagues took into account______.[A]neural differences between infants and adults[B]the age children start to study a second tongue[C]obstacles in second language acquisition[D]impacts of executive control capability39.The quotation of Richard Haier emphasized the importance of ______.[A]language certificates[B]effects of neuroscience[C]second language proficiency[D]problems of language learning40.Bilingualism is beneficial because it can.[A]make brain smarter and more flexible[B]guarantee a promising future[C]delay the onset of disease[D]develop interpersonal relationshipsPart BDirections:Read the following text and match each of the numbered items in the left column to its corresponding information in the right column. There are two extra choices in the right column. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)11版权所有翻版必究Water companies in England discharged raw sewage (wastewater) into rivers on more than 200,000 occasions last year, according to data obtained by the Guardian.Luke Pollard, the shadow environment secretary, said: “Sewage discharges should take place only in the most extreme of circumstances. Regulation needs to be tightened to stop water companies using discharges as a day-to-day measure.”“Customers will rightly be shocked at the frequency of sewage discharges and the damage it does to some of our country’s most precious and valuable river habitats.”The Environment Agency issues permits to allow water companies to release untreated human waste, which includes excrement, condoms and toilet paper, from combined sewer overflows (CSOs) after extreme weather events, such as torrential rain, to stop water backing up and flooding homes.Ashley Smith of the campaign group Windrush against Sewage Pollution said the system was little more than a “licence to pollute”. Smith, who monitors sewage spills on the River Windrush in Oxfordshire, said discharges happened after just a rain shower.He said: “The industry has been given a way to prop up failed infrastructure and it has exploited this enthusiastically. The inability of the Environment Agency to prosecute or even drive improvement has led us to where we are today—in a complete shambles with pollution rife and unchecked.”Michelle Walker of the Rivers Trust described the data as “very alarming”. The environmental charity worked with the Guardian’s data to create an interactive map where you can search for river discharges by area. She said: “When you look at the detail, you see that some of these locations are releasing untreated sewage hundreds of times a year, so they are not just operating during extreme rainstorms.”Walker said: “People think our rivers should be fit to swim in but they don’t realise it is legal to discharge untreated raw sewage into our rivers.”Dr Andrew Singer, a senior scientist at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, said the pollution impact of CSO discharge was a risk to ecological and human health.“English rivers, even the Thames and the Severn, are relatively small, so the contribution of CSOs to many of our rivers can be extremely significant,” he said. “Rivers are much more likely to be impacted now by CSOs because of the increase in population density and the fact that the sewage system has not expanded to meet it.”12版权所有翻版必究A spokesperson for Wessex Water said: “In an ideal world there would not be a combined sewerage system, but many sewers were laid at a time when only one drain served a property —carrying both rainwater and sewage … Since 2000 we have invested £181m to upgrade more than 582 CSOs, and there are plans to improve more over the next five years.” A spokesperson for the industry body Water UK, said: “The water industry is committed to the very highest environmental standards … Although there is currently no simple and effective alternative to overflows, there are some innovative solutions being used, such as sustainable drainage systems, which are natural features that help keep rainwater out of the sewer. In new housing developments, these can help to take some of the pressure off the sewer network.”13版权所有翻版必究Section III Translation46.Directions:Translate the following text into Chinese. Write your translation on the ANSWER SHEET. (15 points)Historically, there’s been no way for third parties to directly gather data on the greenhouse gas emissions of both public and private entities. So any concerted effort to reduce emissions has required trusting companies and governments to tell the truth about how much they’re polluting.Now, a new coalition of nine climate and technology organizations calling themselves Climate Trace say they have used satellite data, artificial intelligence and other technology to track greenhouse-gas emissions from across the globe remotely. At the micro level, the platform allows users to track emissions down to the level of individual factories, ships and power plants. In general, the platform will allow for a collective accounting of how the world is doing in the effort to reduce emissions. If a given country claims to have reduced, say power-plant emissions, other countries will soon be able to immediately tap into Climate Trace and get data to verify the claim.Section IV WritingPart A47.Directions:Suppose your university is to hold an award event for the best ten clubs. Write an email on behalf of your book club to1)apply to participate in the selection, and2)briefly introduce your club.You should write about 100 words on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not use your own name. Use “Li Ming” instead. (10 points)Part B48.Directions:14版权所有翻版必究Write an essay based on the chart below. In your writing, you should1)interpret the chart, and2)give your comments.You should write about 150 words on the ANSWER SHEET. (15 points)15版权所有翻版必究16内部资料免费交流2021年全国硕士研究生招生考试英语(二)模拟试题2参考答案及详解Section I Use of English1.答案:【D】rules【解析】逻辑关系题。

相关文档
最新文档